Next Article in Journal
Diversity of Myrmecophilous Silverfish (Insecta: Zygentoma) in Bulgaria
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological and Phytochemical Evidence of Divergent Oregano-Type Plant Material Marketed as Origanum vulgare in Romania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Applied Biodiversity Metrics; Concepts to Choose Them Well

Département des Sciences Naturelles and Institut des Sciences de la Forêt Tempérée, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 58 rue Principale, Ripon, QC J0V 1V0, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2026, 18(4), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/d18040222
Submission received: 26 February 2026 / Revised: 1 April 2026 / Accepted: 4 April 2026 / Published: 10 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Diversity Discovery and Resource Utilization)

Abstract

The evaluation of biodiversity is an essential tool for conservation, management of natural resources, and assessment of ecosystem functioning. Choosing an appropriate and understandable diversity metric is critical to ultimately make better decisions and apply more sustainable resource management. However, biodiversity metrics are numerous, and care must be taken when using them. So, should one consider all these metrics to obtain the right information? If not, how should one choose? This paper aims to demonstrate the importance of understanding and selecting the appropriate diversity metrics to reach accurate conclusions. We simulated theoretical plant communities for which calculations of different biodiversity metrics were carried out to understand why and how to use them. We explored Richness, Evenness and Disparity components of biodiversity using both scales of diversity partitioning (i.e., alpha and beta diversity). In doing so, a decision tree is proposed to select diversity metrics according to user objectives. We also suggest an add-in term if alpha metrics are calculated with subsamples to better reflect biodiversity. Finally, we recommend that when dealing with ecosystem functioning or conservation concerns, species-dependent metrics should be used, as they reflect Disparity. However, there is a critical need to increase knowledge and data availability on species traits or phylogeny to be able to better analyze Disparity.
Keywords: diversity metrics; alpha beta scale; disparity; plant diversity; functional trait; phylogenetic diversity diversity metrics; alpha beta scale; disparity; plant diversity; functional trait; phylogenetic diversity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roy, M.-È.; Delagrange, S.; Surget-Groba, Y. Applied Biodiversity Metrics; Concepts to Choose Them Well. Diversity 2026, 18, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18040222

AMA Style

Roy M-È, Delagrange S, Surget-Groba Y. Applied Biodiversity Metrics; Concepts to Choose Them Well. Diversity. 2026; 18(4):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18040222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roy, Marie-Ève, Sylvain Delagrange, and Yann Surget-Groba. 2026. "Applied Biodiversity Metrics; Concepts to Choose Them Well" Diversity 18, no. 4: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18040222

APA Style

Roy, M.-È., Delagrange, S., & Surget-Groba, Y. (2026). Applied Biodiversity Metrics; Concepts to Choose Them Well. Diversity, 18(4), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18040222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop