Next Article in Journal
Effects of a Novel Mammalian-Derived Collagen Matrix on Human Articular Cartilage-Derived Chondrocytes from Osteoarthritis Patients
Previous Article in Journal
The Roles of PD-L1, Ki-67, P53, and Cyclin D1 in PitNETs: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications in a Series of 74 Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Potential of Metabolomics as a Tool for Identifying Biomarkers Associated with Obesity and Its Complications: A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition”

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna “Kore”, Contrada Santa Panasia, 94100 Enna, Italy
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(16), 7831; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167831
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025
The understanding of adipose tissue has evolved from viewing it as a passive storage depot for excess energy to recognizing it as a central endocrine organ, crucial in regulating metabolic homeostasis, immune responses, and inter-organ communication. It secretes a wide array of bioactive molecules, adipokines, cytokines, and lipids that modulate systemic energy balance, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and even behavior [1,2]. Dysfunctional adipose tissue, often resulting from a chronic positive energy balance, is a hallmark of obesity and is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and various cancers [3,4,5].
Obesity is not merely an increase in fat mass but reflects a profound alteration in adipose tissue structure and function, marked by hypoxia, fibrosis, macrophage infiltration, and a pro-inflammatory shift in secretory profile [6,7]. These changes disrupt lipid buffering, impair insulin signaling, and promote systemic metabolic dysfunction. Furthermore, adipose tissue plays a role in nutrient sensing, circadian biology, and even thermogenesis through beige and brown fat depots, whose functional decline may exacerbate metabolic disease [8,9].
The global obesity epidemic has amplified the need to understand the biology of adipose tissue at multiple levels, from genetics and epigenetics to microbiome interactions and lifestyle factors. Despite the progress, many questions remain regarding how adipose tissue adapts or maladapts under nutritional, hormonal, and environmental stressors.
This Special Issue of the International Journal of Molecular Science, titled "New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition", brings together a multidisciplinary collection of studies exploring these key questions. It includes investigations into developmental programming, genetic variants, dietary and physical activity interventions, molecular mechanisms of inflammation, and innovative tools such as metabolomics and systems biology.
The contributions reflect the field’s shift toward a more integrative understanding of adipose tissue, not just as a site of energy storage but as a complex and dynamic organ central to metabolic health and disease.
The concept of developmental programming, also known as the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD), proposes that environmental influences during critical periods of prenatal and early postnatal development can have lasting effects on an individual’s risk for obesity and metabolic disease [10]. Among the most potent of these influences is early-life nutrition, which shapes not only adiposity but also the function and structure of adipose tissue itself, as well as appetite regulation, insulin sensitivity, and immune responses [11,12]. In this context, maternal obesity and malnutrition have been strongly associated with an increased risk of metabolic dysfunction in offspring. These effects are thought to be mediated through epigenetic mechanisms, alterations in hypothalamic development, changes in adipose tissue precursor cells, and disruptions in gut microbiota [13,14]. For example, offspring exposed to maternal high-fat diets show increased adiposity, insulin resistance, and pro-inflammatory profiles even when raised on a normal diet post-weaning [15].
This Special Issue includes two contributions that provide compelling evidence for the long-term metabolic impact of early-life dietary exposures and potential preventive strategies. In a rodent model of maternal obesity, Pomar et al. [16] demonstrate that either dietary improvement during gestation or leptin supplementation during the suckling period attenuates the elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers in adult offspring. These findings reinforce leptin’s role not just as a satiety hormone but also as a neurotrophic and immunomodulatory factor critical during early postnatal development [17]. Complementing this, Bazhan et al. [18] reveal that the timing of exposure to a hypercaloric cafeteria diet significantly impacts the obesity phenotype in mice, and that these effects differ between sexes. Early-life exposure exacerbates weight gain and adipose tissue accumulation more profoundly in males than females, suggesting a sex-specific programming of energy metabolism and fat distribution, a phenomenon supported by earlier work in both animal and human studies [19].
A growing body of evidence indicates that genetic factors and molecular signaling pathways play a pivotal role in the development and progression of adipose tissue dysfunction. Monogenic and polygenic forms of obesity can result from variants affecting genes involved in appetite regulation, adipogenesis, insulin signaling, lipolysis, and mitochondrial function [20]. Disruption of these processes can impair adipose tissue expandability, alter its secretory profile, and promote chronic inflammation, ultimately contributing to systemic metabolic disease [21]. In this Special Issue, Mohammed et al. [22] present a functional characterization of a novel homozygous variant in the ADCY3 gene, which encodes adenylate cyclase 3, a key enzyme in cyclic AMP production implicated in hypothalamic signaling and energy homeostasis. Loss-of-function mutations in ADCY3 have been linked to early-onset severe obesity and impaired olfactory signaling, suggesting its dual role in both central and peripheral energy regulation [23,24]. The study highlights the relevance of gene sequencing and functional validation in uncovering pathogenic mechanisms of inherited obesity.
At the cellular level, chronic low-grade inflammation within adipose tissue is a hallmark of dysfunction and insulin resistance. In particular, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have emerged as key modulators of adipocyte metabolism, acting through receptors such as RAGE and signaling intermediates including NF-κB. The study by Michalani et al. [25] shows that AGE exposure leads to downregulation of the Slc2a4 gene, which encodes the glucose transporter GLUT4, via NF-κB activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. This aligns with previous findings demonstrating that inflammatory pathways can impair insulin signaling at the transcriptional level, contributing to reduced glucose uptake and metabolic inflexibility [26,27]. More broadly, epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and microRNAs, are increasingly recognized as mediators of the effects of both genetic predisposition and environmental exposure on adipose tissue biology [28]. For example, obesity has been associated with methylation changes in loci related to adipogenesis and lipid metabolism, and such epigenetic marks may also serve as biomarkers for metabolic risk or targets for future therapies [29].
In the face of the growing global obesity epidemic, lifestyle-based interventions remain the cornerstone for the prevention and management of adipose tissue dysfunction. Exercise and dietary modulation not only reduce adiposity but also improve adipose tissue phenotype, enhance mitochondrial activity, and restore insulin sensitivity [30]. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that the quality, timing, and composition of nutritional intake, as well as bioactive compounds from functional foods, can influence adipose tissue metabolism independently of weight loss [31]. Aerobic exercise, for example, has been shown to induce anti-inflammatory changes in adipose tissue, promoting a shift from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization, enhancing GLUT4 expression, and improving adipokine profiles [32]. In this Special Issue, Del Bianco et al. [33] report that aerobic training ameliorates insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation in rats, even in the context of a low-sodium diet, which paradoxically increases visceral adiposity and inflammatory markers. This study highlights the complexity of diet–exercise interactions, emphasizing that exercise can mitigate some of the unintended metabolic consequences of certain restrictive diets. Dietary interventions also play a crucial role. Erta et al. [34] examine the metabolic effects of a 12-week dietary intervention in overweight women of reproductive age, demonstrating improvements in key adipose tissue markers, including leptin and adiponectin levels. Their findings support previous clinical research showing that even modest dietary changes can significantly alter the endocrine and inflammatory function of adipose tissue, with implications for fertility, metabolic health, and long-term disease risk [35,36]. In parallel, the role of functional foods and bioactive compounds in modulating adipose tissue function is gaining attention. Hyun et al. [37] explore the metabolic potential of L-fucose-rich sulfated glycans derived from brown seaweed, showing that they enhance energy expenditure and mitigate obesity phenotypes in animal models. These findings are aligned with a growing body of literature showing that seaweed-derived polysaccharides, such as fucoidan and alginate, possess prebiotic, anti-inflammatory, and thermogenic properties that can beneficially influence adipose tissue and systemic metabolism [38,39]. Furthermore, dietary polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, and other phytochemicals have demonstrated the capacity to regulate adipocyte differentiation, stimulate the browning of white adipose tissue, and modulate oxidative stress pathways [40]. The integration of such functional food components into conventional dietary approaches represents a promising strategy to target adipose dysfunction without relying solely on caloric restriction.
Understanding the complex regulatory networks that govern adipose tissue function has become essential for identifying biomarkers predictive of obesity progression and its metabolic complications. Modern systems biology approaches, including metabolomics, microRNA profiling, and integrative omics, have revolutionized our capacity to detect subtle changes in adipose physiology that precede overt disease [41]. In this Special Issue, Skowronek et al. [42] conduct a scoping review on the potential of metabolomics in obesity research, highlighting how shifts in amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolites may reflect alterations in adipocyte function and systemic insulin sensitivity. Metabolomic profiles are particularly promising for uncovering early biomarkers of metabolic dysfunction, enabling stratification of obese individuals by risk and responsiveness to therapy [43]. For instance, elevated circulating levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and certain acylcarnitines have been consistently associated with insulin resistance and visceral adiposity, likely reflecting impaired mitochondrial oxidative capacity in adipose and muscle tissue [44]. A second emerging layer of regulation is provided by non-coding RNAs, especially microRNAs (miRNAs), which fine-tune gene expression post-transcriptionally. Dysregulation of specific miRNAs, such as miR-143, miR-103, and miR-21, has been implicated in the promotion of adipogenesis, chronic inflammation, and insulin resistance [45]. In their systematic review, Azari et al. [46] underscore the functional interplay between gut microbiota and host miRNAs, suggesting that microbial-derived metabolites can influence host gene expression via miRNA modulation, creating a bidirectional regulatory axis between the gut and adipose tissue. This emerging field of microbiota and miRNA crosstalk may help explain the persistent effects of diet and environment on adipose tissue phenotype, even after weight normalization. Further contributing to the regulatory complexity is the incretin system, traditionally associated with glucose metabolism via pancreatic effects, but now recognized as a modulator of adipose tissue activity. In their thought-provoking perspective, De Fano et al. [47] propose adipose tissue as a novel target of the incretin axis, suggesting that GLP-1 and GIP receptors in adipocytes may influence lipolysis, browning, and cytokine secretion. This paradigm shift aligns with emerging data indicating that incretin-based therapies not only improve glycemia but also reduce fat mass and inflammation in adipose depots [48,49].
Once regarded as a passive energy depot, adipose tissue is now widely recognized as a highly dynamic endocrine organ, capable of secreting a wide array of hormones, cytokines, and lipid mediators that coordinate systemic metabolism. Among these, adipokines such as leptin, adiponectin, resistin, and visfatin have emerged as key players in energy homeostasis, glucose uptake, and inflammatory modulation [2,50]. The complexity of adipose-derived hormonal signaling is further amplified by its crosstalk with other endocrine systems, including the gut–brain axis, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, and incretin hormones. De Fano et al. [47]’s insight aligns with emerging evidence from GLP-1 receptor agonist studies, which show that incretin-based therapies not only reduce glycemia and appetite but also improve adipose tissue inflammation and insulin sensitivity, independently of weight loss [48,51]. Recent studies have also highlighted the bidirectional communication between adipose tissue and the hypothalamus, mediated by both hormonal and neural pathways. For example, leptin and adiponectin not only regulate hypothalamic appetite centers but are themselves modulated by neuroendocrine signals such as melanocortins and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), creating feedback loops essential for metabolic adaptation [52]. Additionally, adipose tissue glucocorticoid metabolism, via 11β-HSD1 activity, serves as a local amplifier of HPA axis effects, contributing to visceral adiposity and insulin resistance [53]. Furthermore, recent discoveries have expanded the functional repertoire of adipose tissue to include exosomal and extracellular vesicle (EV) signaling, which allow adipocytes to influence distant tissues through the transport of miRNAs, proteins, and lipids. These vesicles have been shown to modulate insulin signaling in skeletal muscle, promote macrophage polarization, and even impact hepatic gluconeogenesis, establishing adipose tissue as a key inter-organ communication hub [54,55].
In conclusion, the studies included in this Special Issue reveal a highly integrated view of adipose tissue biology, ranging from molecular genetics and epigenetic regulation to dietary and hormonal interventions. They collectively highlight adipose tissue not only as a metabolic organ but also as a central node in immune–endocrine crosstalk and systemic homeostasis, serving as a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians working to unravel the complex mechanisms of adipose dysfunction and to develop innovative strategies for the prevention and treatment of metabolic disease.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rosen, E.D.; Spiegelman, B.M. Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature 2006, 444, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kershaw, E.E.; Flier, J.S. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 2548–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gregor, M.F.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 415–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Blüher, M. Adipose tissue dysfunction contributes to obesity related metabolic diseases. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 27, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, J.; Euhus, D.M.; Scherer, P.E. Paracrine and endocrine effects of adipose tissue on cancer development and progression. Endocr. Rev. 2011, 32, 550–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, K.; Kusminski, C.M.; Scherer, P.E. Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2094–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wensveen, F.M.; Valentić, S.; Šestan, M.; Wensveen, T.T.; Polić, B. The “Big Bang” in obese fat: Events initiating obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kajimura, S.; Spiegelman, B.M.; Seale, P. Brown and beige fat: Physiological roles beyond heat generation. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 546–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scheele, C.; Nielsen, S. Metabolic regulation and the anti-obesity perspectives of human brown fat. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barker, D.J. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1995, 311, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Godfrey, K.M.; Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A. Developmental origins of metabolic disease: Life course and intergenerational perspectives. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 21, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Armitage, J.A.; Poston, L.; Taylor, P.D. Developmental origins of obesity and the metabolic syndrome: The role of maternal obesity. Front. Horm. Res. 2008, 36, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Desai, M.; Ross, M.G. Fetal programming of adipose tissue: Effects of intrauterine growth restriction and maternal obesity/high-fat diet. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2011, 29, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aagaard-Tillery, K.M.; Grove, K.; Bishop, J.; Ke, X.; Fu, Q.; McKnight, R.; Lane, R.H. Developmental origins of disease and determinants of chromatin structure: Maternal diet modifies the primate fetal epigenome. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008, 41, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Samuelsson, A.-M.; Matthews, P.A.; Argenton, M.; Christie, M.R.; McConnell, J.M.; Jansen, E.H.M.; Piersma, A.H.; Ozanne, S.E.; Twinn, D.F.; Remacle, C.; et al. Diet-induced obesity in female mice leads to offspring hyperphagia, adiposity, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Hypertension 2008, 51, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pomar, C.A.; Trepiana, J.; Besné-Eseverri, I.; Castillo, P.; Palou, A.; Palou, M.; Portillo, M.P.; Picó, C. Maternal Dietary Improvement or Leptin Supplementation During Suckling Mitigates the Long-Term Impact of Maternal Obesogenic Conditions on Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Offspring of Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bouret, S.G.; Simerly, R.B. Minireview: Leptin and development of hypothalamic feeding circuits. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 2621–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bazhan, N.; Kazantseva, A.; Dubinina, A.; Balybina, N.; Jakovleva, T.; Makarova, E. Age of Cafeteria Diet Onset Influences Obesity Phenotype in Mice in a Sex-Specific Manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nguyen, L.T.; Saad, S.; Chen, H.; Pollock, C.A. Parental SIRT1 Overexpression Attenuate Metabolic Disorders Due to Maternal High-Fat Feeding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Loos, R.J.F.; Yeo, G.S.H. The genetics of obesity: From discovery to biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosen, E.D.; MacDougald, O.A. Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mohammed, I.; Selvaraj, S.; Ahmed, W.S.; Al-Barazenji, T.; Dauleh, H.; Love, D.R.; Saraiva, L.R.; Hussain, K. Functional Evaluation of a Novel Homozygous ADCY3 Variant Causing Childhood Obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saeed, S.; Bonnefond, A.; Tamanini, F.; Mirza, M.U.; Manzoor, J.; Janjua, Q.M.; Din, S.M.; Gaitan, J.; Milochau, A.; Durand, E.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in ADCY3 cause monogenic severe obesity. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tong, T.; Shen, Y.; Lee, H.W.; Yu, R.; Park, T. Adenylyl cyclase 3 haploinsufficiency confers susceptibility to diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 28, 34179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Michalani, M.L.E.; Passarelli, M.; Machado, U.F. Nuclear Factor-Kappa-B Mediates the Advanced Glycation End Product-Induced Repression of Slc2a4 Gene Expression in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ruan, H.; Lodish, H.F. Insulin resistance in adipose tissue: Direct and indirect effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003, 14, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tu, C.; Chen, X.; He, R. Advanced Glycation End Products in Disease Development and Potential Interventions. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rönn, T.; Ling, C. DNA methylation as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in the battle against Type 2 diabetes. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arner, P.; Sahlqvist, A.S.; Sinha, I.; Xu, H.; Yao, X.; Waterworth, D.; Rajpal, D.; Loomis, A.K.; Freudenberg, J.M.; Johnson, T.; et al. Erratum to: The epigenetic signature of systemic insulin resistance in obese women. Diabetologia 2016, 59, 2728, Erratum in Diabetologia 2016, 59, 2393–2405.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stanford, K.I.; Goodyear, L.J. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: Molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2014, 38, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gaggini, M.; Carli, F.; Rosso, C.; Buzzigoli, E.; Marietti, M.; Della Latta, V.; Ciociaro, D.; Abate, M.L.; Gambino, R.; Cassader, M.; et al. Altered amino acid concentrations in NAFLD: Impact of obesity and insulin resistance. Hepatology 2018, 67, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kawanishi, N.; Yano, H.; Yokogawa, Y.; Suzuki, K. Exercise training inhibits inflammation in adipose tissue via both suppression of macrophage infiltration and acceleration of phenotypic switching from M1 to M2 macrophages in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice. Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2010, 16, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Del Bianco, V.; Ferreira, G.d.S.; Bochi, A.P.G.; Pinto, P.R.; Rodrigues, L.G.; Furukawa, L.N.S.; Okamoto, M.M.; Almeida, J.A.; da Silveira, L.K.R.; Santos, A.S.; et al. Aerobic Exercise Training Protects Against Insulin Resistance, Despite Low-Sodium Diet-Induced Increased Inflammation and Visceral Adiposity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Erta, G.; Gersone, G.; Jurka, A.; Tretjakovs, P. Impact of a 12-Week Dietary Intervention on Adipose Tissue Metabolic Markers in Overweight Women of Reproductive Age. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moran, L.J.; Noakes, M.; Clifton, P.M.; Tomlinson, L.; Galletly, C.; Norman, R.J. Dietary composition in restoring reproductive and metabolic physiology in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Warkentin, S.; Stratakis, N.; Fabbri, L.; Wright, J.; Yang, T.C.; Bryant, M.; Heude, B.; Slama, R.; Montazeri, P.; Vafeiadi, M.; et al. Dietary patterns among European children and their association with adiposity-related outcomes: A multi-country study. Int. J. Obes. 2025, 49, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hyun, J.; Lee, H.-G.; Je, J.-G.; Choi, Y.-S.; Song, K.-M.; Kim, T.-K.; Ryu, B.; Kang, M.-C.; Jeon, Y.-J. L-Fucose-Rich Sulfated Glycans from Edible Brown Seaweed: A Promising Functional Food for Obesity and Energy Expenditure Improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z. Antioxidant activity of sulfated polysaccharide fractions extracted from Laminaria japonica. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008, 42, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fitton, J.H. Therapies from fucoidan; multifunctional marine polymers. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1731–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hokayem, M.; Blond, E.; Vidal, H.; Lambert, K.; Meugnier, E.; Feillet-Coudray, C.; Coudray, C.; Pesenti, S.; Luyton, C.; Lambert-Porcheron, S.; et al. Grape polyphenols prevent fructose-induced oxidative stress and insulin resistance in first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 1454–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rinschen, M.M.; Ivanisevic, J.; Giera, M.; Siuzdak, G. Identification of bioactive metabolites using activity metabolomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Skowronek, A.K.; Jaskulak, M.; Zorena, K. The Potential of Metabolomics as a Tool for Identifying Biomarkers Associated with Obesity and Its Complications: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 26, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Newgard, C.B. Metabolomics and Metabolic Diseases: Where Do We Stand? Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, T.J.; Larson, M.G.; Vasan, R.S.; Cheng, S.; Rhee, E.P.; McCabe, E.; Lewis, G.D.; Fox, C.S.; Jacques, P.F.; Fernandez, C.; et al. Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Arner, P.; Kulyté, A. MicroRNA regulatory networks in human adipose tissue and obesity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Azari, H.; George, M.; Albracht-Schulte, K. Gut Microbiota–microRNA Interactions and Obesity Pathophysiology: A Systematic Review of Integrated Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Fano, M.; Malara, M.; Vermigli, C.; Murdolo, G. Adipose Tissue: A Novel Target of the Incretin Axis? A Paradigm Shift in Obesity-Linked Insulin Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Drucker, D.J. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 740–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, Y.S.; Jun, H.S. Anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1-based therapies beyond glucose control. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 3094642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fasshauer, M.; Blüher, M. Adipokines in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 36, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nauck, M.A.; Quast, D.R.; Wefers, J.; Meier, J.J. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes—State-of-the-art. Mol. Metab. 2021, 46, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Morton, G.J.; Meek, T.H.; Schwartz, M.W. Neurobiology of food intake in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Morgan, S.A.; McCabe, E.L.; Gathercole, L.L.; Hassan-Smith, Z.K.; Larner, D.P.; Bujalska, I.J.; Stewart, P.M.; Tomlinson, J.W.; Lavery, G.G. 11β-HSD1 is the major regulator of the tissue-specific effects of circulating glucocorticoid excess. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2482–E2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Thomou, T.; Mori, M.A.; Dreyfuss, J.M.; Konishi, M.; Sakaguchi, M.; Wolfrum, C.; Rao, T.N.; Winnay, J.N.; Garcia-Martin, R.; Grinspoon, S.K.; et al. Adipose-derived circulating miRNAs regulate gene expression in other tissues. Nature 2017, 542, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ying, W.; Riopel, M.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Dong, Y.; Birmingham, A.; Seo, J.B.; Ofrecio, J.M.; Wollam, J.; Hernandez-Carretero, A.; Fu, W.; et al. Adipose tissue macrophage-derived exosomal miRNAs can modulate in vivo and in vitro insulin sensitivity. Cell 2017, 171, 372–384.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mannino, F. Special Issue “New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167831

AMA Style

Mannino F. Special Issue “New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(16):7831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mannino, Federica. 2025. "Special Issue “New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 16: 7831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167831

APA Style

Mannino, F. (2025). Special Issue “New Insights into Adipose Tissue Metabolic Function and Dysfunction, 3rd Edition”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(16), 7831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop