Next Article in Journal
Human Endothelial Membrane as a Structural Prototype: A Comparative Analysis with Artemia salina Endothelial-like Cell
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Volatile Compounds of Some Medicinal Plants from Lamiaceae Family by HS-SPME Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Adhesive Hydrogels as Fixation and Regeneration Platforms in Cartilage Surgery: Rethinking Scaffold-Tissue Integration from a Clinical Perspective

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(10), 4600; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104600
Submission received: 30 April 2026 / Revised: 13 May 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Orthopedic Materials)

Abstract

Articular cartilage defects affect millions of patients annually and pose one of the most persistent challenges in orthopedic surgery, owing to the tissue’s inherent avascular and alymphatic nature. Current surgical approaches, microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI/MACI), and osteochondral grafting, share a common failure mode: inadequate adhesion between repair constructs and surrounding native cartilage, contributing to deterioration rates of 15–75% at five-year follow-up across all techniques. This review repositions adhesion not as a supplementary material property but as the central determinant of clinical success in cartilage repair. We systematically evaluate the biomechanical demands imposed by the joint environment and define clinically relevant adhesion thresholds. Adhesive hydrogel strategies are categorized by surgical context: microfracture augmentation, ACI/MACI enhancement, osteochondral graft integration, and standalone repair platforms. Material platforms are analyzed across catechol/dopamine systems, NHS ester chemistry, photocrosslinkable hydrogels, supramolecular approaches, and multi-mechanism hybrids. Injectable formulations for arthroscopic delivery are critically examined alongside key translational barriers, including fatigue durability, biocompatibility–adhesion trade-offs, sterilization compatibility, batch variability, and regulatory classification ambiguity. Future directions encompass 4D bioprinting, AI-guided formulation optimization, and stimuli-responsive reversible adhesion systems. Adhesive hydrogels represent the missing link that current cartilage repair paradigms require.
Keywords: adhesive hydrogel; bioadhesive; cartilage repair; tissue integration; scaffold fixation; injectable hydrogel; chondrogenesis adhesive hydrogel; bioadhesive; cartilage repair; tissue integration; scaffold fixation; injectable hydrogel; chondrogenesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jo, H.; Lee, S.S. Adhesive Hydrogels as Fixation and Regeneration Platforms in Cartilage Surgery: Rethinking Scaffold-Tissue Integration from a Clinical Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104600

AMA Style

Jo H, Lee SS. Adhesive Hydrogels as Fixation and Regeneration Platforms in Cartilage Surgery: Rethinking Scaffold-Tissue Integration from a Clinical Perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(10):4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jo, Hyejin, and Seunghun S. Lee. 2026. "Adhesive Hydrogels as Fixation and Regeneration Platforms in Cartilage Surgery: Rethinking Scaffold-Tissue Integration from a Clinical Perspective" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 10: 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104600

APA Style

Jo, H., & Lee, S. S. (2026). Adhesive Hydrogels as Fixation and Regeneration Platforms in Cartilage Surgery: Rethinking Scaffold-Tissue Integration from a Clinical Perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(10), 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop