Next Article in Journal
Correction: Santiago-Valentín et al. A New Holoplanktonic Nudibranch (Nudibranchia: Phylliroidae) from the Central Mexican Pacific. Diversity 2025, 17, 479
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Rice Phenology on Local Bat Activity and Community Composition in Gunung Keriang, Malaysia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ancient Lineages of the Western and Central Palearctic: Mapping Indicates High Endemism in Mediterranean and Arid Regions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Diversity of Calocybe (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from Shanxi Province of Northern China

1
Department of Life Sciences, National Natural History Museum of China, Tianqiaonandajie 126, Beijing 100050, China
2
School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
3
College of Life Science, Capital Normal University, Xisanhuanbeilu 105, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(9), 619; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090619
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 1 September 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025

Abstract

Many species of Calocybe are of great edible value. Nineteen species of Calocybe have been reported from China, which represents about 40% of the global population. However, in Shanxi Province, located in northern China, no Calocybe species had been reported before this study. Our present study showed there are at least eight Calocybe species distributed in this province, including seven known species and a new species. The known species are C. badiofloccosa, C. coacta, C. fulvipes, C. gambosa, C. gangraenosa, C. ionides, and C. pseudoflammula. The new species, Calocybe confusa sp. nov., is described and illustrated, and, morphologically, it is diagnosed by the combination of basidiomata turning black when exposed, cream grey, grey yellowish white to pale brown pileus, narrowly ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores, and the absence of hymenial cystidia. The molecular data for known species are provided. The geography of the Calocybe species in Shanxi Province is discussed.

1. Introduction

The genus Calocybe Kühner ex Donk was officially erected by Donk [1], with Calocybe gambosa (Fr.) Donk as its type species. Many species of Calocybe are edible and some are cultivated, such as Calocybe indica [2]. This genus is dominantly distributed in the northern hemisphere, and is characterized by brightly coloured pilei, small basidiospores, and pileipelles of a cutis or cellular type [3]. In earlier studies, Calocybe had been placed in the genus Lyophyllum as a section [4] or a genus of Tricholomataceae [3]. Molecular studies revealed that Calocybe is a monophyletic genus [5,6,7,8,9] and that Rugosomyces Raithelh. should be merged into Calocybe [10].
Index Fungorum registers approximately 124 records, but about 46 species are accepted according to He et al. [11]. In China, 19 species of Calocybe have been documented, with the majority discovered in northern China. However, the knowledge of Calocybe in Shanxi Province is significantly insufficient because of the lack of records of this genus in this region before this study. During recent fieldwork in Shanxi Province, we gathered numerous Calocybe specimens. Integrated morphological and molecular approaches confirmed eight species from these collections, with one representing a novel taxon. This study describes and illustrates a new species and provides molecular data for seven known Calocybe species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

Specimens of the newly identified species were obtained from Zhongtiao Mountain, located in southeastern Shanxi Province. This region experiences a warm-temperate monsoonal continental climate and exhibits distinct vertical zonation in vegetation. From the base to the summit, the vegetation belts include a Quercus variabilis forest zone (400–1400 m), a mixed pine–oak forest zone (1200–2000 m), a poplar–birch forest zone (1900–2200 m), and an alpine meadow zone (2000–2358 m). These vegetation zones correspond to the following soil sequence: mountainous cinnamon soil, leached cinnamon soil, mountainous brown soil, and alpine meadow soil.

2.2. Morphological Studies

Field collections from Shanxi Province were photographed fresh, dehydrated at 35–45 °C using fruit driers, and deposited in BJTC (Herbarium Biology Department, Capital Normal University) HSA (Hebarium of Shanxi Institute for Functional Foods, Shanxi Agricultural University). Macroscopic features were documented from fresh specimens, with standardized colour codes referenced via ColorHexa [http://www.colorhexa.com/ (accessed on 11 July 2025)]. For microscopic analysis, sections of dried specimens were mounted in 5% KOH, Congo Red, or Melzer’s reagent [12], observing structures under compound microscopy [12]. Notation ‘[n/m/p]’ denotes n basidiospores measured from m basidiomata across p collections. Basidiospore dimensions follow (a–)b–c(–d), where b–c covers ≥ 90% of values and a/d are extremes. Spore ratio Q = length/width (side view); Qav = mean Q ± SD [13].

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and DNA Sequencing

Sample processing involved crushing basidiomata fragments (20−30 mg) in a 1.5 mL tube with a 3 mm tungsten carbide ball using a Mixer Mill MM301 (Haan, Mettmann, in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). Grinding was performed at 30 Hz for 45 s per cycle, repeated 2–4 times. Total genomic DNA was subsequently extracted from the resulting powder, employing the NuClean Plant Genomic DNA Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Two nuclear loci were targeted for amplification and sequencing: the nrDNA internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and the nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (nrLSU). Primer pairs ITS1-F/ITS4 and LR0R/LR5 [14,15] were employed for the ITS and nrLSU loci, respectively [14,15]. PCR amplification and sequencing followed established protocols [16]. The PCR amplicons were commercially processed by Beijing Zhongkexilin Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). All newly generated and downloaded sequence accession numbers are detailed in Table 1.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

This study employed a concatenated ITS-nrLSU matrix to characterize the new species and resolve their phylogenetic position within Calocybe. Sequence alignment for both ITS and nrLSU was conducted using the online MAFFT 7.110 platform [17]. The resulting alignments were then manually refined in BioEdit v.7.0.9 [18].
Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) were applied for phylogenetic analyses. The ML analyses utilized RAxML 8.0.14 [19] with the GTRGAMMAI model, applying all default parameters. For ML analysis, a rapid bootstrap procedure with 1000 replicates was executed to identify the best-scoring tree. BI analysis was performed in MrBayes 3.1.2 [20]. The analysis employed a partitioned mixed model, treating ITS and nrLSU sequences as independent partitions with distinct parameter sets. Optimal substitution models for each locus were selected using MrModeltest v2.3 [21] under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), resulting in the GTR + I + G model for both the ITS and nrLSU. Two independent MCMC runs (each with four chains) proceeded for 405,000 generations under default conditions. At run termination, the average standard deviation of split frequency (ASDSF) was well under 0.01. Sampling occurred every 100 generations following burn-in, and a 50% majority-rule consensus tree was built.
Significant clade support thresholds were set at MLBS ≥ 70% and BPP ≥ 0.95 [22,23]. All resulting phylogenies were examined using TreeView [24].

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

In this study, 20 sequences were newly generated from our collections. The final combined ITS-nrLSU dataset consisted of 118 sequences from 71 collections and contained 1516 (614 for ITS; 902 for nrLSU) characters after the exclusion of poorly aligned sites. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses produced congruent tree topologies; consequently, only the phylogeny inferred from the ML analysis is presented (Figure 1). The members of Calocybe formed a monophyletic lineage with strong support. Phylogenetic analysis revealed eight strongly supported clades among our sequenced collections, representing eight distinct species. Of them, seven clades corresponded well to the previously described species, i.e., Calocybe badiofloccosa J.Z. Xu & Yu Li, C. coacta J.Z. Xu & Yu Li, C. fulvipes J.Z. Xu & Yu Li, C. gambosa, C. gangraenosa (Fr.) V. Hofst., Moncalvo, Redhead & Vilgalys, C. ionides (Bull.) Donk, and C. pseudoflammula (J.E. Lange) M. Lange ex Singer. The remaining clade represented an undescribed species.

3.2. Taxonomy

Calocybe confusa L. Fan, N. Mao & T. Li, sp. nov. Figure 2 and Figure 3.
MycoBank: 860463
Etymology: confusa, referring to the fact that the new species is confused with C. gangraenosa in micromorphology.
Holotype: China. Shanxi Province, Xia County, 6 October 2023, on the ground in broadleaf forest dominated by Quercus sp., J.Z Cao, CF2333 (BJTC FM4097).
Diagnosis: This species is characterized by the following combination of features: basidiomata turning black when exposed, cream grey, grey yellowish white to pale brown pileus and narrowly ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores. It is most similar to Calocybe gangraenosa but differs by habitats associated with broadleaf forests and relatively broader basidiospores.
Description: Pileus 27–65 mm diam, at first convex, later broadly convex to plano-convex with age, cream grey (#e6e5cf), grey yellowish white (#f7f7f1) to pale brown (#cebba7), darker in the centre and paler towards the margin; surface felty, not smooth, dry; margin incurved when young, explanate at maturity, occasionally cracking with age. Lamellae adnate to sinuate, crowded, up to 4 mm, cream white (#fffff8), then yellowish brown (#d7bd91) with age, turning black (#3d3d3d) when exposed, lamellulae in 1–3 tiers, concolorous with lamellae. Stipe 35–82 mm long, 5–11 mm in diam, cylindrical to clavate, equal, concolorous with the pileus, surface longitudinally striate. Context white (#ffffff), turning black (#3d3d3d) when exposed. Odour unrecorded. Taste not recorded.
Basidiospores 5–7 × 3–4 μm, Q = 1.71–2.19, Qav = 1.92 (±0.17) [60/3/2], narrowly ellipsoid to subcylindrical, sparsely and minutely warty, inamyloid, cyanophilic. Basidia 20–30 × 5–7 μm, clavate, hyaline in water and 5% KOH, thin-walled, 4-spored. Hymenial cystidia not observed. Hymenophoral trama regular, consisting of cylindrical and subinflated hyphae, hyphae 4–10 μm wide. Pileipellis a cutis, composed of parallel cylindrical hyphae of 3–10 µm wide, yellowish-brown in water and 5% KOH. Stipitipellis a cutis, composed of parallel cylindrical hyphae of 4–8 µm wide, yellowish-brown in water and 5% KOH. Clamp connections present in all tissues.
Ecology and habitat: Scattered or gregarious on the ground in broadleaf or coniferous forest, currently only known in Shanxi Province, northern China.
Additional specimens examined: China. Shanxi Province: Qinshui County, Lishan Mountain, on the ground in broadleaf forest dominated by Quercus sp., 6 October 2023, J.Z Cao, CF2270 (BJTC FM4040); ibid., Jiexiu County, Mianshan Mountain, on the ground in coniferous forest, 20 September 2023, Y. Li, MS590 (BJTC FM3620).

4. Discussion

Our multilocus phylogenetic analysis and morphological data indicated that the new species belongs to Calocybe. Calocybe gangraenosa is the most similar species to the new species in terms of its basidiomata turning black when exposed, pileus colour, and the structure of the pileipellis [25,26]. However, C. gangraenosa differs from the new species by its relatively narrower basidiospores (7–8.5 × 3–3.2 µm; Q = 2.3–2.6) [25,26]. Calocybe coacta J.Z. Xu & Yu Li, a species recently described from Liaoning Province in north-eastern China [27], is phylogenetically closely related to the new species. Both species have a cream pileus and narrowly ellipsoid basidiospores. However, C. coacta is distinguished from C. confusa by its larger basidiomata (pileus 60–115 mm in diam, stipe 40–58 mm long and 20–30 mm wide), smooth basidospores, and hymenial cystidia. Moreover, notably, in our three samples strongly supported to be conspecific to C. coacta by the present analysis (Figure 1), the basidiomata is clearly bruised black, the context is somewhat light blue when exposed, and the lamellae are sinuate to nearly distant (Figure 2), all of which is not described in original description by Xu et al. [27]. The other two species recently described from China, C. betulicola, and C. cystidiosa, are easily distinguished from C. confuse, because C. betulicola has a violet pileus and oval basidiospores, and C. cystidiosa has pink-tinted basidiomata and hymenial cystidia [28].
Eight species of Calocybe have been confirmed in Shanxi Province, northern China, in this study, i.e., Calocybe badiofloccosa, C. coacta, C. confusa, C. fulvipes, C. gambosa, C. gangraenosa, C. ionides, and C. pseudoflammula. Geographically, Calocybe badiofloccosa, C. coacta, C. confusa, and C. pseudoflammula are found in southern regions of Shanxi Province and associated with a warm-temperate forest dominated by Pinus tabuliformis Carrière and/or Quercus spp. The remaining species, C. fulvipes, C. gangraenosa, C. gambosa and C. ionides, are found in subalpine areas of the northern regions and associated with coniferous forest dominated by Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii (Mayr) Pilg.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.; Formal Analysis, T.L., M.H. and N.M.; Funding Acquisition, T.L.; Investigation, N.M. and Y.Z.; Methodology, T.L. and M.H.; Resources, L.F.; Software, N.M.; Writing—Original Draft, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32370010, 31750001), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 5172003), Shanxi Province Modern Agriculture Industry System Construction Project (No. 2023CYJSTX10-06), the BJAST Budding Talent Program (Grant No. 24CE-BGS-19), and the Beijing Government.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing data has been submitted to GenBank.

Acknowledgments

We thank J.Z. Cao, who collected specimens and provided valuable suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Donk, M.A. The Generic Names Proposed for Agaricaceae; Beih. 5 Von Nova Hedwig; Verlag Von J. Cramer: Weinheim, Germany, 1962; ISBN 978-3-768-25405-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Navathe, S.; Borkar, P.; Kadam, J. Cultivation of Calocybe indica (P & C) in Konkan Region of Maharashtra, India. World J. Agric. Res. 2014, 2, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy; Koeltz Scientific Books: Schmitten, Germany, 1986; Volume 24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kühner, R.; Romagnesi, H. Flore analytique des Champignons supérieurs (Agarics, Bolets, Chanterelles); Masson et Cie, éditeurs: Paris, France, 1953; p. 199. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hofstetter, V.; Clémençon, H.; Vilgalys, R.; Moncalvo, J.M. Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 1043–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hofstetter, V.; Redhead, S.A.; Kauff, F.; Moncalvo, J.M.; Matheny, P.B.; Vilgalys, R. Taxonomic revision and examination of ecological transitions of the Lyophyllaceae (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) based on a multigene phylogeny. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2014, 35, 399–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moncalvo, J.M.; Vilgalys, R.; Redhead, S.A.; Johnson, J.E.; James, T.Y.; Aime, M.C.; Hofstetter, V.; Verduin, S.; Larsen, E.; Baroni, T.J.; et al. One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 23, 357–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Matheny, P.B.; Curtis, J.M.; Hofstetter, V.; Aime, M.C.; Moncalvo, J.-M.; Ge, Z.-W.; Yang, Z.-L.; Slot, J.C.; Ammirati, J.F.; Baroni, T.J.; et al. Major clades of Agaricales: A multi-locus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 2006, 98, 982–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Garnica, S.; Weiss, M.; Walther, G.; Oberwinkler, F. Reconstructing the evolution of agarics from nuclear gene sequences and basidiospore ultrastructure. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bellanger, J.M.; Moreau, P.A.; Corriol, G.; Bidaud, A.; Chalange, R.; Dudova, Z.; Richard, F. Plunging hands into the mushroom jar: A phylogenetic framework for Lyophyllaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Genetica 2015, 143, 169–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. He, M.-Q.; Zhao, R.-L.; Hyde, K.D.; Begerow, D.; Kemler, M.; Yurkov, A.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Raspé, O.; Kakishima, M.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; et al. Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 105–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dring, D.M. Techniques for microscopic preparation. In Methods in Microbiology; Booth, C., Ed.; Academic Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1971; pp. 95–111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mao, N.; Lv, J.-C.; Zhao, T.-Y.; Fan, L. Bonomyces pseudoarnoldii (Biannulariaceae, Agaricales), a new species from China revealed by morphology, and multilocus phylogenetic analysis. Phytotaxa 2022, 545, 069–078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, J.-J.; Wu, S.-Y.; Yu, X.-D.; Zhang, S.-B.; Cao, D.-X. Three new species of Calocybe (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from northeastern China are supported by morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 2017, 109, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  19. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nylander, J. MrModeltest2.2. Computer software distributed by the University of Uppsala; Evolutionary Biology Centre: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hillis, D.M.; Bull, J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alfaro, M.E.; Zoller, S.; Lutzoni, F. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Page, R.D.M. TreeView; Glasgow University: Glasgow, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bon, M. Les Collybio-Marasmïoïdes et ressemblants. Flore Mycologique d’Europe 5; Documents Mycologiques, Mémoire Hors-Série n° 5; Verlag nicht ermittelbar: Amiens, France, 1999; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Consiglio, G.; Contu, M. Il genere Lyophyllum P. Karst. Emend. Kühner, in Italia. Riv. Micol. 2002, 45, 99–181. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu, J.Z.; Yu, X.D.; Suwannarach, N.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y. Additions to Lyophyllaceae s.l. from China. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ma, A.; Hu, J.-J.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Wang, X.; Tuo, Y.-L.; Yue, L.; Li, X.-F.; Dai, D.; Wei, Y.-H.; Zhang, B.; et al. Multiple evidence reveals two new species and new distributions of Calocybe species (Lyophyllaceae) from northeastern China. MycoKeys 2024, 103, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree was inferred from Calocybe ITS/LSU sequences using maximum likelihood analysis, with Agaricus bisporus designated as the outgroup. Node support is indicated by left-side values (ML bootstrap ≥ 70%) and right-side values (Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95). Chinese basidiomate sequences are in bold; newly described species have a yellow background. The superscript “H” identifies holotype material.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree was inferred from Calocybe ITS/LSU sequences using maximum likelihood analysis, with Agaricus bisporus designated as the outgroup. Node support is indicated by left-side values (ML bootstrap ≥ 70%) and right-side values (Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95). Chinese basidiomate sequences are in bold; newly described species have a yellow background. The superscript “H” identifies holotype material.
Diversity 17 00619 g001
Figure 2. Basidiomes. (a) Calocybe confusa (BJTC FM4097, holotype). (b) Calocybe coacta (BJTC FM3594). Bar = 1 cm.
Figure 2. Basidiomes. (a) Calocybe confusa (BJTC FM4097, holotype). (b) Calocybe coacta (BJTC FM3594). Bar = 1 cm.
Diversity 17 00619 g002
Figure 3. Calocybe confusa. (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Pileipellis. Bar = 5 µm.
Figure 3. Calocybe confusa. (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Pileipellis. Bar = 5 µm.
Diversity 17 00619 g003
Table 1. ITS and LSU sequences employed in this study. Bold text identifies sequences that were newly generated.
Table 1. ITS and LSU sequences employed in this study. Bold text identifies sequences that were newly generated.
SpeciesCollectionsGenBank Accession Number
ITSnrLSU
Agaricus bisporusCCBAS306LN714517
Asterophora lycoperdoidesCBS17086AF357037AF223190
Asterophora parasiticaCBS68382AF357038AF223191
Calocybe aurantiacaSYAU-FUNGI-005KU528828KU528833
Calocybe aurantiacaSYAU-FUNGI-006NR_156304NG_058937
Calocybe badiofloccosaHMJU00098MN172332MN172334
Calocybe badiofloccosaBJTC FM2798PX220057
Calocybe badiofloccosaBJTC FM2808PX220058
Calocybe betulicolaHMJAU48265OR771918OR771923
Calocybe betulicolaHMJAU48266OR771919OR771924
Calocybe betulicolaHMJAU48267OR771920OR771925
Calocybe buxeaEB20140228KP885633KP885625
Calocybe carneaCBS55250AF357028AF223178
Calocybe coactaHMJU269OK649907OL687156
Calocybe coactaBJTC FM1437PX220060
Calocybe coactaBJTC FM1438PX220061
Calocybe coactaBJTC FM3594PX220062
Calocybe confusaBJTC FM3620PX220067PX220070
Calocybe confusaBJTC FM4040PX220068PX220071
Calocybe confusaBJTC FM4097 (Holotype)PX220069PX220072
Calocybe convexaSYAU-FUNGI-007KU528826KU528830
Calocybe convexaSYAU-FUNGI-008NR_156303NG_058936
Calocybe cyaneaK(M):56506OM905975
Calocybe cystidiosaHMJAU48268OR771915
Calocybe cystidiosaHMJAU48269(1)OR771916
Calocybe cystidiosaHMJAU48269(2)OR771917
Calocybe decolorataSYAU-FUNGI-003KU528824KU528834
Calocybe decolorataSYAU-FUNGI-004NR_156302NG_058938
Calocybe ermineaHMJU00100MN172331MN172333
Calocybe favreiHAe23497cpAF357034AF223183
Calocybe favreiIE-BSC-HC 96cp4EF421102AF223184
Calocybe fulvipesHMJU3027OK649910OK649880
Calocybe fulvipesHMJU317MT071590OK649878
Calocybe fulvipesBJTC FM3231PX220063
Calocybe gambosaHC78/64AF357027AF223177
Calocybe gangraenosaHae25197AF357032AF223202
Calocybe gangraenosaBJTC FM0090PX220064
Calocybe gangraenosaBJTC FM2885PX220065
Calocybe gangraenosaBJTC FM1154PX220066
Calocybe graveolensFR2014044KP192590
Calocybe graveolensBJTC FM0585PX220059
Calocybe ionidesBJTC FM0507PX220073
Calocybe ionidesBJTC FM0510PX220074
Calocybe ionidesBJTC FM0581PX220075
Calocybe ionidesH77/133AF357029AF223179
Calocybe lilaceaSYAU-FUNGI-070OM203538OM341407
Calocybe lilaceaSYAU-FUNGI-071OM203539OM341409
Calocybe longisterigmaSYAU-FUNGI-066OM203542OM341406
Calocybe longisterigmaSYAU-FUNGI-067OM203543OM341408
Calocybe naucoriaAMB17094KP885642KP885630
Calocybe naucoriaHC80/103AF357030AF223180
Calocybe obscurissimaHC79/181AF357031AF223181
Calocybe ochraceaBSI94.cp1AF357033AF223185
Calocybe onychinaCAON-RH19-563MW084664MW084704
Calocybe onychinaCL121115-07KP885644KP885632
Calocybe persicolorHC80/99AF357026AF223176
Calocybe pilosellaTR gmb 00697KJ883237
Calocybe pseudoflammulaFR2014100KP192649
Calocybe pseudoflammulaBJTC FM1450PX220056
Calocybe subochraceusSYAU-FUNGI-069OM203541
Calocybe vinaceaHMJU5135OK649908OK649876
Calocybe vinaceaHMJU5160OK649909OK649877
Calocybella pudicaAMB15994KP858000KP858005
Calocybella semitaleEL187-09HM572552
Calocybella semitaleHC85/13AF357049AF042581
Gerhardtia borealisAMB15993KP858004KP858009
Ossicaulis lignatilisD604DQ825426AF261397
Tephrocybe boudieriBSI96/84AF357047DQ825430
Tephrocybe gibberosaCBS328.50AF357041AF223197
Tephrocybe tylicolorBSI92/245AF357040AF223195
Tricholomella constrictaHC84/75DQ825429AF223188
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Huang, M.; Mao, N.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, L. Species Diversity of Calocybe (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from Shanxi Province of Northern China. Diversity 2025, 17, 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090619

AMA Style

Li T, Huang M, Mao N, Zhang Y, Fan L. Species Diversity of Calocybe (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from Shanxi Province of Northern China. Diversity. 2025; 17(9):619. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ting, Manrong Huang, Ning Mao, Yuxin Zhang, and Li Fan. 2025. "Species Diversity of Calocybe (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from Shanxi Province of Northern China" Diversity 17, no. 9: 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090619

APA Style

Li, T., Huang, M., Mao, N., Zhang, Y., & Fan, L. (2025). Species Diversity of Calocybe (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from Shanxi Province of Northern China. Diversity, 17(9), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop