Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Genotoxicity Screening and Lipid Oxidation in Pork and Chicken Burgers: Effect of Cooking and Gastrointestinal Digestion
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Insights into the Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Tocosh: Traditional Peruvian Fermented Potatoes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Chemical Profile on In Vitro Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Southeast Moroccan Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens

1
Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Agadir, National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Avenue Ennasr, BP415 Rabat Principale, Rabat 10090, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Nanotechnology, Materials and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University Mohammed V, Rabat 10106, Morocco
3
High Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco
4
Biochemistry and Integrative for Health and Environment Laboratory, Department of Biology, Polydisciplinary Faculty, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco
5
Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and Bioengineering, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology-Gueliz, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh 40000, Morocco
6
Laboratory of Chemistry of Natural Products, Sciences and Technics Faculty, University of Corsica, 20250 Corte, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(9), 3983; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093983
Submission received: 20 March 2026 / Revised: 19 April 2026 / Accepted: 27 April 2026 / Published: 29 April 2026

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between chemical profiles and in vitro biological activities of essential oils from Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. The chemical composition of these essential oils has been previously reported in our recent publications, revealing distinct chemical profiles with pronounced interspecific variability and identification rates of 83.3%, 96.7%, and 98.1%, respectively. C. eriolepis exhibited a chemical profile rich in aliphatic esters with a mixed monoterpene–sesquiterpene composition dominated by α-pinene (13.0%), isobutyl angelate (10.7%), and 2-methylbutyl angelate (9.5%), whereas A. graveolens was characterized by a high abundance of 6-oxocyclonerolidol (72.5%). T. luteum subsp. flavovirens showed greater chemical complexity, including elemol (16.4%), α-pinene (12.0%), and eudesmol isomers (14.3%). All essential oils exhibited significant biological activities across various in vitro assays. C. eriolepis showed the strongest acaricidal effect (LC50 = 0.539 µL/mL) and notable inhibitory activities against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase (78.4%, 74.6%, and 69.2%, respectively). T. luteum subsp. flavovirens displayed the highest antioxidant capacity (DPPH IC50 = 51.60 µg/mL; FRAP IC50 = 35.53 µg/mL). Overall, variations in chemical profiles strongly influence biological activities, highlighting their potential as multifunctional bioactive sources.

1. Introduction

Medicinal and aromatic plants have long been recognized as rich natural reservoirs of biologically active compounds, notably essential oils, phenolics, and flavonoids [1]. Essential oils play an important role in plant defense mechanisms [2] and have attracted considerable scientific interest due to their wide range of pharmacological activities [3]. In recent years, growing concerns regarding the safety and environmental impact of synthetic chemicals have reinforced interest in essential oils for therapeutic, cosmetic, and agricultural applications [4,5,6].
Southeastern Morocco, characterized by its arid climate and distinctive ecological conditions, is recognized for its rich diversity of aromatic and medicinal plants traditionally used by local communities [7,8]. Considering the botanical specificity of this region and in order to further investigate and valorize its medicinal flora, members of the Asteraceae and Lamiaceae families have attracted increasing scientific attention due to their diverse phytochemical composition and therapeutic potential. Within the Asteraceae family, Cladanthus eriolepis and Asteriscus graveolens are two representative species widely used in folk medicine to relieve digestive discomfort, respiratory disorders, and inflammatory conditions [9]. Phytochemical investigations have shown that their essential oils are mainly dominated by mono- and sesquiterpenes, compounds frequently associated with antioxidant, antimicrobial [10,11], and antifungal activities [12]. However, despite their traditional use, their potential as enzyme inhibitors remains relatively unexplored.
In parallel, Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens, a species belonging to the Lamiaceae family, is a medicinal plant traditionally used for its antiseptic and digestive properties. Species of the genus Teucrium are widely recognized for their richness in terpenoids and phenolic constituents, which exert a wide range of biological activities [13,14]. Although several Teucrium species have been investigated for their pharmacological activities [15], information regarding the enzyme inhibitory properties of T. luteum subsp. flavovirens remains limited, particularly when compared with more extensively studied species within the genus.
Beyond their phytochemical composition, the mineral profile of medicinal plants significantly contributes to their biological and nutritional value. Minerals are essential for key physiological functions, including tissue formation, metabolic regulation, and the maintenance of physiological balance. Macrolements such as calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), potassium (K), and sodium (Na) support vital processes, while trace elements like copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) offer health-promoting effects, e.g., potassium regulates blood pressure, magnesium aids muscle relaxation, and calcium and zinc support bone health and antioxidant defenses. Evaluating mineral composition thus provides insights into the nutritional and therapeutic potential of plants. In this context, the mineral richness of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens, alongside their phytochemical constituents, enhance their medicinal and nutritional value. Mineral content can also vary with environmental factors such as soil, climate, and geographical origin, highlighting the need for comprehensive mineralogical analysis to support their valorization in traditional and modern health applications [16,17,18,19].
The therapeutic potential of the above-mentioned species remains largely unexplored, particularly with respect to their enzyme-inhibitory properties. Recently, the search for natural enzyme inhibitors has intensified due to their relevance in the management of chronic diseases, and essential oils have emerged as promising bioactive agents in this context [20,21]. Many constituents of essential oils, especially mono- and sesquiterpenes, have shown significant inhibitory effects against key metabolic and neurological enzymes [22,23].
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition represents a key therapeutic strategy in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, as it helps preserve acetylcholine levels in the central nervous system [24]. Tyrosinase, a key enzyme involved in melanin biosynthesis, is associated with hyperpigmentation disorders when overexpressed, prompting the search for safer natural alternatives to synthetic inhibitors used in cosmetic formulations. Similarly, the inhibition of α-glucosidase, an enzyme involved in carbohydrate digestion, constitutes an effective approach to attenuating postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes [25]. In this context, essential oils and other plant-derived inhibitors are increasingly considered attractive candidates due to their perceived safety and multifunctional biological activities.
Beyond their pharmacological properties, several plant-derived compounds, including essential oils, have demonstrated significant acaricidal activity [26,27,28]. Numerous studies have reported both lethal and sublethal effects of essential oils derived from Asteraceae and Lamiaceae species against mites. Essential oils from Lamiaceae species such as Rosmarinus officinalis L., Lavandula angustifolia Mill., and Thymus vulgaris L. have shown high efficacy in reducing mite populations when applied in different formulations [29,30]. In addition, the essential oils of these species have been reported to significantly reduce the fecundity and fertility of Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval females [31].
Regarding Asteraceae species, several studies have reported that essential oils extracted from Artemisia absinthium L. and Tanacetum vulgare L. exert lethal effects on Tetranychus urticae Koch with varying degrees of efficacy. Similarly, essential oils from Artemisia annua L. have exhibited both lethal and sublethal activities against Tetranychus urticae, leading to significant reductions in fecundity, generation time, and adult longevity compared with the control [32]. Despite the rich diversity of Moroccan medicinal plants, ranked among the most diverse in the Mediterranean region, particularly within the Asteraceae and Lamiaceae families, the acaricidal properties of many species remain insufficiently explored.
This work aims to complement and extend our previous research on Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens by examining the behavior of their essential oils in relation to biological activity and providing a descriptive analysis of their mineral content. Biological activities were evaluated, including enzyme inhibition (acetylcholinesterase, tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase), antioxidant capacity, and acaricidal effects, with correlations applied to essential oils, offering insights into their bioactive potential and valorization prospects.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils

In Cladanthus eriolepis (essential oil yield: 0.55 ± 0.09% w/w), GC–MS analysis identified 83.3% of the total oil, revealing the major chemical constituents of the essential oil. The chemical constituents of C. eriolepis essential oil were dominated by α-pinene (13.0%), together with a high proportion of ester compounds, mainly isobutyl angelate (10.7%) and 2-methylbutyl angelate (9.5%), which strongly shape the aromatic profile of the essential oil. Other notable chemical constituents included germacrene D (7.1%), sabinene (4.4%), β-pinene (2.5%), spathulenol (2.5%), β-bisabolene (2.4%), and 2-methylbutyl isobutyrate (2.1%), while the remaining compounds occurred at concentrations below 2% [12]. This distribution reflects a mixed monoterpene–sesquiterpene oil with a distinctive contribution from aliphatic esters (Figure 1).
The essential oil of Asteriscus graveolens (essential oil yield: 0.62 ± 0.10% w/w) showed a highly simplified profile, with 96.7% of the constituents identified. The oil was almost entirely composed of oxygenated sesquiterpenes, dominated by 6-oxocyclonerolidol (72.5%), followed by 6-hydroxycyclonerolidol (9.9%) and intermodeol (2.5%). Minor components included cis-chrysanthenyl acetate (2.1%), humulene epoxide II (1.3%), kessane (0.5%), (Z)-nerolidol (0.4%), and τ-cadinol (0.3%), while monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2%) and camphor (0.6%) were present only in low amounts. This composition clearly defines a highly specific oxygenated sesquiterpene chemotype (Table 1, Figure 1).
In contrast, the essential oil of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens (essential oil yield: 0.75 ± 0.10% w/w) displayed a much more complex profile, with 98.1% of the oil identified. The major constituents were elemol (16.4%), α-pinene (12.0%), trans-caryophyllene (7.0%), α-humulene (6.4%), γ-eudesmol (5.2%), valerianol (4.9%), α-eudesmol (4.8%), and β-eudesmol (4.3%). Additional compounds such as β-pinene (5.7%), 7-epi-α-selinene (3.6%), caryophyllene oxide (2.2%), β-selinene (2.2%), and α-bisabolol (2.3%) further contributed to the essential oil complexity. This profile indicates a sesquiterpene-rich essential oil with a high proportion of oxygenated derivatives (Table 2).

2.2. Mineral Composition

The mineral profiles of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens show marked interspecific variability, reflecting differences in mineral uptake, accumulation capacity, and possibly ecological adaptation.
Overall, macroelements (K, Ca, Mg, P, S, Na, and Cl) were present at much higher concentrations than trace elements, as expected for aerial plant parts. Among the three species, T. luteum subsp. flavovirens exhibited the highest levels of most major minerals, particularly potassium (233.88 mg/kg), calcium (244.71 mg/kg), magnesium (67.07 mg/kg), and sulfur (36.76 mg/kg), indicating a strong capacity for mineral accumulation and suggesting a higher nutritional potential. A. graveolens showed intermediate values, whereas C. eriolepis generally contained lower concentrations of these macronutrients, except for calcium, which remained relatively high (194.97 mg/kg) (Table 3).
Regarding essential trace elements, iron was the most abundant micronutrient in all species, with a pronounced enrichment in T. luteum subsp. flavovirens (56.31 mg/kg), nearly twice that observed in C. eriolepis. Zinc also followed a similar trend, increasing from C. eriolepis (0.21 mg/kg) to A. graveolens (0.41 mg/kg) and reaching the highest level in T. luteum subsp. flavovirens (0.54 mg/kg). Manganese, copper, cobalt, and molybdenum were detected at relatively low but comparable levels across species, suggesting a conserved physiological requirement.
Halogens such as fluorine and iodine displayed species-specific patterns: C. eriolepis was richer in fluorine, while iodine content was highest in T. luteum subsp. flavovirens. Elements like vanadium and silicon were notably higher in T. luteum subsp. flavovirens, which may be linked to structural or stress-related functions.
Concerning potentially toxic elements, lead (Pb) concentrations remained low in all species (≤0.18 mg/kg), indicating no apparent contamination risk. Aluminum and tin were also detected at low to moderate levels, with T. luteum subsp. flavovirens showing slightly higher aluminum content.
In summary, the table highlights clear mineral differentiation among the studied species, with T. luteum subsp. flavovirens standing out as the richest in both macro- and several micronutrients, followed by A. graveolens, while C. eriolepis exhibited comparatively lower mineral accumulation. These differences may influence their nutritional value, physiological performance, and potential applications in food, medicinal, or agro-industrial contexts.

2.3. Biological Activities

2.3.1. Toxicity Effect

The acaricidal activities of the evaluated essential oils (EOs) are summarized in Table 4. The toxicity toward T. urticae adults varied considerably among the tested essential oils. Probit analysis indicated that C. eriolepis exhibited the highest acaricidal efficacy after 48 h of exposure, with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.539 and 6.121 µL/mL, respectively. This was followed by T. luteum subsp. flavovirens (LC50 = 1.482 µL/mL; LC90 = 9.901 µL/mL). In contrast, A. graveolens showed comparatively lower toxicity, with LC50 and LC90 values of 2.843 and 15.983 µL/mL, respectively.

2.3.2. Phyotoxicity

Bean plants treated with the highest concentration of studied essential oils showed no signs of phytotoxicity on the leaves at any of the three evaluation times (24, 48, and 72 h). These findings indicate that the essential oils can be safely used for the management of T. urticae without causing damage to plant foliage.

2.4. Antioxidant Properties

The DPPH assay showed clear variations in radical scavenging capacity among the tested essential oils and reference compounds. T. luteum subsp. flavovirens exhibited the highest activity among the essential oils, with an IC50 of 51.60 µg/mL, indicating a strong ability to quench DPPH radicals. This activity was significantly higher than that of A. graveolens (124.68 µg/mL) and C. eriolepis (155.48 µg/mL) (p < 0.05). As expected, ascorbic acid demonstrated the most potent scavenging effect overall, with the lowest IC50 value (23.60 µg/mL), while BHT showed intermediate activity (104.73 µg/mL). These results highlight substantial differences in antioxidant potential depending on plant species (Table 5).
Significant differences were also observed in the FRAP assay. Ascorbic acid displayed the strongest reducing power, with an IC50 of 12.12 µg/mL. Among the essential oils, T. luteum subsp. flavovirens showed the most pronounced ferric-reducing capacity (35.53 µg/mL), with values close to those obtained for BHT (34.22 µg/mL). A. graveolens exhibited a moderate reducing effect (60.93 µg/mL), whereas C. eriolepis showed the weakest activity in this assay (74.97 µg/mL). These findings suggest that the antioxidant compounds present in T. luteum subsp. flavovirens are particularly effective in electron-transfer reactions.
In contrast to the DPPH and FRAP assays, a different pattern emerged in the β-carotene bleaching test. C. eriolepis demonstrated the strongest inhibition of lipid peroxidation among the essential oils, with an IC50 value of 42.88 µg/mL, outperforming both A. graveolens (77.47 µg/mL) and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens (121.50 µg/mL). Ascorbic acid showed moderate activity (54.57 µg/mL), while BHT exhibited a comparable but weaker effect (77.93 µg/mL). These results indicate that C. eriolepis may contain lipophilic antioxidant constituents that are particularly effective in protecting against lipid oxidation (Table 5).

2.5. Enzyme Inhibitory Activities

The inhibitory effects of the essential oils from Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase were evaluated in vitro at increasing concentrations, and the corresponding inhibition percentages are summarized in Table 6. Overall, all tested essential oils exhibited a clear concentration-dependent inhibitory response, with enzyme inhibition becoming more pronounced at higher doses. According to the classification proposed by Custódio et al. [35], inhibition values above 50% are considered potent, indicating that most of the tested concentrations, particularly at 0.8 and 1.2 mg/mL, displayed strong enzymatic inhibition.
Regarding AChE inhibition, all three essential oils showed potent activity across the tested concentration range (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/mL). C. eriolepis exhibited the highest inhibition, reaching 97.33% at 1.2 mg/mL, which exceeded the activity of the positive control. Similarly, A. graveolens and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens demonstrated strong AChE inhibitory effects at the highest concentration (93.50%), confirming a strong positive correlation between concentration and inhibitory efficiency.
Tyrosinase inhibition also increased significantly with concentration for all essential oils. C. eriolepis displayed the most pronounced activity, achieving 87.43% inhibition at 1.2 mg/mL, followed closely by A. graveolens (85.63%) and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens (81.37%). At higher concentrations, the inhibitory effects of these essential oils were comparable to or slightly exceeded those of the positive control, indicating a strong anti-tyrosinase potential.
In the case of α-glucosidase, the essential oils showed marked inhibitory activity, particularly at elevated concentrations. C. eriolepis exhibited the strongest effect, with inhibition reaching 89.62% at 1.2 mg/mL, surpassing the reference inhibitor. A. graveolens also demonstrated high inhibition (86.87%), closely matching the positive control, while T. luteum subsp. flavovirens showed slightly lower, yet still potent, inhibition (82.03%). The strong inhibitory effects observed, especially at higher doses, may be attributed to the major bioactive constituents of the essential oils or to possible synergistic interactions among their components (Table 6).

2.6. Correlation Matrix

Pearson r values between chemical composition variables and biological activities were computed to describe compositional–activity trends across the three essential oils (n  =  3); given this sample size, these values are presented as exploratory trends only (Figure 2). The ratio of hydrocarbon to oxygenated terpene content emerged as the principal factor linking chemical class composition to activity profiles. For acaricidal activity, oxygenated sesquiterpene content showed the strongest positive associations with LC50 (r = 0.996) and LC90 (r = 0.993), while sesquiterpene hydrocarbon content (r = −0.937 and −0.947) and α-pinene content (r = −0.942 and −0.951) showed the strongest negative associations. The major compound of A. graveolens, 6-oxocyclonerolidol, showed positive associations with LC50 (r = 0.913) and LC90 (r = 0.925), consistent with the lowest acaricidal potency recorded for this species.
For antioxidant activity, elemol showed marked negative associations with DPPH IC50 (r = −0.957) and FRAP IC50 (r = −0.936), and a positive association with β-carotene bleaching IC50 (r = 0.898), consistent with the polar antioxidant profile of T. luteum, the only species containing this compound (16.4%). Oxygenated monoterpene content showed moderate positive associations with DPPH IC50 (r = 0.665) and FRAP IC50 (r = 0.713), and a negative association with β-carotene bleaching IC50 (r = −0.776).
For enzyme inhibition, isobutyl angelate and oxygenated monoterpene content showed the strongest positive associations with AChE inhibition (r = 1.000 and r = 0.996, respectively), while oxygenated monoterpene content also showed a positive association with α-glucosidase inhibition (r = 0.718). Oxygenated sesquiterpene content showed a negative association with AChE inhibition (r = −0.857). Overall, higher hydrocarbon terpene content was linked to stronger acaricidal and polar antioxidant activity, whereas higher oxygenated monoterpene content was associated with greater enzyme inhibition.

2.7. Radar Chart Analysis

Radar chart analysis of the eight bioassays revealed distinct activity profiles among the three essential oils, with C. eriolepis recording the highest normalized values in six of the eight assays (Figure 3). This species exhibited the lowest LC50 (0.539 µL/mL) and LC90 (6.121 µL/mL) in the acaricidal bioassay against Tetranychus urticae, the lowest β-carotene bleaching IC50 (42.88 µg/mL), and the highest enzyme inhibition at 1.2 mg/mL across all three targets (AChE: 97.33%; tyrosinase: 87.43%; α-glucosidase: 89.62%). T. luteum recorded the lowest DPPH IC50 (51.60 µg/mL) and FRAP IC50 (35.53 µg/mL). A. graveolens did not record the highest normalized value in any assay, showing intermediate enzyme inhibition and the lowest acaricidal potency (LC50 = 2.843 µL/mL). C. eriolepis and T. luteum thus displayed complementary activity profiles, each leading in a distinct functional domain, while A. graveolens occupied an intermediate position across all assays.
The chemical class radar chart revealed clear differences in terpene class distribution among the three essential oils (Figure 4). T. luteum had the highest total hydrocarbon terpene content (monoterpene hydrocarbons and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons = 42.3%), with low oxygenated monoterpenes (7.5%) and moderate oxygenated sesquiterpenes (48.3%). C. eriolepis had the highest oxygenated monoterpene content (34.2%), high sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (23.7%), moderate monoterpene hydrocarbons (16.3%), and the lowest oxygenated sesquiterpenes (9.1%). A. graveolens showed a markedly distinct pattern, with negligible hydrocarbons (1.5% monoterpene hydrocarbons; 0.6% sesquiterpene hydrocarbons) and 90.0% oxygenated sesquiterpenes.

3. Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition

The mean essential oil yield obtained by hydrodistillation from Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens was 0.75%, which is substantially higher than the yields reported for populations collected in Monastir, Tunisia (0.02%) [13] and Jebel Aïssa, Algeria (0.42%) [14]. For Asteriscus graveolens, an essential oil yield of 0.62% was recorded, differing from those reported for samples collected in Tamanrasset, southern Algeria (0.30%), and South El-Dahnaa, Saudi Arabia (0.61%) [36]. Likewise, the essential oil yield from the aerial parts of Cladanthus eriolepis reached 0.55%, which contrasts with the lower yield reported for material collected in Ijoukak, High Atlas, Morocco (0.37%) [37]. Overall, essential oil yields exhibited pronounced variability across sampling sites, underscoring the strong influence of geographical origin and local environmental conditions on essential oil productivity. This variability is commonly attributed to differences in climatic factors, soil properties, altitude, and phenological stage, as consistently documented in previous studies [5,6,38,39].
The essential oils of the three studied species displayed distinct terpene-dominated chemical profiles. Cladanthus eriolepis essential oil was mainly composed of oxygenated monoterpenes (34.2%) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (23.7%), with α-pinene (13.0%), isobutyl angelate (10.7%), 2-methylbutyl angelate (9.5%), and germacrene D (7.1%) as the major constituents, whereas populations from the High Atlas of Morocco were richer in sabinene (15.6–23.8%), α-pinene (12.2–17.7%), α-phellandrene (7.1%), terpinen-4-ol (4.6–11.0%), germacrene D (2.7–5.7%), and borneol (0.4–6.2%) [37], and another population was dominated by camphor (37.02%), followed by sabinene (10.26%), α-pinene (6.29%), p-cymene (6.13%), and α-cadinol (5.57%) [10]. Asteriscus graveolens essential oil was overwhelmingly rich in oxygenated sesquiterpenes (90.0%), mainly 6-oxocyclonerolidol (72.5%), 6-hydroxycyclonerolidol (9.9%), and intermodeol (2.5%), while other populations showed distinct compositions such as α-thujone (17.92%), carvacrol (14.14%), p-cineole (13.83%), and camphor (12.71%) in South El-Dahnaa, Saudi Arabia [36], or cis-8-acetoxychrysanthenyl acetate (48.6%), epi-α-muurolol (14.5%), β-eudesmol (6.2%), and chrysanthenyl acetate (5.2%) [40]. Finally, Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens exhibited a sesquiterpene-rich profile, with oxygenated sesquiterpenes (48.3%) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (22.1%), mainly elemol (16.4%), trans-caryophyllene (7.0%), α-humulene (6.4%), γ-eudesmol (5.2%), valerianol (4.9%), α-eudesmol (4.8%), β-elemol (7.2%), (+)-α-pinene (6.0%), β-eudesmol (5.5%), guaiol (4.2%), α-bisabolol (4.2%), and β-caryophyllene (4.1%), consistent with populations from Monastir, Tunisia [13]. The observed differences in the chemical composition of the essential oils, both in our study and in previous reports, are likely linked to soil characteristics and geographical conditions of the areas where the plants were harvested [41,42].
The mineral analysis of the aerial parts of C. eriolepis, A. graveolens, and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens revealed distinct profiles of essential macro- and micronutrients. Notably, T. luteum exhibited the highest levels of potassium (233.88 ± 4.71 mg/kg), calcium (244.71 ± 9.81 mg/kg), magnesium (67.07 ± 2.12 mg/kg), and iron (56.31 ± 1.31 mg/kg), whereas A. graveolens and C. eriolepis showed moderate to lower concentrations of these elements. Trace elements such as zinc, molybdenum, iodine, and vanadium were present in measurable amounts, while potentially toxic elements like lead remained very low (≤0.18 mg/kg). These variations are likely influenced by soil composition and environmental conditions, consistent with trends observed in other medicinal and aromatic plants [43,44,45]. Importantly, the concentrations of all minerals are within the safety limits established by the World Health Organization (WHO, 1998) [46], supporting the potential use of these species in dietary supplements, herbal remedies, and medicinal applications.

3.2. Biological Activity Profiles

The antioxidant assays revealed significant activity in all examined essential oils across three methods: DPPH, FRAP, and β-carotene bleaching. The oils’ activity appears closely related to their chemical composition, particularly the abundance of oxygenated sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes. For example, the complex essential oil of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens, rich in elemol (16.4%), α-pinene (12.0%), trans-caryophyllene (7.0%), and α-humulene (6.4%), showed the strongest radical scavenging activity in DPPH (IC50 = 51.60 ± 1.87 µg/mL) and FRAP assays (IC50 = 35.53 ± 1.05 µg/mL), approaching the activity of the synthetic antioxidant BHT. In contrast, Asteriscus graveolens, dominated by oxygenated sesquiterpenes such as 6-oxocyclonerolidol (72.5%), displayed moderate activity (DPPH IC50 = 124.68 ± 3.76 µg/mL; FRAP IC50 = 60.93 ± 4.41 µg/mL), while Cladanthus eriolepis, with a mixed monoterpene–sesquiterpene composition including α-pinene (13.0%) and isobutyl angelate (10.7%), exhibited the lowest radical scavenging effect (DPPH IC50 = 155.48 ± 4.83 µg/mL; FRAP IC50 = 74.97 ± 4.19 µg/mL). The essential oils of T. luteum subsp. flavovirens collected from the Monastir region are characterized by a diverse chemical profile, notably containing β-elemol (7.2%), (+)-α-pinene (6.0%), β-eudesmol (5.5%), guaiol and α-bisabolol (4.2% each), along with β-caryophyllene (4.1%). This composition is associated with a pronounced antioxidant capacity, as demonstrated by the DPPH radical scavenging assay, which yielded an IC50 value of 8.39 ± 0.24 µg/mL, indicating strong free radical–quenching activity [13]. The essential oils of Teucrium gypsophilum exhibited significant antioxidant activity, with a FRAP value corresponding to an IC50 of 63.53 ± 2.50 mg TE/g. They are primarily composed of β-pinene (28.6%), diethyl phthalate (20.7%), spathulenol (10.49%), ledol (6.92%), germacrene D (6.04%), α-pinene (5.8%), and D-limonene (4.26%), reflecting the strong ferric-reducing capacity of their major constituents [47].
Interestingly, C. eriolepis exhibited the strongest inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the β-carotene bleaching assay (IC50 = 42.88 ± 2.43 µg/mL). This pronounced antioxidant activity is likely related to its distinctive chemical profile, characterized by a predominance of monoterpene hydrocarbons and ester derivatives, mainly α-pinene (13.0%), isobutyl angelate (10.7%), and 2-methylbutyl angelate (9.5%). Additional contributions from germacrene D (7.1%), sabinene (4.4%), β-pinene (2.5%), spathulenol (2.5%), β-bisabolene (2.4%), and 2-methylbutyl isobutyrate (2.1%) may also synergistically enhance its antioxidant potential. In line with these findings, Sarikurkcu et al. [48] reported that the essential oil of Vitex agnus-castus L., characterized by relatively high levels of sabinene (13.45%) and α-pinene (10.60%), also exhibited notable antioxidant activity in the β-carotene bleaching assay, with an inhibition percentage of 86.17% at a concentration of 2.0 mg·mL−1. These compounds may contribute to lipid peroxidation inhibition either through their individual antioxidant capacities or via synergistic interactions between major and minor constituents [12,49].
Our findings indicated that the lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90) varied markedly over the tested essential oils. At 48 h after treatment, C. eriolepis essential oil exhibited the highest efficacy against T. urticae adults compared with the other evaluated EOs, with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.539 µL/mL and 6.121 µL/mL, respectively. The acaricidal activity of the studied EOs may be due to their chemical composition, particularly their major constituents. These essential oils are rich in monoterpenoids, compounds that have been extensively reported to exhibit significant acaricidal activity against various mite species [50,51]. In this regard, Ouknin et al. [28] reported that the acaricidal effects of EOs are largely associated with their major components. Conversely, studies by Wu et al. [52] and Alvares et al. [53] suggested that the acaricidal effects of essential oils cannot be attributed solely to their major constituents but may also result from synergistic interactions between the minor compounds. According to the chemical profile of C. eriolepis EO, isobutyl angelate and 2-methylbutyl angelate were identified as major compounds and are likely responsible for the pronounced acaricidal activity observed. Similarly, Pirali-Kheirabadi et al. [54] reported that Matricaria chamomilla essential oil, in which isobutyl angelate is a dominant constituent, exhibited the highest acaricidal activity against the cattle fever tick (Acari: Ixodidae). In the same context, all chamomile extracts tested showed highly significant acaricidal activity compared with the control [55].
The enzyme inhibition assays demonstrated that the essential oils of C. eriolepis, A. graveolens, and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens exerted clear concentration-dependent inhibitory effects against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase, with inhibition increasing progressively across the tested concentration range (0.2–1.2 mg/mL). Among the investigated oils, C. eriolepis essential oil showed the strongest overall activity, achieving near-complete inhibition of AChE and high inhibition of both tyrosinase and α-glucosidase at the highest concentration, with values exceeding those of the positive controls, thereby highlighting its pronounced enzyme-targeting capacity. The essential oil of A. graveolens also exhibited strong inhibitory effects, particularly against tyrosinase and α-glucosidase, where its activity at higher concentrations closely approached that of the reference compounds, indicating an important contribution of its volatile constituents to enzyme modulation. In comparison, T. luteum subsp. flavovirens essential oil displayed moderate to high inhibition, with a more pronounced effect on AChE than on the other enzymes, while maintaining a consistent dose–response trend. Overall, these results suggest that the observed inhibitory activities are not attributable to a single dominant compound but rather arise from the combined and potentially synergistic actions of major and minor volatile constituents, supporting the concept of essential oils as complex bioactive systems capable of interacting with multiple enzymatic targets [56,57,58]. Several studies have reported that major compounds such as α-pinene and β-caryophyllene, along with other monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, exhibit significant inhibitory activity against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase, contributing to the neuroactive and multifunctional properties of essential oils [59,60,61,62,63,64].
The activity profiles revealed by radar chart analysis (Figure 3) are consistent with the chemical class distributions of the three essential oils, suggesting that the balance between hydrocarbon and oxygenated terpenes influences the assays in which each oil exhibits the strongest activity. The dominance of C. eriolepis in six out of eight assays aligns with its balanced terpene composition, combining substantial fractions of both hydrocarbon and oxygenated monoterpenes, which may account for its performance in both antioxidant and enzyme inhibition assays.
Among the individual compounds identified in C. eriolepis, isobutyl angelate (10.7%), detected exclusively in this species, exhibited a perfect positive correlation (r value) with AChE inhibition. Angelate esters contain an α,β-unsaturated ester moiety, a structural feature associated with cytotoxic activity in other Asteraceae [65]. Acetylcholinesterase possesses a catalytic site in which three amino acids, serine, histidine, and glutamate, act cooperatively to hydrolyze acetylcholine [66]. The α,β-unsaturated ester group of isobutyl angelate may interact with these residues, potentially interfering with the catalytic activity of the enzyme [67]. In addition, the ester oxygen can form hydrogen bonds with glycine residues (Gly121 and Gly122) located near the active site, while the isobutyl chain may occupy a neighboring hydrophobic pocket formed by aromatic residues such as Trp86 and Tyr337 [68]. Together, these interactions provide a plausible molecular explanation for the strong AChE inhibition observed in C. eriolepis essential oil [67,68].
α-Pinene (13.0%), the most abundant monoterpene hydrocarbon, showed strong negative correlations with acaricidal LC50 and LC90 values, consistent with previously reported in vitro cytotoxic effects of this compound [69]. Germacrene D (7.1%) has been identified as a major component of essential oils that exhibit lipid peroxidation inhibition (IC50 = 12.78 µg/mL) [70]. Furthermore, α-glucosidase inhibition has been reported across the tribe Cardueae, with Centaurea lycaonica showing higher activity than acarbose [71] and C. urvillei exhibiting IC50 values around 18 µg/mL [72].
The divergence between β-carotene bleaching and DPPH/FRAP responses observed for C. eriolepis reflects the distinct physicochemical environments of these assays. The β-carotene bleaching test evaluates lipid peroxidation inhibition in an emulsion system, where nonpolar compounds tend to be more effective [73,74]. In contrast, DPPH and FRAP assays are conducted in polar media, where nonpolar hydrocarbons generally exhibit lower activity [75].
The strong polar antioxidant activity of T. luteum is consistent with the presence of elemol (16.4%), an oxygenated sesquiterpene alcohol absent from the other two oils. Essential oils rich in elemol have demonstrated notable DPPH scavenging activity, largely attributed to oxygenated sesquiterpenes [13]. The DPPH IC50 value of T. luteum was lower than that reported for T. polium essential oil (IC50 = 61.38 µg/mL) [76] and also exceeded the activity of BHT, in agreement with findings reported for a Tunisian population of the same subspecies [13]. trans-Caryophyllene (7.0%) and α-pinene (12.0%) have both demonstrated radical-scavenging activity in DPPH assays [69,77], while trans-caryophyllene has also been associated with anti-inflammatory effects [78].
The intermediate position of A. graveolens reflects its distinctive composition, dominated by 6-oxocyclonerolidol (72.5%) and 6-hydroxycyclonerolidol (9.9%), with only 2.1% total hydrocarbons. Although it ranked last among the three oils in terms of acaricidal activity, A. graveolens still exhibited enzyme inhibition at 1.2 mg/mL, comparable to that of the positive controls. Essential oils rich in 6-oxocyclonerolidol have demonstrated antifungal activity in A. graveolens from Morocco [33] and in Anvillea gracinii [79], as well as antioxidant and antiproliferative activities in Perralderia coronopifolia [80]. These oxygenated nerolidol derivatives may interact more effectively with enzyme active sites due to their higher polarity [78].
The terpene class profiles (Figure 4) paralleled the activity patterns described above. Hydrocarbon-rich oils (T. luteum, C. eriolepis) exhibited stronger polar antioxidant and acaricidal activities, whereas the highest content of oxygenated monoterpenes (C. eriolepis) was associated with the most pronounced enzyme inhibition. A. graveolens, dominated by oxygenated sesquiterpenes, showed intermediate responses. Hydrocarbon terpenes are nonpolar and tend to accumulate in lipid phases, where they may inhibit oxidation reactions [74,75]. In contrast, oxygenated terpenes contain functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carbonyl, and ester) that may facilitate specific interactions with enzyme active sites [78].

3.3. Exploratory Correlation Analysis

The correlation matrix analysis (Figure 2), based on three essential oils (n = 3), provides a descriptive framework linking chemical composition to biological activity patterns. The negative associations between hydrocarbon terpene content and acaricidal LC50/LC90 values are consistent with the higher lipophilicity of these compounds, which facilitates their penetration through arthropod cuticles and the disruption of cell membranes [81]. In contrast, the positive associations between 6-oxocyclonerolidol content and LC50/LC90 values reflect the lower acaricidal potency of the oxygenated sesquiterpene-dominated A. graveolens essential oil.
Elemol showed descriptive associations with DPPH and FRAP but not with β-carotene bleaching, suggesting that its antioxidant activity operates preferentially in polar solvent systems rather than in lipid emulsions [73]. This is consistent with the attribution of antioxidant activity in sesquiterpene alcohol-rich oils to oxygenated sesquiterpenoids as a class [13]. Antioxidant compounds usually neutralize free radicals by transferring a hydrogen atom from a hydroxyl (–OH) group, a process known as hydrogen atom transfer [82]. In elemol, this hydroxyl group is attached to a simple carbon chain without any aromatic ring, which makes the hydrogen atom less easily transferable than in aromatic antioxidants such as α-tocopherol (vitamin E) [83]. This explains the moderate DPPH scavenging activity of elemol, while the same hydroxyl group is still sufficient to support its reducing activity in the FRAP assay, consistent with the polar antioxidant profile of T. luteum [84].
The positive descriptive associations between oxygenated monoterpene content and enzyme inhibition (particularly AChE and α-glucosidase) suggest that the polar functional groups present in these compounds (hydroxyl, carbonyl, and ester) may facilitate interactions with enzyme active sites [85]. Isobutyl angelate was present exclusively in C. eriolepis and showed a high positive r value with AChE inhibition, indicating a possible association between this ester and the enzyme-inhibitory activity of this oil. Nevertheless, the descriptive patterns were internally consistent across chemical classes and biological assays.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

The aerial portions of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens were collected during their full flowering stage from several ecological regions of Morocco. The botanical identity of the samples (Table 7) was established based on the Practical Flora of Morocco [86] and later verified at the Herbarium of the Faculty of Science and Technologies, Errachidia. After collection, the plant materials were air-dried under ambient laboratory conditions. For each species, essential oils were extracted from 100 g of dried plant material through hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus for a period of three hours in accordance with the procedure described in the European Pharmacopoeia (1997) [87]. The obtained oils were subsequently dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered to remove residual moisture, and stored at −4 °C until further analysis.

4.2. Plant Mineral Analysis

The aerial parts of each plant species were treated individually following a standardized preparation procedure. Initially, the samples were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and then dried in an oven (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) at 80 °C until a constant mass was obtained. The dried plant material was subsequently ground to a fine powder, and a portion of 0.5 g was used for the mineralization process. This sample was digested with an acid mixture composed of 2 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (98%), 6 mL of nitric acid (65%), and 6 mL of hydrogen peroxide (35%). Digestion was carried out on a sand bath for approximately 30 min to ensure complete degradation of the plant matrix. After allowing the digest to cool, the solution was filtered and diluted to a final volume of 25 mL using 0.1 M nitric acid [43]. The concentrations of mineral elements in the prepared solutions were subsequently determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using JOBIN-YVON 70 ULTIMA and JY 70 instruments, developed by Horiba Scientific (formerly Jobin-Yvon, Palaiseau, 16–18 rue du Canal, Longjumeau Cedex, France).

4.3. GC and GC-MS Analysis

Essential oil composition was determined using a Perkin-Elmer Autosystem XL gas chromatograph (GC) (PerkinElmer, Inc., 940 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with dual flame ionization detectors (FID) and two fused-silica capillary columns, Rtx-1 (polydimethylsiloxane) and Rtx-Wax (polyethylene glycol), each measuring 60 m in length, 0.22 mm in internal diameter, and with a film thickness of 0.25 µm. The oven temperature was initially set at 60 °C and increased to 230 °C at a rate of 2 °C min−1, followed by a 35 min isothermal period at 230 °C, while both the injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 280 °C. For GC-FID analysis, 0.2 µL of undiluted essential oil was injected in split mode (1:50) using helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL min−1. Retention indices (RI) were calculated relative to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C5–C30) according to the equation of Van den Dool and Kratz [88], and the relative abundance of each component was estimated from GC peak areas without applying correction factors. The same samples were subsequently analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) using a Perkin-Elmer Autosystem XL GC coupled with a Perkin-Elmer Turbo mass detector (quadrupole), operating under identical chromatographic conditions and column specifications. Helium served as the carrier gas at 1 mL min−1, the injector temperature was maintained at 280 °C, and the ion source temperature was set at 150 °C. Mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV over a mass range of 35–350 amu, with injections performed in split mode (1:80) using 0.2 µL of pure essential oil.

4.4. Biological Activities

4.4.1. Toxicity Tests

The acaricidal effects of essential oils (EOs) on T. urticae adults were assessed following the method of Miresmailli et al. [89], with slight modifications. Leaf discs (4 cm in diameter) were treated with 100 µL of each concentration of the three tested EOs (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 µL/mL) or with the control solution. Treated discs were allowed to dry for 5 min under laboratory conditions before being placed in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes containing moistened cotton. Twenty T. urticae adults of the same age were transferred onto the treated leaf discs using a fine brush. Each treatment was replicated three times. Mortality of T. urticae was recorded 48 h post-treatment, and the number of eggs deposited on the leaf discs was also counted. Individuals were considered dead if no movement of appendages was observed when gently prodded with a fine brush.

4.4.2. Phyotoxicity

The phytotoxicity effects of the studied essential oils (EOs) on bean plants were assessed according to the method used by Ouknin et al. [27]. Bean plants were treated with the highest concentration (2%) of each EO. The entire leaf surface was uniformly sprayed with 10 mL of each EO solution or the control without EOs using a hand sprayer. Treated plants were maintained at 24 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h light–dark photoperiod. Phytotoxicity was evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h post-treatment and classified into six levels, ranging from grade 0 (no visible injury) to grade 5 (complete leaf necrosis).

4.5. Antioxidant Activities

4.5.1. DPPH Assay

The antioxidant activity of the essential oils was assessed using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging assay according to the method reported by Ouknin et al. [90]. In this test, various concentrations of the essential oils were added to a 0.4 mM methanolic DPPH solution, using a mixture ratio of 50 μL of sample to 5 mL of DPPH solution. The reaction mixtures were kept in the dark for 30 min to allow the scavenging reaction to occur, after which the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm with a Uviling 9400 spectrophotometer (SECOMAM, Aqualabo Group, Aqualabo, France). Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and ascorbic acid served as reference antioxidants. The ability of the samples to neutralize DPPH radicals was expressed as the percentage of inhibition, calculated according to Equation (1):
D P P H   S c a v e n g i n g   e f f e c t   % = A 0 A 1 A 0 × 100
A0 refers to the absorbance of the control measured after 30 min, whereas A1 denotes the absorbance of the sample under the same conditions. All measurements were carried out in triplicate.

4.5.2. Reducing Power Determination (FRAP)

The reducing power of the essential oils was determined by evaluating their ability to convert Fe3+ to Fe2+, following the method described by Oyaizu [91]. The essential oils and reference antioxidants were first diluted in ethanol to obtain concentrations ranging from 20 to 500 µg/mL for the oils and from 5 to 100 µg/mL for the standards. Each solution was mixed with 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe(CN)6] at 1%. The mixtures were incubated at 50 °C for 20 min, after which 2.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (10%) was added. Following centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, 2.5 mL of the supernatant was combined with an equal volume of distilled water and 0.5 mL of FeCl3 (0.1%). The absorbance of the resulting solution was then recorded at 700 nm using a spectrophotometer.
The IC50 value, defined as the concentration of the essential oil that produces an absorbance of 0.5, was determined by plotting measured absorbance against corresponding concentrations. BHT and Ascorbic acid served as reference standards. All measurements were carried out in triplicate, and the IC50 values are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

4.5.3. β-Carotene Bleaching Test

The antioxidant activity of the essential oils was examined using the β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching method, following a procedure adapted from Ouknin et al. [34]. In this assay, Ascorbic acid and BHT were included as positive controls, while ethanol was used as the negative control in place of the oils. The antioxidant efficiency of the tested samples was expressed through the rate of β-carotene bleaching, calculated using Equation (2):
I % = A β - c a r o t e n e   a f t e r   2   h A i n i t i a l   β - c a r o t e n e × 100
Aβ-carotene after 2 h corresponds to the absorbance measured for the remaining β-carotene after two hours of incubation, while Ainitial β-carotene refers to the absorbance recorded at the beginning of the assay. All analyses were performed in triplicate. The IC50 value, which represents the concentration of the essential oil needed to achieve 50 percent inhibition, was determined from a curve produced by plotting inhibition percentage against tested concentrations.

4.6. Enzyme Inhibitory Properties

4.6.1. AChE Inhibition

The inhibitory effect of the essential oils on cholinesterase activity was evaluated using a microplate reader based on a modified method adapted from Ouknin et al. [6]. In each assay well, 25 μL of 15 mM acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCI) was mixed with 125 μL of 3 mM 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), followed by the addition of 50 μL of phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 8.0) and 25 μL of essential oil at different concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/mL). For reference, galanthamine (25 μg/mL) was used as the positive control, while the buffer served as the negative control. The reaction was initiated by adding acetylcholinesterase (AChE, 0.28 U/mL), and the variation in absorbance was recorded at 405 nm for 5 min. Enzyme inhibition was calculated relative to the buffer control, and all experiments were conducted in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.

4.6.2. Tyrosinase Inhibition

Tyrosinase inhibitory activity was measured using a spectrophotometric method adapted from Masuda et al. [92]. In the assay, essential oils at concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/mL, or phosphate buffer as a blank, were added to 80 μL of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). This was followed by the addition of 40 μL of L-DOPA and 40 μL of tyrosinase enzyme. Kojic acid at 200 μg/mL was included as a reference standard. Absorbance was recorded at 475 nm, and the percentage of tyrosinase inhibition was calculated. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

4.6.3. α-Glucosidase Inhibition

The inhibitory potential of the essential oils against α-glucosidase was evaluated according to the procedure reported by Kwon et al. [93]. In this assay, different concentrations of essential oils (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/mL) were mixed with 50 μL of phosphate-buffered solution (0.1 M, pH 6.9) containing yeast α-glucosidase (1.0 U/mL), while acarbose (1 mg/mL) served as the positive reference inhibitor. The reaction mixtures were allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 min before the addition of 50 μL of 5 mM p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside as the substrate. After a further incubation period of 10 min, the absorbance was recorded at 405 nm to monitor the enzymatic reaction, and the percentage inhibition of α-glucosidase activity was subsequently calculated. All measurements were performed in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in R (v4.4.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test was used to compare group means. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to assess relationships among variables, and results were visualized using correlation matrices and radar plots.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the in vitro biological activities of essential oils from Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens are closely influenced by their chemical compositions, with marked interspecific differences mainly characterized by oxygenated sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes that appear to play a key role in their bioactivities. A clear relationship was observed between the presence and relative abundance of these major constituents and the antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation inhibition, and enzyme-modulating activities, in addition to significant effects against Tetranychus urticae and strong inhibitory activities toward acetylcholinesterase, tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase, highlighting their multi-target potential. Among the studied species, C. eriolepis exhibited the most pronounced and broad-spectrum activity, suggesting synergistic interactions between major and minor constituents that enhance its efficacy. Overall, these findings confirm that essential oils behave as complex bioactive systems in which chemical profiles govern biological performance, providing a solid basis for future structure–activity investigations and supporting their potential applications in natural pest management, nutraceutical development, and pharmaceutical research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O. and L.M.; methodology, M.O. and E.M.C.; software, S.L.; formal analysis, E.M.C., N.A.A., K.A. and S.L.; investigation, M.O., H.A. and E.M.C.; data curation, M.O. and E.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O. and H.A.; writing—review and editing, L.M. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Cosme, F.; Bacelar, E.; Morais, M.C.; Oliveira, I.; Gonçalves, B. Bioactive polyphenols and volatile compounds from vegetables, medicinal and aromatic plants. Foods 2021, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zaynab, M.; Fatima, M.; Abbas, S.; Sharif, Y.; Umair, M.; Zafar, M.H.; Bahadar, K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaushik, B.; Sharma, J.; Kumar, P.; Shourie, A. Phytochemical properties and pharmacological role of plants: Secondary metabolites. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2021, 18, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saraiva, S.M.; Miguel, S.P.; Araujo, A.R.; Rodrigues, M.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Coutinho, P. Cosmetic industry: Natural secondary metabolites for beauty and aging. In Natural Secondary Metabolites: From Nature, Through Science, to Industry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 853–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ouknin, M.; Alahyane, H.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Chemical composition, antioxidant and anti-enzymatic activities, and in vitro insecticidal potential of Origanum compactum (Benth.) essential oils. Plants 2024, 13, 2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ouknin, M.; Alahyane, H.; Ait Aabd, N.; Elgadi, S.; Lghazi, Y.; Majidi, L. Comparative analysis of five Moroccan thyme species: Insights into chemical composition, antioxidant potential, anti-enzymatic properties, and insecticidal effects. Plants 2025, 14, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boumezzourh, A.; Ouknin, M.; Merzouki, M.; Dabbous-Wach, A.; Hammouti, B.; Umoren, P.S.; Costa, J.; Challioui, A.; Umoren, S.A.; Majidi, L. Acetylcholinesterase, tyrosinase, and α-glucosidase inhibition by Ammodaucus leucotrichus Coss. & Dur. fruits essential oil and ethanolic extract and molecular docking analysis. Mor. J. Chem. 2023, 11, 1287–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eddouks, M.; Ajebli, M.; Hebi, M. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants used in Daraa-Tafilalet region (Province of Errachidia), Morocco. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 198, 516–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Agour, A.; Chelouati, T.; Messkini, M.; Zouirech, O.; El Moussaoui, A.; Mssillou, I.; Derwich, E. Status of the use of naturalized medicinal plants from the Tata region (southeast of Morocco) in traditional medicine. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2025, 9, 3. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bammou, M.; Bouhlali, E.D.T.; Sellam, K.; Derouich, M.; El-Rhaffari, L.; Ibijbijen, J.; Nassiri, L. Chemical profile and antimicrobial properties of liquid and vapor phases of the essential oil of Cladanthus eriolepis. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1042–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bellioua, S.; Amari, S.; Warda, K.; Aghraz, A.; Dilagui, I.; Ouhaddou, S.; Markouk, M. Chemical profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of essential oil from the Moroccan endemic plant Cladanthus scariosus. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 34, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chibane, E.M.; Ouknin, M.; Renucci, F.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Chemical profile, antioxidant and antifungal activity of essential oil from Cladanthus eriolepis. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1296–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Majdoub, S.; Dall’Acqua, S.; El Mokni, R.; Hammami, S.; Peron, G. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil from the aerial parts of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens growing wild in Tunisia. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gherib, M.; Gordo, B.; Ziane, M.; Braik, O.B.; Bouafia, M.; Chami, K.; Amrouche, A.I. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens essential oil from northwestern Algeria. Vegetos 2023, 36, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Candela, R.G.; Rosselli, S.; Bruno, M.; Fontana, G. A review of the phytochemistry, traditional uses and biological activities of the essential oils of genus Teucrium. Planta Med. 2021, 87, 432–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Macrae, R.; Robinson, R.K.; Sadler, M.J. Encyclopaedia of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition; Academic Press: London, UK, 1993; p. 5365. [Google Scholar]
  17. Amtaghri, S.; Mokhetho, K.C.; Okumu, M.O.; Olofinsan, K.A.; Iqbal, S.; Saayman, J.L.B.; Mangoato, I.M.; Amtaghri, M.; El Brouzi, M.Y.; Matsabisa, M.G. Indigenous medicine applications, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Asteriscus graveolens: A comprehensive overview. Fitoterapia 2025, 186, 106863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karahan, F.; Ozyigit, I.I.; Saracoglu, I.A.; Yalcin, I.E.; Ozyigit, A.H.; Ilcim, A. Heavy metal levels and mineral nutrient status in different parts of various medicinal plants collected from eastern mediterranean region of Turkey. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 197, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ciocarlan, A.; Dragalin, I.; Aricu, A.; Lupascu, L.; Ciocarlan, N.; Vergel, K.; Duliu, O.G.; Hristozova, G.; Zinicovscaia, I. Chemical profile, elemental composition, and antimicrobial activity of plants of the Teucrium (Lamiaceae) genus growing in Moldova. Agronomy 2022, 12, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alves-Silva, J.M.; Zuzarte, M.; Girão, H.; Salgueiro, L. The role of essential oils and their main compounds in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Molecules 2021, 26, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aldi, D.R.; Algristian, H. The effect of aromatherapy lavender essential oils on the quality of life of patients with chronic diseases and pain. J. Ris. Kualitatif Promosi Kesehat. 2025, 4, 68–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zárybnický, T.; Boušová, I.; Ambrož, M.; Skálová, L. Hepatotoxicity of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. Arch. Toxicol. 2018, 92, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arya, A.; Chahal, R.; Rao, R.; Rahman, M.H.; Kaushik, D.; Akhtar, M.F.; Mittal, V. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory potential of various sesquiterpene analogues for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Walczak-Nowicka, Ł.J.; Herbet, M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and the role of acetylcholinesterase in their pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kashtoh, H.; Baek, K.H. Recent updates on phytoconstituent alpha-glucosidase inhibitors: An approach towards the treatment of type two diabetes. Plants 2022, 11, 2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alahyane, H.; Ouknin, M.; Aboussaid, H.; El Messoussi, S.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Biological activities of essential oils from Moroccan plants against the honey bee ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor. Int. J. Acarol. 2022, 48, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ouknin, M.; Alahyane, H.; Aboussaid, H.; Oufdou, K.; El Messoussi, S.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Acaricidal properties of essential oils from Moroccan thyme against oriental red mite, Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ouknin, M.; Alahyane, H.; Dabbous-Wach, A.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Acaricidal properties of Corsican Humulus lupulus L. (Cannabaceae) essential oils against Varroa destructor: A honeybee health perspective. Int. J. Acarol. 2024, 50, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jahanian, H.; Kahkeshani, N.; Sanei-Dehkordi, A.; Isman, M.B.; Saeedi, M.; Khanavi, M. Rosmarinus officinalis as a natural insecticide: A review. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2024, 70, 818–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Valcárcel, F.; Olmeda, A.S.; González, M.G.; Andrés, M.F.; Navarro-Rocha, J.; González-Coloma, A. Acaricidal and insect antifeedant effects of essential oils from selected aromatic plants and their main components. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 662802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Najafabadi, S.M. Comparative study on the acaricidal activities of essential oils from Ziziphora clinopodioides, Thymus vulgaris, Rosmarinus officinalis and Lavandula angustifolia against Tetranychus cinnabarinus on cut roses. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2014, 1, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Esmaeily, M.; Bandani, A.; Zibaee, I.; Sharifian, I. Sublethal effects of Artemisia annua and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils on life table parameters of Tetranychus urticae. Persian J. Acarol. 2017, 6, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chibane, E.; Essarioui, A.; Ouknin, M.; Boumezzourh, A.; Bouyanzer, A.; Majidi, L. Antifungal activity of Asteriscus graveolens (Forssk.) Less essential oil against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis, the causal agent of “Bayoud” disease on date palm. Mor. J. Chem. 2020, 8, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ouknin, M.; Chibane, E.M.; Desjobert, J.M.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Chemical profiling study and antioxidant activity of wild Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens essential oil from Morocco. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 9, 098–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Custódio, L.; Silvestre, L.; Rocha, M.I.; Rodrigues, M.; Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Pereira, H.; Barreira, L.; Varela, J. Methanol extracts from Cystoseira tamariscifolia and Cystoseira nodicaulis are able to inhibit cholinesterases and protect a human dopaminergic cell line from hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1687–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aljeldah, M.M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial potencies of chemically-profiled essential oil from Asteriscus graveolens against clinically important pathogenic microbial strains. Molecules 2022, 27, 3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El Hafidi, S.; Bakhy, K.; Ouhssine, M.; Benzakour, A.; Khamar, H.; Casanova, J.; Mathieu, P.; Tomi, F. Composition and chemical variability of the essential oil from aerial parts of Cladanthus scariosus. Chem. Biodivers. 2023, 20, e202201022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Malaspina, P.; Polito, F.; Mainetti, A.; Khedhri, S.; De Feo, V.; Cornara, L. Exploring chemical variability in the essential oil of Artemisia absinthium L. in relation to different phenological stages and geographical location. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e00743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Disciglio, G.; Stasi, A.; Tarantino, A.; Frabboni, L. Microclimate modification, evapotranspiration, growth and essential oil yield of six medicinal plants cultivated beneath a dynamic agrivoltaic system in southern Italy. Plants 2025, 14, 2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Outaleb, T.; Bensiradj, N.E.H.; Yekkour, A.; Hazzit, M. Phytochemical profiling and DFT-assisted elucidation of antioxidant mechanisms in Asteriscus graveolens essential oil from the Algerian Sahara. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2025, 28, 1161–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qian, Q.; Zhuo, Z.; Peng, Y.; Xu, D. Chemical composition variation in essential oils and correlation with climate factors in Chinese prickly ash peels (Zanthoxylum armatum DC.) from different habitats. Molecules 2024, 29, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aboukhalid, K.; Al Faiz, C.; Douaik, A.; Bakha, M.; Kursa, K.; Agacka-Mołdoch, M.; Lamiri, A. Influence of environmental factors on essential oil variability in Origanum compactum Benth. growing wild in Morocco. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ouknin, M.; Romane, A.; Arjouni, M.Y.; Majidi, L. Mineral composition and multivariate analysis of some oligo-elements and heavy metals in species of the genus Thymus. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2018, 9, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hurseresht, Z.; Jalali, M. Assessment of trace and macro elements in medicinal plants: Implications for safety and phytoremediation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2025, 204, 869–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Golia, E.E.; Barbieri, E.; Papadimou, S.G.; Alexiadis, D. Energy, aromatic, and medicinal plants’ potential and prospects for the remediation of potentially toxic element-contaminated agricultural soils: A critical meta-analysis. Toxics 2024, 12, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. World Health Organization (WHO). Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  47. Benali, T.; Laghmari, M.; Touhtouh, J.; Khabbach, A.; Libiad, M.; Lemhadri, A.; Hammani, K. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antienzymatic, antibacterial, and anticandidal properties of Teucrium gypsophilum essential oils. ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e00272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarikurkcu, C.; Arisoy, K.; Tepe, B.; Cakir, A.; Abali, G.; Mete, E. Studies on the antioxidant activity of essential oil and different solvent extracts of Vitex agnus castus L. fruits from Turkey. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2479–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Elouaddari, A.; Elamrani, A.; Moutia, M.; Oubrim, N.; Habti, N.; JamalEddine, J. Chemical composition and evaluation of antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of Moroccan Cladanthus mixtus essential oil and extracts. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 1450–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdelgaleil, S.A.; Badawy, M.E.; Mahmoud, N.F.; Marei, A.E.S.M. Acaricidal activity, biochemical effects and molecular docking of some monoterpenes against two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 156, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Camilo, C.J.; Nonato, C.D.F.A.; Galvão-Rodrigues, F.F.; Costa, W.D.; Clemente, G.G.; Macedo, M.A.C.S.; Da Costa, J.G.M. Acaricidal activity of essential oils: A review. Trends Phytochem. Res. 2017, 1, 183–198. Available online: https://oiccpress.com/tpr/article/view/11702 (accessed on 26 April 2026).
  52. Wu, L.; Huo, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, D.; He, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, C. Acaricidal activity and synergistic effect of thyme oil constituents against carmine spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus). Molecules 2017, 22, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alvares, F.B.V.; Ferreira, L.C.; Silva, J.O.; Lima, A.M.S.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R. Acaricidal efficacy of the monoterpene linalool against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus and its synergistic potential with cypermethrin. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2025, 94, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pirali-Kheirabadi, K.; Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M. Biological activities of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) flower extract against the survival and egg laying of the cattle fever tick. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2007, 8, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chauhan, E.S.; Jaya, A. Chamomile: An ancient aromatic plant—A review. J. Ayurveda Med. Sci. 2017, 2, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maruca, A.; Lanzillotta, D.; Rocca, R.; Lupia, A.; Costa, G.; Catalano, R.; Moraca, F.; Gaudio, E.; Ortuso, F.; Artese, A.; et al. Multi-targeting bioactive compounds extracted from essential oils as kinase inhibitors. Molecules 2020, 25, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ali, S.S.; Al-Tohamy, R.; Al-Zahrani, M.; Badr, A.; Sun, J. Essential oils and plant-derived bioactive compounds: A comprehensive review of their therapeutic potential, mechanisms of action, and advances in extraction technologies. Phytochem. Rev. 2025, 25, 223–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saad, N.Y.; Muller, C.D.; Lobstein, A. Major bioactivities and mechanisms of action of essential oils and their components. Flavour Fragr. J. 2013, 28, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Asnaashari, S.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Amarowicz, R. Harnessing essential oils for acetylcholinesterase inhibition: A literature review. Phytother. Res. 2025, 39, 2915–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miyazawa, M.; Yamafuji, C. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by bicyclic monoterpenoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1765–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, Z.; Lall, N.; Fibrich, B.; Van Staden, A.B.; Hosenally, M.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Selected essential oils inhibit key physiological enzymes and possess intracellular and extracellular antimelanogenic properties in vitro. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Masah, A.; Salleh, W.M.N.H.W.; Salihu, A.S.; Arzmi, M.H.; Ab Ghani, N.; Alfred Ngenge, T. Bioactive insights into the essential oil composition and enzyme inhibitory effects of leaves of Piper ridleyi C. DC. (Piperaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2025, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Miyazawa, M.; Nakahashi, H.; Usami, A.; Matsuda, N. Chemical composition, aroma evaluation, and inhibitory activity towards acetylcholinesterase of essential oils from Gynura bicolor DC. J. Nat. Med. 2016, 70, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Özbek, H.; Sever Yilmaz, Z. Anti-inflammatory and hypoglycemic activities of alpha-pinene. Acta Pharm. Sci. 2017, 55, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Umereweneza, D.; Atilaw, Y.; Peintner, S.; Rudenko, A.; Bourgard, C.; Xiong, R.; Muhizi, T.; Sunnerhagen, P.; Gogoll, A.; Erdelyi, M. Macrocyclic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids and Silphiperfolanol Angelate Esters from Solanecio mannii. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 26, e202201280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Reynoso-García, M.F.; Nicolás-Álvarez, D.E.; Tenorio-Barajas, A.Y.; Reyes-Chaparro, A. Structural Bioinformatics Applied to Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme Inhibition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chitranshi, N.; Gupta, S.; Tripathi, P.K.; Seth, P.K. New molecular scaffolds for the design of Alzheimer’s acetylcholinesterase inhibitors identified using ligand- and receptor-based virtual screening. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 1574–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kua, J.; Zhang, Y.; Eslami, A.C.; Butler, J.R.; McCammon, J.A. Studying the roles of W86, E202, and Y337 in binding of acetylcholine to acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 2675–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Han, E.J.; Choi, E.Y.; Jeon, S.J.; Moon, J.M.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, J.H.; Jung, G.H.; Han, S.H.; Jung, S.H.; Yang, M.S.; et al. Anticancer Effects of α-Pinene in AGS Gastric Cancer Cells. J. Med. Food. 2024, 27, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Formagio, A.S.N.; Vilegas, W.; Volobuff, C.R.F.; Kassuya, C.A.L.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Pereira, Z.V.; Silva, R.M.M.F.; Dos Santos Yamazaki, D.A.; De Freitas Gauze, G.; Manfron, J.; et al. Exploration of essential oil from Psychotria poeppigiana as an anti-hyperalgesic and anti-acetylcholinesterase agent: Chemical composition, biological activity and molecular docking. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 296, 115220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Fatullayev, H.; Paşayeva, L.; Celik, I.; İnce, U.; Tugay, O. Phytochemical Composition, In Vitro Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Enzyme Inhibition Activities, and In Silico Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulations of Centaurea lycaonica: A Computational and Experimental Approach. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 22854–22865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kahraman, C.; Aydın, Z.; Yilmaz, M.; Çakır, O.; Özenver, N. Investigation of antihyperglycemic potentials of seven Centaurea L. species through in vitro studies and characterization of possible bioactive phenolics by LC–MS/MS and molecular docking approach. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2025, 176, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olszowy-Tomczyk, M.; Wianowska, D. An Updated Overview on the Use of the β-Carotene Bleaching Method in Assessing the Antioxidant Activity of Compounds. Processes 2025, 13, 3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Valgimigli, L. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, X.; Shang, S.; Yan, F.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, G.; Tian, S.; Chen, R.; Chen, D.; Dang, Y. Antioxidant activities of essential oils and their major components in scavenging free radicals, inhibiting lipid oxidation and reducing cellular oxidative stress. Molecules 2023, 28, 4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Al-Otaibi, W.A.; AlMotwaa, S.M. Chemical composition and antioxidant, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of essential oil from Teucrium polium L. from Riyadh province. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2022, 34, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Setiawansyah, A.; Arsul, M.I.; Sukrasno, S.; Damayanti, S.; Insanu, M.; Fidrianny, I. Anti-hyperuricemic potential of caryophyllene from Syzygium aromaticum essential oil: SiO2-AgNO3-based column chromatography purification, antioxidant, and xanthine oxidase inhibitory activities. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2024, 24, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Guo, W.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X.; Lin, Z.; Huang, H.; Shu, Y.; Shentu, J.; Xu, Y. A mechanistic review on the anti-inflammatory effects of β-caryophyllene. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2025, 22, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Oucheikh, L.; Ou-Ani, O.; Ansari, A.; Oubair, A.; Majidi, L.; Costa, J.; Znini, M. Comparative analysis of the volatile constituents of Anvillea garcinii subsp. radiata obtained by HS-SPME and hydrodistillation and antioxidant activity of essential oil. Indian Chem. Eng. 2023, 65, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Boussaha, S.; Lassed, S.; Abdelwahab, A.B.; Krid, A.; Altun, M.; Chalard, P.; Chalchat, J.C.; Figueredo, G.; Zama, D.; Demirtas, I.; et al. Chemical Characterization, DNA-Damage Protection, Antiproliferative Activity and in Silico Studies of the Essential Oils from Perralderia coronopifolia Coss. Chem. Biodivers. 2024, 21, e202301535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pavela, R.; Benelli, G. Essential Oils as Ecofriendly Biopesticides? Challenges and Constraints. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bakhouche, K.; Dhaouadi, Z.; Jaïdane, N.; Hammoutène, D. Comparative antioxidant potency and solvent polarity effects on HAT mechanisms of tocopherols. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2015, 1059, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Stobiecka, A. Comparative study on the free radical scavenging mechanism exerted by geraniol and geranylacetone using the combined experimental and theoretical approach. Flavour Fragr. J. 2015, 30, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wojtunik-Kulesza, K.A. Approach to Optimization of FRAP Methodology for Studies Based on Selected Monoterpenes. Molecules 2020, 25, 5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Salihu, A.S.; Salleh, W.M.N.H.W.; Ogunwa, T.H. Chemical composition, acetylcholinesterase inhibition and molecular docking studies of essential oil from Knema hookeriana Warb. (Myristicaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 2516–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fennane, M.; Ibn Tattou, M.; Mathez, J. Flore Pratique du Maroc; Institut Scientifique: Rabat, Morocco, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  87. European Pharmacopoeia, 3rd ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 1997; pp. 121–122.
  88. Van den Dool, H.; Kratz, P. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas–liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Miresmailli, S.; Bradbury, R.; Isman, M.B. Comparative toxicity of Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil and blends of its major constituents against Tetranychus urticae on two different host plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ouknin, M.; Romane, A.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Comparative study of the chemical profiling, antioxidant and an-timicrobial activities of essential oils from different parts of Thymus willdenowii Boiss. & Reut. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 2398–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Oyaizu, M. Studies on products of browning reactions: Antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn. J. Nutr. 1986, 44, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Masuda, T.; Yamashita, D.; Takeda, Y.; Yonemori, S. Screening for tyrosinase inhibitors among extracts of sea-shore plants and identification of potent inhibitors from Garcinia subelliptica. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kwon, Y.I.; Apostolidis, E.; Shetty, K. In vitro studies of eggplant (Solanum melongena) phenolics as inhibitors of key enzymes relevant for type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2981–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Main compounds of the studied essential oils.
Figure 1. Main compounds of the studied essential oils.
Ijms 27 03983 g001
Figure 2. Correlation matrix between chemical composition variables (terpene classes and major compounds) and biological activities (acaricidal, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibition assays) of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. Values are presented as descriptive/exploratory trends (n = 3).
Figure 2. Correlation matrix between chemical composition variables (terpene classes and major compounds) and biological activities (acaricidal, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibition assays) of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. Values are presented as descriptive/exploratory trends (n = 3).
Ijms 27 03983 g002
Figure 3. Radar chart comparing the normalized biological activities of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens.
Figure 3. Radar chart comparing the normalized biological activities of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens.
Ijms 27 03983 g003
Figure 4. Radar chart comparing the chemical class composition (monoterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, and oxygenated sesquiterpenes) of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens.
Figure 4. Radar chart comparing the chemical class composition (monoterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, and oxygenated sesquiterpenes) of the essential oils of Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens.
Ijms 27 03983 g004
Table 1. Chemical composition of Asteriscus graveolens essential oils aerial parts [33].
Table 1. Chemical composition of Asteriscus graveolens essential oils aerial parts [33].
No aCompoundRI b Appl.RI c Lit.% d
1α-Pinene93310041.2
26-Methylhept-5-en-2-one98013020.3
3Myrcene9821145-
41,8-Cineole102311830.1
5Linalool108115440.2
6α-Thujone10901384-
7α-Campholenal11081446-
8Camphor112414700.6
9cis-Chrysanthenol11461445-
10Albene11521270-
11Terpinen-4-ol116215800.1
12α-Terpineol117017000.2
13Estragole117716500.2
14Carvotanacetone121816640.2
15cis-Chrysanthenyl acetate124815262.1
16Carvacrol127921350.9
17α-Copaene13841476-
18Longifolene14141562-
19trans-Caryophyllene14181579-
20trans-α-Bergamotene14311572-
21Sesquisabinene14351642-
22epi-β-Santalene14421629-
23α-Humulene145216280.3
24Alloaromadendrene14581620-
25γ-Muurolene14701680-
26Germacrene D14741700-
27β-Bisabolene15021754-
28γ-Cadinene150417370.2
29δ-Cadinene151817050.1
30(Z)-Nerolidol152215180.4
31Kessane152817150.5
32α-Cadinene15301731-
336-Oxocyclonerolidol1555196972.5
34cis-8-Acetoxychrysanthenyl acetate156421222.1
35Caryophyllene oxide157619210.1
36Humulene epoxide II159819751.3
376-Hydroxycyclonerolidol162222469.9
38τ-Cadinol163121020.3
39β-Eudesmol163621600.2
40α-Cadinol16392221-
41Intermodeol164321602.5
42α-Oxobisabolene170722660.2
Monoterpene hydrocarbons1.5
Oxygenated monoterpenes4.6
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons0.6
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes90
Total identified96.7
a The order of elution on an apolar column is given (Rtx-1). b Retention indices on the apolar column (Rtx-1). c Retention indices on an apolar column reported in the literature. d Relative percentages of components (%) are calculated for GC peak areas on the apolar column (Rtx-1), except for components with identical RIa (concentrations on the polar column are given). Note: -, not detected.
Table 2. Chemical composition of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens essential oils aerial parts [34].
Table 2. Chemical composition of Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens essential oils aerial parts [34].
No aCompoundlRIa bRia cRip d% e
1α-Pinene936931101712.0
21-Octen-3-ol96295914420.3
3Sabinene97396311130.5
4β-Pinene97896911055.7
5Myrcene98797811490.2
6p-Cymene1015100812560.2
71,8-Cineole1024101712020.1
8Limonene1025101711891.4
9Linalool1086107715440.9
10α-Thujone1089107914110.1
111-Octen-3-yl acetate109310851369-
12β-Thujone1103109014300.1
13α-Campholenal1105109714790.1
14Nopinone1111110115650.3
15Camphor1123111315040.9
16trans-Pinocarveol1126111616340.3
17cis-Verbenol1132112116660.2
18Menthone113611251453-
19Pinocarvone1137113115560.1
20Borneol1150114216700.2
21Terpinen-4-ol1164115415950.6
22Myrtenal1172116216150.5
23α-Terpineol1176116516880.3
24Myrtenol1178117217770.3
25Verbenone1183117316700.6
26trans-Carveol1200119118180.2
27Carvone1214120917100.2
28Carvotanacetone1220121416580.2
29Geraniol123512281832-
30cis-Chrysanthenyl acetate124812361565-
31Bornyl acetate1270126215730.4
32Carvacrol1278127521800.4
33Myrtenyl acetate131313001662-
34α-Terpinyl acetate1335132716880.4
35α-Copaene137913701484-
36β-Bourbonene1386137815110.9
37β-Elemene138913831584-
38trans-Caryophyllene1421141315897.0
39γ-Elemene1429142416300.6
40α-Humulene1455144616456.4
41Dehydrosesquicineole1466145517081.1
42Germacrene D1479147216971.0
43β-Selinene1486147817052.2
44cis-β-Guaiene1488148217620.2
457-epi-Cubebol1490148418700.7
46Bicyclogermacrene1494148717181.6
47Cubebol1514150319200.2
487-epi-α-Selinene1519150916783.6
49δ-Cadinene1526151117440.1
50Elemol15411533205816.4
51E-Nerolidol1553155220271.7
52Caryophyllene oxide1578156719572.2
53Humulene epoxide II1602159220101.6
54epi-Cubenol1623161220300.3
55γ-Eudesmol1618161621895.2
56τ-Cadinol1633162421410.2
57τ-Muurolol1633162421580.2
58β-Eudesmol1641163321904.3
59Valerianol1647163721844.9
60α-Eudesmol1653163721974.8
61Bulnesol166516402170-
62α-Bisabolol1673165021842.3
63α-Cyperone1741172323070.3
Oxygenated monoterpenes7.5
Monoterpene hydrocarbons20.2
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes48.3
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons22.1
Total identified98.1
a Order of elution is given on an apolar column (Rtx-1). lRIa b = retention indices in the literature. Ria c = retention indices on the apolar column (Rtx-1). Rip d = retention indices on the polar column (Rtx-Wax). e Relative percentages of components (%) are calculated on GC peak areas on the apolar column (Rtx-1) except for components with identical RIa (concentrations are given on the polar column). Note: -, not detected.
Table 3. Mineral element composition of the studied species (mg/kg ± SD).
Table 3. Mineral element composition of the studied species (mg/kg ± SD).
C. eriolepisA. graveolensT. luteum subsp. flavovirens
Aerial PartAerial PartAerial Part
MeanS.D.MeanS.D.MeanS.D.
Cr0.640.020.560.020.560.01
Fe20.181.1225.441.2256.311.31
F11.500.506.110.529.410.51
I4.000.542.100.414.450.44
Cu0.080.010.080.010.060.01
Mn0.500.020.440.020.410.02
Mo9.280.917.700.889.940.90
Ni0.370.010.320.010.210.01
Se0.060.010.080.010.070.01
V1.500.031.130.031.800.03
Zn0.210.020.410.020.540.02
Sn0.070.010.060.010.040.01
Co0.650.010.400.010.520.01
K155.124.12177.654.22233.884.71
Mg37.571.1244.121.1567.072.12
Ca194.976.61150.097.76244.719.81
Cl16.780.7421.441.4117.110.94
S27.411.6633.402.0136.762.13
Na10.800.619.230.5713.550.80
P33.902.5640.082.7239.503.33
Al19.201.1015.402.3021.452.25
Pb0.100.030.150.040.180.02
Si0.900.021.200.041.850.03
Table 4. Acaricidal activities (LC50 and LC90) of the studied essential oils against T. urticae adults after 48 h of treatment.
Table 4. Acaricidal activities (LC50 and LC90) of the studied essential oils against T. urticae adults after 48 h of treatment.
Essential OilT (h)LC50 (µL/mL)
(95% LD)
LC90 (µL/mL)
(95% LD)
χ2DF
T. luteum subsp. flavovirens481.482 (0.979–2.621)9.901 (8.181–12.131)93.04123
A. graveolens482.843 (2.132–3.918)15.983 (9.713–30.196)87.46023
C. eriolepis480.539 (0.191–1.532)6.121 (4.989–8.323)117.11823
Table 5. IC50 values (µg/mL) of essential oils determined by DPPH, FRAP, and β-carotene bleaching assays.
Table 5. IC50 values (µg/mL) of essential oils determined by DPPH, FRAP, and β-carotene bleaching assays.
DPPH
(IC50 µg/mL)
FRAP
(IC50 µg/mL)
β-Carotene Bleaching
(IC50 µg/mL)
C. eriolepis155.48 ± 4.83 e *74.97 ± 4.19 d42.88 ± 2.43 a
A. graveolens124.68 ± 3.76 d60.93 ± 4.41 c77.47 ± 2.40 c
T. luteum subsp. flavovirens51.60 ± 1.87 b35.53 ± 1.05 b121.50 ± 9.69 d
Ascorbic acid23.60 ± 2.85 a12.12 ± 1.50 a54.57 ± 2.25 b
BHT104.73 ± 2.78 c34.22 ± 3.71 b77.93 ± 2.50 c
* All data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant differences among values in the same column are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Table 6. In vitro enzyme inhibition profiles of essential oils from C. eriolepis, A. graveolens, and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens.
Table 6. In vitro enzyme inhibition profiles of essential oils from C. eriolepis, A. graveolens, and T. luteum subsp. flavovirens.
PlantDoses (mg/mL)AChE
Inhibition (%)
Tyrosinase
Inhibition (%)
α-Glucosidase Inhibition (%)
C. eriolepis0.248.63 ± 1.33 a *45.23 ± 1.66 a59.00 ± 1.28 b
0.464.37 ± 1.72 b56.87 ± 1.45 b66.33 ± 0.85 c
0.881.77 ± 1.03 c66.53 ± 1.12 c76.30 ± 0.90 d
1.297.33 ± 1.53 e87.43 ± 1.11 e89.62 ± 0.42 e
Positive control78.33 ± 1.78 c76.73 ± 1.79 d77.07 ± 1.65 d
A. graveolens0.246.43 ± 1.01 a50.23 ± 0.91 a46.05 ± 1.39 a
0.464.60 ± 1.64 b57.67 ± 0.68 b58.17 ± 1.00 b
0.880.67 ± 0.55 c71.53 ± 0.76 c67.50 ± 0.93 c
1.293.50 ± 0.85 d85.63 ± 1.06 d86.87 ± 0.46 e
Positive control80.57 ± 1.17 c86.27 ± 0.96 d87.34 ± 0.83 e
T. luteum subsp.
flavovirens
0.256.30 ± 2.80 b48.53 ± 0.90 a46.60 ± 0.92 a
0.475.70 ± 1.86 c56.90 ± 0.20 b61.33 ± 1.56 b
0.885.97 ± 1.40 d67.00 ± 1.27 c65.73 ± 1.50 c
1.293.50 ± 1.20 d81.37 ± 1.00 d82.03 ± 1.64 d
Positive control77.43 ± 1.05 c79.27 ± 1.06 d87.47 ± 0.70 e
* Values represent mean ± SE; different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Collection locations, sampling periods, and essential oil yields of the studied plant species.
Table 7. Collection locations, sampling periods, and essential oil yields of the studied plant species.
SpeciesHarvesting SiteCollection TimeGPS CoordinatesVoucher SpecimenAltitude (m)Oil Yield
(% (w/w))
Cladanthus eriolepisIgoudmane
(Errachidia)
May
2019
31°69′35.1″ N
5°31′95.3″ W
ER-19-1513730.60 ± 0.09
Asteriscus graveolensMerroutcha
(Errachidia)
April
2017
31°33′14.7″ N
4°53′08.9″ W
ER-17-1310090.62 ± 0.10
Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirensErrachidiaApril
2016
31°55′42.2″ N
4°24′36.1″ W
ER-201610400.75 ± 0.10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouknin, M.; Chibane, E.M.; Alahyane, H.; Azekour, K.; Aabd, N.A.; Labbassi, S.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Effect of Chemical Profile on In Vitro Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Southeast Moroccan Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093983

AMA Style

Ouknin M, Chibane EM, Alahyane H, Azekour K, Aabd NA, Labbassi S, Costa J, Majidi L. Effect of Chemical Profile on In Vitro Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Southeast Moroccan Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(9):3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093983

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouknin, Mohamed, El Mustapha Chibane, Hassan Alahyane, Karima Azekour, Naima Ait Aabd, Said Labbassi, Jean Costa, and Lhou Majidi. 2026. "Effect of Chemical Profile on In Vitro Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Southeast Moroccan Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 9: 3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093983

APA Style

Ouknin, M., Chibane, E. M., Alahyane, H., Azekour, K., Aabd, N. A., Labbassi, S., Costa, J., & Majidi, L. (2026). Effect of Chemical Profile on In Vitro Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Southeast Moroccan Cladanthus eriolepis, Asteriscus graveolens, and Teucrium luteum subsp. flavovirens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(9), 3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093983

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop