Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Two-Stream Attention Network for Pain Recognition from Video Sequences
Previous Article in Journal
Fully Differential Touch Screen Controller with Wide Input Dynamic Range for Thin Displays
Previous Article in Special Issue
Activity Recognition Using Wearable Physiological Measurements: Selection of Features from a Comprehensive Literature Study
Article

How Laboratory Experiments Can Be Exploited for Monitoring Stress in the Wild: A Bridge Between Laboratory and Daily Life

Computer Engineering Department, Bogazici University, Bebek, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030838
Received: 3 January 2020 / Revised: 24 January 2020 / Accepted: 1 February 2020 / Published: 4 February 2020
Chronic stress leads to poor well-being, and it has effects on life quality and health. Society may have significant benefits from an automatic daily life stress detection system using unobtrusive wearable devices using physiological signals. However, the performance of these systems is not sufficiently accurate when they are used in unrestricted daily life compared to the systems tested in controlled real-life and laboratory conditions. To test our stress level detection system that preprocesses noisy physiological signals, extracts features, and applies machine learning classification techniques, we used a laboratory experiment and ecological momentary assessment based data collection with smartwatches in daily life. We investigated the effect of different labeling techniques and different training and test environments. In the laboratory environments, we had more controlled situations, and we could validate the perceived stress from self-reports. When machine learning models were trained in the laboratory instead of training them with the data coming from daily life, the accuracy of the system when tested in daily life improved significantly. The subjectivity effect coming from the self-reports in daily life could be eliminated. Our system obtained higher stress level detection accuracy results compared to most of the previous daily life studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: smart band; stress recognition; physiological signal processing; machine learning smart band; stress recognition; physiological signal processing; machine learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Can, Y.S.; Gokay, D.; Kılıç, D.R.; Ekiz, D.; Chalabianloo, N.; Ersoy, C. How Laboratory Experiments Can Be Exploited for Monitoring Stress in the Wild: A Bridge Between Laboratory and Daily Life. Sensors 2020, 20, 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030838

AMA Style

Can YS, Gokay D, Kılıç DR, Ekiz D, Chalabianloo N, Ersoy C. How Laboratory Experiments Can Be Exploited for Monitoring Stress in the Wild: A Bridge Between Laboratory and Daily Life. Sensors. 2020; 20(3):838. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Can, Yekta S., Dilara Gokay, Dilruba R. Kılıç, Deniz Ekiz, Niaz Chalabianloo, and Cem Ersoy. 2020. "How Laboratory Experiments Can Be Exploited for Monitoring Stress in the Wild: A Bridge Between Laboratory and Daily Life" Sensors 20, no. 3: 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030838

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop