Next Article in Journal
A Review of the Giant Triton (Charonia tritonis), from Exploitation to Coral Reef Protector?
Next Article in Special Issue
DNA Barcoding of Moon Jellyfish (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Ulmaridae, Aurelia): Two Cryptic Species from the Azores (NE Atlantic, Macaronesia), and Evaluation of the Non-Indigenous Species (NIS)
Previous Article in Journal
A New Genus of Sminthurididae (Collembola, Symphypleona) from Brazil, with Notes on the Systematics of the Family
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/d14110959
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a New Species of Doliolid (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea

by
Rade Garić
* and
Mirna Batistić
Institute for Marine and Coastal Research, University of Dubrovnik, Kneza D. Jude 12, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(11), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110959
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 2 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gelatinous Zooplankton Diversity and Distribution in a Changing Ocean)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Adriatic Sea, as a part of Mediterranean, is one of the best investigated areas in the world regarding zooplankton. Nevertheless, in the last decade four new species of gelatinous zooplankton were described from the Adriatic Sea. Whether these species are newcomers or they were simply overlooked is still under investigations. Here we provide a description of a new species of Doliolida from the genus Dolioletta, Dolioletta advena sp. nov., found in the Adriatic Sea in August 2021, in a period of high sea temperatures and salinities, suggesting its thermal predilection. Its blastozooids dominated the studied doliolid blastozooid communities in the South Adriatic, except in the 50–100 m depth layer at a coastal Lokrum station. Blastozooids of D. advena sp. nov. possess unique morphological features which easily distinguish it from other doliolid species: the most prominent feature being the curved digestive tract where the intestine does not form a tight coil as in other Dolioletta species. The placement of this species in the genus Dolioletta is corroborated by COI phylogenetic analysis which showed that D. advena sp. nov. forms a well-supported monophyletic clade with Dolioletta gegenbauri (81% bootstrap support). In addition to D. advena sp. nov. COI sequence, we provide COI sequences of five doliolid and one pyrosomatid species, which will greatly improve the availability of thaliacean sequences for metabarcoding studies. The origin of D. advena sp. nov. is unknown, but given the fact that doliolids are well investigated in the Mediterranean Sea, it is likely that it arrived with sea currents either through the Suez Canal or the Strait of Gibraltar. Future investigations will confirm or reject this hypothesis.

1. Introduction

The class Thaliacea consists of the following three orders of holoplanktonic tunicates: Doliolida, Pyrosomatida and Salpida. Doliolids possess complex life cycle with alternations between sexual and asexual generations and inhabit mostly warm and temperate waters with cosmopolitan distribution [1]. Historically they have been most extensively studied in the Mediterranean and the southeastern continental shelf of the USA [1]. Despite large amount of research on doliolids in the Mediterranean (e.g., [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]), doliolids in the Adriatic have been relatively poorly investigated with few published papers scattered throughout the last one-hundred years [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The Adriatic itself is a semi-enclosed sea which is defined by large variations in depth, yearly sea temperature and zooplankton species abundance and richness between its northern and southern parts [13,17,18,19,20]. It exhibits complex physical dynamics which shape plankton community dynamics. In winter the Adriatic is under the influence of strong bura winds which cause cooling and vertical convection at the basin scale, reaching up to more than 600 m depth in its southern part [20]. The wind-driven vertical convection in winter triggers a spring plankton bloom [20,21,22]. On a decadal scale, thermohaline properties of the Adriatic are modified by the BiOS mechanism (Bimodal Oscillating System). BiOS is a phenomenon in which the changes in the direction of circulation in the North Ionian Gyre (NIG) determine the prevailing type of water entering the Adriatic. During its cyclonic phase the NIG brings more saline and warmer waters from the East Mediterranean and during its anticyclonic phase it brings less salty and colder waters from the West Mediterranean into the Adriatic [23,24]. In recent decades it has been shown that advection of allochthonous gelatinous zooplankton species into the Adriatic is also under the influence of the Bimodal Oscillating System (BiOS) [25]. The phase of the BiOS not only determines the prevailing origin of allochthonous species (either East or West Mediterranean) entering the Adriatic, but it also influences the abundance contribution of already established allochthonous species within their respective taxonomic groups at the yearly level [25]. In addition to decadal variations in temperature and salinity due to the BiOS, there is a constant upward trend of both parameters in the Adriatic due to climate change [21,26], favoring the establishment of thermophilic species [25,27,28].
Genetic investigations of doliolids have been rare and only three species have been sequenced so far [29,30,31,32,33,34], with only the Doliolum nationalis COI sequence published [30]. The scarcity of doliolid barcoding sequences largely hampered metabarcoding studies of doliolid distribution and diversity [35].
Here we present a description of Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a first doliolid species described in the last 17 years [36] and the first described doliolid epipelagic species in more than 50 years. Dolioletta advena sp. nov. was found in August 2021 at a coastal as well at an open sea station in the South Adriatic. The species is morphologically as well as genetically distinct with the shape of its digestive tract as its most prominent feature.

2. Materials and Methods

Dolioletta advena sp. nov. individuals were collected at two stations in the South Adriatic: a coastal Lokrum station (42°37′21″ N, 18°06′05″ E) of 100 m maximum depth on 18 August 2021 and an open sea station P-1200 (42°13′01″ N, 17°42′50″ E) of 1200 m maximum depth on 23 August 2021 (Figure 1). The temperature and salinity of the water column at both stations were measured using a Sea-Bird SeaCAT SBE 19plus instrument (Sea-Bird Scientific, Bellevue, WA, USA). Zooplankton at the Lokrum station was sampled using a 200-µm closing Nansen net (56.5 cm diameter, 340 cm length) in two layers, 0–50 m and 50–90 m, while at station P-1200 zooplankton was sampled with a larger 200-µm Nansen net (113 cm diameter and 450 cm length) in one layer, 0–100 m. Samples were taken in duplicate tows. Zooplankton from one tow was put in 10% formalin-seawater solution, for the zooplankton composition analysis, and zooplankton from the other tow was put in 96% ethanol for a genetic analysis after straining over 53-µm mesh in order to remove seawater. The ethanol samples were stored at −20 °C for long-term storage. Formalin-fixed zooplankton samples were processed under an Olympus SZX-16 stereomicroscope (Tokyo, Japan) in order to determine doliolid abundance and community composition. The abundance of doliolids was expressed as individuals per cubic meter, ind. m−3. For the morphological analysis, the collected organisms were stained with a few drops of 0.1% Janus Green B dye (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in seawater [12] until a sufficient level of coloration had been achieved. After dyeing, the animals were removed from the dyeing solution and placed in clear 10% formalin-seawater solution. In order to collect various doliolid and pyrosomatid species for phylogenetic reconstruction, opportunistic samplings were performed on 8 April 2016 (P-1200), 16 April 2021 (Lokrum), 16 September 2021 (Lokrum) and on 18 October 2021 (Table 1).
DNA was isolated from whole animals fixed in 96% ethanol. Each animal was photographed before DNA isolation. After removing ethanol, individual animals were put in acetone to speed up the drying process and were subsequently dried at 55 °C for half an hour. DNA was isolated and purified using the ammonium-acetate procedure followed by isopropanol precipitation. The DNA isolation procedure and purification is described in detail in Garić and Batistić, 2022 [37]. The resulting DNA pellet was dissolved in 40 µL of TE buffer.
A fragment of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) was amplified from five sequenced species using newly designed primer pair dollco (5′-TTTTCTACGAATCATAAAGATATCAG-3′) and dol1150coir (5′-TGAGCTACCACGTAGTAGGTATCATG-3′) (Table 1). This primer pair was designed to have an identical sequence to the corresponding portion of the COI gene sequence of Doliolum nationalis (accession number AB176541) published by Yokobori et al. [30]. The position of the forward dollco primer was selected to correspond to the position of Folmer’s LCO1490 primer [38], while the position of the reverse dol1150coir primer was selected to be at the position of about 1100 nucleotides downstream, which is a fairly conserved position within COI detected by aligning Doliolum nationalis COI sequence (accession number AB176541) [30] with Salpa fusiformis (accession number LC333181) [39] and Salpa thompsoni (accession number LC333180) [39] COI sequences. In addition to the dollco and doll1150coir primer pair, we designed the reverse primer od1140coir (5′-GCGACAACATAGTAGGTATCATG-3′) as a variant of primer dol1150coir in order to target a wider range of species. The theoretical annealing temperature of newly designed primers was calculated using Oligo Analyzer 1.0.3 software (Freeware, Teemu Kuulasmaa, Finland). They were also checked for likelihood of hairpin structures and dimer formation using the same software. For COI amplification of species Pyrosoma atlanticum, primers coi-70f (5′-ATGTCTACTAATCATAAAGATATT-3′) [12] and od1140coir were used, while for species Doliolum nationalis primers dollco and jgHCO2198 (5′-TAIACYTCIGGRTGICCRAARAAYCA-3′) [40] were used (Table 1). PCR was performed in 25 µL of a mix containing 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM of each primer, 1.2 U of Taq polymerase (NEB #M0273) and 0.5 μL of template DNA. All amplifications were performed using the same PCR program, as follows: 2 min denaturation step at 94 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 45 °C for 1 min, 68 °C for 2 min and a final extension step at 68 °C for 5 min. PCR products were sequenced from both directions by the company Macrogen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with the same primers as used for PCR. The obtained sequences were assembled in BioEdit (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [41]. All obtained sequences were translated using the ascidian mitochondrial genetic code in order to check for stop codons in order to detect possible pseudogenes and were then deposited at GenBank (Table 1).
A total of 13 COI sequences belonging to 12 thaliacean species (6 doliolid species, one pyrosomatid and 5 salpid species) were aligned using the ClustalW sequence alignment software with default options [42]. The resulting alignment length (Alignment S1 in Supplementary Material) was 620 bases long. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MegaX software [43] and on all codon positions. The in-software option for optimal model selection was used to determine the optimal model of evolution. The maximum likelihood method was used for phylogenetic reconstruction with the Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano model with 4 discrete gamma categories as the optimal model of evolution. The resulting tree was tested with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Temperature and Salinity at Stations P-1200 and Lokrum

In August 2021, the water column was stratified at both stations with a pronounced thermocline at about 20 m (Figure 2). The thermocline was slightly deeper at the Lokrum station than at station P-1200. Above 20 m depth, the average temperature at station P-1200 was 25.60 °C and at station Lokrum it was 26.74 °C. The average salinity was 39.15 and 38.66 PSU, respectively. Maximum temperatures were 27.80 at P-1200 at the surface and 26.73 °C at 2 m depth at Lokrum station. Maximum salinities were recorded at the surface at P-1200 being 39.32 PSU. At the Lokrum station, the maximum of salinity was in the layer from 49 to 53 m depth being 39.01 PSU. In the layer from the surface to 50 m depth, the average temperature at station P-1200 was 20.48 and at station Lokrum it was 21.14 °C. The salinities in the same layer were 39.00 and 38.92 PSU, respectively. In the layer from 50 to 95 m depth the temperature and salinity at both stations were similar and fairly constant: 15.15 °C and 38.96 PSU at station P-1200 and 15.72 °C and 38.99 PSU at the Lokrum station.

3.2. Abundance and Composition of Doliolid Communities at Stations P-1200 and Lokrum

In August 2021, at station P-1200 in the 0–100 m depth layer, blastozooids of only Dolioletta advena sp. nov. and Doliolina krohni were present, the latter being in very low numbers, 0.01 ind. m−3 (Table 2). At the Lokrum station, blastozooids of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. were the most abundant blastozooids in the 0–50 m depth layer, 2.24 ind. m−3, and Doliolina muelleri blastozooids were in low numbers, 0.32 ind. m−3. In the 50–90 m depth layer, blastozooids of Doliolina muelleri were abundant, 2.80 ind. m−3, while Dolioletta advena sp. nov. blastozooids were in low numbers, 0.80 ind. m−3. Dolioletta nurses and oozooids were present at all depths and stations, while Doliolina nurses and oozooids were present only at the Lokrum station, 50–90 m depth layer, and in high abundance, 13.60 ind. m−3, coinciding with the high abundance of Doliolina muelleri blastozooids.

3.3. DNA Analysis

DNA was isolated and the COI gene fragment was amplified and sequenced from three individuals of Dolioletta advena sp. nov., one gonozooid and two phorozooids (Table 1, Figure 3), and one blastozooid of each Dolioletta gegenbauri, Doliolum nationalis, Doliolum denticulatum, Doliolina muelleri, Doliolina krohni and Pyrosoma atlanticum (Table 1). The three obtained COI sequences of D. advena sp. nov. were 1057 nucleotides long and they were highly similar, but they were not identical. The percentage difference between isolates gega and gegb was highest, being only 0.85%.
Phylogenetic reconstruction showed that doliolids formed well-supported clade (94% bootstrap support). Doliolina as a monophyletic genus was not supported, while Doliolum nationalis and Doliolum denticulatum formed a well-supported monophyletic group (78% bootstrap support), as well as D. advena sp. nov. and Dolioletta gegenbauri (81% bootstrap support) (Figure 4).

3.4. Species Description

Class: Thaliacea Van der Haeven, 1850
Order: Doliolida Delage & Hérouard, 1898
Suborder: Doliolidina Godeaux, 1996
Family: Doliolidae Bronn, 1862
Genus: Dolioletta Garstang, 1933
Dolioletta advena sp. nov. Garić & Batistić
Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Material examined: 10 gonozooids and 86 phorozooids.
Holotype: Gonozooid 1.41 mm in length with developed gonads. Holotype is deposited in Natural History Museum Dubrovnik under inventory number: PMD-2415.
Publication LSID: http://zoobank.org/56A31891-1124-4369-A2A8-60DAF74B9D21
Nomenclature act LSID: http://zoobank.org/331F5A65-5D05-4675-AB6D-EA8CEB2A9E37
Diagnosis: Dolioletta advena sp. nov. does not possess a tightly coiled intestine, which so far has been a unique feature of the Dolioletta species. Instead, after forming a right turn, the intestine sharply turns left so that the anal aperture is facing the left body wall (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The position of the ganglion in D. advena sp. nov. is between MIII and MIV, but close to MIV, unlike other Dolioletta species where the ganglion is positioned close to MIII or midway between MIII and MIV as in Dolioletta mirabilis (Figure 6). The branchial septum reaches the ganglion dorsally, as in other Dolioletta species, while ventrally it reaches MV, or slightly anteriorly. The endostyle in blastozooids of D. advena sp. nov. extends from MII 2/3 to MIV 1/3, sometimes reaching MII anteriorly, which is similar to other Dolioletta species (Figure 6). In gonozooids of D. advena sp. nov., the ovary is round, while the testis is hockey-stick shaped, pointing dorsally. The testis reaches MIV, but it does not seem to surpass it (Figure 5), which is a unique characteristic of this species. Gonozooids of species Dolioletta gegenbauri and Dolioletta tritonis possess testis which surpasses MII, while Dolioletta mirabilis and Dolioletta valdivie possess coiled testis (Figure 6). The size of the holotype was 1.41 mm (gonozooid), while the maximum recorded size of a gonozooid was 1.95 mm. Maximum recorded size of a phorozooid was 2.05 mm. Four individuals were examined for the number of gill slits which varied between 17 and 19.
Etymology: Dolioletta advena sp. nov. is named based on its possible foreign origin in the Adriatic, advenus in Latin meaning stranger or foreigner.
Remarks: Due to the unique shape of the intestine in Dolioletta advena sp. nov., it does not conform to the diagnoses of genus Dolioletta published by previous authors [44,45], nor to any existing genus. We do not believe that this warrants creation of a new genus for this species. Therefore, we decided to place it in the genus Dolioletta based on genetic evidences as well as on the position of branchial septum which reaches ganglion dorsally. The position of the branchial septum in relation to the ganglion is a determining feature of genus Dolioletta so far not recognized by previous authors. The diagnoses of the genus Dolioletta provided by Garstang (1933) [44] (alimentary canal forming a close dextral coil in the middle of the cloacal floor with median anus) and Godeaux (2003) [45] (coiled digestive tube, variable length of endostyle, brain behind M III, branchial septum extending between M II and M IV, tubular testis of various shapes), should be amended in the following way: alimentary canal forming a close dextral coil or it makes ¾ right turn so that the anal aperture is facing the left body wall, branchial septum dorsally reaching ganglion.

4. Discussion

Doliolids are a group with a relatively low number of species. According to WoRMS there have been so far only 24 doliolid species known to science [46]. With the description of Dolioletta advena sp. nov., the number of known doliolid species has grown to 25. There have been eight doliolid species so far recorded in the Mediterranean, as follows, with Dolioletta advena sp. nov. the ninth: Doliolum nationalis, Doliolum denticulatum, Doliolina muelleri, Doliolina krohni, Doliolina intermedia, Dolioloides rarum, Doliopsis rubescens and Dolioletta gegenbauri [45]. Species Dolioloides rarum was considered to be probably extinct in the Mediterranean by Godeaux [45,47], because, according to him, it had not been recorded since the work of Sigl (1912) [10] from the early years of the 20th century. Conversely, Katavić [9] recorded Dolioloides rarum in the Adriatic in the mid-70s [9], and it has been found in the Adriatic again in 2014 by Garić and Batistić (2016) [12]. Doliopsis rubescens is a species that was never recorded in the Adriatic, but it was abundant in the Mediterranean until the beginning of the 20th century [45,47]. Afterwards, it was never recorded again in the Mediterranean [45,47]. Doliolina intermedium is known in the Mediterranean only from nurses as reported by Godeaux [4,5]. Godeaux considered this finding uncertain since only blastozooids of this species were found [47]. Nevertheless this species was included in later Mediterranean doliolid checklists [1,45,48]. Dolioletta advena sp. nov. does not possess the typical tightly-coiled intestine which has been so far the main distinguishing character of the genus Dolioletta, nevertheless, the position of the branchial septum in relation to the ganglion, as well as COI phylogenetic reconstruction led us to conclude that it is indeed a member of genus Dolioletta and does not warrant a separate genus.
Dolioletta advena sp. nov. was found in the South Adriatic from the shore to the open sea in August 2021. Its peak of abundance was in the top 50 m at the coastal station where the temperature was over 21 °C. The distribution and abundance of D. advena sp. nov. suggests that it is a thermophilic species. Its highest abundance was recorded at the Lokrum station in the 0–50 m layer, which would indicate that it is an epipelagic species that prefers inshore waters. Due to the low number of samples examined, future investigations are needed to confirm these indications. One of the big challenges when new or allochthonous species are found is identifying the origin of newcomers. The task is hampered by scarce distribution data due to the limited number of studies and the overall lack of taxonomists, especially from the Indian Ocean. For species which are present in the Atlantic as well as in the Mediterranean, the route of arrival could be inferred using genetic methods if genetic structuring between the basins is present. For a genetic approach to be successful, there should be a good coverage of barcoded taxa from multiple basins. At this point only 31% of all copepods are barcoded [35] and with this study the percentage of doliolid COI barcoded species has risen from 4 to 24%. The last possibility, especially for fragile gelatinous taxa, is that the species has simply been overlooked by lack of effort, expertise or inadequate sampling methods as in the case of Fritillaria ragusina [49]. For the Adriatic, the scarcity of data on doliolids [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] is compensated by extensive investigations in the Mediterranean [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Therefore, it is likely that D. advena sp. nov. would have been found by earlier researchers had it been present in the Mediterranean, especially bearing in mind its morphological distinctness and its ease of identification. This points to the possibility that it arrived in the Adriatic, and probably the Mediterranean, from either the Atlantic, through the Straits of Gibraltar, or the Red Sea, through the Suez Canal. The high salinities at the time of collection, in excess of 39 PSU, could indicate that in the year 2021 a cyclonic regime of BiOS was in place, which could indicate that D. advena sp. nov. arrived from the East Mediterranean into the Adriatic, hence favouring the Red Sea origin hypothesis. Until more researches are conducted, the origin of this species is speculative. D. advena sp. nov. is a new addition to a streak of new gelatinous species for science described from the Adriatic Sea in little more than a decade [12,37,49,50]. For a well-researched sea such as the Adriatic, as a part of the Mediterranean, five newly described species of gelatinous zooplankton in little more than a decade, out of which two are quite large scyphomedusae, is somewhat unexpected. This could indicate that changes in Adriatic zooplankton fauna, influenced by hydroclimatic changes, are picking up pace and points to the need and importance of systematic monitoring projects in such a rapidly changing sea.
So far, sequences of only Doliolum nationalis (18S, COI), Doliolum denticulatum (18S) and Dolioletta gegenbauri (18S) were available from GenBank, which was insufficient to provide any insight of phylogenetic relationships between doliolid genera [30,32,33]. In order to provide genetic context for this newly described species, and also to provide reference sequences for metabarcoding projects, we sequenced COI gene fragment of seven thaliacean species, out of which the COI sequences of six species were not already present in GenBank. The phylogenetic reconstruction showed that all three thaliacean orders (Doliolida, Pyrosomatida and Salpida) are well supported. Within Doliolida, genera Doliolum and Dolioletta were reconstructed with good bootstrap support, while genus Doliolina was not supported in COI phylogeny. Genus Doliolina possesses a primitive branchial septum [44] and digestive system which forms a vertical U-loop, which has also been speculated to be a primitive feature [51]. Given that fact, it is possible that the genus Doliolina is not monophyletic, but that should be confirmed or rejected by sequencing more doliolid species or more genetic markers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14110959/s1, Alignment S1: COI alignment of 12 thaliacean species.

Author Contributions

Specimen collection, genetic analysis, R.G.; morphological analysis, species description, writing, R.G. and M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Croatian Science Foundation (Hrvatska zaklada za znanost, HRZZ), under projects SpaTeGen (UIP-2020-02-3907) and DiVMAd (IP-2019-04-9043).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank technical personnel of the Institute for Marine and Coastal Research of the University of Dubrovnik, as well as the captains and crews of R/V Baldo Kosić and R/V Naše more.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deibel, D. The Abundance, Distribution and Ecological Impact of Doliolids. In The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 171–186. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braconnot, J.-C. Étude Du Cycle Annuel Des Salpes et Dolioles En Rade de Villefranche-Sur-Mer. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 1963, 28, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Braconnot, J.-C. Contribution a l’étude Biologique et Écologique Des Tuniciers Pélagiques Salpides et Doliolides—II. Écologie Des Doliolides, Biologie Des Deux Groupes. Vie Milieu 1971, 22, 437–467. [Google Scholar]
  4. Godeaux, J. A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Thaliacean Faunas of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea. Isr. J. Zool. 1973, 22, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Godeaux, J. Thaliacés récoltés en Méditerranée centrale par le N.O. Atlantis II (Woods Hole). Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege 1987, 56, 107. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ménard, F.; Fromentin, J.-M.; Goy, J.; Dallot, S. Temporal Fluctuations of Doliolid Abundance in the Bay of Villefranche-Sur-Mer (Northwestern Mediterranean Sea) from 1967 to 1990. Oceanol. Acta 1997, 20, 733–742. [Google Scholar]
  7. Godeaux, J.E.A. The Thaliaceans, a Group of Animals Refractory to Lessepsian Migration: An Updated Survey of Their Populations in the Levantine Basin and the Red Sea. Isr. J. Zool. 1999, 45, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weikert, H.; Godeaux, J.E.A. Thaliacean Distribution and Abundance in the Northern Part of the Levantine Sea (Crete and Cyprus) during the Eastern Mediterranean Climatic Transient, and a Comparison with the Western Mediterranean Basin. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2008, 62, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Katavić, I. Qualitative and Quantitative Composition of Thaliacean Populations of the Adriatic Sea in the Autumn 1974 and Spring 1975 (Kvalitativni i Kvantitativni Sastav Populacije Taliacea Jadranskog Mora u Jeseni 1974. i Proljeće 1975. Godine). Master’s Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sigl, A. Adriatische Thaliaceenfauna. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 1912, 121, 463–508. [Google Scholar]
  11. Katavić, I. Cruises of the Research Vessel “Vila Velebita” in the Kvarner Region of the Adriatic Sea. XIV. Thaliacea. Thalass. Jugosl 1979, 15, 217–230. [Google Scholar]
  12. Garić, R.; Batistić, M. Description of Brooksia Lacromae sp. nov. (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea. Eur. J. Taxon. 2016, 196, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Batistić, M.; Jasprica, N.; Carić, M.; Čalić, M.; Kovačević, V.; Garić, R.; Njire, J.; Mikuš, J.; Bobanović-Ćolić, S. Biological Evidence of a Winter Convection Event in the South Adriatic: A Phytoplankton Maximum in the Aphotic Zone. Cont. Shelf Res. 2012, 44, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uljanin, B. Die Arten der Gattung Doliolum Im Golfe von Neapel und den Angrenzenden Meeresabschnitten; Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte, Monographie 10; W. Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany, 1884; Volume VIII. [Google Scholar]
  15. Graeffe, E. Ubersicht Der Fauna Des Golfes von Triest Nebst Notizen Uber Vorkommen Lebensweise, Erscheinungs- Und Laichzeit Der Einzelnen Arten. Arb. Aus. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien Zool. Stn. Triest 1905, 15, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lo Bianco, S. Le Pesce Abissali Eseguita Da F.A. Krupp Col Yacht Puritan Nelle Adiacenze de Capri Ed in Altre Localita Del Mediterraneo. Mitth. Zool. Stn. Zu Neapel 1903, 16, 109–280. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benović, A.; Fonda-Umani, S.; Malej, A.; Specchi, M. Net-Zooplankton Biomass of the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Biol. 1984, 79, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aubry, F.B.; Cossarini, G.; Acri, F.; Bastianini, M.; Bianchi, F.; Camatti, E.; De Lazzari, A.; Pugnetti, A.; Solidoro, C.; Socal, G. Plankton Communities in the Northern Adriatic Sea: Patterns and Changes over the Last 30 Years. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 115, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miloslavić, M.; Lučić, D.; Njire, J.; Gangai, B.; Onofri, I.; Garić, R.; Žarić, M.; Miri Osmani, F.; Pestorić, B.; Nikleka, E.; et al. Zooplankton Composition and Distribution across Coastal and Offshore Waters off Albania (Southern Adriatic) in Late Spring. Acta Adriat. 2012, 53, 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ljubimir, S.; Jasprica, N.; Čalić, M.; Hrustić, E.; Dupčić Radić, I.; Car, A.; Batistić, M. Interannual (2009–2013) Variability of Winter-Spring Phytoplankton in the Open South Adriatic Sea: Effects of Deep Convection and Lateral Advection. Cont. Shelf Res. 2017, 143, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Batistić, M.; Viličić, D.; Kovačević, V.; Jasprica, N.; Garić, R.; Lavigne, H.; Carić, M. Occurrence of Winter Phytoplankton Bloom in the Open Southern Adriatic: Relationship with Hydroclimatic Events in the Eastern Mediterranean. Cont. Shelf Res. 2019, 174, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jasprica, N.; Čalić, M.; Kovačević, V.; Bensi, M.; Dupčić Radić, I.; Garić, R.; Batistić, M. Phytoplankton Distribution Related to Different Winter Conditions in 2016 and 2017 in the Open Southern Adriatic Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). J. Mar. Syst. 2022, 226, 103665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Civitarese, G.; Gačić, M.; Lipizer, M.; Eusebi Borzelli, G.L. On the Impact of the Bimodal Oscillating System (BiOS) on the Biogeochemistry and Biology of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas (Eastern Mediterranean). Biogeosciences 2010, 7, 3987–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gačić, M.; Borzelli, G.L.E.; Civitarese, G.; Cardin, V.; Yari, S. Can Internal Processes Sustain Reversals of the Ocean Upper Circulation? The Ionian Sea Example. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37, L09608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Batistić, M.; Garić, R.; Molinero, J.C. Interannual Variations in Adriatic Sea Zooplankton Mirror Shifts in Circulation Regimes in the Ionian Sea. Clim. Res. 2014, 61, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bonacci, O.; Bonacci, D.; Patekar, M.; Pola, M. Increasing Trends in Air and Sea Surface Temperature in the Central Adriatic Sea (Croatia). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dulčić, J.; Grbec, B.; Lipej, L. Information on the Adriatic Ichthyofauna—Effect of Water Warming? Acta Adriat. 1999, 40, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Iveša, N.; Piria, M.; Gelli, M.; Trnski, T.; Špelić, I.; Radočaj, T.; Kljak, K.; Jug-Dujaković, J.; Gavrilović, A. Feeding Habits of Predatory Thermophilic Fish Species and Species with Subtropical Affinity from Recently Extended Distributional Range in Northeast Adriatic Sea, Croatia. Diversity 2021, 13, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wada, H. Evolutionary History of Free-Swimming and Sessile Lifestyles in Urochordates as Deduced from 18S RDNA Molecular Phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yokobori, S.; Oshima, T.; Wada, H. Complete Nucleotide Sequence of the Mitochondrial Genome of Doliolum Nationalis with Implications for Evolution of Urochordates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 34, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsagkogeorga, G.; Turon, X.; Hopcroft, R.R.; Tilak, M.-K.; Feldstein, T.; Shenkar, N.; Loya, Y.; Huchon, D.; Douzery, E.J.; Delsuc, F. An Updated 18S RRNA Phylogeny of Tunicates Based on Mixture and Secondary Structure Models. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Govindarajan, A.F.; Bucklin, A.; Madin, L.P. A Molecular Phylogeny of the Thaliacea. J. Plankton Res. 2010, 33, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Frischer, M.E.; Lamboley, L.M.; Walters, T.L.; Brandes, J.A.; Arneson, E.; Lacy, L.E.; López-Figueroa, N.B.; Rodríguez-Santiago, Á.E.; Gibson, D.M. Selective Feeding and Linkages to the Microbial Food Web by the Doliolid Dolioletta Gegenbauri. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2021, 66, 1993–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Delsuc, F.; Philippe, H.; Tsagkogeorga, G.; Simion, P.; Tilak, M.-K.; Turon, X.; López-Legentil, S.; Piette, J.; Lemaire, P.; Douzery, E.J.P. A Phylogenomic Framework and Timescale for Comparative Studies of Tunicates. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Bucklin, A.; Peijnenburg, K.T.C.A.; Kosobokova, K.N.; O’Brien, T.D.; Blanco-Bercial, L.; Cornils, A.; Falkenhaug, T.; Hopcroft, R.R.; Hosia, A.; Laakmann, S.; et al. Toward a Global Reference Database of COI Barcodes for Marine Zooplankton. Mar. Biol. 2021, 168, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Robison, B.H.; Raskoff, K.A.; Sherlock, R.E. Adaptations for Living Deep: A New Bathypelagic Doliolid, from the Eastern North Pacific. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2005, 85, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Garić, R.; Batistić, M. Description of Aurelia Pseudosolida sp. nov. (Scyphozoa, Ulmaridae) from the Adriatic Sea. Water 2022, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  39. Goodall-Copestake, W.P. NrDNA:MtDNA Copy Number Ratios as a Comparative Metric for Evolutionary and Conservation Genetics. Heredity 2018, 121, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Leray, M.; Yang, J.Y.; Meyer, C.P.; Mills, S.C.; Agudelo, N.; Ranwez, V.; Boehm, J.T.; Machida, R.J. A New Versatile Primer Set Targeting a Short Fragment of the Mitochondrial COI Region for Metabarcoding Metazoan Diversity: Application for Characterizing Coral Reef Fish Gut Contents. Front. Zool 2013, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garstang, W. Report on the Tunicata. Part I. Doliolida. British Antarctic (‘Terra Nova’) Expedition, 1910. Nat. Hist. Rep. Zool. 1933, 4, 195–252. [Google Scholar]
  45. Godeaux, J.E.A. History and Revised Classification of the Order Cyclomyaria (Tunicata, Thaliacea, Doliolida). Bull. L’institut R. Sci. Nat. Belgique. Biol. 2003, 73, 191–222. [Google Scholar]
  46. WoRMS. WoRMS Editorial Board World List of Thaliacea. Doliolida; World Register of Marine Species: Ostend, Belgium, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  47. Godeaux, J. Thaliacés méditerranéens: Une synthèse. Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege 1988, 57, 359. [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Soest, R.W.M. The Cladistic Biogeography of Salps and Pyrosomes. In The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 231–249. [Google Scholar]
  49. Garić, R.; Batistić, M. Fritillaria Ragusina sp. Nov., a New Species of Appendicularia (Tunicata) from the Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2011, 91, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piraino, S.; Aglieri, G.; Martell, L.; Mazzoldi, C.; Melli, V.; Milisenda, G.; Scorrano, S.; Boero, F. Pelagia Benovici sp. nov. (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa): A New Jellyfish in the Mediterranean Sea. Zootaxa 2014, 3794, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Godeaux, J. The Relationships and Systematics of the Thaliacea, with Keys for Identification. In The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 273–294. [Google Scholar]
Diversity 14 00959 g001 550
Figure 1. Position of stations Lokrum (42°37′21″ N, 18°06′05″ E) and P-1200 (42°13′01″ N, 17°42′50″ E) in the South Adriatic.
Figure 1. Position of stations Lokrum (42°37′21″ N, 18°06′05″ E) and P-1200 (42°13′01″ N, 17°42′50″ E) in the South Adriatic.
Diversity 14 00959 g001
Diversity 14 00959 g002 550
Figure 2. Temperature and salinity at stations P-1200 and Lokrum in August 2021.
Figure 2. Temperature and salinity at stations P-1200 and Lokrum in August 2021.
Diversity 14 00959 g002
Diversity 14 00959 g003 550
Figure 3. Photographs of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. individuals from which DNA was isolated and COI sequences were obtained. (a) gonozooid, isolate dcgen, (b) phorozooid, isolate gega, (c) phorozooid, isolate gegb.
Figure 3. Photographs of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. individuals from which DNA was isolated and COI sequences were obtained. (a) gonozooid, isolate dcgen, (b) phorozooid, isolate gega, (c) phorozooid, isolate gegb.
Diversity 14 00959 g003
Diversity 14 00959 g004 550
Figure 4. Doliolid COI phylogenetic ML tree with the position of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (in red). Five salpid sequences are used as the outgroup. Names in bold represent species sequenced during this investigation, while all other sequences are obtained from GenBank. Numbers next to nodes represent the percentage of bootstrap support for respective nodes.
Figure 4. Doliolid COI phylogenetic ML tree with the position of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (in red). Five salpid sequences are used as the outgroup. Names in bold represent species sequenced during this investigation, while all other sequences are obtained from GenBank. Numbers next to nodes represent the percentage of bootstrap support for respective nodes.
Diversity 14 00959 g004
Diversity 14 00959 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Photograph of Janus Green B stained holotype of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (b) Dorsal view of unrelated Janus Green B stained individual of D. advena sp. nov. which was dissected so that digestive system is exposed. MI to MVIII—muscle bands, en—endostyle, g—ganglion, t—testis, o—ovary, bs—branchial septum, oe—oesophagus, s—stomach, i—intestine, a—anal aperture.
Figure 5. (a) Photograph of Janus Green B stained holotype of Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (b) Dorsal view of unrelated Janus Green B stained individual of D. advena sp. nov. which was dissected so that digestive system is exposed. MI to MVIII—muscle bands, en—endostyle, g—ganglion, t—testis, o—ovary, bs—branchial septum, oe—oesophagus, s—stomach, i—intestine, a—anal aperture.
Diversity 14 00959 g005
Diversity 14 00959 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of blastozooids of three doliolid species, Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (holotype), Dolioletta gegenbauri and Doliolum nationalis, ventral view of their respective digestive systems and photographs of Janus Green stained blastozooids. MI to MVIII—muscle bands, en—endostyle, g—ganglion, t—testis, ds—digestive system, bs—branchial septum, o—ovary.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of blastozooids of three doliolid species, Dolioletta advena sp. nov. (holotype), Dolioletta gegenbauri and Doliolum nationalis, ventral view of their respective digestive systems and photographs of Janus Green stained blastozooids. MI to MVIII—muscle bands, en—endostyle, g—ganglion, t—testis, ds—digestive system, bs—branchial septum, o—ovary.
Diversity 14 00959 g006
Table
Table 1. List of sequenced pyrosomatid and doliolid species, GenBank accession numbers of their respective COI sequences, date of collection of animals, stations at which they were collected and primers used for COI amplification.
Table 1. List of sequenced pyrosomatid and doliolid species, GenBank accession numbers of their respective COI sequences, date of collection of animals, stations at which they were collected and primers used for COI amplification.
SpeciesIsolateGenBank AcessionDate of Collection
(DD-MM-YYYY)		StationForward COI PrimerReverse COI Primer
Pyrosoma atlanticumpyrverOP43748808-04-2016P-1200coi-70fod1140coir
Dolioletta advena sp. nov.gegaOP43749323-08-2021dollcodol1150coir
gegbOP43749223-08-2021
dcgenOP43749418-08-2021Lokrum
Dolioletta gegenbaurigegpr2OP43749116-09-2021
Doliolina krohnidkrohOP43749018-08-2021
Doliolina muelleridcfmul1OP43748918-08-2021
Doliolum denticulatumdolden11OP43748716-04-2021
Doliolum nationalisdolnat11OP43749518-10-2021jgHCO2198
Table
Table 2. Abundance and species composition of doliolids at stations P-1200 (on 23 August 2021) and Lokrum (on 18 August 2021). Abundances are expressed as number of individuals per m3.
Table 2. Abundance and species composition of doliolids at stations P-1200 (on 23 August 2021) and Lokrum (on 18 August 2021). Abundances are expressed as number of individuals per m3.
StationsP-1200Lokrum
Layers 0–100 m0–50 m50–90 m
Species
Dolioletta advena sp. nov. blastozooids0.802.240.80
Dolioletta sp. oozooids + nurses0.540.481.60
Doliolina krohni blastozooids0.0100.80
Doliolina muelleri blastozooids00.322.80
Doliolina sp. oozooids + nurses0013.60
Doliolida larvae003.20
Doliolida ova01.280
Doliolida unidentified0.3800
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garić, R.; Batistić, M. Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a New Species of Doliolid (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea. Diversity 2022, 14, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110959

AMA Style

Garić R, Batistić M. Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a New Species of Doliolid (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea. Diversity. 2022; 14(11):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garić, Rade, and Mirna Batistić. 2022. "Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a New Species of Doliolid (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea" Diversity 14, no. 11: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110959

APA Style

Garić, R., & Batistić, M. (2022). Dolioletta advena sp. nov., a New Species of Doliolid (Tunicata, Thaliacea) from the Adriatic Sea. Diversity, 14(11), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop