Next Article in Journal
How Common Are Lesions on the Tails of Sauropods? Two New Pathologies in Titanosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of Argentine Patagonia
Next Article in Special Issue
Crambe insularis sp. nov. (Crambeidae: Poecilosclerida) a New Crambeid from the Eastern Tropical North Pacific: Morphological, Molecular and Ontogenetic Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Geographically Isolated Wetlands as a Reserve for the Conservation of Amphibian Biodiversity at the Edge of Their Range
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Research on the Mustard Hill Coral, Porites astreoides

by
Ryan G. Eagleson
1,*,
Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip
2 and
John S. Lumsden
1
1
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Biodiversity and Reef Conservation Laboratory, Unidad Académica de Sistemas Arrecifales, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Puerto Morelos 77580, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(3), 462; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030462
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity and Conservation of Coral Reefs)

Abstract

:
Coral reefs are the most diverse habitat per unit area in the world’s oceans, supporting an estimated 1–3 million species in only 0.2% of its area. These ecosystems have suffered severe declines since the 1970s, largely as a result of climate change, ocean acidification, pollution, disease, and overfishing. Porites astreoides is a shallow species that is able to thrive in a variety of environmental conditions and has been a clear ‘winner’ on Atlantic reefs in the last decades. This, coupled with its ease of identification and wide distribution, has caused P. astreoides to become a focal species in many scientific studies. Given the current and increasing significance of P. astreoides, this review sought to (i) identify the key life history traits that allowed this species to thrive under stressful conditions; (ii) compile aspects of its biology and ecology to understand its future contribution to Atlantic reefs, and (iii) identify knowledge gaps. To date, no comprehensive overview of the literature exists for P. astreoides. All articles available on Google Scholar up to the time of submission containing the terms ‘Mustard Hill Coral’, ‘Porites astreoides’, or ‘P. astreoides’ were examined for potential inclusion in this review. Papers were assessed based on whether they captured the most influential or widespread theories, represented an important trend in the research, or contained novel findings relevant to the understanding of this species. This review provides a scholarly resource and wide-ranging synthesis of P. astreoides on Atlantic reefs of today and the future.

1. Introduction

Coral reefs are an essential part of the global marine ecosystem and provide an array of ecological services as well as support complex and diverse species assemblages [1]. They are nurseries for more than a quarter of the oceans’ fish, and nearly one billion people worldwide rely on these fisheries as a food source [1,2]. Healthy reefs also contribute to tourism-based economies in many developing states and are a significant source of pharmaceutical compounds [2].
Scleractinians (stony corals) produce calcareous skeletons from calcium carbonate that form corallites around the coral polyp [3]. This process is largely responsible for the construction of the physical structure of the reef itself [2,4]. Due to differences in life history strategy, habitat preference, symbiont types, competitive interactions, or yet to be determined processes, some species of scleractinian coral are more resilient to local community collapse following physical disturbances and long-term environmental stressors [4,5]. Scleractinian corals have adopted different life history strategies for survival that have had varying degrees of success in our changing oceans. These have been categorized as: weedy, stress tolerant, generalist, and competitive [6]. Porites astreoides is a ‘weedy’ scleractinian coral with a widespread distribution and is easily identifiable in the field, making it an ideal study organism [4] and a focal species in many Caribbean reef studies. As with other weedy corals, P. astreoides is typically defined as a species with a brooding mode of reproduction; it is comparatively small and can rapidly colonize disturbed areas of reef [7,8]. Porites astreoides is considered a resilient shallow-water species as it has become one of the most abundant coral species in the Caribbean and is now responsible for a majority of carbonate production on many reefs [4,9,10]. Though widely regarded as a ‘winner’ on Atlantic reefs, some studies report recent declines in the abundance of this species, potentially indicating that P. astreoides may not be as resilient as previously assumed in a context of rapidly changing environmental conditions [11,12,13]. To date, no comprehensive overview of the literature exists for P. astreoides, with only a review of its ecophysiology being published [11]. For such a widespread and ecologically important species, we sought to (i) identify the key life history traits that have allowed the P. astreoides species to thrive under stressful conditions; (ii) compile aspects of its biology and ecology to understand its future contribution to Atlantic reefs, and (iii) identify knowledge gaps.

2. Taxonomy

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Cnidaria
Class: Anthozoa
Subclass: Hexacorallia
Order: Scleractinia
Family: Poritidae
Genus: Porites
Porites astreoides is a scleractinian coral that was first categorized by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in 1816, along with several other Caribbean coral species [14]. It has been present in the fossil record for approximately 9.9 million years [15]. At present, no subspecies of P. astreoides have been identified with bar-coding analysis [16]. Based on the available genetic sequences of 234 species, Figure 1 shows a summary of the cladogenic position of Porites within Hexacorallia and the phylogenetic relationships between P. astreoides and closely related scleractinians [17]. The genome of P. astreoides has been fully sequenced and is publicly available [18].

3. Distribution

Porites astreoides is found throughout the Caribbean, as well as along the coasts of Florida, Bermuda, Brazil, and West Africa (Figure 2). The geographic range of this species is approximately 6.1 million km2, however it is unclear to what extent gene flow takes place between populations separated by great distances [15,19]. This zooxanthellate species can be found in a variety of reef and reef-associated habitats but is most abundant within shallow fore reef environments [20]. Porites astreoides commonly inhabits depths of 0.5–15 m but can be found as deep as 70 m [20]. The deepest recorded observation of this species was at a depth of 210 m, and it is unclear what conditions allowed these individuals to live in this low-light environment [15]. Colonies can typically be found on hard rocky substrate or rubble and are largely absent from sandy bottom areas [8,21]. Porites astreoides is common throughout its range and is frequently noted as one of the most abundant species on today’s reefs [20]. This species favors clear and calm water but can also tolerate a wide range of thermal and physical stressors [4,22].

4. Physiology & Life-History

Porites astreoides colonies reach maturity at approximately 8–10 years of age, as reported by the ‘Coral Trait Database’ [15]. Field monitoring of individual colonies of P. astreoides has shown that the production of gametes can begin at a colony size of 2–4 cm2 [23]. As a member of the family Poritidae, P. astreoides contains many small corallites filled with septa [15]. Polyp density is ~18 polyps/cm2, with each corallite 1.2–1.6 mm in diameter [15].
Estimates for P. astreoides skeleton extension are 4.5 mm/year; increases in skeletal density occur at 1.5 g/cm3/year, and the rate of calcification is 0.55 +/− 0.12 g/cm/year [9,24]. Growth is largely focused on the extension of the colony edges and is limited at the apex, similar to what has been observed in Porites sp. inhabiting the Pacific Ocean [24]. Colonial growth rates vary based on the environmental conditions that occur across its large range. For instance, colonies in the Gulf of Mexico have reduced growth rates with varied seasonal timing compared to the rest of the Caribbean [24]. Skeletons of P. astreoides have been shown to be useful as a paleoclimate archive in the tropical South Atlantic [25].
Porites astreoides colony form is typically either plate or massive [15] and ranges in size from 4 cm2 to 400 cm2, with the most frequent size of adults being 250 cm2 and under (Figure 3) [8,15,26].
Porites astreoides populations are dominated by medium (41–80 cm in diameter) and large-sized colonies (≥80 cm in diameter), and colony success is typically high, making it very unlikely for large colonies to reduce in size once they have reached this growth stage [27]. A recent study that compared the size–frequency distribution of colonies of this species over three years (2014 vs. 2017) revealed substantial increases in colony size of P. astreoides with a shift towards fewer, larger colonies [8].
Two distinct color morphs of P. astreoides have been identified: green and brown [28]. The green morph is typically found in shallow environments, and the brown morph is found in deeper water [29]. Distinct phenotypical differences between colonies living on mangrove roots and those living on patch reefs have also been observed [30]. Mangrove colonies have lower ecological volume, lower color intensity, and greater corallite density when compared to lagoonal colonies [30].
Corals provide habitat to an array of zooxanthellae and other diverse microbiota communities on their surface, including in mucus [31], and within their intracellular holobiont [32]. The composition and diversity of these microorganisms in the Caribbean is understudied, but initial observations of P. astreoides have revealed a diverse microbial surface community with a high proportion of gammaproteobacteria [32]. The bacterial family Oceanospirillaceae has been observed in the mucus of all examined P. astreoides colonies and may also play some sort of symbiotic role [33]. A number of environmental and ecological factors alter the taxonomic composition and health in the surface microbiota of P. astreoides, including bleaching, physical creation of lesions, and macroalgal exposure [34,35]. Macroalgae presence has been shown to cause shifts in the surface holobiont of P. astreoides, with varying impacts depending on the algal species [35,36]. Algal-colony interactions have been shown to have a less pronounced impact on the holobiont of P. astreoides when compared against Montastraea faveolata [36].
Like all shallow-water corals, P. astreoides has symbiotic photosynthetic zooxanthellae that provide much of the coral’s energy needs [37]. Zooxanthellae clade composition can vary within P. astreoides colonies and populations due to seasonal changes in gradients of environmental stress and different habitats (i.e., offshore vs. coastal) [37,38].
Mucus is produced for protection from ultraviolet radiation, physical damage, and to facilitate the capture of prey [33]. The microbial community of older mucus (mucus present at the outer layer) includes more pathogenic microbes [33]. After the sloughing and replacement of older mucus, the microbial community returns to its original state [33]. The communities living within the mucus seem to be essential to the health of the colony; one study found that removal of these microbial communities through the administration of antibiotics resulted in colony bleaching and death [33]. Innate immune-system related gene expression in P. astreoides colonies has been observed to increase up to fourfold in response to thermal and bacterial stressors [39]. The mucus of P. astreoides has also been found to have toxic and vasoconstricting qualities, particularly against aortic tissue, that may facilitate its capture of prey organisms [40].
Porites astreoides has a brooding reproductive strategy as opposed to broadcast spawning and is capable of sexual or asexual reproduction [41]. Parthenogenesis has also been recently documented in P. astreoides, aiding in successful reproduction in a variety of conditions. However, this also acts to limit genetic diversity and can lead to the isolation of populations [42]. Approximately 47% of scleractinian coral species in the Caribbean share this mode of reproduction, with the remaining 53% being broadcast spawners [43]. Many brooding species populations have increased in the Caribbean while coral communities continue to collapse, perhaps mirroring the coral extinction event of the early Miocene, where brooding coral species experienced far higher survival rates [4,6,44]. Not all areas of the Caribbean have experienced these rapid shifts in community reproductive strategy. Spawning corals were slightly more abundant than brooding corals in the Eastern Caribbean (12% vs. 10%) in 2016 [45]. In one study, half of P. astreoides populations were hermaphroditic, the other half were female only, and no exclusively male colonies were found [46]. Inbreeding in P. astreoides through self-fertilization can occur in hermaphroditic colonies. Histological studies have shown that the very close proximity of eggs and spermaries in the mesenteries of P. astreoides facilitates this mode of reproduction [46]. Reproductive status of colonies in a population can vary with season, lunar day, polyp location/age, and colony size/age [46]. Individual colonies that are hermaphroditic contain a roughly equal mix of male and female polyps and, as mentioned, are capable of self-fertilization [46].
Like many scleractinian species, sexual reproduction of P. astreoides is a carefully timed event synchronized with the temperature of the water and the lunar phase. Typically, the closer a population of this species is to the equator, the longer their period of reproduction will last due to the relative stability of water temperatures year-round [47]. For instance, the reproductive period for P. astreoides in Bermuda is only 2–3 months, Florida 4–6 months, while in Bonaire or Panama it is continuous year-round [23,41]. Release of larvae still peaks around the new moon across its range and occurs at sea temperatures of 25.6–27.5 °C [48]. The higher the latitude, e.g., Bermuda, the more pronounced climatic seasonality becomes, narrowing the time in which conditions are available for P. astreoides to reproduce [47]. As temperature increases, the colony shifts how its energy budget is managed, and reproductive effort and the number of planulae has been found to decrease [47]. Porites astreoides colonies are equally successful in the production of larvae at depth compared with shallow waters, with any differences in the total being a result of abundance of reproductive colonies [49]. Long distance dispersal of larvae is typical of similar Caribbean species and is largely dependent on prevailing ocean currents. For instance, gene flow is strong between P. astreoides colonies in Florida and USVI but more limited between Florida and Bermuda [19]. Within-site genetic diversity of populations has been found to be high and dependent on factors such as local environmental conditions and depth [50]. Upon release to the environment, larvae from P. astreoides can metamorphose into polyps within 10 h [41]. Although brooding corals such as P. astreoides have larger larvae than broadcast spawning species, size can vary across different habitats in their range [51]. A positive correlation exists between the size of P. astreoides colony and the number of planulae larvae that are released [48].
The proper settlement of coral colonies is essential for the continuation of viable populations. Without sufficient larval settling, coral recruits will not reach adulthood to replace adult colony mortality [52]. Like most coral species, P. astreoides larvae settle on coral rubble or hard rocky substrate in the shallow reef environment, and are impacted by algal coverage, competition, and sedimentation [8,52,53]. Porites astreoides larvae are also able to detect the intensity of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and have settlement preferences for areas of reef with a lower level of UVR, such as partially sheltered overhangs [54]. Larvae of P. astreoides are also drawn to settle in areas with higher reef noise, which is the cumulative sound of the reef ecosystem and includes herbivore foraging and scavenger actions. Higher reef noise is often indicative of a healthy reef environment [55]. This larval preference for ‘louder’ reef areas takes place regardless of light conditions [55]. It has been found that, while branching species such as Acropora palmata do not settle on macroalgae, P. astreoides larvae can; however, the chances of those larvae surviving to adulthood are very limited [52,53]. Larval survival and settlement success in P. astreoides is dependent on site-specific conditions [56], with the larvae of colonies in upper mesophotic habitats having increased survival and settlement success [56]. Porites astreoides frequently settles on biofilms as well as coralline algae, particularly on species such as Titanoderma prototypum and Hydrolithon boergesenii, and has a higher rate of post-settlement survival when compared to broadcast spawning corals (i.e., A. cervicornis) [57]. Porites astreoides colony numbers have been found to be negatively associated with fleshy macroalgae and positively associated with coralline algae [8]. This is particularly important as many coral communities in the Caribbean have been shifting from coral- or coralline-dominated states to a state dominated by macroalgae and biofilms. In the water column itself, increased water temperatures (31 °C) have been found to have no effect on the survival of released P. astreoides larvae, their ability to properly settle on the substrate, or the process of metamorphosis that leads to the adult stage [58]. However, long-term stress events, such as incidences of extreme rainfall and storm events, can impact the ability of larvae in the water column to settle on the substrate [26].

5. Resilience

Colony morphology of P. astreoides provides the ability to resist damage from physical storm and wave conditions [59]. In weedy scleractinian species, size and circularity (non-branching physiology) reduces the susceptibility of the colony to breakage from physical disturbance compared to large species with a complex physiology, such as Acropora palmata [59]. Porites astreoides has a ‘massive’ growth form, and its low-lying colonies can be found in a wide range of current and storm impacted environments (Figure 3) [6,15].
Energy budgets within individual coral colonies are believed to play a major role in tolerance to chronic environmental stressors and determining the rates of growth and recovery in colonies [60]. This has been shown to be hereditary among certain populations of P. astreoides distributed across habitats [61]. Shallow-water forms have been observed to be more tolerant to thermal stress compared to those found in deeper water on the reef face [62]. Smaller colonies are hardier and more resilient to bleaching stresses under laboratory conditions, and these colonies have been found to have more protein and a higher zooxanthellae density after bleaching [63]. Porites astreoides adapt to their respective local environments, with shallower brown corals faring better following transplantation to novel environmental conditions than offshore reef colonies or shallow-dwelling green color morphs [29,37,64]. Even within these habitats, the differences between individual colonies plays a role in thermal tolerance, with corals less than 10 km apart exhibiting significant differences in response to bleaching events.
Porites astreoides recruitment and reproductive success may reduce the impact of any thermal sensitivity on a population level [65]. Porites astreoides has high antioxidant capability during dark phases, which could aid in its survival when facing stressors such as bleaching events [66]. Following single bleaching events, P. astreoides is able to make up for the resultant reduced carbon budget (due to zooxanthellae loss) with polyp uptake of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and zooplankton [67]. Uptake of DOC following a single bleaching event accounted for 11–36% of the carbon budget for sampled colonies [67]. However, following repeat bleaching events, this was insufficient to prevent carbon budget reductions in P. astreoides, showing that there are limits in the resilience of colonies to repeated stressors [12,67]. Populations of P. astreoides in Florida have been shown to experience 3.8% partial mortality, and 1.6% full mortality of colonies following a repeat bleaching event [68]. Reduced colony recruitment has also been observed in post-bleaching populations of P. astreoides [69].
Porites astreoides’ ability to rapidly colonize habitats made available by disturbance events is a major factor in its success. As a brooding coral, successful fertilization occurs at much higher rates for P. astreoides colonies compared to broadcasting species that release their gametes into the water column [41]. In more southern areas of its range, reproduction of P. astreoides takes place year-round, allowing the population of colonies to expand continually in damaged areas [46]. Brooding corals also typically produce fewer, and much larger, larvae than broadcasting species, and these have been found to have increased resistance to rising CO2 conditions [55]. Porites astreoides is also able to successfully reproduce in a wide range of abiotic and biotic conditions [46]. Increasing depth does not appear to impact the successful production of planula larvae by P. astreoides, and this occurs well into the mesophotic zone [49]. Planulae larvae of P. astreoides are also resistant to temperature stresses (such as those during bleaching events), but not when cyanobacteria levels are elevated [70]. Porites astreoides has been shown to be particularly effective at both vertical, and horizontal geneflow in reef environments despite its brooding form of reproduction [19,71]. This is significant as populations in the deeper, cooler mesophotic zone can act as a source of population rescue for shallower populations and are able to use this environment as a refugia [19]. Porites astreoides colonies in Florida have also been found to have higher calcification rates, reproductive potential, and zooxanthellae densities in cooler waters [72].

6. Ecology

The ecology of P. astreoides is strongly linked to its weedy life-history strategy [43]. Weedy corals are typically defined as species with a brooding mode of reproduction, a prolonged planulation period, high larval success, are small and short-lived, that rapidly colonize disturbed areas of reef, are resistant to wave action, and that recover rapidly from stressors [6,7,43]. Weedy corals also have limited long-distance dispersal ability at the larval stage and are vulnerable to shading by faster growing branching corals [6,7,43].
Perhaps the best example of the success of the life-history strategy of P. astreoides has been made evident over the last decades, during which several species of reef-building corals have drastically declined, with P. astreoides alone now responsible for 16–72% of live coral cover in the Caribbean [27]. Furthermore, even in sites that have experienced increases in coral cover, this has been driven mainly by the increase in cover or abundance of P. astreoides and other weedy coral species, not by key reef-framework builders [73].
Brooding corals such as P. astreoides and Agaricia sp. are often the most abundant following disturbance; they were found to compose 30–80% of juveniles in Tobago after a large-scale bleaching event in 2010 [74]. Porites astreoides is often able to persist in these environments, and therefore, its abundance is frequently used to differentiate high stress sites with those that have more optimal conditions [75]. Colonies already thriving in high stress environments may prove to be more resilient to the forecasted impacts of climate change [76]. The establishment of marine protected areas has been shown to increase the success and abundance of P. astreoides recruits, with this species (along with Agaricia sp., and Montastrea sp.) comprising much of the reef recovery observed following the implementation of protection [77]. Due to high levels of recruitment of P. astreoides following disturbances, a majority of colonies following protection were typically found to be small [77]. In addition, although the populations of P. astreoides regionally in the Caribbean can be fragmented, with the loss of adult colonies impacting regional success of the species and population connectivity [78], self-recruitment rather than larvae flow from other regions is the predominant method of growth for P. astreoides populations [78].
Despite the individual success of P. astreoides (and other non-framework building coral species such as Agaricia sp.), they will be unable to ensure continued ecosystem functionality without the preservation of key framework species such as A. palmata or Orbicella sp. [79]. Porites astreoides colonies can, however, play an important host role, providing habitat to accessory species such as Christmas tree worms, feather duster worms, barnacles, sponges, bivalves, and snails [80,81,82,83,84]. Some coral-associated species, such as barnacles, Christmas tree worms, and feather duster worms, can cause damage to colonies, particularly in higher numbers and/or in poor water quality conditions [82,84,85]. Parrotfish frequently predate on P. astreoides and have been found to prefer colonies inhabited by many of these associated species [80]. The relative or absolute increases in the abundance or cover of P. astreoides is unlikely to result in increases in habitat complexity, refuge availability, net community calcification, reef growth, or available habitat for fishes [79,86]. On the contrary, as the proportion of non-framework-building coral species increases in the Caribbean, total net carbon production and reef rugosity will continue to decline [4,79], locking the ecology of coral assemblages into diminished states of physical functionality [87]. Porites astreoides has low reef building potential, but currently accounts for 68% of total carbonate production in the Caribbean [4], which explains the low or even net-negative rates of reef-growth estimated for most contemporary Caribbean reefs [79,88]. Although P. astreoides does not contribute to reef-physical functionality, the presence of this species is still beneficial, as it could still protect the reef from erosive processes, such as scraping herbivores or other physical disturbances, and thus maintain a balance at the tipping point between reef growth and erosion [71,73].
Pressures to Caribbean coral reefs are not static; on the contrary, it is estimated that pressures originating from rapidly changing environmental conditions will further affect reef-building corals. Calcification rates in P. astreoides and other common species, such as Orbicella annularis and Montastrea sp., are expected to decline in response to increasing ocean temperatures and ocean acidification [3]. P. astreoides has been shown to respond to warming conditions more effectively than other scleractinian species, though it does demonstrate negative responses to rising acidification [89]. Negative responses to multiple life-history factors for P. astreoides have been demonstrated under laboratory conditions for forecasted ocean conditions in 2050 and 2100 (Table 1) [90].
P. astreoides is commonly found alongside other currently abundant species in the Caribbean such as: Sidastrea radians, Orbicella annularis, Madracis sp., and Agaricia agaricites [45,91]. Porites astreoides has been shown to be positively associated with massive corals and negatively associated with branching coral species [8]. Porites astreoides colonies compete with other coral species found in the same habitats, but the current competitive dynamics between P. astreoides and other scleractinian species are not likely to continue in warmer, more acidic seas [92,93,94].

7. Conclusions

This study has presented a review and synthesis of the key literature for P. astreoides. Though not a formal systematic review, our research team is confident we have reviewed and presented the key research relevant to understanding P. astreoides on both current and future reefs; we have also identified some research gaps and areas for future work.
Though P. astreoides has become a ubiquitous species, one of the most prolific in the Atlantic, it is certainly not immune to the anthropogenic changes occurring in the world’s oceans. Porites astreoides faces similar settlement, competitive, physiological, and environmental challenges as other tropical scleractinean coral species in the Atlantic. Indeed, some demographic declines have been observed in populations that have long experienced success, raising concerns about their long-term viability [13]. Further studies on the resiliency of this species will be essential. Continued research on the physiology, ecology, and life-history of P. astreoides coupled with routine monitoring will be critical to understanding the potential role of this species on future reefs and to fill in any knowledge gaps identified throughout this review.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.E. and J.S.L.; methodology, R.G.E. and J.S.L.; validation, R.G.E. and L.Á.-F.; resources, J.S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.E.; writing—review and editing, R.G.E., L.Á.-F. and J.S.L.; supervision, L.Á.-F. and J.S.L.; project administration, J.S.L.; funding acquisition, J.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by a NSERC Discovery Grant (Lumsden), the Ontario Veterinary College, and the University of Guelph. Eagleson was the recipient of an Ontario Veterinary College Scholarship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The efforts of peer reviewers and fellow authors are gratefully acknowledged for their useful comments which helped to improve the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woodhead, A.J.; Hicks, C.C.; Norström, A.V.; Williams, G.J.; Graham, N.A.J. Coral reef ecosystem services in the Anthropocene. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wilkinson, C. Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2008; Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre: Townsville, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Okazaki, R.R.; Towle, E.K.; van Hooidonk, R.; Mor, C.; Winter, R.N.; Piggot, A.M.; Cunning, R.; Baker, A.C.; Klaus, J.S.; Swart, P.K.; et al. Species-specific responses to climate change and community composition determine future calcification rates of Florida Keys reefs. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 23, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Perry, C.T.; Steneck, R.S.; Murphy, G.N.; Kench, P.S.; Edinger, E.N.; Smithers, S.G.; Mumby, P.J. Regional-scale dominance of non-framework building corals on Caribbean reefs affects carbonate production and future reef growth. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cramer, K.L.; Donovan, M.K.; Jackson, J.B.C.; Greenstein, B.J.; Korpanty, C.A.; Cook, G.M.; Pandolfi, J.M. The transformation of Caribbean coral communities since humans. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 10098–10118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Darling, E.S.; McClanahan, T.R.; Côté, I.M. Life histories predict coral community disassembly under multiple stressors. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baumann, J.H.; Townsend, J.E.; Courtney, T.A.; Aichelman, H.E.; Davies, S.W.; Lima, F.P.; Castillo, K.D. Temperature regimes impact coral assemblages along environmental gradients on lagoonal reefs in Belize. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Eagleson, R.G.; Lumsden, J.S.; Álvarez-Filip, L.; Herbinger, C.M.; Horricks, R.A. Coverage increases of Porites astreoides in Grenada determined by shifts in size-frequency distribution. Diversity 2021, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lange, I.D.; Perry, C.T.; Alvarez-Filip, L. Carbonate budgets as indicators of functional reef “health”: A critical review of data underpinning census-based methods and current knowledge gaps. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 110, 105857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Green, D.H.; Edmunds, P.J.; Carpenter, R.C. Increasing relative abundance of Porites astreoides on Caribbean reefs mediated by an overall decline in coral cover. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 359, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lima, L.F.O.; Bursch, H.; Dinsdale, E.A. Win some, lose some: The ecophysiology of Porites astreoides as a key coral species to Caribbean reefs. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grottoli, A.G.; Warner, M.E.; Levas, S.J.; Aschaffenburg, M.D.; Schoepf, V.; Mcginley, M.; Baumann, J.; Matsui, Y. The cumulative impact of annual coral bleaching can turn some coral species winners into losers. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 3823–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Edmunds, P.J.; Didden, C.; Frank, K. Over three decades, a classic winner starts to lose in a Caribbean coral community. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. WoRMS—World Register of Marine Species—Porites astreoides Lamarck. 1816. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=288889 (accessed on 14 March 2023).
  15. Madin, J.S.; Anderson, K.D.; Andreasen, M.H.; Bridge, T.C.L.; Cairns, S.D.; Connolly, S.R.; Darling, E.S.; Diaz, M.; Falster, D.S.; Franklin, E.C.; et al. The Coral Trait Database, a curated database of trait information for coral species from the global oceans. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Shearer, T.L.; Coffroth, M.A. Barcoding corals: Limited by interspecific divergence, not intraspecific variation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kitahara, M.V.; Cairns, S.D.; Stolarski, J.; Blair, D.; Miller, D.J. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Scleractinia (Cnidaria, Anthozoa) based on mitochondrial CO1 sequence data. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wong, K.H.; Putnam, H.M. The genome of the mustard hill coral, Porites astreoides. GigaByte 2022, 2022, gigabyte65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Serrano, X.M.; Baums, I.B.; Smith, T.B.; Jones, R.J.; Shearer, T.L.; Baker, A.C. Long distance dispersal and vertical gene flow in the Caribbean brooding coral Porites astreoides. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN Global Species Programme Red List Unit: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Goreau, T. The ecology of Jamaican coral reefs. Species composition and zonation. Ecology 1959, 40, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baumann, J.H. Elevated maximum temperatures and high-magnitude thermal variability drive low coral diversity on nearshore lagoonal reefs in Belize. bioRxiv 2016, 036400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Soong, K. Colony size as a species character in massive reef corals. Coral Reefs 1993, 12, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elizalde-Rendón, E.M.; Horta-Puga, G.; González-Diaz, P.; Carricart-Ganivet, J.P. Growth characteristics of the reef-building coral Porites astreoides under different environmental conditions in the Western Atlantic. Coral Reefs 2010, 29, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pereira, N.S.; Sial, A.N.; Frei, R.; Ullmann, C.V.; Korte, C.; Kikuchi, R.K.P.; Ferreira, V.P.; Kilbourne, K.H. The potential of the coral species Porites astreoides as a paleoclimate archive for the tropical South Atlantic Ocean. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2017, 77, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edmunds, P.J.; Lasker, H.R. Cryptic regime shift in benthic community structure on shallow reefs in St. John, US Virgin Islands. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016, 559, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Edmunds, P. Population biology of Porites astreoides and Diploria strigosa on a shallow Caribbean reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2010, 418, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nagelkerken, I.; Bak, R. Differential regeneration of artificial lesions among sympatric morphs of the Caribbean corals Porites astreoides and Stephanocoenia michelinii. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998, 163, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gleason, D.F. Differential effects of ultraviolet radiation on green and brown morphs of the Caribbean coral Porites astreoides. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1993, 38, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lord, K.S.; Barcala, A.; Aichelman, H.E.; Kriefall, N.G.; Brown, C.; Knasin, L.; Secor, R.; Tone, C.; Tsang, L.; Finnerty, J.R. Distinct phenotypes associated with mangrove and lagoon habitats in two widespread Caribbean corals, Porites astreoides and Porites divaricata. Biol. Bull. 2021, 240, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodriguez-Lanetty, M.; Granados-Cifuentes, C.; Barberan, A.; Bellantuono, A.J.; Bastidas, C. Ecological inferences from a deep screening of the complex bacterial consortia associated with the coral, Porites astreoides. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4349–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sunagawa, S.; Woodley, C.M.; Medina, M.; Whitman, W.; Coleman, D.; Wiebe, W.; Pedros-Alio, C.; Sogin, M.; Morrison, H.; Huber, J.; et al. Threatened corals provide underexplored microbial habitats. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Glasl, B.; Herndl, G.J.; Frade, P.R. The microbiome of coral surface mucus has a key role in mediating holobiont health and survival upon disturbance. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2280–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Meyer, J.L.; Paul, V.J.; Teplitski, M.; Riegl, B.; Bruckner, A.; Coles, S.; Renaud, P.; Dodge, R.; Loya, Y.; Sakai, K.; et al. Community shifts in the surface microbiomes of the coral Porites astreoides with unusual lesions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vega Thurber, R.; Burkepile, D.E.; Correa, A.M.S.; Thurber, A.R.; Shantz, A.A.; Welsh, R.; Pritchard, C.; Rosales, S. Macroalgae decrease growth and alter microbial community structure of the reef-building coral, Porites astreoides. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Morrow, K.M.; Liles, M.R.; Paul, V.J.; Moss, A.G.; Chadwick, N.E. Bacterial shifts associated with coral-macroalgal competition in the Caribbean Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 488, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hauff, B.; Haslun, J.A.; Strychar, K.B.; Ostrom, P.H.; Cervino, J.M. Symbiont diversity of zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium Spp.) in Porites astreoides and Montastraea cavernosa from a reciprocal transplant in the Lower Florida Keys. Int. J. Biol. 2016, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kenkel, C.D.; Goodbody-Gringley, G.; Caillaud, D.; Davies, S.W.; Bartels, E.; Matz, M.V. Evidence for a host role in thermotolerance divergence between populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different reef environments. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4335–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Haslun, J.A.; Hauff-Salas, B.; Strychar, K.B.; Ostrom, N.E.; Cervino, J.M. Biotic stress contributes to seawater temperature induced stress in a site-specific manner for Porites astreoides. Mar. Biol. 2018, 165, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. García-Arredondo, A.; Rojas-Molina, A.; Ibarra-Alvarado, C.; Lazcano-Pérez, F.; Arreguín-Espinosa, R.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, J. Composition and biological activities of the aqueous extracts of three Scleractinian Corals from the Mexican Caribbean: Pseudodiploria strigosa, Porites astreoides and Siderastrea siderea. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 22, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Goodbody-Gringley, G.; de Putron, S.J. Brooding corals: Planulation patterns, larval behavior, and recruitment dynamics in the face of environmental change. In The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 279–289. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vollmer, A. Rare Parthenogenic Reproduction in a Common Reef Coral, Porites astreoides. Master’s Thesis, Nova Southeastern University, Davies, FL, USA, 2018. Available online: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/464/ (accessed on 20 March 2023).
  43. Darling, E.S.; Alvarez-Filip, L.; Oliver, T.A.; McClanahan, T.R.; Côté, I.M. Evaluating life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 1378–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Edinger, E.N.; Risk, M.J. Preferential survivorship of brooding corals in a regional extinction. Paleobiology 1995, 21, 200–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Williams, S.M.; Sánchez-Godínez, C.; Newman, S.P.; Cortés, J. Ecological assessments of the coral reef communities in the Eastern Caribbean and the effects of herbivory in influencing coral juvenile density and algal cover. Mar. Ecol. 2016, 38, e12395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chornesky, E.; Peters, E. Sexual reproduction and colony growth in the Scleractinian coral Porites astreoides. Biol. Bull. 1987, 172, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Putron, S.; Smith, S. Planula release and reproductive seasonality of the Scleractinian coral Porites astreoides in Bermuda, a high-latitude reef. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2011, 87, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. McGuire, M.P. Timing of larval release by Porites astreoides in the Northern Florida Keys. Coral Reefs 1998, 17, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Holstein, D.M.; Smith, T.B.; Paris, C.B. Depth-independent reproduction in the reef coral Porites astreoides from shallow to mesophotic zones. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Riquet, F.; Japaud, A.; Nunes, F.L.D.; Serrano, X.M.; Baker, A.C.; Bezault, E.; Bouchon, C.; Fauvelot, C. Complex spatial patterns of genetic differentiation in the Caribbean mustard hill coral Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs 2022, 41, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. White, K.Q. A Correlation between Larval Size and Spat Growth and Development in Coral Species. Honours Thesis, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2014. Available online: https://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/25781 (accessed on 20 March 2023).
  52. Olsen, K.; Sneed, J.M.; Paul, V.J. Differential larval settlement responses of Porites astreoides and Acropora palmata in the presence of the green alga Halimeda opuntia. Coral Reefs 2016, 35, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rushmore, M.E.; Ross, C.; Fogarty, N.D. Physiological responses to short-term sediment exposure in adults of the Caribbean coral Montastraea cavernosa and adults and recruits of Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs 2021, 40, 1579–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gleason, D.F.; Edmunds, P.J.; Gates, R.D. Ultraviolet radiation effects on the behavior and recruitment of larvae from the reef coral Porites astreoides. Mar. Biol. 2006, 148, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lillis, A.; Apprill, A.; Suca, J.J.; Becker, C.; Llopiz, J.K.; Mooney, T.A. Soundscapes influence the settlement of the common Caribbean coral Porites astreoides irrespective of light conditions. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 181358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Goodbody-Gringley, G.; Wong, K.H.; Becker, D.M.; Glennon, K.; de Putron, S.J. Reproductive ecology and early life history traits of the brooding coral, Porites astreoides, from shallow to mesophotic zones. Coral Reefs 2018, 37, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ritson-Williams, R.; Arnold, S.; Paul, V. Patterns of larval settlement preferences and post-settlement survival for seven Caribbean corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016, 548, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ross, C.; Ritson-Williams, R.; Olsen, K.; Paul, V.J. Short-term and latent post-settlement effects associated with elevated temperature and oxidative stress on larvae from the coral Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs 2013, 32, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Porto-Hannes, I.; Zubillaga, A.L.; Shearer, T.L.; Bastidas, C.; Salazar, C.; Coffroth, M.A.; Szmant, A.M. Population structure of the corals Orbicella faveolata and Acropora palmata in the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef system with comparisons over Caribbean basin-wide spatial scale. Mar. Biol. 2015, 162, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kenkel, C.D.; Meyer, E.; Matz, M. Gene expression under chronic heat stress in populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different thermal environments. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4322–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kenkel, C.D.; Setta, S.P.; Matz, M. Heritable differences in fitness-related traits among populations of the mustard hill coral, Porites astreoides. Heredity 2015, 115, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Castillo, K.D.; Ries, J.B.; Weiss, J.M.; Lima, F.P. Decline of fore reef corals in response to recent warming linked to history of thermal exposure. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hall, E.R.; DeGroot, B.C.; Fine, M. Lesion recovery of two Scleractinian corals under low pH conditions: Implications for restoration efforts. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 100, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kenkel, C.D.; Matz, M. Gene expression plasticity as a mechanism of coral adaptation to a variable environment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 1, 0014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Manzello, D.P.; Enochs, I.C.; Kolodziej, G.; Carlton, R. Coral growth patterns of Montastraea cavernosa and Porites astreoides in the Florida Keys: The importance of thermal stress and inimical waters. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2015, 471, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Claquin, P.; Rene-Trouillefou, M.; Lopez, P.J.; Japaud, A.; Bouchon-Navaro, Y.; Cordonnier, S.; Bouchon, C. Singular physiological behavior of the Scleractinian coral Porites astreoides in the dark phase. Coral Reefs 2020, 40, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Levas, S.; Grottoli, A.G.; Schoepf, V.; Aschaffenburg, M.; Baumann, J.; Bauer, J.E.; Warner, M.E. Can heterotrophic uptake of dissolved organic carbon and zooplankton mitigate carbon budget deficits in annually bleached corals? Coral Reefs 2016, 35, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gintert, B.E.; Manzello, D.P.; Enochs, I.C.; Kolodziej, G.; Carlton, R.; Gleason, A.C.R.; Gracias, N. Marked annual coral bleaching resilience of an inshore patch reef in the Florida Keys: A nugget of hope, aberrance, or last man standing? Coral Reefs 2018, 37, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mallela, J.; Crabbe, M.J.C. Hurricanes and coral bleaching linked to changes in coral recruitment in Tobago. Mar. Environ. Res. 2009, 68, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ritson-Williams, R.; Ross, C.; Paul, V.J.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Pandolfi, J.; Bradbury, R.; Sala, E.; Hughes, T.; Bjorndal, K.; Cooke, R.; et al. Elevated temperature and allelopathy impact coral recruitment. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Gallery, D.N.; Green, M.L.; Kuffner, I.B.; Lenz, E.A.; Toth, L.T. Genetic structure and diversity of the mustard hill coral Porites astreoides along the Florida Keys reef tract. Mar. Biodivers. 2021, 51, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lenz, E.A.; Bartlett, L.A.; Stathakopoulos, A.; Kuffner, I.B. Physiological differences in bleaching response of the coral Porites astreoides along the Florida Keys reef tract during high-temperature stress. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 615795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. González-Barrios, F.J.; Cabral-Tena, R.A.; Alvarez-Filip, L. Recovery disparity between coral cover and the physical functionality of reefs with impaired coral assemblages. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Buglass, S.; Donner, S.D.; Alemu I, J.B. A study on the recovery of Tobago’s coral reefs following the 2010 mass bleaching event. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 104, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ennis, R.S.; Brandt, M.E.; Grimes, K.R.W.; Smith, T.B. Coral reef health response to chronic and acute changes in water quality in St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 111, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Barranco, L.M.; Carriquiry, J.D.; Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F.A.; Cupul-Magaña, A.L.; Villaescusa, J.A.; Calderón-Aguilera, L.E.; Calderón-Aguilera, L.E. Spatiotemporal variations of live coral cover in the northern Mesoamerican Reef system, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Sci. Mar. 2016, 80, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mumby, P.J.; Harborne, A.R. Marine reserves enhance the recovery of corals on Caribbean reefs. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Holstein, D.M.; Paris, C.B.; Mumby, P.J. Consistency and inconsistency in multispecies population network dynamics of coral reef ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 499, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Alvarez-Filip, L.; Carricart-Ganivet, J.P.; Horta-Puga, G.; Iglesias-Prieto, R. Shifts in coral-assemblage composition do not ensure persistence of reef functionality. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Rotjan, R.D.; Lewis, S.M. Selective predation by parrotfishes on the reef coral Porites astreoides. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2005, 305, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Muller, E.; de Gier, W.; ten Hove, H.A.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Hoeksema, B.W. Nocturnal predation of Christmas tree worms by a batwing coral crab at Bonaire (Southern Caribbean). Diversity 2020, 12, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hoeksema, B.W.; Timmerman, R.F.; Spaargaren, R.; Smith-Moorhouse, A.; van der Schoot, R.J.; Langdon-Down, S.J.; Harper, C.E. Morphological modifications and injuries of corals caused by symbiotic feather duster worms (Sabellidae) in the Caribbean. Diversity 2022, 14, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Goreau, T.F.; Hartman, W.D. Sponge: Effect on the form of reef corals. Science 1966, 151, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. van der Schoot, R.J.; Hoeksema, B.W. Abundance of coral-associated fauna in relation to depth and eutrophication along the leeward side of Curaçao, Southern Caribbean. Mar. Environ. Res. 2022, 181, 105738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hoeksema, B.W.; Wels, D.; van der Schoot, R.J.; ten Hove, H.A. Coral injuries caused by Spirobranchus opercula with and without epibiotic turf algae at Curaçao. Mar. Biol. 2019, 166, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Alvarez-Filip, L.; Dulvy, N.K.; Côté, I.M.; Watkinson, A.R.; Gill, J.A. Coral identity underpins architectural complexity on Caribbean reefs. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Alvarez-Filip, L.; González-Barrios, F.J.; Pérez-Cervantes, E.; Molina-Hernández, A.; Estrada-Saldívar, N. Stony coral tissue loss disease decimated Caribbean coral populations and reshaped reef functionality. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Perry, C.T.; Alvarez-Filip, L.; Graham, N.A.J.; Mumby, P.J.; Wilson, S.K.; Kench, P.S.; Manzello, D.P.; Morgan, K.M.; Slangen, A.B.A.; Thomson, D.P.; et al. Loss of coral reef growth capacity to track future increases in sea level. Nature 2018, 558, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Bove, C.B.; Davies, S.W.; Ries, J.B.; Umbanhowar, J.; Thomasson, B.C.; Farquhar, E.B.; McCoppin, J.A.; Castillo, K.D. Global change differentially modulates Caribbean coral physiology. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0273897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Albright, R.; Langdon, C. Ocean acidification impacts multiple early life history processes of the Caribbean coral Porites astreoides. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 2478–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Miller, M.; Qian, P.-Y.; Williams, D.E.; Huntington, B.E.; Piniak, G.A.; Vermeij, M.J.A. Decadal comparison of a diminishing coral community: A study using demographics to advance inferences of community status. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Johnston, N.K.; Campbell, J.E.; Paul, V.J.; Hay, M.E. Effects of future climate on coral-coral competition. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Horwitz, R.; Hoogenboom, M.O.; Fine, M. Spatial competition dynamics between reef corals under ocean acidification. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Camp, E.F.; Schoepf, V.; Mumby, P.J.; Hardtke, L.A.; Rodolfo-Metalpa, R.; Smith, D.J.; Suggett, D.J. The future of coral reefs subject to rapid climate change: Lessons from natural extreme environments. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (A) Generalized taxonomic summary of the coral subclass Hexacorallia. Clade location of Poritidae is indicated with asterisks (B) A generalized phylogenetic tree, based on species with available mitochondrial sequence data. Porites astreoides is found within Poritidae (indicated with a black bar). Adapted from Kitahara et al., 2010 [17].
Figure 1. (A) Generalized taxonomic summary of the coral subclass Hexacorallia. Clade location of Poritidae is indicated with asterisks (B) A generalized phylogenetic tree, based on species with available mitochondrial sequence data. Porites astreoides is found within Poritidae (indicated with a black bar). Adapted from Kitahara et al., 2010 [17].
Diversity 15 00462 g001
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) in the Atlantic Ocean, indicated in green [20].
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) in the Atlantic Ocean, indicated in green [20].
Diversity 15 00462 g002
Figure 3. A colony of Porites astreoides, found at a depth of 2 m on the island of Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean.
Figure 3. A colony of Porites astreoides, found at a depth of 2 m on the island of Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean.
Diversity 15 00462 g003
Table 1. Impacts of ocean acidification on P. astreoides under laboratory conditions based on forecasted levels for mid- and late century [90].
Table 1. Impacts of ocean acidification on P. astreoides under laboratory conditions based on forecasted levels for mid- and late century [90].
Porites astreoides20502100
Larval metabolism−27%−63%
Settlement success−43.50%−57.50%
Post-settlement growth −16%−35%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eagleson, R.G.; Álvarez-Filip, L.; Lumsden, J.S. A Review of Research on the Mustard Hill Coral, Porites astreoides. Diversity 2023, 15, 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030462

AMA Style

Eagleson RG, Álvarez-Filip L, Lumsden JS. A Review of Research on the Mustard Hill Coral, Porites astreoides. Diversity. 2023; 15(3):462. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eagleson, Ryan G., Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, and John S. Lumsden. 2023. "A Review of Research on the Mustard Hill Coral, Porites astreoides" Diversity 15, no. 3: 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030462

APA Style

Eagleson, R. G., Álvarez-Filip, L., & Lumsden, J. S. (2023). A Review of Research on the Mustard Hill Coral, Porites astreoides. Diversity, 15(3), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop