# The Torsional Response of Civil Engineering Structures during Earthquake from an Observational Point of View

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

- rotations around the vertical axis (or torsion) due to the symmetric or asymmetric design of the building;
- rotations around the horizontal axis (or rocking) due to the inertial translational response of structures under earthquake loading, coupled with soil–structure interaction.

^{−6}μrad/s for a tele-seismic event) and the ability to record the uncoupled rotation [17]. The seismological community has been aware of the importance of this field for some time now. Over the past three decades, seismologists have invested in the observation and interpretation of the rotation components of the seismic wave field, thanks to the development of dense networks (among others [18,19,20,21]), and the emergence of new rotation sensors (e.g., [22,23,24,25,26,27]). These sensors have gradually become more sensitive and broadband to record earthquake-induced rotational ground motion in the near field and far field. Since the seminal numerical study of Bouchon and Aki [28] on ground motion rotation, this renewed interest has been encouraged by experimental observation and associated signal processing and inversion schemes. That includes new rotational and strain observables to improve our understanding of earthquake processes and the structure of the Earth’s crust [29]. Two monographs [30,31] have been published, several working groups have been formed [32,33], and special issues on rotation have been published in seismological and earth science journals [29,34,35]. In spite of their evocative titles, these special issues contain very few papers related to the field of earthquake engineering, even though all the authors argue the need for earthquake-resistant structures. A few examples of buildings instrumented with sensors allowing rotation analysis do exist, but they are still marginal. Similar to seismology, progress in instrument deployment in structures could provide new observations supported by the development of innovative signal processing methods to improve the understanding of rotational structural response. This may result in new perspectives to refine the principles and foundations of the rotational dynamics of structures, addressing the fields of earthquake engineering and Seismic Structural Health Monitoring (S

^{2}HM, [36,37]).

## 2. The Primary Origin of Torsional Motion in Buildings Linked to Static Eccentricity

_{s}to be taken into account by applying additional equivalent lateral forces at a distance e

_{s}from the centre of stiffness [4,42]. The resulting torque along the height of the structure, in addition to shear and overturning forces, has a direct effect on the peak ductility demand of the resisting elements and the maximum lateral floor displacement [43]. In his review, Rutenberg [4] also noted many conflicting conclusions in almost all referenced studies due to model dependence. This is also confirmed by Paulay’s works [44,45] related to (among others) the elastic/ductile building behaviour considered in earthquake code design. Rutenberg [4] concluded on the absence of experimental confirmation of the rotation and a lack of instrumentation.

## 3. Accidental Eccentricity

_{a}, which may be multiple and difficult to separate with any degree of precision. Modern codes (e.g., [7]) introduce design eccentricity e

_{d}, considering other terms in addition to static eccentricity, as follows:

_{a}is a general term to include any other source of eccentricity. The adjective “accidental” suggests that this eccentricity is the result of discrepancies between the design and the construction of the structure, implying that a building whose plane is nominally symmetric is in fact asymmetric to an unknown degree and undergoes torsional vibrations when subjected to pure translational ground motion. Accidental eccentricity is given as follows:

#### 3.1. Discrepancies between the Calculated and the Actual Values of the Stiffness and Mass of Structural Elements

#### 3.2. The Synchronised Orthogonal Components of Horizontal Ground Motion

#### 3.3. Rotation of Ground Motion at the Base

## 4. Experimental and Numerical Observation of Torsion

#### 4.1. Experimental Observation

#### 4.2. Numerical Observation

_{a}, Equation (2)) provided in codes (as suggested also by [105]). They also showed the strong influence of site conditions for symmetric and asymmetric designs, which are related to soil–structure interactions. When Ω increases (>1), the effect of torsion decreases.

#### 4.3. Array-Derived Rotation

^{2}HM.

## 5. Rotational Structural Response for a Wide Range of Earthquakes

#### 5.1. Data

^{−7}to 10

^{−3}.

^{-3}to 42.4cm/s and from 7.3 × 10

^{−3}to 159.6cm/s, respectively.

#### 5.2. Rotation Rate

_{8NE}), 8FE-8FS ($\theta $

_{8ES}), and 8FS-8FN ($\theta $

_{8SN}), and at the bottom BFN-BFE ($\theta $

_{BNE}), BFE-BFS ($\theta $

_{BES}), and BFS-BFN ($\theta $

_{BSN}), respectively. For example, at the top of the building, rotation rates were calculated as follows:

#### 5.3. Comparison of Rotations and Translations

^{2}and rotations in mrad/s. Without further information on the relations between rotations and translations, a function of the form y=ax+b is fitted to the data. At the bottom of the building (7a), the ratio between rotational rate and acceleration is 0.716 with a σ (standard deviation of the residues) value of 0.045, confirming a simple linear relationship. Compared with Takeo [132] and Liu et al. [25], who reported a ratio around 1 in free field, this ratio is lower. In our case, the rotation rate is calculated at the base of the foundations, with definite soil–structure interaction effects. Analysis of the inertial interaction of a structure with shallow embedded foundations is traditionally performed by imposing that the input motion of the foundations is simply that of the free field, thus neglecting the kinematic interaction generated by the travel of seismic waves. This leads to excessive conservatism, because it has been proved that free field motion can be completely filtered by the foundations. With rigid foundations, the kinematic effect is observed if the dimensions of the foundation are equal to or greater than the apparent wavelength in the frequency range of interest, showing reduced motion at the foundation with respect to the corresponding free field [133]. As a result of the high-frequency content of the rotation compared to the translation motion, the kinematic effect may also have bigger effects on rotational motion that could be explored in further analysis thanks to the design of the ANX array.

## 6. Conclusions and Perspectives

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Verderame, G.M.; Ricci, P.; Manfredi, G.; Cosenza, E. Ultimate chord rotation of RC columns with smooth bars: Some consid-erations about EC8 prescriptions. Bull. Earthq. Eng.
**2010**, 8, 1351–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beneke, D.; Kwok, K. Aerodynamic effect of wind induced torsion on tall buildings. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
**1993**, 50, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, Y.L.; Kwok, K.C.S.; Samali, B. Torsion response and vibration suppression of wind-excited buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod.
**1992**, 43, 1997–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rutenberg, A. Nonlinear response asymmetric building structures and seismic codes: A state of the art review. In Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced ConcreteB; Fajfar, P., Krawinkler, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 328–356. [Google Scholar]
- Anagnostopoulos, S.A.; Kyrkos, M.; Stathopoulos, K. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: Critical review and state of the art. Earthq. Struct.
**2015**, 8, 305–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kausel, E. Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2010**, 30, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - EC8.6. EN 1998-6 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance; Part 6: Towers, Masts, and Chimneys 2005, European Committee for Standardization. Available online: http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ (accessed on 22 August 2020).
- NZS 1170.5:2004. Structural Design Actions. In Parts 5 Earthquake Actions–New Zealand; NZS1170.5:2004, Standards New Zealand; 2002. Available online: https://shop.standards.govt.nz/ (accessed on 22 August 2020).
- Zembaty, Z. Rotational Seismic Load Definition in Eurocode 8, Part 6, for Slender Tower-Shaped Structures. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1483–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Falamarz-Sheikhabadi, M.R.; Ghafory-Ashtiany, M. Approximate formulas for rotational effects in earthquake engineering. J. Seism.
**2012**, 16, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mazor, E.; Korjenkov, A.M. Applied archaeoseismology: Decoding earthquake parameters recorded in archaeological Ruins. In The Makhteshim Country: A Laboratory of Nature-geological and Ecological Studies in the Desert Region of Israel; Krasnov, B., Mazor, E., Eds.; Pensoft Publishers: Sofia-Moscow, Bulgaria, 2001; Part 1; pp. 123–153. [Google Scholar]
- Trifunac, M.; Todorovska, M.; Manić, M.I.; Bulajić, B. Variability of the fixed-base and soil-structure system frequencies of a building-The case of Borik-2 building. Struct. Control. Healt Monit.
**2010**, 17, 120–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Astorga, A.; Guéguen, P.; Kashima, T. Nonlinear Elasticity Observed in Buildings during a Long Sequence of Earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2018**, 108, 1185–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Astorga, A.; Guéguen, P.; Riviere, J.; Kashima, T.; Johnson, P.A. Recovery of the resonance frequency of buildings following strong seismic deformation as a proxy for structural health. Struct. Health Monit.
**2019**, 18, 1966–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Astorga, A.; Guéguen, P. Influence of seismic strain rates on the co- and post-seismic response of civil engineering buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2020**, 49, 1758–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lee, V.W.; Trifunac, M. Empirical Scaling of Rotational Spectra of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Igel, H.; Bernauer, M.; Wassermann, J.; Schreiber, K.U. Seismology, Rotational, Complexity. Encycl. Complex. Syst. Sci.
**2015**, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Castellani, A.; Boffi, G. Rotational components of the surface ground motion during an earthquake. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1986**, 14, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spudich, P.; Steck, L.K.; Hellweg, M.; Fletcher, J.B.; Baker, L.M. Transient stresses at Parkfield, California, produced by theM7.4 Landers earthquake of 28 June 1992: Observations from the UPSAR dense seismograph array. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.
**1995**, 100, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ghayamghamian, M.R.; Nouri, G.R. On the characteristics of ground motion rotational components using Chiba dense array data. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2007**, 36, 1407–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yin, J.; Nigbor, R.L.; Chen, Q.; Steidl, J. Engineering analysis of measured rotational ground motions at GVDA. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2016**, 87, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Nigbor, R.L. Six-degree-of-freedom ground-motion measurement. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1994**, 84, 1665–1669. [Google Scholar] - Igel, H.; Cochard, A.; Wassermann, J.; Flaws, A.; Schreiber, U.; Velikoseltsev, A.; Dinh, N.P. Broad-band observations of earthquake-induced rotational ground motions. Geophys. J. Int.
**2007**, 168, 182–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lee, W.H.; Huang, B.S.; Langston, C.A.; Lin, C.J.; Liu, C.C.; Shin, T.C.; Wu, C.F. Progress in rotational ground-motion ob-servations from explosions and local earthquakes in Taiwan. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Liu, C.C.; Huang, B.S.; Lee, W.H.K.; Lin, C.J. Observing Rotational and Translational Ground Motions at the HGSD Station in Taiwan from 2007 to 2008. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Schreiber, K.U.; Hautmann, J.N.; Velikoseltsev, A.; Wassermann, J.; Igel, H.; Otero, J.; Wells, J.P. Ring laser measurements of ground rotations for seismology. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1190–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bernauer, F.; Wassermann, J.; Igel, H. Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types. J. Seism.
**2012**, 16, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bouchon, M.; Aki, K. Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1982**, 72, 1717–1738. [Google Scholar] - Lee, W.K.; Celebi, M.; Todorovska, M.I.; Igel, H. Introduction to the special issue on rotational seismology and engineering ap-plications. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Teisseyre, R.; Nagahama, H.; Majewski, E. Physics of Asymmetric Continuum: Extreme and Fracture Processes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Teisseyre, R.; Minoru, T.; Majewski, E. Earthquake Source Asymmetry, Structural Media and Rotation Effects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, J.R.; Cochard, A.; Graizer, V.; Huang, B.S.; Hudnut, K.; Hutt, C.R.; Nigbor, R. Rotational seismology workshop of February 2006. USA Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept
**2007**, 1145, 20. [Google Scholar] - IWGoRS. International Working Group on Rotational Seismology (IWGoRS). Available online: http://www.rotational-seismology.org/ (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Lee, W.H.K.; Igel, H.; Trifunac, M. Recent Advances in Rotational Seismology. Seism. Res. Lett.
**2009**, 80, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Igel, H.; Brokesova, J.; Evans, J.; Zembaty, Z. Preface to the special issue on advances in rotational seismology: Instrumentation, theory, observations and engineering. J. Seismol.
**2012**, 16, 571–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Limongelli, M.P.; Dolce, M.; Spina, D.; Guéguen, P.; Langlais, M.; Wolinieck, D.; Maufroy, E.; Karakostas, C.Z.; Vassilios, A.; Lekidis, K.M.; et al. S
^{2}HM in Some European Countries. In Seismic Structural Health Monitoring. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering Limongelli; Çelebi, M.M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sung, S.H.; Park, J.W.; Nagayama, T.; Jung, H.J. A multi-scale sensing and diagnosis system combining accelerometers and gyroscopes for bridge health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct.
**2013**, 23, 015005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mallet, R. On the dynamics of earthquakes; being an attempt to reduce their observed phenomena to the known laws of wave motion in solids and fluids. Trans. R. Irish Acad.
**1846**, 21, 51–105. [Google Scholar] - Chandler, A.M. Building damage in Mexico City earthquake. Nat. Cell Biol.
**1986**, 320, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ayre, R.S. Interconnection of translational and torsional vibrations in buildings. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1938**, 28, 89–130. [Google Scholar] - Ayre, R.S. Experimental response of an asymmetric, one-story building model to an idealized, transient ground motion. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1943**, 33, 91–119. [Google Scholar] - Humar, J.L. Design for seismic torsional forces. Can. J. Civ. Eng.
**1984**, 11, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kan, C.L.; Chopra, A.K. Elastic earthquake analysis of torsionally coupled multistorey buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1977**, 5, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Paulay, T. Displacement-based design approach to earthquake-induced torsion in ductile buildings. Eng. Struct.
**1997**, 19, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Paulay, T. Some design principles relevant to torsional phenomena in ductile buildings. J. Earthq. Eng.
**2001**, 5, 273–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Housner, G.W.; Outinen, H. The effect of torsional oscillations on earthquake stresses. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1958**, 48, 221–229. [Google Scholar] - Bustamante, J.I.; Rosenblueth, E. Building code provisions on torsional oscillation. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 11–18 July 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Kan, C.L.; Chopra, A.K. Closure to “Torsional Coupling and Earthquake Response of Simple Elastic and Inelastic Systems ”by Christopher, L. Kan and Anil, K. Chopra (August, 1981). J. Struct. Eng.
**1983**, 109, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dempsey, K.M.; Irvine, H.M. Envelopes of maximum seismic response for a partially symmetric single storey building model. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1979**, 7, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reinhorn, A.; Rutenberg, A.; Gluck, J. Dynamic torsional coupling in asymmetric building structures. Build. Environ.
**1977**, 12, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chandler, A.; Hutchinson, G. Torsional coupling effects in the earthquake response of asymmetric buildings. Eng. Struct.
**1986**, 8, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tsicnias, T.; Hutchinson, G. Evaluation of code requirements for the earthquake resistant design of torsionally coupled buildings. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.
**1981**, 71, 821–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoerner, J.B. Modal Coupling and Earthquake Response of Tall Buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, 24 May 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.L.; Tsai, K.C. Seismic analysis of two-way asymmetric building systems under bi-directional seismic ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2007**, 37, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tso, W.K. Induced torsional oscillations in symmetrical structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1974**, 3, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Antonelli, R.G.; Meyer, K.J.; Oppenheim, I.J. Torsional instability in structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1981**, 9, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ivanović, S.S.; Trifunac, M.D.; Novikova, E.I.; Gladkov, A.A.; Todorovska, M.I. Ambient vibration tests of a seven-story rein-forced concrete building in Van Nuys, California, damaged by the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2000**, 19, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Clinton, J.F.; Bradford, S.C.; Heaton, T.H.; Favela, J. The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2006**, 96, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chandler, A.M.; Duan, X.N. Inelastic torsional behaviour of asymmetric buildings under severe earthquake shaking. Struct. Eng. Rev.
**1990**, 2, 141–159. [Google Scholar] - De la Llera, J.C.; Chopra, A.K. Accidental torsion in buildings due to base rotational excitation. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1994**, 23, 1003–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - De la Llera, J.C.; Chopra, A.K. Accidental torsion in buildings due to stiffness uncertainty. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1994**, 23, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Douglas, B.M.; Trabert, T.E. Coupled torsional dynamic analysis of a multistory building. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1973**, 63, 1025–1039. [Google Scholar] - Chopra, A.K.; Goel, R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2004**, 33, 903–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ghobarah, A.A.; Tso, W.K. Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1973**, 2, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bycroft, G.N. Soil—foundation interaction and differential ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1980**, 8, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Todorovska, M.I.; Trifunac, M.D. A note on excitation of long structures by ground waves. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE
**1990**, 116, 952–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Trifunac, M.D.; Todorovska, M.I. Response spectra and differential motion of columns. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1997**, 26, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Trifunac, M.; Gičev, V. Response spectra for differential motion of columns paper II: Out-of-plane response. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2006**, 26, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Jalali, R.S.; Trifunac, M. Response Spectra for Near-Source, Differential, and Rotational Strong Ground Motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1404–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cornou, C.; Bard, P.Y.; Dietrich, M. Contribution of dense array analysis to the identification and quantification of basin-edge-induced waves, Part II: Application to Grenoble basin (French Alps). B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2003**, 93, 2624–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Smerzini, C.; Paolucci, R.; Stupazzini, M. Experimental and numerical results on earthquake-induced rotational ground motions. J. Earthq. Eng.
**2009**, 13, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stupazzini, M.; De La Puente, J.; Smerzini, C.; Kaser, M.; Igel, H.; Castellani, A. Study of Rotational Ground Motion in the Near-Field Region. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1271–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guéguen, P.; Bard, P.Y.; Chávez-García, F.J. Site-city seismic interaction in Mexico city–like environments: An analytical study. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2002**, 92, 794–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guéguen, P.; Bard, P.Y. Soil-structure and soil-structure-soil interaction: Experimental evidence at the Volvi test site. J. Earthq. Eng.
**2005**, 9, 657–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guéguen, P.; Colombi, A. Experimental and Numerical Evidence of the Clustering Effect of Structures on Their Response during an Earthquake: A Case Study of Three Identical Towers in the City of Grenoble, France. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2016**, 106, 2855–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lee, V.W.; Trifunac, M.D. Torsional accelerograms. Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**1985**, 4, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Saito, M. Synthesis of Rotational and Dilatational Seismograms. J. Phys. Earth
**2011**, 16, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bolt, B.A.; Tsai, Y.B.; Yeh, K.; Hsu, M.K. Earthquake strong motions recorded by a large near-source array of digital seismo-graphs. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1982**, 10, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reissner, E.; Sagoci, H.F. Forced Torsional Oscillations of an Elastic Half-Space. I. J. Appl. Phys.
**1944**, 15, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bycroft, G.N. Forced vibrations of a rigid circular plate on a semi-infinite elastic space and on an elastic stratum. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci.
**2006**, 248, 327–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Apsel, R.J.; Luco, J.E. Torsional response of rigid embedded foundation. J. Eng. Mech. Div.
**1976**, 102, 957–970. [Google Scholar] - Luco, J.E. Torsional response of structures to obliquely incident seismic sh waves. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1976**, 4, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Housner, G.W. Interaction of building and ground during an earthquake. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1957**, 47, 179–186. [Google Scholar] - Newmark, N.M. Torsion in symmetrical buildings. In Proceedings of the 4th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 13–18 January 1969; pp. 19–32. [Google Scholar]
- Nathan, N.D.; MacKenzie, J.R. Rotational Components of Earthquake Motion. Can. J. Civ. Eng.
**1975**, 2, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tso, W.K.; Hsu, T.I. Torsional spectrum for earthquake motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1978**, 6, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Castellani, A.; Stupazzini, M.; Guidotti, R. Free-field rotations during earthquakes: Relevance on buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2011**, 41, 875–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stanley, W.F. The Earthquake. Nat. Cell Biol.
**2008**, 30, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hodgson, E.A. The rotation rffects of the St. Lawrence earthquake of February 28 1925. J. R. Astrono. Soc. Can.
**1925**, 19, 169. [Google Scholar] - Ulrich, F.P. Helena earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1936**, 26, 323–339. [Google Scholar] - Rouse, J.T.; Priddy, R.R. Recent Earthquakes in Western Ohio. 1938. Available online: https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/2921/V38N01_025.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2020).
- Thornton, D.L. Earthquakes and structures. J. R. Soc. Arts
**1940**, 88, 799–815. [Google Scholar] - Dewell, H.D. Report of Committee on Building for Safety against Earthquakes: Preliminary report of Subcommittee on Framed Structures: Wood, steel, and ferro-concrete. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1925**, 15, 175–195. [Google Scholar] - Sargeant, S.L.; Musson, R.M.W. Rotational Earthquake Effects in the United Kingdom. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1475–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hinzen, K.G. Rotation of vertically oriented objects during earthquakes. J. Seism.
**2011**, 16, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hart, G.C.; Lew, M.; DiJulio, R.M. Torsional response of high-rise buildings. J. Struct. Division ASCE
**1975**, 101, 397–416. [Google Scholar] - Şafak, E. Response of a 42-storey steel-frame building to the MS=7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Eng. Struct.
**1993**, 15, 403–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.; Mau, S.T. Learning from Recorded Earthquake Motion of Buildings. J. Struct. Eng.
**1997**, 123, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Todorovska, M.; Trifunac, M.D. Earthquake damage detection in the Imperial County Services Building III: Analysis of wave travel times via impulse response functions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2008**, 28, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemnitzer, A.; Massone, L.M.; Skolnik, D.A.; De la Llera Martin, J.C.; Wallace, J.W. Aftershock response of RC buildings in Santiago, Chile, succeeding the magnitude 8.8 Maule earthquake. Eng. Struct.
**2014**, 76, 324–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Çelebi, M.; Liu, H.P. Before and after retrofit–response of a building during ambient and strong motions. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
**1998**, 77, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Çelebi, M. Recorded Earthquake Responses from the Integrated Seismic Monitoring Network of the Atwood Building, Anchorage, Alaska. Earthq. Spectra
**2006**, 22, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Michel, C.; Guéguen, P.; El Arem, S.; Mazars, J.; Kotronis, P. Full-scale dynamic response of an RC building under weak seismic motions using earthquake recordings, ambient vibrations and modelling. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2009**, 39, 419–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Michel, C. Vulnérabilité Sismique de L’échelle du Bâtiment à Celle de la Ville-Apport des Techniques Expérimentales in Situ-Application à Grenoble. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I, Grenoble, France, 2007. (In French). Available online: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00191024 (accessed on 22 August 2020).
- Ghayamghamian, M.R.; Nouri, G.; Igel, H.; Tobita, T. The Effect of Torsional Ground Motion on Structural Response: Code Recommendation for Accidental Eccentricity. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tso, W.K.; Dempsey, K.M. Seismic torsional provisions for dynamic eccentricity. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1980**, 8, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shakib, H.; Tohidi, R.Z. Evaluation of accidental eccentricity in buildings due to rotational component of earthquake. J. Earthq. Eng.
**2002**, 6, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Newmark, N.M.; Rosenblueth, E. Fundamentals in Earthquake Engineering; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Luco, J.E.; Sotiropoulos, D.A. Local characterization of free-field ground motion and effects of wave passage. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**1980**, 70, 2229–2244. [Google Scholar] - Dahmardeh, S.R.; Motamedi, M.; Aziminejad, A. A study on the effects of torsional component of ground motions on seismic response of low- and mid-rise buildings. Struct. Des. Tall Speéc. Build.
**2019**, 29, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Castellani, A.; Zembaty, Z. Comparison between earthquake rotation spectra obtained by different experimental sources. Eng. Struct.
**1996**, 18, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zembaty, Z. Tutorial on Surface Rotations from Wave Passage Effects: Stochastic Spectral Approach. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Trifunac, M. A note on rotational components of earthquake motions on ground surface for incident body waves. Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**1982**, 1, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Basu, D.; Whittaker, A.S.; Constantinou, M.C. Estimating Rotational Components of Ground Motion Using Data Recorded at a Single Station. J. Eng. Mech.
**2012**, 138, 1141–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oliveira, C.; Bolt, B. Rotational components of the surface strong ground motion. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**1989**, 18, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Huang, B.S. Ground rotational motions of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake as inferred from dense array observations. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2003**, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Castellani, A. Array-derived rotational seismic motions: Revisited. B Earthq. Eng.
**2017**, 15, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cochard, A.; Igel, H.; Schuberth, B.; Suryanto, W.; Velikoseltsev, A.; Schreiber, U.; Wassermann, J.; Scherbaum, F.; Vollmer, D. Rotational Motions in Seismology: Theory, Observation, Simulation. In Earthquake Source Asymmetry, Structural Media and Rotation Effects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 391–411. [Google Scholar]
- Trifunac, M.D. Differential earthquake motion of building foundations. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE
**1997**, 4, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Çelebi, M.; Okawa, I.; Kashima, T.; Koyama, S.; Iiba, M. Response of a tall building far from the epicenter of the 11 March 2011 M 9.0 Great East Japan earthquake and aftershocks. Struct. Des. Tall Speéc. Build.
**2014**, 23, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Rahmani, M.; Todorovska, M. 1D System identification of a 54-story steel frame building by seismic interferometry. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2013**, 43, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lin, C.J.; Huang, W.G.; Huang, H.P.; Huang, B.; Ku, C.S.; Liu, C.C. Investigation of array-derived rotation in TAIPEI 101. J. Seism.
**2012**, 16, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cao, Y.; Mavroeidis, G.P.; Ashoory, M. Comparison of observed and synthetic near-fault dynamic ground strains and rotations from the 2004 M w 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake. B Seismol. Soc. Am.
**2018**, 108, 1240–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spudich, P.; Fletcher, J.B. Observation and Prediction of Dynamic Ground Strains, Tilts, and Torsions Caused by the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake and Aftershocks, Derived from UPSAR Array Observations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2008**, 98, 1898–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gičev, V.; Trifunac, M.D.; Orbović, N. Translation, torsion, and wave excitation of a building during soil–structure interaction excited by an earthquake SH pulse. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2015**, 77, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kohler, M.D.; Davis, P.M.; Safak, E. Earthquake and Ambient Vibration Monitoring of the Steel-Frame UCLA Factor Building. Earthq. Spectra
**2005**, 21, 715–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Basu, D.; Whittaker, A.S.; Constantinou, M.C. Extracting rotational components of earthquake ground motion using data recorded at multiple stations. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2012**, 42, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Basu, D.; Whittaker, A.S.; Constantinou, M.C. Characterizing rotational components of earthquake ground motion using a surface distribution method and response of sample structures. Eng. Struct.
**2015**, 99, 685–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kashima, T. Dynamic behavior of an 8th-storey SRC building examined from strong motion records. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 August 2004. Paper Number 196. [Google Scholar]
- Kashima, T. Dynamic behavior of SRC buildings damaged by the 2011 great east Japan earthquake based on strong motion records. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–29 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Astorga, A.; Guéguen, P.; Ghimire, S.; Kashima, T. NDE1.0: A new database of earthquake data recordings from buildings for engineering applications. Bull. Earthq. Eng.
**2020**, 18, 1321–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Takeo, M. Rotational Motions Observed during an Earthquake Swarm in April 1998 Offshore Ito, Japan. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 99, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pandey, B.H.; Finn, W.L.; Ventura, C.E. Modification of free-field motions by soil-foundation-structure interaction for shallow foundations. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Bońkowski, P.A.; Bobra, P.; Zembaty, Z.; Jędraszak, B. Application of Rotation Rate Sensors in Modal and Vibration Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Sensors
**2020**, 20, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**Examples of operational modal building responses using ambient vibrations by Frequency Domain Decomposition. (

**a**) City-Hall building in Grenoble (France). (

**b**) Taipo Tower in Taipei (Taiwan). Singular value decomposition and examples of experimental mode shapes including torsion are given with resonance frequencies in translation and in torsion (in bold).

**Figure 3.**Schematic view of the ANX building and the positions of the sensors deployed at the top and bottom used in this study.

**Figure 4.**—Example of translational motion recorded during the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake and the array-derived rotational motion (

**a**) at the top and (

**b**) at the bottom of the ANX building.

**Figure 5.**Comparison of the array-derived rotational rate for the ANX earthquake dataset. (

**a**) at the bottom (the colour scale corresponds to the peak bottom acceleration (PBA) in cm/s

^{2}). (

**b**) at the top (the colour scale corresponds to the peak top acceleration (PTA) in cm/s

^{2}). X-label corresponds to the bottom or top rotation rate computed with Equations (6) and (7).

**Figure 6.**Attenuation of the rotation rate at the bottom of the ANX building with respect to the epicentral distance for several magnitude bins.

**Figure 7.**Comparison of the translational (cm/s

^{2}) and rotational rates (mrad/s) observed in the ANX building: (

**a**) at the bottom, (

**b**) at the top, (

**c**) comparison of bottom and top rotational rates. Thick lines correspond to a linear function (y = ax + b) fitted to the data. $\sigma $ is the standard deviation of the residual values (observed–predicted).

**Figure 8.**Fourier spectra of the rotational rate computed at the top of the structure. Bold line corresponds to the mean Fourier spectra of earthquakes with PBA < 6 cm/s

^{2}. Thin lines correspond to the +/− standard deviation Fourier spectra.

**Table 1.**Qualitative description of the torsion effects. LR, MR, HR: low-rise, mid-rise, high-rise building. CM: centre of mass. CR: centre of rigidity. e

_{s}: static eccentricity. e

_{d}: dynamic eccentricity. e

_{a}: accidental eccentricity. L: dimension perpendicular to the direction of the seismic motion. Ty: resonance period in translation. Ω: torsion-to-translation frequency ratio. Bldg: building.

Description | Building Features | Qualitative Effect | Refs. | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Static e_{s} −CM/CR Shift | asym | Max for Ty | [40,41] | |

Dynamic e_{d} − e_{d} =α e_{s} with α = 1.5 in EC8 | asym Ω = 1 | Amplification of e_{s} | [46,53] | |

Accidental e_{a} − e_{a} =βL with β = 0.05 to 0.10 in EC8 | CM/CR uncertainties | asym/sym | smaller than β value | [60,61] |

2D trans. ground motion | asym/sym | [61,62] | ||

Ground motion rotation | ||||

Differential trans. motion | asym/sym | strong when site effects | [64,65] | |

Rotational component | ||||

Bldg features consideration | ||||

MR-to-HR bldg | Ty > 0.5s | small | [60] | |

HR building | Ty > 1.5 s | strong (up to 20%) | [87] | |

sym/asym torsionally stiff bldg | Ω>1 | small | [107] | |

tall and torsionally stiff bldg | Ω > 1 all Ty | increase | [11] | |

tall asym. bldg | Ty < 1 | decrease | [11] | |

LR-to-MR, short period and torsionally flexible bldg | Ty < 1 s – Ω < 1 | more prevalent for sym. | [107] | |

LR-to-MR, short period and torsionally flexible bldg | Ty < 0.5 to 1s – Ω < 2/3 to 1 | strong | [60,105] | |

β consideration | ||||

LR-to-MR sym. bldg | Ty>0.2 | β = 0.05 significant | [60,108,109] | |

LR-to-MR, short period and torsionally flexible bldg | Ty < 0.3 – Ω < 2/3 | β > 0.05 for sym. bldg | [105,110] | |

torsionally stiff bldg | Ω > 1 all Ty | β < 0.05 | [107] | |

torsionally flexible bldg | Ω < 1 all Ty | β > 0.05 | [107] | |

asym. bldg | β = 0.05 conservative | [11] |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Guéguen, P.; Astorga, A.
The Torsional Response of Civil Engineering Structures during Earthquake from an Observational Point of View. *Sensors* **2021**, *21*, 342.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020342

**AMA Style**

Guéguen P, Astorga A.
The Torsional Response of Civil Engineering Structures during Earthquake from an Observational Point of View. *Sensors*. 2021; 21(2):342.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020342

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Guéguen, Philippe, and Ariana Astorga.
2021. "The Torsional Response of Civil Engineering Structures during Earthquake from an Observational Point of View" *Sensors* 21, no. 2: 342.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020342