Next Article in Journal
Diversity and Seasonal Variation in Live Baits Caught in Hann Bay, Dakar, Senegal
Previous Article in Journal
Sea Slugs (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) from the Medes Islands (Costa Brava, NE Spain): Biodiversity and Ecological Study over a Decade
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Decoupling Patterns and Drivers of Macrozoobenthos Taxonomic and Functional Diversity to Wetland Chronosequences in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas

1
School of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Jining 273165, China
2
College of Physical Education and Sport Science, Qufu Normal University, Jining 273165, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(9), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090607
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 26 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)

Abstract

Surface subsidence caused by coal mining activities generates diverse wetland ecosystems. These newly formed wetlands exhibit distinct environmental characteristics due to variations in subsidence age, resulting in divergent biological communities. While species adapt to environmental changes through specific functional trait combinations, the response of aquatic community functional diversity to environmental gradients across chronosequences of mining subsidence wetlands remains unclear. This study investigated 13 coal mining subsidence wetlands (1–18 years) of macrozoobenthos in Jining, China. Through seasonal monitoring, we analyzed functional traits along with taxonomic and functional diversity patterns. Initial-stage wetlands were dominated by medium-sized (63.9%) and tegument-respiring taxa, whereas late-stage wetlands exhibited a shift toward large-sized (43.9%) and gill-respiring groups. Both species richness and functional richness declined over time, with taxonomic diversity demonstrating greater sensitivity to subsidence age. Seasonal community variability was more pronounced in initial-stage wetlands (1–4 years post-subsidence). Despite increasing habitat heterogeneity with subsidence age, functional redundancy maintains ecosystem stability. The shared origin and developmental trajectory of these wetlands may constrain functional divergence. Current research predominantly relies on traditional taxonomic metrics, whereas our findings emphasize functional trait analysis’s importance for ecosystem assessment, which provides a theoretical framework for ecological restoration and biodiversity conservation in post-subsidence wetlands.

1. Introduction

Understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental change constitutes a central question in community ecology and conservation biology [1,2]. Wetlands, as critically important ecosystems, provide vital services to society [3,4,5], including carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, flood and drought mitigation, water purification, and the maintenance of biodiversity [6,7,8,9,10]. Characterized by high productivity, diverse habitats, and abundant water resources, wetlands sustain unique and rich biodiversity, which in turn constitute key elements in sustaining wetland ecosystem functioning [11]. For example, some studies have shown that differences in ecosystem function among different life forms due to plant phylogeny or plant adaptations to the environment, and the complex interactions between species of different functional groups in natural ecosystems can have significant effects on the structure and function of ecosystems [12,13]. However, wetlands are also among the ecosystems most heavily impacted by human activities and are experiencing unprecedented degradation and loss [14,15]. China experienced a net loss of 60.9 × 103 km2 in wetland area from 1980 to 2020 [16]. In this context, constructed and newly formed wetlands have gained increasing attention as complementary or alternative systems to natural wetlands, given their ecological functions and conservation values [17,18,19].
Coal mining subsidence areas are depressions formed by vertical ground subsidence resulting from stress redistribution in overlying strata after underground coal extraction [20,21]. These topographically low-lying areas readily accumulate precipitation and groundwater, forming waterlogged zones that gradually develop into the newly formed wetlands through hydrological accumulation and ecological succession, characterized by inundated environments, hydric soils, and wetland vegetation communities [22,23]. For example, several end-pit lakes in the Rocky Mountain foothills of west-central Alberta, Canada [24], coal-mining ponds in southern Brazil [25], and coal mining basins within the Czech Republic [22] are all formed in this way. Notably, mining subsidence wetlands (MSWs) differ substantially from natural wetlands. First, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of mining activities leads to significant variations in subsidence age, developmental stage, and environmental conditions [26,27]. Second, wetland stability varies with the time since subsidence: initial-stage wetlands exhibit hydrological fluctuations and unstable substrate structures, whereas late-stage wetlands demonstrate community stability comparable to natural wetlands, attributable to sediment compaction and organic matter accumulation that create stable microhabitats [28,29]. This unique formation mechanism likely results in biological communities with distinct characteristics from those in natural wetlands [27]. Critically, coal mining subsidence acts as a key driver shaping macrozoobenthos assemblages in these newly formed wetlands. The pronounced spatiotemporal heterogeneity in environmental features and biological communities across different subsidence chronosequences provides a natural laboratory for studying community responses to environmental changes [27].
Functional traits and functional diversity provide powerful analytical tools for elucidating how environmental changes drive community responses and associated ecosystem processes [30,31]. Ecological traits (e.g., feeding habitats, habit) regulate species’ adaptive capacity to habitat environmental changes [32,33], while life-history traits (e.g., voltinism, growth rate) reflect species-specific strategies shaped by long-term environmental adaptation, offering critical insights into habitat filtering and species interactions during community assembly [34]. In wetland ecosystems, macrozoobenthos functional diversity often exhibits greater resistance to disturbances than taxonomic diversity [35]. For instance, under eutrophication stress, functional redundancy enables pollution-tolerant species (e.g., chironomid larvae, tubificid worms) to maintain organic matter decomposition through similar filter-feeding strategies, thereby stabilizing ecosystem functioning during initial species loss [36,37,38]. However, when environmental pressures directly target key functional traits (e.g., drought eliminating gill-breathing bivalves), functional diversity responds more rapidly, serving as a better early-warning indicator of ecosystem degradation than species diversity [39]. This demonstrates that functional diversity simultaneously reflects ecosystem buffering capacity and sensitivity to specific stressors [39,40]. Despite these advantages, current assessments of community succession still predominantly rely on traditional taxonomic metrics, with limited application of trait-based approaches [41,42].
Macrozoobenthos constitute a vital component of freshwater wetland ecosystems. Their widespread distribution, ease of collection, and sensitivity to environmental changes make them excellent bioindicators for monitoring aquatic ecosystem health [43,44,45,46]. Occupying intermediate trophic levels, macrozoobenthos play crucial roles in energy flow and nutrient cycling, thereby maintaining critical wetland ecosystem functions [47]. The functional trait combinations of wetland macrozoobenthos typically reflect adaptations to stagnant, low-oxygen environments [48]. Body size demonstrates clear environmental filtering: small-bodied taxa (e.g., chironomid larvae) dominate hydrologically unstable temporary habitats, while large species prevail in stable water bodies [49]. Respiratory types vary from cutaneous respiration (e.g., oligochaetes, chironomids) to specialized gills or spiracles that enhance oxygen uptake under hypoxic conditions. Macrozoobenthos feeding habits can affect secondary productivity and the nutrient cycle [50]. These functional trait patterns not only reveal environmental filtering mechanisms but also provide novel quantitative metrics for wetland health assessment [49,51].
Wetland ecosystems in temperate climate zones exhibit pronounced seasonal dynamics [52]. This study investigates the temporal patterns of macrozoobenthos functional diversity during ecosystem development in MSWs of temperate regions through multi-seasonal sampling. Considering the habitat heterogeneity and water parameter variations caused by different subsidence ages, this study proposes three hypotheses: (1) habitat complexity and stability increase with the time since subsidence, leading to higher taxonomic and functional diversity in older subsidence wetlands [37,53]; (2) functional diversity indices will show greater sensitivity to subsidence age than taxonomic diversity, as functional traits directly reflect species’ environmental adaptation strategies; (3) younger subsidence wetlands (initial stage) exhibit stronger seasonal fluctuations in species composition, taxonomic diversity, and functional diversity compared to mature wetlands, owing to their greater environmental instability. This study not only analyzes taxonomic diversity, but also explores the response patterns of functional diversity of macrozoobenthos in temperate coal mining subsidence wetlands along the subsidence age gradient through multi-season functional trait analysis. This not only provides new insights into the theory of wetland ecological succession but also makes significant contributions to both fundamental research and practical applications in wetland ecology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling Design

Based on field surveys and remote sensing interpretation, we selected 13 MSWs (1–18 years post-subsidence) in Jining City (35°40′80″~35°52′78″ N, 116°80′82″~116°88′34″ E; Figure 1; Table A1) for macrozoobenthos surveys during spring (May), summer (July), autumn (September), and winter (December) of 2024. Located in the temperate climate zone of China, Jining experiences hot rainy summers and cold dry winters, with mean annual precipitation of 600 mm and average temperatures of 13.5–15 °C [54]. These wetlands were all formed by coal mining-induced subsidence and were originally farmland prior to subsidence [27]. They exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity in area (0.0287–1.42 km2) and hydrological connectivity. Water sources primarily included precipitation and groundwater, with some wetlands connected to adjacent water systems via artificial channels. Dominant vegetation comprised emergent plants (Phragmites australis, Typha angustifolia), accompanied by floating species (Trapa bispinosa, Lemna minor). Surrounding landscapes were predominantly agricultural (corn–wheat rotation systems), with scattered villages and plantation forests [27].
Due to spatiotemporal variations in underground coal mining activities, surface subsidence in Jining’s coal mining areas occurred during different stages. Based on field conditions and subsidence age, we classified these MSWs into three distinct successional stages:
Initial stage (IS, five wetlands with a subsidence history of 1–4 years): Characterized by small wetland areas and fragile ecosystems, these wetlands exhibit strong hydrological dependence on precipitation and may experience complete drying during prolonged droughts. The aquatic vegetation is dominated by Phragmites australis and Typha angustifolia, forming relatively simple plant communities.
Middle stage (MS, four wetlands with a subsidence history of 5–10 years): These wetlands represent a transitional stage of dynamic development, where continued subsidence leads to gradual expansion of wetland area and improved environmental stability. While Phragmites australis and Typha angustifolia remain dominant, the vegetation begins to show increased structural complexity compared to IS.
Late stage (LS, four wetlands with a subsidence history of more than 15 years post-subsidence): Subsidence processes are largely complete, resulting in well-developed “subsidence lakes” with extensive shoreline vegetation. Distinct zonation patterns emerge, dominated by bands of Phragmites australis community and Typha angustifolia community. Some sites develop submerged macrophytes including Stuckenia pectinata and Potamogeton crispus. However, these wetlands often display reduced community complexity, tending toward homogeneous, single-dominant plant communities.

2.2. Sample Collection and Processing

Three sampling sites were randomly established in each newly formed wetland. At each site, three replicate samples were collected using a 1/40 Peterson grab sampler (Wildlife Supply Company, Yulee, USA) (following a shallow-to-deep gradient) and subsequently pooled into a single composite sample. The collected samples were sieved through a 250-μm mesh sieve, transferred to sealed bags, and preserved in 75% ethanol. Macrozoobenthos identification was conducted following relevant taxonomic keys and literature [55,56,57,58] in the laboratory. Morphological identification was primarily performed using stereomicroscopes and compound microscopes. Specifically, aquatic oligochaetes and chironomid larvae were identified under a compound microscope, while hirudineans, gastropods, and most aquatic insects were examined using a SOPTOP SZN stereomicroscope (SOPTOP, Ningbo, China). Specimens were classified into the lowest feasible taxonomic level (usually at genus level). Furthermore, all benthic organisms from each sampling site were enumerated, with counts recorded for each taxonomic unit. For fragmented specimens, only heads were counted while tails were disregarded. For data analysis, densities were standardized to individuals per square meter (ind./m2).

2.3. Measurement of Environmental Variables

A total of seven environmental variables were measured, including physical and water chemistry variables. Physical habitat variables comprised soil organic matter (SOM), while water physicochemical variables included pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (Cond), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a). In situ measurements of Cond, pH, DO were conducted using a DZB-718 portable multiparameter water quality analyzer (Shanghai Yidian Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Prior to biological sampling, 1 L water samples were collected for laboratory analysis of TN, TP, and Chl-a, which were measured according to APHA (2012) [59].
The formation time of newly formed wetlands was determined through a visual interpretation of satellite imagery (2006–2024, sourced from the Geospatial Data Cloud platform) based on established interpretation keys using ArcGIS 10.8 software. Additionally, the surface area of subsidence wetlands in 2024 was measured using the area calculation tool in ArcGIS.

2.4. Functional Traits

A total of five functional traits with 19 trait categories were selected, and were known to be sensitive to environmental changes: body size, respiration type, functional feeding groups (FFG), shape, and habit (Table 1). Following the approach of Colzani et al. [60], each trait category was assigned a binary score (0, 1, 2,…). Trait classification and scoring were primarily derived from published literature [58,61].

2.5. Data Analysis

2.5.1. Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Composition

The functional trait composition of macrozoobenthos was characterized using the Community-Weighted Mean (CWM). CWM was calculated based on two data matrices: a community composition matrix (sites × species) and a functional trait matrix (species × traits), implemented via the “dbFD” function in the R package.
An analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) was applied to examine differences in taxonomic and functional composition among wetlands at three subsidence stages. The Global R statistic indicates the magnitude of dissimilarity, quantifying the ratio between among-group differences and within-group differences. Global R ≈ 1 signifies that among-group differences significantly exceed within-group differences, indicating a strong influence of the grouping factor on community structure. Conversely, Global R ≈ 0 suggests no significant distinction between among-group and within-group differences, implying negligible grouping effects. Permutation tests were used to assess whether among-group differences were significantly greater than within-group differences. p ≤ 0.05 indicates that the grouping factor significantly influenced community structure, while p > 0.05 suggests non-significant grouping effects. Prior to analysis, both community data and trait data (CWM) were log(x + 1)-transformed. These analyses were performed using the “anosim” function in the R (version 4.4.1) package vegan.

2.5.2. Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Diversity

Taxonomic diversity of macrozoobenthos in MSWs was assessed using species richness, Pielou’s evenness index (J) [62], Shannon–Wiener index (H′) [63], and Simpson index. Species with relative abundance exceeding 10% were classified as dominant. These analyses were conducted in Primer6.
Functional diversity was characterized using functional richness (FRic), functional evenness index (FEve), and functional dispersion index (FDis). The CWM values represented the mean percentage contribution of each trait within a given trait category. These analyses were implemented via the “dbFD” function in the R package.
Following the framework for studying functional diversity and redundancy proposed by Ricotta et al. [64,65], we calculated the functional redundancy index. Quadratic Entropy Index (RaoQ) and Simpson index were used to measure functional diversity (DF) and taxonomic diversity (DS) within individual communities, respectively. The functional redundancy index (FRI) was computed as: FRI = 1 − DF/DS. RaoQ was implemented via the “dbFD” function in the R package and other analyses were conducted using the “gdm” package in the R package.

2.5.3. Statistical Analysis of Key Drivers

Constrained ordination analysis (CCA) was employed to examine the relationships between macrozoobenthos community taxonomic and functional composition, and environmental variables, respectively. First, to improve data normality and homoscedasticity, environmental variables (except pH), community data, and trait data were log(x + 1)-transformed. Highly correlated environmental variables (|r| > 0.70) were excluded. Correlation analyses were performed using the “Hmisc” package in the R package.
Subsequently, detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was applied to macrozoobenthos community and trait data to determine the maximum axis length. If the maximum axis length exceeded 4, CCA was selected; if it was less than 3, redundancy analysis (RDA) was chosen; and if it fell between 3 and 4, either method was appropriate [66]. DCA was conducted using the “decorana” function, while CCA and RDA were performed using the “cca” and “rda” functions, respectively, in the R package (version 4.4.1) vegan (https://www.r-project.org/ accessed on 1 June 2024).

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Variables

The results demonstrated that the area progressively expanded with increasing duration of coal mining subsidence. Significant differences (p < 0.05, Figure 2) were observed in water chemistry parameters (Cond (Figure 2a), DO (Figure 2b), TP (Figure 2c), Chl-a (Figure 2d)), and physical factors (SOM (Figure 2e)) among wetlands with different subsidence age. Post hoc comparisons revealed that DO, TP, Chl-a and SOM exhibited lower values in IS compared to LS, whereas Cond showed an opposite trend with higher values in IS. Regarding seasonal variations, Chl-a and Cond displayed higher values in IS during spring and winter, while DO, TP, and SOM exhibited lower values in IS during summer and autumn.

3.2. Taxonomic Composition and Functional Composition

The macrozoobenthos we identified belong to 12 orders and 25 families. (Table A2). Aquatic insects dominated the community, primarily represented by Diptera (39.29%) and Odonata (10.71%). Significant differences in species richness were observed among different subsidence stages (p < 0.05), with the highest richness in IS (44 species, 78.57%), followed by LS (33 species, 58.93%) and MS (32 species, 57.14%). Seasonal analysis revealed that MS had lower species richness than IS and LS during spring, autumn, and winter, but exhibited higher richness during summer (Figure 3a).
ANOSIM analysis showed significant differences in taxonomic and functional compositions among all newly formed wetlands during summer (Global R = 0.219, p = 0.001 for taxonomic; Global R = 0.116, p < 0.01 for function) (Table 2). Significant differences in taxonomic composition were also detected in winter (Global R = 0.236, p = 0.001), while functional composition differed significantly across all seasons (Global R = 0.086, p < 0.05) (Table 2). Dominant groups shifted with subsidence age: Chironomus, Glyptotendipes, and Enfeldia dominated IS; Glyptotendipes, Polypedilum, and Propsilocerus were predominant in MS; while Chironomus, Glyptotendipes, and Propsilocerus prevailed in LS (Table A3).
Functional trait analysis revealed distinct patterns across three subsidence stages (Figure 4, Table A4). Body size composition showed medium-sized organisms (9–16 mm) predominated throughout all stages, though their relative abundance decreased progressively from IS (63.9%), MS (53.1%) to LS (44.1%). Conversely, large-bodied species (>16 mm) exhibited a consistent increase along the subsidence chronosequence, rising from 17.5% in IS to 43.9% in LS. Respiration types were dominated by integumentary respiration, maintaining high proportions in both IS (84.7%) and LS (80.6%). Notably, branchial respirers demonstrated significant increases during wetland maturation, expanding from 7.0% to 16.2% of the community. Functional feeding groups displayed temporal dynamics, with gatherer-collectors (GC) peaking in MS (64.56%). IS communities showed elevated proportions of both shredders (SH, 26.1%) and predators (PR, 17.3%) compared to other stages. Morphological analysis revealed near-complete dominance (>95%) of non-streamlined body shapes across all stages, with streamlined forms occurring only marginally (4%) in IS and MS. Life habit composition remained relatively stable, with burrowers consistently representing the dominant group (56.8–63.2% across stages), followed by sprawlers (29%). This persistence suggests habitat architecture may maintain consistent niche availability despite successional changes.

3.3. Taxonomic and Functional Diversity

The results revealed significant differences in the species richness and Shannon–Wiener index across three subsidence stages (p < 0.05), while no significant variation was observed in Pielou’s evenness index (Figure 3). Notably, both the species richness and Shannon–Wiener index were significantly higher in IS compared to MS (p < 0.05). Seasonal analysis demonstrated that the Shannon–Wiener index was lower in MS during spring, autumn, and winter, but exhibited an opposite pattern in summer when MS exhibited higher values than both IS and LS (Figure 3).
FEve showed significant differences among three subsidence stages of wetlands (p < 0.05), with IS displaying significantly higher values than MS. However, neither FRic nor FDiv exhibited significant differences across subsidence stages (Figure 3). Moreover, we found significant seasonal differences in FEve for IS, and significant seasonal differences in both FRic and FDiv for LS.
The FRI medians varied across the three subsidence stages. The IS and LS exhibited relatively similar median values, while the MS showed a slightly lower median. There is greater dispersion in the MS data. In contrast, the IS and LS demonstrated more clustered data distributions (Figure 5). Numerically, LS had the highest FRI, whereas the MS recorded the lowest values (Table A5).

3.4. Key Drivers in Shaping Taxonomic and Functional Variation

Overall, the CCA of annual macrozoobenthos taxonomic composition revealed that environmental factors collectively explained 35.21% of the community structure variation. The first and second axes accounted for 24.75% and 20% of the variance, respectively (Figure 6e). Key environmental drivers significantly affecting taxonomic composition included: TN (F = 2.000, p < 0.01), Chl-a (F = 2.363, p < 0.01), pH (F = 2.001, p < 0.01), Cond (F = 2.584, p < 0.01), DO (F = 1.902, p < 0.01), subsidence age (F = 2.138, p < 0.01), and area (F = 2.122, p < 0.01) (Figure 6, Table 3). For functional composition, CCA indicated environmental factors explained 45.64% of total variation, with the first two axes contributing 36.62% and 24.87% of explanatory power (Figure 7e). Three factors emerged as significant determinants: TN (F = 6.121, p = 0.001), Cond (F = 4.981, p = 0.001), and subsidence age (F = 4.081, p = 0.001) (Figure 7, Table 3).
Subsidence age significantly affected across spring, summer, and autumn, while TP, TN, and Cond showed pronounced influences in most seasons. Chl-a was an important factor during spring and autumn. Notably, functional composition was more sensitive to subsidence age and Cond than species composition, particularly in summer and autumn (Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table 3).

4. Discussion

Functional traits reflect species’ responses to environmental changes [31,67]. To understand how functional traits mediate species’ responses to these changes is crucial for predicting ecosystem dynamics and guiding conservation efforts. Therefore, this study compared macrozoobenthos community diversity across different subsidence stages of MSWs from functional traits and diversity perspectives, while investigating key influencing factors. Our findings revealed the following: (1) As the subsidence age increased, the species richness and FRic of the MSWs showed a declining trend, with biodiversity in LS being lower than IS. (2) Taxonomic diversity metrics were more sensitive to the subsidence age than functional diversity metrics. (3) Wetlands in LS exhibited significant environmental fluctuations, with seasonal variations in species composition and functional diversity being markedly greater than in wetlands in LS. This outcome validated the research hypothesis. The study elucidates the temporal evolution patterns of functional traits in macrozoobenthos in MSWs, providing a new evaluation dimension—functional diversity—for the ecological assessment of such wetlands. It holds significant theoretical value for understanding the succession mechanisms of wetland ecosystems under human-induced disturbances.
Our study reveals distinct patterns in the functional trait composition of macrozoobenthos across three subsidence stages of MSWs. The community was dominated by medium-sized organisms (9–16 mm), though the proportion of large-bodied taxa (>16 mm) increased significantly with subsidence age. Since large species typically exhibit higher individual biomass, this shift suggests enhanced secondary productivity and potential impacts on nutrient cycling through altered excretion patterns, indicating progressive ecosystem stabilization during succession [49,68,69]. Respiratory adaptations showed a clear temporal trend: while integumentary respiration remained predominant overall, branchial respirers increased markedly in LS, likely reflecting improved water quality and dissolved oxygen conditions [69]. Functional feeding groups varied significantly, with collector-gatherers peaking in MS, while shredders and predators were relatively more abundant in IS. Morphologically, non-streamlined body shapes dominated across all stages and burrowing was the prevalent life habit, probably due to stable sedimentary environments with high substrate heterogeneity [50]. Notably, the dominant functional trait combination (medium size, integumentary respiration, collector-gatherer feeding, non-streamlined shape, and burrowing habit) consistently matched the biological characteristics of Chironomidae larvae, the taxonomically dominant group across all subsidence stages. This finding aligns with the conclusion of Zhang et al. [27] regarding the persistent dominance of chironomids throughout wetlands’ development in MSWs.
Contrary to our first hypothesis, we found that both species richness and FRic of macrozoobenthos exhibited declining trends with wetland maturation (Figure 3), despite increasing ecosystem stability. This counterintuitive pattern can be attributed to several ecological processes: Chironomid larvae, the dominant taxa across all subsidence stages, possess unique life history strategies that facilitate cross-ecosystem dispersal and rapid colonization of newly formed aquatic habitats [70,71,72,73]. Functional trait analysis revealed that IS were characterized by medium-sized organisms (63.9% of community composition), dominance of integumentary respiration (84.7%—an adaptation to fluctuating water conditions), and relatively high proportions of shredders (26.1%) and predators (17.3%), likely supported by abundant organic matter inputs from surrounding agricultural lands and elevated nitrogen/conductivity levels. The high FRic (Figure 3) in IS probably resulted from both elevated habitat heterogeneity creating diverse microhabitats and resource availability supporting multiple feeding guilds. In contrast, LS exhibited environmental homogenization (stable conditions with low conductivity and high dissolved oxygen) and monodominant vegetation stands (primarily Phragmites australis and Typha angustifolia), leading to strong habitat filtering that was selected for only a few tolerant trait combinations (e.g., medium body size, burrowing habit). This successional trajectory toward reduced functional diversity despite ecosystem stabilization aligns with established theories of environmental filtering in anthropogenic wetlands [27,28,29,37], demonstrating how heterogeneous habitats can override expected biodiversity increases during ecosystem development.
Taxonomic diversity metrics exhibited greater sensitivity to subsidence age than functional diversity indices. CCA revealed that macrozoobenthos community composition was significantly influenced (p < 0.01) by multiple environmental parameters (TN, Chl-a, pH, Cond, DO, and subsidence age) (Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table 3), with their synergistic effects driving pronounced compositional changes over time. In contrast, functional diversity showed delayed responses to environmental changes, likely due to buffering effects from functional redundancy within ecosystems (Figure 5, Table A5) [38,39,74]. Although species richness declined across successional stages, dominant taxa (particularly Chironomus and Glyptotendipes) consistently maintained core functional traits including medium body size, integumentary respiration, collector-gatherer feeding and burrowing habits (Figure 4, Table A4). This functional conservatism suggests that key ecological processes may persist despite taxonomic turnover [75], demonstrating how functional redundancy buffers against short-term impacts of species loss [38]. Notably, LS showed increased proportions of large-bodied (>16 mm) and branchial-respiring taxa (Table A4), whose traits may functionally compensate for diversity declines [76,77], thereby maintaining stable FDiv. These findings collectively suggest that while taxonomic diversity reflects direct environmental filtering effects in newly formed wetlands, the relative stability of functional diversity underscores ecosystem resilience through dual mechanisms of functional redundancy and trait compensation [38,39].
Our results confirm the hypothesis that IS exhibit greater seasonal fluctuations in taxonomic diversity and functional diversity compared to mature systems (Figure 3). The initial high FRic in the newly formed wetlands was sustained by nutrient inputs from agricultural surroundings and diverse microhabitats supporting multiple functional groups. However, progressive heterogeneous habitats (e.g., Phragmites-dominated monocultures) and intensified environmental filtering (e.g., trait selection under stable low Cond/high DO conditions) gradually reduced functional space volume over time [27,28]. The elevated FEve observed in IS (Figure 3e) suggests equitable trait distribution among pioneer species under resource-abundant conditions, while its subsequent decline reflects competitive exclusion-induced functional convergence, followed by slight recovery indicating potential niche differentiation. The consistently stable FDiv (Figure 3f) likely stems from the persistence of core functional traits (medium body size, burrowing habit) in dominant taxa throughout succession, complemented by LS additions of large-bodied and branchial-respiring species [75]. IS ecosystems, characterized by unstable hydrology, pronounced microtopographic variation, and low functional redundancy, showed amplified seasonal responses due to their transient microhabitats and limited buffering capacity. In contrast, mature wetlands demonstrated dampened seasonal variability through stabilized environmental conditions, enhanced community resistance, and developed biotic interactions [11,78]. This developmental trajectory from highly dynamic pioneer systems to stable mature ecosystems illustrates how anthropogenic wetlands gradually acquire natural-like stability over decadal timescales, with the attenuation of seasonal biodiversity fluctuations serving as a key indicator of ecosystem maturation in post-subsidence wetlands.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that both coal mining subsidence and natural factors serve as key drivers shaping functional diversity patterns in macrozoobenthos communities across different stages of MSWs. During IS and MS, mining-induced disturbances and natural variability (e.g., seasonal changes) indirectly influence functional diversity by mediating dramatic fluctuations in habitat characteristics. As wetlands mature into LS, natural biological processes (particularly species life history strategies) emerge as the predominant factor governing functional diversity patterns. These findings reveal the complex interplay of anthropogenic and natural forces in structuring functional diversity within MSWs, providing novel insights into the formation and maintenance of biodiversity in these unique ecosystems. By elucidating the ecological narrative of subsidence wetlands across their developmental trajectory, our work establishes both theoretical foundations and practical guidelines for ecosystem assessment and restoration in post-subsidence wetlands, while contributing to the broader understanding of anthropogenic wetland ecology. Furthermore, we reinforce the necessity of a pluralistic approach, considering both taxonomic and functional aspects of biodiversity in ecosystem management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z.; methodology, G.Z., F.S. and N.Y.; software, N.Y. and T.W.; validation, G.Z., N.Y. and T.W.; formal analysis, N.Y. and T.W.; investigation, N.Y., T.W. and W.J.; resources, G.Z.; data curation, N.Y. and T.W.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Y.; writing—review and editing, G.Z.; visualization, N.Y.; supervision, G.Z.; project administration, G.Z.; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2022QD124).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yinuo Zhang, Ying Cao, and Jiayi Zhu for their assistance in sample identification.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MSWsMining subsidence wetlands
ISInitial stage
MSMiddle stage
LSLate stage
SOMSoil organic matter
DODissolved oxygen
CondElectrical conductivity
TNTotal nitrogen
TPTotal phosphorus
Chl-aChlorophyll-a
CWMCommunity-Weighted Mean of traits
ANOSIMAnalysis of similarities
JPielou’s evenness index
H′Shannon–Wiener index
FRicFunctional richness
FEveFunctional evenness index
FDisFunctional dispersion index
RaoQRao’s Quadratic Entropy Index
FRIFunctional redundancy index
DCADetrended correspondence analysis
CCACanonical correspondence analysis
RDARedundancy analysis

Appendix A

Table A1. Site characteristics of the studied MSWs in Jining City, China.
Table A1. Site characteristics of the studied MSWs in Jining City, China.
SampleArea (km2)Subsidence Age (Years)Subsidence StageDominant Vegetation
A0.1319 5Middle stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia
B0.06765Middle stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Potamogeton crispus, Ceratophyllum demersum, Najas marina
C0.03011Initial stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Potamogeton crispus, Echinochloa caudata, Abutilon theophrasti
D0.06282Initial stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Persicaria lapathifolia, Echinochloa caudata, Cyperus rotundus, Abutilon theophrasti
E0.03683Initial stageNelumbo nucifera, Typha angustifolia, Persicaria lapathifolia, Echinochloa caudata, Euryale ferox
F0.03131Initial stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Lemna minor, Echinochloa crus-galli, Persicaria lapathifolia, Alternanthera philoxeroides
G0.01706Middle stageNelumbo nucifera, Phragmites australis, Cyperus glomeratus, Echinochloa caudata, Persicaria lapathifolia, Potentilla supina
H0.52492Initial stagePhragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Trapa bispinosa, Echinochloa caudata, Persicaria lapathifolia
I0.028717Late stageNelumbo nucifera, Phragmites australis, Bidens frondosa, Echinochloa caudata, Stuckenia pectinata, Cyperus glomeratus, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Potamogeton crispus
J1.130018Late stagePhragmites australis, Echinochloa caudata, Cyperus glomeratus
K0.579118Late stagePhragmites australis
L0.07586Middle stagePhragmites australis, Trapa bispinosa
M1.420018Late stagePhragmites australis
Table A2. Taxonomic list and functional traits of macrozoobenthos of three stages of mining subsidence wetlands.
Table A2. Taxonomic list and functional traits of macrozoobenthos of three stages of mining subsidence wetlands.
Initial StageMiddle StageLate StageBody SizeRespiration TypeFunctional Feeding GroupsShapeHabit
Annelida
 Oligochaeta
   Dero+ SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Haemonais+ SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Nais+ SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Branchiura sowerbyi+++LargeBranchialGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Aulodrilus pluriseta+ LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Limnodrilus+ LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Limnodrilus grandisetosus ++LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Limnodrilus claparedeianus+++LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri+++LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
 Hirudinida
  Glossiphonia+ MediumIntegumentaryPRnot streamlinedClingers
  Barbronia+ MediumIntegumentaryPRnot streamlinedClingers
Mollusca
 Gastropoda
 Mesogastropoda
  Parafossarulus striatulus ++MediumBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Semisulcospira ningpoensis + LargeBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
   Cipangopaludina chinensis ++LargeBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Bellamya quadrata+++LargeBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Radix lagotis+++LargeBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Hippeutis cantori+ +SmallBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Hippeutis umbilicalis + SmallBranchialSCnot streamlinedSprawlers
 Bivalvia
 Unionida
  Anodonta woodiana wodiana+ +LargeBranchialFCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Anodont arcaeformis +LargeBranchialFCnot streamlinedBurrowers
Arthropoda
 Insecta
 Ephemeroptera
  Baetidae+ SmallAirGCstreamlinedSwimmers
 Trichoptera
  Macrostemum + SmallAirSCnot streamlinedClingers
 Odonata
  Gomphidae + MediumAirPRnot streamlinedDivers
  Libellula++ LargeAirPRnot streamlinedDivers
  Orthetrum+++LargeAirPRnot streamlinedDivers
  Coenagrion +MediumAirPRstreamlinedDivers
  Ischnura + MediumAirPRstreamlinedDivers
  Erythromma + LargeAirPRstreamlinedDivers
 Coleoptera
  Chrysomelidae+ +SmallAirPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Elmidae+ SmallAirSCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Staphylinidae+ LargeAirPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
 Hemiptera
  Sphaerodema+ LargeAirPRstreamlinedSwimmers
  Micronectra++ SmallAirPRstreamlinedSwimmers
 Lepidoptera
  Parapoynx+ LargeAirSHnot streamlinedSprawlers
 Diptera
  Ceratopogonidae +++SmallAirPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Dolichopodidae+ MediumAirPRnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Ephydridae+ +MediumAirSHnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Tabanidae+ +MediumAirPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
Chironomidae
  Chironomus+++MediumIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Cladopelma+++SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Cladotanytarsus+++SmallIntegumentaryFCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Rheotanytarsus++ SmallIntegumentaryFCnot streamlinedClingers
  Cryptochironomus+ +SmallIntegumentaryPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Cryptotendipes+++SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Dicrotendipes+++MediumIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Enfeldia+++MediumIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Endochironomus+ +MediumIntegumentarySHnot streamlinedClingers
  Glyptotendipes+++MediumIntegumentarySHnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Microchironomus+ SmallIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedBurrowers
  Microtendipes +SmallIntegumentaryFCnot streamlinedClingers
  Polypedilum+++MediumIntegumentarySHnot streamlinedClimbers
  Tanytarsus+++SmallIntegumentaryFCnot streamlinedClimbers
  Cricotopus+++SmallIntegumentarySHnot streamlinedClingers
  Propsilocerus+++LargeIntegumentaryGCnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Procladius+++MediumIntegumentaryPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
  Tanypus+++MediumIntegumentaryPRnot streamlinedSprawlers
Table A3. Dominant groups across different subsidence stages of MSWs.
Table A3. Dominant groups across different subsidence stages of MSWs.
Dominant Groups
Initial stageChironomus, Glyptotendipes, Enfeldia
Middle stageGlyptotendipes, Polypedilum, Propsilocerus
Late stageChironomus, Glyptotendipes, Propsilocerus
Table A4. Mean percentage composition of functional traits in macrozoobenthos communities across different subsidence stages of MSWs.
Table A4. Mean percentage composition of functional traits in macrozoobenthos communities across different subsidence stages of MSWs.
TraitCategoryInitial StageMiddle StageLate Stage
Body sizeSmall18.60010.70012.000
Medium63.90053.10044.100
Large 17.50036.20043.900
Respiration typeIntegumentary84.70082.11080.600
Branchial7.0009.74016.200
Air8.3008.1503.200
Functional Collector-gatherers (GC)49.10064.56056.660
feeding groupsCollector-filterers (FC)2.7003.7702.930
Scrapers (SC)4.8007.3506.830
Predators (PR)17.3006.4209.780
Shredders (SH)26.10017.90023.800
ShapeStreamlined4.0004.4000.500
Not Streamlined96.00095.60099.500
HabitClimbers4.91010.4005.670
Burrowers56.76552.92063.200
Sprawlers29.10028.80029.200
Clingers4.5502.2101.190
Swimmers3.9901.9200.000
Divers0.6853.7500.740
Table A5. FRI of macrozoobenthos communities in MSWs at each stage across different seasons.
Table A5. FRI of macrozoobenthos communities in MSWs at each stage across different seasons.
SpringSummerAutumnWinterAverage
Initial stage0.430.330.40.340.375
Middle stage0.230.330.240.40.3
Late stage0.330.550.30.430.4025

References

  1. Jackson, S.T.; Sax, D.F. Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: Extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, H.; Chase, J.M.; Liao, J. Habitat amount modulates biodiversity responses to fragmentation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 8, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Delle Grazie, F.M.; Gill, L.W. Review of the Ecosystem Services of Temperate Wetlands and Their Valuation Tools. Water 2022, 14, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maltby, E.; Acreman, M.C. Ecosystem services of wetlands: Pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2011, 56, 1341–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tuji, A.; Jacobs, S.M.; Malgas, R.R.; Dzama, K.; Alamirew, T. Effects of land-use change on the provisioning ecosystem service of wetlands: The case of a social-ecological systems perspective of Boyo Wetland in Ethiopia. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2024, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Betancur, T.; Bocanegra, E.; Custodio, E.; Manzano, M.; Silva, G.C.d. Estado y factores de cambio de los servicios ecosistémicos de aprovisionamiento en humedales relacionados con aguas subterráneas en Iberoamérica y España. Biota Colomb. 2016, 17, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cejudo, E.; Bravo-Mendoza, M.; Gomez-Ramírez, J.J.; Acosta-González, G. Water retention and soil organic carbon storage in tropical karst wetlands in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 32, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Céréghino, R.; Biggs, J.; Oertli, B.; Declerck, S. The ecology of European ponds: Defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 2007, 597, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Portalanza, D.; Torres-Ulloa, M.; Arias-Hidalgo, M.; Piza, C.; Villa-Cox, G.; Garcés-Fiallos, F.R.; Álava, E.; Durigon, A.; Espinel, R. Ecosystem services valuation in the Abras de Mantequilla wetland system: A comprehensive analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zilli, F.L.; Fernández, F. Factors explaining the diversity of invertebrates inhabiting woods in the Paraná River wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 31, 595–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zedler, J.B.; Kercher, S. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 2005, 30, 39–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thébault, E.; Loreau, M. Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 14949–14954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Z.; Yang, H.; Mao, H.; Peng, Q.; Yang, S.; Chou, Q.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wei, L. Environment and time drive the links between the species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality from multitrophic freshwater mesocosms. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1125705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fluet-Chouinard, E.; Stocker, B.D.; Zhang, Z.; Malhotra, A.; Melton, J.R.; Poulter, B.; Kaplan, J.O.; Goldewijk, K.K.; Siebert, S.; Minayeva, T.; et al. Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 2023, 614, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moreno-Mateos, D.; Power, M.E.; Comín, F.A.; Yockteng, R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mao, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Yuan, W.; Luo, L.; Feng, K.; Wang, D.; Xiang, H.; Ren, Y.; et al. The trajectory of wetland change in China between 1980 and 2020: Hidden losses and restoration effects. Sci. Bull. 2025, 70, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.M.; Liu, G.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Q.; Yan, N.; Agostinho, F.; Almeida, C.M.V.B.; Giannetti, B.F. Urban constructed wetlands: Assessing ecosystem services and disservices for safe, resilient, and sustainable cities. Front. Eng. Manag. 2023, 10, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, H.; Wang, R.; Yan, P.; Wu, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, C.; Hu, Z.; Zhuang, L.; Guo, Z.; et al. Constructed wetlands for pollution control. Nature 2023, 4, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, W.; Chang, J.; Xu, B.; Peng, C.; Ge, Y. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Z.; Xiao, W. Optimization of concurrent mining and reclamation plans for single coal seam: A case study in northern Anhui, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 68, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhao, Y. Dynamic monitoring of land subsidence in mining area from multi-source remote-sensing data—A case study at Yanzhou, China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33, 5528–5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harabiš, F. High diversity of odonates in post-mining areas: Meta-analysis uncovers potential pitfalls associated with the formation and management of valuable habitats. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Harabiš, F.; Tichanek, F.; Tropek, R. Dragonflies of freshwater pools in lignite spoil heaps: Restoration management, habitat structure and conservation value. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 55, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luek, A.; Rasmussen, J.B. Chemical, Physical, and Biological Factors Shape Littoral Invertebrate Community Structure in Coal-Mining End-Pit Lakes. Environ. Manag. 2017, 59, 652–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Lucca, G.S.; Barros, F.A.P.; Oliveira, J.V.; Dal Magro, J.; Lucas, E.M. The role of environmental factors in the composition of anuran species in several ponds under the influence of coal mining in southern Brazil. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 26, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Michalik-Kucharz, A. The occurrence and distribution of freshwater snails in a heavily industrialised region of Poland (Upper Silesia). Limnologica 2008, 38, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, G.; Yuan, X.; Wang, K. Biodiversity and temporal patterns of macrozoobenthos in a coal mining subsidence area in North China. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Antwi, E.K.; Krawczynski, R.; Wiegleb, G. Detecting the effect of disturbance on habitat diversity and land cover change in a post-mining area using GIS. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 87, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prakash, A.; Gupta, R.P. Land-use mapping and change detection in a coal mining area—A case study in the Jharia coalfield, India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 19, 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mason, N.W.H.; de Bello, F.; Wilson, B. Functional diversity: A tool for answering challenging ecological questions. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 24, 777–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moretti, M.; Dias, A.T.C.; de Bello, F.; Altermatt, F.; Chown, S.L.; Azcárate, F.M.; Bell, J.R.; Fournier, B.; Hedde, M.; Hortal, J.; et al. Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits. Funct. Ecol. 2017, 31, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kleyer, M.; Dray, S.; Bello, F.; Lepš, J.; Pakeman, R.J.; Strauss, B.; Thuiller, W.; Lavorel, S.; Wildi, O. Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: Which multivariate methods? J. Veg. Sci. 2012, 23, 805–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Z.; Heino, J.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, T.; Jiang, Y.; Mo, Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. A refined functional group approach reveals novel insights into effects of urbanization on river macroinvertebrate communities. Landsc. Ecol. 2023, 38, 3791–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bonada, N.; Rieradevall, M.; Prat, N. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 2007, 589, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pillar, V.D.; Blanco, C.C.; Müller, S.C.; Sosinski, E.E.; Joner, F.; Duarte, L.D.S.; de Bello, F. Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 24, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Biggs, C.R.; Yeager, L.A.; Bolser, D.G.; Bonsell, C.; Dichiera, A.M.; Hou, Z.; Keyser, S.R.; Khursigara, A.J.; Lu, K.; Muth, A.F.; et al. Does functional redundancy affect ecological stability and resilience? A review and meta-analysis. Ecosphere 2020, 11, e03184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.; Du, F.; Wang, L.; Gu, Y.; Ning, J. A biological trait approach to assess ecological functions of macrobenthos at different stand age of rehabilitated Sonneratia apetala mangrove. South China Fish. Sci. 2018, 14, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mouillot, D.; Graham, N.A.J.; Villéger, S.; Mason, N.W.H.; Bellwood, D.R. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cai, Y.; Dong, R.; Kattel, G.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, K.; Gong, Z. Macroinvertebrate diversity and ecosystem functioning across the eutrophication gradients of the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River lakes (China). Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e9751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bongers, F.J.; Schmid, B.; Bruelheide, H.; Bongers, F.; Li, S.; von Oheimb, G.; Li, Y.; Cheng, A.; Ma, K.; Liu, X. Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment. Nature 2021, 5, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dong, R.; Peng, K.; Zhang, Q.; Heino, J.; Cai, Y.; Gong, Z. Spatial and temporal variation in lake macroinvertebrate communities is decreased by eutrophication. Environ. Res. 2024, 243, 117872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ni, D.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X. Benthic ecological quality assessment of the Bohai Sea, China using marine biotic indices. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Burgmer, T.; Hillebrand, H.; Pfenninger, M. Effects of climate-driven temperature changes on the diversity of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 2007, 151, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chang, F.-H.; Lawrence, J.E.; Rios-Touma, B.; Resh, V.H. Tolerance values of benthic macroinvertebrates for stream biomonitoring: Assessment of assumptions underlying scoring systems worldwide. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 2135–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fernández-Aláez, C.; de Soto, J.; Fernández-Aláez, M.; García-Criado, F. Spatial structure of the caddisfly (Insecta, Trichoptera) communities in a river basin in NW Spain affected by coal mining. Hydrobiologia 2002, 487, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mereta, S.T.; Boets, P.; Meester, L.D.; Goethals, P.L.M. Development of a multimetric index based on benthic macroinvertebrates for the assessment of natural wetlands in Southwest Ethiopia. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 29, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nogaro, G.; Mermillod-Blondin, F.; Valett, M.H.; François-Carcaillet, F.; Gaudet, J.-P.; Lafont, M.; Gibert, J. Ecosystem engineering at the sediment–water interface: Bioturbation and consumer-substrate interaction. Oecologia 2009, 161, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rasmussen, T.C.; Deemy, J.B.; Long, S.L. Wetland Hydrology. In The Wetland Book, 1st ed.; Finlayson, C.M., Everard, M., Irvine, K., McInnes, R.J., Middleton, B.A., van Dam, A.A., Davidson, N.C., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 201–216. [Google Scholar]
  49. Coccia, C.; Almeida, B.A.; Green, A.J.; Gutiérrez, A.B.; Carbonell, J.A. Functional diversity of macroinvertebrates as a tool to evaluate wetland restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 2999–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Braghin, L.d.S.M.; Almeida, B.d.A.; Amaral, D.C.; Canella, T.F.; Gimenez, B.C.G.; Bonecker, C.C. Effects of dams decrease zooplankton functional β-diversity in river-associated lakes. Freshw. Biol. 2018, 63, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Coccia, C.; Vanschoenwinkel, B.; Brendonck, L.; Boyero, L.; Green, A.J. Newly created ponds complement natural waterbodies for restoration of macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61, 1640–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, H.; Wang, W.J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Bao, S.G.; Ba, S.; Cong, Y. Woody encroachment induced earlier and extended growing season in boreal wetland ecosystems. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1413896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Byeon, J.S.; Kim, D.G. Development of a Wetland Ecosystem Health Assessment Method Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community. Wetlands 2024, 45, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Meng, J.; Miao, M.; Kong, Q.; Wang, R.; Liu, J. Quantifying the responses of biological indices to rare macroinvertebrate taxa exclusion: Does excluding more rare taxa cause more error? Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 1583–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brinkhurst, R.O. Guide to the Freshwater Aquatic Microdrile Oligochaetes of North America, 1st ed.; Fisheries and Oceans Canada Scientific Publishing Branch: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  56. Clifford, H.F. Aquatic Invertebrates of Alberta, 1st ed.; University of Alberta Press: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  57. Epler, J.H. Identification Manual for the Larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina, 1st ed.; North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2001.
  58. John, C.M.; Yang, L.; Tian, L. Aquatic Insects of China Useful for Monitoring Water Quality, 1st ed.; Hohai University Press: Nanjing, China, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  59. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA; American Water Works Association: Denver, CO, USA; Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  60. Colzani, E.; Siqueira, T.; Suriano, M.T.; Roque, F.O. Responses of Aquatic Insect Functional Diversity to Landscape Changes in Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 2013, 45, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Usseglio-Polatera, P.; Bournaud, M.; Richoux, P.; Tachet, H. Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: Relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshw. Biol. 2001, 43, 175–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pielou, E.C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 1966, 13, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ricotta, C.; de Bello, F.; Moretti, M.; Caccianiga, M.; Cerabolini, B.E.L.; Pavoine, S.; Peres-Neto, P. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: A quantitative guide. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1386–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ricotta, C.; Kosman, E.; Laroche, F.; Pavoine, S. Beta redundancy for functional ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lepš, J.; Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  67. Poff, N.L.; Olden, J.D.; Vieira, N.K.M.; Finn, D.S.; Simmons, M.P.; Kondratieff, B.C. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: Traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 2006, 25, 730–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Litchman, E.; Ohman, M.D.; Kiørboe, T. Trait-based approaches to zooplankton communities. J. Plankton Res. 2013, 35, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vineetha, S.; Nandan, S.B. Biological Traits and Trait Combinations of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in a Wetland Under Hydrological Disturbance. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2021, 74, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barnes, L.E. The colonization of ball-clay ponds by macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. Freshw. Biol. 1983, 13, 561–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Batzer, D.P.; Wissinger, S.A. Ecology of Insect Communities in Nontidal Wetlands. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996, 41, 75–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bloechl, A.; Koenemann, S.; Philippi, B.; Melber, A. Abundance, diversity and succession of aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera in a cluster of artificial ponds in the North German Lowlands. Limnol. Ecol. Manag. Inland Waters 2010, 40, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Layton, R.J.; Voshell, J.R., Jr. Colonization of New Experimental Ponds by Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lawton, J.H.; Brown, V.K. Redundancy in Ecosystems. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, 1st ed.; Schulze, E.D., Mooney, H.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; Volume 99, pp. 255–270. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mason, N.W.H.; Mouillot, D.; Lee, W.G.; Wilson, J.B. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 2005, 111, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cadotte, M.W.; Dinnage, R.; Tilman, D. Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability. Ecology 2012, 93, S223–S233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. de Bello, F.; Lavorel, S.; Hallett, L.M.; Valencia, E.; Garnier, E.; Roscher, C.; Conti, L.; Galland, T.; Goberna, M.; Májeková, M.; et al. Functional trait effects on ecosystem stability: Assembling the jigsaw puzzle. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 822–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ballantine, K.; Schneider, R. Fifty-five years of soil development in restored freshwater depressional wetlands. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 1467–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling site distribution of macrozoobenthos in the newly formed wetlands within coal mining subsidence areas. (a) Map of Shandong Province (the grey area represents Jining City). (b) Map of Jining City (the red box indicates the sampling area). (c) (C, D, E, F, H) show the IS of MSWs, (A, B, G, L) show the MS of MSWs, and (I, J, K, M) show the LS of MSWs. (d) Typical MSWs in IS. (e) Typical MSWs in MS. (f) Typical MSWs in LS.
Figure 1. Sampling site distribution of macrozoobenthos in the newly formed wetlands within coal mining subsidence areas. (a) Map of Shandong Province (the grey area represents Jining City). (b) Map of Jining City (the red box indicates the sampling area). (c) (C, D, E, F, H) show the IS of MSWs, (A, B, G, L) show the MS of MSWs, and (I, J, K, M) show the LS of MSWs. (d) Typical MSWs in IS. (e) Typical MSWs in MS. (f) Typical MSWs in LS.
Diversity 17 00607 g001
Figure 2. Seasonal dynamics of environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at each stage in MSWs (only list the environmental factors showing significant differences; different lowercase letters (a,b) in the figure indicate significant differences). Cond (a), DO (b), Chl-a (c), TP (d), and SOM (e).
Figure 2. Seasonal dynamics of environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at each stage in MSWs (only list the environmental factors showing significant differences; different lowercase letters (a,b) in the figure indicate significant differences). Cond (a), DO (b), Chl-a (c), TP (d), and SOM (e).
Diversity 17 00607 g002
Figure 3. Species richness (a), Pielou’s evenness index (b), Shannon–Wiener index (c), FRic (d), FEve (e), and FDiv (f) of macrozoobenthos communities in newly formed wetlands of MSWs across different seasons (different lowercase letters (a,b) in the figure indicate significant differences).
Figure 3. Species richness (a), Pielou’s evenness index (b), Shannon–Wiener index (c), FRic (d), FEve (e), and FDiv (f) of macrozoobenthos communities in newly formed wetlands of MSWs across different seasons (different lowercase letters (a,b) in the figure indicate significant differences).
Diversity 17 00607 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundance of functional traits at three subsidence stages in MSWs across different seasons. Body size (a), respiration type (b), functional feeding groups (c), shape (d), and habit (e).
Figure 4. Relative abundance of functional traits at three subsidence stages in MSWs across different seasons. Body size (a), respiration type (b), functional feeding groups (c), shape (d), and habit (e).
Diversity 17 00607 g004
Figure 5. FRI of macrozoobenthos communities in newly formed wetlands of MSWs across different stages.
Figure 5. FRI of macrozoobenthos communities in newly formed wetlands of MSWs across different stages.
Diversity 17 00607 g005
Figure 6. CCA of the taxonomic composition and environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at three subsidence stages of MSWs across different seasons. Spring (a), summer (b), autumn (c), winter (d), and average (e).
Figure 6. CCA of the taxonomic composition and environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at three subsidence stages of MSWs across different seasons. Spring (a), summer (b), autumn (c), winter (d), and average (e).
Diversity 17 00607 g006
Figure 7. CCA of functional composition and environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at three subsidence stages of MSWs across different seasons. Spring (a), summer (b), autumn (c), winter (d), and average (e).
Figure 7. CCA of functional composition and environmental variables in newly formed wetlands at three subsidence stages of MSWs across different seasons. Spring (a), summer (b), autumn (c), winter (d), and average (e).
Diversity 17 00607 g007
Table 1. Functional traits, trait categories, scores, and their codes of macrozoobenthos.
Table 1. Functional traits, trait categories, scores, and their codes of macrozoobenthos.
TraitCategoryScoreCode
Body sizeSmall (<9 mm)1Size1
Medium (9–16 mm)2Size2
Large (>16 mm)3Size3
Respiration typeIntegumentary1Resp1
Branchial2Resp2
Air (spiracles, tracheae, plastrons)3Resp3
Functional feedingCollector-gatherers (GC)1FFG1
groupsCollector-filterers (FC)2FFG2
Scrapers (SC)3FFG3
Predators (PR)4FFG4
Shredders (SH)5FFG5
ShapeStreamlined (flat, fusiform)1Shpe1
Not streamlined (cylindrical, round or bluff)2Shpe2
HabitClimbers1Habi1
Burrowers2Habi2
Sprawlers3Habi3
Clingers4Habi4
Swimmers5Habi5
Divers6Habi6
Table 2. ANOSIM analysis of seasonal variations in taxonomic and functional composition of macrozoobenthos communities across each stage in MSWs (statistically significant differences are highlighted in bold).
Table 2. ANOSIM analysis of seasonal variations in taxonomic and functional composition of macrozoobenthos communities across each stage in MSWs (statistically significant differences are highlighted in bold).
Global RpIS vs. MSIS vs. LSMS vs. LS
RpRpRp
Spring
Taxonomic composition0.0410.1710.0680.1000.0130.3920.0370.234
Functional composition−0.0280.713−0.0080.491−0.0940.9610.0330.233
Summer
Taxonomic composition0.2190.0010.2530.0010.3300.0010.0370.203
Functional composition0.1160.0060.0280.2340.2670.0020.0350.198
Autumn
Taxonomic composition−0.0370.7440.0330.295−0.0540.825−0.0880.900
Functional composition−0.0660.903−0.1160.933−0.0400.714−0.0590.765
Winter
Taxonomic composition0.2360.0010.2920.0010.2450.0010.1380.028
Functional composition0.0400.1180.0240.2560.0850.0550.0180.275
Average
Taxonomic composition0.0430.1390.0700.111−0.0360.7400.1140.061
Functional composition0.0860.0260.1470.0170.0610.1310.0440.211
Table 3. CCA results for relationships between macrozoobenthos community structure and environmental factors in MSWs (only significantly influential factors shown).
Table 3. CCA results for relationships between macrozoobenthos community structure and environmental factors in MSWs (only significantly influential factors shown).
Taxonomic CompositionFunctional Composition
SeasonKey FactorsFpAxis 1Axis 2Key FactorsFpAxis 1Axis 2
SpringCond3.127 0.001 −0.892 0.083 TP 3.312 0.005 −0.647 −0.283
DO2.073 0.004 0.057 −0.582 Chl-a2.454 0.029 0.027 0.515
Cond 3.360 0.009 0.549 −0.685
SummerTN2.196 0.005 0.557 0.431 Subsidence age3.265 0.005 0.590 −0.465
Cond2.835 0.001 0.359 −0.844
Subsidence age2.100 0.004 −0.614 −0.238
AutumnTP2.537 0.003 0.250 0.250 TP 3.051 0.004 0.322 0.467
Chl-a2.212 0.001 −0.073 0.035 Chl-a3.067 0.001 0.383 −0.330
Subsidence age1.952 0.009 0.077 0.565 Cond 2.488 0.019 −0.915 0.040
Subsidence age2.019 0.044 0.315 0.240
WinterTN1.689 0.022 −0.414 −0.255
DO2.020 0.008 0.113 −0.715
Area1.896 0.006 −0.764 −0.145
Subsidence age1.360 0.104 −0.644 0.414
AverageTN2.000 0.003 −0.487 0.072 TN 6.121 0.001 −0.677 0.295
Chl-a2.363 0.001 −0.075 −0.561 Chl-a3.137 0.004 −0.341 0.622
PH2.001 0.004 −0.351 0.444 Cond 4.981 0.001 −0.567 −0.461
Cond2.584 0.001 −0.625 −0.043 DO 2.101 0.039 −0.292 0.256
DO1.902 0.002 −0.032 0.633 Area2.183 0.040 0.109 0.349
Area2.122 0.003 0.375 0.253 Subsidence age4.081 0.001 0.602 0.064
Subsidence age2.138 0.001 0.602 0.293
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, N.; Wang, T.; Jiang, W.; Shu, F.; Zhang, G. Decoupling Patterns and Drivers of Macrozoobenthos Taxonomic and Functional Diversity to Wetland Chronosequences in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas. Diversity 2025, 17, 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090607

AMA Style

Yang N, Wang T, Jiang W, Shu F, Zhang G. Decoupling Patterns and Drivers of Macrozoobenthos Taxonomic and Functional Diversity to Wetland Chronosequences in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas. Diversity. 2025; 17(9):607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Nan, Tingji Wang, Wenzheng Jiang, Fengyue Shu, and Guanxiong Zhang. 2025. "Decoupling Patterns and Drivers of Macrozoobenthos Taxonomic and Functional Diversity to Wetland Chronosequences in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas" Diversity 17, no. 9: 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090607

APA Style

Yang, N., Wang, T., Jiang, W., Shu, F., & Zhang, G. (2025). Decoupling Patterns and Drivers of Macrozoobenthos Taxonomic and Functional Diversity to Wetland Chronosequences in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas. Diversity, 17(9), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop