Next Article in Journal
Functional Characterization of AfBBX from Amorpha fruticosa in Enhancing Osmotic and Salt–Alkali Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco
Previous Article in Journal
CD271 Identifies a Subpopulation with Enhanced Neural-like Potential Within Wharton Jelly Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Liquid Biopsies in HNSCC: Current Landscape and Emerging Opportunities in the Era of HPV Stratification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles

Competence Unit Molecular Diagnostics, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 4, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(11), 4899; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 April 2026 / Revised: 21 May 2026 / Accepted: 22 May 2026 / Published: 28 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extracellular Vesicles—New Findings on the Block in Liquid Biopsy)

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have attracted growing attention for their diagnostic and prognostic potential as they carry molecular cargo such as DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids derived from their cells of origin. While EV research has traditionally focused on blood, this study explicitly explored saliva as a promising, non-invasive sample matrix for EV isolation and biomarker discovery. Six different EV isolation methods were compared for their ability to recover salivary small EVs suitable for downstream DNA and microRNA analysis. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) revealed variation in vesicle sizes, concentrations and surface charges across all tested EV isolation approaches. In addition to being the fastest and simplest isolation method, the miRCURY Exosome Isolation kit—serum and plasma from Qiagen (ExiQ) also resulted in the highest EV yields with average particle sizes of ~130 nm. Western blot analysis further verified the presence of EV-specific markers (CD9, Alix) and no detectable signal for ApoA1 as an indicator for lipoprotein contamination, underscoring the purity of ExiQ-isolated vesicles. Always applying the same protocol for parallel DNA and RNA isolation on vesicles extracted by various methods, differences in DNA and RNA yields were observed across the evaluated isolation kits. ExiQ-isolated EVs showed the best recovery for both nucleic acid types. Notably, nuclease treatment of isolated EVs revealed that substantial amounts of DNA were present on the EV surface, whereas microRNA was predominantly localized within the vesicles. The present study, extensively comparing different EV isolation methods, demonstrates that salivary EVs are a viable source for non-invasive diagnostics and suggests the miRCURY Exosome Isolation kit—serum and plasma from Qiagen (ExiQ) to be a good choice for integration in future salivary EV-based diagnostic assays given its simplicity, speed and excellent performance.
Keywords: extracellular vesicles; EV isolation; saliva; DNA methylation; microRNA; non-invasive diagnostics extracellular vesicles; EV isolation; saliva; DNA methylation; microRNA; non-invasive diagnostics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kegler, U.; Buhmann, A.; Friedl, H.-P.; Hofner, M.; Noehammer, C. Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899

AMA Style

Kegler U, Buhmann A, Friedl H-P, Hofner M, Noehammer C. Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(11):4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kegler, Ulrike, Anja Buhmann, Heinz-Peter Friedl, Manuela Hofner, and Christa Noehammer. 2026. "Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 11: 4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899

APA Style

Kegler, U., Buhmann, A., Friedl, H.-P., Hofner, M., & Noehammer, C. (2026). Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(11), 4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114899

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop