Next Article in Journal
Cable Cars to the Nucleus: TM4SF1-Enriched Microdomains Conduct Signaling in Endothelial Cells for Blood Vessel Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Attenuated Molecular Response to SARS-CoV-2 in MDMs Isolated from Immunosuppressed Transplanted Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Semi-Automatic Tool for the Standardized Analysis of Fluorescent Intensity Changes in Polarized Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Ca2+ Bridge: From Neurons to Circuits in Rett Syndrome

by
Luis Molina Calistro
1,†,
Yennyfer Arancibia
1,2,†,
Javiera Alarcón
3 and
Rodrigo Flavio Torres
1,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile
2
Millennium Nucleus of Neuroepigenetics and Plasticity (EpiNeuro), Santiago 8320000, Chile
3
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Sebastián, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(21), 10490; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110490
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 21 October 2025 / Published: 29 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calcium Homeostasis of Cells in Health and Disease: Third Edition)

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder caused primarily by mutations in the gene encoding the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (Mecp2). Mecp2 binds to methylated cytosines, playing a crucial role in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. At the neurobiological level, RTT is characterized by dendritic spine dysgenesis and altered excitation–inhibition balance, drawing attention to the mechanisms that scale from mutations in a nuclear protein to altered neuronal connectivity. Although Mecp2 dysfunction disrupts multiple neuronal processes, emerging evidence highlights altered calcium (Ca2+) signaling as a central contributor to RTT pathophysiology. This review explores the link between Mecp2 and Ca2+ regulation by highlighting how Mecp2 affects Ca2+-dependent transcriptional pathways, while Ca2+ modulates Mecp2 function by inducing post-translational modifications. We discuss this crosstalk in light of evidence from RTT models, with a particular focus on the brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF-miR132-Mecp2 axis and the dysregulation of ryanodine receptors (RyRs). Additionally, we examine how these perturbations contribute to the reduced structural plasticity and the altered activity-driven gene expression that characterizes RTT. Understanding the intersection between Mecp2 function and Ca2+ homeostasis will provide critical insights into RTT pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets aimed at restoring neuronal connectivity.

1. Introduction

RTT is a devastating postnatal progressive neurodevelopmental disorder estimated to affect 1:15,000 live births [1,2]. Actually, our current estimation of RTT incidence may be lower than the true value, as some non-syndromic autism cases may in fact be non-diagnosed RTT [3]. RTT manifests in early childhood. However, not all symptoms appear simultaneously. Patients with RTT show normal development until 6–18 months of age when behavioral stagnation becomes apparent. Developmental milestones such as learning to walk or the purposeful use of hands are lost as the disorder progresses and autistic features such as social isolation and loss of language become evident as the patient ages [1,3,4]. Systemic alterations are also associated with RTT. For instance, short statures, weight disorders and precocious puberty and menstrual irregularities are observed in RTT patients [5]. Calling attention to the role played by endocrine hormones, such as estrogen, could help explain the neurobiological characteristics and progression of RTT [6].
Although RTT was first described over 50 years ago, unraveling the basis of such a complex syndrome required developments that favored a better understanding of the processes governing gene expression. One of such processes relies on the chemical modification of DNA. These modifications adjust the chromatin structure and affect the binding capacity of transcription factors, constituting a mechanism through which gene expression can be regulated in a long-lasting manner [7]. Cytosine methylation is a highly dynamic DNA modification with roles ranging from cell differentiation to neuronal function [7,8]. Several proteins containing a methyl-binding domain (MBD) interact with methylcytosines, translating DNA methylation into gene expression regulation. Among these, the first identified and most extensively studied MBD protein is the methylated cytosine binding protein 2 (Mecp2) [9,10,11]. In 1999, the relevance of Mecp2 was highlighted by the discovery that Mecp2 mutations are the main cause of Rett syndrome (RTT, MIM 312750) [10].
The gene MECP2 is located on the X chromosome and comprises four exons that, through alternate splicing, produce two isoforms that differ in the first exon. These isoforms, namely Mecp2-E1 and Mecp2-E2, are translated into proteins containing 498 and 486 amino acids, respectively. Although Mecp2-E1 shows a slightly larger N-terminal domain (NTD), both isoforms share almost identical amino acid sequences [12]. The observation that Mecp2 isoforms show a differential pattern of expression during early mouse development is indicative of non-redundant functions [12]. However, it has also been shown that the RTT-like phenotype is prevented independently by Mecp2-E1 and Mecp2-E2 transgenes [13], suggesting overlapping functions. The reader can be referred to excellent reviews that will provide a deeper insight into the functional redundancies and discrepancies of Mecp2 isoforms [14,15]. In addition to the common MBD, this protein has a transcriptional repressor domain (TRD) and a carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) [9]. The MBD is necessary and sufficient for methylcytosine binding in a DNA sequence-independent manner. The CTD allows Mecp2-nucleosome and Mecp2-naked DNA interactions [16]. Whereas the TRD has been shown to interact with histone deacetylases (HDACs) among other proteins, therefore compacting the chromatin and silencing gene transcription [9,17]. Although it is tempting to think of DNA methylation and Mecp2 binding as a gene silencing sign, an Mecp2-CREB interaction has also been described [18]. Moreover, Mecp2 also binds to hydroxymethylated cytosines (hmC), particularly in CpA dinucleotides within active genes [19,20], and transgenic mouse models have shown that Mecp2 target genes can be up- or downregulated in the brain [15,21,22], suggesting that Mecp2 function is far more complex than initially thought [15,23].
While there are over 200 different mutations that cause RTT through complete or partial loss of Mecp2 function and accounting for 95–97% of RTT cases, about 60% of typical RTT cases are produced by only eight mutations [4,24,25]. The gene–phenotype relationship is strengthened as the type of Mecp2 mutation is associated with the severity of the disease [24]. This gene–phenotype association is also evident in the several mouse models currently available, ranging from complete Mecp2 deletion to specific mutation-containing Mecp2 variants [4,11,26,27]. The Mecp2-null mice (Mecp2-KO) is the widest used RTT mouse model. It recapitulates the features of RTT, showing a pre-symptomatic window of about 3–4 weeks. After this, several symptoms appear gradually, such as abnormal gait and movements, hypoactivity, hypotonicity, tremor, hindlimb clasping and irregular breathing [26,28,29].
A neurobiological characteristic of RTT is the alteration in neuronal morphology [25,30]. Dendritic complexity and dendritic spine density are reduced in postmortem samples from RTT patients and Mecp2-KO mice [30,31,32,33]. In vivo observation of dendritic spines in Mecp2-KO mice showed that spine dynamics is severely impaired from an early postnatal developmental stage, when RTT-like symptoms are mild [34]. Moreover, Mecp2 deletion in older mice also results in a dramatic reduction in dendritic complexity and dendritic spine density [32], highlighting the role of Mecp2 not only in the formation but also in the maintenance of functional dendritic spines. Dendritic spine dysgenesis has been suggested as a cause for RTT and is considered a relevant therapeutic target [30,35,36]. Hence, understanding the basis of dendritic spine dysgenesis and the mechanisms contributing to unstable connectivity are critical issues in understanding the pathophysiology of RTT.
The reversible nature of RTT has been shown using several approaches. For instance, Mecp2 re-expression in post-symptomatic Mecp2-null mice ameliorates behavioral and functional alterations [37]. Furthermore, the attenuation of RTT characteristics has also been achieved using isoform-specific Mecp2 transgenic complementation in a null background [13]. Recently, Mecp2 re-expression using adeno-associated viral vectors prolonged lifespan and ameliorated behavioral abnormalities associated with RTT in mouse models [38], opening a real possibility for gene therapy to treat RTT. On the other hand, the early manifestation of RTT has occluded the relevance of Mecp2 in aging [39,40]. In this regard, postnatal Mecp2 inactivation revealed a late age window in which a reduction in Mecp2 levels is incompatible with life [41], suggesting that the maintenance of previously established connections is deeply dependent on Mecp2 function. Altogether, such evidence are strong indicators of Mecp2-driven cell-autonomous mechanisms that generate and maintain neuronal connectivity [42].

2. Cell-Autonomous Mechanisms and Circuit Consequences

The devastating phenotype associated with RTT emerges from a cell-autonomous perturbation that scales up to disturb neuronal connectivity. For instance, it has been recently reported that functional brain connectivity or neuronal networks, determined as wide field mesoscale calcium measurements, are severely altered in developing and adult Mecp2 null mice [43]. The excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance represents a framework to understand circuit perturbations in the context of neurodevelopmental disorders and other pathologies [30,44]. This framework posits that neuronal alterations drive a reduced signal-to-noise ratio, diminishing the information processing capability of circuits. The signal-to-noise ratio is tightly controlled within neurons and collectively within circuits. For instance, neurons show a regular ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synapses along dendrites, whereas circuits show a regular ratio of excitatory to inhibitory neurons [45,46]. Hence, an increase in excitatory connectivity shifts the E/I balance towards noisier circuits, whereas increased inhibition leads to abnormally silent connectivity. In the context of RTT, the alteration of the E/I balance is observed not only as a perturbation of the signal-to-noise ratio at a circuit level, but also as a functional and morphological alteration of the dendritic spines of individual neurons [25,30,36,47]. This diminishes the available surface area for glutamatergic neurotransmission and drives counterbalancing mechanisms that increase the excitability of glutamatergic neurons, thereby exacerbating the E/I alterations.
Several lines of evidence suggest an altered E/I balance in RTT. For instance, the stimulation of white matter with currents of increasing intensity evoked reduced calcium (Ca2+) responses in the medial prefrontal cortex of Mecp2-null mice (mPFC), in contrast to that of WT mice [48,49]. Furthermore, diminished dendritic spine density and reduced abundance of critical excitatory proteins, such as the vesicular transporter of glutamate (vGLUT1), suggests that Mecp2 absence determines a reduction in excitatory connectivity [47,48]. It was further shown that Mecp2 overexpression increases, whereas Mecp2 deletion reduces glutamatergic synapse numbers estimated by vGLUT1, PSD95 and MAP2 colocalization [47,50]. Moreover, a brief postnatal knockdown of Mecp2 was sufficient to reduce the excitatory synapse number by 30% [50]. These findings highlight the relevance of Mecp2 for generating and maintaining glutamatergic connectivity. In the context of chronic changes in network activity, the E/I balance is maintained by the homeostatic adjusting of the synaptic strength, a process known as synaptic scaling. Synaptic scaling is a transcriptional-dependent process, with Mecp2 contributing to scaling-down in the context of elevated network activity, and scaling-up in the context of decreased activity [42,51,52]. For instance, 4 days of visual deprivation increased the amplitude of the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC) in WT but not in Mecp2-null mice [42], suggesting a critical role for Mecp2 in synaptic scaling-up in vivo. Hence, Mecp2 represents a critical actor to E/I balance, contributing to the regulation of the strength and number of glutamatergic synapses. Collectively, these data position Mecp2 as a nodal regulator, linking cell-autonomous molecular mechanisms to circuit-level perturbations.
The question is, how do cell-autonomous perturbations, such as a Mecp2 mutation, scale up to circuits? The evidence suggests that Ca2+ homeostasis is centrally positioned to bridge cell-autonomous perturbations with the widespread connectivity changes associated with the RTT neurobiological characteristics. Ca2+ plays a central role in excitation–transcription coupling, contributing to the neuronal adaptation for varying levels of activity associated with brain function. For instance, intracellular calcium transients direct gene expression [53,54,55], post-translational modifications and orchestrate the modification of neuronal architecture [56,57,58]. Furthermore, non-neuronal cell types also show Ca2+ disturbances in the context of RTT [59]. Hence, understanding the mechanisms by which Mecp2 drives the alterations in Ca2+ signaling observed in RTT should be a primary focus of research as it could open new avenues for pharmacological interventions for this devastating syndrome.
The nature of Mecp2 as a chromatin organizer determines that several genes associated with Ca2+ homeostasis could be either direct or indirect Mecp2 downstream target genes (IE genes that are directly affected by Mecp2, either by binding to a promoter or enhancer, or genes whose regulators are targets of Mecp2). However, besides Mecp2 downstream targets, there are also upstream mechanisms associating Ca2+ signaling with the post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation of Mecp2. These upstream mechanisms are relevant for coupling neuronal activity with Mecp2 function, contributing to neuronal remodeling in response to activity. In the following sections we will elaborate on both Mecp2 upstream and downstream in relation to Ca2+.

3. Upstream Mecp2 Post-Translational Regulation by Ca2+ Signaling

Mecp2 is subject to several post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination and SUMOylations [60,61]. Among these, Mecp2 phosphorylation by CaMK II and CaMK IV highlights the importance of Ca2+ for the regulation of Mecp2 functions [62]. Neuronal activity drives the brain-specific phosphorylation at serine 421 (pS421) [53,63,64]. On the other hand, neuronal activity reduces the phosphorylation at serine 80 (pS80) [62]. Ca2+ entry through L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel represents a common trigger for the phosphorylation of Mecp2 at S421 and the dephosphorylation of Mecp2-pS80 [62]. Thus, pS421 and pS80 are regulated as mirrored images, directing the dynamic binding of Mecp2 to several gene promoters and affecting the protein partners that interact with Mecp2 under different conditions [62]. Mecp2-pS80 is considered relevant for Mecp2 function in resting neurons, whereas Mecp2-pS421 is deemed as an activity-induced modification [56,62,65]. Both pS421 and pS80 are relevant in directing the association of Mecp2 to chromatin in response to neuronal depolarization, but also relate neuronal activity to the structural remodeling of neurons [65,66].
A major example of Mecp2-pS421 relevance to neuronal morphology and organization comes from the activity-induced transcriptional activity of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) [63]. This neurotrophic factor is processed and released upon neuronal activity, contributing to axonal guidance, dendritic arborization and dendritic spine formation and maintenance [67]. BDNF signals through the tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase B (TrkB), which recruits the phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ) to promote the formation of IP3 and the concomitant release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores.
Neuronal stimulation with BDNF and other neurotrophins increases the level of Mecp2-pS421. In turn, Mecp2-pS421 is required to release Mecp2 from the BDNF promoter and increase its transcription, contributing to the activity-induced upregulation of BDNF [68]. Replacement of Mecp2 for an S421A mutant (Mecp2-S421A) blunted the depolarization -induced transcriptional activation of the BDNF gene [68]. Interestingly, the Mecp2-S421A mutant also showed impaired dendritic spine morphogenesis and altered dendritic patterning in vitro [63,66,68]. In vivo studies, using an S421A knock in mouse, showed that the loss of Mecp2 pS421 increased the locomotor activity in a running wheel and disrupted the behavioral response to novel objects [62,69]. On the other hand, an S80A knock in mouse model showed decreased locomotor activity, resembling the RTT-associated phenotype observed in Mecp2-null mice [62]. These observations highlight the relevance of the Ca2+-dependent post-translational regulation of Mecp2 to turn activity-driven transcription into functional circuits. Importantly, sensory stimuli drive Mecp2 phosphorylation, representing a cornerstone in the role of the environmental contribution to brain circuit refinement during development, a period where RTT-associated disturbances arise [62,64].

4. Upstream Mecp2 Post-Transcriptional Regulation by Ca2+ Signaling

Neurons show a remarkably high level of Mecp2 expression, reaching up to one Mecp2 molecule every two nucleosomes [70]. Notwithstanding, Mecp2 levels are tightly controlled. As a sign of this, even a small increase in Mecp2 expression originates neuronal abnormalities leading to a progressive neurological disorder that shares characteristics with RTT [71]. Hence, understanding how Mecp2 levels are regulated as a function of neuronal activity is relevant to determine RTT pathophysiology.
The micro-RNA 132 (miR132) is a highly conserved micro-RNA that was found in a search for targets of the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) [72,73]. The miR132 gene shows several functional cAMP response elements (CREs) that link the Ca2+ dependent CREB phosphorylation to miR132 transcription [58,72,74]. Several studies have shown that miRNA132 is rapidly induced by depolarization as well as BDNF and CREB signaling [72,74]. In neurons, miR132 is required for activity-dependent dendritic growth [72,75]. This effect is mediated by the translational suppression of p250GAP, a brain-enriched GTPase-activating protein for the Rho family of GTPases [58,74], which determines the increased activity of the Rac1-Pak actin-remodeling pathway [58]. Thus, miR132 overexpression increases neurite outgrowth in vitro and in vivo [75,76,77]. Furthermore, behavioral alterations are also observed in mouse models that knockdown or overexpress this micro-RNA, highlighting its contribution to neuronal organization and ultimately, behavior [75,76,78].
Interestingly, Mecp2 is also a target of miR132, originating a BDNF negative feedback that bridges intracellular modifications to neuronal remodeling [79,80,81]. On one hand, BDNF directs miR132 upregulation and promotes Mecp2-pS421, contributing to activity-dependent BDNF transcription [63,68]. On the other hand, miR132 suppresses Mecp2, providing a homeostatic regulation of BDNF expression (Figure 1) [79,80]. This homeostatic BDNF regulation has been associated with physiological and pathological conditions, including water homeostasis, depression and neurogenesis, among others [80,81,82,83,84,85]. Its relevance becomes apparent when considering that abolishing the miR132-directed suppression of Mecp2 resulted in increased BDNF levels [79,82]. Furthermore, an miR132-KO mouse model showed increased Mecp2 levels and diminished dendritic spine density [83], suggesting its relevance in the RTT-associated phenotype. The reduction in Mecp2 levels by a small dose of siRNA recovered the dendritic spine density, strengthening the association of the miR132-Mecp2 interplay with neuronal morphology [83]. Concordantly, transgenic mice overexpressing the miR132 and mice exposed to an enriched environment show a reduction in Mecp2 levels and increased dendritic spine density [33,75].
The relevance of this homeostatic regulation for RTT is highlighted by the observation that BDNF levels are consistently reduced in RTT patients and mouse models [86,87]. Furthermore, the administration of exogenous BDNF ameliorates RTT-like characteristics in mouse models, positioning BDNF as a central factor in RTT neurobiology [87,88,89]. However, reduced levels of miR132 have also been reported for mouse models and postmortem samples of RTT patients [69,85]. Therefore, it is likely that the loss or alteration of the BDNF-miR132-Mecp2 axis contributes to the reduced structural plasticity and dendritic complexity that characterizes RTT [33,85].
Importantly, Ca2+ represents the nodal point for these post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations. For instance, Ca2+ entry through NMDA receptors or L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels drives Mecp2-pS421 and directs BDNF and miR132 transcription [56,57,90,91]. For instance, using organotypic slice cultures and a BDNF reporter, it was shown that the transcriptional response of BDNF to several stimulations was directly associated with the intracellular Ca2+ concentration achieved [91]. Furthermore, blocking NMDA and L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels abolished the transcriptional response of the BDNF promoter [91], underlining the strong association of BDNF transcription with Ca2+ signaling. On the other hand, the role of Ca2+ in directing the transcriptional activity of miR132 is well described. For instance, the ryanodine receptor (RyR)-mediated calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum is required for miR132 upregulation, as pharmacological interventions or siRNA downregulation of RyR abolished miR132 upregulation and dendritic remodeling [58,77]. Furthermore, KN62, an inhibitor of Ca2+/calmodulin dependent kinase II, impaired the miR132 upregulation induced by neuronal activity [58]. Altogether, activity-induced Ca2+ transients orchestrate the BDNF-miR132-Mecp2 axis, translating neuronal activity into dendritic spine remodeling. Hence, Ca2+ signaling acts as an upstream bridge from neuronal activity to regulate Mecp2 levels and function.

5. Downstream Regulation of Ca2+ Signaling by Mecp2

The high levels of Mecp2 expression and its role as a chromatin organizer suggested that Mecp2 deletion or overexpression would result in a vast number of differentially expressed genes. However, the initial findings from the transcriptomics analyses were in contrast with this expectation [21]. The reason behind this discrepancy was later termed as the dilution effect [92]. The dilution effect arises from the specific role Mecp2 plays in different cell types and brain regions. Hence, upregulated genes in a cell type can be downregulated in the neighboring cell. Similarly, diverse brain regions or activity levels within a brain region can lead to opposing transcriptional signatures, masking the results obtained from massive analyses such as transcriptomics. Hence, such studies should be analyzed while paying particular attention to details such as cell types, brain regions and stimulation protocols.
A recent effort to determine common pathways altered in RTT emphasized the top genes showing significant differential expression across 38 datasets from transcriptomic studies [93]. Ca2+ signaling was ranked the fourth-top KEGG pathway associated with RTT [93]. To draw attention to which Ca2+-associated genes are altered in RTT and the possible contribution these genes could have toward RTT pathophysiology, we graphed the Ca2+ signaling KEGG pathway and highlighted those genes showing altered levels (Figure 2). Although the nature of the transcriptomic studies does not support these genes as direct Mecp2 targets (IE. direct promoter or enhancer binding), these genes certainly deserve a closer examination, in order to understand their potential contribution to RTT pathophysiology.
Evidence for the direct role played by Mecp2 in the transcriptional regulation of genes associated with Ca2+ signaling is sparse, as most efforts have turned into genome wide analyses. However, early and recent transcriptomic studies showed altered expression of RyR2 and RyR3 in Mecp2-null brain tissue [21,93]. RyRs are relevant to synaptic function as they are critical mediators of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) from the endoplasmic reticulum, contributing to Ca2+ propagation from the dendritic spine to the nucleus [77,94,95]. Hence, RyRs participate in neuronal function at several levels, including neuronal remodeling in response to BDNF, long term potentiation and excitation–transcription coupling [55,96,97].
Behavioral stimulation by exposition to an enriched environment or training in the water maze increases RyR3 expression [33,96]. Importantly, these stimulations increase promoter methylation and direct Mecp2 binding [33,98]. On the other hand, RyR3 downregulation was associated with increased promoter hydroxymethylation [33,98]. This strengthens the association between DNA modifications and the transcriptional regulation of these Ca2+ channels. Furthermore, Mecp2-null mice were unable to increase the transcriptional activity of RyR2 and RyR3 despite 5 weeks of continuous exposure to an enriched environment, underlining the relevance of Mecp2 in directing the upregulation of RyR transcriptional activity. Importantly, RyRs are also associated with the Mecp2-BDNF-miR132 axis. For instance, WT mice exposed to an enriched environment showed the miR132-depedent p250GAP and Mecp2 suppression. Consequently, these WT mice showed an increase in hippocampal dendritic spine density. On the other hand, Mecp2-null mice failed to show p250GAP suppression and hippocampal dendritic spine remodeling [33], highlighting the relevance of RyRs for activity-dependent neuronal remodeling and suggesting that reduced RyR expression contributes to the altered neuronal morphology associated with RTT [33,77].
RyRs have also been associated with the regulation of autophagic flux. The autophagic flux is essential for maintaining neuronal function by promoting the recycling of cellular components and the elimination of altered organelles. For instance, it was shown that RyR inhibition decreases autophagic flux in neurons [99], and this loss of neuronal autophagy increases presynaptic probability of release by axonal RyR accumulation and subsequent RyR-mediated calcium release, associating RyRs to autophagy and neuronal function [100]. In this line, it was recently reported that Mecp2-null neurons show reduced autophagy and that the pharmacologically induced restoration of autophagy recovers neuronal activity and morphology [101]. Hence, it is possible that reduced RyR expression in Mecp2-null neurons contributes to the impaired autophagy observed in these cells, leading to the abnormal accumulation of cellular components and to a progressive alteration in synaptic plasticity, which is an issue that could be further studied in the context of RTT pathophysiology. Altogether, RyRs are critical mediators of neuronal function through CICR and have been directly associated with Mecp2. Furthermore, RyR expression is altered in pre-symptomatic Mecp2-null mice, raising the need for a deeper understanding of its role in RTT pathophysiology.
It is also relevant to assess the possible contribution of endocrine hormones to the neurobiological characteristics of RTT. The precocious puberty and altered menstrual cycle factors observed in RTT suggests hormonal disturbances that could be associated with the neurobiological characteristics of RTT [5]. For instance, estradiol (E2), is relevant during brain formation, acting as a trophic and neuroprotective factor [102,103]. Furthermore, E2 fluctuations may contribute to the severity and progression of neurodevelopmental disorders [6,103]. E2 acts through its classical nuclear estrogen receptors α and β (ERα and ERβ). Importantly, Mecp2 has been associated with the developmental regulation of ERα expression in the mouse cortex. Concordantly, mice harboring a truncated Mecp2 gene showed an altered pattern of expression of this estrogen receptor [104]. However, apart from the classical estrogen receptor, the G-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) is an atypical, membrane-bound estrogen receptor that mediates non-genomic responses to E2. GPER1 signals through mitogen activated kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase, (PI3k) driving an intracellular Ca2+ rise associated with phospholipase C activity and concomitant inositol triphosphate signaling (IP3). GPER1 has been detected in association to the postsynaptic protein 95 (PSD95) contributing to hippocampal synaptic plasticity [105,106]. Furthermore, GPER1 activity has been associated with learning, memory and social behaviors [107]. Interestingly, GPER1 has been suggested as a target of interest for neurological disorders, and in recent transcriptomic studies, reduced GPER1 expression has been observed in the blood and brains of Mecp2 null mice, opening the possibility that Mecp2 acts as a transcriptional regulator of this receptor [108,109]. Furthermore, it has been reported that E2 potentiates L-Type Ca2+channels in neurons directly and by a non-classical membrane estrogen receptor such as GPER1 [110,111], which opens the possibility that endocrine alterations could directly contribute to the Ca2+ signaling alterations associated with RTT.
Recently, a meta-analysis of the transcriptomic data from a mouse brain, postmortem human brain tissue and iPSC-derived neurons called attention to the alpha-1A subunit of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel gene (CACNA1A) [112]. This gene is predominantly expressed in the central nervous system and has been associated with several neurological conditions including epileptic encephalopathy, cerebellar ataxia and developmental disorders [113]. This meta-analysis found CACNA1A to be a hub spot downregulated across these RTT models [112]. Interestingly, a report on a female patient diagnosed with atypical RTT showed a period of behavioral regression, loss of the purposeful use of hands, stereotypic hand movements and impaired gait in absence of MECP2, CDKL5 or FOXG1 mutations, and was subject to genetic studies. DNA sequencing revealed a de novo point mutation in the CACNA1A gene [114]. Although no functional assays have been reported, this mutation together with transcriptomic studies suggests a direct association of the CACNA1A calcium channel gene with the emergence of the RTT phenotype, suggesting its consideration once mutations associated with classical RTT have been discarded. Strengthening the association of the CACNA1A and RTT phenotype will open a new pathway to understanding RTT physiopathology.
The Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) is a ligand and thermosensitive cation channel located mainly in primary nociceptive neurons. At negative potentials, TRPV1 opening causes Na+ and Ca2+ influx, resulting in cell depolarization and the initiation of nociception [115]. For instance, WT mice injected via the tongue with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) showed increased heat sensitivity accompanied by increased TRPV1 immunoreactivity in the trigeminal ganglion neurons. However, the hyperalgesia induced by CFA injection was not observed in Mecp2−/+ heterozygous female mice. Concordantly, TRPV1 immunoreactivity remained unaltered, suggesting the involvement of Mecp2 in heat sensitivity and increased TRPV expression in this model of hyperalgesia [116]. Additionally, a TRPV1 agonist, piperine, showed potential in rescuing some phenotypic alterations associated with RTT. For instance, piperine reduced RTT-associated breathing pauses and increased the locomotor activity in Mecp2-KO mice, suggesting a role for the TRPV1 cation channel in RTT pathophysiology [117]. This phenotypic recovery is better understood by considering that TRPV1 expression extends beyond nociceptive pathways to the central nervous system, including the prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, cerebellum and hippocampus, among others [118]. Here, TRPV1 expression has been associated with pre- and postsynaptic function, contributing to the presynaptic Ca2+ influx required for neurotransmitter release and postsynaptic Ca2+ mediated calcineurin activation [118]. This suggests that the phenotypic recovery observed in Mecp2-KO mice could be actively associated with TRPV1-mediated calcium influx.
The relevance of Ca2+ signaling as a key mediator of the neuronal alterations associated with RTT has been recently made evident by the use of a novel genetic enhancer of L-type Ca channel, GeeCL [119]. This genetic enhancer increases the open probability of the L-type Ca2+ channel, potentiating its function. Interestingly, an engineered human neuronal model of RTT expressing the GeeCL enhancer showed signs of recovery. For instance, CREB phosphorylation was restored, reversing the reduced excitation–transcription coupling associated with RTT neurobiology. Similarly, GeeCL expression in this neuronal model of RTT increased the soma size of neurons, recovering the reduced soma size associated with RTT, paralleling the results obtained by re-expressing Mecp2 from the inactivated X chromosome [120]. Altogether, these observations further enhance the relevance of understanding both the upstream and downstream relations of Mecp2 and Ca2+ signaling.

6. Conclusions

Years of great-quality research and recent transcriptomic studies have drawn attention to Ca2+ signaling as a key contributor to RTT neurobiology. The evidence suggests a central role for Mecp2 in maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis, and that perturbations in the Mecp2-Ca2+ interplay are direct contributors to synaptic and morphological alterations that characterize RTT. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that Ca2+ signaling potentiation recovers neuronal disturbances associated with RTT. However, there is still a profound need for functional studies of Ca2+ signaling genes to assert which targets are specifically Mecp2 targets and most importantly, how they contribute to RTT pathophysiology. Such an effort could help to open pathways for new pharmaceutical targets for this devastating syndrome.

Funding

R.F.T. and L.M.C. are funded by FONDECYT 11230898 (R.F.T.) and 11240855 (L.M.C.). Y.A. is funded by ANID Fondecyt Postdoctorado 3200655 and ANID-MILENIO (NCN2023_032).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neul, J.L.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Rett Syndrome: A Prototypical Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Neuroscientist 2004, 10, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laurvick, C.L.; de Klerk, N.; Bower, C.; Christodoulou, J.; Ravine, D.; Ellaway, C.; Williamson, S.; Leonard, H. Rett Syndrome in Australia: A Review of the Epidemiology. J. Pediatr. 2006, 148, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Young, D.J.; Bebbington, A.; Anderson, A.; Ravine, D.; Ellaway, C.; Kulkarni, A.; de Klerk, N.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Leonard, H. The Diagnosis of Autism in a Female: Could It Be Rett Syndrome? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2008, 167, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chahrour, M.; Zoghbi, H.Y. The Story of Rett Syndrome: From Clinic to Neurobiology. Neuron 2007, 56, 422–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pepe, G.; Coco, R.; Corica, D.; Luppino, G.; Morabito, L.A.; Lugarà, C.; Abbate, T.; Zirilli, G.; Aversa, T.; Stagi, S.; et al. Endocrine Disorders in Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1477227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ziemka-Nalecz, M.; Pawelec, P.; Ziabska, K.; Zalewska, T. Sex Differences in Brain Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bird, A. DNA Methylation Patterns and Epigenetic Memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, J.U.; Ma, D.K.; Mo, H.; Ball, M.P.; Jang, M.-H.; Bonaguidi, M.A.; Balazer, J.A.; Eaves, H.L.; Xie, B.; Ford, E.; et al. Neuronal Activity Modifies the DNA Methylation Landscape in the Adult Brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Free, A.; Wakefield, R.I.D.; Smith, B.O.; Dryden, D.T.F.; Barlow, P.N.; Bird, A.P. DNA Recognition by the Methyl-CpG Binding Domain of MeCP2. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3353–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amir, R.E.; Van den Veyver, I.B.; Wan, M.; Tran, C.Q.; Francke, U.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Rett Syndrome Is Caused by Mutations in X-Linked MECP2, Encoding Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tillotson, R.; Bird, A. The Molecular Basis of MeCP2 Function in the Brain. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 1602–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dragich, J.M.; Kim, Y.-H.; Arnold, A.P.; Schanen, N.C. Differential Distribution of the MeCP2 Splice Variants in the Postnatal Mouse Brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 501, 526–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kerr, B.; Soto C, J.; Saez, M.; Abrams, A.; Walz, K.; Young, J.I. Transgenic Complementation of MeCP2 Deficiency: Phenotypic Rescue of Mecp2-Null Mice by Isoform-Specific Transgenes. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 20, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rodrigues, D.C.; Mufteev, M.; Ellis, J. Regulation, Diversity and Function of MECP2 Exon and 3′UTR Isoforms. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020, 29, R89–R99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Y.; Whitfield, T.W.; Bell, G.W.; Guo, R.; Flamier, A.; Young, R.A.; Jaenisch, R. Exploring the Complexity of MECP2 Function in Rett Syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2025, 26, 379–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chandler, S.P.; Guschin, D.; Landsberger, N.; Wolffe, A.P. The Methyl-CpG Binding Transcriptional Repressor MeCP2 Stably Associates with Nucleosomal DNA. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 7008–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nan, X.; Ng, H.-H.; Johnson, C.A.; Laherty, C.D.; Turner, B.M.; Eisenman, R.N.; Bird, A. Transcriptional Repression by the Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein MeCP2 Involves a Histone Deacetylase Complex. Nature 1998, 393, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chahrour, M.; Jung, S.Y.; Shaw, C.; Zhou, X.; Wong, S.T.C.; Qin, J.; Zoghbi, H.Y. MeCP2, a Key Contributor to Neurological Disease, Activates and Represses Transcription. Science 2008, 320, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mellén, M.; Ayata, P.; Dewell, S.; Kriaucionis, S.; Heintz, N. MeCP2 Binds to 5hmC Enriched within Active Genes and Accessible Chromatin in the Nervous System. Cell 2012, 151, 1417–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gabel, H.W.; Kinde, B.Z.; Stroud, H.; Gilbert, C.S.; Harmin, D.A.; Kastan, N.R.; Hemberg, M.; Ebert, D.H.; Greenberg, M.E. Disruption of DNA Methylation-Dependent Long Gene Repression in Rett Syndrome. Nature 2015, 522, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ben-Shachar, S.; Chahrour, M.; Thaller, C.; Shaw, C.A.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Mouse Models of MeCP2 Disorders Share Gene Expression Changes in the Cerebellum and Hypothalamus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 2431–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, Y.-T.; Goffin, D.; Johnson, B.S.; Zhou, Z. Loss of MeCP2 Function Is Associated with Distinct Gene Expression Changes in the Striatum. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 59, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kinde, B.; Gabel, H.W.; Gilbert, C.S.; Griffith, E.C.; Greenberg, M.E. Reading the Unique DNA Methylation Landscape of the Brain: Non-CpG Methylation, Hydroxymethylation, and MeCP2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 6800–6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schanen, C.; Houwink, E.J.F.; Dorrani, N.; Lane, J.; Everett, R.; Feng, A.; Cantor, R.M.; Percy, A. Phenotypic Manifestations of MECP2 Mutations in Classical and Atypical Rett Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2004, 126A, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Banerjee, A.; Miller, M.T.; Li, K.; Sur, M.; Kaufmann, W.E. Towards a Better Diagnosis and Treatment of Rett Syndrome: A Model Synaptic Disorder. Brain 2019, 142, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guy, J.; Hendrich, B.; Holmes, M.; Martin, J.E.; Bird, A. A Mouse Mecp2-Null Mutation Causes Neurological Symptoms That Mimic Rett Syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.; Pozzo-Miller, L. Beyond Widespread Mecp2 Deletions to Model Rett Syndrome: Conditional Spatio-Temporal Knockout, Single-Point Mutations and Transgenic Rescue Mice. Autism Open Access 2012, 2012, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asaka, Y.; Jugloff, D.G.M.; Zhang, L.; Eubanks, J.H.; Fitzsimonds, R.M. Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity Is Impaired in the Mecp2-Null Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 21, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kerr, B.; Silva, P.A.; Walz, K.; Young, J.I. Unconventional Transcriptional Response to Environmental Enrichment in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bach, S.; Shovlin, S.; Moriarty, M.; Bardoni, B.; Tropea, D. Rett Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome: Different Etiology With Common Molecular Dysfunctions. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2021, 15, 764761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belichenko, P.V.; Oldfors, A.; Hagberg, B.; Dahlström, A. Rett Syndrome: 3-D Confocal Microscopy of Cortical Pyramidal Dendrites and Afferents. Neuroreport 1994, 5, 1509–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nguyen, M.V.C.; Du, F.; Felice, C.A.; Shan, X.; Nigam, A.; Mandel, G.; Robinson, J.K.; Ballas, N. MeCP2 Is Critical for Maintaining Mature Neuronal Networks and Global Brain Anatomy during Late Stages of Postnatal Brain Development and in the Mature Adult Brain. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 10021–10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torres, R.F.; Hidalgo, C.; Kerr, B. Mecp2 Mediates Experience-Dependent Transcriptional Upregulation of Ryanodine Receptor Type-3. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Landi, S.; Putignano, E.; Boggio, E.M.; Giustetto, M.; Pizzorusso, T.; Ratto, G.M. The Short-Time Structural Plasticity of Dendritic Spines Is Altered in a Model of Rett Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zoghbi, H.Y. Postnatal Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Meeting at the Synapse? Science 2003, 302, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, X.; Miller, E.C.; Pozzo-Miller, L. Dendritic Spine Dysgenesis in Rett Syndrome. Front. Neuroanat. 2014, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luikenhuis, S.; Giacometti, E.; Beard, C.F.; Jaenisch, R. Expression of MeCP2 in Postmitotic Neurons Rescues Rett Syndrome in Mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004, 101, 6033–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Powers, S.; Likhite, S.; Gadalla, K.K.; Miranda, C.J.; Huffenberger, A.J.; Dennys, C.; Foust, K.D.; Morales, P.; Pierson, C.R.; Rinaldi, F.; et al. Novel MECP2 Gene Therapy Is Effective in a Multicenter Study Using Two Mouse Models of Rett Syndrome and Is Safe in Non-Human Primates. Mol. Ther. 2023, 31, 2767–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Torres, R.F.; Kouro, R.; Kerr, B. Writers and Readers of DNA Methylation/Hydroxymethylation in Physiological Aging and Its Impact on Cognitive Function. Neural Plast. 2019, 2019, 5982625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bajikar, S.S.; Zhou, J.; O’Hara, R.; Tirumala, H.P.; Durham, M.A.; Trostle, A.J.; Dias, M.; Shao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, W.; et al. Acute MeCP2 Loss in Adult Mice Reveals Transcriptional and Chromatin Changes That Precede Neurological Dysfunction and Inform Pathogenesis. Neuron 2024, 113, 380–395.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheval, H.; Guy, J.; Merusi, C.; De Sousa, D.; Selfridge, J.; Bird, A. Postnatal Inactivation Reveals Enhanced Requirement for MeCP2 at Distinct Age Windows. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 3806–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blackman, M.P.; Djukic, B.; Nelson, S.B.; Turrigiano, G.G. A Critical and Cell-Autonomous Role for MeCP2 in Synaptic Scaling Up. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 13529–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rahn, R.M.; Yen, A.; Chen, S.; Gaines, S.H.; Bice, A.R.; Brier, L.M.; Swift, R.G.; Lee, L.; Maloney, S.E.; Culver, J.P.; et al. Mecp2 Deletion Results in Profound Alterations of Developmental and Adult Functional Connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 2023, 33, 7436–7453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dani, V.S.; Chang, Q.; Maffei, A.; Turrigiano, G.G.; Jaenisch, R.; Nelson, S.B. Reduced Cortical Activity Due to a Shift in the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12560–12565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iascone, D.M.; Li, Y.; Sümbül, U.; Doron, M.; Chen, H.; Andreu, V.; Goudy, F.; Blockus, H.; Abbott, L.F.; Segev, I.; et al. Whole-Neuron Synaptic Mapping Reveals Spatially Precise Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance Limiting Dendritic and Somatic Spiking. Neuron 2020, 106, 566–578.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, G. Local Structural Balance and Functional Interaction of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses in Hippocampal Dendrites. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chao, H.-T.; Zoghbi, H.Y.; Rosenmund, C. MeCP2 Controls Excitatory Synaptic Strength by Regulating Glutamatergic Synapse Number. Neuron 2007, 56, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sceniak, M.P.; Lang, M.; Enomoto, A.C.; James Howell, C.; Hermes, D.J.; Katz, D.M. Mechanisms of Functional Hypoconnectivity in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex of Mecp2 Null Mice. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 1938–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dani, V.S.; Nelson, S.B. Intact Long-Term Potentiation but Reduced Connectivity between Neocortical Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 11263–11270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nelson, E.D.; Kavalali, E.T.; Monteggia, L.M. MeCP2-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Regulates Excitatory Neurotransmission. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Noutel, J.; Hong, Y.K.; Leu, B.; Kang, E.; Chen, C. Experience-Dependent Retinogeniculate Synapse Remodeling Is Abnormal in MeCP2-Deficient Mice. Neuron 2011, 70, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qiu, Z.; Sylwestrak, E.L.; Lieberman, D.N.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.-Y.; Ghosh, A. The Rett Syndrome Protein MeCP2 Regulates Synaptic Scaling. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bading, H. Nuclear Calcium Signalling in the Regulation of Brain Function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hagenston, A.M.; Bading, H. Calcium Signaling in Synapse-to-Nucleus Communication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lobos, P.; Córdova, A.; Vega-Vásquez, I.; Ramírez, O.A.; Adasme, T.; Toledo, J.; Cerda, M.; Härtel, S.; Paula-Lima, A.; Hidalgo, C. RyR-Mediated Ca2+ Release Elicited by Neuronal Activity Induces Nuclear Ca2+ Signals, CREB Phosphorylation, and Npas4/RyR2 Expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2102265118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Buchthal, B.; Lau, D.; Weiss, U.; Weislogel, J.-M.; Bading, H. Nuclear Calcium Signaling Controls Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2 (MeCP2) Phosphorylation on Serine 421 Following Synaptic Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 30967–30974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hardingham, G.E.; Arnold, F.J.; Bading, H. Nuclear Calcium Signaling Controls CREB-Mediated Gene Expression Triggered by Synaptic Activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wayman, G.A.; Davare, M.; Ando, H.; Fortin, D.; Varlamova, O.; Cheng, H.-Y.M.; Marks, D.; Obrietan, K.; Soderling, T.R.; Goodman, R.H.; et al. An Activity-Regulated microRNA Controls Dendritic Plasticity by down-Regulating p250GAP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9093–9098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Postogna, F.M.; Roggero, O.M.; Biella, F.; Frasca, A. Interpreting the Rich Dialogue between Astrocytes and Neurons: An Overview in Rett Syndrome. Brain Res. Bull. 2025, 227, 111386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kalani, L.; Kim, B.H.; Vincent, J.B.; Ausió, J. MeCP2 Ubiquitination and Sumoylation, in Search of a Function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2023, 33, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bellini, E.; Pavesi, G.; Barbiero, I.; Bergo, A.; Chandola, C.; Nawaz, M.S.; Rusconi, L.; Stefanelli, G.; Strollo, M.; Valente, M.M.; et al. MeCP2 Post-Translational Modifications: A Mechanism to Control Its Involvement in Synaptic Plasticity and Homeostasis? Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tao, J.; Hu, K.; Chang, Q.; Wu, H.; Sherman, N.E.; Martinowich, K.; Klose, R.J.; Schanen, C.; Jaenisch, R.; Wang, W.; et al. Phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Serine 80 Regulates Its Chromatin Association and Neurological Function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4882–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, W.G.; Chang, Q.; Lin, Y.; Meissner, A.; West, A.E.; Griffith, E.C.; Jaenisch, R.; Greenberg, M.E. Derepression of BDNF Transcription Involves Calcium-Dependent Phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science 2003, 302, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tzeng, C.P.; Whitwam, T.; Boxer, L.D.; Li, E.; Silberfeld, A.; Trowbridge, S.; Mei, K.; Lin, C.; Shamah, R.; Griffith, E.C.; et al. Activity-Induced MeCP2 Phosphorylation Regulates Retinogeniculate Synapse Refinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2310344120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chao, H.-T.; Zoghbi, H.Y. The Yin and Yang of MeCP2 Phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4577–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rutlin, M.; Nelson, S.B. MeCP2: Phosphorylated Locally, Acting Globally. Neuron 2011, 72, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zagrebelsky, M.; Tacke, C.; Korte, M. BDNF Signaling during the Lifetime of Dendritic Spines. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 382, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, Z.; Hong, E.J.; Cohen, S.; Zhao, W.; Ho, H.H.; Schmidt, L.; Chen, W.G.; Lin, Y.; Savner, E.; Griffith, E.C.; et al. Brain-Specific Phosphorylation of MeCP2 Regulates Activity-Dependent Bdnf Transcription, Dendritic Growth, and Spine Maturation. Neuron 2006, 52, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cohen, S.; Gabel, H.W.; Hemberg, M.; Hutchinson, A.N.; Sadacca, L.A.; Ebert, D.H.; Harmin, D.A.; Greenberg, R.S.; Verdine, V.K.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Genome-Wide Activity-Dependent MeCP2 Phosphorylation Regulates Nervous System Development and Function. Neuron 2011, 72, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Skene, P.J.; Illingworth, R.S.; Webb, S.; Kerr, A.R.W.; James, K.D.; Turner, D.J.; Andrews, R.; Bird, A.P. Neuronal MeCP2 Is Expressed at near Histone-Octamer Levels and Globally Alters the Chromatin State. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Collins, A.L.; Levenson, J.M.; Vilaythong, A.P.; Richman, R.; Armstrong, D.L.; Noebels, J.L.; Sweatt, J.D.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Mild Overexpression of MeCP2 Causes a Progressive Neurological Disorder in Mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 2679–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Impey, S.; Davare, M.; Lesiak, A.; Lasiek, A.; Fortin, D.; Ando, H.; Varlamova, O.; Obrietan, K.; Soderling, T.R.; Goodman, R.H.; et al. An Activity-Induced microRNA Controls Dendritic Spine Formation by Regulating Rac1-PAK Signaling. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2010, 43, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wanet, A.; Tacheny, A.; Arnould, T.; Renard, P. miR-212/132 Expression and Functions: Within and beyond the Neuronal Compartment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 4742–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vo, N.; Klein, M.E.; Varlamova, O.; Keller, D.M.; Yamamoto, T.; Goodman, R.H.; Impey, S. A cAMP-Response Element Binding Protein-Induced microRNA Regulates Neuronal Morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16426–16431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hansen, K.F.; Sakamoto, K.; Wayman, G.A.; Impey, S.; Obrietan, K. Transgenic miR132 Alters Neuronal Spine Density and Impairs Novel Object Recognition Memory. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tognini, P.; Pizzorusso, T. MicroRNA212/132 Family: Molecular Transducer of Neuronal Function and Plasticity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lesiak, A.; Zhu, M.; Chen, H.; Appleyard, S.M.; Impey, S.; Lein, P.J.; Wayman, G.A. The Environmental Neurotoxicant PCB 95 Promotes Synaptogenesis via Ryanodine Receptor-Dependent miR132 Upregulation. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, R.-Y.; Phang, R.-Z.; Hsu, P.-H.; Wang, W.-H.; Huang, H.-T.; Liu, I.Y. In Vivo Knockdown of Hippocampal miR-132 Expression Impairs Memory Acquisition of Trace Fear Conditioning. Hippocampus 2013, 23, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Klein, M.E.; Lioy, D.T.; Ma, L.; Impey, S.; Mandel, G.; Goodman, R.H. Homeostatic Regulation of MeCP2 Expression by a CREB-Induced microRNA. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10, 1513–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Su, M.; Hong, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, S.; Xue, X. MeCP2 Controls Hippocampal Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression via Homeostatic Interactions with microRNA-132 in Rats with Depression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 5399–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yao, Z.-H.; Yao, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.-F.; Hu, J. miR-132 Down-Regulates Methyl CpG Binding Protein 2 (MeCP2) During Cognitive Dysfunction Following Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2017, 14, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tong, L.; Li, M.-D.; Nie, P.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.-L.; Ji, L.-L. miR-132 Downregulation Alleviates Behavioral Impairment of Rats Exposed to Single Prolonged Stress, Reduces the Level of Apoptosis in PFC, and Upregulates the Expression of MeCP2 and BDNF. Neurobiol. Stress. 2021, 14, 100311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mendoza-Viveros, L.; Chiang, C.-K.; Ong, J.L.K.; Hegazi, S.; Cheng, A.H.; Bouchard-Cannon, P.; Fana, M.; Lowden, C.; Zhang, P.; Bothorel, B.; et al. miR-132/212 Modulates Seasonal Adaptation and Dendritic Morphology of the Central Circadian Clock. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bijkerk, R.; Trimpert, C.; van Solingen, C.; de Bruin, R.G.; Florijn, B.W.; Kooijman, S.; van den Berg, R.; van der Veer, E.P.; Bredewold, E.O.W.; Rensen, P.C.N.; et al. MicroRNA-132 Controls Water Homeostasis through Regulating MECP2-Mediated Vasopressin Synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2018, 315, F1129–F1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pejhan, S.; Del Bigio, M.R.; Rastegar, M. The MeCP2E1/E2-BDNF-miR132 Homeostasis Regulatory Network Is Region-Dependent in the Human Brain and Is Impaired in Rett Syndrome Patients. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vanhala, R.; Korhonen, L.; Mikelsaar, M.; Lindholm, D.; Riikonen, R. Neurotrophic Factors in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum of Patients with Rett Syndrome. J. Child Neurol. 1998, 13, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chang, Q.; Khare, G.; Dani, V.; Nelson, S.; Jaenisch, R. The Disease Progression of Mecp2 Mutant Mice Is Affected by the Level of BDNF Expression. Neuron 2006, 49, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sampathkumar, C.; Wu, Y.-J.; Vadhvani, M.; Trimbuch, T.; Eickholt, B.; Rosenmund, C. Loss of MeCP2 Disrupts Cell Autonomous and Autocrine BDNF Signaling in Mouse Glutamatergic Neurons. eLife 2016, 5, e19374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Li, W.; Pozzo-Miller, L. BDNF Deregulation in Rett Syndrome. Neuropharmacology 2014, 76, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tao, X.; Finkbeiner, S.; Arnold, D.B.; Shaywitz, A.J.; Greenberg, M.E. Ca2+ Influx Regulates BDNF Transcription by a CREB Family Transcription Factor-Dependent Mechanism. Neuron 1998, 20, 709–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Miyasaka, Y.; Yamamoto, N. Neuronal Activity Patterns Regulate Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression in Cortical Cells via Neuronal Circuits. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 699583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Sugino, K.; Hempel, C.M.; Okaty, B.W.; Arnson, H.A.; Kato, S.; Dani, V.S.; Nelson, S.B. Cell-Type-Specific Repression by Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2 Is Biased toward Long Genes. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 12877–12883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sanfeliu, A.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Gill, M.; Guasoni, P.; Tropea, D. Transcriptomic Studies in Mouse Models of Rett Syndrome: A Review. Neuroscience 2019, 413, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Torres, R.; Hidalgo, C. Subcellular Localization and Transcriptional Regulation of Brain Ryanodine Receptors. Functional Implications. Cell Calcium 2023, 116, 102821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rosado, J.; Bui, V.D.; Haas, C.A.; Beck, J.; Queisser, G.; Vlachos, A. Calcium Modeling of Spine Apparatus-Containing Human Dendritic Spines Demonstrates an “All-or-Nothing” Communication Switch between the Spine Head and Dendrite. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18, e1010069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Adasme, T.; Haeger, P.; Paula-Lima, A.C.; Espinoza, I.; Casas-Alarcón, M.M.; Carrasco, M.A.; Hidalgo, C. Involvement of Ryanodine Receptors in Neurotrophin-Induced Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Spatial Memory Formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3029–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mellentin, C.; Jahnsen, H.; Abraham, W.C. Priming of Long-Term Potentiation Mediated by Ryanodine Receptor Activation in Rat Hippocampal Slices. Neuropharmacology 2007, 52, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Torres, R.F.; Kerr, B. Spatial Learning Is Associated with Antagonist Outcomes for DNA Methylation and DNA Hydroxymethylation in the Transcriptional Regulation of the Ryanodine Receptor 3. Neural Plast. 2021, 2021, 9930962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Vervliet, T.; Pintelon, I.; Welkenhuyzen, K.; Bootman, M.D.; Bannai, H.; Mikoshiba, K.; Martinet, W.; Nadif Kasri, N.; Parys, J.B.; Bultynck, G. Basal Ryanodine Receptor Activity Suppresses Autophagic Flux. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 132, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kuijpers, M.; Kochlamazashvili, G.; Stumpf, A.; Puchkov, D.; Swaminathan, A.; Lucht, M.T.; Krause, E.; Maritzen, T.; Schmitz, D.; Haucke, V. Neuronal Autophagy Regulates Presynaptic Neurotransmission by Controlling the Axonal Endoplasmic Reticulum. Neuron 2021, 109, 299–313.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Esposito, A.; Seri, T.; Breccia, M.; Indrigo, M.; De Rocco, G.; Nuzzolillo, F.; Denti, V.; Pappacena, F.; Tartaglione, G.; Serrao, S.; et al. Unraveling Autophagic Imbalances and Therapeutic Insights in Mecp2-Deficient Models. EMBO Mol. Med. 2024, 16, 2795–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Denley, M.C.S.; Gatford, N.J.F.; Sellers, K.J.; Srivastava, D.P. Estradiol and the Development of the Cerebral Cortex: An Unexpected Role? Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L. The Impact of 17β-Estradiol on the Estrogen-Deficient Female Brain: From Mechanisms to Therapy with Hot Flushes as Target Symptoms. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 14, 1310432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Westberry, J.M.; Trout, A.L.; Wilson, M.E. Epigenetic Regulation of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Gene Expression in the Mouse Cortex during Early Postnatal Development. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Akama, K.T.; Thompson, L.I.; Milner, T.A.; McEwen, B.S. Post-Synaptic Density-95 (PSD-95) Binding Capacity of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 (GPR30), an Estrogen Receptor That Can Be Identified in Hippocampal Dendritic Spines. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6438–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Clements, L.; Alexander, A.; Hamilton, K.; Irving, A.; Harvey, J. G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER1) Activation Promotes Synaptic Insertion of AMPA Receptors and Induction of Chemical LTP at Hippocampal Temporoammonic-CA1 Synapses. Mol. Brain 2023, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kumar, A.; Foster, T.C. G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor: Rapid Effects on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Memory and Synaptic Plasticity. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sanfeliu, A.; Hokamp, K.; Gill, M.; Tropea, D. Transcriptomic Analysis of Mecp2 Mutant Mice Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes and Altered Mechanisms in Both Blood and Brain. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Roque, C.; Mendes-Oliveira, J.; Duarte-Chendo, C.; Baltazar, G. The Role of G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1 on Neurological Disorders. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2019, 55, 100786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Sarkar, S.N.; Huang, R.-Q.; Logan, S.M.; Yi, K.D.; Dillon, G.H.; Simpkins, J.W. Estrogens Directly Potentiate Neuronal L-Type Ca2+ Channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 15148–15153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pemberton, K.; Rosato, M.; Dedert, C.; DeLeon, C.; Arnatt, C.; Xu, F. Differential Effects of the G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) on Rat Embryonic (E18) Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons. eNeuro 2022, 9, ENEURO.0475-21.2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Haase, F.; Singh, R.; Gloss, B.; Tam, P.; Gold, W. Meta-Analysis Identifies BDNF and Novel Common Genes Differently Altered in Cross-Species Models of Rett Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Indelicato, E.; Boesch, S. From Genotype to Phenotype: Expanding the Clinical Spectrum of CACNA1A Variants in the Era of Next Generation Sequencing. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 639994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Epperson, M.V.; Haws, M.E.; Standridge, S.; Gilbert, D.L. An Atypical Rett Syndrome Phenotype Due to a Novel Missense Mutation in CACNA1A. J. Child Neurol. 2018, 33, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rosenbaum, T.; Simon, S.A. TRPV1 Receptors and Signal Transduction. In TRP Ion Channel Function in Sensory Transduction and Cellular Signaling Cascades; Liedtke, W.B., Heller, S., Eds.; Frontiers in Neuroscience; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-8493-4048-2. [Google Scholar]
  116. Suzuki, A.; Shinoda, M.; Honda, K.; Shirakawa, T.; Iwata, K. Regulation of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Expression in Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons via Methyl-CpG Binding Protein 2 Signaling Contributes Tongue Heat Sensitivity and Inflammatory Hyperalgesia in Mice. Mol. Pain. 2016, 12, 1744806916633206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tang, X.; Drotar, J.; Li, K.; Clairmont, C.D.; Brumm, A.S.; Sullins, A.J.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.S.; Wang, J.; Gray, N.S.; et al. Pharmacological Enhancement of KCC2 Gene Expression Exerts Therapeutic Effects on Human Rett Syndrome Neurons and Mecp2 Mutant Mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau0164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Meza, R.C.; Ancatén-González, C.; Chiu, C.Q.; Chávez, A.E. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Function at Central Synapses in Health and Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 864828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Morfin, P.J.d.R.; Chavez, D.S.; Jayaraman, S.; Yang, L.; Geisler, S.M.; Kochiss, A.L.; Tuluc, P.; Colecraft, H.M.; Marx, S.O.; Liu, X.S.; et al. A Genetically Encoded Actuator Boosts L-Type Calcium Channel Function in Diverse Physiological Settings. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadq3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Qian, J.; Guan, X.; Xie, B.; Xu, C.; Niu, J.; Tang, X.; Li, C.H.; Colecraft, H.M.; Jaenisch, R.; Liu, X.S. Multiplex Epigenome Editing of MECP2 to Rescue Rett Syndrome Neurons. Sci. Transl. Med. 2023, 15, eadd4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Homeostatic regulation of the BDNF-miR132-Mecp2 axis in synaptogenesis induced by synaptic activity. Synaptic activity drives phosphorylation of Mecp2 at S421, contributing to BDNF increased transcriptional activity. BDNF stimulation upregulates miR132 expression, which in turn suppresses Mecp2. Calcium plays a pivotal role in this axis, orchestrating BDNF and miR132 transcription and Mecp2 phosphorylation. Patients and RTT mouse models show reduced levels of BDNF and miR132, suggesting the contribution of this axis to the reduced structural plasticity associated with this devastating syndrome.
Figure 1. Homeostatic regulation of the BDNF-miR132-Mecp2 axis in synaptogenesis induced by synaptic activity. Synaptic activity drives phosphorylation of Mecp2 at S421, contributing to BDNF increased transcriptional activity. BDNF stimulation upregulates miR132 expression, which in turn suppresses Mecp2. Calcium plays a pivotal role in this axis, orchestrating BDNF and miR132 transcription and Mecp2 phosphorylation. Patients and RTT mouse models show reduced levels of BDNF and miR132, suggesting the contribution of this axis to the reduced structural plasticity associated with this devastating syndrome.
Ijms 26 10490 g001
Figure 2. Altered expression of genes associated with Ca2+ homeostasis in RTT. The KEGG Ca2+ signaling pathway is depicted (ko04020). The genes highlighted in green were found altered according to the meta-transcriptomic analysis of RTT models by Sanfeliu and collaborators, 2019 [93]. Importantly, genes contributing to Ca2+ rise in response to depolarization and genes responsible for the intracellular Ca2+ liberation from the endoplasmic reticulum are part of the altered pool of genes common to the 38 datasets of RTT models.
Figure 2. Altered expression of genes associated with Ca2+ homeostasis in RTT. The KEGG Ca2+ signaling pathway is depicted (ko04020). The genes highlighted in green were found altered according to the meta-transcriptomic analysis of RTT models by Sanfeliu and collaborators, 2019 [93]. Importantly, genes contributing to Ca2+ rise in response to depolarization and genes responsible for the intracellular Ca2+ liberation from the endoplasmic reticulum are part of the altered pool of genes common to the 38 datasets of RTT models.
Ijms 26 10490 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Molina Calistro, L.; Arancibia, Y.; Alarcón, J.; Torres, R.F. The Ca2+ Bridge: From Neurons to Circuits in Rett Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110490

AMA Style

Molina Calistro L, Arancibia Y, Alarcón J, Torres RF. The Ca2+ Bridge: From Neurons to Circuits in Rett Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(21):10490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Molina Calistro, Luis, Yennyfer Arancibia, Javiera Alarcón, and Rodrigo Flavio Torres. 2025. "The Ca2+ Bridge: From Neurons to Circuits in Rett Syndrome" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 21: 10490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110490

APA Style

Molina Calistro, L., Arancibia, Y., Alarcón, J., & Torres, R. F. (2025). The Ca2+ Bridge: From Neurons to Circuits in Rett Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop