Next Article in Journal
Tightly Coupled GNSS/INS Integration with Robust Sequential Kalman Filter for Accurate Vehicular Navigation
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Depth Resolution of Ultrasonic Phased Array Imaging to Inspect Aerospace Composite Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic-Measuring Square in the Measurement of the Circular Curve of Rail Transport Tracks

by
Arkadiusz Kampczyk
Department of Engineering Surveying and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Sensors 2020, 20(2), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020560
Submission received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 11 January 2020 / Accepted: 14 January 2020 / Published: 20 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
In rail transport, measuring the actual condition of a circular curve of a railway track is a key element of track position monitoring not only during operation but also during final works. Predicting changes in its position in the horizontal plane is one of the most important related scientific issues. This paper presents the results of measurements performed with an innovative measuring device called the Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS). The aim of the research was to demonstrate the acceptability of using the MMS. Horizontal versines of a rail track curve were measured as three neighboring points on a curve (using the method of lacing/stringlining, also called the three-point or the Hallade method), and the perpendicularity of rail joints and shortenings were measured. The MMS device presented in this article was used to measure versines and differences in rails lengths (rail shortenings in the curve) in the operating mode involving a laser distance meter with a laser beam (laser power P < 1 mW, laser wavelength λ = 635 nm) with a target cross, a camera, and a surveying measuring disk. The measurement results confirmed that it is possible to employ the MMS to monitor the geometry of railway track fragments such as track transition curves and railway track curves in rail transport.

1. Introduction

Three points on a plane determine a circle with a radius R, and the height of this triangle is the curve versine fi, while the base is the measurement chord ci. The shapes of track sections such as transition curves and curves are analyzed and evaluated on the basis of horizontal versine measurements. Adjustment of the track location in the horizontal plane by thrusting the track on curves and transitional curves should be verified through the measurement of versines. In reference to the topic of measuring the actual condition of a railway track curve, authors of numerous publications [1,2,3] have drawn attention to the fact that in order to minimize errors, land surveyors are obliged to take accurate measurements and properly select and calibrate measurement instruments depending on the purpose of the measurement [1]. Within the scope of preparatory works, the correct location of the track axis must be determined at the level of the track axis adjustment marks while thrusting the track. It has also been found out that if there are no adjustment marks near the track, then the displacement values are determined by using the values of versines measured every 5 m on a chord of 10 m [2]. Additionally, when the track is thrusted in its proper position, besides verifying the distance between track centers on multitrack railway lines, the preservation of the clearance gauge for structures and trolley poles, and the tilt, the values of versines on the transitional curve and the curve must also be ensured [2]. Transitional curves and railway track curves have different lengths in parallel matching, and the difference depends on the length and radius [4]. The value of the track radius (curvature) is determined by measuring the value of the versines. The state of the track curvature is assessed by dividing the curve into measuring sections of 5 m [3]. There are essentially, found that there are two methods for monitoring tracks. The first one assumes that the track is examined with optical instruments. This method is employed to analyze the geometrical quality of the track, and it is required for the designing processes related to comprehensive track works. In the second method, the railway track is examined from the chord to the running edge of the rail. The measured values are called versines, and measurements are carried out cyclically with overlapping strings. Attention has been drawn to the stringlining or the Hallade method [5]. The Hallade method was also referenced in [6,7,8,9,10]. Because curvilinear sections of the track are more prone to geometric irregularities than straight sections, they require regular maintenance and repair works [5]. The maintenance of the railway surface is its diagnostics together with the implementation of conclusions resulting from it, as well as planning and execution of maintenance and repair works [11]. A new system for correcting track irregularities has been developed using high-performance track machines (tamping machines). In this method, optimal data are calculated on the basis of measurements of track abnormalities using a three-point system [12,13]. The chord method is generally used for the horizontal and vertical versine measurements of rails in order to maintain their alignment [14]. In [14], the horizontal versines of the left and right rails were precisely calculated, and the vertical versine functions were exactly derived. According to these inferences, line charts for determining the vertical versine were created to demonstrate the proportional relationship with the grade difference and the curve length.
In turn, Wang et al. in [15] presented an error theory of the chord-based measurement system regarding track geometry and improvement by high-frequency sampling.
Yazawa and Takeshita [16] developed a device to measure track irregularity using an inertial mid-chord offset method. In [17], Zhang et al. stated that curve adjustment is an important part of railway maintenance and plays a major role in safe railway operations. To meet the requirements of calculating the versine in the lining and lifting work carried out by a tamping wagon, the authors of [17] proposed an approach for modeling the track curve and an algorithm for calculating the versine of any point in the rectangular coordinate system.
The issues involved in monitoring the state of railway track geometry were also dealt with by the authors of works [18,19,20,21] in reference to the use of railway vehicles. Seeing the same track repeatedly provides an opportunity to observe the degradation of track geometry, and such observations can potentially be used to inform maintenance decisions [18,19,20]. Maintaining the alignment of a railway track is vitally important for the smooth and safe passage of railway vehicles. Poor track alignment can result in poor ride quality, flange contact, or even flange climb [20]. In [21], the authors investigated the application of Doppler-based LIght Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) technology for determining track curvature and lateral irregularities, including alignment and gauge variation. The proposed method uses track measurements by two low-elevation, slightly tilted LIDAR sensors that are nominally pointed at the rail gauge face on each track. The study reported a close match between the LIDAR measurements and those made with existing sensors on-board the railcar [21]. Maciuk in [22] presented the advantages of combined GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) processing involving a limited number of visible satellites. The author noted that the accuracy level is needed to address certain surveying and civil engineering issues. In turn, in [23], the author observed that GNSS measurement techniques have recently acquired a major role in civil engineering and other technical fields. Examples of this application include the monitoring of both natural phenomena and fabricated constructions.
Al-Douri et al. in [24] confirmed that increased traffic has led to an increased rate of degradation of the railway track, which has resulted in higher maintenance costs. Degradation affects comfort, safety, and track quality, as well as reliability, availability, speed, and overall railway performance. By implementing a long-term maintenance strategy and conducting preventive maintenance actions, maintenance costs can be reduced [24]. In addition to that, problems with measured data, missing data, and incorrect location data have resulted in increased and unnecessary maintenance tasks. The conclusions in [24] show that proactive solutions are needed to reach the desired goals of improved safety, improved availability, and improved reliability. Chiacchiari and Loprencipe in [25] concluded that rail irregularities, particularly those in urban railway infrastructures, are one of the main causes of noise and vibration generation. Monitoring defects on a periodic basis enables a network’s rail managers to apply proactive measures to limit further damage.
This paper presents results of measuring the real condition of a rail track curve and transitional curves with an innovative measuring device called the Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS) [26]. Magnetic-Measuring Square is made of aluminium and metal. It is characterized by geometric features adapted to the structural elements in the rail transport infrastructure. The surfaces of the MMS are perpendicular to each other, in which neodymium magnets are installed and there are centering windows (centring over the point). The design of the measuring MMS ensures that the measuring work is carried out up to the lower edge of the rail head (crown of the rail) or at a height of 14 mm below the top running surface of the rail, depending on the measuring purpose [26]. The advantage of MMS is its compatibility inter alia with:
  • Surveying pins prisms (adapter pin) for mounting various surveying prisms (Figure 1b);
  • A surveying pin (adapter pin) with a guide for mounting a surveying target (disc) with an extended graduation;
  • Reference signals for laser scanning (Figure 1c,d);
  • Laser distance meter (LDM) with a laser beam (Figure 1a, Figure 2c,d and Figure 5a,b,d);
  • A rolled up meter;
  • Adapter for assembling reference signals to scanners (Figure 1d) [27];
  • Specialised measuring strings;
  • Horizontal and vertical measuring target (disk) (Figure 5a,c);
  • Measuring archet (Figure 2a,b), measuring archet adapter.
The advantage of the Magnetic-Measuring Square is that it can be used universally and optimally for measurements. Finds a demand, among others in:
  • Measurements of geometrical parameters of tracks and turnouts railways;
  • Measurements of the horizontal and vertical versines;
  • Checking the measurement of rails shortenings and perpendicularity of rail joint;
  • Measurements of creeping of the rail (displacement continuous welded rail (CWR));
  • The track zeroing measurements;
  • Intertrack space measurements;
  • Measuring the infrastructure gauge (structure gauge);
  • Measurement of second differences (gradients) in the height of turnouts or diamond crossings;
  • Levelling tracks and tornouts railways.
The aim of this research was to demonstrate the acceptability of using the MMS to measure the following:
  • Versine measurements: the MMS was used in the operation mode with a taut measuring line (string) and laser distance meter (laser rangefinder) with a laser beam;
  • Rail shortenings and the perpendicularity of rail joints: the MMS was applied in the operation mode with a laser distance meter with a laser beam and a horizontal surveying measuring disk.
The measurement was applied to track No.1 at the 14,860–15,760 km point, located within railway line No.144 Tarnowskie Góry–Opole Główne, Voivodship Silesian (in Polish: Śląskie), Poland. The characteristics of the geometrical layout of the track are as follows:
  • km 14,860–14,980: entry transitional curve P1 = 120 m;
  • km 14,980–15,640: full railway track curve R = 1090 m, L = 660 m;
  • km 15,640–15,760: exit transitional curve P2 = 120 m.
The track grid, or so called track frame, is a connection between two rails by means of rail fastenings. The track grid together with the ballast forms a railway surface. Railway track surface is composed of UIC 60 type rails, sleepers, ballast and fixings, adapted to transfer loads of rail vehicles on the track bed. The sleepers are arranged perpendicularly to the axis of the track and their spacing is 0.70 m. The ballast is a layer of compacted gravel, laid under the sleepers and filling the space between them.
Reference was made to differences in the values of the versines on a measurement base of a 10 m chord as permissible deviations of the track location parameters, depending on the permitted speed on the track. There are also some principles for calculating and laying the shortened rails in the railway track curves, and the differences in the lengths of the internal and external rails were determined. The possible applications of the MMS for monitoring the state under off-road conditions are presented.

2. Methods of Measurement Using the MMS

2.1. Versine Measurement

The actual condition of a railway track curve with transitional curves was measured using an innovative measurement instrument—the Magnetic-Measuring Square—in two independent modes (methods) of work [26]:
  • Two rail measuring squares (left and right) with a pin with a guide, an edge plate, a taut measuring line, and a measuring archet in a horizontal plane (chord base length ci = 10 m);
  • One measuring square with the cap of a laser distance measuring device, the cap installation pin, the stabilizer bracket, the laser distance measuring device (laser beam: class II; laser power P < 1 mW; laser wavelength λ = 635 nm), the edge plate, and the measuring archet, with an archet adapter providing vertical orientation (chord base length ci = 10 m) (Figure 2).
In the first case, the versines were measured by using a chord with a taut measuring line, and in the second case, the versines were measured by using a chord with the laser beam.
The track No.1 fragment at the 14,860–15,760 km point was divided into 5 m measurement sections and marked accordingly before the works started (abscissa xi of the versine measurements). The measurement points were marked on the side surface of the rail head and neck (in a way that did not lead to their destruction by the traveling rolling stock). Two measurement sections form a single measurement base ci. The versine measurements were carried out according to the chord ci = 10 m. Duplicate and independent measurements were taken for both the MMS with the taut measuring line and the MMS with the laser distance measuring device with a pointing cross and a video camera: the first measurement was in the main direction, and the second was in the return direction (Figure 3). Dependence between the versine fi and the curve radius R was determined by Equation (1):
f i =   a   · b 2   · R   =   a   · b 2   k  
where fi is the horizontal versine of the curve, R is the curve radius, a and b are the distances between points, and k is the curvature of the track (inverse of the curve radius). At a given point in the curve, the curvature is the inverse of the radius. From the curvature and how it changes depends on train speed [28]. In a straight line the curvature at each point is equal to zero k = 0. On the other hand, on a circular arch, the curvature at each point of the arch is constant and equal to the inverse of the curve, determined by Equation (2):
k =   1 R  
The state of track curvature characterizes the course of the measured versines. For easy orientation of the curvature of the track, the versines are measured at fixed intervals at half the length of the measuring chord.

2.2. Measurement of Rails Shortenings and the Perpendicularity of Rail Joints

The adequate and correct position of the opposite joints has a certain impact on the smooth travel of a railway rolling stock. To date, the instrument employed to verify the perpendicularity of opposite rail joints and the position toward the track axis has been the track square, which is applied to the rail heads of the external and internal rails (Figure 4). The Magnetic-Measuring Square (Figure 5) is an innovative instrument that allows for the verification of:
  • the perpendicularity of rail joints to the track axis,
  • the perpendicularity of opposite rail joints, and
  • rail shortenings.
For measurements of the state of the perpendicularity of rail joints and shortenings in the classical track, the MMS is equipped with the following [26]:
  • A measuring square with a cap of a laser distance measuring device, cap installation pin, stabilizer bracket, and laser distance measuring device with or without an edge plate (Figure 5a,b,d);
  • A measuring square with a horizontal surveying measuring disk (equipped with amillimeter scale and concentric rings) with or without an edge plate (Figure 5a,c,d) or with a surveying pin (adapter pin) with a guide for mounting a surveying target (disc) with an extended graduation.
The MMS structure is designed in such a way that the surveying measuring disk can be rotated by 180°, i.e., in the second position, and it has a vertical millimeter scale with concentric rings on the other side. It can then check the horizontality of the parallel rail joint locations and their underestimation (especially those of the traditional fishplate joints). The zero “0” value on the millimeter scale of the surveying measuring disk overlaps with the edge and measuring surface and with the cut of the pointing cross. The structure of the MMS allows it to take measurements to a height of 14 mm below the upper rail running surface or to the lower rail head edge (the most protruding point of the rail head). The MMS has been employed for the measurement of railway turnouts [29], the geometry of railway and road crossings, and the structure gauge [30,31], among other measurements.
External and internal rails fragments that correspond to each other and are contained within the same radius have different lengths. The inner rails is shorter than the external one. Therefore, the internal rail of the same cell should be shorter than its corresponding external rail. For railway track curves characterized by a high curve radius, the difference in lengths is small, and it can be leveled by clearance to some extent [32]. Maintaining the correct opposite position of the joints requires the use of leveling rails [32]. The leveling is carried out by placing:
  • Regular rails within the external rails, and
  • Shortened rails within the internal rails.
Corresponding themselves sections of the external and internal rail, contained between the same radii, have different lengths. The internal rail is shorter (Figure 6). In order to carry out measurements of rail shortening with the MMS device, the matching themselves sections of external and internal rails were divided into lengths l = 30 m. In the next stage, a projection of the obtained end point P on the inner rail was carried out, obtaining a point P1. The difference between the with projection point P1 on the inner rail and the end point P2 is the value of the real dr rail shortening (Figure 6).

3. Results

3.1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Results of Versine Measurements Obtained from the MMS

Not depending on the measurements performed with the MMS, the measurement of the versines has also been made with an additional so-called Versine Measuring Device (VMD, as a regular device used so far) (Figure 7). The value of the average versine obtained with Versine Measuring Device fspd ≈ 12 mm, actual radius of the railway track curve Rpd = 1040 m.
The VMD with metal handles is a device designed only for measuring arrows, used so far (Figure 7). It consists of two metal handles connected together by a string. The string, through the VMD construction, coincides with the lower edge of the crown of the rail. The metal handles are equipped with libellas. The VMD grippers have jaws to ensuring that it is applied to the lower edge of the crown of the rail. The gripper handle ensures that the jaw is placed on a rail and pressed against the edge. The measurement is done analogously according to Figure 3. The vesines measurement with the VMD can only be performed on days without wind. The VMD design makes it difficult to measure versines in turnout tracks.
In each measurement method, the difference between the two measurements did not exceed the value of Δfi ≤ 2 mm. Three neighboring points of the curve were considered during the measurements of versines in each measurement base ci (Figure 3). The distance of the central point of the straight line connecting two other points (chords ci) is the versine fi of the examined curvature. The measurements were considered satisfactory (Figure 8 and Figure 9). The difference between the value of the versine measured in the main and return direction (between the first and second measurement) must not exceed 2 mm [28]. Exceeding this value qualifies the measurement to be repeated [28]. For the MMS with the taut measuring line, the influence of wind was observable while taking the measurements, and this required the measurements to be repeated in order to maintain an accuracy of 2 mm. When it comes to measurements using the MMS with a laser distance measuring device (laser beam), the impact of weather conditions, especially sunlight, was observable. Satisfactory results could be obtained on cloudy days. The actual course of the track section condition was characterized by the values of the measured versines. The maximum difference between the MMS measurement with the taut measuring line and the MMS with the laser beam was 3 mm. The value of the design versine for a full curve with a radius R = 1090 m was fp = 11.5 mm ≈ 12 mm. The actual value of the average versine obtained from the MMS measurement with the taut measuring line was fsrL≈ 12 mm, and the value from the MMS with the laser distance measuring device was fsrdal ≈ 12 mm. The value of the actual railway track curve was RL = Rdal = 1040 m.
The analysis and evaluation of the shape of the railway track section that includes the transitional curves and the railway track curve were carried out for a speed of Vmax = 120 km/h. The value of permissible deviations from the basic parameters of the track locations within the difference of a versine value on a chord of 10 m for Vmax = 120 km/h should not exceed ± 10 mm for exploited tracks [11]. This deviation for tracks in final commissioning upon maintenance, major repair, or modernization is the most restrictive. For a 10 m chord, the difference in the value of the actual versine measurement using the MMS with the taut measuring line fsrL and using the laser distance measuring device fsrdal was determined in relation to the design versine fp. The analysis proved that the differences in versine values were exceeded on the entry and exit transitional curve sections (Figure 9). There is a road and railway crossing zone on the section of the entry transitional curve P1 at measurements points 110–120. Ensuring the safe exploitation of the examined track section requires the introduction of a speed limit of Vo1 = 100 km/h at the 14,860–15,640 km point on the entry transitional line P1. With this speed, the permissible difference in the versine value on the 10 m chord should not exceed ± 12 mm. For the exit transitional curve P2 at the 15,640–15,760 km point, it is recommended to introduce a speed limit of Vo2 = 80 km/h. Within this speed, the permissible difference in the versine value on the 10 m chord should not exceed ± 14 mm. There is also a need to adjust the track axis in order to maintain the maximum speed.

3.2. Analysis and Evaluation of the Results of the Measurement of Rails Shortenings Obtained from the MMS

In a railway track curve with a radius R = 1090 m and a length L = 660 m (left direction toward increasing km points) and the length of each transitional curve P1 = P2 = 120 m, it is proposed to lay UIC 60 type rails with a length of L = 30 m and employ traditional shortening of rails d = 45 mm for L = 30 m. Laying the internal rails of the curve requires the use of standard length rails in addition to the shortened ones.
The number of shortened rails necessary for each curve should be determined by calculations. For a railway track curve that forms a full circle, the internal course of the rails is shorter than the external one by a value determined according to (3) [32]:
d c = 2 π   ( R   +   s 2 )   2 π   ( R   s 2 ) = 2 π   · s
where s is the distance between axes of the rails (1.5 m), and R is the curve radius in the track axis [m].
Given a distance between rails axes of 1.5 m, Equation (3) is transformed into Equation (4):
d c = 2 π   · s = 2   · 1.5 π = 3 π  
In a railway track curve of length L, the difference in the length of both rails is expressed by Equation (5):
d L = 3 π   ·   L 2 π   · R =   3 L 2 R =   3   · 660 2   · 1090 =   1980 2180 = 0.91   m
Whether only the shortened rail or both shortened and regular rails should be laid within a particular curve is determined on the basis of the railway track curve radius, as well as the lengths of the regular and shortened rails. They are distributed along certain sections of the internal rails in so-called rail series. There is a need to calculate the curve radius Rmin, within which the internal course of only the shortened rails should be laid. For curves with radius values greater than the calculated Rmin, shortened and regular rails are laid in series. While determining the values for rail shortening, it must be borne in mind that for certain radius values, the internal course will be composed of only shortened rails [32].
Rails shortened by values that are multiples of 45 or 40 mm should be used in internal rails of traditional tracks. For new shortened rails, the rated shortenings 45, 90, 135, and 180 mm are applied [11]. The regular lengths of rails are 15, 18, 25, and 30 m. The curve radius Rmin in which only shortened rails are laid is calculated using Equation (6) [33]:
R min =   1.5   · l d =   1.5   · 30 0.045 = 1000   m  
where Rmin is the curve radius in which only shortened rails are laid [m], l is the regular length of rails [m], d is the assumed rail shortening [m], and 1.5 is the distance between axes of two rails [m].
According to the performed calculations, the radius of the curve in which only shortened rails are laid should be Rmin = 1000 m. For curves with radius values larger than 1000 m, in addition to the rails shortened by 45 mm, regular rails with a length of l = 30 m should also be laid (rail cell of 30 m). The number of shortened rails that must be laid in the internal rails of the railway track curve N1 is (7) [33]:
N 1 =   1.5   · L d   · R =   1.5   · 660 0.045   · 1090 =   990 49.05 = 20.2   20
where N1 is the total number of shortened rails of a railway track curve, without consideration of transitional curves; L is the length of the curve [m]; 1.5 is the distance between axes of two rails [m]; R is the curve radius [m]; and d is the assumed rail shortening [m].
Twenty shortened rails were adopted. Shortening of the internal rails in relation to the external rails for the whole length or part of the curve is calculated according to Equation (8) [33]:
D =   1.5   · L R =   1.5   · 660 1090 = 0.91   m
where D is the difference in length between the internal and external rails [m], L is the length of the curve [m], and R is the curve radius [m]. This value confirms the result of the calculations in Equation (5).
Next, the number of shortened rails N2 necessary for a given railway track curve considering the transitional curves is determined using Equation (9) [32]:
N 2 =   1.5   · L 1 d   · R =   1.5   · 780 0.045   · 1090 = 23.8   25
where N2 is the total number of shortened rails of a railway track curve, with consideration of transitional curves; L1 is the length of the railway track curve that includes half the length of both transitional curves [m]; 1.5 is the distance between axes of two rails [m]; R is the curve radius [m]; and d is the assumed rail shortening [m].
The number of shortened rails and their distribution within a curve with a radius R = 1090 m with transitional curves that each have a length of 120 m and a railway track curve of length L = 660 m were determined by establishing the following:
  • The calculated length is L 1 = 660 +   2   · 120 2 = 780   m ;
  • The shortening of the internal rails is 3   ·   L 1 2   · R   = 3   ·   780 2   · 1090 = 1.073   m ;
  • The assumed rail shortening is 45 mm;
  • The whole calculated length requires 1.073/0.045 = 23.8 ≈ 25 shortened rails;
  • The assumed length of a regular rail is l = 30 m;
  • The relation of shortened to regular rails is 25 30 =   5 6 .
Therefore, for every six regular rails in the external rails, the internal rails has five shortened rails and one regular rail. The shortened rails should be laid relatively symmetrically about the center of the curve. However, if the curve is long, they should be laid in the same groups so that the deviations of the internal rails joints from the common radius are as small as possible. At the same time, the shortened and regular rails should be distributed as evenly as possible in each series. A series is composed of six rails. The number of series is 780 6   ×   30 = 4.3 .
In the examined track No.1, measurements of the actual state rails shortenings were carried out. The analysis and evaluation of the obtained (real) values of the rails shortenings was carried out in relation to the design values. The results of actual rails shortenings for selected series were as follows:
  • Seria A: 42; 45; 45; 46; 47 mm;
  • Seria B: 44; 46; 46; 45; 44 mm.
The average value of the obtained real rails shortenings in the analyzed series A and B was 45 mm. The design rails shortenings adopted in accordance with recommendations of Id-1 (D-1) [11] is 45 mm. The minimum difference between the average value of a rails shortenings and the designed one is 0 mm and the maximum value of the difference is 3 mm. Rail contacts in curved track shall be in line with the curve radius. The permissible deviation from this rule may not exceed half of the shortened value of a single rail according to the recommendations of Id-1 (D-1) [11,34]. In the examined track No. 1 this condition has been preserved.

4. Discussion

The research conducted by the author focused on measuring the real state of a circular arch with transition curves using an innovative measuring instrument called the Magnetic-Measuring Square. The analysis of measuring instruments used to measure the actual condition of curvilinear sections, with the use of both measuring vehicles [18,19,20,21] and portable measuring equipment [6,7,8,9,10], has shown that monitoring the condition of a curvilinear section’s geometry is an important part of railway infrastructure maintenance and plays an important role in the safe operation of railways. In [8,35] they correctly state that measurements of track irregularities are based on the assumption that the curvature of the track can be determined by versines. Increased railway traffic leads to the rapid degradation of railway tracks [24], which significantly affects quality, comfort, and safety. The state of a curvilinear section’s (the actual circular curve condition with transition curves) geometry is particularly important, especially for tracks in operation, and requires the use of universal and optimal measuring instruments: the solution of this problem is the MMS.
The measurement of versine in curves is performed on the basis of 10 m chord, such recommendation results from both the Id-14 (D-75) [36] instruction and the Id-1 (D-1) [11] technical conditions. Additionally, Id-14 (D-75) [36] and Id-1 (D-1) [11] define the values of permissible basic deviations as the differences of versine on the chord measured 10 [m] (measuring base). The tests of track No.1 using MMS and Versine Measuring Device were carried out according to the requirements of these regulations. The distance between measured points is 5 m. According to the recommendations of Id-14 (D-75) [36] and Id-1 (D-1) [11] regardless of the value of the curve radius, the length of the chord is always 10 m and the distance between the measured points is 5 m.
However, the binding technical standard GK-1 [28] allows for the selection of the distance between the measured points depending on the value of the curve radius:
  • 5 m for radius R < 250 m;
  • 10 m for radius from R = 250 m to R < 800 m;
  • 20 m for radius from R = 800 m to R < 2000 m;
  • 25 m for radius from R = 2000 m to R < 4000 m;
  • 50 m for radius R ≥ 4000 m.
The design value of the radius of the arc under examination is R = 1090 m, so the distance between the measured points 20 m, i.e. chord length 40 m, had to be taken. This recommendation is contrary to the requirements of Id-14 (D-75) [36] and Id-1 (D-1) [11], especially since they determine the permissible deviations of the versine values. By analysing and evaluating the state of curvature, they determine the appropriate speed in the track. These deviations depend on the speed in the track. In addition, using such a large value of the measuring chord (40 m), it is exposed to many errors and not really reflecting the state of curvature.
The author’s measurement and control system using the MMS was successfully applied for rail transport infrastructure. The measurement results show that the system is accurate, fast, safe, and reliable. It includes optimization through the use of the best (optimal) solution for the specific application. The versatility of MMS measurement allows for the acquisition of measurement data from active rail infrastructure. Special attention was paid to measurements taken in the laser rangefinder and laser beam modes, which, in contrast to the measurement line mode, are not susceptible to wind effects. An important design feature of the MMS is the ability to take measurements to a height of 14 mm below the upper rolling surface of the rail or to the lower edge of the rails.
The acquisition of observational data using laser beam solutions is able to complement or even replace traditional methods of obtaining geometric data of the real state of curvilinear track sections.
The MMS with the laser rangefinder with a laser beam with a visible target cross and camera was also used to monitor railway infrastructure elements, such as the structure gauge (infrastructure gauge), turnout track geometry, and diamond crossing, and take measurements for surveying the Railway Special Grid.
In the field of engineering and industrial geodesy, laser beams have been used for innovative solutions involving measuring instruments [37,38]. In [37], an autonomous measuring system of lifts’ long guide rail deformations was applied in the context of telemonitoring as a challenge for geodesy of the XXI century. In [38], a laser beam was used in a leveling measurement system using the LSS.
Measuring the actual state of a circular arch using the Magnetic-Measuring Square significantly shortens the time of periodical measurements, which is very significant for tracks in operation. The final measurement results of the actual state of a circular curve using the MMS are used to maintain the geometry of the exploited track, including the periodic adjustment of the track axis.

5. Conclusions

Satisfactory results were obtained by applying the Magnetic-Measuring Square to measure the actual condition of a railway track curve with transitional curves using two independent operating modes: one used a taut measuring line and the other used a laser distance measuring device equipped with a pointing cross and video camera. For measurements obtained by using the MMS with the taut measuring line, the impact of wind was observable. On the other hand, measurements carried out with the MMS with the laser beam of the laser distance measuring device and video camera depended on the influence exerted by strong insolation. The measuring instrument was subjected to direct tests in the field conditions of an operated railway line, enabling its operation with a single beam or laser plane.
The new measuring instrument was used and verified in terms of its construction by taking measurements on a 10 m chord. The laser rangefinder with a laser beam used in the MMS, with the selection of the appropriate power and wavelength, ensured that the measurements were carried out.
Within straight fragments of the track, the rail joint in both rails should be located within the same line, which is perpendicular to the track axis and within the same radius in the case of curves. According to [11], deviations from these principles must not exceed 20 mm for a straight track or half of the shortening value of a single rail for a track in a curve. In each series, the same number of regular rails should be accompanied by a constant number of shortened rails so that the joints of both rails at the beginning and at the end of each series lay as close as possible toward the radius [32]. On the basis of the performed examinations, it is recommended that the series of rails be distributed within the internal rails with an accuracy not greater than half of the rail shortening (as the deviation of joints in both rails from the opposite position).

6. Patents

Magnetic-Measuring Square and its application. Patent application No.P.420214. (Przykładnica magnetyczno-pomiarowa i jej zastosowanie. Zgłoszenie patentowe P.420214).
Bulletin of the Patent Office, 16, pp. 24, Warsaw.
Biuletyn Urzędu Patentowego, 16, pp. 24, Warszawa.
Adapter for assembling reference signals to scanners. Utility model PL 69951 Y1 (Adapter do montażu sygnałów referencyjnych do skanerów. Wzór użytkowy PL 69951 Y1).
Bulletin of the Patent Office, 17, pp. 41, Warsaw.
Biuletyn Urzędu Patentowego, 17, pp. 41, Warszawa.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This paper was made within statutory research AGH University of Science and Technology No.16.16.150.545.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Checking the Versine Survey Precision. 2016. Available online: https://pwayblog.com/2016/12/27/checking-the-versine-measurement-precision/ (accessed on 8 May 2018).
  2. Kędra, Z. Technologia Robót Torowych; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej: Gdańsk, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allgemeines zum Horizontalen Trassenverlauf. Available online: https://www.gleisbau-welt.de/lexikon/gleisbau-und-instandhaltung/gleisvermessung/pfeilhoehenmessung/ (accessed on 8 May 2018).
  4. Chainage Creep. 2016. Available online: https://pwayblog.com/2016/10/06/chainage-creep/ (accessed on 8 May 2018).
  5. Track Realignment and Rectification. 2016. Available online: https://pwayblog.com/2016/12/05/track-realignment-and-rectification/ (accessed on 9 May 2018).
  6. Chen, Q.; Niu, X.; Zuo, L.; Zhang, T.; Xiao, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. A railway track geometry measuring trolley system based on aided INS. Sensors 2018, 18, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sánchez, A.; Bravo, J.L.; González, A. Estimating the accuracy of track-surveying trolley measurements for railway maintenance planning. J. Surv. Eng. ASCE 2017, 143, 05016008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Glaus, R. Kinematic Track Surveying by Means of a Multi-Sensor Platform. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. Marx, L.; Moβmann, D.; Kullmann, H. Arbeitsverfahren für Die Instandhaltung des Oberbaus; Eisenbahn-Fachverlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  10. Naganuma, Y.; Yada, T. Development of truly portable track geometry recording trolley and accompanying new measurement principle. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Railway Engineering Design and Operation (CR 2016), Madrid, Spain, 19–21 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Technical Conditions for Maintaining Track Surface on Railway Lines Id-1 (D-1). 2015. Available online: https://www.plk-sa.pl/files/public/user_upload/pdf/Akty_prawne_i_przepisy/Instrukcje/Wydruk/Warunki_techniczne_Id-1_ujednolic.pdf (accessed on 19 September 2019).
  12. Kamiyama, M.; Yoshimura, A.; Furukawa, A.; Mori, T. Software for Railway Track Irregularity Correction Using Heavy Tamping Machine. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 1998, 37, 10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oshimura, A. A New Method for Repairing Railway Track Irregularities Using Levelling and Lining Machines. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 1996, 20, 10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiou, S.B.; Yen, J.Y. Precise railway alignment measurements of the horizontal circular curves and the vertical parabolic curves using the chord method. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F J. Rail. Rapid Transit 2018, 233, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Gao, M.; Chen, R.; Xu, J. Error theory of chord-based measurement system regarding track geometry and improvement by high frequency sampling. Measurement 2018, 115, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yazawa, E.; Takeshita, K. Development of Measurement Device of Track Irregularity using Inertial Mid-chord Offset Method. Q. Rep. RTRI 2002, 43, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Z.B.; Qing, L.; Wang, H.R.; Shen, Y. An Algorithm for the Curve Versine Measurements on Railway Tracks. Adv. Mat. Res. 2014, 43, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weston, P.; Roberts, C.; Yeo, G. Stewart, E. Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2015, 53, 1063–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Westeon, P.F.; Ling, C.S.; Roberts, C.; Goodman, C.J.; Li, P.; Goodall, R.M. Monitoring vertical track irregularity from in-service railway vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F J. Rail. Rapid Transit 2007, 221, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Weston, P.F.; Ling, C.S.; Goodman, C.J.; Roberts, C.; Li, P.; Goodall, R.M. Monitoring lateral track irregularity from in-service railway vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F J. Rail. Rapid Transit 2007, 221, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Andani, M.T.; Peterson, A.; Munoz, J.; Ahmadian, M. Railway track irregularity and curvature estimation using doppler LIDAR fiber optics. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F J. Rail. Rapid Transit 2018, 232, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maciuk, K. Advantages of combined GNSS processing involving a limited number of visible satellites. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 2018, 98, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maciuk, K. GPS-only, GLONASS-only and combined GPS+GLONASS absolute positioning under different sky view conditions. Teh. Vjesn. 2018, 25, 933–939. [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-Douri, Y.K.; Tretten, P.; Karim, R. Improvement of railway performance: A study of Swedish railway infrastructure. J. Mod. Transp. 2016, 24, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chiacchiari, L.; Loprencipe, G. Measurement methods and analysis tools for rail irregularities: A case study for urban tram track. J. Mod. Transp. 2015, 23, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kampczyk, A. Magnetic-Measuring Square and Its Application. Patent Application P.420214, 16 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kampczyk, A. Adapter for Assembling Reference Signals to Scanners. Utility Model PL 69951 Y1, 10 February 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Technical Standard “About Organization and Execution of Measurements in Railway Surveying” GK-1, Warsaw. 2015. Available online: https://www.pkp.pl/images/geodezja/dokumenty/Standard%20techniczny%20%E2%80%9EO%20organizacji%20i%20wykonywaniu%20pomiar%C3%B3w%20w%20geodezji%20kolejowej%E2%80%9D%20GK-1.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2019).
  29. Kampczyk, A. Pomiar strzałek montażowych toru zwrotnego w rozjeździe. Przegląd Geodezyjny 2017, 89, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kampczyk, A. Pomiar geometrycznych warunków widoczności przejazdu kolejowo-drogowego. Przegląd Komunikacyjny 2017, 72, 2–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kampczyk, A. Measurement innovations in railway infrastructure safety. World Sci. News 2017, 89, 336–347. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zamięcki, H. Budowa i utrzymanie dróg kolejowych; Wydawnictwo Komunikacji i Łączności: Warszawa, Poland, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  33. Technical Rules for the Maintenance and Operation of the Track Surface on Public Service Railway Lines D1. 1982. Available online: http://kolej.krb.com.pl/d1/zal11.htm (accessed on 21 September 2019).
  34. Regulation of the Minister of Transport and Maritime Economy of 10 September 1998 on Technical Conditions to Be Met by Railway Structures and Their Location. Available online: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19981510987 (accessed on 21 September 2019).
  35. Zhang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Niu, X.; Shi, C. Requirement assessment of the relative spatial accuracy of a motion-constrained GNSS/INS in shortwave track irregularity measurement. Sensors 2019, 19, 5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Instruction for Measuring, Researching and Assessing Track Condition Id-14 (D-75). 2010. Available online: https://www.plk-sa.pl/files/public/user_upload/pdf/Akty_prawne_i_przepisy/Instrukcje/Podglad/Id-14.pdf (accessed on 22 September 2019).
  37. Bryś, H.; Jaśkowski, W.; Gołuch, P. Autonomiczny system wyznaczania geometrii deformacji długich szyn prowadnic wind - telemonitoring wyzwaniem geodezji XXI wieku. Przegląd Geodezyjny 2017, 89, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bryś, H.; Ćmielewski, K. Niwelacyjny system pomiarowy z zastosowaniem laserowej stopki sygnalizacyjnej. Przegląd Geodezyjny 2019, 91, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Application of the proprietary Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS) in monitoring infrastructure of rail transport (own figure and photograph): (a) MMS in the cross section built on the rail head (crown of the rail); (b) MMS with Geodetic Mini Prism Type 111 (GMP111); (c) MMS with High-Definition Surveying (HDS) flat target Black & White and proprietary adapter made of insulating material for assembling reference signals to scanners; (d) MMS with HDS flat target Blue & White and proprietary adapter made of insulating material for assembling reference signals to scanners.
Figure 1. Application of the proprietary Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS) in monitoring infrastructure of rail transport (own figure and photograph): (a) MMS in the cross section built on the rail head (crown of the rail); (b) MMS with Geodetic Mini Prism Type 111 (GMP111); (c) MMS with High-Definition Surveying (HDS) flat target Black & White and proprietary adapter made of insulating material for assembling reference signals to scanners; (d) MMS with HDS flat target Blue & White and proprietary adapter made of insulating material for assembling reference signals to scanners.
Sensors 20 00560 g001aSensors 20 00560 g001b
Figure 2. The Magnetic-Measuring Square for measuring versines (own photograph): (a) the lengths of the measurement base ci = 10 m; (b) a measuring archet with a measuring archet adapter for vertical orientation; (c) a measuring square with a cap of a laser distance measuring device and the laser distance measuring device; (d) a measuring square with a laser distance measuring device with a visible pointing cross and video camera.
Figure 2. The Magnetic-Measuring Square for measuring versines (own photograph): (a) the lengths of the measurement base ci = 10 m; (b) a measuring archet with a measuring archet adapter for vertical orientation; (c) a measuring square with a cap of a laser distance measuring device and the laser distance measuring device; (d) a measuring square with a laser distance measuring device with a visible pointing cross and video camera.
Sensors 20 00560 g002
Figure 3. Horizontal versine measurement with the MMS (own Figure), where fi is the horizontal versine of the curve, ci is the chord base length, a and b are the distances between points, Δfi is the difference between two measurements and fi-1 the value of the previous versine to the versine fi, fi+1 value of the next versine to the versine fi.
Figure 3. Horizontal versine measurement with the MMS (own Figure), where fi is the horizontal versine of the curve, ci is the chord base length, a and b are the distances between points, Δfi is the difference between two measurements and fi-1 the value of the previous versine to the versine fi, fi+1 value of the next versine to the versine fi.
Sensors 20 00560 g003
Figure 4. Track square (own photograph).
Figure 4. Track square (own photograph).
Sensors 20 00560 g004
Figure 5. The Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS) for measurements verifying the perpendicularity of the rail joints and shortening positions (own photograph): (a) the MMS location within rails; (b) the measuring square with a cap of the laser distance measuring device and with the laser distance measuring device; (c) the measuring square with a horizontal surveying measuring disk (with a millimeter scale with concentric rings); (d) the measuring square with a cap of the laser distance measuring device and with the laser distance measuring device with a visible surveying measuring disk, cross pointer, and video camera.
Figure 5. The Magnetic-Measuring Square (MMS) for measurements verifying the perpendicularity of the rail joints and shortening positions (own photograph): (a) the MMS location within rails; (b) the measuring square with a cap of the laser distance measuring device and with the laser distance measuring device; (c) the measuring square with a horizontal surveying measuring disk (with a millimeter scale with concentric rings); (d) the measuring square with a cap of the laser distance measuring device and with the laser distance measuring device with a visible surveying measuring disk, cross pointer, and video camera.
Sensors 20 00560 g005
Figure 6. Measurement of the actual rail shortening (own Figure).
Figure 6. Measurement of the actual rail shortening (own Figure).
Sensors 20 00560 g006
Figure 7. The Versine Measuring Device (VMD), as a regular device used so far) (own photograph): (a) the VMD—side view; (b) the VMD—overhead view.
Figure 7. The Versine Measuring Device (VMD), as a regular device used so far) (own photograph): (a) the VMD—side view; (b) the VMD—overhead view.
Sensors 20 00560 g007
Figure 8. A diagram of horizontal versines in the exploited track (measurement on the basis of the measurement chord ci = 10 m (own Figure).
Figure 8. A diagram of horizontal versines in the exploited track (measurement on the basis of the measurement chord ci = 10 m (own Figure).
Sensors 20 00560 g008
Figure 9. A diagram with differences of horizontal versines on the basis of the measurement chord ci = 10 m (own Figure).
Figure 9. A diagram with differences of horizontal versines on the basis of the measurement chord ci = 10 m (own Figure).
Sensors 20 00560 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kampczyk, A. Magnetic-Measuring Square in the Measurement of the Circular Curve of Rail Transport Tracks. Sensors 2020, 20, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020560

AMA Style

Kampczyk A. Magnetic-Measuring Square in the Measurement of the Circular Curve of Rail Transport Tracks. Sensors. 2020; 20(2):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kampczyk, Arkadiusz. 2020. "Magnetic-Measuring Square in the Measurement of the Circular Curve of Rail Transport Tracks" Sensors 20, no. 2: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop