Next Article in Journal
Nidogen-1, a Player in KMT2A-Rearranged Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Cellular Responses to Class I and II Sphingomyelinase D: Unraveling the Mechanisms of Loxosceles Venom-Induced Dermonecrosis and Potential Therapeutic Targets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alterations in RNA Expression Profile Following S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculation into Platelet Concentrates

1
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
2
Research and Development Institute for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073009
Submission received: 7 February 2025 / Revised: 21 March 2025 / Accepted: 24 March 2025 / Published: 26 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

Microbial contamination of platelet concentrates (PC) remains a persistent challenge in transfusion medicine, necessitating robust preventive measures prior to product release. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis of microbe inoculated PC offers a promising approach to identifying potential biomarkers for contamination detection. Within PC, each S. aureus (ATCC 29213) and S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228) was inoculated in a 103 CFU/mL concentration. Total RNA was extracted from the samples at predetermined time points (0-, 1-, 3-, and 6-hours post-inoculation), followed by high-throughput RNA sequencing. DEG, gene enrichment, and pathway analysis were conducted. Diagnostic potential was evaluated through the calculation of area under the curve (AUC) values and the assessment of additional performance metrics. DEG identified 5884 and 974 DEGs in S. aureus and S. epidermidis samples, respectively. Pathway analysis revealed distinct biological responses: S. aureus-inoculated samples showed prominent enrichment in ribosomal and spliceosome pathways, while S. epidermidis-inoculated samples demonstrated significant activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways and natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity pathways. ROC analysis of the commonly differentially expressed genes in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis-inoculated samples demonstrated significant diagnostic potential. The genes H19, CAVIN1, A2M, and EPAS1 exhibited statistically significant adjusted p-values and AUC values exceeding 0.8, with the exception of the H19 gene in S. epidermidis, suggesting their utility as potential biomarkers for staphylococcal contamination detection. Interaction between PC and microbial contaminants resulted in DEG and genes could be analyzed for microbial contamination of PC. However, to establish the robustness and broader applicability of these findings, further studies encompassing a more diverse range of microbial species are necessary.

1. Introduction

Platelet concentrates (PC) are widely utilized in transfusion medicine, particularly for patients with diverse clinical conditions. These include individuals with hematologic malignancies, oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy, those with hepatic disorders, and critically ill patients in intensive care units [1,2]. PC are maintained under specific storage conditions, namely at 20–24 °C with continuous agitation, to preserve cellular function, sustain metabolic processes, and ensure adequate oxygenation [3,4]. However, these room temperature storage conditions and relatively high oxygen provision particularly render PC susceptible to microbial proliferation, especially skin normal flora and environmental sources of bacteria [5]. Epidemiological data indicate that the incidence of microbial contamination in apheresis platelet units ranges from 1:1000 to 1:2500. Moreover, the frequency of fatal outcomes associated with contaminated platelet transfusions has been reported at approximately 1:108,000 units [6,7,8,9,10].
Donor skin microflora has been identified as the predominant source of microbial contamination in platelet components [11]. A comprehensive study analyzing primary cultures from 960,470 apheresis units revealed that 63.5% of bacterial contaminants were species associated with donor skin microbiota, while 24.5% originated from mucous membrane microbiota, and 12.0% from other sources [12]. The principal bacterial species derived from donor skin include Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, various coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Corynebacterium species [13].
To mitigate the risk of microbial contamination, a multi-faceted approach has been implemented, encompassing rigorous donor selection protocols, aseptic skin preparation techniques, utilization of blood collection containers with integrated diversion pouches, implementation of pathogen reduction systems, and screening for potential microbial contamination using advanced assay methodologies [11,14,15,16,17,18].
Microbial contamination in platelet components can be detected through various methodologies, each with distinct characteristics. Culture-based methods, while highly sensitive, require a prolonged cultivation period to achieve their low detection limit (101 to 102 CFU/mL) [19]. Lateral flow assays offer rapid results by detecting microbial cell wall components via antigen-antibody reactions but necessitate a higher microbial load for detection compared to culture methods (analytical sensitivity 103 to 105 CFU/mL) [18]. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), targeting bacterial 16S or 23S ribosomal genes, provide a balance between test turnaround time and sensitivity, demonstrating faster turnaround times than culture-based techniques and lower detection limits than lateral flow assays (limit of detection of 13 ± 4.94 CFU/mL). However, NAATs require stringent method standardization and quality control measures to ensure reliability [18].
Next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technology has significantly advanced our understanding of platelet biology by providing comprehensive transcriptomic profiles in various contexts. These include elucidating normal platelet gene expression patterns, characterizing platelet mRNA expression in sepsis patients, and monitoring transcriptional changes in platelet products during storage [20,21,22]. Despite these advances, the gene expression landscape of bacterially contaminated platelets remains largely unexplored. Explanation of the transcriptional changes associated with bacterial presence in platelet products is crucial for identifying potential biomarkers and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying platelet-pathogen interactions [23,24,25,26,27].
In this study, we postulated that microbial contamination in platelet components (PC) would induce detectable alterations in RNA expression profiles. We hypothesized both white blood cells and platelets would engage in interactions with the introduced microbial agents, resulting in distinct transcriptional changes. To test this hypothesis, we employed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technology to analyze the transcriptome of PC at multiple time points following bacterial inoculation. Specifically, we examined the differential gene expression patterns at 0-, 1-, 3-, and 6-hours post-inoculation with S. aureus and S. epidermidis. This temporal analysis aimed to explicate the dynamic transcriptional changes occurring in response to bacterial contamination, potentially revealing early molecular indicators of microbial presence in PC.

2. Results

2.1. Quality Control Metrics

The quality control data from blood service including volume, pH, and platelet count of PC from 400 mL whole blood was as follows: 49 mL, pH 7.05, 6.6 × 1010/unit. Following bacterial inoculation, the final concentration was determined to be 2.03 CFU/mL.
The average number of total reads per sample was 114,319,791.3 for S. aureus, 122,060,437.4 for S. epidermidis, and 123,675,789.1 for the control group. For the S. aureus inoculation group, the mean mapped read count was 109,850,678, with a mapping percentage of 97.98%. The S. epidermidis inoculation samples demonstrated a mean mapped read count of 116,090,627, corresponding to a mapping percentage of 97.35%. The control group exhibited identical characteristics to the S. aureus group, with a mean mapped read count of 109,850,678 and a mapping percentage of 97.98%. The percentage of bases with a Phred quality score above 20 exceeded 97% for all samples. We use samples with a RIN greater than 7 [28,29].

2.2. Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) of Samples After Inoculation of S. aureus

A total of 31,476 genes that undergo prefiltering were analyzed for differentially expressed gene analysis. The differential gene expression analysis revealed the following counts of up-regulated and down-regulated genes at 1-, 3-, and 6-hours post-treatment: 1 h (1528 up, 2071 down), 3 h (1305 up, 2162 down), and 6 h (867 up, 2022 down). Temporal analysis of differential gene expression across all time points identified a total of 5884 genes (3009 up, 2875 down) exhibiting significant changes when samples were stratified according to elapsed time. The DEGs between 0 and 1 h included up-regulated genes such as EPAS1, CDKN1C, ZNF761, TYMP, CAVIN1, and NADK, while down-regulated genes comprised CCNYL1, EEF1AKMT1, DNAI4, HECTD2, RPPH1, and SPIDR. Comparative analysis of gene expression between 0- and 3-hours post-treatment identified several DEGs. Among the up-regulated genes were TYMP, H19, CAVIN1, URB2, IGF2, and A2M, while CCNYL1, RPS29, EXOC6B, EEF1AKMT1, SNORD133, and SPIDR were found to be down-regulated. Further examination of DEGs between 0 and 6 h revealed up-regulation of CAVIN1, IGF2, A2M, ARHGAP29, EPAS1, and H19, whereas EEF1AKMT1, CCNYL1, HECTD2, EXOC6B, ADAL, and AGAP4 exhibited down-regulation. The temporal expression patterns of differentially regulated genes are summarized (Table 1).
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to visualize the overall gene expression patterns throughout the observed time period (Figure 1A). To further elucidate the magnitude and statistical significance of gene expression changes, volcano plots were constructed using log2 fold change values plotted against −log10 p-values over the entire time course (Figure 1B). The supplementary data presents PCA plots and volcano plots for each time point (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). To delineate the expression patterns of DEGs, a hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted. The resulting patterns were visualized through a heatmap (Supplementary Figure S3).

2.3. Comprehensive Gene Enrichment for Pathway Analysis of Samples After Inoculation of S. aureus

Gene set enrichment for pathway analysis was conducted on samples inoculated with S. aureus using the pathfindR package in R. The analysis utilized gene sets corresponding to the Homo sapiens (hsa) KEGG pathways. Results revealed significant enrichment in 225 pathways, notably ribosome, spliceosome, and nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways, all of which demonstrated high −log10 p-values, indicating strong statistical significance (Figure 1C). The term-gene graph of inoculated platelet concentrates shows both ribosome and spliceosome pathways had no overlapping genes (Supplementary Figure S4). Further pathway analysis was conducted using the GeneTonic R package v.3.0.0 with Gene Ontology (GO) pathways. The resulting enrichment map revealed significant enrichment in several key biological processes, notably chromatin remodeling, cell division, and regulation of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase III (Supplementary Figure S5). The gene set volcano plot corroborated the findings from the previous enrichment map, reaffirming the significance of chromatin remodeling and cell division processes. Additionally, this analysis revealed a novel pathway of interest: the proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (Supplementary Figure S6).

2.4. Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) of Samples After Inoculation of S. epidermidis

A comprehensive analysis of differential gene expression was conducted on a total of 23,794 genes that passed the initial quality filtering criteria. Following the methodology applied to S. epidermidis inoculation samples, we identified DEGs at 1-, 3-, and 6-hours post-treatment, using stringent criteria, same as the analysis of samples with S. aureus inoculation. Differential gene expression analysis, performed across all time points, revealed 852 up-regulated and 122 down-regulated genes when samples were stratified by elapsed time. The temporal analysis revealed the following DEG counts: 1 h (10 up-regulated, 7 down-regulated), 3 h (2 up-regulated, 3 down-regulated), and 6 h (5 up-regulated, 3 down-regulated). At the 1 h time point, notable up-regulated genes included SERPINE1, BPI, IL1R1, PTGS2, RPL10P9, and DNAH17, while HNRNPUL2-BSCL2, LOC105370464, BIVM-ERCC5, RPL23AP7, RPL23AP79, and LINC00964 were significantly down-regulated. The 3-hours post-treatment analysis identified SLC34A3 and RPL10P9 as up-regulated, whereas TMX2-CTNND1, TRIM6-TRIM34, and LOC101927613 showed down-regulation. At 6 h post-treatment, LMO3, RPL10P9, NXF3, PTGS2, and MXRA7 exhibited up-regulation, while PRSS1, RPL23AP7, and RPL23AP79 were down-regulated. The significant transcriptional changes observed in the S. epidermidis inoculation samples throughout the period are summarized (Table 2).
PCA plots (Figure 2A) and volcano plots (Figure 2B) were generated across all time points. Additionally, the supplementary data include PCA plots and volcano plots corresponding to each time point (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8).

2.5. Comprehensive Gene Set Enrichment for Pathway Analysis of Samples After Inoculation of S. epidermidis

Same as S. aureus analysis, gene set enrichment for pathway analysis was performed on S. epidermidis-inoculated samples utilizing the pathfindR package in R, employing the same Homo sapiens (hsa) KEGG pathway database. This comprehensive analysis identified 177 significantly enriched pathways. Among these, several key cellular signaling and immune response pathways demonstrated particularly strong enrichment, including the MAPK signaling pathway, proteoglycans in cancer, NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and focal adhesion pathways (Figure 2C). Analysis of the term-gene network in S. epidermidis-inoculated samples revealed substantial gene overlap among four distinct pathways, with key shared components including PAK1, RAF1, GRB2, and ARAF (Supplemental Figure S9). Subsequent pathway analysis, conducted using the GeneTonic R package in conjunction with GO pathways, generated an enrichment map highlighting several significant biological processes: positive regulation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) production, negative regulation of cell population proliferation, symbiont entry into the host cell, and inflammatory response (Supplemental Figures S10 and S11). The gene set volcano plot analysis further validated these findings, particularly emphasizing the significance of positive regulation of IL-6 production and negative regulation of cell population proliferation (Supplemental Figure S12).

2.6. DEG Analysis and ROC Curve Assessment of Commonly Expressed Genes in S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculated Samples

Differential expression analysis revealed a total of 403 genes exhibiting significant expression alterations in platelet concentrate samples inoculated with both S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive overview of the top 10 differentially expressed genes that demonstrated consistent expression patterns across both bacterial contamination conditions. Each of these identified genes met the statistical significance threshold criterion (adjusted p-value < 0.05) in both the S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculated samples (Table 3). Subsequently, we selected the four genes (H19, CAVIN1, A2M, and EPAS1) exhibiting the most statistically significant p-values in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculated samples for further evaluation through ROC curve analysis.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on the four candidate genes that we manually selected based on their consistent differential expression patterns in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis contaminated samples. The analysis demonstrated that these four candidate genes possess substantial diagnostic potential, with area under the curve values exceeding 0.8 (AUC > 0.8) for all selected genes except H19, which nevertheless approached this threshold (Figure 3). Each of these manually curated candidate genes exhibited distinct and statistically robust optimal cutoff values, which could be instrumental in establishing quantitative parameters for the development of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic assays.

2.7. Multiseries Time-Course Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns and ROC Curve Generation for Curated Genes in S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculated Specimens

Utilizing the maSigPro R package v1.78.0, we systematically elucidated and visualized the time-specific gene expression profiles in samples inoculated with S. aureus. Our analysis identified a total of 2439 genes that met our significance criteria, with p-values less than 0.05 and R-squared values exceeding 0.5, indicating robust temporal expression patterns. From this subset, we further refined our focus to select four candidate genes (YY1AP1, PDSS1, CDC25C, CCZ1B) that demonstrated particularly high statistical significance and strong model fit (Table 4). Notably, the expression patterns of these genes exhibited a clear differential between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group, as evidenced by the distinct profiles in the generated plots (Figure 4).
Following the meticulous curation of candidate genes, we generated ROC curves to evaluate their discriminative performance (Figure 5). The analysis demonstrated that each candidate gene achieved an AUC of 1, indicating a perfect separation between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group. Logistic regression models for all candidate genes could not be established due to the perfect separation in the data. These findings suggest that these genes could serve as highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for detecting S. aureus contamination in platelet concentrates.
Employing identical methodological approaches and selection criteria as those utilized for S. aureus-inoculated specimens, we identified seven genes exhibiting statistically significant differential expression. From this subset, we subsequently selected four genes (FARS2, LOC105370462, LOC105377460, and ZCCHC7) that demonstrated consistently elevated expression levels across temporal expression profiles (Table 5, Figure 6).
Subsequent to the rigorous selection of candidate genes, we conducted ROC curve analyses to assess their discriminatory efficacy (Figure 7). Unlike the S. aureus experimental group, perfect separation between control and S. epidermidis-inoculated specimens was not achieved, resulting in comparatively reduced AUC values. Nevertheless, with the exception of the FARS2 gene, all candidate genes demonstrated robust AUC values exceeding 0.9. These findings suggest that the curated genes may serve as appropriate diagnostic biomarkers for bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates, particularly for the detection of S. epidermidis contamination.

3. Discussion

The predominant microorganisms associated with PC contamination are Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, which are common constituents of the normal skin flora [7,8]. These microorganisms not only serve as primary contaminants of platelet products but have also been increasingly implicated in transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality. While pathogen inactivation technologies have been implemented as preventive measures against platelet contamination, they have not proven uniformly effective. Notable cases have documented fatal outcomes in PC recipients due to contamination with Acinetobacter and Staphylococcus species, even in pathogen-reduced platelet products [9,10].
Early detection of microbial contamination could facilitate the identification of compromised PC prior to their distribution from blood services to hospitals or from blood banks to patients. We hypothesized that PC contamination might induce differential gene expression in residual white blood cells or platelets within the concentrate. Indeed, our analysis revealed distinct transcriptional changes at 1, 3, and 6 hours post-S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculation compared to baseline (0 h). The inoculation dose was standardized at 103 CFU/mL, corresponding to the detection threshold of conventional lateral flow assays [18].
The observed transcriptional modifications likely reflect molecular interactions between contaminating microorganisms and cellular components within the PC. Given that white blood cells contain approximately 103-fold higher mRNA content, the RNA-seq analysis presumably captures gene expression from both white blood cells and platelets. The PTPRC gene encoding CD45 serves as a white blood cell marker, while PF4 is specifically expressed in platelets, allowing assessment of white blood cell presence [27]. Previous research by Middleton et al. demonstrated that in platelet concentrates sequencing, FPKM values of the PTPRC gene were approximately 5000-fold lower than PF4, indicating minimal white blood cell contamination. In our analysis, the mean FPKM values across all samples were 2539 for PF4 and 7.878 for PTPRC, indicating that the FPKM values of the PTPRC gene were approximately 300-fold lower than that of PF4. This finding suggests that white blood cell contamination was not entirely eliminated in our experimental samples.
In the current investigation, we conducted an ROC curve analysis to assess the diagnostic utility of hub genes identified from the four most significantly enriched pathways in S. epidermidis inoculated samples. We initially selected three genes (PAK1, RAF1, and GRB2) based on their involvement in critical molecular signaling networks, including the MAPK signaling pathway, proteoglycans in cancer, focal adhesion, and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. However, all three genes exhibited statistically non-significant p-values (≥0.05) accompanied by suboptimal area under the curve (AUC) values. Based on these findings, we determined that a hub gene-centric approach was not appropriate for achieving the objectives of our study. Consequently, we implemented an alternative methodology, utilizing statistical significance (p-values) and discriminatory capacity (AUC values) as primary selection criteria for candidate gene identification. These statistical metrics were generated through differential expression analysis using the DESeq2 algorithm.
Comparative analysis identified 403 genes with significant differential expression (p-value < 0.05) in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis samples, including H19, CAVIN1, A2M, and EPAS1. The observed transcriptional changes align with expected biological responses, as some of these genes are associated with inflammatory and immune responses. For instance, the H19 gene encodes a long non-coding RNA that plays a significant regulatory role in inflammation, aging, and disease progression [30]. Studies have demonstrated that H19 is involved in the modulation of inflammatory pathways, particularly in arthritic conditions. Furthermore, H19 exhibits increased expression in various malignancies, functioning as a competitive endogenous RNA that sequesters microRNAs, thereby altering the expression profiles of downstream target genes. Alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M) functions as a broad-spectrum protease inhibitor that employs a distinctive “bait-and-trap” mechanism [31]. A2M demonstrates significant immunomodulatory properties, including enhancement of neutrophil functionality through promotion of adhesion to endothelial cells, facilitation of migration, and augmentation of pathogen phagocytosis and elimination. Additionally, A2M stimulates bacterial phagocytosis, ROS production, and antigen presentation via major histocompatibility complex class I and II (MHC-I and MHC-II) pathways. Furthermore, A2M plays a crucial role in the regulation of fibrinolysis and coagulation processes through its inhibition of proteinases, a phenomenon that has been documented in patients with sepsis [32]. The EPAS1 gene, also known as HIF-2α, serves a pivotal role in the regulation of physiological responses to hypoxic conditions. These hypoxic states may be precipitated by high-altitude exposure or pathological conditions such as sepsis, which characteristically manifests with tissue hypoxia and inflammatory processes [33].
We compared our findings with previously published RNA sequencing data from platelets of sepsis patients [26]. Temporal analysis of gene expressions after bacterial inoculation revealed significant upregulation of H19, A2M, and EPAS1 genes in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculated platelet concentrates. While this gene also showed elevated expression in sepsis patients, the increases did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, LOC105376872 and SNORA53 genes demonstrated significant downregulation in both samples, but neither gene was identified among the downregulated genes in sepsis patients based on transcriptomic analysis. The observed differences in expression patterns may be attributable to the distinct sample types used: transfusion-ready platelet-rich plasma in our study versus platelet mRNA in sampled monovettes in the previous investigation. Previous studies utilizing a sepsis mouse model demonstrated the upregulation of the ITGA2B gene, which correlated with increased mortality rates [27]. In contrast, our RNA sequencing analysis of microorganism-inoculated platelet concentrates failed to detect significant alterations in ITGA2B gene expression levels.
Ribosomes play a fundamental role in protein synthesis, utilizing mRNA as a template and amino acids as substrates [34]. Ribosomal dysfunction has been implicated in various pathological conditions, including altered bacterial resistance, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and oncogenesis [35,36]. Our analysis revealed statistically significant enrichment of the ribosomal pathway in S. aureus-inoculated samples, suggesting its involvement in the immunoregulatory response to bacterial contamination. The MAPK family, comprising serine/threonine protein kinases, regulates essential biological processes and cellular responses to external stressors [37]. Enhanced MAPK activity, particularly p38 MAPK, regulates inflammatory mediator synthesis at both transcriptional and translational levels. Notably, our analysis of S. epidermidis-inoculated samples demonstrated significant enrichment of the MAPK signaling pathway. NK cells, classified as innate lymphoid cells, possess the capacity to eliminate virally infected and tumor cells [38]. These cells employ an HLA-unrestricted recognition mechanism, utilizing diverse arrays of activating and inhibitory receptors to discriminate between healthy and infected cells. As group 1 innate lymphoid cells, NK cells respond to both intracellular and extracellular bacteria and demonstrate lytic activity against various bacterial species [39,40,41]. Significantly, pathway analysis of S. epidermidis-inoculated samples revealed prominent enrichment of the NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity pathway.
ROC analysis identified four candidate genes (H19, CAVIN1, A2M, and EPAS1) that were selected based on DESeq2 results with significant p-values and notable AUC values for distinguishing between normal and inoculated platelet concentrates (Table 3). These genes demonstrated high area under the curve values in both S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculated samples (AUC > 0.8), with the exception of the H19 gene, which nonetheless approached this threshold (AUC = 0.8). These findings suggest their potential utility as early diagnostic biomarkers for the detection of S. aureus and S. epidermidis contamination in platelet concentrates.
Despite our comprehensive approach, we were unable to identify common genes between S. aureus and S. epidermidis samples in the time-domain analysis utilizing the maSigPro algorithm. This limitation may be attributed to several factors, including the stringent p-value and R-squared value criteria employed in our analytical framework, potential procedural inconsistencies, or insufficient temporal correlation between gene expression levels in the S. epidermidis inoculated samples. While we acknowledge that the rigorous statistical thresholds implemented were instrumental in maintaining analytical integrity, we also recognize that relaxing these parameters could potentially compromise the validity and reliability of our findings. Accordingly, we conducted a targeted selection process by independently identifying four distinct candidate genes from S. aureus inoculated specimens and four separate candidate genes from S. epidermidis inoculated specimens. This gene selection methodology was implemented separately from, and not influenced by, the candidate genes previously identified through the DESeq2 differential expression analysis. Therefore, we regarded the DESeq2 as the main analytical approach to identify commonly differentially expressed genes between S. aureus and S. epidermidis inoculated samples, circumventing the limitations encountered with the maSigPro time-series analysis.
Several limitations should be acknowledged in the present study. First, our investigation was restricted to S. aureus and S. epidermidis contamination, while other significant PC contaminants, including Streptococcus species and gram-negative bacteria, were not examined. Additionally, a methodological limitation emerges from our utilization of ATCC strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis rather than bacterial isolates derived from human skin flora. This methodological discrepancy may potentially induce differential RNA expression patterns during contamination and proliferation phases, thereby potentially affecting the accuracy and clinical translatability of our diagnostic assay results. Also, the study was limited by our inability to quantify bacterial loads at sequential time points throughout the experimental period. This limitation is attributable to the technical constraints of our methodology, specifically establishing the limit of detection. Furthermore, bacterial growth kinetics and potential co-contamination scenarios were not evaluated. Future studies should encompass these other clinically relevant microorganisms and investigate various inoculation concentrations, particularly around 1 CFU/mL, which represents the detection threshold for conventional culture methods. Furthermore, the platelet concentrates utilized in this study were obtained from donors with elevated AST values (2–3 times above the normal range). The possibility of underlying liver disease, including hepatitis B virus infection, could not be definitively excluded. These varying hepatic conditions might have influenced the observed gene expression patterns, potentially confounding our results.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Preparation

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital and Hanmaeum blood service (Gunpo, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). PC prepared by the platelet-rich plasma method, which exhibited aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels exceeding 100 IU/mL and thus did not meet the quality criteria for transfusion, were utilized in this study. PC products were transported to the blood bank of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Upon arrival, each PC unit was inoculated with 100 μL of S. aureus (ATCC 29213) and S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228) suspension at a concentration of 103 CFU/mL. This concentration was selected because in this concentration, microbes growth are expected to be detected after 12 h of culture. The inoculated PC were stored in a platelet agitator and incubator under standard conditions. RNA extraction was performed using 6 mL of platelet-rich plasma collected in EDTA tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) at the following time points: immediately before inoculation (0 h), and at 1-, 3-, and 6-hours post-inoculation. A total of 75 samples were prepared, consisting of 27 samples in the S. aureus group, 24 samples in the S. epidermidis group, and 24 samples in the control group.

4.2. RNA Preparation, Library Construction, and Sequencing

RNA from platelet-rich plasma was extracted based on previous methods using an RNA extraction kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) [23,24]. cDNA synthesis, library preparation, and RNA-seq were performed by Macrogen (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea). In brief, total RNA was isolated from the samples and subjected to DNase treatment to eliminate DNA contamination, followed by purification using TruSeq Stranded Total RNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For short-read sequencing, the purified RNA was fragmented, and cDNA synthesis was performed. Subsequently, adaptor ligation, PCR amplification, and sequencing were carried out using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). RNA quality was measured by RNA integrity number (RIN) [28].

4.3. Data Quality Control and Read Mapping

The quality of raw transcriptome data was evaluated using multiple metrics, including total read bases, total reads, and GC content. Additionally, sequencing accuracy was assessed by calculating Q20 and Q30 scores based on the Phred quality score using fastp (v0.23.0). The raw FASTQ files were subsequently processed using fastp for adapter trimming and quality filtering. Adapter sequences were removed, and low-quality bases (Phred score < 3) were discarded. Reads shorter than 36 bp were excluded to ensure reliable downstream analyses. Following preprocessing, the filtered reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh38) using HISAT2 (v2.2.1). The resulting SAM files were converted into BAM format using samtools (v1.19). Transcript quantification was performed using StringTie (v2.2.1), which estimated gene expression levels based on the reference gene model. Gene expression levels were quantified as read counts and fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). To reduce potential bias from lowly expressed genes in downstream statistical analyses, genes with read counts below 10 were excluded using a threshold-based filtering approach [42]. All analyses were conducted in an Ubuntu (v22.04.4) computing environment.

4.4. Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Differential expression analysis was conducted utilizing DESeq2 R package version 1.44.0 with default parameters [43], a package that offers statistical approaches for identifying differentially expressed genes in digital transcriptome data through a model grounded in negative binomial distribution. Genes characterized by |log2(fold change)| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed genes. Genes were classified as up-regulated when exhibiting a log2(fold change) > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05, while genes with log2(fold change) < −1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05 were designated as down-regulated. For data visualization, we employed multiple techniques. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plots were created using the plotPCA function from the DESeq2 package in R. For enrichment analysis utilizing active subnetworks and subsequent clustering of enrichment terms, we employed the pathfindR R package v2.4.2 [44]. Extracted pathways were annotated with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).
To comprehensively analyze our specimens while integrating time-course data, we employed the maSigPro R package, which utilizes generalized linear models to systematically detect temporal patterns in gene expression. Following model fitting, genes were meticulously ranked based on their p-values and R-squared metrics, thereby providing a dual assessment of both statistical significance and the goodness-of-fit of the temporal models. Moreover, candidate genes were selected not only on the basis of these quantitative criteria but also through detailed graphical analysis, which confirmed that these genes consistently exhibited elevated expression levels across all time points. This comprehensive strategy ensured that the final selection of candidate genes was both statistically robust and biologically meaningful.
Following the careful curation of candidate genes, we generated ROC curves to assess their discriminative performance. Subsequently, we calculated the AUC values and determined the confidence intervals for these AUCs and optimal cutoff thresholds using the ROCit R package v2.1.2. This analysis was exclusively performed on genes that exhibited consistent expression profiles throughout the entire time course, thereby reinforcing the robustness and reliability of our biomarker selection process.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated differential gene expression patterns between bacterially contaminated and control platelet concentrate samples. Our analysis identified 5884 differentially expressed genes in S. aureus-inoculated samples and 974 in S. epidermidis-inoculated samples. Subsequent gene enrichment analysis revealed significant enrichment of multiple pathways associated with infection and inflammatory responses. ROC analysis of both bacterial groups demonstrated consistent upregulation of H19, CAVIN1, and EPAS1 genes, suggesting their potential utility as biomarkers for predicting platelet concentrate contamination. Additionally, the incorporation of time-series analysis highlighted the significance of additional genes, broadening our understanding of the transcriptional response to bacterial contamination.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26073009/s1.

Author Contributions

D.W.J. and H.S.K. designed experiments and analyzed data. D.W.J. and J.K.K. analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. T.K. and Y.K. (Youngeun Kweon) performed experiments. I.Y.Y. and Y.-J.P. designed experiments and provided resources. E.-J.O. and Y.K. (Yonggoo Kim) supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MIST) (2021R1F1A1046464).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional review board of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (KC21SISI0436, 16 June 2021) and the Institutional review board of Hanmaeum blood service (20220404-Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, 4 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waivered due to the nature of the study using blood products below standard.

Data Availability Statement

Available data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Kyuho Park (Blood Bank Unit) and staff of Blood Bank Unit for technical support. We would also like to thank Hyun Soo Seok (Microbiology Unit) and staff of microbiology unit for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. Scridon, A. Platelets and Their Role in Hemostasis and Thrombosis-From Physiology to Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dunbar, N.M. Does ABO and RhD matching matter for platelet transfusion? Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2020, 2020, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shea, S.M.; Thomas, K.A.; Spinella, P.C. The effect of platelet storage temperature on haemostatic, immune, and endothelial function: Potential for personalised medicine. Blood Transfus. 2019, 17, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Smethurst, P.; Cardigan, R. Current challenges in platelet transfusion. Platelets 2022, 33, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Levy, J.H.; Neal, M.D.; Herman, J.H. Bacterial contamination of platelets for transfusion: Strategies for prevention. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Prax, M.; Bekeredjian-Ding, I.; Krut, O. Microbiological Screening of Platelet Concentrates in Europe. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 2019, 46, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kerantzas, C.A.; Merwede, J.; Snyder, E.L.; Hendrickson, J.E.; Tormey, C.A.; Kazmierczak, B.I.; Peaper, D.R. Assessment of polymicrobial interactions in bacterial isolates from transfused platelet units associated with sepsis. Transfusion 2022, 62, 2458–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fridey, J.L.; Stramer, S.L.; Nambiar, A.; Moayeri, M.; Bakkour, S.; Langelier, C.; Crawford, E.; Lu, T.; Lanteri, M.C.; Kamm, J.; et al. Sepsis from an apheresis platelet contaminated with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/baumannii complex bacteria and Staphylococcus saprophyticus after pathogen reduction. Transfusion 2020, 60, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cloutier, M.; De Korte, D. Isbt Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party SoB. Residual risks of bacterial contamination for pathogen-reduced platelet components. Vox Sang. 2022, 117, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abela, M.A.; Fenning, S.; Maguire, K.A.; Morris, K.G. Bacterial contamination of platelet components not detected by BacT/ALERT®. Transfus. Med. 2018, 28, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. White, S.K.; Schmidt, R.L.; Walker, B.S.; Metcalf, R.A. Bacterial contamination rate of platelet components by primary culture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfusion 2020, 60, 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. McDonald, C.; Allen, J.; Brailsford, S.; Roy, A.; Ball, J.; Moule, R.; Vasconcelos, M.; Morrison, R.; Pitt, T. Bacterial screening of platelet components by National Health Service Blood and Transplant, an effective risk reduction measure. Transfusion 2017, 57, 1122–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jacobs, M.R.; Zhou, B.; Tayal, A.; Maitta, R.W. Bacterial Contamination of Platelet Products. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mohammadi, T.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Pietersz, R.N.; Reesink, H.W. Applications of real-time PCR in the screening of platelet concentrates for bacterial contamination. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2006, 6, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El Mehdaoui, F.; Benajiba, M.; Boulahdid, S.; El Hattimy, F.; Soulaymani, A.; Alami, R. Skin flora and bacterial contamination of diversion pouch and recovered platelet components in Moroccan blood donors. Transfus. Med. 2020, 30, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Szczepiorkowski, Z.M.; Pagano, M.B. Platelet components and bacterial contamination: Hospital perspective 2022. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2022, 2022, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gammon, R.R.; Reik, R.A.; Stern, M.; Vassallo, R.R.; Waxman, D.A.; Young, P.P.; Benjamin, R.J. Acquired platelet storage container leaks and contamination with environmental bacteria: A preventable cause of bacterial sepsis. Transfusion 2022, 62, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schmidt, M.; Ramirez-Arcos, S.; Stiller, L.; McDonald, C. Isbt Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party SoB. Current status of rapid bacterial detection methods for platelet components: A 20-year review by the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party Subgroup on Bacteria. Vox Sang. 2022, 117, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. AABB. Clinical Recognition and Investigation of Suspected Bacterial Contamination of Platelets. Available online: http://www.aabb.org/programs/publications/bulletins/Documents/ab14-04.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2024).
  20. Stark, R.; Grzelak, M.; Hadfield, J. RNA sequencing: The teenage years. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 631–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kukurba, K.R.; Montgomery, S.B. RNA Sequencing and Analysis. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2015, 2015, 951–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Deshpande, D.; Chhugani, K.; Chang, Y.; Karlsberg, A.; Loeffler, C.; Zhang, J.; Muszyńska, A.; Munteanu, V.; Yang, H.; Rotman, J.; et al. RNA-seq data science: From raw data to effective interpretation. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 997383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Best, M.G.; In’t Veld, S.; Sol, N.; Wurdinger, T. RNA sequencing and swarm intelligence-enhanced classification algorithm development for blood-based disease diagnostics using spliced blood platelet RNA. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 1206–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Heililahong, H.; Jin, P.; Lei, H.; Gu, H.; Qian, B.; Wang, X.; Dai, J.; Cai, X. Whole transcriptome analysis of platelet concentrates during storage. Blood Transfus. 2023, 21, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Supernat, A.; Popeda, M.; Pastuszak, K.; Best, M.G.; Grešner, P.; Veld, S.I.T.; Siek, B.; Bednarz-Knoll, N.; Rondina, M.T.; Stokowy, T.; et al. Transcriptomic landscape of blood platelets in healthy donors. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nuhrenberg, T.G.; Stockle, J.; Marini, F.; Zurek, M.; Grüning, B.A.; Benes, V.; Hein, L.; Neumann, F.J.; Stratz, C.; Cederqvist, M.; et al. Impact of high platelet turnover on the platelet transcriptome: Results from platelet RNA-sequencing in patients with sepsis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0260222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Middleton, E.A.; Rowley, J.W.; Campbell, R.A.; Grissom, C.K.; Brown, S.M.; Beesley, S.J.; Schwertz, H.; Kosaka, Y.; Manne, B.K.; Krauel, K.; et al. Sepsis alters the transcriptional and translational landscape of human and murine platelets. Blood 2019, 134, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schroeder, A.; Mueller, O.; Stocker, S.; Salowsky, R.; Leiber, M.; Gassmann, M.; Lightfoot, S.; Menzel, W.; Granzow, M.; Ragg, T. The RIN: An RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol. Biol. 2006, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, J.T.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.; Jekarl, D.W. Regulatory Mechanism between Ferritin and Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Spinal Ligament-Derived Cells from Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Patient. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, B.; Suen, C.W.; Ma, H.; Wang, Y.; Kong, L.; Qin, D.; Lee, Y.W.W.; Li, G. The Roles of H19 in Regulating Inflammation and Aging. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 579687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vandooren, J.; Itoh, Y. Alpha-2-Macroglobulin in Inflammation, Immunity and Infections. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 803244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kelly, B.J.; Lautenbach, E.; Nachamkin, I.; Coffin, S.E.; Gerber, J.S.; Fuchs, B.D.; Garrigan, C.; Han, X.; Bilker, W.B.; Wise, J.; et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Epicenters Program. Combined biomarkers discriminate a low likelihood of bacterial infection among surgical intensive care unit patients with suspected sepsis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 85, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schweizer, R.M.; Velotta, J.P.; Ivy, C.M.; Jones, M.R.; Muir, S.M.; Bradburd, G.S.; Storz, J.F.; Scott, G.R.; Cheviron, Z.A. Physiological and genomic evidence that selection on the transcription factor Epas1 has altered cardiovascular function in high-altitude deer mice. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Djumagulov, M.; Demeshkina, N.; Jenner, L.; Rozov, A.; Yusupov, M.; Yusupova, G. Accuracy mechanism of eukaryotic ribosome translocation. Nature 2021, 600, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiao, L.; Liu, Y.; Yu, X.Y.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tu, J.; Song, Y.H.; Li, Y. Ribosome biogenesis in disease: New players and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Turi, Z.; Lacey, M.; Mistrik, M.; Moudry, P. Impaired ribosome biogenesis: Mechanisms and relevance to cancer and aging. Aging 2019, 11, 2512–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaminska, B. MAPK signalling pathways as molecular targets for anti-inflammatory therapy—from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic benefits. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1754, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Laskowski, T.J.; Biederstadt, A.; Rezvani, K. Natural killer cells in antitumour adoptive cell immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2022, 22, 557–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Elemam, N.M.; Ramakrishnan, R.K.; Hundt, J.E.; Halwani, R.; Maghazachi, A.A.; Hamid, Q. Innate Lymphoid Cells and Natural Killer Cells in Bacterial Infections: Function, Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Targets. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 733564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schmidt, S.; Ullrich, E.; Bochennek, K.; Zimmermann, S.Y.; Lehrnbecher, T. Role of natural killer cells in antibacterial immunity. Expert. Rev. Hematol. 2016, 9, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Klimpel, G.R.; Niesel, D.W.; Klimpel, K.D. Natural cytotoxic effector cell activity against Shigella flexneri-infected HeLa cells. J. Immunol. 1986, 136, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, K.S.; Kang, T.; Jekarl, D.W. Immune Gene Networks from Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ulgen, E.; Ozisik, O.; Sezerman, O.U. pathfindR: An R Package for Comprehensive Identification of Enriched Pathways in Omics Data Through Active Subnetworks. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plots of gene expression profiles of platelet concentrate following S. aureus inoculation over the entire time course. (B) Volcano plots of DEGs in the S. aureus inoculated platelet concentrate across all time points. (C) Pathway analysis of samples inoculated with S. aureus. The results revealed highly significant enrichment in several key cellular processes, including ribosome, spliceosome, and nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways.
Figure 1. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plots of gene expression profiles of platelet concentrate following S. aureus inoculation over the entire time course. (B) Volcano plots of DEGs in the S. aureus inoculated platelet concentrate across all time points. (C) Pathway analysis of samples inoculated with S. aureus. The results revealed highly significant enrichment in several key cellular processes, including ribosome, spliceosome, and nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways.
Ijms 26 03009 g001
Figure 2. (A) PCA plots of gene expression profiles of platelet concentrate after S. epidermidis inoculation. (B) Volcano plots of DEGs in the S. epidermidis inoculated platelet concentrate. (C) Pathway analysis of samples inoculated with S. epidermidis. The results revealed highly significant enrichment in several key cellular processes, including MAPK signaling pathway, proteoglycans in cancer, NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and focal adhesion.
Figure 2. (A) PCA plots of gene expression profiles of platelet concentrate after S. epidermidis inoculation. (B) Volcano plots of DEGs in the S. epidermidis inoculated platelet concentrate. (C) Pathway analysis of samples inoculated with S. epidermidis. The results revealed highly significant enrichment in several key cellular processes, including MAPK signaling pathway, proteoglycans in cancer, NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and focal adhesion.
Ijms 26 03009 g002
Figure 3. ROC curve analysis of four manually curated candidate genes. Panels (AD) represent the ROC curves for the selected genes in S. aureus inoculated samples, while panels (EH) illustrate the ROC curves for the same genes in S. epidermidis inoculated samples. The analysis demonstrates the diagnostic potential of these genes for detecting staphylococcal contamination in platelet concentrates.
Figure 3. ROC curve analysis of four manually curated candidate genes. Panels (AD) represent the ROC curves for the selected genes in S. aureus inoculated samples, while panels (EH) illustrate the ROC curves for the same genes in S. epidermidis inoculated samples. The analysis demonstrates the diagnostic potential of these genes for detecting staphylococcal contamination in platelet concentrates.
Ijms 26 03009 g003
Figure 4. The gene expression plots for the four curated candidate genes consistently demonstrated marked differences between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group across all assessed time points. (AD) represent YY1AP1, PDSS1, CDC25C, and CCZ1B expression level, respectively. Each data point corresponds to a specific sample’s temporal position and measured expression level, while the linear element represents the collective expression trajectory of the group.
Figure 4. The gene expression plots for the four curated candidate genes consistently demonstrated marked differences between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group across all assessed time points. (AD) represent YY1AP1, PDSS1, CDC25C, and CCZ1B expression level, respectively. Each data point corresponds to a specific sample’s temporal position and measured expression level, while the linear element represents the collective expression trajectory of the group.
Ijms 26 03009 g004
Figure 5. ROC curves of four curated genes in samples inoculated with S. aureus. (AD) show ROC curves of YY1AP1, PDSS1, CDC25C, CCZ1B genes, respectively.
Figure 5. ROC curves of four curated genes in samples inoculated with S. aureus. (AD) show ROC curves of YY1AP1, PDSS1, CDC25C, CCZ1B genes, respectively.
Ijms 26 03009 g005
Figure 6. Expression profiles of the four selected candidate genes demonstrating consistent and pronounced differential expression between the S. epidermidis-inoculated group and the control group across all temporal measurement points. (AD) represent FARS2, LOC105370462, LOC105377460, and ZCCHC7 expression, respectively. Individual data points represent the temporal coordinates and corresponding expression values of specific samples, whereas the linear line illustrates the aggregate expression profile across the collective group.
Figure 6. Expression profiles of the four selected candidate genes demonstrating consistent and pronounced differential expression between the S. epidermidis-inoculated group and the control group across all temporal measurement points. (AD) represent FARS2, LOC105370462, LOC105377460, and ZCCHC7 expression, respectively. Individual data points represent the temporal coordinates and corresponding expression values of specific samples, whereas the linear line illustrates the aggregate expression profile across the collective group.
Ijms 26 03009 g006
Figure 7. ROC curves for the four selected candidate genes in specimens inoculated with S. epidermidis. (AD) depict the ROC curves for FARS2, LOC105370462, LOC105377460, and ZCCHC7 genes, respectively.
Figure 7. ROC curves for the four selected candidate genes in specimens inoculated with S. epidermidis. (AD) depict the ROC curves for FARS2, LOC105370462, LOC105377460, and ZCCHC7 genes, respectively.
Ijms 26 03009 g007
Table 1. Up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in S. aureus inoculated samples.
Table 1. Up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in S. aureus inoculated samples.
Up-regulated genes at S. aureus inoculation
1 hEPAS1, CDKN1C, ZNF761, TYMP, CAVIN1, NADK
3 hTYMP, H19, CAVIN1, URB2, IGF2, A2M
6 hCAVIN1, IGF2, A2M, ARHGAP29, EPAS1, H19
Down-regulated genes at S. aureus inoculation
1 hCCNYL1, EEF1AKMT1, DNAI4, HECTD2, RPPH1, SPIDR
3 hCCNYL1, RPS29, EXOC6B, EEF1AKMT1, SNORD133, SPIDR
6 hEEF1AKMT1, CCNYL1, HECTD2, EXOC6B, ADAL, AGAP4
Table 2. Up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in S. epidermidis inoculated samples.
Table 2. Up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in S. epidermidis inoculated samples.
Up-regulated genes at S. epidermidis inoculation
1 hSERPINE1, BPI, IL1R1, PTGS2, RPL10P9, DNAH17
3 hSLC34A3, RPL10P9
6 hLMO3, RPL10P9, NXF3, PTGS2, MXRA7
Down-regulated genes at S. epidermidis inoculation
1 hHNRNPUL2-BSCL2, LOC105370464, BIVM-ERCC5, RPL23AP7, RPL23AP79, LINC00964
3 hTMX2-CTNND1, TRIM6-TRIM34, LOC101927613
6 hPRSS1, RPL23AP7, RPL23AP79
Table 3. Top 10 differentially expressed genes found commonly on two sample groups. Sau, S. aureus; Sepi, S. epidermidis; padj, adjusted p-value.
Table 3. Top 10 differentially expressed genes found commonly on two sample groups. Sau, S. aureus; Sepi, S. epidermidis; padj, adjusted p-value.
Gene Namelog2FC.Saupadj.SauAUClog2FC.Sepipadj.SepiAUC
H194.1040812.38 × 10−5411.3897040.0043150.7795
CAVIN13.473546.56 × 10−5111.4778860.0004690.8125
A2M2.9254641.82 × 10−4011.1789960.0086840.8385
EPAS13.1894994.96 × 10−370.99851.2335580.0008080.8090
LOC105376872−4.288481.36 × 10−331−1.048650.0107690.8359
SNORA53−4.638632.32 × 10−310.95981.5107680.0109820.6354
PPM1F1.8022541.14 × 10−260.98691.1009950.0085670.7118
CDKN1C2.2790733.42 × 10−260.98301.1574390.0012520.8056
HK32.4354735.62 × 10−260.99231.3285660.0027770.7682
RXRA2.3387016.99 × 10−260.97991.56130.00020.7448
Table 4. Four candidate genes were identified using the maSigPro R package for subsequent downstream analyses. These genes were selected based on their robust statistical performance, as evidenced by high R-squared values and statistically significant p-values. Notably, ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for these genes was 1, indicating a perfect separation of read counts between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group.
Table 4. Four candidate genes were identified using the maSigPro R package for subsequent downstream analyses. These genes were selected based on their robust statistical performance, as evidenced by high R-squared values and statistically significant p-values. Notably, ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for these genes was 1, indicating a perfect separation of read counts between the S. aureus inoculated group and the control group.
p-ValueR-SquaredAUCciAUCCutoff
YY1AP11.45 × 10−290.927411–117,985
PDSS18.69 × 10−260.896511–1470
CDC25C1.12 × 10−250.895511–1231
CCZ1B1.29 × 10−250.894911–14065
Table 5. Four candidate genes selected from the subset of seven genes demonstrating statistical significance and consistently elevated expression levels across all temporal intervals. In contrast to the findings observed in S. aureus specimens, these candidates exhibited comparatively lower R-squared values and AUC values.
Table 5. Four candidate genes selected from the subset of seven genes demonstrating statistical significance and consistently elevated expression levels across all temporal intervals. In contrast to the findings observed in S. aureus specimens, these candidates exhibited comparatively lower R-squared values and AUC values.
p-ValueR-SquaredAUCciAUCCutoff
FARS24.67 × 10−90.52940.88540.7875–0.98331219
LOC1053704629.83 × 10−110.60110.96960.9191–1544
LOC1053774601.01 × 10−80.51370.94180.8718–1494
ZCCHC75.09 × 10−90.52770.93580.8622–15575
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.K.; Kang, T.; Kweon, Y.; Yoo, I.Y.; Oh, E.-J.; Park, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Jekarl, D.W. Alterations in RNA Expression Profile Following S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculation into Platelet Concentrates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073009

AMA Style

Kim JK, Kang T, Kweon Y, Yoo IY, Oh E-J, Park Y-J, Kim Y, Kim HS, Jekarl DW. Alterations in RNA Expression Profile Following S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculation into Platelet Concentrates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jae Kwon, Taewon Kang, Youngeun Kweon, In Young Yoo, Eun-Jee Oh, Yeon-Joon Park, Yonggoo Kim, Hoon Seok Kim, and Dong Wook Jekarl. 2025. "Alterations in RNA Expression Profile Following S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculation into Platelet Concentrates" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073009

APA Style

Kim, J. K., Kang, T., Kweon, Y., Yoo, I. Y., Oh, E.-J., Park, Y.-J., Kim, Y., Kim, H. S., & Jekarl, D. W. (2025). Alterations in RNA Expression Profile Following S. aureus and S. epidermidis Inoculation into Platelet Concentrates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop