Next Article in Journal
Ornamental Plant Diversity and Traditional Uses in Home Gardens of Kham Toei Sub-District, Thai Charoen District, Yasothon Province, Northeastern Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
First Records of Beetle Fauna (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Late Glacial Sediments of Lithuania: Novel Environmental Reconstructions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mycoforestry with the Saffron Milk Cap (Lactarius deliciosus L.:Fr. S.F. Gray) and Its Potential as a Large-Scale Food Production System

1
Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
2
Mycorrhizal Systems Ltd., Lancashire PR25 2SD, UK
3
Biological, Clinical and Environmental Systems Modelling Group, Ridley Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(12), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17120821
Submission received: 15 September 2025 / Revised: 20 October 2025 / Accepted: 27 October 2025 / Published: 27 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycorrhizal Fungi Biodiversity and Ecology)

Abstract

Mycoforestry, a farming system that produces edible fungi crops in forest plantations through controlled mycorrhizal symbiosis, has the potential to enhance biodiversity in forestry plantations and mitigate some of the negative impacts associated with modern agriculture, such as soil erosion, habitat degradation, and carbon emissions. Mycoforestry systems typically exploit a range of native fungi that can be inoculated into planting stock of commercial tree species, with biodiversity benefits delivered through expanded habitat provision for the fungi and a range of other organisms through alterations to stand structure. One mycoforestry system showing strong potential for commercial viability involves the cultivation of Lactarius deliciosus (L.:Fr.) S.F. Gray in Pinaceae plantations. This review aims to evaluate the benefits of mycoforestry systems with a focus on Lactarius deliciosus (L.:Fr.) as a case study. It will review the state of the art and discuss technical developments necessary for the successful large-scale application of mycoforestry systems.

1. Introduction

In this study, we evaluate the potential economic, societal and ecological benefits of large-scale applications of Lactarius deliciosus (L.:Fr.) S.F. Gray mycoforestry and give recommendations on how this could be achieved, with the UK as an exemplar. We explore technical aspects including inoculation success, in-vitro growth and long-term persistence in soils and the need to mitigate limitations that constrain the commercial viability of this food production system. Currently, large-scale application is limited by the slow in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus [1,2,3] and its inconsistent inoculation success and persistence in pot and plantation trials [4,5,6,7,8].

2. L. deliciosus Mycoforestry: General Overview

2.1. What Are Ectomycorrhizal Associations?

An ectomycorrhizal association is defined by the presence of three structural components: (1) a sheath or mantle that surrounds the root; (2) a Hartig net which grows inwardly and intercellularly between the epidermal and cortical cells; (3) an outwardly growing extraradical mycelium system that forms essential connections with the soil and the fruiting bodies (basidiocarps) of the ectomycorrhizal fungus [9]. The interface where this mycorrhizal association operates (area between the fungal mantle and soil) is referred to as the mycorrhizosphere [10].
Ectomycorrhizal associations broadly function as mutualistic symbiotic biotrophy. This is because the ectomycorrhizal fungus supplies the host plant with nutrients and water that it pumps or mobilizes from the soil using its extraradical mycelial network [11,12,13], increasing the absorption area of the root system [9,14]. In return, the tree host provides carbohydrates to the fungal symbiont [13,15]. Apart from increasing the nutrient and water uptake capabilities of trees, ECM provide a range of other benefits to their host by increasing their resistance to environmental stressors [16,17,18], pests [19], pathogens and diseases [20,21].
Bacteria play a part in mycorrhizal associations, as bacteria help mobilize nutrients [22,23,24,25] and facilitate ECM growth and root colonization intensity [26,27,28]. Hence, ectomycorrhizal associations are tripartite (plant–fungi–bacteria). The structure of bacterial communities in the mycorrhizosphere is influenced by their associated partners, either through the supply of carbohydrates (fungi [26,29]) or through the rhizodeposition of exudates and formation of bacteria traps on root surfaces (trees [30,31,32]).

2.2. What Is Mycoforestry?

Mycoforestry is an approach to cultivating edible ECM in forest plantations using controlled mycorrhizal synthesis [33,34], achieved by producing an inoculum of fungal mycelium or spores and using it to confront receptive non-mycorrhized roots of a compatible host plant [12]. For this mycorrhizal synthesis to be successful, it must be conducted in an environment with favourable abiotic and biotic conditions for the coupled symbionts, as unfavourable conditions for either partner will prevent ECM development [12]. Consequently, following the establishment of the mycoforestry plantation, silvicultural practices would need to be implemented to sustain the long-term fruiting of the target fungus. Information on the optimal environmental conditions of the target fungus is required to determine the necessary management practices.
Various inoculation methods have been developed to facilitate controlled mycorrhizal synthesis such as vegetative inoculum (derived from liquid and solid pure fungal cultures), gamic inoculum (spores), natural inoculum (soil and humus) and symbiotic inoculum (mother tree planting and excised colonized roots) [35,36,37,38]. Since ectomycorrhizal fungi can become adapted to localized environmental conditions, especially L. deliciosus (see Section 3.2, Section 3.3, Section 5.4 and Section 5.5), region-specific isolates should be used when implementing this farming system on a commercial scale. Additionally, the use of region-specific isolates should help prevent outbreeding depression and the loss of genetic variability in wild populations of L. deliciosus.

2.3. L. deliciosus

L. deliciosus is a basidiomycete fungus that belongs to a complex of species known as Lactarius sect. Deliciosi (Fr.:Fr.) Redeuilh, Verbeken and Walleyn [39]. Fungi in this complex can be differentiated by the colours of their basidiocarps (dark yellow, orange, wine red, brown and indigo) [39,40,41]. The basidiocarps of L. deliciosus are pale orange in colour (discolouring green in mature basidiocarps) and exude a bright orange latex when damaged [42]. In natural ecosystems, L. deliciosus forms multi-stage ectomycorrhizal associations with conifer trees from the Pinaceae family [8] and is characteristically associated with species in the Pinus genus [39,43].
L. deliciosus is naturally distributed throughout the European continent and some parts of the Middle East [8]. Moreover, because of trade and artificial introductions it can now be found in China [44], Chile [45], Australia [46,47], New Zealand [8,48] and South Africa [49]. Hence, it is broadly distributed across a variety of climatic conditions, which suggests that it is adaptable to a wide range of environmental conditions. In the UK, this fungus is more abundant in the north than in the south, where it is recorded most frequently in Scotland (Figure 1), a disparity potentially driven by Scotland having the greatest conifer forest cover [50].

2.4. L. deliciosus Mycoforestry and Its Potential in the UK

L. deliciosus produces edible basidiocarps that are consumed and sold internationally, in areas such as Europe [52,53], Guatemala [54], Nigeria [55], Turkey [56] and China [57]. The cultivation of L. deliciosus basidiocarps was pioneered in France by Poitou et al. [58] using laboratory-inoculated Pinus pinaster Aiton seedlings planted in a former vineyard near Bordeaux. After 3 years, the inoculated stands in this plantation began to produce basidiocarps [59]. Since then, L. deliciosus has been successfully used to inoculate a range of different Pinus species such as P. halepensis Miller [4], P. sylvestris L. [6,60], P. radiata [48], P. nigra J.F.Arnold [61], P. pinaster [5], P. massoniana Lamb. [62], P. pinea L. and P. armandii Franch. [63]. However, this practice is still in its infancy and further research is needed to overcome the substantial knowledge gaps and limitations (see Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5) preventing the large-scale application of this mycoforestry practice.
This mycoforestry system has not been commercially implemented in the UK. Nevertheless, results from plantations in New Zealand can offer insights into their economic potential, where small-scale P. sylvestris plantations recorded an annual yield equating to >1 T/ha [12]. Consequently, if L. deliciosus plantations in the UK produce similar yields, this would generate a minimum annual income of €17,010 €/ha from mushroom production alone (based on the current market price advertised by online retailers in Spain [64]). Additionally, if these yields could be sustained throughout an entire optimal P. sylvestris forest plantation rotation period of 50 years [65], this would result in a minimum total income generation of 782,460 €/ha (excluding first four years to allow for L. deliciosus establishment [6]). However, reservations should be made towards the value stated above, as increases in the supply of L. deliciosus would likely result in a price decrease due to greater availability, as observed in L. deliciosus markets in Spain [66].

2.5. Benefits of Upscaling L. deliciosus Mycoforestry

Presently, L. deliciosus markets are dependent on the harvesting of wild populations to meet consumer demands [53,66]. However, basidiocarp productivity from wild fungi populations is currently declining due to habitat loss [67,68,69], forest floor trampling [70], climate change [71,72] and air pollution [73], which could lead to inflated basidiocarp prices if market demand exceeds supply [66]. Hence, the upscaling of this mycoforestry practice should mitigate price inflations, making L. deliciosus a more accessible and economically viable food source for lower-income households. Large-scale L. deliciosus mycoforestry plantations should also reduce anthropogenic foraging pressures in natural ecosystems, increasing the amount of available food for wildlife (especially for rodent and marsupial species, [74,75,76,77]) and mitigating the detrimental effects of mushroom foraging such as forest floor trampling [70] or disturbance to wildlife [78].
Studies demonstrate that trees inoculated with L. deliciosus exhibit enhanced resistance to plant pathogens (though not always significant) [61,79], accelerated growth rates [80], and improved survival in adverse soil conditions [81]. Hence, large-scale inoculation of P. sylvestris trees with L. deliciosus in forestry offers ecological and economic advantages through faster timber production, reduced tree mortality, and decreased fungicide applications—thereby minimizing detrimental effects on non-target native wildlife [82,83,84,85,86]. Since L. deliciosus can increase tree seedling survival in adverse environmental conditions, development of large-scale L. deliciosus inoculation protocols would also benefit forest restoration and ectomycoremediation projects. This includes revegetation or decontamination of polluted lands, as L. deliciosus has been recorded to degrade pollutants such as triphenylmethane dyes [87] and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [88]. Additionally, Thomas and Jump [33] analysed the carbon sequestration potential of L. deliciosus mycoforestry compared to the nine most important food production systems and concluded that this is the only system to sequester carbon, suggesting it could aid countries meet their legally binding Paris Agreement [89] targets.
L. deliciosus has been reported to harbour anti-inflammatory [90], antimicrobial [91], immunomodulatory [92], antiproliferative and anticancer [93,94,95], antioxidant and antihyperglycemic properties [96]. Hence, commercial scale production systems could have significant benefits for the pharmacological industry. Since wild basidiocarp production in natural ecosystems is currently declining, these plantations could help maintain an adequate supply and serve as living repositories of pharmacologically active chemicals.

3. In-Vitro Growth Requirements of L. deliciosus

Here we focus on the abiotic and biotic factors that affect the growth of this fungus in liquid culture, given that liquid fermentation and mycelial slurry inoculation have been identified as the optimal methods for cultivating L. deliciosus and inoculating root systems of host plants (see Section 4.1) [4,97].

3.1. Liquid Media

Gomes et al. [98] observed the greatest in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus in biotin–aneurin–folic acid (BAF) [99], compared to potato dextrose broth (PDB), modified Melin-Norkans (MMN) with added glucose of 2% [100], malt extract, and Oddoux [101]. Evidence of BAF being the optimal medium for the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus has also been reported in solid culture studies [60,102,103,104]. BAF contains higher concentrations of glucose, amino acids and vitamins compared to the other media tested, and increases in L. deliciosus growth have been attributed to these three components in in-vitro studies [60,105,106,107,108,109]. Two of the nitrogen (N) sources BAF contains (peptone and yeast extract) have also been recorded as the optimal N sources for L. deliciosus in a multitude of liquid culture studies [110,111,112,113].
While glucose has been recorded as the optimal C source in liquid culture [106] and hypothesized to be a key ingredient stimulating L. deliciosus growth in BAF, research from China presents conflicting results. Seven Chinese studies optimizing C sources in liquid culture (Table A1) identified soluble starch most frequently as the optimal C source. This regional discrepancy may reflect the greater volume of research conducted in China compared to the West, where only one study [106] has examined this question. The variation could also stem from intraspecific differences in carbon utilization capabilities among L. deliciosus isolates, as observed with other ECM [114]. Applications of different carbohydrates at equal weight in these studies might also have caused these results. Since 1 g of starch yields 1.11 grams of glucose upon complete hydrolysis, greater amounts of free glucose may have been available in soluble starch treatments compared to glucose treatments [115,116,117]. Differences in optimal C source results could also be due to taxonomic confusion, as Lactarius spp. in the Lactarius sect. Deliciosi (especially L. hatsudake Nobuj. Tanaka) complex have often been mistaken as L. deliciosus in China [118,119]. Evidence of this misidentification can be observed in scientific articles [120,121], as L. deliciosus is often referred to as the “purple pine fungus”. Reinforcingly, Dong et al. [122] genetically identified the purple pine fungus in China as L. hatsudake and L. vividus X.H. Wang, Nuytinck & Verbeken. The mistaking of L. deliciosus for other fungi in the same complex may be more widespread [123].
Since BAF has been identified as the optimal growth medium for the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus [60,98,102,103,124], this medium should be used as a base recipe for in-vitro growth optimization experiments. To clarify the differences in optimal C results between China and western countries, the growth promoting effects of different C sources should be tested in BAF. Studies should also test different combinations of C sources, as Zhan and Wei [125] recorded increased L. deliciosus growth when C sources were added in combination. Furthermore, the effects of other potential growth promoting compounds should be tested in BAF (root exudates, growth regulator hormones, plant materials and plant material filtrates, see Section 3.5). Any growth-stimulating compound identified in these trials should then be tested at different concentrations in BAF, in a multifactorial manner, to optimize their concentrations and subsequent growth-promoting effects. To avoid nutrient saturation of the medium from the addition of multiple novel compounds, one of the treatment levels in the multifactorial experiment should be absence (0%) of each novel compound, solution, filtrate or plant material. Identifying the optimal concentrations and compound mixtures would provide a targeted medium for the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus, increasing its growth rate and avoiding problems associated with prolonged ECM culture times such as decreases in inoculum viability [126]. Once optimal compound concentrations have been identified, further optimization of L. deliciosus growth in liquid culture could be carried out by manipulating the pH, temperature and oxygen concentration (see Section 3.2, Section 3.3 and Section 3.4).

3.2. pH

The pH of the medium greatly influences the in-vitro growth of fungi, with growth increasing under optimal pH conditions [127]. Research into the optimal pH for the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus in BAF liquid media has been scant. However, Pereira et al. [124] reported the optimal in-vitro growth of an L. aff. deliciosus isolate in BAF at a pH of 5.5 and 6.5 in static and agitated conditions, respectively. These results are consistent with those obtained in different media and in solid BAF culture (Table A2), as most of these studies have either recorded a weakly acidic or basic pH as the optimum. Variability in optimal pH can also occur because of the isolate used, as Chung [103] and Flores et al. [128] reported differences in optimal pH among L. deliciosus isolates tested in BAF solid medium. Variation in pH preference between isolates of the same species could be due to genetic variability or localized adaptation to certain environmental conditions. The four studies that tested the optimal pH for their L. deliciosus isolates and recorded the pH of the source site [129,130,131,132] showed that the in-vitro optimal pH aligned with source site conditions, suggesting adaptation to localised pH conditions. However, Hung and Trappe [127] caution that this relationship is not universal, and that a multitude of factors can influence the optimal in-vitro pH. Consequently, testing for the optimal pH of an L. deliciosus isolate prior to large-scale culturing is a necessity, as the optimal pH can also differ because of the media used [2]. These optimization experiments can also identify isolates with broader pH tolerance ranges; a valuable trait for mycoforestry applications given the variability of soil pH conditions in field settings [133,134,135,136]. Hence, inoculating trees with an isolate that can grow well in a range of pH conditions would be better for long-term plantations than a counterpart that can only thrive in one.

3.3. Temperature

Experiments which have analysed the effects of temperature on the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus have recorded differences in optimal temperature depending on where the isolate was sourced. For Chinese L. deliciosus isolates an optimal in-vitro temperature range of 25–28 °C has been recorded (Table A3), whilst for European isolates an optimal range of 22–23 °C has been reported [129,130]. Differences in optimal temperature between these two regions could be a result of localized adaptation to in-situ climatic conditions. The two isolates used in the European studies were from mountainous areas [129,130], whereas, the isolates used in the two Chinese studies that recorded in-situ conditions [109,132], were sourced from a semiarid region were soil temperatures reach >45 °C. These two Chinese isolates had higher in-vitro temperature tolerances, as they could grow at 30 °C, a temperature that recorded no growth in the one European isolate tested at this temperature [129]. However, even with these differing results, some universal trends can be observed between isolates from these two regions, as temperatures <20 °C and >30 °C impeded the growth of every isolate tested [109,129,132].

3.4. Oxygen Concentration

In submerged conditions, oxygen availability is one of the most important factors controlling fungal growth [97,137,138]. To date, research optimizing the oxygen concentration for L. deliciosus in Western journals has been scant. However, in China two studies have attempted to discover the in-vitro optimal oxygen concentration for L. deliciosus in conical flask culture, observing optimal growth at liquid-to-flask volume ratios of 75/250 ml [112] and 90/250 ml [121]. Additionally, Li et al. [112] fully optimized the in-vitro oxygen concentration for their isolate by optimizing the rotation speed, reporting an optimal rotation per minute (RPM) speed of 210, which suggests that this fungus prefers well oxygenated conditions. Since intraspecific variation has been recorded with other abiotic factors (see Section 3.2 and Section 3.3), and only one study has fully optimized the in-vitro oxygen concentration of L. deliciosus [112], further research into this matter is needed. It is worth noting that Wang et al. [121] referred to L. deliciosus as the “purple pine fungus”, which suggests that they may have been experimenting with a different species (see Section 3.1).

3.5. Effects of Root Exudates, Plant Material and Plant Growth Regulators on the In-Vitro Growth of L. deliciosus

3.5.1. Root Exudates

Root exudates are compounds secreted by plants into soils, consisting of organic soluble substances such as carbohydrates, amino acids, organic acids, lipids, flavonoids, cytokinins and enzymes. [139,140,141]. These compounds once exuded by the root can act as signal mechanisms [142,143] and growth stimulators for ECM [144,145,146]. The only experiment to analyse the effects of root exudates and root materials on the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus was undertaken by Melin [147]. In their experiment, they recorded a growth increase of 160% when P. sylvestris roots were added to the medium. However, further tests conducted by this author on other ECM weren’t always positive, as growth inhibition and decreases in growth promotion were recorded because of the sterilization and root processing methods used, high root exudate concentrations, and root maturation. Consequently, careful consideration of the root processing methods and their physical state is necessary when undertaking these experiments. Since no experiments have tested the effects of root material and their exudates in BAF, further experiments should repeat this study in this medium, as media type can influence the growth promoting effects of a compound [145]. Additionally, when Melin [147] tested the effects of root exudates and materials, some of the species in the same complex as L. deliciosus (deliciosi complex) were not considered separate species [43]. Possible taxonomic confusion can be noted in Melin’s work, as they stated that Picea spp. are a host of L. deliciosus [105], whereas modern taxonomic literature reports the species forming natural mycorrhizal associations with Pinus spp. [148,149]. While these results are informative given testing on a species within the deliciosi complex, verification of these results is needed with a genetically confirmed L. deliciosus isolates. Exudates from non-mycorrhizal plants species such as Brassica rapa subsp. rapa L. could also be tested as they have been reported to significantly increase the in-vitro growth of Paxillus involutus (Batsch) Fr. [144] (see Section 5.2). If these experiments are successful, they could offer practitioners a low-tech and cheap method for improving the in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus.
Plants alter the exudates they release based on their environmental conditions [139,150,151]. To optimize the potential benefits of root exudate solutions, experiments should test the root exudates from plants with different nutritional statuses, as this has never been considered in L. deliciosus in-vitro growth optimization experiments. Evidence of the nutritional status of plants influencing the degree of fungal growth stimulation by root exudates has been recorded with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, with growth-promoting effects by root exudates increasing in low phosphorus conditions [152]. Consequently, further studies should test the growth stimulating effects of aseptically cultured phosphorus deficient Pinus spp. and see if the exudate from their roots stimulate growth better than non-deficient counterparts.
Compounds found in root exudates should also be tested singularly in BAF, without root exudate solutions. This is because Sun and Freis [145] recorded higher growth rates for some ECM (S. granulatus, S. variegatus (Sw.) Kuntze Thelephora terrestris Ehrh. and Pisolithus tinctorius (Pers.) Coker and Couch) when exudate compounds (palmitic, stearic acid and 2-Isopentenyl-aminopurine) were tested separately (compared to the root exudate solution tested). Testing exudate compounds in this manner should allow practitioners to better customize BAF medium for L. deliciosus growth, as the results from these single factor experiments would identify the exudates that best promote growth, and the compound concentrations needed to facilitate this. Additionally, some P. sylvestris root exudates such as jasmonic acid have been recorded to inhibit the growth of ECM [153]. Hence, bypassing root exudate solutions and individually adding exudate compounds to the medium should result in greater growth through the mitigation of these inhibitors. Root exudate compounds which record the greatest growth promoting effects should then be tested in a multifactorial manner, in BAF, in different combinations, as Gogala and Pohleven [154] further increased the growth stimulation effects of Kinetin by adding it to the medium with β-indolylacetic acid.

3.5.2. Effect of Plant Material and Filtrates Not Derived from Roots

The addition of pine plant material filtrates have been reported to increase the growth of L. deliciosus [155]. Additionally, Melin [156] recorded L. deliciosus in-vitro growth increases of 5900% and 2475% in 20 ml of Lindeberg [157] nutrient medium after the addition of 0.8 ml of a Populus tremula L. leaf extract and ash solution, respectively. Greater in-vitro growth of L. deliciosus with the addition of leaf and pine filtrates in these studies could be due to its saprotrophic capabilities, which enable it to scavenge its own nutrients from plant matter. Evidence of L. deliciosus saprotrophic capabilities have already been recorded, as Gramss et al. [88] found that L. deliciosus was the one of the best ECM (out of 22) at degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Given that the type of media used has a significant effect on growth-promoting effects by root exudates [145], and none of the above-mentioned experiments were conducted in BAF, further experiments should test the effects of pine needle and leaf filtrates on the growth of L. deliciosus in this medium. However, when adding plant materials to media, the condition of the needles or leaves must be taken into consideration, as decreases in L. deliciosus growth have been recorded when filtrates from fresh pine needles were added to media [155,158]. Decreases in growth from the fresh needle filtrates could have occurred because of the antibiotic properties or tannins contained in pine needles [159,160]. Hence, fresh pine needles may contain greater amounts of these inhibitor compounds.

4. Nursey Stage and the Production of Inoculated Plants

4.1. Different Types of Inoculation Methods That Have Been Used and Their Success

In L. deliciosus pot experiments, five inoculation methods have been used: mycelial slurry and plugs, solid-state fermentation (SSF), spores and alginate beads [4,5,60,79,80,81,124,132,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168]. Mycelium entrapped in alginate beads has been reported as the most ineffective inoculation method due to the low or absent fungal colonization post inoculation [4,161]. Poor success using this method in these studies was attributed to the mycelial fragmentation processes and chemicals used in the fabrication of the beads. Spore inoculations have recorded slightly more success, as González-Ochoa et al. [5] recorded some of their highest inoculation rates using this technique. However, success using spore inoculum hasn’t been consistently reported across all studies [12]. Additionally, the disadvantages associated with this method (variations in colonization abilities; high chance of contamination; slower colonization rate compared to vegetative inoculum) make it unsuitable for L. deliciosus mycoforestry [37,38].
Most studies which have conducted L. deliciosus pot experiments have used SSF [79,80,162,163,164,165] or mycelial slurry [4,5,124,161,166,167,168]. In inoculation studies that have compared the success of these two methods, conflicting results have been reported. Diaz et al. [4] recorded higher growth rates using mycelial slurry compared to SSF, contradicting findings by Parladé et al. [161]. Diaz et al. [4] injected the root system of older trees (4 months, compared with seedling emergence at 15 days post sowing) with double the amount of mycelial slurry (10 ml/plant). Consequently, the lower mycorrhization results recorded by Parladé et al. [161] are most likely due to their plants having a reduced infectivity potential caused by a combination of these two factors. Even with these conflicting inoculation results, mycelial slurry seems to be the superior inoculation method for commercial production systems, given the potential for cultivating L. deliciosus on a large scale using bioreactors [4,169]. SSF inoculum has also been stated to be a more time consuming and laborious plant inoculation method compared to mycelial slurry [4].
Future studies should aim to optimize the mycelial slurry inoculation method. Optimization of this method can be achieved through various ways, such as increasing the mycelial dose given per plant (g/L), the placement of the inoculum within the root system (direct root placement rather than indirect), the fragmentation method used (blending time and power or the machinery used to fragment mycelium), or through the addition of novel compounds, nutrient solutions or mycorrhizal helper bacteria (MHB) to the mycelial slurry. Increases in mycorrhization of plants by L. deliciosus or other ECM have already been recorded by some of the recommendations mentioned above [4,60,170,171]. The only above-mentioned recommendations that remain unexplored are the fragmentation method used, or the placement of the mycelium within the root system. To minimize energy expenditure in the production of L. deliciosus inoculum, efforts should focus on optimizing the placement of the inoculum, fragmentation of the mycelium and the addition of novel compounds and MHB prior to analysing the effects of higher mycelial doses per plant.

4.2. Effect of Potting Media on the Inoculation Success and Colonization Intensity of L. deliciosus

For a potting medium to be suitable for mycoforestry, it must facilitate high colonization intensity (the percentage of the root system which has been colonized) and mycorrhization rates (number of plants that were successfully colonized) by the target fungus [37]. A colonization intensity rate of ≥33% has been deemed necessary for plants to be suitable for outplanting [172]. Having a high L. deliciosus colonization intensity rate prior to out planting is important as the persistence of this fungus in introduced soils has been positively correlated with colonization intensity [7]. However, Guerin-laguette et al. [48] recorded greater basidiocarp production from some of their initially low colonized trees. Hence, having a high mycorrhization rate seems to be the more important factor. Additionally, having a greater amount of inoculated plants for out planting should make the system more cost effective for practitioners.
In L. deliciosus pot trials conducted under greenhouse or nursery conditions, the highest colonization intensity results (>70%) were obtained using peat and vermiculite in a ratio of 1:10 [173], whereas the highest mycorrhization results (100%) were recorded by Wang et al. [162] using a potting mixture consisting of vermiculite, perlite, peat, and pine bark (4:2:1:1 by volume). However, colonization results using peat and vermiculite have not been consistent across experiments, with some researchers reporting low colonization intensity (<33%) [4,5,79,161] and mycorrhization (<40%) [4,79]. Variations in colonization and mycorrhization results could be due to a multitude of factors such as intraspecific variation in the colonization abilities of isolates [7,161,167,174], the host plant species used [79,174,175], potting medium [4,5], contamination from non-target ECM (see Section 5.1), the amount of inoculum applied and inoculation method used (see Section 4.1), high fertilizer applications [4,60,166] and domestication of the isolate [174].
Even if consistently high colonization intensity and mycorrhization results using peat and vermiculite based potting mixtures were recorded across all studies, the requirement for peat in potting mixtures poses a significant threat to the commercial viability and sustainability of this mycoforestry system. Drying of peatlands for the subsequent harvesting of peat results in detrimental effects to the environment such as the production of greenhouse gas emissions [176], release of toxic metals [177], eutrophication of wetlands [178], loss of peatland habitats [179] and the decline of peatland specialist species [180]. Consequently, international governments are seeking to phase out the sale of peat [181,182] or implement legislation that will prohibit its sale [183]. Hence, there is a need to identify a peat-free alternative that facilitates adequate mycorrhization and colonization intensity by L. deliciosus.
Published research into peat-free potting media alternatives for L. deliciosus mycoforestry has been scant, although González-Ochoa et al. [5] used a peat-free medium (composted pine bark) in their P. pinaster pot trial and recorded greater root colonization intensities compared to the peat and vermiculite medium used. However, lower colonization intensities were recorded compared to some other studies using peat and vermiculite potting media [80,163,164,173]. Even with the lower colonization rates, this study showcases the potential of using non-peat composted plant material in potting media. Furthermore, L. deliciosus has been successfully grown using plant materials such as pine wood chips and sawdust, wheat bran and cotton seed hulls [184]. However, when experimenting with plant products, careful consideration must be taken, as polyphenol-rich residues such as tannins can be toxic to microbial populations [185]. Toxic effects from the addition of plant materials to media have been recorded in L. deliciosus in-vitro studies [155,158], as filtrates from fresh pine needles resulted in decreased L. deliciosus growth. Guerin-Laguette et al. [48] also recorded initial decreases in L. deliciosus fructification and root colonization intensity in trees that had been mulched using pine bark, indicating that bark impeded growth and establishment of the fungus. Hence, studies using plant materials should opt for decomposed materials, as tannins are biodegraded [186] or leached out over time through rainwater due to their water solubility [187].
Given the lack of research into peat alternatives, more pot inoculation trials should be carried out using a range of peat-free mixtures. Since high colonization intensity and mycorrhization rates are essential in L. deliciosus mycoforestry, future experiments should aim to achieve this with peat-free potting media. In these experiments, different combinations of minerals and non-peat composted organic matter should be tested using a high mineral to organic matter ratio (as the highest colonization intensity rates were recorded using this mineral to organic matter ratio) [173]. Careful consideration must be taken when trialing novel potting media to ensure that the factors recorded to adversely affect colonization are avoided in the potting mixtures. To further facilitate mycorrhization and colonization intensity by the fungus in these peat free potting mixtures, ameliorants such as MHB, Tween 80 (non-ionic surfactant and emulsifier) and vegetable oil should also be tested, as they have improved colonization for other ECM [170,171].

5. Long-Term Persistence and Fructification of L. deliciosus in Mycoforestry Plantations

5.1. Impacts of ECM Communities on the Persistence of L. deliciosus in Soils

ECM communities naturally co-exist within the root system of a single tree [188,189,190] and their composition changes over time [191]. In L. deliciosus experiments, contamination from non-target ECM has resulted in conflicting results. In some studies non-target ECM have outcompeted and displaced L. deliciosus from the inoculated tree, resulting in the disappearance or gradual decline of this fungus in introduced soils [7,163], whereas in other studies, contamination from non-target ECM has been reported to have no effect on the basidiocarp productivity or persistence of this fungus [44,48,59]. Non-antagonistic results reported in some of these experiments could have been due to niche partitioning, as Taylor and Bruns [192] recorded the co-existence of ECM within P. muricata D.Don stands because of this mechanism. However, a multitude of factors could have caused these contrasting results, as the persistence of ECM in soil ecosystems are influenced by soil temperature [193,194], nutrient availability [195,196], number of competitors [197], species pairings and inter- and intraspecific competition [198,199,200], pH [195,201,202] and soil moisture [203,204]. Hence, future research should aim to better understand the effects of indigenous ECM communities on the persistence of L. deliciosus under different environmental conditions, as this could help facilitate the establishment of this fungus in field sites through the co-inoculation or promotion of symbiotic fungal communities. For example, increased mycorrhiza formation has already been recorded in Tuber borchii Vittad. inoculated plants when co-inoculated with Arthrinium phaeospermum (Corda) M.B. Ellis strain [205].

5.2. Intercropping with Brassicaceae Plants in L. deliciosus Mycoforestry Plantations

Intercropping L. deliciosus plantations with Brassicaceae flora (B. rapa subsp. rapa.) has the potential to increase the persistence of L. deliciosus in soils and the economic value of these plantations. This is because root exudates from Brassica spp. have been recorded to significantly increase the in-vitro growth of P. involutus [144]. Consequently, if similar effects are recorded with L. deliciosus, increases in mycelial growth should increase the productivity of these plantations and subsequently the revenue gained, as the basidiocarp productivity of L. deliciosus has been recorded to be positively correlated with mycelial biomass [206] and colonization of host root systems [48]. Additionally, the sale of Brassica crop would further increase the income generated through these plantations. However, to ensure the intercropping of these plantations doesn’t adversely affect the persistence of L. deliciosus through the growth stimulation of antagonistic ECM, the effects of exudates from Brassica spp. on indigenous ECM communities should also be recorded. In addition, the nutrient removal effects of this intercropping treatment should be monitored alongside fungal growth stimulation, as B. rapa subsp. rapa has been reported to have a very high phosphorus (P) requirement [207] and this demand could reduce tree growth overtime through the depletion of P in soils. On the other hand, the high phosphorus requirements of B. rapa subsp. rapa could result in further growth stimulation, as mycorrhizal symbiosis can be stimulated in low phosphorus conditions [152]. Since no research has tested the effects of Brassica spp. exudates on L. deliciosus, further in-vitro and in situ research is needed to verify if these also stimulate the growth of this fungus.

5.3. Applications of Mycorrhizal Helper Bacteria (MHB)

No published research has tested the effects of MHB on the colonization intensity and persistence of L. deliciosus. This is surprising, given that MHB extracted from the rhizosphere of P. pinea have been recorded to increase the colonization of host root systems by other ECM [208]. Hence, further research should test the effects of MHB at different concentrations in pot and field trials. Since the objective of this research is to improve the commercial viability of this food production system, further studies should focus on testing commercially available MHB, as successful results with MHB that can’t be cultivated on a large scale would be of limited practical value. One commercially available MHB that justifies further experimentation is Psedomonas fluorescens Migula, as this MHB has been recorded to increase the colonization intensity of Boletus edulis Bull in host root systems [171].

5.4. Effects of Soil Type on the Persistence of L. deliciosus

The type of soil in the field site has been recorded by Hortal et al. [173] and Parlade et al. [163] to significantly affect the persistence of L. deliciosus, with unfavourable physical-chemical and biotic soil characteristics resulting in the disappearance of poorly suited isolates overtime. In Scotland, the predominant soil types in which L. deliciosus basidiocarps have been recorded are mineral podzols (Figure 2). The proliferation of L. deliciosus in mineral podzols could be due to the low nutrient content of these soils [209], as these conditions facilitate mycorrhization by L. deliciosus [4,166]. Moreover, L deliciosus has an affinity for sandy soils in Northern Europe [148], and pine trees, their plant hosts, facilitate the podzolization of sandy soils over time [210]. The proliferation of this fungus in soils with a high mineral content has also been recorded in other regions [211,212]. In pot trials the highest colonization rates were obtained in potting mixtures with a high mineral content (see Section 4.2). These findings suggest that soils with a high mineral ratio are the optimal soil type for the persistence of L. deliciosus, especially in Scotland, as basidiocarp productivity has been positively correlated with mycelial biomass [206] and colonization of host root systems [48]. However, no research has been conducted in the UK on the effects of soil types on the persistence of L. deliciosus.
Globally, successful field applications of this mycoforestry system have been undertaken in various soil types such as sandy clay [58], clayey loam [7], silt loam [6,48] and clay soils [44]. The successful persistence of L. deliciosus in these soil types indicates its preference for clay and loam based soils. However, these prior experiments were predominantly undertaken in areas with contrasting meteorological conditions to each other, as they were undertaken in the Mediterranean [7,58], New Zealand [6,48] and Southwest China [44]. Hence, it is difficult to discern general trends in L. deliciosus persistence from these results. Geographical differences in optimal soil type can already be seen from the literature, as L. deliciosus is attributed to sandy soils in Northern Europe (Figure 2) [148], contradicting the findings of Hortal et al. [7], as they recorded poor L. deliciosus persistence in sandy loam and good persistence in clayey loam. Contrasting results between these two regions could be due to the soil moisture tolerances of L. deliciosus, as water availability may be a key factor limiting the persistence of this fungus in arid climates. Evidence of reductions in water availability having a negative impact on this fungus has already been recorded, with drought and reduced rainfall resulting in decreased basidiocarp productivity [6]. Consequently, the greater persistence of this fungus in clay soils in arid regions could be due to the greater water holding capacities of clay soils compared to sandy soils [214,215].
To better understand the performance of L. deliciosus mycoforestry in different soil types. Further in situ plantation trials are needed in areas with soils of different texture classes and similar meteorological conditions. Controlled pot trials manipulating the physical and chemical properties of these soils should also be undertaken alongside to better understand the effects of these soil factors. The results from these experiments, along with meteorological data, should help identify where and under what conditions this mycoforestry system would be economically profitable. This information should also give insights into the treatments required to maintain the long-term basidiocarp productivity in these plantations. To optimize the selection of suitable plantation sites and symbionts, the influence of the source site’s soil conditions on the persistence of L. deliciosus isolates post out-planting should also be evaluated using isolates sourced from different soil types and climates, as evidence of localized adaption to source site conditions has been reported [174].

5.5. Impacts of Climate on the Persistence of L. deliciosus

Decreases in basidiocarp productivity have been attributed to climatic factors such as reduced annual rainfall (especially in summer) and high wind intensity [6,48,216]. Since basidiocarp productivity has been positively correlated with extraradical mycelium [206] and colonization of host root systems [48], results from these studies offer insights into the effects of climate on the proliferation of L. deliciosus. However, none of these studies identified the optimal meteorological conditions for L. deliciosus or conducted controlled experiments that manipulated these factors. Further studies analysing the effects of climate on the persistence of L. deliciosus need to be undertaken to determine the optimal climatic conditions for both international populations and those in the UK. Results from these studies should be coupled with those of persistence in different soil texture classes to map and identify regions where this food production system would be the most productive. Additionally, land managers could use the climatic data generated from these experiments to understand the maintenance required for the persistence of L. deliciosus within their plantations. Since localized adaptation to different climatic conditions has been recorded with L. deliciosus [174], experiments analysing the effects of meteorological conditions on the proliferation and fructification of this fungus should aim to use multiple isolates sourced from areas with different climates. Using isolates sourced from different climates should help better distinguish general species trends from those of localized adaptation.

5.6. Effects of Mycophagous Invertebrate Communities on Basidiocarp Productivity

One important under studied factor that could affect the basidiocarp productivity of L. deliciosus plantations is the impact of mycophagous invertebrates. A plethora of invertebrates are reported to feed on the basidiocarps of L. deliciosus such as Gastropoda species [217], Collembola species [218] and Diptera larvae [219]. In China, severe greenhouse infestations of Diptera larvae resulted in the disappearance of L. deliciosus from the root systems of inoculated plants [162]. Heavy infestations of Diptera larvae have also been reported in Europe in basidiocarps of wild L. deliciosus populations [219]. Justifications for the heavy infestations of L. deliciosus by Diptera larvae are attributed to the mild-tasting latex they produce being relatively ineffective at dissuading mycophagous organisms [47]. On the other hand, the consumption of L. deliciosus basidiocarp by mycophagous invertebrates could have some positive impacts, as Deroceras invadens Reise, Hutchinson, Schunack & Schlitt, 2011 has been recorded to act as a vector of spore dispersal for T. aestivum Vittad [220]. Hence, mycophagous organisms could help maintain the persistence of L. deliciosus in introduced soils. Since the impact of mycophagous invertebrates have never been monitored in a plantation setting, further research should evaluate the impacts of these communities on the persistence of L. deliciosus and its basidiocarp production.

5.7. L. deliciosus Basidiocarp Productivity Within Mycoforestry Plantations

Currently, no economic modelling has been conducted on the long-term productivity of L. deliciosus plantations. The lack of a viable economic model is likely due to substantial knowledge gaps in the long-term persistence and productivity of this mycoforestry system under varying environmental conditions (see Section 5.1, Section 5.4, Section 5.5 and Section 5.6). However, basidiocarp productivity of L. deliciosus in natural forest ecosystems has been successfully modelled [221], indicating that it should be possible to model the economic potential of these plantations under a variety of environmental scenarios once these limitations have been overcome. Better demonstrating the economic potential of these plantations could entice interested stakeholders to adopt this practice, as these models would offer key insights into the profitability of this food production system under different environmental conditions and over a full forest rotation period. To accurately portray the long-term economic potential of these plantations over the next 50 years (length of an optimal P. sylvestris forest rotation period [65]), these models should incorporate different climate change scenarios, as Kauserud et al. [222] concluded that climate change should result in longer ECM growth periods and fruiting seasons in the UK.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

L. deliciosus mycoforestry has significant potential as a sustainable food production system and a resource for the pharmaceutical industry, with markets for this fungus already established in many countries around the world (see Section 2.4 and Section 2.5). However, there are many knowledge gaps (see Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5) that need to be explored before L. deliciosus mycoforestry can become a commercially viable and widespread food production system. Hence, further research and development is needed across all technical aspects of this system.
Better understanding how soil and meteorological factors affect the growth and persistence of this fungus should be of the highest priority. Knowing how environmental factors affect the persistence of L. deliciosus should aid in identifying suitable sites for this mycoforestry system and the silvicultural practices needed to maximize productivity. Since information on the optimal environmental conditions for L. deliciosus is currently unavailable (see Section 5.4 and Section 5.5), the silvicultural practices required to maintain the long-term fruiting of this fungus in these plantations weren’t discussed due to the uncertainty surrounding this subject. Greater information on how soil factors affect L. deliciosus should also help identify a sustainable peat free potting medium that reliably provides adequate mycorrhization and colonization intensity by this fungus.
Since localized adaptation to different environmental conditions has been recorded by L. deliciosus populations, studies analysing the effects of environmental factors on the persistence of L. deliciosus should incorporate multiple isolates sourced from different environmental conditions. Being able to distinguish general species trends from those of localized adaptations should help facilitate the selection and breeding of efficient symbionts through the creation of a library of isolates targeted to different regions and environmental conditions. Moreover, having a library of targeted isolates for specific areas would minimise any potential negative impacts of L. deliciosus mycoforestry on natural L. deliciosus populations.
Greater transnational L. deliciosus research collaboration is needed between North America and Europe and their east Asian counterparts, as acknowledgement of research endeavours between these regions is lacking. Having greater collaboration and acknowledgement of research between these regions could significantly advance the field of mycoforestry, especially since China is the world’s largest producer and exporter of edible mushrooms [223] and the second largest global investor into research and development [224].
The knowledge gained through the upscaling of L. deliciosus mycoforestry should help expand the field, potentially aiding establishment of plantations with other ectomycorrhizal fungi and tree hosts. Through the expansion of this field, the ecological benefits of this practice should increase, particularly through the diversification of forest plantation and management practices. Given the plethora of benefits mycoforestry can provide, research must continue to unlock the potential of this promising food production system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D., P.W.T., C.W., R.S. and A.J.; formal analysis, A.D.; investigation, A.D.; resources, A.D.; data curation, A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.; writing—review and editing, A.D., P.W.T., C.W., R.S. and A.J.; visualization, A.D.; supervision, P.W.T., C.W., R.S. and A.J.; project administration, A.D.; funding acquisition, P.W.T., C.W., R.S. and A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the NERC IAPETUS DTP (Grant NE/S007431/1) and Mycorrhizal Systems Ltd. AJ and PT received funding from Innovate UK (Grant 10075683).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

L. deliciosus presence records and associated soil type information for each data entry are available in section “Lactarius deliciosus” at https://nbnatlas.org/ (accessed on 4 September 2025).

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our heartfelt appreciation to Guangqi Li for their vital assistance in translating the Chinese literature, and to the library staff at the University of Stirling for their invaluable support in obtaining these documents.

Disclaimer

References written in Chinese were translated in 2023 using translation services provided by Google and Bing. Consequently, mistranslation of the text cannot be ruled out. However, most of the translated text was verified with the assistance of native Chinese speaker.

Conflicts of Interest

The first author (Andre Dhungana) is partly funded by Mycorrhizal Systems Ltd. and the Second author (Paul. W. Thomas) is the founder of this company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ECMEctomycorrhizal fungi
CCarbon
MHBMycorrhizal helper bacteria
SSFSolid-state fermentation
BAFBiotin–aneurin–folic acid
PDBPotato dextrose broth
NNitrogen
RPMRotations per minute
PPhosphorus
PDAPotato dextrose agar

Appendix A

Table A1. Carbon source which yielded optimal growth in Chinese liquid culture in vitro studies.
Table A1. Carbon source which yielded optimal growth in Chinese liquid culture in vitro studies.
Article Optimal Carbon Source
Fu et al. [110]Sucrose
Han et al. [111]Soluble Starch
Hu et al. [225]Soluble starch
Li et al. [112]Maltose
Lin and Chen [113]Soluble starch
Su et al. [226]Soluble starch
Wang et al. [121]Glucose
Table A2. Temperature at which optimal growth was recorded for Chinese L. deliciosus isolates.
Table A2. Temperature at which optimal growth was recorded for Chinese L. deliciosus isolates.
ArticleTemperature Range Tested (°C)Optimal Temperature (°C)
Xu et al. [109]5, 10, 20, 25, 28, 30, 37 and 4025
Zhu et al. [132]5, 10, 20, 25, 28, 30, 37 and 4028
Hu et al. [225]23, 25, 27, 29 and 3127
Li et al. [158]20, 25, 28, 30 and 3228
Wang et al. [227]18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 2826
Xue et al. [228]15, 22, 27 and 3227
Zhan and Wei [125]15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 25
Zhou et al. [229]18, 20, 24, 26, 28 and 3026
Zhou et al. [230]5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27, 30, 32, 35, 37 and 4027
Table A3. pH level at which optimal growth was recorded for L. deliciosus isolates.
Table A3. pH level at which optimal growth was recorded for L. deliciosus isolates.
ArticleNumber of Isolates Tested Media Used Optimal pH
Chung [103]4Solid MMN, PDA and BAFIF 725004 (BAF = 6.8; MMN = 6.8; PDA = 5.8)
IF 1608006 (BAF = 6.3; MMN = 6.8; PDA = 5.8)
IF 914002 (BAF = 6.3; MMN = 6.8; PDA = 5.8)
IF 936001 (BAF = 5.3; MMN = 5.8; PDA = 5.8)
Flores et al. [128]4Solid BAFL. deliciosus SM 63.00 (6.5)
L. deliciosus PX 252.01 (4.5)
L. deliciosus SO.10 (5.5)
L. deliciosus Rp.01 (7.0)
Guerin-Laguette et al. [60]1Solid BAF6
Han et al. [111]1Custom PDB7
Hu et al. [225]1Custom PDB7
Lazarević et al. [130]1Liquid MMN5.8
Li et al. [158]1PDA5
Li et al. [112]1Liquid modified Martin’s mediumSingle factor experiment = 6
Multifactorial experiment = 8
Olaizola et al. [131] 1Liquid MMN8.5
Sanchez et al. [129]1Solid MMN6.5
Torres and honrubia [2]1Solid Raper, Hagem, MMN, PDA, MMN (+10 g glucose) and 2% malt extract agarRaper (7.5); Hagem (7–7.5); MMN (6.5); PDA (5.5), MMN (+10 g glucose) (7.5); 2% MEA (7.5)
Wang et al. [227]1PDA6
Xu et al. [109]1Solid and Liquid MMN6
Xue et al. [228]1Custom PDA6
Zhou et al. [229]13 different modified PDB media 8
Zhou et al. [230]1PDB6.5
Zhu et al. [132] 1Solid and liquid MMN6.0

References

  1. He, Y.; Xiao, N.; Liu, Y. A preliminary study on semi-artificial cultivation of wild Lactarius pine in Ji’an, Jiangxi Province. Edible Fungi. 2016, 2, 51–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Torres, P.; Honrubia, M. Growth dynamics and characterization of some ectomycorrhizal fungi in culture [Suillus collinitus, Suillus granulatus, Rhizopogon roseolus, Rhizopogon luteolus, Amanita muscaria, Lactarius deliciosus]. Cryptogam. Mycol. Fr. 1991, 12, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, X.; Kang, H.; Bian, Y.B. Advances in studies of edible Lactarius sensu lato. Mycosystema 2018, 37, 1562–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Díaz, G.; Carrillo, C.; Honrubia, M. Production of Pinus halepensis seedlings inoculated with the edible fungus Lactarius deliciosus under nursery conditions. New For. 2009, 38, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. González-Ochoa, A.; de las Heras, J.; Torres, P.; Sánchez-Gómez, E. Mycorrhization of Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinaster Aiton seedlings in two commercial nurseries. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guerin-Laguette, A.; Butler, R.; Wang, Y. Advances in the Cultivation of Lactarius deliciosus (Saffron Milk Cap) in New Zealand. In Mushrooms, Humans and Nature in a Changing World; Pérez-Moreno, J., Guerin-Laguette, A., Flores Arzú, R., Yu, F.Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hortal, S.; Pera, J.; Parladé, J. Field persistence of the edible ectomycorrhizal fungus Lactarius deliciosus: Effects of inoculation strain, initial colonization level, and site characteristics. Mycorrhiza 2009, 19, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, D.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, Y.; Zambonelli, A.; Hall, I.; Xiong, W.P. The cultivation of Lactarius with edible mushrooms. Ital. J. Mycol. 2021, 50, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  10. Timonen, S. Microbial Activity in the Rhizoshere; Manoharachary, C., Singh, J., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; Volume 7, pp. 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brownlee, C.; Duddridge, J.A.; Malibari, A.; Read, D.J. The structure and function of mycelial systems of ectomycorrhizal roots with special reference to their role in forming inter-plant connections and providing pathways for assimilate and water transport. In Tree Root Systems and Their Mycorrhizas; Atkinson, D., Bhat, K.K.S., Coutts, M.P., Mason, P.A., Read, D.J., Eds.; Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1983; pp. 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guerin-Laguette, A. Successes and challenges in the sustainable cultivation of edible mycorrhizal fungi–furthering the dream. Mycoscience 2021, 62, 10–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leake, J.; Johnson, D.; Donnelly, D.; Muckle, G.; Boddy, L.; Read, D. Networks of power and influence: The role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1016–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nehls, U.; Das, A.; Neb, D. Carbohydrate metabolism in ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In Molecular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 1st ed.; Martin, F., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2016; pp. 159–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kebert, M.; Kostić, S.; Čapelja, E.; Vuksanović, V.; Stojnić, S.; Markić, A.G.; Zlatković, M.; Milović, M.; Galović, V.; Orlović, S. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Modulate Pedunculate Oak’s Heat Stress Responses through the Alternation of Polyamines, Phenolics, and Osmotica Content. Plants 2022, 11, 3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ortega, U.; Duñabeitia, M.; Menendez, S.; Gonzalez-Murua, C.; Majada, J. Effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation in the nursery on growth and water relations of Pinus radiata in different water regimes. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, W.; Yang, B.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Qin, G.; Yang, H. Ectomycorrhizal fungi enhance the tolerance of phytotoxicity and cadmium accumulation in oak (Quercus acutissima Carruth.) seedlings: Modulation of growth properties and the antioxidant defense responses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 6526–6537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Oddsdottir, E.S.; Eilenberg, J.; Sen, R.; Halldorsson, G. The effects of insect pathogenic soil fungi and ectomycorrhizal inoculation of birch seedlings on the survival of Otiorhynchus larvae. Agric. For. Entomol. 2010, 12, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Dai, D.; Tang, M. Inoculation with Ectomycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Endophytes Contributes to the Resistance of Pinus spp. to Pine Wilt Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 687304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, H.; Yu, H.; Tang, M. Prior contact of Pinus tabuliformis with ectomycorrhizal fungi increases plant growth and survival from damping-off. New For. 2017, 48, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, J.; Yan, R.; Zhang, X.; Su, K.; Liu, H.; Wei, X.; Wang, R.; Huang, L.; Tang, N.; Wan, S.; et al. Soil organic phosphorus is mainly hydrolyzed via phosphatases from ectomycorrhiza-associated bacteria rather than ectomycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil. 2024, 504, 659–678. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11104-024-06649-z (accessed on 1 October 2025). [CrossRef]
  23. Calvaruso, C.; Turpault, M.P.; Frey-Klett, P. Root-Associated Bacteria Contribute to Mineral Weathering and to Mineral Nutrition in Trees: A Budgeting Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1258–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rodriguez, H.; Gonzalez, T.; Goire, I.; Bashan, Y. Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum spp. Naturwissenschaften 2004, 91, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uroz, S.; Calvaruso, C.; Turpault, M.P.; Frey-Klett, P. Mineral weathering by bacteria: Ecology, actors and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deveau, A.; Brulé, C.; Palin, B.; Champmartin, D.; Rubini, P.; Garbaye, J.; Sarniguet, A.; Frey-Klett, P. Role of fungal trehalose and bacterial thiamine in the improved survival and growth of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor S238N and the helper bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens BBc6R8. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duponnois, R.; Plenchette, C. A mycorrhiza helper bacterium enhances ectomycorrhizal and endomycorrhizal symbiosis of Australian Acacia species. Mycorrhiza 2003, 13, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sbrana, C.; Bagnoli, G.; Bedini, S.; Filippi, C.; Giovannetti, M.; Nuti, M.P. Adhesion to hyphal matrix and antifungal activity of Pseudomonas strains isolated from Tuber borchii ascocarps. Can. J. Microbiol. 2000, 46, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Uroz, S.; Calvaruso, C.; Turpault, M.P.; Pierrat, J.C.; Mustin, C.; Frey-Klett, P. Effect of the Mycorrhizosphere on the Genotypic and Metabolic Diversity of the Bacterial Communities Involved in Mineral Weathering in a Forest Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 3019–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, M.; Song, Z.; Li, Z.; Qiao, R.; Zhang, P.; Ding, C.; Xie, J.; Chen, Y.; Guo, H. Populus root exudates are associated with rhizosphere microbial communities and symbiotic patterns. Front Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1042944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barriuso, J.; Pereyra, M.T.; García, J.A.L.; Megías, M.; Mañero, F.J.G.; Ramos, B. Screening for Putative PGPR to Improve Establishment of the Symbiosis Lactarius deliciosus-Pinus sp. Microb. Ecol. 2005, 50, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shirakawa, M.; Matsushita, N.; Fukuda, K. Visualization of root extracellular traps in an ectomycorrhizal woody plant (Pinus densiflora) and their interactions with root-associated bacteria. Planta 2023, 258, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Thomas, P.; Jump, A. Edible fungi crops through mycoforestry, potential for carbon negative food production and mitigation of food and forestry conflicts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2220079120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Perez, R.; Flores, W.; Astolfi, M.; Espinoza, U.J.; Zimring, T.B.; Fox, K. Indigenizing fungal biotechnology for planetary health: An opinion paper. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2025, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brundrett, M.; Bougher, N.; Dell, B.; Grove, T.; Malajczuk, N. (Eds.) Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra, Australia, 1996. [CrossRef]
  36. Hall, I.R.; Lyon, A.J.E.; Wang, Y.; Sinclair, L. Ectomycorrhizal fungi with edible fruiting bodies 2. Boletus edulis. Econ. Bot. 1998, 52, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iotti, M.; Piattoni, F.; Zambonelli, A. Techniques for Host Plant Inoculation with Truffles and Other Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms. In Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms; Zambonelli, A., Bonito, G.M., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 34, pp. 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Repáč, I. Ectomycorrhizal Inoculum and Inoculation Techniques. In Diversity and Biotechnology of Ectomycorrhizae; Rai, M., Varma, A., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 25, pp. 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nuytinck, J.; Verbeken, A. Species delimitation and phylogenetic relationships in Lactarius section Deliciosi in Europe. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hesler, L.R.; Smith, A.H. Studies on Lactarius-I: The North American Species of Sect. Lactarius. Brittonia 1960, 12, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nuytinck, J.; Verbeken, A.; Miller, S.L. Worldwide phylogeny of Lactarius section Deliciosi inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 2007, 99, 820–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Hall, I.R.; Dixon, C.; Hance-Halloy, M.; Strong, G.; Brass, P. The cultivation of Lactarius deliciosus (saffron milk cap) and Rhizopogon rubescens (shoro) in New Zealand. In Edible Mycorrhizal Mushrooms and Their Cultivation; New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2001; p. 6. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:83471204 (accessed on 1 October 2025).
  43. Nuytinck, J.; Verbeken, M. Morphology and taxonomy of the European species in Lactarius sect. Deliciosi (Russulales). Mycotaxon 2005, 92, 125–168. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Guerin-Laguette, A.; Zhang, P.; Colinas, C.; Yu, F. Factors influencing successful establishment of exotic Pinus radiata seedlings with co-introduced Lactarius deliciosus or local ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 973483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Valenzuela, F. Hongos Comestibles Silvestres Colectados en la X Region de Chile. Bol. Micológico 2003, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dunstan, W.A.; Dell, B.; Malajczuk, N. The diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with introduced Pinus spp. in the Southern Hemisphere, with particular reference to Western Australia. Mycorrhiza 1998, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nuytinck, J. Lactarius Section Deliciosi (Russulales, Basidiomycota) and Its Ectomycorrhiza: A Morphological and Molecular Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2005. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-523175 (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  48. Guerin-Laguette, A.; Cummings, N.; Butler, R.C.; Willows, A.; Hesom-Williams, N.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. Lactarius deliciosus and Pinus radiata in New Zealand: Towards the development of innovative gourmet mushroom orchards. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rasalanavho, M.; Moodley, R.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Elemental bioaccumulation and nutritional value of five species of wild growing mushrooms from South Africa. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Brady, D. Forestry Statistics 2024: Chapter 1 Woodland Area & Planting; Forest Research: Dumfries, Scotland, 2024; p. 8. Available online: https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2024/10/Ch1_Woodland-WA-amendment.pdf (accessed on 8 September 2025).
  51. Lactarius deliciosus (L.) Gray Saffron Milkcap. NBN Atlas. 2025. Available online: https://nbnatlas.org/ (accessed on 4 September 2025).
  52. De la Varga, H.; Águeda, B.; Ágreda, T.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Parladé, J.; Pera, J. Seasonal dynamics of Boletus edulis and Lactarius deliciosus extraradical mycelium in pine forests of central Spain. Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Román, M.; Boa, E. The marketing of Lactarius deliciosus in Northern Spain. Econ. Bot. 2006, 60, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boa, E.R. Wild Edible Fungi: A Global Overview of Their Use and Importance to People; Food & Agriculture Org.: Rome, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ibe, C.; Osuji, C.; Akunna, T.; Ahaotu, E.; Nwabueze, E. Vitamin Contents in Five Edible Varieties of Mushroom Consumed in Umuagwo Community, Imo State, Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2013, 2, 177–180. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mumcu Kucuker, D.; Baskent, E.Z. Spatial prediction of Lactarius deliciosus and Lactarius salmonicolor mushroom distribution with logistic regression models in the Kızılcasu Planning Unit, Turkey. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nuytinck, J.; De Crop, E.; Delgat, L.; Bafort, Q.; Ferreiro, M.R.; Verbeken, A.; Wang, X.-H. Recent Insights in the Phylogeny, Species Diversity, and Culinary Uses of Milkcap Genera Lactarius and Lactifluus. In Mushrooms, Humans and Nature in a Changing World: Perspectives from Ecological, Agricultural and Social Sciences; Pérez-Moreno, J., Guerin-Laguette, A., Flores Arzú, R., Yu, F.Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Poitou, N.; Mamoun, M.; Ducamp, M.; Delmas, J. Après le bolet granuleux, le lactaire délicieux obtenu en fructification au champ à partir de plants mycorhizés. P.H.M. Rev. Hortic. 1984, 244, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  59. Guinberteau, J.; Ducamp, M.; Poitou, N.; Mamoun, M.; Olivier, J.M. Ecology of various competitors from an experimental plot of Pinus pinaster inoculated with Suillus granulatus and Lactarius deliciosus. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1990, 28, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guerin-Laguette, A.; Plassard, C.; Mousain, D. Effects of experimental conditions on mycorrhizal relationships between Pinus sylvestris and Lactarius deliciosus and unprecedented fruit-body formation of the Saffron milk cap under controlled soilless conditions. Can. J. Microbiol. 2000, 46, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martín-Pinto, P.; Pajares, J.; Díez, J. In Vitro effects of four ectomycorrhizal fungi, Boletus edulis, Rhizopogon roseolus, Laccaria laccata and Lactarius deliciosus on Fusarium damping off in Pinus nigra seedlings. New For. 2006, 32, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. He, Y.; Zhu, W. Effects of different morphologies of Lactarius pine strains on the survival of Pinus massoniana seedlings infected for a certain period of time. Rural. Pract. Technol. 2022, 83–84. Available online: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ncsyjs202201038 (accessed on 26 October 2025).
  63. Wang, D.; Hall, I.; He, X.; Xiong, W.; Peng, W. Morphological Observation of Synthesized Ectomycorrhizae betweeen Lactarius deliciosus and Three Pinus Species and Molecular Identification of Contaminating Species. Acta Edulis Fungi. 2021, 28, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Llenatudespensa. Rebollón Lactarius deliciosus 1Kg Congelado. Llenatudespensa. 2025. Available online: https://llenatudespensa.com/Ficha/Producto/rebollon-lactarius-deliciosus-1kg_1284.html (accessed on 29 August 2025).
  65. Saraev, V.; Ahtikoski, A.; Whittet, R.; Ray, D. Economic evaluation of reopening a dormant tree improvement programme: A case study with Scots pine in Scotland. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2025, 98, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Voces, R.; Diaz-Balteiro, L.; Alfranca, Ó. Demand for wild edible mushrooms. The case of Lactarius deliciosus in Barcelona (Spain). J. For. Econ. 2012, 18, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dahlberg, A.; Croneborg, H. The 33 Threatened Fungi in Europe; Council of Europe Publishing: Strasbourg, France, 2006; ISBN 978-92-871-5928-1. [Google Scholar]
  68. Dahlberg, A.; Croneborg, H. 33 Threatened Fungi in Europe: Complementary and Revised Information on Candidates for Listing in Appendix I of the Bern Convention; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2003; p. 3. Available online: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/conventions/bern/T-PVS/sc27_tpvs13_en.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2025).
  69. Sterkenburg, E.; Clemmensen, K.E.; Lindahl, B.D.; Dahlberg, A. The significance of retention trees for survival of ectomycorrhizal fungi in clear-cut Scots pine forests. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 56, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Egli, S.; Peter, M.; Buser, C.; Stahel, W.; Ayer, F. Mushroom picking does not impair future harvests–results of a long-term study in Switzerland. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 129, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Büntgen, U.; Oliach, D.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Latorre, J.; Egli, S.; Krusic, P.J. Black truffle winter production depends on Mediterranean summer precipitation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 074004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, H.; Gao, B.; Gu, W. Prediction of the potential geographic distribution of the ectomycorrhizal mushroom Tricholoma matsutake under multiple climate change scenarios. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Arnolds, E. Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1991, 35, 209–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Elliott, T.F.; Elliott, K.; Vernes, K.; Elliott, T.F.; Elliott, K.; Vernes, K. The fungal rat race: Mycophagy among rodent communities in eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 2022, 50, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Maser, Z.; Maser, C.; Trappe, J.M. Food habits of the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) in Oregon. Can. J. Zool. 1985, 63, 1084–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nuske, S.J.; Vernes, K.; May, T.W.; Claridge, A.W.; Congdon, B.C.; Krockenberger, A.; Abell, S.E. Data on the fungal species consumed by mammal species in Australia. Data Brief. 2017, 12, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schickmann, S.; Urban, A.; Kräutler, K.; Nopp-Mayr, U.; Hackländer, K. The interrelationship of mycophagous small mammals and ectomycorrhizal fungi in primeval, disturbed and managed Central European mountainous forests. Oecologia 2012, 170, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zeller, K.A.; Ditmer, M.A.; Squires, J.R.; Rice, W.L.; Wilder, J.; DeLong, D.; Egan, A.; Pennington, N.; Wang, C.A.; Plucinski, J.; et al. Experimental recreationist noise alters behavior and space use of wildlife. Curr. Biol. 2024, 34, 2997–3004.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Suárez, J.O.; Villada, D.; de Rueda, J.A.O.; Alves-Santos, F.M.; Diez, J.J. Effects of Lactarius deliciosus and Rhizopogon roseolus ectomycorrhyzal fungi on seeds and seedlings of Scots and stone pines inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium verticillioides. For. Chron. 2018, 94, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sanchez-Zabala, J.; Majada, J.; Martín-Rodrigues, N.; Gonzalez-Murua, C.; Ortega, U.; Alonso-Graña, M.; Arana, O.; Duñabeitia, M.K. Physiological aspects underlying the improved outplanting performance of Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings associated with ectomycorrhizal inoculation. Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guerin-Laguette, A.; Conventi, S.; Ruiz, G.; Plassard, C.; Mousain, D. The ectomycorrhizal symbiosis between Lactarius deliciosus and Pinus sylvestris in forest soil samples: Symbiotic efficiency and development on roots of a rDNA internal transcribed spacer-selected isolate of L. deliciosus. Mycorrhiza 2003, 13, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dijksterhuis, J.; van Doorn, T.; Samson, R.; Postma, J. Effects of Seven Fungicides on Non-Target Aquatic Fungi. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2011, 222, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gürkan, M.; Hayretdağ, S. Acute toxicity of maneb in the tadpoles of common and green toad. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2015, 66, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ochoa-Acuña, H.G.; Bialkowski, W.; Yale, G.; Hahn, L. Toxicity of soybean rust fungicides to freshwater algae and Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhu, B.; Liu, L.; Gong, Y.X.; Ling, F.; Wang, G.X. Triazole-induced toxicity in developing rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus) embryos. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 13625–13635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zubrod, J.P.; Bundschuh, M.; Arts, G.; Brühl, C.A.; Imfeld, G.; Knäbel, A.; Payraudeau, S.; Rasmussen, J.J.; Rohr, J.; Scharmüller, A.; et al. Fungicides: An Overlooked Pesticide Class? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3347–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhao, J.; Wu, Q.-X.; Cheng, X.-D.; Su, T.; Wang, X.-H.; Zhang, W.-N.; Lu, Y.-M.; Chen, Y. Biodegradation and detoxification of the triphenylmethane dye coomassie brilliant blue by the extracellular enzymes from mycelia of Lactarius deliciosus. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gramss, G.; Kirsche, B.; Voigt, K.D.; Günther Th Fritsche, W. Conversion rates of five polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in liquid cultures of fifty-eight fungi and the concomitant production of oxidative enzymes. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. UNFCCC Paris Agreement. 2015. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  90. Moro, C.; Palacios, I.; Lozano, M.; D’Arrigo, M.; Guillamón, E.; Villares, A.; Martínez, J.A.; García-Lafuente, A. Anti-inflammatory activity of methanolic extracts from edible mushrooms in LPS activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Feussi Tala, M.; Qin, J.; Ndongo, J.T.; Laatsch, H. New Azulene-Type Sesquiterpenoids from the Fruiting Bodies of Lactarius deliciosus. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2017, 7, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dong, X.; Sun, S.; Wang, X.; Yu, H.; Dai, K.; Jiao, J.; Peng, C.; Ji, H.; Peng, L. Structural characteristics and intestinal flora metabolism mediated immunoregulatory effects of Lactarius deliciosus polysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 135063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ding, X.; Hou, Y.; Hou, W. Structure feature and antitumor activity of a novel polysaccharide isolated from Lactarius deliciosus Gray. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kosanić, M.; Ranković, B.; Rančić, A.; Stanojković, T. Evaluation of metal concentration and antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer potentials of two edible mushrooms Lactarius deliciosus and Macrolepiota procera. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nowakowski, P.; Markiewicz-Żukowska, R.; Gromkowska-Kępka, K.; Naliwajko, S.K.; Moskwa, J.; Bielecka, J.; Grabia, M.; Borawska, M.; Socha, K. Mushrooms as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of cancer: Evaluation of anti-glioma effects of Coprinus comatus, Cantharellus cibarius, Lycoperdon perlatum and Lactarius deliciosus extracts. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 111090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xu, Z.; Fu, L.; Feng, S.; Yuan, M.; Huang, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhou, L.; Yang, H.; Ding, C. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antihyperglycemic Activities of the Wild Lactarius deliciosus from China. Molecules 2019, 24, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rossi, M.; Furigo, A., Jr.; Oliveira, V. Inoculant Production of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi by Solid and Submerged Fermentations. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 45, 227–286. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gomes, F.; Suárez, D.; Santos, R.; Silva, M.; Gaspar, D.; Machado, H. Mycorrhizal synthesis between Lactarius deliciosus and Arbutus unedo L. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Moser, M. Die Gattung Phlegmacium. In Die Pilze Mitteleuropas 4; J. Klinkhardt: Bad Heilbrunn, Germany, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  100. Marx, D.H. The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 1969, 59, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Oddoux, L. Recherches sur les Myceliums Secondaires des Homobasidies en Culture Pure–morphologie -cytoiogie–exigences alimentaires. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lyon, Lyon, France, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  102. Chávez, D.; Pereira, G.; Machuca, Á. Crecimiento In Vitro de Lactarius Deliciosus en Medio de Cultivo BAF y, MNM.; Universidad de Talca: Talca, Chile, 2010; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  103. Chung, P. Crecimiento In Vitro de 4 cepas de Lactarius deliciosus bajo diferentes niveles de pH y medios de cultivo. Cienc. Investig. For. 2022, 28, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Oort, A.J.P. Nutritional Requirements of Lactarius Species, and Cultural Characters in Relation to Taxonomy; North-Holland Publ. Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  105. Melin, E.; Norkrans, B. Amino Acids and the Growth of Lactarius deliciosus (L.) Fr. Physiol. Plant. 1948, 1, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Akata, I.; Kalyoncu, F.; Halil Solak, M.; Kalmış, E. Growth of mycelium of three ectomycorrhizal macrofungi, Infundibulicybe geotropa, Tricholoma anatolicum and Lactarius deliciosus in culture media containing various carbon sources. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 3042–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Long, F.; Zhang, W. Effects of Four Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators on the Mycelia Growth of Lactarius deliciosus. Edible Fungi China 2014, 33, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Melin, E.; Nyman, B. Weitere Untersuchungen über die Wirkung von Aneurin und Biotin auf das Wachstum von Wurzelpilzen. Arch. Mikrobiol. 1940, 11, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xu, M.; Zhu, J.; Kang, H.; Xu, A.; Zhang, J.; Li, F. Optimum conditions for pure culture of major ectomycorrhizal fungi obtained from Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in southeastern Keerqin sandy lands, China. J. For. Res. 2008, 19, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fu, Y.; Nie, L.; Xia, F.; Shu, Q.; Wei, S. Study on Liquid Fermentation Medium for the Cultivation of Lactarius deliciosus. Biol. Disaster Sci. 2017, 40, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Han, S.; Du, J.; Xia, H. Nutritional requirements and fermentation conditions of Lactarius pine mycelium in shake flask fermentation. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2012, 40, 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, L.; Luo, G.; Chen, M.; Huo, G. Selection of liquid medium and optimization of fermentation conditions of Lactarius deliciosus. China Brew. 2011, 20, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  113. Lin, Q.; Chen, J. Effect of C-sources and N-sources on the Mycelial Growth of Lactarius deliciosus. Acta Edulis Fungi. 2002, 9, 44–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ohta, A. Ability of ectomycorrhizal fungi to utilize starch and related substrates. Mycoscience. 1997, 38, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, J.; Danao, M.G.C.; Chen, S.F.; Li, S.; Singh, V.; Brown, P.J. Prediction of Starch Content and Ethanol Yields of Sorghum Grain Using near Infrared Spectroscopy. J Infrared Spectrosc. 2015, 23, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Montebugnoli, T.; Antonelli, G.; Chiarello, E.; Rivera, N.S.; Camporesi, G.; Danesi, F.; Bordoni, A. Development of a Simple Protocol to Assess Glucose Release After In Vitro Digestion, Allowing Comparison of Starchy Foods. Food Sci Nutr. 2025, 13, e70323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sakwa, L.; Cripwell, R.A.; Rose, S.H.; Viljoen-Bloom, M. Consolidated bioprocessing of raw starch with Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing fungal alpha-amylase and glucoamylase combinations. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, Y.; Tan, Z.; He, X. Pine mushrooms from Hunan of China. Acta Edulis Fungi. 2003, 10, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, X.; Nuytinck, J.; Verbeken, A. Lactarius vividus sp. nov. (Russulaceae, Russulales), a widely distributed edible mushroom in central and southern China. Phytotaxa 2015, 231, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Song, S.; Wang, Y.; Long, H.; Wan, X.; Liu, D. Research on Fruiting Regularity of Lactarius deliciosus in Eastern Guizhou. Guizhou For. Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, H.; Luan, Z.; Liu, C.; Gong, X.; You, C.; Liang, L. Optimization of Solid and Submerged Culture Conditions for Purple Bronze Lactarius deliciosus Under Tissue Culture Conditions. Farm Prod. Process. 2019, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dong, F.; Zhang, C.; Wu, S. Identification of Zihuajun in Guizhou Based on ITS and GPD Sequence Analysis. Chin. J. Trop. Crops. 2018, 39, 1794–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Silva-Filho, A.; Sulzbacher, M.; Grebenc, T.; Wartchow, F. Not every edible orange milkcap is Lactarius deliciosus: First record of Lactarius quieticolor (sect. Deliciosi) from Brazil. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2020, 93, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pereira, G.; Campos, J.L.; Chávez, D.; Anabalón, L.; Arriagada, C. Characterization of mycelial growth of ectomycorrhizal fungus Lactarius aff. deliciosus and its symbiosis with Pinus radiata. Quebracho 2015, 22, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhan, S.; Wei, C. Culture for the Hyphae of Lactarius deliciosus in Wanxi Dabie Mountains by Semisolid Medium. J. West. Anhui Univ. 2013, 29, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  126. Lapryrie, F.L.; Bruchet, G. Some Factors Influencing Viability of Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Inoculum. New Phytol. 1985, 100, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hung, L.L.; Trappe, J.M. Growth Variation Between and Within Species of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in Response to pH In Vitro. Mycologia 1983, 75, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Flores, R.; Honrubia, M.; Díaz, G. Caracterización de cepas de Lactarius sección Deliciosi de Guatemala y su comparación con cepas europeas de L. deliciosus. Rev. Mex. Micol. 2008, 26, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sanchez, F.; Honrubia, M.; Torres, P. Effects of pH, water stress and temperature on in vitro cultures of ectomycorrhizal fungi from Mediterranean forests. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2001, 22, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lazarević, J.; Stojičić, D.; Keča, N. Effects of temperature, pH and carbon and nitrogen sources on growth of in vitro cultures of ectomycorrhizal isolates from Pinus heldreichii forest. For. Syst. 2016, 25, 048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Olaizola, J.; Santamaría, O.; Diez, J.J. In Vitro growth of nine edible ectomycorrhizal fungi under a range of pH conditions. Bioagro 2023, 35, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhu, J.; Li, F.; Xu, M.; Kang, H.; Wu, X. The role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in alleviating pine decline in semiarid sandy soil of northern China: An experimental approach. Ann. For. Sci. 2008, 65, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ehrenfeld, J.G.; Kourtev, P.; Huang, W. Changes in Soil Functions Following Invasions of Exotic Understory Plants in Deciduous Forests. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11, 1287–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Horswill, P.; O’Sullivan, O.; Phoenix, G.K.; Lee, J.A.; Leake, J.R. Base cation depletion, eutrophication and acidification of species-rich grasslands in response to long-term simulated nitrogen deposition. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 155, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Neina, D. The Role of Soil pH in Plant Nutrition and Soil Remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil. Sci. 2019, 2019, 5794869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xu, J.; Tang, C.; Chen, Z.L. The role of plant residues in pH change of acid soils differing in initial pH. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rossi, M. Technology of the Production of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Inoculants Employing Submerged Cultivation in an Airlift Bioreactor. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  138. Schmidell, W. Stirring and Aeration in Bioreactors. In Engenharia Bioquímica; Schmidell, W., Lima, U.A., Aquarone, E., Borzani, W., Eds.; Biotecnologia Industrial; Edgard Blücher Ltda.: São Paulo, Brazil, 2001; Volume 2, pp. 277–331. [Google Scholar]
  139. Badri, D.; Vivanco, J. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Koo, B.J.; Adriano, D.C.; Bolan, N.S.; Barton, C.D. Root Exudates and Microorganisms. In Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Stirk, W.A.; van Staden, J. Flow of cytokinins through the environment. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 62, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Horan, D.P.; Chilvers, G.A. Chemotropism—The key to ectomycorrhizal formation? New Phytol. 1990, 116, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lagrange, H.; Jay-Allgmand, C.; Rutin, L.F. the phenolglycoside from eucalyptus root exudates, stimulates Pisolithus hyphal growth at picomolar concentrations. New Phytol. 2001, 149, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zeng, R.S.; Mallik, A.U.; Setliff, E. Growth Stimulation of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi by Root Exudates of Brassicaceae Plants: Role of Degraded Compounds of Indole Glucosinolates. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 1337–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sun, Y.P.; Fries, N. The effect of tree-root exudates on the growth rate of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. Mycorrhiza 1992, 1, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Fries, N.; Bardet, M.; Serck-Hanssen, K. Growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi stimulated by lipids from a pine root exudate. Plant Soil. 1985, 86, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Melin, E. Some effects of forest tree roots on mycorrhizal basidiomycetes. In Symbiotic Associations; Nutman, P.S., Mosse, B., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1963; Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19630601879 (accessed on 4 April 2024).
  148. Laessøe, T.; Petersen, J.H. Fungi of Temperate Europe; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  149. Nuytinck, J.; Verbeken, A. A revision of Lactarius sect. Deliciosi (Russulales) in Europe. Scr. Bot. Belg. 2013, 51, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  150. De Sena, A.; Mosdossy, K.; Whalen, J.K.; Madramootoo, C.A. Root exudates and microorganisms. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xie, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, J.; Deng, J.; Gille, C.E.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Robson, T.M.; Wang, Q.-W. Variation in seedling growth, root exudates and rhizosphere microbial communities of two temperate tree species under fluctuating light and extreme drought. Plant Soil 2025, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Elias, K.S.; Safir, G.R. Hyphal Elongation of Glomus fasciculatus in Response to Root Exudates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 1928–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gogala, N. Growth substances in root exudate of Pinus sylvestris—Their influence on mycorrhizal fungi. (Effects of jasmonic acid). Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1990, 28, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gogala, N.; Pohleven, F. The effect of cytokinins and auxins on the growth of mycorrhizal fungus Suillus variegatus. Acta Bot. Croat. 1976, 35, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  155. Zheng, X.; Kang, C.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y. Effects of Different Isolation and Culture Conditions on the Mycelia of Lactarius pine. Seed Sci. Technol. 2020, 38, 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  156. Melin, E. Der Einfluss von Waldstreuextrakten auf das Wachstum von Bodenpilzen, mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Wurzelpilze von Baumen. Symb. Bot. Ups. 1946, 8, 116. [Google Scholar]
  157. Lindeberg, G. Über die Wirkung von Biotin auf Marasmius androsaceus (Fr.). Arch. Für. Mikrobiol. 1942, 12, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, Z.; Ao, C.; Zhong, H. Study on fruit body of Lactarius deliciosus upon solid culture medium. Food Mach. 2006, 22, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  159. Lee, J.; Kang, H.K.; Cheong, H.; Park, Y. A Novel Antimicrobial Peptides from Pine Needles of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. Against Foodborne Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 662462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Selvakumar, G.; Saha, S.; Kundu, S. Inhibitory activity of pine needle tannin extracts on some agriculturally resourceful microbes. Indian. J. Microbiol. 2007, 47, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Parladé, J.; Pera, J.; Luque, J. Evaluation of mycelial inocula of edible Lactarius species for the production of Pinus pinaster and P. sylvestris mycorrhizal seedlings under greenhouse conditions. Mycorrhiza 2004, 14, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wang, R.; Guerin-Laguette, A.; Huang, L.-L.; Wang, X.-H.; Butler, R.; Wang, Y.; Yu, F.-Q. Mycorrhizal syntheses between Lactarius spp. section Deliciosi and Pinus spp. and the effects of grazing insects in Yunnan, China. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Parladé, J.; Hortal, S.; Pera, J.; Galipienso, L. Quantitative detection of Lactarius deliciosus extraradical soil mycelium by real-time PCR and its application in the study of fungal persistence and interspecific competition. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rincón, A.; Álvarez, I.F.; Pera, J. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus pinea L. in northeastern Spain. Mycorrhiza 1999, 8, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Su, K.; Yuan, J.; Wang, R.; Huang, L.; Zhan, J.; Zhang, X.; Wan, S.; He, X.; Lambers, H.; Yu, F.; et al. Dual transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses provide novel insights into the role of vitamins A and B metabolism in ectomycorrhizal symbiosis between Pinus yunnanensis and Lactarius deliciosus. Physiol Plant. 2024, 176, e14194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Diaz, G.; Carrillo, C.; Honrubia, M. Mycorrhization, growth and nutrition of Pinus halepensis seedlings fertilized with different doses and sources of nitrogen. Ann. For. Sci. 2010, 67, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Díaz, G.; Flores, R.; Honrubia, M. Lactarius indigo and L. deliciosus form mycorrhizae with Eurasian or Neotropical Pinus species. Sydowia 2007, 59, 32–45. [Google Scholar]
  168. Carrillo, C.; Diaz, G.; Honrubia, M. Testing the effect of routine fungicide application on ectomycorrhiza formation on Pinus halepensis seedlings in a nursery. For Pathol. 2011, 41, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Carrillo, C.; Díaz, G.; Honrubia, M. Improving the Production of Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Mycelium in a Bioreactor by Measuring the Ergosterol Content. Eng. Life Sci. 2004, 4, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Guerin-Laguette, A.; Vaario, L.M.; Matsushita, N.; Shindo, K.; Suzuki, K.; Lapeyrie, F. Growth stimulation of a Shiro-like, mycorrhiza forming, mycelium of Tricholoma matsutake on solid substrates by non-ionic surfactants or vegetable oil. Mycol. Prog. 2003, 2, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Mediavilla, O.; Olaizola, J.; Santos-del-Blanco, L.; Oria-de-Rueda, J.A.; Martín-Pinto, P. Mycorrhization between Cistus ladanifer L. and Boletus edulis Bull is enhanced by the mycorrhiza helper bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wang, Y.; Hall, I.R. Edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms: Challenges and achievements. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Hortal, S.; Pera, J.; Parladé, J. Tracking mycorrhizas and extraradical mycelium of the edible fungus Lactarius deliciosus under field competition with Rhizopogon spp. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Parladé, J.; Hortal, S.; De La Varga, H.; Pera, J. Intraspecific variability of Lactarius deliciosus isolates: Colonization ability and survival after cold storage. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Parladé, J.; Álvarez, I.F.; Pera, J. Ability of native ectomycorrhizal fungi from northern Spain to colonize Douglas-fir and other introduced conifers. Mycorrhiza 1995, 6, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Yang, T.; Jiang, J.; He, Q.; Shi, F.; Jiang, H.; Wu, H.; He, C. Impact of drainage on peatland soil environments and greenhouse gas emissions in Northeast China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Das, R.; Wang, X.; Itoh, M.; Shiodera, S.; Kuwata, M. Estimation of Metal Emissions From Tropical Peatland Burning in Indonesia by Controlled Laboratory Experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 6583–6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Nieminen, M.; Sallantaus, T.; Ukonmaanaho, L.; Nieminen, T.M.; Sarkkola, S. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in discharge from drained peatland forests are increasing. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Vítovcová, K.; Lipárová, J.; Manukjanová, A.; Vašutová, M.; Vrba, P.; Prach, K. Biodiversity restoration of formerly extracted raised bogs: Vegetation succession and recovery of other trophic groups. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 30, 207–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kędzior, R.; Zarzycki, J.; Zając, E. Raised bog biodiversity loss: A case-study of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as indicators of ecosystem degradation after peat mining. Land Degrad. Dev. 2022, 33, 3511–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/1056 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 Establishing the Just Transition Fund. Off. J. Eur. Union 2021, 1–20. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R1056 (accessed on 26 October 2025).
  182. European Commission. EU Cohesion Policy: €192 Million for Latvia’s Just Climate Transition. European Commission–Regional Policy. 2022. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/newsroom/12-01-2022-eu-cohesion-policy-eur192-million-for-latvia-s-just-climate-transition_en#:~:text=In%20particular%2C%20the%20Just%20Transition,with%20European%20Investment%20bank%20loans (accessed on 26 October 2025).
  183. Defra Press Office. Media Reporting on Peat-Ban for the Professional Horticulture Sector. Defra in the Media. Available online: https://deframedia.blog.gov.uk/2023/03/24/media-reporting-on-peat-ban-for-the-professional-horticulture-sector/ (accessed on 24 April 2023).
  184. Zheng, H.; Xu, L.; Xu, M. A Preliminary Study on the Cultivation and Mushroom Production of Lactarius Pine in Pine Forests. J. Jiangsu For. Sci. Technol. 2020, 47, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kraus, T.E.C.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Zasoski, R.J. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems—A review. Plant Soil. 2003, 256, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Grant, W.D. Microbial Degradation of Condensed Tannins. Science. 1976, 193, 1137–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Nierop, K.G.J.; Verstraten, J.M. Fate of Tannins in Corsican Pine Litter. J Chem Ecol. 2006, 32, 2709–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Tedersoo, L.; Suvi, T.; Jairus, T.; Kõljalg, U. Forest microsite effects on community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi on seedlings of Picea abies and Betula pendula. Environ Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1189–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jonsson, L.; Dahlberg, A.; Nilsson, M.; Kårén, O.; Zackrisson, O. Continuity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in self-regenerating boreal Pinus sylvestris forests studied by comparing mycobiont diversity on seedlings and mature trees. New Phytol. 1999, 142, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Horton, T.R.; Bruns, T.D. The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: Peeking into the black-box. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 1855–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Guo, M.; Ding, G.; Gao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Ren, Y. Community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations of various ages in the Horqin Sandy Land. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 110, 105860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Taylor, D.L.; Bruns, T.D. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: Minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8, 1837–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Solly, E.F.; Lindahl, B.D.; Dawes, M.A.; Peter, M.; Souza, R.C.; Rixen, C.; Hagedorn, F. Experimental soil warming shifts the fungal community composition at the alpine treeline. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 766–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Erland, S.; Finlay, R. Effects of temperature and incubation time on the ability of three ectomycorrhizal fungi to colonize Pinus sylvestris roots. Mycol. Res. 1992, 96, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mahmood, S. Colonisation of spruce roots by two interacting ectomycorrhizal fungi in wood ash amended substrates. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 221, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yang, N.; Wang, B.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Peng, S.; Ge, Z.; Mao, L.; et al. Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition Alters Ectomycorrhizal Community Composition and Function in a Poplar Plantation. J. Fungi. 2021, 7, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kennedy, P.G.; Hortal, S.; Bergemann, S.E.; Bruns, T.D. Competitive Interactions among Three Ectomycorrhizal Fungi and Their Relation to Host Plant Performance. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kennedy, P. Ectomycorrhizal fungi and interspecific competition: Species interactions, community structure, coexistence mechanisms, and future research directions. New Phytol. 2010, 187, 895–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Parladé, J.; Alvarez, I.F. Coinoculation of aseptically grown Douglas fir with pairs of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 1993, 3, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Timonen, S.; Tammi, H.; Sen, R. Outcome of interactions between genets of two Suillus spp. and different Pinus sylvestris genotype combinations: Identity and distribution of ectomycorrhizas and effects on early seedling growth in N-limited nursery soil. New Phytol. 1997, 137, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Geml, J.; Leal, C.M.; Nagy, R.; Sulyok, J. Abiotic environmental factors drive the diversity, compositional dynamics and habitat preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pannonian forest types. Front Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1007935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Erland, S.; Taylor, A.F.S. Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities in Relation to the Abiotic Environment. In Mycorrhizal Ecology; van der Heijden, M.G.A., Sanders, I.R., Eds.; Ecological Studies; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002; pp. 163–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Castaño, C.; Lindahl, B.D.; Alday, J.G.; Hagenbo, A.; de Aragón, J.M.; Parladé, J.; Pera, J.; Bonet, J.A. Soil microclimate changes affect soil fungal communities in a Mediterranean pine forest. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Erlandson, S.R.; Savage, J.A.; Cavender-Bares, J.M.; Peay, K.G. Soil moisture and chemistry influence diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associating with willow along an hydrologic gradient. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiv148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Sabella, E.; Nutricati, E.; Aprile, A.; Miceli, A.; Sorce, C.; Lorenzi, R.; De Bellis, L. Arthrinium phaeospermum isolated from Tuber borchii ascomata: The first evidence for a “Mycorrhization Helper Fungus”? Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Liu, B.; Bonet, J.A.; Fischer, C.R.; Martínez de Aragón, J.; Bassie, L.; Colinas, C. Lactarius deliciosus Fr. soil extraradical mycelium correlates with stand fruitbody productivity and is increased by forest thinning. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 380, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Funchess, M.J. Phosphurus Studies with Different Vegetable Crops in Different Soils; Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute: Auburn, AL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  208. Barriuso, J.; Ramos Solano, B.; Santamaría, C.; Daza, A.; Gutiérrez Mañero, F.J. Effect of inoculation with putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from Pinus spp. on Pinus pinea growth, mycorrhization and rhizosphere microbial communities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105, 1298–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Blake, G.R.; Steinhardt, G.C.; Pombal, X.P.; Muñoz, J.C.N.; Cortizas, A.M.; Arnold, R.W.; Schaetzl, R.J.; Stagnitti, F.; Parlange, J.-Y.; Steenhuis, T.S.; et al. Podzols. In Encyclopedia of Soil Science; Chesworth, W., Ed.; Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 580–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Jankowski, M.; Rutkowska, P.A. Podzolization in a 150-year chronosequence of soils under pine timber forest on inland dunes in the Toruń Basin (Northern Poland). CATENA. 2024, 247, 108551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mongil-Manso, J.; Navarro-Hevia, J.; Díaz-Gutiérrez, V.; Cruz-Alonso, V.; Ramos-Díez, I. Badlands forest restoration in Central Spain after 50 years under a Mediterranean-continental climate. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 97, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Urban, A.; Puschenreiter, M.; Strauss, J.; Gorfer, M. Diversity and structure of ectomycorrhizal and co-associated fungal communities in a serpentine soil. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Soil Survey of Scotland Staff. National Soil Map of Scotland. 1981. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/4646891 (accessed on 26 October 2025).
  214. O’Green, A. Soil Water Dynamics. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2013, 4, 1–9. Available online: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/soil-water-dynamics-103089121/ (accessed on 7 September 2025).
  215. Romano, N.; Santini, A. 3.3.3 Field. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4: Physical Methods; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2002; p. 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Bonet, J.A.; de-Miguel, S.; Martínez De Aragón, J.; Pukkala, T.; Palahí, M. Immediate effect of thinning on the yield of Lactarius group deliciosus in Pinus pinaster forests in Northeastern Spain. For Ecol Manag. 2012, 265, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Elliott, W.T. Some observations on the Mycophagous propensities of slugs. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1922, 8, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Hernández-Santiago, F.; Díaz-Aguilar, I.; Pérez-Moreno, J.; Tovar-Salinas, J.L. Interactions Between Soil Mesofauna and Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms. In Mushrooms, Humans and Nature in a Changing World; Pérez-Moreno, J., Guerin-Laguette, A., Flores Arzú, R., Yu, F.Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 367–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Hackman, W.; Meinander, M. Diptera feeding as larvae on macrofungi in Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1979, 16, 50–83. [Google Scholar]
  220. Ori, F.; Menotta, M.; Leonardi, M.; Amicucci, A.; Zambonelli, A.; Covès, H.; Selosse, M.-A.; Schneider-Maunoury, L.; Pacioni, G.; Iotti, M. Effect of slug mycophagy on Tuber aestivum spores. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mumcu Küçüker, D.; Başkent, E.Z. Sustaining the Joint Production of Timber and Lactarius Mushroom: A Case Study of a Forest Management Planning Unit in Northwestern Turkey. Sustainability 2017, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Kauserud, H.; Heegaard, E.; Büntgen, U.; Halvorsen, R.; Egli, S.; Senn-Irlet, B.; Krisai-Greilhuber, I.; Dämon, W.; Sparks, T.; Nordén, J.; et al. Warming-induced shift in European mushroom fruiting phenology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14488–14493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Li, C.; Xu, S. Edible mushroom industry in China: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 3949–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Bonaglia, D.; Rivera León, L.; Wunsch-Vincent, S. Against All Odds, Global R&D Has Grown Close to USD 3 Trillion in 2023. Global Innovation Index. 2024. Available online: https://www.wipo.int/web/global-innovation-index/w/blogs/2024/end-of-year-edition (accessed on 10 September 2025).
  225. Hu, Y.; Qin, D.; Wang, D. Study on the nutritive factors and fermented permented process of the submerged culture of Lactarius deliciosus. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Su, F.; Gu, X.; Deng, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, T. Effect of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and mineral nutrition of Lactarius deliciosus In-Vitro. Food Ferment. Ind. 2015, 41, 99–104. Available online: http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/Y2015/V41/I5/99 (accessed on 26 October 2025).
  227. Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, M. Study on the culture characteristics of mycelium of Lactarius pine. Edible Fungi 2016, 38, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  228. Xue, Z.; Ying, G.; Lu, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, K.; Gao, F.; Ye, H. Study on the Pure Culture Characteristics of Lactarius pine Mycelium. Edible Med. Mushrooms 2012, 20, 231–233,242. [Google Scholar]
  229. Zhou, C.Y.; Liao, X.H.; Tan, Z.J.; Peng, Y.F. Study on the Strain Breeding and Cultivating Conditions of Wild Lactarius deliciosus. Food Sci. 2004, 25, 66–69. [Google Scholar]
  230. Zhou, G.; Liu, J.; Li, Q. Tissue isolation and mycelium growth characteristics of Lactarius deliciosus. J. Zhejiang For. Coll. 2003, 20, 158–161. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Number of accepted L. deliciosus basidiocarp records per jurisdiction in the United Kingdom from 2000–2024. L. deliciosus presence records were downloaded from NBN Atlas [51] on 4 September 2025.
Figure 1. Number of accepted L. deliciosus basidiocarp records per jurisdiction in the United Kingdom from 2000–2024. L. deliciosus presence records were downloaded from NBN Atlas [51] on 4 September 2025.
Diversity 17 00821 g001
Figure 2. L. deliciosus records in Scotland from 2000–2024 in different soil types. L. deliciosus presence records and soil type data were downloaded from NBN Atlas [51] on 4 September 2025. Soil type data was derived from the National Soil Map of Scotland [213].
Figure 2. L. deliciosus records in Scotland from 2000–2024 in different soil types. L. deliciosus presence records and soil type data were downloaded from NBN Atlas [51] on 4 September 2025. Soil type data was derived from the National Soil Map of Scotland [213].
Diversity 17 00821 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dhungana, A.; Thomas, P.W.; Wilson, C.; Sanderson, R.; Jump, A. Mycoforestry with the Saffron Milk Cap (Lactarius deliciosus L.:Fr. S.F. Gray) and Its Potential as a Large-Scale Food Production System. Diversity 2025, 17, 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17120821

AMA Style

Dhungana A, Thomas PW, Wilson C, Sanderson R, Jump A. Mycoforestry with the Saffron Milk Cap (Lactarius deliciosus L.:Fr. S.F. Gray) and Its Potential as a Large-Scale Food Production System. Diversity. 2025; 17(12):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17120821

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dhungana, André, Paul W. Thomas, Clare Wilson, Roy Sanderson, and Alistair Jump. 2025. "Mycoforestry with the Saffron Milk Cap (Lactarius deliciosus L.:Fr. S.F. Gray) and Its Potential as a Large-Scale Food Production System" Diversity 17, no. 12: 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17120821

APA Style

Dhungana, A., Thomas, P. W., Wilson, C., Sanderson, R., & Jump, A. (2025). Mycoforestry with the Saffron Milk Cap (Lactarius deliciosus L.:Fr. S.F. Gray) and Its Potential as a Large-Scale Food Production System. Diversity, 17(12), 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17120821

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop