Next Article in Journal
ADST: Forecasting Metro Flow Using Attention-Based Deep Spatial-Temporal Networks with Multi-Task Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Bruit by Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
A Compact High-Speed Image-Based Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Motion of Living Tissues
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Hybrid Feature Selection and Extraction Methods for Sleep Apnea Detection Using Bio-Signals
Article

Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension

1
SCH Media Labs, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea
2
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(16), 4575; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164575
Received: 7 July 2020 / Revised: 10 August 2020 / Accepted: 11 August 2020 / Published: 14 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sensors)
Hypotensive events in the initial stage of anesthesia can cause serious complications in the patients after surgery, which could be fatal. In this study, we intended to predict hypotension after tracheal intubation using machine learning and deep learning techniques after intubation one minute in advance. Meta learning models, such as random forest, extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost), and deep learning models, especially the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and the deep neural network (DNN), were trained to predict hypotension occurring between tracheal intubation and incision, using data from four minutes to one minute before tracheal intubation. Vital records and electronic health records (EHR) for 282 of 319 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from October 2018 to July 2019 were collected. Among the 282 patients, 151 developed post-induction hypotension. Our experiments had two scenarios: using raw vital records and feature engineering on vital records. The experiments on raw data showed that CNN had the best accuracy of 72.63%, followed by random forest (70.32%) and Xgboost (64.6%). The experiments on feature engineering showed that random forest combined with feature selection had the best accuracy of 74.89%, while CNN had a lower accuracy of 68.95% than that of the experiment on raw data. Our study is an extension of previous studies to detect hypotension before intubation with a one-minute advance. To improve accuracy, we built a model using state-of-art algorithms. We found that CNN had a good performance, but that random forest had a better performance when combined with feature selection. In addition, we found that the examination period (data period) is also important. View Full-Text
Keywords: hypotension prediction; machine learning; deep learning; anesthesia; vital records; biomedical sensor hypotension prediction; machine learning; deep learning; anesthesia; vital records; biomedical sensor
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Woo, J.; Kang, A.R.; Jeong, Y.-S.; Jung, W.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.H. Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension. Sensors 2020, 20, 4575. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164575

AMA Style

Lee J, Woo J, Kang AR, Jeong Y-S, Jung W, Lee M, Kim SH. Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension. Sensors. 2020; 20(16):4575. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jihyun, Jiyoung Woo, Ah R. Kang, Young-Seob Jeong, Woohyun Jung, Misoon Lee, and Sang H. Kim. 2020. "Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension" Sensors 20, no. 16: 4575. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164575

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop