Next Article in Journal
Impact of Land Use on Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in Temperate Pine and Indigenous Forest Soils
Previous Article in Journal
Abrupt Change in a Subtidal Rocky Reef Community Coincided with a Rapid Acceleration of Sea Water Warming
Open AccessReview

Old Processes, New Movements: The Inclusion of Geodiversity in Biological and Ecological Discourse

Geography and Spatial Sciences, The University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2019, 11(11), 216;
Received: 16 October 2019 / Revised: 5 November 2019 / Accepted: 8 November 2019 / Published: 13 November 2019
There exists substantial variation in the qualitative and quantitative interpretations of the concept of geodiversity and its embedded elements and values. The resulting divergence and ambiguity in applications of the term constrain its present use as an operationalized concept in nature conservation research and discourse, unlike its seemingly analogous biotic term, ‘biodiversity’. This paper presents findings from a critical literature review of 299 academic journal articles and texts that define geodiversity values, or otherwise incorporate geodiversity or its derived elements and values as components of conservation. Contrary to previous suggestions, we have found that most geoscientists have united behind a single definition of geodiversity and applied it frequently in their primary and applied, geotouristic, research. Qualitative elements of geodiversity, including system support values and aesthetic appeals within nature conservation, have been largely confined to geoconservation and geoscientific literature and are nearly absent from biological discourse. Encouragingly, however, we have observed a more recent increase in research pertaining to quantitative interpretations of abiotic geodiversity elements and their relationship with the spatial distribution and abundance of species. Although the inclusion of geodiversity elements (quantitative and qualitative) in conservation assessment and biodiversity research has been and remains far less universal than for biodiversity elements, there is strong potential for further unification of these two concepts, especially though collaborative quantitative research. The more that geodiversity is discussed outside of geographic and geoscientific disciplines, broader recognition and validated use of the concept of geodiversity will be used in the understanding, interpretation, and protection of patterns and processes at the landscape scale. View Full-Text
Keywords: geoheritage; geoconservation; GIS; geoparks; soils; rocks; minerals; landforms geoheritage; geoconservation; GIS; geoparks; soils; rocks; minerals; landforms
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Boothroyd, A.; McHenry, M. Old Processes, New Movements: The Inclusion of Geodiversity in Biological and Ecological Discourse. Diversity 2019, 11, 216.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop