Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Anodic Bonding Performance of (PEG)10LiClO4/NaAlOSiO Solid Electrolyte for Packaging
Previous Article in Journal
Myostatin Research: From Molecular Understanding to Clinical Translation for Musculoskeletal and Metabolic Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur

1
AltruBio Inc., Taipei 115, Taiwan
2
Department of Genomic Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
6
Hemophilia Treatment and Thrombosis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
7
Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
8
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(9), 3831; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093831
Submission received: 10 February 2026 / Revised: 13 April 2026 / Accepted: 14 April 2026 / Published: 25 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)

Abstract

Hemophilia A (HA), an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by Factor VIII (F8) gene mutations, persists in the population due to sporadic cases arising from de novo mutations. This study analyzed 24 pedigrees from hemophilia registries of multiple medical centers in Taiwan to assess whether sporadic non-inversion variants (NIVs) recur in the same generation within families. Linkage analysis using intragenic and extragenic markers combined with amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) revealed that among 16 individuals inheriting the same X chromosome as the one bearing the sporadic HA-causing mutation, none carried the F8 variant. These findings strongly suggest that sporadic NIVs exhibit very low risk of recurrence. Our results provide critical information for recurrence risk assessment and counseling strategies for HA sporadic NIVs.

1. Introduction

Factor VIII (FVIII), a cofactor comprising 2332 amino acids, facilitates the activation of Factor X (FX) by activated Factor IX (aFIX) during the coagulation cascade [1,2,3]. FVIII is encoded by the F8 gene located on chromosome Xq28 [4]. Deficiency or dysfunction of FVIII due to F8 gene mutations underlies hemophilia A (HA), the most common X-linked congenital bleeding disorder [5]. Clinical severity correlates with plasma FVIII activity: patients with mild (FVIII activity > 5–40 IU/dL) and moderate (FVIII activity 1–5 IU/dL) hemophilia may remain asymptomatic or have prolonged bleeding after minor trauma whereas those with severe hemophilia (FVIII activity < 1 IU/dL) often experience spontaneous bleeding episodes [5].
Hemophilia is traditionally regarded as a familial genetic disorder transmitted through female carriers. As a deleterious mutation that reduces individual fitness, such variants, especially those with severe HA, would be expected to diminish over time through natural selection, particularly in the absence of adequate medical care [6]. However, the incidence of hemophilia A—estimated at 24.6 cases per 100,000 males for all severities and 9.5 cases for severe HA—has remained stable [5]. This persistence is largely attributable to sporadic mutations. Sporadic hemophilia, defined as the first affected individual in a family with no prior history of hemophilia or carrier status among relatives, accounts for approximately 30–60% of HA cases and represents a key mechanism for disease maintenance in the population [7,8].
Mutations in the F8 gene are broadly categorized into inversion variants—primarily intron 22 and intron 1 inversions—and non-inversion variants (NIVs), which include point mutations, deletions, insertions, and duplications [9,10,11]. Inversion mutations have been extensively studied in sporadic hemophilia, with evidence indicating that they originate predominantly but not exclusively in male germ cells [12,13,14,15]. Our recent investigations into NIVs revealed that HA sporadic NIVs are primarily caused by de novo mutations. With clear definitions of “occurrence”—the proband or the carrier mother, and haplotypic “origin”—the family member who transmitted mutant F8 variant to the offspring (occurrence) but does not himself/herself harbor the variant and exhibits no coagulation abnormalities, HA sporadic NIVs arise through two distinct events—grandparental (Event 1) and maternal (Event 2). Furthermore, based on our data, the origin of sporadic NIVs is most often from female, contrary to inversion variant. In addition, our clinical observation suggested that the sporadic NIV seemed to be an isolated event; no recurrence in same generation within the family was reported [16,17].
This study is the continuation of previous studies aiming to thoroughly address how frequently de novo mutations recur in the same generation within the same family. Based on sibship inheritance analysis from all available family pedigrees registered in multiple medical centers in Taiwan, we concluded that HA sporadic NIVs exhibit very low recurrence risk.

2. Results: Sibship Inheritance Analysis Indicates Sporadic HA Variants Rarely Recur in the Same Generation

We analyzed 24 comprehensive family pedigrees from the 126 hemophilia A families registered in multiple medical centers in Taiwan. (Table 1). A pedigree was deemed adequate if it included grandparents, parents, and proband. Linkage analysis was performed using four intragenic markers (F8int9.2, F81VS13, F8int21, F8IVS22) and an extragenic marker (DSX9901) to determine X-chromosome inheritance patterns.
Of the 24 pedigrees studied, 13 families contained at least one individual from the same generation as the sporadic HA occurrence (either the proband or the carrier mother), thereby enabling inheritance analysis. In two families (Table 1, Families 1 and 4), a member inherited the homologous, non-mutant X chromosome rather than the X chromosome on which the HA-NIV occurred. In the remaining 11 families, 16 individuals inherited chromosomes identical to those bearing the HA-causing F8 mutation in the sporadic HA occurrence.
Amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARM-qPCR), a customized PCR method that differentially amplifies mutant and wild-type alleles with enhanced sensitivity for detecting low levels of mutant cells (<0.1%), was used to detect the presence of F8 variants in the 16 analyzable individuals. Among the 16 individuals, none carried the associated F8 variant (Table 1, Figure 1). For example,
  • Family 5 (Figure 1A): The mother (origin) transmitted the same X chromosome to the elder sister of the proband (occurrence). Despite inheriting the same chromosome, the chromosome exhibited wildtype F8 allele without the associated hemophilia-causing genetic change in the proband. The proband’s other sister inherited the homologous X chromosome from the mother.
  • Family 13 (Figure 1B): The maternal grandmother (origin) transmitted the hemophilia-causing chromosome to proband’s mother (occurrence, carrier). As for the proband’s uncle, although he inherited the same X chromosome from the maternal grandmother, his X chromosome exhibited wildtype F8 allele.
  • Family 19 (Figure 1C): The maternal grandfather (origin) transmitted the same X chromosome to the proband’s mother (occurrence, carrier) and her three sisters. Despite inheriting the same chromosome, all three sisters exhibited wildtype F8 alleles.
Results of linkage analysis for Family 2, Family 7, family 9 and Family 15 were shown in Figure 2. No sibling recurrence was observed.
Results of linkage analysis and ARMS-qPCR for Family 3, Family 12, Family 16 and Family 21 have been previously reported [16].
In summary, under the applied detection methods, no sibling recurrence was observed, no additional carriers sharing the same X haplotype were identified, and no somatic mosaicism was detected in tested tissues. These findings from a total of 11 families strongly suggest that the recurrence risk of sporadic F8 gene non-inversion variants in the same generation is very low.

3. Discussion

Sporadic hemophilia A enables the persistence of HA in the population. HA is generally considered a genetic disease propagated through female carriers. Unlike HA with clear family history where recurrence risk can be clearly estimated, determining the origin, occurrence and estimating recurrence risk are major challenges in genetic counseling for sporadic hemophilia [18].
A mutation-specific gender ratio exists for inversional mutation [12,13]. Over 90% of F8 inversions, which are presented in 40–50% of HA sporadic variants, originate from males [13,19]. For F8 non-inversional variants, based on our study [17] and previous studies [20,21], no such male dominance could be observed.
The de novo mutation, either inversion variant or non-inversion variant, can arise during gametogenesis (sperm/egg formation), early embryonic, or postzygotic development [16,18].
When a de novo mutation originates from a grandparent (Event 1), the affected female is typically an obligate carrier, though mosaicism may occasionally occur [22]. Rarely, mosaicism has been reported in asymptomatic males [23,24,25,26], see also Supplementary Materials Table S1 and Figure S1).
In Event 2, where the mutation originates from the proband’s mother, it likely occurs during post-zygotic, first few cell divisions, rendering the mother unlikely to be a carrier. Among 11 analyzable families, the X chromosome bearing the sporadic HA non-inversion variant (NIV) was transmitted to 11 occurrences (probands, heterozygote carrier mothers, and mosaic carrier mothers). However, the same X chromosome was inherited by 16 additional offsprings from the same generation without the associated genetic variation. Based on the Poisson model for rare events (rule of three), when zero recurrence events are observed among N families, the upper 95% confidence bound for recurrence risk can be approximated as 3/N. The approximated current risk in the current study (3/11) is significantly lower than the current risk in familiar HA with female carriers (50%).
Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge the limitation of the current study that isolated germline mosaicism cannot be definitively excluded in family members identified as the origin of sporadic mutations, and isolated germline mosaicism can pass down mutations to an offspring and be misinterpreted as de novo mutations [27]. Patients with mosaicism should be considered as an “occurrence” in the current study instead of an “origin”. Among the six families whose origins of sporadic HA were confirmed to be the maternal grandfather, one sperm sample was available (family 16), and ARMs-qPCR confirmed 0% of mutant cells [16], supporting a true de novo mutation. As maternal germ cells cannot be directly studied, isolated germline mosaicism cannot be definitely ruled out in females assigned as the origin of sporadic mutation. However, by reviewing our data from hemophilia registries, we have identified four families with germline mosaicism for HA mutations (families 21–22 [16], and family 25 [26], see also Supplementary Materials Table S1 and Figure S1); all of them exhibited somato-germline mosaicism. Although isolated germline mosaicism has been reported in other genetic disorders, including von Willebrand disease [28], and suggested in HA by Kasper [8] and Lannoy [29], these findings in HA might require confirmation using more sensitive methodologies to rule out somato-germline mosaicism.
Accurate determination of maternal carrier status is essential when only one affected son has been born. A true carrier mother—either heterozygous or mosaic—faces a genuine and measurable risk of recurrence, whereas a sporadic case, based on our data, rarely recur. From a genetic counseling point of view, the overall recurrence risk is positively correlated with the level of somatic mosaicism in parental blood [27,30], and negative results from somatic cell testing have not excluded occult germline mosaicism. As zero recurrence risk cannot be guaranteed, current guidelines recommend avoiding definitive statements regarding carrier status and suggest discussing prenatal diagnosis in subsequent pregnancies [18,31]. In the era of highly sensitive prenatal diagnostic technologies and advanced therapies that enable individuals with HA to lead near-normal lives, a more positive and encouraging approach to childbearing, combined with diligent prenatal screening, may represent an appropriate strategy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Family Groups and Study Design

This study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Changhua Christian Hospital (approval no. 201209). Only patients who bore HA sporadic NIVs were investigated. All patients and relevant family members provided informed consent. Sporadic patients were recruited from 2015 to 2024 from among 126 registered families with HA to prevent selection bias. Only families containing three generations of data (patients to MGPs) were analyzed.
The occurrence of sporadic HA is defined as the first affected patient with hemophilia or a hemophilia carrier in a family where no relative or cousin has hemophilia or has been proven to be a hemophilia carrier. The haplotypic origin of sporadic HA is defined as the family member who transmitted the mutant F8 variant to the offspring (the occurrence) but does not himself/herself harbor the variant and exhibits no coagulation abnormalities. The possible origin of sporadic HA NIV was identified by genetic testing and linkage analysis (4.2) and confirmed by amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR, 4.3). Genetic testing, linkage analysis and ARMS-qPCR were also applied to evaluate sibship inheritance patterns in the current study.

4.2. Linkage Analysis for Sibship Inheritance Analysis

Intragenic (F8int9.2, F8IVS13, F8int21 and F8IVS22) and closely located extragenic (DXS9901) HA gene markers (short tandem repeat elements) were used to trace the X chromosomal inheritance patterns as previously described [16,32,33].

4.3. Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (ARMS-qPCR)

A specialized form of PCR that enables differential amplification of mutant and wildtype alleles with heightened sensitivity for detecting mutant (<0.1%), was performed as previously described [16,17].

5. Conclusions

Based on long-time clinical observation and thorough sibship inheritance analysis from all available family pedigrees registered in multiple medical centers in Taiwan, among 11 families and 16 relevant family members, sporadic non-inversion variants exhibit very low recurrent risk in the same generation within families. Our findings provide insightful information for genetic counseling in sporadic non-inversional hemophilia A.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27093831/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-Y.L. and M.-C.S.; methodology, M.C., M.-C.S. and G.-C.M.; validation, M.C., M.-C.S., S.-P.C. and G.-C.M.; formal analysis, M.-C.S., S.-P.C. and D.-J.L.; investigation, M.C., M.-C.S., S.-P.C., D.-J.L. and A.Y.; resources, M.-C.S., S.-P.C., D.-J.L. and A.Y.; writing—original draft and preparation, S.-Y.L., H.-N.H. and M.-C.S.; writing—review and editing, M.-C.S., S.-P.C., and D.-J.L.; supervision, M.C., G.-C.M. and M.-C.S.; and funding requisition, M.-C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by Sanofi Company, grant number TW20002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Changhua Christian Hospital (approval no 201209, approval date: 3 January 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

All patients and their family members provided informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The data reported in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. This data is not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank H.Y.L of the Hemophilia Treatment and Thrombosis Centre of Changhua Christian Hospital and S.C.C of the Hemophilia Treatment Centre of National Taiwan University Hospital for taking care of the patients. The authors would also like to thank Y.T.H and S.F.C of the Hemophilia Treatment and Thrombosis Centre of Changhua Christian Hospital and T.S of the Hemophilia Treatment Centre of National Taiwan University Hospital for their help with the collection of blood and tissue specimens. The authors would also like to thank Y.C.H for her help in isolating DNA from blood and tissue cells and J.D.W for their kind referral of patients for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Shih-Yao Lin is employed by the company AltruBio Inc. This work was conducted entirely out of Shih-Yao Lin’s personal activities and does not represent or involve the views, resources, or responsibilities of AltruBIo, Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Samelson-Jones, B.J.; Doshi, B.S.; George, L.A. Coagulation factor VIII: Biological basis of emerging hemophilia A therapies. Blood 2024, 144, 2185–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. van Dieijen, G.; Tans, G.; Rosing, J.; Hemker, H.C. The role of phospholipid and factor VIIIa in the activation of bovine factor X. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 3433–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mutucumarana, V.P.; Duffy, E.J.; Lollar, P.; Johnson, A.E. The active site of factor IXa is located far above the membrane surface and its conformation is altered upon association with factor VIIIa. A fluorescence study. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 17012–17021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gitschier, J.; Wood, W.I.; Goralka, T.M.; Wion, K.L.; Chen, E.Y.; Eaton, D.H.; Vehar, G.A.; Capon, D.J.; Lawn, R.M. Characterization of the human factor VIII gene. Nature 1984, 312, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Srivastava, A.; Santagostino, E.; Dougall, A.; Kitchen, S.; Sutherland, M.; Pipe, S.W.; Carcao, M.; Mahlangu, J.; Ragni, M.V.; Windyga, J.; et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 2020, 26, 1–158, Corrigendum in Haemophilia 2021, 27, 699. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mannucci, P.M. Hemophilia treatment innovation: 50 years of progress and more to come. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2023, 21, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ljung, R.; Petrini, P.; Nilsson, I.M. Diagnostic symptoms of severe and moderate haemophilia A and B. A survey of 140 cases. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1990, 79, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kasper, C.K.; Lin, J.C. Prevalence of sporadic and familial haemophilia. Haemophilia 2007, 13, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lakich, D.; Kazazian, H.H., Jr.; Antonarakis, S.E.; Gitschier, J. Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nat. Genet. 1993, 5, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naylor, J.; Brinke, A.; Hassock, S.; Green, P.M.; Giannelli, F. Characteristic mRNA abnormality found in half the patients with severe haemophilia A is due to large DNA inversions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1993, 2, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuddenham, E.G.; Schwaab, R.; Seehafer, J.; Millar, D.S.; Gitschier, J.; Higuchi, M.; Bidichandani, S.; Connor, J.M.; Hoyer, L.W.; Yoshioka, A.; et al. Haemophilia A: Database of nucleotide substitutions, deletions, insertions and rearrangements of the factor VIII gene, second edition. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4851–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rossiter, J.P.; Young, M.; Kimberland, M.L.; Hutter, P.; Ketterling, R.P.; Gitschier, J.; Horst, J.; Morris, M.A.; Schaid, D.J.; de Moerloose, P.; et al. Factor VIII gene inversions causing severe hemophilia A originate almost exclusively in male germ cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1994, 3, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Antonarakis, S.E.; Rossiter, J.P.; Young, M.; Horst, J.; de Moerloose, P.; Sommer, S.S.; Ketterling, R.P.; Kazazian, H.H., Jr.; Negrier, C.; Vinciguerra, C.; et al. Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia A: Results of an international consortium study. Blood 1995, 86, 2206–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oldenburg, J.; Rost, S.; El-Maarri, O.; Leuer, M.; Olek, K.; Muller, C.R.; Schwaab, R. De novo factor VIII gene intron 22 inversion in a female carrier presents as a somatic mosaicism. Blood 2000, 96, 2905–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lu, Y.; Xin, Y.; Dai, J.; Wu, X.; You, G.; Ding, Q.; Wu, W.; Wang, X. Spectrum and origin of mutations in sporadic cases of haemophilia A in China. Haemophilia 2018, 24, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, M.; Shen, M.C.; Chang, S.P.; Ma, G.C.; Lee, D.J.; Yan, A. De Novo Noninversion Variants Implicated in Sporadic Hemophilia A: A Variant Origin and Timing Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, M.; Shen, M.C.; Chang, S.P.; Ma, G.C.; Lee, D.J.; Yan, A. Noninversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Originate Mostly from Females. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lannoy, N.; Hermans, C. Genetic mosaicism in haemophilia: A practical review to help evaluate the risk of transmitting the disease. Haemophilia 2020, 26, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ljung, R.C.; Sjorin, E. Origin of mutation in sporadic cases of haemophilia A. Br. J. Haematol. 1999, 106, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kosower, N.; Christiansen, R.; Morton, N.E. Sporadic cases of hemophilia and the question of a possible sex difference in mutation rates. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1962, 14, 159–169. [Google Scholar]
  21. Barrai, I.; Cann, H.M.; Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.; Barbujani, G.; De Nicola, P. Segregation analysis of hemophilia A and B. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1985, 37, 680–699. [Google Scholar]
  22. Leuer, M.; Oldenburg, J.; Lavergne, J.M.; Ludwig, M.; Fregin, A.; Eigel, A.; Ljung, R.; Goodeve, A.; Peake, I.; Olek, K. Somatic mosaicism in hemophilia A: A fairly common event. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 69, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Costa, C.; Frances, A.M.; Letourneau, S.; Girodon-Boulandet, E.; Goossens, M. Mosaicism in men in hemophilia: Is it exceptional? Impact on genetic counselling. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 7, 367–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lebo, R.V.; Koerper, M.A.; Kim, J.H.; Chueh, J.; Golbus, M.S. Prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia involving grandpaternal mosaicism. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1993, 47, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Casey, G.J.; Rodgers, S.E.; Hall, J.R.; Rudzki, Z.; Lloyd, J.V. Grandpaternal mosaicism in a family with isolated haemophilia A. Br. J. Haematol. 1999, 107, 560–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shen, M.C.; Chen, M.; Ma, G.C.; Chang, S.P.; Lin, C.Y. Germline and somatic mosaicisms of factor VIII gene mutation identified in an asymptomatic grandfather. Haemophilia 2018, 24, 42. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zemet, R.; Van den Veyver, I.B.; Stankiewicz, P. Parental mosaicism for apparent de novo genetic variants: Scope, detection, and counseling challenges. Prenat. Diagn. 2022, 42, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, M.; Shen, M.C.; Chang, S.P.; Ma, G.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Lin, C.Y. Origin and timing of de novo variants implicated in type 2 von Willebrand disease. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2022, 26, 5403–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lannoy, N.H.C. Unique case of maternal germinal mosaicism in mild haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2015, 21, 135. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rahbari, R.; Wuster, A.; Lindsay, S.J.; Hardwick, R.J.; Alexandrov, L.B.; Turki, S.A.; Dominiczak, A.; Morris, A.; Porteous, D.; Smith, B.; et al. Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Keeney, S.; Mitchell, M.; Goodeve, A. The molecular analysis of haemophilia A: A guideline from the UK haemophilia centre doctors’ organization haemophilia genetics laboratory network. Haemophilia 2005, 11, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Machado, F.B.; Medina-Acosta, E. High-resolution combined linkage physical map of short tandem repeat loci on human chromosome band Xq28 for indirect haemophilia A carrier detection. Haemophilia 2009, 15, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Laurie, A.D.; Hill, A.M.; Harraway, J.R.; Fellowes, A.P.; Phillipson, G.T.; Benny, P.S.; Smith, M.P.; George, P.M. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hemophilia A using indirect linkage analysis and direct genotyping approaches. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010, 8, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sibship inheritance analysis by linkage analysis and ARMS-PCR. (A,C,E) Linkage analysis using intra- and extragenic markers for the F8 gene to determine the X chromosome inheritance patterns of the sporadic non-inversion variants (NIV) in family 5 (severe hemophilia A), family 13 (moderate hemophilia A), and family 19 (severe hemophilia). The F8 gene located on the X chromosome (Xq28) is shown on the left side of Figure 1A, along with the four intragenic markers and one extragenic marker (F8int9.2, F8IVS13, F8int21, F8IVS22, and DXS9901) selected for linkage analysis. The same X chromosome from family members as the X chromosome bearing hemophilia A-causing mutant in the occurrence was framed. (B,D,F) ARMS-qPCR was applied in various tissue cells obtained from family members to determine the percentage of mutant cells and was shown in each table.
Figure 1. Sibship inheritance analysis by linkage analysis and ARMS-PCR. (A,C,E) Linkage analysis using intra- and extragenic markers for the F8 gene to determine the X chromosome inheritance patterns of the sporadic non-inversion variants (NIV) in family 5 (severe hemophilia A), family 13 (moderate hemophilia A), and family 19 (severe hemophilia). The F8 gene located on the X chromosome (Xq28) is shown on the left side of Figure 1A, along with the four intragenic markers and one extragenic marker (F8int9.2, F8IVS13, F8int21, F8IVS22, and DXS9901) selected for linkage analysis. The same X chromosome from family members as the X chromosome bearing hemophilia A-causing mutant in the occurrence was framed. (B,D,F) ARMS-qPCR was applied in various tissue cells obtained from family members to determine the percentage of mutant cells and was shown in each table.
Ijms 27 03831 g001
Figure 2. Linkage analysis of Family 2, 7, 9 and 15 (AD) using intra- and extragenic markers for the F8 gene to determine the X chromosome inheritance patterns. The same X chromosome from family members as the X chromosome bearing hemophilia A-causing mutant in the occurrence was framed.
Figure 2. Linkage analysis of Family 2, 7, 9 and 15 (AD) using intra- and extragenic markers for the F8 gene to determine the X chromosome inheritance patterns. The same X chromosome from family members as the X chromosome bearing hemophilia A-causing mutant in the occurrence was framed.
Ijms 27 03831 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of HA-NIVs and sibship inheritance analysis.
Table 1. Characteristics of HA-NIVs and sibship inheritance analysis.
Family No.FVIII Level (IU/dL)Amino Acid SubstitutionFamily Members Designated as the Origin of Sporadic NIV §Number of Family Members from the Same Generation as the Occurrence of Sporadic NIV (Proband or Carrier Mother) Bearing the Same X-Chromosome as the OccurrenceNumber of Family Members from the Same Generation as the Occurrence of Sporadic NIV (Proband or Carrier Mother) Bearing F8 Variant
1<1p.R2016GM00
2<1p.W274CM10
3<1p.R550CM10
43.7p.R1708CM00
5<1p.L2044PM10
61p.N1460Ifs*5M00 ¢
7<1p.L471*M10
8<1p.D135NM00 ¥
9<1p.N982Kfs*9M10
23<1p.I1213Ffs*5M00 ¥
247.8p.R2169HM00 ¥
10<1p.N982Kfs*9MGM00 ¥
11<1p.Y1781*MGM00 ¥
12<1p.I1213Ffs*5MGM20
131.2c.1538-1G>A in the IVS10MGM10
14<1p.P617Sfs*7MGF00 ¥
15<1c.5219+1G>A in the IVS14MGF10
16<1p.Y605HMGF 10
17<1p.Q774Hfs*12MGF00 ¥
18<1p.I1213Nfs*28MGF00 ¢
19<1p.M2183Rfs*9MGF30
20<1p.R509*MGM 00 ¢
2125.1p.R546WMGF 30
22<1p.S62*EGT M 00 ¥
M: mother; MGM: maternal grandmother; MGF: maternal grandfather; EGT, earlier generation than; § tissue cells (blood cells, buccal cells, and tonsil epithelial cells) obtained from each of them all demonstrated 0% mutant cells by amplification refractory mutation system-qualitative polymerase chain reaction; † sperm cells also exhibited 0% mutant cells; ‡ their descendants (mother) demonstrated mosaic variants. ¶ bearing homologous X-chromosome. ¢ no family members available for testing. ¥ family member unwilling to be tested.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, S.-Y.; Chen, M.; Chang, S.-P.; Ma, G.-C.; Lee, D.-J.; Yan, A.; Hsieh, H.-N.; Shen, M.-C. Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093831

AMA Style

Lin S-Y, Chen M, Chang S-P, Ma G-C, Lee D-J, Yan A, Hsieh H-N, Shen M-C. Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(9):3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Shih-Yao, Ming Chen, Shun-Ping Chang, Gwo-Chin Ma, Dong-Jay Lee, Adeline Yan, Han-Ni Hsieh, and Ming-Ching Shen. 2026. "Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 9: 3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093831

APA Style

Lin, S.-Y., Chen, M., Chang, S.-P., Ma, G.-C., Lee, D.-J., Yan, A., Hsieh, H.-N., & Shen, M.-C. (2026). Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(9), 3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop