Next Article in Journal
UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Digital Transformation in Smart Farm and Forest Operations Needs Human-Centered AI: Challenges and Future Directions
Previous Article in Journal
Motion Sensor-Based Detection of Outlier Days Supporting Continuous Health Assessment for Single Older Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cyber-Physical System for Environmental Monitoring Based on Deep Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components

Institute for Software Integrated Systems, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(18), 6089; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186089
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 25 August 2021 / Accepted: 6 September 2021 / Published: 11 September 2021

Abstract

Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) must be robust against potential failure modes, including physical degradations and software issues, and are required to self-manage contingency actions for these failures. Physical degradations often have a significant impact on the vehicle dynamics causing irregular behavior that can jeopardize system safety and mission objectives. The paper presents a novel Behavior Tree-based autonomy architecture that includes a Fault Detection and Isolation Learning-Enabled Component (FDI LEC) with an Assurance Monitor (AM) designed based on Inductive Conformal Prediction (ICP) techniques. The architecture implements real-time contingency-management functions using fault detection, isolation and reconfiguration subsystems. To improve scalability and reduce the false-positive rate of the FDI LEC, the decision-making logic provides adjustable thresholds for the desired fault coverage and acceptable risk. The paper presents the system architecture with the integrated FDI LEC, as well as the data collection and training approach for the LEC and the AM. Lastly, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed architecture using a simulated autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) based on the BlueROV2 platform.
Keywords: assured autonomy; behavior trees; learning-enabled component; assurance monitor; fault detection and isolation; BlueROV; ROS assured autonomy; behavior trees; learning-enabled component; assurance monitor; fault detection and isolation; BlueROV; ROS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stojcsics, D.; Boursinos, D.; Mahadevan, N.; Koutsoukos, X.; Karsai, G. Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components. Sensors 2021, 21, 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186089

AMA Style

Stojcsics D, Boursinos D, Mahadevan N, Koutsoukos X, Karsai G. Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components. Sensors. 2021; 21(18):6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stojcsics, Daniel, Dimitrios Boursinos, Nagabhushan Mahadevan, Xenofon Koutsoukos, and Gabor Karsai. 2021. "Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components" Sensors 21, no. 18: 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186089

APA Style

Stojcsics, D., Boursinos, D., Mahadevan, N., Koutsoukos, X., & Karsai, G. (2021). Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components. Sensors, 21(18), 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop