Next Article in Journal
Screening of Germination and Early Seedling Growth Reveal Contrasting Cu Tolerance of Chilean Quinoa Accessions Depending on Origin
Next Article in Special Issue
New Insight into the Demography History, Evolution, and Phylogeography of Horseshoe Crabs with Special Emphasis on American Species
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Taxonomic Analysis of Biomphalaria (Hygrophila: Planorbidae) from the Brazilian Amazon
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Indigenous Knowledge and Utilisation of Strychnos spinosa Lam. in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Its Medicinal, Nutritional, and Cultural Significance

by
Sanele Nomfundo Sandisiwe Thothela
,
Elizabeth Kola
,
Mwazvita T. B. Dalu
and
Peter Tshepiso Ndhlovu
*
School of Biology & Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture & Natural Science, University of Mpumalanga, Cnr R40 and D725 Road, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(4), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040228
Submission received: 28 January 2025 / Revised: 20 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 25 March 2025

Abstract

:
In sub-Saharan Africa, indigenous knowledge is a vital source of information about the local environment, including the identification and use of various plant species. One plant species that has attracted much attention in the area is Strychnos spinosa Lam., as local communities utilise it for various purposes, such as medicinal, nutritional, and cultural. A systematic search for eligible studies was carried out by exploring different electronic databases, such as JSTOR, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The survey yielded 61 eligible studies, highlighting the diverse of uses of S. spinosa. The literature indicates that 37% of African countries have studied S. spinosa, mainly in Southern Africa. Most studies used semi-structured interviews, but over 70% did not analyse the plant’s nutritional and bioactive compounds. The research highlighted six distinct S. spinosa plant parts used for managing different ailments and conditions in Africa. Roots (25%), along with bark and fruits (23%), are primarily used for digestive disorders and fever; this was followed by leaves (20%) and wood (6%). The least utilised plant part was the radix or cortex (3%). These findings emphasise a significant gap in the understanding of S. spinosa’s nutritional and bioactive compounds, emphasising the need for quantitative research on its phytochemical properties and therapeutic applications within African traditional medicine.

1. Introduction

The world is currently confronted with urgent environmental issues, including climate change, deforestation, habitat loss, and biodiversity depletion [1]. It is becoming increasingly clear that indigenous knowledge systems (IKSs) can play a critical role in environmental conservation [2]. These systems contain a wealth of knowledge about local ecosystems, agroecosystems, and sustainable resource management [2,3]. Indigenous people, who have lived in harmony within their natural surroundings for generations, possess invaluable knowledge that can contribute to protecting and preserving the environment [4,5]. However, the older generation is predominantly the custodian of information [3].
Indigenous knowledge (IK) refers to the knowledge, practices, and beliefs accumulated and passed down through generations within specific cultural groups [6]. The use of IK has been a critical aspect of natural resource management, especially in rural communities across Africa, as most developing countries rely on local remedies from traditional medicines for their healthcare needs [7,8,9]. Studies by Bhatta [2], Mpofu, and Miruka [3] have shown that IK is more practiced by the elderly than the young generation. One main factor that influences this is the spread of urbanisation and globalisation [3].
Mpofu and Miruka [3] articulated that young people often lack interest in IKSs because these wisdom, skills, and practices developed by indigenous peoples over generations are frequently overlooked in their activities, such as the school curriculum. Modern school subjects are often valued more highly than IK. As a result, IK is losing ground globally. The potential for finding new solutions to today’s most challenging health and environmental issues is at risk of being lost [10]. IK can complement modern science by providing context-specific insights into local ecosystems and sustainable resource management practices [4]. Unlike conventional scientific methods, which often adopt a universal approach, IK is rooted in long-term observation, adaptive management, and holistic perspectives [5,6]. For example, indigenous practices of crop rotation, water conservation, and forest management have been shown to enhance biodiversity and maintain ecosystem balance [7]. Integrating IK with scientific research enables policymakers and conservationists to develop more effective strategies for addressing climate change and biodiversity loss [8].
Collaborative efforts between indigenous communities and scientists can promote mutual learning and innovation, resulting in hybrid solutions that align with scientific principles and cultural traditions [9]. Furthermore, recognising and integrating IK into environmental governance can bolster community-based conservation initiatives and empower local populations to actively participate in safeguarding their natural heritage. This approach not only improves ecological resilience but also aids in the preservation of cultural heritage and the promotion of social equity [7,9]. In sub-Saharan Africa, IK is an essential repository of information about the local environment, including identifying and using various plant species for medicinal purposes, culinary uses, ecological understanding, and conservation efforts [11].
One such plant species that has garnered significant interest in the African region is Strychnos spinosa Lam. This flowering plant belongs to the family Loganiaceae, within the order Gentianales, commonly known as “monkey orange” or “umKwakwa” [10]. This tree is endemic to Africa [12,13]. In South Africa, it is densely distributed in 44.5% of provinces [13,14]. Strychnos spinosa has acclimatised to drought and low soil fertility [15,16]. Local communities have utilised it for medicinal, nutritional, and cultural purposes [17]. However, the botanical uses of S. spinosa and the factors determining its utilisation within different communities still need to be studied [9,12,14,18].
Studies by Omotayo and Aremu [2], Aremu and Moyo [11] highlighted the excellent potential for S. spinosa to add value to sustainable food systems and health benefits. These studies also highlighted the S. spinosa fruit’s high nutritional content, which includes essential vitamins such as vitamin C, minerals like iron and zinc, and phytochemical compounds with antioxidant qualities. The fruit is drought-tolerant and grows well in soils with low fertility, which makes it a good option for addressing food and nutrition insecurity, especially in the rural and arid areas of sub-Saharan Africa. The potential of S. spinosa to improve diet quality and serve as an economic resource for marginalised communities further reinforces its significance [2].
The studies also highlight the urgent need for sustainable harvesting practices and effective monitoring systems to ensure the long-term existence of S. spinosa. Agricultural expansion, urbanisation, and related habitat destruction are major threats to its natural populations [11]. Furthermore, the absence of formal cultivation practices and reliance on wild harvesting increases the risk of depletion. Establishing guidelines for sustainable use, promoting agroforestry initiatives, and integrating local communities into conservation efforts are critical steps to mitigate these risks [2,11,12].
While S. spinosa is currently classified as “Least Concern” on the IUCN Red List [13], its widespread utilisation by local communities necessitates a reassessment of its conservation status. Ongoing usage patterns and environmental challenges suggest that its long-term availability may be at risk [2]. For instance, studies have documented its application in traditional medicine, where the roots, bark, and fruit are extensively harvested for various ailments. If these practices are not monitored, they could result in localised overexploitation [11,12]. Additionally, research indicating its importance as a renewable food supply and its beneficial bioactive characteristics calls for greater emphasis on its preservation [14].
This study is crucial for biodiversity conservation and sustainable natural resource management [15], an initiative that has already begun worldwide, particularly in regions with higher plant diversity [16,17,18]. It reveals the traditional uses of S. spinosa, providing insights into sustainable harvesting practices. The findings can also benefit environmental policymakers by incorporating IK into conservation and resource management policies. The study aims to address the gap in understanding S. spinosa’s traditional uses in African communities by reviewing existing knowledge, examining the socio-ecological impact of harvesting and use, and screening phytochemicals.

2. Materials and Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement founded by Moher, et al. [19] was used to develop this study. A comprehensive electronic search of databases such as Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley was conducted between April 2024 and February 2025. The inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed journal articles and grey literature, such as theses, dissertations, and reports. Peer-reviewed articles were prioritised to ensure the reliability and scientific rigor of the findings. However, grey literature was included to capture valuable IK and ethnobotanical data that may not be widely available in mainstream scientific journals. Grey literature was selected based on its relevance, methodological transparency, and contribution to understanding the traditional uses of S. spinosa. Some of the leading search terms used included “indigenous knowledge”, “socio-ecological impact”, or “traditional ecological knowledge”, and “phytochemical analysis” in conjunction with “Strychnos spinosa”, “monkey orange”, and “umKwakwa”. For this study, inclusion criteria focused on studies explicitly conducted in Africa. The selection process involved three key stages: identification, which included records that met initial search terms; eligibility assessment or screening, which excluded records that were not available in full text and available in non-English; and inclusion (Figure 1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Literature Results

The search through various scientific databases yielded a total of 1924 studies. After removing duplicates, 929 studies were retained. In addition, data from five sources, including theses, dissertations, and books, were obtained from the Thoko Mayekiso Library and Information Centre at the University of Mpumalanga, South Africa. The full texts of the 116 studies were reviewed in detail. About 49 studies were excluded due to no available full text, in foreign languages, and without scientific names. Furthermore, studies focused on different Strychnos species or those that did not examine traditional uses of medicinal plants as their main subjects were also discarded. Ultimately, 61 studies contributed to the inventory presented in this study (Figure 1).
According to Table 1, the studies represented 37% of African countries. More studies were conducted in Southern Africa, with seven conducted in South Africa within KwaZulu Natal Province (four) and Limpopo Province (two). Notwithstanding the studies conducted by Avakoudjo, Hounkpèvi, Idohou, Koné and Assogbadjo [12] andMbhele, et al. [20], which focused explicitly on documenting IK of the uses of S. spinosa, and the study byMadzimure, Nyahangare, Hamudikuwanda, Hove, Belmain, Stevenson and Mvumi [14], which focused on the efficacy of S. spinosa extracts on cattle ticks, the other records were part of broader ethnobotanical surveys by various researchers. Generally, semi-structured interviews or questionnaires were the predominant techniques for gathering data, with only a few having in vitro analysis. The number of participants involved in the interviews was not reported in approximately 20% of the studies.
A comprehensive assessment of nutritional and bioactive compounds found in S. spinosa was not analysed in over 70% of the studies. Authenticating the phytochemical composition of S. spinosa within different African communities is a crucial step towards understanding its pharmacological and nutritional effects [21,22]. A study conducted by Tittikpina, et al. [23] provides some insights into the chemical compounds present in S. spinosa, including alkaloids, terpenes, sterols, flavonoids, saponins, and other bioactive components. By identifying and characterising these phytochemicals, researchers can further investigate the potential therapeutic properties of S. spinosa and assess its efficacy in addressing various health conditions traditionally treated with this plant. The reviewed literature on the phytochemical composition and bioactivity of S. spinosa is limited, with seven studies focusing on the plant’s antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [14,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In-depth research into the phytochemical composition of the products made from parts of the S. spinosa plant could yield significant benefits.
Table 1. An in-depth botanical review of S. spinosa across Sub-Saharan Africa, examining its diverse ecological range, traditional medicinal uses, ethnobotanical significance, and potential for nutritional and pharmacological applications.
Table 1. An in-depth botanical review of S. spinosa across Sub-Saharan Africa, examining its diverse ecological range, traditional medicinal uses, ethnobotanical significance, and potential for nutritional and pharmacological applications.
AuthorStudy TitleLocationParticipant-TypeInterviewee NumberMethodological Framework* Nutritional, Phytochemical, and/or Biological Signature
Asase, et al. [30]Ethnobotanical study of some Ghanaian anti-malarial plantsWechiau Community Hippopotamus Sanctuary, GhanaLocal community members, herbalists20Field interviews, house-to-house interviews, focus groupNone
Avakoudjo, Hounkpèvi, Idohou, Koné and Assogbadjo [12]Local knowledge, uses, and factors determining the use of Strychnos spinosa organs in Benin (West Africa)Guinean, Sudano-Guinean and Guinean climatic zones, BeninFarmers, THPs, cattle herdsmen, artisans, and students733Semi-structured questionnairesNone
Bero, Ganfon, Jonville, Frederich, Gbaguidi, DeMol, Moudachirou and Quetin-Leclercq [24]In vitro antiplasmodial activity of plants used in Benin in traditional medicine to treat malariaSouth of BeninN/AN/AIn vitro testingB
Bizimana, Tietjen, Zessin, Diallo, Djibril, Melzig and Clausen [25]Evaluation of medicinal plants from Mali for their in vitro and in vivo trypanocidal activitySouthern part of MaliN/AN/AIn vitro testingB
Bruschi, et al. [31]Traditional healers and laypeople: A qualitative and quantitative approach to local knowledge on medicinal plants in Muda (Mozambique)Muda, MozambiqueLocal leaders and laypeople
THPs, Independent Pentecostal churches “prophets” and lay villagers
(7/67)
67Semi-structured interviewsNone
De Wet, et al. [32]Medicinal plants used for the treatment of various skin disorders by a rural community in northern Maputaland, South AfricaMaputaland, Republic of South AfricaLocal community members87Structured questionnairesNone
Doka [33]Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in West Kordofan (Western Sudan)West Kordofan, SudanLocal practitioners31Semi-structured interviewsNone
Karou, et al. [34]Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the Central Region of TogoCentral Region of TogoTHPs55Semi-structured questionnairesNone
Koné and Kamanzi Atindehou [35]Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants used in traditional veterinary medicine in Northern Côte d’Ivoire (West Africa)Northern Côte d’IvoireLocal breeders and traditional practitioners14Structured questionnairesNone
Lawal, Bapela, Adebayo, Nkadimeng, Yusuf, Malterud, McGaw and Tshikalange [26]Anti-inflammatory potential of South African medicinal plants used for the treatment of sexually transmitted infectionsVenda region, Limpopo, Republic South AfricaN/AN/AIn vitro testingB, P
Lockett, et al. [36]Energy and micronutrient composition of dietary and medicinal wild plants consumed during drought. Study of rural Fulani, Northeastern NigeriaRural Fulani, Northeastern NigeriaElderly focus groupNot specified
(Four groups of 4–8 participants)
Semi-structured questionnaires; in vitro testingN
Madzimure, Nyahangare, Hamudikuwanda, Hove, Belmain, Stevenson and Mvumi [14]Efficacy of Strychnos spinosa (Lam.) and Solanum incanum L. aqueous fruit extracts against cattle ticksHenderson Research Station (HRS), ZimbabweN/AN/AIn vitro testingB, P
Magassouba, Diallo, Kouyate, Mara, Mara, Bangoura, Camara, Traore, Diallo, Zaoro, Lamah, Diallo, Camara, Traore, Keita, Camara, Barry, Keita, Oulare, Barry, Donzo, Camara, Tote, Berghe, Totte, Pieters, Vlietinck and Balde [27]Ethnobotanical survey and antibacterial activity of some plants used in Guinean traditional medicineLow, Middle, Upper, and Forest ecological zones of GuineaTraditional practitioners418Structured questionnaires; In vitro testingB, P
Maroyi [37]An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by the people in Nhema communal area, ZimbabweNhema communal area, ZimbabweTraditional practitioners9Participatory Rapid Appraisal approach using open-ended interviews (unstructured)None
Mbhele, Zharare, Zimudzi and Ntuli [20]Indigenous knowledge on the uses and morphological variation among Strychnos spinosa Lam. at Oyemeni Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaOyemeni Area, KwaZulu-Natal, Republic of South AfricaKnowledgeable local community members100Structured questionnairesNone
Molander, Nielsen, Sogaard, Staerk, Ronsted, Diallo, Chifundera, van Staden and Jager [28]Hyaluronidase, phospholipase A2 and protease inhibitory activity of plants used in traditional treatment of snakebite-induced tissue necrosis in Mali, DR Congo and South AfricaDemocratic
Republic of Congo, Mali, and Republic of South Africa
N/AN/AIn vitro testingB, P
Mhlongo and Van Wyk [38]Zulu medicinal ethnobotany: new records from the Amandawe area of KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaAmandawe area of KwaZulu-Natal, Republic of South AfricaLocal community members37Freelisting; rapid ethnobotanical appraisalNone
Novotna, et al. [39]Medicinal plants used by ‘root doctors’, local traditional healers in Bié province, AngolaBié province, AngolaProfessional herbalists10Participatory observation; semi-structured interviews; transect walksNone
Ruffo [40]A Survey of medicinal plants in Tabora region [40,41]Tabora Region, TanzaniaTraditional health practitioners27Structured interviewsNone
Tchacondo, et al. [42]Herbal remedies and their adverse effects in Tem tribe traditional medicine in TogoTchaoudjo prefecture, TogoTraditional health practitioners54Rapid ethnobotanical appraisalNone
Waterman, Smith, Pontiggia and DerMarderosian [29]Anthelmintic screening of Sub-Saharan African plants used in traditional medicineMadagascar and Central African RepublicN/AN/AIn vitro testingB, P
Zwane, et al. [43]Blood purification practices: Some ethnopharmacological insight from a rural community in KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaNorthern Maputaland, Kwazulu-Natal, Republic of South AfricaKnowledgeable local community members55Structured questionnairesNone
Derya, et al. [44]Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Sissala East municipality of the upper West region, GhanaSissala East municipality, GhanaTHPs and knowledgeable local community members50Semi-structured questionnairesNone
Mohamadoua, et al. [45]Ethnopharmacological investigation of plants used in the treatment of breast cancer in Northern CameroonNorthern CameroonTraditional health practitioners 131Semi-structured questionnairesNone
Magwede, et al. [46]An inventory of Vhavenḓa useful plantsVenda, Republic of South AfricaKnowledgeable local community members66Semi-structured questionnairesNone
Mlilo and Sibanda [47]An ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal plants used in the treatment of cancer in some parts of Matebeleland, ZimbabweMatebeleland, ZimbabweTraditional health practitioners, herbalists, apprentices, and family members of traditional health practitioners25Open-ended semi-structured interviewsNone
Chinsembu, et al. [48]Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers in the management of HIV/AIDS opportunistic diseases in Lusaka, ZambiaLusaka, ZambiaTraditional health practitioners40Semi-structured interviewsNone
Aparicioa, et al. [49]Ethnobotanical study of medicinal and edible plants used in Nhamacoa area, Manica Province, MozambiqueNhamacoa area, Manica province, MozambiqueRandomly selected villagers25Free listing and semi-structured interviews; random selectionNone
Shopoa, et al. [50]Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants traditionally used in Gokwe South District, ZimbabweGokwe South District, ZimbabweKnowledgeable local community members46Semi-structured questionnaireNone
Yaoitcha, et al. [51]Prioritization of useful medicinal tree species for conservation in Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin: A multivariate analysis approachWari-Maro Forest Reserve, BeninTraditionally most prominent authorities of local households149Semi-structured interviewsNone
Hilonga, Otieno, Ghorbani, Pereus, Kocyan and de Boer [41]Trade of wild-harvested medicinal plant species in local markets of Tanzania and its implications for conservationArusha, Dodoma, Mbeya, Morogoro, and Mwanza regions, TanzaniaLocal herbal vendors40Semi-structured interviewsNone
Masumbu, et al. [52]Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants claimed by traditional herbal practitioners to manage cancers in MalawiMzimba and Nkhata Bay district of northern MalawiTraditional health practitioners25Semi-structured questionnaires and purposive sampling techniqueNone
* Nutraceutical profile—nutritional (N), phytochemical (P), and/or biological (B) analysis of Strychnos spinosa.

3.2. Plant Part Utilisation of S. spinosa in Africa

This study reports the use of six distinct plant parts of S. spinosa for the treatment of various health conditions in Figure 2. S. spinosa roots, with 25.7% usage, are commonly used for treating digestive disorders and fever, followed by bark (22.9%) and fruit (22.9%). S. spinosa fruit is consumed raw or cooked in East African countries like Tanzania [40,41], where its bark is traditionally used for analgesic properties [40,41]. In South Africa and Zimbabwe, the fruit is valued for its ripeness as a snack or food [14,37,47,50], while the wood is used for tools and firewood production [20,26,28,32,38,43,46]. The plant’s various parts are also used for respiratory and digestive issues.
In the studies of Nigeria, Lockett, Calvert and Grivetti [36] and Ghana, Asase, Oteng-Yeboah, Odamtten and Simmonds [30], Derya, Dzitse and Tom-Dery [44], leaves and roots of a plant are commonly used in herbal preparations to treat ailments like fevers and headaches, with some communities believing it has protective properties [30,36]. In contrast to the Democratic Republic of Congo [28] and Central Africa [29,39,45], where S. spinosa fruit is appreciated more for its nutritional value and is sometimes fermented to enhance the flavour and nutritional profile of the fruit, the leaves and roots are also employed in traditional medicine, particularly in treatments related to women’s health [28,29,39,45].

3.3. Methods of Preparation and Administration

Preparation methods include decoctions, crushed plant parts, infusions, macerations, and calcinations (Figure 3A). Decoction (30%), followed by crushed plant parts (22%), infusions (17%), which involve soaking a part of the plant in hot water for a period ranging from overnight to several hours, macerations (9%), which involve softening plant parts by soaking them in a liquid, and lastly, calcinations (9%) involving heating plant material to high temperatures in the absence of air. Some of the studies (13%) did not specify methods of preparation (Figure 3A). A portion of the studies that reported that the parts of S. spinosa are often crushed, ground, or prepared in powder form, highlight the critical role of dried plant materials in traditional medicine. This method provides benefits such as a longer shelf life and flexibility in usage, which can be especially valuable in resource-limited settings [53,54]. Interestingly, the results are similar to other studies [53,55,56,57] that identified decoction as the predominant preparation method. The ease of making decoctions is a key reason why they are the main method used in traditional healing practices. Numerous indigenous cultures worldwide utilise decoctions to harness the healing properties of different plants. Additionally, decoctions eliminate contaminants and are deemed a safer option than other preparation methods [55].
The distribution of administration methods for S. spinosa, as illustrated in Figure 3B, reveals a strong preference for oral administration, accounting for 59% of the studies. This is followed by topical application (16%). The least documented means of administration was enemas (2%). Some of the studies (23%) did not specify any administration methods. The predominance of oral administration aligns with findings from Yadav, et al. [58], where Strychnos potatorum L.f was found to exhibit significant pharmacological efficacy when administered orally. This predominance of oral administration suggests that S. spinosa may contain bioactive compounds that are effective when ingested. The high incidence of oral usage may stem from the presence of similar bioactive substances readily absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, potentially aiding in the treatment of various internal disorders [23,59,60]. However, oral administration is influenced by digestive metabolism, first-pass liver effects, and compound solubility, which can impact active compounds’ bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy [20,37]. Beyond oral ingestion, ethnobotanical studies indicate that topical applications, inhalation, and rectal administration are also used for specific treatments. For instance, in South Africa, S. spinosa bark is crushed and applied topically to wounds and skin infections, suggesting transdermal absorption as an alternative route of bioactive compound delivery [41]. Albahri, et al. [61] reported that topical applications of plant extracts demonstrate notable wound-healing properties attributed to their antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects. In West African communities, steam inhalation from boiled bark extracts is used in traditional respiratory infections and fever treatments, indicating a pulmonary absorption pathway that may enhance rapid systemic effects [2].

3.4. Regional Variations in the Utilisation of S. spinosa

The use of S. spinosa shows significant variations across the various African cultures and regions (Table 2), reflecting the diverse ethnobotanical knowledge systems within sub-Saharan Africa [23]. Although the plant’s medicinal, nutritional, and cultural applications are well documented in the studies reviewed, the methods of preparation, preferred plant parts, and symbolic meanings often vary between regions.

3.4.1. Medicinal Uses of S. spinosa

The medicinal applications of S. spinosa are diverse and widespread across sub-Saharan Africa, with various plant parts being used to treat a wide range of health conditions. According to Figure 4, the most frequently reported use of S. spinosa is in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, accounting for approximately 30% of the documented medicinal applications. These include conditions such as diarrhoea (10%), stomach aches (8%), constipation (6%), and vomiting (6%). In South Africa and Zimbabwe, S. spinosa is primarily used to treat digestive disorders such as stomach aches and diarrhoea, with the roots, bark, and leaves being the most used parts [20,32,37,43]. These treatments are widely used across Southern and West Africa, where gastrointestinal issues are prevalent due to poor sanitation and limited healthcare access [12,37].
A significant proportion (20%) of the reported uses of S. spinosa relate to the treatment of infectious diseases, including malaria (7%), bacterial infections (6%), tuberculosis (4%), and venereal diseases (3%) (Figure 4). The leaves, twigs, and bark of S. spinosa are often boiled to create infusions or macerations, which can be consumed orally or applied topically, depending on the ailment [12,26]. Traditional healers in Ghana, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique commonly use S. spinosa to treat these conditions [24,26].
Conditions associated with pain and inflammation represent 18% of the documented medicinal uses of S. spinosa. These uses include fever (7%), haemorrhoids (5%), swelling (4%), and diabetes-related inflammation (2%) (Figure 4). The roots and bark of S. spinosa are often prepared as macerations or infusions; in some cases, calcinations are used to enhance their potency [12,20]. The topical application of S. spinosa extracts is frequently reported for managing pain-related conditions, particularly in rural communities with limited access to conventional pain relievers [27,61].
Approximately 12% of S. spinosa’s medicinal applications are linked to reproductive health issues. The plant is utilised for treating dysmenorrhea (5%), infertility (4%), miscarriage prevention (2%), and labour induction (1%) (Figure 4). The roots and bark are commonly administered orally in decoctions and infusions to regulate menstrual cycles, support fertility, and assist in childbirth [12]. Traditional healers, particularly in West Africa (Benin and Ghana), have used S. spinosa for fertility-related treatments for many years [12,30].
Skin-related conditions account for 10% of reported medicinal uses, including chronic wounds (5%), dermatitis (3%), and foot crevices (2%) (Figure 4). The fruits, bark, and leaves of S. spinosa are commonly crushed into pastes or powders and applied directly to affected areas [32,47]. The use of S. spinosa in dermatological treatments is prominent in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique, where it is often integrated into traditional wound-healing practices [12,32].
Respiratory ailments constitute 7% of the reported uses of S. spinosa, with treatments focused on respiratory deficiencies (5%) and cardiovascular issues (2%) (Figure 4). Decoctions and macerations made from leaves and roots are commonly utilised to alleviate symptoms associated with respiratory distress, often administered orally or through steam inhalation [12].
Beyond its medicinal uses, S. spinosa is utilised in various traditional practices (8%), including treatments for snake bites (3%), spiritual rituals (3%), blood purification (1%), and cattle tick management (1%) (Figure 4). The roots, bark, and fruits are employed in diverse cultural and protective rituals, especially in Southern and West Africa, where they are thought to have spiritual and healing properties [12,20,43]. In Central Africa, the plant is more commonly associated with antivenom treatments and wound healing, often prepared by crushing or calcining the roots and bark [28,45]. Traditional healers and local communities have used S. spinosa to manage diarrhoea, dysentery, and stomach ulcers (Table 2), conditions that are prevalent in areas with poor sanitation and limited access to conventional medicine [2]. The plant’s antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties may enhance its effectiveness in treating these ailments [24]. Additionally, S. spinosa is commonly utilised in managing fever-related illnesses, which are frequently linked to malaria, typhoid fever, and other febrile infections [14]. Malaria is still a leading cause of mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, and traditional remedies incorporating S. spinosa have been documented for their potential antiplasmodial activity [23].

3.4.2. Preparation Methods of S. spinosa

Preparation methods also vary significantly between regions. In Southern Africa, decoctions and infusions are the predominant methods, which aligns with findings from ethnobotanical studies in KwaZulu-Natal [20,38]. Conversely, West African communities often favour macerations and poultices, particularly for reproductive health treatments [12,30]. In Central African traditions, the calcination of plant parts is frequently utilized for snakebite treatments [28,45].

3.4.3. Cultural Significance of S. spinosa

The cultural significance of S. spinosa extends beyond its medicinal and nutritional applications, playing a vital role in various traditional rituals, ceremonies, and folklore across sub-Saharan Africa [12,30,31]. In several communities, the plant is regarded as a symbol of protection and fertility, with its fruits and bark used in spiritual cleansing and homestead protection rituals [12,20,43]. Among the Zulu communities in South Africa, the plant is believed to possess protective properties and is often used in rituals to ward off evil spirits and promote good fortune [20,38].
In West African traditions, particularly in Benin and Ghana, S. spinosa is incorporated into love charms and fertility rites, where its roots and bark are prepared in decoctions or macerations to aid conception and enhance reproductive health [12,30]. Additionally, some communities in Zimbabwe and Mozambique employ the plant in ancestral ceremonies, using its bark and fruit as offerings to seek blessings from ancestors [14,31].
The plant’s association with healing and purification is prevalent across different regions. For example, in northern Ghana, decoctions made from S. spinosa roots are used in cleansing rituals following periods of illness or misfortune [30]. Similarly, the Shona people of Zimbabwe integrate S. spinosa into rites of passage, symbolising spiritual renewal and communal unity [37].
Despite the widespread use of S. spinosa in cultural practices, there is limited documentation of these rituals in the scientific literature. Future ethnobotanical studies should prioritise recording oral histories and engaging with local communities to preserve this rich cultural heritage [4,7]. Such efforts would enhance the understanding of the plant’s socio-cultural significance and contribute to the broader preservation of IKSs [5].

3.5. Economic Importance of S. spinosa

The fruits of S. spinosa are a vital economic resource for many rural communities [2,11,60]. The plant produces nutrient-rich fruits that can be consumed fresh or processed into various food products, such as jams, juices, and dried fruit snacks, which have growing commercial demand locally and internationally [2]. Research shows that the fruit is sold in markets throughout Southern and East Africa, generating income for small-scale farmers and traders [60]. Furthermore, because of its drought tolerance and capacity to thrive in semi-arid conditions, S. spinosa offers opportunities for sustainable agriculture and food security initiatives [11].
Beyond its nutritional value, S. spinosa has demonstrated potential pharmaceutical applications, with bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and saponins exhibiting antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties [23]. Ethnopharmacological research suggests that fruit, bark, and leaf extracts are therapeutic against bacterial infections, malaria, and gastrointestinal disorders [24,27]. This has led to increased interest from pharmaceutical industries, exploring its potential as a source of novel drug compounds [6].
In addition to formal pharmaceutical research, S. spinosa plays a crucial role in traditional African medicine. Indigenous communities widely use it to treat fevers, digestive ailments, and reproductive health concerns [12]. The commercialisation of traditional remedies derived from S. spinosa could contribute to the growing market for herbal medicines, supporting both economic development and the preservation of IKSs [5].
The species also holds potential for sustainable agriculture and agroforestry. S. spinosa is utilised as fodder for livestock, particularly in arid regions where alternative feed resources are scarce [14]. Additionally, the hardwood is employed in craft production and tool-making, such as general carpentry, implement handles, fighting sticks, hut poles, and carving [23]. Furthermore, the hard shells of dried fruits are repurposed as resonators for musical instruments like the marimba and are carved and sold as souvenirs [23].

3.6. Socio-Ecological Impact and Implications for Conservation

Limited research on the socio-ecological impacts of harvesting and using S. spinosa in African communities, highlighting potential biodiversity and ecosystem changes, requires in-depth analysis [30,41,51]. Future research should focus on assessing the socio-ecological impacts of S. spinosa use, considering factors such as resource sustainability, environmental conservation, and community well-being to inform sustainable management practices. Likewise, expanding on the nutritional and economic potential of S. spinosa, it becomes evident that it holds promise for addressing food-nutrition insecurity and economic prosperity among marginalised rural populations [2]. With its high content of essential nutrients like vitamin C, iron, and zinc, S. spinosa stands out as a valuable resource for enhancing food security and improving health outcomes in developing nations. To fully harness the benefits of S. spinosa, further research on domestication processes, value chain integration, and economic viability is recommended [2]. Collaboration among stakeholders is essential to explore the full potential of this fruit as a sustainable solution to food shortages and malnutrition experienced by rural communities [8].
S. spinosa is currently classified as “Least Concern” on the IUCN Red List due to its widespread distribution across sub-Saharan Africa and the absence of significant population declines reported at a global scale [13]. However, this classification may not fully account for localised threats and regional population pressures associated with widespread harvesting and habitat loss [12]. While the species remains abundant in some regions, increasing demand for its medicinal, nutritional, and cultural uses may pose significant risks to its long-term availability in areas where it is heavily exploited [12,20]. Local communities in Southern Africa, particularly in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique, rely extensively on S. spinosa for traditional medicine and food, with roots, bark, and fruit being the most harvested parts [20,32,37]. Overharvesting these plant parts, especially from wild populations, can lead to population decline and affect the species’ natural regeneration capacity [2]. Additionally, the absence of formal cultivation practices and the reliance on wild harvesting further exacerbate the risk of localised depletion [11]. Furthermore, habitat destruction from agricultural expansion, deforestation, and urbanisation indirectly threatens the plant’s natural populations in many regions [11,41].
These pressures highlight the need for a more nuanced approach to assessing the conservation status of S. spinosa, one that considers regional population trends and localised exploitation patterns [12,41,51]. Future conservation efforts should prioritise measures for sustainable conservation, such as establishing sustainable harvesting guidelines in collaboration with local communities [7,9], promoting agroforestry initiatives to encourage the cultivation of S. spinosa [2,11], incorporating IK into community-based conservation programmes [6,7,9], and reassessing the IUCN Red List classification based on regional data and population monitoring [13,41,51]. Collaborative strategies that have been implemented include Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), where researchers work directly with indigenous communities to document oral traditions, medicinal practices, and ecological knowledge [7], as well as participatory workshops and co-authorship with local knowledge holders to ensure equitable representation [5]. The establishment of sustainable harvesting and agroforestry initiatives such as partnering with local farmers and conservation groups [51] to promote the sustainable cultivation of S. spinosa instead of relying on wild harvesting.
The current study revealed significant implications for biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource management. The study emphasises the importance of degraded areas as a source of medicinal plants for indigenous communities, indicating the need to prioritise protecting and restoring these ecosystems [30,37]. Furthermore, this study highlights the need to integrate IK into conservation strategies, as the traditional practices and resource utilisation patterns can provide valuable insights for sustainable management [30,41,51]. This calls for developing collaborative approaches that respect and engage with local communities, ensuring the equitable sharing of benefits and the protection of traditional ecological knowledge [9].

4. Research Gap and Limitations

Despite the valuable insights gathered from this systematic review, several limitations affect the completeness and generalisability of the findings. One key limitation is the accessibility and quality of data, particularly in ethnobotanical research. Many relevant studies are published in local or regional journals, government reports, or theses and dissertations, which are not always accessible in mainstream scientific databases. Additionally, language barriers present a challenge, as a significant portion of IK is documented in local dialects and non-English sources, making it difficult to capture a truly comprehensive dataset [12,37]. The quality and methodological rigor of the included studies also vary, with some relying primarily on oral interviews without experimental validation of the reported medicinal or nutritional properties. The absence of quantitative analysis, such as standardised phytochemical screenings, undermines the ability to compare bioactive properties across regions [2].
Furthermore, sample sizes in many ethnobotanical surveys are small, raising concerns about the representativeness and reliability of the data [20]. Thus, future research should address these limitations by expanding the geographic scope, incorporating more diverse sources of IK, and employing innovative methodologies that prioritise community engagement and reciprocity [4,5], such as incorporating multilingual searches or collaborating with native speakers to capture a more comprehensive range of IKSs [5,7]. Further research is needed to explore the biological activity, toxicological properties, and potential applications of S. spinosa, based on the novel use reports and identified knowledge gaps. Collaborative efforts between researchers, local communities, and conservation organisations can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of this plant species and its role in IKSs, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable resource management [6].
Several studies have documented the traditional uses of S. spinosa within indigenous communities in only two provinces of South Africa [20,32,38,43,46]. This distribution indicates a significant gap in the geographical coverage of S. spinosa research, particularly in underrepresented regions of South Africa and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa [18,19,20]. The previous studies have highlighted the diverse uses of the plant, including medicinal, cultural, and socio-economic purposes [20,32,38,43,46]. However, the existing literature needs a comprehensive and cohesive compilation of the various traditional uses across different communities. There is a need for further research to systematically document and compare the traditional uses of S. spinosa within various indigenous communities to provide a clearer understanding of its significance and cultural value [2,23].
More studies are needed to authenticate the ethnobotanical uses of S. spinosa by assessing its nutritional and bioactive compounds, including its phytochemical composition in Africa [14,24,25,26,27,28,29]. However, the existing literature often needs a community-specific approach to authenticating the phytochemicals within different indigenous communities. Further research should adopt a community-based participatory approach to identify and authenticate the phytochemicals in S. spinosa samples, acknowledging the variations that may exist across different communities and the potential implications for traditional medicinal practices [7].
This study emphasises the critical importance of IK in the conservation and sustainable management of S. spinosa, a plant species of significant cultural and ecological value in Africa [2]. The findings indicate that IK contains invaluable insights into the traditional uses, socio-ecological impacts, and potential phytochemical applications of S. spinosa, highlighting its multifaceted roles in local communities [20].
The comprehensive exploration of current literature underscores the urgent need to document and preserve this knowledge, particularly as it faces threats from modernity and globalisation [4,5]. As communities navigate environmental challenges and shifting socio-economic landscapes, it becomes paramount to empower local populations by recognising and integrating their traditional ecological knowledge. In addition, fostering collaboration between indigenous communities and scientific research can lead to more effective conservation strategies that protect biodiversity and promote cultural heritage [8,9]. This study serves as a call to action for policymakers, researchers, and environmental practitioners to value and incorporate indigenous perspectives into sustainable resource management frameworks [5,23]. Ultimately, efforts to understand and preserve S. spinosa through the lens of IK can enhance environmental resilience and support the rights and well-being of local communities.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review highlights the significant medicinal, nutritional, and cultural uses of S. spinosa across sub-Saharan Africa. The findings underscore the plant’s vital role in traditional medicine, particularly in treating gastrointestinal conditions, fevers, and infectious diseases. Despite its widespread application, a notable gap exists in quantitative research, particularly concerning the plant’s bioactive compounds and pharmacological efficacy. Future research should prioritise underrepresented regions, such as West, Central, and East Africa, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the plant’s significance. Additionally, interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ethnobotany, pharmacology, and environmental science would enhance the understanding of S. spinosa’s therapeutic potential. Collaborative, community-based participatory research is essential for ethically engaging local communities, respecting IK, and promoting equitable benefit-sharing. By bridging the gap between traditional knowledge and scientific inquiry, S. spinosa could provide innovative solutions for food security, health promotion, and biodiversity conservation. These efforts will not only enhance the scientific understanding of this valuable plant but also support the preservation of IKSs and promote the sustainable management of natural resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.S.T., E.K. and P.T.N.; methodology, S.N.S.T. and P.T.N.; formal analysis, S.N.S.T., investigation, S.N.S.T., P.T.N. and M.T.B.D.; resources, S.N.S.T.; writing—preparation of original draft, S.N.S.T. and M.T.B.D.; writing—review and editing, P.T.N. and E.K.; supervision, P.T.N., M.T.B.D. and E.K.; project administration, P.T.N.; funding acquisition, P.T.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding, and The APC was funded by the University of Mpumalanga.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the University of Mpumalanga for providing funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IKSsIndigenous knowledge systems
IKIndigenous knowledge

References

  1. Rowe, A.; Hirnschall, G.; Lambrechts, T.; Bryce, J. Linking the integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) and health information system (HIS) classifications: Issues and options. Bull. World Health Organ. 1999, 77, 988. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Omotayo, A.O.; Aremu, A.O. Undervalued Spiny Monkey Orange (Strychnos spinosa Lam.): An Indigenous Fruit for Sustainable Food-Nutrition and Economic Prosperity. Plants 2021, 10, 2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mpofu, D.; Miruka, C.O. Indigenous knowledge management transfer systems across generations in Zimbabwe. Indilinga—Afr. J. Indig. Knowl. Syst. 2009, 8, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Is there a future for indigenous and local knowledge? J. Peasant Stud. 2021, 49, 1139–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Le Roux, L.  Strychnos spinosa. Available online: https://pza.sanbi.org/strychnos-spinosa (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  6. Aremu, A.O.; Moyo, M. Health benefits and biological activities of spiny monkey orange (Strychnos spinosa Lam.): An African indigenous fruit tree. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 283, 114704. [Google Scholar]
  7. Avakoudjo, H.G.G.; Hounkpèvi, A.; Idohou, R.; Koné, M.W.; Assogbadjo, A.E. Local Knowledge, Uses, and Factors Determining the Use of Strychnos spinosa Organs in Benin (West Africa). Econ. Bot. 2019, 74, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harvey-Brown, Y.  Strychnos spinosa. IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2024, 2024, e.T191203656A208357993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Madzimure, J.; Nyahangare, E.T.; Hamudikuwanda, H.; Hove, T.; Belmain, S.R.; Stevenson, P.C.; Mvumi, B.M. Efficacy of Strychnos spinosa (Lam.) and Solanum incanum L. aqueous fruit extracts against cattle ticks. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2013, 45, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahmoud, K.B.; Abdelkefi, F.; Mezzapesa, G.N.; Perrino, E.V. Nutritional value and functional properties of an underexploited Tunisian wild beet (Beta macrocarpa Guss.) in relation to soil characteristics. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2024, 9, 705–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Perrino, E.V.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Mezzapesa, G.N.; Trani, A. Stachys italica Mill.: Synecology, functional compounds and potential use of an Italian endemic taxon. Planta 2024, 260, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Georgiadis, P. Ethnobotanical knowledge against the combined biodiversity, poverty and climate crisis: A case study from a Karen community in Northern Thailand. Plants People Planet 2022, 4, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. UNESCO. Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management for Integrated Community Development in National Parks of Madagascar. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/biodiversity-conservation-and-sustainable-natural-resource-management-biocom (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  14. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mbhele, Z.; Zharare, G.E.; Zimudzi, C.; Ntuli, N.R. Indigenous Knowledge on the Uses and Morphological Variation among Strychnos spinosa Lam. at Oyemeni Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ali, S.; Hanif, U.; Raza, A.; Ali, B.; Khan, M.N.; Wahab, S.; Ullah, R. Authentication of Ethnoveterinary Important Grasses Through Microscopic Techniques: Insights Into the Anatomical and Phytochemical Analysis of Grasses. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024, 33, 2001–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bisso, B.N.; Nkwelle, R.N.E.; Tchuenteu, R.T.; Dzoyem, J.P. Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Seven Underinvestigated Medicinal Plants against Microbial Pathogens. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 2022, 1998808. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tittikpina, N.K.; Atakpama, W.; Hoekou, Y.; Diop, Y.M.; Batawila, K.; Akapagana, K. Strychnos spinosa Lam: Comprehensive review on its medicinal and nutritional uses. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 17, 8–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bero, J.; Ganfon, H.; Jonville, M.C.; Frederich, M.; Gbaguidi, F.; DeMol, P.; Moudachirou, M.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. In vitro antiplasmodial activity of plants used in Benin in traditional medicine to treat malaria. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 122, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bizimana, N.; Tietjen, U.; Zessin, K.H.; Diallo, D.; Djibril, C.; Melzig, M.F.; Clausen, P.H. Evaluation of medicinal plants from Mali for their in vitro and in vivo trypanocidal activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lawal, F.; Bapela, M.J.; Adebayo, S.A.; Nkadimeng, S.M.; Yusuf, A.A.; Malterud, K.E.; McGaw, L.J.; Tshikalange, T.E. Anti-inflammatory potential of South African medicinal plants used for the treatment of sexually transmitted infections. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 125, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Magassouba, F.B.; Diallo, A.; Kouyate, M.; Mara, F.; Mara, O.; Bangoura, O.; Camara, A.; Traore, S.; Diallo, A.K.; Zaoro, M.; et al. Ethnobotanical survey and antibacterial activity of some plants used in Guinean traditional medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Molander, M.; Nielsen, L.; Sogaard, S.; Staerk, D.; Ronsted, N.; Diallo, D.; Chifundera, K.Z.; van Staden, J.; Jager, A.K. Hyaluronidase, phospholipase A2 and protease inhibitory activity of plants used in traditional treatment of snakebite-induced tissue necrosis in Mali, DR Congo and South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 157, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Waterman, C.; Smith, R.A.; Pontiggia, L.; DerMarderosian, A. Anthelmintic screening of Sub-Saharan African plants used in traditional medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 755–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Asase, A.; Oteng-Yeboah, A.A.; Odamtten, G.T.; Simmonds, M.S. Ethnobotanical study of some Ghanaian anti-malarial plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 99, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bruschi, P.; Morganti, M.; Mancini, M.; Signorini, M.A. Traditional healers and laypeople: A qualitative and quantitative approach to local knowledge on medicinal plants in Muda (Mozambique). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 138, 543–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Wet, H.; Nciki, S.; van Vuuren, S.F. Medicinal plants used for the treatment of various skin disorders by a rural community in northern Maputaland, South Africa. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doka, I.G.; Yagi, S.M. Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants in West Kordofan (Western Sudan). Ethnobot. Leafl. 2009, 13, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar]
  29. Karou, S.D.; Tchacondo, T.; Djikpo Tchibozo, M.A.; Abdoul-Rahaman, S.; Anani, K.; Koudouvo, K.; Batawila, K.; Agbonon, A.; Simpore, J.; de Souza, C. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the Central Region of Togo. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 1286–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koné, W.M.; Kamanzi Atindehou, K. Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants used in traditional veterinary medicine in Northern Côte d’Ivoire (West Africa). South Afr. J. Bot. 2008, 74, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lockett, C.T.; Calvert, C.C.; Grivetti, L.E. Energy and micronutrient composition of dietary and medicinal wild plants consumed during drought. Study of rural Fulani, northeastern Nigeria. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 51, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maroyi, A. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by the people in Nhema communal area, Zimbabwe. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mhlongo, L.S.; Van Wyk, B.-E. Zulu medicinal ethnobotany: New records from the Amandawe area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 266–290. [Google Scholar]
  34. Novotna, B.; Polesny, Z.; Pinto-Basto, M.F.; Van Damme, P.; Pudil, P.; Mazancova, J.; Duarte, M.C. Medicinal plants used by ‘root doctors’, local traditional healers in Bie province, Angola. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 260, 112662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ruffo, C.K. A Survey of medicinal plants in Tabora region, Tanzania. Tradit. Med. Plants 1991, 391. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hilonga, S.; Otieno, J.N.; Ghorbani, A.; Pereus, D.; Kocyan, A.; de Boer, H. Trade of wild-harvested medicinal plant species in local markets of Tanzania and its implications for conservation. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 214–224. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tchacondo, T.; Karou, S.D.; Batawila, K.; Agban, A.; Ouro-Bang’na, K.; Anani, K.T.; Gbeassor, M.; de Souza, C. Herbal remedies and their adverse effects in Tem tribe traditional medicine in Togo. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 8, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zwane, N.S.; De Wet, H.; Van Vuuren, S.F. Blood purification practices: Some ethnopharmacological insight from a rural community in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 324, 117795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Derya, G.; Dzitse, S.; Tom-Dery, D. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Sissala East municipality of the upper West region, Ghana. Phytomed. Plus 2023, 3, 100461. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mohamadoua, H.; Tagnec, S.R.; LIENOU, L.L.; Kadad, P.H.; Emboloa, E.E.L.; Nganwae, K.G.; Essamea, O.J.L.; Jazet, D.P.M. Ethnopharmacological Investigation of Plants Used in the Treatment of Breast Cancer in Northern Cameroon. J. Herb. Med. 2024, 46, 100906. [Google Scholar]
  41. Magwede, K.; van Wyk, B.-E.; van Wyk, A.E. An inventory of Vhavenḓa useful plants. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 57–89. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mlilo, S.; Sibanda, S. An ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal plants used in the treatment of cancer in some parts of Matebeleland, Zimbabwe. South Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 146, 401408. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chinsembu, K.C.; Syakalima, M.S.; Semenya, S.S. Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers in the management of HIV/AIDS opportunistic diseases in Lusaka, Zambia. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aparicioa, H.; Hedbergb, I.; Bandeirac, S.; Ghorbani, A. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal and edible plants used in Nhamacoa area, Manica province Mozambique. South Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 139, 318332. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shopoa, B.; Mapayaa, R.J.; Maroyi, A. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants traditionally used in Gokwe South District, Zimbabwe. South Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 149, 2948. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yaoitcha, A.S.; Houehanou, T.D.; Fandohan, A.B.; Houinato, M.R.B. Prioritization of useful medicinal tree species for conservation in Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin: A multivariate analysis approach. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 61, 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  47. Masumbu, F.F.F.; Mwamatope, B.; Tembo, D.; Mwakikunga, A.; Kamanula, J. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants claimed by traditional herbal practitioners to manage cancers in Malawi. J. Herb. Med. 2023, 42, 100796. [Google Scholar]
  48. Adeniyi, A.; Asase, A.; Ekpe, P.K.; Asitoakor, B.K.; Adu-Gyamfi, A.; Avekor, P.Y. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants from Ghana; confirmation of ethnobotanical uses, and review of biological and toxicological studies on medicinal plants used in Apra Hills Sacred Grove. J. Herb. Med. 2018, 14, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schultz, F.; Anywar, G.; Wack, B.; Quave, C.L.; Garbe, L.A. Ethnobotanical study of selected medicinal plants traditionally used in the rural Greater Mpigi region of Uganda. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 256, 112742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dlova, N.C.; Ollengo, M.A. Traditional and ethnobotanical dermatology practices in Africa. Clin. Dermatol. 2018, 36, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dabré, Z.; Zerbo, I.; Nacoulma, B.M.I.; Soro, D.; Thiombiano, A. Ethnobotany and conservation of the species Celtis toka (Forssk.) Hepper & J.R.I. wood: A way forward for sustainable use in Burkina Faso. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18621. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kshirsagar, P.R.; Jagtap, U.B.; Gaikwad, N.B.; Bapat, V.A. Ethanopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of medicinally potent genus Swertia: An update. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 444–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yadav, K.N.; Kadam, P.V.; Patel, J.A.; Patil, M.J. Strychnos potatorum: Phytochemical and pharmacological review. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2014, 8, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Ndarubu, T.S.; Rahinat, G.; Majiyebo, A.J.; Julius, I.N.; Moshood, A.O.; Damola, A.S.; Eustace, B.B. Strychnos spinosa as a potential anti-oxidants and anti-microbials natural product. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 2, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ngadze, R.T.; Linnemann, A.R.; Nyanga, L.K.; Fogliano, V.; Verkerk, R. Local processing and nutritional composition of indigenous fruits: The case of monkey orange (Strychnos spp.) from Southern Africa. Food Rev. Int. 2016, 33, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Albahri, G.; Badran, A.; Hijazi, A.; Daou, A.; Baydoun, E.; Nasser, M.; Merah, O. The Therapeutic Wound Healing Bioactivities of Various Medicinal Plants. Life 2023, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferreira, M.; Gendron, F. Community-based participatory research with traditional and indigenous communities of the Americas: Historical context and future directions. Int. J. Crit. Pedagog. 2011, 3, 153–168. [Google Scholar]
  58. Magni, G. Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. Eur. J. Educ. 2017, 52, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McClatchey, W.C.; Mahady, G.B.; Bennett, B.C.; Shiels, L.; Savo, V. Ethnobotany as a pharmacological research tool and recent developments in CNS-active natural products from ethnobotanical sources. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 123, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nontu, Y.; Mdoda, L.; Dumisa, B.M.; Mujuru, N.M.; Ndwandwe, N.; Gidi, L.S.; Xaba, M. Empowering Rural Food Security in the Eastern Cape Province: Exploring the Role and Determinants of Family Food Gardens. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Robinson, J.M.; Gellie, N.; MacCarthy, D.; Mills, J.G.; O’Donnell, K.; Redvers, N. Traditional ecological knowledge in restoration ecology: A call to listen deeply, to engage with, and respect Indigenous voices. Restor. Ecol. 2021, 29, e13381. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Workflow for selecting articles from specific databases (Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley) related to the traditional knowledge of S. spinosa in sub-Saharan Africa (61 is the total number of reports).
Figure 1. Workflow for selecting articles from specific databases (Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley) related to the traditional knowledge of S. spinosa in sub-Saharan Africa (61 is the total number of reports).
Diversity 17 00228 g001
Figure 2. Different S. spinosa plant parts used for managing different ailments and conditions in Africa.
Figure 2. Different S. spinosa plant parts used for managing different ailments and conditions in Africa.
Diversity 17 00228 g002
Figure 3. Methods of preparation (A) and administration (B) of S. spinosa for treatment of different ailments and conditions in Africa.
Figure 3. Methods of preparation (A) and administration (B) of S. spinosa for treatment of different ailments and conditions in Africa.
Diversity 17 00228 g003
Figure 4. Different ailments treated with S. spinosa in Africa (A—Gastrointestinal Disorders, B—Infectious Diseases, C—Pain and Inflammation, D—Reproductive Health Issues, E—Skin-related Conditions, F—Respiratory Conditions, and G—Other Traditional Uses).
Figure 4. Different ailments treated with S. spinosa in Africa (A—Gastrointestinal Disorders, B—Infectious Diseases, C—Pain and Inflammation, D—Reproductive Health Issues, E—Skin-related Conditions, F—Respiratory Conditions, and G—Other Traditional Uses).
Diversity 17 00228 g004
Table 2. Ethnobotanical uses of Strychnos spinosa Lam. and modes of administration in Africa.
Table 2. Ethnobotanical uses of Strychnos spinosa Lam. and modes of administration in Africa.
Category of DiseasesEthnobotanical UsePlant PartMethod of PreparationAdministrationReference
Gastrointestinal diseasesStomach achesLeaves, roots, bark, non-ripe fruitCalcinated to powder (fruit), decoction (leaves boiled)Orally[12,20,39,45,51]
Diarrhoea (humans and livestock)
Constipation
Roots, barkPowder or decoction (roots)Orally[12,37,42]
Diseases of the digestive tractLeaves, barkDecoctionNot specified[45]
VomitingRootsPowderOrally[42]
Abdominal painsRootsNot specifiedNot specified[37]
Infectious diseasesMalariaLeaves, twigsDecoction and infusion (leaves), grind twigsOrally, topical (twigs ground, mixed with pomade)[12,30,45,51]
Venereal diseases (gonorrhoea, syphilis, lymphogranuloma inguinale)Roots, fruit, root barkMaceration (roots, fruit), decoctionOrally[26,27,31,40,42,48,50]
Bacterial infectionsBarkCalcinated or infusionOrally[12]
TuberculosisNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified[45]
Sleeping sickness (anti-trypanosal activity)Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specified[45]
Pain and inflammationHaemorrhoidsRootCrushedEnema[39]
FeverRoot, bark with ripe fruitMaceration of root and infusion of bark and rootOrally[12]
WearinessLeaves with rootsInfusionOrally and/or submerged[12]
DiabetesRootsCalcinationOrally[34,45]
CataractBark, fruits, leaves, or rootsDecoctionTopical (on eye)[50]
HerniaRootsDecoctionOrally[31,51]
Cures swelling of feetBark with ripe fruitDecoctionOrally, topical[12]
HypertensionRoot, fruitInfusionOrally[12,33,45]
Ear diseaseLeaf, bark, and rootsNot specifiedNot specified[51]
Prevents paralysisBark with ripe fruitDecoctionOrally, topical[12]
OedemaBark, fruits, leaves, or rootsDecoctionOrally[50]
Foot crevicesFruitPulpNot specified[12]
CardiovascularNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified[38]
Food allergiesBark, rootsDecoction (bark), powder (roots)Orally[20,42]
Unblocking respiratory deficienciesLeaves with rootsMacerationOrally[12]
Reproductive healthFacilitation of milk production (for mothers and cows)FruitRipe fruit calcinated and reduced to powderOrally (sprinkled in porridge)[12]
DysmenorrheaRoot, barkInfusion of root or bark, decoction of barkOrally[12,38,41]
Prevention of miscarriageBark, fruits, leaves, or rootsDecoctionOrally[50]
Labour inductionRootsMacerationOrally[31]
Prevention of sterilityNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified[38]
Trauma and emergenciesSnake bitesRoot, bark, fruit, radix/ cortexCalcination, decoction (bark), un-ripe fruit lickedOrally, topical[20,28,31,36,44,45]
Slows venom (anti-venom)RootInfusion/calcinatedOrally[12]
Other usesCultural rituals
(homestead protection, livestock increase, love charm, blood cleanser)
Fruit, root, bark (mixed with Sapium integerrimuma
(Hochst.) J. Leonard.)
Paste (pulp of non-ripe fruit), maceration (root), crushed (bark)Orally[12,20,43]
Growth retardationLeaves, bark, rootNot specifiedNot specified[51]
Cattle dermatitisLeaves with leaves of Crossopteryx febrifuga (G. Don) BenthDecoctionOrally and topical[35]
Fever in oxenBarkCalcinated or infusionOrally[12]
Construction/craftworkWoodWood driedNot specified[46]
FirewoodWoodWood driedNot specified[12,20]
Solidification of babiesLeavesInfusion and decoctionOrally and submerged[12]
Cattle ticksFruitGround (pulp and seeds of un-ripe fruit)Topical[14]
Food/drink
(fermented maize meal/porridge, jam, alcohol, juice)
FruitPulp from ripe fruitOrally[12,20,30,46,49]
FodderLeavesPicked freshOrally[12]
Skin related conditionsChronic wounds/soresFruit, fruit sap with leaves of S. madagascariensis, barkPowderOrally, topical[32,47,52]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thothela, S.N.S.; Kola, E.; Dalu, M.T.B.; Ndhlovu, P.T. Indigenous Knowledge and Utilisation of Strychnos spinosa Lam. in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Its Medicinal, Nutritional, and Cultural Significance. Diversity 2025, 17, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040228

AMA Style

Thothela SNS, Kola E, Dalu MTB, Ndhlovu PT. Indigenous Knowledge and Utilisation of Strychnos spinosa Lam. in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Its Medicinal, Nutritional, and Cultural Significance. Diversity. 2025; 17(4):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thothela, Sanele Nomfundo Sandisiwe, Elizabeth Kola, Mwazvita T. B. Dalu, and Peter Tshepiso Ndhlovu. 2025. "Indigenous Knowledge and Utilisation of Strychnos spinosa Lam. in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Its Medicinal, Nutritional, and Cultural Significance" Diversity 17, no. 4: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040228

APA Style

Thothela, S. N. S., Kola, E., Dalu, M. T. B., & Ndhlovu, P. T. (2025). Indigenous Knowledge and Utilisation of Strychnos spinosa Lam. in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Its Medicinal, Nutritional, and Cultural Significance. Diversity, 17(4), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop