Next Article in Journal
Climate Change Potential Impacts on the Tuna Fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zones of Tonga
Next Article in Special Issue
Chaenothecopsis xishuiensis sp. nov. to Science and Lecanora pseudargentata Newly Reported from China
Previous Article in Journal
Ancient Ecological Disaster Site Is Now a Refuge: Bryophyte Diversity in Volcanic Lava Caves of Jingpo Lake World Geopark
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rediscovery of Five Rinodina Species Originally Described from Southwest China and One New Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Lichenized Fungus, Lendemeriella luteoaurantia, with a Key to the Species of Lendemeriella

1
Baekdudaegan National Arboretum, Bonghwa 36209, Republic of Korea
2
Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(7), 845; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070845
Submission received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 30 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 10 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Ecosystems of Lichens)

Abstract

:
Lendemeriella luteoaurantia B.G. Lee is described as a new lichen species from South Korea. The new species is identified by smaller, yellow-orange apothecia, larger ascospores with wider septum width, and the absence of Cinereorufa-green pigment and teloschistin, different from the closest species, L. aureopruinosa I.V. Frolov, Vondrák, Arup, Konoreva, S. Chesnokov, Yakovczenko and Davydov in morphology and chemistry. Molecular phylogeny employing internal transcribed spacer (nuITS), nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA (nuLSU), and mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) sequences strongly supports the new species as nonidentical in the genus Lendemeriella. A preliminary key is provided to assist in the identification of all 10 species of Lendemeriella.

1. Introduction

The genus Lendemeriella S.Y. Kondr., previously the ‘Caloplaca’ exsecuta group, was defined recently from the mother genus Caloplaca Th. Fr. [1,2]. Lendemeriella is characterized by biatorine apothecia containing anthraquinones, i.e., chemosyndrome A such as parietin (major), emodin (minor), and traces of emodinal, emodic acid, parietinic acid, and fallacinal, golden brown episamma, ascospore septum width >3.5 μm, bacilliform pycnoconidia, Cinereorufa-green pigment in thallus or apothecia, and distribution in arctic-alpine to boreal-montane areas [1,2,3].
Lendemeriella is a genus in the subfamily Caloplacoideae and can be confused with similar genera in the subfamily, i.e., Bryoplaca Søchting, Frödén and Arup, Olegblumia S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös and Hur, Rufoplaca Arup, Søchting and Frödén, and Pyrenodesmia A. Massal. Vondrák et al. mentioned the similarity of Lendemeriella, Bryoplaca, and Parvoplaca Arup, Søchting and Frödén in the aspect of their habitat preference to humid alpine areas [1]. However, Lendemeriella differs from Bryoplaca by substrate preference mainly for rock or bark, biatorine apothecia, and the presence of parietin. Parvoplaca is easily distinguishable from Lendemeriella as the genus inhabits moss, plant debris, or bark with a poorly developed thallus and belongs to the subfamily Xanthorioideae [4]. Kondratyuk et al. compared Olegblumia as the most closely related genus to Lendemeriella in the introduction of Lendemeriella [2]. However, Lendemeriella quite differs from Olegblumia by the crustose thallus without lobes, the presence of the chemosyndrome A, and the narrow distribution limited to arctic-alpine and boreal-montane areas. Frolov et al. compared Lendemeriella with Rufoplaca because they have similar ecology [3]. However, Lendemeriella differs from Rufoplaca by an ascospore septum width of over 3.5 μm and the presence of episamma (the minute granules in epithecium). Pyrenodesmia, previously the Caloplaca xerica group, can be compared with Lendemeriella. The C. xerica group is similar to Rufoplaca, and Pyrenodemia s. lat. previously included Olegblumia, i.e., O. demissa (Flot. ex Körb.) S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös, Jung Kim, A.S. Kondr., S.O. Oh and Hur [3,4]. However, Lendemeriella differs from Pyrenodesmia by biatorine apothecia with an orange pigment other than Sedifolia-grey, bacilliform pycnoconidia, and the presence of the chemosyndrome A [4].
Lendemeriella comprised nine species. Eight species were transferred from Caloplaca, i.e., L. borealis (Vain.) S.Y. Kondr., L. dakotensis (Wetmore) S.Y. Kondr., L. exsecuta (Nyl.) S.Y. Kondr., L. lucifuga (G. Thor) S.Y. Kondr., L. nivalis (Körb.) S.Y. Kondr., L. reptans (Lendemer and B.P. Hodk.) S.Y. Kondr., L. sorocarpa (Vain.) S.Y. Kondr., and L. tornoensis (H. Magn.) S.Y. Kondr. [2]. An additional new species, L. aureopruinosa, was added by Frolov et al. [3]. Frolov et al. also suggested Caloplaca lacinulata (Hue) Zahlbr. and C. hexaspora (Hue) T. Okamoto as probable species for Lendemeriella [3].
This study describes an additional new species of the genus. Field surveys of the lichen biodiversity in the main mountains of Korea, i.e., Baekdudaegan, were carried out during the summer of 2022, and 24 specimens in Lendemeriella were collected on a shaded scree of a valley and the summit of a mountain (Figure 1). The specimens were comprehensively analyzed and did not correspond to any previously known species. We describe them as a new species, Lendemeriella luteoaurantia, also providing a preliminary key for all Lendemeriella species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological and Chemical Analyses

Hand sections were prepared manually with a razor blade under a stereomicroscope (Leica LED2500; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), scrutinized under a compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse E400; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and photographed using a software program (NIS-Elements D; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a DS-Fi3 camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a Nikon Eclipse Ni-U microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The ascospores were examined at 1000× magnification in water. The length and width of the ascospores were measured and the range of spore sizes was shown with average, standard deviation (SD), length-to-width ratio, and number of measured spores. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using solvent systems A and C according to standard methods [5]. The specimens are used in the herbarium of the Baekdudaegan National Arboretum (KBA), South Korea.

2.2. Isolation, DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

Hand-cut sections of 10 to 20 ascomata per collected specimen were prepared for DNA isolation and DNA was extracted with a NucleoSpin Plant II Kit in line with the manufacturer’s instructions (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). PCR amplification for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA) and the nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA genes was achieved using Bioneer’s AccuPower PCR Premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) in 20 μL tubes with 16 μL of distilled water, 2 μL of DNA extracts, and 2 μL of primers ITS5 and ITS4 [6] or LR0R and LR5 [7]. The PCR thermal cycling parameters used were 95 °C (15 s), followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C (45 s), 54 °C (45 s), and 72 °C (1 min), and a final extension at 72 °C (7 min) based on Ekman [8]. The annealing temperature was changed by ±1 degree for a better result. PCR purification and DNA sequencing were carried out by the Macrogen genomic research company (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

All nuITS, nuLSU, and mtSSU sequences were aligned and edited manually using ClustalW in Bioedit V7.7.1 [9]. All missing and ambiguously aligned data and phylogenetically uninformative positions were removed and only phylogenetically informative regions were finally analyzed. The final alignment comprised 1265 (nuITS), 2102 (nuLSU), and 965 (mtSSU) columns. In them, variable regions were 265 (nuITS), 532 (nuLSU), and 305 (mtSSU). The phylogenetically informative regions were 734 (nuITS), 638 (nuLSU), and 307 (mtSSU). A concatenation was carried out for combining all nuITS, nuLSU, and mtSSU gene loci. They were manually combined for the informative regions. Four problematic sequences were removed when conflicting results occurred in the internal branches with the bootstrap values ≥ 70% and the posterior probabilities ≥ 95% in the concatenated tree. Phylogenetic trees with bootstrap values were obtained in RAxML GUI 2.0.6 [10] using the maximum likelihood method with a rapid bootstrap with 1000 bootstrap replications and GTR GAMMA (SYM + I + G4) for the substitution matrix as the best models produced by the model test in the software. The posterior probabilities were obtained in BEAST 2.7.4 [11] using the GTR 123141 model as the appropriate model of nucleotide substitution produced by the Bayesian model averaging methods with bModelTest [12], empirical base frequencies, gamma for the site heterogeneity model, four categories for gamma, and a 10,000,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo chain length with a 10,000-echo state screening and 1000 log parameters. Then, a consensus tree was constructed in TreeAnnotator 2.7.4 [11] with no discard of burnin, no posterior probability limit, a maximum clade credibility tree for the target tree type, and median node heights. All trees were displayed in FigTree 1.4.4 [13] and edited in Microsoft Paint. Overall analyses in the materials and methods were accomplished based on Lee and Hur [14].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

The new species is positioned in the Lendemeriella-clade in the concatenated tree. The tree describes L. luteoaurantia, the new species, being nested with L. aureopruinosa, supported by a bootstrap value of 100 and a posterior probability of 1.00 for the branch (Figure 2). Although neighboring L. aureopruinosa, L. luteoaurantia is located in another branch distant from L. aureopruinosa. The new species is included in the subfamily Caloplacoideae and positioned closer to the genera Bryoplaca, Pyrenodesmia, Rufoplaca and Usnochroma Søchting, Arup and Frödén than other genera such as Caloplaca s. str., Leproplaca (Nyl.) Nyl., and Seirophora Poelt in the subfamily. This result on the phylogeny for Lendemeriella and closely related genera corresponds to Frolov et al. [3]. Their phylogeny also describes Lendemeriella neighboring with Pyrenodesmia, Rufoplaca, and Usnochroma, and other genera such as Caloplaca s. str., Leproplaca, and Seirophora are located in a different clade.

3.2. Taxonomy

3.2.1. Lendemeriella luteoaurantia B.G. Lee sp. nov. (Figure 3)

MycoBank: MB 848800
Type: South Korea, North Chungcheong Province, Youngdong, Yonghwa-myeon, Mt. Gakho, a shaded scree slope, 36°04′03.6′′ N, 127°50′52.6′′ E, 900 m alt., on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001116, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös and Hur, Caloplaca sp., Porpidia albocaerulescens (Wulfen) Hertel and Knoph (holotype: KBA-L-0004045!; GenBank OQ981387 for ITS, and OQ981383 for LSU).
Figure 3. Lendemeriella luteoaurantia (KBA-L-0004045, holotype) in morphology. (AC) habitus and apothecia. Black prothallus (red arrows) shown in (A). (D,E) apothecia section showing proper margin only and algal layer present at the base of hypothecium. (F) pycnidia. (GK) clavate asci. (L) polarilocular ascospores. (M) bacilliform pycnoconidia. Scale bars: (A) = 2 mm, (B,C) = 500 μm, (D) = 100 μm, (E,F) = 50 μm, (GM) = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Lendemeriella luteoaurantia (KBA-L-0004045, holotype) in morphology. (AC) habitus and apothecia. Black prothallus (red arrows) shown in (A). (D,E) apothecia section showing proper margin only and algal layer present at the base of hypothecium. (F) pycnidia. (GK) clavate asci. (L) polarilocular ascospores. (M) bacilliform pycnoconidia. Scale bars: (A) = 2 mm, (B,C) = 500 μm, (D) = 100 μm, (E,F) = 50 μm, (GM) = 10 μm.
Diversity 15 00845 g003
Description: thallus saxicolous, crustose, generally continuous but discontinuous or isolated locally, rarely rimose, smooth to slightly rugose, rarely with local thickenings, thin, brown-gray to olive-gray, the margin determinate, 70–150 μm thick; cortex indistinct, up to 10 μm thick; medulla mainly indistinct because of domination of algal layer and substrate-originated large rock crystals dispersed on and below algal layer, up to 150 μm thick; photobiont coccoid, cells globose to subglobose, 5–15 μm thick, algal layer 60–100 μm thick. Small crystals present between algal cells, dissolving in K. Prothallus black, endosubstratal.
Apothecia numerous, scattered and not concentrated in center, solitary, rarely contiguous, emerging on the surface of thallus, adnate or sessile, slightly constricted at the base, 0.12–0.46 mm diam. (mean = 0.27; SD = 0.08; n = 108). Disc flat or slightly concave when young and flat or slightly convex when mature, with a yellow-orange pruina, yellow-orange to light orange or brownish yellow-orange, c. 200 μm thick; proper margin persistent, prominent, and wide when young and almost even and narrow when mature, entire or crenulate, concolorous with disc, more brownish laterally; thalline margin absent. Parathecium hyaline and brownish to periphery, 35–70 μm wide laterally with epinecral layer c. 10 μm. Epihymenium gold-brown, minutely granular (episamma), K+ wine red and episamma dissolving, 10–15 μm high. Hymenium hyaline, 50–70 μm high. Hypothecium hyaline or slightly yellowish, 70–120 μm high, with algal layer (up to 80 μm) at the base. Oil droplets absent. Paraphyses septate, simple, 1–1.5 μm wide, mainly simple or rarely branched at tips, tips not or slightly swollen, not pigmented, 1–2 μm wide. Asci clavate, 8-spored, 40–55 × 13–25 μm (mean = 50 × 17 μm; SD = 4.8 (L), 3.6 (W); n = 9). Ascospores ellipsoid to widely ellipsoid, 1-septate, polarilocular, permanently hyaline, 11–18 × 5–9.5 μm (mean = 14.7 × 7.6 μm; SD = 1.7 (L), 0.9 (W); L/W ratio 1.4–2.7, ratio mean = 2.0, ratio SD = 0.3; n = 106), septum width 4–6 μm (mean = 5; SD = 0.7; n = 26). Pycnidia dark brown to black, immersed at base and projecting with the upper 1/3, globose and sometimes widening, 135–210 μm high and 160–265 μm wide (SD = 32 (H), 49 (W); n = 5), with brownish wall, K–. Pycnoconidia hyaline, bacilliform, 2.7–4.2 × 0.8–1.4 μm (mean = 3.2 × 1.0 μm; SD = 0.2 (L), 0.1 (W); n = 50).
Chemistry: thallus K–, KC–, C–, Pd–. Apothecia K+ wine red. Epihymenium K+ wine red. Epihymenium and hymenium I+ blue. UV–. Parietin, parietinic acid, fallacinal and emodin were detected by TLC.
Distribution and ecology: The species occurs on siliceous rocks, mainly on the western scree slope shaded by deciduous trees (Acer pictum Thunb. var. mono (Maxim.) Maxim. ex Franch., Betula pendula Roth, Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr., F. rhynchophylla Hance, and Magnolia sieboldii K.Koch), herbs (Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. and Urtica angustifolia Fisch. ex Hornem.), and a fern (Dryopteris crassirhizoma Nakai). The species is currently known from the shaded scree and the summit of Mt. Gakho (1176 m alt.), South Korea.
Etymology: the species epithet indicates the yellow-orange color of the apothecia.
Notes: the new species is similar to the saxicolous members of the genus, i.e., L. aureopruinosa, L. exsecuta, and L. reptans. However, the new species differs from L. aureopruinosa and L. exsecuta by pale, small apothecia, colorless hypothecium, little swollen tips of paraphyses, larger ascospores, and the absence of Cinereorufa-green pigment and teloschistin (Table 2).
The new species differs from L. reptans by the absence of soredia and thalline margin and the presence of emodin, fallacinal, parietin, and parietinic acid (Table 2).
Without regard to the substrate preference for rock, the new species is similar to the corticolous L. borealis in having yellow-orange and small (<0.5 mm diam.) apothecia, black prothallus, epihymenium with K+ red reaction, and the presence of emodin, fallacinal, parietin, and parietinic acid. However, the new species differs from L. borealis by darker and thicker thallus, higher hypothecium, larger ascospores with wider septum width, and the absence of teloschstin [15,16,17].
Caloplaca lacinulata is another comparable species that is a probable member of Lendemeriella and previously reported from South Korea [3,18]. However, the new species differs from C. lacinulata by continuous thallus, crystal-dominated medulla, presence of prothallus, smaller and paler apothecia, higher hypothecium, larger ascospores, larger pycnoconidia, and the absence of lacinules (vegetative propagules) [18,19].
Table 2. Comparison of the new species with closely related species in the genus Lendemeriella.
Table 2. Comparison of the new species with closely related species in the genus Lendemeriella.
SpeciesLendemeriella luteoaurantiaLendemeriella aureopruinosaLendemeriella exsecutaLendemeriella reptans
Soredianot observednot observednot observedpresent
Apothecia coloryellow-orange to light orangedark orange to orange-redbrown-yellow, orange-brown, or blackred-brown
Apothecia (mm in diam.)0.1–0.40.3–0.60.2–0.7immature
Thalline marginabsentabsentabsentpresent (gray)
Hypothecium colorcolorless to slightly yellowishyellowish (upper), colorless (lower)yellow to brown
Paraphysial tip width (μm)1–23–4 1.5–4
Pigment in true exciplenot pigmentedCinereorufa-greenCinereorufa-green
Ascospores (μm)11–18 × 5–9.511.5–15 × 6–712–16.5 × 6–7.5
Substanceemodin, parietin, parietinic acid, fallacinalemodin, fallacinal parietin, parietinic acid, teloschistin7-chloroemodin, emodin, fallacinal, fragilin, parietin, parietinic acid, teloschistinno substance
ReferenceKBA-L-0004040 (isotype),
KBA-L-0004041 (isotype),
KBA-L-0004045 (holotype),
KBA-L-0004046 (isotype)
[3][20][21]
The morphological and ecological characteristics for the closely related species are referenced from the previous literature. All information on the new species is produced from selected types of specimens in this study.
Additional specimens examined: South Korea, North Chungcheong Province, Youngdong, Yonghwa-myeon, Mt. Gakho, a shaded scree slope, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001111, with Porina leptalea (Durieu and Mont.) A.L. Sm. (isotype: KBA-L-0004040; GenBank OQ981385 for ITS, and OQ981381 for LSU); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-00112, with Aspicilia asteria Hue (isotype: KBA-L-0004041; GenBank OQ981386 for ITS and OQ981382 for LSU); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001114, with Caloplaca sp., Circinaria caesiocinerea (Nyl. ex Malbr.) A. Nordin, Savić and Tibell, Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004043); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001115, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Porpidia albocaerulescens (isotype: KBA-L-0004044); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001117, with Circinaria caesiocinerea, Porpidia albocaerulescens (isotype: KBA-L-0004046; GenBank OQ981388 for ITS and OQ981384 for LSU); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001119, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Caloplaca sp., Lepraria sp. (isotype: KBA-L-0004048); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001122, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Circinaria caesiocinerea, Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004051); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001123 with Aspicilia sp., Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004052); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001125, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Porina leptalea, Rimularia geumodoensis (S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös and Hur) S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös, and Hur (isotype: KBA-L-0004054); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001129, with Caloplaca sp., Porpidia albocaerulescens, Pseudosagedia guentheri (Flot.) Hafellner and Kalb (isotype: KBA-L-0004058); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001137, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Circinaria caesiocinerea, Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004066); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001142, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004071); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001143, with Gyalolechia flavovirescens (Wulfen) Søchting, Frödén and Arup, Porina leptalea, Pseudosagedia guentheri, Rimularia geumodoensis, Verrucaria sp. (isotype: KBA-L-0004072); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001144, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Caloplaca sp., Circinaria caesiocinerea, Porina leptalea, Rimularia geumodoensis (isotype: KBA-L-0004073); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001150, with Circinaria caesiocinerea, Ionaspis lacustris (With.) Lutzoni (isotype: KBA-L-0004079); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001151, with Aspicilia asteria, A. pseudovulcanica, Ionaspis lacustris, Porpidia albocaerulescens, Rimularia geumodoensis (isotype: KBA-L-0004080); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001152, with Caloplaca sp. (isotype: KBA-L-0004081); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001153, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Caloplaca sp., Circinaria caesiocinerea, Pseudosagedia guentheri (isotype: KBA-L-0004082); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001154, with Porina leptalea, Rinodina oxydata (A. Massal.) A. Massal. (isotype: KBA-L-0004083); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001155, with Circinaria caesiocinerea, Gyalolechia flavovirescens, Porina leptalea (isotype: KBA-L-0004084); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001157, with Aspicilia pseudovulcanica, Circinaria caesiocinerea (isotype: KBA-L-0004086); same locality, on siliceous rock, 16 June 2022, B.G. Lee and J.M. Kim 2022-001158, with Circinaria caesiocinerea, Gyalolechia flavovirescens, Rinodina oxydata (isotype: KBA-L-0004087); South Korea, North Chungcheong Province, Youngdong, Yonghwa-myeon, Mt. Gakho (summit), 36°03′45.1′′ N, 127°50′46.4′′ E, 1176 m alt., on siliceous rock, 24 May 2022, B.G. Lee and H.W. Kim 2022-000173 with Acarospora badiofusca (Nyl.) Th. Fr., Aspicilia subgoettweigensis S.Y. Kondr., Lőkös and Hur, Buellia sp., Lecanora saxigena Lendemer and R.C. Harris, Micarea aff. peliocarpa (Anzi) Coppins and R. Sant., Scoliciosporum umbrinum (Ach.) Lojka (paratype: KBA-L-0003102).

3.2.2. Key to the Species of Lendemeriella (Table 3)

The key includes all 10 species in Lendemeriella. The genus Lendemeriella was defined by Kondratyuk et al. [2] with eight new combinations. Among them, L. dakotensis is doubtful for the genus, and the species was not supported with any proof for the new combination. The species differs from other Lendemeriella species by subsquamulose and lobed thallus, absence of proper margin in the apothecia, and no secondary metabolites, as well as no reaction to spot test. Lendemeriella dakotensis may not be in Lendemeriella at last but is included in the key at present.
Table 3. Key to the species of Lendemeriella.
Table 3. Key to the species of Lendemeriella.
1.On rock or moss on rock2
On bark7
2.Directly on rock3
On moss6
3.Soredia present; apothecia immature; thalline margin gray; no substanceL. reptans
Soredia absent; apothecia developed; proper margin present only; emodin, fallacinal, parietin, parietinic acid present or other substance present4
4.Apothecia yellow-orange to light orange, less than 0.5 mm diam.; hypothecium entirely colorless; tips of paraphyses little swollen; ascospores 11–18 × 5–9.5 μm; Cinereorufa-green pigment absent; teloschistin absentL. luteoaurantia
Apothecia brown-yellow, red-brown to black, 0.5–0.6 mm diam.; hypothecium yellowish to brownish; tips of paraphyses swollen; ascospores 12–17 × 6–7.5 μm; Cinereorufa-green pigment present in true exciple; teloschistin present5
5.Apothecia brownish or entirely black; 7-chloroemodin and fragilin present; arctic-alpineL. exsecuta
Apothecia reddish; 7-chloroemodin and fragilin absent; boreal-montaneL. aureopruinosa
6.On Racomitrium; thalline margin pale to dark gray; ascospores 25–30 × 3–5 μm; distributed in mid to high latitudesL. nivalis
On Andreaea or Grimmia; thalline margin absent; ascospores 17–20 × 6–7.5 μm; limited to high latitudesL. tornoensis
7.Soredia present; apothecia extremely rare or absent8
Soredia absent; apothecia generally present9
8.Soralia K+ purpleL. lucifuga
Soralia K–, C+ pale yellowL. sorocarpa
9.On deciduous trees (Alnus, Salix or Sorbus); thallus whitish, smooth to wrinkled; prothallus black; apothecia yellow, orange to reddish, 0.2–0.5 mm diam.; thalline margin absent; epihymenium K+ red; emodin, fallacinal, parietin, parietinic acid, and teloschistin presentL. borealis
On conifers; thallus gray-brown, subsquamulose, margin uplifted and lobed; prothallus absent; apothecia brown 0.5–0.8 mm diam.; thalline margin present; epihymenium K–; no substanceL. dakotensis

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.-G.L.; methodology, B.-G.L. and J.-S.H.; validation, B.-G.L. and J.-S.H.; formal analysis, B.-G.L.; investigation, B.-G.L.; data curation, B.-G.L. and J.-S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.-G.L.; writing—review and editing, B.-G.L.; supervision, B.-G.L. and J.-S.H.; project administration, B.-G.L.; funding acquisition, B.-G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Baekdudaegan National Arboretum (2022-KS-OB-02-01-01) for the biodiversity conservation of the Baekdudaegan mountains of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 18 May 2023; Table 1). All new taxa were deposited in MycoBank (https://www.mycobank.org/, accessed on 18 May 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vondrák, J.; Frolov, I.; Davydov, E.A.; Yakovchenko, L.; Malíček, J.; Svoboda, S.; Kubásek, J. The lichen family Teloschistaceae in the Altai-Sayan region (Central Asia). Phytotaxa 2019, 396, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kondratyuk, S.Y.; Lőkös, L.; Farkas, E.; Kärnefelt, I.; Thell, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Hur, J.S. Three new genera of the Teloschistaceae proved by three gene phylogeny. Acta Bot. Hung. 2020, 62, 109–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Frolov, I.V.; Vondrák, J.; Konoreva, L.A.; Chesnokov, S.V.; Himelbrant, D.E.; Arup, U.; Stepanchikova, I.S.; Prokopiev, I.A.; Yakovchenko, L.S.; Davydov, E.A. Three new species of crustose Teloschistaceae in Siberia and the Far East. Lichenologist 2021, 53, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arup, U.; Søchting, U.; Frödén, P. A new taxonomy of the family Teloschistaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 2013, 31, 016–083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Orange, A.; James, P.W.; White, F.J. Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens; The British Lichen Society: London, UK, 2001; pp. 1–101. [Google Scholar]
  6. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J., White, T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 1, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rehner, S.A.; Samuels, G.J. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ekman, S. Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 783–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Edler, D.; Klein, J.; Antonelli, A.; Silvestro, D. raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bouckaert, R.; Vaughan, T.G.; Barido-Sottani, J.; Duchêne, S.; Fourment, M.; Gavryushkina, A.; Heled, J.; Jones, G.; Kühnert, D.; De Maio, N.; et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2019, 15, e1006650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bouckaert, R.R.; Drummond, A.J. bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4.2. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed on 28 February 2022).
  14. Lee, B.G.; Hur, J.S. A new lichenized fungus, Lecanora baekdudaeganensis, from South Korea, with a taxonomic key for Korean Lecanora species. MycoKeys 2020, 70, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thomson, J.W. American Arctic Lichens II: The Microlichens; University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, USA, 1997; pp. 1–675. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wetmore, C.M. Notes on Caloplaca cerina (Teloschistaceae) in North and Central America. Bryologist 2007, 110, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stenroos, S.; Velmala, S.; Pykälä, J.; Ahti, T. Lichens of Finland; Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History: Helsinki, Finland, 2016; pp. 1–896. [Google Scholar]
  18. Joshi, Y.; Andreev, M.; Hur, J.-S. Caloplaca lacinulata rediscovered for the lichen flora of South Korea. Feddes Repert. 2011, 122, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hue, A. Lichenes morphologice et anatomice disposuit (continuatio). Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. 1913, 5, 133–398. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nimis, P.L. ITALIC-The Information System on Italian Lichens. Version 7.0. Trieste: University of Trieste, Department of Biology. Available online: https://dryades.units.it/italic (accessed on 18 May 2023).
  21. Hodkinson, B.P.; Lendemer, C. Phylogeny and Taxonomy of an Enigmatic Sterile Lichen. Syst. Bot. 2012, 37, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Collection site for the new species Lendemeriella luteoaurantia (black star mark).
Figure 1. Collection site for the new species Lendemeriella luteoaurantia (black star mark).
Diversity 15 00845 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among available species in the genus Lendemeriella under the subfamily Caloplacoideae based on a maximum likelihood analysis of the concatenated dataset of nuITS, nuLSU, and mtSSU sequences. The tree was rooted with the sequences of the subfamilies Teloschistoideae and Xanthorioideae based on Arup et al. [4]. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 70% and posterior probabilities ≥ 95% are shown above internal branches. Branches with bootstrap values ≥ 90% are shown as fatty lines. The new species, L. luteoaurantia, is presented in bold as its DNA sequences were produced from this study. All species names are referred to Table 1.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among available species in the genus Lendemeriella under the subfamily Caloplacoideae based on a maximum likelihood analysis of the concatenated dataset of nuITS, nuLSU, and mtSSU sequences. The tree was rooted with the sequences of the subfamilies Teloschistoideae and Xanthorioideae based on Arup et al. [4]. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 70% and posterior probabilities ≥ 95% are shown above internal branches. Branches with bootstrap values ≥ 90% are shown as fatty lines. The new species, L. luteoaurantia, is presented in bold as its DNA sequences were produced from this study. All species names are referred to Table 1.
Diversity 15 00845 g002
Table 1. Species list and DNA sequence information employed for phylogenetic analysis.
Table 1. Species list and DNA sequence information employed for phylogenetic analysis.
SpeciesnuITSnuLSUmtSSUVoucher
Blastenia crenulariaKC179415KC179162KC179492Søchting 7523
Blastenia ferrugineaKC179416KC179163KC179493Søchting 9996
Bryoplaca jungermanniaeKC179420MT952895MT952925Søchting 10451
Bryoplaca sinapispermaKC179421MT952896KC179495Arup L08184
Bryoplaca tetrasporaKC179422MT952897KC179496Søchting 7979 (ITS); Søchting 10,480 (LSU, SSU)
Caloplaca cerinaKC179425KC179168KC179499Elvebakk 03:084
Caloplaca chlorinaKC179426KC179169KC179500Frödén 1876 (ITS); Søchting 7321 (LSU, SSU)
Fauriea orientochinensisKX793097KX793100KX793103KoLRI 013957
Gyalolechia fulgensKC179440KC179199KC179533Poelt, Nimis and Tretiach 95/460 (ITS); Arup L06206 (LSU); Søchting 10,586 (SSU)
Gyalolechia gomeranaKC179441KC179200KC179534Søchting 9653
Gyalolechia flavovirescensAF353966KC179198KC179532Arup L97253 (ITS); Søchting 8648 (LSU, SSU)
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 1MG954212--Chesnokov_sn
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 2MG954213--Chesnokov 239
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 3MG954214--Chesnokov230
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 4MN814228MW227504MW227332LE-L15207
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 5MN814229MW227511MW227333LE-L15209
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 6MN814230--LE-L15210
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 7MN814231--LE-L15212
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 8MN814233--Frolov 2232
Lendemeriella aureopruinosa 9MN814234MW227505MW227331Frolov 2236 (ITS); Frolov 2473 (LSU, SSU)
Lendemeriella borealis 1KX216687--IF 1184
Lendemeriella borealis 2MW227317MW227512MW227334Frolov 2476
Lendemeriella exsecuta 1MG954130--Vondrák 11105
Lendemeriella exsecuta 2MG954131--Vondrák 11110
Lendemeriella exsecuta 3MG954211--Tønsberg 46194
Lendemeriella exsecuta 4MG954223--Zhdanov_sn
Lendemeriella exsecuta 5MG954224--Spribille 39677
Lendemeriella exsecuta 6MG954225--Vondrák 7420
Lendemeriella exsecuta 7MG954226--Vondrák 6201
Lendemeriella exsecuta 8MG954227--Spribille 24441
Lendemeriella luteoaurantia 1OQ981385OQ981381KBA-L-0004040
Lendemeriella luteoaurantia 2OQ981386OQ981382KBA-L-0004041
Lendemeriella luteoaurantia 3OQ981387OQ981383KBA-L-0004045
Lendemeriella luteoaurantia 4OQ981388OQ981384KBA-L-0004046
Lendemeriella nivalisMG954222--Spribille 29306
Lendemeriella reptans 1JQ686192-JQ686191Lendemer 11745
Lendemeriella reptans 2MH104934MH100766MH100796Lendemer 48186
Lendemeriella sorocarpa 1MG773658--Vondrák 14274
Lendemeriella sorocarpa 2MG954132--Vondrák 12695
Lendemeriella tornoensis 1MG954220--Spribille 26816
Lendemeriella tornoensis 2MG954221--Spribille 29473
Leproplaca chrysodetaKC179448KC179206MT952933Arup L7107 (ITS, LSU); Arup L13261 (SSU)
Leproplaca obliteransKC179449KC179207KC179541Arup L02331 (ITS, SSU); Arup L03472 (LSU)
Leproplaca xantholytaKC179451KC179208KC179542Arup L97278 (ITS); Søchting 9675 (LSU, SSU)
Orientophila corticolaMN687909-MN687910KBA-L-0000118
Orientophila subscopularisKC179375-KC179546Frisch Jp171
Orientophila sp. 21KC179372KC179210KC179544Frisch Jp99
Pyrenodesmia chalybaeaKC179454MT952921KC179571Søchting 9351
Pyrenodesmia rugosaMW832828MW832804MW832825KBA-L-0001099
Pyrenodesmia variabilisAF353963KC179234KC179572Arup s.n. (ITS); Arup L03134 (LSU, SSU)
Rufoplaca scotoplacaKC179457KC179235KC179573Arup L10032
Rufoplaca sp. 43KC179458KC179236KC179574Arup L09201
Rufoplaca tristiusculaKC179460KC179237KC179575Arup L08171
Seirophora lacunosaKC179465KC179243KC179582Moberg & Nordin K18:04
Seirophora orientalisKJ021240--KoLRI 011917
Seirophora scorigenaKC179466KC179244KC179583S. & B Snogerup 17201
Sirenophila bermaguianaKC179299KC179245KC179584Kondratyuk 20487
Sirenophila eosKC179300KC179246KC179585Kärnefelt 20044702
Squamulea squamosaKC179125KC179252KC179591Kärnefelt AM960105
Squamulea subsolutaAF353954KC179253KC179592Arup L97072
Usnochroma carphinea 1EU639594--A. Terron (LEB 4452)
Usnochroma carphinea 2EU639595--E. Gaya 201, X. Llimona & M. De Caceres (BCN 13714)
Usnochroma carphinea 3KC179468KC179259KC1795981998, Roux s.n.
Usnochroma carphinea 4MZ391142--VAL_Lich 31793
Usnochroma carphinea 5-JQ301548JQ301482E. Gaya, S. Fernandez-Brime 542 & X. Llimona (BCN)
Usnochroma scoriophila 1EU639596--N. Hladun & A. Gomez-Bolea (BCN)
Usnochroma scoriophila 2JQ301664JQ301560JQ301496P. & B. v.d. Boom 38386
Usnochroma scoriophila 3KC179469KC179260KC1795991995, Gomez-Bolea
Variospora aegaeaEU639597--E. Gaya 248 & X. Llimona (BCN)
Variospora aurantiaKC179470KC179261KC1796001998, Llimona (ITS, SSU); 2006, Lange (LSU)
Variospora australisAY233223--Gaya 239
Variospora cancarixiticolaEU639608-KT291482Llimona and Egea s.n.
Variospora dolomiticolaKC179471KC179262KC179601Thell SP0514
Variospora erythrinaKC179472--1998, Lutzoni s.n.
Variospora flavescensKC179473KC179263KC179602Søchting 9601 (ITS); Arup L03060 (LSU, SSU)
Variospora glomerataKC179474KC179264KC179603Arup L03119
Variospora macrocarpaAF353956--Arup L97306
Variospora pauliiEU639606-KT291503Gaya 183
Variospora thallincolaKC179475JQ301563KC179604Søchting 7481 (ITS); Gaya et al. s.n. (LSU); Arup L92148 (SSU)
Variospora velanaKC179476KC179265KC179605Arup L07194 (ITS); Arup L07123 (LSU, SSU)
Wetmoreana decipioidesKC179333KC179269KC179608Thor 20768
Wetmoreana texanaKC179337KC179273KC179612Søchting 9925
Wetmoreana sp. 53KC179335KC179271KC179610Frödén 1519
Overall824950
DNA sequences that were generated for the new species Lendemeriella luteoaurantia in this study are presented in bold. All others were obtained from GenBank. The species names are followed by GenBank accession numbers and voucher information. nuITS, internal transcribed spacer; nuLSU, nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA; mtSSU, mitochondrial small subunit; Voucher, voucher information.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, B.-G.; Hur, J.-S. A New Lichenized Fungus, Lendemeriella luteoaurantia, with a Key to the Species of Lendemeriella. Diversity 2023, 15, 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070845

AMA Style

Lee B-G, Hur J-S. A New Lichenized Fungus, Lendemeriella luteoaurantia, with a Key to the Species of Lendemeriella. Diversity. 2023; 15(7):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Beeyoung-Gun, and Jae-Seoun Hur. 2023. "A New Lichenized Fungus, Lendemeriella luteoaurantia, with a Key to the Species of Lendemeriella" Diversity 15, no. 7: 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070845

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop