Next Article in Journal
Screening, Characterization and Comparison of Endoglucanases/Xylanases from Thermophilic Fungi: A Thielavia terrestris Xylanase with High Activity-Stability Properties
Previous Article in Journal
TrkA Expression as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resveratrol’s Pro-Apoptotic Effects in Cancer Are Mediated Through the Interaction and Oligomerization of the Mitochondrial VDAC1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Genetic Landscape of a Pleural Mesothelioma in a Child Affected by NF2-Related Schwannomatosis

1
U.O.C. Genetica Medica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
2
U.O.S.D. Neuro Oncologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno-Infantili, Università Degli Studi di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
4
U.O.C. Gastroenterologia Pediatrica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
5
U.O.C. Genetica Clinica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
6
U.O.C. Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6848; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146848
Submission received: 10 June 2025 / Revised: 14 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 16 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Oncology)

Abstract

We report the first case of pleural mesothelioma (PM) occurring in a child affected by NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) and without any history of environmental exposure to asbestos. Mesothelioma is a rare secondary tumor in brain cancer patients and the association with NF2-SWN has been described only in a few anecdotal cases and never in the pediatric field. NF2-SWN is an autosomal dominant disease caused by inactivating germline mutations of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene, one of the most common mutations associated with human primary mesothelioma too. By MLPA assay, array-CGH analysis, and NGS on blood and tumor DNA, we determined the mutation profile of this rare NF2-driven PM and we identified several atypical chromosomal aberrations in tumor cells, suggesting a different genomic signature between pediatric and adult mesothelioma.

1. Introduction

Mesothelioma emerges principally from the mesothelial cells belonging to the serosal membrane that covers the pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial cavities and can be divided into benign and malignant types [1]. Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive rare disease with an incidence in Italy of about 2.46 per 100,000 inhabitants, and it is the most common form of mesothelioma, representing about 80% of cases of this tumor. Depending on the histology, from better to worse prognosis, it is classified as epithelioid, biphasic, or sarcomatoid. Pleural mesothelioma is mainly linked to industrial pollutants and mineral fiber exposure, with approximately 85% of cases linked to asbestos. Though asbestos is certainly the largest and most well-known cause of mesothelioma, roughly 20% of patients do not have any known exposure [2]. Genetic analysis and other studies have led to the suspicion that genetic predisposition and radiation therapy are other possible culprits [3,4].
Less than 1% of patients affected by PM without a known exposure carry a specific inherited genetic mutation. These inherited mesotheliomas appear at a younger age and demonstrate no sex or specific anatomic site predilection. Additionally, the possible presence of other concurrent cancers, in particular melanomas and renal cell carcinomas, suggests a broader cancer predisposition syndrome [5]. For the successful development of diagnostic, prognostic, and personalized therapies, it is crucial to understand the genetic alterations that drive PM. Since PM is a rare disease, genomic studies are limited and involve only a small number of cases. Loss-of-function mutations in BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2A have been previously described in PM [6,7], and other studies have reported copy gains and copy losses involving many different regions of the genome [8]. Recent whole-genome sequencing analysis identified new significantly mutated genes in PM, including RDX, PIK3C2B, TAOK1, TP53, DDX3X, SETD2, SF3B1, and TRAF7 [6,9].
Mesothelioma is extremely rare in children, usually not related to asbestos exposure, and with some clinical differences with the adult forms. Furthermore, the prognosis of pediatric mesothelioma appears to be more favorable than its adult analog. The median age at onset is 13.4 years [1].
NF2 (Neurofibromatosis type 2)-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) is an autosomal dominant disorder whose characteristic features include multiple nervous system tumors (vestibular schwannomas, intracranial meningiomas, spinal ependymomas, and peripheral nerve tumors), ocular abnormalities, and skin lesions [10]. Tumors associated with NF2-SWN are caused by inactivating mutations or loss of both alleles (constitutional and somatic mutations) of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene. NF2 expresses the Merlin protein, an ERM (ezrin–radixin–moesin)-like molecule that interacts with cell surface proteins involved in cytoskeletal dynamics and in the regulation of ion transport [11]. NF2 mutations are also detectable in sporadic schwannomas, in meningiomas, and, peculiarly, in sporadic malignant mesotheliomas, indicating that the NF2 gene may be a critical growth regulator for all these cell types. Even if mesothelioma is not a distinctive feature of NF2-SWN, a high prevalence of mesothelioma in NF2-SWN could nevertheless escape detection because both diseases are rare [12].
It has been suggested that NF2-SWN patients could be at increased risk of developing mesothelioma, but, actually, patients with inherited NF2-SWN rarely develop mesothelioma as a second cancer and the few reported cases all happened in adult age [13,14,15].
We report here the first known case of a pediatric patient diagnosed with syndromic NF2-SWN at the age of one year, who twelve years later developed a PM. We identified a germline NF2 loss-of-function mutation and, in PM, a second hit, the loss of the NF2 locus on chromosome 22, resulting in NF2 bi-allelic inactivation, together with many other numerical chromosomal aberrations, some of which are unusual for a PM genetic profile.

2. Results

2.1. Patient Information

A one-year-old boy was diagnosed with severe NF2-related schwannomatosis and treated with several neurosurgical exereses (cerebral and spinal meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas) and with multiple chemotherapy lines (hydroxycarbamide, bevacizumab, and sirolimus), the latter all proving ineffective. After twelve years, he developed pleural effusion and weight loss. The CT scan showed the thickening of the right pleura and multiple peritoneal nodules (Figure 1A). The cytological examination on thoracentesis diagnosed an epithelioid PM that followed a mild course, giving an overall survival of about one year; then the patient died because of rapidly increasing meningiomas related to NF2-SWN (Figure 1B). Importantly, there was no tumor family history and no environmental exposure to asbestos contamination.

2.2. Molecular Diagnosis of NF2-Related Schwannomatosis

No pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and no small insertions/deletions were identified through NGS of three NF2-SWN-related genes (NF2, LZTR1, and SMARCB1) in the genomic patient’s DNA. Nevertheless, by MLPA assay (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification), we discovered a heterozygous deletion of the NF2 gene (NM_000268.3) encompassing the 5’UTR (414 bps before the start codon) and exon 1 (Figure 2A,B), thus confirming the clinical diagnosis.

2.3. Genomic Profile Analysis of Mesothelioma Cells by Array-CGH

Since PM is a tumor frequently characterized by typical chromosomal abnormalities [16], the DNA from the patient’s PM effusion cells was analyzed by a-CGH. We found a gain of whole chromosomes 6, 10, 11, 16, and 20 and loss of whole chromosomes 14, 22, and Y (Figure 3).

2.4. Genomic Profiling of Mesothelioma Cells by NGS Analysis

To assess the complete mutational profile of the tumor, we performed NGS on DNA extracted from mesothelioma effusion cells using a commercial NGS panel covering 501 cancer-associated genes. The analysis did not find any pathogenic SNVs on cancer-related genes, but it did find many copy number variations (CNVs) that substantially confirmed the a-CGH results (Table 1) and the somatic loss of the NF2 locus. The NF2 second hit confirmed the role of this tumor suppressor gene as a driver for PM. The analysis also identified co-occurring mutations commonly present in tumors, which may activate complementary oncogenic pathways, such as PARP2, FANCM, RAD51B, MLH3, DICER1, and XRCC3 on chromosome 14q and MAPK1, SMARCB1, CHEK2, NF2, and EP300 on chromosome 22q, whose function, apart from NF2, is, so far, not for all clearly associable with PM.

3. Discussion

Both NF2-SWN and PM are related to NF2 dysfunction; consequently, it may be plausible that NF2 patients are at increased risk of PM. However, to date, very few cases describing patients diagnosed with both NF2 and malignant mesothelioma have been reported by the literature [13,14,15], and they were all adults.
NF2 mutations are linked to peritoneal and pericardial mesothelioma too. NF2 mutations were identified in 21–35% of cases of peritoneal mesothelioma [17]. Primary pericardial mesotheliomas are extremely rare, accounting for <1% of all mesotheliomas, and they share similar genomic aberrations with peritoneal mesotheliomas, being driven by several genes including NF2 [18].
We describe here the first case of a pediatric patient affected by NF2-SWN, who twelve years later, at the age of 13, developed a PM. Furthermore, he was never subjected to asbestos contamination and he had no tumor family history. We identified a pathogenic heterozygous deletion of NF2 in blood DNA and the concomitant loss of the NF2 locus in the tumor through the loss of the whole chromosome 22, demonstrating that PM was driven by the bi-allelic loss of function of NF2. In adults, NF2 inactivation in mesothelioma cells is considered a late event that may result in an aggressive phenotype [19]. Here we propose that in pediatric mesothelioma NF2 inactivation could instead represent an early driver event.
The NGS analysis of tumor DNA showed the presence of several CNVs, substantially recalling the same numerical chromosomal aberrations identified by a-CGH. Apart from the loss of chromosomes 14 and 22, the other found chromosomal aberrations are not typical of mesothelioma [8,16,20]. In particular, mesothelioma is mainly characterized by the loss of the p or q arm of chromosomes rather than gain [17], while our patient had only entire affected chromosomes and much more gained than lost ones. It is conceivable that the loss of NF2 together with the deletion of other tumor suppressor genes or with the duplication of oncogenes contained in the chromosomes, respectively, found lost or gained in this patient, and, to date, not associated with mesothelioma, may have acted collectively in our patient.
In particular, NGS analysis highlighted ten cancer-related genes (PARP2, FANCM, RAD51B, MLH3, DICER1, XRCC3, MAPK1, SMARCB1, CHEK2, and EP300), besides NF2, whose loss is still not clearly proven to be related to PM. While the correlation of PM with MAPK pathways genes such as MAPK1 or with EP300 is quite well described [20,21], for CHEK2, FANCM, XRCC3, and SMARCB1 some suggestion has been proposed [21,22,23,24]. Surely interesting and not yet reported as associated with PM are RAD51B and MLH3, both essential for DNA mismatch repair [25,26].
Several studies have investigated genes and genetic mechanisms associated with PM, employing various kind of technologies such as Sanger sequencing, genome-wide association (GWAS), and whole-genome sequencing. In adult PM, the oncogenic pathways of mTOR, Hippo (NF2), and p53 were mainly associated with the tumor. Alterations in BAP1, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, NF2, MTAP, TP53, and SETD2 occurred with an incidence of at least 10% [17]. Recurring chromosomal changes included partial deletions of 1p and 3p and monosomy of 14, 18, 19, and 22. Pediatric PM is an extremely rare disease, with very few cases published in the literature. It appears to be a different entity than its adult counterpart, since it is never associated with asbestos or radiation exposure [27]. Recently, pediatric malignant peritoneal mesothelioma cases have been genetically studied, with alterations observed in ALK, EWSR1, FUS1, YY1, or in AURKA, AURKC, HLA-1B, ZNF-217, OR5F1, and MEN1 genes, but not in BAP1 [28,29].
While most PMs arise from exposure to environmental carcinogenic factors with a long latency period of about 30–60 years, a small percentage of cases occur spontaneously from somatic or germline variants. Adult PM related to inherited germline variants of BAP1 occurs at a younger age, 55 versus 72 years [30]. As for NF2, although many NF2 patients reach the age of morbidity for mesothelioma onset, the development of mesothelioma has not specifically been reported, suggesting that NF2 germline mutation is unlikely to be a predisposing condition for familial PM development like BAP1.
All the cancer genes here identified or even others not yet described could consequently represent possible genetic risk factors for juvenile PM occurrence in the absence of environmental contamination. Future additional investigations and functional studies are needed to understand which genes could be preferentially linked with the malignant evolution of pediatric pleural mesothelioma.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection

Genomic DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes and PM DNA from pleural effusion cells of the patient were extracted using the QIAsymphony DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

4.2. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of NF2-SWN-Related Genes

Genomic DNA was analyzed for the sequencing of three NF2-SWN-related genes. Given the clinical overlap between Neurofibromatosis type 2 and schwannomatosis, we developed an NGS customized panel using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Designer v6.13 algorithm provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Carlsbad, CA, USA) in order to target the entire coding sequence (CDS) and 10 bases of the adjacent intronic regions of NF2 (NM_000268.3), LZTR1 (NM_006767), and SMARCB1 (NM_003073.3). The primers pools were composed of 117 amplicons showing the following features: 100% total coverage, 0% missed regions, and amplicon range of 125–275 bps. Libraries were prepared starting from 10 ng of genomic DNA using the AmpliSeq Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final concentration of the library was evaluated with a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer using the Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Template preparation and chip loading were performed on the Ion Chef System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequencing was performed on Gene Studio S5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a 510 Ion Chip. Base calling was generated by Torrent Suite 3.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using tmap-f3 on the Ion Torrent server for further analysis. Bam files were analyzed by Ion Reporter Software v.5.16 (https://ionreporter.thermofisher.com/ir/, accessed on 10 March 2025).

4.3. Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Analysis (MLPA)

Genomic DNA was analyzed with the SALSA MLPA probemix P044-B3 NF2 (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to identify single- and multi-exon deletions/duplications inside the NF2 gene. Results obtained by ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer (ThermoFisher Scientific) were analyzed with Coffalyser Net software, version v.240129.1959 (MRC Holland). The mean cut-off for the normalized peak height ratio of the patient to the control sample was less than 0.7 in case of exon deletions and more than 1.30 in case of exon duplications.

4.4. Genomic Profile Analysis by Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH)

DNA from PM effusion cells was tested by high-resolution oligonucleotide a-CGH using the 4 × 180 K Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a mean resolution of 25 kb. The images produced by each hybridization were processed using Agilent Feature Extraction 10.5 software, and the obtained data were analyzed using Genomic Workbench 7.0.40 software (Agilent), as previously described [31].

4.5. Targeted NGS of Cancer-Related Genes

Comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor DNA was performed using Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific), which covers 501 cancer-associated genes. The panel detects telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), large-scale state transitions (LST), microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and HRD (Homologous Repair Deficiency) all in one workflow. In general, multiplex PCR amplification was conducted using a nucleic acid concentration of approximately 20 ng as input. Manually prepared libraries were loaded according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using the Ion Library TaqMan Quantitation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All libraries were adjusted to 50 pM before template preparation and 550™ chip loading using the Ion Chef™ System according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed using the Ion GeneStudio™ S5 Prime Sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Libraries were loaded on 550TM Chips (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Ion Chef™ liquid handler in order to obtain a median coverage >1000× and to detect variants with a minor allelic frequency (MAF) of 1%.

4.6. Bioinformatics Analysis

BAM files were analyzed using Ion Reporter™ Software version 5.20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the Oncomine Comprehensive Plus-w3.1-DNA and Fusions-Single Sample workflow. Variants were ultimately classified using the tier-based system defined by a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. Copy number estimates were made using a proprietary VCIB (Variability Control Informatics Baseline) algorithm. The VCIB informatics baseline was created using at least 48 diverse samples with at least 6 normal samples. The MAPD metric is a measure of read coverage noise detected across all amplicons in a panel. Higher MAPD typically translates to lower coverage uniformity. Lower coverage uniformity can result in missed or erroneous CNV calls. MAPD score is viewable in a downloadable VCF file or in the review of the analysis results of a single-sample extended analysis. To make a CNV call, the following criteria must be met: MAPD 2; p-value < 0.85.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we report here the genetic study of the first known pediatric case of a patient affected by both NF2-SWN and PM, suggesting the possible existence of a different genomic signature compared to the adult analog. Indeed, our patient did not display the genetic mutations classically associated with adult PM, apart from the loss of the NF2 locus, causative of the severe schwannomatosis, and the loss of chromosomes 14 and 22. Further studies are therefore needed to determine which genes could be specifically related to pediatric PM in order to address targeted molecular-based therapeutic approaches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., P.D.M., M.C., G.P. and A.V.; methodology, M.O., M.D.D., A.R. and P.D.M.; validation, M.O., G.P., M.C., A.V., F.R. and P.D.M.; investigation, M.O., M.D.D., A.R. and P.D.M.; resources, F.Z. and C.M.; data curation, M.O. and P.D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O. and P.D.M.; writing—review and editing, M.O., P.D.M., G.P., M.C., A.V., M.M., F.R., V.C. and C.M.; visualization, M.O.; project administration, V.C., F.Z. and C.M.; funding acquisition, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, with RICERCA CORRENTE 2024 (MSALRC24) and with 5 × 1000 PROJECT 2018 (UAUT 2020/12).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient before he was included in this study. This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review was waived as this study presents a description of a clinical case, with no experimental or non-standardized clinical interventions involved. Additionally, the patient’s data have been fully anonymized and do not include any sensitive information that could lead to their identification.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed parental consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Orbach, D.; André, N.; Brecht, I.B.; López Almaraz, R.; Ben-Ami, T.; Vermersch, S.; Carton, M.; Virgone, C.; Bisogno, G.; Schneider, D.T.; et al. Mesothelioma in children and adolescents: The European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT) contribution. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 140, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abbott, D.M.; Bortolotto, C.; Benvenuti, S.; Lancia, A.; Filippi, A.R.; Stella, G.M. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Genetic and Microenviromental Heterogeneity as an Unexpected Reading Frame and Therapeutic Challenge. Cancers 2020, 12, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Betti, M.; Aspesi, A.; Sculco, M.; Matullo, G.; Magnani, C.; Dianzani, I. Genetic predisposition for malignant mesothelioma: A concise review. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2019, 781, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Farioli, A.; Ottone, M.; Morganti, A.G.; Compagnone, G.; Romani, F.; Cammelli, S.; Mattioli, S.; Violante, F.S. Radiation-induced mesothelioma among long-term solid cancer survivors: A longitudinal analysis of SEER database. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Attanoos, R.L.; Churg, A.; Galateau-Salle, F.; Gibbs, A.R.; Roggli, V.L. Malignant Mesothelioma and Its Non-Asbestos Causes. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2018, 142, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guo, G.; Chmielecki, J.; Goparaju, C.; Heguy, A.; Dolgalev, I.; Carbone, M.; Seepo, S.; Meyerson, M.; Pass, H.I. Whole-exome sequencing reveals frequent genetic alterations in BAP1, NF2, CDKN2A, and CUL1 in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kato, S.; Tomson, B.N.; Buys, T.P.H.; Elkin, S.K.; Carter, J.L.; Kurzrock, R. Genomic Landscape of Malignant Mesotheliomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 2498–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Neragi-Miandoab, S.; Sugarbaker, D.J. Chromosomal deletion in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Interact Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2009, 9, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bueno, R.; Stawiski, E.W.; Goldstein, L.D.; Durinck, S.; De Rienzo, A.; Modrusan, Z.; Gnad, F.; Nguyen, T.T.; Jaiswal, B.S.; Chirieac, L.R.; et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Plotkin, S.R.; Messiaen, L.; Legius, E.; Pancza, P.; Avery, R.A.; Blakeley, J.O.; Babovic-Vuksanovic, D.; Ferner, R.; Fisher, M.J.; Friedman, J.M.; et al. Updated diagnostic criteria and nomenclature for neurofibromatosis type 2 and schwannomatosis: An international consensus recommendation. Genet. Med. 2022, 24, 1967–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Petrilli, A.M.; Fernández-Valle, C. Role of Merlin/NF2 inactivation in tumor biology. Oncogene 2016, 35, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Baser, M.E.; De Rienzo, A.; Altomare, D.; Balsara, B.R.; Hedrick, N.M.; Gutmann, D.H.; Pitts, L.H.; Jackler, R.K.; Testa, J.R. Neurofibromatosis 2 and malignant mesothelioma. Neurology 2002, 59, 290–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Glass, C.; Sholl, L.M.; Landgraf, J.R.; Chirieac, L.; Roggli, V.R. Molecular Analysis of a Patient With Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 44, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Evaristo, G.; Fiset, P.O.; Camilleri-Broët, S.; Vanounou, T.; Kavan, P.; Spatz, A.; Wang, H. Molecular Analysis of a Patient With Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 44, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baser, M.E.; Rai, H.; Wallace, A.J.; Evans, D.G. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and malignant mesothelioma in a man with a constitutional NF2 missense mutation. Fam. Cancer 2005, 4, 321–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ivanov, S.V.; Miller, J.; Lucito, R.; Tang, C.; Ivanova, A.V.; Pei, J.; Carbone, M.; Cruz, C.; Beck, A.; Webb, C.; et al. Genomic events associated with progression of pleural malignant mesotheliom. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hiltbrunner, S.; Fleischmann, Z.; Sokol, E.S.; Zoche, M.; Felley-Bosco, E.; Curioni-Fontecedro, A. Genomic landscape of pleural and peritoneal mesotelioma tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2022, 127, 1997–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schaefer, I.M.; Mariño-Enríquez, A.; Hammer, M.M.; Padera, R.F.; Sholl, L.M. Recurrent Tumor Suppressor Alterations in Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma. Mod. Pathol. 2023, 36, 100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, M.; Luo, J.L.; Sun, Q.; Harber, J.; Dawson, A.G.; Nakas, A.; Busacca, S.; Sharkey, A.J.; Waller, D.; Sheaff, M.T.; et al. Clonal architecture in mesothelioma is prognostic and shapes the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hylebos, M.; Van Camp, G.; van Meerbeeck, J.P.; Op de Beeck, K. The Genetic Landscape of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Results from Massively Parallel Sequencing. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, 1615–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hylebos, M.; Van Camp, G.; Vandeweyer, G.; Fransen, E.; Beyens, M.; Cornelissen, R.; Suls, A.; Pauwels, P.; van Meerbeeck, J.P.; Op de Beeck, K. Large-scale copy number analysis reveals variations in genes not previously associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 113673–113686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mitchell, O.D.; Gilliam, K.; Del Gaudio, D.; McNeely, K.E.; Smith, S.; Acevedo, M.; Gaduraju, M.; Hodge, R.; Ramsland, A.S.S.; Segal, J.; et al. Germline Variants Incidentally Detected via Tumor-Only Genomic Profiling of Patients With Mesothelioma. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e2327351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Melaiu, O.; Gemignani, F.; Landi, S. The genetic susceptibility in the development of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10 (Suppl. S2), S246–S252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kawai, T.; Ogata, S.; Nakashima, H.; Urabe, S.; Murakami, I.; Hiroshima, K. Clinicopathologic study of deciduoid mesothelioma using SMARCB1/INI1 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum. Pathol. 2019, 93, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Greenhough, L.A.; Liang, C.C.; Belan, O.; Kunzelmann, S.; Maslen, S.; Rodrigo-Brenni, M.C.; Anand, R.; Skehel, M.; Boulton, S.J.; West, S.C. Structure and function of the RAD51B-RAD51C-RAD51D-XRCC2 tumour suppressor. Nature 2023, 619, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khailany, R.A.; Ozaslan, M. Exonic sequencing and MLH3 gene expression analysis of breast cancer patients. Cell Mol. Biol. 2021, 67, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Scharf, J.B.; Lees, G.M.; Sergi, C.M. Malignant pleural mesothelioma in a child. J. Pediatr. Surg. Case Rep. 2015, 3, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, R.A.; Lin, M.; Harper, M.M.; Beck, S.J.; Dietrich, C.S.; Kolesar, J.M.; Arnold, S.M.; Hahn, J.; Pandalai, P.K.; Qasem, S.A.; et al. Pediatric patient with peritoneal mesothelioma harboring ALK rearrangement. Curr. Probl. Cancer Case Rep. 2021, 4, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Redzepagic, J.; Zvizdic, Z.; Bilalovic, N.; Milisic, E.; Bukvic, M.; Vranic, S. Comprehensive genomic profiling of pediatric peritoneal mesothelioma: Case report with a literature review. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2024, 5, rjae324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cedres, S.; Valdivia, A.; Priano, I.; Rocha, P.; Iranzo, P.; Pardo, N.; Martinez-Marti, A.; Felip, E. BAP1 Mutations and Pleural Mesothelioma: Genetic Insights, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Perspectives. Cancers 2025, 17, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ognibene, M.; De Marco, P.; Amoroso, L.; Fragola, M.; Zara, F.; Parodi, S.; Pezzolo, A. Neuroblastoma Patients’ Outcome and Chromosomal Instability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Computed Tomography scan of abdomen (transverse plane), showing pleural thickening and effusion (yellow star); (B) brain MRI (T1 post-contrast, axial), showing rapidly increasing bilateral recurrent meningiomas (yellow arrows).
Figure 1. (A) Computed Tomography scan of abdomen (transverse plane), showing pleural thickening and effusion (yellow star); (B) brain MRI (T1 post-contrast, axial), showing rapidly increasing bilateral recurrent meningiomas (yellow arrows).
Ijms 26 06848 g001
Figure 2. MLPA analysis of patient’s genomic DNA: (A) the capillary electrophoresis pattern identified lower peaks for the 5’UTR and exon 1 of NF2 (indicated by black arrows) (RFU: relative fluorescence units); (B) ratio chart of the MLPA results, with the blue line indicating the threshold to identify duplication of genetic material and the red line identifying the deletion. NF2 5’UTR and exon 1 heterozygous deletion were visible under the red line.
Figure 2. MLPA analysis of patient’s genomic DNA: (A) the capillary electrophoresis pattern identified lower peaks for the 5’UTR and exon 1 of NF2 (indicated by black arrows) (RFU: relative fluorescence units); (B) ratio chart of the MLPA results, with the blue line indicating the threshold to identify duplication of genetic material and the red line identifying the deletion. NF2 5’UTR and exon 1 heterozygous deletion were visible under the red line.
Ijms 26 06848 g002aIjms 26 06848 g002b
Figure 3. Genomic profile obtained by array-CGH on DNA extracted from mesothelioma biopsy of the patient (effusion cells), displaying duplication of chromosomes 6, 10, 11, 16, and 20 and deletion of chromosomes 14, 22, and Y.
Figure 3. Genomic profile obtained by array-CGH on DNA extracted from mesothelioma biopsy of the patient (effusion cells), displaying duplication of chromosomes 6, 10, 11, 16, and 20 and deletion of chromosomes 14, 22, and Y.
Ijms 26 06848 g003
Table 1. Genes and chromosomes displaying CNVs in tumor DNA.
Table 1. Genes and chromosomes displaying CNVs in tumor DNA.
Locus *FilterVariant ClassVariant IDCytoband and Copy Number **
chr6:350767GAINCNVARM 6p6p25.3p12.1 (350,767–55,739,590) × 3
chr6:62442567GAINCNVARM 6q6q11.1q27 (62,442,567–170,627,672) × 3
chr10:323466GAINCNVARM 10p10p15.3p11.22 (323,466–32,856,813) × 3
chr10:43292608GAINCNVARM 10q10q11.21q26.2 (43,292,608–129,902,370) × 3
chr11:403974GAINCNVARM 11p11p15.5p11.12 (403,974–50,003,230) × 3
chr11:55032426GAINCNVARM 11q11q11q24.3 (55,032,426–130,776,619) × 3
chr14:20248397LOSSCNVARM 14q14q11.2q32.33 (20,248,397–105,246,558) × 1
chr14:20811781LOSSCNVPARP214q11.2 (20,811,781–20,825,977) × 0.942029
chr14:45605157LOSSCNVFANCM14q21.2 (45,605,157–45,669,234) × 1.05797
chr14:68290164LOSSCNVRAD51B14q24.1 (68,290,164–69,061,406) × 1
chr14:68290164LOSSLOHRAD51B14q24.1 (68,290,164–69,061,406) × 1
chr14:75483761LOSSCNVMLH314q24.3 (75,483,761–75,516,400) × 0.971014
chr14:95556791LOSSCNVDICER114q32.13 (95,556,791–95,599,859) × 1.07246
chr14:104165043LOSSCNVXRCC314q32.33 (104,165,043–104,177,450) × 1.05797
chr16:336630GAINCNVARM 16p16p13.3p11.2 (336,630–31,092,113) × 3
chr16:47697595GAINCNVARM 16q16q12.1q24.3 (47,697,595–89,883,082) × 3
chr20:391069GAINCNVARM 20p20p13p11.21 (391,069–25,187,259) × 3
chr20:30954155GAINCNVARM 20q20q11.21q13.33 (30,954,155–62,595,178) × 3
chr22:22123473LOSSCNVMAPK122q11.21 (22,123,473–22,162,093) × 1.07246
chr22:24129273LOSSCNVSMARCB122q11.23 (24,129,273–24,176,467) × 0.913043
chr22:29083868LOSSCNVCHEK222q12.1 (29,083,868–29,130,729) × 1
chr22:29083868LOSSLOHCHEK222q12.1 (29,083,868–29,130,729) × 1
chr22:29999923LOSSCNVNF222q12.2 (29,999,923–30,090,863) × 0.855072
chr22:41489001LOSSCNVEP30022q13.2 (41,489,001–41,574,996) × 0.971014
CNV: Copy Number Variation; LOH: Loss of Heterozygosity. * The locus is annotated using GRCh38/hg38 (UCSC Genome Browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu (accessed on 10 March 2025)). ** The standard copy number is 2.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ognibene, M.; Piccolo, G.; Crocco, M.; Di Duca, M.; Verrico, A.; Molteni, M.; Romano, F.; Capra, V.; Rossi, A.; Zara, F.; et al. Genetic Landscape of a Pleural Mesothelioma in a Child Affected by NF2-Related Schwannomatosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146848

AMA Style

Ognibene M, Piccolo G, Crocco M, Di Duca M, Verrico A, Molteni M, Romano F, Capra V, Rossi A, Zara F, et al. Genetic Landscape of a Pleural Mesothelioma in a Child Affected by NF2-Related Schwannomatosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(14):6848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ognibene, Marzia, Gianluca Piccolo, Marco Crocco, Marco Di Duca, Antonio Verrico, Marta Molteni, Ferruccio Romano, Valeria Capra, Andrea Rossi, Federico Zara, and et al. 2025. "Genetic Landscape of a Pleural Mesothelioma in a Child Affected by NF2-Related Schwannomatosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 14: 6848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146848

APA Style

Ognibene, M., Piccolo, G., Crocco, M., Di Duca, M., Verrico, A., Molteni, M., Romano, F., Capra, V., Rossi, A., Zara, F., De Marco, P., & Milanaccio, C. (2025). Genetic Landscape of a Pleural Mesothelioma in a Child Affected by NF2-Related Schwannomatosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(14), 6848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop