Fog Architectures and Sensor Location Certification in Distributed Event-Based Systems †
1
Information & Computing Lab, AtlantTIC Research Center, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
2
SAMOVAR (Services répartis, Architectures, MOdélisation, Validation, Administration des Réseaux), Télécom SudParis, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91000 Évry, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
This Paper is an Extended Version of Our Paper Published in “Castro-Jul, F.; Conan, D.; Chabridon, S.; Díaz-Redondo, R.P.; Fernández-Vilas, A.; Taconet, C. Combining Fog Architectures and Distributed Event-Based Systems for Mobile Sensor Location Certification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 7–10 November 2017; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017, pp. 27–33.”.
Sensors 2019, 19(1), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010104
Received: 15 November 2018
/
Revised: 11 December 2018
/
Accepted: 20 December 2018
/
Published: 29 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pervasive Intelligence and Computing)
Since smart cities aim at becoming self-monitoring and self-response systems, their deployment relies on close resource monitoring through large-scale urban sensing. The subsequent gathering of massive amounts of data makes essential the development of event-filtering mechanisms that enable the selection of what is relevant and trustworthy. Due to the rise of mobile event producers, location information has become a valuable filtering criterion, as it not only offers extra information on the described event, but also enhances trust in the producer. Implementing mechanisms that validate the quality of location information becomes then imperative. The lack of such strategies in cloud architectures compels the adoption of new communication schemes for Internet of Things (IoT)-based urban services. To serve the demand for location verification in urban event-based systems (DEBS), we have designed three different fog architectures that combine proximity and cloud communication. We have used network simulations with realistic urban traces to prove that the three of them can correctly identify between 73% and 100% of false location claims.
View Full-Text
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Castro-Jul, F.; Díaz-Redondo, R.P.; Fernández-Vilas, A.; Chabridon, S.; Conan, D. Fog Architectures and Sensor Location Certification in Distributed Event-Based Systems. Sensors 2019, 19, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010104
AMA Style
Castro-Jul F, Díaz-Redondo RP, Fernández-Vilas A, Chabridon S, Conan D. Fog Architectures and Sensor Location Certification in Distributed Event-Based Systems. Sensors. 2019; 19(1):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010104
Chicago/Turabian StyleCastro-Jul, Fátima, Rebeca P. Díaz-Redondo, Ana Fernández-Vilas, Sophie Chabridon, and Denis Conan. 2019. "Fog Architectures and Sensor Location Certification in Distributed Event-Based Systems" Sensors 19, no. 1: 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010104
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
