Next Article in Journal
Applying Learning Analytics to Detect Sequences of Actions and Common Errors in a Geometry Game
Next Article in Special Issue
Decoding of Ankle Joint Movements in Stroke Patients Using Surface Electromyography
Previous Article in Journal
Vibration Sensor Based on Hollow Biconical Fiber
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arduino-Based Myoelectric Control: Towards Longitudinal Study of Prosthesis Use
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles

by
Kaci E. Madden
,
Dragan Djurdjanovic
and
Ashish D. Deshpande
*
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(4), 1024; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041024
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 28 January 2021 / Accepted: 29 January 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Applications of EMG Sensors and Signals)

Abstract

Current methods for evaluating fatigue separately assess intramuscular changes in individual muscles from corresponding alterations in movement output. The purpose of this study is to investigate if a system-based monitoring paradigm, which quantifies how the dynamic relationship between the activity from multiple muscles and force changes over time, produces a viable metric for assessing fatigue. Improvements made to the paradigm to facilitate online fatigue assessment are also discussed. Eight participants performed a static elbow extension task until exhaustion, while surface electromyography (sEMG) and force data were recorded. A dynamic time-series model mapped instantaneous features extracted from sEMG signals of multiple synergistic muscles to extension force. A metric, called the Freshness Similarity Index (FSI), was calculated using statistical analysis of modeling errors to reveal time-dependent changes in the dynamic model indicative of performance degradation. The FSI revealed strong, significant within-individual associations with two well-accepted measures of fatigue, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force (rrm=0.86) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (rrm=0.87), substantiating the viability of a system-based monitoring paradigm for assessing fatigue. These findings provide the first direct and quantitative link between a system-based performance degradation metric and traditional measures of fatigue.
Keywords: human fatigue monitoring; neuromuscular fatigue; surface electromyography time-frequency signal analysis; time-series modeling; autoregressive moving average model with exogenous inputs; isometric contraction; elbow extension human fatigue monitoring; neuromuscular fatigue; surface electromyography time-frequency signal analysis; time-series modeling; autoregressive moving average model with exogenous inputs; isometric contraction; elbow extension

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Madden, K.E.; Djurdjanovic, D.; Deshpande, A.D. Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles. Sensors 2021, 21, 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041024

AMA Style

Madden KE, Djurdjanovic D, Deshpande AD. Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles. Sensors. 2021; 21(4):1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Madden, Kaci E., Dragan Djurdjanovic, and Ashish D. Deshpande. 2021. "Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles" Sensors 21, no. 4: 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041024

APA Style

Madden, K. E., Djurdjanovic, D., & Deshpande, A. D. (2021). Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles. Sensors, 21(4), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop