Next Article in Journal
B3 Superfamily in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): Identification, Evolution, Expression Patterns, and Function in Glandular Trichome Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Determined as Blood Culture Contamination Have High Virulence Characteristic Including Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Determinants to Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Journal
Biphasic Catalytic Conversion of Olefins in Aqueous Media: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acidocin A and Acidocin 8912 Belong to a Distinct Subfamily of Class II Bacteriocins with a Broad Spectrum of Antimicrobial Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Plant-Derived Polyphenols on Combating Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance

by
Anna Duda-Madej
1,*,†,
Szymon Viscardi
2,†,
Piotr Niezgódka
2,
Wiktoria Szewczyk
2 and
Katarzyna Wińska
3
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Chałubińskiego 4, 50-368 Wrocław, Poland
2
Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Ludwika Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
3
Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, C. K. Norwida 25, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4030; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094030
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 16 April 2025 / Accepted: 22 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Treatment for Bacterial Infections)

Abstract

The global healthcare system is increasingly challenged by the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the limited therapeutic options for related infections. Efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance represents a significant obstacle, primarily due to the absence of drugs specifically designed to target bacterial efflux pumps. Recent research has identified polyphenols, a broad class of plant-derived organic compounds, as potential inhibitors of efflux pump activity. This review consolidates data on the inhibitory properties of eight widely distributed polyphenols: curcumin, quercetin, luteolin, tannic acid, naringenin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, ellagic acid, and resveratrol. These compounds have demonstrated the capacity to inhibit efflux pumps, either through direct interference with bacterial protein function or by downregulating the expression of genes encoding pump subunits. Importantly, several polyphenols exhibit synergistic interactions with antibiotics, including colistin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline. For instance, quercetin has shown inhibitory potency comparable to that of established efflux pump inhibitors such as verapamil and reserpine. These findings suggest that polyphenols represent promising candidates for the development of novel efflux pump inhibitors. However, further research is required to validate their efficacy and safety and facilitate their translation into clinical applications for combating antibiotic resistance.

1. Introduction

Efflux pumps are protein channels located in the cell membrane. They are responsible for removing dangerous substances from the cell, i.e., antibiotics, heavy metals, detergents, toxins, and some active agents of disinfectants and antiseptics. Due to their different specificities and substrate ranges, they exhibit two types of mechanisms of action: specific (removal of defined substrates) and non-specific (removal of several different compounds) [1]. Pumping systems are most often encoded on chromosomes (expression occurs by substrate induction or mutation associated with environmental stress) [2]. However, genes encoding transport proteins can also be found on plasmids and/or other mobile genetic elements, i.e., transposons and integrons [3,4]. This is particularly dangerous as these elements also carry antibiotic resistance genes, which promote the formation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains [5].
The pumping out mechanism depends on the structure of the bacterial membrane and cell wall. Transport proteins are classified into five families according to the number of transmembrane sequences, substrate specificity, mechanism of action, and function, as follows: (i) MFS—major facilitator superfamily [6,7]; (ii) SMR—small multidrug resistance [8,9]; (iii) ABC—ATP-binding cassette; (iv) MATE—multidrug and toxic compounds extrusion, and (v) RND—resistance-nodulation-cell division [10,11,12]. Figure 1 shows a simplified scheme of action for all five efflux pump families.
In Gram-negative bacteria, owing to the more complex structure of their cell envelope, efflux transporters form a triple structure composed of: (i) an intracellular cytoplasmic membrane protein; (ii) an outer membrane protein forming a transport channel, and (iii) a periplasmic space protein connecting (i) and (ii) [13,14,15]. For these bacteria, the RND and MATE families are more significant. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria, characterized by a less complex structure, have a transport system represented by a single membrane protein [16]. All five families can be found in these bacteria; however, the most common are MFS, SMR, and ABC. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of efflux pump families among Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
The phenomenon of natural pumping out for antibiotics not only gives bacteria resistance properties, but can also lead to the development of new resistance mechanisms by (i) changing the target site of action of antimicrobial drugs, and (ii) producing degrading enzymes [43,44,45]. Consequently, the expression of efflux mechanisms can lead to the interaction of different resistance mechanisms and initiate the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, posing a problem for modern medicine. The fact that the efflux pump mechanism can be modified extremely easily and quickly becomes dangerous. Indeed, a single mutation in the genome of a bacterial cell contributing to the overexpression of new, unknown pumps is enough [46,47]. The rapidity of this adaptation is becoming the bacteria’s weapon of choice against commonly used antibiotics.
The discovery of effective methods to inhibit efflux pumps is becoming a challenge for many scientific fields. This is an extremely difficult task due to the fact that several independent mechanisms may be involved in pumping out a single antibiotic. The known efflux pump inhibitors include: (i) reserpine [48]; (ii) berberine (BRB) [49,50]; (iii) 5’-methoxyhydnocarpin (5’-MHC) [51]; (iv) quinoline derivatives [52]; and (v) arylpiperidine and arylpiperazine [53,54]. However, most of them are not neutral to the human body and are characterized by side effects, including high toxicity. Therefore, the identification of new efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) is necessary. Great hope is placed in natural compounds, specifically their main components, active substances. Given their diverse and highly selected activity, they can inhibit modification of the efflux pump mechanism formed by random mutations in the bacterial genome. One of the promising groups capable of showing high specificity in recognizing efflux pump substrates is polyphenols. These compounds are widely distributed in nature in many forms (Figure 2). They are found in green tea, Yerba mate, cocoa, olive oil, nuts, legumes, fruits, as well as wine and beer [55,56]. Their chemical structure, consisting of a hydroxyl group linked to an aromatic ring, influences their importance in the body’s purification and regeneration processes through strong antioxidant and free radical-destroying activities [57]. In addition, the most important positive effects of polyphenols on the human organism include: (i) antioxidant activity [58]; (ii) impact on the cardiovascular system, [59,60,61]; and (iii) effects on the immune system [62,63], including (1) anti-tumor [64,65], (2) antiviral [66,67], (3) antibacterial [68,69,70], (4) antifungal [71,72], and (5) analgesic [73,74] effects. Considering their wide distribution and wide-ranging effects, polyphenols are exactly the group of compounds that should be seen as potential inhibitors of efflux pumps or as compounds capable of avoiding membrane transporters.
Our study focused on reviewing the ability of polyphenols to overcome efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance among human pathogenic bacteria. For clearer communication of this very broad topic, we have divided our results into sections based on the main classification of polyphenols shown in Figure 2. In turn, each section clusters subsections describing specific types of microorganisms. In addition, due to the growing recent interest in all kinds of carriers with applications in phytomedicine, we have separated the results focused on the anti-efflux properties of polyphenols’ derivatives and nanoparticles (NPs). All the studies we cite were carried out only in vitro/in silico.
The main aim of our review is to highlight the importance of the efflux mechanism in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance worldwide. Efflux is one of the main mechanisms responsible for multidrug resistance in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Efflux pumps are not specific to a single antibiotic, but can simultaneously remove different groups of antibiotics from the cell using different action mechanisms, contributing early on to the failure of the applied therapy. It is important, as we underline in this review, that the effect of efflux pumps is not total insensitivity to a given microorganism, but low-level resistance. This phenomenon promotes the selection of increasingly resistant strains, and its detection is overlooked in routine diagnostics. Surprisingly, pathogens gain the ability to efflux various antibiotic molecules from their cells through the expression of the pumps mentioned above. So far, a reflection of the scale of this problem has been seen in the global increase in colistin (COL) resistance by efflux mechanism, among other things. The widespread use of linezolid to treat infections caused by Gram-positive strains, i.e., MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) or VRE/GRE (vancomycin/glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus), has also contributed to the emergence of the latest resistance phenotype LR (linezolid resistant). It is associated with the presence of optrA and poxtA genes, encoding the ABC family of transporter proteins in Enterococcus spp. that condition the LRE phenotype (linezolid-resistant Enterococcus) [75,76]. Mechanisms involving MFS and ABC family pumps have also been identified in S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis [77]. This review is intended to increase the understanding of the role of efflux in resistance and, consequently, enable the selection of antibiotics that are not substrates of efflux pumps or combination therapies with EPIs.
Our idea was to develop a review that comprehensively summarizes the available reports on the activity of a range of polyphenol groups in terms of their properties as inhibitors of efflux pumps in bacteria. We tried to include the greatest possible number of subfamilies of substances contained in this broad group, resulting in a thorough yet complex study. We also aimed to highlight pioneering pharmaceutical solutions—the development of derivatives of these substances and nanoparticles. As a result, to the best of our knowledge, we have created the first review article that not only attempts to describe the activity of pure substances of natural origin but also underlines the extraordinary potential of these compounds as precursors of a new generation of antimicrobial pharmaceuticals.

2. Anti-Efflux Potentials of Pure Polyphenols

2.1. Curcuminoids Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Curcuminoids (Figure 3) are a group of polyphenol compounds originally derived from rhizomes of Curcuma longa L. as well as other members of the Zingiberaceae family [78]. These plant-derived compounds form a group of substances (diarylheptanoids, derivatives of hydroxycinnamic acid) consisting of three substances: curcumin (A), demethoxycurcumin (B), and bisdemethoxycurcumin (C) [79].
Curcumin (CU)-[1,7-bis (hydroxyl-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione] is a polyphenol compound that has been identified as a possible EPI molecule. Additionally, the substance is widely known for its anti-inflammatory [80], anti-bacterial [81], anticancer [82], and neuroprotective [83] effects.
Non-fermenting rods: Promising reports on CU activity as an EPI come from the Negi et al. study [84]. The researchers reported that the exposure of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to polyphenols resulted in a reduction in the percentage of bacterial strains resistant to classic antibiotics used to treat infections with P. aeruginosa etiology. Furthermore, the strains were tested, and it was shown that 9–26% of them were not susceptible to the tested antibiotics (meropenem, ceftazidime, carbenicillin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin) and were characterized by resistance due to the efflux mechanism (phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide [PAβN] assay). CU in the concentration range of 20–50 μg/mL led to a restoration of ceftazidime (CAZ) sensitivity at a comparable rate to that of PAβN. In addition, the efficiency of CU in this process was superior to comparators in the cases of carbenicillin, gentamicin (GEN), and ciprofloxacin (CYP) [84]. CU was also tested for its ability to restore aminoglycoside sensitivity in P. aeruginosa strains that were originally resistant to them. For 100 of them, MICs for amikacin (ACN), tobramycin (TOB), and GEN were tested before and after the addition of efflux pump inhibitors (CU or PAβN). Importantly, it was shown that an above threefold reduction in MIC for any antibiotic was more frequent with polyphenol than with the comparator: GEN—26.6% vs. 6.6%, TOB—16.6% vs. 5.5%, and CAN—27.2% vs. 9.09% of tested strains. Surprisingly, the study proved that CU is a much more active inhibitor of efflux pumps than PAβN and can successfully restore aminoglycoside sensitivity in originally resistant Pseudomonas spp. [85]. The ability of CU to overcome efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa was investigated by Sulaiman et al. [86]. Their study showed a high percentage of resistance to CAZ (66%) and CYP (40%) among the bacteria; a total of 42% of strains were defined as MDR (total number equal to 74). The susceptibility of 13 MDR strains to CYP was significantly increased by exposure to CU at a concentration of 50 µg/mL (decrease in MIC from 1- to 5-fold). However, a similar phenomenon was not observed when CU and CAZ were combined. The study confirmed the previously cited reports on the ability to disrupt the outflow of fluoroquinolones in pathogens previously resistant to them; however, clinical usage of CU as an EPI requires further research [86]. Another study on the ability of CU to disrupt efflux in P. aeruginosa showed that the exposure to polyphenol increased the diameter of the growth inhibition zone in the Kirby–Bauer test. What is particularly important is that 100% of the strains tested showed expression of the pump-associated mexB gene. The strains resistant to meropenem (MER), CYP, ACN, and CAZ treated with CU have acquired sensitivity to aminoglycoside (increase of ZOI from 0 mm to 10 mm at exposures of 25–50 μg/mL of CU) and fluoroquinolone (ZOI increased from 0 to 7 mm in 50 μg/mL of CU). The presence of the efflux pump and the documented role of CU in its dysfunction adequately explain the increasing sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to the antibiotics used in combination [87]. The effect of A. baumannii exposure to CU alone and CU in combination with COL was assessed as a strategy to break down the reduced susceptibility of the pathogen to the antibiotic due to the efflux mechanism. A synergistic interaction of CU + COL was demonstrated in the checkerboard test. Polyphenol at 100 µM lowered the MIC for the antibiotic threefold, from 2 to 0.5 μg/mL. In turn, in the analysis using ethidium bromide (EtBr)—a well-established method to monitor efflux activities in bacteria—the use of CU led to the accumulation of the compound in a manner similar to the exposure to carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP). In addition to increased accumulation, a decrease in EtBr outflow after exposure to CU was noted, and at the molecular level, a decrease in emrB gene expression (gene encoding a compound of an efflux pump) was demonstrated. The reduction in expression was enhanced with the use of a synergistic combination. Importantly, CU also inhibited efflux ability via transporters other than AdeABC, because the tested A. baumannii ΔadeB mutant also presented the accumulation of EtBr and a decrease in EtBr outflow [88].
Enterobacteriaceae: The effect of CU on efflux pumps produced by representatives of the Enterobacteriaceae has also been demonstrated. One study showed that exposure of COL-resistant E. coli strain U3790 and K. pneumoniae BC936 to CU, among others, enabled increased EtBr accumulation inside cells. Of all the organic compounds tested, CU was inferior only to CCCP in potentiating efflux inhibition. What is more, a checkerboard analysis was carried out between COL, CU, and an inhibitor of MarR operon (operon associated with the overexpression of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump). The test also used knock-out mutants of acrA, acrB, and tolC genes. The study showed a strong synergy of CU with both preparations (32-128-fold reduction in MIC value for COL). The ability to also lower the MIC against acrB mutants indicated that CU may interfere with the efflux via other pump functions, e.g., EmrAB-TolC [89]. Qin et al. also investigated interactions between CU and COL and the potential clinical implications of polyphenols’ ability to restore COL susceptibility in MDR Gram-negative bacteria [90]. Synthesized liposomes containing a CU + COL combination were characterized by such high activity against COL-NS (non-susceptible) E. coli (decrease in MIC for the antibiotic ≥31 times) that the interaction was considered synergistic (checkerboard assay). The analysis using EtBr and CCCP as a comparator showed that CU in liposomal form led to the accumulation of EtBr inside E. coli cells in a more efficient way than CCCP (fluorescence analysis). The results of the study clearly indicated that CU interfered with MDR pumps in E. coli and thus intensified the effect of classic antibiotics [90]. Liang et al. evaluated the effect of curcumin photosensitization on survival and gene expression in Shigella flexneri. Interestingly, exposure to light and CU led to the upregulation of key genes regulating the functions of the AcrAB pump: marA and arcA. This may suggest that while CU (as other studies have shown) is able to inhibit efflux pumps in a number of pathogens, it can also induce its overexpression, especially under oxidative stress conditions [91].
Staphylococcus aureus: Joshi et al. examined the activity of CU against four S. aureus strains characterized by efflux resistance conditioned by pumps: NorA (resistance to CYP), TetK (resistance to tetracycline [TET]), MsrA (resistance to erythromycin), and MdeA (resistance to mupirocin). Exposure to CU led to an 8-fold reduction in MIC for CYP, which was associated with overcoming resistance conditioned by the NorA pump. However, the compound was unable to interfere with the remaining pumps [92]. The ability of CU to inhibit the activity of the S. aureus NorA pump and thus restore sensitivity to fluoroquinolone preparations was the main thread of the Jaberi et al. study [93]. The researchers showed that while 31% of tested strains (out of 100) were resistant to CYP, the addition of CCCP significantly reduced the MIC for the antibiotic in 13 cases, proving resistance in the efflux mechanism. After using CU, interesting molecular effects were noted—the level of norA gene expression decreased in the range of 3–100 times, depending on the strain. Similar to CCCP’s impact on CYP activity, a decrease in MIC for the antibiotic was also noted [93].

2.2. Flavonoids Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

A wide range of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds characterized by various biological effects were identified to be flavonoids. Flavonoids present as a large group of plant secondary metabolites with a common carbon-based skeleton composed of three rings (C6-C3-C6) and modified via alkyl and hydroxide groups [94]. The main division of flavonoids into subgroups is presented in Figure 4.
After reviewing the literature on the EPI properties of flavonoid substances, we focused our attention on four compounds with promising interference profiles with bacterial efflux. The detailed descriptions of flavonoids occurrence and documented biological activity are summarized in Table 2. In the following part of this section, we present the collected data associated with their EPI properties.

2.2.1. Quercetin Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Gram-positive bacteria: Quercetin’s (QR) activity of NorA efflux pump inhibition in S. aureus was assessed in the Brown et al. study. The researchers showed that the preparation was not characterized by a significant inhibitory effect of efflux, reaching IC50 = 75 µg/mL. A similar result was recorded against other polyphenols, including luteolin. The comparator used in the study—CCCP—was the most active inhibitor (IC50 = 4.7 μg/mL) [123]. QR and a number of other flavonoids were tested in the field for their ability to intensify the action of classic antibiotics against (ampicillin, CYP, erythromycin, oxacillin, and TET) bacteria originally resistant to them via the efflux mechanism. The study tested clinical S. aureus and selected mutants overexpressing norA, tetK, msrA genes. In the study, the QR (500 mg/L) and its isomer, morin, were found to sensitize CYP-NS Staphylococcus strains to the antibiotic (strain SA1199B overexpressing pump genes). In addition, the ability of QR and morin to reduce MICs for CYP, TET, and erythromycin (3-16-fold reduction) was proven. The described interaction was confirmed in relation to pathogens forming efflux pumps. Importantly, the study indicated the existence of the mechanism of polyphenols’ interference with the mentioned pumps [124]. Abreu et al. continued their research on the ability of QR and morin to interfere with biofilm formation by S. aureus SA1199B strain (overexpression of NorA pump). According to the previous study [125], QR efficiently increased CYP activity in a strain originally resistant to the mentioned drug. Morin, on the other hand, was characterized by the ability to inhibit the development of biofilm not only in the SA1199B strain, but also in two other strains characterized by overexpression of the TetK pump that is associated with resistance to TET and the erythromycin-resistant strain (MsrA) [125]. The ability of QR to overcome antibiotic resistance in S. aureus by interfering with efflux pumps NorA, MrsA, and TetK was also examined. There was a spectacular reduction in MIC for TET (from 1024 to 128 μg/mL) when the mentioned drug was applied together with QR, and a statistically significant reduction in MIC for CYP (from 256 to 128 μg/mL). Additionally, the EtBr assay confirmed a reduction in MIC for the substance in relation to the tested strains (strains with TetK and NorA overexpression), which was associated with the inhibition of efflux pumps. A ligand/protein complex stabilized by hydrogen bonds formed in silico showed QR’s ability to directly bind in the NorA efflux pump area [126].
Gram-negative bacteria: Pal et al. demonstrated the efficacy of QR as a formulation capable of inhibiting the activity of both carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) and overcoming the efflux pump resistance. Importantly, the tested polyphenol showed a synergistic interaction with MER. Analysis using EtBr evaluated the effect of QR on E. coli and K. pneumoniae overexpressing the acrB gene, P. aeruginosa (gene mexB), and A. baumannii (adeB). It was noted that the combination of QR + MER significantly reduced the activity of carbapenemases KPC, VIM, NDM, and OXA-type, which enabled an increase in the stability of the tested antibiotic. For acrB (+) strains, efflux pumps were inhibited in a statistically significant manner (p < 0.05) with a reduction in efflux of >40% (for QR = ½ MIC = 64 µg/mL). In silico docking analysis showed that QR interfered with the AcrB pump in a non-competitive manner with the PAβN. Both EPIs were binding to different critical regions of the efflux protein [127]. Furthermore, QR has demonstrated the ability to impair resistance to MER in CRAB and CRPA (carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa). The qRT-PCR analysis showed a decrease in the expression of both adeB and blaNDM genes [128]. De Carvalho et al. demonstrated a significant ligand interaction between QR and the structure of the gene repressor involved in the expression of the TtgABC efflux pump in the P. putida DOT-T1E strain. The polyphenol presented the ability to form a stable complex with the TtgR repressor. This action subsequently led to inhibition in the dissociation of the molecule from the binding area on the bacterial operon. As a result, the overcoming of resistance mediated via the efflux pump in Pseudomonas was revealed [129]. An in silico analysis was also performed on the docking capacity of QR and CYP comparators against a number of proteins produced by bacterial pathogens. Polyphenol was evaluated for its ability to interfere with, among others, the AdeJ protein forming the efflux pump in MDR A. baumannii. It has been shown that QR had a higher affinity (−7.4 kcal/mol) to the molecule than fluoroquinolone (−7.0 kcal/mol), which is an important premise in terms of the ability of polyphenol to disrupt efflux in MDR bacterial pathogens. Interestingly, polyphenol also showed a synergistic interaction with piperacillin against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii [130]. Sahoo et al. reported on the beneficial antibacterial properties of three organic compounds derived from Zingiber officinale: QR, 6-gingerol, and epicatechin. In an in silico docking study, QR demonstrated the ability to block the efflux pump AcrB expressed in MDR K. pneumoniae [131]. The activity of Fuzheng Touxie Jiedu Huayu decoction (especially rich in QR) was examined against difficult-to-treat MDR P. aeruginosa, characterized by efflux pump MexAB-OprM overexpression. The in silico study evaluated the docking abilities of the major components of the decoction, including QR. Polyphenol demonstrated the ability to bind and form stable complexes with MexR and OprM proteins, which was associated with the inhibition of the function of the MexAB-OprM pump in P. aeruginosa [132]. QR has also been shown to have a strong affinity for the AcrB protein (model in silico), obtaining a similar binding strength as the inhibitor PAβN (−7.15 vs. −7.95 kJ/mol). Polyphenols from other tested substances (e.g., plumbagin, plumbagin nordihydroguaretic acid, shikonin, acridine) showed the highest effectiveness in inhibiting the protein of the pump expressed in the E. coli BW25113 strain. Interestingly, the compound itself did not have antibacterial activity against both the mentioned strain and the knock-out mutant ΔacrB (MIC > 1024 μg/mL) [133].

2.2.2. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Gram-negative bacteria: The synergistic effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) with β-lactam antibiotics was studied by Lee et al. Treating carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) with subinhibitory concentrations of polyphenol (128 μg/mL) resulted in the sensitization (MIC drop below 1.0 μg/mL) of all MDR strains tested. After observing a synergistic effect of EGCG with NMP (1-(1-naphtylmethyl)-piperazine), it was suggested that the effect of EGCG may be related to the inhibition of multidrug efflux pumps [134]. Kanagaratnam et al. observed a synergistic effect of EGCG with CPL and TET against P. aeruginosa. Subinhibitory concentrations of the substance (128 μg/mL) significantly increased the effectiveness of these classes of antibiotics. This effect was caused by the inhibition of the three-component efflux pump MexAB-OprM by the tested compound. This efflux pump system contains several potential binding sites for direct inhibitors. Since the simultaneous application of EGCG together with PAβN resulted in a significant amplification of MexAB-OprM inhibition, it has been suggested that the mechanism of EGCG’s inhibitory action is caused by the direct binding of EGCG to sites on MexAB-OprM other than those involved in PAβN binding [135]. Significant reports on the ability of EGCG to overcome resistance to erythromycin and CYP in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli were derived from the Kurinčič et al. study. The described strains were characterized by the expression of genes encoding efflux pumps cmeB, cmeF, and cmeR. EGCG at sub-inhibition concentrations (similarly to PAβN and NMP) led to a decrease in MICs for these antibiotics, demonstrating its EPI properties [136]. Kurinčič et al. also assessed the ability of EGCG to interfere with efflux pumps expressed in C. jejuni ATCC33559, ATCC33560, and NCTC11168 strains. The mentioned bacteria were resistant to macrolide antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin [ERT], clarithromycin [CLA], and azithromycin [AZT]). EGCG in combination with AZT and CLA led to a decrease in the MIC of antibiotics in the range of 4–64-fold in the strains forming the CmeABC and CmeDEF pumps. Importantly, polyphenol lowered the MIC of strains resistant to CLA or dyrithromycin in the range of 4–64-fold, which is an important premise in the era of increasing resistance to macrolides among C. jejuni strains [137].
Gram-positive bacteria: Fiedler et al. proved that the combination of tigecycline (TGC) and various EPIs, including EGCG, resulted in a significant increase in antibiotic sensitivity in Enterococcus faecium expressing MATE-type efflux pumps. Polyphenol at a concentration of 60 mg/L induced a decrease in MIC by 0.125–10-fold, as well as in the case of resistant strains positive for vanA and vanB gene expression [138]. EGCG also demonstrated synergistic properties with TET against S. aureus and S. epidermidis harboring the TetK efflux pump. While polyphenol itself was not particularly active against bacteria (MIC = 100 µg/mL), its subinhibitory concentration (½ MIC) in combination with TET resulted in a 256- and 128-fold decrease in the MIC of the antibiotic (for TetK[+] S. epidermidis and S. aureus, respectively). Importantly, the fluorescence study confirmed increased accumulation of the antibiotic inside S. epidermidis cells after prior incubation in a medium containing EGCG [139].

2.2.3. Luteolin Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Gram-negative bacteria: Luteolin (LT) and a number of other substances contained in Fuzheng Touxie Jiedu Huayu decoction have been tested for their ability to disrupt the activity of efflux pump MexAB-OprM in MDR P. aeruginosa. Similarly to the previously described QR, polyphenol also had a significant binding affinity for key efflux pump proteins MexR (−8.1 kcal/mol) and OprM (−7.4 kcal/mol) [132]. Ding et al. have shown that LT isolated from Lophatherum gracile Brongn. has antibacterial activity against MDR E. coli (harboring sul2, sul3, gyrA, gyrB, oqxA, and parC genes), yielding an MIC of 1 mg/mL. Importantly, in molecular analysis (qRT-PCR), pathogen exposure to polyphenol (1xMIC) led to a significant reduction in the expression of all these genes, including oqxA (a 75% decrease in expression). This gene encodes a component of an RND pump that determines resistance to, among others, fluoroquinolones [140].
Gram-positive bacteria: LT isolated from Hydrastis canadensis extract was evaluated for its ability to disrupt the NorA efflux pump function present in the S. aureus NCTC 8325-4 strain. The preparation showed higher antibacterial activity than the previously tested QR (75 μg/mL vs. >150 µg/mL). On the other hand, in the field of NorA pump inhibition, polyphenol obtained much lower effectiveness than the CCCP comparator (IC50 = 75 µg/mL vs. 4.7 µg/mL) [123].
Others: Lechner et al. tested the efficacy of LT in inhibiting efflux against Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155. The natural preparation showed a higher antimicrobial activity by a row than resveratrol (MIC = 32 mg/L vs. 64 mg/L). Furthermore, the use of EtBr by these authors proved that the LT preparation at subinhibitory concentrations of 8 and 16 mg/L caused a twofold decrease in MIC for EtBr. Importantly, both LT and resveratrol showed no significant ability to interfere with EtBr efflux (in vitro analysis) [141]. Guo et al. revealed that after treatment with luteolin at ½ MIC, msrA-positive (containing msrA efflux pumps) of Trueperella pyogenes developed increased sensitivity to the macrolides acetylspiramycin, tylosin, and azithromycin, with MICs decreasing by 1- to 256-fold. Such a correlation was not present in the msrA-negative group. LT was proven to inhibit the msrA pump through several mechanisms: inhibition of msrA gene expression, interaction with post-transcriptional processing of the msrA gene, blocking energy acquisition by the MsrA efflux pump, and interfering with its ATP-binding regions and ATPase activity [142]. The effect of LT on the efflux systems of T. pyogenes was also confirmed by the study of Zhang et al. The researchers demonstrated that treatment of T. pyogenes with LT in concentrations of ¼ MIC led to increased sensitivity of the bacteria to GEN. Analysis of LT-treated strains showed reduced mRNA expression of MATE efflux pumps, responsible for the outflow of GEN, streptomycin, erythromycin, and roxithromycin, suggesting that inhibition occurred at the level of gene expression [143].

2.2.4. Naringenin Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Gram-negative bacteria: The multidrug efflux pump TtgABC, expressed by Pseudomonas putida, provides resistance to numerous antibiotics and toxic substances present in the environment [144]. It has been shown that substances of natural origin can interfere with the TrgR repressor molecule, which, after binding the ligand, inhibits the expression of DNA encoding the components of efflux pumps [145]. The Fernandez-Escamilla et al. study assessed whether ligand binding site mutations of TrgR affect the efficacy of the anti-efflux potentials of, among others, naringenin (NG) and phloretin [146]. For four mutant P. putida strains, both NG and phloretin have been shown to retain ligand-area binding capacity and form stable complexes with the repressor. Notably, phloretin (a polyphenol compound) showed the highest affinity for all altered areas of the protein in this respect [146]. Negm et al. evaluated the antibacterial activity of EtBr thouarsii leaf extract, rich in six compounds including NG, in relation to clinical strains and the ATCC13883 strain of K. pneumoniae. Furthermore, in the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of isolated substances, NG achieved a promising MIC in the range 0.5–1 µg/mL. The extract itself showed the ability to potentiate the effects of EtBr in the cartwheel test. In addition, there was a significant decrease in the expression of genes encoding components of various efflux pumps, norE, acrB, mdfA, and yihV, after exposure to the preparation [147]. Extremely important reports on the ability of NG to interfere with colistin resistance mediated via efflux come from the Xu et al. study. The authors showed that polyphenol and antibiotic alone were not effective against A. baumannii overexpressing AdeABC and AdeIJK pumps (COL MICs range: 8–32 µg/mL, NG > 512 µg/mL). However, their combination resulted in a synergistic interaction and resistance breakdown (COL MICs range: 0.25–1 µg/mL, NG: 16–32 µg/mL) [148]. Oyedara et al. examined the ability to disrupt the function of the efflux AcrAB-TolC pump present in Salmonella enterica. In silico molecular docking analysis showed that NG has a strong affinity for the AcrB protein (binding energy: −95.5 kJ/mol) [149].
Gram-positive bacteria: Although NG was not highly active against S. aureus SA-1199B (expression of the NorA efflux pump), reaching an MIC value > 256 µg/mL, it has been shown to be capable of interfering with the efflux mechanism. In an analysis using EtBr, polyphenol (concentration ¼ MIC) induced a fourfold decrease in MIC for EtBr. Additionally, NG also induced a fourfold decrease in MIC value for NOR (128 to 32 µg/mL) [150]. Polyphenol has also demonstrated the ability to break resistance mediated by efflux among S. aureus clinical strains (expressing genes: norA-C, mdeA, lmrS, mepA and AbcA) resistant to numerous fluoroquinolones (CYP, moxifloxacin [MOX], gatifloxacin [GTX], and ofloxacin [OFX]). The presence of pumps in the tested microorganisms was confirmed by analysis using EtBr. Exposure of the S. aureus 2493 strain to NG resulted in a decrease in the MIC for NOR (32 to 8 µg/mL) and erythromycin (>512 to 256 µg/mL). In turn, the combination of NG and NOR/MOX resulted in sensitivity to antibiotics of strains S. aureus N297214 and N307002 (NOR, respectively, 16 to 8 µg/mL and 512 to 16 μg/mL, and MOX 32-fold). Similarly, there was a spectacular decrease in MIC for NOR when combined with NG against the S. aureus 1079 strain (32-fold MIC reduction) [151]. It was also found that NG, similarly to another known inhibitor of efflux—chlorpromazine—may increase the activity of aminoglycoside antibiotics against S. aureus ATCC25923 and the SA10 strain. NG in subinhibitory concentrations (1/8 MIC = 128 µg/mL) induced a decrease in MIC for neomycin (from >600 µg/mL to <400 µg/mL) and amikacin (from ~200 to <70 µg/mL). The researchers suggested a possible role of the substance in interfering with the LmrS efflux pump, but the topic requires further in-depth research [152]. Johari et al. have shown that the simple NG derivative naringenin-4’-methyl ether present in the Chromolaena odorata extract exhibited efflux pump inhibitor properties in MDR S. aureus (three strains) and against S. aureus ATCC25923. Despite the lack of direct antibacterial activity (MIC ≥ 256 µg/mL), the preparation in the test using EtBr led to a decrease in the MIC of EtBr against MDR strains in the two–eightfold range [153].
Others: Biswas et al. have shown that polyphenol also has the ability to interfere with the function of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tap efflux pump (Rv1258c). In the in silico docking test, the preparation produced promising results, giving way to site-specific docking for only two comparators: baicalein and ellagic acid [154].

2.3. Non-Flavonoids Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Stilbenoids

Stilbenoids are a group of organic compounds of plant origin characterized by a common carbon skeleton C6-C2-C6 [155,156]. In terms of chemical structure, all substances included in this group are hydroxylated derivatives of the common precursor, stilbene (Figure 5). Other subgroups of this family are dibenzyls, bisdibenzyls, phenanthrenoids, and stilbene oligomers [157,158].
A careful study of global literature on the EPI properties of polyphenols from the stilbenoid group has identified resveratrol (RVT) as a promising compound capable of interrupting drug resistance in bacteria. RVT (Figure 6) is a plant-derived polyphenol present in grapes, berry fruits, and nuts, as well as Veratrum grandiflorum and white hellebore plants [159]. It has become the subject of numerous studies on its therapeutic use, including its antiviral [160], antimicrobial [161], cardioprotective [162], neuroprotective [163], and anticancer properties [164], and its potential use in the treatment of obesity [165].
Gram-positive bacteria: Santos et al. have shown that RVT has the ability to interfere with the efflux pump NorA expressed by the S. aureus SA1199 strain and the overexpressing norA gene mutant (SA1199B). RVT at subinhibitory concentrations (¼ MIC) caused a four to eightfold decrease in MIC for EtBr and induced a synergistic interaction with NOR (2–16-fold MIC reduction for fluoroquinolone). In the analysis using EtBr, after exposure to RVT of the SA1199B strain, the intensity of fluorescence caused by NorA pump inhibition was noted [166]. Another study considered the use of RVT in combating S. aureus resistance to NOR. It has been reported that RVT can effectively bind to the NorA efflux pump system through hydrogen bonds in some critical regions in the pump structure, leading to its inhibition [166].
Gram-negative bacteria: RVT isolated from Nauclea pobeguinii extract showed antibacterial activity against a number of Gram-negative pathogens that are resistant via efflux: E. coli acrF-overexpressing strains (MIC range: 32–128 µg/mL), Enterobacter aerogenes AcrAB-TolC harboring (MIC= 64 µg/mL), K. pneumoniae (MIC range: 16–64 µg/mL), P. aeruginosa (64–256 µg/mL), and Providencia stuartii AcrAB-TolC expressing (MIC range 128–256 µg/mL). Importantly, the combination of RVT at subinhibition concentrations (½ and ¼ MIC) led to the sensitization of 83.3–100% of tested strains to CYP, CPL, STM, and kanamycin and 50–66.7% to TET. A particularly significant synergistic effect was obtained with respect to the combinations of CPL + RVT and CYP + RVT (32-fold decrease of MIC) in the case of E. coli AG100A [167]. Abdulkareem et al. have shown that the combination of CYP and RVT can effectively reduce the expression of the adeF gene carried by A. baumannii (100% OXA-51 positive strains) derived from patients hospitalized in the ICU. RVT separately led to a twofold decrease in the expression of the gene encoding the efflux pump; in turn, its combination with CYP led to a less significant decrease to 0.93 from the primary 1.0 in the positive control (both cases had a static p value < 0.05) [168]. As in the 2023 study, Abdulkareem et al. evaluated the ability of RVT alone and RVT + CYP in combination to inhibit the expression of genes encoding RND-type pump components in MDR and PDR A. baumannii isolated from ICU ward patients. The researchers showed that exposure to RVT and RVT + CYP (at 1 × MIC concentrations) led to a decrease in adeI gene expression from 1.0 (unit adopted for positive control) to 0.59 and 0.79, respectively. Importantly, exposure to the antibiotic alone led to increased expression of the pump gene (to a value of 1.35). In turn, exposure to RVT alone (concentration of ¼ MIC) led to a very strong decrease in the expression of the adeJ gene, from 1.0 (positive control) to 0.28 (~fourfold reduction) [169]. A synergistic effect of RVT with COL was observed by Cheng et al. against mcr-1-positive E. coli strains. The combination of RVT and COL resulted in a reduction of the starting MIC of the substance for COL in the range of 2–256-fold. As a result, in the case of five of the eight mcr-1(+) strains tested, the study showed a synergistic interaction between the compounds (FICI ≤ 0.5). The EtBr fluorescence assay revealed that RVT inhibited the activity of E. coli efflux pumps. However, the effect of RVT was relatively moderate compared to the combination of this compound with COL and baicalin. Molecular docking (in silico) demonstrated that the stilbenoid had an affinity for the mcr-1 protein (binding energy–5.45 kcal/mol), which confirmed the reports of the EtBr-assisted study [170]. Downregulated expression of genes encoding the AcrAB-TolC drug efflux complex in E. coli was also reported in an experiment by Hwang et al. The study showed that the direct target of RVT was the TolC component. RVT led to the inactivation of the tolC gene by inhibiting the p-tolC promoter [171]. Singkham et al. tested the effect of RVT against CRAB isolates. No synergistic effect was observed with RVT in combination with IMI, COL, or ACN. The combination of RVT + rifampicin was effective in 15% of A. baumannii cases, and RVT + chlorhexidine proved to be the most effective combination, showing synergism in all drug-resistant strains tested (FICI range of: 0.19–0.38, while FICI ≤ 0.5 was defined as synergistic). It has been revealed that the efflux pumps AdeB and AceI, responsible for the outflow of chlorhexidine in A. baumannii, are a key element in the synergism of these agents. It was found that significantly reduced expression of the adeB gene, without changes in the expression of aceI, adeR, and adeS, was sufficient to impair the efflux pump by RVT. Therefore, the sensitization of A. baumannii to chlorhexidine was primarily caused by AdeB efflux pump inhibition, while the AdeRS efflux system was not downregulated [172]. Similar findings emerged from later studies reporting that RVT inhibited the gene expression of A. baumannii efflux system superfamilies, AdeB and AceI. After polyphenol-based treatment, A. baumannii exhibited over a 10-fold decrease in the expression of amvA, adeB, and adeJ genes and a twofold decrease in aceI expression [173,174].
Others: Lechner et al. investigated the efficacy of RVT in blocking the efflux mechanism in M. smegmatis mc2155. The preparation showed MIC at a level of 64 mg/L. Additionally, the analysis using EtBr proved that the preparation in subinhibitory concentrations of 16 mg/L caused a twofold decrease in MIC for EtBr. Resveratrol did not show a significant ability to interfere with the efflux of EtBr (in vitro analysis) [141].

2.4. Tannins Activity as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Tannins form an important group of polyphenolic plant-derived compounds. These substances are originally derived from various fruits, e.g., blackberries, apples, grapes, and legume trees Acacia spp. and Sesbania spp. Gallotannins are widely distributed in Quercus infectoria, Rhus chinensis, Caesalpinia spinosa, and Quercus montana [175,176]. Substances in this family are characterized by high molecular mass (500 to ≥20.000 Da) and numerous free hydroxyl phenolic groups (1–2 per 100 Da) [177,178]. Due to the presence of -OH groups, their representatives are capable of forming macromolecules or conjugates with, e.g., proteins, lipids, or saccharides [179,180]. One of the methods of tannin classification divides them into four groups: condensed tannins, hydrolysable tannins, phlorotannins, and complex tannins. This division is based on the structure of monomeric units forming a given macromolecule. Hydrolysable tannins form a polyol core (usually D-glucose) and esterified monomers, ellagic acid (ellagitannins) or gallic acid (gallotannins) [181,182]. Condensed tannins (proanthocyanins) are produced by polymerization of flavonoid monomers such as anthocyanins [183]. Phlorotannins are a group of tannins formed by the polymerization of phloroglucinol [184]. Complex tannins, on the other hand, are formed both as a result of the polymerization of flavonoid structures and as esters of gallic acid [185]. A summary of the tannins division into their main groups is presented in Figure 7.

Tannic Acid as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor

Tannic acid (2,3-dihydroxy-5-[[(2R,3R,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5,6-tetrakis [[3,4-dihydroxy-5-(3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoyl)oxybenzoyl]oxy]oxan-2-yl]methoxycarbonyl]phenyl] 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate) (Figure 8) is a representative of gallotannins, commonly extracted from the gall nuts and leaves of Caesalpinia spinosa, Rhus semialata, or Quercus infectoria [186]. The term tannin is ordinarily used as a synonym for tannic acid (TA). This polyphenol has numerous industrial, pharmacological, and food additive applications. Polyphenol is reported to be toxic to animals when injected into the bloodstream or consumed in large amounts, with an LD50 of 5 g/kg in rats and 6 g/kg in mice [187,188]. It is also a potent antioxidant [189] and has exhibited anti-mutagenic [190], antibacterial [187], and anti-inflammatory activity [191] and has reduced carcinogenic potency [188].
Gram-positive bacteria: Tintino et al. proved that exposure to TA induces decreased norA gene expression in S. aureus SA1199B (strain characterized by hyperexpression of the norA gene). The combination of TA and NOR (both at ¼ MIC) has been shown to lead to almost complete regression of norA gene expression in the SA1199B strain. Analysis with EtBr showed increased fluorescence of staphylococcal cells after exposure to polyphenol. Furthermore, TA has been shown to interact synergistically (FICI ≤ 0.5) with both NOR and EtBr. The in silico study indicated that TA inhibited NorA through various interactions, e.g., Van der Waals interactions, hydrogen bonds, and electrostatic effects. The ability of TA to interfere with efflux pumps can also be correlated with its effect on signaling pathways associated with the ArlRS factor (two-component regulatory system) necessary for adhesion, biofilm formation, and virulence [192]. In another study, Tintino et al. evaluated the effect of TA on S. aureus strains expressing two different efflux pumps: MsrA (S. aureus RN4220) and TetK (S. aureus IS-58). The preparation did not show direct antibacterial activity against both tested strains (MIC = 512 µg/mL) in contrast to, e.g., CCCP (MIC = 1–2 μg/mL) or EtBr (MIC = 32 µg/mL). The combination of TA (1/8 MIC) with antibiotics (TET, ERT) against IS-58 and RN4220 strains resulted in, respectively, a twofold reduction in MIC for TET (comparable result for TET + CCCP connection) and a greater than fourfold reduction in MIC for ERT against the MsrA harboring strain. A noteworthy combination of TA + EtBr resulted in a greater than twofold reduction in the MIC of EtBr against the IS-58 strain [187]. In a similar study, Tintino et al. evaluated the ability of polyphenol to impair the function of the NorA pump in the case of the S. aureus SA1199B (norA gene hyperexpression) and SA1199 strains. The preparation, despite its low antibacterial activity against both strains (MIC ≥ 1024 µg/mL), limited the MIC for EtBr (>twofold) against both staph strains in a positive way. The combination of TA (1/8 MIC) and NOR resulted in a fourfold decrease in the MIC for the antibiotic (128 to 32 µg/mL) for the SA1199 strain and a spectacular MIC reduction for the SA1199B strain (~eightfold decrease) [193]. Myint et al. investigated whether TA exposure could inhibit the efflux of fusidic acid by S. aureus MRSA, previously exposed to subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Importantly, it has been shown that while chronic exposure to fusidic acid induces the development of efflux-mediated resistance in MRSA, the polyphenol (concentrations of 0.3 and 0.6 MIC) intensified EtBr accumulation inside bacterial cells. The described process can potentially protect against the development of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus [194]. Further reports on the blocking of efflux-mediated resistance in S. aureus via the NorA pump come from the Diniz-Silva et al. study. The researchers showed that TA (subinhibitory concentration) interfered with efflux in the SA1199B staph strain and led to an increase in NOR activity (decrease in MIC from 128 to 4 µg/mL), and the interaction was confirmed to be synergistic (FICI ≤ 0.5) [195].
Gram-negative bacteria: TA has been studied as a potential inhibitor of efflux pumps in MDR A. baumannii JVC1053 (resistant to LEV, aztreonam, CYP, and TRM-STX) and the ATCC19606 strain. The Kirby–Bauer test showed that the addition of TA in subinhibitory concentrations (40 µM) to a range of antibiotics resulted in an increase in the size of the ZOI in the case of the MDR strain for fusidic acid, rifampicin, TET, coumermycin, novobiocin, and chlorbiocin. It has also been shown that the addition of TA (40 µM) reduces the MIC for novobiocin, chlorbiocin, coumermycin (foufold), fusidic acid, and rifampicin (twofold) preparations. There was no increased accumulation of EtBr using the compound, but the increasing intracellular accumulation of pyronine Y (in vitro) proved that TA can interfere with the efflux pump system in A. baumannii [196]. Lin et al. conducted a study on the potential role of TA in interfering with the efflux pump system in A. baumannii with the active two-component BaeSR system and in the case of ΔbaeR mutants. In the case of strains lacking this gene (as in the case with other tested compounds), the inhibition of Acinetobacter growth was noted after TA exposure (total inhibition at 150 μg/mL). In the context of the described strain, there was a significant decrease in the expression of genes encoding efflux pump subunits adeB, adeJ, and macB. However, in the case of strains with functional BaeSR regulation, an increase in pump expression after TA exposure was detected (increase from a concentration of 100 µg/mL). BaeR has been identified as a potential defense mechanism that, as in the case of TGC resistance induction, can enable A. baumannii to survive in a TA-rich environment [197].

2.5. Phenolic Acids

Phenolic acids are a large group of organic compounds widely distributed in various fruits and vegetables, such as pomegranate (Punica granatum), raspberry (Rubus idaeus), carrots (Daucus carota), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); cereals, such as wheat (Triticum aestivum), and rice (Oryza sativa); and, among others, nuts (Juglans regia) and coffee (Coffea arabica) [198,199]. From the point of view of their chemical structure, they are characterized by the presence of both carboxyl and phenolic groups [199]. In general, the group is divided into benzoic acid derivatives (hydroxybenzoic acids) and cinnamic acid derivatives (hydroxycinnamic acids) [200]. A comparison of the structure of both groups is presented in Figure 9.

Ellagic Acid as an Efflux Pump

Ellagic acid (EA, Figure 10) belongs to the hydroxybenzoic acids and contains two oxidized and esterified molecules of gallic acid. The compound naturally occurs in many herbs and is also abundant in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), grape (Vitis vinifera L.), and raspberry (Rubus spp. raspberry) [201]. EA is widely known for its antioxidant [202], antimicrobial [203], antiviral, and anti-inflammatory [204] properties. It also causes tumor gene suppression, antiproliferation, and positive regulation of apoptosis genes in cancer cells [205]. EA is insoluble in water, so its metabolites are characterized by low bioavailability and are quickly eliminated. Therefore, its therapeutic advantage is limited, since most clinical drugs are administered orally [206].
Gram-negative bacteria: EA was identified as a potential EPI active against MDR A. baumannii JVC1053 (resistant to LEV, aztreonam, CYP, and TRM-STX) and ATCC19606 strains. The exposure to polyphenol (40 µM) led to an increase in the ZOI diameter of antibiotics (novobiocin, chlorbiocin, coumermycin, TET, RIF, and fusidic acid) tested against the MDR strain (Kirby–Bauer assay). EA (40 µM) was revealed to reduce the MIC for novobiocin, coumermycin, fusidic acid, and rifampicin (fourfold) preparations. Moreover, the 100% reduction in the growth of the MDR A. baumannii strain was noted with the combination of EA (40 µM) and novobiocin (1/4 MIC). This activity (both substances at subinhibitory concentrations) suggested that polyphenol may interrupt efflux-mediated resistance among Acinetobacter. There was no increased accumulation of EtBr using the compound, but the increasing intracellular accumulation of pyronine Y (in vitro) proved that EA disrupted the efflux pump system in A. baumannii [196].
Gram-positive bacteria: Macêdo et al. performed a test using EA and gallic acid, which showed a reduction in the MIC value of TET from 256 to 128 μg/mL for the IS-58 S. aureus strain. Additionally, in the test with CYP in the presence of EA and gallic acid, antibacterial activity was increased—an MIC reduction from 161.27 to 128 μg/mL. It has been proven that neither acid showed direct activity on the efflux pump in S. aureus but their properties were associated with affecting tetK and mepA gene expression. However, the authors did not explain the specific mechanism of action, so further molecular tests are needed [207].
Others: Due to M. tuberculosis acquiring resistance to RIF, Nirmal et al. conducted a study of EA that showed synergistic inhibitory activity with RIF against resistant Mycobacterium strains. In the in silico assay, the possibility of inhibiting the Rv1819c- BecA efflux pump was noted. EPI activity was performed by evaluating the accumulation of EtBr in MDR strains of M. tuberculosis and the BecA-expressing recombinant M. smegmatis strain. The cytotoxicity of the tested inhibitors (including EA) was assessed using the in silico and ex vivo methods. Recombinant M. smegmatis exposed to EtBr in the presence of EA (0.5 MIC concentration) showed increased accumulation of EtBr. EA exposure led (among other EPIs like piperine) to the strongest BecA inhibition (fluorescence intensity assay). This ability of EA to interfere with BecA EP presents a strong premise for its EPI properties in disrupting RIF resistance [208]. An in silico study performed by Biswas et al. showed the potential of EA to bind to the efflux pump (Rv1258c) Tap, which is responsible for the resistance of M. tuberculosis to various tuberculostatics. EA exhibited significant binding affinity to the structure of Tap EP via the formation of, e.g., hydrogen bonds. The polyphenolic compound showed satisfactory docking results and bioavailability as a possible EPI active against MDR M. tuberculosis [154].

3. Cutting-Edge Technologies Enhancing the Efficiency of Plant-Derived Drugs

The newly synthesized derivatives of the phytochemicals described above offer great hope in the fight against growing bacterial resistance to antibiotics associated with active pumping out. The EPI properties of these polyphenolic derivatives demonstrated in vitro make it possible to successfully use them in modern nanotechnologies. Table 3 is dedicated to summarizing information on the anti-efflux properties of polyphenolic derivatives.
One of the most rapidly developing nanotechnologies in phytomedicine in recent times is the process of synthesizing nanoparticles (NPs). Due to the chemical characteristics of substances of natural origin it is possible to use them in both the synthesis of metal-based NPs (green synthesis, based on their reducing and stabilizing properties) and the formation of compound-based NPs [215,216]. Table 4 summarizes data on the nanotechnology implications of the compounds described in this review.

4. Materials and Methods

In this review, we searched for articles in the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. In total, 225 articles were cited. The articles were qualified for review by searching for the following keywords in their titles and abstracts: “efflux pump”, “curcumin”, “quercetin”, “luteolin”, “naringenin”, “tannic acid”, “ellagic acid”, “resveratrol”, “epigallocatechin-3-gallate”, “stilbenoids’’, “flavonoids’’.
Our review includes articles that were published after 2012. Older manuscripts were classified as not qualifying and were rejected.
Figure 1 presents a simplified scheme of the molecular action of several classes of efflux pumps. Figure 2 presents the classification of natural polyphenolic compounds based on structure. Figure 3, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 8 and Figure 10 illustrate the molecular structures of the polyphenols qualified for review. Figure 4 presents the classification of flavonoids, and Figure 7 presents the classification of tannins. Figure 9 shows the simplified molecular formula of phenolic acids.
Table 1 describes the classification, prevalence, and substrates of the efflux pumps depicted in Figure 1. Table 2 describes the characteristics of qualified flavonoids and their properties. Table 3 and Table 4 present summarized data on the EPI properties of polyphenols’ derivatives and polyphenols’ applications in nanomedicine, respectively. The symbols used represent the following: ↓—down regulation/decrease in; ↑—up regulation/increase in.

5. Conclusions

Several types of EPIs with documented efficacy (CCCP, PAβN, NMP) have already been recognized, but their excessive toxicity unfortunately excludes them from clinical practice. The evidence we presented about the effectiveness of plant-derived polyphenols in this field opens the door to discussing their role in this issue. The described compounds are characterized by low systemic toxicity and are widely used in traditional and herbal medicine. The fact that many of them (especially quercetin) presented inhibitory activity comparable to that of reserpine or verapamil is extremely important. On reflection, it appears that synthesizing polyphenol derivatives as a novel EPI and pursuing synergy with classic antibiotics is a promising strategy. The reports on the ability of flavonoids (QR, EGCG, and LT) to interfere with the function of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, e.g., in non-fermenting bacilli such as P. aeruginosa, are especially significant. The mentioned pump is characterized by a very broad substrate spectrum, which poses a serious threat of rapidly developing multidrug resistance. QR, RVT, and EA also appear to be comparatively promising, with the ability to downregulate the expression of key genes encoding components of the AdeABC pump, present especially in MDR A. baumannii. Both cited pathogens are responsible for the vast majority of infections in the ICU, and are often characterized by limited treatment options, which makes these reports all the more clinically valuable. What is more, rapid molecular diagnostic systems, e.g., MALDI-TOF MS, were developed to be capable of confirming the presence of efflux pumps in detected bacteria. A successful way to overcome multidrug resistance may be achieved by combining this possibility with the simultaneous use of novel EPIs and classic antibiotics. However, to achieve this targeted therapy, more research in this field is required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.V. and A.D.-M.; software, S.V.; investigation, A.D.-M. and S.V.; resources A.D.-M., S.V., P.N., W.S. and K.W.; data curation, A.D.-M., S.V., P.N., W.S. and K.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.-M., S.V., P.N. and W.S.; writing—review and editing, A.D.-M. and S.V.; visualization, A.D.-M. and S.V.; supervision, A.D.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Seukep, A.J.; Mbuntcha, H.G.; Kuete, V.; Chu, Y.; Fan, E.; Guo, M.Q. What Approaches to Thwart Bacterial Efflux Pumps-Mediated Resistance? Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Levy, S.B. Active Efflux, a Common Mechanism for Biocide and Antibiotic Resistance. Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gilbert, P.; McBain, A.J. Potential Impact of Increased Use of Biocides in Consumer Products on Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poole, K. Efflux-Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 20–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lekshmi, M.; Ortiz-Alegria, A.; Kumar, S.; Varela, M.F. Major Facilitator Superfamily Efflux Pumps in Human Pathogens: Role in Multidrug Resistance and Beyond. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024, 7, 100248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pasqua, M.; Grossi, M.; Zennaro, A.; Fanelli, G.; Micheli, G.; Barras, F.; Colonna, B.; Prosseda, G. The Varied Role of Efflux Pumps of the Mfs Family in the Interplay of Bacteria with Animal and Plant Cells. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stephen, J.; Salam, F.; Lekshmi, M.; Kumar, S.H.; Varela, M.F. The Major Facilitator Superfamily and Antimicrobial Resistance Efflux Pumps of the ESKAPEE Pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bay, D.C.; Rommens, K.L.; Turner, R.J. Small Multidrug Resistance Proteins: A Multidrug Transporter Family That Continues to Grow. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2008, 1778, 1814–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nishino, K.; Yamasaki, S.; Nakashima, R.; Zwama, M.; Hayashi-Nishino, M. Function and Inhibitory Mechanisms of Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 737288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piddock, L.J.V. Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 382–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nikaido, H. Structure and Mechanism of RND-Type Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 2010, 77, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novelli, M.; Bolla, J.M. RND Efflux Pump Induction: A Crucial Network Unveiling Adaptive Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Auda, I.G.; Ali Salman, I.M.; Odah, J.G. Efflux Pumps of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Brief. Gene Rep. 2020, 20, 100666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gurvic, D.; Zachariae, U. Multidrug Efflux in Gram-Negative Bacteria: Structural Modifications in Active Compounds Leading to Efflux Pump Avoidance. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blair, J.M.A.; Richmond, G.E.; Piddock, L.J.V. Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Their Role in Antibiotic Resistance. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schindler, B.D.; Kaatz, G.W. Multidrug Efflux Pumps of Gram-Positive Bacteria. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 27, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, L.; Wu, C.; Gao, H.; Xu, C.; Dai, M.; Huang, L.; Hao, H.; Wang, X.; Cheng, G. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps at the Frontline of Antimicrobial Resistance: An Overview. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cho, H.H.; Sung, J.Y.; Kwon, K.C.; Koo, S.H. Expression of Sme Efflux Pumps and Multilocus Sequence Typing in Clinical Isolates of Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia. Ann. Lab. Med. 2012, 32, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, J.; Xu, X.; Guo, Q.; Zhao, X.; Ye, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, M. Prevalence of the OqxAB Gene Complex in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1655–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Castanheira, M.; Deshpande, L.M.; Jones, R.N.; Farrell, D.J. Evaluation of Quinolone Resistance–Determining Region Mutations and Efflux Pump Expression in Neisseria Meningitidis Resistant to Fluoroquinolones. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 72, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dreier, J.; Ruggerone, P. Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Leus, I.V.; Weeks, J.W.; Bonifay, V.; Smith, L.; Richardson, S.; Zgurskaya, H.I. Substrate Specificities and Efflux Efficiencies of RND Efflux Pumps of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00049-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saw, H.T.H.; Webber, M.A.; Mushtaq, S.; Woodford, N.; Piddock, L.J.V. Inactivation or Inhibition of AcrAB-TolC Increases Resistance of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae to Carbapenems. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1510–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, D.; van Veen, H.W.; Murakami, S.; Pos, K.M.; Luisi, B.F. Structure, Mechanism and Cooperation of Bacterial Multidrug Transporters. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 33, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rouquette-Loughlin, C.E.; Dhulipala, V.; Reimche, J.L.; Raterman, E.; Begum, A.A.; Jerse, A.E.; Shafer, W.M. Cis- and Trans-Acting Factors Influence Expression of the NorM -Encoded Efflux Pump of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Levels of Gonococcal Susceptibility to Substrate Antimicrobials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Banchs, C.; Poulos, S.; Nimjareansuk, W.S.; Joo, Y.E.; Faham, S. Substrate Binding to the Multidrug Transporter MepA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2014, 1838, 2539–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuroda, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Multidrug Efflux Transporters in the MATE Family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2009, 1794, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tocci, N.; Iannelli, F.; Bidossi, A.; Ciusa, M.L.; Decorosi, F.; Viti, C.; Pozzi, G.; Ricci, S.; Oggioni, M.R. Functional Analysis of Pneumococcal Drug Efflux Pumps Associates the MATE DinF Transporter with Quinolone Susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, S.; Zgurskaya, H.I. MacA, a Periplasmic Membrane Fusion Protein of the Macrolide Transporter MacAB-TolC, Binds Lipopolysaccharide Core Specifically and with High Affinity. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 4865–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, H.T.; Bavro, V.N.; Barrera, N.P.; Frankish, H.M.; Velamakanni, S.; van Veen, H.W.; Robinson, C.V.; Borges-Walmsley, M.I.; Walmsley, A.R. MacB ABC Transporter Is a Dimer Whose ATPase Activity and Macrolide-Binding Capacity Are Regulated by the Membrane Fusion Protein MacA*. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lerma, L.L.; Benomar, N.; Valenzuela, A.S.; Muñoz, M.d.C.C.; Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H. Role of EfrAB Efflux Pump in Biocide Tolerance and Antibiotic Resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Traditional Fermented Foods and the Effect of EDTA as EfrAB Inhibitor. Food Microbiol. 2014, 44, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tatsuno, I.; Isaka, M.; Masuno, K.; Hata, N.; Matsumoto, M.; Hasegawa, T. Functional Predominance of Msr (D), Which Is More Effective as Mef(A)-Associated Than Mef(E)-Associated, Over Mef (A)/ Mef (E) in Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Garvey, M.I.; Baylay, A.J.; Wong, R.L.; Piddock, L.J.V. Overexpression of PatA and PatB, Which Encode ABC Transporters, Is Associated with Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shirshikova, T.V.; Sierra-Bakhshi, C.G.; Kamaletdinova, L.K.; Matrosova, L.E.; Khabipova, N.N.; Evtugyn, V.G.; Khilyas, I.V.; Danilova, I.V.; Mardanova, A.M.; Sharipova, M.R.; et al. The ABC-Type Efflux Pump MacAB Is Involved in Protection of Serratia marcescens against Aminoglycoside Antibiotics, Polymyxins, and Oxidative Stress. mSphere 2021, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Costa, S.S.; Viveiros, M.; Amaral, L.; Couto, I. Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Staphylococcus aureus: An Update. Open Microbiol. J. 2013, 7, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chancey, S.T.; Bai, X.; Kumar, N.; Drabek, E.F.; Daugherty, S.C.; Colon, T.; Ott, S.; Sengamalay, N.; Sadzewicz, L.; Tallon, L.J.; et al. Transcriptional Attenuation Controls Macrolide Inducible Efflux and Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and in Other Gram-Positive Bacteria Containing Mef/Mel(Msr(D)) Elements. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nunez-Samudio, V.; Chesneau, O. Functional Interplay between the ATP Binding Cassette Msr(D) Protein and the Membrane Facilitator Superfamily Mef(E) Transporter for Macrolide Resistance in Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 2013, 164, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wright, D.J.; Tate, C.G. Isolation and Characterisation of Transport-Defective Substrate-Binding Mutants of the Tetracycline Antiporter TetA(B). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2015, 1848, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fluman, N.; Bibi, E. Bacterial Multidrug Transport through the Lens of the Major Facilitator Superfamily. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteomics 2009, 1794, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bay, D.C.; Turner, R.J. Diversity and Evolution of the Small Multidrug Resistance Protein Family. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, M.-F.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Tu, C.-C.; Lan, C.-Y. Distribution of Different Efflux Pump Genes in Clinical Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Their Correlation with Antimicrobial Resistance. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 50, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Padariya, M.; Kalathiya, U.; Baginski, M. Structural and Dynamic Insights on the EmrE Protein with TPP + and Related Substrates through Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2018, 212, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Webber, M.A.; Piddock, L.J.V. The Importance of Efflux Pumps in Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Yan, A. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Mechanisms, Physiology and Pharmacological Exploitations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gaurav, A.; Bakht, P.; Saini, M.; Pandey, S.; Pathania, R. Role of Bacterial Efflux Pumps in Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence, and Strategies to Discover Novel Efflux Pump Inhibitors. Microbiology 2023, 169, 001333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vaez, H.; Faghri, J.; Isfahani, B.; Moghim, S.; Yadegari, S.; Fazeli, H.; Moghofeei, M.; Safaei, H. Efflux Pump Regulatory Genes Mutations in Multidrug Resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Wound Infections in Isfahan Hospitals. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014, 3, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roy, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Saha, B.; Dutta, S.; Basu, S. Overexpression of Efflux Pumps, Mutations in the Pumps’ Regulators, Chromosomal Mutations, and AAC(6′)-Ib-Cr Are Associated With Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Diverse Sequence Types of Neonatal Septicaemic Acinetobacter baumannii: A 7-Year Single Center S. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 602724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shaheen, A.; Afridi, W.A.; Mahboob, S.; Sana, M.; Zeeshan, N.; Ismat, F.; Mirza, O.; Iqbal, M.; Rahman, M. Reserpine Is the New Addition into the Repertoire of AcrB Efflux Pump Inhibitors. Mol. Biol. 2019, 53, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.; Ge, X. Role of Berberine as a Potential Efflux Pump Inhibitor against MdfA from Escherichia coli: In Vitro and In Silico Studies. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e03324-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Morita, Y.; Nakashima, K.; Nishino, K.; Kotani, K.; Tomida, J.; Inoue, M.; Kawamura, Y. Berberine Is a Novel Type Efflux Inhibitor Which Attenuates the MexXY-Mediated Aminoglycoside Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. PTegos, G.P.; Haynes, M.; Strouse, J.J.; Khan, M.M.T.; Bologa, C.G.; Oprea, T.I.; Sklar, L.A. Microbial Efflux Pump Inhibition: Tactics and Strategies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 17, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mahamoud, A.; Chevalier, J.; Davin-Regli, A.; Barbe, J.; Pages, J.-M. Quinoline Derivatives as Promising Inhibitors of Antibiotic Efflux Pump in Multidrug Resistant Enterobacter aerogenes Isolates. Curr. Drug Targets 2006, 7, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sharma, A.; Gupta, V.K.; Pathania, R. Efflux Pump Inhibitors for Bacterial Pathogens: From Bench to Bedside. Indian J Med. Res. 2019, 149, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Compagne, N.; Jiménez-Castellanos, J.C.; Meurillon, V.; Pradel, E.; Vieira Da Cruz, A.; Piveteau, C.; Biela, A.; Eveque, M.; Leroux, F.; Deprez, B.; et al. Optimization of Pyridylpiperazine-Based Inhibitors of the Escherichia coli AcrAB-TolC Efflux Pump. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 259, 115630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant Polyphenols as Dietary Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Souto, E.B.; Cicala, C.; Caiazzo, E.; Izzo, A.A.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Polyphenols: A Concise Overview on the Chemistry, Occurrence, and Human Health. Phyther. Res. 2019, 33, 2221–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rudrapal, M.; Khairnar, S.J.; Khan, J.; Bin Dukhyil, A.; Ansari, M.A.; Alomary, M.N.; Alshabrmi, F.M.; Palai, S.; Deb, P.K.; Devi, R. Dietary Polyphenols and Their Role in Oxidative Stress-Induced Human Diseases: Insights Into Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Mechanism(s) of Action. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 806470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gebicki, J.M.; Nauser, T. Fast Antioxidant Reaction of Polyphenols and Their Metabolites. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Behl, T.; Bungau, S.; Kumar, K.; Zengin, G.; Khan, F.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, R.; Venkatachalam, T.; Tit, D.M.; Vesa, C.M.; et al. Pleotropic Effects of Polyphenols in Cardiovascular System. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 130, 110714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hedayati, N.; Yaghoobi, A.; Salami, M.; Gholinezhad, Y.; Aghadavood, F.; Eshraghi, R.; Aarabi, M.H.; Homayoonfal, M.; Asemi, Z.; Mirzaei, H.; et al. Impact of Polyphenols on Heart Failure and Cardiac Hypertrophy: Clinical Effects and Molecular Mechanisms. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1174816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goszcz, K.; Duthie, G.G.; Stewart, D.; Leslie, S.J.; Megson, I.L. Bioactive Polyphenols and Cardiovascular Disease: Chemical Antagonists, Pharmacological Agents or Xenobiotics That Drive an Adaptive Response? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1209–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sun, S.; Liu, Z.; Lin, M.; Gao, N.; Wang, X. Polyphenols in Health and Food Processing: Antibacterial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antioxidant Insights. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1456730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Davidova, S.; Galabov, A.S.; Satchanska, G. Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antiviral Activity, and Mechanisms of Action of Plant Polyphenols. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Duda-Madej, A.; Viscardi, S.; Szewczyk, W.; Topola, E. Natural Alkaloids in Cancer Therapy: Berberine, Sanguinarine and Chelerythrine against Colorectal and Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bhosale, P.B.; Ha, S.E.; Vetrivel, P.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, G.S. Functions of Polyphenols and Its Anticancer Properties in Biomedical Research: A Narrative Review. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 7619–7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chojnacka, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Mikula, K.; Szopa, D. Antiviral Properties of Polyphenols from Plants. Foods 2021, 10, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Montenegro-Landívar, M.F.; Tapia-Quirós, P.; Vecino, X.; Reig, M.; Valderrama, C.; Granados, M.; Cortina, J.L.; Saurina, J. Polyphenols and Their Potential Role to Fight Viral Diseases: An Overview. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mandal, M.K.; Domb, A.J. Antimicrobial Activities of Natural Bioactive Polyphenols. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Manso, T.; Lores, M.; de Miguel, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Natural Polyphenolic Extracts on Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Othman, L.; Sleiman, A.; Abdel-Massih, R.M. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Alkaloids in Middle Eastern Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, S.; Zheng, L.; Ji, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xiao, D.; Wang, M.; Ai, B.; Sheng, Z. Enhancing the Antioxidant and Antifungal Properties of Polyphenols through Encapsulation in β-Lactoglobulin Nanoparticles Using Emulsification-Evaporation Technique. LWT 2023, 185, 115198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Simonetti, G.; Brasili, E.; Pasqua, G. Antifungal Activity of Phenolic and Polyphenolic Compounds from Di Ff Erent Matrices of Vitis Vinifera. Molecules 2020, 25, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sabin, O.; Pop, R.M.; Bocsan, I.C.; Chedea, V.S.; Grozav, A.; Levai’, A.-M.; Buzoianu, A.D. The Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic, and Antioxidant Effects of Polyphenols from Brassica oleracea Var. capitata Extract on Induced Inflammation in Rodents. Molecules 2024, 29, 3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ghannadi, A.; Hajhashemi, V.; Jafarabadi, H. An Investigation of the Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Nigella Sativa Seed Polyphenols. J. Med. Food 2005, 8, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Cai, J.; Schwarz, S.; Cui, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Zhao, Q.; He, T.; et al. A Novel Gene, OptrA, that Confers Transferable Resistance to Oxazolidinones and Phenicols and Its Presence in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium of Human and Animal Origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 2182–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Antonelli, A.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Brenciani, A.; Galeotti, C.L.; Morroni, G.; Pollini, S.; Varaldo, P.E.; Rossolini, G.M. Characterization of PoxtA, a Novel Phenicol-Oxazolidinone-Tetracycline Resistance Gene from an MRSA of Clinical Origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sharkey, L.K.R.; Edwards, T.A.; O’Neill, A.J. ABC-F Proteins Mediate Antibiotic Resistance through Ribosomal Protection. MBio 2016, 7, e01975-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Anandaraj, M.; Prasath, D.; Kandiannan, K.; Zachariah, T.J.; Srinivasan, V.; Jha, A.K.; Singh, B.K.; Singh, A.K.; Pandey, V.P.; Singh, S.P.; et al. Genotype by Environment Interaction Effects on Yield and Curcumin in Turmeric (Curcuma Longa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Amalraj, A.; Pius, A.; Gopi, S.; Gopi, S. Biological Activities of Curcuminoids, Other Biomolecules from Turmeric and Their Derivatives—A Review. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017, 7, 205–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Peng, Y.; Ao, M.; Dong, B.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, L.; Chen, Z.; Hu, C.; Xu, R. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Curcumin in the Inflammatory Diseases: Status, Limitations and Countermeasures. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2021, 15, 4503–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Neyestani, Z.; Ebrahimi, S.A.; Ghazaghi, A.; Jalili, A.; Sahebkar, A.; Rahimi, H.R. Review of Anti-Bacterial Activities of Curcumin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2019, 29, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zoi, V.; Galani, V.; Lianos, G.D.; Voulgaris, S.; Kyritsis, A.P.; Alexiou, G.A. The Role of Curcumin in Cancer Treatment. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yang, F.; Lim, G.P.; Begum, A.N.; Ubeda, O.J.; Simmons, M.R.; Ambegaokar, S.S.; Chen, P.; Kayed, R.; Glabe, C.G.; Frautschy, S.A.; et al. Curcumin Inhibits Formation of Amyloid β Oligomers and Fibrils, Binds Plaques, and Reduces Amyloid in Vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5892–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Negi, N. Possible Role of Curcumin as Ection an Efflux Pump Inhibitor in Multi Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, DC04–DC07. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Charkhi, P.; Haghshenas, M.R.; Mirzaei, B.; Davoodi, L.; Norouzi Bazgir, Z.; Goli, H.R. Comparison of the Effect of Phenylalanine Arginine Beta Naphthylamide (PAβN) and Curcumin on Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aminoglycosides on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates. J. Adv. Med. Biomed. Res. 2020, 28, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sulaiman, S.D.; Abdulhasan, G.A. Curcumin as Efflux Pump Inhibitor Agent for Enhancement Treatment Against Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates. Iraqi J. Sci. 2020, 61, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yaseen, N.N.; Ahmed, D.A. Detection of MexB Multidrug Efflux Gene in Some Local Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iraqi J. Sci. 2023, 64, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kaur, A.; Sharma, P.; Capalash, N. Curcumin Alleviates Persistence of Acinetobacter baumannii against Colistin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sundaramoorthy, N.S.; Sivasubramanian, A.; Nagarajan, S. Simultaneous Inhibition of MarR by Salicylate and Efflux Pumps by Curcumin Sensitizes Colistin Resistant Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 148, 104445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qin, C.; Tang, N.; Gan, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Tian, G.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yuan, P.; Ding, X. Liposomes Co-Delivering Curcumin and Colistin to Overcome Colistin Resistance in Bacterial Infections. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2202903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, Z.; Liu, X.; Qin, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; He, X.; Zhu, L.; Fan, H.; Hu, Y.; Yao, J.; et al. Photodynamic Inactivation of Shigella flexneri by Curcumin. LWT 2022, 153, 112491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Joshi, P.; Singh, S.; Wani, A.; Sharma, S.; Jain, S.K.; Singh, B.; Gupta, B.D.; Satti, N.K.; Koul, S.; Khan, I.A.; et al. Osthol and Curcumin as Inhibitors of Human Pgp and Multidrug Efflux Pumps of Staphylococcus aureus: Reversing the Resistance against Frontline Antibacterial Drugs. Med. Chem. Commun. 2014, 5, 1540–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jaberi, S.; Fallah, F.; Hashemi, A.; Karimi, A.; Azimi, L. Inhibitory Effects of Curcumin on the Expression of NorA Efflux Pump and Reduce Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 12, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant Flavonoids: Classification, Distribution, Biosynthesis, and Antioxidant Activity. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Anand David, A.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of Biological Importance of Quercetin: A Bioactive Flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cushnie, T.P.T.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial Activity of Flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. de la Lastra, A.; Martin, M.J.; Motilva, V. Antiulcer and Gastroprotective Effects of Quercetin: A Gross and Histologic Study. Pharmacology 1994, 48, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Han, M.; Song, Y.; Zhang, X. Quercetin Suppresses the Migration and Invasion in Human Colon Cancer Caco-2 Cells through Regulating Toll-like Receptor 4/Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Pathway. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2016, 12, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Askari, G.; Ghiasvand, R.; Feizi, A.; Ghanadian, S.M.; Karimian, J. The Effect of Quercetin Supplementation on Selected Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2012, 17, 637–641. [Google Scholar]
  100. Amin, I.; Majid, S.; Farooq, A.; Wani, H.A.; Noor, F.; Khan, R.; Shakeel, S.; Bhat, S.A.; Ahmad, A.; Madkhali, H.; et al. Naringenin (4,5,7-Trihydroxyflavanone) as a Potent Neuroprotective Agent: From Chemistry to Medicine. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta Ur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 65, pp. 271–300. [Google Scholar]
  101. Adedokun, K.A.; Imodoye, S.O.; Bello, I.O.; Lanihun, A.-A.; Bello, I.O. Therapeutic Potentials of Medicinal Plants and Significance of Computational Tools in Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery. In Phytochemistry, Computational Tools and Databases in Drug Discovery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 393–455. [Google Scholar]
  102. Singhal, S.; Singh, M.; Singh, R.K.; Tiwari, V.K.; Bajpai, S. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Breast Cancer and Role of Plant Products in Targeted Therapy. In Discovery and Development of Anti-Breast Cancer Agents from Natural Products; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 295–351. [Google Scholar]
  103. Sachan, N.; Singh Chauhan, B.; Srikrishna, S. Plant Bioactives as Promising Therapeutic Agents in Parkinson’s Disease Targeting Oxidative Stress during Aging. In Plant Bioactives as Natural Panacea Against Age-Induced Diseases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 329–357. [Google Scholar]
  104. Gupta, M.K.; Gouda, G.; Sultana, S.; Punekar, S.M.; Vadde, R.; Ravikiran, T. Structure-Related Relationship: Plant-Derived Antidiabetic Compounds. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2023, 77, 241–295. [Google Scholar]
  105. Qian, W.; Liu, M.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, T. Antimicrobial Mechanism of Luteolin against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria Monocytogenes and Its Antibiofilm Properties. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 142, 104056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tian, C.; Liu, X.; Chang, Y.; Wang, R.; Lv, T.; Cui, C.; Liu, M. Investigation of the Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Luteolin, Kaempferol, Apigenin and Quercetin. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sangeetha, R. Luteolin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J. 2019, 7, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Mao, Z.; Duan, B.; Long, Y.; Xue, F.; Liu, D.; Liu, S.; Gao, Z. Luteolin Exerts an Anticancer Effect on Gastric Cancer Cells through Multiple Signaling Pathways and Regulating MiRNAs. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 3669–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yoo, D.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, W.; Nam, S.M.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Won, M.-H.; Yoon, Y.S.; Hwang, I.K. Effects of Luteolin on Spatial Memory, Cell Proliferation, and Neuroblast Differentiation in the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus in a Scopolamine-Induced Amnesia Model. Neurol. Res. 2013, 35, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Si, H.; Wyeth, R.P.; Liu, D. The Flavonoid Luteolin Induces Nitric Oxide Production and Arterial Relaxation. Eur. J. Nutr. 2014, 53, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chakrawarti, L.; Agrawal, R.; Dang, S.; Gupta, S.; Gabrani, R. Therapeutic Effects of EGCG: A Patent Review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2016, 26, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Parvez, M.A.K.; Saha, K.; Rahman, J.; Munmun, R.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Dey, S.K.; Rahman, M.S.; Islam, S.; Shariare, M.H. Antibacterial Activities of Green Tea Crude Extracts and Synergistic Effects of Epigallocatechingallate (EGCG) with Gentamicin against MDR Pathogens. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pervin, M.; Unno, K.; Ohishi, T.; Tanabe, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Nakamura, Y. Beneficial Effects of Green Tea Catechins on Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2018, 23, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Biasibetti, R.; Tramontina, A.C.; Costa, A.P.; Dutra, M.F.; Quincozes-Santos, A.; Nardin, P.; Bernardi, C.L.; Wartchow, K.M.; Lunardi, P.S.; Gonçalves, C.-A. Green Tea (−)Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Reverses Oxidative Stress and Reduces Acetylcholinesterase Activity in a Streptozotocin-Induced Model of Dementia. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 236, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rahardiyan, D. Antibacterial Potential of Catechin of Tea (Camellia sinensis) and Its Applications. Food Res. 2018, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Vázquez-Calvo, Á.; Jiménez de Oya, N.; Martín-Acebes, M.A.; Garcia-Moruno, E.; Saiz, J.-C. Antiviral Properties of the Natural Polyphenols Delphinidin and Epigallocatechin Gallate against the Flaviviruses West Nile Virus, Zika Virus, and Dengue Virus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Luo, Q.; Zhang, J.-R.; Li, H.-B.; Wu, D.-T.; Geng, F.; Corke, H.; Wei, X.-L.; Gan, R.-Y. Green Extraction of Antioxidant Polyphenols from Green Tea (Camellia sinensis). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xing, H.; Lu, X.; Zhao, L.; Qu, K.; Bi, K. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity of Ten Compounds in Different Tea Samples by Means of an On-Line HPLC–DPPH Assay. Food Res. Int. 2013, 53, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Farzaei, M.; Rahimi, R.; Abdollahi, M. The Role of Dietary Polyphenols in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2015, 16, 196–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Novilla, A.; Djamhuri, D.S.; Nurhayati, B.; Rihibiha, D.D.; Afifah, E.; Widowati, W. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Oolong Tea (Camellia sinensis) Ethanol Extract and Epigallocatechin Gallate in LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Cells. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Alam, M.; Ali, S.; Ashraf, G.M.; Bilgrami, A.L.; Yadav, D.K.; Hassan, M.I. Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate: From Green Tea to Cancer Therapeutics. Food Chem. 2022, 379, 132135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kumazoe, M.; Tachibana, H. Anti-Cancer Effect of EGCG and Its Mechanisms. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2016, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Brown, A.R.; Ettefagh, K.A.; Todd, D.; Cole, P.S.; Egan, J.M.; Foil, D.H.; Graf, T.N.; Schindler, B.D.; Kaatz, G.W.; Cech, N.B. A Mass Spectrometry-Based Assay for Improved Quantitative Measurements of Efflux Pump Inhibition. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Abreu, A.C.; Serra, S.C.; Borges, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Mcbain, A.J.; Salgado, A.J.; Simões, M. Combinatorial Activity of Flavonoids with Antibiotics Against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Abreu, A.C.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M. Combinatorial Approaches with Selected Phytochemicals to Increase Antibiotic Efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms. Biofouling 2016, 32, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. dos Santos, J.F.S.; Tintino, S.R.; da Silva, A.R.P.; Barbosa, C.R.d.S.; Scherf, J.R.; Silveira, Z.d.S.; de Freitas, T.S.; Neto, L.J.d.L.; Barros, L.M.; Menezes, I.R.d.A.; et al. Enhancement of the Antibiotic Activity by Quercetin against Staphylococcus aureus Efflux Pumps. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2021, 53, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Quercetin Inhibits Carbapenemase and Efflux Pump Activities among Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria. APMIS 2020, 128, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Quercetin Potentiates Meropenem Activity among Pathogenic Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. de Carvalho Matias, E.G.; Bezerra, K.S.; Costa, A.H.L.; Clemente Junior, W.S.; Oliveira, J.I.N.; Ribeiro Junior, L.A.; Galvão, D.S.; Fulco, U.L. Quantum Biochemical Analysis of the TtgR Regulator and Effectors. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Majumdar, G.; Mandal, S. Evaluation of Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Efficacy of Quercetin by Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and in Vitro Studies. Chem. Phys. Impact 2024, 8, 100501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sahoo, M.; Behera, D.U.; Gaur, M.; Subudhi, E. Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and MM/PBSA Analysis of Ginger Phytocompounds as a Potential Inhibitor of AcrB for Treating Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2024, 43, 3585–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, T.; Xu, H.; Huang, T.; Liu, G.; Cao, H.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, X. Fuzheng Touxie Jiedu Huayu Decoction Inhibits the MexAB-OprM Efflux Pump and Quorum Sensing-Mediated Biofilm Formation in Difficult-to-Treat Multidrug Resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 332, 118365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ohene-Agyei, T.; Mowla, R.; Rahman, T.; Venter, H. Phytochemicals Increase the Antibacterial Activity of Antibiotics by Acting on a Drug Efflux Pump. Microbiologyopen 2014, 3, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lee, S.; Al Razqan, G.S.; Kwon, D.H. Antibacterial Activity of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) and Its Synergism with β-Lactam Antibiotics Sensitizing Carbapenem-Associated Multidrug Resistant Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Phytomedicine 2017, 24, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kanagaratnam, R.; Sheikh, R.; Alharbi, F.; Kwon, D.H. An Efflux Pump (MexAB-OprM) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Associated with Antibacterial Activity of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG). Phytomedicine 2017, 36, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kurinčič, M.; Klančnik, A.; Smole Možina, S. Epigallocatechin Gallate as a Modulator of Campylobacter Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kurinčič, M.; Klančnik, A.; Smole Možina, S. Effects of Efflux Pump Inhibitors on Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Tetracycline Resistance in Campylobacter Spp. Isolates. Microb. Drug Resist. 2012, 18, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fiedler, S.; Bender, J.K.; Klare, I.; Halbedel, S.; Grohmann, E.; Szewzyk, U.; Werner, G. Tigecycline Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Enterococcus faecium Is Mediated by an Upregulation of Plasmid-Encoded Tetracycline Determinants Tet (L) and Tet (M). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sudano Roccaro, A.; Blanco, A.R.; Giuliano, F.; Rusciano, D.; Enea, V. Epigallocatechin-Gallate Enhances the Activity of Tetracycline in Staphylococci by Inhibiting Its Efflux from Bacterial Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1968–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ding, Y.; Wen, G.; Wei, X.; Zhou, H.; Li, C.; Luo, Z.; Ou, D.; Yang, J.; Song, X. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Luteolin Isolated from Lophatherum Gracile Brongn. against Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1430564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lechner, D.; Gibbons, S.; Bucar, F. Plant Phenolic Compounds as Ethidium Bromide Efflux Inhibitors in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 62, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Guo, Y.; Huang, C.; Su, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, M.; Wang, R.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Liu, M. Luteolin Increases Susceptibility to Macrolides by Inhibiting MsrA Efflux Pump in Trueperella pyogenes. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, D.; Gao, X.; Song, X.; Zhou, W.; Hong, W.; Tian, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M. Luteolin Showed a Resistance Elimination Effect on Gentamicin by Decreasing MATE MRNA Expression in Trueperella pyogenes. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 25, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Terán, W.; Felipe, A.; Segura, A.; Rojas, A.; Ramos, J.-L.; Gallegos, M.-T. Antibiotic-Dependent Induction of Pseudomonas Putida DOT-T1E TtgABC Efflux Pump Is Mediated by the Drug Binding Repressor TtgR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3067–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Alguel, Y.; Meng, C.; Terán, W.; Krell, T.; Ramos, J.L.; Gallegos, M.-T.; Zhang, X. Crystal Structures of Multidrug Binding Protein TtgR in Complex with Antibiotics and Plant Antimicrobials. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Fernandez-Escamilla, A.M.; Fernandez-Ballester, G.; Morel, B.; Casares-Atienza, S.; Ramos, J.L. Molecular Binding Mechanism of TtgR Repressor to Antibiotics and Antimicrobials. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Negm, W.A.; El-Aasr, M.; Kamer, A.A.; Elekhnawy, E. Investigation of the Antibacterial Activity and Efflux Pump Inhibitory Effect of Cycas Thouarsii R.Br. Extract against Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Xu, M.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, S.; Sun, Y.; Feng, L.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, X.; Cao, J.; Zhou, T. Naringenin Restores Colistin Activation against Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Vitro and in Vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 916587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Oyedara, O.O.; Fadare, O.A.; Franco-Frías, E.; Heredia, N.; García, S. Computational Assessment of Phytochemicals of Medicinal Plants from Mexico as Potential Inhibitors of Salmonella enterica Efflux Pump AcrB Protein. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 41, 1776–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Diniz-Silva, H.T.; Magnani, M.; de Siqueira, S.; de Souza, E.L.; de Siqueira-Júnior, J.P. Fruit Flavonoids as Modulators of Norfloxacin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus That Overexpresses NorA. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 85, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Aggarwal, S.; Singh, D.V. Efflux Pumps and Biofilm Formation by Both Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Strains. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2020, 58, 527–538. [Google Scholar]
  152. Medeiros Barreto, H.; Cerqueira Fontinele, F.; Pereira de Oliveira, A.; Arcanjo, D.D.R.; Cavalcanti dos Santos, B.H.; de Abreu, A.P.L.; Douglas Melo Coutinho, H.; Alves Carvalho da Silva, R.; Oliveira de Sousa, T.; Freire de Medeiros, M.d.G.; et al. Phytochemical Prospection and Modulation of Antibiotic Activity In Vitro by Lippia origanoides H.B.K. in Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 305610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Johari, S.A. Efflux Inhibitory Activity of Flavonoids from Chromolaena Odorata against Selected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates. African J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 5631–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Biswas, S.S.; Roy, J.D. Phytocompounds as Potential Inhibitors of Mycobacterial Multidrug Efflux Pump Rv1258c: An in Silico Approach. AMB Express 2024, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lucas Tenório, C.J.; Assunção Ferreira, M.R.; Lira Soares, L.A. Recent Advances on Preparative LC Approaches for Polyphenol Separation and Purification: Their Sources and Main Activities. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 128, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kotkar, G.D.; Shetgaonkar, A.D.; Tilve, S.G. Diversity of Chemical Skeletons. In New Horizons in Natural Compound Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 75–132. [Google Scholar]
  157. Teka, T.; Zhang, L.; Ge, X.; Li, Y.; Han, L.; Yan, X. Stilbenes: Source Plants, Chemistry, Biosynthesis, Pharmacology, Application and Problems Related to Their Clinical Application—A Comprehensive Review. Phytochemistry 2022, 197, 113128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Shen, T.; Xie, C.-F.; Wang, X.-N.; Lou, H.-X. Stilbenoids. In Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes; Ramawat, K.G., Mérillon, J.-M., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1901–1949. ISBN 978-3-642-22144-6. [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhang, L.-X.; Li, C.-X.; Kakar, M.U.; Khan, M.S.; Wu, P.-F.; Amir, R.M.; Dai, D.-F.; Naveed, M.; Li, Q.-Y.; Saeed, M.; et al. Resveratrol (RV): A Pharmacological Review and Call for Further Research. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 143, 112164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lin, S.-C.; Ho, C.-T.; Chuo, W.-H.; Li, S.; Wang, T.T.; Lin, C.-C. Effective Inhibition of MERS-CoV Infection by Resveratrol. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Franciosoa, A.; Mastromarino, P.; Masci, A.; d’Erme, M.; Mosca, L. Chemistry, Stability and Bioavailability of Resveratrol. Med. Chem. 2014, 10, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Raj, P.; Zieroth, S.; Netticadan, T. An Overview of the Efficacy of Resveratrol in the Management of Ischemic Heart Disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1348, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Liu, T.; Ma, Y.; Huang, S.; Lei, L.; Wen, A.; Ding, Y. Resveratrol: Multi-Targets Mechanism on Neurodegenerative Diseases Based on Network Pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Butt, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Peters, D.G.; Mubarak, M.S. Resveratrol as an Anti-Cancer Agent: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1428–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhang, W.-L.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, J.-G. Active Ingredients from Natural Botanicals in the Treatment of Obesity. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Santos, M.; Santos, R.; Ferreira, S. Resveratrol, A Novel Inhibitor of the NorA Efflux Pump and Resistance Modulator in Staphylococcus aureus. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics—Drugs for Superbugs: Antibiotic Discovery, Modes of Action and Mechanisms of Resistance, Online, 15–30 June 2022; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2022; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  167. Seukep, J.A.; Sandjo, L.P.; Ngadjui, B.T.; Kuete, V. Antibacterial and Antibiotic-Resistance Modifying Activity of the Extracts and Compounds from Nauclea Pobeguinii against Gram-Negative Multi-Drug Resistant Phenotypes. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Abdulkareem, M.A.; Mubarak, K.I. Detection of Antibiotics Resistance Andefflux Pumps Production in Clinical Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2023, 15, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Abdulkareem, M.A.; Mubarak, K.I. Activity of Ciprofloxacin and Resveratrol On Expression Of AdeI J Genes In Clinical Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates. Acad. Sci. J. 2024, 2, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Cheng, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B.; Liang, S.; Yang, Y.; Gui, S.; Zhang, K.; Qu, S.; Li, L. Mechanism of Synergistic Action of Colistin with Resveratrol and Baicalin against Mcr-1-Positive Escherichia coli. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 180, 117487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Hwang, D.; Lim, Y.-H. Resveratrol Controls Escherichia coli Growth by Inhibiting the AcrAB-TolC Efflux Pump. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Singkham-in, U.; Higgins, P.G.; Wannigama, D.L.; Hongsing, P.; Chatsuwan, T. Rescued Chlorhexidine Activity by Resveratrol against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii via down-Regulation of AdeB Efflux Pump. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Migliaccio, A.; Esposito, E.P.; Bagattini, M.; Berisio, R.; Triassi, M.; De Gregorio, E.; Zarrilli, R. Inhibition of AdeB, AceI, and AmvA Efflux Pumps Restores Chlorhexidine and Benzalkonium Susceptibility in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 790263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Migliaccio, A.; Stabile, M.; Bagattini, M.; Triassi, M.; Berisio, R.; De Gregorio, E.; Zarrilli, R. Resveratrol Reverts Tolerance and Restores Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine and Benzalkonium in Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria and Yeasts. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sharma, K.; Kumar, V.; Kaur, J.; Tanwar, B.; Goyal, A.; Sharma, R.; Gat, Y.; Kumar, A. Health Effects, Sources, Utilization and Safety of Tannins: A Critical Review. Toxin Rev. 2021, 40, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Falcão, L.; Araújo, M.E.M. Tannins Characterisation in New and Historic Vegetable Tanned Leathers Fibres by Spot Tests. J. Cult. Herit. 2011, 12, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. D’Mello, J.F.; Duffus, C.M.; Duffus, J.H. (Eds.) Toxic Substances in Crop Plants. In Toxic Substances in Crop Plants; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Edinburgh, Scotland, 1991; pp. 180–201. [Google Scholar]
  178. Serrano, J.; Puupponen-Pimiä, R.; Dauer, A.; Aura, A.; Saura-Calixto, F. Tannins: Current Knowledge of Food Sources, Intake, Bioavailability and Biological Effects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S310–S329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Bacon, J.R.; Rhodes, M.J.C. Binding Affinity of Hydrolyzable Tannins to Parotid Saliva and to Proline-Rich Proteins Derived from It. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Dufourc, E.J. Wine Tannins, Saliva Proteins and Membrane Lipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2021, 1863, 183670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Das, A.K.; Islam, M.N.; Faruk, M.O.; Ashaduzzaman, M.; Dungani, R. Review on Tannins: Extraction Processes, Applications and Possibilities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 135, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Jourdes, M.; Pouységu, L.; Deffieux, D.; Teissedre, P.-L.; Quideau, S. Hydrolyzable Tannins: Gallotannins and Ellagitannins. In Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes; Ramawat, K.G., Mérillon, J.-M., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1975–2010. ISBN 978-3-642-22144-6. [Google Scholar]
  183. Porter, L.J. Structure and Chemical Properties of the Condensed Tannins. In Plant Polyphenols: Synthesis, Properties, Significance; Hemingway, R.W., Laks, P.E., Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1992; pp. 245–258. ISBN 978-1-4615-3476-1. [Google Scholar]
  184. Shrestha, S.; Zhang, W.; Smid, S.D. Phlorotannins: A Review on Biosynthesis, Chemistry and Bioactivity. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Mukherjee, P.K. Qualitative Analysis for Evaluation of Herbal Drugs. In Quality Control and Evaluation of Herbal Drugs; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 79–149. [Google Scholar]
  186. Cabezas, R.; Fidel Avila, M.; Torrente, D.; Gonzalez, J.; Santos El-Bachá, R.; Guedes, R.; Barreto, G.E. Natural Antioxidants in Dementia. In Diet and Nutrition in Dementia and Cognitive Decline; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 827–836. [Google Scholar]
  187. Tintino, S.R.; Morais-Tintino, C.D.; Campina, F.F.; Costa, M.d.S.; Menezes, I.R.A.; de Matos, Y.M.L.S.; Calixto-Júnior, J.T.; Pereira, P.S.; Siqueira-Junior, J.P.; Leal-Balbino, T.C.; et al. Tannic Acid Affects the Phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Tetracycline and Erythromycin by Inhibition of Efflux Pumps. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 74, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Robles, H. Tannic Acid. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 474–475. [Google Scholar]
  189. Zhang, W.; Roy, S.; Ezati, P.; Yang, D.-P.; Rhim, J.-W. Tannic Acid: A Green Crosslinker for Biopolymer-Based Food Packaging Films. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 136, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Nejad, F.S.; Karami, H.; Darvish, M. Triggering of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress by Tannic Acid Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of Colorectal Cancer Cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2023, 24, 2705. [Google Scholar]
  191. Alavarse, A.C.; Frachini, E.C.G.; da Silva, R.L.C.G.; Lima, V.H.; Shavandi, A.; Petri, D.F.S. Crosslinkers for Polysaccharides and Proteins: Synthesis Conditions, Mechanisms, and Crosslinking Efficiency, a Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 202, 558–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tintino, S.R.; Wilairatana, P.; de Souza, V.C.A.; da Silva, J.M.A.; Pereira, P.S.; de Morais Oliveira-Tintino, C.D.; de Matos, Y.M.L.S.; Júnior, J.T.C.; de Queiroz Balbino, V.; Siqueira-Junior, J.P.; et al. Inhibition of the NorA Gene Expression and the NorA Efflux Pump by the Tannic Acid. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Tintino, S.R.; Oliveira-Tintino, C.D.M.; Campina, F.F.; Silva, R.L.P.; Costa, M.d.S.; Menezes, I.R.A.; Calixto-Júnior, J.T.; Siqueira-Junior, J.P.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Leal-Balbino, T.C.; et al. Evaluation of the Tannic Acid Inhibitory Effect against the NorA Efflux Pump of Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 97, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Myint, K.B.; Sing, L.C.; Wei, Z. Tannic Acid as Phytochemical Potentiator for Antibiotic Resistance Adaptation. APCBEE Procedia 2013, 7, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Diniz-Silva, H.T.; Cirino, I.C.d.S.; Falcão-Silva, V.d.S.; Magnani, M.; de Souza, E.L.; Siqueira-Júnior, J.P. Tannic Acid as a Potential Modulator of Norfloxacin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Overexpressing norA. Chemotherapy 2016, 61, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Chusri, S.; Villanueva, I.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P.; Davies, J. Enhancing Antibiotic Activity: A Strategy to Control Acinetobacter Infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Lin, M.-F.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Lan, C.-Y. The Role of the Two-Component System BaeSR in Disposing Chemicals through Regulating Transporter Systems in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhang, Y.; Cai, P.; Cheng, G.; Zhang, Y. A Brief Review of Phenolic Compounds Identified from Plants: Their Extraction, Analysis, and Biological Activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Chandrasekara, A. Phenolic Acids. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 535–545. [Google Scholar]
  200. Ratnavathi, C.V. Grain Structure, Quality, and Nutrition. In Breeding Sorghum for Diverse End Uses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 193–207. [Google Scholar]
  201. Peng, S.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, L.; Huang, Y.; Fu, X.; Luo, R.; Xue, J.; Yang, S.; Ling, L.; et al. Nanoparticles Loaded with Pharmacologically Active Plant-Derived Natural Products: Biomedical Applications and Toxicity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 225, 113214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Sajna, K.V.; Gottumukkala, L.D.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Pandey, A. White Biotechnology in Cosmetics. In Industrial Biorefineries & White Biotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 607–652. [Google Scholar]
  203. De La Rosa-Esteban, K.; Sepúlveda, L.; Chávez-González, M.; Torres-León, C.; Estrada-Gil, L.; Aguilar, C.; Ascacio-Valdés, J. Valorization of Mexican Rambutan Peel through the Recovery of Ellagic Acid via Solid-State Fermentation Using a Yeast. Fermentation 2023, 9, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Athiappan, M.; Srinivasan, S.; Anandan, R.; Rajaram, J. Novel Process of Ellagic Acid Synthesis from Waste Generated from Mango Pulp Processing Industries. In Emerging Technologies in Environmental Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 443–454. [Google Scholar]
  205. Han, D.H.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, J.H. Antioxidant and Apoptosis-Inducing Activities of Ellagic Acid. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 3601–3606. [Google Scholar]
  206. Norouzalinia, F.; Asadpour, L.; Mokhtary, M. Anti-Microbial, Anti-Biofilm, and Efflux Pump Inhibitory Effects of Ellagic Acid–Bonded Magnetic Nanoparticles against Escherichia coli Isolates. Int. Microbiol. 2024, 28, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Macêdo, N.S.; Barbosa, C.R.d.S.; Bezerra, A.H.; Silveira, Z.d.S.; da Silva, L.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Dashti, S.; Kim, B.; da Cunha, F.A.B.; da Silva, M.V. Evaluation of Ellagic Acid and Gallic Acid as Efflux Pump Inhibitors in Strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Biol. Open 2022, 11, bio059434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Nirmal, C.R.; Rajadas, S.E.; Balasubramanian, M.; Mohanvel, S.K.; Aathi, M.S.; Munishankar, S.; Chilamakuru, N.B.; Thiruvenkadam, K.; Pandiya Raj, A.K.; Paraman, R.; et al. Myoinositol and Methyl Stearate Increases Rifampicin Susceptibility among Drug-resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Expressing Rv1819c. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2023, 101, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Raj Dwivedi, G.; Khwaja, S.; Singh Negi, A.; Panda, S.S.; Swaroop Sanket, A.; Pati, S.; Chand Gupta, A.; Bawankule, D.U.; Chanda, D.; Kant, R.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Drug Resistance Reversal Potential of Novel Curcumin Mimics Van D. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 106, 104454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Oliveira, M.M.; Santos, H.S.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Bandeira, P.N.; da Silva, P.T.; Freitas, T.S.; Rocha, J.E.; Xavier, J.C.; Campina, F.F.; Barbosa, C.R.S.; et al. Spectroscopic Characterization and Efflux Pump Modulation of a Thiophene Curcumin Derivative. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1215, 128291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Park, K.; Choo, H.; Kim, M.K.; Chong, Y. Quercetin 7-O-Glutamate Potentiates Staphylococcus aureus to Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2016, 37, 1515–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Lee, T.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.K.; Ahn, J.H.; Park, J.S.; Seo, H.W.; Park, K.-H.; Chong, Y. 3-O-Substituted Quercetin: An Antibiotic-Potentiating Agent against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Enterobacteriaceae through Simultaneous Inhibition of Efflux Pump and Broad-Spectrum Carbapenemases. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024, 10, 1624–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Xiao, Z.-P.; Wang, X.-D.; Wang, P.-F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.-W.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.-S.; Ouyang, H.; Lin, X.-Y.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Fluoroquinolone–Flavonoid Hybrids as Potent Antibiotics against Drug-Resistant Microorganisms. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 80, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Verma, P.; Tiwari, M.; Tiwari, V. Potentiate the Activity of Current Antibiotics by Naringin Dihydrochalcone Targeting the AdeABC Efflux Pump of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 217, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Ying, S.; Guan, Z.; Ofoegbu, P.C.; Clubb, P.; Rico, C.; He, F.; Hong, J. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Current Developments and Limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Andreani, T.; Cheng, R.; Elbadri, K.; Ferro, C.; Menezes, T.; dos Santos, M.R.; Pereira, C.M.; Santos, H.A. Natural Compounds-Based Nanomedicines for Cancer Treatment: Future Directions and Challenges. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2024, 14, 2845–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Shariati, A.; Asadian, E.; Fallah, F.; Azimi, T.; Hashemi, A.; Yasbolaghi Sharahi, J.; Taati Moghadam, M. Evaluation of Nano-curcumin effects on expression levels of virulence genes and biofilm production of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wound infection in Tehran, Iran. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 2223–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Rahbar Takrami, S.; Ranji, N.; Sadeghizadeh, M. Antibacterial Effects of Curcumin Encapsulated in Nanoparticles on Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through Downregulation of Efflux Pumps. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 2395–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Chen, Y.; Gao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Jin, Q.; Ji, J. Inhibiting Quorum Sensing by Active Targeted PH-Sensitive Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibiotic Therapy of Biofilm-Associated Bacterial Infections. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 10019–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Mohanty, H.; Yadav, R.P. Boosting Gentamicin Activity Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Nano-Formulation of Curcumin. Bionanoscience 2024, 14, 4606–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Cai, L.; Zhu, X.; Ruan, H.; Yang, J.; Wei, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, H.; Ji, M.; Chen, J. Curcumin-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Biocompatible Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffold for Sustained Eradication of Drug-Resistant Bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Zahmatkesh, H.; Mirpour, M.; Zamani, H.; Rasti, B. Effect of Samarium Oxide Nanoparticles Fabricated by Curcumin on Efflux Pump and Virulence Genes Expression in MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clust. Sci. 2023, 34, 1227–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Attallah, N.G.M.; Elekhnawy, E.; Negm, W.A.; Hussein, I.A.; Mokhtar, F.A.; Al-Fakhrany, O.M. In Vivo and In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Srichaiyapol, O.; Thammawithan, S.; Siritongsuk, P.; Nasompag, S.; Daduang, S.; Klaynongsruang, S.; Kulchat, S.; Patramanon, R. Tannic Acid-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles Used in Biomedical Application as an Effective Antimelioidosis and Prolonged Efflux Pump Inhibitor against Melioidosis Causative Pathogen. Molecules 2021, 26, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Elhassan, E.; Omolo, C.A.; Gafar, M.A.; Kiruri, L.W.; Ibrahim, U.H.; Ismail, E.A.; Devnarain, N.; Govender, T. Disease-Inspired Design of Biomimetic Tannic Acid–Based Hybrid Nanocarriers for Enhancing the Treatment of Bacterial-Induced Sepsis. Mol. Pharm. 2024, 21, 4924–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of efflux pumps classification and mechanism of action; A—membrane fusion protein, B—outer membrane protein, C—H+ gradient-dependent efflux pump protein, D—outer membrane protein.
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of efflux pumps classification and mechanism of action; A—membrane fusion protein, B—outer membrane protein, C—H+ gradient-dependent efflux pump protein, D—outer membrane protein.
Ijms 26 04030 g001
Figure 2. Classification of natural polyphenolic compounds based on structure.
Figure 2. Classification of natural polyphenolic compounds based on structure.
Ijms 26 04030 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of curcuminoids (two-dimensional); (A)—curcumin, (B)—demethoxycurcumin, (C)—bisdemethoxycurcumin.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of curcuminoids (two-dimensional); (A)—curcumin, (B)—demethoxycurcumin, (C)—bisdemethoxycurcumin.
Ijms 26 04030 g003
Figure 4. Flavonoids classification with regard to their molecular structure (two-dimensional).
Figure 4. Flavonoids classification with regard to their molecular structure (two-dimensional).
Ijms 26 04030 g004
Figure 5. Molecular structure of stilbene isomers (A): trans (E)—stilbene, (B): cis (Z)—stilbene (two-dimensional).
Figure 5. Molecular structure of stilbene isomers (A): trans (E)—stilbene, (B): cis (Z)—stilbene (two-dimensional).
Ijms 26 04030 g005
Figure 6. Molecular structure of resveratrol (two-dimensional).
Figure 6. Molecular structure of resveratrol (two-dimensional).
Ijms 26 04030 g006
Figure 7. Classification of the tannins family with special regard to the hydrolysable group and the molecular structure of its monomeric precursors: ellagic acid (left) and gallic acid (right).
Figure 7. Classification of the tannins family with special regard to the hydrolysable group and the molecular structure of its monomeric precursors: ellagic acid (left) and gallic acid (right).
Ijms 26 04030 g007
Figure 8. Molecular structure of tannic acid (two-dimensional).
Figure 8. Molecular structure of tannic acid (two-dimensional).
Ijms 26 04030 g008
Figure 9. Molecular structure of hydroxybenzoic acids (A) and hydroxycinnamic acids (B).
Figure 9. Molecular structure of hydroxybenzoic acids (A) and hydroxycinnamic acids (B).
Ijms 26 04030 g009
Figure 10. Molecular structure of ellagic acid (two-dimensional).
Figure 10. Molecular structure of ellagic acid (two-dimensional).
Ijms 26 04030 g010
Table 1. Summary of efflux pumps classification including spectrum of antibiotic resistance.
Table 1. Summary of efflux pumps classification including spectrum of antibiotic resistance.
Efflux Pump SuperfamilyPumps ExamplesMain ProducersAntibiotic Resistance ProfileReferences
RND
(Resistance-
Nodulation-Cell
Division)
AcrAB-TolC, AdeABC, MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MmpL5, MtrCDE, OqxAB, SmeABCM. tuberculosis
GNB: N. gonorrhoeae,
Enterobacteriaceae,
N-F: P. aeruginosa,
A. baumannii,
S. maltophilia
AMG, CPL, FLQ,
LNC, MCL, PLX,
RIF, SLF, TET, BL
[17,18,19,20,21,22,23]
MATE
(Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion)
AbeM, DinF, EmmdR, FepA, MepA, NorM, KetM, PmpM, Rv2836cM. tuberculosis
GNB: N. gonorrhoeae,
K. pneumoniae
GPB: S. aureus,
L. monocytogenes,
E. faecalis
N-F: A. baumannii,
P. aeruginosa
AMG, CPL, FLQ,
TGC, TRM
[17,24,25,26,27,28]
ABC
(ATP-binding cassette)
AbcA, EfrAB, LmrA, macAB-TolC, MsrA, PatA/B, Rv1218cM. tuberculosis,
GPB: E. faecalis,
S. pneumoniae, S. aureus
GNB: Enterobacteriaceae
AMG, CPL,
FLQ, LNC, MCL,
RIF, TET
[17,29,30,31,32,33,34]
MFS
(Major facilitator
superfamily)
AbaQ, EmrAB-TolC, Lde, MdeA, MdfA, Mef, NorA-D, QepA, Rv1258c, TetKM. tuberculosis
GPB: S. aureus,
S. pneumoniae,
L. monocytogenes,
GNB: Enterobacteriaceae
N-F: P. aeruginosa,
A. baumannii
AMG, CPL, COT, FLQ, LNC, MCL, PLX, RIF, SLF, TET, TGC, BL[17,35,36,37,38,39]
SMR
(Small multidrug
resistance family)
AbeS, EmrE, KpnEF, Mmr, QacC-J, SepAM. tuberculosis
GPB: S. aureus,
E. faecalis
GNB: Enterobacteriaceae
N-F: P. aeruginosa,
A. baumannii
AMG, MCL, PLX,
RIF, SLF, TET, BL
[8,17,40,41,42]
Abbreviations: AMG—aminoglycosides, BL—β-lactams, CPL—chloramphenicol, COT—cotrimoxazole, FLQ—fluoroquinolones, GNB—Gram-negative bacteria, GPB—Gram-positive bacteria, LNC—lincosamides, MCL—macrolides, N-F—non-fermenting rods, PLX—polymyxins, RIF—rifampicin, SLF—sulfonamides, TET—tetracyclines, TGC—tigecycline, TRM—trimethoprim. Strains: A. baumanniiAcinetobacter baumannii, E. faecalisEnterococcus faecalis, K. pneumoniaeKlebsiella pneumoniae, L. monocytogenesListeria monocytogenes, M. tuberculosisMycobacterium tuberculosis, N. gonorrhoeaeNeisseria gonorrhoeae, P. aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureusStaphylococcus aureus, S. maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophilia, S. pneumoniaeStreptococcus pneumoniae.
Table 2. Characteristics of flavonoids characterized by EPI properties.
Table 2. Characteristics of flavonoids characterized by EPI properties.
Structure and NameFlavonoid GroupPlant CultivarBiological ActivityReferences
Ijms 26 04030 i001
Quercetin
FlavonolMoraceae, Theaceae, Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Rosaceaeanti-inflammatory
anti-microbial
anti-neoplasm
gastroprotective
[95,96,97,98,99]
Ijms 26 04030 i002
Naringenin
FlavanoneMain source:
Citrus aurantium,
Citrus clementia,
Citrus reticulata
antidiabetic
anti-estrogenic
anti-inflammatory
anti-neoplasm
antioxidant
hypolipidemic
neuroprotective
[100,101,102,103,104]
Ijms 26 04030 i003
Luteolin
FlavoneVarious fruits and vegetables e.g., Apium graveolens L., Chrysanthemum L. and Daucus carota Hoffm.antidiabetic
anti-inflammatory
anti-microbial
anti-neoplasm
antioxidant
cardioprotective
[105,106,107,108,109,110]
Ijms 26 04030 i004
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate
Flavan-3-olMain source:
Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze
anti-inflammatory
anti-microbial
anti-neoplasm
antioxidant
anti-viral
neuroprotective
[111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122]
Table 3. Summary of polyphenol-based derivatives’ anti-efflux activity.
Table 3. Summary of polyphenol-based derivatives’ anti-efflux activity.
Name of DerivativePrecursor PolyphenolPathogensMechanism of Antimicrobial
Activity
References
1,3-Bis-(E/E)-[3-(3-Methoxy,4-hydroxyphenyl)-
1-oxo-2-en-yl]-
benzene
CUP. aeruginosa
(MBL positive)
Synergy with TET[209]
↓ expression of mexA, mexB and oprM genes
(separately and combined with TET)
Direct inhibition of pumps subunits: MexA, MexB, OprM
(1E,4E)-1,5-Di
(thiophen-2-yl)
penta-1,4-dien-3-one
S. aureus 1199B and K2068Synergy with NOR[210]
Direct inhibition of pumps:
NorA (1199B) and MepA (K2068)
quercetin
7-O-glutamate
QRS. aureusInhibition of NorA pump
(superior to QR
and comparable to reserpine)
[211]
Potentiating of antibiotics activity for: TET (2-fold MIC reduction), CYP and GEN (4-fold)
3-O-substituted
quercetin
CREDirect inhibiton of AcrB pump
subunit
[212]
Inhibition of
MBL e.g., NDM-1
Synergy with MER
(>4-fold MIC reduction)
Naringenin-
ethylidene-
fluoroquinolone
hybrid
NGE. coli
Bacillus subtilis
S. aureus
Synergy with CYP
(8–88-fold MIC reduction)
[213]
Enhancing bacterial DNA-gyrase
inhibition
Reduction in CYP efflux ratio in tested strains
Naringin
dihydrochalcone
NGCRABDirect inhibition of AdeB protein [214]
Inhibition of MER
efflux
Abbreviations: CRAB—carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, CRE—carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, CU—curcumin, CYP—ciprofloxacin, GEN—gentamycin, MBL—metallo-β-lactamase, MIC—minimal inhibitory concentration, MER—meropenem, NDM-1—New Delhi MBL type 1, NG—naringenin, NOR—norfloxacin, QR—quercetin, TET—tetracycline.
Table 4. The summary of selected polyphenols’ implications for nanomedicine.
Table 4. The summary of selected polyphenols’ implications for nanomedicine.
Polyphenol PrecursorNanotechnology ApplicationPathogensMechanism of Antibacterial ActionReferences
CUPolyphenol-based NPsMDR
P. aeruginosa and PA01 strain
↓ expression of mexB, mexT, mexD genes[217]
↑ expression of nfxB gene
(negative regulator of MexCD-OprJ)
CYP-NS
P. aeruginosa
Concentration-dependent enhancing activity of CYP by NPs[218]
Increased accumulation of CYP
in pathogen cells
↓ expression of mexX and oprM genes (mexXY-oprM and
mexAB-oprM pumps)
CU-based NPs
combined with
2,3-dimethyl maleic
anhydride
MDR
P. aeruginosa
↓ expression of mexA-F
and oprM genes
[219]
Synergy with TOB
Polyphenol-based NPsP. aeruginosaSynergy with GEN (combination with CU formed ZOI comparable to combination with verapamil)[220]
CU-stabilized silver NPs
(green synthesis)
S. aureus
MRSA
↓ expression of sdrM gene[221]
CU-synthesized
samar oxide-based NPs
(green synthesis)
MDR S. aureus↓ expression of norA-B genes[222]
MDR
P. aeruginosa
↓ expression of mexA-B genes
NGnaringin
dihydrochalcone
based silver NPs
CRABGenerating of ROS and RNS[214]
Increasing susceptibility to MER via disrupting transmembrane proton gradient (malfunction of RND type pumps e.g., AdeABC)
QRQR-stabilized silver NPs
(green synthesis)
S. aureusEnhanced EtBr accumulation[223]
↓ expression of norA-C genes
TATA-stabilized silver NPs
(green synthesis)
Burkoholderia pseudomallei
MDR Enterobacter cloacae
↑ permeability of cell membrane via silver NPs[224]
Interference with acrAB-TolC
efflux pump
TA-based hybrid NPsS. aureus
MRSA,
P. aeruginosa
NorA pump inhibition via metal ions chelating[225]
Inhibition of QS
EAPolyphenol-bonded magnetic Fe3O4 NPsESβL
E. coli
Eradication both planktonic and biofilm form of pathogen [206]
↓ expression of acrB and tolC genes
Abbreviations: CRAB—carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, CU—curcumin, CYP—ciprofloxacin, EA—ellagic acid, ESβL—extended-spectrum β-lactamase, EtBr—etidine bromide, GEN—gentamycin, MDR—multidrug-resistant, MER—meropenem, MRSA—methicillin-resistant S. aureus, NG—naringenin, NPs—nanoparticles, NS—non-susceptible, QSquorum sensing, QR—quercetin, RND—resistance-nodulation cell division efflux pump type, RNS—reactive nitrogen species, ROS—reactive oxygen species, TA—tannic acid, TOB—tobramycin, ZOI—zone of inhibition.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duda-Madej, A.; Viscardi, S.; Niezgódka, P.; Szewczyk, W.; Wińska, K. The Impact of Plant-Derived Polyphenols on Combating Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094030

AMA Style

Duda-Madej A, Viscardi S, Niezgódka P, Szewczyk W, Wińska K. The Impact of Plant-Derived Polyphenols on Combating Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(9):4030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duda-Madej, Anna, Szymon Viscardi, Piotr Niezgódka, Wiktoria Szewczyk, and Katarzyna Wińska. 2025. "The Impact of Plant-Derived Polyphenols on Combating Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9: 4030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094030

APA Style

Duda-Madej, A., Viscardi, S., Niezgódka, P., Szewczyk, W., & Wińska, K. (2025). The Impact of Plant-Derived Polyphenols on Combating Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop