Next Article in Journal
The Role of Vegetation in Elevational Diversity Patterns of Tenebrionid Beetles in Central Italy
Previous Article in Journal
The Diversity of Metazoan Parasites of South American Stromateidae (Pisces: Teleostei) Is Related to Marine Biogeography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Forest Refugium of the Bükk Mountains, Hungary—Vegetation Change and Human Impact from the Late Pleistocene

1
Department of Geology and Palaeontology, University of Szeged, Egyetem utca 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
2
HUN-REN Institute for Nuclear Research, Bem square 18/c., H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(2), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020109
Submission received: 30 November 2023 / Revised: 24 January 2024 / Accepted: 25 January 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Phylogeny and Evolution)

Abstract

:
The Rejtek I. Rock Shelter in the Bükk Mountains of the inner Western Carpathian region plays an important role in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene environmental historical analyses. The investigations of the cave sediment accumulated from the end of the Pleistocene and the recovered paleontological finds, together with the archaeological artefacts, provided an opportunity to develop stratigraphic classifications. In addition, by comparing archaeostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic data, it was possible to link environmental and prehistoric events. The importance of the site is shown by both the mollusc and floral cold- and warm-tolerant species that were present in the area during the Late Pleistocene. The early expansion of thermophilous species indicates the presence of a refuge already during the Late Pleistocene. Based on the documents of the excavation, the previous works, the sediment sequence, as well as the sediment samples and the filling material of the mollusc shells, together with the new chronology, we were able to clarify the relative order of the excavated layers and the description of the sediment types in the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter.

1. Introduction

The European Extra-Mediterranean forest refugia of the Late Pleistocene were theorized by de Lattin [1], but the first Extra-Mediterranean forest refugium of the Late Pleistocene based on concrete paleoecological data was presented by József Stieber (1921–2001), a Hungarian anthracologist [2]. In an exemplary rock shelter excavated by the vertebrate palaeontologist Dénes Jánossy (1926–2005) [3], Stieber revealed the presence of thermos-mesophilous species from Pleistocene layers [2,4,5,6]. Unfortunately, his anthracological results and hypothesis were rejected in Hungary and further research on the late glacial Extra-Mediterranean forest refugia theory has been relegated. In the 1990s an Anglo-Hungarian project led by Professor Keith David Bennett started. In this joint work Professor Baroness Katherine Jane Willis, a palynologist, investigated the radiocarbon dated pollen material of the Bátorliget bog [7], the Kelemér bog [8], and as a result of the radiocarbon dated charcoal samples from loess layers [9] she finally confirmed the existence of deciduous forest patches (oases, refugium) in the late glacial coniferous forest.
In this way, the vegetation picture of the Carpathian Basin, which had been described as a cold tundra desert at the end of the Pleistocene has been disproved, and it supported the hypotheses of József Stieber on the glacial forest refugia, independently of him. Together with the charcoal assemblage, very rich vertebrate skeletal and mollusc material was recovered and allowed the chronological control of the late glacial forest refugium presented by Stieber [4,5].
Since only a short French and German summary has been published about the anthracological results of the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter excavation [5], we present Stieber’s results and the examinations and evaluation of our own chronological, sedimentological and malacological investigations.
The Rejtek I. Rock Shelter is located in the Bükk Mountains, Hungary, near Répáshuta (Figure 1). It is in the south-facing 500–800 m elevation region of the inner Western Carpathian Bükk Mountains where forest refugia surviving the most significant glacial cooling events have been modelled [10].
The excavation lasted from 1957 to 1959. As a consequence of the stone blocks and a large amount of debris, the section was revealed and sampled in three blocks (Table 1; [3]). Very significant archaeological finds [11], vertebrate fauna fragments [3,12,13,14], a significant amount of charcoal [2,4,5,6] and a very briefly described, species-rich mollusc fauna (without evaluation) were excavated and identified later. The malacological material and documents of the section were handed over by Endre Krolopp (1935–2010), a quarter-malacologist, for further evaluation and publication. This site is of great significance for the understanding of the environmental changes in the Carpathian Basin and has had a decisive influence on the Hungarian geological, environmental and archaeological specialists in terms of their views on the temporal appearance of the various Quaternary cultures and the environmental changes. In addition, one of the first Mesolithic blades of the Tardonasian culture, with a clear stratigraphic position was found here. Surprisingly, however, isotope geochemical (radiocarbon) and sedimentological studies have not been carried out to allow a correct comparison with other sites of similar age, or to provide a chronological clarification of the archaeological, palaeontological, prehistoric and environment historical horizons.
We aimed to clarify the stratigraphic position of the excavated layers using radiocarbon analysis, to accomplish the sedimentological analysis, to re-identify the mollusc fauna of the cave sequence and to compare these data with previously published palaeontological results.

2. Materials and Methods

The study site is located in Northern Hungary in the Bükk Mountains near Répáshuta, on the western side of Szarvaskő Hill at 534 m above sea level. The rock shelter is about 900 cm long in a north-south direction, 250 cm wide and 220 cm deep. It was filled with sediments before the excavations.
During the excavation (1957–1959), three blocks (block I. /test sampling—side-niche/, II., III.) were formed (Table 1) and sediment samples were taken from them [3,12,13,15].
The entire sediment sequence was excavated, extracted and samples were taken at 30/20 cm intervals. These were then wet-sieved using a 0.5 mm diameter sieve [3,12,13,15]. Only a few decagrams of sediment per sample were submitted for further analysis. The stratigraphic sequence was reconstructed based on the publications of Dénes Jánossy [3,12,13,15] (Table 1). Reassessing the sedimentological description, the categories of Troels-Smith [16] were used, and the Munsell colour chart [17] for dry sediment colour description. The remaining sediment samples of the original excavation (20 cm sampling intervals, occasionally 30 cm) were used for sedimentological, magnetic susceptibility, loss on ignition, organic and carbonate content determination.
Sedimentological analysis was carried out using Easy Laser Particle Sizer 2.0. Laser Sediraph after proper sample preparation [18]. We used a Bartington MS2 Magnetic Susceptibility Meter for magnetic susceptibility measurements for both field and laboratory testing at 2.7 MHz [19]. Three measurements were conducted on each sample and the values obtained were averaged. The carbonate and organic material content were determined using the loss on ignition (LOI) method of Dean [20].
Radiocarbon measurements were carried out on Mollusca shells at the Poznan Radiocarbon Laboratory to reassess the section from anthracological, vertebrate fauna and malacological points of view. The bones extracted from the horizon of the Holocene, from 140 cm towards the surface, were burnt through and did not contain enough collagen for the analyses [21], thus shell remains were used for the radiocarbon analyses. In addition, the effect of fire could not be detected in the snail shells extracted from the section [22], so these proved suitable for radiocarbon measurements. Following this, a stratigraphic, environmental and prehistoric evaluation of the section was carried out, including a complete geochronological study.

3. Results

3.1. Lithological Observations and Analysis

A significant amount of coarse debris was embedded in the sedimentary sequence [3,12,13,15]. The sharp sediment facies shifts suggested that a sediment deficit may have developed in the sequence [22,23]—similar to other Hungarian cave deposits [11]. These data and observations suggest caution and it is assumed that this (probably incomplete) stratigraphic sequence is unusable for sedimentation rate determination. Unfortunately, samples could only be excavated in blocks and not in a single stratigraphic sequence because of the debris material and stone blocks (Table 1).
Based on the sediment fill found in the aperture of Mollusca shells and the leftover sediment material, the following layers could be revealed.
Between 220 and 180 cm there is a significant amount of coarse, slightly carbonate, yellowish-brown, clayey silt (Figure 2). Based on its evolution, this horizon can be considered as a so-called “cave loess” [24], a variety of surface loess accumulated in a cave or a rock shelter.
Between 180 and 140 cm, a reddish-brown, carbonate-free, clay horizon developed with minimal coarse silt content. It is best understood as the ‘B’ level of an overlay of brown forest soil.
Between 140 and 110 cm, a black silty clayey with high organic material and carbonate content developed. It can be perceived as a poorly developed lithosol formed on carbonate bedrock, a secondary (reworked) rendzina soil, or a highly disturbed forest soil.
From 110 cm to the surface, a blackish-brown clay with aleurit with varying carbonate and organic material content evolved. It may originate from the reworked ‘A’ level of forest soil [3,12,15]. The development of the layer confirms weathering and soil formation under very significant vegetation cover.

3.2. Radiocarbon Analysis and Archaeological Finds

According to radiocarbon measurements (Table 2, Figure 3), the sediment layers of the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter accumulated from 15,000 cal BP until the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Modern Ages.
Late Glacial Epipalaeolithic and Early Holocene Mesolithic finds are present in the stratigraphic sequence. The original findings [11,25] were prehistoric, featureless pottery from the Neolithic through the Bronze Age; at the same time pottery of the Late Neolithic, Early Copper Age and probably Bronze Age (Table 3) occurred as well. Radiocarbon data indicate that the development of the sequence was not continuous.
Sediment accumulation ceased between approximately 14,000 and 11,200 cal BP (Table 1) and coarse rock debris had fallen into the rock shelter.

3.3. Paleobotanical Analysis

The paleobotanical analysis was based on charcoal samples from the sediment material [2,4,5,6].
The first paleobotanical horizon developed between 220 and 180 cm (Figure 4, Table 4). The remains of coniferous trees dominated, which evolved between 15,000 and 14,000 cal BP, with spruce (Picea sp.) accounting for more than 50% of all charcoal remains, and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) for 25%. The spruce (Picea sp.) and larch (Larix sp.) remains could not yet be separated from each other at the technical level of the time [2,4,5,6]. József Stieber therefore introduced Picea—Larix as an anthracological taxon, as the wood anatomical picture of these species are very similar to each other. However, Edina Zita Rudner, an anthracologist, clarified by SEM microscopy analyses that these remains belong to the spruce (Picea) taxon [26,27]. In addition to coniferous elements, the presence of thermo-mesophilous deciduous trees is detectable in the charcoal assemblage.
In the next horizon between 180 and 140 cm, i.e., between 11,300 and 9900 cal BP years, during the Early Holocene, deciduous trees, mainly oak (Quercus sp.), linden (Tilia sp.), elm (Ulmus sp.), beech (Fagus sp.), maple (Acer sp.), and hazel (Corylus sp.) dominated, while Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and spruce (Picea sp.) charcoal were only secondary.
The third paleobotanical horizon evolved between 140 and 80 cm. The proportion of coniferous trees decreased and the number of deciduous trees has become absolutely dominant in the profile.

3.4. Malacological Analysis

Based on the composition of the Mollusca fauna, four malacological zones could be distinguished (Table 5, Figure 5).
The first malacological zone developed between 220 and 180 cm, between 15,000 and 14,000 cal BP years. European and Central European forest species [28] are absolutely dominant at this late-glacial horizon, especially Cochlodina cerata. Cold-tolerant Mollusca species are represented only by Discus ruderatus, while warm-tolerant species (Bradybaena fruticum, Euomphalia strigella, Granaria frumentum) have also been found in this section.
The next malacological horizon developed between 180 and 140 cm, i.e., between 11,200 and 9900 cal BP. The number of Cochlodina cerata, the dominant species of the late-glacial horizon, has declined but persists in the section. Several character elements of the Early Holocene faunal evolution of the Pre-Carpathian region, such as Acicula polita, Ruthenica filograna, Sphyradium doliolum, Aegopinella minor, Oxychilus glaber, Trichia unidentata, Helicigona faustina and Helicodonta obvoluta appeared (Table 5 and Figure 5).
In the next malacological horizon, between 140 and 60 cm (cc. 6500–4600 cal BP), the number of individuals declined strongly, the proportion of closed forest species declined and the ratio of species preferring more open forest environments (Helix pomatia) increased. The number of hygrophilous malacofauna elements (Iphigena ventricosa) was higher. In this horizon, prehistoric pottery was found in all of the samples, so it can be assumed that there was significant human disturbance and vegetation conversion (wood harvesting for fuel and building material) in the area around the rock shelter. We have named this locally important malacological horizon the Iphigena ventricosa—Helix pomatia horizon.
Human impact may have diminished in the study area at the beginning of the Iron Age (60–0 cm), as Mollusca species preferring open areas declined and Clausilia species became the absolute dominant elements in the near-surface horizon. Balea cana species appeared only in this horizon, which is the eponymous Mollusca species of this depth (Figure 5).
The determination of the malacological material was verified and accepted by Endre Krolopp, who then requested the return of the material after the radiocarbon analysis. By his will, the remaining malacological assemblage was deposited in the collection of the Mátra Museum.
Figure 5. Malacological results based on the palaeoecological categories of Ložek [29] and recent distribution data [28]. Paleoecological categories of Ložek [29]: W = Woodland, locally open habitat species; 1Wf = Woodland species; 2WM = Mesophilous forests species; 3Wh = Wet forest species (gallery forest); 8H = Hygrophilous species; O = Open habitat species; 4S = Warm steppe species; 5O = Open woodland species; 6X = Xero-thermophilous species; M = Mesophilous species.
Figure 5. Malacological results based on the palaeoecological categories of Ložek [29] and recent distribution data [28]. Paleoecological categories of Ložek [29]: W = Woodland, locally open habitat species; 1Wf = Woodland species; 2WM = Mesophilous forests species; 3Wh = Wet forest species (gallery forest); 8H = Hygrophilous species; O = Open habitat species; 4S = Warm steppe species; 5O = Open woodland species; 6X = Xero-thermophilous species; M = Mesophilous species.
Diversity 16 00109 g005

3.5. Vertebrate Analysis

The analysis is based entirely on the results of previously and extensively published vertebrate fauna analysis [3,12,13,14,15].
In the horizon between 220 and 180 cm ptarmigan species (Lagopus mutus/muta, Lagopus lagopus), western capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), black grouse (Lyrurus tetrix), and hazel grouse (Tetrastes bonasia) were present. This is supported by the composition of the vole fauna. Birch mice (Sicista), narrow-headed vole (Microtus gregalis), European snow vole (Chionomys nivalis/Microtus nivalis) and tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) which are widespread in the Boreal-Alpine region characterized by humid-cool climate, have been found together with species indicating milder climate, such as small rodents (Arvicola, Pitymys subterraenus, Myoides glareolus, Apodemus silvaticus), European fat dormouse (Glis glis), hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius), snakes (Ophidia), amphibians (Bufo) and reptiles (Lacerta) in this horizon (Figure 6).
In the next horizon between 180 and 140 cm, i.e., between 11,200 and 9900 cal BP, the typical fauna elements of the Late Pleistocene disappear, such as ptarmigan species (Lagopus mutus/muta, Lagopus lagopus), European snow vole (Chionomys nivalis/Microtus nivalis), while others recede, such as narrow-headed vole (Microtus gregalis) and tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus). The ratio of birch mice (Sicista) and pika (Ochotona) remained significant, and the finds of bison (Bison) appeared. The presence of reindeer (Rangifer) [3,12,13] suggests that perhaps reindeer populations did not completely disappear from the Carpathian Basin during the last glacial as previously modelled [30]. The proportion of faunal elements, that were dispersing during the Holocene, such as European fat dormouse (Glis glis), hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius), snakes (Ophidia), amphibians (Bufo), lizards and European pine vole (Pitymys subterraneus/Microtus subterraneus), bank vole (Myoides glareolus) and wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) increased, while wild boar (Sus scrofa) and squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) appeared.
In the next vertebrate fauna horizon, from 140 cm to 60 cm (6500–4600 cal BP, from the Late Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age) the remains of narrow-headed vole (Microtus gregalis), European snow vole (Chionomys nivalis/Microtus nivalis) and tundra vole suggest that cold-tolerant elements persisted until historical times. From the Late Neolithic onwards, the ratio of forest species (Pitymys subterraenus, Myoides glareolus, Apodemus silvaticus) increased sharply, while the proportion of common vole (Microtus arvalis) declined (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Based on the radiocarbon data, the accumulation processes may have started at the end of the Late Glacial, during the last glaciation, in the younger Dryas cooling (stadial) horizon. This horizon, known as the Nahanagan Stadial in Ireland [31] and the Loch Lomond Stadial in England [32], may have caused significant cooling and recurrence of dust accumulation in the North Atlantic region. The development of this cooling event was limited in the Carpathian Basin [33], as evidenced by the clay content of this layer, which indicates a more pronounced weathering, i.e., a milder and wetter climate. Sediment accumulation ceased between approximately 14,000 and 11,200 cal BP (Table 2) and coarse rock debris had fallen into the rock shelter. It is interesting to note that this occurred at a time when dust accumulation was drastically reduced in the Carpathian Basin and the temperature increased, when poorly developed litho and podzol soil developed in the study area [8,33,34]. This phenomenon is not unique in caves in Hungary; in other cases, the lack of sediment accumulation and the change in sedimentation was observed between 14,000 and 11,200 cal BP years. During the same period, a significant increase in slope processes was observed [35] and the accumulation of coarse rock debris accelerated in the mid-mountain zones, including the Pre-Carpathian region. Probably the permafrost layer in the mid-mountain zone was melted as a local environmental projection of the global warming that started at the end of the Pleistocene, and this caused the changes in the sedimentation process.
However, the amount of anthracological material does not reach the minimum number for statistical analysis in these days (Table 4, [24] in both the Rejtek [4,5] and the Petényi cave [4,5,36]); yet these data were completely unique in the 1950s, even though the local presence of trees had been known for several decades based on the analyses of charcoal remains by Hollendonner [37,38], Greguss [39] and Sárkány and Stieber [40] in the Carpathian Basin during glacials.
At the same time, the local presence of woody (especially coniferous) elements in the glacial and late-glacial vegetation has been suggested by pollen samples [41,42] and woodpecker bones [12,15]. However, the novelty (and the complete rejection of these new data) was caused by the detection of the local presence of broad-leaved thermo-mesophilous (Quercus sp., Ulmus sp., Acer sp., Carpinus sp., Fagus sp.) trees in the Late Glacial horizon, the existence of a deciduous refugia [4,5,6,38] in northern Hungary.
Anthracological data indicate that a mixed taiga forest with deciduous elements, such as beech (Fagus sp.), oak (Quercus sp.), ash (Fraxinus sp.), elm (Ulmus sp.) and maple (Acer sp.) trees was already present in the local vegetation at the end of the Pleistocene [4,5,6].
The Late Pleistocene charred wood remains clearly demonstrate that thermo-mesophillous wood species, already locally assumed in the 1990s on the basis of pollen analysis [7,8,9], were indeed present in the Carpathian foreland in the Late Pleistocene vegetation in the appropriate microclimatic and microenvironmental oases [9].
The composition of charcoal is primarily used to reconstruct the composition of former forests [43]. As a result, mixed spruce-pine (Picea—Pinus) taxa dominated with scattered thermo-mesophilous deciduous forest (oak (Quercus sp.), elm (Ulmus sp.), ash (Fraxinus sp.), linden (Tilia sp.), beech (Fagus sp.), hornbeam (Carpinus sp.)) species [4,5,6,34]. Based on the anthracological results, the hypothesis of József Stieber was right. His results preceded palynological studies in Hungary by almost 40 years and proved that coniferous and thermo-mesophilous (broad-leaved) deciduous trees were already present in the Carpathian Basin vegetation at the end of the Pleistocene. In other words, the area was not a cold tundra desert zone, but due to microenvironmental factors, a mosaic vegetation developed during the last glacial [33,34].
The most surprising was the local presence of beech (Fagus sp.) (Table 4, Figure 4) in this mixed forest canopy at the end of the Pleistocene [5]. Namely, several pollen analytical models [44,45,46,47,48] have modelled the distribution of beech in the Carpathian foothills, gradually spreading from a beech refugium in Slovenia (Figure 7), where the age of the oldest beech pollen was around 8500 BP years (7500–7600 BC) [44,45,46]. According to pollen models [49], beech (Fagus sp.) may have spread in the Transdanubian region between 8000 and 7300 cal BP years, in the North Hungarian Mountains between 6300 and 5500 cal BP years, and in the Great Hungarian Plain between 4500 and 4000 cal BP years. In contrast, anthracological data indicate that beech (Fagus sp.) was already present in the study area during the Late Glacial (Rejtek) and Early Holocene (Bátorliget) (Figure 7).
The presence of beech (Fagus sp.) charcoal in Rejtek indicates that beech dispersal could not have started only from the Quaternary beech refugium in Slovenia [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. According to the Rejtek site and data from Bátorliget, several relict areas of beech may have developed on the periphery of the Carpathian Basin, in the mountain ranges surrounding the basin (Transylvania, Northern Carpathians, Czech Basin, possibly the Transdanubian Central Mountains), so the spread of beech, its colonization in the Carpathian Basin, may have been a multi-directional process, or may have occurred from several directions in the Carpathian Basin. The anthracological analysis of the Rejtek section [4,5,6] shows that in the deciduous forest formed during the Early Holocene, the scattered stands of pine forest elements (Figure 4) retreated in the relict as the temperature rose.
A very similar process could be modelled from Bátorliget [7,8,9] and the Nyíres Lake of Csaroda [34]. The process whereby thermo-mesophilous species persist in an area during cooling, and cold-tolerant species preserve during warming periods has been termed the double refugial effect in previous works [7,9]. Anthracological results demonstrated that the pine forest—deciduous forest transition—outlined in previous palynological works [7,8,9,33]—was also taking place in this area at the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary. At the same time, the composition of the charcoal assemblage also suggests that the vertical structure of vegetation was already established in the area at the beginning of the Holocene.
The composition and dominance changes of the species-rich Mollusca fauna of the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter raise many questions (Table 5). The results of the radiocarbon measurements and their correlative comparison with the Mollusca fauna have fundamentally changed the previously described ideas about the evolution of the Mollusca fauna of the Bükk Mountains [51,52,53].
Forest species (Ložek’s forest taxa: Wf category: [29]) dominated throughout the profile, mainly European and Central European forest species (Figure 5). The composition of the malacofauna showed similar results to the anthracological results. The co-presence of Discus perspectivus and Discus ruderatus, which are now widespread in beech and coniferous forests, and the dominance of Cochlodina cerata support the development of the double refugial effect. In addition, the Pleistocene residual elements and the Holocene elements, i.e., the cold-tolerant and cryophylous Pleistocene and the thermophilous Holocene malacofauna, coexisted in the Bátorliget bog [7], which support this hypothesis [33]. The name of the Late Glacial horizon is the Cochlodina cerata zone, which is a locally evolved ecozone (Figure 8). In addition, bird species typical of both boreal-alpine regions and deciduous forests were present in the Late Glacial sedimentary horizon. The co-presence of cold-tolerant and milder climate preferring species in the Late Glacial vertebrate fauna is similar to the above discussed malacological and vegetation development. The composition of the Rejtek fauna is thus very similar to the composition of vegetation at the Late Glacial and confirms the ideas described for forest refugium vegetation evolution.
The continuous presence of Cochlodina cerata (which spread at higher elevations in the mountainous region nowadays), Cochlodina laminata, Clausilia dubia, Clausilia pumila, Laciniaria plicata species throughout the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene, and the Late Glacial presence of the Discus perspectivus species is of particular importance. As a result, it is clear that in addition to the previous cold steppe/warm steppe faunal variation model [51,52,53], a forest/forest-like faunal composition change associated with parallel vegetation evolution has also developed in the Bükk Mountains. The faunal composition shows significant similarities with the Early Holocene malacofauna of the Bátorliget bog [33] and the Carpathian region [54,55,56]. At the same time, there are also differences, as forest elements originating from the Balkan gene centre [28] were not found in the Rejtek section. The distribution of Central European—European species is similar [57] in the Early Holocene section of the Bátorliget bog. On the other hand, species with a Carpathian distribution did not occur in the same proportion as it was observed in the Rejtek section.
The composition of the Early Holocene malacofauna of Rejtek indicates that the forest environment was already established at the beginning of the Early Holocene without the interposition of a major steppe phase.
However, the Early Holocene presence of the Boreo-Alpine Discus ruderatus species (as in the case of the Bátorliget section) is very significant evidence of a double refugial effect. This malacological horizon is called the Ruthenica filograna-Clausilia pumila horizon. The presence of Acicula polita and Helicigona faustina in the Early Holocene and their records from about 11,200 and 9900 cal BP years (confirming our earlier statements [33]) clearly make it meaningless to postulate the Helicigona faustinaAcicula polita biozone to the Late Holocene. This Early Holocene biozone can only be interpreted as a local ecozone.
The presence of Clausilia species and the persistence of Discus ruderatus suggest that the study site is suitable for a long-term temperate (deciduous) forest refugium, which could and can survive the climatic cycles of the Quaternary and perhaps also the anthropogenic industrial influences, and, therefore, has outstanding conservation importance in the temperate zone both in Europe and globally.
The upper horizon of the profile (140–80 cm) indicates that the ratio of coniferous trees decreased and the number of deciduous trees has become dominant. This change coincided with the settlement of productive farming communities and the emergence of ceramic finds. In these ceramic-rich horizons, a greater proportion of south-eastern European mollusc species preferring open forests were distributed. Thus, we can assume that the composition of the Early Holocene forest changed due to human impact during the Middle Neolithic. It is noticeable that the spread of hornbeam (Carpinus sp.) can be attributed to anthropogenic influences, although the spread of this tree species has also been linked to climatic changes [47]. Nevertheless, based on previous data [8,34], we maintain that human influences (selective logging, burning, copper smelting) have played a role in the rapid spread of hornbeam (and perhaps beech) in the Middle Holocene.

5. Conclusions

Radiocarbon data indicate that the profile spans the end of the Pleistocene to the entire Holocene; thus, it is suitable for exploring the environmental background of Quaternary cultures and the local appearance of individual cultures, for answering questions of archaeostratigraphy, litho-, biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy, and for establishing a unified geochronology. The comparative radiocarbon analyses on shells [58,59,60,61,62,63] show correct geochronological data and therefore proved to be suitable for the characterization of the sedimentary sequence accumulated in the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter. This is supported by new radiocarbon analyses carried out 10 years after our radiocarbon survey, in which the data showed a completely similar trend with the most recent analyses on bones recovered from the profile [21]. This seems to be supported by the charcoal, the radiocarbon data from the snail shells, the archaeological finds from the sedimentary assemblage, the post-lithostratigraphic classification of the section and the biostratigraphic classification of the excavated vertebrate material [3,12,13,15] (Table 2).
Based on chronological investigations, the section probably begins with the Late Glacial horizon of the end of the Pleistocene between 15,000 and 14,000 cal BP years. Loess-like sediment has accumulated in the rock shelter. Based on the composition of the bioindicator groups, the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary around the cave was strongly humid and forested, but it can be assumed that the forest was not closed on the hillsides, possibly alternating between steppe and forest mosaics. This can only explain why the local anthracological and malacological assemblages allow us to reconstruct a closed and mixed pine forest in the area of the study site.
This is confirmed by the composition of the vertebrate fauna, but the presence and proportion of cold steppe and tundra species confirm the presence of more open vegetation patches. If we consider the important role that owl droppings may have played in the accumulation of vertebrate material in the rock shelter [12], it can be assumed that the action radius of the owls in the area [64] determined the origin of the small mammal remains in Rejtek. This allows us to conclude not only about the immediate surroundings of the rock shelter, but also about its background and wider environment in the Bükk Mountains. The anthracological, malacological and vertebrate material thus reflects different distances of dispersal, different sizes of vegetation cover and environmental conditions in the section, so differences between them are to be expected. In the immediate vicinity of the rock shelter, epipaleolithic communities (Figure 8) lived and exploited its features in the mixed canopy of thermo-mesophilous temperate deciduous trees, and a mixed taiga woodland with possibly more open patches in the background. The evolution of the epipalaeolithic horizon [11] suggests that Late Pleistocene epipalaeolithic groups preserving Palaeolithic traditions were still present in the study area at the end of the Pleistocene, between 15,000 and 14,000 cal BP years.
There is a sediment hiatus of about 2000 years, the beginning of the Early Holocene between the 14th and 12th millennia BP. Environment historical analysis of continuous, radiocarbon dated sections from different study sites shows that the sedimentation process, the vegetation cover and the nature of the weathering changed fundamentally within this period. It can be assumed that this change could have caused the stratigraphic hiatus in the sequence of the rock shelter.
During the Early Holocene a deciduous forest existed in the vicinity of the rock shelter, but cold-tolerant relict elements were also preserved. This species-rich, closed forest containing coniferous trees may have already been inhabited by Mesolithic communities, and the trapezoidal blades found in the Rejtek Rock Shelter suggest that Mesolithic Tardonasien groups lived in or in the vicinity of the study site. According to the Rejtek section, the emergence and spread of the Mesolithic population and the retreat of epipaleolithic groups were also influenced by the environmental alterations generated by climate change, the establishment and spread of a new deciduous forest environment.
Prehistoric pottery finds from the Neolithic to the Bronze age were revealed; however, sediment hiatus occurred throughout the Neolithic horizon of the profile according to radiocarbon data (Table 3).
At the end of the Neolithic and beginning of the Copper age the deciduous forest environment subsisted in the vicinity of the cave, with species-rich shrub and crown canopy, where beech (Fagus sp.), hornbeam (Carpinus sp.), oak (Quercus sp.) and hazel (Corylus sp.) trees and shrub vegetation spread over the area. This is supported by the mollusc fauna that indicate open forest. Probably the exposure of the hillsides, the higher humidity of the valley in the foreground of the rock shelter had a fundamental influence on the vegetation, similar to what we can observe today in the south-facing valleys of the Bükk Mountains, so parallel vegetation development could have occurred. As a result, lithophyte vegetation, steppes, oak (Quercus sp.) forests with a rich shrub layer, linden (Tilia sp.) forest, beech (Fagus sp.) forest mixed with hornbeam (Carpinus sp.) and maple (Acer sp.) trees, similar to what we can observe today in the Imókő area [65], may have developed side by side on open steep faces. It can be assumed that this mosaic vegetation, which is contingent on local exposure and humidity, was already established during the Late Glacial and that this may have allowed the thermophilic deciduous forest species to persist in the coniferous forest during the Last Glacial. This mosaic nature may also have characterized the deciduous forest environment that evolved during the Early Holocene, when coniferous forest species receded into refugial locations with cooler, more humid microclimates and deciduous forest species spread from the former milder relict patches.
Probably, this change can be linked to human impact; according to the pottery finds [25] the area was inhabited from the Late Neolithic, and the significant anthropogenic disturbance (trampling, building and fuel extraction) affected the structure of the vegetation.
From the Iron age the expansion of forests was related to the depopulation of the area around the rock shelter, as neither archaeological finds, nor charred wood fragments were found. A very similar process could be observed and linked to the decline of human influence in the surroundings of the Mohos bog at Kelemér in the 8th century BC [8].
The study site appears to be particularly valuable for long-term forest refugia because the forest environment has been able to survive major climatic changes and human impact. At the same time, the sedimentological profile, although it is not continuous, contains archaeological finds, palaeobotanical, malacological and vertebrate palaeontological remains that are some of the most valuable environmental and stratigraphic data in Hungary for the Late Pleistocene and Holocene.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, writing–review and editing; visualization, K.N.; writing—original draft preparation, supervision, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “NKFP” grant number 5/2002 and “OTKA” grant number 034 396.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Lattin, G Beiträge zur Zoogeographie des Mittelmeergebietes. Verhandlungen Der Dtsch. Zool. Ges. Kiel 1949, 13, 143–150.
  2. Stieber, J. Anthrakotonia, Kvarther Kronológia és a Hazai Pleisztocén Vegetáció. Ph.D. Thesis, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jánossy, D. Vorlaufige Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen in der Felsnische Rejtek 1. (Bükk- Gebirge, Gem. Répáshuta). Karszt És Barlangkutatás 1962, 3, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stieber, J. A Hazai Felső-Pleisztocénből Származó Faszénmaradványok Antrakotómiai Vizsgálata. Candidate Thesis, Budapest, Hungary, 1957. (In Hungarian). [Google Scholar]
  5. Stieber, J. A magyarországi felső-pleisztocén vegetációtörténete az anthrakotómiai eredmények (1957-ig) tükrében. Földtani Közlöny 1967, 97, 308–316, (In Hungarian with German Summary). [Google Scholar]
  6. Stieber, J. A hazai későglaciális vegetációtörténet anthrakotómiai vizsgálatok alapján. Földtani Közlöny 1969, 99, 188–193, (In Hungarian with German summary). [Google Scholar]
  7. Willis, K.J.; Sümegi, P.; Braun, M.; Tóth, A. The Late Quaternary environmental history of Bátorliget, N.E. Hungary. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1995, 118, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Willis, K.J.; Braun, M.; Sümegi, P.; Tóth, A. Does soil change cause vegetation change or vice-versa? A temporal perpective from Hungary. Ecology 1997, 78, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Willis, K.J.; Rudner, E.; Sümegi, P. The full-glacial forests of central and southeastern Europe: Evidence from Hungarian palaeoecological records. Quat. Res. 2000, 53, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Birks, H.H. The Late-Quaternary history of arctic and alpine plants. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2008, 1, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vértes, L. Az Őskőkor és az Átmeneti Kőkor Emlékei Magyarországon; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jánossy, D. Pleistocene Vertebrate Faunas of Hungary; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1979. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Jánossy, D.; Kordos, L. Pleistocene-Holocene Mollusc and Vertebrate Fauna of Two Caves in Hungary. Ann. Musei Hist. Nat. Hung. 1976, 68, 5–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pazonyi, P. A Kárpát-Medence Kvarter Emlősfauna Közösségeinek Paleoökológiai és Rétegtani Vizsgálata. Ph.D. Thesis, ELTE Őslénytani Tanszék, Budapest, Hungary, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jánossy, D. Pleistocene Vertebrate Faunas of Hungary; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; 205p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Troels-Smith, J. Karakterisering af lose jordater. Dan. Geol. Unders. 1955, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Munsell Color Company. Munsell Soil Color Charts; Macbeth, Division of Kollmorgen Corporation, Munsell Color: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  18. Njalsson, T.; Novosselov, I. Design and optimization of a compact low-cost optical particle sizer. J. Aerosol Sci. 2018, 119, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xu, X.W.; Qiang, X.K.; Fu, C.F.; Zhao, H.; Chen, T.; Sun, Y.F. Characteristics of frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility in Bartington MS2 and Kappabridge MFK1-FA, and its application in loess-paleosol, red clay and lacustrine sediments. Chin. J. Geophys. 2012, 55, 197–206. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dean, W.E., Jr. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods. J. Sediment. Res. 1974, 44, 242–248. [Google Scholar]
  21. Magyari, E.K.; Gasparik, M.; Major, I.; Lengyel, G.; Pál, I.; Virág, A.; Korponai, J.; Haliuc, A.; Szabó, Z.; Pazonyi, P. Mammal extinction facilitated biome shift and human population change during the last glacial termination in East-Central Europe. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sümegi, P.; Persaits, G.; Gulyás, S. Woodland-Grassland Ecotonal Shifts in Environmental Mosaics: Lessons Learnt from the Environmental History of the Carpathian Basin (Central Europe) during the Holocene and the Last Ice Age Based on Investigation of Paleobotanical and Mollusk Remains. In Ecotones Between Forest and Grassland; Myster, R., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 15–57. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sümegi, P.; Náfrádi, K. A radiocarbon, dated cave sequence and the Pleistocene/Holocene transition in Hungary. Open Geosci. 2015, 7, 783–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gaál, I. A Gerecse-hegység egyik legérdekesebb barlangcsoportja. Földgömb 1934, 5, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mozsolics, A.A. Goldfunde des Depotfundhorizontes von Hajdúsámson. In Bericht der Römisch–Germanischen Kommission; J. Baer & Company: Berlin, Germany, 1968; Volume 46–47, pp. 2–76. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rudner, E.; Sümegi, P. Recurring taiga forest steppe habitats in the Carpathian Basin in the Upper Weichselian. Quat. Int. 2001, 76/77, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rudner, E.; Sümegi, P. Charcoal as a remain of natural and human-set fires of Palaeolithic Times—Case study from Hungary. Br. Archaeol. Rep. 2002, 1089, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  28. Welter-Schultes, F. European Non-Marine Mollusc, a Guide for Species Identification; Planet Poster Editions: Göttingen, Germany, 2012; 680p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lozek, V. Quartärmollusken der Tschechoslowakei—Rozpravy Ustredniho Ústavu Geologického; Ústřední Ústav Geologický: Prague, Czech Republic, 1964; p. 31. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vörös, I. Large mammalian faunal changes during the late Upper Pleistocene and early Holocene times in the Carpathian Basin. In Pleistocene Environment in Hungary; Pécsi, M., Ed.; Geographical Research Institute of HAS: Budapest, Hungary, 1987; pp. 81–101. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilson, K.R. The last glaciation in the western Mourne Mountains, Northern Ireland. Scott. Geogr. J. 2004, 120, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sissons, J.B. The Loch Lomond Stadial in the British Isles. Nature 1979, 280, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sümegi, P. The results of paleoenvironmental reconstruction and comparative geoarcheological analysis for the examined area. In The Geohistory of Bátorliget Marshland; Sümegi, P., Gulyás, S., Eds.; Archaeolingua Press: Budapest, Hungary, 2004; pp. 301–348. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sümegi, P. Reconstruction of flora, soil and landscape evolution, and human impact on the Bereg Plain from late-glacial up to the present, based on palaeoecological analysis. In The Upper Tisa Valley; Hamar, J., Sárkány Kiss, A., Eds.; Tiscia Monograph Series; Tisza Klub & Liga Pro Europa: Szeged, Hungary, 1999; pp. 173–204. [Google Scholar]
  35. Szabó, J. Csuszamlásos Folyamatok Szerepe a Magyarországi Tájak Geomorfológiai Fejlődésében. Habilitation Thesis, Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó, Debrecen, Hungary, 1996. (In Hungarian). [Google Scholar]
  36. Stieber, J. Anthrakotomische Untersuchung. Folia Archaeol. 1956, 8, 13–14, (In Hungarian with German and French Summaries). [Google Scholar]
  37. Hollendonner, F. A magyarországi praehistorikus fák és faszenek mikroszkópikus vizsgálata. Math. És Természettudományi Értesítő 1926, 42, 204–207. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hollendonner, F. A fosszilis faszenek vizsgálata. In A cserépfalui Mussolini barlang (Subalyuk). Geol. Hung. Ser. Palaeonthologica 1938, 14, 311–315. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Greguss, P. Az első alföldi paleolit-lelet faszén maradványai. Dolg. A Magy. Királyi Ferenc József Tudegy. Archeol. Intézetéből 1936, 12, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sárkány, S.; Stieber, J. A Szelim-barlang újabb faszénmaradványainak anthrakotómiai vizsgálata. In Budapesti Tudományegyetem Biológiai Intézetének Évkönyve; Budapesti Tudományegyetem Biológiai Intézetének: Budapest, Hungary, 1950; pp. 32–37. [Google Scholar]
  41. Miháltz, I. A Duna-Tisza köze déli részének földtani felvétele. In A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évi jelentése 1950-ről; Müszaki Könyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1953; pp. 113–143. Available online: https://epa.oszk.hu/02900/02934/00118/pdf/EPA02934_mafi_evi_jel_1950_113-143.pdf. (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  42. Csinády, G. A bátorligeti láp története a pollenanalízis tükrében. (The evolutionary history of Bátorliget marshland from a pollen analytical point of view). Földrajzi Értesítő 1953, 3, 684–694. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Connor, T.P.; Evans, J.G. Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Methods; Sutton Publishing: London, UK, 1999; 242p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gardner, A.R. Biotic response to Early Holocene human activity: Results from palaeoenvironmental analyses of sediments from Podpesko Jezero. Dok. Prehist. 1998, 24, 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gardner, A.R. The ecology of Neolithic environmental impacts–re-evaluation of existing theory using case studies from Hungary. Dok. Prehist. 1999, 26, 163–183. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gardner, A.R.; Willis, K.J. Prehistoric farming and the postglacial expansion of beech and hornbeam: A comment on Küster. Holocene 1999, 9, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Magyari, E. A bükk (Fagus silvatica) és a gyertyán (Carpinus betulus) terjedésének problematikája a Kárpát-medence holocén vegetációfejlődésében. A 4. Magyar Őslénytani Vándorgyűlés előadásainak kivonatai. Pécsvárad. 2001. Available online: https://foldtan.hu/sites/default/files/3071150_2001_pecsvarad_fuzet.pdf. (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  48. Juhász, I.E. A Délnyugat Dunántúl Negyedkori Vegetációtörténetének Palinológiai Rekonstrukciója. (Reconstitution Palynologique de la Végétation Depuis le Tardiglaciaire Dans la Région de Zala, Sud-Ouest de la Hongrie). Ph.D. Thesis, University Aix Marseille III., Marseille, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  49. Magyari, E. Climatic Versus Human Modification of the Late Quaternary Vegetation in Eastern Hungary. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mineralogy and Geology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  50. Magri, D.; Vendramin, G.G.; Comps, B.; Dupanloup, I.; Geburek, T.; Gömöry, D.; Latałowa, M.; Litt, T.; Paule, L.; Roure, J.M.; et al. A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: Palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fűköh, L. A magyarországi középhegységi holocén Mollusca-fauna zoogeográfiai vizsgálata. Malacol. Newsl. 1994, 13, 9–43. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fűköh, L. Biostratigraphical and geomorphological investigation in areas of Hungarian subsided during the Holocene. Z. Geomorphol. Suppl. 1997, 110, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  53. Medzihradszky, Z.; Gasparik, M.; Fűköh, L. A Vallonia costata biozóna (Fűköh, L. 1990) sztratotípus lelőhely újravizsgálata. Folia Hist. Nat. Musei Matra. 2002, 26, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  54. Alexandrowicz, W.P. Molluscan assemblages of Late Glacial and Holocene calcareous tufas in Southern Poland. Folia Quat. 2004, 75, 309. [Google Scholar]
  55. Alexandrowicz, W.P. Malacological evidence of the natural and anthropogenic changes of the environment in the eastern part of the Carpathian Foreland: The studies in the Glinne stream valley near Rzeszów (southern Poland). Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 14, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alexandrowicz, W.P.; Szymanek, M.; Rybska, E. Molluscan assemblages from Holocene calcareous tufa and their significance for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. A study in the Pieniny Mountains (Carpathians, southern Poland). Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 11, 37–54. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sümegi, P.; Deli, T. Results of the quartermalacological analysis of the profiles from the central and marginal areas of Bátorliget marshland. In The Geohistory of Bátorliget Marshland; Sümegi, P., Gulyás, S., Eds.; Archaeolingua Press: Budapest, Hungary, 2004; pp. 183–207. [Google Scholar]
  58. Preece, R.C. Mapping snails in time: The prospect of elucidating the historical biogeography of the European malacofauna. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Malacological Congress (Tübingen 1989); Meier Brook, C., Ed.; Unitas Malacologica: Sidney, Australia, 1991; pp. 477–479. [Google Scholar]
  59. Preece, R.C.; Day, S.P. Comparison of the molluscan and vegetational successions from a radiocarbon-dated tufa in Oxfordshire. J. Biogeogr. 1994, 21, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pigati, J.S.; Quade, J.; Shahanan, T.M.; Haynes, C.V., Jr. Radiocarbon dating of minute gastropods and new constraints on the timing of late Quaternary spring-discharge deposits in southern Arizona, USA. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2004, 204, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pigati, J.S.; Rech, J.A.; Nekola, J.C. Radiocarbon dating of small terrestrial gastropod shells in North America. Quat. Geochronol. 2010, 5, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pigati, J.S.; McGeehin, J.P.; Muhs, D.R.; Bettis III, E.A. Radiocarbon dating late Quaternary loess deposits using small terrestrial gastropod shells. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2013, 76, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Újvári, G.; Molnár, M.; Novothny, Á.; Páll-Gergely, B.; Kovács, J.; Várhegyi, A. AMS 14C and OSL/IRSL dating of the Dunaszekcső loess sequence (Hungary): Chronology for 20 to 150 ka and implications for establishing reliable age–depth models for the last 40 ka. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2014, 106, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Roberts, N. The Holocene. An Environmental History; Blackwell Press: Oxford, UK, 1998; 384p. [Google Scholar]
  65. Nyilas, I.; Sümegi, P. Pointing out Cochlicopa nitens (Gallenstein, 1848) a new species for the Pleistocene in Hungary, in the territory of the Hortobágy National Park. Soosiana 1989, 17, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The location of Rejtek I. Rock Shelter.
Figure 1. The location of Rejtek I. Rock Shelter.
Diversity 16 00109 g001
Figure 2. Results of grain size analysis.
Figure 2. Results of grain size analysis.
Diversity 16 00109 g002
Figure 3. The location of sampling blocks [13] with the calibrated radiocarbon data (range).
Figure 3. The location of sampling blocks [13] with the calibrated radiocarbon data (range).
Diversity 16 00109 g003
Figure 4. Results of anthracological analysis [4,5,6].
Figure 4. Results of anthracological analysis [4,5,6].
Diversity 16 00109 g004
Figure 6. Dominance change of the microvertebrata assemblage (selected taxa) [12,13,15]. Dark blue color = Cryophilous species; Light blue color = Cold-resistanat species; Green color = Euryok species; Red color = Thermophilous species.
Figure 6. Dominance change of the microvertebrata assemblage (selected taxa) [12,13,15]. Dark blue color = Cryophilous species; Light blue color = Cold-resistanat species; Green color = Euryok species; Red color = Thermophilous species.
Diversity 16 00109 g006
Figure 7. Reconstruction of Fagus (beech) tree distribution based on beech pollen and radiocarbon dated Fagus (beech) charcoal remains (Rejtek (study site: red dot), Bátorliget) (modified after Magyari [49]).
Figure 7. Reconstruction of Fagus (beech) tree distribution based on beech pollen and radiocarbon dated Fagus (beech) charcoal remains (Rejtek (study site: red dot), Bátorliget) (modified after Magyari [49]).
Diversity 16 00109 g007
Figure 8. Antracological [5,36], malacological, vertebrate [12,13,15] and archaeological [11,25] ecozones, and vegetation type reconstruction.
Figure 8. Antracological [5,36], malacological, vertebrate [12,13,15] and archaeological [11,25] ecozones, and vegetation type reconstruction.
Diversity 16 00109 g008
Table 1. Sampling of the blocks and the re-numbering of samples (based on [11,12,15]). Blue: Block II/2 and Block III/3 represent more or less the same age and sediment.
Table 1. Sampling of the blocks and the re-numbering of samples (based on [11,12,15]). Blue: Block II/2 and Block III/3 represent more or less the same age and sediment.
BLOCK II.BLOCK III.BLOCK III. Northern Part, Sporadic Finds
Depth (cm)Original Sample Number 1957Renumbered 1962Renumbered 1976Original Sample Number 1957Renumbered 1962Renumbered 1976Original Sample Number 1957Renumbered 1962Renumbered 1976
0–30II/115
30–60II/26
60–90II/37
90–120 (140)II/4
“Neolithic”
28block III. northern part at 1.10 m/110–140 cm3
(110–140 cm)
13
(at 110 cm)
direct continuity of layers between Blocks II. and III. is lacking [13]
140–160 BLOCK III. 140–16049
160–180BLOCK III. 160–180510
180–200BLOCK III. 180–200611
200–220BLOCK III. 200–220712
Table 2. Results of radiocarbon analysis with uncalibrated, calibrated BP and calibrated BC/AD ages.
Table 2. Results of radiocarbon analysis with uncalibrated, calibrated BP and calibrated BC/AD ages.
Depth (cm)Uncal BP+/−Cal BP+/−Range Cal BPCal BC/AD+/−Range Cal BCLab Code
0–304802552020500–5401431 AD201411–1451 ADPoz-7881
30–6024703028871723059–2715593 BC172765–421 BCPoz-7880
60–9042653548031524955–46512804 BC1522956–2652 BCPoz-7887
90–12046753554311165547–53153714 BC1163830–3598 BCPoz-7877
110–11751604058761235999–57533927 BC1234050–3804 BCPoz-7879
110–1405630406400896489–63114451 BC894540–4362 BCPoz-7872
140–16089705010,07216310,235–99098019 BC1598169–7869 BCPoz-7876
160–18097904011,2174511,262–11,1729268 BC459313–9223 BCPoz-7878
180–20012,2605014,42537714,802–14,04812,476 BC37712,853–12,099 BCPoz-7963
200–22012,5305014,81232615,138–14,48612,835 BC32613,161–12,509 BCPoz-7975
Table 3. Calibrated radiocarbon data and recovered archaeological findings in the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter.
Table 3. Calibrated radiocarbon data and recovered archaeological findings in the Rejtek I. Rock Shelter.
Depth (cm)Cal BP (Range)Cal BC/AD (Range)Archaeological Finds
[11,12,15]
0–30500–5401411–1451 ADcoin from 18th century
hiatus
30–603059–2715765–421 BC-
hiatus
60–904955–46512956–2652 BCPrehistoric (Neolithic-Bronze Age) ceramics pieces
90–1205547–53153830–3598 BCPrehistoric (Neolithic-Bronze Age) ceramics pieces
110–117 (sample 13)5999–57534050–3804 BCPrehistoric (Neolithic-Bronze Age) ceramics pieces
110–140
(sample 13)
6489–63114540–4362 BCPrehistoric (Neolithic-Bronze Age) ceramics pieces
hiatus
140–16010,235–99098169–7869 BCMezolithic (Tardonasien) trapezoid
blade
160–18011,262–11,1729313–9223 BC
hiatus
180–20014,802–14,04812,853–12,099 BCEpipaleolit (?) finds
220–20015,138–14,48613,161–12,509 BCEpipaleolit (?) finds
Table 4. Charcoal remains from Rejtek I. Rock Shelter [4,5,6].
Table 4. Charcoal remains from Rejtek I. Rock Shelter [4,5,6].
Sample Number [13]1211109138
cal BP years15,138–14,48614,802–14,04811,262–11,17210,235–99096489–63115547–5315
Depth (cm)220–200 cm200–180 cm180–160 cm160–140 cm140–110 cm90–120 cm
Charcoal taxanumber of piecesnumber of piecesnumber of piecesnumber of piecesnumber of piecesnumber of pieces
Picea (original Picea-Larix)526130
Pinus sylvestris11116 1
Pinus cembra25
Needle-leaf tree632246 1
Quercus sp. 1 4 2
Tilia cf. cordata 2 25
Fraxinus cf. excelsior 1 24
Ulmus cf. campestre1 4
Salix sp. 1
Acer cf. platanoides22 1554
Acer cf. tataricum 2
Carpinus cf. betulus 2 4231
Fagus cf. sylvatica 1 1118
Corylus cf. avellana 18210
Broad leaf trees and shrub381481484
SUMMA11403941485
Table 5. Results of malacological analysis.
Table 5. Results of malacological analysis.
Sample Number [13]1211109138765
cal BP years (range)15,138–14,48614,802–14,04811,262–11,17210,235–99096489–63115547–53134955–46513059–2715540–500
Depth (cm)220–200200–180180–160160–140140–110120–9090–6060–3030–0
Piece (i = individual)iiiiiiiii
Acicula polita 1
Carychium tridentatum 1 7
Cochlicopa lubricella 1
Chondrina clienta 1 1
Granaria frumentum 1 21
Orcula dolium 1111 1
Sphyradium doliolum 141
Truncatellina cylindrica 1
Vallonia pulchella 1
Vallonia costata 1217
Chondrula tridens 21
Cochlodina laminata 43711
Cochlodina cerata355202611
Clausilia dubia2212 12
Clausilia pumila 1711610121
Iphigena ventricosa 2
Iphigena plicatula 11
Laciniaria plicata 13418121
Laciniaria biplicata 5 1
Balea cana 4
Ruthenica filograna 3196 16
Clausilia sp.1075271503721956
Vitrea crystallina 1 6
Vitrea contracta 1
Vitrea diaphana 1
Aegopinella minor 155
Aegopinella pura 4
Oxychilus glaber 8
Oxychilus orientalis 1411
Oxychilus depressus 1
Nesovitrea hammonis 3 1
Zonitidae 4221
Euconulus fulvus 1
Daudebardia rufa 4
Limax maximus 11218
Limacidae 4
Discus ruderatus 1 7 1
Discus rotundatus 212
Discus perspectivus 1
Bradybaena fruticum1 2
Euomphalia strigella13 11
Trichia unidentata 1
Perforatella incarnata 21
Isognomostoma isognomostoma 1
Helicigona faustina 31
Helicodonta obvoluta 1 2 1
Helix pomatia 13211 4
Helicidae 2451 4
SUMMA4916857307128111123100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Náfrádi, K.; Sümegi, P. The Forest Refugium of the Bükk Mountains, Hungary—Vegetation Change and Human Impact from the Late Pleistocene. Diversity 2024, 16, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020109

AMA Style

Náfrádi K, Sümegi P. The Forest Refugium of the Bükk Mountains, Hungary—Vegetation Change and Human Impact from the Late Pleistocene. Diversity. 2024; 16(2):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Náfrádi, Katalin, and Pál Sümegi. 2024. "The Forest Refugium of the Bükk Mountains, Hungary—Vegetation Change and Human Impact from the Late Pleistocene" Diversity 16, no. 2: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop