17β-Hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one

Abstract

We have successfully synthesized a 2-oxa androstane derivative, 17β-hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6), and confirmed its structure using NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.

1. Introduction

Androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS) have been utilized in clinical practice for many years due to their benefits for structural conditions such as muscle and bone wasting, as well as for various functional disorders (endocrine, metabolic, or infectious) [1,2]. A notable representative of AAS, valued for its therapeutic potential, is Oxandrolone [17β-hydroxy-17α-methyl-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (1)]. This compound has a unique chemical structure, characterized by an oxygen atom at C-2 and an additional methyl group at C-17α (Figure 1a) [3]. This structural configuration enhances oral bioavailability and results in a high anabolic-to-androgenic ratio (AAR) of 10:1, compared to the well-known endogenous androgen testosterone, which has an AAR of 1:1 [4,5]. The AAR is a critical metric for evaluating the relative effects of different steroids on anabolic and androgenic pathways, and it significantly impacts athletic performance and overall health [5].

Oxandrolone, however, also has drawbacks, including hepatotoxicity due to C-17α-alkylation, which can lead to severe liver conditions such as cholestasis, fibrosis, and even liver cancer [6]. Therefore, it is hypothesized that synthesizing 17α-alkyl-free 2-oxa steroids might offer high androgenic activity and anti-estrogenic effects while reducing liver toxicity. Indeed, such steroids have been researched previously, and their biological potential has been recognized. In 1956, Pappo and Jung [7] reported the synthesis of a series of 2-oxa steroids, including the non-methylated analog of Oxandrolone-17β-hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6, Figure 1b). They synthesized 6 from 5α-androst-1-ene-3,17-dione (1-androstenedione) using lead tetraacetate in acetic acid, achieving a 50% overall yield after reduction. However, only the melting point, UV absorption spectrum, and specific rotation of the unknown compound (at that time) were reported.

Given the interest in 2-oxa steroids, this communication presents a different synthetic pathway to 17β-hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6) by using 17β-hydroxy-5α-androstan-3-one [(5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 2] as a starting material and employing cheaper reagents in the key steps of the synthesis. Furthermore, we unequivocally characterized the structure of compound 6 using NMR and mass spectrometry.

2. Results and Discussion

Several methods to introduce an oxygen atom into the steroid skeleton are available. Hara described one such approach, which employs peroxybenzoic acid in the Bayer-Villiger oxidation of 17β-hydroxy-A-nor-5α-androstan-2-one [8]. This technique enables the synthesis of both 2-oxa and 4-oxaandrostane derivatives in a single-step reaction; however, the starting material is not readily available and must be synthesized in advance. An alternative method, illustrated in Scheme 1, entails the oxidation of α,β-unsaturated ketones to generate secocarbonyl acids, which are subsequently reduced to lactones [9]. This approach enables the synthesis of 2-oxa or 4-oxa derivatives from parent steroids possessing a conjugated double bond in ring A.

In synthesizing compound 6, we utilized the synthetic method outlined in Scheme 2. Due to the high cost (ranging from €420 to €550 for 25 mg) of 17β-hydroxy-5α-androst-1-en-3-one and its acetylated form (4a), we synthesized the latter from the more affordable precursor, DHT (2). This was achieved through acetylation with acetic anhydride in dry pyridine, followed by dehydrogenation using 2,3-Dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in dry dioxane [10]. The latter transformation results in a mixture of 17β-acetoxy-5α-androst-1-en-3-one (4a) and 17β-acetoxy-androst-1,4-dien-3-one (4b, not shown in Scheme 2). For the second reaction, we observed that the product ratio is influenced by the reaction time and the amount of DDQ used, and that using 1.4 equivalents of DDQ for 24 h achieved optimal results, yielding a 2:1 ratio of products 4a to 4b.

Various oxidizing agents can oxidize the double bond in ring A. OsO₄ is the most selective for producing diols when used in equimolar amounts [11]; however, its high toxicity and cost—approximately €650 per gram—render it an impractical choice for this procedure. Although combining OsO₄ in less than equimolar amounts with an excess of NaIO₄ has shown some promise, this approach still has limitations [12,13]. An alternative is the ozonation reaction [9,14,15] or oxidation with lead tetraacetate in acetic acid [7]. However, the need for specialized equipment in the first method and the unsatisfactory yields (ca. 50%) in the second made us opt for a combination of KMnO₄ and NaIO₄ for the one-step production of secocarbonyl acid 5 from compound 4a. This method is based on the conditions established by Lao et al. [16] during their research on 5α-reductase inhibitors and androgen receptor antagonists. We used KMnO₄ in amounts less than one equivalent to minimize the risk of overoxidation of the products. Meanwhile, NaIO₄ served a dual purpose: it regenerated KMnO₄ and oxidized the diol to form the corresponding secocarbonyl acid. In the last step, we obtained the target 2-oxa steroid 6 by the reduction of 5 with NaBH₄. The structures of all of the compounds were confirmed using NMR spectroscopy and, for the target compound, mass spectrometry (HRMS). Analytical data for all of the known compounds are consistent with those in the literature [17,18,19,20,21]. NMR spectra are available as Supplementary Materials.

In conclusion, we have successfully synthesized and characterized a known non-alkylated 2-oxa steroid, specifically 17β-hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6), which had not yet undergone spectral characterization. This steroid is believed to possess a high anabolic-to-androgenic ratio and anti-estrogenic effects, all while minimizing the risk of liver toxicity. Our ongoing research aims to assess the in vitro efficacy of this compound and to explore its potential therapeutic benefits for conditions such as estrogen-positive breast cancer, hypogonadism, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and osteoporosis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

All chemicals used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Column chromatography was performed with Silica gel 60, 0.060–0.2 mm. TLC was run on silica gel coated aluminum sheets (Alugram^® SIL G/UV₂₅₄, Macherey-Nagel, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker^® Avance III 500 MHz spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard. High-Resolution Mass Spectra (HRMS) were obtained on a Shimadzu LCMS-9050 (Shimadzu Handels GmbH., Korneuburg, Austria). Optical rotation was recorded on a Rudolph Autopol II polarimeter.

3.2. Procedures

3.2.1. Dihydrotestosterone Acetate (3)

In a round-bottom flask, 5.8 g (20.0 mmol) of 2 was dissolved in 32.0 mL (400 mmol) of dry pyridine, and 18.8 mL (200 mmol) of acetic anhydride were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until the reaction was completed (24 h, TLC). The excess pyridine and acetic acid were evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was then dissolved in ethyl acetate and washed consecutively with acidified water (pH = 3), 10%Na₂CO₃ and water to a neutral pH. The organic layer was dried with Na₂SO₄ and evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crystals were recrystallized from ethyl acetate. Dihydrotestosterone acetate (3) was obtained as white crystals (yield 5.5 g, 83%), m.p. 155–156 °C {Lit. m.p. 155–156 °C [17]}. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.58 (1H, t, 17-H), 2.43–2.06 (5H, m), 2.01 (3H, s, 17-Acetate-Me), 1.78–1.24 (13H), 1.21–1.12 (1H, m), 1.10–0.98 (4H), 0.97–0.84 (1H, m), 0.84–0.70 (4H). Lit. ¹H-NMR [17]}. ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 211.86 (C, C3), 171.18 (C, OC(O)CH₃), 82.72 (CH, C17), 53.73, 50.58, 46.62, 44.65, 42.62, 38.50, 38.11, 36.83, 35.72, 35.18, 31.22, 28.77, 27.53, 23.52, 21.17, 20.91, 12.12, 11.47.

3.2.2. 17β-Acetoxy-5α-androst-1en-3-one (4a) and (4b)

In a round-bottom flask, 5.0 g (15.0 mmol) of 3 was dissolved in 70 mL of dry dioxane and 4.8 g (21.0 mmol) of DDQ were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h. After filtration, dioxane was evaporated under reduced pressure and ethyl acetate was added. The organic solution was washed with 10%Na₂CO₃ and water to a neutral pH and dried with Na₂SO₄. After the evaporation of the solvent, products 4a and 4b were separated via column chromatography (mobile phase—benzene/ethyl acetate = 3.5/1.5) to give white crystals of 17β-acetoxy-5α-androst-1en-3-one (4a, 1.9 g, 38% yield) and 17β-acetoxy-androst-1,4-dien-3-one (4b, 1.6 g, 32% yield). Data for 4a: m.p. 126–128 °C {Lit. m.p. 125–127 °C [18]}; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.14 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1-H), 5.84 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 2-H), 4.64–4.58 (1H, m, 17-H), 2.41–2.32 (1H, m), 2.25–2.12 (2H, m), 2.06–2.03 (3H, s, OC(O)CH₃), 1.97–1.89 (1H, m), 1.84–1.60 (5H, m), 1.57–1.18 (8H, m), 1.15–1.07 (1H, m), 1.02 (3H, s, 19-Me), 0.83 (3H, s, 18-Me). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 200.07 (C, C3), 171.18 (C, OC(O)CH₃), 158.22 (CH, C1), 127.47 (CH, C2), 82.55 (CH, C17), 50.70, 49.94, 44.27, 42.76, 40.95, 39.00, 36.76, 35.46, 30.82, 27.53, 27.48, 23.44, 21.17, 20.74, 13.03, 12.25. Data for 4b: m.p. 156–158 °C {Lit. m.p. 151 °C [19]}; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.06 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1-H), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 10.1, 2-H), 6.07 (1H, s, 4-H), 4.58 (1H, m, 17-H), 2.52–2.34 (2H, m), 2.18 (1H, m), 2.04 (3H, s, OC(O)CH3), 2.00–1.92 (1H, m), 1.83–1.61 (5H, m), 1.57–1.47 (1H, m), 1.38 (1H, m), 1.24 (4H, m), 1.11–0.99 (3H, m), 0.87 (3H, s, 18-Me). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 186.27 (C, C3), 171.08 (C, OC(O)CH3), 168.78 (C, C5), 155.62 (CH, C1), 127.57 (CH, C2), 123.96 (CH, C4), 82.31 (CH, C17), 52.22, 49.88, 43.50, 42.71, 36.51, 35.33, 33.06, 32.72, 27.43, 23.66, 22.34, 18.74, 12.12, 12.06. Lit. ¹H-NMR [20] & ¹³C-NMR [19]}.

3.2.3. 17β-Hydroxy-1-oxo-1,2-seco-A-nor-5α-androstan-2-oic Acid (5)

In a round-bottom flask, 1.7 g (5 mmol) of 4a was dissolved in 30 mL of isopropyl alcohol and 1.1 g (10 mmol) of Na₂CO₃ dissolved in 10 mL of water were added. The mixture was heated to reflux under stirring. A warm solution of 7.7 g (36 mmol) of NaIO₄ and 0.05 g (0.32 mmol) of KMnO₄ in 100 mL of water was added dropwise within 45 min. After the addition, the reaction mixture was heated for 1 h. The mixture was slowly cooled to room temperature and the inorganic salts were filtered. Isopropyl alcohol was evaporated under reduced pressure, the residual aqueous solution was acidified to pH = 3 with HCl (1:1) and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was then washed with brine to pH = 5 and dried with Na₂SO₄. After evaporation, tert-butyl-methyl ether (10 mL) was added to the residual oil and white crystals of 17β-hydroxy-1-oxo-1,2-seco-A-nor-5α-androstan-2-oic acid (5) were isolated within an hour (0.5 g, yield 36%). M.p. 191–195 °C {Lit. m.p. 190–194 °C [21]}. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 12.05 (1H, s, COOH), 9.15 (1H, s, 1-H), 4.34 (1H, d), 3.34 (1H, td), 3.23 (1H, s), 2.40 (1H, dt), 2.01–1.92 (1H, m), 1.81–1.66 (3H), 1.55 (3H, dt), 1.40 (1H, ddd), 1.26–1.01 (6H), 0.83 (4H), 0.72 (3H, s, 19-Me), 0.52 (3H, s, 18-Me). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 207.40 (C, C1), 173.82 (C, COOH), 80.35 (CH, C17), 52.83, 50.65, 46.07, 43.13, 37.25, 36.68, 36.61, 34.04, 30.70, 30.11, 26.63, 23.40, 23.28, 11.67, 8.06.

3.2.4. 17β-Hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6)

In a round-bottom flask, 0.3 g (1 mmol) of 5 was dissolved in 6 mL of ethanol and 5 mL of 1M NaOH and 0.15 g (3.8 mmol) of NaBH₄ was added. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 2–4 h (TLC). After the complete consumption of the starting material, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, acidified to pH = 3 with HCl (1:1) and stirred for an additional 30 min. The acidified solution was then extracted with ethyl acetate and the organic layer was washed with water to a neutral pH and dried with Na₂SO₄. After evaporation, the crude product was recrystallized from ethyl acetate. 17β-hydroxy-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one (6) was obtained as white crystals (0.26 g, 90% yield), m.p. 201–202 °C, [α]_D²⁵ = +0.78 (c = 0.5 mg/mL, CHCl₃) {Lit. m.p. 198–203 °C, [α]_D²⁵ = +1.0 (c = 1%, CHCl₃) Pappo & Jung [7]}. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.24 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1-H), 3.94 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1-H), 3.64 (1H, t, 17-H), 2.52 (1H, dd), 2.22 (1H, dt), 2.10–2.00 (1H, m), 1.87–1.56 (5H), 1.52–1.38 (4H), 1.35–1.15 (3H), 1.12–1.02 (1H, m), 1.00 (3H, s, 19-Me), 0.97–0.78 (3H, m), 0.75 (3H, s, 18-Me). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 170.59 (C, C3), 81.68 (CH, C17), 81.02 (CH₂, C1), 50.55, 49.75, 42.81, 40.41, 36.24, 34.81, 34.71, 33.79, 30.58, 30.27, 27.08, 23.35, 20.94, 11.07, 10.16. HRMS (ESI) m/z calculated for [M+H]⁺ C₁₈H₂₉O₃⁺: 293.21112; found: [M+H]⁺ 293.21104.