Next Article in Journal
A Pre-Clinical Study on the Use of the Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor PEP 2-8 to Mitigate Ischemic Injury in a Rat Marginal Donor Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Foliar Nano-Selenium Modulates Metabolic and Antioxidant Responses in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): Integration of Pot and Field Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Mitotic Disruption and Cytoskeletal Alterations Induced by Acorus calamus Essential Oil: Implications for Bioherbicidal Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biotic and Abiotic Factors Influencing Maize Plant Height
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Folcisteine Safeguards Maize Against Copper–Cadmium Stress by Boosting the Activity of Photosynthesis-Related Enzymes and Antioxidant Defense Systems, Mediating Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathways and Hormonal Regulation

1
College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Crop Development Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of land Reclamation Sciences, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 8938; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188938
Submission received: 18 August 2025 / Revised: 4 September 2025 / Accepted: 11 September 2025 / Published: 13 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Plant Abiotic Stress: 3rd Edition)

Abstract

With the rapid development of industry and agriculture, soil heavy metal pollution has become increasingly severe. Copper (Cu) and cadmium (Cd) often co-occur in soils, exerting combined stress on crops. As a major food and feed crop, maize was studied under CuCd stress to assess the mitigating effects of exogenous Folcisteine (NATCA). Two varieties with contrasting tolerance (Jiuyuan 15 and Longfuyu 6) were subjected to composite stress (80 mg·L−1 CuSO4 + 100 mg·L−1 CdCl2), with or without 20 mg·L−1 NATCA. The impacts on photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, and endogenous hormones were investigated. The results showed that CuCd stress reduced the activities of RUBPCase and PEPCase, inhibiting CO2 fixation, while NATCA application enhanced their activities and improved photosynthetic efficiency. Stress also induced ROS accumulation (elevated O2· and H2O2) and elevated electrolyte leakage, whereas NATCA reduced oxidative damage and stabilized membrane integrity. Additionally, NATCA boosted both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity in the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, improving ROS scavenging. Stress disrupted endogenous hormone balance, decreasing IAA, GA, and ZR, and increasing ABA. NATCA application restored hormone levels toward balance, promoting growth and enhancing tolerance to CuCd stress. These findings demonstrate NATCA’s role in improving maize resilience under heavy metal stress.

1. Introduction

Soil heavy metal contamination has a substantial impact on the physiological and biochemical processes of maize. Specifically, it can lead to a reduction in photosynthesis efficiency, affect the activities of various enzymes, disrupt the balance of endogenous hormones, and ultimately result in a decline in maize biomass and yields [1]. Maize, as a crop characterized by relatively low accumulation of heavy metals, plays a crucial role in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils [2]. However, it has been observed that maize kernels tend to accumulate significant levels of cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) [3]. Analysis of the environmental monitoring data provided by the Ministry of Agriculture indicates that approximately one-fifth of China’s total cultivated land area is affected by heavy metal contamination. This contamination has led to an annual reduction of around 10 million tons in grain production [4]. Heavy metals are absorbed and accumulated by plants from the soil, and once they enter the food chain, they pose risks to the entire ecosystem. For instance, an investigation into the characteristics and health risks related to heavy metal contamination in cultivated soil within a small watershed in the black soil region of Northeast China revealed notable pollution levels of Cd, Hg, and Cu [5]. Such findings highlight the importance of understanding and addressing the issue of soil heavy metal contamination to safeguard agricultural productivity and ecological safety. Former studies also showed that the accumulation status and ecological risks of heavy metals in the surface black soil (0–20 cm) of the Haigou River small watershed in Heilongjiang Province were analyzed. The US EPA model was used to evaluate the health risks of soil heavy metal pollution. The results showed that the average content of heavy metal elements in cultivated soil in the Haigou River small watershed was 16.334 mg/kg for Cu and 0.213 mg/kg for Cd. The single factor pollution index, comprehensive pollution index, and land accumulation index all indicated that heavy metals in the soil of the study area had begun to accumulate and enrich [6]. In the context of soil pollution in China, heavy metal contamination often occurs as a complex pollution scenario, with copper–cadmium compound pollution being the most prevalent.
The main sources of heavy metals in maize farmland soil are industrial and agricultural production activities. Research has found that soil pollution in maize fields is inversely proportional to the distance between the fields and tailings [7,8]. Research has found that due to the discharge of waste from leather factories, the heavy metal content in the soil of nearby maize fields exceeds the standard [9]. The farmland soil around the smelting plant shows a clear trend of pollution and enrichment of Cd, Hg, Zn, Pb, and Cu, with an overall level of severe pollution. Maize is contaminated with Cd and Pb, with Cd and Pb exceeding the standard rates of 69% and 46%, respectively [10]. The pollution of Cu and Cd caused by sewage irrigation is becoming increasingly serious, and long-term accumulation of Cu and Cd can cause pollution to soil and maize [11]. In the sampling and monitoring of irrigation wastewater, farmland, and maize in northern Ningxia, China, it was found that the content of Pb, Cd, and Cu in the irrigation wastewater exceeded the standard, and the heavy metal content in the irrigated farmland soil and maize exceeded the standard [12]. Excessive use of steel slag in farmland leads to the accumulation of Cr content in the soil surface, causing heavy metal pollution in maize fields [13]. The application of solid waste compost from household garbage can also increase the level of heavy metal pollution in maize farmland soil [14].
After treatment with Cu and Cd, the synthesis of chlorophyll is hindered, reducing the activity of photosynthesis-related enzymes and thus decreasing the photosynthetic capacity of plants [15,16,17,18]. There are multiple reasons why cadmium stress leads to a decrease in chlorophyll content, including its effects on several enzymes and subcellular tissues [19,20,21,22]. Rubisco is a key enzyme in the C3 pathway, accounting for over 50% of plant soluble leaf protein [23]. The carbon assimilation process is completed by Rubisco, and most of the total carbon atoms present in the organism pass through Rubisco’s active sites [24]. In addition to catalyzing the reaction of carbon dioxide fixation, Rubisco can also catalyze the reaction of oxygen with 1,5-diphosphate ribulose to produce phosphoglycolic acid, which also triggers the photorespiration process [25]. Copper cadmium significantly inhibits Rubisco activity, ultimately reducing photosynthetic rate [26,27,28]. Cd treatment resulted in inhibition of leaf growth, as well as decreased photosynthetic parameters, transpiration, and stomatal conductance [29]. The efficiency of the PSII complex in absorbing and utilizing light energy decreases after Cu and Cd treatment [30]. Cd2+ enters the guard cells of leaves through Ca2+ channels, affecting the pathway of ABA and causing stomatal closure. Cadmium also affects the biosynthesis of the precursor of chlorophyll biosynthesis [31]. Cu and Cd stress cause significant damage to chloroplasts. After entering the cell, Cu and Cd can bind to thiol groups on proteins in chloroplasts, thereby inhibiting chlorophyll synthesis [32,33,34]. Therefore, the impact of Cu and Cd stress on the plant photosynthetic system is a holistic damage, including the absorption and transformation of light energy, photosynthetic enzymes, and chloroplast structure.
Under natural conditions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are typically generated within organelles that possess electron transport chains or exhibit high oxidative metabolism rates. Among these organelles, peroxisomes and mitochondria are particularly prone to ROS production [35]. Copper (Cu) and cadmium (Cd), which are divalent cations, do not have the inherent ability to directly generate free radicals within plants. Nevertheless, numerous studies have documented the occurrence of ROS generation in plants subsequent to copper–cadmium stress [36]. Under physiological conditions, Cd2+ ions can substitute for metal ions on other proteins. This substitution process leads to an increase in the quantity of active antioxidant minerals as well as free reducing metal ions within cells. Subsequently, these free redox-active metals can directly augment the production of hydroxyl radicals through specific interactions [37]. Mitochondria serve as crucial sites for ROS production; however, the quantity of ROS generated under normal circumstances differs significantly from that under Cu and Cd stress conditions. In healthy tissues, the amount of free radicals produced by mitochondria is relatively low. In contrast, when subjected to stress, the production of ROS by mitochondria increases substantially. These elevated levels of ROS may trigger a series of detrimental consequences, including membrane lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial DNA breakage, impairment of ATP synthesis, mitochondrial damage, and ultimately, induction of cell apoptosis [38]. It has been demonstrated that Cd stress significantly elevates the relative electrical conductivity of both the aboveground and underground parts of two maize varieties during the germination stage. Moreover, as the concentration of Cd increases, the extent of membrane damage in each part shows a significant upward trend [39]. Additionally, research findings indicate that as the concentration of copper ions rises, the electrical conductivity and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of the extracellular exudate of petunias also increase significantly, thereby revealing a highly significant positive correlation between copper ions and both electrical conductivity and MDA [40].
In plants, endogenous hormones play a significant role in regulating plant resistance under stress conditions. Specifically, abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) are of major importance in modulating plant defense and resistance responses to both biotic and abiotic stressors [41]. IAA is involved in multiple aspects of plant growth and development. It can regulate the development of plant embryos and, at low concentrations, promote the growth of plant roots, stems, leaves, and flowers, thereby exerting a crucial influence on plant sexual growth. Moreover, IAA can also interact with other hormonal pathways. It has been shown to inhibit the biosynthesis of cytokinins and activate the ABA signaling pathway as well as the brassinosteroid signaling pathway [42,43,44,45]. Similarly, zeatin riboside (ZR) at low concentrations can contribute to plant physiological processes. It can promote cell division and collaborate with auxin to facilitate the germination of callus tissue, enhance root development, regulate the construction of stem apical meristematic tissue, and ultimately strengthen plant resistance to adverse conditions. Gibberellic acid (GA), on the other hand, can promote seed germination, fruit development, and stem elongation [46]. Regarding ABA, its effect on seed germination under cadmium (Cd) stress is concentration-dependent. A low concentration of ABA can alleviate the toxic effects of Cd on seed germination, whereas a high concentration of ABA exacerbates the Cd toxicity and inhibits seed germination [47]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that within plants, each plant hormone does not act in isolation but rather needs to cooperate with other plant hormones to achieve complex and effective regulation in different growth stages, under various environmental conditions, and within specific tissues [48,49,50]. The coordinated regulation of both synergistic and antagonistic hormone effects, along with the regulation of hormone biosynthesis pathways, is crucial for plant resistance to adverse circumstances [51]. Under cadmium stress, the levels of endogenous hormones in plants can be altered, disrupting the hormonal balance. For instance, under high concentrations of Cd stress, the content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) increases, and H2O2 functions as a signaling molecule downstream of IAA, which consequently leads to a decrease in IAA content [52]. It is worth noting that many processes that impact crop performance and yield are governed by the balance of plant hormones, which is specific to particular organs or tissues. As the treatment time and concentration of Cd increase, the ratio of ABA to ZR gradually rises, and the antagonistic interaction between endogenous ABA and ZR under Cd stress might exert a protective effect against Cd toxicity [53]. Research findings have also indicated that under copper (Cu) stress, the ratio of GA to ABA in rapeseed leaves significantly decreases, and the ratios of IAA to ABA and ZR to ABA all exhibit a decreasing trend, with similar patterns in their changes [54]. Additionally, under Cu stress conditions, as the concentration of Cu2+ increases, the contents of ZR and GA in the leaves of grafted and self-rooted seedlings decline [55]. Furthermore, Cd treatment has been shown to inhibit the synthesis of endogenous hormones such as IAA, GA3, and cytokinin (CTK) in Chinese fescue, while promoting the synthesis of ABA [56].
Folcisteine (NATCA) is often used as an intermediate in pesticides and mixed with other substances to play a role in agricultural production. A plant growth regulator composition composed of hemiphyllin, inositol peptide, and potassium magnesium sulfate has specific functions of stimulating plant absorption of water and fertilizer, stabilizing the structure of large molecular substances, increasing the activity of metabolic enzymes in plants, regulating redox potential, increasing the content of amino acids in plants, and improving protein synthesis rate [57]. The plant growth regulator composition composed of hemifolin and auxin can act on agricultural production in the form of powder solubilizer, granulator, and ultra-low molecular spray, which is conducive to promoting fruit expansion and grain plumpness after passing away, improving root growth capacity and increasing yield [58]. A plant growth regulator combination composed of hemiphyllin and sodium salicylate can effectively improve the growth of crops such as wheat, rice, maize, soybeans, and peanuts under stress environments, enhance crop salt and alkali tolerance, and alleviate cell damage under crop stress [59]. In the soil environment, the chemical reaction process between the exogenous compound hemiphyllin (NATCA) and two heavy metals, namely copper and cadmium, plays a significant role. Through chelation, NATCA can modify the existing forms of copper and cadmium. Specifically, it can transform these heavy metals from their highly active and easily plant-absorbable forms into relatively stable forms with lower bioavailability. This transformation effectively alleviates the stress exerted on crop growth.
Research on heavy metal stress in maize has witnessed progress across multiple aspects. It has ranged from clarifying the impacts of stress on diverse aspects of maize growth to delving into tolerance mechanisms and seeking mitigation strategies. Nevertheless, numerous aspects still await further exploration. Notably, there has been a lack of reports regarding the utilization of exogenous hemiphyllin (NATCA) as a plant growth regulator in enhancing maize’s resistance to heavy metals [60]. In this study, maize varieties with varying sensitivities to heavy metals were selected as experimental materials. The aim was to comprehensively investigate the effects of exogenous NATCA on several key physiological processes in maize leaves under copper–cadmium compound stress. These processes encompassed the activities of key photosynthetic enzymes, active oxygen metabolism, the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, and hormone metabolism. By conducting comprehensive research that spans from theoretical mechanisms to practical applications, novel technological approaches can be unearthed. Such approaches are expected to enhance the production capacity of farmland that is polluted by copper–cadmium compounds in the field. Simultaneously, a robust theoretical and practical foundation can be established for the application of exogenous NATCA in the field. This, in turn, will contribute to promoting the sustainable utilization of polluted farmland and facilitating the green development of agriculture.

2. Results

2.1. Photosynthetic Key Enzymes Activity

As shown in Figure 1, compared with CK, the RUBPCase activity and PEPCase enzyme activity of maize seedling leaves treated with exogenous NATCA were significantly increased. At 5 days after treatment, the RUBPCase activity of Jiuyuan 15 reached its maximum value, which was 1.79% higher than that of CK; when processing for 4 days, the RUBPCase enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 reached its maximum value, which was 12.70% higher than that of CK. During the 4 days of treatment, the PEPCase enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 and Longfuyu 6 reached their maximum values, which were 18.84% and 21.25% higher than the CK treatment, respectively. The activity of RUBPCase and PEPCase enzymes in maize seedling leaves after CuCd treatment decreased with increasing treatment time. Among them, the RUBPCase and PEPCase enzyme activities in the leaves of Longfuyu 6 seedlings showed the most significant decrease. Compared with CK, the RUBPCase enzyme activity in the leaves of Jiuyuan 15 decreased by 7.22%, 21.08%, 28.72%, 32.65%, and 35.88% after being treated with CuCd for 1–5 days; During the 5-day treatment with CuCd, the RUBPCase enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 8.98%, 25.43%, 33.96%, 41.22%, and 42.94%, respectively. Compared with CK, the PEPCase enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 decreased by 6.07%, 22.51%, 32.43%, 37.94%, and 36.41% after 1–5 days of CuCd treatment, respectively. The PEPCase enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 12.42%, 22.95%, 48.61%, 34.33%, and 34.32%, respectively, on days 1–5 of CuCd treatment. After treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the activity of RUBPCase and PEPCase enzymes in the leaves of two varieties increased significantly, which was higher than that of CuCd treatment. Compared with CuCd treatment, the RUBPCase enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 2.81%, 25.61%, 37.24%, 45.55%, and 53.43% after 1–5 days of treatment with NATCA + CuCd, respectively. Longfuyu 6 showed an increase in RUBPCase enzyme activity of 5.13%, 30.69%, 46.81%, 54.15%, and 57.71% in NATCA + CuCd treatment from day 1 to day 5, respectively. The PEPCase enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 2.51%, 15.29%, 30.97%, 39.96%, and 32.65% after 1–5 days of treatment with NATCA + CuCd, respectively. The PEPCase enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 increased by 8.61%, 24.98%, 34.55%, 27.54%, and 20.49%, respectively, on days 1–5 after NATCA + CuCd treatment (Figure 1).

2.2. Superoxide Anion (O2·)and Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

Maize seedlings subjected to CuCd stress produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species and cause disturbances in peroxide metabolism, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2·). In DAB color development, DAB can react with peroxides to form a brownish substance that is insoluble in organic solvents such as water and alcohol. Using NBT staining, superoxide anions can react with nitrogen blue tetrazole to form blue methyl hydrazone. As shown in Figure 2, the distribution of brown spots on the leaves of maize seedlings represents the content and distribution of H2O2, while blue represents the content and distribution of O2·. In situ detection of hydrogen peroxide and H2O2 in vivo tissue chemistry revealed that maize leaves treated with CuCd had the most brown spots. Compared with CuCd treatment, the maize leaves treated with NATCA + CuCd showed fewer brown spots, but more than those treated with NATCA. In situ detection of superoxide anion (O2·) in live tissue chemistry showed that the maize leaves treated with CuCd had the most blue spots. Compared with CuCd treatment, the leaves of maize treated with NATCA + CuCd showed fewer blue spots, but more than those treated with NATCA. The content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2·) in maize leaves treated with CuCd was high, and the content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2·) in maize leaves decreased after NATCA treatment (Figure 2).

2.3. Electrolyte Leakage (EL)

As shown in Figure 3, the electrolyte leakage rate of maize seedling leaves treated with CuCd increased, and Longfuyu 6 showed a more significant effect. Compared with CK, the electrolyte leakage rates of Jiuyuan 15 and Longfuyu 6 increased by 53.34% and 78.44%, respectively, after CuCd treatment. After CuCd treatment, the electrolyte leakage rate of Longfuyu 6 is 25.1% higher than that of Jiuyuan 15. The damage caused by CuCd stress to Longfuyu 6 is higher than that to Jiuyuan 15. Compared with CuCd treatment, the electrolyte leakage rates of Jiuyuan 15 and Longfuyu 6 were reduced by 18.70% and 69.36%, respectively, after NATCA + CuCd treatment. After NATCA treatment, the electrolyte leakage rate of the two varieties of maize decreased by 45.22% and 62.50% compared to CuCd. NATCA can alleviate CuCd stress in maize seedlings, and NCTCA has a more significant effect on the resistance of Longfuyu 6 to CuCd (Figure 3).

2.4. Activity of AsA–GSH Cycle Enzyme

The AsA GSH cycle can clear H2O2 produced under copper and cadmium stress, with the main enzymes involved being APX, DHAR, MDHAR, and GR. Figure 4 shows the changes in the activity of GR, APX, DHAR, and MDHAR. Compared with CK, the activities of DHAR and MDHAR in maize leaves treated with CuCd decreased, while the activity of GR and APX increased. The activities of GR, DHAR, MDHAR, and APX in maize leaves treated with NATCA + CuCd were increased compared to CuCd treatment. Compared with CK, the DHAR enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 treated with CuCd decreased by 6.36%, 20.52%, 18.55%, 21.71%, and 18.06% in 1–5 days, respectively. The MDHAR enzyme activity decreased by 2.27%, 3.83%, 1.79%, 21.33%, and 27.25%, respectively. Compared with CK, the DHAR enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 1.97%, 13.72%, 14.58%, 35.39%, and 36.42% after 1–5 days of CuCd treatment, respectively. The MDHAR enzyme activity decreased by 4.00%, 9.49%, 21.94%, 35.09%, and 39.80%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, the DHAR enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 5.73%, 20.28%, 13.04%, 67.60%, and 77.98% in the 1–5 days treated with NATCA + CuCd, respectively. The MDHAR enzyme activity increased by 35.78%, 41.10%, 45.49%, 64.75%, and 81.37%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, the DHAR enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 increased by 34.74%, 14.09%, 53.07%, 94.71%, and 87.53% in NATCA + CuCd treatment for 1–5 days, respectively. The MDHAR enzyme activity increased by 48.26%, 68.69%, 102.09%, 109.20%, and 126.40%, respectively. Compared with CK, the GR enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 treated with CuCd increased by 29.27%, 45.27%, 50.20%, and 76.47% in 1–4 days, respectively. The APX enzyme activity increased by 48.46%, 38.51%, 47.58%, and 55.60%, respectively. The GR enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 increased by 21.25%, 28.33%, 47.12%, and 56.65%, respectively; APX increased by 10.71%, 45.53%, 69.78%, and 82.32%, respectively. Compared with CuCd treatment, the GR enzyme activity of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 11.89%, 16.66%, 20.21%, and 18.45% in the 1–4 days treated with NATCA + CuCd, respectively. The APX enzyme activity increased by 30.36%, 56.07%, 60.98%, and 68.17%, respectively. The GR enzyme activity of Longfuyu 6 increased by 13.07%, 23.15%, 23.21%, and 23.90%, respectively. The APX enzyme activity increased by 30.07%, 54.91%, 52.83%, and 47.50%, respectively (Figure 4).

2.5. Content of AsA and GSH

AsA and GSH, as important reducing substances in plants, play a crucial role in preventing membrane lipid peroxidation. Figure 5 illustrates the changes in the content of AsA and GSH. Compared with CK, the AsA content in maize seedling leaves treated with CuCd decreased, and the decrease in Longfuyu 6 was higher than that in Jiuyuan 15. Compared with CuCd treatment, the AsA content in maize seedling leaves increased after NATCA + CuCd treatment, and the increase in Longfuyu 6 was higher than that in Jiuyuan 15. Compared with CK, the AsA content in maize seedling leaves of Jiuyuan 15 decreased by 13.14%, 13.25%, 21.63%, 15.43%, and 42.00% after 1–5 days of CuCd treatment, respectively. The AsA content of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 21.02%, 30.66%, 37.24%, 45.18%, and 49.58%, respectively. Compared with CuCd treatment, the AsA content in maize seedling leaves of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 47.25%, 78.43%, 105.07%, 97.37%, and 130.96% after 1–5 days of NATCA + CuCd treatment, respectively. The AsA content of Longfuyu 6 increased by 59.79%, 75.07%, 111.62%, 142.53%, and 185.76%, respectively.
Compared with CK, the GSH content in maize leaves treated with CuCd decreased. After treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the GSH content in maize leaves increased compared to CuCd treatment. After being treated with CuCd for 1–5 days, the GSH content in the leaves of maize seedlings in Jiuyuan 15 decreased by 30.32%, 45.51%, 37.92%, 51.33%, and 55.77%, respectively, compared to the control group; The GSH content of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 15.40%, 20.98%, 40.78%, 48.47%, and 34.34%, respectively. Compared with CuCd treatment, the GSH content in the leaves of 15 maize seedlings in Jiuyuan increased by 134.73%, 351.18%, 525.62%, 587.61%, and 612.91% after 1–5 days of NATCA + CuCd treatment, respectively. The GSH content of Longfuyu 6 increased by 119.90%, 330.01%, 591.45%, 469.52%, and 405.42%, respectively (Figure 5).

2.6. Contents of Endogenous Hormones

In Table 1, the content of IAA, GA, and ZR in maize seedlings decreased, and the content of ABA increased after CuCd treatment. Compared with CK, the IAA content in the leaves of 9-day-15 seedlings treated with CuCd decreased by 4.04%, 14.08%, 31.92%, 38.47%, and 43.05%, respectively. The IAA content in the leaves of Longfuyu maize seedlings decreased by 21.91%, 42.29%, 47.58%, 56.94%, and 57.38%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, the IAA content in maize leaves treated with NATCA + CuCd increased by 37.33%, 34.74%, 57.53%, 45.98%, and 49.37% after 1–5 days, respectively. The leaf content of Longfuyu seedlings increased by 43.83%, 69.27%, 72.24%, 35.47%, and 30.93%, respectively. After CuCd treatment, the GA content of maize seedling leaves in Jiuyuan 15 decreased by 12.21%, 23.13%, 44.61%, 48.28%, and 53.22% from day 1 to day 5 compared to CK. The GA content of Longfuyu 6 seedling leaves decreased by 24.37%, 31.46%, 39.56%, 48.19%, and 56.85%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, the GA content in maize seedling leaves of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 5.21%, 28.18%, 64.14%, 66.40%, and 91.12% after being treated with NATCA + CuCd for 1–5 days, respectively; The GA content in the leaves of Longfuyu 6 seedlings increased by 28.18%, 37.08%, 38.92%, 50.50%, and 70.41%, respectively. Compared with CK, the ZR content in the leaves of 9-day-old seedlings treated with CuCd decreased by 25.19%, 28.55%, 11.70%, 14.10%, and 22.32%, respectively. The ZR content in the leaves of Longfuyu seedlings decreased by 14.45%, 25.16%, 37.30%, 51.72%, and 51.30%, respectively. After treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the ZR content in maize seedling leaves increased by 18.61%, 20.88%, 58.48%, 61.38%, and 44.16% compared to CuCd treatment. The ZR content in Longfuyu seedling leaves increased by 30.75%, 32.24%, 33.28%, and 28.05%, respectively. After CuCd treatment, the ABA content in the leaves of Jiuyuan 15 increased by 17.22%, 46.02%, 59.53%, 60.32%, and 114.58%, respectively, compared to the control group. The ABA content in the leaves of Longfuyu 6 increased by 19.54%, 32.71%, 53.63%, 73.99%, and 50.86%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, after treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the ABA content in the leaves of Jiuyuan 15 maize seedlings decreased by 9.29%, 12.18%, 9.97%, 24.85%, and 26.23%, respectively. The ABA content in Longfuyu 6 maize seedlings decreased by 6.92%, 14.06%, 13.85%, 10.89%, and 22.80%, respectively (Table 1).

2.7. Balance of Endogenous Hormones

As shown in Figure 6, the ratios of IAA, GA, ZR, and ABA in maize seedling leaves decreased after CuCd treatment, and the decrease in Longfuyu 6 was higher than that in Jiuyuan 15. After treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the levels of IAA/ABA, ZR/ABA, and GA/ABA in maize seedling leaves showed an increasing trend compared to CuCd treatment. Compared with CK, after CuCd treatment, the IAA/ABA levels in the leaves of Jiuyuan 15 seedlings decreased by 50.73%, 41.12%, 57.32%, 61.62%, and 73.48% in 1–5 days, respectively. The IAA/ABA of Longfuyu 6 leaves decreased by 34.67%, 56.52%, 65.86%, 75.25%, and 72.31%, respectively. After treatment with NATCA + CuCd, the IAA/ABA levels in the leaves of 15 maize seedlings in Jiuyuan increased by 1042.29%, 66.83%, 106.78%, 114.23%, and 126.84% compared to CuCd levels within 1–5 days. The IAA/ABA of Longfuyu 6 leaves increased by 70.42%, 109.69%, 152.77%, 125.93%, and 130.65%, respectively, from day 1 to day 5. After 1–5 days of CuCd treatment, the GA/ABA levels in the leaves of Jiuyuan 15 seedlings decreased by 25.03%, 47.35%, 65.27%, 67.74%, and 78.20%, respectively. The leaves of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 36.74%, 48.36%, 60.60%, 70.22%, and 71.96%, respectively. After NATCA + CuCd treatment, Jiuyuan 15 showed an increase of 19.31%, 58.62%, 115.37%, 144.18%, and 190.19% compared to CuCd treatment from 1 to 5 days. Longfuyu 6 showed an increase of 51.83%, 69.81%, 103.66%, 150.96%, and 199.94% after 1–5 days, respectively. Compared with CK, after CuCd treatment, the ZR/ABA of Jiuyuan 15 leaves decreased by 25.09%, 39.73%, 58.84%, 65.91%, and 71.68% in 1–5 days, respectively. The ZR/ABA of Longfuyu 6 decreased by 28.43%, 43.63%, 59.17%, 72.26%, and 68.46%, respectively. Compared with CuCd, after NATCA + CuCd treatment, the ZR/ABA of Jiuyuan15 increased by 34.48%, 49.61%, 107.95%, 136.70%, and 118.94% in 1–5 days, respectively. Longfuyu 6 increased by 54.88%, 63.81%, 95.58%, 113.54%, and 125.09%, respectively (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

Folcisteine (NATCA) is often used as an intermediate in pesticides and mixed with other substances to play a role in agricultural production. A plant growth regulator combination synthesized from hemiphyllin, inositol peptide, and potassium magnesium sulfate has specific functions of stimulating plant absorption of water and fertilizer, stabilizing the structure of large molecular substances, increasing the activity of metabolic enzymes in plants, regulating redox potential, increasing amino acid content in plants, and improving protein synthesis rate [57]. A 1:1 plant growth regulator composed of hemifolin and auxin can act on agricultural production in the form of powder solubilizer, particle solubilizer, and ultra-low molecular spray, which is conducive to promoting fruit expansion and grain plumpness after passing away, improving root growth capacity and increasing yield [58]. A plant growth regulator combination composed of hemiphyllin and sodium salicylate can effectively improve the growth of crops such as wheat, rice, maize, soybeans, and peanuts under stress environments, enhance crop salt and alkali tolerance, and alleviate cell damage under crop stress [59]. Research has found that NATCA increases the height, crown length, and volume of apricot trees, and improves fruit setting and retention rates. Applying 100 ppm NATCA increases tree height, crown length, volume, fruit setting, and retention rates by 32.54%, 61.37%, 30.13%, 34.26%, and 50.97%, respectively [61,62]; the yield was increased by applying 100 ppm NATCA, resulting in an increase of 14.59%, 12.00%, 28.82%, 27.12%, and 35.66% in fruit length, diameter, weight, volume, and yield, respectively [63]. The lowest fruit drop rate was observed when NATCA was applied to apricot trees during the petal shedding period, with a drop rate of only 27.03% when 50 ppm NATCA was applied [64]. Spraying NATCA on the leaves during the flowering period of apricot trees increased chlorophyll content. Spraying NATCA on the leaves during the flower bud period of apricot trees increased the total sugar, reducing sugar, and non-reducing sugar content of the fruit. When 100 ppm NATCA was applied, the total sugar content increased by 30.14% compared to the control, the reducing sugar content increased by 19.15%, and the non-reducing sugar content increased by 21.06%. Hemiphyllin increased the sugar content of the fruit by regulating the balance of endogenous hormones and amino acid content [65]. Research has found that hemiphyllin can promote the growth of watermelon, tomato, and rice seedlings, and facilitate the accumulation of dry matter in crops. Treatment with hemiphyllin significantly increases both fresh and dry weight of crops [60].
At high concentrations, all heavy metals accumulate in plant tissues over time, causing toxicity and inhibiting plant growth, with Cd and Cu being the most commonly reported toxic heavy metals [66]. The main carboxylase, 1,5-diphosphoribulose carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), is used by all photosynthetic organisms to fix atmospheric carbon dioxide [67]. After CuCd stress, the activity of RUBP carboxylase in maize seedlings weakened, indicating that CuCd stress not only destroyed the structure of chloroplasts but also hindered the C3 pathway of maize photosynthesis. Research has shown that stress from two heavy metals (Cd, Cu) significantly reduces tobacco growth, total chlorophyll content, Rubisco content, and activity [28]. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase) is a cytoplasmic enzyme commonly found in higher plants [68]. The leaves of C4 and Sedum acid metabolizing plants contain high levels of PEPC, which catalyze initial CO2 fixation during photosynthesis [69]. This study found that CuCd stress reduced the activity of PEPC enzyme and hindered the C4 pathway. Cd stress reduces the activity of RUBP carboxylase and PEPC enzyme in maize [70]. The C3 and C4 pathways are pathways for maize carbon assimilation. CuCd stress hinders the carbon assimilation process in maize and inhibits its photosynthesis. Cadmium stress can reduce the activity of the carboxylation system in maize, hinder the conversion of light energy to chemical energy, and accumulate a large amount of excess electrons at PSI. The coordination between PSII and PSI decreases, leading to a decrease in net photosynthetic rate [71]. Research has found that using pig manure with high copper concentration on maize can inhibit the photosynthetic parameters of maize, significantly reducing the net photosynthetic rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, transpiration rate, and photosynthetic pigment content of maize leaves [72]. This study indicates that the application of NATCA to maize seedlings significantly increases the activities of RUBP carboxylase and PEPC enzyme, enhances carbon assimilation efficiency, and increases photosynthetic rate. Exogenous substances can effectively alleviate the damage of Cd to photosynthesis, enhance the light capture ability of seedling leaves, promote photosynthesis, and enhance the resistance of maize seedlings to Cd stress [73]. This study showed that applying NATCA to maize under CuCd stress increased the activity of RUBP and PEPC enzymes, restored normal carbon assimilation pathways, and resulted in healthy oil green leaves, indicating that chlorophyll was also protected and photosynthesis was greatly improved.
When plants are subjected to CuCd stress, they produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species. When there is a serious imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense, oxidative stress occurs [74,75]. The main sites of ROS damage are mitochondria, chloroplasts, peroxisomes, plasma membranes, and extracellular vesicles. Due to the limitations of stress conditions, the inhibition of CO2 fixation can lead to a reduction in carbon fixation and a decrease in the oxidation of electron acceptors (NADP) in photosynthesis [76]. This study indicates that under CuCd stress, the content of O2· and H2O2 in maize seedling leaves increases, and the damage area of reactive oxygen species to leaves increases. The appearance of brown spots (H2O2) and dark blue spots (O2·) on plant leaves under cadmium stress is very obvious [77]. Under Cd stress, the accumulation of O2· and H2O2 in wheat seedlings may be disrupted by excessive H2O2, which may damage antioxidant enzyme activity. Unresolved reactive oxygen species spontaneously react with organic molecules, leading to membrane lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, enzyme inhibition, as well as DNA and RNA [78]. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a continuous source of attack on genetic material, and nutrients, hormones, exogenous substances, and environmental influences can enhance or partially reduce ROS. Previous studies have found that Cd entering cells increases the content of Cu [79]. Cd itself increases the content of O2· and H2O2 in the cell. After the increase in Cu content, the production of HO in H2O2 is increased through the Fenton reaction. HO free radicals induce single and double strand breaks in DNA, causing DNA damage, which may be caused by the reaction between HO free radicals and hydrogen atoms on the carbon C3, C4, C5, or C2 of 2-deoxyribose residues [80,81,82,83]. This study indicates that under CuCd stress, the permeability of cell membranes increases, and the electrolyte leakage rate of maize increases, resulting in plant dehydration. Previous studies have shown that under the combined stress of copper and cadmium, the electrical conductivity of cattail increases, and membrane lipids are damaged [84]. Cd leads to the accumulation of H2O2, an increased degree of lipid peroxidation, and elevated electrical conductivity [85]. The toxicity of Cu increased the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and electrolyte leakage in the tissues of European rapeseed leaves and roots [86]. This study indicates that NATCA can alleviate the oxidative stress response of maize seedlings to CuCd stress and reduce the damage of reactive oxygen species to maize seedlings. Research has shown that exogenous proline alleviates oxidative damage caused by Cd accumulation, and the application of proline to olives under cadmium stress increases antioxidant enzyme activity, photosynthetic activity, nutritional status, plant growth, and olive fruit oil content. In this study, no significant differences in reactive oxygen species were found between maize seedlings treated with NATCA alone and those not treated with NATCA [87].
Maize seedlings possess a relatively strong ability to accumulate cadmium and exhibit tolerance to high concentrations of cadmium. Under cadmium (Cd) stress, oxidative damage constitutes the primary cause of cellular damage. This oxidative damage occurs as a result of alterations in membrane permeability, which subsequently triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) at the organelle level, thereby impeding plant growth [88]. To counteract oxidative stress, plants have evolved diverse defense strategies aimed at safeguarding themselves against the detrimental effects of ROS. These defense strategies primarily encompass antioxidant enzymes, such as guaiacol peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR). Additionally, non-enzymatic antioxidants like ascorbic acid (AA), glutathione (GSH), tocopherols, and carotenoids also play significant roles in this regard [89].
It has been observed that variations in soil cadmium concentration have a direct impact on certain physiological parameters in maize seedling leaves. Specifically, a decrease in soil cadmium concentration leads to a reduction in the content of glutathione (GSH), while an increase in soil cadmium concentration results in enhanced activities of guaiacol peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) [90]. Moreover, research has demonstrated that in barley, which is sensitive to Cd, treatment with Cd leads to an elevation in the levels of ascorbic acid, particularly in non-protein sulfhydryl (SH) groups [91]. Osmotic substances also contribute to plants’ ability to resist copper (Cu) and cadmium (Cd) stress [92]. Proline (Pro) is involved in multiple aspects of plant physiology and development. It not only functions as a protein amino acid but also serves as an important osmoregulatory substance, playing a role in stress resistance. Proline is capable of scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby stabilizing proteins [93]. Furthermore, changes in proline metabolism can influence the cellular redox state, prompting corresponding metabolic adjustments. Additionally, proline helps to buffer the cytoplasmic pH value and can act as a source of carbon and nitrogen to support plant growth following the alleviation of stress [94,95].
The good coordination between APX, MDHAR, DHAR, and GR in the AsA–GSH cycle can also increase plant tolerance to Cu, Cd, or any other metal toxicity [96]. This study indicates that after CuCd stress, the activities of MDHAR and DHAR in leaves decrease, while the activities of APX and GR increase. DHAR participates in the process of reducing DHA to AsA. MDHAR plays a crucial role in preventing the reduction in AsA and ascorbic acid redox buffer under stress conditions. Previous studies have shown that Cd significantly reduces the activity of DHAR and MDHAR, respectively [97]. Research has found that the activity of APX increases after Cd + As treatment, which may be due to the increase in H2O2 content [98]. Research has shown that after Cd treatment, the GR content in wheat leaves increases, and the upregulation of GR activity comes from modifications during translation [99]. AsA and GSH can reduce the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts, and when AsA and GSH levels are high, they can protect cells from oxidative damage caused by Cu and Cd stress. The GSH content of wheat seedlings decreased under copper–cadmium composite stress [100]. Therefore, the decrease in AsA content in seedlings affected by Cd in this study confirms the decrease in MDHAR and DHAR. Many previous studies have shown that the application of exogenous plant growth regulators can enhance the ability of the AsA–GSH cycle to clear reactive oxygen species. Plant growth regulators (2,4-brassinosteroids) can improve grape resistance to Cu and enhance antioxidant capacity [101]. Our study indicates that the application of NATCA under CuCd stress can effectively increase the activity of APX, MDHAR, DHAR, and GR, as well as the content of AsA and GSH.
Abscisic acid, ethylene, etc., are considered stress response hormones; auxins, cytokinins, and other hormones belong to the category of growth-promoting hormones [102]. This study showed that under CuCd stress, the content of IAA, GA, and ZR in maize seedlings decreased, while the content of ABA increased, indicating that CuCd stress inhibited the production of growth promoting hormones in maize seedlings and activated stress hormones to resist CuCd stress. Previous studies have found that the IAA content in maize root tips significantly decreases under Cu stress [103]. IAA and GA3 play a protective role under copper stress by restoring redox homeostasis, thereby reducing protein damage in roots [104]. Research has shown that under high concentration cadmium treatment, the content of IAA, GA, and ZR decreases, while the content of ABA increases [105]. Research has shown that the GA content in tobacco roots decreases under cadmium stress [106]. GA can promote the increase in precursors for IAA synthesis and facilitate the transformation of IAA from bound to free form. As a result, GA content gradually decreases, leading to a gradual decrease in IAA content [107]. The cell wall of pea roots seems to increase the ability of peroxidase activity, which oxidizes IAA in the presence of cadmium and copper ions. This reduces endogenous auxin in plant roots under metal stress, thereby inhibiting the growth of pea seedlings [108]. Under Cu and Cd stress, IAA plants can trigger short-term responses (such as closing stomata) to resist the damage caused by Cu and Cd. After the accumulation of Cu and Cd, the concentrated genes that produce ABA are upregulated, such as the maize xanthin cyclooxygenase gene (ZEP), aldehyde oxidase gene (AAO3), dioxygenase gene (NCED3), and molybdenum cofactor sulfurase gene (MCSU) [109]. Under cadmium stress, ABA can lead to oxidative stress, and the enhancement of oxidative stress tolerance may mean that plants need to mobilize their entire antioxidant defense system, including enzymatic and non-enzymatic components, to resist oxidative damage to stressed plant tissues, rather than some enzymes or metabolites [110,111]. ABA enhances plant tolerance to cadmium stress and reduces absorption of heavy metals, indicating that ABA may be involved in signaling events leading to reduced Cd accumulation or activation of other defense mechanisms against heavy metal stress [112]. This study found that after CuCd treatment, the balance of endogenous hormones was disrupted, and the values of IAA/ABA, GA/ABA, and ZR/ABA decreased compared to the control. Under Cd stress, the ABA/Zr ratio in the leaf tissue of rapeseed significantly increased [48]. High concentrations of cadmium stress caused a decrease in the content of ZR, IAA, and GA in Sedum erinaceus, while the content of ABA significantly increased [113]. The values of ABA/IAA, ABA/GA, and ABA/ZR increase with the increase of cadmium concentration. Cadmium has an inhibitory effect on IAA, ZR, and GA, and a stimulating effect on ABA synthesis [114]. Plant growth regulators can increase the content of plant growth promoting hormones and maintain the balance of endogenous hormones in the plant body. Research has found that exogenous CPPU (cytokinin plant growth regulator) can inhibit the absorption and transport of Cu and Cd by cells [115]. Research has found that CPPU increases the content of IAA, GA3, and ZR in rice husks, while reducing the content of ABA [116]. This study shows that applying NATCA to maize seedlings under CuCd stress reduces growth promoting hormones and stress response hormones, while maintaining hormone balance. This indicates that exogenous NATCA can promote maize seedling growth by regulating hormone levels, improve maize seedlings’ resistance to CuCd, and alleviate the damage caused by maize seedlings in CuCd environment. Copper cadmium composite stress has significant effects on multiple aspects of maize growth, including growth and development, physiological and biochemical characteristics, mineral nutrient absorption, and quality. Although some progress has been made in mitigating measures, further in-depth research is still needed on the mechanism of copper–cadmium composite stress, especially at the molecular level, to explore the key genes and signaling pathways that maize responds to composite stress, in order to more accurately select tolerant varieties, develop more effective remediation and prevention strategies, ensure the safe production of maize in polluted soil environments, and safeguard food security and ecological environment health.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Condition

Based on preliminary experiments, Jiuyuan 15 (tolerant to CuCd stress) and Longfuyu 6 (intolerant to CuCd stress) were selected as materials. Half leaf extract (NATCA, Folcisteine) was purchased from Zhengzhou Zhengshi Chemical Products Co., Ltd.(Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China), CAS number: 5025-82-1, molecular formula C6H9NO3S, molecular weight 175.2056. Copper stress was treated with copper sulfate pentahydrate, molecular formula CuSO4·5H2O, molecular weight: 249.685, CAS number: 7758-99-8. Cadmium stress is treated with anhydrous cadmium chloride, molecular formula CdCl2, molecular weight: 183.32, CAS number: 10108-64-2. We select healthy and plump seeds, disinfect them with 10% sodium hypochlorite solution, wash and soak for 10 h, evenly spread them into the germination box, and transfer them to a constant temperature incubator (26 ± 1 °C). After the seeds germinate and the embryo grows to 1.5–2 cm, select germinated seeds with consistent growth and plant them in a non-light culture pot containing 20 L of 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution (pH = 6.0). Change the nutrient solution once in 3D, ventilate the air pump at regular intervals (45 min·h−1), expose to light for 12 h, and maintain a temperature of 28 ± 1 °C. When the seedlings grow to three leaves and one center, select seedlings with consistent growth for treatment. Each group has 60 seedlings, divided into four groups. The experimental processing is as follows:
(1)
Control group (CK), 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution;
(2)
NATCA treatment (NATCA), add 20 mg·L−1 NATCA to 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution;
(3)
Copper and cadmium stress treatment (CuCd), adding 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4 to 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution [117,118]; and
(4)
Copper and cadmium stress combined with NATCA treatment (NATCA + CuCd), 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4 were added to 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution.
Add 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4 to the three leaves at the same time. The seedlings that require CuCd treatment should be added to the copper–cadmium treatment solution twice, with an interval of 12 h, to provide a buffer time for the seedlings. Seedlings that require NATCA treatment should be treated with copper–cadmium compound for 12 h before adding NATCA. Adjust pH once a day, with a photoperiod of 12/12 (day/night), temperature of (28 ±1) °C/(25 ± 1) °C day/night, light intensity of around 400 μ mol·m−2·s−1, and relative humidity of 60% to 70%. The 12th hour after adding various treatments is taken as the 1st day of sampling.

4.2. Determination of RuBPCase (Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase) and PEPCase (Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase)

Samples were taken at regular intervals within 1–5 days after treatment, and seedlings with consistent growth were selected. The leaves were cut and ground into a homogenate at 2–8 °C in PBS (pH = 7.4). Take the supernatant after 20 min (3000 r·min−1). Use the RUBP carboxylase detection kit and PEPCase ELISA kit provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing City, China) for detection on 5 January 2022 (http://www.njjcbio.com/). After the color development step is terminated, measure the absorbance of each well using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 450 nm and repeat three times.

4.3. Determination of O2· and H2O2

On the 5th day of processing, take the third leaf, wash it, and dry it with filter paper. Repeat each process three times. NBT staining method is used for measure O2·. We select the seedling leaves in a 1 mg·L−1 NBT solution, evacuate and place in a dark place for 10 h, then boil with anhydrous ethanol to remove green. H2O2 was stained using the DAB staining method. Place the seedling leaves in 2 mg·L−1 DAB solution, vacuum, and place in the dark for 10 h. Boil with anhydrous ethanol to remove the green color. After decolorization, select the leaves with obvious staining and take photos [119,120].

4.4. Determination of Electrolyte Leakage (EL)

On the 5th day after treatment, 1 g of leaves was taken from each group, washed with deionized water, dried with filter paper, and then decomposed into small square pieces of one square centimeter. Soak completely in 10 mL of deionized water for 24 h. Measure the initial conductivity (EC1) using a Thunderbolt DDS-11A conductivity meter. Boil water for 10 min, cool down, and measure the final conductivity (EC2). Calculate the electrolyte leakage (EL) as EC1/EC2 × 100 [121].

4.5. Determination of Glutathione Reductase Activity (GR)

Take maize seedlings with consistent growth from each treatment at regular intervals every day for 1–5 days after treatment, and separate the roots and leaves. Cut each sample into pieces, add PBS (pH = 7.4), grind to a homogenate at 2–8 °C, and leave for 20 min (3000 r/min) to obtain the supernatant. The GR activity was measured using the glutathione reductase activity detection kit provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (http://www.njjcbio.com/) and assessed on 5 January 2022. Measure the absorbance using a spectrophotometer (450 nm) within 15 min after adding the stop solution.

4.6. Determination of Ascorbate Peroxidase Activity (APX)

Take maize seedlings with consistent growth from each treatment at regular intervals every day for 1–5 days after treatment. Add 5 mL of pre-cooled extract and quartz sand to the roots and leaves, respectively, and centrifuge at 12,000× g·min−1 for 20 min. Take the supernatant as the crude extract. Add 2.9 mL of APX reaction solution to 0.1 mL of crude extract, and then compare the color [122].

4.7. Determination of Dehydroascorbate Reductase Activity (DHAR)

The preliminary preparation work is the same as the steps for GR activity determination. DHAR was detected using the dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activity detection kit provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (http://www.njjcbio.com/) and assessed on 5 January 2022. Measure the absorbance using a spectrophotometer.

4.8. Determination of Monodehydroascorbate Reductase Activity (MDHAR)

The preliminary preparation work is the same as the steps for GR activity determination. The MDHAR was detected using the MDHAR detection kit from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute (http://www.njjcbio.com/) and assessed on 5 January 2022. Measure the absorbance using a spectrophotometer.

4.9. Determination of Ascorbate (AsA) Content

Take maize seedlings with consistent growth from each treatment at regular intervals every day for 1–5 days after treatment. Grind 0.5 g of the sample with 5% hydrochloric acid, centrifuge at 15,000× g for 20 min, and take the supernatant as the crude extract. Then, add PBS and water to the supernatant (supernatant: 150 MmPBS: water = 1:1:1). Vortex the mixture and let it stand at room temperature for 1 min. Add 10% TCA, 45% H3PO4, and 3% FeCl3 for vortexing. Insulate at 37 °C for 1 h. Use a spectrophotometer for measurement [123].

4.10. Determination of Glutathione (GSH) Content

Prepare the crude extract as shown in the AsA content determination, take the supernatant to measure the total content of GSH and GSSG, add the crude enzyme solution to the reaction solution, and then perform colorimetric analysis. Measure the content of GSSG again, add the crude enzyme solution diluted 50 times to the pyrimidine water bath, and perform colorimetric analysis. Subtracting the two gives the GSH content [124].

4.11. Determination of Endogenous Hormones Content

Samples were taken at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 108 h after processing for the determination of endogenous hormones. Simultaneous determination of IAA, GR, ZR, and ABA using high-performance liquid chromatography. Add 80% methanol prepared with 1 mmol·L−1 BHT to the ground seedling leaves under ice bath conditions to obtain the sample extract. After centrifugation, the supernatant was passed through a C-18 solid-phase extraction column, and methanol was removed. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and Bio TEK Elx-800 fully automatic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [125].

4.12. Data Analysis

The data were expressed by the measured mean value, analyzed by SPSS19.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, 2010), and compared by Duncan’s new complex difference method (α = 0.05), and origin 8 is used for drawing.

5. Conclusions

Employing exogenous substances to bolster maize’s resistance to copper and cadmium stress represents an efficient and eco-friendly development strategy. Research indicates that the application of exogenous NATCA boosts the activities of key photosynthetic enzymes RUBPCase and PEPCase, thereby enhancing photosynthetic capacity. Simultaneously, the reduction in O2· and H2O2 levels mitigates the damage to leaf cells inflicted by reactive oxygen species. The introduction of exogenous NATCA elevates the activities of MDHAR and DHAR, antioxidants within the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in maize seedling leaves, and increases the concentrations of non-enzymatic antioxidants AsA and GSH. Consequently, this enhances the leaves’ capacity to scavenge reactive oxygen species via the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, further reducing the harm inflicted by copper and cadmium combined stress on maize seedlings. Upon the application of exogenous NATCA, the concentrations of IAA, GA, and ZR rise, whereas ABA levels decline. NATCA fosters seedling growth by modulating the content and balance of endogenous hormones, thereby augmenting maize’s tolerance to copper and cadmium combined stress. This study contributes to advancing the application of exogenous plant growth regulators in environmental remediation. In the future, NATCA can be developed into new types of agricultural products such as fertilizers, plant growth regulators, or soil conditioners, which can alleviate the toxic effects of heavy metals on maize, promote maize growth, enhance the stress resistance of maize, and thus ensure the yield and quality of grain. Due to the differences between hydroponic culture and actual soil environments, the results of this experiment on the physiological and biochemical changes and tolerance of plants under heavy metal stress have considerable uncertainty when extrapolated to field conditions. Further verification of the field is needed in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W., Z.X., W.G. and Y.Z.; Data curation, L.D., Y.F., W.G. and Y.Z.; Formal analysis, L.D., M.Z., Y.F., Z.X., W.G. and Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, W.G. and Y.Z.; Investigation, L.D., J.W., W.G. and Y.Z.; Methodology, L.D., M.Z., J.W. and Z.X.; Project administration, W.G. and Y.Z.; Resources, W.G. and Y.Z.; Software, L.D., M.Z., J.W., Y.F., Z.X., L.X., W.G. and Y.Z.; Supervision, W.G. and Y.Z.; Validation, L.X. and Y.Z.; Visualization, M.Z. and L.X.; Writing—original draft, L.D.; Writing—review and editing, L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2022C009), the Backbone of Young Talent Scholar Project (20XG23) and the Collaborative Innovation and Promotion System for Green and Organic Agriculture in Heilongjiang Province (2025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the Chemical Control Research Center, College of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, for technical guidance and assistance in the methods and data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NATCAfolcisteine
Cucopper
Cdcadmium
ROSreactive oxygen species
RUBPCaseribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase
PEPCasephosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase
AsAascorbate
GSHglutathione
IAAauxin
GAgibberellin
ZRzeatin nucleoside
ABAabscisic acid.
ELelectrolyte leakage
GRglutathione reductase activity
APXascorbate peroxidase activity
DHARdehydroascorbate reductase activity
MDHARmonodehydroascorbate reductase activity
O2superoxide anion
H2O2hydrogen peroxide

References

  1. Dai, W. Effects of Heavy Metals on Growth and Physiological Biochemical Characteristics of Maize. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Y. Differences of Cadmium Accumulation and Transport in Different Maize Varieties and Its Mechanism. Master’s Thesis, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, S.; Wu, W.; Liu, F.; Liao, R.; Hu, Y. Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil-Crop Systems: A Review for Wheat and Corn. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 15209–15225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, R.; Qian, C.; Wu, M.; Cheng, L. Study on heavy metals in soil mineralized by bacteria. J. Funct. Mater. 2007, 38, 1523–1526, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, F.; Wang, X.; Han, J.; Liv, M.; Guo, X. Heavy metal pollution characteristics and its health risk assessment in a mollisol watershed of Northeast China: Taking Haigou watershed as study case. J. China Agric. Univ. 2020, 25, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, W.; Long, J.; Zhang, X.; Shen, W.; Wei, Z. Pollution and Ecological Risk Evaluation of Heavy Metals in the Soil and Sediment around the HTM Tailings Pond, Northeastern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Armienta, M.A.; Beltrán, M.; Martínez, S.; Labastida, I. Heavy Metal Assimilation in Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants Growing near Mine Tailings. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 2361–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, X.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, M.; Wang, J.; Shen, N.; et al. Health Risks of Metal(Loid)s in Maize (Zea mays L.) in an Artisanal Zinc Smelting Zone and Source Fingerprinting by Lead Isotope. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bashir, M.A.; Naveed, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Gao, B.; Mustafa, A.; Núñez-Delgado, A. Combined Application of Biochar and Sulfur Regulated Growth, Physiological, Antioxidant Responses and Cr Removal Capacity of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Tannery Polluted Soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 259, 110051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dou, X.; Li, B.; Cui, J.; Li, G.; Wang, Y. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and risk of farmland soil and agricultural products around a smelter in Liaoning. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2020, 39, 2249–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, L. The Remediation Research of Cu and Cd Contaminated in Wastewater Irrigation Farmland. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, N.; Zhu, M.; Tian, J. Potentially Toxic Element (PTE) Levels in Maize, Soil, and Irrigation Water and Health Risks through Maize Consumption in Northern Ningxia, China. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hua, X.; Cheng, B.; Zhao, R.; Huo, X.; Guo, X. Effect of Steel Slag Application on Maize Production in Farmland. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 2015, 43, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carbonell, G.; Imperial, R.M.D.; Torrijos, M.; Delgado, M.; Rodriguez, J.A. Effects of Municipal Solid Waste Compost and Mineral Fertilizer Amendments on Soil Properties and Heavy Metals Distribution in Maize Plants (Zea mays L.). Chemosphere 2011, 85, 1614–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, S.; Song, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhang, H.; Luo, X.; Zheng, Z. Damage of Heavy Metals to Vallisneria natans (V. natans) and Characterization of Microbial Community in Biofilm. Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 225, 105515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, W.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Li, J. Effects of Cadmium and Lead Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Physiology of Populus yunnanensis Seedlings. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2021, 37, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, Y.; Guo, H. The Effect of Copper Stress on Pigment Content, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Osmotic Regulation System of Luffa cylindrica Seedlings. Tianjin Agric. Sci. 2021, 27, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, M. Effect of FA on the Amelioration of Tomato Under the Stress of Copper, Cadmium. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, T.-W.; Tseng, C.-C.; Cai, M.; Chen, K.; Cheng, S.-Y.; Wang, J. Effects of Cadmium on Bioaccumulation, Bioabsorption, and Photosynthesis in Sarcodia suiae. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, M.; Yang, Y.; Song, Z. Effects of Graphene Oxide on Cadmium Uptake and Photosynthesis Performance in Wheat Seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lorenzini, A.; Sell, C. Enhanced Stress-Induced Senescence-Response May Increase Species Lifespan. Aging 2021, 13, 15694–15696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, S.; Dai, J.; Shen, X.; Wang, L.; Cui, Q.; Zhu, Y. The effect of water stress on the photosynthetic performance and yield of maize. Acta Agron. Sin. 1995, 21, 356–363. [Google Scholar]
  23. Song, M. Study on the photosynthetic characteristics and changes in starch synthesis related enzyme activities of regenerated maize hairy root plants. J. Tonghua Norm. Univ. 2021, 42, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taylor, T.C.; Andersson, I. The Structure of the Complex between Rubisco and Its Natural Substrate Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Portis, A.R. Regulation of Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Activity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 43, 415–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hussain, I.; Iqbal, M.; Qurat-Ul-Ain, S.; Rasheed, R.; Mahmood, S.; Wahid, A. Cadmium Dose and Exposure-Time Dependent Alterations in Growth and Physiology of Maize (Zea mays). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2012, 14, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Horváth, G.; Droppa, M.; Oravecz, Á.; Raskin, V.I.; Marder, J.B. Formation of the Photosynthetic Apparatus during Greening of Cadmium-Poisoned Barley Leaves. Planta 1996, 199, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khairy, A.I.H.; Oh, M.J.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, D.S.; Roh, K.S. Nitric Oxide Overcomes Cd and Cu Toxicity in in Vitro-Grown Tobacco Plants through Increasing Contents and Activities of Rubisco and Rubisco Activase. Biochim. Open 2016, 2, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peco, J.D.; Campos, J.A.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Olmedilla, A.; Higueras, P.; Sandalio, L.M. Characterization of Mechanisms Involved in Tolerance and Accumulation of Cd in Biscutella auriculata L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Z. The Responses of Corn Seedlings to Copper Stress as well as Comparison with Responses to Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. Perfus-Barbeoch, L.; Leonhardt, N.; Vavasseur, A.; Forestier, C. Heavy Metal Toxicity: Cadmium Permeates through Calcium Channels and Disturbs the Plant Water Status. Plant J. 2002, 32, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, L.; Liu, W.; Lian, J.; Shen, M.; Huo, X. Effects of Electric Fields on Cd Accumulation and Photosynthesis in Zea mays Seedlings. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Zia Ur Rehman, M.; Adrees, M.; Arshad, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Ali, L.; Hussain, A.; Chatha, S.A.S.; Imran, M. Alleviation of Cadmium Accumulation in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Foliar Spray of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Biochar to Contaminated Soil. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, H.-C.; Zhang, S.-L.; Wu, K.-J.; Li, R.; He, X.-R.; He, D.-N.; Huang, C.; Wei, H. The Effects of Exogenous Organic Acids on the Growth, Photosynthesis and Cellular Ultrastructure of Salix variegata Franch. Under Cd Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dorta, D.J.; Leite, S.; DeMarco, K.C.; Prado, I.M.R.; Rodrigues, T.; Mingatto, F.E.; Uyemura, S.A.; Santos, A.C.; Curti, C. A Proposed Sequence of Events for Cadmium-Induced Mitochondrial Impairment. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2003, 97, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tanwir, K.; Javed, M.T.; Abbas, S.; Shahid, M.; Akram, M.S.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Iqbal, M. Serratia Sp. CP-13 Alleviates Cd Toxicity by Morpho-Physio-Biochemical Improvements, Antioxidative Potential and Diminished Cd Uptake in Zea mays L. Cultivars Differing in Cd Tolerance. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Casalino, E.; Sblano, C.; Landriscina, C. Enzyme Activity Alteration by Cadmium Administration to Rats: The Possibility of Iron Involvement in Lipid Peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1997, 346, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rizvi, A.; Khan, M.S. Heavy Metal Induced Oxidative Damage and Root Morphology Alterations of Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants and Stress Mitigation by Metal Tolerant Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter Chroococcum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cao, Y. Effects Of Cadmium On Physiological and Metabolic Characteristics of Fuyou 9 and Shenyu 33 Maize During Germination. Master’s Thesis, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, F.; Hao, S.; Chen, K. Effect of Copper Stress on Seedling Biomass, Photosynthetic Pigment and Oxygen Metabolism in Petunia hybrida Vilm. J. West China For. Sci. 2017, 46, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, P. Regulation of Plant Responses to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, R. Effects of Exogenous Brassinolide on Root Development of Kentucky Bluegrass Under Cadmium Stres. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, J. The Study of Endogenous Hormone on the Leaf of Different Rice Materials Under Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  44. Guo, Y. The Effects of Low Temperature Stress on Corn Growth. Guangdong Seric. 2021, 55, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Han, X. Alleviating Effect of Spraying Salicylic Acid and 6-Benzylamino Adenine on High Temperature Stress of Summer Maize. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  46. Leng, X. Study on the Molecular Mechanism of Grape in Response to Copper Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, Q. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide and Salhicvhic Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Ryegrass Under Copper, Lead and Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. López-Ruiz, B.A.; Zluhan-Martínez, E.; Sánchez, M.D.L.P.; Álvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Garay-Arroyo, A. Interplay between Hormones and Several Abiotic Stress Conditions on Arabidopsis Thaliana Primary Root Development. Cells 2020, 9, 2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shu, K.; Liu, X.; Xie, Q.; He, Z. Two Faces of One Seed: Hormonal Regulation of Dormancy and Germination. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Q.; Gong, M.; Liu, K.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, J.; Chang, Q. Rhizoglomus intraradices Improves Plant Growth, Root Morphology and Phytohormone Balance of Robinia pseudoacacia in Arsenic-Contaminated Soils. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peleg, Z.; Blumwald, E. Hormone Balance and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, L.P.; Zhu, J.; Wang, P.; Zeng, J.; Tan, R.; Yang, Y.Z.; Liu, Z.M. Effect of Cd on Growth, Physiological Response, Cd Subcellular Distribution and Chemical Forms of Koelreuteria paniculata. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yan, H.; Filardo, F.; Hu, X.; Zhao, X.; Fu, D. Cadmium Stress Alters the Redox Reaction and Hormone Balance in Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Leaves. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 3758–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, H.; Yang, X.; Lai, F. The effect of copper stress on endogenous growth factors in rapeseed leaves. Hubei Agric. Sci 2018, 57, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tan, M.; Tang, J.; He, Z.; Ju, L. Effects of grafting on growth and endogenous hormones of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seedlings under copper stress. J. Northwest Sci-Tech Univ. Agric. For. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 44, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, M.; Lin, W.; Ma, B.; Li, M.; Tian, P. Effect of endophyte infection on growth and endogenous hormones of Festuca sinensis under Zn and Cd treatments. Pratac. Sci. 2019, 36, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ni, S.; Wang, W.; Chen, H. A Plant Growth Regulator Composition, Its Preparation Method, and Application 2020. Patent, China Application Number CN 202010693241.4, 17 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zheng, X.; Wan, Q.; Yao, F.; Liu, J. A Crop Growth Regulator Composition and Its Application. Patent, China Application Number CN 201911273679.0, 12 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu, R.; Wang, C.; Han, A.; Li, D.; Xu, L.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, P.; Li, J.; Zhang, B. A Growth Regulator Composition Containing Sodium Salicylate and Hemiphyllin 2021. Patent, China Application Number CN 202110711097.7, 25 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yao, F.; Wan, C.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Zheng, X. Research on Biological Activity of Acetyl-Thiazolidine-4-Carboxylic Acid in Seedling Stage of Several Crops. Mod. Agrochem. 2021, 20, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hota, D.; Bhoyar, M.G.; Sharma, D. Analysis of Vegetative Growth by Spraying of Forchlorfenuron and N-Acetyl Thiazolidine 4-Carboxylic Acid on of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cv. New Castle. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2017, 5, 2182–2185. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hota, D.; Sharma, D.P.; Sharma, N. Effect of Forchlorfenuron and N-Acetyl Thiazolidine 4-Carboxylic Acid on Vegetative Growth and Fruit Set of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cv. New Castle. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 279–282. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hota, D.; Sharma, D.P.; Sharma, N.; Mishra, G.; Singh Solanki, S.P.; Priyadarshi, V. Effect of Forchlorfenuron and N-Acetyl Thiazolidine 4-Carboxylic Acid on Size and Yield of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cv. New Castle. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1852–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hota, D.; Sharma, D.P.; Singh, N. Effect of Forchlorfenuron and N-Acetyl Thiazolidine 4-Carboxylic Acid on Fruit Drop of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cv. New Castle. Int. J. Pure Appl. BioSci. 2017, 5, 1123–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hota, D.; Sharma, D.P.; Sahoo, T. Effect of Forchlorfenuron and N-Acetyl Thiazolidine 4-Carboxylic Acid on Chemical Parameter of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cv. New Castle. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2018, 31, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rascio, N.; Navari-Izzo, F. Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulating Plants: How and Why Do They Do It? And What Makes Them so Interesting? Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jhanji, S.; Setia, R.C.; Kaur, N.; Kaur, P.; Setia, N. Role of Nitric Oxide in Cadmium-Induced Stress on Growth, Photosynthetic Components and Yield of Brassica napus L. J. Environ. Biol. 2012, 33, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sage, R.F.; Sage, T.L.; Kocacinar, F. Photorespiration and the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jobe, T.O.; Zenzen, I.; Rahimzadeh Karvansara, P.; Kopriva, S. Integration of Sulfate Assimilation with Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Transition from C3 to C4 Photosynthesis. J. Environ. Biol. 2019, 70, 4211–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Meng, Y. Mitigation Effect and Physiological and Ecological Regulation Mechanism of Exogenous Hemin on Maize Seedling under Cadmium Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  71. Li, G.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Gao, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Dong, S.; Zhang, J. Effect of Cadmium on Photosystem Activities of Maize (Zea mays L.) Leaves. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2011, 44, 3118–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gao, F.; Yang, R.; Tian, K.; Zhong, Y. Effects of Copper in Pig Feces on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2008, 27, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Chang, H.; Li, C.; Liang, Y.; Lu, X. Effects of exogenous Ca2+ on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and photosystem II function of maize seedlings under cadmium stress. Pratac. Sci. 2016, 25, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McCord, J.M. The Evolution of Free Radicals and Oxidative Stress. Am. J. Med. 2000, 108, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mittler, R. Oxidative Stress, Antioxidants and Stress Tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, Oxidative Stress and the Biology of Ageing. Nature 2000, 408, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Anee, T.I.; Fujita, M. Exogenous Silicon Attenuates Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress in Brassica Napus L. by Modulating AsA-GSH Pathway and Glyoxalase System. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lin, R.; Du, W.; Wang, X.; Guo, H. Free Radical Metabolism and Response of Antioxidant Enzymes in Wheat Seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) Exposed to Soil Cadmium. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2008, 27, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abreu, I.A.; Saraiva, L.M.; Soares, C.M.; Teixeira, M.; Cabelli, D.E. The Mechanism of Superoxide Scavenging by Archaeoglobus fulgidus Neelaredoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38995–39001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jonak, C. Complexity, Cross Talk and Integration of Plant MAP Kinase Signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nzengue, Y.; Steiman, R.; Rachidi, W.; Favier, A.; Guiraud, P. Oxidative Stress Induced by Cadmium in the C6 Cell Line: Role of Copper and Zinc. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 146, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Krężel, A.; Maret, W. Different Redox States of Metallothionein/Thionein in Biological Tissue. Biochem. J. 2007, 402, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bulgakova, N.M.; Bulgakov, A.V. Pulsed Laser Ablation of Solids: Transition from Normal Vaporization to Phase Explosion. Appl. Phys. A 2001, 73, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhao, H. The Effect of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Typha angustifolia Seedling Under Copper. Cadmium and Combined Stress. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tousi, S.; Zoufan, P.; Ghahfarrokhie, A.R. Alleviation of Cadmium-Induced Phytotoxicity and Growth Improvement by Exogenous Melatonin Pretreatment in Mallow (Malva parviflora) Plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 206, 111403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zaheer, I.E.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Farid, M.; Shakoor, M.B.; Gill, R.A.; Najeeb, U.; Iqbal, N.; Ahmad, R. Citric Acid Assisted Phytoremediation of Copper by Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 120, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zouari, M.; Ben Ahmed, C.; Elloumi, N.; Bellassoued, K.; Delmail, D.; Labrousse, P.; Ben Abdallah, F.; Ben Rouina, B. Impact of Proline Application on Cadmium Accumulation, Mineral Nutrition and Enzymatic Antioxidant Defense System of Olea europaea L. cv Chemlali Exposed to Cadmium Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 128, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xu, X.; Liu, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, R.; Deng, W. Involvement of an Antioxidant Defense System in the Adaptive Response to Cadmium in Maize Seedlings (Zea mays L.). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 93, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hayat, K.; Menhas, S.; Bundschuh, J.; Zhou, P.; Niazi, N.K.; Amna; Hussain, A.; Hayat, S.; Ali, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Plant Growth Promotion and Enhanced Uptake of Cd by Combinatorial Application of Bacillus pumilus and EDTA on Zea mays L. Int. J. Phytorem. 2020, 22, 1372–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tiryakioglu, M.; Eker, S.; Ozkutlu, F.; Husted, S.; Cakmak, I. Antioxidant Defense System and Cadmium Uptake in Barley Genotypes Differing in Cadmium Tolerance. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2006, 20, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jian, M. Enrichment and Proteomics of Cadmiumin Wheat Under Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  92. Szalai, G.; Tajti, J.; Hamow, K.Á.; Ildikó, D.; Khalil, R.; Vanková, R.; Dobrev, P.; Misheva, S.P.; Janda, T.; Pál, M. Molecular Background of Cadmium Tolerance in Rht Dwarf Wheat Mutant Is Related to a Metabolic Shift from Proline and Polyamine to Phytochelatin Synthesis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 23664–23676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, J.; Wen, R.; Liu, J. Effects of Copper Stress on the Growth of Radix Isatis Seedlings. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 1659–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. He, J. Studies on the Varieties of Corn and Sorghum with Cu, Cr Forms of Distribution Infuence and Response in Sewage Soil. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  95. Petrovic, D.; Krivokapic, S. The Effect of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb Accumulation on Biochemical Parameters (Proline, Chlorophyll) in the Water Caltrop (Trapa natans L.), Lake Skadar, Montenegro. Plants 2020, 9, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Hossain, M.S.; Mahmud, J.; Rahman, A.; Inafuku, M.; Oku, H.; Fujita, M. Coordinated Actions of Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems in Conferring Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kaya, C.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. The Role of Nitrate Reductase in Brassinosteroid-Induced Endogenous Nitric Oxide Generation to Improve Cadmium Stress Tolerance of Pepper Plants by Upregulating the Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 196, 110483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, B.; Ashraf, U.; Fahad, S.; Hassan, W.; Jan, S.; Khan, I.; Saleem, M.F.; et al. Osmoregulation and Antioxidant Production in Maize under Combined Cadmium and Arsenic Stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11864–11875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yannarelli, G.G.; Fernández-Alvarez, A.J.; Santa-Cruz, D.M.; Tomaro, M.L. Glutathione Reductase Activity and Isoforms in Leaves and Roots of Wheat Plants Subjected to Cadmium Stress. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Weng, N.; Zhou, D.; Wang, P.; Wang, D.; Chu, L. Influence of Sulfur on Subcellular Distribution, Uptake and Toxicity of Cu and Cd to Wheat Seadlings. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2011, 6, 87–93. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhou, Y.; Huo, S.; Wang, L.; Meng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xi, Z. Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviates Oxidative Damage from Copper Stress in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Cuttings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zuo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiao, J.; Ren, X.; Liu, Z.; Zuo, S.; Li, J. Effects of GA3 seed soaking on antioxidant enzymes and endogenous hormones of maize embryo under low temperature. Chin. J. Ecol. 2021, 40, 1340–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Matayoshi, C.L.; Pena, L.B.; Arbona, V.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Gallego, S.M. Early Responses of Maize Seedlings to Cu Stress Include Sharp Decreases in Gibberellins and Jasmonates in the Root Apex. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1243–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ben Massoud, M.; Sakouhi, L.; Karmous, I.; Zhu, Y.; El Ferjani, E.; Sheehan, D.; Chaoui, A. Protective Role of Exogenous Phytohormones on Redox Status in Pea Seedlings under Copper Stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 221, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xiao, Q. Physiological Response in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Cadmium Stress Conditions. Master’s Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  106. Yuan, Z.; Wu, Z. Effect of cadmium on antioxidative capability and phytohormone level in tobacco roots. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 4109–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rabinovici, J.; Stewart, E.A. New Interventional Techniques for Adenomyosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 20, 617–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chaoui, A.; Jarrar, B.; El Ferjani, E. Effects of Cadmium and Copper on Peroxidase, NADH Oxidase and IAA Oxidase Activities in Cell Wall, Soluble and Microsomal Membrane Fractions of Pea Roots. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lata, C.; Prasad, M. Role of DREBs in Regulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. J. Environ. Biol. 2011, 62, 4731–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, M.; Zhang, J. Effect of Abscisic Acid on Active Oxygen Species, Antioxidative Defence System and Oxidative Damage in Leaves of Maize Seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Guan, L.; Scandalios, J.G. Two Structurally Similar Maize Cytosolic Superoxide Dismutase Genes, Sod4 and Sod4A, Respond Differentially to Abscisic Acid and High Osmoticum. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hsu, Y.T.; Kao, C.H. Heat Shock-Mediated H2O2 Accumulation and Protection against Cd Toxicity in Rice Seedlings. Plant Soil 2007, 300, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Deng, J. The Effect of Zinc or Cadmium Stress on Photosynthesis and Endogenous Hormone Levels of Sedum alfredii. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang, Z. Effects of Cadmium Pollution on Phytohormone Contents and Growth of Glycine max Plants. Master’s Thesis, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  115. Piotrowska-Niczyporuk, A.; Bajguz, A.; Zambrzycka, E.; Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz, B. Phytohormones as Regulators of Heavy Metal Biosorption and Toxicity in Green Alga Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 52, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zeng, H.; Yang, W.; Lu, C.; Lin, W.; Zou, M.; Zhang, H.; Wan, J.; Huang, X. Effect of CPPU on Carbohydrate and Endogenous Hormone Levels in Young Macadamia Fruit. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhu, K. Preliminary Study on β -Aminobutyric Acid Induce Tobacco Against Copper, Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China: Hefei, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhang, C. The Physiological and Biochemical Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Cadmium Stress and the Regulation Effect of Exogenous CalciumTreatment. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  119. Qiu, D. The Physiological Mechanism of Chitosan Relieves Cadmium Toxicity in Maize Seedlings. Master’s Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  120. Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Palma, J.M.; Gómez, M.; Del Río, L.A.; Sandalio, L.M. Cadmium Causes the Oxidative Modification of Proteins in Pea Plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jambunathan, N. Determination and Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Lipid Peroxidation, and Electrolyte Leakage in Plants. In Plant Stress Tolerance; Sunkar, R., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 639, pp. 291–297. ISBN 978-1-60761-701-3. [Google Scholar]
  122. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Machinery in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Guo, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, H.; Sun, Y.; Yin, Y.; Pei, D.; Ji, R.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Elevated CO2 Levels Affects the Concentrations of Copper and Cadmium in Crops Grown in Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metals under Fully Open-Air Field Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6997–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hao, Z.; Cang, J.; Xu, Z. Plant Physiology; Harbin Institute of Technology Press: Harbin, China, 2004; ISBN 978-7-5603-2086-1. [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhang, X.; Feng, B.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Shi, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, Z.; Sathe, A.P.; Shi, L.; Wu, J. A Substitution Mutation in OsPELOTA Confers Bacterial Blight Resistance by Activating the Salicylic Acid Pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on photosynthetic key enzymes activity in maize seedlings roots under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 1. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on photosynthetic key enzymes activity in maize seedlings roots under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g001
Figure 2. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on detection of superoxide anion (O2·) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the leaves of maize seedlings under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 2. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on detection of superoxide anion (O2·) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the leaves of maize seedlings under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g002
Figure 3. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaves of maize seedlings under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 3. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaves of maize seedlings under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g003
Figure 4. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on the activity of ascorbate–glutathione cycle (AsA–GSH cycle) in maize seedling leaves under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 4. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on the activity of ascorbate–glutathione cycle (AsA–GSH cycle) in maize seedling leaves under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g004
Figure 5. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on the content of ascorbate (AsA) and glutathione (GSH) in maize seedlings leaves under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 5. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on the content of ascorbate (AsA) and glutathione (GSH) in maize seedlings leaves under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g005
Figure 6. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on maize seedlings’ endogenous hormones balance (IAA/ABA, GA/ABA, and ZR/ABA) under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. IAA represents auxin; GA represents gibberellin; ZR represents zeatin nucleoside; ABA represents abscisic acid. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Figure 6. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on maize seedlings’ endogenous hormones balance (IAA/ABA, GA/ABA, and ZR/ABA) under combined copper–cadmium stress. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. IAA represents auxin; GA represents gibberellin; ZR represents zeatin nucleoside; ABA represents abscisic acid. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Ijms 26 08938 g006
Table 1. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on maize seedlings’ endogenous hormones content under combined copper–cadmium stress.
Table 1. Effects of Folcisteine (NATCA) on maize seedlings’ endogenous hormones content under combined copper–cadmium stress.
ParametersVarietyTreatment1d2d3d4d
IAA
(ng·g−1·FW)
Jiuyuan15Ck159.64 ± 0.20 c172.18 ± 4.11 c220.10 ± 2.36 c232.47 ± 1.54 b
NATCA230.22 ± 2.87 a234.30 ± 2.54 a251.78 ± 6.68 a258.56 ± 4.20 a
CuCd153.19 ± 1.58 d147.94 ± 2.11 d149.85 ± 1.35 d143.03 ± 1.57 d
NATCA + CuCd210.38 ± 1.75 b199.33 ± 2.50 b236.07 ± 3.49 b208.81 ± 2.01 c
Longfuyu 6Ck208.45 ± 2.09 c242.94 ± 1.68 b252.68 ± 2.76 b294.48 ± 2.39 b
NATCA274.22 ± 2.64 a314.91 ± 2.60 a337.72 ± 1.92 a348.69 ± 2.31 a
CuCd162.78 ± 0.86 d140.21 ± 2.91 d132.45 ± 1.28 d126.80 ± 1.85 d
NATCA + CuCd234.12 ± 3.41 b237.32 ± 2.46 c228.14 ± 4.39 c171.77 ± 5.73 c
GA
(ng·g−1·FW)
Jiuyuan15Ck314.01 ± 9.62 b312.76 ± 5.19 b379.47 ± 2.09 b388.38 ± 2.68 b
NATCA354.85 ± 6.15 a361.99 ± 3.38 a410.63 ± 7.68 a409.78 ± 7.92 a
CuCd275.66 ± 2.17 c240.41 ± 1.59 c210.19 ± 7.29 d200.86 ± 4.24 d
NATCA + CuCd290.03 ± 4.29 c308.17 ± 3.31 b345.00 ± 3.63 c334.23 ± 5.39 c
Longfuyu 6Ck326.12 ± 6.27 b339.96 ± 1.25 b375.61 ± 0.95 b378.64 ± 4.13 b
NATCA379.67 ± 1.89 a366.66 ± 4.46 a392.11 ± 2.48 a397.22 ± 3.45 a
CuCd246.64 ± 3.06 c233.02 ± 1.48 d227.02 ± 2.50 d196.18 ± 2.33 d
NATCA + CuCd316.14 ± 5.29 b319.43 ± 2.43 c315.37 ± 0.49 c295.26 ± 1.53 c
ZR
(ng·g−1·FW)
Jiuyuan15Ck234.31 ± 2.57 c215.62 ± 1.39 c274.41 ± 1.43 c305.31 ± 4.45 b
NATCA293.33 ± 3.39 a277.17 ± 4.10 a306.52 ± 3.23 a348.35 ± 0.68 a
CuCd205.85 ± 1.96 d189.69 ± 1.68 d180.16 ± 1.24 d166.81 ± 5.30 d
NATCA + CuCd244.15 ± 1.98 b229.30 ± 1.71 b285.51 ± 2.74 b269.19 ± 1.19 c
Longfuyu 6Ck252.01 ± 1.64 c273.26 ± 5.39 b282.17 ± 1.34 b291.42 ± 2.88 b
NATCA311.39 ± 7.83 a321.64 ± 3.43 a332.65 ± 3.46 a354.14 ± 1.98 a
CuCd215.59 ± 0.95 d204.52 ± 1.27 d176.93 ± 2.02 d140.68 ± 1.69 d
NATCA + CuCd281.88 ± 1.32 b270.46 ± 1.00 c235.82 ± 2.04 c180.14 ± 1.37 c
ABA
(ng·g−1·FW)
Jiuyuan15Ck208.45 ± 5.03 b194.55 ± 2.10 c192.54 ± 0.82 c203.17 ± 0.37 c
NATCA189.07 ± 1.68 c170.85 ± 1.85 d173.35 ± 1.23 d152.68 ± 2.30 d
CuCd244.34 ± 5.01 a284.09 ± 4.35 a307.16 ± 1.53 a325.72 ± 2.00 a
NATCA + CuCd215.34 ± 1.58 b229.62 ± 4.48 b234.06 ± 2.03 b222.01 ± 1.35 b
Longfuyu 6Ck237.26 ± 2.69 b256.10 ± 2.24 c231.58 ± 2.17 b218.77 ± 0.97 c
NATCA220.83 ± 2.54 c220.08 ± 3.80 d199.51 ± 0.41 c194.95 ± 2.41 d
CuCd283.62 ± 3.18 a339.86 ± 1.20 a355.76 ± 8.27 a380.63 ± 1.62 a
NATCA + CuCd239.50 ± 3.90 b274.36 ± 2.02 b242.58 ± 6.05 b228.28 ± 1.06 b
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level. Ck represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution; NATCA represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA; CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2 and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4; NATCA + CuCd represents 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution containing 20 mg·L−1 NATCA, 80 mg·L−1 CdCl2, and 100 mg·L−1 CuSO4. IAA represents auxin; GA represents gibberellin; ZR represents zeatin nucleoside; ABA represents abscisic acid. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at 5% level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, L.; Zhao, M.; Wei, J.; Fu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xie, L.; Gu, W.; Zhou, Y. Folcisteine Safeguards Maize Against Copper–Cadmium Stress by Boosting the Activity of Photosynthesis-Related Enzymes and Antioxidant Defense Systems, Mediating Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathways and Hormonal Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8938. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188938

AMA Style

Dong L, Zhao M, Wei J, Fu Y, Xu Z, Xie L, Gu W, Zhou Y. Folcisteine Safeguards Maize Against Copper–Cadmium Stress by Boosting the Activity of Photosynthesis-Related Enzymes and Antioxidant Defense Systems, Mediating Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathways and Hormonal Regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(18):8938. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188938

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Ling, Meng Zhao, Jingwen Wei, Yiping Fu, Zihan Xu, Lihua Xie, Wanrong Gu, and Yu Zhou. 2025. "Folcisteine Safeguards Maize Against Copper–Cadmium Stress by Boosting the Activity of Photosynthesis-Related Enzymes and Antioxidant Defense Systems, Mediating Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathways and Hormonal Regulation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 18: 8938. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188938

APA Style

Dong, L., Zhao, M., Wei, J., Fu, Y., Xu, Z., Xie, L., Gu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Folcisteine Safeguards Maize Against Copper–Cadmium Stress by Boosting the Activity of Photosynthesis-Related Enzymes and Antioxidant Defense Systems, Mediating Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathways and Hormonal Regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(18), 8938. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188938

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop