Direct Production of 2-Butanol from Glucose by Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Construction of a Synthetic 2-Butanol Pathway in Klebsiella pneumoniae
2.2. Baseline Metabolism of Klebsiella pneumoniae G31 and Comparison with a Reference Strain
2.3. Effect of Heterologous Genes on 2-Butanol Formation by Engineered K. pneumoniae Strains
2.4. Conversion of Exogenously Supplied 2-Butanone to 2-Butanol by Engineered K. pneumoniae
2.5. Quantitative Analysis of the pduC, pduQ, and adh Gene Expression
2.6. Structural Features of Heterologous Enzymes Relevant to Pathway Performance
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Strains, Media, and Culture Conditions
4.2. Nucleic Acid Isolation and PCR Amplification Conditions
4.3. Reverse Transcription and Real-Time qPCR
4.4. Construction of Recombinant Strains
4.5. Transformation of E. coli and K. pneumoniae
4.6. Rifampicin Treatment
4.7. Analytical Methods
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Malik, K.; Capareda, S.C.; Kamboj, B.R.; Malik, S.; Singh, K.; Arya, S.; Bishnoi, D.K. Biofuels Production: A Review on Sustainable Alternatives to Traditional Fuels and Energy Sources. Fuels 2024, 5, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Nagaj, R.; Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, B.; Grebski, W.W. The Influence of the Global Energy Crisis on Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis. Energies 2024, 17, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.H.; Bonifacio, S.; Clowes, J.; Foulds, A.; Holland, R.; Matthews, J.C.; Percival, C.J.; Shallcross, D.E. Investigation of Biofuel as a Potential Renewable Energy Source. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marks-Bielska, R.; Bielski, S.; Kurowska, K.; Zielińska-Chmielewska, A. First-Generation Biofuels vs. Energy Security: An Overview of Biodiesel and Bioethanol. Energies 2025, 18, 6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrano-Echeverry, V.A.; Guerrero-Fajardo, C.A.; Castro-Tibabisco, K.T. A Review of Biobutanol: Eco-Friendly Fuel of the Future—History, Current Advances, and Trends. Fuels 2025, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osat, M.; Shojaati, F.; Osat, M. Techno-economic assessment of butanol and pentanol productions from sorption enhanced chemical looping gasification of a lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Energy 2023, 217, 119176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolesinska, B.; Fraczyk, J.; Binczarski, M.; Modelska, M.; Berlowska, J.; Dziugan, P.; Antolak, H.; Kaminski, Z.J.; Witonska, I.A.; Kregiel, D. Butanol Synthesis Routes for Biofuel Production: Trends and Perspectives. Materials 2019, 12, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deitmann, E.; Maskos, M.; Menges-Flanagan, M.G.; Ziegenbalg, D. Impact of residence time distributions in reacting magnesium packed beds on Grignard reagent formation–selectivity of Grignard reagent formation (part 2). React. Chem. Eng. 2023, 8, 2717–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.; Han, J.; Lee, J. Renewable Butanol Production via Catalytic Routes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Souza Pinto, T.V.; Sobrinho, K.D.V.P.; da Silva, M.E.C.; de Oliveira, S.A.; de Jesus, A.P.V.; Ribeiro, T.A.N.; de Vasconcelos, L.G.; de Sousa Júnior, P.T.; Saba, S.; Rafique, J.; et al. Cobalt-Catalyzed C–Se Bond Activation: Cross-Coupling of Organoselenides with Grignard Reagents. Molecules 2025, 30, 4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.; Ma, Y. Advances in biosynthesis of higher alcohols in Escherichia coli. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arsov, A.; Petrov, K.; Petrova, P. How to outwit nature: Omics insight into butanol tolerance. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 46, 107658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganeshan, S.; Tülbek, M.Ç. Fermentative Butanol Production—Perspectives and Scale-Up Challenges. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obergruber, M.; Hönig, V.; Procházka, P.; Kučerová, V.; Kotek, M.; Bouček, J.; Mařík, J. Physicochemical Properties of Biobutanol as an Advanced Biofuel. Materials 2021, 14, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arsov, A.; Petrova, P.; Gerginova, M.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Armenova, N.; Ignatova, I.; Petrov, K. Bacterial Tolerance to 1-Butanol and 2-Butanol: Quantitative Assessment and Transcriptomic Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghiaci, P.; La Meiras, F.; Norbeck, J.; Larsson, C. Production of 2-butanol through meso-2,3-butanediol consumption in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 360, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russmayer, H.; Marx, H.; Sauer, M. Microbial 2-butanol production with Lactobacillus diolivorans. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mar, M.J.; Andersen, J.M.; Kandasamy, V.; Liu, J.; Solem, C.; Jensen, P.R. Synergy at work: Linking the metabolism of two lactic acid bacteria to achieve superior production of 2-butanol. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.T.M.; Cheirsilp, B.; Hodgson, B.; Umsakul, K. Potential use of Bacillus subtilis in a co-culture with Clostridium butylicum for acetone–butanol–ethanol production from cassava starch. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghiaci, P.; Norbeck, J.; Larsson, C. 2-Butanol and butanone production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through combination of a B12-dependent dehydratase and a secondary alcohol dehydrogenase using a TEV-based expression system. PLoS ONE 2014, 23, e102774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, D. Metabolic engineering of Klebsiella pneumoniae for the de novo production of 2-butanol as a potential biofuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 197, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrov, K.; Petrova, P. High production of 2,3-butanediol from glycerol by Klebsiella pneumoniae G31. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, L.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, W.; Tišma, M.; Oh, B.; Shi, J.; Lye, G.J.; Baganz, F.; Wei, D.; Hao, J. The roles of diol dehydratase from pdu operon on glycerol catabolism in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2022, 157, 110021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sauvageot, N.; Muller, C.; Hartke, A.; Auffray, Y.; Laplace, J.-M. Characterisation of the diol dehydratase pdu operon of Lactobacillus collinoides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 209, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberato, V.; Benevenuti, C.; Coelho, F.; Botelho, A.; Amaral, P.; Pereira, N., Jr.; Ferreira, T. Clostridium sp. as Bio-Catalyst for Fuels and Chemicals Production in a Biorefinery Context. Catalysts 2019, 9, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiu, S.F.; Zhu, C.X.; Yan, R.T.; Chen, J.S. Butanol-Ethanol Dehydrogenase and Butanol-Ethanol-Isopropanol Dehydrogenase: Different Alcohol Dehydrogenases in Two Strains of Clostridium beijerinckii (Clostridium butylicum). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korkhin, Y.; Kalb(Gilboa), A.J.; Peretz, M.; Bogin, O.; Burstein, Y.; Frolow, F. NADP-dependent bacterial alcohol dehydrogenases: Crystal structure, cofactor-binding and cofactor specificity of the ADHs of Clostridium beijerinckii and Thermoanaerobacter brockii. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 278, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oh, B.R.; Heo, S.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Hong, W.K.; Park, J.M.; Jung, Y.R.; Kim, D.-H.; Sohn, J.-H.; Seo, J.-W.; Kim, C.H. Production of 2-butanol from crude glycerol by a genetically-engineered Klebsiella pneumoniae strain. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 57–62, Erratum in Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1383-3.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, X.J. Comment on “Production of 2-butanol from crude glycerol by a genetically-engineered Klebsiella pneumoniae strain [Oh et al., Biotechnol Lett (2014) 36:57–62]”. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Petrov, K.; Petrova, P. Enhanced production of 2,3-butanediol from glycerol by forced pH fluctuations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsvetanova, F.; Petrova, P.; Petrov, K. 2,3-butanediol production from starch by engineered Klebsiella pneumoniae G31-A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 2441–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Sun, H.; Huang, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, D. Metabolic Engineering of Klebsiella pneumoniae for the Production of 2-Butanone from Glucose. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthe, L.; Balestrino, D.; Azizi, B.; Dessaux, D.; Soldan, V.; Esque, J.; Schiex, T.; Barbe, S.; Garcia-Alles, L.F. Promiscuous structural cross-compatibilities between major shell components of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacterial microcompartments. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0322518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.J.; Palmer, D.J.; Warren, M.J. Biotechnological Advances in Bacterial Microcompartment Technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pflügl, S.; Marx, H.; Mattanovich, D.; Sauer, M. 1,3-Propanediol production from glycerol with Lactobacillus diolivorans. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 119, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Santana, J.S.; da Silva, J.L.; Dutra, E.D.; Menezes, R.S.C.; de Souza, R.B.; Pinheiro, I.O. Production of 1,3-propanediol by Lactobacillus diolivorans from agro-industrial residues and cactus cladode acid hydrolyzate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 1585–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russmayer, H.; Ergoth, S.; Marx, H.; Sauer, M. Process engineering towards an oxidative cellular state improves 3-hydroxypropionic acid production with Lentilactobacillus diolivorans. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 382, 129160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismaiel, A.A.; Zhu, C.X.; Colby, G.D.; Chen, J.S. Purification and characterization of a primary-secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from two strains of Clostridium beijerinckii. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 5097–5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, G.L.; Wang, C.W.; Li, C. Cloning, expression and characterization of meso-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34, 1519–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Kim, B.; Oh, M.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J. Enhanced activity of meso-secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from Klebsiella species by codon optimization. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Browning, D.; Busby, S. The regulation of bacterial transcription initiation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swiatek, L.-S.; Surmann, K.; Eger, E.; Müller, J.U.; Gesell Salazar, M.; Heiden, S.E.; Werner, G.; Hübner, N.-O.; Bohnert, J.A.; Becker, K.; et al. Multi-omics investigation reveals unique markers in Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to closely related species. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1657680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krooneman, J.; Faber, F.; Alderkamp, A.C.; Elferink, S.J.H.W.O.; Driehuis, F.; Cleenwerck, I.; Swings, J.; Gottschal, J.C.; Vancanneyt, M. Lactobacillus diolivorans sp. nov., a 1,2-propanediol-degrading bacterium isolated from aerobically stable maize silage. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toth, J.; Ismaiel, A.A.; Chen, J.S. The ald gene, encoding a coenzyme A-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase, distinguishes Clostridium beijerinckii and two other solvent-producing clostridia from Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4973–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campbell, E.A.; Korzheva, N.; Mustaev, A.; Murakami, K.; Nair, S.; Goldfarb, A.; Darst, S.A. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 2001, 104, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alifano, P.; Palumbo, C.; Pasanisi, D.; Talà, A. Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 202, 60–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Strain | Products | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA (g/L) | LA (g/L) | AA (g/L) | meso-2,3-BD (g/L) | L-2,3-BD (g/L) | EtOH (g/L) | 2-Butanone (mg/L) | 2-Butanol (mg/L) | 2-Butanol (mg/L/h) | 2-Butanol (mg/g) 1 | |
| Native strains | ||||||||||
| G31 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 13.9 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 9.0 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 5 | 11 ± 5 2 | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| ATCC 9621 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 13.6 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 18 ± 6 | 14 ± 5 2 | 0.12 | 0.23 |
| Engineered strains | ||||||||||
| G31 K3 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 12.5 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 0.4 | 69 ± 8 | 110 ± 4 | 0.92 | 1.83 |
| G31 K4 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 12.7 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 9.1 ± 0.1 | 73 ± 6 | 108 ± 5 | 0.90 | 1.80 |
| G31 K5 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 13.5 ± 1.6 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 9.2 ± 0.2 | 71 ± 25 | 89 ± 19 | 0.74 | 1.48 |
| G31 K6 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 6.5 ± 0.8 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 109 ± 28 | 437 ± 32 | 3.64 | 7.28 |
| G31 K7 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 12.6 ± 1.9 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 9.2 ± 0.3 | 119 ± 38 | 124 ± 21 | 1.03 | 2.07 |
| G31 K8 3 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 10.6 ± 1.8 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 95 ± 16 | 191 ± 18 | 1.59 | 3.18 |
| G31 K8 4 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 10.4 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 98 ± 18 | 201 ± 16 | 1.68 | 3.35 |
| ATCC 9621 K6 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 18.3 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 127 ± 6 | 40 ± 4 | 0.33 | 0.69 |
| ATCC 9621 K8 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 14.3 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.0 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 59 ± 8 | 38 ± 2 | 0.32 | 0.63 |
| Strain | Products | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA (g/L) | LA (g/L) | AA (g/L) | meso-2,3-BD (g/L) | L-2,3-BD (g/L) | EtOH (g/L) | 2-Butanone (g/L) | 2-Butanol (g/L) | 2-Butanol (g/L/h) | 2-Butanol (g/g) 1 | |
| Native strains | ||||||||||
| G31 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 0.021 | 0.50 |
| ATCC 9621 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 0.022 | 0.50 |
| Engineered strains | ||||||||||
| G31 K3 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.018 | 0.44 |
| G31 K4 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 0.018 | 0.59 |
| G31 K5 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 0.018 | 0.66 |
| G31 K6 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 0.033 | 0.85 |
| G31 K7 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 0.018 | 0.83 |
| G31 K8 2 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 0.025 | 0.77 |
| Strain | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli HST08 (StellarTM) | F–, endA1, supE44, thi-1, recA1, relA1, gyrA96, phoA, Φ80d lacZΔ M15, Δ(lacZYA-argF) U169, Δ(mrr-hsdRMSmcrBC), ΔmcrA, λ– | Clontech Laboratories Inc., Takara Bio |
| L. diolivorans DSM 14421 | Source of pduCDEGH and pduQ | [43] |
| C. beijerinkii DSM 51 | Source of adh | [44] |
| K. pneumoniae ATCC 9621 | Reference strain | [15] |
| K. pneumoniae G31 | NBIMCC 8645; overproducer of 2,3-BD | [22] |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K3 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K4 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_pduQ+ | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K5 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_T7_pduQ | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K6 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_T7_adh | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K7 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_Ptac_pduQ | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K8 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_Ptac_adh | This study |
| K. pneumoniae G31 K8_Ptac_Xba | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_Ptac_XbaI_adh | This study |
| K. pneumoniae ATCC 9621 K6 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_T7_adh | This study |
| K. pneumonia ATCC 9621 K8 | K. pneumoniae G31 with pCR_pduC+DEGH_Ptac_XbaI_adh | This study |
| Component | Premix Taq | Q5 |
|---|---|---|
| MgCl2 | 1.5 mM | 2 mM |
| KCl | 50 mM | 50 mM |
| Primers | 400 nM | 500 nM |
| Initial denaturation | 94 °C/1 min | 98 °C/30 s |
| Hot Start | 98 °C/10 s | 98 °C/10 s |
| Elongation (temperature) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Elongation (speed) | 1 kb/min | 1 kb/30–40 s |
| Primer | Sequence (5′ -> 3′) | Product (bp) | Position in the Gene |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16S_F | ACTGTGAGACAGGTGCTGC | 100 | 110–128 |
| 16S_R | ACCGCTGGCAACAAAGGATA | 100 | 209–190 |
| rpoD_F | GACCCGTGAAGGCGAAATTG | 100 | 333–352 |
| rpoD_R | CAGGTAGGTGATCGCTTCCG | 100 | 432–413 |
| pduC_F | CGTGATAACACAATTGCCGGT | 100 | 1018–1038 |
| pduC_R | TTGGCACAATCCCACCGTTA | 100 | 1117–1098 |
| pduQ_F | ACCCACCGCTGCATAACAT | 100 | 191–209 |
| pduQ_R | CCGGTATCAATTGCCGAACC | 100 | 290–271 |
| adh_F | AATTGGCATTGGAGCTGTTGG | 100 | 516–536 |
| adh_R | CTCAACACAAATCGGCCTGC | 100 | 615–596 |
| ID | Source | Size (bp) | Function | NCBI GenBank Accession No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pduCDEGH | L. diolivorans DSM 14421 | 5274 | Glycerol dehydratase operon + reactivase subunits | AZEY01000108 |
| pduQ | L. diolivorans DSM 14421 | 1122 | Propanol dehydrogenase | AZEY01000108 |
| adh | C. beijerinckii DSM 51 | 1056 | NADP-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase | PX999923 |
| Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Product | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| pCR-TOPO_R | TCTGAGGGCCCAATTCGCC | pCR®2.1-TOPO® backbone | 3830 1 |
| pCR-TOPO_F | GTACCAAGCTTGGCGTAATCATGG | ||
| pduC+_F | caggaaacagctatgaccatgattacgccaagcttggtacTTGAAACGTCAAAAGAGATTTG | pduCDEGH operon + native promoter | 5254 2 |
| pduC+_R | aacctcccatgaacgtaatgTTAACTCTTAAATGGCACTC | ||
| pduQ+_F | gagtgccatttaagagttaaCATTACGTTCATGGGAGGTTTAATTTATG | pduQ gene + native promoter | 1148 |
| pduQ+_R | tgtaatacgactcactatagggcgaattgggccctctagaTTAACGGATTACTTTCTTGTAAATGTTG | ||
| K4_pduQ_T7_R | GGAATTCGAATTTCTTCCATtctagaggtcctaattcgcccta | K4 backbone | 9212 |
| K4_pduQ_T7_F | ACAAGAAAGTAATCCGTTAAttaactcttaaatggcactcatcttgctga | ||
| pduQ_T7_F | GGCGAATTAGGACCTCTAGAatggaagaaattcgaattccaaccaaagt | pduQ gene | 1162 |
| pduQ_T7_R | GAGTGCCATTTAAGAGTTAAttaacggattactttcttgtaaatgttgcgc | ||
| K7_pduQ_Ptac_R | tctagaggtcctaattcgccCTATAGT | K7 backbone | 9252 |
| K7_pduQ_Ptac_F | ttcctcctattataactattacaaatcagatgtcaaAAATT AAACCTCCCATGAACGTAATGTTA | ||
| pduQ_Ptac_F | ttgacatctgatttgtaatagttataataggaggaaATGGAAG AAATTCGAATTCCAACCAAAGT | pduQ + Ptac promoter 3 | 1158 3 |
| pduQ_Ptac_R | actatagggcgaattaggacctctagaTTAACG GATTACTTTCTTGTAAATGTTGCGC | ||
| K4_adh_R | tctagaggtcctaattcgccCTATAGT | K4 backbone | 9212 |
| K4_adh_F | ttaactcttaaatggcacTCATCTTGCTG | ||
| adh_T7_F | TGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGAATTAGGAC CTCTAGAatgaaaggttttgcaatgctaggtattaataagt | adh gene | 1056 |
| adh_T7_R | ctcgagtttttcagcaagatgagtgcCATTTAAGAGT TAATTATAATATAACTACTGCTTT AATTAAGTCTTTTGGCTTGTCTTTC | ||
| K8_adh_Ptac | ttcctcctattataactattacaaatcagatgtcaaAAATTAAACCTCCCATGAACGTAATGTTAACTC | K8 backbone | 9252 |
| adh_Ptac_F | ttgacatctgatttgtaatagttataataggaggaaATGAAAGGT TTTGCAATGCTAGGTATTAATAAGT | adh gene + Ptac 3 promoter | 1092 3 |
| adh_Ptac_R | actatagggcgaattaggacctctagaTTATAATATAACTA CTGCTTTAATTAAGTCTTTTGGCTTGTCTTTC | ||
| K8adh_Ptac_XbaI_R | AAGCAGTAGTTATATTATAA TCTAGAGGTCCTAATTCGC | K8 backbone | 9278 |
| K8_F | CCTCCTATTATAACTATTACAAATCAGATGTCAA | K8 backbone | 9278 |
| adhPtac_XbaI_F | ttgacatctgatttgtaatagttataataggaggtctagaATG AAAGGTTTTGCAATGCTAGG | adh + Ptac promoter + XbaI site | 1096 |
| adhPtac_XbaI_R | ggcgaattaggacctctagaTTATAATATAACTACTG CTTTAATTAAGTCTTTTGGCTTGTCTTTC |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Gergov, E.; Arsov, A.; Petrov, K.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Petrova, P. Direct Production of 2-Butanol from Glucose by Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062892
Gergov E, Arsov A, Petrov K, Tsigoriyna L, Petrova P. Direct Production of 2-Butanol from Glucose by Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062892
Chicago/Turabian StyleGergov, Emanoel, Alexander Arsov, Kaloyan Petrov, Lidia Tsigoriyna, and Penka Petrova. 2026. "Direct Production of 2-Butanol from Glucose by Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062892
APA StyleGergov, E., Arsov, A., Petrov, K., Tsigoriyna, L., & Petrova, P. (2026). Direct Production of 2-Butanol from Glucose by Recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062892

