Next Article in Journal
The Pleiotropic Influence of Cannabidiol and Tetrahydrocannabinol on Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Benchmarking Cost-Effective DNA Extraction Kits for Diverse Metagenomic Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers

1
Department of Plastic Surgery, St. John’s Cancer Center, Jaczewskiego 7, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Health Sciences, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1 H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
4
Experimental Research Center, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1 H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland
5
Holycross Cancer Center, Department of Genetic Engineering, Artwinskiego 3, 25-734 Kielce, Poland
6
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 4a (Collegium Pharmaceuticum), 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(23), 11617; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311617
Submission received: 14 October 2025 / Revised: 25 November 2025 / Accepted: 28 November 2025 / Published: 30 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

Metallomics, which studies the role of metals in biological processes, is crucial for understanding the impact of elements on human health. It requires an integrated approach combining quantitative and functional methods, supported by advanced analytical techniques. A comprehensive understanding of metallomics considers the accumulation, speciation, and distribution of metals. In recent decades, an increasing number of studies have focused on determining metal levels in human tissues, particularly in the context of chronic diseases and developmental disorders. Levels of macro- and microelements, both essential and toxic, play a fundamental role in both physiological and pathological processes. Given the increasing health risks associated with addictions such as smoking, understanding the mechanisms of toxicity based on metallomic studies is crucial. This literature review synthesizes current advances in analytical techniques used to determine trace elements in biological samples, the accumulation of toxic metals, and the disruption of element homeostasis in tobacco smokers. The aim of this study is to identify key risks from tobacco-related metal exposure, thereby providing a deeper understanding of the long-term health consequences. The obtained results may constitute the basis for future directions of metallomic research.

1. Introduction

Excessive accumulation of metals in tissues is primarily caused by exposure to a polluted anthropogenic environment and toxic dietary contaminants [1]. Psychoactive substance abuse is also a source of exposure to many organic and inorganic toxins [2,3]. With the development of civilization, we are observing an increase in the incidence of addictions (including alcoholism, drug addiction, and nicotine addiction), which are considered in the context of psychological or physical causes, taking into account the negative effects of poisoning the body. Despite growing public awareness and evidence of the harmful effects of smoking, nicotine addiction and tobacco smoking continue to cause disease and premature death [4]. 2025 will mark over 20 years since the entry into force of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), signed in Geneva on 21 May 2003 [5]. Currently, approximately 28.8% of adults in Poland smoke tobacco, which is higher than the European Union (EU) average of 25.3%. In comparison, in Sweden, only 5–8% of the population smokes [6]. On 16 January 2024, the WHO published the “WHO Global Report on Trends in Tobacco Prevalence 2000–2030,” which emphasized that although smoking rates have declined in most countries, there are still 1.25 billion adult tobacco users worldwide, and the number of deaths caused by tobacco smoking will begin to decline in the next few years [7]. According to the WHO, one person currently dies every 4 s from smoking. Tobacco cigarette consumption and the number of smokers are high, particularly in countries with lower economic status. Given the risk of addiction and its health consequences, there is an urgent need for research to determine the effects of exposure, understand the pathogenic mechanisms and their relationship to the accumulation of toxins present in tobacco smoke, develop strategies for preventing intoxication, and identify potential diagnostic parameters and new therapeutic approaches.
An important aspect of cigarette smoking is the disruption of homeostasis, micronutrient and trace element status, and the accumulation of toxic elements. The first study on the determination of selected metals, i.e., iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg), in the tissues of nicotine addicts dates back to 1991 [8]. This study was continued in 2001, measuring selenium (Se), Zn, Cu, and Fe in the plasma of tobacco smokers [9]. In both cases, quantitative determinations were performed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Regarding counteracting the consequences of smoking, no trace elements have demonstrated efficacy as a diagnostic instrument or prospective supplement/medication.
The literature review aimed to gather current research on the risk of toxic metal accumulation in tobacco smokers, which would allow for the identification of the greatest risks associated with cigarette smoking, which, with long-term exposure, can lead to serious and permanent health effects. An initial search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2000 to 2025 was conducted based on the article title and abstract to gather information on the latest results and trends in metallomic research related to tobacco smoking. Duplicates were excluded. The lead authors decided on the inclusion/exclusion of articles based on their novelty and the relevance of the study findings. Articles were included if full text was available. Ultimately, 474 articles were included, sorted qualitatively according to the subsection topics. The summary includes biological sample preparation, the latest analytical techniques, comparative studies using different tissues and body fluids in smoker/nonsmoker groups, and the mechanisms of toxicity of the most frequently detected toxic metals in smokers: lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni). The final section discusses challenges that may determine trends in future metallomic research.

2. Introduction to Metallomics

R.J.P. Williams was the first to use the term “metalome” to describe the specific pathways of metal distribution in the body [10]. However, Hiroki Haraguchi, a professor at Nagoya University, is considered the pioneer and founder of metallomics, initiating the integration of various scientific fields to assess the role of metals in complex biological systems [11,12].
According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), metallomics is defined as “the totality of metal and metalloid species present in a biological system, defined in terms of their identity and/or quantity” [13].
Metallomics can be divided into structural, functional, and quantitative metallomics. Therefore, there is a subset of metallomics that concerns the qualitative identification of individual elements (qualitative metallomics) and their concentration (quantitative metallomics). In turn, the assessment of element content in biological materials, related to function, falls within the scope of functional metallomics. It should be emphasized that metallomics is a holistic approach aimed at understanding the role of metals in biology and medicine [14,15,16,17,18]. Since quantitative aspects are usually the basis for metallomic interpretation, there is a need for multidisciplinary research using a set of modern tools [19]. Quantitative metallomic studies must meet the criteria of specificity, sensitivity and be flexible enough to cover a wide range of concentrations, the complex chemistry of the sample matrix, and account for the dynamics of possible transformations.
Currently, elemental quantification has significantly expanded its capabilities, primarily thanks to the development of advanced analytical techniques, primarily inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which enables simultaneous qualitative and quantitative determination of many chemical elements present at trace and ultratrace levels [20,21]. In turn, the coupling of spectroscopic and microscopic techniques has led to the development of in situ metallomic imaging techniques, which open up new perspectives for metal speciation, with the possibility of multi-element tracking and generating isotopically specific maps of element distribution in complex biological matrices, complemented by the identification of valence states and the entire environment, i.e., interactions and functional connections of metals with genes, proteins (metalloproteomes), metabolites, and other endogenous or bioinduced biomolecules, such as organic acids, sugars, or DNA fragments in the cell [22,23,24]. Analytical techniques as tools of structural metallomics, thanks to its high sensitivity (10–100 ppq) and spatial resolution at the level of 1 submicron, enable the transition from the atomic level to systemic processes [25]. Analytical techniques used for the quantitative determination of elements in biological materials should be adapted to the needs of the study. Currently available techniques differ significantly in incomparable detection limits (DL), influences of the organic matrix, or various types of interferences [26].
Defining the metalome allows us to determine: (i) the distribution of metals within individual compartments; (ii) the concentration of individual metals; and (iii) the type of complexed bioligands. Different tissues have varying requirements, leading to an uneven distribution of metal ions at the (sub)cellular level, within individual systems, and throughout the body. For instance, approximately 90% of the total iron (Fe) in the body is found in the blood as a component of hemoglobin. Zinc (Zn) is a cellular ion present in blood plasma and other bodily fluids, while calcium (Ca) is the primary component of bones. The distribution of these elements within cells is also uneven. Iron accumulates in the mitochondria, except in red blood cells; calcium is primarily found in the cytosol; and zinc is located in the cell nucleus. Of note, the content of so-called non-essential elements in tissues, such as rubidium (Rb), strontium (Sr), and titanium (Ti), is noteworthy. The Mayo Clinic states that there is no evidence that titanium is an essential element. Quantitatively, titanium is a (ultra)trace element, typically found in sub-ppb concentrations, although higher levels have been detected in artificial joints, prostheses, implants, etc. Their functions are not yet fully understood, and it is unknown to what extent they disrupt the functions of essential elements, particularly through binding to proteins in metalloproteomes. In the human body, metal levels, both macro- and micronutrients, are subject to dynamic changes and are critical for health [27]. The mechanisms ensuring both systemic homeostasis and cellular balance are complex and specific to individual metal ions [28]. Many proteins responsible for the acquisition and distribution of chemical elements participate in this process [29]. Accessory proteins that ensure the binding of the correct metal are called metallochaperones. The term “chaperone” was introduced in the late 20th century by Tom O’Halloran, who studied the role of the copper chaperone in Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) [30]. Under physiological conditions, specific metalloproteins bind to specific metals. Biometals, such as manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu), are essential components of metalloproteins. They act as cofactors necessary for various metabolic processes. Cobalt serves as a cofactor primarily in the structure of cobalamin (vitamin B12), which is vital for enzymes like methionine synthase and methylmalonyl-CoA mutase. If proteins bind to the wrong metal, their function can be inhibited. Therefore, controlling metal availability is crucial, as it ensures the proper selectivity of metal ion binding to proteins. This is particularly important for Fe and Zn, which can occupy the same binding sites. It is known that approximately 30% of proteins are metallomes, i.e., transport proteins in the cytoplasm [31,32,33]. To ensure the appropriate amount of metals necessary for proper cellular function, living organisms possess homeostatic mechanisms, utilizing a range of acquisition and storage proteins, transporters, metal chaperones, and metal-sensing transcriptional regulators [34]. In this way, the organism can avoid metal overload and the associated toxic effects.
The “biology of iron” is well understood. In the body, Fe occurs as Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions with varying reactivity and complex stability. It should be noted that iron research has been ongoing since the 18th century, when Menghini first identified Fe in human blood [35,36]. However, the essential role of Zn for humans was not proven until the 1960s. There is evidence suggesting that bromine (Br) may be an essential element for life, although this idea is not yet widely accepted. A study conducted in 2014 by Scott McCall and colleagues described bromine as an essential trace element for the formation of collagen scaffolds, which are important for tissue development and architecture [37]. Currently, the prevailing view is that there are more than 20 elements essential for human life, including (macro)minerals: hydrogen (H), carbon (C), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), chlorine (Cl), sodium (Na), potassium (K), Mg, Ca, as well as trace elements such as Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Co, Mo, Se, iodine (I). In fact, since the 1960s, the concept of indispensability has been modified with respect to mineral elements. Some trace elements were not considered essential, such as boron (B), silicon (Si), chromium (Cr), and nickel (Ni), but it has now been recognized that they reduce the risk of chronic diseases, and their deficiency in the diet adversely affects biological functions. Other examples include Cr or fluorine (F), which supports dental health; however, this is not considered to be essential for life [38,39]. Elements such as Fe and Zn occur at the gram level (2–5 g/70 kg human), hence some authors classify them as minerals [40,41,42], in contrast to trace elements, which occur in quantities two (Cu), three (Mn), or four orders of magnitude smaller (Mo, Cr, Co). However, in body fluids, reference ranges (or values) for various elements established for non-diseased people are established for diagnostic purposes. For example, the Mayo Clinic has defined reference ranges for serum zinc from 66 to 106 mcg/dL in adults. For serum iron, the reference ranges for men are 50–150 mcg/dL, and for women: 35–145 mcg/dL. In turn, Skalnaya and Skalny, in their monograph on biometals [43], considered macroelements to be those elements whose concentration in the body exceeds 0.01% (O, C, H, N, Ca, P, K, Na, S, Cl, Mg). The absolute mass of macroelements per 70 kg of a human ranges from a few grams (Mg) to over forty kilograms (O). The next group, known as trace elements, ranges from 0.00001% to 0.01%. (Fe, Zn, F, Sr, Mo, Cu, Br, silicon (Si), caesium (Cs), I, Mn, aluminium (Al), Pb, Cd, boron (B), Rb), which translates to mass amounts from hundreds of milligrams to several grams. Ultratrace elements have contents of less than 0.000001% (Se, Co, vanadium (V), Cr, arsenic (As), Ni, lithium (Li), barium (Ba), Ti, silver (Ag), tin (Sn), beryllium (Be), gallium (Ga), germanium (Ge), mercury (Hg), scandium (Sc), zirconium (Zr), bismuth (Bi), antimony (Sb), uranium (U), thorium (Th), rhodium (Rh)), and their absolute mass is expressed in milligrams (mg) or micrograms (µg). Among the essential trace elements mentioned above, such as Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Zn, and Se, the human body also accumulates toxic metals that do not perform any physiological function, such as Al, As, Hg, Pb, Be, Ni, Cd, thallium (Tl), etc. There is no universal definition of trace elements, as their classification can vary depending on the perspective—nutritional (macro and micronutrients), environmental, or within human biology, clinical chemistry, and toxicology. The CLSI C38 standard document titled “Control of Preexamination Variation in Trace Element Determinations,” 2nd edition, published in 1997, categorizes elements based on their concentration in the body. It defines trace elements as those with body content ranging from 0.01 to 100 µg/g (10 µg/L to 104 µg/L), and ultratrace elements as those with body content of less than 0.01 µg/g (10 µg/L) [44].
It should be noted that many non-essential elements, considered toxic and referred to as “heavy metals,” such as Ba, As, Al, Cd, Pb, and Hg, are often present at dangerously high levels, depending on the duration and intensity of exposure. According to the IUPAC, the term “heavy metals” associated with and used in the context of pollution and potential toxicity or ecotoxicity should not be used. The report’s authors suggest that characterization should be based on chemical classification based on the periodic table of elements and predicted toxic effects [45].
Complex interactions occur between essential, non-essential, and even toxic elements. For example, an overload or deficiency of one element can affect the others. For example, excessive zinc supplementation can result in copper deficiency [41]. Despite the existence of compensatory systems, chronic exposure to environmental factors and/or reduced excretion capacity leads to the accumulation of toxic metals in tissues depending on the absorbed dose, the route of exposure, and the duration of exposure (acute or chronic) [42,43]. Metals, like other agents, more often exhibit a hormetic dose-response relationship. This type of dependence, characterized by beneficial effects at low doses and adverse effects at high doses, is a general concept within the field of medicine and toxicology. To report hormetic responses, many other terms can be used, including the Arndt-Schulz Law, biphasic dose response, U-shaped dose response, preconditioning/adaptive response, overcompensation responses, rebound effect, repeat bout effect, and steeling effect, among others [46]. There are many examples in scientific literature of hormetic dose-response curves. For example, one of the trace elements, selenium (Se), which is essential for the proper function of selenoproteins, is toxic at high doses, causing a condition called selenosis. Iron is essential for red blood cells and serves an important function in other cell types, but excessive iron intake can cause oxidative damage to tissues. The hormetic response for Fe and Cu has been well established, and dysregulation of iron and copper homeostasis is involved in a wide range of diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease [47]. This hormetic dose-response is a perfect illustration of the famous maxim of Paracelsus, which states that “Dosis sola facit venenum”, i.e., only the dose makes the poison (Figure 1) [48,49].
There are many examples confirming this principle [50,51,52]. For example, Mn deficiency caused by a poor diet leads to the development of the so-called metabolic syndrome, diabetes, etc. [53,54]. On the other hand, Mn toxicity, manifested by manganism, is observed in association with the consumption of contaminated water with high Mn content or other repeated occupational and nutritional excessive exposure to Mn. Zinc (Zn2+) participates as a component of metalloproteins in many enzymatic catalytic processes. Zn distribution within the cell is tightly controlled to avoid zinc ion overload, which causes protein misfolding and aggregation. The mechanisms of intracellular Zn metalloregulation are described in detail in the review by Maret and Li [55]. Much is known about chromium Cr(III), which is an essential metal, competitive with cations such as Fe(III), in contrast to Cr(VI), which, as chromate (CrO42−) or dichromate (Cr2O72−), is toxic and competitive with anions such as sulfate and phosphate [38,56]. The molecular mechanisms of toxicity as well as potential essentiality of many other metals, such as Ni and V, and nonmetals, such as Si and boron (B), are still a subject of debate [57,58,59,60]. The first step in understanding trace element metabolism and their role in disease pathogenesis is to determine their distribution in different compartments and identify sites of accumulation, trace element deficiencies, or elemental imbalances. In recent years, much research has focused on predicting factors influencing metal speciation [61] and comparative metallomics, which involves monitoring changes in metallomics over time in healthy and diseased tissues from different populations suffering from various diseases [59,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]. Extensive metallomics studies allow us to understand the role of mineral imbalances in the pathogenesis of these diseases and dysfunctions, including neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as schizophrenia (SZ), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), epilepsy, and drug and alcohol addiction [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. A review of metallomics studies reveals a major trend in contemporary research, which, in addition to identifying changes in tissue macro- and micronutrient levels, also seeks interelemental correlations. Toxic elements, including Cd, have been found to disrupt cellular metabolism of Ca, Fe, Mg, Zn, and Cu. Conversely, deficiencies of essential trace elements, such as Zn, Co, Cu, K, Fe, Mg, Mn, Se, and Zn, not only induce epigenetic changes but can also enhance the absorption of toxic metals [48,85].

3. Analysis of the Elemental Composition of Biological Samples

3.1. Sample Pretreatment

Biological fluids have a complex matrix rich in organic and inorganic compounds. In addition to their multicomponent matrix, they are characterized by very low concentrations of most trace elements (up to ng/L). The sample digestion step is crucial for subsequent chemical analysis using spectroscopic techniques. Sample preparation for trace element determination can be accomplished by acid digestion (nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide), alkaline digestion (tetramethylammonium hydroxide); ultrasonic matrix destruction; ultraviolet photolysis; protein denaturation (trichloroacetic acid or nitric acid); and microwave digestion. Ivanenko et al. [86] reviewed trace element analysis in biological fluids. In the case of elemental analysis of body fluids, i.e., urine, serum/plasma and whole blood, the sample may be diluted with an appropriate diluent and optionally with internal standards.
The direct analysis of samples without a digestion step is very attractive. Jones et al. [87] developed a sample preparation method for the determination of Pb, Cd, and Hg in whole blood using ICP-MS. The authors used sample dilutions in an alkaline diluent without acid digestion, additional sonication, or centrifugation. The optimized diluent composition (0.4% (v/v) tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH), 1% ethanol, 0.01% ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (APDC), 0.05% Triton X-100™, 5 μg L−1 Rh, Te, Ir) minimized memory effects from high-concentration samples. The sample volume was 50 μL of whole blood and the LOD reached the values: 0.07 μg dL−1 for Pb, 0.10 μg L−1 for Cd, 0.28 μg L−1 for Hg, 0.99 μg L−1 for Mn and 24.5 μg L−1 for Se. Navarro et al. [88] developed a method for preparing whole blood samples for the determination of Pb by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). Blood was diluted 10 times with 0.01% Triton X-100; and a mixture of 0.6% m/V NH4H2PO4 and 0.15% m/V Mg(NO3)2 in 0.01 M HNO3. The sample volume was 10 µL of blood and the LOD values were 1.2 µg L−1 of Pb (pyrolytic graphite tube) and 0.7 µg L−1 of Pb (L’vov platform).
Solid samples preparation for further elemental analysis requires mineralization, which is the decomposition of organic substances into simple inorganic compounds, which are formed through oxidation and evaporation. Elements such as H, C, S, and N are converted to gaseous forms, while other elements remain as oxides and salts. Mineralization can be performed in a closed or open system, wet or dry [89,90,91]. In most cases, acids or acid mixtures such as HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, HClO4, and HF, with or without H2O2, are used for digestion at elevated temperatures.
Historically, the oldest method of digestion is wet digestion in an open system. Currently, wet digestion in a closed system using microwaves is more popular due to its several advantages over other techniques, especially open digestion in a heating block. Microwave digestion utilizes chemical processes (acid decomposition), thermal energy (temperature), and microwave energy (2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation) for digestion.
Closed and open digestion systems differ significantly in terms of process support (closed: thermal conductivity, microwaves; open: additional UV, ultrasound), vessel type (closed: reusable: teflon, quartz, or glassy carbon, requiring cleaning with hot acid vapors and steam; open: disposable DigiTube vessels), and degree of digestion (closed: high; open: low). The closed system is characterized by a shorter digestion time (30–60 min) and the ability to handle sample sizes < 0.5 g dried weight, but is associated with higher costs and is not suitable for samples that generate a lot of gas. The open system, although slower (60 min) and subject to loss of gas products, is less expensive and allows for larger sample sizes (0.5–2.0 g). Dry digestion involves oxidation with supplied oxygen, which leads to the decomposition of organic matter into simple inorganic compounds. Dry combustion digestion involves oxidizing samples at high temperatures (450–550 °C) for 3–5 h, which ensures the decomposition of the organic matrix but can lead to elemental and contaminant losses; it requires subsequent acid digestion of the ash. Low-temperature oxygen plasma digestion, although time-consuming, allows for the determination of trace elements thanks to combustion below 150 °C. Oxygen bomb combustion and the Schöniger method are closed-system methods under pressure in which gaseous products are absorbed by aqueous solutions or by sulfuric acid or hydrogen peroxide, respectively. Dynamic combustion allows for the digestion of larger samples (up to 10 g) using a quartz apparatus, where gaseous products are absorbed and solids (ash) are digested in acids. Alloying at 500–1200 °C with fluxes produces a homogeneous product, but high salt content can cause interference. However, the method is expensive and carries a risk of contamination.
The vast majority of authors prefer sample digestion using microwave digestion in closed vessels, which occurs at high temperatures and pressures, which increases the reaction rate and eliminates the possibility of loss of trace elements that form volatile hydrides and/or halides, such as As, B, Cr, Hg, Sb, Sn, and Se. Furthermore, it uses smaller amounts of reagents, making it more economical.

3.2. Selected Analytical Techniques

Many analytical techniques are known for the quantitative determination of metals and selected nonmetals and metalloids. Due to limitations, the choice of technique should be tailored to the specific task and depends on the sample matrix, the level of the elements being determined in the sample (concentration range), and the type of elements being determined.
AAS became widespread in the 1960s. A hollow cathode lamp (HCL) is most often used as a source of monochromatic radiation with a characteristic wavelength typical of the element being determined. Therefore, it is necessary to have separate lamps for each element being determined. AAS instruments differ in the method of sample atomization. In flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), atomization occurs in a flame (air-acetylene, nitrous oxide-acetylene), while in electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS), it occurs in a graphite furnace, where the sample is electrically heated in an inert gas (argon) that prevents oxidation of the graphite tube and purges the fumes from the tube. Chemical elements that form volatile hydrides, i.e., As, Bi, Cd, Hg, In, Pb, Sb, Se, Te and Tl are determined by hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy (HGAAS), while mercury (Hg) is usually determined using cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) [92]. The three versions of atomic absorption spectrometry—FAAS, GFAAS, and GHAAS/CVAAS—differ primarily in detection range, required sample volume, cost, and susceptibility to chemical and spectral interferences. FAAS, characterized by intermediate costs, is less sensitive (detection limits in the ppm range) and more affected by chemical and spectral interferences, but requires a larger volume of sample (2–3 mL) in a shorter time (10–15 s/element). GFAAS, on the other hand, achieves very good detection limits (ppb) and requires a small volume of sample (on the order of a few microliters). GFAAS, due to its better control ensured by longitudinal Zeeman background correction and the use of matrix modifiers, is more resistant to matrix background errors [93]. GFAAS has disadvantages, including longer analysis times due to more complex stages, such as drying and ashing, as well as higher instrument costs. GHAAS/CVAAS also offers very good detection limits (ppb-ppt) and minimal interferences, requires a large sample volume and is expensive, and the analysis time is the longest; however, it can be integrated with automated sample introduction (flow injection) for faster throughput and reduced sample/reagent consumption [94,95].
Inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP) is a group of analytical techniques that utilize a high-temperature plasma to excite or ionize a sample. Combining ICP with mass spectrometry (MS) is currently most commonly used in practice for the quantitative detection of multiple elements simultaneously in trace amounts in biological samples. Identification is based on the mass spectrum, which represents the intensity of the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of the cation formed in the plasma. ICP-MS provides rapid and sensitive analysis of many elements, including isotopes, with low detection limits in the parts-per-billion (ppb) or even parts-per-trillion (ppt) range and a wide linear range, enabling measurement over a wide range of metal concentrations in samples [96,97]. ICP-MS requires expensive equipment and appropriate sample preparation, as matrix effects can interfere with the results. ICP-MS is equipped with a special system for spraying liquid samples in a nebulizer-spray chamber and a system for laser evaporation of solid samples using a laser beam (LA-LCP-MS) [98]. Laser ablation (LA) coupled to ICP-MS (LA–ICP-MS) is used for in situ analysis and quantitative imaging of metal distribution in biological samples. LA-ICP-MS provides high spatial resolution and excellent sensitivity compared to sample solution analysis [99,100]. Coupling ICP with optical detection, i.e., inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), enables identification through spectrometric measurement of emitted light at wavelengths characteristic of individual elements. Another optical technique, rarely used in the analysis of biological samples, is laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). The basic theory behind LIBS is plasma emission spectroscopy, which describes the spectral emission of a plasma produced by a laser-induced breakdown.
Techniques based on synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (XRF), thanks to their high resolution, are increasingly used for element mapping in tissues, cellular compartments, and single cells [100,101]. XRF involves excitation of the sample with high-energy X-rays and measurement of the characteristic fluorescence. Advantages of this technique include high accuracy, precision, no need for special sample preparation, the ability to analyze many elements from Be to U, a detection limit at the level of ppm, no sample destruction, and the ability to analyze solid samples. The weaknesses of this technique include lower sensitivity for light elements, the inability to detect metals in trace amounts, and interference from other elements. Clavijo Jordan et al. investigated the distribution and transport of Zn at the organ level using microsynchrotron X-ray fluorescence (μSR-XRF) using a gadolinium-based contrast agent reactive to Zn(II) [102]. Another example of this technique is the mapping of Mn using nanosynchrotron X-ray fluorescence (nano-SXRF), which allowed for the acquisition of an image of the subcellular distribution of this redox-active metal. While XRF uses an X-ray beam for excitation [103], EDS (energy dispersive spectroscopy) relies on excitation by an electron beam for elemental analysis. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with EDS provides information on structure and morphology, but also allows for the assessment of the elemental composition of the sample. The electron gun generates a beam of primary electrons, which, upon interaction with the sample, emits secondary electrons, X-rays, and cathodoluminescence. An EDS detector is used to analyze the emitted X-ray radiation (energy, wavelength, and intensity of spectral lines) pointwise, along a designated line, or for surface elemental mapping. EDS can be coupled with both SEM and TEM. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) allows for the determination of oxidation states of metals in cells, the type and number of neighboring atoms, and the coordination motif of the probed metal [104]. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) is another research technique based on the interaction of a high-energy electron beam with the sample material. EELS can be integrated with Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopes (STEM) or Energy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscopes (EFTEM) to generate elemental maps and spectrum images, but its potential is rarely fully utilized, especially in the case of biological specimens. Although most toxicology laboratories are equipped with AAS, GFAAS, HG (CV) AAS, ICP-MS, atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) as a highly sensitive (LOD below the µg L−1), and selective technique (element-specific process) is also suitable in toxicological studies for analyzing trace amounts of toxic elements [104,105]. Especially, AFS is dedicated to speciation hydride forming elements (As, Se and Sb) and Hg [106]. AFS is suitable for detecting one element at a time, which slows down the process when the sample contains multiple elements of interest.
Particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) techniques use a proton source from the radioactive decay of Cm244 to excite and measure the characteristic X-ray radiation of the elements. PIXE offers high sensitivity (µg/g range), can analyze multiple elements simultaneously, and is often a non-destructive method, making it valuable for studies of biological samples. Chassot et al. examined metallic contamination in surrounding tissues with metallic elements released from joint prostheses [107]. Huszank et al. used particle-induced X-ray and gamma-ray emission spectrometry (PIXE, PIGE) techniques to determine trace and major elements in human blood samples (whole blood, serum, and plasma) [108]. In Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) and Gamma Spectrometry, the sample is irradiated with a neutron beam from a nuclear reactor, and the gamma emission from the decay of radioactive isotopes is measured. This sensitive technique is used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for standard certification. NAA is used for the analysis of gold (Au) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs) by making them radioactive for detection. Both techniques are cumbersome to use and require radiological safety measures.
Imaging techniques for the uptake and subcellular distribution of metals in cells or organs are increasingly appreciated tools, allowing for a broader understanding of the mechanism of action of metal derivatives. Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) is an example of a technique designed for in situ elemental and isotopic analysis. NanoSIMS provides high resolution and sensitivity, which has been proven to track the transformation of metallo-medicines containing platinum (Pt) and ruthenium (Ru) [109,110]. Multiplexed in-cell imaging is provided by a combination of LA and mass cytometry, known as Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) [111]. IMC has been used to study the distribution of Pt in tissues after cis-Pt treatment [112].
Electrochemical techniques rely on electrochemical reactions between metal ions and selective electrodes. Electrochemical techniques have the disadvantage of being susceptible to matrix interference and requiring frequent electrode maintenance. A recent review by Shi et al. from 2025 details recent advances in electrode surface modification with metal nanomaterials (such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), copper oxide (CuO), ZIF-8, MXene, etc.) to improve sensor performance [113]. The sensitivity of electrochemical techniques, such as voltammetry, which detects heavy metal ions with a detection limit of 0.1 nM, and electrochemical sensors based on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) achieves subnanomolar sensitivity in situ [114]. Among electrochemical techniques, anodic voltammetry (ASV) with a mercury electrode in the form of a hanging drop or thin film, also known as sequential injection-anodic stripping voltammetry (SIA-ASV), is noteworthy. Voltammetry is a sensitive, inexpensive, and useful technique for detecting trace amounts of metals. Its operating principle involves the accumulation of reduced ions in the form of an amalgam on a working electrode under the influence of an applied reduction potential. Upon application of an oxidation potential specific to the analyte, a cathodic current is generated proportional to the analyte concentration. However, ASV can only detect approximately 20 elements, whereas ICP-MS can detect over 70 [115]. The classification of analytical techniques used in the analysis of chemical elements in samples is presented in the diagram in Figure 2.
Chromatographic techniques, including ion chromatography (IC) such as cation exchange, anion exchange, and ion exclusion, as well as reversed-phase ion interaction chromatography (RP-IC), chelate chromatography, and multidimensional or multimodal chromatography (for example, combining ion exchange with ion exclusion or using two or more columns), are viable options for analysis. These methods can utilize conductometric or spectrometric detection, linking the detection process with separation [116]. Compared to analyses based on spectroscopic techniques, IC offers insight into metal speciation, allowing for the differentiation of metal oxidation states, for example: Cr(III)/Cr(VI), Fe(II)/Fe(III), or As(III)/As(V).
Lateral flow assay (LFA) technology, thanks to biosensor technology, has expanded its applications in the detection of heavy metal ions [117]. Metal detection utilizes key recognition mechanisms, such as DNA probes, nucleic acid enzymes, aptamers, and antigen-antibody binding. Applications of this technology so far include environmental monitoring and food safety.

4. Contamination of Tobacco Products with Heavy Metals

Tobacco contains over 7000 harmful substances. At least 69 of these chemicals are classified as carcinogens [118]. Cigarette smoke contains many toxic volatile organic substances, such as nitrosamines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and toxic metals [2,118]. Fowles et al. [119] presented a list of approximately 158 carcinogenic or potentially carcinogenic chemicals present in cigarette smoke. The authors indicate that the cancer risk index (CRI) depends primarily on the contribution of 1,3-butadiene, acrylonitrile, As, and acetaldehyde. Among the toxic substances are also toxic metals that can cause inflammation, sensitization, and carcinogenesis. Metals such as As, Be, Cd, and Ni are group I carcinogens, as defined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [120]. Metals contained in tobacco products reach tobacco leaves through absorption from the soil [121]. Tobacco has been shown to accumulate heavy metals. Plants absorb metal ions and compounds from the soil through their roots, which are then transported to the leaves [122]. The efficiency of mineral uptake from the soil depends on the plant’s growing conditions, soluble organic matter, soil type and pH, fertilizers used, and the geographical location of cultivation [123,124]. Heavy metal contamination varies from country to country, depending on the location of cultivation and tobacco processing technology [125]. Therefore, the origin of tobacco may play a significant role in the level of cigarette contamination [126,127,128,129,130]. Heavy metal contamination of soil has become a global problem as the agricultural and industrial sectors are rapidly developing. Elements such as As, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb enter the soil through various routes, including sewage irrigation, atmospheric deposition, mining activities, and the use of chemical fertilizers [131].
Another source of tobacco contamination may be the manufacturing process and additives, such as flavorings or humectants [132]. Therefore, in March 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published guidelines for reporting harmful ingredients in tobacco products, including the content of metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb [133]. Tobacco products have been analyzed for trace toxic metals. Numerous analyses of heavy metals have been conducted in numerous cigarette brands worldwide [134,135,136]. A recent review of heavy metal studies in cigarette brands produced from 2000 to September 2024 provides average levels of toxic heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb) and assesses associated health risks to consumers [137]. An example of such a study is another study performed using the ICP-MS technique on the content of toxic metals, i.e., As, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Pb, Mn, Hg, and Ni in 50 commercial tobacco products available in the USA, described by Fresquez et al. [138]. The determined mean levels of Mn ranged from 131 to 245 μg/g; Cr from 1.4 to 3.2 μg/g, As from 0.22 to 0.36 μg/g, Cd from 1.0 to 1.7 μg/g, Ni from 2.1 to 3.9 μg/g and Pb from 0.6 to 1.2 μg/g. As reported by IARC, the detected metals have a carcinogenic effect [139]. The toxicity of these metals depends, among others, on volatility, which is why nickel and cobalt, for example, pose a lower risk as they are less volatile. In turn, even if Cd and Pb concentrations were lower in dried tobacco, due to the volatility of Cd compounds (chloride, oxide) or lead chloride, transport in smoke is more efficient [140]. Ni causes a number of different forms of cancer, especially in the respiratory tract. The main mechanism responsible for this activity is that Ni is mutagenic and induces sister chromatid exchange [141]. The amount of Ni varies significantly in cigarettes and can range from 0.078 mg to as much as 5 mg [142].
Tobacco is also characterized by high concentrations of Li, which exhibits a broad spectrum of neuroprotective effects, including enhanced autophagy and reduction of α-synuclein, as confirmed in preclinical models of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [143]. It is hypothesized that inhaled Li from tobacco smoke may be responsible for the lower incidence of PD and melanoma, and this mechanism may be mediated by inhibition of GSK-3β and activation of the β-catenin pathway. This hypothesis requires verification in clinical trials assessing the effect of Li therapy on the progression of PD and melanoma.
Tobacco radioactivity originates from the accumulation of natural radionuclides such as potassium-40 (40K), polonium-210 (210Po), lead-210 (210Pb), radium-226 (226Ra), thorium-232 (232Th), and uranium-238 (238U), primarily through absorption from soil and deposition on leaves. Phosphate fertilizers can increase their content in soil and tobacco plants [144]. During tobacco combustion, radioisotopes are transferred to smoke, which, when inhaled, is deposited in the bronchi and lungs of smokers, causing harmful internal exposure through alpha particle emission [145], contributing to an increased risk of lung cancer, heart disease, and other conditions. Studies by Karagueuzian et al. [146] and Laking [147] analyze the content of these radioisotopes in cigarettes, smoke, and human tissues. Karagueuzian et al. [146] published data on cigarette radioactivity resulting from the content of radioactive 210Po in cigarette smoke and assessed the long-term risk of lung cancer caused by alpha particle deposition in the lungs of heavy smokers. Laking [147] presented the results of studies on the content of 210Po and 210Pb in cigarettes, tobacco leaves, cigarette smoke, and human respiratory tissues. In a review by Felix and Ntarisa [148] from 2024, 40 publications were analyzed regarding the level of radioactivity in tobacco cigarette brands and the associated radiation effects on smokers. The studies most often used alpha particle and gamma radiation spectrometry to assess the activity of radioisotopes. The mean radioactivity included the isotopes 210Po, 210Pb, 40K, 232Th, 232U and 226Ra, with values of 20.4 (0.4–128.6), 15.4 (2.0–78.8), 630.8 (1.2–1330.0), 8.1 (0.3–41.0), 15.2 (0.2–82.0) and 5.9 (2.0–16.0) mBq/g, respectively. The annual effective doses, estimated assuming smoking 20 cigarettes per day, were 295, 74.1, 5.80, 889.7, 192.6, and 90.1 μSv/year, respectively, with 232Th radioisotopes contributing the largest amount to the annual effective dose and risk. The mean annual effective dose remains below the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 103 reference level of 1000–20,000 μSv/year. The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) and lifetime cancer risk (LCC) were also below the threshold values. However, the literature sources cited by the authors indicate that cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of lung cancer worldwide, contributing to up to 70–90% of lung cancer cases.
Cigarette smoke consists of particulate matter suspended in the gas phase. Over 3500 chemicals have been identified in these particulate matter, including tar, nicotine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and heavy metals [149].
Matassa et al. [150] used microscopic imaging to provide direct evidence that metallic, inorganic microparticles are transported with the smoke stream to fibrous filters in the mouthpiece, forming nanostructures up to 150 µm containing compounds of V, Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, U, Mn, and osmium (Os), among others. The authors point out that the porosity of the filters does not hinder the passage of toxic volatile substances. This research provides a basis for further work on creating microfibers capable of capturing toxic particles in the gas phase to protect human health.
The efficiency of transport of toxic metals from tobacco filler into cigarette smoke during smoking depends on many factors, but will always be proportional to their concentrations in tobacco [151,152]. Some components have been shown to penetrate smoke better than others. The highest rates of penetration from tobacco into cigarette smoke were found for Tl (85–92%) and Cd (81–90%), followed by Pb (46–60%) and As (33–44%). Studies show that the concentration of metals in cigarette smoke ranges from almost 1% (As) to as much as 22% (Cd) [123,153,154,155,156]. Therefore, it seems understandable that significantly higher levels of As, Cd, and Pb were found in the lung tissue of smokers compared to nonsmokers, demonstrating that smoking increases the levels of these metals in the lungs and may contribute to the carcinogenic effects of cigarette smoke [156]. Smoking plays only a minor role as a source of Hg emissions. Suzuki et al. [157] reported that only 5–7 ng Hg from one cigarette enters the smoke. The concentration of V in cigarettes averages 1.11 mg/cigarette, of which approximately 31.3% enters the smoke [158]. V is known to cause local irritation of the eyes and upper respiratory tract (such as rhinitis, cough, conjunctivitis, chest pain) and has insulin-like properties [159,160]. It is also suspected of causing neurobehavioral disorders that affect attention and visuospatial abilities [161].
Still, few studies have quantified the trace metals in secondhand smoke (SHS) and thirdhand smoke (THS) contributing to nonsmokers’ health risks. It is known that trace elements are released during smoking primarily as particulate matter. A recent study by Matt et al. [162] demonstrated a correlation between Pb and Cd concentrations and nicotine in settled dust from smokers’ homes, indicating that passive smoking may be a significant source of exposure to these elements. In a 2024 study by Tang et al. [163], the emission and deposition rates of 28 trace metals, including Cd, As, Cr, Mn, Be, and Se, were investigated indoors using inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS). The authors conclude that average indoor concentrations of Cd, As, and Cr, even more than 3 h after smoking cessation, exceed cancer risk thresholds or non-cancer reference exposure levels.
Studies of passive smokers indicate that they also accumulate metals emitted during smoking. Gatzke-Kopp et al. [164] demonstrated a correlation between cotinine and Pb and other metals in the saliva of children. Jung et al. [165] measured elevated levels of Cd and Pb in the blood of nonsmokers exposed to tobacco smoke. In a study by Drago et al. [166], air in the homes of smokers (41 homes) was examined and compared with air in control homes (32 homes). Smokers’ homes were found to have higher concentrations of cerium (Ce), lanthanum (La), Cd, and Tl in PM2.5. A study by Bohlandt et al. [167] presents measurements of Cd, Ce, and La concentrations in smokers’ homes and public places (pubs and restaurants). In smokers’ and control homes, 0.8 and 0.1 ng m−3 of Cd, 9.6 ng m−3 and 0.4 ng m−3 of Ce, 5.9 ng m−3 and 0.2 ng m−3 of La were measured, respectively; in public places, Cd concentrations ranged from 2.6 to 9.7 ng m−3, Ce concentrations ranged from 18.5 to 50 ng m−3, and La concentrations ranged from 10.6 to 23 ng m−3. The study by Na et al. [168] showed higher levels of rare earth elements (La, Ce) in the hair of non-smokers living with smokers.
Inorganic particles found in tobacco products were analyzed as a potential source of exposure due to smoking. SEM-EDS demonstrated the presence of aluminum silicate, phytolithic silica, and calcium compounds such as oxalates in tobacco products [169]. Mineral components in tobacco are transported in the smoke stream and, when inhaled, cause chronic inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity and lungs. It has been suggested that Cd from cigarettes is mostly associated with smaller airborne particles with an aerodynamic diameter below 1.8 μm [170]. Piadé et al. believe that approximately half of the Cd released during smoking is released in the form of organocadmium compounds, such as Cd(CH3)2, which could explain its volatility [171]. In the case of As content, while inorganic As(V) compounds predominate in tobacco leaves, both As(V) and As(III) are present in the main smoke condensate, indicating As reduction during combustion [172]. Studies on the analysis of tobacco of various origins to quantify the concentrations of toxic substances transported into cigarette smoke and inhaled by smokers are included in Table 1.
Cd is a metal frequently detected in tobacco products. It is a carcinogen associated with the etiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and nephrotoxicity. Suwazono et al. investigated the biological half-life of Cd in urine based on a 24-year study [180]. The estimated half-life was 13.6 years (9.0–28.2 years) in men and 13.9 years (9.6–25.6 years) in women. The creatinine-corrected values were 14.2 years (11.2–19.4 years) and 23.5 years (17.7–35.0 years), respectively. It should be remembered that Cd can accumulate in various tissues but is stored primarily in the liver and kidneys. The biological half-life of Cd in body tissues varies and can range from 10 to 30 years [180,181,182]. Cr, present in tobacco smoke, has toxicity dependent on its oxidation state. While Cr (VI) is an IARC group 1 carcinogen [183], Cr (III) is only an allergen [184]. Pb is an IARC group 2A carcinogen [185]. Pb is a known neurotoxic agent [186]. Mn is neurotoxic [187]. Co is an IARC group 2B carcinogen. Metals such as Mn and Se, Fe, and Cu are proinflammatory and allergenic in excess [188,189,190]. Ba and its oxide are non-volatile, so despite their presence in tobacco, they are not transported into smoke [173]. However, other authors suggest that Ba may enter the human body via inhalation exposure vectors. Ba may be a component of particulate matter, and similarly to oral ingestion, the rate of absorption through respiratory membranes depends on the chemical form [191].
Al in the form of soluble compounds is readily bioavailable to both plants [192] and humans [193]. Exposure to Al compounds through absorption, inhalation, or ingestion is neurotoxic, as long-lived postmitotic cells, such as neurons, are particularly susceptible to Al accumulation [193]. It should be noted that Al uptake from the gastrointestinal tract is quite low and does not exceed 0.01%, however, over time Al accumulates in the brain, bones, and other tissues [194]. One route of human exposure to Al is through inhalation of tobacco smoke, either during active or passive smoking [195]. Although Al compounds are mostly non-volatile, combustion of Al-containing tobacco causes transport of insoluble aluminum silicates with the smoke stream as particles or gaseous complexes to the oral cavity and lungs, where they accumulate and are engulfed by phagocytic cells such as bronchoalveolar and interstitial macrophages [196,197,198,199,200].

5. Major Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Tobacco Smoke

Tobacco-related diseases include incurable respiratory diseases, such as COPD and comorbidities associated with COPD, such as chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and recurrent bacterial lung infections. Currently, the WHO predicts that by 2030, COPD will become the third leading cause of disease-related deaths worldwide [7]. Furthermore, smoking is associated with a causal relationship with an increase in the incidence of malignant tumors, including lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease, as well as type 2 diabetes and reproductive function [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,151,201,202,203,204]. Metals in cigarette smoke play a significant role in the process leading to damage to the vascular endothelium, which is a major factor in the development of atherosclerosis, which is responsible for the dramatically increasing number of deaths.

5.1. Addiction to Smoking Cigarettes

Nicotine is known to be a highly addictive neurotoxin [205]. The lethal dose (LD50) of nicotine is approximately 1–1.5 mg per kg of body weight. The median LD50 for nicotine in adults is assumed to be 0.8 mg/kg [206]. The Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, in its clinical practice guidelines, states that the potentially lethal dose of nicotine for children is 0.5 mg/kg [207]. Difficulty quitting smoking stems from the need for self-medication, providing a temporary mood boost and stress relief. Because nicotine can reach the brain in seconds, this effect is almost immediate. Smoking provides relaxation and improves mood through the release of dopamine. On the other hand, smoking increases adverse stress symptoms, such as heart rate and blood pressure, which result from nicotine’s effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and increased cortisol levels. Quitting smoking is associated with nicotine withdrawal stress, which can be alleviated by antidepressants [208,209]. Understanding the mechanisms of nicotine addiction has involved proteomic analyses, which assessed the effect of nicotine on specific genes or proteins [210,211]. Proteomic studies of smokers’ saliva identified protein markers, among which the levels of stress-related proteins, fibrinogen alpha, cystatin A, and sAA, were twice as high in smokers compared to nonsmokers [212]. A number of proteins (AMY1, CAH1, CAH6, BPIA2, BPIB1, TCO1, NGAL, GSTO1 A2ML1, TGM3, and SAP) have been found to be altered by smoking. In its ninth WHO report in 2023, tobacco smoking was declared a major public health threat, with nearly 8 million premature deaths annually attributed to tobacco use [4]. Data recently released in November 2023 by the Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCH), indicate that 28.3 million American adults smoke cigarettes, 16 million suffer from smoking-related diseases, and nearly half a million die annually from smoking. Healthcare expenditures for smoking-related diseases amount to $225 billion annually [213]. Eurostat data for 2019 regarding the share of cigarette smokers among people over 15 years of age is presented in Figure 3. As can be seen, 5.9% of the EU population aged 15 and older smoked at least 20 cigarettes a day, and 12.6% smoked fewer than 20. Among the EU Member States, only in Croatia did heavy smokers constitute the majority of daily smokers; heavy smokers also constituted the majority in Turkey and Serbia. By comparison, in the Netherlands and Sweden, less than one in five daily smokers was a heavy smoker. The planned data update will take place in July 2027.
The prevalence of cigarette smoking was even studied among university athletes at Thammasat University in Thailand, with a mean age of 19.8 ± 1.3 years [215]. The study confirmed that the percentage of smokers in the study population was relatively high. Smokers were predominantly male (70.6% vs. 29.4%, p < 0.001), who had higher levels of the measured indicator, exhaled CO (3.75 ± 3.08 ppm vs. 2.18 ± 0.73 ppm, p < 0.001). The division into the study and control groups was based on the results of the Fagerström test, a questionnaire used to assess nicotine dependence. According to the report of the National Health Fund in Poland on tobacco-related diseases from 7 July 2021, 8.5 million people smoked tobacco, which constituted almost 25% of people over 10 years of age [216]. The report indicates that in 2019, the value of health services allocated to the treatment of tobacco-related diseases increased by 47.4% compared to 2013.

5.2. Accumulation of Metals in Tissues by Tobacco Smokers

Tobacco smoke is known to contain numerous compounds, many of which are oxidants and pro-oxidants, capable of generating free radicals and exacerbating oxidative stress in vivo. There are intrinsic mechanisms for neutralizing free radicals, including enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions. Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu-Zn SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and catalase (CAT) are important components of the antioxidant enzyme system. It has been shown that tobacco smoking can alter the activities of these enzymes [217,218]. Because these enzymes contain metals as cofactors (the cytoplasmic Cu-Zn SOD enzyme contains Cu and Zn, the GSH-Px enzyme contains Se, and the CAT enzyme contains Fe), trace element homeostasis in smokers may be impaired by heavy metal intoxication [219,220]. It has been confirmed that chronic smoking leads to the accumulation of metals in tissues and body fluids, leading to health deterioration [156,164,165,197,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227], although the number of studies on heavy metal intoxication resulting from smoking is still insufficient.
Tobacco smoke is a source of exposure to heavy metals, including Cd and Pb, which have a very long half-life in the human body [198,199]. The toxicity of metals detected in cigarette smoke is not limited to carcinogenicity; As and Cd are toxic to the cardiovascular system and kidneys, while Pb is toxic to the nervous system [228].
Gatzke-Kopp et al. in 2023 [164] examined the effects of exposure to passive smoking in children. Salivary cotinine levels in children aged approximately 90 months were selected as biomarkers of exposure using an immunoanalyzer and trace metal concentrations, i.e., Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, and Zn, determined by ICP-OES. Interestingly, when the salivary cotinine concentration in children was higher than 1 ng mL−1, higher levels of Zn (95% CI: 0.183–0.619; p = 0.0003), Cu (95% CI: 0.206–1.104; p = 0.004), and Pb (95% CI: 0.424 to 2.459; p = 0.006) were observed compared to children whose salivary cotinine levels were lower than 1 ng mL−1. The study suggests that children exposed to tobacco smoke are at increased risk of heavy metal accumulation [164]. Rzymski et al. [222] were the first to examine eight metals (Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in aborted embryos. In samples collected from former smokers, significant increases (p < 0.05) were observed in the concentrations of Al (over 5-fold), Cd (over 2-fold), and Pb (over 2-fold).
Stojanović et al. [223] demonstrated elevated Ni levels in the blood and urine of smokers. Richter et al. [224] determined metal levels in urine. They found that smokers had significantly higher levels of Cd, Pb, Sb, and Ba compared to nonsmokers. Another study found that the mean content of Al, As, Cd, Hg, Ni, and Pb was significantly higher in the scalp hair and blood samples of diabetic patients compared to healthy controls, but the difference became statistically significant in smokers (p < 0.001) [178].
Tobacco may contain Tl, which is more toxic than Hg, Cd, and Pb, which are mainly absorbed from the soil and accumulate in leaves. The maximum dose of Tl should not exceed 15 µg, and the LD50 for humans is 8–12 mgTl × kg−1. Tl rapidly enters the bloodstream and is transported throughout the body, preferentially accumulating in nails, bones, and hair, but can also accumulate in the kidneys, liver, and brain. Tl is found in the tissues of smokers due to its presence in cigarette smoke, leading to higher levels in smokers’ urine and hair compared to non-smokers [225].
Biomonitoring studies show that smokers have significantly higher levels of Cd and Pb [226], but bioaccumulation of the metals has also been demonstrated in individuals chronically exposed to tobacco smoke pollution (also known as secondhand smoke or passive smoking) [227]. Cd exposure and accumulation have been associated with lung diseases as early as 1950 [229,230]. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has been conducting continuous biomonitoring of Cd concentrations in urine since 1988 [224]. One of the original goals of the study was to estimate trends in Cd exposure between 1988 and 2008, influenced by population changes, particularly smoking. The report authors hypothesized that the observed decreasing trend coincided with decreasing rates of tobacco smoking.
However, the traditional focus on total body Cd burden, estimated through urine analysis, may not fully reflect the local Cd burden. Therefore, assessing local Cd accumulation in the lungs seems more relevant, considering tissue-specific Cd retention.
According to the WHO, Cd is a serious public health concern because it is a toxic heavy metal that increases the risk of kidney disease, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, and various cancers, including lung cancer [231,232,233,234]. This metal is naturally accumulated in the tobacco plant (Nicotiana tabacum) [131,134]. This “hyperaccumulation” leads to very high Cd concentrations in tobacco leaves, relatively independent of soil content. Generally, the Cd content in tobacco leaves ranges from 1 to 2 μg g−1 dry weight, which translates to 0.5–1 μg Cd per cigarette. Cadmium oxide, produced during tobacco smoking, likely either accumulates locally in lung tissue or is absorbed into the systemic circulation, or both [231]. Absorption following inhalation into the lungs is thought to be significantly higher than absorption from food or the intestines, resulting in blood Cd concentrations that may be as much as four or five times higher and kidney concentrations as much as two or three times higher in smokers compared to nonsmokers [235,236,237]. However, very little is known about its local deposition in the lungs. Exposure to Cd in tobacco smoke has been associated with the development of numerous lung diseases [238], e.g., pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, impaired ventilatory function, reduced gas exchange, and severe COPD in smokers. Cd accumulation poses a threat not only to the lungs but also to other organs, as this metal disrupts intracellular signaling, leading to impaired defense functions. For this reason, smokers are more susceptible to bacterial infections and chronic inflammation. However, the mechanisms of Cd’s pathogenic effects are poorly understood. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the increased urinary Cd levels in smokers [239] and the observed increases in blood [240] and lung levels [239,241] are related to Cd accumulation in the lungs. It is difficult to distinguish between Cd-induced effects, the effects of other toxins present in tobacco smoke, or Cd-mediated effects. It is believed that chronic Cd accumulation in smokers’ lungs predisposes them to various lung diseases, especially since the half-life of Cd is very long and, according to various sources, can be even over 25 years [242,243]. ICP-MS elemental mapping of the bronchi and lungs of a group of smokers, compared to a control group, was published by a group led by J. Flieger [244]. The presence of Cd and Pb was noted in bronchial and lung samples, consistent with the predominant route of exposure: inhalation.

5.2.1. Bronchi and Lungs

Studies on the determination of chemical elements in tissues collected from the bronchi and lungs of tobacco smokers are summarized in Table 2.
Local accumulation of Cd in the respiratory tract appears to be a critical component of the predisposition to lung disease among long-term smokers [238,249,250,251,252]. Kjell Torén et al. [251] showed that low-dose exposure to Cd was associated with an increased incidence of emphysema and impaired lung function in a group of 50–64-year-old residents of Gothenburg (n = 1111). The study population consisted of 45.3% (n = 336) never smokers and 17.4% current smokers (n = 129), with a mean of 16.7 pack-years for former smokers and a mean of 20.5 pack-years for current smokers. Never-smokers had significantly lower B-Cd concentrations (mean 0.22 µg L−1, median 0.19 µgL−1) compared to smokers (mean 1.02 µgL−1, median 0.85 µgL−1). The correlation (rs) between B-Cd and pack-years was 0.48 (p < 0.0001); among individuals with emphysema, it was 0.42 (p < 0.001); and among individuals without emphysema, it was 0.37 (p < 0.001). Cd accumulation is particularly important given that the biological half-life of Cd in the human body is up to 25 years, suggesting the possibility of significant Cd retention in the lungs of long-term smokers [253].
Studies by Flieger et al. [244] revealed elevated Al concentrations in the bronchi and lungs of smokers. Although Al compounds are mostly non-volatile, it is known that burning tobacco containing Al causes the transport of insoluble aluminum silicates into the lungs via the smoke stream as particles or gaseous complexes. Conversely, the concentrations of elements such as Cu, Rb, and Se were lower compared to control tissue. Additionally, an accumulation of rare earth elements (including Ce, praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), samarium (Sm), europium (Eu), dysprosium (Dy), and erbium (Er)) was observed in the lungs of smokers, which showed significant inter-elemental correlations with Al. It is known that Al is an element with no physiological function and is toxic even at low concentrations [193,254]. Se and Cu, in turn, are essential trace elements involved in the body’s antioxidant defenses as components of selenoproteins (GPx1, GPx2, GPx4), as well as selenium-dependent iodothyronine deiodinase enzymes (Dio1, Dio2) [255,256,257,258,259,260,261].
Cu deficiency weakens the body’s immune and antioxidant defenses, negatively impacts skeletal development, melanin synthesis, Fe metabolism, neurotransmission, and erythropoiesis [259,260,261]. Dyshomeostasis of many chemical elements is observed in states of oxidative stress and pathological conditions associated with inflammation [262,263,264,265,266,267,268].
Cr was detected in the lungs of smokers at the end of the 20th century [250]. The study was performed on a group of 45 Finnish individuals using plasma emission spectrometry (DCP-AES). Mean Cd and Cr concentrations were determined in nonsmokers, smokers, and former smokers. Cd concentrations were 0.4 (±0.4), 3.0 (±2.2), and 1.1 (±1.0) mg/g dry weight, but Cr concentrations were significantly higher at 1.3 (±0.9), 4.3 (±3.3), and 4.8 (±4.0) mg/g dry weight, respectively. In smokers, Cr concentrations increase with age and duration of smoking. It is important to remember that Cr can occur in the natural environment in the following forms: trivalent, potentially safe, and hexavalent (VI), highly toxic and carcinogenic. Studies indicate that Cr(VI) exposure is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer [183,184]. Other effects of Cr accumulation in the respiratory tract include ulcers, chronic rhinopharyngitis, impaired lung function, and emphysema (ICDA, Paris, 1997).
The role of rare earth elements in the body is still being studied. They are considered low-toxicity elements that can act as Ca analogs in biological systems [269,270,271]. Some of them, e.g., gadolinium (Gd), are used in diagnostics as a contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [272,273].

5.2.2. Liver, Kidneys, Prostate

In 2022, studies by Chen et al. published confirming that there is a high probability of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with smoking [274]. Smoking is a risk factor for fibrosis and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [275]. According to studies by Flieger et al. [244], smoker’s liver tissue contains significantly more toxic Pb and Tl than controls and less Cu. Pb, as one of the most toxic heavy metals [276], accumulates in the liver [277,278] and is responsible for its damage by generating oxidative stress [279]. The effects of Tl on the human body have not been described in sufficient detail, yet the toxicity of this element is one hundred times higher than that of Hg. The Tl+ ion not only forms complexes with S-containing ligands but also replaces K in enzymes and protoplasm (the ionic radii and properties of K+ and Tl+ are similar), shifting the Na+/K+ balance and disrupting membrane equilibrium [280].
The levels and ratios of Se and Cd in the prostate, liver, and kidneys of nonsmokers and smokers were studied by Schöpfer et al. [281] based on analysis of post-mortem samples from 129 men aged 15–99 years, collected from three different organs (prostate, liver, kidneys), and urine using AAS with the graphite furnace technique and longitudinal AC Zeeman effect background correction. In heavy smokers, prostates contain more Cd than prostates of nonsmokers, which occurs in stoichiometric excess relative to Se. The authors suggest that Cd accumulation in the prostate of smokers may contribute to the development of prostate cancer. In organs such as the kidney and liver, Cd levels also tend to exceed Se levels, but in these organs, Cd is detoxified by sequestration by metallothioneins (MTs). The mean Cd concentration of 240 µmol/kg in the kidneys of smokers was almost four times higher than in nonsmokers, ranging from 11 to 750 µmol/kg. The mean Se content was 10.4 µmol/kg, twice as high as in nonsmokers, ranging from 2.7 to 10.5 µmol/kg. Other studies also point to the fact that, through interaction with Cd, Se exerts a protective effect against prostate cancer [282]. Drasch, Schöpfer, and Schrauzer observed that the Se/Cd ratio declines more steeply with age in smokers compared to nonsmokers. In the prostates of some smokers, Se/Cd ratios even reached values of <1, indicating a stoichiometric excess of Cd over Se [282].
Studies in mice have shown that Ca can also mitigate Cd toxicity to the liver and kidneys [283]. The most beneficial protective effect was demonstrated by a concentration of 100 g/kg of dietary Ca. Cu supplementation may also have a protective effect against Cd-induced oxidative stress in the liver, kidney, and placental tissues of pregnant rats and their fetuses [284]. Cu supplementation also prevented Cd-induced decreases in reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and SOD, and CAT activity.

5.2.3. Brain

Using AFM and NMR imaging, fluorescence, and mass spectrometry, Wallin et al. [285] investigated the effects of various chemicals associated with cigarette smoking (nicotine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Cd, Cr, Pb) on Aβ aggregation in vitro. They found that both aromatic hydrocarbons and metal ions modulated the Aβ aggregation process through electrostatic interactions (Cd(II), Cr(III), and Pb(II)) or specific, transient coordination of binding to the N-terminal segment of Aβ (Pb(IV)). These results support the higher incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) among smokers and indicate Pb as a possible environmental risk factor for the development of this disease. Pb is a neurotoxic element that accumulates in the tissues of smokers. Taiwo and colleagues [286] used a mouse model to investigate how neurotoxic metals from e-cigarette aerosol accumulate in the CNS at biologically significant levels. The study population of mice was exposed to a dose of e-cigarette aerosol comparable to human exposure or to a dose five times higher. After a two-month study, the olfactory bulb, anterior and posterior frontal cortex, striatum, ventral midbrain, cerebellum, brainstem, remaining brain tissue, and spinal cord were collected for analysis and metals were determined using ICP-MS. Even low-dose exposure resulted in increases in Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Pb, measured in the striatum. Concomitantly, decreases in some essential metals were observed in the CNS, leading to endogenous metal dyshomeostasis. Therefore, long-term neurotoxic and neurodegenerative risks for e-cigarette users and bystanders are certain. Exposure to e-cigarette aerosol for over two months induces the accumulation of neurotoxic metals and alteration of essential metals in the mouse brain [287].
According to a study by Flieger et al. [244], statistically significant elevated levels of toxic metals such as Cd, Al, Cr, and Pb are observed in the brains of smokers, as well as changes in the content of elements involved in the body’s antioxidant defenses (e.g., Zn, Cu, Se), which may influence neurobiological processes. Examination of the elemental composition of various anatomical regions shows that statistically significant differences between the smoker and non-smoker groups were observed for the insula, which accumulates significantly more Al, and the nucleus accumbens septi and precentral gyrus, which contained significantly more Cd.

5.2.4. Body Fluids

Levels of toxic metals such as Cd in body fluids (e.g., urine and blood) can be useful as biomarkers of exposure and potential harm. Many reports have shown a correlation between urinary Cd concentrations and smoking status, taking into account the number of packs smoked and the period of exposure [224,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295]. Urinary Cd levels are clearly correlated with chronic exposure, while Cd concentrations in blood or serum indicate recent exposure and the number of cigarettes smoked per day [252,288,291,296,297,298,299,300]. The Rayyan study [299] examined Cd accumulation in acute (blood, B-Cd) and chronic (hair, H-Cd) storage sites in a group of 200 individuals, including 90 nonsmokers and 110 smokers, aged 18 to 65 years. The mean concentrations of H-Cd and B-Cd measured by ICP-AES were 0.417 µg/g and 0.292 µg/L, respectively. It was noted that the concentration of Cd was significantly higher in men than in women (p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between smoking duration and H-Cd and B-Cd levels (r = 0.289, p < 0.05) (r = 0.303, p < 0.05). In the smoker group, a threefold increase in H-Cd and B-Cd levels was observed over a period longer than 10 years compared to the non-smoker group. There is evidence of an association between blood lead and cadmium levels with smoking-related changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) and an increased risk of mortality. Furthermore, the analysis showed an additive effect of these metals on smoking-related DNAm, as well as a synergistic effect on all-cause mortality [300]. According to the German Environmental Study [288], Cd concentrations in the blood of smokers were 3 to 6 times higher than in non-smokers. Torres-Sánchez et al. [301] examined blood Cd levels (BCd μg/L) in a group of approximately 700 men over 40 years of age from Mexico City using AAS. They found that the BCd level was dependent, among others, on current smoking status (β ≤ 8.5 packs/year vs. non-smoker = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28–0.64 μg/L; p < 0.01) and high smoking status (β > 8.5 packs/year vs. non-smoker = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56–0.87 μg/L; p < 0.01). According to a study by Adams et al. [291], smoking for 5 days increases Cd levels in blood, but not in urine. At the same time, quitting smoking causes a decrease in Cd concentrations in blood and urine, with the decrease being greater in men than in women, reaching 40% and 25%, respectively, within a year. Similar observations were reported by Wróblewski et al. [296] and Mérida-Ortega et al. [302].
In cigarette smokers, an inverse relationship between serum Cd and Zn levels was observed [296,303]. It appears that it is not the individual levels of these elements, but the Cd/Zn ratio that is indicative of an increased risk of disease. Fresquez et al. measured Zn concentrations to be insignificant compared to Cd in cigarette smoke particles [304]. According to Rodgman and Perfetti [123], 0.4–2.7% of Zn and 7–22% of Cd are transferred from tobacco to smoke during combustion. A preliminary study by Kim et al. [305] suggests that Cd absorption and accumulation may be dependent on Zn intake. Physiological levels of these elements in blood are dependent on gender and age [306,307]. Numerous studies have shown that Zn concentrations in blood, serum, and tissues are lower in tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers [308,309,310,311]. In the study by Uz et al. [309], smokers had a mean serum Zn concentration of 14,150 µg/L compared to 16,050 µg/L in control subjects. Northrop-Clewes et al. [311] analyzed the results of studies on micronutrients (vitamins A, E, and C; the carotenoids; some of the B-vitamin group; and the trace elements Se, Zn, Cu, and Fe) in smokers and non-smokers. According to their findings, serum Se concentrations and erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity were lower in smokers. In this review, the authors examined the impact of smoking on iron (Fe) status by analyzing several biomarkers, including serum iron, ferritin, hemoglobin, and a marker of iron-related oxidative damage: oxidized plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Based on the collected data, they concluded that iron homeostasis in smokers seems to be disrupted, which is indicated by elevated hemoglobin concentrations. Moreover, CuZn-SOD) activity in erythrocytes and serum ceruloplasmin concentrations were higher in smokers compared to non-smokers. The authors suggest that this increase may be linked to the body’s anti-inflammatory response to smoking. Furthermore, serum Zn concentration was found to be decreased only in heavy smokers.
Kulikowska-Karpińska et al. described decreased urinary Cu concentrations in smokers [312]. Jasińska-Starczewska et al., in turn, observed higher plasma Cu concentrations in smokers compared to nonsmokers (122.5 ± 19.15 vs. 101.5 ± 16.2 μg/dL, p < 0.01) [313]. In the study by Choi et al. [314], the association between tobacco smoking and, among others, sodium (Na) intake was examined in a population of 6340 Korean men with a smoking prevalence of 44.1% and a mean number of pack-years of smoking of 13.2 (0–180). Rates of excessive Na intake were higher in the group exposed to smoking and alcohol drinking than in the group who never smoked or drank. The effect of smoking on electrolyte balance, i.e., Na and K, is not widely documented in research. In the study by Bushra et al. [315], blood samples from smokers and non-smokers aged 18–50 years were analyzed using the Atellica CH analyzer. The results showed electrolyte imbalance in smokers. Smokers, depending on smoking intensity, had elevated Na levels and decreased K levels, while Li levels were <0.10 mEq/L in all participants, regardless of smoking status. The measured serum Na concentration (men: 143.56; women: 144.4) mEq/L and serum K concentration (men: 3.82; women: 3.91) mEq/L were different compared to non-smokers (Na: men: 140.35, women: 140.75; K: men: 4.32, women: 4.23) mEq/L. These results are consistent with the study by Eliasson et al. documenting serum hypernatremia in chronic smokers [316]. Studies in animal models suggest that vasopressin secretion induced by chronic smoking causes renal water retention and increases Na concentration [317]. However, these differences in Na and K levels in smoker/non-smoker groups are not confirmed by epidemiological studies [318]. Smoking-induced hypokalemia causes the release of catecholamines, which activate Na+/K+-ATPase, which lowers serum K levels by transporting it into the cell [319]. Furthermore, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) by nicotine increases urinary K excretion. Studies confirm the influence of comorbidities on the development of renal electrolyte imbalance in smokers. In medical emergencies, such as myocardial infarction, hypokalemia in smokers may not be confirmed [320] or may be exacerbated by treatment of hypertension with diuretics, which also cause K loss [321,322].
In the case of Li, Bushra et al. [315] suggested that smoking does not affect the dynamics of this electrolyte. Enderle et al. [323] also reported that plasma Li concentrations are approximately 1000 times lower than therapeutic levels even in populations of heavy smokers. This sheds new light on the assumption that smokers are at reduced risk of developing PD and melanoma due to inhalation of trace Li from tobacco [143,324]. The authors of the study [315] emphasize that differences in electrolyte levels between women and men should be taken into account when interpreting the results due to differences in electrolyte distribution, which are not eliminated by smoking. Few studies have reported measurements of metals in the saliva of adult smokers [325,326]. Environmental tobacco smoke may also be a source of increased exposure to heavy metals in children. Gatzke-Kopp et al. [164] demonstrated that children exposed to passive smoking had significantly higher levels of Zn (p = 0.0003), Cu (p = 0.004), and Pb (p = 0.006) in saliva in comparison to the reference group. The study authors warn that exposure to the highly neurotoxic Pb may contribute to learning and behavioral disorders, including attention deficit disorder.

5.2.5. Skin, Hair

Human hair reflects the body’s mineral composition. This means that the concentration of elements in hair correlates with their internal levels in the body. Furthermore, the level of elements in hair is significantly higher compared to body fluids (blood, urine), which improves the quality of detection. Advantages of hair analysis include non-invasive sampling, ease of transport, storage, and purification [327,328,329,330,331,332].
A study by Afridi et al. [178] showed that mean values of Al, As, Cd, Hg, Ni, and Pb were two to three times higher in scalp hair and blood samples from smokers compared to nonsmokers (p < 0.001). It was also noted that smoking may interact synergistically with risk factors associated with diabetes. The samples were obtained from a population living in Dublin, Ireland, and analyses were performed using an inductively coupled plasma emission spectrophotometer.
Muchacka et al. [327] examined hair and nails collected from smoking and non-smoking women from the Małopolska region, aged 18 to 70. The samples were assayed for heavy metals: Cd, Pb, Ni, Mg, Zn, Fe, and Cu using the FAAS method. The study showed that more Cd, Zn, and Cu accumulated in hair than in nails in both groups. Smoking affects the accumulation of metals in hair and nails in the case of Mg, Ni, Cd, Fe, and Pb. Similar studies by Afridi et al. [328] determined Zn, Se, Cd, and Hg in scalp hair and blood from smokers and non-smokers with concomitant hypertension. The analysis revealed significantly increased mean concentrations of Cd and Hg in hair and blood samples from patients with hypertension compared to a control group of healthy individuals. Concomitantly, reduced levels of Zn and Se were observed in patients with hypertension, with a statistically significant difference observed in smokers (p < 0.001). Smokers, even without concomitant hypertension, demonstrated 2–3 times higher concentrations of the studied trace elements (TE) in hair and blood compared to nonsmoking controls. This suggests that exposure to trace elements through cigarette smoking may have a synergistic effect with other risk factors for developing hypertension.
In a subsequent article by Afridi et al. [329], the association between exposure to toxic elements through cigarette smoking and the occurrence of hypertension in Dublin residents was analyzed. The study included analysis of As, Al, Ni, and Pb in the hair and blood of hypertensive patients, as well as in cigarette samples. The results showed significantly higher concentrations of toxic elements in patients with hypertension, particularly smokers (p < 0.001), and also in smokers without hypertension, compared to the control group. Remarkably, concentrations of toxic elements were two to three times higher in the scalp hair and blood samples of smokers, even those without concomitant hypertension, compared to nonsmokers.
Another Afridi et al.’s study [330] analyzed the profiles of trace elements (Zn, Cu, Mn, Se) and toxic elements (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) in the hair and blood of smoking patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) living in Dublin, comparing them with a healthy, non-smoking control group. Significantly higher mean concentrations of As, Cd, Hg, and Pb were observed in biological samples in patients with RA. At the same time, the concentrations of Zn, Cu, Mn, and Se were lower in these patients, with particular statistical significance in smokers (p < 0.001). Furthermore, smoking individuals without RA had 2- to 3-fold higher levels of four toxic elements compared to the control group.
A study by Skalny et al. [331] conducted on 344 adult women showed that smoking significantly affects the levels of essential metals and metalloids. Smokers had lower serum concentrations of Cu, Fe, and Zn, as well as lower hair Fe and Se levels, compared to nonsmokers. Smokers had increased serum concentrations of Mn, V, and Cr. Multiple regression analysis confirmed an inverse association between smoking intensity and selenium levels, and a positive correlation with chromium levels. Additionally, an inverse relationship was found between serum zinc and hair iron levels and the number of cigarettes smoked per day. These results suggest that changes in metal and metalloid metabolism may contribute to the health risks associated with smoking.
Other metallomic studies in smokers’ hair, along with the methodology and the authors’ observations, are summarized in Table 3.

6. Molecular Mechanism of Metal Toxicity

Among the heavy metals found in tobacco, the highest concentrations are found in Pb and Ni, while Cd and Ni pose the greatest carcinogenic risk when inhaled, which is related to their strong tendency to accumulate in the smoker’s body [345]. The following subsections will discuss the molecular mechanisms of toxicity of these metals and the observed health effects.

6.1. Cd Toxicity

The importance of Cd as a systemic toxin is underscored by two key features: its exceptionally long half-life in the human body, estimated at 10–30 years, and the definitive classification of Cd by the IARC as a Group 1 human carcinogen. This combination of persistence and carcinogenicity makes Cd a prime target for ongoing public health surveillance. To fully appreciate its clinical impact, understanding the mechanisms of toxicity is essential. Currently, the prevailing view is that Cd, through molecular/ionic mimicry, disrupts the metabolism of essential metals, leading to general metal ion dyshomeostasis, a mechanism that initiates a range of pathologies in various tissues [253,346,347]. The molecular mechanisms of Cd toxicity are shown schematically in Figure 4.
Ion mimicry, in which Cd2+ mimics divalent metals essential at the binding sites of various carrier proteins and/or channels, results from the ability of Cd to mimic essential divalent cations, particularly Zn2+, Ca2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+). Due to their similar ionic radius and chemical properties (ionic radius similar to Ca and similar electronegativity to Zn), Cd utilizes ion channels (especially calcium channels) and divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1/DCT1/Nramp1) for these essential metals, leading to widespread cellular metal dyshomeostasis [348,349]. This disruption is so crucial to its toxic effects that the mineral uptake pathway has been identified as a single KEGG pathway, significantly dysregulated in lung, liver, and neuronal cell models, indicating its common initial factor in Cd-induced cell damage.
The toxic effects of Cd also include the induction of oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing metabolic disturbances in cells and, subsequently, functional disturbances in many organs. Cd-induced ROS production in neuronal models is caused, among other things, by a reduction in enzyme activity due to interactions with Zn, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ca, and Se ions. Cd exposure affects SOD1 due to the replacement of Zn by Cd, CAT, and glutathione peroxidase and reductase (GSHPx and GSHR), contributing to the induction of oxidative stress and, consequently, peroxidative damage to cell membranes [350]. In response to oxidative stress and the resulting proteotoxicity, cellular systems demonstrate the induction of metallothioneins (MTs) and heat shock proteins (Hsp70). MTs are small, cysteine-rich proteins crucial for the chelation of metal ions (Zn and Cu) and the sequestration of toxic elements such as Cd. Toxicogenomic studies have found that genes encoding MT (including MT1A, MT1B, MT1E, MT2A) are strongly regulated (usually upregulated) in all cell models studied (liver, lung, and neuronal), confirming the role of MT as a primary line of defense.
The work of Forcella et al. [346] describes a toxicogenomic study comparing how Cd exposure affects gene expression in three human cell models: lung (A549), liver (HepG2), and neuronal (SH-SY-5Y), identifying both common and tissue-specific molecular mechanisms of toxicity, such as dysregulation of metal homeostasis (mineral absorption pathway), increased expression of metallothioneins, activation of oncogenes and apoptotic pathways. According to the analysis of Forcella et al. [346], Cd alters the expression of various genes, e.g., 32 genes upregulated in all three models studied, involved in tumor promotion, proliferation, and invasiveness (e.g., BATAF, CREB5, LAMB3). Analysis of the common features of DEGs in three cell models revealed that only four genes were downregulated in all cell models exposed to Cd: AMDHD1, encoding a protein protective against breast cancer [351,352], KAZALD1, associated with hypermethylation in malignant pleural mesothelioma [353,354], KLHDC9, associated with lung adenocarcinoma [355], and RAB26, associated with important regulators of vesicular fusion and transport [356], and breast cancer cell migration and invasion [351]. Cd negatively affects signaling pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), NF-κB, and the p53 pathway. Deregulation of the p53 pathway is observed in neuronal cells. Activation of p38-MAPK by Cd leads to increased expression of genes associated with inflammation and cell death. Cd interferes with autophagy, a self-degradation process crucial for the elimination of damaged organelles. It can act both protectively and promote cell death (apoptosis), depending on the level of autophagy. Cd-induced increases in intracellular Cd lead to the induction of ROS, which in turn initiates apoptosis. However, the authors of the study emphasize the rather ambiguous role of autophagy. They concluded that Cd can act as both a protector and a promoter of cell death (apoptosis) by interfering with the autophagy (self-degradation) process. This conflicting effect on cell fate is determined by the “appropriate level of autophagy needed to maintain cell survival” [253].
Although Cd is recognized as an epigenetic modulator (DNA methylation, regulation of imprinting-related genes (e.g., H19 and PEG13), there is considerable uncertainty regarding its effect on global DNA methylation. Short-term exposure to Cd has been shown to reduce DNA methylation, whereas chronic exposure can lead to hypermethylation (due to the induction of DNA methyltransferase-1–DNMT1) [346,357]. The health effects of Cd-induced toxicity and disease can be observed in various body systems, mainly in the lungs and kidneys (Figure 5).
The kidneys are the primary target organ and the most sensitive to Cd toxicity. Cd accumulates in the proximal tubular epithelial cells, impairing tubular and glomerular function and leading to renal failure [347,358,359]. MTs sequester Cd as a defense mechanism. The CdMT complex is released into the blood and then into the kidneys, where it is reabsorbed by the proximal tubular cells. Depletion of MT stores in the kidneys causes unbound Cd to damage the proximal tubular epithelial cells and leads to toxic nephropathy and reduced capacity for nutrient reabsorption, glycosuria, aminoaciduria, and increased excretion of low molecular weight (LMW) proteins, Ca, and P [347,360,361]. Because Cd interferes with the metabolism of Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu, it leads to skeletal disorders such as bone demineralization, osteomalacia, and osteoporosis. This effect is caused by competitive displacement of Ca ions and inhibition of the enzyme 1-hydroxycholecalciferol hydroxylase, necessary for converting vitamin D to its active form in the kidneys, which limits Ca absorption from the intestines [347].
Deterioration of renal function in smokers has been confirmed in recent years. 10,267 individuals over the age of 20 from the NHANES were examined for serum cotinine concentration and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A negative correlation was found between serum cotinine concentration and eGFR [362]. Long-term inhalation exposure to Cd from tobacco smoking can severely damage the respiratory system and lead to pulmonary edema, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and abnormal lung function, and even complete loss of the sense of smell (anosmia) [363]. Cd exposure is associated with cancers in various organs: lung, breast, liver, bladder, prostate, pancreas, and nasopharynx. Cd toxicity at the cellular level promotes oncogenesis through the induction of oxidative stress, epigenetic effects, and the activation of genes associated with proliferation and metastasis (e.g., BATAF, CREB5, LAMB3) [253,346,347,364,365,366].
Cd has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, PD, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and multiple sclerosis (MS) [367,368,369,370]. Higher Cd concentrations in children correlate with neurological disorders, learning disabilities, and cognitive decline [371]. Neurotoxicity is associated with Cd-induced oxidative stress and impaired Ca/Zn signaling. Meysami et al. studied 10,134 participants and performed MRI on smokers and nonsmokers and compared gray and white matter volume normalized to total intracranial volume using a two-tailed t-test. Smokers had lower normalized gray matter volumes (t = −7.806 × 100, p = 6.508 × 10−15) and white matter volumes (t = −7.374 × 100, p = 1.791 × 10−13) compared to nonsmokers. Long-term smoking has been shown to cause volume loss in areas such as total gray matter volume, total white matter volume, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, hippocampus, precuneus, and posterior cingulate gyrus [371]. Chronic exposure to Cd can lead to hypertension, atherosclerosis, and impaired heart function. Smokers have higher blood Cd levels, which correlate with an increased risk of developing atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [372,373]. The study by Li et al. [374] The impact of tobacco smoking (via Cd) on cardiovascular disease was studied over almost 20 years in a Swedish population-based cohort of 4304 men and women. The measured blood Cd concentration was 0.43 μg L−1 (median 0.24 μg L−1) and increased with smoking. Shorter survival and a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease were observed in smokers.
Cd can cross the placenta, exerting teratogenic effects [375,376]. In women: Cd concentrations in blood, urine, and kidneys are often higher in women than in men, which may be related to iron deficiency. Cd has also been associated with impaired fertility and hormonal disruption [377]. In men, Cd toxicity impairs testicular function (necrosis of the seminiferous tubules, damage to Leydig and Sertoli cells) and disrupts testosterone synthesis and spermatogenesis. The number of normal sperm has been found to decrease with increasing blood Cd concentrations [378]. Cigarette smoking has a clear and significant negative impact on the reproductive system of both men and women, leading to a wide range of problems related to fertility and pregnancy outcomes [379].

6.2. Pb Toxicity

Lead (Pb) is a highly toxic metal that has no known biological function in the body and affects almost all organ systems (Figure 6).
The toxic effects of Pb are multifactorial and include redox imbalance and the generation of oxidative stress through the overproduction of ROS (singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals (HO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anions, and hydroperoxides (HO2−•), which are considered the main mechanism of lead toxicity [379,380]. Pb also causes hemoglobin oxidation, which directly leads to erythrocyte hemolysis. This occurs due to inhibition of the ALAD enzyme (δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase), resulting in an increase in the concentration of the substrate (δ-aminolevulinic acid) ALA in both blood and urine. These elevated levels of ALA generate hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radicals and also interact with oxyhemoglobin to produce hydroxyl radicals [381]. Pb’s inhibition of the antioxidant system results from its high affinity for the sulfhydryl (-SH) groups of proteins, which inactivates antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, GPx, and GR [382,383,384]. Pb can also substitute for Zn and Cu ions, which are cofactors for these enzymes [385,386]. Pb binds to the thiol groups of glutathione (GSH), reducing its levels, which interferes with the recycling of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) to the reduced form (GSH) and depletes antioxidant reserves [385]. Lipid peroxidation causes the generation of ROS. As a result of ROS attack on polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes, lipid oxidation products such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) are formed, which are highly reactive and can damage other macromolecules, including DNA [383,387].
Another mechanism responsible for Pb toxicity is ion mimicry and interference with essential metal metabolism. Pb exerts its toxic effects by mimicking essential divalent cations, primarily Ca, Zn, and Fe [380,388]. By mimicking Ca, Pb enters cells, including neurons, through voltage-gated calcium channels and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA), disrupting calcium homeostasis, leading to increased intracellular calcium concentration. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been demonstrated to result in neuronal death [389,390]. Pb competes for Ca2+ binding sites on key proteins such as calmodulin (CaM), protein kinase C (PKC), and synaptic proteins and troponin C. Activation of PKC by picomolar concentrations of Pb2+ can lead to aberrant activation of transcription factors and act as a tumor promoter [391,392]. Interference with Zn2+ and Fe2+ is also possible. Pb2+ substitutes for Zn2+ in zinc finger proteins (e.g., transcription factors Sp1 and Egr-1), disrupting the regulation of gene expression (e.g., in the developing brain) [393,394]. Pb2+ can substitute for Fe2+ in divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), facilitating its own transport [395]. Recent studies indicate that lead exposure increases Fe2+ levels in the rat brain, which is associated with reduced expression of ferroportin 1 (FP1), a key Fe export protein [396].
Another mechanism responsible for Pb toxicity is mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis. Mitochondria are considered the primary target of Pb toxicity, leading to energy-related disruptions. Pb2+ ions accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix, where they inhibit the activity of respiratory chain enzymes (particularly complexes II and III), leading to dysfunctional oxidative phosphorylation and decreased ATP synthesis [386]. Pb induces programmed cell death (apoptosis) in neurons and hepatocytes [379]. The mechanisms responsible for this process include oxidative stress, increased intracellular Ca2+ levels, and an imbalance of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g., increased p53 and Bax expression, altered Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and cytochrome C release) [383]. Recent studies indicate that Pb also triggers non-apoptotic cell death pathways, such as ferroptosis (via increased free iron and downregulation of GPX4) and necroptosis [396].
There is scientific evidence that Pb ions induces autophagy/mitophagy (selective degradation of damaged mitochondria), which is an adaptive mechanism but can also lead to cell death. This mechanism involves regulation of mitochondrial dynamics proteins (MFF, Drp1, MFN) and acceleration of mitophagy via the PINK1/Parkin pathway [386,396]. Pb is classified by the IARC as a probable human carcinogen (Group 2A/2B) and is responsible for genotoxicity and epigenetic changes. Pb damages DNA directly (by binding to oxygen atoms in nucleic acids or nitrogen atoms in DNA bases, e.g., the formation of Pb2+-DNA complexes in the minor groove) or indirectly through ROS and oxidized lipids (causing strand breaks, chromosomal aberrations, and the formation of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)) [379]. Pb disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, including base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) [397,398].
A key recent development has been the evidence that Pb2+ inhibits the activity of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1/Ref-1), an enzyme critical for DNA repair, by directly binding to divalent cation sites [399,400]. Lead induces telomere instability in human cells, which is associated with the formation of gammaH2AX foci (indicating double-stranded DNA breaks) and the stabilization of G-quadruplexes by Pb2+ ions, leading to telomere shortening [401]. Pb also modulates gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms [402]. Pb toxicity alters DNA methylation status, for example, by increasing methylation of repeat element promoters (LINE-1) or the ALAD gene promoter, which represses its transcription [397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405].
Schneider et al. demonstrated that Pb also affects methyltransferases (DNMT1, DNMT3a) and MeCP2 (methyl cytosine-binding protein) and posttranslational histone modifications (e.g., increased histone acetylation) in the hippocampus [406]. Pb is toxic to the central nervous system. Specific mechanisms, such as disruption of neurotransmission through effects on neurotransmitters and their receptors, are responsible for Pb’s neurotoxicity [379,388]. For example, Pb2+ is a potent, noncompetitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), binding at the Zn2+ site [407,408,409]. Recent reports indicate changes in the expression of NMDAR subunits (e.g., an increased proportion of NR2B subunits) and the activation of extrasynaptic NMDAR receptors, which leads to the shutdown of the CREB phosphorylation pathway (a transcription factor crucial for memory and synaptic plasticity) [410,411]. Pb2+ neurotoxicity induces hyperphosphorylation of tau protein (e.g., at positions Ser 199/202 and Thr 231), leading to microtubule damage and disintegration [412]. Energy deficits in neurons through the inhibition of key glycolytic enzymes (hexokinase and pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHc)) in the brain, which leads to a longer-term increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases [382].
In recent years, attention has been drawn to the fact that Pb2+ poisoning induces neuroinflammation through the activation of microglia and astroglia. This leads to increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNFα)) and activation of signaling pathways such as NF-κB, JNK/MAPK kinases, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related kinase (Nrf-2) [413,414]. In lung cell cultures, lead acetate has been observed to induce activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), autophosphorylation of Src family kinases (SFKs), and an increase in Ras-GTP [415,416].
The main toxic effect of Pb2+ in blood is red blood cell damage. Pb inhibits heme synthesis enzymes (ALAD, ferrochelatase) and leads to microcytic and hypochromic anemia [389]. Dysfunction of blood cell metabolism has also been confirmed by inhibition of glycolysis (e.g., glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase) and the pentose phosphate pathway, which leads to decreased ATP concentration in erythrocytes [417], inducing phosphatidylserine (PS) translocation to the outer membrane of erythrocytes, and accelerating eryptosis (a type of red blood cell death), which may be related to procoagulant activity and anemia [418]. Pb immunotoxicity manifests itself through a shift in the immune response towards Th2 lymphocytes, resulting in increased IgE and IL-4 concentrations [419].
The molecular mechanisms of Pb toxicity vary, resulting in diverse biological effects of exposure. Exposure to Pb, even at low levels, leads to serious health problems, especially in children, and an increased risk of cancer and cognitive impairment. Neurotoxicity manifests itself in the form of cognitive and behavioral disorders, i.e., lower intelligence quotient (IQ) and cognitive impairment, learning difficulties, problems with short-term memory and attention (attention deficit/ADHD), abnormal behavior, irritability, aggression (in children), increased risk of psychological disorders (depression, anxiety) and crime (in adulthood, related to childhood exposure [379,380,385,402,415,420,421]. High exposure to Pb may lead to encephalopathy (progressive brain degeneration, brain edema), convulsions, coma, paralysis, ataxia (lack of coordination) as a result of structural and molecular damage, i.e., blood-brain barrier (BBB), hypomyelination and demyelination (glial cell damage), neurotransmission disorders (e.g., blocking of NMDA receptors) [379,380]. Exposure to Pb affects the hematopoietic system, leading to anemia, which manifests itself as changes in blood parameters: decreased hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and red blood cell (RBC) counts, as well as a potential increase in white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT) [380,382].
The kidneys are at risk of damage because Pb is excreted and accumulates within them. Acute nephropathy is characterized by impaired tubular transport, degeneration of the tubular epithelium, and the presence of inclusion bodies. It can lead to Fanconi syndrome [380,382]. Chronic kidney disease can lead to irreversible functional and morphological changes, including renal failure, hypertension, and hyperuricemia (gout) due to glomerular damage and increased urea and creatinine levels [382,422].
Pb It is associated with cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension (often at low exposure levels), increased risk of stroke, coronary artery disease, coronary artery disease and arrhythmia, atherosclerosis (atherosclerosis) and endotheliitis, and impaired cardiomyocyte contractility [380,382,423].
Pb toxicity affects reproductive function in both men and women. In men: Reduced sperm count and motility, abnormal morphology, chromosomal damage, infertility, and changes in testosterone levels. In women: Infertility, miscarriages, premature rupture of membranes, premature birth, and gestational hypertension. Pb has been identified as an endocrine disruptor [424,425,426,427,428].
The liver is one of the main organs affected by Pb toxicity. Exposure can lead to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and elevated enzymes. Hepatic enzymes (e.g., transaminases, bilirubin). Necrosis and fibrosis are possible [429,430,431]. Bone: Pb is stored in bone (85–95% in adults) for decades. It can replace Ca in hydroxyapatite crystals, leading to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased susceptibility to fractures [432,433,434].
Pb toxicity increases the risk of genotoxicity and cancer development. IARC classification: The IARC classifies Pb as a probable human carcinogen (Group 2A). HHS classification: The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) considers Pb to be a substance that may reasonably be expected to be carcinogenic to humans. Epidemiological studies have shown an association between exposure to Pb (particularly occupational exposure, but also in the general population) and the development of several types of cancer, including lung cancer, kidney cancer, brain cancer, including meningioma, other cancers of the esophagus, stomach, rectum, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and acute myeloid leukemia [421]. The mechanisms responsible for Pb genotoxicity include oxidative stress (generates ROS, inhibition of enzymes (SOD), (CAT) and (GPx), lipid peroxidation), DNA damage (DNA strand breaks (single or double), chromosomal aberrations and genome instability, induction of apoptosis, ion mimicry towards divalent cations, (Ca2+, Zn2+ and Fe2+), mitochondrial dysfunction, immunotoxicity and increased risk of autoimmune diseases [382,435].

6.3. Ni Toxicity

Ni toxicity in smokers is mainly due to inhalation of tobacco smoke, which is a significant source of exposure to this element [223]. Ni in tobacco smoke can occur in the gaseous phase or as particles. Of particular toxicological importance is Ni carbonyl (Ni(CO)4), which, due to its lipid solubility, rapidly penetrates the alveolar barrier into the bloodstream after inhalation [436]. Studies by Stojanović et al. showed high Ni content in both tobacco (2.20–4.91 mg/kg) and cigarettes (2.32–4.20 mg/kg), regardless of their type and origin; one cigarette contains from 1.1 to 3.1 g of Ni. Biomonitoring of Ni concentrations in body fluids showed that urinary nickel concentrations in smokers were significantly higher (median 1.20 μg/L) compared to nonsmokers (median 0.50 μg/L) (p < 0.05). Blood Ni concentrations in smokers (median 0.07 μg/L) were higher than in nonsmokers (median 0.06 μg/L), although this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) [223]. High exposure to carcinogenic Ni in smokers increases health risks. Inhalation of Ni is the main route leading to toxicity in the respiratory tract, lungs, and immune system. Ni exposure can cause lung and nasal cancer, pulmonary fibrosis, and cardiovascular and renal diseases, among others [437,438,439]. A higher incidence of malignant diseases has also been observed in smokers exposed to Ni [440]. The mechanism of Ni toxicity is complex, and although not yet fully understood, research indicates the key role of several molecular mechanisms, including oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [441]. Mitochondrial damage by Ni leads to impaired mitochondrial membrane potential, reduced ATP concentration, and mitochondrial DNA destruction [442]. In turn, mitochondrial damage disrupts the electron transport chain, leading to increased production of ROS and increased oxidative stress [443]. Exposure to Ni nanoparticles increases the levels of ROS, nitric oxide (NO), and malondialdehyde (MDA—a marker of lipid peroxidation), while simultaneously reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT [444]. Ni is classified as a carcinogen (Ni compounds as Group 1). The carcinogenic potential of Ni is related to its ability to induce epigenetic changes [445]. Ni is capable of replacing other metal ions in enzymes, e.g., the iron ion at the catalytic sites of iron- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. These enzymes, such as the histone demethylase JMJD1A and the DNA repair enzyme ABH2, are targets of Ni [441].
Ni exposure leads to changes in the epigenetic landscape, including DNA hypermethylation, histone modifications (e.g., H3S10 hyperphosphorylation, H3K4 hypermethylation, H2A and H2B hyperubiquitination), and interference with the microRNA (miRNA) network [446,447,448]. Ni ions are capable of inducing heterochromatization by binding to DNA-histone complexes and initiating chromatin condensation. This can lead to gene silencing (e.g., tumor suppressor genes), cell transformation, and ontogeny [449].
Ni2+ ions can induce apoptosis by activating caspase-dependent pathways: Intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway: Ni2+ facilitates the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C) from mitochondria into the cytosol. Cyt C activates procaspase-9, which in turn activates caspases-3, -6, and -7. Extrinsic pathway: At the cell surface, Ni2+ promotes the interaction between Fas (First Apoptotic Signal) and FasL (Fas Ligand), leading to the activation of caspase-8 and -10. These caspases activate caspases-3, -6, and -7. In both pathways, effector caspases (mainly-3, -6, and -7) act on PARP, leading to apoptosis [441].
Ni is responsible for enzymatic inhibition by binding to specific amino acid residues in the active site (such as cysteine, histidine, glutamate, and lysine), blocking catalytic activity; binding to secondary (allosteric) sites, e.g., binding to ATP:Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase, the activity of which decreases by approximately 50% following Ni exposure [450,451,452].
Ni compounds have embryotoxic and teratogenic properties, as demonstrated in numerous experimental studies [441]. Leonard and colleagues, who confirmed the strong teratogenic effects of nickel compounds, hypothesized that the prenatal effects of Ni may be partially due to changes in mitosis leading to cell death [453,454].
Ni is a potent allergen, leading to the production of cytokines or chemokines [441]. The reaction involves the activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and T lymphocytes in complex immune responses. Activated APCs migrate to lymph nodes, where they present Ni (allergen/hapten) to naive CD4+ T lymphocytes. Upon re-exposure to the same hapten, T cells are stimulated and proliferate, entering the bloodstream and producing visible hypersensitivity symptoms 48–72 h after allergen exposure. After repeated exposures, T cell clones reach a “threshold” and a skin rash develops, which can manifest as acute, subacute, or chronic eczema-like patches [455,456]. The pathogenesis and precise mechanisms of the allergic response to Ni remain incompletely understood. The molecular mechanisms of Ni toxicity are schematically shown in Figure 7.

7. Summary and Future Directions

Tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.), used in cigarette production, contains, among more than 7000 identified chemical compounds [123,457], heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, Ni, As, and Cd [345]. Many of them are carcinogenic and mutagenic substances [457]. The metal content in tobacco ranges from less than 1 μg/g (Co, Cd, Pb, As, and Tl) to several hundred μg/g (Al, Mn, and Ba) [458]. The toxicity of metals and their bioaccumulative properties pose a serious long-term health risk and contribute to the development of tobacco-related diseases, particularly respiratory diseases (emphysema, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer) [118,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470]. The number of deaths due to tobacco-related diseases is predicted to increase to eight million by 2030 [7]. Numerous studies are being conducted to quantify these metals in cigarettes, tissues, and body fluids of tobacco smokers, and to examine the correlation between the accumulation of toxic metals and health risk assessments. There is no doubt that toxins from cigarettes originate from the tobacco growing site and the technological processes used in its production. Until now, the ability of plants such as Nicotiana tabacum to accumulate metals has been primarily exploited for the removal of metal contaminants from soil (bioremediation). To ensure that tobacco cultivation for cigarette production does not pose a health risk, it must meet ecological requirements. Changing cigarette production technology could also improve the situation.
It has been proven that the group of elements that accumulate in tissues as a result of chronic smoking primarily includes Pb, Al, Cr, Ni, As, and Cd. Despite existing evidence of metal accumulation in the human body as a result of cigarette smoking and passive smoking, there are still few studies demonstrating the general distribution of toxins and the organs that preferentially accumulate them. We know that smoking disrupts mineral homeostasis, but further research is needed on interelemental correlations that would allow for preventive supplementation and potentially even therapy.
Currently, thanks to the development of analytical techniques, it is possible to analyze multi-element elements present in trace and ultra-trace amounts even in small sample masses. Therefore, attention has recently drawn to the increased content of rare earth elements in the tissues of smokers, whose role in the body and toxicity are poorly understood. The main analytical challenge is lowering detection limits for ultra-trace elements, alongside significant variations in total metal concentrations in biological samples.
The lack of consistency in the results of metallomic studies conducted by different teams may be due to the variety of methodologies used, but also to objective factors such as the origin of the tobacco. The selection of the control and treatment groups took into account lifestyle, diet, chronic diseases, and medications taken, which affect the body’s mineral status and may mask or synergize with smoking in the processes of metal accumulation in smokers. For example, Mortada et al. [471] reported blood Pb levels of 101.6 + 30.9 mg L−1 in nonsmokers and 143.7 + 33.8 mg L−1 in smokers, while Satarug et al. [472] reported much lower serum Pb levels of 4.2 + 5.4 mg L−1 in nonsmokers and 9.0 + 12 mg L−1 in smokers.
Based on a review of recent literature, only one proposal can be found for eliminating toxic elements accumulated as a result of smoking. Zn supplementation has been found to prevent Cd accumulation. In the case of plants, Mg biofortification has been observed to protect tobacco plants from Al accumulation. The idea of searching for interelemental correlations may be a useful strategy in further research, especially since toxicogenomic studies indicate the mechanism of molecular/ionic mimicry as a common process initiating other pathologies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.F., E.D. and J.F.; methodology, F.W. and A.S.; software, Ł.P. and M.Ł.; validation, M.S., F.W. and A.S.; formal analysis, W.F.; investigation, W.F.; resources, M.S.; data curation, P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F. and W.F. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, E.D. and P.G.; visualization, M.S. and A.S.; supervision, E.D. and P.G.; project administration, J.F.; funding acquisition, Ł.P. and M.Ł. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
4-HNE4-hydroxynonenal
8-OHdG8-hydroksy-2′-deoksyguanozyny
AASAtomic absorption spectrometry
ADAlzheimer’s disease
ADHDAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AESAtomic Emission spectrometry
AFMAtomic force microscope
AFSAtomic fluorescence spectrometry
ALAδ-aminolevulinic acid
ALADδ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase
ALSAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis
AMAlveolar macrophage
APCAntigen presenting cells
APDCammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate
APE1/Ref-1Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1/redox effector factor 1
ASDAutism Spectrum Disorder
ASVAnodic Stripping Voltammetry
BALBronchoalveolar lavage fluid
BATFBasic leucine zipper ATF-like transcription factor
BaxBcl-2-associated X protein
BBBBlood-Brain Barrier
BCBBlood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier
Bcl-2B cell lymphoma 2
BDNFBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
BERBase excision repair
CaMCalmodulin
CATCatalase
CNSCentral nervous system
COPDChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
CREB5cAMP responsive element binding protein 5
CRICancer Risk Index
CSPCigarette smoke particle
CVCyclic voltammetry
CVAASCold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry
CVG/HGChemical vapor or hydride generation
Cyt CCytochrome c
DCT1Divalent cation transporter 1
DiosJodothyronine deiodinases
DLDetection Limit
DMTDivalent metal transporter
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DNMTDNA methyltransferases
DPASVDifferential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry
DPVDifferential pulse voltammetry
DRCDynamic Reaction Cell
EDSEnergy dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
EDXRFEnergy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
EELSElectron Energy Loss Spectroscopy
EFTEMEnergy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscopes
EGFREpidermal Growth Factor Receptor
eGFRAn estimated GFR
ELCRExcess Lifetime Cancer Risk
EPMAElectron probe X-ray microanalysis
ETAASElectrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry
EUEuropean Union
FAASFlame atomic absorption spectrometry
FasFirst apoptotic signal
FasLFas Ligand
FCTCFramework Convention on Tobacco Control
FDAU.S. Food and Drug Administration
FPFerroportin
GFAASGraphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry
GFRGlomerular Filtration Rate
GPxGlutathione peroxidase
GSHGlutathione
GSH-PxGlutathione peroxidase
GSHR or GRGlutathione reductase
GSSGGlutathione disulfide
GTPGuanosine-5′-triphosphate
HbHemoglobin
HCLHollow cathode lamps
HctHematocrit
HGAASHydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy
HHSU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
HPAThe hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
HR-CSHigh resolution-continuum source
IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancer
ICIon chromatography
ICDAInternational Chromium Development Association
ICP-AESInductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
ICP-OESInductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry
ICP-QQQ-MSInductively Coupled Plasma–Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry
ICP-TOF-MSInductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry
ICRPInternational Commission on Radiological Protection
ID-ICP-MSIsotopic dilution ICP-MS
ILInterleukin
IMCImaging mass cytometry
IQIntelligence Quotient
ISEPotentiometry using ion-selective electrode
IUPACInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
LALaser Ablation
LAMB3Laminin subunit beta 3
LCCLifetime Cancer Risk
LFALateral flow assay technology
LIBSLaser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
LMWLow-molecular-weight proteins
LSASVLinear sweep anodic stripping voltammetry
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
MAPK/JNKmitogen-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase
MDAMalondialdehyde
MeCP2Methyl-CpG binding protein 2
miRNAmicroRNA
MOFMetal-organic framework
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
MSMultiple sclerosis
MTMetallothionein
NAANeutron activation analysis
NAFLDNon-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
NanoSIMSNanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry
nano-SXRFNano-Synchrotron X-Ray Fluorescence
NCCHNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
NDDNeurodevelopmental Disorders
NERNucleotide excision repair
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NHANESNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
NISTNational Institute of Standards and Technology
NMDARN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
Nramp1Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein
Nrf-2Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related
PDParkinson’s disease
PDHcPyruvate dehydrogenase complex
PIGEParticle-Induced Gamma-ray Emission
PIXEParticle-induced X-ray emission
PKCProtein Kinase C
PLTPlatelet Count
PSPhosphatidylserine
RARheumatoid arthritis
RAASRenin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
RasRat sarcoma proteins
RBCRed Blood Cells
ROSReactive oxygen species
RP-ICReversed-phase ion interaction chromatography
SELFStimulated Epithelial Lung Fluid
SEMScanning electron microscope
SFKSrc family kinase
-SHSulfhydryl groups
SHSSecondhand smoke exposure
SIA-ASVSequential Injection Analysis Anodic Stripping Voltammetry
SIMSSecondary ion mass spectroscopy
SOD Superoxide Dismutase
STEMScanning Transmission Electron Microscopes
SVAStripping voltammetry analysis
SWASVSquare wave anodic stripping voltammetry
SWVSquare wave voltammetry
SZSchizophrenia
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
THSThird-Hand Smoke
TNFTumor necrosis factor
TMAHTetramethylammonium hydroxide
TrkBTropomyosin receptor kinase B
TS-FFThermospray flame-furnace
TXRFTotal reflection X-ray fluorescence
UVUltraviolet
WBCWhite Blood Cells
WDSWavelength Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
WHOWorld Health Organization
XASX-ray absorption spectroscopy
XRDX-ray diffraction analysis
XRFX-ray fluorescence
μSR-XRFX-ray microfluorescence analysis using synchrotron radiation

References

  1. Munir, N.; Jahangeer, M.; Bouyahya, A.; El Omari, N.; Ghchime, R.; Balahbib, A.; Aboulaghras, S.; Mahmood, Z.; Akram, M.; Ali Shah, S.M.; et al. Heavy Metal Contamination of Natural Foods Is a Serious Health Issue: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lin, H.M.; Zhang, J.R.; Li, M.X.; Hou, H.; Wang, H.; Huang, Y. Cigarette smoking and alcohol-related liver disease. Liver Res. 2024, 8, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.Q.; Wang, W.J.; Wu, C.C.; Bao, L.J.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, E.Y. Low tar level does not reduce human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental tobacco smoke. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2023: Protect People from Tobacco Smoke. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077164 (accessed on 20 May 2024).
  5. WHO 2003, Updated Reprint 2004, 2005; Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Available online: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/264104b3-241a-4e48-88f9-aa7120779ffc/content (accessed on 18 January 2010).
  6. Prognistic Raport. Available online: https://ippez.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2025_RAPORT_5PROCENTPOLSKI_.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2025).
  7. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Use 2000–2030. 16 January 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240088283 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  8. Dubick, M.A.; Keen, C.L. Influence of nicotine on tissue trace element concentrations and tissue antioxidant defense. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1991, 31, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kocyigit, A.; Erel, O.; Gur, S. Effects of tobacco smoking on plasma selenium, zinc, copper and iron concentrations and related antioxidative enzyme activities. Clin. Biochem. 2001, 34, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Williams, R.J.P. Chemical selection of elements by cells. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haraguchi, H. Metallomics as integrated biometal science. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Haraguchi, H. Metallomics: The history in the last decade and the future outlook. Metallomics 2017, 9, 1001–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lobinski, R.; Becker, J.S.; Haraguchi, H.; Sarkar, B. Metallomics: Guidelines for terminology and critical evaluation of analytical chemistry approaches (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maret, W. An Appraisal of the Field of Metallomics and the Roles of Metal Ions in Biochemistry and Cell Signaling. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maret, W. The quintessence of metallomics: A harbinger of a different life science based on the periodic table of the bioelements. Metallomics 2022, 14, mfac051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maret, W.; Caruso, J.A.; Contag, C.H.; Giedroc, D.P.; Hagedoorn, P.-L.; Matusch, A.; Skaar, E.P.; Thompson, R.B. Methods and techniques for studing metals in biological systems. In Trace Metals and Infectious Diseases; Nriagu, J.O., Skaar, E.P., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 341–401. [Google Scholar]
  17. Maret, W. The Metals in the Biological Periodic System of the Elements: Concepts and Conjectures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cvetkovic, A.; Menon, A.L.; Thorgersen, M.P.; Scott, J.W.; Poole, F.L., 2nd; Jenney, F.E., Jr.; Lancaster, W.A.; Praissman, J.L.; Shanmukh, S.; Vaccaro, B.J.; et al. Microbial metalloproteomes are largely uncharacterized. Nature 2010, 466, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Tse, E.; Sun, H. Metal-detection based techniques and their applications in metallobiology. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 10264–10280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szpunar, J.; Lobinski, R.; Prange, A. Hyphenated techniques for elemental speciation in biological systems. Appl. Spectrosc. 2003, 57, 102A–111A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wilschefski, S.C.; Baxter, M.R. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Introduction to Analytical Aspects. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2019, 40, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, J.S.; Kim, A.M.; Bleher, R.; Myers, B.D.; Marvin, R.G.; Inada, H.; Nakamura, K.; Zhang, X.F.; Roth, E.; Li, S.Y.; et al. Imaging and elemental mapping of biological specimens with a dual-EDS dedicated scanning transmission electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy 2013, 128, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Davison, C.; Beste, D.; Bailey, M.; Felipe-Sotelo, M. Expanding the boundaries of atomic spectroscopy at the single-cell level: Critical review of SP-ICP-MS, LIBS and LA-ICP-MS advances for the elemental analysis of tissues and single cells. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2023, 415, 6931–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szpunar, J. Metallomics: A new frontier in analytical chemistry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stewart, T.J. Across the spectrum: Integrating multidimensional metal analytics for in situ metallomic imaging. Metallomics 2019, 11, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carter, K.P.; Young, A.M.; Palmer, A.E. Fluorescent sensors for measuring metal ions in living systems. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4564–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Razzaque, M.S.; Wimalawansa, S.J. Minerals and Human Health: From Deficiency to Toxicity. Nutrients 2025, 17, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Foster, A.W.; Osman, D.; Robinson, N.J. Metal preferences and metallation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 28095–28103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Maret, W.; Wedd, A.G. (Eds.) Binding, Transport and Storage of Metal Ions in Biological Cells; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pufahl, R.A.; Singer, C.P.; Peariso, K.L.; Lin, S.J.; Schmidt, P.J.; Fahrni, C.J.; Culotta, V.C.; Penner-Hahn, J.E.; O’Halloran, T.V. Metal ion chaperone function of the soluble Cu(I) receptor Atx1. Science 1997, 278, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hagedoorn, P.-L. Microbial Metalloproteomics. Proteomes 2015, 3, 424–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tainer, J.A.; Roberts, V.A.; Getzoff, E.D. Metal-binding sites in proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1991, 2, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Leyssens, L.; Vinck, B.; Van Der Straeten, C.; Wuyts, F.; Maes, L. Cobalt toxicity in humans-a review of the potential sources and systemic health effects. Toxicology 2017, 387, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Buccella, D.; Lim, M.H.; Morrow, J.R. Metals in Biology: From Metallomics to Trafficking. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 13505–13508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Menghini, V. De Ferreorum Particulerum Sede in Sanguis; Commentar: Bologna, Italy, 1747. [Google Scholar]
  36. Prasad, A.S.; Halsted, J.A.; Nadimi, M. Syndrome of iron deficiency anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, hypogonadism, dwarfism and geophagia. Am. J. Med. 1961, 31, 532–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McCall, A.S.; Cummings, C.F.; Bhave, G.; Vanacore, R.; Page-McCaw, A.; Hudson, B.G. Bromine is an essential trace element for assembly of collagen IV scaffolds in tissue development and architecture. Cell 2014, 157, 1380–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nielsen, F.H. Should bioactive trace elements not recognized as essential, but with beneficial health effects, have intake recommendations. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 406–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tian, X.; Teng, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, C.; Feng, J. Advances in Mammalian Metallomics: New Insights into Metal Dynamics and Biological Significance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yasuda, H.; Yonashiro, T.; Yoshida, K.; Ishii, T.; Tsutsui, T. Relationship between body mass index and minerals in male Japanese adults. Biomed. Res. Trace Elem. 2006, 17, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zoroddu, M.A.; Aaseth, J.; Crisponi, G.; Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M. The essential metals for humans: A brief overview. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maret, W. Metallomics: The Science of Biometals and Biometalloids. In Metallomics; Arruda, M., Ed.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; p. 1055. [Google Scholar]
  43. Skalnaya, M.G.; Skalny, A.V. Essential Trace Elements in Human Health: A Physician’s View; Tomsk Publishing House of Tomsk State University: Tomsk, Russia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. CLSI C38A. Control of Preexamination Variation in Trace Element Determinations. 1997. C38-A, Vol. 13, Replaces 2024, C38-P, Vol. 14. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/638520133/CLSI-C38-A (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  45. Duffus, J.H. Heavy metals-A meaningless term? Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 793–807. Available online: https://publications.iupac.org/pac/2002/pdf/7405x0793.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2002).
  46. Calabrese, E.J.; Mattson, M.P. How does hormesis impact biology, toxicology, and medicine? NPJ Aging Mech. Dis. 2017, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mattson, M.P.; Calabrese, E.J. Hormesis: A Revolution in Biology, Toxicology and Medicine; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wessels, I. Metal Homeostasis during Development, Maturation, and Aging: Impact on Infectious Diseases. In Trace Metals and Infectious Diseases; Nriagu, J.O., Skaar, E.P., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Chapter 8. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK569694/ (accessed on 18 February 2015).
  49. Aaseth, J.O. Toxic and Essential Metals in Human Health and Disease 2021. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tsatsakis, A.M.; Vassilopoulou, L.; Kovatsi, L.; Tsitsimpikou, C.; Karamanou, M.; Leon, G.; Liesivuori, J.; Hayes, A.W.; Spandidos, D.A. The dose response principle from philosophy to modern toxicology: The impact of ancient philosophy and medicine in modern toxicology science. Toxicol. Rep. 2018, 5, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Momčilović, B.; Reeves, P.; Blake, M.J. Idiorrhythmic dose-rate variability in dietary zinc intake generates a different response pattern of zinc metabolism than conventional dose-response feeding. Br. J. Nutr. 1997, 78, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Momčilović, B.; Prejac, J.; Brundić, S.; Morović, S.; Skalny, A.V.; Mimica, N.; Drmić, S. An essay on human and elements, multielement profiles, and depression. Translat. Neurosci. 2010, 1, 322–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  53. Freeland-Graves, J.H.; Mousa, T.Y.; Kim, S. International variability in diet and requirements of manganese: Causes and consequences. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2016, 38, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Baj, J.; Flieger, W.; Barbachowska, A.; Kowalska, B.; Flieger, M.; Forma, A.; Teresiński, G.; Portincasa, P.; Buszewicz, G.; Radzikowska-Büchner, E.; et al. Consequences of Disturbing Manganese Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maret, W.; Li, Y. Coordination dynamics of zinc in proteins. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4682–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. DesMarais, T.L.; Costa, M. Mechanisms of Chromium-Induced Toxicity. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2019, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nielsen, F.H. Update on the possible nutritional importance of silicon. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nielsen, F.H. Update on human health effects of boron. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yokel, R.A.; Lasley, S.M.; Dorman, D.C. The speciation of metals in mammals influences their toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics and therefore human health risk assessment. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2006, 9, 63–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Emsley, J. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  61. Laur, N.; Kinscherf, R.; Pomytkin, K.; Kaiser, L.; Knes, O.; Deigner, H.-P. ICP-MS trace element analysis in serum and whole blood. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nawi, A.M.; Chin, S.-F.; Jamal, R. Simultaneous analysis of 25 trace elements in micro volume of human serum by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Pract. Lab. Med. 2020, 18, e00142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, Y.H.; Bang, E.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.D.; Kang, D.R.; Hong, J.; Lee, J.M. Serum Concentrations of Trace Elements Zinc, Copper, Selenium, and Manganese in Critically Ill Patients. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 188, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Grochowski, C.; Blicharska, E.; Krukow, P.; Jonak, K.; Maciejewski, M.; Szczepanek, D.; Jonak, K.; Flieger, J.; Maciejewski, R. Analysis of Trace Elements in Human Brain: Its Aim, Methods, and Concentration Levels. Front. Chem. 2019, 5, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Adani, G.; Filippini, T.; Michalke, B.; Vinceti, M. Selenium and Other Trace Elements in the Etiology of Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Neuroepidemiology 2020, 54, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. De Benedictis, C.A.; Vilella, A.; Grabrucker, A.M. The Role of Trace Metals in Alzheimer’s Disease. In Alzheimer’s Disease; Wisniewski, T., Ed.; Codon Publications: Brisbane, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cilliers, K.; Muller, C.J.F.; Page, B.J. Trace Element Concentration Changes in Brain Tumors: A Review. Anat. Rec. 2020, 303, 1293–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Maciejewski, R.; Radzikowska-Büchner, E.; Flieger, W.; Kulczycka, K.; Baj, J.; Forma, A.; Flieger, J. An Overview of Essential Microelements and Common Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Effects on Male Fertility. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baj, J.; Flieger, W.; Flieger, M.; Forma, A.; Sitarz, E.; Skórzyńska-Dziduszko, K.; Grochowski, C.; Maciejewski, R.; Karakuła-Juchnowicz, H. Autism spectrum disorder: Trace elements imbalances and the pathogenesis and severity of autistic symptoms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 129, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baj, J.; Forma, A.; Sitarz, E.; Karakuła, K.; Flieger, W.; Sitarz, M.; Grochowski, C.; Maciejewski, R.; Karakula-Juchnowicz, H. Beyond the Mind—Serum Trace Element Levels in Schizophrenic Patients: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy metals: Toxicity and human health effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 153–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baj, J.; Teresiński, G.; Kowalska, B.; Krajka, T.; Buszewicz, G.; Forma, A.; Flieger, W.; Karakuła, K.H.; Kędzierawski, P.; Cywka, T.; et al. ICP-MS Multi-Elemental Analysis of the Human Meninges Collected from Sudden Death Victims in South-Eastern Poland. Molecules 2022, 27, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Baj, J.; Kowalska, B.; Flieger, W.; Radzikowska-Büchner, E.; Forma, A.; Czeczelewski, M.; Kędzierawski, P.; Karakuła, K.; Flieger, M.; Majerek, D.; et al. Assessment of the Concentration of 51 Elements in the Liver and in Various Parts of the Human Brain—Profiling of the Mineral Status. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Baj, J.; Forma, A.; Kowalska, B.; Teresiński, G.; Buszewicz, G.; Majerek, D.; Flieger, W.; Maciejewski, R.; Karakuła, K.; Flieger, M.; et al. Multi-Elemental Analysis of Human Optic Chiasm—A New Perspective to Reveal the Pathomechanism of Nerve Fibers’ Degeneration. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Höck, A.; Demmel, U.; Schicha, H.; Kasperek, K.; Feinendegen, L.E. Trace element concentration in human brain. Activation analysis of cobalt, iron, rubidium, selenium, zinc, chromium, silver, cesium, antimony and scandium. Brain 1975, 98, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Liu, T.; Lu, Q.-B.; Yan, L.; Guo, J.; Feng, F.; Qiu, J.; Wang, J. Comparative Study on Serum Levels of 10 Trace Elements in Schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cai, L.; Chen, T.; Yang, J.; Zhou, K.; Yan, X.; Chen, W.; Sun, L.; Li, L.; Qin, S.; Wang, P.; et al. Serum trace element differences between Schizophrenia patients and controls in the Han Chinese population. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Grochowski, C.; Szukała, M.; Litak, J.; Budny, A.; Proch, J.; Majerek, D.; Blicharska, E.; Niedzielski, P. Correlations Between Trace Elements in Selected Locations of the Human Brain in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder. Molecules 2020, 25, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, B.; Fang, T.; Chen, H. Zinc and Central Nervous System Disorders. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shen, B.; Lu, R.; Lv, M.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Long, J.; Cai, H.; Su, L.; Gong, Z. Association between the levels of toxic heavy metals and schizophrenia in the population of Guangxi, China: A case-control study. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 363 Pt 2, 125179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Grochowski, C.; Blicharska, E.; Bogucki, J.; Proch, J.; Mierzwińska, A.; Baj, J.; Litak, J.; Podkowiński, A.; Flieger, J.; Teresiński, G.; et al. Increased Aluminum Content in Certain Brain Structures is Correlated with Higher Silicon Concentration in Alcoholic Use Disorder. Molecules 2019, 24, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Botturi, A.; Ciappolino, V.; Delvecchio, G.; Boscutti, A.; Viscardi, B.; Brambilla, P. The Role and the Effect of Magnesium in Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Popescu, C.; Munteanu, C.; Spînu, A.; Andone, I.; Bistriceanu, R.; Postoiu, R.; Suciu, A.; Giuvara, S.; Vlădulescu-Trandafir, A.-I.; Aurelian, S.M.; et al. Actual Data on Essential Trace Elements in Parkinson’s Disease. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. López-Alonso, M.; Rivas, I.; Miranda, M. Trace Mineral Imbalances in Global Health: Challenges, Biomarkers, and the Role of Serum Analysis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lech, T.; Dudek-Adamska, D. The influence of the method of digestion of biological samples and the method of determination of some major and trace elements in these samples on analytical results. Probl. Forensic Sci. 2009, 80, 429–440. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ivanenko, N.B.; Ganeev, A.A.; Solovyev, N.D.; Moskvin, N.L. Determination of trace elements in biological fluids. J. Anal. Chem. 2011, 66, 784–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jones, D.R.; Jarrett, J.M.; Tevis, D.S.; Franklin, M.; Mullinix, N.J.; Wallon, K.L.; Derrick Quarles, C., Jr.; Caldwell, K.L.; Jones, R.L. Analysis of whole human blood for Pb, Cd, Hg, Se, and Mn by ICP-DRC-MS for biomonitoring and acute exposures. Talanta 2017, 162, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Navarro, J.A.; Granadillo, V.A.; Parra, O.E.; Romero, R.A. Determination of lead in whole blood by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with matrix modification. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1989, 4, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Uddin, A.H.; Khalid, R.S.; Alaama, M.; Abdualkader, A.M.; Kasmuri, A.; Abbas, S.A. Comparative study of three digestion methods for elemental analysis in traditional medicine products using atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. El Hosry, L.; Sok, N.; Richa, R.; Al Mashtoub, L.; Cayot, P.; Bou-Maroun, E. Sample Preparation and Analytical Techniques in the Determination of Trace Elements in Food: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Helaluddin, A.; Khalid, R.S.; Alaama, M.; Abbas, S.A. Main analytical techniques used for elemental analysis in various matrices. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2016, 15, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guo, C.-Y.; Lv, L.-J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Ji, M.-Y.; Zang, E.-H.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, M.; Li, M. Applied analytical methods for detecting heavy metals in medicinal plants. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2023, 53, 339–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Slavin, W. Accuracy in Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1988, 93, 445–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lorenc, W.; Hanć, A.; Sajnóg, A.; Barałkiewicz, D. LC/ICP-MS and complementary techniques in bespoke and nontargeted speciation analysis in food samples. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2022, 41, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Thomas, R. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS): Principles, Instrumentation, and Comparisons with Other AS Techniques. Separation Science 2025. Available online: https://www.sepscience.com/atomic-absorption-spectrophotometry-aas-principles-instrumentation-and-comparisons-with-other-as-techniques-12134 (accessed on 2 October 2025).
  96. Chemnitzer, R. Strategies for Achieving the Lowest Possible Detection Limits in ICP-MS. Spectroscopy 2019, 34, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ruggieri, F.; Alimonti, A.; Bocca, B. Full validation and accreditation of a method to support human biomonitoring studies for trace and ultra-trace elements. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mounicou, S.; Szpunar, J.; Lobinski, R. Metallomics: The concept and methodology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1119–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tsang, C.N.; Bianga, J.; Sun, H.Z.; Szpunar, J.; Lobinski, R. Probing of bismuth antiulcer drug targets in H. pylori by laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Metallomics 2012, 4, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lovett, J.H.; Harris, H.H. Application of X-ray absorption and X-ray fluorescence techniques to the study of metallodrug action. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2021, 61, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. McRae, R.; Bagchi, P.; Sumalekshmy, S.; Fahrni, C.J. In situ imaging of metals in cells and tissues. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4780–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Clavijo Jordan, V.; Al-Ebraheem, A.; Geraki, K.; Dao, E.; Martins, A.F.; Chirayil, S.; Farquharson, M.; Sherry, A.D. Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Fluorescence Elemental Mapping in Healthy Versus Malignant Prostate Tissues Provides New Insights into the Glucose-Stimulated Zinc Trafficking in the Prostate as Discovered by MRI. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 13654–13660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Aitken, J.B.; Levina, A.; Lay, P.A. Studies on the biotransformations and biodistributions of metal-containing drugs using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 553–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wietecha, R.; Koœcielniak, P.; Lech, T.; Rymanowski, M. Determination of selenium in human blood using atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Probl. Forensic Sci. 2002, 52, 21–36.38. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wietecha-Posłuszny, R.; Koœcielniak, P.; Lech, T.; Kielar, T. Simple method for simultaneous determination of selenium and arsenic in human hair by means of atomic fluorescence spectrometry with hydride generation technique. Microchim. Acta 2005, 149, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sánchez-Rodas, D.; Corns, W.T.; Chen, B.; Stockwell, P.B. Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry: A suitable detection technique in speciation studies for arsenic, selenium, antimony and mercury. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010, 25, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chassot, E.; Irigaray, J.L.; Terver, S.; Vanneuville, G. Analytical method used for PIXE analyses. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2005, 229, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Huszank, R.; Csedreki, L.; Török, Z. Direct Trace Element Analysis of Liquid Blood Samples by In-Air Ion Beam Analytical Techniques (PIXE-PIGE). Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1558–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Legin, A.A.; Schintlmeister, A.; Jakupec, M.A.; Galanski, M.; Lichtscheidl, I.; Wagner, M.; Keppler, B.K. NanoSIMS combined with fluorescence microscopy as a tool for subcellular imaging of isotopically labeled platinum-based anticancer drugs. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3135–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, R.F.; Escrig, S.; Croisier, M.; Clerc-Rosset, S.; Knott, G.W.; Meibom, A.; Davey, C.A.; Johnsson, K.; Dyson, P.J. NanoSIMS analysis of an isotopically labelled organometallic ruthenium(II) drug to probe its distribution and state in vitro. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 16486–16489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Giesen, C.; Wang, H.A.; Schapiro, D.; Zivanovic, N.; Jacobs, A.; Hattendorf, B.; Schüffler, P.J.; Grolimund, D.; Buhmann, J.M.; Brandt, S.; et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chang, Q.; Ornatsky, O.I.; Siddiqui, I.; Straus, R.; Baranov, V.I.; Hedley, D.W. Biodistribution of cisplatin revealed by imaging mass cytometry identifies extensive collagen binding in tumor and normal tissues. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shi, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, H.; Dong, Y.; Liu, G.; Ye, W.; He, R.; Zhao, G. Recent Developments in Heavy Metals Detection: Modified Electrodes, Pretreatment Methods, Prediction Models and Algorithms. Metals 2025, 15, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Guo, X.; Feng, S.; Peng, Y.; Li, B.; Zhao, J.; Xu, H.; Meng, X.; Zhai, W.; Pang, H. Emerging insights into the application of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based materials for electrochemical heavy metal ion detection. Food Chem. 2024, 463, 141387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Higson, S.P.J. Analytical Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  116. Michalski, R. Applications of Ion Chromatography for the Determination of Inorganic Cations. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2009, 39, 230–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xie, X.; Hu, X.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, W.; Yu, R.; Liu, S.; Hu, H.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Z. Heavy Metal Ion Detection Based on Lateral Flow Assay Technology: Principles and Applications. Biosensors 2025, 15, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. 2010. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53017/ (accessed on 28 March 2024).
  119. Fowles, J.; Dybing, E. Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob. Control 2003, 12, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhu, Y.; Costa, M. Metals and molecular carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2020, 41, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Bell, P.F.; Mulchi, C.L.; Chaney, R.L. Microelement levels in Maryland air-cured tobacco. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1992, 23, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Özcan, M.M.; Aljuhaimi, F.; Uslu, N.; Ghafoor, K.; Mohamed Ahmed, I.A.; Babiker, E.E. Distribution of heavy metal and macroelements of Indian and imported cigarette brands in Turkey Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 28210–28215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rodgman, A.; Perfetti, T.A. The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  124. Pappas, R.S. Toxic elements in tobacco and in cigarette smoke: Inflammation and sensitization. Metallomics 2011, 3, 1181–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ziarati, P.; Mousavi, Z.; Pashapour, S. Analysis of heavy metals in cigarette tobacco. J. Med. Discov. 2016, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Viana, G.F.; Garcia, K.S.; Menezes-Filho, J.A. Assessment of carcinogenic heavy metals levels in Brazilian cigarettes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2001, 181, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. O’Connor, R.J.; Li, Q.; Stephens, W.E.; Hammond, D.; Elton-Marshall, T.; Cummings, K.M.; Giovino, G.A.; Fong, G.T. Cigarettes sold in China: Design, emissions and metals. Tob. Control 2010, 19, i47–i53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Stephens, W.E.; Calder, A.; Newton, J. Source and health implications of high toxic metal concentrations in illicit tobacco products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pappas, R.S.; Polzin, G.M.; Watson, C.H.; Ashley, D.L. Cadmium, lead, and thallium in smoke particulate from counterfeit cigarettes compared to authentic US brands. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Eneji, I.S.; Olalekan, S.; Sha’ato, R.; Eneji Ishaq, S.; Salawu, O.W. Analysis of heavy metals in selected cigarettes and tobacco leaves in Benue state. Nigeria J. Sci. (JOS) 2013, 3, 244–247. [Google Scholar]
  131. Su, X.; Narayanan, M.; Shi, X.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Ma, Y. Mitigating heavy metal accumulation in tobacco: Strategies, mechanisms, and global initiatives. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 926, 172128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wertz, M.S.; Kyriss, T.; Paranjape, S.; Glantz, S.A. The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Philip Morris’ project mix reconsidered: An analysis of documents released through litigation. PLoS Med. 2011, 8, e1001145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Food and Drug Administration. Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke; Established List; FDA: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  134. Bernhard, D.; Rossmann, A.; Wick, G. Metals in cigarette smoke. IUBMB Life 2005, 57, 805–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Iradukunda, A.; Zhang, D.; Proshad, R.; Mperejekumana, P. A review on cadmium contamination in soil and bioaccumulation by tobacco, its source, toxicity and health risk. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2021, 11, 154–163. [Google Scholar]
  136. Ashraf, M.W. Levels of heavy metals in popular cigarette brands and exposure to these metals via smoking. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 729430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Felix, A.T.; Ntarisa, A.V. Review of toxic metals in tobacco cigarette brands and risk assessment. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2024, 36, 103484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fresquez, M.R.; Pappas, R.S.; Watson, C.H. Establishment of Toxic Metal Reference Range in Tobacco from U.S. Cigarettes. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2013, 37, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2004; Volume 83. [Google Scholar]
  140. Counts, M.E.; Morton, M.J.; Laffoon, S.W.; Cox, R.H.; Lipowicz, P.J. Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 41, 185–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Werfel, U.; Langen, V.; Eickhoff, I.; Schoonbrood, J.; Vahrenholz, C.; Brauksiepe, A.; Popp, W.; Norpoth, K. Elevated DNA single-strand breakage frequencies in lymphocytes of welders exposed to chromium and nickel. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chiba, M.; Masironi, R. Toxic and trace elements in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Bull. World Health Organ. 1992, 70, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  143. Guttuso, T., Jr. High lithium levels in tobacco may account for reduced incidences of both Parkinson’s disease and melanoma in smokers through enhanced β-catenin-mediated activity. Med. Hypotheses 2019, 131, 109302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kubalek, D.; Serša, G.; Štrok, M.; Benedik, L.; Jeran, Z. Radioactivity of cigarettes and the importance of (210)Po and thorium isotopes for radiation dose assessment due to smoking. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 155–156, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Boujelbane, F.; Samaali, M.; Rahali, S.; Dridi, W.; Abdelli, W.; Oueslati, M.; Takriti, S. The activities of 210Po and 210Pb in cigarette smoked in Tunisia. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2020, 59, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Karagueuzian, H.S.; White, C.; Sayre, J.; Norman, A. Cigarette smoke radioactivity and lung cancer risk. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2012, 14, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Laking, G.R. Human Exposure to Radioactivity From Tobacco Smoke: Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2019, 21, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Felix, A.T.; Ntarisa, A.V. Review of natural radioactivity in tobacco cigarette brands. J. Environ. Radioact. 2024, 272, 107348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mansouri, N.; Etebari, M.; Ebrahimi, A.; Ebrahimpour, K.; Rahimi, B.; Hassanzadeh, A. Genotoxicity and phytotoxicity comparison of cigarette butt with cigarette ash. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 40383–40391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Matassa, R.; Cattaruzza, M.S.; Sandorfi, F.; Battaglione, E.; Relucenti, M.; Familiari, G. Direct imaging evidences of metal inorganic contaminants traced into cigarettes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 125092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults—United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011, 60, 2004–2010. [Google Scholar]
  152. Galazyn-Sidorczuk, M.; Brzóska, M.; Moniuszko-Jakoniuk, J. Estimation of Polish cigarettes contamination with cadmium and lead, and exposure to these metals via smoking. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 137, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tyka, A.; Rusin, M. Heavy metals content in various types of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Med. Srod. 2019, 22, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. European Commission. Ambient Air Pollution by AS, CD and NI compounds: Position Paper—Final Verision; LUA NRW; European Commission: Essen, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  155. Lugon-Moulin, N.; Martin, F.; Krauss, M.R.; Ramey, P.B.; Rossi, L. Arsenic Concentration in Tobacco Leaves: A Study on Three Commercially Important Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Types. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008, 192, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Pinto, E.; Cruz, M.; Ramos, P.; Santos, A.; Almeida, A. Metals transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke: Evidences in smokers’ lung tissue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 325, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Suzuki, T.; Shishido, S.; Urushiyama, K. Mercury in cigarettes. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1976, 119, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Adachi, A.; Asai, K.; Koyama, Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Kobayashi, T. Vanadium content of cigarettes. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1998, 61, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Goldfine, A.B.; Simonson, D.C.; Folli, F.; Patti, M.E.; Kahn, C.R. Metabolic effects of sodium metavanadate in humans with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in vivo and in vitro studies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 3311–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Barceloux, D.G. Vanadium. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 265–278, Erratum in: J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Barth, A.; Schaffer, A.W.; Konnaris, C.; Blauensteiner, R.; Winker, R.; Osterode, W.; Rüdiger, H.W. Neurobehavioral effects of vanadium. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2002, 65, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Matt, G.E.; Quintana, P.J.E.; Hoh, E.; Dodder, N.G.; Mahabee-Gittens, M.; Padilla, S.; Markman, L.; Watanabe, K. Tobacco smoke is a likely source of lead and cadmium in settled house dust. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 63, 126656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tang, X.; Dong, W.; Destaillats, H. Inhalation of Trace Metals in Secondhand and Thirdhand Tobacco Smoke Can Result in Increased Health Risks. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2024, 11, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gatzke-Kopp, L.M.; Riis, J.L.; Ahmadi, H.; Piccerillo, H.L.; Granger, D.A.; Blair, C.B.; Thomas, E.A. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure is associated with increased levels of metals in children’s saliva. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 33, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Jung, S.Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, K.; Kim, J.Y.; Bae, W.K.; Lee, K.; Han, J.-S.; Kim, S. Association between secondhand smoke exposure and blood lead and cadmium concentration in community dwelling women: The fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2010–2012). BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Drago, G.; Perrino, C.; Canepari, S.; Ruggieri, S.; L’Abbate, L.; Longo, V.; Colombo, P.; Frasca, D.; Balzan, M.; Cuttitta, G.; et al. Relationship between domestic smoking and metals and rare earth elements concentration in indoor PM2.5. Environ. Res. 2018, 165, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Bohlandt, A.; Schierl, R.; Diemer, J.; Koch, C.; Bolte, G.; Kiranoglu, M.; Fromme, H.; Nowak, D. High concentrations of cadmium, cerium and lanthanum in indoor air due to environmental tobacco smoke. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 414, 738–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Na, J.; Chen, H.; An, H.; Li, N.; Yan, L.; Ye, R.; Li, Z. Association of rare earth elements with passive smoking among housewives in Shanxi Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Halstead, M.M.; Watson, C.H.; Pappas, R.S. Electron Microscopic Analysis of Surface Inorganic Substances on Oral and Combustible Tobacco Products. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2015, 39, 698–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  170. Landsberger, S.; Larson, S.; Wu, D. Determination of air borne cadmium in environmental tobacco smoke by instrumental neutron activation analysis with a Compton suppression system. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1506–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Piade, J.-J.; Jaccard, G.; Dolka, C.; Belushkin, M.; Wajrock, S. Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead. Toxicol. Rep. 2015, 2, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Taebunpakul, S.; Liu, C.; Wright, C.; McAdam, K.; Heroult, J.; Braybrook, J.; Goenaga-Infante, H. Determination of total arsenic and arsenic speciation in tobacco products: From tobacco leaf and cagarette smoke. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2011, 26, 1633–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pappas, R.S.; Stanfill, S.B.; Watson, C.H.; Ashley, D.L. Analysis of toxic metals in commercial moist snuff and Alaskan iqmik. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2008, 32, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Dahlawi, S.; Almulla, A.; Ullah, S.; Salama, K.; Labib, O.; Aljassim, M.; Akhtar, A.; Asghar, W.; Faraj, T.K.; Khalid, N. Assessment of different heavy metals in cigarette filler and ash from multiple brands retailed in Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Pappas, R.S.; Watson, C.H.; Valentin-Blasini, L. Aluminum in Tobacco Products Available in the United States. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2018, 42, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Exley, C.; Begum, A.; Woolley, M.B.; Bloor, R.N. Aluminum in tobacco and cannabis and smoking-related disease. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119, e9–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Lisboa, T.P.; Mimura, A.M.S.; da Silva, J.C.J.; de Sousa, R.A. Chromium Levels in Tobacco, Filter and Ash of Illicit Brands Cigarettes Marketed in Brazil. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2020, 44, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Afridi, H.I.; Talpur, F.N.; Kazi, T.G.; Brabazon, D. Effect of Trace and Toxic Elements of Different Brands of Cigarettes on the Essential Elemental Status of Irish Referent and Diabetic Mellitus Consumers. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 167, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Kazi, T.G.; Jalbani, N.; Arain, M.B.; Jamali, M.K.; Afridi, H.I.; Sarfraz, R.A.; Shah, A.Q. Toxic metals distribution in different components of Pakistani and imported cigarettes by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Suwazono, Y.; Kido, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Nishijo, M.; Honda, R.; Kobayashi, E.; Dochi, M.; Nogawa, K. Biological half-life of cadmium in the urine of inhabitants after cessation of cadmium exposure. Biomarkers 2009, 14, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Rani, A.; Kumar, A.; Lal, A.; Pant, M. Cellular mechanisms of cadmium-induced toxicity: A review. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2014, 24, 378–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Dumkova, J.; Vrlikova, L.; Vecera, Z.; Putnova, B.; Docekal, B.; Mikuska, P.; Fictum, P.; Hampl, A.; Buchtova, M. Inhaled Cadmium Oxide Nanoparticles: Their in Vivo Fate and Effect on Target Organs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Chromium, Nickel and Welding; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  184. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 49. Chromium and Chromium Compounds. In Chromium, Nickel and Welding; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1990.
  185. Hansen, M.B.; Johansen, J.D.; Menne, T. Chromium allergy: Significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermat. 2003, 49, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. International Agency for Research on Cancer Inorganic and Organic Lead Compounds. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 87, 378, 2006. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol87/volume87.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2012).
  187. American Toxic Substances and Diseases Registry Toxicological Profile for Lead. 2007; pp. 21–169. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp13.pdf2007 (accessed on 20 November 2012).
  188. American Toxic Substances and Diseases Registry Toxicological Profile for Manganese, 38–86, 2008. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp151-c3.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2012).
  189. Schaumann, F.; Borm, P.J.A.; Herbrich, A.; Knoch, J.; Pitz, M.; Schins, R.P.F.; Luetti, B.; Hohlfeld, J.M.; Heinrich, J.; Krug, N. Metal-rich ambient particles (Particulate Matter 2.5) cause airway inflammation in healthy subjects. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 170, 898–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kim, J.G.; Dixon, J.B.; Chusuei, C.C.; Deng, Y. Oxidation of chromium (III) to (VI) by manganese oxides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kravchenko, J.; Darrah, T.H.; Miller, R.K.; Lyerly, H.K.; Vengosh, A. A review of the health impacts of barium from natural and anthropogenic exposure. Environ. Geochem. Health 2014, 36, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Grevenstuk, T.; Romano, A. Aluminium speciation and internal detoxification mechanisms in plants: Where do we stand? Metallomics 2013, 5, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Exley, C. The toxicity of aluminium in humans. Morphologie 2016, 100, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Aluminum. 2008; pp. 14–126. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp22.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2018).
  195. Girod, C.E.; King, T.E., Jr. COPD a dust-induced disease? Chest 2005, 128, 3055–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Pappas, R.S.; Halstead, M.M.; Watson, C.H. Electron microscopic analysis of silicate and calcium particles in cigarette smoke tar. Int. J. Respir. Pulm. Med. 2016, 3, 039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Benson, N.U.; Anake, W.U.; Adedapo, A.E.; Fred-Ahmadu, O.H.; Ayejuyo, O.O. Toxic metals in cigarettes and human health risk assessment associated with inhalation exposure. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Pappas, R.S.; Fresquez, M.R.; Martone, N.; Watson, C.H. Toxic metal concentrations in mainstream smoke from cigarettes available in the USA. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2014, 38, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Shaykhiev, R.; Krause, A.; Salit, J.; Strulovici-Barel, Y.; Harvey, B.-G.; O’Connor, T.P.; Crystal, R.G. Smoking-dependent reprogramming of alveolar macrophage polarization: Implication for pathogenesis of COPD. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 2867–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Hadrup, N.; Sørli, J.B.; Jenssen, B.M.; Vogel, U.; Sharma, A.K. Toxicity and biokinetics following pulmonary exposure to aluminium (aluminum): A review. Toxicology 2024, 506, 153874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Rahman, M.; Alatiqi, M.; Al Jarallah, M.; Hussain, M.Y.; Monayem, A.; Panduranga, P.; Rajan, R. Cardiovascular Effects of Smoking and Smoking Cessation: A 2024 Update. Glob Heart. 2025, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Dai, X.; Gil, G.F.; Reitsma, M.B.; Ahmad, N.S.; Anderson, J.A.; Bisignano, C.; Carr, S.; Feldman, R.; Hay, S.I.; He, J.; et al. Health effects associated with smoking: A Burden of Proof study. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2045–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Winnall, W.; Bellew, B.; Hanley-Jones, S.; Greenhalgh, E.M.; Winstanley, M.H. 3.27 Health effects of smoking tobacco in other forms. In Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues; Greenhalgh, E.M., Scollo, M.M., Winstanley, M.H., Eds.; Cancer Council Victoria: Melbourne, Australia, 2023; Available online: https://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-3-health-effects/3-27-health-effects-of-smoking-tobacco-in-other-fo (accessed on 12 March 2025).
  204. Vogelmeier, C.F.; Criner, G.J.; Martinez, F.J.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Bourbeau, J.; Celli, B.R.; Chen, R.; Decramer, M.; Fabbri, L.M.; et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 557–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ferrea, S.; Winterer, G. Neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects of nicotine. Pharmacopsychiatry 2009, 42, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Mayer, B. How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Clinical Practice Guidelines, Nicotine Poisoning. Available online: https://www.rch.org.au/clinicalguide/guideline_index/Nicotine_Poisoning/ (accessed on 31 January 2019).
  208. Howes, S.; Hartmann-Boyce, J.; Livingstone-Banks, J.; Hong, B.; Lindso, N. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 4, CD000031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Choi, D.; Ota, S.; Watanuki, S. Does cigarette smoking relieve stress? Evidence from the event-related potential (ERP). Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2015, 98 Pt 1, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Li, M.D.; Wang, J. Neuroproteomics and its applications in research on nicotine and other drugs of abuse. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2007, 1, 1406–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Bortner, J.D., Jr.; Richie, J.P., Jr.; Das, A.; Liao, J.; Umstead, T.M.; Stanley, A.; Stanley, B.A.; Belani, C.P.; El-Bayoumy, K. Proteomic profiling of human plasma by iTRAQ reveals down-regulation of ITI-HC3 and VDBP by cigarette smoking. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Sinha, I.; Modesto, J.; Krebs, N.M.; Stanley, A.E.; Walter, V.A.; Richie, J.P., Jr.; Muscat, J.E.; Sinha, R. Changes in salivary proteome before and after cigarette smoking in smokers compared to sham smoking in nonsmokers: A pilot study. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2021, 19, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/index.htm (accessed on 31 July 2023).
  214. Eurostat. Tobacco Consumption Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Tobacco_consumption_statistics (accessed on 4 April 2022).
  215. Saiphoklang, N.; Poachanukoon, O.; Soorapan, S. Smoking characteristics and lung functions among university athletes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. NFZ o Zdrowiu Choroby Odtytoniowe. (In Polish)
  217. Zhou, J.F.; Yan, X.F.; Guo, F.Z.; Sun, N.Y.; Qian, Z.J.; Ding, D.Y. Effects of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on plasma constituents and enzyme activities related to oxidative stress. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2000, 13, 44–55. [Google Scholar]
  218. Sohn, H.O.; Lim, H.B.; Lee, Y.G.; Lee, D.W.; Kim, Y.T. Effect of subchronic administration of antioxidants against cigarette smoke exposure in rats. Arch. Toxicol. 1993, 67, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Lapenna, D.; Mezzetti, A.; de Gioia, S.; Pierdomenico, S.D.; Daniele, F.; Cuccurullo, F. Plasma copper and lipid peroxidation in cigarette smokers. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 849–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Faruque, M.O.; Khan, M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Ahmed, F. Relationship between smoking and antioxidant nutrient status. Br. J. Nutr. 1995, 73, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Ntarisa, A.V. Heavy metals concentration and human health risk assessment in tobacco cigarette products from Tanzania. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2024, 52, 100428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Rzymski, P.; Niedzielski, P.; Poniedziałek, B.; Tomczyk, K.; Rzymski, P. Identification of toxic metals in human embryonic tissues. Arch. Med. Sci. 2018, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Stojanović, D.; Nikić, D.; Lazarević, K. The level of nickel in smoker’s blood and urine. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2004, 12, 187–189. [Google Scholar]
  224. Richter, P.A.; Bishop, E.E.; Wang, J.; Swahn, M.H. Tobacco smoke exposure and levels of urinary metals in the U.S. youth and adult population: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1930–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Banafshe, H.R.; Ghaderi, A. Thallium Intoxication in Relation to Drug Abuse and Cigarette Smoking in Iran. Int. J. Med. Toxicol. Forensic Med. 2018, 8, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Marano, K.M.; Naufal, Z.S.; Kathman, S.J.; Bodnar, J.A.; Borgerding, M.F.; Garner, C.D.; Wilson, C.L. Cadmium exposure and tobacco consumption: Biomarkers and risk assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 64, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Serdar, M.A.; Akin, B.S.; Razi, C.; Akin, O.; Tokgoz, S.; Kenar, L.; Aykut, O. The correlation between smoking status of family members and concentrations of toxic trace elements in the hair of children. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 148, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Dorne, J.L.; Kass, G.E.; Bordajandi, L.R.; Amzal, B.; Bertelsen, U.; Castoldi, A.F.; Heppner, C.; Eskola, M.; Fabiansson, S.; Ferrari, P.; et al. Human risk assessment of heavy metals: Principles and applications. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2011, 8, 27–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  229. Friberg, L. Health hazards in the manufacture of alkaline accumulators with special reference to chronic cadmium poisoning; a clinical and experimental study. Acta Medica Scand. Suppl. 1950, 240, 1–124. [Google Scholar]
  230. Friberg, L. Injuries following continued administration of cadmium. preliminary report of a clinical and experimental study. Arch. Indust. Hyg. Occup. Med. 1950, 1, 458–466. [Google Scholar]
  231. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Cadmium; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012.
  232. NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics) National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. 2010. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm (accessed on 14 January 2011).
  233. Yang, Y.; Hassan, M.F.; Ali, W.; Zou, H.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y. Effects of Cadmium Pollution on Human Health: A Narrative Review. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. World Health Organization (WHO). Exposure to Cadmium: A Major Public Health Concern; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  235. Satarug, S.; Moore, M.R. Adverse health effects of chronic exposure to low-level cadmium in foodstuffs and cigarette smoke. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Nair, A.R.; Degheselle, O.; Smeets, K.; Van Kerkhove, E.; Cuypers, A. Cadmium-induced pathologies: Where is the oxidative balance lost (or not)? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6116–6143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Barregard, L.; Fabricius-Lagging, E.; Lundh, T.; Mölne, J.; Wallin, M.; Olausson, M.; Modigh, C.; Sallsten, G. Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of living kidney donors: Impact of different exposure sources. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Ganguly, K.; Levänen, B.; Palmberg, L.; Åkesson, A.; Lindén, A. Cadmium in tobacco smokers: A neglected link to lung disease? Eur. Respir. Rev. 2018, 27, 170122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Mannino, D.M.; Holguin, F.; Greves, H.M.; Savage-Brown, A.; Stock, A.L.; Jones, R.L. Urinary cadmium levels predict lower lung function in current and former smokers: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Thorax 2004, 59, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Rokadia, H.K.; Agarwal, S. Serum heavy metals and obstructive lung disease: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Chest 2013, 143, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Hassan, F.; Xu, X.; Nuovo, G.; Killilea, D.W.; Tyrrell, J.; Da Tan, C.; Tarran, R.; Diaz, P.; Jee, J.; Knoell, D.; et al. Accumulation of metals in GOLD4 COPD lungs is associated with decreased CFTR levels. Respir. Res. 2014, 15, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Sundblad, B.M.; Ji, J.; Levänen, B.; Midander, K.; Julander, A.; Larsson, K.; Palmberg, L.; Lindén, A. Extracellular cadmium in the bronchoalveolar space of long-term tobacco smokers with and without COPD and its association with inflammation. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2016, 11, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Nawrot, T.S.; Martens, D.S.; Hara, A.; Plusquin, M.; Vangronsveld, J.; Roels, H.A.; Staessen, J.A. Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium: The meta-analytical evidence. Cancer Causes Control 2015, 26, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Flieger, W.; Niedzielski, P.; Wojciechowska, Z.; Proch, A.; Proch, J.; Forma, A.; Torbicz, A.; Majerek, D.; Teresiński, G.; Baj, J.; et al. Evidence of Organ-Specific Metal Accumulation: ICP-MS Elemental Analysis of Autopsy Tissues of Tobacco Smokers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Ndokiari, B.; Holly, B.; Tamuno-Boma, O.; Julie, C. Inhalation Bioaccessibility of Potentially Toxic Metals in Tobacco Snuff and Related Exposure Risks. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 12, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Petit, A.; Knabe, L.; Khelloufi, K.; Jory, M.; Gras, D.; Cabon, Y.; Begg, M.; Richard, S.; Massiera, G.; Chanez, P.; et al. Bronchial Epithelial Calcium Metabolism Impairment in Smokers and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Decreased ORAI3 Signaling. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 61, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Sjåheim, T.; Halstensen, T.S.; Lund, M.B.; Bjørtuft, Ø.; Drablø, P.A.; Malterud, D.; Kongerud, J. Airway inflammation in aluminium potroom asthma. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004, 61, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Ghio, A.J.; Pavlisko, E.N.; Roggli, V.L.; Todd, N.W.; Sangani, R.G. Cigarette Smoke Particle-Induced Lung Injury and Iron Homeostasis. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2022, 17, 117–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Lugg, S.T.; Scott, A.; Parekh, D.; Naidu, B.; Thickett, D.R. Cigarette smoke exposure and alveolar macrophages: Mechanisms for lung disease. Thorax 2022, 77, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Pääkkö, P.; Kokkonen, P.; Anttila, S.; Kalliomäki, P.L. Cadmium and chromium as markers of smoking in human lung tissue. Environ. Res. 1989, 49, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Torén, K.; Olin, A.C.; Johnsson, Å.; Vikgren, J.; Forsgard, N.; Bergström, G.; Sallsten, G.; Barregård, L. The association between cadmium exposure and chronic airflow limitation and emphysema: The Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study (SCAPIS pilot). Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 1900960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Richter, P.; Faroon, O.; Pappas, R.S. Cadmium and Cadmium/Zinc Ratios and Tobacco-Related Morbidities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Davidova, S.; Milushev, V.; Satchanska, G. The Mechanisms of Cadmium Toxicity in Living Organisms. Toxics 2024, 12, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Jackson, J.S.; Rout, P. Aluminum Toxicity. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK609094/ (accessed on 13 March 2025).
  255. Verma, P.; Sharma, A.K.; Shankar, H.; Sharma, A.; Rao, D.N. Role of Trace Elements, Oxidative Stress and Immune System: A Triad in Premature Ovarian Failure. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 184, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Rayman, M.P. Selenium and human health. Lancet 2012, 379, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Köhrle, J.; Jakob, F.; Contempré, B.; Dumont, J.E. Selenium, the thyroid, and the endocrine system. Endocr. Rev. 2005, 26, 944–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Hawkes, W.C.; Turek, P.J. Effects of dietary selenium on sperm motility in healthy men. J. Androl. 2001, 22, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Scheiber, I.F.; Dringen, R. Astrocyte functions in the copper homeostasis of the brain. Neurochem. Int. 2013, 62, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Scheiber, I.F.; Mercer, J.F.; Dringen, R. Metabolism and functions of copper in brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 116, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Uriu-Adams, J.Y.; Keen, C.L. Copper, oxidative stress, and human health. Mol. Asp. Med. 2005, 26, 268–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Fang, X.; Wang, K.; Han, D.; He, X.; Wei, J.; Zhao, L.; Imam, M.U.; Ping, Z.; Li, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Med. 2016, 14, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Jurowski, K.; Szewczyk, B.; Nowak, G.; Piekoszewski, W. Biological consequences of zinc deficiency in the pathomechanisms of selected diseases. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 19, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Mocchegiani, E.; Giacconi, R.; Muzzioli, M.; Cipriano, C. Zinc, infections and immunosenescence. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2000, 121, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Rayman, M.P. Selenium intake, status, and health: A complex relationship. Hormones 2020, 19, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Arora, M.; Mahat, R.K.; Kumar, S.; Mustafa, I.; Sah, S.P. Study of Trace Elements in Patients of Hypothyroidism with Special Reference to Zinc and Copper. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2018, 6, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Del Gobbo, L.C.; Hruby, A.; Dai, Q.; Song, Y. Serum magnesium concentrations and all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among U.S. adults: Results from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 37, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Kim, D.J.; Xun, P.; Liu, K.; Loria, C.; Yokota, K.; Jacobs, D.R.; He, K. Magnesium intake in relation to systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, and the incidence of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 2604–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. El-Fakahany, E.; Richelson, E. Effects of lanthanides on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor function. Mol. Pharmacol. 1981, 19, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Chantler, P.D. Lanthanides do not function as calcium analogues in scallop myosin. J. Bio. Chem. 1983, 258, 4702–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Wang, K.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, R. Cell responses to lanthanides and potential pharmacological actions of lanthanides. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 2003, 40, 707–751. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  272. Morrow, J.R.; Tóth, É. Next-generation magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6029–6034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Boros, E.; Gale, E.M.; Caravan, P. MR imaging probes: Design and applications. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 4804–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Chen, B.; Sun, L.; Zeng, G.; Shen, Z.; Wang, K.; Yin, L.; Xu, F.; Wang, P.; Ding, Y.; Nie, Q.; et al. Gut bacteria alleviate smoking-related NASH by degrading gut nicotine. Nature 2022, 610, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Marti-Aguado, D.; Clemente-Sanchez, A.; Bataller, R. Cigarette smoking and liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 2022, 77, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Assi, M.A.; Hezmee, M.N.M.; Abd Wahid Haron, M.Y.M.; Sabri, M.A.R. The detrimental effects of lead on human and animal health. Vet. World 2016, 9, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Ilesanmi, O.B.; Adeogun, E.F.; Odewale, T.T.; Chikere, B. Lead exposure-induced changes in hematology and biomarkers of hepatic injury: Protective role of TrévoTM supplement. Environ. Anal. Health Toxicol. 2022, 37, e2022007-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Mudipalli, A. Lead hepatotoxicity & potential health effects. Indian J. Med. Res. 2007, 126, 518. [Google Scholar]
  279. Flora, S.J.; Flora, G.; Saxena, G. Environmental occurrence, health effects and management of lead poisoning. In Lead Chemistry, Analytical Aspects; Cascas, S.B., Sordo, J., Eds.; Environmental Impacts and Health Effects; Elsevier Publication: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 158–228. [Google Scholar]
  280. Favari, L.; Mourelle, M. Thallium replaces potassium in activation of the (Na+,K+)-ATPase of rat liver plasma membranes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1985, 5, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Schöpfer, J.; Drasch, G.; Schrauzer, G.N. Selenium and Cadmium Levels and Ratios in Prostates, Livers, and Kidneys of Nonsmokers and Smokers. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2010, 134, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Drasch, G.; Schöpfer, J.; Schrauzer, G.N. Selenium/cadmium ratios in human prostates: Indicators of prostate cancer risk of smokers and nonsmokers, and relevance to the cancer protective effects of selenium. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2005, 103, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Chen, Z.; Shi, K.; Kuang, W.; Huang, L. Exploration of the optimal strategy for dietary calcium intervention against the toxicity of liver and kidney induced by cadmium in mice: An in vivo diet intervention study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Enli, Y.; Turgut, S.; Oztekin, O.; Demir, S.; Enli, H.; Turgut, G. Cadmium intoxication of pregnant rats and fetuses: Interactions of copper supplementation. Arch. Med. Res. 2010, 41, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Wallin, C.; Sholts, S.B.; Österlund, N.; Luo, J.; Jarvet, J.; Roos, P.M.; Ilag, L.; Gräslund, A.; Wärmländer, S.K.T.S. Alzheimer’s disease and cigarette smoke components: Effects of nicotine, PAHs, and Cd(II), Cr(III), Pb(II), Pb(IV) ions on amyloid-β peptide aggregation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Taiwo, O.A. Diffuse parenchymal diseases associated with aluminium use and primary aluminum production. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 55 (Suppl. S5), S71–S72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Re, D.B.; Hilpert, M.; Saglimbeni, B.; Strait, M.; Ilievski, V.; Coady, M.; Talayero, M.; Wilmsen, K.; Chesnais, H.; Balac, O.; et al. Exposure to e-cigarette aerosol over two months induces accumulation of neurotoxic metals and alteration of essential metals in mouse brain. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Hoffmann, K.; Becker, K.; Friedrich, C.; Helm, D.; Krause, C.; Seifert, B. The German Environmental Survery 1990/1992 (GerESII): Cadmium in blood, urine, and hair of adults and children. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2000, 10, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Jeong, J.; Yun, S.-m.; Kim, M.; Koh, Y.H. Association of Blood Cadmium with Cardiovascular Disease in Korea: From the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013 and 2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Mortensen, M.E.; Wong, L.Y.; Osterloh, J.D. Smoking status and urine cadmium above levels associated with subclinical renal effects in U.S. adults without chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2011, 214, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Adams, V.A.; Newcomb, P.A. Cadmium blood and urine concentrations as measures of exposure: NHANES 1999–2010. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2014, 24, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals (2009 Report Updated February 2015). Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/ (accessed on 29 August 2017).
  293. Townsend, A.T.; Miller, K.A.; Mclean, S.; Aldous, S. The determination of copper, zinc, cadmium and lead in urine by high resolution ICP-MS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Everett, C.J.; Frithsen, I.L. Association of urinary cadmium and myocardial infarction. Environ. Res. 2008, 106, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Lin, Y.-S.; Caffrey, J.L.; Chang, M.-H.; Dowling, N.; Lin, J.-W. Cigarette smoking, cadmium exposure, and zinc intake on obstructive lung disorder. Respir. Res. 2010, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Wróblewski, K.; Wojnicka, J.; Tutka, P.; Szmagara, A.; Błażewicz, A. Measurements of cadmium levels in relation to tobacco dependence and as a function of cytisine administration. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. American Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Cadmium; American Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012; pp. 12–105. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp5.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2017).
  298. Paschal, D.C.; Burt, V.; Caudill, S.P.; Gunter, E.W.; Pirkle, J.L.; Sampson, E.J.; Miller, D.T.; Jackson, R.J. Exposure of the U.S. population aged 6 years and older to cadmium: 1988–1994. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Rayyan, W.A. The Impact of Chronic Smoking on Blood and Hair Cadmium Levels among Saudi Citizens in Hail. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci. 2016, 4, 375–382. Available online: https://www.saspublishers.com/media/articles/SJAMS_42B_375-382.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2022).
  300. Fang, Y.W.; Chen, C.W.; Su, T.C.; Wang, C.; Lin, C.Y. Investigating the associations of blood lead and cadmium with smoking-related DNA methylation and mortality among U.S. adults. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 299, 118360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Torres-Sánchez, L.; Vázquez-Salas, R.A.; Vite, A.; Galván-Portillo, M.; Cebrián, M.E.; Macias-Jiménez, A.P.; Ríos, C.; Montes, S. Blood cadmium determinants among males over forty living in Mexico City. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637–638, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Mérida-Ortega, Á.; López-Carrillo, L.; Rangel-Moreno, K.; Ramirez, N.; Rothenberg, S.J. Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Urinary Cadmium in Women from Northern Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Anetor, J.I.; Ajose, F.; Anetor, G.O.; Iyanda, A.A.; Babalola, O.O.; Adeniyi, F.A. High cadmium/zinc ratio in cigarette smokers: Potential implications as a biomarker of risk of prostate cancer. Niger. J. Physiol. Sci. 2008, 23, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Fresquez, M.R.; Pappas, R.S.; Watson, C.H. Determination of Differences in Cadmium, Mercury, Copper, Lead and Zinc Transport in Cigarette Smoke Using Electrothermal Vaporization-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. In Proceedings of the Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Amelia Island, FL, USA, 6–11 January 2014. [Google Scholar]
  305. Kim, K.; Melough, M.M.; Vance, T.M.; Kim, D.; Noh, H.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K. The relationship between zinc intake and cadmium burden is influenced by smoking status. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 125, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Galan, P.; Viteri, F.E.; Bertrais, S.; Czernichow, S.; Faure, H.; Arnaud, J.; Ruffieux, D.; Chenal, S.; Arnault, N.; Favier, A.; et al. Serum concentrations of beta-carotene, vitamins C and E, zinc and selenium are influenced by sex, age, diet, smoking status, alcohol consumption and corpulence in a general French adult population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 59, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Buxaderas, S.C.; Farré-Rovira, R. Whole blood and serum zinc levels in relation to sex and age. Rev. Esp. Fisiol. 1985, 41, 463–470. [Google Scholar]
  308. Costello, L.C.; Franklin, R.B.; Feng, P.; Tan, M.; Bagasra, O. Zinc and prostate cancer: A critical scientific, medical, and public interest issue (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16, 901–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Uz, E.; Sahin, S.; Hepsen, I.F.; Var, A.; Sogut, S.; Akyol, O. The relationship between serum trace element changes and visual function in heavy smokers. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2003, 81, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Afridi, H.I.; Kazi, T.G.; Kazi, N.G.; Jamali, M.K.; Arain, M.B.; Sirajuddin Baig, J.A.; Kandhro, G.A.; Wadhwa, S.K.; Shah, A.Q. Evaluation of cadmium, lead, nickel and zinc status in biological samples of smokers and nonsmokers hypertensive patients. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2010, 24, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Northrop-Clewes, C.A.; Thurnham, D.I. Monitoring micronutrients in cigarette smokers. Clin. Chim. Acta 2007, 377, 14–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Kulikowska-Karpińska, E.; Zdanowicz, M.; Gałażyn-Sidorczuk, M. Estimation of copper in the urine of cigarette smokers. Wiad. Lek. 2017, 70, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  313. Jasińska-Starczewska, M.; Szydłowska, I.; Mroczek, B.; Laszczyńska, M.; Chlubek, D.; Kemicer-Chmielewska, E.; Chełstowski, K.; Karakiewicz, B.; Ciećwież, S.; Starczewski, A. The Influence of Cigarette Smoke Exposure on the Copper Concentration in the Serum Depending on the Use of Menopausal Hormone Therapy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 5732380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Choi, K.H.; Park, M.S.; Kim, J.A.; Lim, J.A. Associations Between Excessive Sodium Intake and Smoking and Alcohol Intake Among Korean Men: KNHANES V. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 15540–15549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Bushra, J.; Summiaya, K.; Hafsa, A.; Mubashir, R.; Eeman, S.; Sohaib, I.; Sameer, A. Smoking and human body electrolyte levels? Evaluating with automated CH analyzer. Pak. J. Med. Cardiol. Rev. 2025, 4, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Eliasson, M.; Hägg, E.; Lundblad, D.; Karlsson, R.; Bucht, E. Influence of smokingand snuff use on electrolytes, adrenal and calcium regulating hormones. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1993, 128, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Nwaji, A.R.; Inwang, U.; Nwoke, F.A.; Ante, I. Changes in serumelectrolytes, ureaand creatinine in nicotiana tabacum-treated rats. Niger. J. Physiol. Sci. 2022, 37, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Overwyk, K.J.; Pfeiffer, C.M.; Storandt, R.J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Campbell, N.R.; Wiltz, J.L.; Merritt, R.K.; Cogswell, M.E. Serum sodium and potassiumdistributionandcharacteristics in the US population, national health and nutritionexamination survey 2009–2016. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2021, 6, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Wu, W.; Xia, C.; Gan, L.; Liao, S.; Yan, Y. Etomidate-induced hypokalemiainelectronic cigarette users: Two case reports and literature review. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1321610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Das, S.; Saha, S.N. A study of serum sodium and potassiumlevels in subjectsof acute myocardial infarction in a tertiary care hospital in EasternIndia. Int. J. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 11, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Lin, Z.; Wong, L.Y.; Cheung, B.M. Diuretic-induced hypokalaemia: An updatedreview. Postgrad. Med. J. 2022, 98, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Fan, P.; Lu, Y.T.; Yang, K.Q.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.Y.; Tian, T.; Luo, F.; Wang, L.P.; Ma, W.J.; Liu, Y.X.; et al. Apparent mineralocorticoid excess caused by novel compound heterozygous mutations in HSD11B2 and characterized by early-onset hypertension and hypokalemia. Endocrine 2020, 70, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Enderle, J.; Klink, U.; di Giuseppe, R.; Koch, M.; Seidel, U.; Weber, K.; Birringer, M.; Ratjen, I.; Rimbach, G.; Lieb, W. Plasma lithium levels in the general population: A cross-sectional analysis of metabolic and dietary correlates. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Rose, K.N.; Schwarzschild, M.A.; Gomperts, S.N. Clearing the Smoke: What Protects Smokers from Parkinson’s Disease? Mov. Disord. 2024, 39, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Parzynski, C.S.; Jaszyna-Gasior, M.; Franken, F.H.; Moolchan, E.T. Measuring nicotine intake among highly-dependent adolescent smokers: Comparability of saliva and plasma cotinine concentrations. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 2008, 89, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  326. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kho, H.S. Effects of smoking on trace metal levels in saliva. Oral Dis. 2010, 16, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Muchacka, R.; Kapusta, E.; Greń, A.; Formicki, G.; Kopańska, M.; Kraska, K.; Skomoruch, I.; Sosnówka-Czajka, E. Accumulation of metals in hair and nails of women smoking cigarettes. J. Microb. Biotech. Food Sci. 2013, 2, 22. [Google Scholar]
  328. Afridi, H.I.; Talpur, F.N.; Kazi, T.G.; Brabazon, D. Assessment of toxic elements in the samples of different cigarettes and their effect on the essential elemental status in the biological samples of Irish hypertensive consumers. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2015, 29, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Afridi, H.I.; Talpur, F.N.; Kazi, T.G.; Brabazon, D. Estimation of Aluminum, Arsenic, Lead and Nickel Status in the Samples of Different Cigarettes and their Effect on Human Health of Irish Smoker Hypertensive Consumers. Clin. Lab. 2015, 61, 1147–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Afridi, H.I.; Talpur, F.N.; Kazi, T.G.; Brabazon, D. Estimation of toxic elements in the samples of different cigarettes and their effect on the essential elemental status in the biological samples of Irish smoker rheumatoid arthritis consumers. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Skalny, A.V.; Serebryansky, E.P.; Korobeinikova, T.V.; Tsatsakis, A.; Vardavas, C.; Paoliello, M.M.B.; Sotnikova, T.I.; Aschner, M.; Tinkov, A.A. Smoking is associated with altered serum and hair essential metal and metalloid levels in women. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 167, 113249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Alrobaian, M.; Arida, H. Assessment of Heavy and Toxic Metals in the Blood and Hair of Saudi Arabia Smokers Using Modern Analytical Techniques. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 2019, 7125210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Hong, D.; Cho, S.H.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, S.B. Hair mercury level in smokers and its influence on blood pressure and lipid metabolism. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 36, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Pang, Y.; Huo, W.; Li, N.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ye, R.; Wang, B. Association Between Chronic Exposure to Tobacco Smoke and Accumulation of Toxic Metals in Hair Among Pregnant Women. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 185, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Samejo, S.; Kazi, A.G.; Afridi, H.I.; Kazi, T.G. Evaluate the effect of cadmium on levels of zinc in scalp hair and blood samples of smoker and nonsmoker psoriatic patients at different stage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 31763–31769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Szynkowska, M.I.; Marcinek, M.; Pawlaczyk, A.; Albińska, J. Human hair analysis in relation to similar environmental and occupational exposure. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 40, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Bah, H.A.F.; Martinez, V.O.; Dos Santos, N.R.; Gomes Junior, E.A.; Costa, D.O.; Pires, E.M.; Santana, J.V.A.; Cerqueira, F.D.S.; Menezes-Filho, J.A. Determinants of Exposure to Potentially Toxic Metals in Pregnant Women of the DSAN-12M Cohort in the Recôncavo Baiano, Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. He, M.J.; Li, Q.; Wang, D.X.; Zhao, J.Y.; Yang, T. Bioaccumulation and Correlation of Heavy Metals in Human Hairs From Urban and Rural Areas of Chongqing. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2017, 38, 1697–1703. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Chanihoon, G.Q.; Afridi, H.I.; Unar, A.; Talpur, F.N.; Kalochi, H.B.; Nassani, R.; Laghari, N.; Uddin, N.; Ghulam, A.; Chandio, A.U.R. Selenium and mercury concentrations in biological samples from patients with COVID-19. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2022, 73, 127038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Li, L.; Guo, L.; Chen, X.; Xiang, M.; Yang, F.; Ren, J.C.; Zhang, G.H. Secondhand smoke is associated with heavy metal concentrations in children. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2018, 177, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Noreen, F.; Sajjad, A.; Mahmood, K.; Anwar, M.; Zahra, M.; Waseem, A. Human Biomonitoring of Trace Elements in Scalp Hair from Healthy Population of Pakistan. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 196, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Ali, F.; Kazi, T.G.; Afridi, H.I.; Baig, J.A. Exposure of cadmium via smoking and drinking water on zinc levels of biological samples of malnutrition pregnant women: A prospective cohort study. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 63, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Cabar, H.D.; Ersoy Karaçuha, M.; Yilmaz, M. The Interaction Between Concentration of Heavy Metal-Trace Elements and Non-Smoking Status of Adolescents in Sinop (Turkey). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 194, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Yaprak, E.; Yolcubal, I.; Sinanoğlu, A.; Doğrul-Demiray, A.; Guzeldemir-Akcakanat, E.; Marakoğlu, I. High levels of heavy metal accumulation in dental calculus of smokers: A pilot inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry study. J. Periodontal. Res. 2017, 52, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Sandal, S.; Verghese, P.S.; Taneja, A.; Massey, D.D.; Habil, M. Cigarettes as a source of heavy metal toxicity: Evaluating human health risks. Discov. Public Health 2025, 22, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Forcella, M.; Lau, P.; Fabbri, M.; Fusi, P.; Oldani, M.; Melchioretto, P.; Gribaldo, L.; Urani, C. Is Cadmium Toxicity Tissue-Specific? Toxicogenomics Studies Reveal Common and Specific Pathways in Pulmonary, Hepatic, and Neuronal Cell Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Charkiewicz, A.E.; Omeljaniuk, W.J.; Nowak, K.; Garley, M.; Nikliński, J. Cadmium Toxicity and Health Effects—A Brief Summary. Molecules 2023, 28, 6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Bridges, C.C.; Zalups, R.K. Molecular and ionic mimicry and the transport of toxic metals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 204, 274–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Thévenod, F.; Fels, J.; Lee, W.K.; Zarbock, R. Channels, transporters and receptors for cadmium and cadmium complexes in eukaryotic cells: Myths and facts. Biometals 2019, 32, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Mol. Clin. Environ. Toxicol. 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Wang, H.; Zhao, L.; Liu, H.; Luo, S.; Akinyemiju, T.; Hwang, S.; Wei, Q. Variants in SNAI1, AMDHD1 and CUBN in Vitamin D Pathway Genes Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk: A Large-Scale Analysis of 14 GWASs in the DRIVE Study. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020, 10, 2160–2173. [Google Scholar]
  352. Jiang, X.; Kiel, D.P.; Kraft, P. The genetics of vitamin D. Bone 2019, 126, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Goto, Y.; Shinjo, K.; Kondo, Y.; Shen, L.; Toyota, M.; Suzuki, H.; Gao, W.; An, B.; Fujii, M.; Murakami, H.; et al. Epigenetic Profiles Distinguish Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma from Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 9073–9082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Shen, Q.; Polom, K.; Williams, C.; de Oliveira, F.M.S.; Guergova-Kuras, M.; Lisacek, F.; Karlsson, N.G.; Roviello, F.; Kamali-Moghaddam, M. A Targeted Proteomics Approach Reveals a Serum Protein Signature as Diagnostic Biomarker for Resectable Gastric Cancer. eBioMedicine 2019, 44, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Gao, C.; Zhan, J.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; Zhou, C.; Liu, L.; Sun, C. Exploration of methylation-driven genes for monitoring and prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. Int. 2018, 18, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Qiu, H.; Zhan, R.; Han, Y.; Liu, X.; Qiu, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, L.; Tan, R.; et al. Rab26 suppresses migration and invasion of breast cancer cells through mediating autophagic degradation of phosphorylated Src. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  357. Chen, Q.Y.; DesMarais, T.; Costa, M. Metals and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 59, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Sasaki, T.; Horiguchi, H.; Matsukawa, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Omori, Y.; Oguma, E.; Komatsuda, A. A suspected case of “itai-itai disease” in a cadmium-polluted area in Akita prefecture, Japan. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2024, 29, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Smereczański, N.M.; Brzóska, M.M. Current Levels of Environmental Exposure to Cadmium in Industrialized Countries as a Risk Factor for Kidney Damage in the General Population: A Comprehensive Review of Available Data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Zając-Nędza, M.; Langauer-Lewowicka, H.; Kadm (Eds.) Mark Kazimierz, Choroby Zawodowe; Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL: Warszawa, Poland, 2001; pp. 195–199. [Google Scholar]
  361. Järup, L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar]
  362. Lech, T.; Sadlik, J.K. Cadmium concentration in human autopsy tissues. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 179, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Fu, Y.C.; Xu, Z.L.; Zhao, M.Y.; Xu, K. The Association Between Smoking and Renal Function in People Over 20 Years Old. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 870278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Ajmani, G.S.; Suh, H.H.; Wroblewski, K.E.; Pinto, J.M. Smoking and olfactory dysfunction: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2017, 127, 1753–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Brown, K.F.; Rumgay, H.; Dunlop, C.; Ryan, M.; Quartly, F.; Cox, A.; Deas, A.; Elliss-Brookes, L.; Gavin, A.; Hounsome, L.; et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015. Br. J. Cancer. 2018, 118, 1130–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Cancer Research UK (2025), Lung Cancer Statistics, Cancer Research UK. Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/lung-cancer (accessed on 13 January 2025).
  367. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2012; (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 100E.); Tobacco Smoking. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304395/ (accessed on 13 March 2025).
  368. Ruczaj, A.; Brzóska, M.M. Environmental exposure of the general population to cadmium as a risk factor of the damage to the nervous system: A critical review of current data. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2023, 43, 66–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Wang, B.; Du, Y. Cadmium and its neurotoxic effects. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2013, 2013, 898034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  370. Syeda, T.; Cannon, J.R. Environmental exposures and the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: The potential role of BACE1 as a critical neurotoxic target. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2021, 35, e22694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Meysami, S.; Garg, S.; Hashemi, S.; Akbari, N.; Gouda, A.; Chodakiewitz, Y.G.; Nguyen, T.D.; Attariwala, R.; Niotis, K.; Merrill, D.A.; et al. Smoking predicts brain atrophy in 10,134 healthy individuals and is potentially influenced by body mass index. NPJ Dement. 2025, 1, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Fagerberg, B.; Barregard, L.; Sallsten, G.; Forsgard, N.; Ostling, G.; Persson, M.; Borné, Y.; Engström, G.; Hedblad, B. Cadmium exposureand atherosclerotic carotid plaques-results from the Malmodiet and Cancer study. Environ. Res. 2015, 136, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Charkiewicz, A.E.; Garley, M.; Ratajczak-Wrona, W.; Jabłońska, E.; Miltyk, W.; Motyka, J.; Omeljaniuk, W.J. The diagnostic potential of novel biomarkers of hypertension in men. Arch. Med. Sci. 2022, 18, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Li, H.; Fagerberg, B.; Sallsten, G.; Borné, Y.; Hedblad, B.; Engström, G.; Barregard, L.; Andersson, E.M. Smoking-induced risk of future cardiovascular disease is partly mediated by cadmium in tobacco: Malmö Diet and Cancer Cohort Study. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Genchi, G.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Lauria, G.; Carocci, A.; Catalano, A. The Effects of Cadmium Toxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Omeljaniuk, W.J.; Socha, K.; Soroczynska, J.; Charkiewicz, A.E.; Laudanski, T.; Kulikowski, M.; Kobylec, E.; Borawska, M.H. Cadmium and Lead in Women Who Miscarried. Clin. Lab. 2018, 64, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Kippler, M.; Ekström, E.C.; Lönnerdal, B.; Goessler, W.; Akesson, A.; El Arifeen, S.; Persson, L.A.; Vahter, M. Influence of iron and zinc status on cadmium accumulation in Bangladeshi women. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 222, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Czeczot, H.; Majewska, M. Cadmium–exposure and its effects on health. Toksykologia 2010, 66, 243–250. [Google Scholar]
  379. Mishra, A.; Khan, S.A.; Jadhav, K.; Mehrotra, N. Inhaling Risk: Smoking Impact on Male and Female Reproductive Health. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia 2025, 22, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Jurdziak, M.; Matys, T.; Gać, P.; Mazur, G.; Poręba, R. Molecular basis of lead toxicity. Environ. Med. 2018, 21, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Flora, G.; Gupta, D.; Tiwari, A. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2012, 5, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Patrick, L. Lead toxicity, a review of the literature. Part 1: Exposure, evaluation, and treatment. Altern. Med. Rev. 2006, 11, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  383. Gonzalez-Villalva, A.; Marcela, R.L.; Nelly, L.V.; Patricia, B.N.; Guadalupe, M.R.; Brenda, C.T.; Maria Eugenia, C.V.; Martha, U.C.; Isabel, G.P.; Fortoul, T.I. Lead systemic toxicity: A persistent problem for health. Toxicology 2025, 515, 154163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Xu, J.; Lian, L.J.; Wu, C.; Wang, X.F.; Fu, W.Y.; Xu, L.H. Lead induces oxidative stress, DNA damage and alteration of p53, Bax and Bcl-2 expressions in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 1488–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  385. Ahamed, M.; Verma, S.; Kumar, A.; Siddiqui, M.K. Environmental exposure to lead and its correlation with biochemical indices in children. Sci. Total. Environ. 2005, 346, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Virgolini, M.B.; Aschner, M. Molecular Mechanisms of Lead Neurotoxicity. In Advances in Neurotoxicology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 5, pp. 159–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Han, Q.; Zhang, W.; Guo, J.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, H.; Xia, Y.; Zhu, G. Mitochondrion: A sensitive target for Pb exposure. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2021, 46, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y. Molecular Mechanism of Lead-Induced Superoxide Dismutase Inactivation in Zebrafish Livers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 14820–14826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Lidsky, T.I.; Schneider, J.S. Lead neurotoxicity in children: Basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Brain 2003, 126 Pt 1, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Collin, M.S.; Venkatraman, S.K.; Vijayakumar, N.; Kanimozhi, V.; Arbaaz, S.M.; Sibiya Stacey, R.G.; Anusha, J.; Choudhary, R.; Lvov, V.; Tovar, G.I.; et al. Bioaccumulation of lead (Pb) and its effects on human: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Parithathvi, A.; Choudhari, N.; Dsouza, H.S. Prenatal and early life lead exposure induced neurotoxicity. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2024, 43, 09603271241285523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  392. Fracasso, M.E.; Perbellini, L.; Soldà, S.; Talamini, G.; Franceschetti, P. Lead induced DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes of exposed workers: Role of reactive oxygen species and protein kinase C. Mutat. Res. 2002, 515, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Kasten-Jolly, J.; Heo, Y.; Lawrence, D.A. Central nervous system cytokine gene expression: Modulation by lead. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2011, 25, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  394. Li, L.; Davie, J.R. The role of Sp1 and Sp3 in normal and cancer cell biology. Ann. Anat. 2010, 192, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Reddy, G.R.; Zawia, N.H. Lead exposure alters Egr-1 DNA-binding in the neonatal rat brain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2000, 18, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Paithankar, J.G.; Saini, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Sharma, A.; Chowdhuri, D.K. Heavy metal associated health hazards: An interplay of oxidative stress and signal transduction. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Koyama, H.; Kamogashira, T.; Yamasoba, T. Heavy Metal Exposure: Molecular Pathways, Clinical Implications, and Protective Strategies. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  398. García-Lestón, J.; Méndez, J.; Pásaro, E.; Laffon, B. Genotoxic effects of lead: An updated review. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  399. Zhang, H.; Wei, K.; Zhang, M.; Liu, R.; Chen, Y. Assessing the mechanism of DNA damage induced by lead through direct and indirect interactions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 136, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  400. Hemmaphan, S.; Bordeerat, N.K. Genotoxic Effects of Lead and Their Impact on the Expression of DNA Repair Genes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Witkowska, D.; Słowik, J.; Chilicka, K. Heavy Metals and Human Health: Possible Exposure Pathways and the Competition for Protein Binding Sites. Molecules 2021, 26, 6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  402. Liu, W.; Fu, Y.; Zheng, B.; Cheng, S.; Li, W.; Lau, T.C.; Liang, H. Kinetics and mechanism of conformational changes in a G-quadruplex of thrombin-binding aptamer induced by Pb2+. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011, 115, 13051–13056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  403. Szymański, M. Molecular mechanisms of lead toxicity. BioTechnologia 2014, 95, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  404. Winter, D.; Polacek, N.; Halama, I.; Streicher, B.; Barta, A. Lead-catalysed specific cleavage of ribosomal RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 1817–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  405. Wright, R.O.; Schwartz, J.; Wright, R.J.; Bollati, V.; Tarantini, L.; Park, S.K.; Hu, H.; Sparrow, D.; Vokonas, P.; Baccarelli, A. Biomarkers of lead exposure and DNA methylation within retrotransposons. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  406. Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ni, N.; Bao, B.; Zhang, C.; Lu, L. High lead exposure is associated with telomere length shortening in Chinese battery manufacturing plant workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 69, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Schneider, J.S.; Kidd, S.K.; Anderson, D.W. Influence of developmental lead exposure on expression of DNA methyltransferases and methyl cytosine-binding proteins in hippocampus. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 217, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  408. Nihei, M.K.; Guilarte, T.R. NMDAR-2A subunit protein expression is reduced in the hippocampus of rats exposed to Pb2+ during development. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1999, 66, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  409. Nihei, M.K.; Guilarte, T.R. Molecular changes in glutamatergic synapses induced by Pb2+: Association with deficits of LTP and spatial learning. Neurotoxicology 2001, 22, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  410. Ordemann, J.M.; Austin, R.N. Lead neurotoxicity: Exploring the potential impact of lead substitution in zinc-finger proteins on mental health. Metallomics 2016, 8, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  411. Feng, C.; Gu, J.; Zhou, F.; Li, J.; Zhu, G.; Guan, L.; Liu, H.; Du, G.; Feng, J.; Liu, D.; et al. The effect of lead exposure on expression of SIRT1 in the rat hippocampus. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 44, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  412. Toscano, D.; Hashemzadeh-Gargari, H.; McGlothan, J.L.; Guilarte, T.R. Developmental Pb2+ exposure alters NMDAR subtypes and reduces CREB phosphorylation in the rat brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2002, 139, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  413. Rahman, A.; Brew, B.J.; Guillemin, G.J. Lead dysregulates serine/threonine protein phosphatases in human neurons. Neurochem. Res. 2011, 36, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  414. Metryka, E.; Chibowska, K.; Gutowska, I.; Falkowska, A.; Kupnicka, P.; Barczak, K.; Chlubek, D.; Baranowska-Bosiacka, I. Lead (Pb) Exposure Enhances Expression of Factors Associated with Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  415. Akaras, N.; Kucukler, S.; Gur, C.; Ileriturk, M.; Kandemir, F.M. Sinapic acid protects against lead acetate- induced lung toxicity by reducing oxidative stress, apoptosis, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress damage. Environ. Toxicol. 2024, 39, 20240326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  416. Generalova, A.; Davidova, S.; Satchanska, G. The Mechanisms of Lead Toxicity in Living Organisms. J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  417. Wang, C.Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Tzeng, D.W.; Yang, J.L. Lead acetate induces EGFR activation upstream of SFK and PKCalpha linkage to the Ras/Raf-1/ERK signaling. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2009, 235, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  418. Baranowska-Bosiacka, I.; Dziedziejko, V.; Safranow, K.; Gutowska, I.; Marchlewicz, M.; Dołegowska, B.; Rać, M.E.; Wiszniewska, B.; Chlubek, D. Inhibition of erythrocyte phosphoribosyltransferases (APRT and HPRT) by Pb2+: A potential mechanism of lead toxicity. Toxicology 2009, 259, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  419. Jin, Q.; Yao, C.; Bian, Y.; Pi, J. Pb-Induced Eryptosis May Provoke Thrombosis Prior to Hemolysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  420. Dietert, R.R.; Lee, J.E.; Hussain, I.; Piepenbrink, M. Developmental immunotoxicology of lead. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 198, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  421. Wani, A.L.; Ara, A.; Usmani, J.A. Lead toxicity: A review. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2015, 8, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  422. Swaringen, B.F.; Gawlik, E.; Kamenov, G.D.; McTigue, N.E.; Cornwell, D.A.; Bonzongo, J.J. Children’s exposure to environmental lead: A review of potential sources, blood levels, and methods used to reduce exposure. Environ. Res. 2022, 204 Pt B, 112025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  423. Andjelkovic, M.; Buha Djordjevic, A.; Antonijevic, E.; Stanic, M.; Kotur-Stevuljevic, J.; Spasojevic-Kalimanovska, V.; Jovanovic, M.; Boricic, N.; Wallace, D.; Bulat, Z. Toxic Effect of Acute Cadmium and Lead Exposure in Rat Blood, Liver, and Kidney. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  424. Park, S.K.; Wang, X.; Lee, S.; Hu, H. Do we underestimate risk of cardiovascular mortality due to lead exposure? Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 923, 171511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  425. Dossou-Agoin, G.B.; Gbankoto, A.; Azonbakin, S.; Osseni, R.; Yemoa, A.; Lalèyè, A. Aqueous extract of Pedalium murex D. Royen ex L. leafy stem protects against lead induced testicular toxicity in Wistar rats. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2022, 19, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  426. Abedini, B.; Khazaei, K.; Salehzadeh, A. Effects of N-Acetylcysteine supplementation on oxidative stress and expression of apoptosis-related genes in testicular tissue of rats exposed to lead. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 2407–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  427. Blahova, L.; Novakova, Z.; Vecera, Z.; Vrlíková, L.; Dočekal, B.; Dumková, J.; Křůmal, K.; Mikuška, P.; Buchtová, M.; Hampl, A.; et al. The effects of nano-sized PbO on biomarkers of membrane disruption and DNA damage in a sub-chronic inhalation study on mice. Nanotoxicology 2020, 14, 214–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  428. Gallegos-Reyes, M.A.; Antaño-Martínez, A.R.; Alcaraz-Contreras, Y.; Alegría-Torres, J.A.; Robles, J.; Yáñez-Barrientos, E.; Martinez-Alfaro, M. Melatonin therapy reverses lead exposure-induced testicular damage in rats despite the lack of effect on serum testosterone levels. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2023, 48, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  429. Flora, S.J.S.; Pachauri, V.; Saxena, G. Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 415–438. [Google Scholar]
  430. González-Rendón, E.S.; Gutierrez-Cano, G.; Alcaraz-Zubeldia, M.; Garibay-Huarte, T.; Fortoul, T.I. Lead Inhalation and Hepatic Damage: Morphological and Functional Evaluation in Mice. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2018, 34, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  431. Kim, J.W.; Kim, Y.J. The Evidence-Based Multifaceted Roles of Hepatic Stellate Cells in Liver Diseases: A Concise Review. Life Sci. 2024, 344, 122547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  432. Kucukler, S.; Benzer, F.; Yildirim, S.; Gur, C.; Kandemir, F.M.; Bengu, A.S.; Ayna, A.; Caglayan, C.; Dortbudak, M.B. Protective Effects of Chrysin Against Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Induced by Lead Acetate in Rat Kidneys: A Biochemical and Histopathological Approach. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 1501–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  433. Battistini, B.; Greggi, C.; Visconti, V.V.; Albanese, M.; Messina, A.; De Filippis, P.; Gasperini, B.; Falvino, A.; Piscitelli, P.; Palombi, L.; et al. Metals Accumulation Affects Bone and Muscle in Osteoporotic Patients: A Pilot Study. Environ. Res. 2024, 250, 118514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  434. Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, R.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.; Lu, X. The Influence of Adult Urine Lead Exposure on Bone Mineral Densit: NHANES 2015–2018. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1412872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  435. Mitra, P.; Sharma, S.; Purohit, P.; Sharma, P. Clinical and molecular aspects of lead toxicity: An update. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2017, 54, 506–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  436. Nagaraju, R.; Kalahasthi, R.; Balachandar, R.; Bagepally, B.S. Association between lead exposure and DNA damage (genotoxicity): Systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 2899–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  437. Cempel, M.; Nikel, G. Nickel: A review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2006, 15, 375–382. [Google Scholar]
  438. Chen, Q.Y.; Brocato, J.; Laulicht, F.; Costa, M. Mechanisms of nickel carcinogenesis. In Essential and Non-Essential Metals; Mudipalli, A., Zelikoff, J.T., Eds.; Molecular and Integrative Toxicology; Springer International Publishing AG: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 181–197. [Google Scholar]
  439. Sinicropi, M.S.; Caruso, A.; Capasso, A.; Palladino, C.; Panno, A.; Saturnino, C. Heavy metals: Toxicity and carcinogenicity. Pharmacologyonline 2010, 2, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  440. Sinicropi, M.S.; Amantea, D.; Caruso, A.; Saturnino, C. Chemical and biological properties of toxic metals and use of chelating agents for the pharmacological treatment of metal poisoning. Arch. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 501–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  441. Andersen, A.; Berge, S.R.; Engeland, A.; Norseth, T. Exposure to nickel compounds and smoking in relation to incidence of lung and nasal can-cer among nickel refinery workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 1996, 53, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Genchi, G.; Carocci, A.; Lauria, G.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Catalano, A. Nickel: Human Health and Environmental Toxicology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Song, X.; Kenston, S.S.F.; Kong, L.; Zhao, J. Molecular mechanisms of nickel induced neurotoxicity and chemoprevention. Toxicology 2017, 392, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  444. Xu, S.; He, M.; Zhong, M.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, Z. The neuroprotective effects of taurine against nickel by reducing oxidative stress and maintaining mitochondrial function in cortical neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 590, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  445. Kong, L.; Gao, X.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, K.; Tang, M. Mechanisms involved in reproductive toxicity caused by nickel nanoparticle in female rats. Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 1674–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  446. Arita, A.; Costa, M. Epigenetics in metal carcinogenesis: Nickel, arsenic, chromium and cadmium. Metallomics 2009, 1, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  447. Ke, Q.; Li, Q.; Ellen, T.P.; Sun, H.; Costa, M. Nickel compounds induce phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 by activating JNK–MAPK pathway. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 1276–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  448. Cantone, L.; Nordio, F.; Hou, L.; Apostoli, P.; Bonzini, M.; Tarantini, L.; Angelici, L.; Bollati, V.; Zanobetti, A.; Schwartz, J.; et al. Inhalable metal-rich air particles and histone H3K4 dimethylation and H3K9 acetylation in a cross-sectional study of steel workers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  449. Ke, Q.; Ellen, T.P.; Costa, M. Nickel compounds induce histone ubiquitination by inhibiting histone deubiquitinating enzyme activity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2008, 228, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  450. Ellen, T.P.; Kluz, T.; Harder, M.E.; Xiong, J.; Costa, M. Heterochromatinization as a potential mechanism of nickel-induced carcinogenesis. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 4626–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  451. Buan, N.R.; Suh, S.J.; Escalante-Semerena, J.C. The eutT gene of Salmonella enterica encodes an oxygen-labile, metal-containing ATP:corrinoid adenosyltransferase enzyme. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 5708–5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  452. Johnson, C.L.; Buszko, M.L.; Bobik, T.A. Purification and initial characterization of the Salmonella enterica PduO ATP:Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 7881–7887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Buan, N.R.; Escalante-Semerena, J.C. Purification and initial biochemical characterization of ATP:Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase (EutT) enzyme of Salmonella Enterica. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 16971–16977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  454. Léonard, A.; Gerber, G.B.; Jacquet, P. Carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and teratogenicity of nickel. Mutat. Res. Rev. Genet. Toxicol. 1981, 87, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  455. Leonard, A.; Jacquet, P. Embryotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Nickel; Iarc Scientific Publications: Lyon, France, 1984; pp. 277–291. [Google Scholar]
  456. Da Mata Perez, L.; França, A.T.; Zimmerman, J.R. Systemic nickel allergy syndrome. World Allergy Organ. J. 2015, 8, A89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  457. Talhout, R.; Schulz, T.; Florek, E.; van Benthem, J.; Wester, P.; Opperhuizen, A. Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke. Int.J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  458. Condoluci, A.; Mazzara, C.; Zoccoli, A.; Pezzuto, A.; Tonini, G. Impact of smoking on lung cancer treatment effectiveness: A review. Fut. Oncol. 2016, 12, 2149–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  459. Stewart, B.W.; Wild, C.P. World Cancer Report. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2014; Available online: https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/28525/1/world%20cancer%20report.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2013).
  460. Michael, M.; Meyyazhagan, A.; Velayudhannair, K.; Pappuswamy, M.; Maria, A.; Xavier, V.; Balasubramanian, B.; Baskaran, R.; Kamyab, H.; Vasseghian, Y.; et al. The Content of Heavy Metals in Cigarettes and the Impact of Their Leachates on the Aquatic Ecosystem. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  461. Swan, G.E.; Lessov-Schlaggar, C.N. The effects of tobacco smoke and nicotine on cognition and the brain. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2007, 17, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  462. Sulaiman, M.B.; Adamu, A.M.; Ali, S.B.; Ezenobi, U.V.; Gimba, A.M.; Akinlotan, O.O.; Abubakar, A. Heavy metal contamination in medicinal plants: Assessing carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks. Discov. Environ. Res. 2024, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  463. Armendariz, C.R.; Garcia, T.; Soler, A.J.; Fernandez, A.J.G.; Glez-Weller, D.; Gonzalez, G.L.; Girones, C.R. Heavy metals in cigarettes for sale in Spain. Environ. Res. 2015, 143, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  464. Banožić, M.; Jokić, S.; Ačkar, Đ.; Blažić, M.; Šubarić, D. Carbohydrates key players in tobacco aroma formation and quality determination. Molecules 2020, 25, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  465. Peto, R.; Lopez, A.D. The future worldwide health effects of current smoking patterns. In Tobacco and Public Health: Science and Policy; Boyle, P., Gray, N., Henningfield, J., Seffrin, J., Zatonski, W., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  466. Giovino, G.A.; Mirza, S.A.; Samet, J.M.; Gupta, P.C.; Jarvis, M.J.; Bhala, N.; Asma, S. Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: An analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys. Lancet 2012, 380, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  467. Liu, B.Q.; Peto, R.; Chen, Z.M.; Boreham, J.; Wu, Y.P.; Li, J.Y.; Campbel, T.C.; Chen, J.S. Emerging tobacco hazards in China: 1. Retrospective proportional mortality study of one million deaths. BMJ 1998, 317, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  468. Lopez, A.D.; Mathers, C.D. Measuring the global burden of disease and epidemiological transitions: 2002–2030. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2006, 100, 481–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  469. Chu, V.; Southammavong, T.; Sackda, P.; Sombandith, X.; Thongsna, S.; MMedSD, M.D.; Vidhamaly, S. Tobacco-Related Socioeconomic Cost of Stroke, Lung Cancer, and Copd in Laos; Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA): Vientiane, Laos, 2009. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b4a40f0b652dd000be4/Laos-Healthcare_costs_of_smoking.pdf (accessed on 18 February 2009).
  470. Lazarević, K.; Nikolić, D.; Stosić, L.; Milutinović, S.; Videnović, J.; Bogdanović, D. Determination of lead and arsenic in tobacco and cigarettes: An important issue of public health. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 20, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  471. Mortada, W.I.; Sobh, M.A.; El Defrawy, M.M. The exposure to cadmium, lead and mercury from smoking and its impact on renal integrity. Med. Sci. Monit. 2004, 10, CR112–CR116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  472. Satarug, S.; Ujjin, P.; Vanavanitkun, Y.; Nishijo, M.; Baker, J.R.; Moore, M.R. Effects of cigarette smoking and exposure to cadmium and lead on phenotypic variability of hepatic CYP2A6 and renal function biomarkers in men. Toxicology 2004, 204, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic dose–response relationship illustrating the concept of hormesis.
Figure 1. Schematic dose–response relationship illustrating the concept of hormesis.
Ijms 26 11617 g001
Figure 2. Analytical techniques for the determination of trace elements in biological samples.
Figure 2. Analytical techniques for the determination of trace elements in biological samples.
Ijms 26 11617 g002
Figure 3. Share of cigarette smokers among the adult population over 15 years of age, by level of consumption in 2019 [214].
Figure 3. Share of cigarette smokers among the adult population over 15 years of age, by level of consumption in 2019 [214].
Ijms 26 11617 g003
Figure 4. Molecular mechanisms of Cd toxicity.
Figure 4. Molecular mechanisms of Cd toxicity.
Ijms 26 11617 g004
Figure 5. Cd toxicity—health outcomes.
Figure 5. Cd toxicity—health outcomes.
Ijms 26 11617 g005
Figure 6. Molecular mechanisms of Pb toxicity.
Figure 6. Molecular mechanisms of Pb toxicity.
Ijms 26 11617 g006
Figure 7. Molecular mechanisms of Ni toxicity.
Figure 7. Molecular mechanisms of Ni toxicity.
Ijms 26 11617 g007
Table 1. Metal content in tobacco products.
Table 1. Metal content in tobacco products.
Tobacco ProductMetalAverage Metal ConcentrationRef.
commercial moist snuff and Alaskan iqmikAs, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Pb, Ni0.23 ± 0.06 µg/g (As); 1.40 ± 0.31 µg/g (Cd); 0.45 ± 0.13 µg/g (Pb); 2.28 ± 0.36 µg/g (Ni)[173]
Tobacco from U.S. Cigarettes (n = 50)As, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Pb, Mn, Hg, NiMn 131–245 µg/g; Cr 1.4–3.2 µg/g; Co 0.44–1.11 µg/g; Ni 2.1–3.9 µg/g; Cd 1.0–1.7 µg/g; Pb 0.60–1.16 µg/g; As 0.29 µg/g; Be 0.031 µg/g[138]
cigarette filler and ash from 36 brands retailed in Saudi ArabiaCr, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn0.66 mg/kg (Cr), 0.09 mg/kg (Cd), 2.61 mg/kg (Cu), 245.55 mg/kg (Fe), 0.38 mg/kg (Pb), 3.985 mg/kg (Mn); 1.64 mg/kg (Zn)[174]
Tobacco Products Available in the United States Alcigarette tobacco 0.719 ± 0.157 μg/mg;
smokeless tobacco 0.408 ± 0.104 μg/mg; little cigar 1.20 ± 0.30 μg/mg;
pipe/roll your own 1.05 ± 0.31 μg/mg
[175]
tobacco and cannabisAlBangladeshi tobacco 2.3–3.7 mg Al/g;
Rothmans 0.6–1.5 mg Al/g;
natural tobacco 1.2–2.0 mg Al/g;
medium tobacco 0.8–1.4 mg Al/g;
cannabis (2 types) 0.1–0.4 mg Al/g;
cannabinoid extract (THC) 0.1–0.4 mg Al/g
[176]
tobacco, filter and ash of illicit brands cigarettes marketed
in Brazil
Cr0.32–0.80 µg/ashes
0.96 to 3.85 μg/cigarette for tobacco
[177]
7 commercially available branded cigarettes purchased from local market of Dublin (Ireland)As, Al, Cd, Ni, Hg, and Pb9.55–12.4 ng/cigarette, 0.432–0.727 μg/cigarette, 360–496 μg/cigarette, 1.70–2.12 μg/cigarette, 0.715–1.52 μg/cigarette, 0.378–1.16 μg/cigarette[178]
packs of 20 cigarette brands were purchased from retail outlets at Oporto, PortugalCo, Cd, Pb, As, Tl, Al, Mn, Bafrom less than1 μg/g (Co, Cd, Pb, As i Tl) to several hundreds of μg/g (Al, Mn i Ba)[156]
different components of Pakistani local branded and imported cigarettesAl, Cd, Ni, Pb97.3–99.0%, and 15.0–31.3% of total metal contents were observed for Al and Cd in ash, respectively[179]
Table 2. Studies on the metal content in samples taken from the respiratory tract of smokers.
Table 2. Studies on the metal content in samples taken from the respiratory tract of smokers.
TissueChemical ElementObservationRef.
bronchoalveolar spaceextracellular CdCd concentrations increased in cell-free BAL fluid of smokers compared to nonsmokers (n = 19–29; p < 0.001)[242]
SELF fluidinhalation bioaccessibility of Cd, Cr, Ni, ZnThe percentage inhalation bioaccessibility ranged between 20.8–59.8% (Cd), 3.3–8.1% (Cr), 21.7–48.8% (Ni) and 7.6–12.5% (Zn).[245]
bronchial
epithelium
Ca2+ signalingCa2+ signaling is impaired in smoker epithelia[246]
bronchial biopsy specimensAl potroom emissionsairway inflammation is a central feature of potroom asthma[247]
bronchial autopsy tissue41 elementssignificantly higher concentrations of Al in bronchial and lung of smokers[244]
non-neoplastic lung injuryFedisruption of iron homeostasis in cells after exposure to CSP[248]
lungFeincreased extracellular Fe from AMs is a potential source of oxidative damage and inflammation in the lung following CS exposure[249]
lung samples of controls and COPD patients Cd, Mnthe accumulation of Cd, Mn suggests a role for these metals in the pathogenesis of COPD[241]
human lung
tissue
Cr, Cdconcentrations of about 4.3 mg/g (dry weight) were found in
smokers compared to 1.3 mg/g in non smokers; increasing concentration was observed
with age and smoking time
[250]
Abbreviations: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL); the Stimulated Epithelial Lung Fluid (SELF); cigarette smoke particle (CSP); alveolar macrophages (AMs); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Table 3. Studies on the metal content in samples taken from the hair and nails of smokers.
Table 3. Studies on the metal content in samples taken from the hair and nails of smokers.
Studied SamplesPopulationMetalsDetection MethodObservationRef.
blood and hairhealthy adult male volunteers, smokers (29), nonsmokers volunteers (14)Hg, Pb, Cd, As, Se, Mn, Zn, Ni, and CrICP-AESAll the investigated toxic elements levels in the hair of cigarette-smoking subjects (except Hg and Zn) were significantly higher than nonsmoker subjects[332]
hair236 healthy people 16–75-years-of-ageHgICP-MSHg concentration was higher in the smoking exposure
group than the non-exposure group
[333]
hair252 pregnant womenAg, Cd, Hg, Pb)ICP-MSpositive correlations between cotinine and Ag (r = 0.369, p < 0.001), Cd (r = 0.185, p < 0.01), Hg (r = 0.161, p < 0.05), and Pb (r = 0.243, p < 0.001); positive correlations between nicotine and Ag (r = 0.331, p < 0.001), Cd (r = 0.176, p < 0.01), and Pb (r = 0.316, p < 0.001)[334]
serum and hair344 women 20–70 years old including 199 smokers and 145 non-smoking womenCo, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, V, Zn, Se ICP-MSsmoking leads to decreased serum Cu, Fe, Zn concentrations, hair Fe, Se; increased serum Mn, V, Cr; inverse relationship between smoking intensity and Se levels, and a positive correlation with serum Cr, Zn, and hair Fe levels[331]
blood,
scalp hair
smoker and nonsmoker males who have mild and severe psoriasisCd, ZnAASincreased Cd levels in hair and blood in smoking patients with psoriasis; decreased Zn concentrations in smoking patients with psoriasis; 5% decreased Zn levels in smokers; 17.8–33.3% decreased Zn levels in non-smoking patients with psoriasis; 25% lower Cd levels in the blood of smokers; two- to three-fold higher Cd concentrations in psoriasis patients[335]
hair95 subjects (24 males and 71 females)Co, Cr, Cu, Li, Sr, PbICP-TOF-MSsmokers’ hair contained more Cu, while the content of Pb, Cr, and Co was similar in the hair of nonsmokers and smokers. The results were not statistically significant.[336]
blood, toenails, and hair163 pregnant womenPb, Cd, As, MnGFAASpassive smoking significantly increased levels of Mn, Pb, Cd[337]
hair-Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn FAASsignificantly higher concentrations of Cd and Pb in male hair and smokers than those in female and non-smokers (p < 0.01)[338]
blood, nasal fluid, saliva, sputum, serum, scalp hairmale smokers and nonsmokers infected with COVID-19 and from healthy men (aged 29–59 years)Se, HgAASSe concentrations in all samples from smokers and nonsmokers with COVID-19 were lower than those of healthy smokers and nonsmokers; Hg concentrations were elevated in both smokers and nonsmokers with COVID-19[339]
hair821 students (433 boys and 388 girls) SHS; 48.9% of fathers who are smokers, but 25.2% of fathers smoke in front of their children.Cr, Mn, Ni, As, Pb, Cd ICP-MSincreasing levels of Pb and Cd in the hair of SHS children[340]
scalp hairvarious age groups (16–32 years, 33–50 years, and 51–62 years)Zn, Fe, Cu, Cr, Cd, Ni, Pb, AsFAAS,
GF AAS
the concentrations of As (0.17, 0.81, and 0.91 μg/g), Cd (2.80, 3.81, and 3.16 μg/g), Cr (4.1, 4.2, and 5.3 μg/g), Cu (20.0, 21.0, and 21.9 μg/g), Ni (3.9, 4.6, and 4.3 μg/g), Pb (4.0, 4.8, and 5.0 μg/g), and Fe (49.0, 49.0, and 59.3 μg/g) were significantly higher in smokers for various age groups respectively. The concentrations of Zn (165, 163, and 173 μg/g v) were lower in smokers. Correlation studies for male smokers show a highly positive correlation between Cr-Cd, Cr-Ni, Cu-Fe, and Ni-Zn.[341]
scalp hair200 pregnant and non-pregnant women (20–35
years)
Cd, ZnAASThe malnourished pregnant and non-pregnant smoking women group had three to four times higher levels of Cd in their scalp hair samples than those values obtained for non-smokers; the content of Zn in scalp hair samples of the reference women was ∼20% higher than the malnourished group[342]
hair40 female studentsMg, Cr, Co, and ZnICP-MS/MSMg, Cr, Co, and Zn concentrations were higher for the non-smoking girls; Cd concentration was higher for passive smoking; the strong positive correlation for smokers was for Ca/Cd, Al/Fe, Mg/Cr, Na/Fe, Al/Cd, and Al/Na[343]
supragingival dental calculus29 subjects, including nonsmokers (n = 14) and smokers (n = 15)26 metals and metalloidsICP-MSThe concentrations of toxic heavy metals, As (p < 0.05), Cd (p < 0.05), Pb (p < 0.01), Mn (p < 0.01), and V (p < 0.01), were significantly higher in smokers than in nonsmokers[344]
Abbreviations: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS); atomic absorptions spectrometer (AAS); flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS); graphite furnace atomic ab-sorption spectrometry (GF AAS); secondhand smoke exposure (SHS); inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ICP-TOF-MS); inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Flieger, W.; Stankiewicz, M.; Dzierżyński, E.; Gawlik, P.; Pietrzyk, Ł.; Łańcut, M.; Walczak, F.; Szymkiewicz, A.; Flieger, J. A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311617

AMA Style

Flieger W, Stankiewicz M, Dzierżyński E, Gawlik P, Pietrzyk Ł, Łańcut M, Walczak F, Szymkiewicz A, Flieger J. A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(23):11617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311617

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flieger, Wojciech, Magdalena Stankiewicz, Eliasz Dzierżyński, Piotr Gawlik, Łukasz Pietrzyk, Mirosław Łańcut, Filip Walczak, Anna Szymkiewicz, and Jolanta Flieger. 2025. "A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 23: 11617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311617

APA Style

Flieger, W., Stankiewicz, M., Dzierżyński, E., Gawlik, P., Pietrzyk, Ł., Łańcut, M., Walczak, F., Szymkiewicz, A., & Flieger, J. (2025). A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(23), 11617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311617

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop