This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles
by
Ulrike Kegler
Ulrike Kegler
,
Anja Buhmann
Anja Buhmann ,
Heinz-Peter Friedl
Heinz-Peter Friedl ,
Manuela Hofner
Manuela Hofner and
Christa Noehammer
Christa Noehammer *
Competence Unit Molecular Diagnostics, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 4, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(11), 4899; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 April 2026
/
Revised: 21 May 2026
/
Accepted: 22 May 2026
/
Published: 28 May 2026
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have attracted growing attention for their diagnostic and prognostic potential as they carry molecular cargo such as DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids derived from their cells of origin. While EV research has traditionally focused on blood, this study explicitly explored saliva as a promising, non-invasive sample matrix for EV isolation and biomarker discovery. Six different EV isolation methods were compared for their ability to recover salivary small EVs suitable for downstream DNA and microRNA analysis. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) revealed variation in vesicle sizes, concentrations and surface charges across all tested EV isolation approaches. In addition to being the fastest and simplest isolation method, the miRCURY Exosome Isolation kit—serum and plasma from Qiagen (ExiQ) also resulted in the highest EV yields with average particle sizes of ~130 nm. Western blot analysis further verified the presence of EV-specific markers (CD9, Alix) and no detectable signal for ApoA1 as an indicator for lipoprotein contamination, underscoring the purity of ExiQ-isolated vesicles. Always applying the same protocol for parallel DNA and RNA isolation on vesicles extracted by various methods, differences in DNA and RNA yields were observed across the evaluated isolation kits. ExiQ-isolated EVs showed the best recovery for both nucleic acid types. Notably, nuclease treatment of isolated EVs revealed that substantial amounts of DNA were present on the EV surface, whereas microRNA was predominantly localized within the vesicles. The present study, extensively comparing different EV isolation methods, demonstrates that salivary EVs are a viable source for non-invasive diagnostics and suggests the miRCURY Exosome Isolation kit—serum and plasma from Qiagen (ExiQ) to be a good choice for integration in future salivary EV-based diagnostic assays given its simplicity, speed and excellent performance.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kegler, U.; Buhmann, A.; Friedl, H.-P.; Hofner, M.; Noehammer, C.
Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4899.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899
AMA Style
Kegler U, Buhmann A, Friedl H-P, Hofner M, Noehammer C.
Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(11):4899.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899
Chicago/Turabian Style
Kegler, Ulrike, Anja Buhmann, Heinz-Peter Friedl, Manuela Hofner, and Christa Noehammer.
2026. "Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 11: 4899.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899
APA Style
Kegler, U., Buhmann, A., Friedl, H.-P., Hofner, M., & Noehammer, C.
(2026). Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(11), 4899.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.