Next Article in Journal
Miglustat in Neuronopathic Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Biological Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Limits of Repurposing
Previous Article in Journal
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status Across Vertebrate Species: A Comparative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phylogenetic Relationships and Structural Conservation of blaOXA-48-like Carbapenemase in Multispecies Clinical Strains from an Intensive Care Unit in Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025”

by
Yuriy L. Orlov
1,2,3,*,
Anastasia A. Anashkina
4,
Inessa A. Minenko
5 and
Nikolay A. Kolchanov
6
1
Center of Digital Health and AI in Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Agrarian and Technological Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Mathematics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
4
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
5
Departmentof Sport Medicine and Medical Rehabilitation, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia
6
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(18), 8334; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188334 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 August 2026 / Accepted: 16 September 2026 / Published: 19 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025)
This article overviews current trends in the molecular mechanisms of gene expression regulation studies published in the “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure—2025” Special Issue (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/3I56FG1O3A, accessed on 30 July 2026). This topical issue collects papers on genetics and bioinformatics, on the topic of gene expression regulation, from the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS) in Novosibirsk (https://www.icgbio.ru/bgrs2026, accessed on 30 July 2026), discussed at the “Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Structure/Systems Biology” (BGRS/SB) conference series last year and related systems biology meetings in Russia.
We have already organized several successful Special Issues on the bioinformatics of gene expression, including “Molecular Mechanisms of Gene Expression: “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure”” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/Bioinformatics_Genomics, accessed on 30 July 2026) and “New Sights into Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/MVA479KFR7, accessed on 30 July 2026), and then a series of topic issues on the medical applications of the bioinformatics of gene expression: “25 Anniversary of Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Structure Conference Series” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/0LGA6103S5, accessed on 30 July 2026) [1,2,3]. The central problems include the analysis of the molecular mechanisms of gene expression regulation, the analysis of transcription regulation by protein transcription factors, regulatory gene network interaction analysis, and applications of modern AI tools in bioinformatics. This Special Issue is focused on the bioinformatics of gene expression, as before [2,3]. The topics of interest include the analysis of gene expression regulation, applications of bioinformatics to 3D genomics technologies, interaction network analysis, and computational genomics for model organisms.
The BGRS conference series started in 1998, presenting unique genetics and genomics discoveries biannually till recent years. To commemorate the history of BGRS in Novosibirsk, we note the Belyaev conference on genetics and evolution “Belyaev Readings—2017” (http://conf.bionet.nsc.ru/belyaev100/en, accessed on 30 July 2026) devoted to the memory of Academician Dmitry K. Belyaev (1917–1985), the founder of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics [4]. His research on the genetics of the behavior and the domestication of animals [5,6] laid the background for modern neurobiology studies continued in this issue. The research areas of gene expression and genome regulation discussed at the BGRS series [1,2] include sequence analysis, transcription regulation, gene network modeling and medical applications of gene function analysis [7,8].
We open this collection of papers with theoretical work on gene expression (Contributions 1 and 2). Pavel Kondrakhin and Fedor Kolpakov (Contribution 1) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010490) presented a modular mathematical model of neuronal activity, designed to simulate the dynamics of the main molecular targets of antiepileptic drugs and their pharmacological effects. The model was developed based on several existing synaptic transmission models that capture cellular processes crucial to the pathology of epilepsy [9,10].
Erik Tadevosyan and co-authors (Contribution 2) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411977) discussed age-related dependencies in gene expression. This fundamental study used single-cell RNA-seq data and scGPT, a large transcriptomic model, to predict chronological age groups [7,11,12]. The authors demonstrated that scGPT does capture age-related dependencies in single-cell data and can be utilized to discover novel candidate gene perturbations—potential targets to be validated as anti-aging interventions.
The next block of papers considers applications in model organisms. Natalya Bondar and colleagues (Contribution 3) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010018) used a mouse model to study the molecular mechanisms of social stress, constituting a challenge for neurobiology [13]. The authors investigated the epigenetic signatures (H3K4me3) of social defeat stress in the prefrontal cortex of C57BL/6 mice, continuing model research on laboratory animals [14,15]. The analysis of differential H3K4me3 modifications in gene promoter regions in the mouse stress groups revealed genes encoding transcription, as well as postsynaptic density, proteins (Shank2, Shank1, and Gria2) associated with stress sensitivity and the onset of depression.
Valentina Grushina and colleagues (Contribution 4) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311407) analyzed gene expression in a model organism—chickens [16]. Gene expression from promoters is influenced by interactions with genomic enhancers located within the same topologically associating domain (TAD) [17]. The authors examined the correlation between gene and enhancer activities within individual TADs across multiple tissues in slow- and fast-growing chickens. It was shown that enhancer-mediated regulation appears to activate key pathways involved in transcriptional control and nucleic acid biosynthesis.
The current understanding of avian enhancers remains less developed compared to that of mammals [16,18]. The next study by the same group of authors, Grushina et al. (Contribution 5) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210986), utilized CAGE-seq data from chicken tissues obtained through the “Genetic Technologies in Poultry” project to predict enhancers in the chicken genome. The analysis revealed that the proportion of enhancer-associated DNA in chickens is quite similar to that observed in mammals, encompassing about 9% of the entire chicken genome, similar to the estimate made by the ChickenGTEx project [19]. A group of enhancers was significantly expressed among the tissues studied, highlighting gene expression regulation in chickens [20].
Finally, we note medical applications presented in this Special Issue. Yebin Son and Jae Yong Ryu (Contribution 6) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199530) investigated anticancer targets in ovarian cancer using genomic drug sensitivity data. PARP inhibitors exploit synthetic lethality in BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancers but are limited by emerging therapeutic resistance [21]. The authors investigated biomarkers associated with PARP inhibitor responses. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed that BRCA1, MLL2, NF1, and SMARCA4 mutations enhance sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer.
The study by Zeb Hussain et al. (Contribution 7) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125391) presents a phylogenetic analysis of microbiology data from an Intensive Care Unit. The global dissemination of carbapenem resistance is predominantly facilitated by plasmid-mediated carbapenemase genes, notably blaOXA-48-like genes [22,23]. Understanding their evolutionary relationships is essential for monitoring their spread and informing therapeutic strategies. The study investigated the phylogenetic relationships and structural conservation of blaOXA-48-like carbapenemase genes in multiple Gram-negative bacterial species [23]. The authors found that blaOXA-48-like carbapenemases have high evolutionary stability.
Andrey R. Karpenko and colleagues (Contribution 8) (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188967) studied a medical case of severe COVID-19 [24]. Human heat shock proteins (HSPs) play a dual role by either protecting host cells or acting to advance viral spread in viral infections [25]. Genetic variants of human heat shock proteins raised interest in the context of severe COVID-19 risk [26,27]. In this study, 1228 subjects were genotyped for 20 SNPs in genes encoding HSPs and their regulatory regions. Several SNPs were found. The study provides preliminary evidence that SNPs of heat shock proteins can significantly modulate the risk of severe COVID-19.
To recap current trends in gene expression studies, we note AI applications in bioinformatics (https://mathai.club/index.html, https://enigma.ist/journals, accessed on 30 July 2026) discussed at the mathematical conference series initiated in Novosibirsk and Moscow (https://congrsysalgbai.ru/, accessed on 30 July 2026). Recent special journal issues on the bioinformatics of gene expression regulation include an issue of Frontiers in Genetics (https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/40408/bioinformatics-of-genome-regulation-and-systems-biology-volume-iii, https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/21036/high-throughput-sequencing-based-investigation-of-chronic-disease-markers-and-mechanisms, accessed on 30 July 2026) and a series published by BioMedCentral (https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-20-supplement-3, accessed on 30 July 2026) [28].
This year, we continue the series of Special Issues in the Gene Expression journal (https://www.xiahepublishing.com/journal/ge/features/bioinformatics, accessed on 30 July 2026). In addition, the IJMS Special Issue (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/C0F2W4J5X5, accessed on 30 July 2026) continues the trend set by the earlier journal issues and paper collections on advances in computer genomics and bioinformatics presented at the Young Scientist Schools “Systems biology and bioinformatics” (SBB) – education course series [29].
We hope that readers find these materials to be interesting and stimulating for the gene expression field [30], and we will continue to collect papers on this topic for ongoing issues including plant biology (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/1D646O0T7V, accessed on 30 July 2026).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A.M., Y.L.O., and A.A.A.; resources, Y.L.O. and N.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.A.M. and Y.L.O.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A.; supervision, N.A.K. and Y.L.O.; project administration, Y.L.O. and N.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Program of Fundamental Research in the Russian Federation for the 2021–2030 period (project No. 124031500019-8).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the reviewers who helped validate this thematic issue. The authors thank the BGRS/SB Organizing Committee for providing platforms for international conferences and schools on bioinformatics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Kondrakhin, P.Y.; Kolpakov, F.A. Modular Model of Neuronal Activity That Captures the Dynamics of Main Molecular Targets of Antiepileptic Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010490.
  • Tadevosyan, E.; Efimov, E.; Kriukov, D.; Khrameeva, E. Discovering Candidate Anti-Aging Perturbations Using a Foundation Model for Gene Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11977. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411977.
  • Grushina, V.A.; Filatova, A.P.; Gagarina, V.S.; Prasolov, D.E.; Kolpakov, F.A.; Gusev, O.A.; Pintus, S.S. Interaction Between Enhancers and Promoters in Chicken Genome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311407.
  • Grushina, V.A.; Gagarina, V.S.; Prasolov, D.E.; Kolpakov, F.A.; Gusev, O.A.; Pintus, S.S. Prediction of Enhancer RNAs in Chicken Genome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210986.
  • Bondar, N.; Reshetnikov, V.; Ritter, P.; Ershov, N.; Zhukova, N.; Kolmykov, S.; Merkulova, T. Epigenetic Signatures of Social Defeat Stress Varying Duration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010018.
  • Son, Y.; Ryu, J.Y. Identification of Anticancer Targets in Ovarian Cancer Using Genomic Drug Sensitivity Data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199530.
  • Hussain, Z.; Fatima, A.; Karim, A.; Jahanzaib, M.; Qureshi, M.S.; Naim, A. Phylogenetic Relationships and Structural Conservation of blaOXA-48-like Carbapenemase in Multispecies Clinical Strains from an Intensive Care Unit in Pakistan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125391.
  • Karpenko, A.R.; Kobzeva, K.A.; Orlov, Y.L.; Bushueva, O.Y. Genes Encoding Heat Shock Proteins Are Associated with Risk and Clinical Course of Severe COVID-19: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8967. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188967.

References

  1. Anashkina, A.A.; Leberfarb, E.Y.; Orlov, Y.L. Recent Trends in Cancer Genomics and Bioinformatics Tools Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Orlov, Y.L.; Baranova, A.V. Editorial: Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Systems Biology. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Anashkina, A.A.; Orlova, N.G.; Kolchanov, N.A.; Orlov, Y.L. New Sights into Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Orlov, Y.L.; Baranova, A.V.; Hofestädt, R.; Kolchanov, N.A. Genomics at Belyaev conference—2017. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Belyaev, D.K.; Gruntenko, E.V. Strain differences in thymus weight in mice with different predispositions to spontaneous mammary cancer. Nature 1972, 237, 401–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Belyaev, D.K. Stress as a factor of genetic variation and the problem of destabilizing selection. Folia Biol. 1983, 29, 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, S.; Wu, L.; Zhao, Z.; Fernandez Masso, J.R.; Chen, M. Artificial Intelligence in Gerontology: Data-Driven Health Management and Precision Medicine. Adv. Gerontol. 2024, 14, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Chen, X.; Xu, H.; Yu, S.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, L.; Lin, X.; et al. AI-Driven Transcriptome Prediction in Human Pathology: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Applications. Biology 2025, 14, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Devinsky, O.; Vezzani, A.; O’Brien, T.J.; Jette, N.; Scheffer, I.E.; De Curtis, M.; Perucca, P. Epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Depannemaecker, D.; Destexhe, A.; Jirsa, V.; Bernard, C. Modeling Seizures: From Single Neurons to Networks. Seizure 2021, 90, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Shen, X.; Wang, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, W.; Hornburg, D.; Wu, S.; Snyder, M.P. Nonlinear dynamics of multi-omics profiles during human aging. Nat. Aging 2024, 4, 1619–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Carlisle, A.K.; Carter, H.P.; Lowe, J.R.; Mutlu-Smith, M.; Lee, W.; Leiter, O.; Zhang, S.; Harding, A.; Syed, M.; et al. Ferroptosis susceptibility in hippocampal neural precursor cells influences neurogenesis and memory across aging. Cell Stem Cell 2026, 33, 1031–1046.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Ershov, N.I.; Bondar, N.P.; Lepeshko, A.A.; Reshetnikov, V.V.; Ryabushkina, J.A.; Merkulova, T.I. Consequences of Early Life Stress on Genomic Landscape of H3K4me3 in Prefrontal Cortex of Adult Mice. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Reshetnikov, V.V.; Kisaretova, P.E.; Bondar, N.P. Transcriptome Alterations Caused by Social Defeat Stress of Various Durations in Mice and Its Relevance to Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Humans: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Reshetnikov, V.V.; Kisaretova, P.E.; Ershov, N.I.; Merkulova, T.I.; Bondar, N.P. Social Defeat Stress in Adult Mice Causes Alterations in Gene Expression, Alternative Splicing, and the Epigenetic Landscape of H3K4me3 in the Prefrontal Cortex: An Impact of Early-Life Stress. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 106, 110068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Grushina, V.A.; Yevshin, I.S.; Gusev, O.A.; Kolpakov, F.A.; Stanishevskaya, O.I.; Fedorova, E.S.; Zinovieva, N.A.; Pintus, S.S. Prediction and annotation of alternative transcription starts and promoter shift in the chicken genome. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2025, 23, 2550004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Fishman, V.; Battulin, N.; Nuriddinov, M.; Maslova, A.; Zlotina, A.; Strunov, A.; Chervyakova, D.; Korablev, A.; Serov, O.; Krasikova, A. 3D organization of chicken genome demonstrates evolutionary conservation of topologically associated domains and highlights unique architecture of erythrocytes’ chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 648–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Fang, L.; Teng, J.; Lin, Q.; Bai, Z.; Liu, S.; Guan, D.; Li, B.; Gao, Y.; Hou, Y.; Gong, M.; et al. The Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project. Nat. Genet. 2025, 57, 786–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Pan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Gu, S.; Zhong, C.; An, L.; Shan, M.; Damas, J.; et al. An atlas of regulatory elements in chicken: A resource for chicken genetics and genomics. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eade1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Zhang, F.; Chen, H.; Chang, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H. Comparative genomic analysis across multiple species to identify candidate genes associated with important traits in chickens. Genes 2025, 16, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Mestrovic, T.; Naghavi, M.; Aguilar, G.R.; Weaver, N.D.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Wool, E.E.; Araki, D.T.; Hayoon, A.G.; Han, C.; Ikuta, K.S.; et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region 1990–2021: A cross-country systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet Public Health 2025, 10, e955–e970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D. Rapidly spreading Enterobacterales with OXA-48-like carbapenemases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2025, 63, e01515-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Diab, A.A.; Jalal, D.; Fadel, Y.M.; Samir, O.; Shalaby, L.; Elanany, M.; Abo-Elmaaty, S.A.; Aziz, R.K.; Sayed, A.A.; Hassan, M.G. Limits of rapid diagnostics: Genomic and structural insights into OXA-48–like mediated carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2026, 17, 1790597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Tsai, P.-H.; Lai, W.-Y.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Luo, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Chen, H.-K.; Chen, Y.-M.; Lai, Y.-C.; Kuo, L.-C.; Chen, S.-D.; et al. Clinical Manifestation and Disease Progression in COVID-19 Infection. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2021, 84, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Krishnan-Sivadoss, I.; Mijares-Rojas, I.A.; Villarreal-Leal, R.A.; Torre-Amione, G.; Knowlton, A.A.; Guerrero-Beltrán, C.E. Heat Shock Protein 60 and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Intricate Love-Hate Story. Med. Res. Rev. 2021, 41, 29–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Belykh, A.E.; Soldatov, V.O.; Stetskaya, T.A.; Kobzeva, K.A.; Soldatova, M.O.; Polonikov, A.V.; Deykin, A.V.; Churnosov, M.I.; Freidin, M.B.; Bushueva, O.Y. Polymorphism of SERF2, the Gene Encoding a Heat-Resistant Obscure (Hero) Protein with Chaperone Activity, Is a Novel Link in Ischemic Stroke. IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 2023, 14, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Loktionov, A.V.; Kobzeva, K.A.; Karpenko, A.R.; Sergeeva, V.A.; Orlov, Y.L.; Bushueva, O.Y. GWAS-Significant Loci and Severe COVID-19: Analysis of Associations, Link with Thromboinflammation Syndrome, Gene-Gene, and Gene-Environmental Interactions. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1434681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Sung, W.K.F. Frontiers in Biomedical Informatics. Biomed. Inform. 2025, 1, 0001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Baranova, A.V.; Orlov, Y.L. The papers presented at 7th Young Scientists School “Systems Biology and Bioinformatics” (SBB’15): Introductory Note. BMC Genet. 2016, 17, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Türker, C.; Panse, C.; Sommer, B.; Friedrichs, M.; Hofestädt, R. International symposium on integrative bioinformatics 2024—Editorial. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2024, 21, 20240051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Orlov, Y.L.; Anashkina, A.A.; Minenko, I.A.; Kolchanov, N.A. Special Issue “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188334

AMA Style

Orlov YL, Anashkina AA, Minenko IA, Kolchanov NA. Special Issue “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(18):8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Orlov, Yuriy L., Anastasia A. Anashkina, Inessa A. Minenko, and Nikolay A. Kolchanov. 2026. "Special Issue “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 18: 8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188334

APA Style

Orlov, Y. L., Anashkina, A. A., Minenko, I. A., & Kolchanov, N. A. (2026). Special Issue “Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure–2025”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(18), 8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop