Previous Article in Journal
New Stonefly Synonymy Changes Conservation Outlook: 100-Year-Old Specimens and Integrated Taxonomy Clarify Species Concepts and Distributions of Several Eastern Nearctic Stripetails (Perlodidae: Isoperla Banks, 1905)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Mitogenome Diversity and Phylogeny of Felidae Species

1
The Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu 610081, China
2
Institute of Wildlife Conservation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(9), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090634 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 August 2025 / Revised: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 1 September 2025 / Published: 8 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)

Abstract

As apex predators, felids (Felidae) face unresolved phylogenetic controversies due to their recent rapid speciation and remarkable morphological conservatism. Previous studies, often relying on a limited number of genetic markers, were constrained by insufficient data and conflicting phylogenetic signals, leaving these disputes unresolved. Therefore, establishing a robust phylogenetic framework based on larger-scale genomic data is crucial. This study integrated complete mitogenomes from 37 species representing all major felid genera to characterize genomic diversity, selection pressures, and phylogenetic relationships. Results revealed conserved gene content and arrangement patterns but significant intergenic variation in nucleotide composition, with the light-strand encoded ND6 exhibiting pronounced strand-specific bias. Nucleotide diversity was highest in ND4L (Pi = 0.132) and ATP6 (Pi = 0.131), suggesting their utility as novel markers for species delimitation and population studies. Selection pressure analysis indicated strong purifying selection on cytochrome oxidase subunits (e.g., COX1 Ka/Ks = 0.00327) but relaxed constraints on ATP8 (Ka/Ks = 0.12304). Phylogenies reconstructed from the complete 13PCGs + 2rRNAs dataset (showing high congruence between maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods) clearly delineated Felidae into two primary clades (Pantherinae and Felinae), confirming monophyly of all genera and positioning Neofelis nebulosa as the basal lineage within Pantherinae. Crucially, exclusion of ND6 (12PCGs + 2rRNAs) yielded topologies congruent with the complete 13PCGs + 2rRNAs dataset, whereas single-gene or limited multi-gene datasets produced inconsistent trees (particularly at genus-level nodes). This demonstrates that near-complete mitogenomic data (≥12PCGs + 2rRNAs) are essential for reconstructing robust felid phylogenetic frameworks. Our study provides insights into carnivoran mitogenome evolution.
Keywords: Felidae; mitogenome; evolution; diversity; phylogeny Felidae; mitogenome; evolution; diversity; phylogeny

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, J.; Yu, X.; Bi, W.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, R.; Feng, F.; Huang, C.; Gu, J.; Wu, W.; et al. Mitogenome Diversity and Phylogeny of Felidae Species. Diversity 2025, 17, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090634

AMA Style

Yu J, Yu X, Bi W, Li Z, Zhou Y, Ma R, Feng F, Huang C, Gu J, Wu W, et al. Mitogenome Diversity and Phylogeny of Felidae Species. Diversity. 2025; 17(9):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Jiaojiao, Xiang Yu, Wenlei Bi, Zusheng Li, Yanshan Zhou, Rui Ma, Feifei Feng, Chong Huang, Jiang Gu, Wei Wu, and et al. 2025. "Mitogenome Diversity and Phylogeny of Felidae Species" Diversity 17, no. 9: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090634

APA Style

Yu, J., Yu, X., Bi, W., Li, Z., Zhou, Y., Ma, R., Feng, F., Huang, C., Gu, J., Wu, W., Lan, G., Zhang, L., Chen, C., Xue, F., & Liu, J. (2025). Mitogenome Diversity and Phylogeny of Felidae Species. Diversity, 17(9), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop