Next Article in Journal
Blood-Based Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Incident Colorectal Cancer Risk: Findings from a Population-Based Case–Control Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Pathogenesis of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Plexiform Fibromyxoma in the Stomach: Immunohistochemical Profile and Comprehensive Genetic Characterization
Previous Article in Special Issue
HLA-DR Expression in Natural Killer Cells Marks Distinct Functional States, Depending on Cell Differentiation Stage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms25094849
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) and D-Dopachrome Tautomerase (DDT): Pathways to Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Opportunities

by
Caroline Naomi Valdez
1,
Gabriela Athziri Sánchez-Zuno
2,
Richard Bucala
1,2,3 and
Thuy T. Tran
1,3,4,*
1
School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510, USA
2
Section of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510, USA
3
Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510, USA
4
Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(9), 4849; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094849
Submission received: 28 March 2024 / Revised: 24 April 2024 / Accepted: 25 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Immune Cells and Cytokines)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Discovered as inflammatory cytokines, MIF and DDT exhibit widespread expression and have emerged as critical mediators in the response to infection, inflammation, and more recently, in cancer. In this comprehensive review, we provide details on their structures, binding partners, regulatory mechanisms, and roles in cancer. We also elaborate on their significant impact in driving tumorigenesis across various cancer types, supported by extensive in vitro, in vivo, bioinformatic, and clinical studies. To date, only a limited number of clinical trials have explored MIF as a therapeutic target in cancer patients, and DDT has not been evaluated. The ongoing pursuit of optimal strategies for targeting MIF and DDT highlights their potential as promising antitumor candidates. Dual inhibition of MIF and DDT may allow for the most effective suppression of canonical and non-canonical signaling pathways, warranting further investigations and clinical exploration.

1. Introduction

Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) was first described in the 1960s as an inflammatory cytokine produced by T cells [1,2]. Since its initial discovery, MIF is now known to be almost ubiquitously expressed across cell types [3]. MIF has since been implicated in a multitude of innate and adaptive physiologic processes, particularly in response to infection and inflammation, and understanding of its role in tumorigenesis has expanded in recent years [4,5,6]. D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDT), a close homolog of MIF, has also been studied in a variety of inflammatory and neoplastic processes, albeit less than MIF. With increasing studies demonstrating that MIF and DDT enhance immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes, these cytokines have emerged as promising antitumor targets across a variety of tumor types [7].

2. MIF and DDT Structure and Regulation

MIF, a 12.5 kDa homotrimeric protein encoded by the MIF gene on chromosome 22q11.23, functions intracellularly or can be stored in cytoplasmic vesicles, where it is secreted in response to signals such as LPS, TNFα, and hypoxia via upstream TLR and HIF1α signaling [3,8]. Upon secretion, MIF has the ability to operate under autocrine and paracrine signaling. Interaction with its canonical receptor CD74 and non-canonical receptors CXCR2, CXCR4, and CXCR7 drives a wide range of inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic processes [3]. MIF/CD74 signaling requires co-activation with glycoprotein CD44, which plays a crucial role in the MIF/CD74 cognate receptor complex, though MIF itself does not bind directly to CD44. The CD44 gene comprises 19 exons, with 10 participating in alternative splicing to generate variants featuring an extended ectodomain structure (e.g., CD44v1–10) [9].
DDT, a homolog encoded approximately 76 kb away from MIF, shares 34% amino acid homology and similarly interacts with CD74/CD44, CXCR4, and CXCR7 to drive downstream signaling [10,11]. Modeling of MIF and DDT structures is depicted in Figure 1a. Unlike MIF, DDT lacks the pseudo-ELR domain required for CXCR2 binding and is therefore unable to signal through this receptor [12,13]. An overview of MIF and DDT chemokine interactions with its cognate (CD74) and non-cognate (CXCR2, 4, 7) receptors is outlined in Figure 1c.
MIF and DDT are constitutively and ubiquitously expressed by a variety of immune and non-immune cell types, including but not limited to the those of the brain, kidney, liver, skin, and heart. MIF and DDT have been widely described as being secreted by macrophages and monocytes, in addition to other immune cells such as neutrophils, B and T lymphocytes, and eosinophils, particularly in response to hypoxia, LPS, ROS, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and glucocorticoids [4,14,15]. They are also secreted by endothelial and epithelial cells in response to LPS, TNF-α, and direct injury, playing a role in neutrophil recruitment and extravasation for wound healing [16,17,18]. Additionally, they are secreted by a wide range of central and peripheral neuronal cells such as astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes in response to LPS and direct injury [4]. In endocrine systems, MIF is co-localized with insulin in intracellular vesicles of pancreatic beta cells and secreted in response to elevated circulating glucose [19]. MIF secretion is also induced by glucocorticoids in pro-inflammatory states such as infection or sepsis and follows a bell-shaped dose–response curve, with secretion being inhibited at very high glucocorticoid levels to protect the host from a potentially life-threatening inflammatory response [20]. A list of cell types and their stimuli impacting MIF and DDT expression is outlined in Supplementary Table S1.
Intracellularly, MIF is regulated at genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional levels. At the genetic level, polymorphisms located in the MIF promoter are known to drive MIF expression. Polymorphism rs5844572 located at the -794 locus is comprised of five to eight short-tandem repeats of the CATT sequence (CATT5–8), with higher repeat numbers correlating with increased MIF expression [21,22] (Figure 1b). The DDT gene, in contrast, lacks a similar promotor region structure (Figure 1b) [23]. In vitro and in vivo Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) models reveal that MIF is positively regulated by UHRF1 (ICBP90) and negatively regulated by HBP1, both of which drive MIF overexpression in disease progression by binding to the promotor region. UHRF1 binds specifically to the CATT sequence, whereas HBP1 binds to promotor regions regardless of the presence of CATT-containing sequences [24]. MIF is also regulated by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs755622 at the -173 gene locus. Particularly, C/C and G/C genotypes are associated with the progression of a variety of neoplastic diseases such as cervical cancer, ALL, and gastric carcinoma [25,26,27,28,29,30]. This binding site interacts with the transcription factor activator protein 4 to promote MIF transcription and expression, but whether the -173 G/C has an independent action on MIF transcription is unclear, as it is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the -794 CATT microsatellite repeat [31]. MIF also operates under epigenetic regulation, as the -173 G/C SNP is associated with CpG island hypermethylation and silencing of the tumor suppressors p14ARF and p16INK; histone deacetylase inhibition results in further MIF downregulation [32,33].
At the transcriptional level, various non-coding microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate MIF expression by binding to its 3′-untranslated region. Negative regulators of MIF and downregulated miRNAs include miRNA-451 (prostate cancer, neuroblastoma, gastric carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma) [34,35,36,37], miRNA-144 and miRNA-1228 (hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric carcinoma) [37,38], and miRNA-608 (lung adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma) [39,40]. In contrast, MIF is positively regulated by miRNA-451 (colorectal carcinoma) and miRNA-301b (pancreatic carcinoma) [41,42,43]. No similar regulators of DDT are currently known.

3. MIF and DDT Functions in Cancer Progression

Macrophage dysregulation and suppression were first described in the 1970s and have increasingly become targets of interest in oncology [44,45,46]. Though MIF and DDT have been widely described in inflammation and autoimmunity, interest in these cytokines within oncology has also been relatively recent given their roles in driving cancer hallmarks and their overexpression across a variety of cancers (Figure 2) [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Here, we provide an overview of tumorigenic phenotypes influenced by MIF and DDT (Figure 3).
MIF and DDT promote cell regeneration and proliferation in cancer by activating the ERK1/2, PI3K-Akt, NFκB, and AMPK pathways, which subsequently activate downstream NF-κB/P-TEFb complexes and drive c-Myb transcription [3,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. Additionally, early studies identified MIF as a negative regulator of p53, and further evidence has since emerged implicating MIF and DDT’s role in tumor suppressor inhibition [65,66,67]. MIF physically interacts with p53 to inhibit transcription-dependent and independent effects on cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and they perturb Rb/E2F tumor suppressor activity by disrupting the C-terminal binding region of E2F responsible for binding Rb [68,69,70]. MIF and DDT also suppress apoptotic pathways by downregulating pro-apoptotic Fas receptors, Bax, and Caspase-3 and upregulating anti-apoptotic factors BDNF, MAP2, and BCL2 [71,72,73,74]. This action may be a particularly important role for MIF and DDT in the inflammatory pathogenesis of different cancers, where sustained MIF expression by inflammatory cells in a pre-malignant tumor environment would enhance proliferative signals and cell lifespan, create a deficient response to genotoxic damage, and allow for the accumulation of additional oncogenic mutations [75]. MIF drives tumor metabolic re-programming to confer survival in hypoxic environments by inducing anaerobic metabolism via the NF-κB and HIF-1α pathways [76,77,78,79]. De Azevedo et al. studied murine melanoma cell lines subject to hypoxic conditions and observed the dual MIF and DDT antagonist 4-IPP to downregulate lactate dehydrogenase A and generate less lactate [80]. Further studies show HIF-1α stabilization in hypoxic conditions may concurrently activate MIF and upregulate PD-L1 expression, conferring tumor survival in oxygen-deficient intratumoral environments [76,80,81,82,83,84,85].
MIF and DDT are also linked to tumor vascularization. Inhibition of MIF and DDT reduces tumor vascularization and angiogenic markers in various cell and animal models [86,87,88,89,90,91,92]. Studies propose MIF as an upstream regulator of VEGF, impacting JNFK and AP-1 activity, with a similar role likely for DDT [92,93]. In the context of these findings, it is noteworthy that the CD44 component plays a crucial role in promoting angiogenesis and migration. Upon MIF/CD74 binding, CD44 is recruited to the receptor complex to initiate Src-family kinase activation, CD44 alternative exon splicing, and expression of tumor-associated isoforms such as CD44v3–v6, which are implicated in enhancing cellular migration, adhesion, and invasion. Notably, the CD44v3–v6 isoforms drive these processes by promoting increased matrix interaction and creating neodomains for growth factors and matrix metalloproteinases [9]. Accordingly, MIF/CD74 signaling likely contributes to the invasive and tissue-destructive characteristics observed in transformed cells. In vitro, CXCR4 signaling mediates cellular adhesion to fibronectin, angiogenesis, and migration, consistent with later reports of MIF and DDT enhancing metastatic potential via promoting the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (EMT) [94,95,96]. Thus, MIF and DDT further enhance morphologies associated with invasion.
MIF and DDT also drive tumorigenesis by modulating immune populations within the tumor microenvironment (TME) through cytokine-induced signaling. MIF expression is induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-5, IFN-γ, and TGF-β and stimulates the secretion of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, CXCL8/IL-8, and IL-12 from macrophages [97,98,99]. MIF-dependent secretion of these cytokines promotes proliferation, angiogenesis, and EMT [100,101,102,103]. IFN-γ signaling is particularly important in tumor infiltration and functions by polarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from an M2-immunosuppressive type to an M1-pro-inflammatory type; however, it also reduces the presence of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the TME via MIF/CD74 signaling [7,61,104,105,106,107]. Additionally, MIF induces differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the TME, further enhancing tumor permissiveness and immune evasion [108].
Additionally, MIF drives a stem cell-like phenotype, resulting in tumor dedifferentiation. This is supported by observations of MIF enrichment in human embryonic stem cells (HESCs) [109]. HESCs mainly express CXCR2 and CXCR7; therefore, MIF is thought to maintain “stemness” through non-canonical pathways. There is also evidence to suggest MIF enhances myocardial repair through autophagy-induced survival of human mesenchymal stem cells [110]. DDT has not yet been implicated in driving a stem cell-like phenotype.

4. Evidence of MIF and DDT in Cancer

4.1. Hematologic Cancers

MIF is elevated in multiple hematologic malignancies, including lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), and ALL, where it is correlated with adverse outcomes [74,86,111,112,113,114,115]. Increased circulating MIF levels have been detected in CLL, ALL, and AML, with additional bone marrow enrichment in patients with AML.
GC/CC phenotypes are associated with an increased risk of childhood ALL, particularly among high-risk ALL and B-ALL groups [116]. In vivo, MIF-/- (MIF-KO) transgenic Eμ-TCL1 mouse CLL models exhibit delayed disease onset and improved survival [117]. MIF suppresses PAX5 and DMTF1 tumor-suppressor activity and upregulates TAp63 and VLA-4 integrin, collectively enhancing CLL survival and bone marrow tropism [118,119,120]. Though DDT’s role in hematologic malignancies is unexplored, studies are underway (NCT03918655) to evaluate the prognostic value of MIF during the treatment of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutated AML [121].

4.2. Osteosarcoma

Elevated levels of MIF are found in tissue and serum samples from patients with osteosarcoma and are correlated with increased tumor size, pulmonary metastases, and worse survival [122]. In xenograft murine models, administration of the MIF/DDT antagonist 4-IPP led to reductions in tumor burden and metastases [55,122]. 4-IPP induces STUB1 E3 ligand-mediated proteasomal degradation of MIF and reduces subsequent osteolytic activity via suppressing osteoclast formation and promoting osteoblast differentiation [55,123]. Though DDT levels were not directly measured in these studies, its involvement can be inferred, as 4-IPP targets both DDT and MIF [124].

4.3. Skin Cancers

Early studies of benzo[α]pyrene-induced fibrosarcomas in MIF-KO mice exhibited enhanced p53 activity in vitro and reduced tumor growth in vivo, suggesting MIF drives development of cutaneous fibrosarcomas via p53 suppression [125]. MIF is also a known driver of melanogenesis and functions by inducing keratinocyte secretion of stem cell factors, a process further enhanced by UV-B [126]. MIF and DDT have been described in UVB-induced (but not chemically induced) non-melanoma skin cancer progression, suggesting that MIF and DDT may play less important roles in chemical carcinogenesis [127]. In melanoma, MIF is present across UV- and non-UV-induced melanomas, where enrichment in serum and tumor is correlated with advanced stages, poor survival, and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) [73,80,128,129,130,131,132]. DDT, though less studied in melanoma, is also enriched in melanoma models [133]. In uveal melanoma, MIF overexpression suppresses natural killer (NK) cell activity, thus establishing an immunosuppression [134]. Uveal melanomas trigger the release of MIF-containing exosomes from hepatocytes, which subsequently enhance tumor viability. Given the high concentration of hepatic NK cells, tumor survival is conferred by MIF-mediated evasion of NK-driven cell lysis [129,135,136]. Though little research has described the role of MIF in acral melanoma, it has similarly been hypothesized to drive pathogenesis via the presence of M2-type macrophages in the TME [137].

4.4. Head and Neck Cancers

Elevated MIF expression has also been detected in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC), particularly in the nasopharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and oral cavity [138,139,140]. ELISA and single-cell transcriptome analysis have revealed elevated MIF levels in patients with HNSCC [141,142,143]. In patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, increased MIF tumor expression is a strong prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis and worse survival [144]. The role of MIF in human papillomavirus (HPV)+ and HPV− cancers has been described, but mechanistically, it remains unclear. HPV suppresses p53 and Rb via the E6 and E7 glycoproteins, respectively, and is a known driver of HNSCC that is associated with better prognosis and survival [145]. Kindt et al. observed by immunohistochemical staining that HPV- tissue had higher total MIF levels compared to HPV+ tissue, but HPV+ cells appear to secrete more MIF, as evidenced by E6- and E7-transfected HNSCC lines producing higher levels of MIF. Kindt et al. also observed 4-IPP treatment of HNSCC cell lines reduced proliferation regardless of HPV status, with HPV+ cells exhibiting a higher IC50, suggesting more MIF requiring neutralization [146]. This group subsequently hypothesized that E6 activation of mTOR drives HIF-1α accumulation and subsequent MIF upregulation. The role of DDT, in contrast, has not yet been described in HNSCC.

4.5. Lung Cancers

MIF plays a significant role in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with several studies implicating similar functions of DDT. Elevated serum MIF levels in NSCLC predict worse overall and progression-free survival, and co-expression with CD74 correlates strongly with enrichment of tumor-associated CXC chemokines and tumor vascularization [147,148]. MIF or DDT knockdown led to reduced in vitro cellular migration and vascular tube formation; combined knockdown had the greatest effect on dampening CXCL8 and VEGF expression [149]. CXCR4 inhibition suppressed NSCLC migration and invasion, suggesting non-canonical signaling drives metastasis [150]. Interestingly, cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cell lines secrete MIF and enhance macrophage polarization [151]; and ionizing radiation frees MIF from complexing with ribosomal protein S3, enabling its downstream pro-tumorigenic activity [152].
In lung squamous cell carcinoma, tumor MIF expression correlates with lymph node metastasis and worse disease-free survival, and in mesothelioma, CD74 tumor enrichment independently predicts improved survival [153,154]. MIF overexpression in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with increased proliferation and migration and the development of multiple primary tumors [153,155,156]. MIF gene overexpression was also recently identified as a component of a unique gene signature in lung adenocarcinoma, conferring a 53% 5-year recurrence-free survival for patients exhibiting the signature [157]. These studies have been confirmed by in vivo models, whereby decreased tumor growth was observed in mutated MIF and MIF-KO mice, as well as with administration of MIF inhibitor SCD-19 [156].

4.6. Gastrointestinal Cancers

4.6.1. Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), MIF drives cancer progression via Akt activation and GSK3β tumor suppressor inactivation [158,159]. MIF inhibition decreases tumor growth in murine ESCC models, concordant with patient studies correlating MIF serum and tumor enrichment with tumor dedifferentiation, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, and worse survival [87,160,161]. Patients with ESCC and poor prognosis also exhibit CXCR4 enrichment, suggesting the importance of non-canonical signaling in tumor progression [162]. Additionally, in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, MIF levels are negatively correlated with survival [163]. To date, DDT has not been described in ESCC.
Elevated MIF tumor detection in gastric cancer also correlate with angiogenesis, lymph node metastasis, and advanced disease [164,165,166]. High-expression MIF CATT7 genotypes have been associated with gastritis and gastric cancer in younger patients, suggesting this MIF risk polymorphism may drive early stages of mucosal inflammation and increase the subsequent risk for gastric cancer [167]. MIF is also released by monocytes responding to Helicobacter pylori virulence factor CagA and enhances tumorigenesis [168]. Transcriptomic analysis of CagA+ gastric carcinomas revealed MIF secretion in the TME induces TAM polarization, EMT, and suppression of MAPK4 pathways, all of which are correlated with poor prognosis [169]. P53 suppression mediated by ZFPM2-AS1, an antisense RNA strand that negatively regulates MIF, is also a driver of in vitro gastric carcinogenesis [170]. The specific mechanisms by which DDT may drive gastric carcinoma, however, are less understood.

4.6.2. Hepatocellular Carcinoma

MIF also contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as evidenced by the -173 GC/CC SNP correlating with elevated circulating MIF levels and worse prognosis [28]. In vitro, MIF promotes HCC cell survival and is abrogated by anti-CD74 treatment [171]. Hepatocyte-specific MIF-KO and global CD74 KO mice exhibited reduced tumor burden compared to their WT counterparts. Single-cell transcriptome analysis revealed CD36+ HCC-associated fibroblasts secreted MIF through increased intratumor lipid oxidation; the authors hypothesized that this induced a pro-tumor environment via lipid oxidation, which subsequently activates p38 kinase and drives MIF overexpression [172]. In murine models, combined CD36 and PD-L1 inhibition restored an antitumor immune signature in the TME, further validating the role of MIF in cancer progression. DDT, in contrast, has not been described in HCC.

4.6.3. Pancreatic Carcinoma

Elevated MIF levels in pancreatic carcinoma tissue are correlated with worse prognosis, and studies have consistently demonstrated MIF and DDT’s role in disease progression via driving proliferation, invasion, and anti-apoptotic processes [60,68,173,174]. DDT and MIF knockdown in pancreatic cancer in vitro increased p53 expression and reduced proliferation and invasion in vivo [60,68]. MIF was also found to negatively regulate tumor suppressor NR3C2, an orphan nuclear receptor that inhibits EMT and correlates with improved patient survival. MIF suppression of NR3C2 occurs via upregulation of miR-301b, which binds the 3′ untranslated region of NR3C2 and inhibits its activity [44,175,176] MIF is also present in pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes, which drive the expression, recruitment, and differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the TME [177,178,179].

4.6.4. Colorectal Carcinoma

MIF has been widely described in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), where elevated serum MIF levels correlate with increased hepatic metastasis and intratumoral macrophage infiltration [89,180,181]. Additionally, the -173 GC/CC polymorphism is linked to tumor de-differentiation and advanced disease, offering potential as a prognostic biomarker for CRC [182]. In vivo models demonstrate reduced tumor burden and increased apoptosis with MIF blockade [183]. MIF enrichment in KRAS-mutated CRC cell lines contributes to aberrant proliferative signaling, highlighting its potential as a target in treatment-resistant cancers [184,185]. DDT also plays a role in CRC progression via COX-2, a key regulator of β-catenin stability and EMT. Li et al. observed that DDT increases JNK signaling via β-catenin-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and its interaction with atractylenolide I (AT1) leads to p53 deacetylation, both of which confer tumor survival and metastasis [186,187]. Thus, DDT appears to play a role in promoting the adenoma–carcinoma sequence, in part by regulating AT1.

4.7. Central Nervous System Cancers

Transcriptomic analyses have identified MIF and DDT as negative prognostic factors in patients with neuroblastoma, regardless of MYCN amplification [188,189]. Mice treated with 4-IPP exhibited reduced neuroblastoma growth and improved survival [190]. MSI1, a neural stem cell marker widely expressed in high-grade gliomas, is thought to be correlated with MIF and drives immunosuppression [106,188]. Furthermore, brain-derived neurotrophic factor conferred neuronal protection in hypoxic and hypoglycemic environments via MIF-dependent apoptotic suppression, consistent with MIF’s known role in enhancing hypoxic survival [71,191]. Of note, the MIF/CXCR4 signaling axis has been implicated in the survival, invasion, and drug resistance of patient-derived neuroblastoma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment and may provide an explanation for the high propensity of bone metastasis in neuroblastoma [190].
MIF and DDT play a pivotal role in aggressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [83,192,193]. GBM cell lines and patient tissue show overexpression of MIF and DDT; levels are correlated with tumor recurrence and poor prognosis [94,194]. Overexpression of CD74/CD44, CXCR2, and CXCR4 in malignant GBM is associated with poor patient prognosis, suggesting that both canonical and non-canonical MIF-dependent pathways contribute to GBM progression [195]. Targeting MIF/DDT pathways offers a therapeutic approach in treatment-resistant GBM, but results are conflicting. 4-IPP combined with radiation therapy reduces in vitro proliferation substantially more than 4-IPP monotherapy, and MIF enrichment is correlated with improved survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy [58,193]. Additionally, MIF in GBM induces immune evasion through MDSCs and modulation of CD8 T cell activity within the TME [108,196].
Thus, MIF targeting has a potential role as an adjunctive therapy with standard treatments. Conversely, bevacizumab resistance appears to be associated with reduced MIF and increased M2-type macrophages, presumably through MIF’s role as an upstream regulator of VEGF production [93,197]. Further research is needed to evaluate these disparate MIF functions and highlight the optimal approach to leveraging MIF-based therapies in treatment-resistant GBM.

4.8. Urogenital Cancers

4.8.1. Bladder Cancer

MIF and DDT overexpression has been observed in TCGA analysis of bladder cancers [198,199]. Similarly, CD74 overexpression is detected in high-grade invasive bladder cancer and is associated with proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis of HT-1376 bladder cancer cells [200,201,202]. MIF-KO murine bladder cancer models demonstrated decreased vascularization and tumor stage [91]. 4-IPP treatment in murine bladder cancer models resulted in decreased tumor weights in MIF-KO versus WT mice, suggesting an additive contribution of DDT inhibition [198]. In bladder cancer cells, MIF knockdown produced a dose-dependent reduction in growth [203]. CPSI-1306, which inhibits the enzymatic region of MIF, reduced cellular proliferation and VEGF expression in vitro and reduced tumor growth and neovascularization in vivo [88].

4.8.2. Prostate Cancer

MIF promotor polymorphisms are associated with worse survival in prostate cancer, with the -173 G/C SNP correlating with increased disease incidence and -794 CATT7 correlating with an increased 5-year recurrence risk [204]. This coincides with observations of MIF and CXCR7 overexpression in prostate cancer tissues and in vitro models, including castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC) [57,205,206,207]. CXCR7 is vital for the growth and migration of CRPC cell lines, promoting enhanced growth and metastasis in mice. Low miR-451 expression independently predicts worse disease-free and overall survival in CRPC; conversely, enhanced expression in prostate cancer cell lines reduces growth, migration, and invasiveness, negatively correlating with MIF [34]. These findings highlight MIF as a potential target for treating CRPCs. DDT has not been evaluated in prostate cancer.

4.8.3. Renal Cell Carcinoma

High MIF and DDT expression in the kidney impacts renal cell carcinoma (RCC) progression through interactions with HIF1α and HIF2α [90,202]. Hypoxia is a well-known inducer of MIF expression. Similarly, VHL knockout in vitro also decreased DDT levels under hypoxic conditions. DDT and MIF knockdown reduced murine RCC growth, with DDT knockdown producing the most dramatic reduction [90]. This finding suggests a greater contribution of DDT to tumorigenesis in this model. Combined DDT and MIF knockdown exhibited the largest reduction in tumor growth and angiogenesis, further highlighting their synergistic roles and the potential for dual blockade in antitumor treatment [90].

4.9. Breast Cancer

Elevated sera and tumor MIF and DDT levels have been observed in breast cancer, validated by cell lines, patient samples and murine models, and are correlated with worse survival [133,208,209]. MIF induces HMGB1 secretion from tumor cells, which subsequently binds TLR4 and activates NF-κB-mediated cell migration [210]. Interestingly, cytosolic MIF correlates with improved survival, suggesting a potential protective role when localized intracellularly [211]. Elevated MIF also has been found in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive breast cancer subtype [212]. In vivo models treated with the small molecule antagonist CPSI-1306 exhibited reduced tumor apoptosis, tumor growth, and metastasis, suggesting MIF to be a potential treatment target in TNBC [211,212]. Likewise, TNBC cells implanted into MIF-KO mice had reduced tumor growth [212]. These findings highlight the role of MIF and DDT in breast cancers.

4.10. Gynecologic Cancers

4.10.1. Endometrial Carcinoma

The role of MIF in endometrial carcinoma is less clear. Unlike other cancers, MIF tumor enrichment in endometrial carcinomas is correlated with lower metastatic potential given lower histological grade and lympho-vascular invasion compared to healthy tissue [213,214]. Conflicting studies also suggest MIF tissue overexpression drives carcinoma progression [215]. This is evidenced by MIF upregulation of αv and β3 integrin and VEGF expression in vitro, findings later confirmed in patient-derived endometrial adenocarcinoma tissues [214,216]. Further studies reported MIF secreted by endometrial cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to immunosuppression [217]. Further research is needed to clarify the role of MIF in endometrial carcinoma progression. To date, there is no research on the role of DDT on endometrial carcinoma.

4.10.2. Cervical Cancer

Increased levels of tumor-expressing and circulating MIF, DDT, and CD74 have been detected in early- and late-stage cervical cancer and have been linked to lymphatic metastasis and up-regulation of E-cadherin and vimentin [60,218,219,220]. Reduced proliferation, vascularization, and migration occurred with MIF and DDT knockdown, as well as with administration of MIF and DDT small-molecule inhibitor ISO-1 [60,218]. Dual blockade of MIF and DDT demonstrated the most profound effect. Murine studies corroborated these results, with dual MIF and DDT inhibition exhibiting the most substantial reduction in tumor size, likely due to greater suppression of involved signaling pathways (Figure 1c) [60].

5. Current Therapeutic Applications and Clinical Trials

Despite strong evidence regarding MIF and DDT in tumorigenesis, only a handful of clinical trials have been conducted targeting MIF in oncology, with none targeting DDT. A summary of agents targeting the MIF/DDT/CD74 axis evaluated in vivo and in clinical trials is outlined in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. Imalumab is a human recombinant antibody targeted against a MIF epitope associated with its oxidation (oxMIF), which may arise in oxidative inflammatory environments, offering a more selective target that spares MIF functions in normal physiology [221,222]. Of note, DDT lacks the CXXC motif crucial for MIF’s redox sensing and may not be targeted by Imalumab [12,13]. In the Phase I trial NCT01765790, the safety of Imalumab was tested in patients with advanced solid tumors and exhibited successful tumor penetration and activation of apoptotic pathways. Encouragingly, the administered regimens did not reach a maximally tolerated dose, indicating a favorable safety profile for patients. This study was halted early due to poor efficacy data and limited enrollment, as 50 of the 69 patients enrolled discontinued treatment due to disease progression or consent withdrawal. Although this study did not extend beyond Phase I, preliminary data suggest a treatment benefit in some patients, with responses primarily manifesting as stable disease for at least 4 months [44,222,223]. A Phase I/IIa trial of Imalumab was conducted in patients with malignant ascites of ovarian cancer; however, it was terminated due to poor study design and limited patient recruitment [223]. A phase IIa study investigating Imalumab in conjunction with fluorouracil/leucovorin or pantimumab versus standard of care in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma was also initiated in 2015 but was terminated soon after an early review of safety and efficacy data (NCT01765790) [223].
There are two plausible hypotheses for the limited clinical efficacy to date for Imalumab. First is the uncertainty regarding the relative pro-tumorigenic activities of MIF and oxMIF, as oxidative protein modifications generally reduce productive receptor signal transduction. Second is the likely coordinate expression of DDT in cancers, which is not targeted by Imalumab.
Ibudilast is both an inhibitor of PDE2 and allosteric MIF antagonist that has shown efficacy in inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines, with clinical evidence for good CNS penetration [224]. Ibudlilast is already approved in Japan for treating asthma and cerebrovascular disease, with past studies demonstrating the oral form is well tolerated in healthy adults [224]. In a recent Phase II Trial of Ibudilast in Multiple Sclerosis patients, Ibudliast administration slowed whole-brain atrophy, suggesting robust localization and targeting of oligodendrocytes (NCT01982842) [225]. As these cells are also sources of MIF and DDT expression, Ibudliast offers promise as a pharmacologic intervention to CNS cancers such as glioblastoma and brain metastases. It should be noted that the study observed high rates of gastrointestinal side effects associated with the treatment (vomiting, diarrhea, nausea). Additionally, CNS penetration poses a risk for CNS-related toxicities, though it is promising that these side effects were not observed in the trial. Further clinical evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy and toxicity profile associated with the optimal therapeutic window. Indeed, Ibudilast is currently under investigation in combination with temozolomide for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma patients (NCT03782415) [44,226].
Milatuzumab, an anti-CD74 antibody, was evaluated in a Phase I study for relapsed or refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT00421525), where it showed disease stability in 26% of patients, along with improved B cell concentration in the serum, without dose-limiting toxicity or rapid drug clearance [227]. In a Phase I/II trial for relapsed or refractory CLL (NCT00868478), Milatuzumab demonstrated a modest overall response, reducing spleen size, enhancing malignant apoptosis, and improving WBC counts, leading to stable disease. Another Phase I–II clinical trial assessed Milatuzumab in frail patients with refractory CLL and detected an improvement in patient quality of life and performance or functional status among patients treated with Milatuzumab [228]. Limitations to this study include the small sample size (n = 8) as well as overrepresentation of pre-treated patients, both of which make it difficult to evaluate the generalizability of these results. Though Milatuzumab does not directly neutralize MIF or DDT, these clinical data further support the hypothesis that CD74/MIF/DDT blockade is a promising therapeutic.
Indeed, clinical evidence evaluating direct MIF blockade remains scant, and it has never been tested for DDT antagonism, either alone or in combination with MIF. Moreover, as MIF and DDT exert functions both intra- and extracellularly, the optimal method for MIF and DDT blockade remains unclear. Still, the existing clinical and preclinical data published make a strong case for development of an antitumor therapeutic targeting the MIF and DDT pathway. Overall, targeting this pathway requires a nuanced approach in targeting inflammatory pathways enabling tumor permissiveness without disrupting antitumor inflammatory processes to strike the most therapeutic balance of maximizing clinical outcomes and minimizing immune-related toxic events.

6. Future Directions

MIF/DDT/CD74 are potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets across a variety of cancers. Determining which targets within this pathway to neutralize requires further research, especially with respect to determining the distinct versus overlapping functions of MIF and DDT with their canonical versus non-canonical receptors. Given the substantial evidence for MIF and DDT in the progression of a variety of tumors, these are highly tractable targets in oncology with potentially tumor-agnostic applications. Furthermore, MIF and DDT may contribute to ICI resistance in melanoma and pancreatic cancer through T cell suppression and exhaustion, emphasizing the need to target these cytokines and restore antitumor immunity in the TME [229]. Thus, targeting MIF and DDT holds promise for improving ICI response in these highly lethal cancers [230]. A dearth of clinical trial evidence remains a significant limitation to understanding how these agents may work in patients. Given substantial data for roles for MIF and DDT in preclinical cancer models, we encourage continued exploration of clinical and patient-derived models to further evaluate MIF and DDT as effective antitumor targets. Additionally, a human-compatible DDT inhibitor as well as a dual MIF and DDT inhibitor have yet to be developed and studied in preclinical models to validate the hypothesis of targeting MIF and DDT as a synergistic therapeutic approach to cancer in patients.
Targeting MIF and DDT as an antitumor intervention may continue to pose challenges in specificity, as they are ubiquitously and constitutively expressed. Therefore, continued research needs to be performed to optimize pharmacokinetic parameters such as drug stability, delivery to the tumor site, pharmacokinetic development, and binding interactions within the target site. We recommend proceeding with clinical trials of anti-MIF and -DDT agents, with an emphasis on cancer types supported by strong preclinical and clinical evidence for MIF and DDT involvement, such as melanoma. As clinical trials to date have demonstrated overall favorable safety profiles for MIF pathway-targeting agents, we are hopeful that expanding clinical research in MIF and DDT will aid further understanding of these molecules as antitumor targets.

7. Discussion

MIF and DDT play pivotal roles in multiple facets of cancer progression and possibly initiation [75,125]. Initially recognized as proinflammatory cytokines, their implication in driving numerous cancer hallmarks has positioned them as potential biomarkers for prognosis, surveillance, and treatment. Extensive experimental and computational research has unveiled intricate signaling mechanisms in MIF/DDT/CD74 pathways across diverse cancer types, shedding light on the complexity of canonical and non-canonical signaling processes within the TME. Moreover, various experimental approaches have assessed a multitude of strategies for MIF and DDT inhibition in both in vitro and in vivo models.
Clinical trials exploring MIF targeting in cancer are limited but show promise. Demonstrated efficacy is possibly limited by unopposed DDT signaling, which is also increased in expression in many cancers (Figure 4). Imalumab showed a modest effect with minimal toxicity in early trials with solid cancers and demonstrated potential in GBM. Milatuzumab has demonstrated efficacy and has been approved for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and CLL. Despite progress, therapeutic development for MIF remains in its early stages and requires ongoing evaluation in clinical models. Notably, DDT has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials as an antitumor target, though substantial preclinical data suggest that its potential alone or in combination with MIF should be explored.

8. Conclusions

Despite the wealth of evidence implicating MIF and DDT in tumorigenesis, further research is necessary to elucidate the disparate and overlapping mechanisms regulating their function in tumorigenesis. Though clinical exploration of these targets in cancer therapy remains limited, further research is needed to identify optimal blocking methods for these pathways. There is substantial evidence to support the pivotal roles of MIF and DDT in cancer progression and highlight their potential as promising and broadly applicable targets in oncology, arguing for the need for expanded research and clinical trials to establish their efficacy in cancer therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25094849/s1.

Author Contributions

Manuscript conceptualization and design, C.N.V. and T.T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.N.V.; writing—review and editing, C.N.V., T.T.T., G.A.S.-Z. and R.B.; figure production, C.N.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Head and Neck Cancer SPORE and Skin Cancer SPORE Career Enhancement Program (CEP) (T.T.T.), the Stephen A. Sherwin ’70 MD Translational Research Fellowship Award (T.T.T.), and the William U. Gardner Memorial Student Research Fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine (C.N.V.).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Acknowledgments

Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 were created with BioRender.com. Thank you to the William U. Gardner Memorial Student Research Fellowship for the support of training resources. In Memoriam: S. Perwez Hussain, Ph.D. (1960–2023). We dedicate this work to the memory of S. Perwez Hussain (1960–2023), Senior Investigator in the Laboratory of the Human Carcinogenesis and Head of the Pancreatic Cancer Unit at the National Cancer Institute, whose seminal work on MIF in the malignant progression of pancreatic cancer continues to inspire our ongoing investigations.

Conflicts of Interest

R.B. is a co-inventor on Yale-managed patents for therapeutic MIF/DDT antagonism and serves on the Clinical Advisory Board for OncoOne GmbH.

References

  1. David, J.R. Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: Its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1966, 56, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bloom, B.R.; Bennett, B. Mechanism of a Reaction in Vitro Associated with Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity. Science 1966, 153, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jankauskas, S.S.; Wong, D.W.; Bucala, R.; Djudjaj, S.; Boor, P. Evolving complexity of MIF signaling. Cell Signal. 2019, 57, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sumaiya, K.; Langford, D.; Natarajaseenivasan, K.; Shanmughapriya, S. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): A multifaceted cytokine regulated by genetic and physiological strategies. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 233, 108024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Calandra, T.; Roger, T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: A regulator of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Froidevaux, C.; Roger, T.; Martin, C.; Glauser, M.P.; Calandra, T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and innate immune responses to bacterial infections. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 29, S13–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balogh, K.N.; Templeton, D.J.; Cross, J.V. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor protects cancer cells from immunogenic cell death and impairs anti-tumor immune responses. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, J.; Leng, L.; Sauler, M.; Fu, W.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Du, X.; Yu, X.; Lee, P.; Bucala, R. Transcription factor ICBP90 regulates the MIF promoter and immune susceptibility locus. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yoo, S.-A.; Leng, L.; Kim, B.-J.; Du, X.; Tilstam, P.V.; Kim, K.H.; Kong, J.-S.; Yoon, H.-J.; Liu, A.; Wang, T.; et al. MIF allele-dependent regulation of the MIF coreceptor CD44 and role in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7917–E7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meza-Romero, R.; Benedek, G.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R.; Vandenbark, A.A. Predicted structure of MIF/CD74 and RTL1000/CD74 complexes. Metab. Brain Dis. 2016, 31, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Merk, M.; Zierow, S.; Leng, L.; Das, R.; Du, X.; Schulte, W.; Fan, J.; Lue, H.; Chen, Y.; Xiong, H.; et al. The D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDT) gene product is a cytokine and functional homolog of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, E577–E585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pomposo, O.I.; Illescas, O.; Pacheco-Fernández, T.; Laclette, J.P.; Rodriguez, T.; Rodriguez-Sosa, M. Immune modulation by the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) family: D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDT) is not (always) a backup system. Cytokine 2020, 133, 155121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chauhan, N.; Hoti, S. Role of cysteine-58 and cysteine-95 residues in the thiol di-sulfide oxidoreductase activity of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor-2 of Wuchereria bancrofti. Acta Trop. 2016, 153, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Calandra, T.; Bernhagen, J.; Mitchell, R.A.; Bucala, R. The macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 179, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, J.P.W.; Foote, A.; Fan, H.; de Castro, C.P.; Lang, T.; Jones, S.A.; Gavrilescu, N.; Mills, K.H.G.; Leech, M.; Morand, E.F.; et al. Loss of autophagy enhances MIF/macrophage migration inhibitory factor release by macrophages. Autophagy 2016, 12, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pellowe, A.S.; Sauler, M.; Hou, Y.; Merola, J.; Liu, R.; Calderon, B.; Lauridsen, H.M.; Harris, M.R.; Leng, L.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Endothelial cell-secreted MIF reduces pericyte contractility and enhances neutrophil extravasation. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 2171–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hu, C.-T.; Guo, L.-L.; Feng, N.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, N.; Ma, L.-L.; Shen, L.; Tong, G.-H.; Yan, Q.-W.; Zhu, S.-J.; et al. MIF, secreted by human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells, promotes chemotaxis and outgrowth of colorectal cancer in liver prometastasis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 22410–22423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Simons, D.; Grieb, G.; Hristov, M.; Pallua, N.; Weber, C.; Bernhagen, J.; Steffens, G. Hypoxia-induced endothelial secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and role in endothelial progenitor cell recruitment. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 668–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waeber, G.; Calandra, T.; Roduit, R.; Haefliger, J.-A.; Bonny, C.; Thompson, N.; Thorens, B.; Temler, E.; Meinhardt, A.; Bacher, M.; et al. Insulin secretion is regulated by the glucose-dependent production of islet β cell macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 4782–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kang, I.; Bucala, R. The immunobiology of MIF: Function, genetics and prospects for precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2019, 15, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leng, L.; Siu, E.; Bucala, R. Genotyping Two Promoter Polymorphisms in the MIF Gene: A -794 CATT(5-8) Microsatellite Repeat and a -173 G/C SNP. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2080, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Matia-García, I.; Salgado-Goytia, L.; Muñoz-Valle, J.F.; García-Arellano, S.; Hernández-Bello, J.; Salgado-Bernabé, A.B.; Parra-Rojas, I. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Promoter Polymorphisms (−794 CATT5–8and −173 G>C): Relationship with mRNA Expression and Soluble MIF Levels in Young Obese Subjects. Dis. Markers 2015, 2015, 461208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Merk, M.; Mitchell, R.A.; Endres, S.; Bucala, R. D-dopachrome tautomerase (D-DT or MIF-2): Doubling the MIF cytokine family. Cytokine 2012, 59, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yao, J.; Luo, Y.; Zeng, C.; He, H.; Zhang, X. UHRF1 regulates the transcriptional repressor HBP1 through MIF in T acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 46, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Avalos-Navarro, G.; Del Toro-Arreola, A.; Daneri-Navarro, A.; Quintero-Ramos, A.; Bautista-Herrera, L.A.; Topete, R.A.F.; Macias, B.U.A.; Castro, D.I.J.; Morán-Mendoza, A.d.J.; Oceguera-Villanueva, A.; et al. Association of the genetic variants (-794 CATT5-8 and -173 G > C) of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) with higher soluble levels of MIF and TNFα in women with breast cancer. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2020, 34, e23209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Z.-W.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, L.-Y.; Tian, M.-M.; Feng, G.-S.; You, W.-C.; Li, J.-Y. Inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms increase the risk of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 1788–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharaf-Eldein, M.; Elghannam, D.; Abdel-Malak, C. MIF-173G/C (rs755622) polymorphism as a risk factor for acute lymphoblastic leukemia development in children. J. Gene Med. 2018, 20, e3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, L.; Qin, J.; Lv, X.; Yin, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J. MIF promoter polymorphism increases peripheral blood expression levels, contributing to increased susceptibility and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 22, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hizawa, N.; Yamaguchi, E.; Takahashi, D.; Nishihira, J.; Nishimura, M. Functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and atopy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 169, 1014–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Renner, P.; Roger, T.; Calandra, T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: Gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to inflammatory diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41 (Suppl. S7), S513–S519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, X.-B.; Leng, L.; Beitin, A.; Chen, R.; McDonald, C.; Hsiao, B.; Jenison, R.D.; Kang, I.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, A.; et al. Simultaneous detection of microsatellite repeats and SNPs in the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) gene by thin-film biosensor chips and application to rural field studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Osipyan, A.; Chen, D.; Dekker, F.J. Epigenetic regulation in macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)-mediated signaling in cancer and inflammation. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 1728–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sakurai, N.; Shibata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Takano, H.; Hayashi, T.; Ota, M.; Nomura-Horita, T.; Hayashi, R.; Shimasaki, T.; Ostuka, T.; et al. Influence of MIF polymorphisms on CpG island hyper-methylation of CDKN2A in the patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Med. Genet. 2020, 21, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, G.; Yao, L.; Yang, T.; Guo, L.; Gu, S.; Liu, J.; Yang, K. MiR-451 suppresses the growth, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer cells by targeting macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Transl. Cancer Res. 2019, 8, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, G.; Xu, Z.; Hao, D. MicroRNA-451 inhibits neuroblastoma proliferation, invasion and migration by targeting macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 2253–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bandres, E.; Bitarte, N.; Arias, F.; Agorreta, J.; Fortes, P.; Agirre, X.; Zarate, R.; Diaz-Gonzalez, J.A.; Ramirez, N.; Sola, J.J.; et al. microRNA-451 Regulates Macrophage migration inhibitory factor production and proliferation of gastrointestinal cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 2281–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Zhao, S.; Wang, E.; Zhu, J.; Feng, D.; Zhu, Y.; Dou, W.; Fan, Q.; Hu, J.; et al. Epigenetic silencing of miR-144/451a cluster contributes to HCC progression via paracrine HGF/MIF-mediated TAM remodeling. Mol. Cancer 2021, 20, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jia, L.; Chen, J.; Xie, C.; Shao, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, L. microRNA-1228⁎ impairs the pro-angiogenic activity of gastric cancer cells by targeting macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Life Sci. 2017, 180, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, H.-X.; Wang, X.-M.; Han, X.-D.; Cao, B.-F. MiR-608 exerts tumor suppressive function in lung adenocarcinoma by directly targeting MIF. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 4908–4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, J.; Ma, J. miR-608 inhibits the migration and invasion of glioma stem cells by targeting macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 2733–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mamoori, A.; Gopalan, V.; Lu, C.-T.; Chua, T.C.; Morris, D.L.; Smith, R.A.; Lam, A.K.-Y. Expression pattern of miR-451 and its target MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor) in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 70, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, M.-B.; Wei, M.-X.; Han, J.-Y.; Wu, X.-Y.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Shen, W.; Lu, P.-H. MicroRNA-451 regulates AMPK/mTORC1 signaling and fascin1 expression in HT-29 colorectal cancer. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, S.; He, P.; Wang, J.; Schetter, A.; Tang, W.; Funamizu, N.; Yanaga, K.; Uwagawa, T.; Satoskar, A.R.; Gaedcke, J.; et al. A Novel MIF Signaling Pathway Drives the Malignant Character of Pancreatic Cancer by Targeting NR3C2. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 3838–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Barthelmess, R.M.; Stijlemans, B.; Van Ginderachter, J.A. Hallmarks of Cancer Affected by the MIF Cytokine Family. Cancers 2023, 15, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guda, M.R.; Rashid, M.A.; Asuthkar, S.; Jalasutram, A.; Caniglia, J.L.; Tsung, A.J.; Velpula, K.K. Pleiotropic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 9, 2760–2773. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Snyderman, R.; Pike, M.C. Macrophage migratory dysfunction in cancer. A mechanism for subversion of surveillance. Am. J. Pathol. 1977, 88, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, T.; Fu, J.; Zeng, Z.; Cohen, D.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Li, B.; Liu, X.S. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W509–W514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ives, A.; Le Roy, D.; Théroude, C.; Bernhagen, J.; Roger, T.; Calandra, T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes the migration of dendritic cells through CD74 and the activation of the Src/PI3K/myosin II pathway. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, H.; Lou, C.; Ma, J.; Gong, Q.; Tian, Z.; You, Y.; Ren, G.; Guo, W.; Wang, Y.; He, K.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Changes of Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemotherapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 914120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kim, C.; Park, J.; Song, Y.; Kim, S.; Moon, J. HIF1α-mediated AIMP3 suppression delays stem cell aging via the induction of autophagy. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, B.; Tilstam, P.V.; Hwang, S.S.; Simons, D.; Schulte, W.; Leng, L.; Sauler, M.; Ganse, B.; Averdunk, L.; Kopp, R.; et al. D-dopachrome tautomerase in adipose tissue inflammation and wound repair. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bilsborrow, J.B.; Doherty, E.; Tilstam, P.V.; Bucala, R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) as a therapeutic target for rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2019, 23, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zheng, L.; Feng, Z.; Tao, S.; Gao, J.; Lin, Y.; Wei, X.; Zheng, B.; Huang, B.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; et al. Destabilization of macrophage migration inhibitory factor by 4-IPP reduces NF-κB/P-TEFb complex-mediated c-Myb transcription to suppress osteosarcoma tumourigenesis. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022, 12, e652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liang, H.; Yang, X.; Liu, C.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X. Effect of NF-kB signaling pathway on the expression of MIF, TNF-alpha, IL-6 in the regulation of intervertebral disc degeneration. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal. Interact. 2018, 18, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Hussain, F.; Freissmuth, M.; Völkel, D.; Thiele, M.; Douillard, P.; Antoine, G.; Thurner, P.; Ehrlich, H.; Schwarz, H.-P.; Scheiflinger, F.; et al. Human Anti-Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Antibodies Inhibit Growth of Human Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 1223–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, S.H.; Kwon, H.J.; Park, S.; Kim, C.I.; Ryu, H.; Kim, S.S.; Park, J.B.; Kwon, J.T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) inhibitor 4-IPP downregulates stemness phenotype and mesenchymal trans-differentiation after irradiation in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guo, D.; Guo, J.; Yao, J.; Jiang, K.; Hu, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Lin, L.; Sun, W.; Jiang, X. D-dopachrome tautomerase is over-expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and acts cooperatively with macrophage migration inhibitory factor to promote cancer growth. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 2056–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, J. Combined Knockdown of D-dopachrome Tautomerase and Migration Inhibitory Factor Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion in Human Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2017, 27, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cotzomi-Ortega, I.; Nieto-Yañez, O.; Juárez-Avelar, I.; Rojas-Sanchez, G.; Montes-Alvarado, J.B.; Reyes-Leyva, J.; Aguilar-Alonso, P.; Rodriguez-Sosa, M.; Maycotte, P. Autophagy inhibition in breast cancer cells induces ROS-mediated MIF expression and M1 macrophage polarization. Cell Signal. 2021, 86, 110075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, G.-Q.; Xie, J.; Lei, X.-Y.; Zhang, L. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor regulatesproliferation of gastric cancer cellsvia the PI3K/Akt pathway. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 5541–5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xia, H.H.-X.; Lam, S.K.; Chan, A.O.; Lin, M.C.M.; Kung, H.F.; Ogura, K.; Berg, D.E.; Wong, B.C.Y. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor stimulated by Helicobacter pylori increases proliferation of gastric epithelial cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 1946–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Beswick, E.J.; Pinchuk, I.V.; Minch, K.; Suarez, G.; Sierra, J.C.; Yamaoka, Y.; Reyes, V.E. The Helicobacter pylori urease B subunit binds to CD74 on gastric epithelial cells and induces NF-κB activation and Interleukin-8 production. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brock, S.E.; Rendon, B.E.; Xin, D.; Yaddanapudi, K.; Mitchell, R.A. MIF family members cooperatively inhibit p53 expression and activity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hudson, J.D.; Shoaibi, M.A.; Maestro, R.; Carnero, A.; Hannon, G.J.; Beach, D.H. A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits P53 Tumor suppressor activity. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1375–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suresh, V.; Dash, P.; Suklabaidya, S.; Murmu, K.C.; Sasmal, P.K.; Jogdand, G.M.; Parida, D.; Sethi, M.; Das, B.; Mohapatra, D.; et al. MIF confers survival advantage to pancreatic CAFs by suppressing interferon pathway-induced p53-dependent apoptosis. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fukaya, R.; Ohta, S.; Yaguchi, T.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Sugihara, E.; Okano, H.; Saya, H.; Kawakami, Y.; Kawase, T.; Yoshida, K.; et al. MIF Maintains the Tumorigenic Capacity of Brain Tumor–Initiating Cells by Directly Inhibiting p53. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 2813–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mitchell, R.A.; Liao, H.; Chesney, J.; Fingerle-Rowson, G.; Baugh, J.; David, J.; Bucala, R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) sustains macrophage proinflammatory function by inhibiting p53: Regulatory role in the innate immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Petrenko, O.; Moll, U.M. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor MIF Interferes with the Rb-E2F Pathway. Mol. Cell 2005, 17, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, D.Y.; Bae, S.H.; Yoo, M.R.; Kim, Y.Y.; Hong, I.K.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, S.H. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediates macrophage migration inhibitory factor to protect neurons against oxygen-glucose deprivation. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Huang, X.-H.; Jian, W.-H.; Wu, Z.-F.; Zhao, J.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Xia, J.-T. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) suppressed cyclin D1 expression and hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 5570–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fukuda, Y.; Bustos, M.A.; Cho, S.N.; Roszik, J.; Ryu, S.; Lopez, V.M.; Burks, J.K.; Lee, J.E.; Grimm, E.A.; Hoon, D.S.; et al. Interplay between soluble CD74 and macrophage-migration inhibitory factor drives tumor growth and influences patient survival in melanoma. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Binsky, I.; Haran, M.; Starlets, D.; Gore, Y.; Lantner, F.; Harpaz, N.; Leng, L.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Shvidel, L.; Berrebi, A.; et al. IL-8 secreted in a macrophage migration-inhibitory factor- and CD74-dependent manner regulates B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13408–13413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bucala, R.; Donnelly, S.C. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor: A Probable Link between Inflammation and Cancer. Immunity 2007, 26, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fu, H.; Luo, F.; Yang, L.; Wu, W.; Liu, X. Hypoxia stimulates the expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human vascular smooth muscle cells via HIF-1α dependent pathway. BMC Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Xie, F.; Peng, J.; Wu, X. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes Warburg effect via activation of the NF-κB/HIF-1α pathway in lung cancer. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 41, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Winner, M.; Koong, A.C.; Rendon, B.E.; Zundel, W.; Mitchell, R.A. Amplification of tumor hypoxic responses by macrophage migration inhibitory factor–dependent hypoxia-inducible factor stabilization. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yada, R.C.; Desa, D.E.; Gillette, A.A.; Bartels, E.; Harari, P.M.; Skala, M.C.; Beebe, D.J.; Kerr, S.C. Microphysiological head and neck cancer model identifies novel role of lymphatically secreted monocyte migration inhibitory factor in cancer cell migration and metabolism. Biomaterials 2023, 298, 122136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. de Azevedo, R.A.; Shoshan, E.; Whang, S.; Markel, G.; Jaiswal, A.R.; Liu, A.; Curran, M.A.; Travassos, L.R.; Bar-Eli, M. MIF inhibition as a strategy for overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in melanoma. OncoImmunology 2020, 9, 1846915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Imaoka, M.; Tanese, K.; Masugi, Y.; Hayashi, M.; Sakamoto, M. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor-CD74 interaction regulates the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 in melanoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 2273–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Baugh, J.A.; Gantier, M.; Li, L.; Byrne, A.; Buckley, A.; Donnelly, S.C. Dual regulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression in hypoxia by CREB and HIF-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 347, 895–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bacher, M.; Schrader, J.; Thompson, N.; Kuschela, K.; Gemsa, D.; Waeber, G.; Schlegel, J. Up-regulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene and protein expression in glial tumor cells during hypoxic and hypoglycemic stress indicates a critical role for angiogenesis in glioblastoma multiforme. Am. J. Pathol. 2003, 162, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Oda, S.; Oda, T.; Nishi, K.; Takabuchi, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Tanaka, T.; Adachi, T.; Fukuda, K.; Semenza, G.L.; Hirota, K. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor activates hypoxia-inducible factor in a p53-dependent manner. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. No, Y.R.; Lee, S.-J.; Kumar, A.; Yun, C.C. HIF1α-Induced by Lysophosphatidic Acid Is Stabilized via Interaction with MIF and CSN5. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chesney, J.; Metz, C.; Bacher, M.; Peng, T.; Meinhardt, A.; Bucala, R. An essential role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in angiogenesis and the growth of a murine lymphoma. Mol. Med. 1999, 5, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, L.; He, S.; Feng, F.; Guo, L.; Jiang, W.; Lu, S. Macrophage inhibitory factor 1 acts as a potential biomarker in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and is a target for antibody-based therapy. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Choudhary, S.; Hegde, P.; Pruitt, J.R.; Sielecki, T.M.; Choudhary, D.; Scarpato, K.; DeGraff, D.J.; Pilbeam, C.C.; Taylor, J.A. Macrophage migratory inhibitory factor promotes bladder cancer progression via increasing proliferation and angiogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 2891–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. He, X.-X.; Chen, K.; Yang, J.; Li, X.-Y.; Gan, H.-Y.; Liu, C.-Y.; Coleman, T.R.; Al-Abed, Y. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes colorectal cancer. Mol. Med. 2009, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pasupuleti, V.; Du, W.; Gupta, Y.; Yeh, I.-J.; Montano, M.; Magi-Galuzzi, C.; Welford, S.M. Dysregulated D-dopachrome tautomerase, a hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent gene, cooperates with macrophage migration inhibitory factor in renal tumorigenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 3713–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. A Taylor, J.; A Kuchel, G.; Hegde, P.; Voznesensky, O.S.; Claffey, K.; Tsimikas, J.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R.; Pilbeam, C. Null mutation for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is associated with less aggressive bladder cancer in mice. BMC Cancer 2007, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ren, Y.; Chan, H.M.; Li, Z.; Lin, C.; Nicholls, J.; Chen, C.F.; Lee, P.Y.; Lui, V.; Bacher, M.; Tam, P.K.H. Upregulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor contributes to induced N-Myc expression by the activation of ERK signaling pathway and increased expression of interleukin-8 and VEGF in neuroblastoma. Oncogene 2004, 23, 4146–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, J.; Zhang, G.; Yang, S.; Qiao, J.; Li, T.; Yang, S.; Hong, Y. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor regulating the expression of VEGF-C through MAPK signal pathways in breast cancer MCF-7 cell. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 14, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Guo, X.; Xu, S.; Gao, X.; Wang, J.; Xue, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Qian, M.; Qiu, W.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes vasculogenic mimicry formation induced by hypoxia via CXCR4/AKT/EMT pathway in human glioblastoma cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 80358–80372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shin, H.-N.; Moon, H.-H.; Ku, J.-L. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α and macrophage migration-inhibitory factor induce metastatic behavior in CXCR4-expressing colon cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 1537–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Morris, K.T.; Nofchissey, R.A.; Pinchuk, I.V.; Beswick, E.J. Chronic macrophage migration inhibitory factor exposure induces mesenchymal epithelial transition and promotes gastric and colon cancers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Tanese, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Berkova, Z.; Wang, Y.; Samaniego, F.; Lee, J.E.; Ekmekcioglu, S.; Grimm, E.A. Cell Surface CD74–MIF Interactions Drive Melanoma Survival in Response to Interferon-γ. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2775–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kasama, T.; Ohtsuka, K.; Sato, M.; Takahashi, R.; Wakabayashi, K.; Kobayashi, K. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: A multifunctional cytokine in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis 2010, 2010, 106202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Stosic-Grujicic, S.; Stojanovic, I.; Maksimovic-Ivanic, D.; Momcilovic, M.; Popadic, D.; Harhaji, L.; Miljkovic, D.; Metz, C.; Mangano, K.; Papaccio, G.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is necessary for progression of autoimmune diabetes mellitus. J. Cell Physiol. 2008, 215, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Choi, S.; Kim, H.-R.; Leng, L.; Kang, I.; Jorgensen, W.L.; Cho, C.-S.; Bucala, R.; Kim, W.-U. Role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the regulatory t cell response of tumor-bearing Mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3905–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hao, Y.; Baker, D.; Dijke, P.T. TGF-β-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Candido, J.; Hagemann, T. Cancer-Related Inflammation. J. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 33, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qu, X.; Tang, Y.; Hua, S. Immunological Approaches Towards Cancer and Inflammation: A Cross Talk. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cai, J.; Huang, L.; Tang, H.; Xu, H.; Wang, L.; Zheng, M.; Yu, H.; Liu, H. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor of Thelazia callipaeda induces M2-like macrophage polarization through TLR4-mediated activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chan, P.-C.; Wu, T.-N.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, C.-H.; Wabitsch, M.; Tian, Y.-F.; Hsieh, P.-S. Targeted inhibition of CD74 attenuates adipose COX-2-MIF-mediated M1 macrophage polarization and retards obesity-related adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance. Clin. Sci. 2018, 132, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yang, Y.-P.; Chien, C.-S.; Yarmishyn, A.A.; Chan, M.-S.; Lee, A.C.-L.; Chen, Y.-W.; Huang, P.-I.; Ma, H.-I.; Lo, W.-L.; Chien, Y.; et al. Musashi-1 Regulates MIF1-Mediated M2 Macrophage Polarization in Promoting Glioblastoma Progression. Cancers 2021, 13, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ghoochani, A.; A Schwarz, M.; Yakubov, E.; Engelhorn, T.; Doerfler, A.; Buchfelder, M.; Bucala, R.; E Savaskan, N.; Eyüpoglu, I.Y. MIF-CD74 signaling impedes microglial M1 polarization and facilitates brain tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2016, 35, 6246–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Alban, T.J.; Bayik, D.; Otvos, B.; Rabljenovic, A.; Leng, L.; Jia-Shiun, L.; Roversi, G.; Lauko, A.; Momin, A.A.; Mohammadi, A.M.; et al. Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets Express Differential Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Receptor Profiles That Can Be Targeted to Reduce Immune Suppression. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wei, Y.; Zheng, X.; Huang, T.; Zhong, Y.; Sun, S.; Wei, X.; Liu, Q.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Z. Human embryonic stem cells secrete macrophage migration inhibitory factor: A novel finding. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0288281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.; He, H.; Fan, B.; Deng, R.; Hong, Y.; Liang, X.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, F. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor rejuvenates aged human mesenchymal stem cells and improves myocardial repair. Aging 2019, 11, 12641–12660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Thavayogarajah, T.; Sinitski, D.; El Bounkari, O.; Torres-Garcia, L.; Lewinsky, H.; Harjung, A.; Chen, H.-R.; Panse, J.; Vankann, L.; Shachar, I.; et al. CXCR4 and CD74 together enhance cell survival in response to macrophage migration-inhibitory factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Exp. Hematol. 2022, 115, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Luo, Y.; Wang, X.; Shen, J.; Yao, J. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the pathogenesis of leukemia (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2021, 59, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Benjamin, D.; Aderka, D.; Livni, E.; Joshua, H.; Shaklai, M.; Pinkhas, J. Migration inhibition factor activity in sera of patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1979, 63, 1175–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Islam, M.; Mohamed, E.H.; Esa, E.; Kamaluddin, N.R.; Zain, S.M.; Yusoff, Y.M.; Assenov, Y.; Mohamed, Z.; Zakaria, Z. Circulating cytokines and small molecules follow distinct expression patterns in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sharaf-Eldein, M.; Elghannam, D.; Elderiny, W.; Abdel-Malak, C. Prognostic Implication of MIF Gene Expression in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin. Lab. 2018, 64, 1429–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xue, Y.; Xu, H.; Rong, L.; Lu, Q.; Li, J.; Tong, N.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, Y. The MIF −173G/C polymorphism and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a Chinese population. Leuk. Res. 2010, 34, 1282–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Reinart, N.; Nguyen, P.-H.; Boucas, J.; Rosen, N.; Kvasnicka, H.-M.; Heukamp, L.; Rudolph, C.; Ristovska, V.; Velmans, T.; Mueller, C.; et al. Delayed development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the absence of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Blood 2013, 121, 812–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. David, K.; Friedlander, G.; Pellegrino, B.; Radomir, L.; Lewinsky, H.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R.; Becker-Herman, S.; Shachar, I. CD74 as a regulator of transcription in normal B cells. Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 111572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gil-Yarom, N.; Radomir, L.; Sever, L.; Kramer, M.P.; Lewinsky, H.; Bornstein, C.; Blecher-Gonen, R.; Barnett-Itzhaki, Z.; Mirkin, V.; Friedlander, G.; et al. CD74 is a novel transcription regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Binsky, I.; Lantner, F.; Grabovsky, V.; Harpaz, N.; Shvidel, L.; Berrebi, A.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R.; Alon, R.; et al. TAp63 regulates VLA-4 expression and chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell migration to the bone marrow in a CD74-dependent manner. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4761–4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cao, H.; Tadros, V.; Hiramoto, B.; Leeper, K.; Hino, C.; Xiao, J.; Pham, B.; Kim, D.H.; Reeves, M.E.; Chen, C.-S.; et al. Targeting TKI-Activated NFKB2-MIF/CXCLs-CXCR2 Signaling Pathways in FLT3 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Reduced Blast Viability. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Han, I.; Lee, M.R.; Nam, K.W.; Oh, J.H.; Moon, K.C.; Kim, H.-S. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor relates to survival in high-grade osteosarcoma. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008, 466, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zheng, L.; Gao, J.; Jin, K.; Chen, Z.; Yu, W.; Zhu, K.; Huang, W.; Liu, F.; Mei, L.; Lou, C.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) inhibitor 4-IPP suppresses osteoclast formation and promotes osteoblast differentiation through the inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 7667–7683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Rajasekaran, D.; Zierow, S.; Syed, M.; Bucala, R.; Bhandari, V.; Lolis, E.J. Targeting distinct tautomerase sites of D-DT and MIF with a single molecule for inhibition of neutrophil lung recruitment. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 4961–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fingerle-Rowson, G.; Petrenko, O.; Metz, C.N.; Forsthuber, T.G.; Mitchell, R.; Huss, R.; Moll, U.; Müller, W.; Bucala, R. The p53-dependent effects of macrophage migration inhibitory factor revealed by gene targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9354–9359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Enomoto, A.; Yoshihisa, Y.; Yamakoshi, T.; Rehman, M.U.; Norisugi, O.; Hara, H.; Matsunaga, K.; Makino, T.; Nishihira, J.; Shimizu, T. UV-B Radiation induces macrophage migration inhibitory factor–mediated melanogenesis through activation of protease-activated receptor-2 and stem cell factor in keratinocytes. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Huth, S.; Huth, L.; Heise, R.; Marquardt, Y.; Lopopolo, L.; Piecychna, M.; Boor, P.; Fingerle-Rowson, G.; Kapurniotu, A.; Yazdi, A.S.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and its homolog D-dopachrome tautomerase (D-DT) are significant promotors of UVB- but not chemically induced non-melanoma skin cancer. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rossi, E.; Croce, M.; Reggiani, F.; Schinzari, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Gangemi, R.; Tortora, G.; Pfeffer, U.; Amaro, A. Uveal Melanoma Metastasis. Cancers 2021, 13, 5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Repp, A.C.; Mayhew, E.S.; Apte, S.; Niederkorn, J.Y. Human uveal melanoma cells produce macrophage migration-inhibitory factor to prevent lysis by NK cells. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Oliva, M.; Rullan, A.J.; Piulats, J.M. Uveal melanoma as a target for immune-therapy. Ann. Transl. Med. 2016, 4, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chattopadhyay, C.; Roszik, J.; Grimm, E. Combined inhibition of SDHA and MIF in Uveal Melanoma cells effectively reduces cell survival. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 4959. [Google Scholar]
  132. Shimizu, T.; Abe, R.; Nakamura, H.; Ohkawara, A.; Suzuki, M.; Nishihira, J. High expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human melanoma cells and its role in tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 264, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kobold, S.; Merk, M.; Hofer, L.; Peters, P.; Bucala, R.; Endres, S. The macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)-homologue D-dopachrome tautomerase is a therapeutic target in a murine melanoma model. Oncotarget 2013, 5, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Midena, E.M.; Parrozzani, R.M.; Midena, G.; Trainiti, S.; Marchione, G.; Cosmo, E.; Londei, D.; Frizziero, L.M. In vivo intraocular biomarkers: Changes of aqueous humor cytokines and chemokines in patients affected by uveal melanoma. Medicine 2020, 99, e22091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nemeth, E.; Baird, A.W.; O’farrelly, C. Microanatomy of the liver immune system. Semin. Immunopathol. 2009, 31, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ambrosini, G.; Rai, A.J.; Carvajal, R.D.; Schwartz, G.K. Uveal Melanoma Exosomes Induce a Prometastatic Microenvironment through Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor. Mol. Cancer Res. 2022, 20, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. He, Z.; Xin, Z.; Yang, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Rao, W.; Du, Z.; Bai, J.; Guo, Z.; Ruan, X.; et al. Mapping the single-cell landscape of acral melanoma and analysis of the molecular regulatory network of the tumor microenvironments. eLife 2022, 11, e78616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, S.; Zheng, M.; Pang, X.; Zhang, M.; Yu, X.; Wu, J.; Gao, X.; Wu, J.; Yang, X.; Tang, Y.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes the invasion and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma through matrix metalloprotein-2/9. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 1809–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, S.-S.; Cen, X.; Liang, X.-H.; Tang, Y.-L. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: A potential driver and biomarker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 8, 10650–10661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Cludts, S.; Decaestecker, C.; Johnson, B.; Lechien, J.; Leroy, X.; Kindt, N.; Kaltner, H.; André, S.; Gabius, H.-J.; Saussez, S. Increased expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor during progression to hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer. Res. 2010, 30, 3313–3319. [Google Scholar]
  141. Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Sun, R.; Franceschi, D.; Pan, H.; Wei, C.; Ogbuehi, A.C.; Lethaus, B.; Savkovic, V.; Gaus, S.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Different Immune Signatures in HPV- and HPV + Driven Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Immunol. Res. 2022, 2022, 2079389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Kindt, N.; Lechien, J.; Decaestecker, C.; Rodriguez, A.; Chantrain, G.; Remmelink, M.; Laurent, G.; Gabius, H.-J.; Saussez, S. Expression of macrophage migration-inhibitory factor is correlated with progression in oral cavity carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 4499–4505. [Google Scholar]
  143. Kindt, N.; Preillon, J.; Kaltner, H.; Gabius, H.-J.; Chevalier, D.; Rodriguez, A.; Johnson, B.D.; Megalizzi, V.; Decaestecker, C.; Laurent, G.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Clinical and experimental studies. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 139, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pei, X.-J.; Wu, T.-T.; Li, B.; Tian, X.-Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, Q.-X. Increased expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 contribute to cell invasion and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 11, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bhatia, A.; Burtness, B. Treating Head and Neck Cancer in the Age of Immunotherapy: A 2023 Update. Drugs 2023, 83, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kindt, N.; Descamps, G.; Lechien, J.R.; Remmelink, M.; Colet, J.-M.; Wattiez, R.; Berchem, G.; Journe, F.; Saussez, S. Involvement of HPV Infection in the Release of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xu, C.; Li, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, R. Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 as a clinical marker for non–small cell lung cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 3169–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. McClelland, M.; Zhao, L.; Carskadon, S.; Arenberg, D. Expression of CD74, the receptor for macrophage migration inhibitory factor, in non-small cell lung cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Coleman, A.M.; Rendon, B.E.; Zhao, M.; Qian, M.-W.; Bucala, R.; Xin, D.; Mitchell, R.A. Cooperative regulation of non-small cell lung carcinoma angiogenic potential by macrophage migration inhibitory factor and its homolog, d-dopachrome tautomerase. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 2330–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zheng, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, C.; Tu, S. Inhibition of CXCR4 regulates epithelial mesenchymal transition of NSCLC via the Hippo-YAP signaling pathway. Cell Biol. Int. 2018, 42, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Huang, W.-C.; Kuo, K.-T.; Wang, C.-H.; Yeh, C.-T.; Wang, Y. Cisplatin resistant lung cancer cells promoted M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages via the Src/CD155/MIF functional pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Youn, H.; Son, B.; Kim, W.; Jun, S.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.; Kang, C.; Kim, J.; Youn, B. Dissociation of MIF-rpS3 complex and sequential NF-κB activation is involved in IR-induced metastatic conversion of NSCLC. J. Cell Biochem. 2015, 116, 2504–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Koh, H.M.; Kim, D.C.; Kim, Y.; Song, D.H. Prognostic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Thorac. Cancer 2019, 10, 2209–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Otterstrom, C.; Soltermann, A.; Opitz, I.; Felley-Bosco, E.; Weder, W.; A Stahel, R.; Triponez, F.; Robert, J.H.; Serre-Beinier, V. CD74: A new prognostic factor for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 2040–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Liu, W.; Yang, H.; Zhi, F.; Feng, Y.; Luo, H.; Zhu, Y.; Lei, Y. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor may contribute to the occurrence of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas. Clin. Transl. Med. 2023, 13, e1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mawhinney, L.; Armstrong, M.E.; O’reilly, C.; Bucala, R.; Leng, L.; Fingerle-Rowson, G.; Fayne, D.; Keane, M.P.; Tynan, A.; Maher, L.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) enzymatic activity and lung cancer. Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Carr, S.R.; Wang, H.; Hudlikar, R.; Lu, X.; Zhang, M.R.; Hoang, C.D.; Yan, F.; Schrump, D.S. A Unique Gene Signature Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival In Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2023, 165, 1554–1564.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Bian, Y.; Bi, G.; Shan, G.; Liang, J.; Yao, G.; Sui, Q.; Hu, Z.; Zhan, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Q. Identification of the relationship between single-cell N6-methyladenosine regulators and the infiltrating immune cells in esophageal carcinoma. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Liu, R.-M.; Sun, D.-N.; Jiao, Y.-L.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Ma, J.; Sun, M.; Gu, B.-L.; Chen, P.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes tumor aggressiveness of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via activation of Akt and inactivation of GSK3β. Cancer Lett. 2018, 412, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ren, Y.; Law, S.; Huang, X.; Lee, P.Y.; Bacher, M.; Srivastava, G.; Wong, J. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor stimulates angiogenic factor expression and correlates with differentiation and lymph node status in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2005, 242, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Xia, H.H.; Zhang, S.T.; Lam, S.K.; Lin, M.C.; Kung, H.F.; Wong, B.C. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and effects of bile acids and NSAIDs. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhang, L.; Ye, S.-B.; Ma, G.; Tang, X.-F.; Chen, S.-P.; He, J.; Liu, W.-L.; Xie, D.; Zeng, Y.-X.; Li, J. The expressions of MIF and CXCR4 protein in tumor microenvironment are adverse prognostic factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Wu, L.; Gao, Y.; Xie, S.; Ye, W.; Uemura, Y.; Zhang, R.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, M.; Wu, Q.; et al. The level of macrophage migration inhibitory factor is negatively correlated with the efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Transl. Oncol. 2023, 37, 101775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Shun, C.-T.; Lin, J.-T.; Huang, S.-P.; Lin, M.-T.; Wu, M.-S. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor is associated with enhanced angiogenesis and advanced stage in gastric carcinomas. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 3767–3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Yu, H.-P.; Yu, X.-H.; Zhang, S.-X. Expression and significance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in gastric adenocarcinoma. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010, 90, 2625–2628. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  166. Zheng, Y.-X. CD74 and macrophage migration inhibitory factor as therapeutic targets in gastric cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 2253–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Arisawa, T.; Tahara, T.; Shibata, T.; Nagasaka, M.; Nakamura, M.; Kamiya, Y.; Fujita, H.; Yoshioka, D.; Arima, Y.; Okubo, M.; et al. Functional promoter polymorphisms of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene in gastric carcinogenesis. Oncol. Rep. 2008, 19, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Beswick, E.J.; Pinchuk, I.V.; Suarez, G.; Sierra, J.C.; Reyes, V.E. Helicobacter pylori CagA-dependent macrophage migration inhibitory factor produced by gastric epithelial cells binds to CD74 and stimulates procarcinogenic events. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6794–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Li, S.; Guo, D.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, L.; Cui, Y.; Liu, M.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Cui, W.; Sun, L.; et al. MAPK4 silencing in gastric cancer drives liver metastasis by positive feedback between cancer cells and macrophages. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023, 55, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kong, F.; Deng, X.; Kong, X.; Du, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xie, D.; Guha, S.; Li, Z.; et al. ZFPM2-AS1, a novel lncRNA, attenuates the p53 pathway and promotes gastric carcinogenesis by stabilizing MIF. Oncogene 2018, 37, 5982–5996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wirtz, T.H.; Saal, A.; Bergmann, I.; Fischer, P.; Heinrichs, D.; Brandt, E.F.; Koenen, M.T.; Djudjaj, S.; Schneider, K.M.; Boor, P.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor exerts pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects via CD74 in murine hepatocellular carcinoma. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 178, 4452–4467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhu, G.-Q.; Tang, Z.; Huang, R.; Qu, W.-F.; Fang, Y.; Yang, R.; Tao, C.-Y.; Gao, J.; Wu, X.-L.; Sun, H.-X.; et al. CD36+ cancer-associated fibroblasts provide immunosuppressive microenvironment for hepatocellular carcinoma via secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Cell Discov. 2023, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Denz, A.; Pilarsky, C.; Muth, D.; Rückert, F.; Saeger, H.-D.; Grützmann, R. Inhibition of MIF leads to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. J. Surg. Res. 2010, 160, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jin, Z.-Q.; Zhi, F.-C.; Chen, X.-Q.; Wang, Y.-D. Expression of macrophage migration inhibition factor in pancreatic carcinoma tissue. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2004, 24, 1301–1303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  175. Wang, D.; Wang, R.; Huang, A.; Fang, Z.; Wang, K.; He, M.; Xia, J.; Li, W. Upregulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes tumor metastasis and correlates with poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 2628–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Funamizu, N.; Hu, C.; Lacy, C.; Schetter, A.; Zhang, G.; He, P.; Gaedcke, J.; Ghadimi, M.B.; Ried, T.; Yfantis, H.G.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition, enhances tumor aggressiveness and predicts clinical outcome in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Jia, X.; Xi, J.; Tian, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.; Long, J.; Wang, J.; Fan, G.-H.; et al. The Tautomerase Activity of Tumor exosomal MIF promotes pancreatic cancer progression by modulating mdsc differentiation. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2023, 12, 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Matsushita, H.; Yang, Y.M.; Pandol, S.J.; Seki, E. Exosome Migration Inhibitory Factor as a Marker and Therapeutic Target for Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 1033–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Costa-Silva, B.; Aiello, N.M.; Ocean, A.J.; Singh, S.; Zhang, H.; Thakur, B.K.; Becker, A.; Hoshino, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Gordon-Weeks, A.; Lim, S.; Yuzhalin, A.; Jones, K.; Muschel, R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: A key cytokine and therapeutic target in colon cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015, 26, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yasasever, V.; Camlica, H.; Duranyildiz, D.; Oguz, H.; Tas, F.; Dalay, N. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in cancer. Cancer Investig. 2007, 25, 715–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Ramireddy, L.; Chen, W.T.; Peng, C.; Hu, R.; Ke, T.; Chiang, H.; Chang, S.; Tsai, F.; Lo, W. Association Between Genetic Polymorphism of the MIF Gene and Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2015, 29, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. He, X.-X.; Wu, L.-H.; Xia, H.H.-X.; Ma, W.-Q.; Zhong, H.-J.; Xu, H.-X.; Wang, Y.-M.; Yang, R.-J.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, Y.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor siRNA inhibits hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer cells. Front. Biosci. 2017, 22, 1365–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Cheon, S.; Kim, H.; Park, Y.; Jang, J.; Lim, Y.; Song, S.; Han, S.; Kim, T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes resistance to MEK blockade in KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 1398–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Wang, L.; Li, S.; Luo, H.; Lu, Q.; Yu, S. PCSK9 promotes the progression and metastasis of colon cancer cells through regulation of EMT and PI3K/AKT signaling in tumor cells and phenotypic polarization of macrophages. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xin, D.; Rendon, B.E.; Zhao, M.; Winner, M.; Coleman, A.M.; Mitchell, R.A. The MIF homologue D-dopachrome tautomerase promotes COX-2 expression through β-catenin–dependent and –independent mechanisms. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010, 8, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Li, L.; Jing, L.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Gong, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yao, X.; Sun, X. Autophagic flux is essential for the downregulation of D-dopachrome tautomerase by atractylenolide I to ameliorate intestinal adenoma formation. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Cavalli, E.; Mazzon, E.; Mammana, S.; Basile, M.S.; Lombardo, S.D.; Mangano, K.; Bramanti, P.; Nicoletti, F.; Fagone, P.; Petralia, M.C. Overexpression of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor and Its Homologue D-Dopachrome Tautomerase as Negative Prognostic Factor in Neuroblastoma. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Cavalli, E.; Ciurleo, R.; Petralia, M.C.; Fagone, P.; Bella, R.; Mangano, K.; Nicoletti, F.; Bramanti, P.; Basile, M.S. Emerging Role of the Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Family of Cytokines in Neuroblastoma. Pathogenic Effectors and Novel Therapeutic Targets? Molecules 2020, 25, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Garcia-Gerique, L.; García, M.; Garrido-Garcia, A.; Gómez-González, S.; Torrebadell, M.; Prada, E.; Pascual-Pasto, G.; Muñoz, O.; Perez-Jaume, S.; Lemos, I.; et al. MIF/CXCR4 signaling axis contributes to survival, invasion, and drug resistance of metastatic neuroblastoma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Baron, N.; Deuster, O.; Noelker, C.; Stüer, C.; Strik, H.; Schaller, C.; Dodel, R.; Meyer, B.; Bacher, M. Role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in primary glioblastoma multiforme cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2011, 89, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Mangano, K.; Mazzon, E.; Basile, M.S.; Di Marco, R.; Bramanti, P.; Mammana, S.; Petralia, M.C.; Fagone, P.; Nicoletti, F. Pathogenic role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in glioblastoma and its targeting with specific inhibitors as novel tailored therapeutic approach. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 17951–17970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Presti, M.; Mazzon, E.; Basile, M.S.; Petralia, M.C.; Bramanti, A.; Colletti, G.; Bramanti, P.; Nicoletti, F.; Fagone, P. Overexpression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and functionally-related genes, D-DT, CD74, CD44, CXCR2 and CXCR4, in glioblastoma. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 2881–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Wang, X.-B.; Tian, X.-Y.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Li, Z. Elevated expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor correlates with tumor recurrence and poor prognosis of patients with gliomas. J. Neuro-Oncology 2012, 106, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Khan, A.B.; Lee, S.; Harmanci, A.S.; Patel, R.; Latha, K.; Yang, Y.; Marisetty, A.; Lee, H.; Heimberger, A.B.; Fuller, G.N.; et al. CXCR4 expression is associated with proneural-to-mesenchymal transition in glioblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 2023, 152, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Otvos, B.; Silver, D.J.; Mulkearns-Hubert, E.E.; Alvarado, A.G.; Turaga, S.M.; Sorensen, M.D.; Rayman, P.; Flavahan, W.A.; Hale, J.S.; Stoltz, K.; et al. Cancer Stem Cell-Secreted Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Stimulates Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cell Function and Facilitates Glioblastoma Immune Evasion. STEM CELLS 2016, 34, 2026–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. A Castro, B.; Flanigan, P.; Jahangiri, A.; Hoffman, D.; Chen, W.; Kuang, R.; De Lay, M.; Yagnik, G.; Wagner, J.R.; Mascharak, S.; et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor downregulation: A novel mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Oncogene 2017, 36, 3749–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Woolbright, B.L.; Rajendran, G.; Abbott, E.; Martin, A.; Amalraj, S.; Dennis, K.; Li, X.; Warrick, J.; A Taylor, J. Role of MIF1/MIF2/CD74 interactions in bladder cancer. J. Pathol. 2023, 259, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Guo, Y.-S.; Dai, Y.-P.; Li, W.; Liu, L.-D. Expression and significance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in bladder urothelial cell carcinoma. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2011, 33, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  200. Choi, J.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y. CD74 expression is increased in high-grade, invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Int. J. Urol. 2013, 20, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Gai, J.; Wahafu, W.; Song, L.; Ping, H.; Wang, M.; Yang, F.; Niu, Y.; Qing, W.; Xing, N. Expression of CD74 in bladder cancer and its suppression in association with cancer proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis in HT-1376 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7631–7638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Penticuff, J.C.; Woolbright, B.L.; Sielecki, T.M.; Weir, S.J.; Taylor, J.A. MIF family proteins in genitourinary cancer: Tumorigenic roles and therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2019, 16, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Meyer-Siegler, K.L.; Leifheit, E.C.; Vera, P.L. Inhibition of macrophage migration inhibitory factor decreases proliferation and cytokine expression in bladder cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2004, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Meyer-Siegler, K.L.; Vera, P.L.; Iczkowski, K.A.; Bifulco, C.; Lee, A.; Gregersen, P.K.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) gene polymorphisms are associated with increased prostate cancer incidence. Genes Immun. 2007, 8, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Meyer-Siegler, K.L.; Iczkowski, K.A.; Leng, L.; Bucala, R.; Vera, P.L. Inhibition of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor or Its Receptor (CD74) Attenuates Growth and Invasion of DU-145 Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8730–8739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Rafiei, S.; Gui, B.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.S.; Kibel, A.S.; Jia, L. Targeting the MIF/CXCR7/AKT Signaling Pathway in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2019, 17, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Meyer-Siegler, K.; Hudson, P.B. Enhanced expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma metastases. Urology 1996, 48, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Richard, V.; Kindt, N.; Decaestecker, C.; Gabius, H.-J.; Laurent, G.; Noël, J.-C.; Saussez, S. Involvement of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and its receptor (CD74) in human breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Xu, X.; Wang, B.; Ye, C.; Yao, C.; Lin, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Overexpression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor induces angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2008, 261, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lv, W.; Chen, N.; Lin, Y.; Ma, H.; Ruan, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Pan, X.; Tian, X. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes breast cancer metastasis via activation of HMGB1/TLR4/NF kappa B axis. Cancer Lett. 2016, 375, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Verjans, E.; Noetzel, E.; Bektas, N.; Schütz, A.K.; Lue, H.; Lennartz, B.; Hartmann, A.; Dahl, E.; Bernhagen, J. Dual role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Charan, M.; Das, S.; Mishra, S.; Chatterjee, N.; Varikuti, S.; Kaul, K.; Misri, S.; Ahirwar, D.K.; Satoskar, A.R.; Ganju, R.K. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor inhibition as a novel therapeutic approach against triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Xiao, W.; Dong, X.; Zhao, H.; Han, S.; Nie, R.; Zhang, X.; An, R. Expression of MIF and c-erbB-2 in endometrial cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 3828–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Giannice, R.; Erreni, M.; Allavena, P.; Buscaglia, M.; Tozzi, R. Chemokines mRNA expression in relation to the Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) mRNA and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) mRNA expression in the microenvironment of endometrial cancer tissue and normal endometrium: A pilot study. Cytokine 2013, 64, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Xiao, W.; Jin, O.; Han, S.; Nie, R.; Zhu, L.; Gao, X.; Li, L. Correlations of leukemia inhibitory factor and macrophage migration inhibitory factor with endometrial carcinoma. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2015, 36, 146–149. [Google Scholar]
  216. Bondza, P.K.; Metz, C.N.; Akoum, A. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates alpha(v)beta(3) integrin and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line Ishikawa. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2008, 77, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Teng, F.; Tian, W.-Y.; Wang, Y.-M.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Guo, F.; Zhao, J.; Gao, C.; Xue, F.-X. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote the progression of endometrial cancer via the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Cheng, R.-J.; Deng, W.-G.; Niu, C.-B.; Li, Y.-Y.; Fu, Y. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and cd74 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2011, 21, 1004–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Krockenberger, M.; Engel, J.B.; Kolb, J.; Dombrowsky, Y.; Häusler, S.F.M.; Kohrenhagen, N.; Dietl, J.; Wischhusen, J.; Honig, A. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in cervical cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 136, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Wu, S.; Lian, J.; Tao, H.; Shang, H.; Zhang, L. Correlation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene polymorphism with the risk of early-stage cervical cancer and lymphatic metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2011, 2, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Schinagl, A.; Thiele, M.; Douillard, P.; Völkel, D.; Kenner, L.; Kazemi, Z.; Freissmuth, M.; Scheiflinger, F.; Kerschbaumer, R.J. Oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor is a potential new tissue marker and drug target in cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 73486–73496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Thiele, M.; Donnelly, S.C.; A Mitchell, R. OxMIF: A druggable isoform of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in cancer and inflammatory diseases. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e005475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Mahalingam, D.; Patel, M.R.; Sachdev, J.C.; Hart, L.L.; Halama, N.; Ramanathan, R.K.; Sarantopoulos, J.; Völkel, D.; Youssef, A.; de Jong, F.A.; et al. Phase I study of imalumab (BAX69), a fully human recombinant antioxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor antibody in advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 86, 1836–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Rolan, P.; Gibbons, J.A.; He, L.; Chang, E.; Jones, D.; Gross, M.I.; Davidson, J.B.; Sanftner, L.M.; Johnson, K.W. Ibudilast in healthy volunteers: Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics with single and multiple doses. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008, 66, 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Fox, R.J.; Coffey, C.S.; Conwit, R.; Cudkowicz, M.E.; Gleason, T.; Goodman, A.; Klawiter, E.C.; Matsuda, K.; McGovern, M.; Naismith, R.T.; et al. Phase 2 Trial of Ibudilast in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 846–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Ha, W.; Sevim-Nalkiran, H.; Zaman, A.M.; Matsuda, K.; Khasraw, M.; Nowak, A.K.; Chung, L.; Baxter, R.C.; McDonald, K.L. Ibudilast sensitizes glioblastoma to temozolomide by targeting Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Govindan, S.V.; Cardillo, T.M.; Sharkey, R.M.; Tat, F.; Gold, D.V.; Goldenberg, D.M. Milatuzumab–SN-38 Conjugates for the Treatment of CD74+ Cancers. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 968–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Haran, M.; Mirkin, V.; Braester, A.; Harpaz, N.; Shevetz, O.; Shtreiter, M.; Greenberg, S.; Mordich, O.; Amram, O.; Binsky-Ehrenreich, I.; et al. A phase I-II clinical trial of the anti-CD74 monoclonal antibody milatuzumab in frail patients with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A patient based approach. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 182, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Schmiechen, Z.C.; Stromnes, I.M. Mechanisms Governing Immunotherapy Resistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 613815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Wen, Y.; Cai, W.; Yang, J.; Fu, X.; Putha, L.; Xia, Q.; Windsor, J.A.; Phillips, A.R.; Tyndall, J.D.A.; Du, D.; et al. Targeting Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 638950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 04849 g001
Figure 1. (a) Molecular models of MIF and DDT tertiary and homotrimeric structures and (b) schematic diagrams of the human MIF and DDT genes. The MIF gene depicts two known promotor polymorphisms: the -794 CATT5–8 short-tandem repeat and -173 G/C single-nucleotide polymorphism. (c) MIF and DDT binding interactions, subsequent canonical (CD74/CD44) and non-canonical (CXCR2, CXCR4, and CXCR7) pathways, and downstream activities implicated in tumorigenesis. In vivo and therapeutic agents tested in preclinical and clinical cancer models (Imalumab, Ibudilast, Milatuzumab, 4-IPP, ISO-1, CPSI-1306, SCD-19, and anti-MIF and anti-DDT antibodies) are shown at their levels of inhibition in red.
Figure 1. (a) Molecular models of MIF and DDT tertiary and homotrimeric structures and (b) schematic diagrams of the human MIF and DDT genes. The MIF gene depicts two known promotor polymorphisms: the -794 CATT5–8 short-tandem repeat and -173 G/C single-nucleotide polymorphism. (c) MIF and DDT binding interactions, subsequent canonical (CD74/CD44) and non-canonical (CXCR2, CXCR4, and CXCR7) pathways, and downstream activities implicated in tumorigenesis. In vivo and therapeutic agents tested in preclinical and clinical cancer models (Imalumab, Ibudilast, Milatuzumab, 4-IPP, ISO-1, CPSI-1306, SCD-19, and anti-MIF and anti-DDT antibodies) are shown at their levels of inhibition in red.
Ijms 25 04849 g001
Ijms 25 04849 g002
Figure 2. Evidence of MIF and DDT dysregulation has been described in a wide range of cancers, including hematologic, musculoskeletal, skin, head and neck, lung, gastrointestinal, CNS, urogenital, and gynecologic cancers.
Figure 2. Evidence of MIF and DDT dysregulation has been described in a wide range of cancers, including hematologic, musculoskeletal, skin, head and neck, lung, gastrointestinal, CNS, urogenital, and gynecologic cancers.
Ijms 25 04849 g002
Ijms 25 04849 g003
Figure 3. Modified version of cancer hallmarks, as previously described by Hanahan and Weinberg, with evidence of MIF (*) and DDT (ꝉ) involvement, accompanied by references.
Figure 3. Modified version of cancer hallmarks, as previously described by Hanahan and Weinberg, with evidence of MIF (*) and DDT (ꝉ) involvement, accompanied by references.
Ijms 25 04849 g003
Ijms 25 04849 g004
Figure 4. Distributions of MIF (top), DDT (center), and CD74 (bottom) differential expression levels across all TCGA tumors using TIMER 2.0 [52]. Normal (blue), tumor (red), and metastatic (purple) tissues are represented. (Wilcoxon statistical significance *: p-value < 0.05; **: p-value < 0.01; ***: p-value < 0.001).
Figure 4. Distributions of MIF (top), DDT (center), and CD74 (bottom) differential expression levels across all TCGA tumors using TIMER 2.0 [52]. Normal (blue), tumor (red), and metastatic (purple) tissues are represented. (Wilcoxon statistical significance *: p-value < 0.05; **: p-value < 0.01; ***: p-value < 0.001).
Ijms 25 04849 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valdez, C.N.; Sánchez-Zuno, G.A.; Bucala, R.; Tran, T.T. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) and D-Dopachrome Tautomerase (DDT): Pathways to Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094849

AMA Style

Valdez CN, Sánchez-Zuno GA, Bucala R, Tran TT. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) and D-Dopachrome Tautomerase (DDT): Pathways to Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Opportunities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(9):4849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094849

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valdez, Caroline Naomi, Gabriela Athziri Sánchez-Zuno, Richard Bucala, and Thuy T. Tran. 2024. "Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) and D-Dopachrome Tautomerase (DDT): Pathways to Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Opportunities" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 9: 4849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094849

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop