Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Potential of Waste Protein Hydrolysates in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Seed Germination and Growth Parametres
2.2. Changes in Elemental Composition
2.3. Changes in Nitrogen Concentration
2.4. Changes in Nitrate and Nitrite Reductase Activities
2.5. Changes in Photosynthetic Pigments and Their Precursors
2.6. Changes in Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and β-Carotene
2.7. ATR–FTIR Analysis Differences
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material
4.2. Primer Agents and Seed Priming Method
4.3. Germination Tests
4.4. Seedlings Growth Conditions
4.5. Growth Parameters
4.6. Elemental Components Analysis
4.7. Determination of Nitrogen Content Using the Kjeldahl Method
4.8. Nitrate and Nitrite Reductases Activity
4.9. Determination of Photosynthetic Pigment and Its Precursor Contents
4.10. Determination of β-Carotene, Lutein, and Zeaxanthin Levels
4.11. ATR–FTIR Analysis
4.12. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dodson, J.C.; Dérer, P.; Cafaro, P.; Götmark, F. Population growth and climate change: Addressing the overlooked threat multiplier. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 15, 141346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pretty, J.; Benton, T.G.; Bharucha, Z.P.; Dicks, L.V.; Flora, C.B.; Godfray, H.C.J.; Goulson, D.; Hartley, S.; Lampkin, N.; Morris, C.; et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikwuoma, S.U.; Amagada, E.I. The Interplay between Population Growth and Climate Change: A Critical Analysis. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2024, 644, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priya, A.K.; Alagumalai, A.; Balaji, D.; Song, H. Bio-based agricultural products: A sustainable alternative to agrochemicals for promoting a circular economy. RSC Sustain. 2023, 1, 746–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skwarek, M.; Nawrocka, J.; Lasoń-Rydel, M.; Ławińska, K. Diversity of Plant Biostimulants in Plant Growth Promotion and Stress Protection in Crop and Fibrous Plants. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 2020, 4, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Kuang, Y.; Wang, N. Amino Acids Biostimulants and Protein Hydrolysates in Agricultural Sciences. Plants 2024, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Parvin, K.; Bardhan, K.; Nahar, K.; Anee, T.I.; Masud, A.A.C.; Fotopoulos, V. Biostimulants for the Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Cells 2021, 10, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarigan, S.I.; Toth, S.; Szalai, M.; Kiss, J.; Turoczi, G.; Toepfer, S. Biological control properties of microbial plant biostimulants A Review. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2022, 32, 1351–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Posmyk, M.M.; Szafrańska, K. Biostimulators: A New Trend towards Solving an Old Problem. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeline Vinila, J.E.; Paramaguru, P.; Arunkumar, K.; Vaidehi, G. Studies on bio-chemical parameters of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) genotypes under drought condition. J. Pharm. Innov. 2020, 9, 265–272. [Google Scholar]
- Spence, C. Coriander (Cilantro): A most divisive herb. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 33, 100779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scandar, S.; Zadra, C.; Marcotullio, M.C. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum) Polyphenols and Their Nutraceutical Value against Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Molecules 2023, 28, 4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szafrańska, K.; Reiter, R.J.; Posmyk, M.M. Melatonin Application to Pisum sativum L. Seeds Positively Influences the Function of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Growing Seedlings during Paraquat-Induced Oxidative Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikder, R.K.; Biswas, A.K.; Iqbal, M.A.; Reza, M.M. Seed Germination and Seedling Development in Vegetable Crops. In Growth Regulation and Quality Improvement of Vegetable Crops; Ahammed, G.J., Zhou, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, Q.; Yu, T.; Wu, T.; Yang, Q.; Gong, K.; Zhou, R.; Cui, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Kang, X.; et al. Comprehensive identification and analyses of the Hsf gene family in the whole-genome of three Apiaceae species. Hortic. Plant J. 2021, 7, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, J.; Du, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of HSF genes from celery (Apium graveolens L.) and functional characterization of AgHSFa6-1 in response to heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1132307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sahib, N.G.; Anwar, F.; Gilani, A.H.; Hamid, A.A.; Saari, N.; Alkharfy, K.M. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.): A potential source of high-value components for functional foods and nutraceuticals—A review. Phytother. Res. 2013, 27, 1439–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faix, O. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In Methods in Lignin Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 83–109. [Google Scholar]
- Ragupathi Raja Kannan, R.; Arumugam, R.; Anantharaman, P. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of seagrass polyphenols. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2011, 7, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van de Weert, M.; Haris, P.I.; Hennink, W.E.; Crommelin, D.J. Fourier transform infrared spectrometric analysis of protein conformation: Effect of sampling method and stress factors. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 297, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, H.; Krähmer, A.; Naumann, A.; Gudi, G. Infrared and Raman spectroscopic mapping and imaging of plant materials. In Infrared and Raman Spectroscopic Imaging: Second, Completely Revised and Updated Edition; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 225–294. [Google Scholar]
- Begaam, T.; Lal, N.; Pal, N.; Singh, A.K.; Tiwari, A. Identification of adulterant present in coriander powder using FTIR spectroscopy and chemical method. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2024, 13, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baqir, H.A.; Zeboon, N.H.; Al-behadili, A.A.J. The role and importance of amino acids within plants: A review. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 1402–1410. [Google Scholar]
- Hayat, S.; Hayat, Q.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wani, A.S.; Pichtel, J.; Ahmad, A. Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 1456–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Aguilar, H.; Lacruz-Asaro, M.; Arán-Ais, F. Evaluation of Biostimulants Based on Recovered Protein Hydrolysates from Animal By-products as Plant Growth Enhancers. J. Plant Sci. Phytopathol. 2023, 7, 042–047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, P.; Kumar, P.; Singh, B.N.; Pandey, D.K.; Kumar, V.; Bose, B. Mitigation of heat stress responses in crops using nitrate primed seeds. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essemine, J.; Ammar, S.; Bouzid, S. Impact of heat stress on germination and growth in higher plants: Physiological, biochemical and molecular repercussions and mechanisms of defence. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 10, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamindžić, G.; Ignjatov, M.; Miljaković, D.; Červenski, J.; Milošević, D.; Nikolić, Z.; Vasiljević, S. Seed Priming Treatments to Improve Heat Stress Tolerance of Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Agriculture 2023, 13, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanein, R.A.; Hussein, O.S.; Farag, I.A.; Hassan, Y.E.; Abdelkader, A.F.; Ibrahim, M. Salt-Stressed Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Responses to Potassium Silicate, Humic Acid and Gamma Irradiation Pretreatments. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allahmoradi, P.; Ghobadi, M.; Taherabadi, S. Assessing Cardinal Temperature for Germination in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum), Sainfoin (Onobrychis vicifolia) and Bitter Vetch (Vicia ervilia). Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2013, 3, 881–887. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, S.; Dey, S.; Kundu, R. Seed priming: An emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, U.M.; Sareen, P.; Sengar, R.S.; Kumar, A. Plant ionomics: A newer approach to study mineral transport and its regulation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2641–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olbrycht, M.; Kołodziej, M.; Bochenek, R.; Przywara, M.; Balawejder, M.; Matłok, N.; Antos, P.; Piątkowski, W.; Antos, D. Mechanism of nutrition activity of a microgranule fertilizer fortified with proteins. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popko, M.; Michalak, I.; Wilk, R.; Gramza, M.; Chojnacka, K.; Górecki, H. Effect of the New Plant Growth Biostimulants Based on Amino Acids on Yield and Grain Quality of Winter Wheat. Molecules 2018, 23, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holz, M.; Zarebanadkouki, M.; Benard, P.; Hoffmann, M.; Dubbert, M. Root and rhizosphere traits for enhanced water and nutrients uptake efficiency in dynamic environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1383373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Spaccarotella, K.; Gido, J.; Samanta, I.; Chowdhary, G. Effects of Heat Stress on Plant-Nutrient Relations: An Update on Nutrient Uptake, Transport, and Assimilation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koevoets, I.T.; Venema, J.H.; Elzenga, J.T.M.; Testerink, C. Roots Withstanding their Environment: Exploiting Root System Architecture Responses to Abiotic Stress to Improve Crop Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giri, A.; Heckathorn, S.; Mishra, S.; Krause, C. Heat Stress Decreases Levels of Nutrient-Uptake and -Assimilation Proteins in Tomato Roots. Plants 2017, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Janaagal, M.; Sheoran, A.R.; Luhach, A.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, C. Multifaceted responses to heat stress in plants: A review of the morpho-physiological, biochemical and anatomical changes. Asian Res. J. Agric. 2024, 17, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Q.; Shen, Y.; Huang, Y. Advances in Mineral Nutrition Transport and Signal Transduction in Rosaceae Fruit Quality and Postharvest Storage. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 620018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syuhada, N.; Jahan, M.S.; Khandaker, M.M.; Nashriyah, M.; Khairi, M.; Nozulaidi, M.; Razali, M.B. Application of copper increased corn yield through enhancing physiological functions. Aust. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 2014, 8, 282–286. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.K. Nutrient uptake under combined drought and salinity stress in hexaploid wheat species. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1682258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shabala, S.; White, R.G.; Djordjevic, M.A.; Ruan, Y.L.; Mathesius, U. Root-to-shoot signalling: Integration of diverse molecules, pathways and functions. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015, 43, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Schmidhalter, U. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gargallo-Garriga, A.; Sardans, J.; Pérez-Trujillo, M.; Rivas-Ubach, A.; Oravec, M.; Vecerova, K.; Urban, O.; Jentsch, A.; Kreyling, J.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; et al. Opposite metabolic responses of shoots and roots to drought. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricachenevsky, F.K.; de Araújo Junior, A.T.; Fett, J.P.; Sperotto, R.A. You shall not pass: Root vacuoles as a symplastic checkpoint for metal translocation to shoots and possible application to grain nutritional quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between nitrate and ammonium in their uptake, allocation, assimilation, and signaling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, A.J.; Cramer, M.D. Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant Soil 2004, 274, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, K.; Percival, F.; Merino, J.; Mooney, H.A. Estimation of tissue construction cost from heat of combustion and organic nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ. 1987, 10, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; Sun, M.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Ren, F. Integrated Analysis of Molybdenum Nutrition and Nitrate Metabolism in Strawberry. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nieves-Silva, E.; Sandoval-Castro, E.; Delgado-Alvarado, A.; Castañeda-Antonio, M.D.; Huerta-De la Peña, A. Nitrate Reductase and Glutamine Synthetase Enzyme Activities and Chlorophyll in Sorghum Leaves (Sorghum bicolor) in Response to Organic Fertilization. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2024, 15, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argentel, L.; Garatuza, J.; Arredondo, T.; Yépez, E. Effects of experimental warming on peroxide, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activities in wheat. Agron. Res. 2019, 17, 22–32. [Google Scholar]
- Purbajanti, E.; Slamet, W.; Fuskhah, E.; Rosyida, R. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, activity of nitrate reductase and chlorophyll contents of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 250, 012048. [Google Scholar]
- Onwueme, I.C.; Laude, H.M.; Huffaker, R.C. Nitrate Reductase Activity in Relation to Heat Stress in Barley Seedlings 1. Crop Sci. 1971, 11, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Gautam, H.; Sehar, Z.; Rehman, M.T.; Hussain, A.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Khan, N.A. Nitric Oxide Enhances Photosynthetic Nitrogen and Sulfur-Use Efficiency and Activity of Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle to Reduce High Temperature Stress-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.I.R.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid alleviates adverse effects of heat stress on photosynthesis through changes in proline production and ethylene formation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e26374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majeed, S.; Nawaz, F.; Naeem, M.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ejaz, S.; Ahmad, K.S.; Mehmood, K. Nitric oxide regulates water status and associated enzymatic pathways to inhibit nutrients imbalance in maize (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendoza-Tafolla, R.; Juarez-Lopez, P.; Ontiveros-Capurata, R.; Sandoval-Villa, M.; Alia-Tejacal, I.; Alejo-Santiago, G. Estimating nitrogen and chlorophyll status of romaine lettuce using SPAD and at LEAF readings. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo. Cluj-Napoca 2019, 47, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamle, D.; Raut, D. Evaluation of organic and inorganic fertilizers on chlorophyll content, leaf area and yield of maize. EPRA J. Agric. Rural. Econ. Res. 2021, 10, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Trinh, M.D.L.; Masuda, S. Chloroplast pH homeostasis for the regulation of photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 919896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skwarek-Fadecka, M.; Nawrocka, J.; Sieczyńska, K.; Patykowski, J.; Posmyk, M.M. Effect of Oak Powdery Mildew on Ascorbate–Glutathione Cycle and Other Antioxidants in Plant—Erysiphe alphitoides Interaction. Cells 2024, 13, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demmig-Adams, B.; Hodges, A.K.; Polutchko, S.K.; Adams, W.W., III. Zeaxanthin and Other Carotenoids: Roles in Abiotic Stress Defense with Implications for Biotic Defense. Plants 2025, 14, 2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, D.; Li, J.; Xie, J.; Li, N.; Bakpa, E.P.; Han, K.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C. Exogenous Zeaxanthin Alleviates Low Temperature Combined with Low Light Induced Photosynthesis Inhibition and Oxidative Stress in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Plants. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 2453–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demmig-Adams, B.; Polutchko, S.K.; Adams, W.W., III. Structure-Function-Environment Relationship of the Isomers Zeaxanthin and Lutein. Photochem 2022, 2, 308–325. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, S.J.; Yim, K.J.; Ryu, Y.J.; Lee, C.G.; Jang, H.J.; Jung, J.Y.; Kim, Z.H. Improvement of Lutein and Zeaxanthin Production in Mychonastes sp. 247 by Optimizing Light Intensity and Culture Salinity Conditions. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 33, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, S.; Huang, B. Carotene-enhanced Heat Tolerance in Creeping Bentgrass in Association with Regulation of Enzymatic Antioxidant Metabolism. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2022, 147, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Yadav, S.; Singh, M.P. Possible involvement of xanthophyll cycle pigments in heat tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1773–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, N.; Li, C.; Li, G.; Yu, Y.; Hu, J.; Guo, X. Comparative Evaluation on Vitamin E and Carotenoid Accumulation in Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.) Seedlings under Temperature Stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 9772–9781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso-Simón, A.; García-Angulo, P.; Mélida, H.; Encina, A.; Álvarez, J.M.; Acebes, J.L. The use of FTIR spectroscopy to monitor modifications in plant cell wall architecture caused by cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, G.; Nagy, C.; Yu, P. Combined molecular spectroscopic techniques (SR-FTIR, XRF, ATR-FTIR) to study physiochemical and nutrient profiles of Avena sativa grain and nutrition and structure interactive association properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 7225–7237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vârban, R.; Crișan, I.; Vârban, D.; Ona, A.; Olar, L.; Stoie, A.; Ștefan, R. Comparative FT-IR prospecting for cellulose in stems of some fiber plants: Flax, velvet leaf, hemp and jute. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna, C.; Barriga-Castro, E.D.; Gómez-Treviño, A.; Núñez, N.O.; Mendoza-Reséndez, R. Microstructural, spectroscopic, and antibacterial properties of silver-based hybrid nanostructures biosynthesized using extracts of coriander leaves and seeds. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 4787–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaidau, C.; Stanca, M.; Niculescu, M.D.; Alexe, C.A.; Becheritu, M.; Horoias, R.; Cioineag, C.; Râpă, M.; Stanculescu, I.R. Wool keratin hydrolysates for bioactive additives preparation. Materials 2021, 14, 4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, O.; Yagcioglu, K.D.; Kadioglu, Y.K.; Ozturk, H.S.; Gunes, A. Valorization of Sheep Wool: Impact of Keratin Hydrolysate on the Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Lettuce, Spinach, and Radish Plants. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 25, 2642–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Posmyk, M.M.; Kuran, H.; Marciniak, K.; Janas, K.M. Pre-sowing seed treatment with melatonin protects red cabbage seedlings against toxic copper ion concentrations. J. Pineal Res. 2008, 45, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skwarek, M.; Wala, M.; Kołodziejek, J.; Sieczyńska, K.; Lasoń-Rydel, M.; Ławińska, K.; Obraniak, A. Seed Coating with Biowaste Materials and Biocides—Environment-Friendly Biostimulation or Threat? Agronomy 2021, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar]
- Series, S.C. Plant analysis reference procedures for the southern region of the United States. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 1992, 368, 68. [Google Scholar]
- Debouba, M.; Maâroufi-Dghimi, H.; Suzuki, A.; Ghorbel, M.H.; Gouia, H. Changes in growth and activity of enzymes involved in nitrate reduction and ammonium assimilation in tomato seedlings in response to NaCl stress. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgramq uantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarropoulou, V.; Dimassi-Theriou, K.; Therios, I.; Koukourikou-Petridou, M. Melatonin enhances root regeneration, photosynthetic pigments, biomass, total carbohydrates and proline content in the cherry rootstock PHL-C (Prunus avium × Prunus cerasus). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 61, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pipiak, P.; Sieczyńska, K.; Gendaszewska, D.; Skwarek-Fadecka, M. Effect of Pre-Sowing Seed Stimulation on Maize Seedling Vigour. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinova, D.; Ribarova, F. HPLC determination of carotenoids in Bulgarian berries. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirupathi, B.; Gangadhar Rao, S.; Swapna, V. HPLC Analysis of Lutein and Zeaxanthin in Green and Colored Varieties of Vegetables. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2017, 9, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rahman, A.N.F.; Latief, R.; Kartono, H. Extraction and analysis of lutein and antioxidant activities from red spinach’s root, stem, and leaf. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1200, 012021. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro da Luz, B. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy of plant leaves: A tool for ecological and botanical studies. New Phytol. 2006, 172, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, B.C. Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]








| Conditions | Seedling Variants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | H-Col | H-Ker | |
| Optimal | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Post-stress recovery | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Conditions | Growth Parameter | Seedling Variants | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | H-Col | H-Ker | ||||||
| Optimal | Shoot Length [cm] | 9.00 ± 1.50 | ab | 8.80 ± 1.69 | a | 9.10 ± 1.72 | abc | 8.70 ± 1.97 | a |
| No. of Leaves/Plant | 4.00 ± 2.16 | a | 3.80 ± 1.48 | a | 4.20 ± 2.04 | ab | 4.30 ± 2.45 | ab | |
| No. of Branches/Plant | 2.70 ± 0.82 | a | 3.10 ± 0.74 | ab | 3.10 ± 0.74 | ab | 3.40 ± 0.70 | ab | |
| Fresh Weight of Shoots [g] | 0.27 ± 0.05 | a | 0.28 ± 0.05 | ab | 0.44 ± 0.09 | bc | 0.36 ± 0.15 | abc | |
| Dry Weight of Shoots [g] | 0.04 ± 0.02 | ab | 0.03 ± 0.01 | a | 0.04 ± 0.02 | ab | 0.05 ± 0.03 | ab | |
| Root Length [cm] | 11.0 ± 2.18 | a | 11.7 ± 2.08 | ab | 11.9 ± 2.13 | ab | 12.2 ± 0.87 | ab | |
| Fresh Weight of Roots [g] | 0.07 ± 0.03 | a | 0.12 ± 0.08 | ab | 0.23 ± 0.08 | bc | 0.31 ± 0.25 | bc | |
| Dry Weight of Roots [g] | 0.01 ± 0.00 | a | 0.02 ± 0.01 | a | 0.02 ± 0.01 | a | 0.02 ± 0.01 | a | |
| Post-stress recovery | Shoot Length [cm] | 11.2 ± 1.14 | bc | 10.6 ± 1.17 | abc | 11.3 ± 1.42 | c | 10.5 ± 1.78 | abc |
| No. of Leaves/Plant | 6.20 ± 1.75 | abc | 6.30 ± 1.49 | abc | 6.70 ± 2.11 | bc | 7.00 ± 1.49 | c | |
| No. of Branches/Plant | 3.70 ± 0.67 | ab | 3.90 ± 1.10 | b | 3.70 ± 0.82 | ab | 3.80 ± 0.79 | ab | |
| Fresh Weight of Shoots [g] | 0.29 ± 0.12 | ab | 0.42 ± 0.13 | abc | 0.49 ± 0.13 | c | 0.47 ± 0.15 | c | |
| Dry Weight of Shoots [g] | 0.06 ± 0.01 | abc | 0.06 ± 0.02 | bc | 0.06 ± 0.02 | abc | 0.08 ± 0.03 | c | |
| Root Length [cm] | 11.3 ± 1.69 | a | 13.2 ± 1.62 | ab | 13.6 ± 2.72 | ab | 14.5 ± 2.84 | b | |
| Fresh Weight of Roots [g] | 0.22 ± 0.06 | abc | 0.30 ± 0.09 | c | 0.29 ± 0.12 | c | 0.31 ± 0.08 | c | |
| Dry Weight of Roots [g] | 0.01 ± 0.00 | a | 0.02 ± 0.00 | a | 0.02 ± 0.01 | a | 0.02 ± 0.01 | a | |
| Conditions | Elements | Seedling Variants | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | H-Col | H-Ker | |||||||
| Optimal | Macroelements [g kg−1 DW] | Ca | 11.6 ± 0.81 | a | 11.9 ± 0.97 | a | 11.1 ± 1.36 | a | 11.9 ± 1.42 | a |
| K | 40.7 ± 3.54 | c | 36.3 ± 1.72 | bc | 33.4 ± 2.16 | b | 34.0 ± 2.87 | b | ||
| Mg | 1.61 ± 0.09 | a | 1.46 ± 0.26 | a | 1.94 ± 0.30 | a | 1.96 ± 0.27 | a | ||
| Na | 0.94 ± 0.12 | a | 1.07 ± 0.25 | ab | 1.15 ± 0.27 | ab | 0.83 ± 0.17 | a | ||
| P | 6.09 ± 0.66 | a | 5.68 ± 1.13 | a | 5.56 ± 0.82 | a | 5.59 ± 1.12 | a | ||
| Post-stress recovery | Ca | 16.5 ± 1.75 | bc | 14.6 ± 0.84 | ab | 16.1 ± 2.16 | bc | 19.0 ± 2.96 | c | |
| K | 16.7 ± 0.04 | a | 13.5 ± 1.75 | a | 13.7 ± 4.89 | a | 13.6 ± 2.65 | a | ||
| Mg | 4.90 ± 0.96 | b | 3.96 ± 0.13 | b | 3.99 ± 0.43 | b | 4.63 ± 1.27 | b | ||
| Na | 6.82 ± 0.57 | d | 1.32 ± 0.03 | ab | 3.91 ± 0.43 | c | 1.70 ± 0.07 | b | ||
| P | 5.75 ± 0.25 | a | 4.65 ± 0.60 | a | 4.33 ± 1.39 | a | 5.15 ± 1.67 | a | ||
| Optimal | Microelements [mg kg−1 DW] | Cu | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| Fe | 113 ± 9.81 | a | 68.7 ± 11.79 | a | 85.2 ± 8.95 | a | 67.4 ± 10.8 | a | ||
| Mn | 83.2 ± 7.45 | a | 83.7 ± 12.65 | a | 83.9 ± 19.1 | a | 83.8 ± 11.07 | a | ||
| Mo | 1.22 ± 0.03 | e | 1.35 ± 0.04 | f | 1.45 ± 0.01 | g | 2.43 ± 0.02 | h | ||
| Zn | 36.2 ± 5.84 | a | 32.8 ± 5.29 | a | 32.8 ± 5.19 | a | 42.0 ± 1.96 | ab | ||
| Post-stress recovery | Cu | 4.78 ± 2.35 | a | 4.61 ± 1.88 | a | 2.29 ± 0.37 | a | 2.71 ± 0.08 | a | |
| Fe | 106 ± 26.42 | a | 81.7 ± 20.0 | a | 69.6 ± 32.5 | a | 93.5 ± 58.8 | a | ||
| Mn | 157 ± 1.48 | d | 66.2 ± 0.48 | a | 108 ± 4.18 | b | 133 ± 2.23 | c | ||
| Mo | 0.36 ± 0.03 | a | 0.99 ± 0.05 | c | 0.53 ± 0.03 | b | 1.11 ± 0.03 | d | ||
| Zn | 47.2 ± 7.03 | b | 47.6 ± 3.66 | b | 41.8 ± 2.25 | ab | 43.2 ± 3.26 | ab | ||
| Conditions | Elements | Seedling Variants | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | H-Col | H-Ker | |||||||
| Optimal | Macroelements [g kg−1 DW] | Ca | 11.6 ± 0.66 | a | 11.2 ± 1.49 | a | 12.9 ± 0.74 | ab | 10.2 ± 0.51 | a |
| K | 33.3 ± 7.36 | bc | 39.5 ± 043 | c | 28.1 ± 2.84 | b | 35.4 ± 5.01 | bc | ||
| Mg | 3.29 ± 0.44 | ab | 3.36 ± 0.50 | ab | 3.34 ± 0.25 | ab | 3.76 ± 0.53 | bc | ||
| Na | 8.45 ± 0.37 | bc | 11.5 ± 2.51 | d | 9.66 ± 2.38 | cd | 12.0 ± 0.96 | d | ||
| P | 7.16 ± 0.83 | b | 7.35 ± 1.34 | b | 7.40 ± 0.86 | b | 8.03 ± 1.26 | b | ||
| Post-stress recovery | Ca | 17.7 ± 5.21 | bc | 19.4 ± 3.04 | c | 22.2 ± 1.20 | c | 18.2 ± 0.88 | c | |
| K | 6.66 ± 2.84 | a | 5.43 ± 2.31 | a | 3.81 ± 1.25 | a | 5.86 ± 1.58 | a | ||
| Mg | 4.35 ± 0.33 | cd | 4.12 ± 0.25 | bc | 2.57 ± 0.14 | a | 5.11 ± 0.30 | d | ||
| Na | 2.46 ± 0.07 | a | 1.98 ± 0.02 | a | 0.97 ± 0.03 | a | 6.17 ± 0.04 | b | ||
| P | 5.12 ± 2.42 | ab | 3.24 ± 1.57 | a | 2.34 ± 1.09 | a | 3.49 ± 0.58 | a | ||
| Optimal | Microelements [mg kg−1 DW] | Cu | 8.15 ± 0.84 | b | 5.47 ± 0.84 | a | 10.3 ± 0.57 | c | 5.49 ± 0.71 | a |
| Fe | 341 ± 35.2 | ab | 400 ± 62.5 | bc | 338 ± 55.1 | ab | 210 ± 15.1 | a | ||
| Mn | 178 ± 14.3 | b | 193 ± 34.0 | bc | 221 ± 6.78 | c | 301 ± 22.5 | d | ||
| Mo | 6.25 ± 0.04 | f | 3.89 ± 0.05 | d | 3.03 ± 0.62 | c | 4.57 ± 0.11 | e | ||
| Zn | 297 ± 22.9 | d | 176 ± 15.2 | b | 135 ± 14.7 | ab | 252 ± 15.6 | cd | ||
| Post-stress recovery | Cu | 9.22 ± 1.20 | bc | 7.91 ± 0.34 | b | 8.03 ± 0.55 | b | 7.81 ± 0.46 | b | |
| Fe | 329 ± 20.9 | ab | 524 ± 16.2 | cd | 552 ± 130 | d | 425 ± 71.9 | bcd | ||
| Mn | 213 ± 2.03 | bc | 191 ± 2.18 | bc | 80.3 ± 3.48 | a | 86.7 ± 0.26 | a | ||
| Mo | 2.35 ± 0.02 | b | 2.63 ± 0.07 | bc | 1.11 ± 0.03 | a | 2.22 ± 0.24 | b | ||
| Zn | 195 ± 30.1 | bc | 130 ± 25.4 | ab | 133 ± 62.0 | ab | 107 ± 10.6 | a | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Skwarek-Fadecka, M.; Pipiak, P.; Sieczyńska, K.; Krępska, M.; Posmyk, M.M. Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Potential of Waste Protein Hydrolysates in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052188
Skwarek-Fadecka M, Pipiak P, Sieczyńska K, Krępska M, Posmyk MM. Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Potential of Waste Protein Hydrolysates in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(5):2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052188
Chicago/Turabian StyleSkwarek-Fadecka, Monika, Paulina Pipiak, Katarzyna Sieczyńska, Małgorzata Krępska, and Małgorzata M. Posmyk. 2026. "Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Potential of Waste Protein Hydrolysates in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 5: 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052188
APA StyleSkwarek-Fadecka, M., Pipiak, P., Sieczyńska, K., Krępska, M., & Posmyk, M. M. (2026). Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Potential of Waste Protein Hydrolysates in Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(5), 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052188









