Next Article in Journal
It May Be Possible to Prevent both Early and Late Relapses in Breast Cancer; Perhaps This Is an Opportunity for Sensors or Biosensors to Help
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of High-Temperature Hydrogen Sensors Based on BaCe0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O3-α and Sr(Ce0.9Zr0.1)0.95Yb0.05O3-α Perovskites for Industrial Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Letter

Simulation of SAW Sensors with Various Distributed Mass Loadings Using Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Theory

1
Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(24), 7260; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247260
Submission received: 30 October 2020 / Revised: 10 December 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published: 18 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
In order to accurately investigate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on surface acoustic wave (SAW) propagation characteristics, two-dimensional coupling-of-modes (2-D COM) theory and finite element method (FEM) were used to simulate the responses of SAW sensors. By using the PDE mode of FEM software, four SAW resonators with the loads in different distribution patterns were modeled. Also, we fabricated and measured a series of SAW resonators accordingly. The results showed that the 2-D COM theory combined with the finite element method was able to simulate the transverse modes of the device and the disturbance of the mass loading on the transverse mode effectively, making the simulation more accurate.

1. Introduction

Coupling-of-modes (COM) theory is an effective method for the simulation of surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices [1], which is widely used in the design and optimization of SAW filters. In order to calculate the influence of waveguide effect on the response of SAW filter, Haus et al. proposed the two-dimensional coupling-of-modes (2-D COM) theory [2,3], and then the two-dimensional P-matrix model was developed by Bergmann et al. [4] Although these methods have the ability to calculate the transverse modes of the SAW, they are difficult to be used in the design and optimization of SAW devices effectively due to the complexity of modeling and calculation. In order to improve the efficiency of simulation, Hirota et al. solved the 2-D COM equation by using the finite element method (FEM) [5]. Based on this work, a new form of 2-D COM equations under biquadratic approximation was developed by Xiao et al. They used the finite element method to extract anisotropic parameters, which further improved the accuracy of the two-dimensional simulation [6].
In recent years, the SAW devices have been widely used in the field of biochemical detection [7,8,9,10,11,12]. In many cases, the target analytes adhered to the sensor’s surface usually presents complex and non-uniformly distributions, as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, to investigate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on the SAW propagation characteristics is necessary, which put forward higher requirements for the simulation technology. In our previous work, we used a two-dimensional segmentation method (2-D SM) combined with 1-D COM theory to calculate the sensor response under various non-uniformly distributed loads [13]. However, the 2-D SM is an approximate method which discretizes the sensitive area of the sensor, and the 1-D COM theory is unable to simulate the transverse mode of the SAW, so the accuracy of the 2-D SM still needs to be improved. What’s more, the complexity of the two-dimensional segmentation design and the P-matrix cascading operation limit the application of the 2-D SM in different SAW devices.
In order to investigate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on the SAW propagation characteristics more accurately and improve the efficiency of simulation, we applied the 2-D COM theory to the simulation of a series of Rayleigh type SAW (R-SAW) sensors in this paper, and used the finite element method to solve the 2-D COM equations. Firstly, the structure model of SAW sensors with four patterns of the mass loading’s distribution were established by using the finite element simulation software (COMSOL Multiphysics); Next, the 2-D COM equation was introduced into the FEM model in the form of a generalized partial differential equation and solved. Finally, the displacement distributions of the main modes of the sensor under four load distribution patterns were drawn according to the solution results. At the same time, we calculated the insertion loss (S21) parameters of the device, and obtained the sensors’ responses under four patterns of the load’s distribution.
To verify the accuracy of simulation results, we fabricated a series of SAW sensor chips with the loads in four distribution patterns, and measured their frequency responses. The experimental results confirm the advantage of using the 2-D COM equations to simulate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on SAW propagation characteristics.

2. Methods

2.1. Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Equations

The 1-D COM theory was based on the plane-wave assumption that ignored the diffraction phenomenon in the propagation of the SAW. Thus, it can’t simulate the transverse mode of the device. In the 2-D COM theory, the surface acoustic wave is no longer approximated to a plane wave whose wave vector K is decomposed into two orthogonal components Kx and Ky, corresponding to the longitudinal and transverse components of the device, respectively, as shown in Figure 2.
According to the slowness curve of the SAW on piezoelectric substrate, the relationship between wave vector component Kx and Ky will be established approximately. The parabola approximate form [14] was shown in Equation (1). And the biquadratic approximate form [6] was shown in Equation (2).
k x k 0 γ 2 ( k y ) 2 k 0
k x k 0 + 1 γ 1 2 k 0 k y 2 + 1 γ 2 24 k 0 3 k y 4
Here, γ , γ 1 , γ 2 are the parameters to characterize the anisotropy of piezoelectric substrate; k 0 is the wave number according to the electric period of the IDT.
Based on the 1-D COM equation and the slowness relation of the SAW, the 2-D COM equation can be obtained. As shown in Equation (3), the 2-D COM equations in the form of biquadratic approximation is adopted in this paper.
u + x = j k 0 u + + j γ 1 2 k 0 2 u + y 2 + j γ 1 24 k 0 3 4 u + y 4 + j κ u + j α V u x = j k 0 u j γ 1 2 k 0 2 u y 2 j γ 2 24 k 0 3 4 u y 4 j κ * u j α * V 2 I x y = 2 j α * u + 2 j α u + j ω C V
Here, u + , u are the particle displacements of waves propagating forward and backward directions, respectively; κ , α , C , V and I represent coupling coefficient, excitation coefficient, static capacitance, input voltage and output current.

2.2. Two-Dimensional Finite Element Model of the SAW Sensor Chip

In this paper, a two-port SAW resonator was selected as the sensing chip and its structure was shown in Figure 3a. The 2-D model of the SAW resonator was built in the finite element simulation software, as shown in Figure 3b. The structural parameters were given in Table 1.
To investigate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on the SAW propagation characteristics, four different load-distribution patterns were designed, as shown in Figure 4. The white parts were the mass loadings.

2.3. Two-Dimensional COM Parameters

The 2-D COM parameters are composed of the 1-D COM parameters v, κ, α, C and the anisotropic parameters γ 2 , γ 2 . The 1-D COM parameters can be determined by Equation (4).
v = ( f s c + + f s c ) λ 2 κ = 2 π ( f s c + f s c ) ( f s c + + f s c ) λ α = ω C W π λ 2 ( f o c + + f o c f s c + + f s c 1 ) C = 2 W e V 2 W
Here, f s c + , f s c , f o c + , and f o c denote the up and down boundary frequency of the stop band in periodic shorted grating and open grating; V , W and W e represent the input voltage, the acoustic aperture and the electrostatic energy.
To determine f s c + , f s c , f o c + , f o c and W e , a 3D periodic finite element model, including a pair of IDTs, was established as shown in Figure 5. And the substrate material and structural parameters of the model were given in Table 2.
By setting the boundary conditions of constant voltage or constant charge electrode, the periodic grating was controlled to be shorted grating and open grating. The resonant frequencies of symmetric and anti-symmetric Rayleigh surface acoustic wave (R-SAW) modes corresponding to the up and down boundary frequency of the stop band.
By performing static analysis in the FEM software (COMSOL Multiphysics), the electrostatic energy of the periodic element W e can be obtained.
The 1-D COM parameters of IDTs with and without mass loading were calculated by Equation (4), as shown in Table 3.
By calculating the second and fourth derivatives at the zero point of the slowness curve, the anisotropic parameters were obtained [6].
γ 1 = d 2 ( k x k 0 ) d ( k y k 0 ) 2 k y = 0
γ 2 = d 4 ( k x k 0 ) d ( k y k 0 ) 4 k y = 0
To obtain the slowness curves of the SAW, the periodic conditions of the 3D periodic FEM model at the front and back side should be set up to a Floquet-Bloch boundary conditions form as follows:
U F = U B exp ( j k 0 tan ( θ ) y )
Here, U F and U B denote the wave amplitudes at front side and back side, and θ is the oblique angle.
By calculating the slowness of the SAW with different oblique angles, the slowness curves were obtained.
The slowness curves of the SAW in different domains on ST-X quartz substrate were shown in Figure 6.
The anisotropic parameters γ 1 and γ 2 of each domain were obtained by Equations (5) and (6), as shown in Table 4.

2.4. Generalized PDE Form of 2-D COM Equations

In the PDE mode of FEM software (COMSOL Multiphysics), the 2-D COM equations in the form of biquadratic approximation were established into generalized PDE form [6].
The SAW displacements U + and U in Equation (3) could be represented as Equation (8):
U + = A 1 exp ( j k 0 x ) U = A 2 exp ( j k 0 x )
Then, the 2-D COM equations were rewritten as follows:
A 1 j γ 2 24 k 0 3 A 3 y = j Δ A 1 j κ A 2 + j γ 1 2 k 0 A 3 + α V A 2 j γ 2 24 k 0 3 A 4 y = j Δ A 2 j κ * A 1 + j γ 1 2 k 0 A 4 + α * V 0 A 1 y = A 3 0 A 2 y = A 4 Δ = ω v k 0
Here, was the divergence operator, Δ represented detuning coefficient.
In the reflector domains, the electric terms were equal to zero due to the electrical shorting of the gratings. In the gaps, PML (perfectly matched layer) and busbar domains, the electric terms and internal reflection terms were equal to zero because there were no internal reflections. What’s more, the PML domain was set to avoid reflections from the boundaries, thus a decay factor γ α ( r ) was introduced into the detuning coefficient of PML domain, as shown in Equation (10).
Δ P M L = ω v 1 j γ α ( r ) k 0 γ α ( r ) = γ 0 r d
Here, d represented the width of the PML domain, and r was the distance from the boundary. The γ 0 in this paper was set up to 0.5 to achieve sufficient absorption effect.

2.5. Admittance Matrix and Insertion Loss

For the two-port SAW resonator, the relationship between the output current I and the input voltage V was given by Equation (11):
I 1 I 2 = Y V 1 V 2 = Y 11 Y 12 Y 21 Y 22 V 1 V 2
Here, Y matrix was the admittance matrix of the device.
The current of each port was obtained by Equation (12):
I = D o m a i n 2 j α * u + 2 j α u + j ω C V
By short-circuiting the IDTs of the two ports respectively and calculating the current of each port, the admittance matrix was obtained.
The principle of the short-circuiting operation to calculate the admittance matrix’s elements was summarized in Table 5.
In this paper, the insertion loss (S21) parameter of SAW resonator was chosen as the response signal of the sensor. The relationship between the insertion loss (S21) and the admittance matrix is given by Equation (13):
S 21 = 2 Y 21 Y 01 Y 02 Y 01 + Y 11 Y 02 + Y 22 Y 12 Y 21 I n s e r t i o n   L o s s = 20 log 10 S 21 = 20 log 10 Y 01 + Y 11 Y 02 + Y 22 Y 12 Y 21 2 Y 21 Y 01 Y 02 Y 01 = Y 02 = 1 50
where Y01, Y02 denote transmission admittance.

2.6. Experimental Design

Using SiO2 as the loading material, we fabricated a series of SAW resonators with the loads in four distribution patterns. The fabrication process was as follows:
Firstly, metallic materials Al was deposited on the ST-X quartz substrate with a thickness of 2000 Å using an electron beam evaporator. Secondly, the photoresist (PR) was spin-coated, exposed and patterned for gratings. Thirdly, the Al was wet-etched and the PR was dissolved in acetone and the SAW resonators without SiO2 layers were fabricated. Finally, the SiO2 was deposited at 4 different distributions with a photomask we designed by using overlay technology, and the SAW resonators with the loads in four patterns were fabricated.
The photos of the SAW resonators under 4 different load patterns were taken by a microscope (LEICA DM4 M), as shown in Figure 7a–d. The information of material and structural parameters in the experiment was summarized in Table 6.
In the experiment the input port (IDT 2, IDT 3) and output port (IDT1) were connected to the VNA (Agilent E5071B Network analyzer) by using a probe device, which was shown in Figure 8.

3. Results and Discussion

By solving the 2-D COM equations with FEM, we simulated the SAW sensors under four distributed patterns of mass loadings, respectively. Figure 9 showed the displacement distributions of the main modes under four load patterns.
By calculating the admittance matrix and the insertion loss(S21) parameters, we draw the frequency response curves of the device. As a comparison, we also obtained the frequency response curves using the 2-D SM [13], and the results were shown in Figure 10.
Of note was that the frequency response curves of load pattern 3~4 showed their center frequencies remained unchanged while the main peaks split. The reason for this phenomenon was that the SiO2 layer disturbed the surface acoustic wave propagation characteristics on the pattern position. It was considered that the device was composed of several channels along the aperture direction, the disturbance from SiO2 layer would lead to the change of the longitudinal resonance modes in those corresponding channels while it almost not has any impact on other channels [13]. The admittance of SAW device is approximately equal to the superposition of that in each channel. Therefore, the transverse distribution of the SiO2 layer which only appeared in pattern 3~4 affected the shape of the frequency response curves.
The experimental results were shown in Figure 11. Of note was that the machining errors led to the frequency excursion of the fabricated SAW resonators. To achieve a better comparison and exhibit the advantage of the mothed in this paper, the response curves of load pattern-4 from measurement, 2-D SM, and 2-D COM were carried out in Figure 12. Obviously, the results obtained by using the 2-D COM equations simulated the transverse modes of the devices effectively as well as the disturbance of the mass loadings on the transverse modes (such as the parts circled in Figure 12a,c), which were more consistent with the experimental results.

4. Conclusions

With the wide application of SAW sensors in the field of biochemical detection, the distribution of the target analytes adhered to the sensor’s surface becomes more diverse. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on the SAW propagation characteristics. Fortunately, in recent years, the finite element simulation technology has been greatly developed relying on computer technology, which provides greater help for researchers to carry out more accurate simulation work. In order to improve the accuracy of calculation and the efficiency of simulation modeling, we innovatively applied the 2-D COM theory to the simulation of SAW sensors, and used the finite element method to solve the partial differential equations. In this way, we simulated the transverse modes of SAW device and obtained the disturbance of the mass loadings on the transverse modes. The experimental results further confirmed the advantage of using the 2-D COM theory to simulate the disturbance of complex distributed mass loading on the SAW propagation characteristics.

Author Contributions

Concept, R.Y. and J.L.; methodology, R.Y.; simulation, R.Y. and Z.C.; experiments, M.L. and Z.C.; data analysis, R.Y. and Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.L. and S.H.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences: No. ZDRW-XH-2019-4/1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Plessky, V.; Koskela, J. Coupling-of-modes analysis of saw devices. Int. J. High Speed Electron. Syst. 2000, 10, 867–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haus, H.A. Modes in SAW grating resonators. J. Appl. Phys. 1977, 48, 4955–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haus, H.A.; Wang, K.L. Modes of grating waveguide. J. Appl. Phys. 1978, 49, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bergmann, A.; Wagner, K.; Mayer, M.; Riha, G. 6D-5 A 2D P-Matrix Model for the Simulation of Waveguiding and Diffraction in SAW Components (Invited). In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2–6 October 2006; IEEE: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2006; pp. 380–388. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirota, O.T.K. Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Analysis in Surface Acoustic Wave Device Performed by COMSOL Multiphysics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xiao, Q.; Ji, X.; Ma, X.; Cai, P. A New General Form of 2-D Coupling-of-Modes Equations for Analysis of Waveguiding in Surface Acoustic Wave Devices. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 2020, 67, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Länge, K.; Rapp, B.E.; Rapp, M. Surface acoustic wave biosensors: A review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gronewold, T.M.A. Surface acoustic wave sensors in the bioanalytical field: Recent trends and challenges. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 603, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Saitakis, M.; Gizeli, E. Acoustic sensors as a biophysical tool for probing cell attachment and cell/surface interactions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; Liu, M.; He, S. Advances in SAW Gas Sensors Based on the Condensate-Adsorption Effect. Sensors 2011, 11, 11871–11884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ding, X.; Li, P.; Lin, S.C.S.; Stratton, Z.S.; Nama, N.; Guo, F.; Slotcavage, D.; Mao, X.; Shi, J.; Costanzo, F.; et al. Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Drbohlavová, L.; Fekete, L.; Bovtun, V.; Kempa, M.; Taylor, A.; Liu, Y.; Bou Matar, O.; Talbi, A.; Mortet, V. Love-wave devices with continuous and discrete nanocrystalline diamond coating for biosensing applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 298, 111584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. You, R.; Liu, J.; Liu, M.; He, S. Detecting of non-uniformly distributed loads with SAW sensors using a two-dimensional segmentation method. 2020; Under Review. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirota, K.; Nakamura, K. Analysis of SAW Grating Waveguides using 2-D Coupling-of-Modes equations. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263), Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–10 October 2001; pp. 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SAW sensors with non-uniform load.
Figure 1. SAW sensors with non-uniform load.
Sensors 20 07260 g001
Figure 2. Decomposition of the wave vector K.
Figure 2. Decomposition of the wave vector K.
Sensors 20 07260 g002
Figure 3. (a) The structure of a two-port R-SAW resonator with three IDTs; (b) The 2-D model of the SAW resonator built in FEM software.
Figure 3. (a) The structure of a two-port R-SAW resonator with three IDTs; (b) The 2-D model of the SAW resonator built in FEM software.
Sensors 20 07260 g003
Figure 4. Geometries of SAW resonators with four different load-distribution patterns. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Figure 4. Geometries of SAW resonators with four different load-distribution patterns. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Sensors 20 07260 g004
Figure 5. 3D FEM model of periodic grating structure and Rayleigh surface acoustic wave (R-SAW) modes: (a) periodic gratings without SiO2 layer (b) periodic gratings with SiO2 layer (c) symmetric R-SAW mode (d) anti-symmetric R-SAW mode.
Figure 5. 3D FEM model of periodic grating structure and Rayleigh surface acoustic wave (R-SAW) modes: (a) periodic gratings without SiO2 layer (b) periodic gratings with SiO2 layer (c) symmetric R-SAW mode (d) anti-symmetric R-SAW mode.
Sensors 20 07260 g005
Figure 6. The slowness curves of the SAW in different domains.
Figure 6. The slowness curves of the SAW in different domains.
Sensors 20 07260 g006
Figure 7. Fabricated SAW resonators with SiO2 loads in distribution pattern 1~4. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Figure 7. Fabricated SAW resonators with SiO2 loads in distribution pattern 1~4. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Sensors 20 07260 g007
Figure 8. The probe device used in the measurements of the SAW resonators.
Figure 8. The probe device used in the measurements of the SAW resonators.
Sensors 20 07260 g008
Figure 9. The displacement distributions of the main modes: (a) without mass loading; (be) with four different load-distribution patterns.
Figure 9. The displacement distributions of the main modes: (a) without mass loading; (be) with four different load-distribution patterns.
Sensors 20 07260 g009
Figure 10. The simulated frequency response curves of the SAW sensors under four different load-distribution patterns. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Figure 10. The simulated frequency response curves of the SAW sensors under four different load-distribution patterns. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Sensors 20 07260 g010
Figure 11. The measured frequency response curves of the load distribution pattern 1~4. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Figure 11. The measured frequency response curves of the load distribution pattern 1~4. (a) Load pattern-1; (b) Load pattern-2; (c) Load pattern-3; (d) Load pattern-4.
Sensors 20 07260 g011
Figure 12. The comparison of results for load pattern-4 from measurement, 2-D SM, and 2-D COM with FEM: (a) the measured result; (b) the result of 2-D SM; (c) the result of 2-D COM with FEM.
Figure 12. The comparison of results for load pattern-4 from measurement, 2-D SM, and 2-D COM with FEM: (a) the measured result; (b) the result of 2-D SM; (c) the result of 2-D COM with FEM.
Sensors 20 07260 g012
Table 1. The structural parameters of the 2-D FEM model.
Table 1. The structural parameters of the 2-D FEM model.
Structural ParametersValue
Period (λ)6.074 (μm)
Aperture150*λ
Width of busbar10*λ
Length of Gaps between IDTs1.25*λ
Length of Gaps between IDT and reflector1*λ
Number of fingers in IDT1121
Number of fingers in IDT2,361
Number of fingers in reflector401
Table 2. The substrate material and structural parameters of the FEM model.
Table 2. The substrate material and structural parameters of the FEM model.
Substrate Material: ST-X Quartz
Period (λ)6.074 (μm)
Thickness of IDTs2000 (Å)
Metallization ratio0.5
Thickness of loads1000 (Å)
Table 3. 1-D COM parameters of IDTs with and without mass loading.
Table 3. 1-D COM parameters of IDTs with and without mass loading.
1-D COM ParametersNon-LoadedLoaded
SAW velocity3126 (m/s)3124 (m/s)
Normalized reflection coefficient0.0400.044
Normalized excitation coefficient2.49 × 10−52.31 × 10−5
Static capacitance4.00 × 10−11 (F)4.48 × 10−11 (F)
Table 4. Anisotropic parameters γ 1 and γ 2 of each domain.
Table 4. Anisotropic parameters γ 1 and γ 2 of each domain.
Domains γ 1 γ 2
Grating−1.3754−0.3988
Grating with SiO2 load−1.3499−0.6601
Busbar−1.3366−0.1233
Free space−1.39280.1871
Table 5. The principle of the short-circuiting operation to calculate the admittance matrix’s elements.
Table 5. The principle of the short-circuiting operation to calculate the admittance matrix’s elements.
Elements of Y MatrixShort-Circuited IDTs
Y11IDT1
Y12IDT2, IDT3
Y21IDT1
Y22IDT2, IDT3
Table 6. The information of material and structural parameters in the experiment.
Table 6. The information of material and structural parameters in the experiment.
ParametersValue
Substrate materialST-X Quartz
Load materialSiO2
Grating materialAl
Thickness of gratings2000 (Å)
Thickness of loads1000 (Å)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, R.; Liu, J.; Liu, M.; Chen, Z.; He, S. Simulation of SAW Sensors with Various Distributed Mass Loadings Using Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Theory. Sensors 2020, 20, 7260. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247260

AMA Style

You R, Liu J, Liu M, Chen Z, He S. Simulation of SAW Sensors with Various Distributed Mass Loadings Using Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Theory. Sensors. 2020; 20(24):7260. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247260

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Ran, Jiuling Liu, Minghua Liu, Zhiyuan Chen, and Shitang He. 2020. "Simulation of SAW Sensors with Various Distributed Mass Loadings Using Two-Dimensional Coupling-of-Modes Theory" Sensors 20, no. 24: 7260. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop