Next Article in Journal
Updated Distribution of the Mysid Antromysis cenotensis (Crustacea: Peracarida), a Protected Key Species in Yucatan Peninsula Cenotes
Previous Article in Journal
Conservation Genetics of Four Critically Endangered Greek Endemic Plants: A Preliminary Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Evolutionary Genetics and Biogeography of Galaxiid Fishes (Teleostei: Galaxiiformes: Galaxiidae)

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
Diversity 2021, 13(4), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040153
Submission received: 26 March 2021 / Accepted: 29 March 2021 / Published: 31 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolutionary Genetics and Biogeography of Galaxiid Fishes)

1. Introduction

Since the dawn of the discipline, biogeographers have wondered at the widespread distribution of galaxiid fishes throughout temperate regions of the Southern Hemisphere [1,2]. Much of the endemic flora and fauna was at first shoe-horned into familiar groups by colonists. Galaxiids were variously classified as trouts, gudgeons, minnows and pikes, compounding the problem of how they became so widely dispersed, before their discrete taxonomic identity and diadromous life history became clear [3,4]. Further important clarification of taxonomy and natural history became the life’s work of the late Bob McDowall [5,6,7,8,9]. Application of molecular techniques has helped to clarify galaxiid species boundaries and provided evidence for many new species, particularly stream-resident species whose ancestors lost diadromy [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. More recently, DNA sequence data have formed the basis for time-calibrated phylogenies that answer some biogeographical questions and resolve the evolution of diadromy and its loss [17,18,19,20]. These give a better baseline for further investigating the evolutionary biology of this fascinating group of fishes and some of the interesting features that they show [21,22,23,24].

2. Palaeontology

Next to taxonomy and current distribution, fossils form a foundation to all evolutionary and biogeographic study. Given the widespread distribution of galaxiids across the Gondwanan continent, it is perhaps surprising that all undisputed galaxiid fossils found so far [25,26,27,28] herald from present-day New Zealand, a small remnant of the continent Zealandia [29,30,31]. This may in part reflect the importance of the region as a centre of origin, given that the group is predominantly cool-temperate in current distribution, and climates have been warmer over most of the last 50 million years since the Eocene. Apart from a New Caledonian species, galaxiids are limited to southern parts of South America, Africa and Australasia [8], and genetic diversity within the diverse G. vulgaris [32] and G. olidus [12,13] complexes show strikingly higher genetic diversity to the south. Additionally, the extensive system of Miocene freshwater lakes with marine links, making up part of what is today Otago (South Island, New Zealand), offered wonderful conditions for preservation, with fine sediments in a low-energy environment.
In this Special Issue, Kaulfuss et al. [33] review the history of these fossil discoveries, describing the location, stratigraphy, sedimentology and age of the sites. They list the galaxiid species found, and the number and type of fossils and their preservation type (body fossils, otoliths, coprolites). In addition to eight named species known from fossils alone, the authors give preliminary descriptions of four or five likely new species. These fossils provide an important record of the paleodiversity and paleoecology of the region, as well as the biogeographic history of galaxiids in New Zealand.

3. Biogeography

Molecular analyses of extant galaxiid species suggest a mix of vicariant and dispersive origins at a global level [15,17,20,29,31]. Within New Zealand, the dynamic nature of the geology, especially rapid fault movement, uplift and erosion, has driven major changes in hydrology. Waters, Burridge et al. [34] review 20 years of research focused on the effects of the changing topography on the galaxiid fauna. On a broad scale, two species of pencil galaxiid (G. paucispondylus, G. divergens) and two mudfish (N. burrowsius, N. apoda) either side of the Southern Alps probably arose in allopatry with uplift along the Alpine Fault over the last 5+ myrs [35]. In particular, several likely incidences of river capture have been inferred from combining geological and molecular analyses through ‘reciprocal illumination’. These changes of course have led to isolation and subsequent divergence of some lineages, such as the Teviot and Nevis Valley galaxiids [36], which are of conservation significance and possibly merit species status. Even in Australia, where such geological processes are slower and more subtle, there is evidence of hydrological evolution leading to biological evolution. For example, G. oliros, sister to the G. olidus complex, likely formed as an inland remnant in the Douglas Basin once the Murray-Darling cut its new and current path to the sea through the Murray Gorge to the west. The fast-evolving mtDNA genome has been key to dating such events, even those as recent as the last glaciation. For example, populations of both G. divergens and G. vulgaris ‘northern’ show parallel divergence between the upper Clarence and Wairau rivers (Marlborough, New Zealand), following glacial retreat and severing of links between the two systems. Vera-Escalona, Delgado et al. [15] review population genetic structure of South American galaxiids, including how de-glaciation has led to river reversals from Atlantic to Pacific sides of South America. G. maculatus shows a strong signal of reduced diversity in areas that were glaciated despite its diadromous life history enabling rapid re-colonisation. G. platei shows an east–west split across the Andes of about 1.5 myrs, and similar evidence of retreat to glacial refugia, but its post-glacial re-colonisation has been rapid for a strictly freshwater species.

4. Morphological Differentiation and Plasticity

As well as having a wide latitudinal range, galaxiids can be found in a wide range of aquatic habitats, including soft-bottomed volcanic and rocky post-glacial lakes; riffles and pools in river margins and small fast-flowing streams; intermittent and permanent watercourses; tidal inlets, swamps, estuaries and streams. Fossils abound in the Otago volcanic maar sites, and the type location for G. anomalus Stokell is a farm drain. G. brevipinnis shows great climbing ability, traversing vertical faces of concrete dams and weirs, penetrating far up-river systems and waterfalls to high altitudes. Other species, like G. prognathus, may be able to survive drought conditions in the hyporheos; Neochanna mudfish and Lepidogalaxias go one step further, aestivating in dried mud deposits. A review of the South American galaxiids by Cussac, Barrantes et al. [37] exemplifies the breadth of habitats occupied. These sorts of tolerances and behaviours have protected some threatened species from competition and predation by brown trout in particular, which prefer cooler more predictable conditions, and are excluded from sections above waterfalls in streams [38], unless deliberately transferred there. Adaptability to different habitats can be found within species, such as G. gollumoides McDowall and Chadderton, originally described from a swamp on Stewart Island, New Zealand, but common in lowland and upland sections of streams in Southland, New Zealand.
Dunn, O’Brien et al. [39] address phenotypic plasticity in G. gollumoides driven by wetland and stream habitats using reciprocal transfer experiments and detailed morphometric analysis over 3+ years. In the wild, adult G. gollumoides in streams tend to have smaller and flatter heads with smaller eye orbits than the stockier wetland fish. Using wetland and stream larvae raised to adulthood in either flowing or still tanks, wetland larvae raised in stream-like conditions converged toward the stream MDS centroid for 19 morphological characters, consistent with adaptive plasticity. The stream larvae raised in still conditions, however, diverged away from both centroids, though convergent on wetland in dimension 2 alone. Sample sizes and effects were small, so conclusions should be treated with caution, but convergence in higher-flow regions likely reflects more constraint on morphology. The limits to body form are likely narrow in more rapid flow, just as marine vertebrates show convergence of body form for streamlining. The paper also contrasts ontogenetic trends for fin characters between the two forms, showing a variety of convergent, divergent and parallel trajectories.
Counter-intuitively, phenotypic plasticity is of great potential evolutionary significance: it increases the breadth of environments in which the organism can survive. As such, it can be the starting point for morphological divergence, differentiation and ultimately speciation. If body form is persistently pushed towards one end of the spectrum of plastic response, then concomitant genetic change will occur that begins to lock that phenotype in place, and indeed adapt it further by Darwinian selection. This scenario can be thought of as genes being the “followers of evolution” [40]. Two other papers in this issue also draw attention to plasticity of G. maculatus, in relation to its widespread distribution [15,37]
This mode of evolution has probably been important in the evolution of fishes in general [41], given their remarkable morphological plasticity, including the G. vulgaris group (sensu Allibone and Wallis [10]), which divide naturally into flathead and roundhead groups [11,42,43,44]. A second paper by Dunn, O’Brien et al. [45] focuses on how lentic and lotic habitats alternatively impact upon morphological differentiation in flathead G. vulgaris, roundhead G. gollumoides and the ancestral diadromous G. brevipinnis form. Each species showed some significant intraspecific morphological differentiation across several of a subset of 25 out of 35 morphological characters. Nineteen characters showed convergence across all species; only one character was significantly divergent (body width at vent). Lentic Galaxias had longer bodies, stouter caudal peduncles, longer and narrower pectoral fins, and longer, wider heads with larger mouths. These results likely reflect widespread phenotypic plasticity, but could also include some longer-term genotypic adaptation to local hydrological conditions, the fore-runner of speciation. The results parallel findings in other Galaxias, Paragalaxias and Neochanna.
Both of these papers [39,45] show the dangers of basing taxonomy of closely related species on morphology alone: convergence of body form may result in under-splitting whereas divergence due to intraspecific differentiation could lead to over-splitting. Full resolution of the number of galaxiid species in the vulgaris group in New Zealand, olidus group in Australia and zebratus group in South Africa will require detailed genetical data, though even then, it is difficult to decide where to draw the line with allopatric replacements. One criterion might be to demand evidence of additional morphological (or other adaptive) differentiation despite parallel existence in similar environments [46]. Past hybridization, particularly through river capture [34,36,47,48] or human modification [49] might conflate these attempts, but a genomic biogeographic approach should allow this history to be resolved.

5. Conservation

The papers in this Special Issue show how galaxiids are a distinctive evolutionary element in global fish diversity, as well as playing important functional roles in the freshwater ecosystems of southern lands. From both viewpoints, we should cherish and protect remaining populations. Introduced salmonids have been recognized as a threat for many years [8], and these continue to increase with expanding aquaculture and damming followed by stocking of reservoirs [15]. In addition, there is a growing list of more recently introduced species threatening galaxiid populations worldwide, including carp, catfish, characins, cyprinodontiforms and atherinopsids [37]. Volcanic lakes of North Island New Zealand were once burgeoning with lake forms of G. brevipinnis, an important resource to Maori, but now decimated by trout [50]. Intensification of farming, particularly dairying in New Zealand, has further marginalized mudfish populations and increased run-off into waterways. As a result, nitrification and pesticide residues threaten remaining galaxiid populations. Recent years has seen the added threat of climate change, which has contributed to the loss of northern population of G. maculatus in Chile and Argentina, exacerbated by enabling the southern spread of invading species [37].

6. Parasitology

Since nearly every non-parasitic metazoan has at least one species-specific metazoan parasite, the global diversity of the latter group probably exceeds that of the former. In a review of galaxiid parasites, Paterson, Viozzi et al. [51] show that at least half of all species have parasites described from them. The number of parasites discovered in a species reflects the geographic range of that species and intensity of research, with 23 parasite species described from G. maculatus across 14 studies. The wide range of parasites found in galaxiids includes several macroparasites (e.g., acanthocephalans, cestodes, copepods, molluscs, monogeneans, nematodes, trematodes, leeches) and microparasite groups (e.g., myxozoans, ciliates). The authors support idea of an online database of species and their hosts, and a broadening of attitudes to treat parasites as an important component of diversity in themselves, rather than simply threats to the fish species that they infest.

7. Future Work

Reviews in this Special Issue show different degrees of knowledge for different aspects of galaxiid biology. We have a much fuller picture of taxonomy, phylogeny and phylogeography, thanks to application of molecular genetics [15,34,37]. There may well be isolated populations of non-migratory forms yet to be discovered [52], and the African situation needs more work [53]. Genomic data will clarify finer-scale relationships and structure in more detail, and assess the importance of past hybridisation in the evolution of the group [49,54]. More importantly, genomics will allow us to address the underlying genetic basis of diadromy, more specifically its loss [55,56]. Genes involved in species becoming stream-resident are excellent examples of speciation genes in the true sense of the word, since long-term landlocking almost inevitably leads to allopatric speciation. Genomics will also allow us to address the underlying basis of physiological adaptation, particularly related to changing osmotic [57] and disease [55] challenges.
To a certain extent, genomics releases us from the tyranny of model species; this freedom is important in allowing us to build a fuller understanding of diversity across all forms of life. Galaxiids have much to offer the full range of biological research with their fascinating life-history, biogeography and evolution. The biggest challenge of the next few decades will be preserving their dwindling populations under the manifold threats to freshwater ecosystems [58].

Funding

This study received no direct support, but our work over the years has been supported by several grants from the University of Otago and the Marsden Fund.

Acknowledgments

I thank all the contributors who took the time to make this Special Issue happen under challenging conditions in 2020; it was unfortunate that we were unable to procure a contribution from African researchers. I started working on galaxiids at the urging of the late Donald Scott in 1988. Those early days were especially reliant on the resourceful and perceptive dedication of Richard Allibone, whose MSc thesis revealed the depth of genetic divergence in the G. vulgaris complex. Tania King, Karen Judge, Jean Holmes, Alex Hofmann and Julie Bland ran many isozyme gels to help define the limits of what we now regard as at least six species. The application of mtDNA sequencing by Jon Waters and Chris Burridge provided concordant support for the new taxonomy, but more importantly provided great insight into both global and New Zealand biogeography of the group. This work blossomed with geological input from Dave Craw. Shannan Crow and Yuzine bin Esa looked at character displacement and hybridization in contact zones. Finally, I acknowledge the endless energy, enthusiasm and encouragement of the late Bob McDowall, who was always keen to exchange ideas and information.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Origin of Species, 6th ed.; (Reprint); J.M. Dent & Sons: London, UK, 1872. [Google Scholar]
  2. McDowall, R.M. Generalized tracks and dispersal in biogeography. Syst. Zool. 1978, 27, 88–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stokell, G. The systematic arrangement of the New Zealand Galaxiidae. Part I. Generic and sub-generic classification. Trans. R. Soc. N. Z. 1945, 75, 124–137. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stokell, G. Freshwater Fishes of New Zealand; Simpson & Williams: Christchurch, New Zealand, 1955. [Google Scholar]
  5. McDowall, R.M. The galaxiid fishes of New Zealand. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. 1970, 139, 341–431. [Google Scholar]
  6. McDowall, R.M. The galaxiid fishes of South America. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1971, 50, 33–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McDowall, R.M.; Frankenberg, R.S. The galaxiid fishes of Australia. Rec. Aust. Mus. 1981, 33, 443–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. McDowall, R.M. New Zealand Freshwater Fishes. A Natural History and Guide; Heinemann Reed: Auckland, New Zealand, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  9. McDowall, R.M. The Reed Field Guide to New Zealand Freshwater Fishes; Reed Publishing: Auckland, New Zealand, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  10. Allibone, R.M.; Wallis, G.P. Genetic variation and diadromy in some native New Zealand galaxiids (Teleostei: Galaxiidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 50, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Allibone, R.M.; Crowl, T.A.; Holmes, J.M.; King, T.M.; McDowall, R.M.; Townsend, C.R.; Wallis, G.P. Isozyme analysis of Galaxias species (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) from the Taieri River, South Island, New Zealand: A species complex revealed. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1996, 57, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Adams, M.; Raadik, T.A.; Burridge, C.P.; Georges, A. Global biodiversity assessment and hyper-cryptic species complexes: More than one species of elephant in the room? Syst. Biol. 2014, 63, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Raadik, T.A. Fifteen from one: A revision of the Galaxias olidus Günther, 1866 complex (Teleostei, Galaxiidae) in south-eastern Australia recognises three previously described taxa and describes 12 new species. Zootaxa 2014, 3898, 1–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Coleman, R.A.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Raadik, T.A. A review of Galaxiella pusilla (Mack) (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) in south-eastern Australia with a description of a new species. Zootaxa 2015, 4021, 243–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vera-Escalona, I.; Delgado, M.L.; Habit, E.; Ruzzante, D.E. Historical and contemporary diversity of galaxiids in South America: Biogeographic and phylogenetic perspectives. Diversity 2020, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nelson, N.J.; Briskie, J.V.; Constantine, R.; Monks, J.; Wallis, G.P.; Watts, C.; Wotton, D.M. The winners: Species that have benefited from 30 years of conservation action. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 2019, 49, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Waters, J.M.; Dijkstra, L.H.; Wallis, G.P. Biogeography of a southern hemisphere freshwater fish: How important is marine dispersal? Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Waters, J.M.; Lopez, J.A.; Wallis, G.P. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of galaxiid fishes (Osteichthyes: Galaxiidae): Dispersal, vicariance, and the position of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49, 777–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Waters, J.M.; Rowe, D.L.; Burridge, C.P.; Wallis, G.P. Gene trees versus species trees: Reassessing life-history evolution in a freshwater fish radiation. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 504–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Burridge, C.P.; McDowall, R.M.; Craw, D.; Wilson, M.V.H.; Waters, J.M. Marine dispersal as a pre-requisite for Gondwanan vicariance among elements of the galaxiid fish fauna. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berra, T.M.; Pusey, B.J. Threatened fishes of the world: Lepidogalaxias salamandroides Mees, 1961 (Lepidogalaxiidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 1997, 50, 201–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suter, H.C.; Kennedy, M.; Young, G. Neoteny or not? The distribution of the hypophysial duct within the Galaxioidea. J. Fish. Biol. 2004, 64, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Waters, J.M.; McDowall, R.M. Phylogenetics of the Australasian mudfishes: Evolution of an eel-like body plan. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 37, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wallis, L.J.; Wallis, G.P. Extreme positive selection on a new highly-expressed larval glycoprotein (LGP) gene in Galaxias fishes (Osmeriformes: Galaxiidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McDowall, R.M. Notes on some Galaxias fossils from the Pliocene of New Zealand. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 1976, 6, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McDowall, R.M.; Pole, M. A large galaxiid fossil (Teleostei) from the Miocene of Central Otago, New Zealand. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 1997, 27, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, D.E.; McDowall, R.M.; Lindqvist, J.K. Galaxias fossils from Miocene lake deposits, Otago, New Zealand: The earliest records of the Southern Hemisphere family Galaxiidae (Teleostei). J. R. Soc. N. Z. 2007, 37, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Schwarzhans, W.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, J.P.; Worthy, T.H. Fish remains, mostly otoliths, from the non-marine early Miocene of Otago, New Zealand. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 2012, 57, 319–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wallis, G.P.; Trewick, S.A. New Zealand phylogeography: Evolution on a small continent. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 3548–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mortimer, N.; Campbell, H. Zealandia: Our Continent Revealed; Penguin and GNS: Auckland/Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wallis, G.P.; Jorge, F. Going under down under? Lineage ages argue for extensive survival of the Oligocene marine transgression on Zealandia. Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 4368–4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wallis, G.P.; Judge, K.F.; Bland, J.; Waters, J.M.; Berra, T.M. Genetic diversity in New Zealand Galaxias vulgaris sensu lato (Teleostei: Osmeriformes: Galaxiidae): A test of a biogeographic hypothesis. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 28, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaulfuss, U.; Lee, D.E.; Robinson, J.H.; Wallis, G.P.; Schwarzhans, W.W. A review of Galaxias (Galaxiidae) fossils from the Southern Hemisphere. Diversity 2020, 12, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Waters, J.M.; Burridge, C.P.; Craw, D. River capture and freshwater biological evolution: A review of galaxiid fish vicariance. Diversity 2020, 12, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Craw, D.; Upton, P.; Burridge, C.P.; Wallis, G.P.; Waters, J.M. Rapid biological speciation driven by tectonic evolution in New Zealand. Nat. Geosci. 2016, 9, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Waters, J.M.; Wallis, G.P.; Burridge, C.P.; Craw, D. Geology shapes biogeography: Quaternary river-capture explains New Zealand’s biologically ‘composite’ Taieri River. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2015, 120, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cussac, V.E.; Barrantes, M.E.; Boy, C.C.; Górski, K.; Habit, E.; Lattuca, M.E.; Rojo, J.H. New insights into the distribution, physiology and life histories of South American galaxiid fishes, and potential threats to this unique fauna. Diversity 2020, 12, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McIntosh, A.R.; McHugh, P.A.; Dunn, N.R.; Goodman, J.M.; Howard, S.W.; Jellyman, P.G.; O’Brien, L.K.; Nystrom, P.; Woodford, D.J. The impact of brown trout on galaxiid fishes in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Ecol. 2010, 34, 195–206. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dunn, N.R.; O’Brien, L.K.; Closs, G.P. Phenotypically induced intraspecific variation in the morphological development of wetland and stream Galaxias gollumoides McDowall and Chadderton. Diversity 2020, 12, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schwander, T.; Leimar, O. Genes as leaders and followers in evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Seehausen, O.; Wagner, C.E. Speciation in freshwater fishes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2014, 45, 621–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McDowall, R.M.; Wallis, G.P. Description and redescription of Galaxias species (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) from Otago and Southland. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 1996, 26, 401–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Waters, J.M.; Wallis, G.P. Mitochondrial DNA phylogenetics of the Galaxias vulgaris complex from South Island, New Zealand: Rapid radiation of a species flock. J. Fish Biol. 2001, 58, 1166–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Crow, S.K.; Waters, J.M.; Closs, G.P.; Wallis, G.P. Morphological and genetic analysis of Galaxias ‘southern’ and G. gollumoides: Interspecific differentiation and intraspecific structuring. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 2009, 39, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dunn, N.R.; O’Brien, L.K.; Burridge, C.P.; Closs, G.P. Morphological convergence and divergence in Galaxias fishes in lentic and lotic habitats. Diversity 2020, 12, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Crandall, K.A.; Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P.; Mace, G.M.; Wayne, R.K. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Waters, J.M.; Craw, D.; Youngson, J.H.; Wallis, G.P. Genes meet geology: Fish phylogeographic pattern reflects ancient, rather than modern, drainage connections. Evolution 2001, 55, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Carrea, C.; Anderson, L.V.; Craw, D.; Waters, J.M.; Burridge, C.P. The significance of past interdrainage connectivity for studies of diversity, distribution and movement of freshwater-limited taxa within a catchment. J. Biogeogr. 2014, 41, 536–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Esa, Y.B.; Waters, J.M.; Wallis, G.P. Introgressive hybridization between Galaxias depressiceps and Galaxias sp D (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) in Otago, New Zealand: Secondary contact mediated by water races. Conserv. Genet. 2000, 1, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McDowall, R.M. Ikawai: Freshwater Fishes in Māori Culture and Economy; Canterbury University Press: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  51. Paterson, R.A.; Viozzi, G.P.; Rauque, C.A.; Flores, V.R.; Poulin, R.P. A global assessment of parasite diversity in galaxiid fishes. Diversity 2021, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Watts, R.J.; Storey, A.W.; Hebbert, D.R.; Edward, D.H.D. Genetic and morphological differences between populations of the western minnow, Galaxias occidentalis, from two river systems in south-western Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1995, 46, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chakona, G.; Swartz, E.R.; Chakona, A. The status and distribution of a newly identified endemic galaxiid in the eastern Cape Fold Ecoregion, of South Africa. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2018, 28, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wallis, G.P.; Cameron-Christie, S.R.; Kennedy, H.L.; Palmer, G.; Sanders, T.R.; Winter, D.J. Interspecific hybridization causes long-term phylogenetic discordance between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in freshwater fishes. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 3116–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Wallis, G.P.; Wallis, L.J. A preliminary transcriptomic study of galaxiid fishes reveals a larval glycoprotein gene under strong positive selection. In Evolutionary Biology: Genome Evolution, Speciation, Coevolution and Origin of Life; Pontarotti, P., Ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Chapter 3; pp. 47–68. [Google Scholar]
  56. Delgado, M.L.; Manosalva, A.; Urbina, M.A.; Habit, E.; Link, O.; Ruzzante, D.E. Genomic basis of the loss of diadromy in Galaxias maculatus: Insights from reciprocal transplant experiments. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 4857–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ruiz-Jarabo, I.; González-Wevar, C.A.; Oyarzún, R.; Fuentes, J.; Poulin, E.; Bertrán, C.; Vargas-Chacoff, L. Isolation driven divergence in osmoregulation in Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns, 1848) (Actinopterygii: Osmeriformes). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Chilcott, S.; Freeman, R.; Davies, P.E.; Crook, D.; Fulton, W.; Hamr, P.; Jarvis, D.; Sanger, A. Extinct habitat, extant species: Lessons learned from conservation recovery actions for the Pedder galaxias (Galaxias pedderensis) in south-west Tasmania, Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2013, 64, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wallis, G.P. Evolutionary Genetics and Biogeography of Galaxiid Fishes (Teleostei: Galaxiiformes: Galaxiidae). Diversity 2021, 13, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040153

AMA Style

Wallis GP. Evolutionary Genetics and Biogeography of Galaxiid Fishes (Teleostei: Galaxiiformes: Galaxiidae). Diversity. 2021; 13(4):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wallis, Graham P. 2021. "Evolutionary Genetics and Biogeography of Galaxiid Fishes (Teleostei: Galaxiiformes: Galaxiidae)" Diversity 13, no. 4: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop