Next Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Insulation Condition of MV Switchgears by Application of Different Partial Discharge Measuring Methods and Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Motor Planning Error: Toward Measuring Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults Using Wearables
Previous Article in Journal
A Custom Approach for a Flexible, Real-Time and Reliable Software Defined Utility
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Affordable Insole-Sensor-Based Trans-Femoral Prosthesis for Normal Gait
Article

Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity

1
School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 0AB, Wales, UK
2
Arthritis Research UK Biomechanics and Bioengineering Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AXB, Wales, UK
3
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(3), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030719
Received: 15 January 2018 / Revised: 10 February 2018 / Accepted: 26 February 2018 / Published: 28 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Gait, Posture, and Health Monitoring)
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of a commercially available Xsens MVN BIOMECH inertial-sensor-based motion capture system during clinically relevant functional activities. A clinician with no prior experience of motion capture technologies and an experienced clinical movement scientist each assessed 26 healthy participants within each of two sessions using a camera-based motion capture system and the MVN BIOMECH system. Participants performed overground walking, squatting, and jumping. Sessions were separated by 4 ± 3 days. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement, and validity was evaluated using the coefficient of multiple correlation and the linear fit method. Day-to-day reliability was generally fair-to-excellent in all three planes for hip, knee, and ankle joint angles in all three tasks. Within-day (between-rater) reliability was fair-to-excellent in all three planes during walking and squatting, and poor-to-high during jumping. Validity was excellent in the sagittal plane for hip, knee, and ankle joint angles in all three tasks and acceptable in frontal and transverse planes in squat and jump activity across joints. Our results suggest that the MVN BIOMECH system can be used by a clinician to quantify lower-limb joint angles in clinically relevant movements. View Full-Text
Keywords: inertial measurement units; motion analysis; kinematics; gait; functional activity; repeatability; reliability; biomechanics inertial measurement units; motion analysis; kinematics; gait; functional activity; repeatability; reliability; biomechanics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Amri, M.; Nicholas, K.; Button, K.; Sparkes, V.; Sheeran, L.; Davies, J.L. Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity. Sensors 2018, 18, 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030719

AMA Style

Al-Amri M, Nicholas K, Button K, Sparkes V, Sheeran L, Davies JL. Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity. Sensors. 2018; 18(3):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Amri, Mohammad; Nicholas, Kevin; Button, Kate; Sparkes, Valerie; Sheeran, Liba; Davies, Jennifer L. 2018. "Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity" Sensors 18, no. 3: 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030719

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop