Next Article in Journal
Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidences Reveal Lasiodiplodia chonburiensis and L. theobromae Associated with Leaf Blight in Hevea brasiliensis in Southern Thailand
Next Article in Special Issue
Diverse Communities of Endemic and Cosmopolitan Lineages at Local Sites in the Lecanora polytropa Aggregate (Ascomycota)
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity of the Critically Endangered Big-Headed Turtle (Platysternon megacephalum) Based on Wild and Traded Samples: Implications for Conservation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chaenothecopsis xishuiensis sp. nov. to Science and Lecanora pseudargentata Newly Reported from China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Species and Two New Records of the Lichen Genus Fissurina from China

College of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(9), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15090959
Submission received: 22 July 2023 / Revised: 15 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Ecosystems of Lichens)

Abstract

:
The lichenized fungal genus Fissurina with mostly slit-like lirellae, belongs to Graphidaceae and is mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical regions. A total of 17 Fissurina species have been reported from China. During a survey of the lichen diversity of southern China, a new species Fissurina wuyinensis K.J. Shi, Z.F. Jia and X. Zhao, sp. nov. was found, which is characterized by a corticolous thallus without detected secondary substances, uncarbonized lirellae, and an exposed disc with pruina, muriform and amyloid ascospores. Furthermore, two new records of F. pseudostromatica, F. subcomparimuralis have been identified by morphological, anatomical, chemical and molecular studies. Phylogenetic analyses of three loci (ITS, nuLSU and mtSSU) supported the position of these species within Fissurina. Detailed morphological descriptions as well as high-resolution photographs of the morphology and anatomy of the three species are provided, as well as a comparison and discussion of the characteristics of similar species. The studied specimens were deposited in the Fungarium of the College of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University (LCUF).

1. Introduction

Graphidaceae is the largest family of tropical and subtropical crustose lichens. It is a symbiotic ecosystem composed of lichenized fungi of various genera and species of Chlorophyta Chlorococcaceae Trebouxia spp. and Trentepohliaceae Trentepohlia spp. from the plant kingdom. It belongs to Ascomycota, Lecanoromycetes, Ostropomycetidae and Ostropales. The currently accepted Graphidaceae includes 4 subfamilies, more than 80 genera, and a total of more than 2000 species [1,2,3,4].
The lichen genus Fissurina Fée belongs to Graphidaceae, and is characterized by a pale yellow-brown to olive green (rarely whitish), mostly smooth and glossy thallus, mostly slit-like lirellae and ovoid ascospores with a halo, transversely septate or muriform, amyloid to non-amyloid [5,6,7]. Fée established the genus with Fissurina dumastii Fée as the type species [8], it was subsumed within Graphis Adans. And Graphina Müll. Arg. [9,10,11]. In 1992, with the description of Fissurina quadrispora by Kalb and Hafellner, Fissurina was resurrected to the generic level [12], and in 1999, Staiger and Kalb redescribed Fissurina [13]. Staiger studied the combination of the phenotypic characteristics (ascomata characteristics, asci structure, ascospores characteristics, etc.) and genotype of Graphidaceae. She proposed a taxonomy of the family based on features other than spores combined with existing molecular data. Enter the embryonic phase of the combination of phenotype and genotype; a more natural classification of the family Graphidaceae was defined and generally accepted [14]. After that, Kalb et al., Archer, Lücking et al., etc., revised Graphidaceae [15,16,17,18], and so far the lirellate-morph Graphidaceae classification system of 24 genera has been generally recognized, and the genus level of Fissurina status tends to be more scientifically defined. Subsequent phylogenetic studies confirmed its phylogenetic position in the family Graphidaceae [19]. Phylogenetic studies indicate that Fissurina as currently defined is polyphyletic, and together with some taxa of Dyplolabia A. Massal., Ocellularia G. Mey. and Myriotrema Fée (the only common characteristic is the astrothelioid ascospores) constitute a monophyletic group, which is clearly distinct from other taxa of the family Graphidaceae and included in Fissurinoideae [1,20,21,22]. Kraichak and Lücking used a temporal banding approach to conduct in-depth studies on several orders of the two main subclasses of Lecanoromycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka., the results split Graphidaceae into four families: Diploschistaceae Zahlbr, Fissurinaceae B.P. Hodk, Graphidaceae s.str. and Thelotremataceae [22,23]. This classification system was adopted in the latest “Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa”, a classification system for eukaryotic microorganisms [24].
There are more than 150 species of Fissurina in the world, and this genus is mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical regions [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The subtropical zone of China is south of the Qinling Mountains and the Huaihe River, north of the Leizhou Peninsula and east of the Hengduan Mountains; the tropical zone generally refers to the area between the Tropic of Cancer, such as the entire Hainan Province, the Nansha Islands, and southern Guangxi, Guangdong, Yunnan and Taiwan. The species resources are very rich in these regions and are therefore the key to revealing the biodiversity of lichens [32,33]. Until now, 17 species of Fissurina have been described and reported in China, all distributed in tropical and subtropical zones [7,34,35]. During a survey of the lichen diversity of southern China, a new species of Fissurina collected from Fujian Province, and two newly recorded species from Yunnan and Guangdong provinces were discovered and they are described in this paper; phylogenetic trees were also constructed for these species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological and Chemical Analyses

The Chinese materials for this study were collected from Hunan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Fujian, Guangdong and Hainan provinces, and were deposited in the Fungarium of the College of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University (LCUF) after drying and low-temperature treatment.
Morphological and anatomical features were observed and photographed using a stereo microscope (OLYMPUS SZX16) and an optical microscope (OLYMPUS BX53 with digital camera OLYMPUS DP74).
Morphological observations were made, including the growth type, color, surface state and accessory structure of the thallus, the disc and labia, and mode of initiation of the ascomata. The specific methods of anatomical research are as follows:
First, remove the well-developed ascomata, thallus and a small part of substrate as one with a blade, gently flatten the sample on white cardboard, and slice the ascomata with part of the substrate by hand with a blade. Next, select a complete, uniform, and thin slice, place it in the sterile water droplet on the glass slide, add a coverslip, absorb excess water from one side with absorbent paper, and remove air bubbles. According to the characteristics of the genus, observe the characteristics of the epithecium, hymenium, paraphyses and ascospores in detail, and take pictures and make records. This process requires a light press of the coverslip to disperse the paraphyses so that the branches at the ends of the paraphyses can be easily observed. After the ascus is exposed, the number, size and type of the ascospores in the ascus can be clearly observed. Finally, add Lugol’s iodine solution dropwise on one side of the coverslip, and absorb it with absorbent paper on the other side, and test the amyloidity of the hymenium and ascospores using Lugol’s solution.
Spot tests were performed on the thallus surface and thin thallus sections by adding K (10% KOH solution), C (saturated aqueous NaClO solution) and P (dissolving p-phenylenediamine in anhydrous ethanol to prepare a 5% ethanol solution) reagents. The secondary metabolites of the lichens were analyzed and identified by thin layer chromatography (TLC) with the C solvent system [36,37,38], specific steps are as follows:
In this study, Lethariella cladonioides (Nyl.) Krog. containing atranorin and norstictic acid was used as the partition standard sample.
Firstly, do the preparatory work: Prepare the solvent according to the formula (toluene: acetic acid = 200:30 mL). Then, use a 2B pencil to lightly draw a straight line about 1.5 cm from the bottom edge of the long side of the glass silicone board, (take the size of 100 mm × 200 mm as an example), and draw a parallel straight line 0.2 cm above and below the straight line, take a point every 1 cm between the two ends of the first straight line, except the 1st, 10th and 19th, these three points are numbered as standard samples, the rest are coded as 1–16 in the sequence for sampling.
Next, sample preparation, extraction and spotting: use a blade (75% alcohol disinfection) to scrape a small amount of thallus cortex and medulla onto white paper, transfer them to sterilized small centrifuge tubes and number them; add a small amount of acetone to the small centrifuge tube until the sample is buried. After soaking for about 1–2 h, the capillary can be used to spot the sample according to the number.
Exposure layer: Pour an appropriate amount of C system solvent into the chromatography cylinder, put the glass silicone board with sample placed on it into the chromatography cylinder, and the straight line at the bottom of the glass silicone board should be above the chromatography solution. After the glass silicone board has been saturated in the chromatographic solution for 15–20 min, and before the solvent reaches 1 cm from the end of the chromatography plate, the glass silicone board can be taken out, and the surface of the plate can be dried with a hair dryer.
Color development: Observe the position and color of the chromatographic spots under sunlight; observe the fluorescence of the chromatographic spots under 365 nm and 254 nm ultraviolet light. Then, spray the silica gel plate evenly with 10% sulfuric acid solution, observe whether there are fat spots while wet, and record results. Then, put it in an oven at 85 °C for 10–15 min, so that the chromatographic color develops well.
Partition and component research: the three straight lines at the beginning of the chromatography on the silica gel plate are zone 1; draw the tangent lines on the upper and lower borders of the norstictic acid and atranorin acid spots, respectively, and define them as zone 4 and zone 7; draw a line between zone 1 and zone 4, and divide them into zone 2 and zone 3 in the middle; draw a line between zones 4 and 7 to divide them evenly into zones 5 and 6; above zone 7 is zone 8. Record the color and position of each spot, and record the Rf value if necessary.

2.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the ascomata and thallus of the specimens using the REDExtract-N-Amp Plant PCR Kits (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), nuclear large subunit rDNA (nuLSU) and mitochondrial small subunit rDNA (mtSSU) regions were amplified using the primer pair ITS1F/ITS4 [39,40], AL2R/LR6 [41] and mrSSU1/mrSSU3R [42], respectively. The 50 µL PCR reaction system consisted of 2.5 µL each primer solution, 4 µL genomic DNA, 16 µL ddH2O and 25 µL 2×Taq PCR MasterMix (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Thermocycling conditions for ITS comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C (3 min), 35 denaturation cycles at 94 °C (30 s), annealing at 52 °C (30 s), extension at 72 °C (1.5 min) and a final extension at 72 °C (10 min); for nuLSU conditions comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C (5 min), 35 denaturation cycles at 95 °C (30 s), annealing at 58 °C (30 s), extension at 72 °C (1 min) and a final extension at 72 °C (10 min); for mtSSU conditions comprised initial denaturation at 95 °C (5 min), 35 denaturation cycles at 94 °C (45 s), annealing at 50 °C (1 min), extension at 72 °C (1.5 min) and a final extension at 72 °C (10 min). The target product of PCR was affirmed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and sequenced by Biosune Inc. (Shanghai, China) and Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank (Table 1). Porina aenea (Körb.) Zahlbr. and P. leptalea (Durieu & Mont.) A.L. Sm. were selected as the outgroup [21].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The contigs were assembled and edited using the program Geneious v. 9.0.2 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), and subjected to BLAST searches for an initial verification of their identities. The sequences were aligned using MAFFT v 7.308 with settings appropriate for the variability of each locus [43]. For ITS sequences, we used the L-ING-i alignment algorithm with the remaining parameters set to default values. For nuLSU, the G-ING-i algorithm and “leave gappy regions” were selected. Then, we used the E-ING-i algorithm for mtSSU with the remaining parameters set to default values. A concatenated, 3-locus matrix was generated using Geneious v. 9.0.2. This matrix contained both Fissurina species and species belonging to related genera in the Fissurinoideae of the Graphidaceae family [4,44]. In addition to our newly generated sequences, other related sequences were downloaded from GenBank and added to the matrix (Table 1). Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) were performed using the CIPRES Scientific gateway portal (http://www.phylo.org/portal2/) (accessed on 12 July 2023) [45]. Maximum likelihood bootstrapping analysis was performed with RAxML HPC v. 8, using the locus-specific model partitions with the default parameters and the GTRGAMMA model as implemented on the CIPRES, NSF XSEDE resource with bootstrap statistics calculated from 1000 bootstrap replicates [46]. For the Bayesian analysis, the best substitution models of the three loci were estimated using the Akaike information criterion in jModelTest 2.1.6 [47]. Based on the results, we used the GTR+G model for ITS, SYM+I+G for nuLSU and GTR+I+G for mtSSU. Bayesian analysis was performed using MrBayes v. 3.2.2 on CIPRES with 2 independent runs, searching for 10 000 000 generations with four independent chains and sampling every 1000th tree [48]. After discarding the burn-in, the remaining 7500 trees of each run were pooled to calculate a 50% majority-rule consensus tree. Clades that received bootstrap support ≥70% under ML and posterior probabilities ≥0.95 were considered significant. Generated phylogenetic trees were visualized under Figtree v. 1.4.2 [49].

3. Results and Discussion

Detailed figures of the morphology and spores, together with information regarding the chemical compositions of the three species, have been provided. Furthermore, the phylogenetic positions of these species have been confirmed.
For this study, 50 new sequences were generated (Table 1). The concatenated, three-locus matrix consisted of 65 individuals and 3253 aligned nucleotide position characters. Phylogenies derived from the ML and B/MCMC analyses were generally concordant. Minor differences in the arrangement of some terminals occurred, but relationships at deeper nodes and in well-supported clades were identical. We chose to present the ML topology, with nodal support values from both ML bootstrap analysis and posterior probabilities from the Bayesian inference (Figure 1).
The phylogenetic analysis showed that the subfamily Fissurinoideae exhibits a well-supported monophyletic lineage containing the genera Clandestinotrema Rivas Plata, Lücking & Lumbsch, Cruentotrema Rivas Plata, Papong, Lumbsch & Lücking, Dyplolabia A. Massal., Fissurina and Pycnotrema Rivas Plata & Lücking. The tree shows that Fissurina is polyphyletic in its current delimitation. The topology of our tree is similar to the results of Rivas Plata et al. and Lumbsch et al. [2,44].
The new species Fissurina wuyinensis formed a single clade, represented by a bootstrap support of 100, and a posterior probability of 1 for the branch (Figure 1). Its species status is further supported by its distinctive morphological, chemical and geographic characteristics (see below in Taxonomy).
Fissurina pseudostromatica is polyphyletic in this tree, forming a high-support clade together with F. aggregatula, F. wuyinensis and Pycnotrema pycnoporellum (bootstrap = 99%, posterior probability = 1). Two specimens of F. pseudostromatica from China were clustered with the material from USA, while another specimen was clustered with F. aggregatula collected from Peru. It appears to indicate issues with current species circumscriptions. Similar problems also arise in the species F. adscribens, F. insidiosa and F. marginata; none of them are monophyletic in our tree.
Fissurina subcomparimuralis from China is phylogenetically close to F. comparimuralis and F. nitidescens; they all have fissurinoid to chroodiscoid ascomata, somewhat carbonized lirellae and muriform spores, but F. subcomparimuralis has non-amyloid ascospores which can be distinguished from the other two species.

4. Taxonomy

Fissurina wuyinensis K.J. Shi, Z.F. Jia and X. Zhao, sp. nov., Figure 2.
Type: China, Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Xingcun Town, Tongmu Village, Guadun, 27°43′52″ N, 117°39′29″ E, alt. 875 m, on bark, 9 June 2023, Jiang Shuhao FJ230464 (LCUF, holotype).
Fungal Names: FN 571620
Description: Thallus corticolous on tree trunk, continuous, epiperidermal, dark green to olive green, smooth, glossy. Photobiont trentepohlioid, cells angular to elongate, 6–15 × 5–9 μm. Ascomata lirellate, prominent to sessile, straight, curved or sinuous, terminally acute, single to sparsely branched, 0.8–1.5 mm long, 0.35–0.45 mm wide. Disc partially exposed and deeply immersed, labia thin but conspicuous, grey, white pruina present, thalline margin remaining inclined but with the cortex splitting off and becoming erect. Excipulum uncarbonized, yellowish brown to grayish brown, with clusters of crystals, 28–40 μm wide; epithecium black-grey, 7–16 μm wide; hymenium colorless, clear, 120–130 μm high; hypothecium brown, 25–34 μm high; paraphyses simple, apically not or sometimes slightly thickened and smooth, 0.5–0.8 μm wide; periphysoids absent. Asci broadly clavate to cylindrical, 103–138 × 24–42 μm. Ascospores 8 per ascus, ellipsoid, hyaline, muriform with 5–7 × 1–3 septa, 25–35 × 16–19 μm, without halo, I+ deep violet-blue.
Chemistry: thallus K–, C–, P–; no substances detected by TLC.
Etymology: The epithet refers to the type locality: Mount Wuyi.
Additional specimens examined: Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Xingcun Town, Tongmu Village, Guadun, 27°43′52″ N, 117°39′29″ E, alt. 875 m, on the bark of Camellia, 9 June 2023, Guo Tangli FJ230472 (LCUF); Gaoqiao, 27°42′55″ N, 117°43′06″ E, alt 510 m, on the bark of Camellia, 9 June 2023, Jia Zefeng FJ230605, Jiang Shuhao FJ230610 (LCUF).
Ecology and distribution: The new species grows on bark at a comparatively low elevation (no more than 1000 m). It is thus far known only from the type locality.
Notes: The thallus and ascomata morphology and molecular sequence data place it in the genus Fissurina Fée [50]. In the reported Fissurina species of China, only three species viz. Fissurina elaiocarpa (A.W. Archer) A.W. Archer, F. inabensis (Vain.) M. Nakan. & Kashiw. and F. subundulata Kalb & Z.F. Jia have muriform ascospores of similar size and lack lichen substances, but they all have a concealed disc, and F. subundulata and F. inabensis have non-amyloid ascospores [7,51].
Fissurina wuyinensis is characterized by uncarbonized lirellae, exposed disc with pruina, amyloid muriform ascospores and no chemistry. The new species largely resembles Fissurina confusa Common & Lücking, but differs in the wider lirellate (0.35–0.45 mm vs. 0.15–0.2 mm), thin-walled ascospores and in lacking lichen substances [52]. Fissurina aperta Herrera-Camp., Barcenas-Peña & Lücking and F. reticulata R. Miranda, Herrera-Camp. & Lücking have more or less similar morphological features, but the former has apically carbonized lirellae and the latter has longer ascospores about 35–45 μm [53]. In addition, it differs from Fissurina americana Lendemer & R.C. Harris by the prominent lirellae with exposed disc [54].
Fissurina pseudostromatica Lücking & Rivas Plata, Bull. Florida Mus. Nat. Hist. 49(4): 145 (2011), Figure 3.
Type: U.S.A. Florida. Collier County, Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park, Janes Scenic Drive 6.5 mi NNW of ranger station, west of old tram, Taxodium-Sabal hardwood hammock, slough and strand, March 2009, Lücking & Rivas Plata 26512 (F, holotype).
Description: Thallus corticolous, crustose, continuous, surface smooth, olive-green, glossy. Ascomata 0.1–0.4 mm long, 0.1–0.2 mm wide, lirellae densely aggregate in pseudostromatic, white clusters, short to elongate, straight to curved, single to sparsely branched, immersed to slightly raised arising. Disc concealed to slightly gaping, with thin, whitish labia, covered by concolorous thalline margin. Excipulum uncarbonized, brown to tawny, with clusters of crystals, 20–27 μm wide; epithecium grey, 3–8 μm wide; hymenium colorless, clear, 71–89 μm high; hypothecium pale brown, 10–18 μm high; paraphyses simple, 1–2.5 μm wide. Asci cylindrical, 75–83 × 7–11 µm. Ascospores 8 per ascus, ellipsoid, hyaline to pale gray-brown when old, 4 loculars, 15–20 × 7–11 μm (including 1 μm thick wall), I–.
Chemistry: thallus K+, C–, P–; no substances detected by TLC.
Selected specimens examined: China, Yunnan Province: Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 21°55′37″ N, 101°14′51″ E, alt. 530 m, on bark, 30 June 2021, Zhu Mengli YN210691 (LCUF); Menglun Town, Linleyuan Mountain Village, 21°55′55″ N, 101°16′09″ E, alt. 540 m, on bark, 4 September 2022, Jia Tao YN222451, YN222474 (LCUF).
Ecology and distribution: Growing on tree bark of the tropical rainforests at low altitudes. Previously reported from the U.S.A. and Brazil [52,55]. Newly reported for China.
Notes: The morphology, anatomy and chemical characteristics of the Chinese specimens are the same as those of the type specimens, but the ascospores are wider (7–11 μm vs. 5–7 μm) [52]. Fissurina pseudostromatica is distinguished by pseudostromatic clusters of lirellae, transversely septate and I– ascospores. Fissurina mexicana and F. intercludens have similar thallus structure, but differ in having muriform ascospores. The species is also similar to F. aggregatula Common & Lücking by its 4 locular ascospores and the absence of lichen substances, while the latter has labiate-aggregate lirellae and narrower ascospores (14–20 × 7–9 μm) [52,56].
Fissurina subcomparimuralis Common & Lücking, Phytotaxa 18: 58 (2011), Figure 4.
Type: U.S.A. Florida. Collier County, Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park, Common 7323A (holotype MSC, isotype hb. Common).
Description: Thallus corticolous, crustose, continuous, surface smooth, yellowish-brown to olive-brown, slightly glossy. Lirellae immersed to sessile, straight to curved, single, 0.4–1.0 mm long, 0.2–0.35 mm wide. Disc concealed to fissured; labia conspicuous, yellowish-white, covered by thalline margin; proper margin distinct, visible as thick. Excipulum entire, dark brown to brown-black, 49–61 μm wide; epithecium black-grey, 11–20 μm wide; hymenium colorless, 70–85 μm high; hypothecium grayish brown, 15–23 μm high; paraphyses unbranched, glabrous, 0.5–0.8 μm wide; periphysoids short, 10–20 μm long, indistinctly warty. Ascospores 8 per ascus, ellipsoid, colorless, muriform with 4–6 × 1–3 septa, 17–24.5 × 6–8.5 μm, weakly halonate, I–.
Chemistry: thallus K–, C–, P–; no substances detected by TLC.
Selected specimens examined: China, Guangdong Province: Guangzhou, Baiyun Mountain, Pugu, 23°10′08″ N, 113°17′32″ E, alt. 110 m, on bark, 20 January 2019, Li Min GD19219 (LCUF); South China Botanical Garden, North Entrance, 23°11′19″ N, 113°21′30″ E, alt. 22 m, on bark, 21 January 2019, Yao Zongting GD19359 (LCUF).
Ecology and distribution: This species grows on bark in low elevations of tropical regions. Previously reported from Florida, U.S.A. [57]. Newly reported for China.
Notes: The morphology and chemical characteristics of the specimens are the same as those of the type specimens, but the disc sometimes gaping and lirellae shorter. The lirellae features of GD19359 are more similar to the type specimen than GD19219 in having thin labia greyish-black to brown-black below corticate thalline margin. F. subcomparimuralis is similar to F. comparimuralis Staiger, but the latter differs in having amyloid ascospores and lacking periphysoids [14,57]. F. subcomparimuralis is also similar to F. incrustans Fée in having similar-sized, muriform ascospores and lacking lichen substances, but F. incrustans has I+ violet ascospores and exposed disc [7,58,59].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z. and Z.J.; methodology, X.Z.; software, K.S. and X.Z.; validation, K.S., Z.J. and X.Z.; formal analysis, K.S. and X.Z.; investigation, K.S. and Z.J.; resources, Z.J.; data curation, K.S. and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.; writing—review and editing, X.Z.; visualization, K.S.; supervision X.Z.; project administration, Z.J. and X.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.J. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Emergency Management Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31750001, the Young Scientists Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31700018 and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2023MC105).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 14 July 2023).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jiang Shuhao and Guo Tangli for their help with field research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rivas Plata, E.; Lücking, R.; Lumbsch, H.T. A new classification for the family Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Lecanoromycetes: Ostropales). Fungal Divers. 2012, 52, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rivas Plata, E.; Lücking, R. High diversity of Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycota: Ostropales) in Amazonian Perú. Fungal Divers. 2013, 58, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lücking, R.; Tehler, A.; Bungartz, F.; Rivas Plata, E.; Lumbsch, H.T. Journey from the West: Did tropical Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycota: Ostropales) evolve from a saxicolous ancestor along the American Pacific coast? Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 844–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lumbsch, H.T.; Parnmen, S.; Kraichak, E.; Papong, K.B.; Lücking, R. High frequency of character transformations is phylogenetically structured within the lichenized fungal family Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Syst. Biodivers. 2014, 12, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miadlikowska, J.; Kauff, F.; Högnabba, F.; Oliver, J.C.; Molnár, K.; Fraker, E.; Gaya, E.; Hafellner, J.; Hofstetter, V.; Gueidan, C. A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 79, 132–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, B.O.; Khadilkar, P.; Makhija, U. New species and new combinations in the lichen genera Fissurina and Hemithecium from India. Lichenologist 2012, 44, 339–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, Z.F.; Li, J.; Meng, Q.F. A preliminary study of the lichen genus Fissurina (Graphidaceae) in China. Mycosystema 2018, 37, 881–895. Available online: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jwxb/EN/Y2018/V37/I7/881 (accessed on 7 July 2023).
  8. Fée, A.L.A. Méthode Lichénographique et Genera: Ornée de Quatre Planches, Dont Trois Coloriées Donnant les Caractères des Genres qui Composent la Famille des Lichens avec Leurs Détails Grossis; Firmin Didot: Paris, France, 1824; pp. 1–124. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vainio, E.A. Lichenes Insularum Philippinarum III. Acta Soc. Sci. Fenn. 1921, 15, 1–368. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zahlbruckner, A. Catalogus Lichenum Universalis; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Stuttgart, Germany, 1923; pp. 145–452. [Google Scholar]
  11. Redinger, K. Die Graphidineen der ersten Regnell’schen Expedition nach Brasilien 1892–1894. III. Graphis, Phaeographis, nebst einem Nachtrage zu Graphina. Ark. För Bot. 1935, 27A, 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalb, K.; Josef, H. Bemerkenswerte Flechten und lichenicole Pilze von der Insel Madeira. Herzogia 1992, 9, 45–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Staiger, B.; Kalb, K. Acanthothecis and other graphidioid lichens with warty periphysoids or paraphysis-tips. Mycotaxon 1999, 73, 69–134. [Google Scholar]
  14. Staiger, B. Die Flechtenfamilie Graphidaceae; Bibliotheca Lichenologica: Berlin, Germany, 2002; Volume 85, pp. 1–526. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalb, K.; Staiger, B.; Elix, J.A. A monograph of the lichen genus Diorygma—A first attempt. Symb. Bot. Ups. 2004, 34, 133–181. [Google Scholar]
  16. Archer, A.W. The lichen genera Cyclographina, Diplogramma, Glyphis, Gymnographa, Medusulina, Sarcographa and Sarcographina (Graphidaceae) in Australia. Telopea 2004, 10, 589–605. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lücking, R.; Chaves, J.L.; Sipman, H.J.; Umaña, L.; Aptroot, A. A first assessment of the Ticolichen biodiversity inventory in Costa Rica: The genus Graphis, with notes on the genus Hemithecium (Ascomycota: Ostropales: Graphidaceae). Fieldiana Bot. 2008, 46, 1–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lücking, R.; Kalb, K.; Staiger, B.; McNeill, J. (1792) Proposal to conserve the name Phaeographis, with a conserved type, against Creographa, Ectographis, Flegographa, Hymenodecton, Platygramma, and Pyrographa (Ascomycota: Ostropales: Graphidaceae), along with notes on the names Graphina and Phaeographina. Taxon 2007, 56, 1296–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mangold, A.; Martín, M.P.; Lücking, R.; Lumbsch, H.T. Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Taxon 2008, 57, 476–486. [Google Scholar]
  20. Staiger, B.; Kalb, K.; Grube, M. Phylogeny and phenotypic variation in the lichen family Graphidaceae (Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). Mycol. Res. 2006, 110, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rivas Plata, E.; Parnmen, S.; Staiger, B.; Mangold, A.; Frisch, A.; Weerakoon, G.; Hernandez, J.; Caceres, M.; Kalb, K.; Sipman, H. A molecular phylogeny of Graphidaceae (Ascomycota, Lecanoromycetes, Ostropales) including 428 species. MycoKeys 2013, 6, 55–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kraichak, E.; Huang, J.-P.; Nelsen, M.; Leavitt, S.D.; Lumbsch, H.T. A revised classification of orders and families in the two major subclasses of Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota) based on a temporal approach. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 188, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lücking, R. Stop the abuse of time! Strict temporal banding is not the future of rank-based classifications in fungi (including lichens) and other organisms. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2019, 38, 199–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wijayawardene, N.; Hyde, K.; Dai, D.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Magurno, F. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa–2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Archer, A.W. Key and checklist for the lichen family Graphidaceae (lichenised Ascomycota) in the Solomon Islands. Syst. Biodivers. 2007, 5, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lendemer, J.C. Lichens of Eastern North America Exsiccati, Fascicle V, nos. 201–250. Opusc. Philolichenum 2007, 4, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lücking, R.; Johnston, M.K.; Aptroot, A.; Kraichak, E.; Lendemer, J.C.; Boonpragob, K.; Caceres, M.E.; Ertz, D.; Ferraro, L.I.; Jia, Z.F.; et al. One hundred and seventy-five new species of Graphidaceae: Closing the gap or a drop in the bucket? Phytotaxa 2014, 189, 7–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diederich, P.; Lücking, R.; Aptroot, A.; Sipman, H.J.; Braun, U.; Ahti, T.; Ertz, D. New species and new records of lichens and lichenicolous fungi from the Seychelles. Herzogia 2017, 30, 182–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aptroot, A.; Feuerstein, S. New Graphidaceae from South and Central Brazil. Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg. Arch. Lichenol. 2020, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lücking, R.; Álvaro-Alba, W.R.; Moncada, B.; Marín-Canchala, N.L.; Tunjano, S.S.; Cárdenas-López, D. Lichens from the Colombian Amazon: 666 Taxa Including 28 new Species and 157 New Country Records Document an Extraordinary Diversity. Bryologist 2023, 126, 242–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van den Boom, P.P.; Lücking, R.; Sipman, H.J. Notes on Graphidaceae in Macaronesia, with Descriptions of Four New Species. Diversity 2023, 15, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fang, J.Y.; Song, Y.C.; Liu, H.Y.; Piao, S.L. Vegetation-climate relationship and its application in the division of vegetation zone in China. Acta Bot. Sin. 2002, 44, 1105–1122. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu, Q.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Xu, C. Determinants and identification of the northern boundary of China’s tropical zone. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, Z.F.; Lücking, R. Resolving the species of the lichen genus Graphina Müll. Arg. in China, with some new combinations. MycoKeys 2017, 25, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nakanishi, M.; Kashiwadani, H.; Moon, K.H. Notes on the genera Graphina and Graphis (Graphidaceae) in Thailand. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Ser. B 2001, 27, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wei, J.C.; Jia, Z.F. Flora Lichenum Sinicorum Vol. 13 Ostropales(I) Graphidaceae (1); Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016; pp. 1–210. [Google Scholar]
  37. Culberson, C.F. Improved conditions and new data for identification of lichen products by standardized thin-layer chromatographic method. J. Chromatogr. A 1972, 72, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Culberson, C.F.; Kristinsson, H.D. A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. J. Chromatogr. A 1970, 46, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zoller, S.; Scheidegger, C.; Sperisen, C. PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 1999, 31, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lumbsch, H.T.; Kraichak, E.; Parnmen, S.; Plata, E.R.; Aptroot, A.; Cáceres, M.E.S.; Ertz, D.; Feuerstein, S.C.; Mercado-Díaz, J.A.; Staiger, B.; et al. New higher taxa in the lichen family Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycota: Ostropales) based on a three-gene skeleton phylogeny. Phytotaxa 2014, 189, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rambaut, A. FigTree v. 1.4.2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 15 July 2023).
  50. Fée, A.L.A. Essai sur les Cryptogames des Ecorces Exotiques Officinales; Firmin Didot: Paris, France, 1825; pp. 1–167. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chesnokov, S.V.; Pan’kova, V.V.; Konoreva, L.A. Fissurina inabensis (Graphidaceae, Ascomycota), a new record to Russia from Shikotan Island. Turczaninowia 2023, 26, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lücking, R.; Seavey, F.; Common, R.S.; Beeching, S.Q.; Breuss, O.; Buck, W.R.; Crane, L.; Hodges, M.; Hodkinson, B.P.; Lay, E. The lichens of Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park, Florida: Proceedings from the 18th tuckerman workshop. Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2011, 49, 127–186. [Google Scholar]
  53. Herrera-Campos, M.A.; Barcenas-Pena, A.; Miranda-González, R.; Mejía, M.A.; González, J.A.B.; Colín, P.M.; Téllez, N.S.; Lücking, R. New lichenized Arthoniales and Ostropales from Mexican seasonally dry tropical forest. Bryologist 2019, 122, 62–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lendemer, J.C.; Harris, R.C. Seven new species of Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycetes) from the Coastal Plain of southeastern North America. Phytotaxa 2014, 189, 153–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cáceres, M.E.; Aptroot, A.; Parnmen, S.; Lücking, R. Remarkable diversity of the lichen family Graphidaceae in the Amazon rain forest of Rondônia, Brazil. Phytotaxa 2014, 189, 87–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Papong, K.B.; Luecking, R.; Kraichak, E.; Parnmen, S.; Konrat, M.; Lumbsch, H.T. Twenty-three new species in the lichen family Graphidaceae from New Caledonia Ostropales, Ascomycota. Phytotaxa 2014, 189, 204–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lumbsch, H.T.; Ahti, T.; Altermann, S.; De Paz, G.A.; Aptroot, A.; Arup, U.; Peña, A.B.; Bawingan, P.A.; Benatti, M.N.; Betancourt, L.; et al. One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: A signature of undiscovered global diversity. Phytotaxa 2011, 18, 1–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Joshi, S.; Upreti, D.K.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, A.D.; Oh, S.O.; Hur, J.S. A new species of Fissurina and new records of Graphidaceae from Vietnam. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2015, 36, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Joshi, S.; Nguyen, T.T.; Dzung, N.A.; Jayalal, U.; Oh, S.O.; Hur, J.S. The lichen genus Fissurina (Graphidaceae) from Vietnam. Mycotaxon 2013, 124, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, nuLSU and mtSSU sequences. ML bootstrap values and B/MCMC posterior probabilities (second value) are displayed above each branch. New species and records from China are shown in bold.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, nuLSU and mtSSU sequences. ML bootstrap values and B/MCMC posterior probabilities (second value) are displayed above each branch. New species and records from China are shown in bold.
Diversity 15 00959 g001
Figure 2. Fissurina wuyinensis (FJ230464) (A) Thallus with ascomata; (B) Cross-section of apothecium; (C) Hymenium with asci; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 1.0 mm; B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm; D = 50 μm.
Figure 2. Fissurina wuyinensis (FJ230464) (A) Thallus with ascomata; (B) Cross-section of apothecium; (C) Hymenium with asci; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 1.0 mm; B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm; D = 50 μm.
Diversity 15 00959 g002
Figure 3. Fissurina pseudostromatica (YN210691) (A,B) Thallus with ascomata; (C) Cross-section of apothecium; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 2.0 mm; B = 1.0 mm; C = 100 μm; D = 50 μm.
Figure 3. Fissurina pseudostromatica (YN210691) (A,B) Thallus with ascomata; (C) Cross-section of apothecium; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 2.0 mm; B = 1.0 mm; C = 100 μm; D = 50 μm.
Diversity 15 00959 g003
Figure 4. Fissurina subcomparimuralis (GD19219) (A,B) Thallus with ascomata. (C) Cross-section of apothecium; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 1.0 mm; B = 1.0 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 50 μm.
Figure 4. Fissurina subcomparimuralis (GD19219) (A,B) Thallus with ascomata. (C) Cross-section of apothecium; (D) Ascospores. Bars: A = 1.0 mm; B = 1.0 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 50 μm.
Diversity 15 00959 g004
Table 1. Specimens and sequences used for phylogenetic analyses. Newly generated sequences are shown in bold.
Table 1. Specimens and sequences used for phylogenetic analyses. Newly generated sequences are shown in bold.
SpeciesCountryVoucher
Specimens
ITSmtSSUnuLSU
Clandestinotrema clandestinumCosta RicaSipman 44327JX421014
C. leucomelaenumEcuadorLuecking 26216JX421016
C. leucomelaenumCosta RicaLuecking LCB6bJX421015
C. stylotheciumNicaraguaLuecking 28636HQ639597HQ639662
Cruentotrema cruentatumBrazilLuecking 263HQ639587HQ639660
Cr. thailandicumMyanmarTNS:YO12327LC573996
Cr. thailandicumThailandLumbsch 19955d1JF828960JF828975
Cr. thailandicumThailandLumbsch 19955d2JX421020
Cr. thailandicumThailandLumbsch 19955d3JX421021
Dyplolabia afzeliiAustraliaMEL:2382721KP012902
D. afzelii/RMG246MK503256
D. afzeliiUSALuecking 26509HQ639594HQ639628
D. afzeliiAustraliaKalb 33915DQ431950AY640013
Fissurina adscribensChinaHNX18044OR264094OR264108OR264070
F. adscribensChinaFJ220250OR264085OR264107OR264068
F. adscribensChinaFJ211195OR264084
F. adscribensThailandLumbsch 20200cJX421032
F. aff. dumastiiThailandKalb 38899JX421034JX421487
F. aff. humilisTanzaniaA. Frisch No. 99/Tz2002DQ431948DQ431921
F. aggregatulaPeruRivasPlata 107CJX421036JX421490
F. aggregatulaThailandLuecking 24019JX421038
F. aggregatulaThailandKalb 38890JX421037
F. amazonicaBrazilCaceres 11030KJ608636KJ608633
F. astroisidiataMexicoLuecking RLD057JX421040JX421491
F. bullataAustraliaMangold 6fJX421041KF875537
F. comparimuralisEl SalvadorLuecking 28103JX421042JX421492
F. crassilabraChinaFJ211425OR264081OR264114OR264065
F. crystalliferaUSAMercado 4462KF875538
F. dumastiiCameroonFrisch & Tamnjong Idi 99/Ka3855DQ384926
F. illiterataUSACommon 9115BJX421045
F. inabensisChinaGZ18113OR264087OR264105OR264071
F. inabensisChinaYN221499OR264086OR264109OR264067
F. inabensisChinaFJ211545OR264088OR264104OR264066
F. inabensisRussiaLE L-18645OP901516
F. insidiosaChinaHN19093OR264080OR264111
F. insidiosa/AFTOL-ID 1662DQ972995DQ973045
F. insidiosaUSASpribille 39035KR017123KR017325KR017185
F. inspersaUSACommon 9113GJX421047
F. marginataAustraliaKalb 33944DQ431951AY640012
F. marginataThailandLuecking 24122HQ639613JX421493
F. moniliferaPuerto RicoMercado 838KJ435167KJ440941
F. nigrolabiataPhilippinesRivas Plata 1198BJF828961JF828976
F. nigrolabiataPhilippinesRivas Plata 1016EJX421494
F. nitidescensUSACommon 9113CJX421048
F. pseudostromaticaChinaYN222451OR264089OR264098OR264074
F. pseudostromaticaChinaYN222474OR264090OR264099OR264072
F. pseudostromaticaUSACommon 9126BJX421051
F. pseudostromaticaUSACommon 9113AJX421050
F. pseudostromaticaBoliviaLuecking 29014JX421049
F. pseudostromaticaThailandKalb 38827JX421495
F. pseudostromaticaChinaYN210691OR264091OR264100OR264075
F. rufulaFijiLumbsch 20521lJX421053JX421497
F. rufulaFijiLumbsch 20500lJX421052
F. subcomparimuralisChinaGD19219OR264092OR264112OR264079
F. subcomparimuralisChinaGD19359OR264093OR264113OR264078
F. subfurfuraceaBrazilCaceres 11981KJ608635KJ608632
F. subundulataChinaFJ220370OR264082OR264110
F. subundulataChinaGZ18148OR264083OR264106OR264069
F. triticeaTanzaniaA. Frisch No. 99/Tz1855DQ431952AY640011
F. wuyinensisChinaFJ230605OR264095OR264101OR264076
F. wuyinensisChinaFJ230610OR264097OR264103OR264073
F. wuyinensisChinaFJ230464OR264096OR264102OR264077
Porina aeneaCzech RepublicPRA-Vondrak25464OQ718026OQ646398
P. leptaleaCzech RepublicPRA-Vondrak24457OQ718029OQ646400
Pycnotrema pycnoporellumUSALuecking 26546JX421295JX421615
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, K.; Jia, Z.; Zhao, X. A New Species and Two New Records of the Lichen Genus Fissurina from China. Diversity 2023, 15, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15090959

AMA Style

Shi K, Jia Z, Zhao X. A New Species and Two New Records of the Lichen Genus Fissurina from China. Diversity. 2023; 15(9):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15090959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Kaijie, Zefeng Jia, and Xin Zhao. 2023. "A New Species and Two New Records of the Lichen Genus Fissurina from China" Diversity 15, no. 9: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15090959

APA Style

Shi, K., Jia, Z., & Zhao, X. (2023). A New Species and Two New Records of the Lichen Genus Fissurina from China. Diversity, 15(9), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15090959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop