Next Article in Journal
A CSI-Based Indoor Fingerprinting Localization with Model Integration Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogel Microdomain Encapsulation of Stable Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles for SERS pH and Urea Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Adaptive Framework Based on MAPE Loop for Internet of Things
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design for Distributed Feedback Laser Biosensors Based on the Active Grating Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Direct Current Measurement Method Based on Terbium Gallium Garnet Crystal and a Double Correlation Detection Algorithm

Sensors 2019, 19(13), 2997; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132997
by Yan Shen 1,*, Tong Chen 1, Wen-bin Yu 1, Jin-ming Ge 1, Yue Han 2 and Fang-wei Duan 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2019, 19(13), 2997; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132997
Submission received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 5 July 2019 / Published: 7 July 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1) In Figure 1 it is necessary to show not only the direction of the magnetic field intensity H, but also the coil with N turns and current i.

2) It is necessary to explain in lines 115-116 that the dependencies shown in Figure 2 are obtained at the same number of turns N.

3) In line 163, it is necessary to make an explanation similar to what is done in lines 149-151.

4) The comma must be at the end of line 195 rather than at the beginning of line 196.

5) In the formula (25) is extracted from Vo1 and Vo2 amplitudes it is necessary to designate other letters.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is well crafted with clear information. The article profile is suitable for publication in Sensors.

Author Response

Thank you for reviewing my paper and your evaluation of my paper. Wish everything goes well with your work!

Reviewer 3 Report

Generally, the paper is short of novelty and the presentation is in need of further polishing. The author need to make it more professional.

1, Please define DC in the first paragraph. 

2, Please use OCT instead of the full name if it is already defined. Please pg through the paper for the semilar problems;

3, The curves in the picture is too thin, please revise and make it more visiable;

4, Please use the screenshot picture for Fig. 5 rather than such a captured picture. By the way, I cannot find any useful information in the picture, which can relate to the claim of "the modulated light is good" and the claim here should be more specific.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop