Next Article in Journal
Unravelling Different Water Management Strategies in Three Olive Cultivars: The Role of Osmoprotectants, Proteins, and Wood Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Notch Inhibitors and BH3 Mimetics in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
Contrast Relative Humidity Response of Diverse Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Genotypes: Deep Study Using RNAseq Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
CD68-Negative Histiocytoses with Cardiac Involvement, Associated with COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma

by
Hinako Narita
1,†,
Kai Kuroiwa
1,†,
Yukiko Kawaguchi
1,
So Murai
2,
Yosuke Sasaki
2,
Mayumi Homma
2,
Natsuki Kawamata
1,
Hidenori Hayashi
1,
Kazuki Nagao
1,
Reiko Okamura
1,
Yuka Uesugi
1,
Yohei Sasaki
1,
Shotaro Shimada
1,
Megumi Watanuki
1,
Nana Arai
1,
Kouji Yanagisawa
1,
Eisuke Shiozawa
2,
Toshiko Yamochi
2 and
Norimichi Hattori
1,*
1
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(20), 11057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011057
Submission received: 22 September 2024 / Revised: 10 October 2024 / Accepted: 12 October 2024 / Published: 15 October 2024

Abstract

Most follicular lymphomas (FLs) demonstrate an indolent clinical course with favorable outcomes; however, a fraction of patients experiences progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) and has adverse outcomes. This study aimed to determine the predictive risk factors for POD24 in patients with FL, and the characteristics of the microenvironment in FL with POD24. By multivariate analysis, we revealed that increased Ki-67 expression was associated with POD24 events in patients with FL (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.96–20.22, p = 0.0020). Additionally, patients with FL with POD24 demonstrated immune cell reduction by immunohistochemistry analysis. Our results help better understand the therapeutic strategies for FL with POD24.

1. Introduction

Follicular lymphoma (FL), the most prevalent type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, usually demonstrates indolent clinical behavior. While most patients undergo an indolent clinical course characterized by relapsing and remitting patterns, early relapse in FL, defined as disease progression or recurrence within 24 months of first-line treatment (POD24), affects around 20% of patients and is linked to a poor prognosis [1,2,3]. Therefore, predicting POD24 before first-line treatment could benefit patients. Several clinical prognostic tools are available to predict outcomes, including the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognosis Index (FLIPI) [4], FLIPI-2 [5], PRIMA-prognostic index (PRIMA-PI) [6], and Follicular Lymphoma Evaluation Index (FLEX) [7]. These models were developed based on patients receiving alkylating agents but did not incorporate bendamustine, which is frequently used for patients with FL. The FLEX model is constrained by the routine lack of several calculated parameters despite the inclusion of patients treated with obinutuzumab and bendamustine (GB) [7,8]. Moreover, several genetic models that include the status of several gene mutations or gene-expression profiling have been proposed to develop clinical risk models, such as m7-FLIPI [9], POD24-PI [10], the 23-gene signature model [11], and Bio-clinical FLIPI (Bio-FLIPI) [12]. However, these models are not standardized and remain part of a research approach. In a recent study comparing the FLIPI, FLIPI2, PRIMA-PI, and m7-FLIPI models, it was found that FLIPI remained a PI with higher discriminatory power for survival in patients with advanced FL treated with immunochemotherapy, including bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) [13]. Overall, optimal tools to estimate prognostic factors, in particular, POD24 for patients with FL, remain under development.
The tumor microenvironment of FL includes a variable number of immune cells that contribute to immunosurveillance and immune evasion. However, studies have reported discrepant results regarding the infiltration of specific immune cells, with some showing a correlation with a better prognosis while others indicate a poorer prognosis [14,15,16,17,18]. The present study investigated the predictive risk factors for POD24 and explored the characteristics of patients with FL with POD24, particularly focusing on the microenvironment.

2. Results

2.1. Patient Characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of 101 patients. Our patients had a median age of 65 years at diagnosis. Additionally, 80 patients (79%) received R + chemotherapy; including rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) (n = 29); R plus cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-THP-COP) (n = 29); and R plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) (n = 6), and BR (n = 16). Moreover, nine patients (8%) received R monotherapy. Other therapies included GB (n = 9), fludarabine (n = 2), and CVP (n = 1).
The median follow-up of this study population was 2483 days (range: 149–7224), with 85 (84.2%) patients who were alive and 16 (15.8%) who died because of relapse or disease progression (n = 13), infections (n = 2), and aortic dissection (n = 1). Additionally, 40 (39.6%) patients had a relapse, of which 10 (10/40, 25.0%) had progression to DLBCL. Moreover, of 40 patients, 15 (15/40, 37.5%) were classified as POD24. Of them, four (4/15, 26.7%) had progression to DLBCL. In 15 patients with POD24, no patient (0/25, 0%) received RB or GB, and 12 patients (12/65, 18.5%) received R-CHOP, R-THP-COP, R-CVP, or CVP as first-line treatment. Of 40 relapsed patients, 2 (2/40, 5.0%) received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and 1 (1/40, 2.5%) received allogeneic stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy after relapse. Of the 15 patients with POD24, 1 (1/15, 6.7%) received ASCT. Furthermore, 5-year OS rates in patients with POD24 and without POD24 were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.5–84.6%) and 95.8% (95% CI: 87.4–98.6%), respectively. Patients with POD24 had a significant adverse effect on OS compared with those without POD24 (p = 0.0063) (Figure 1).

2.2. Comparison of Characteristics between Patients with FL with and without POD24

Table 2 shows the characteristics of the subgroups with POD24 and without POD24. The POD24 group compared with the non-POD24 group was enriched for higher Ki-67 expression (73% vs. 22%, p = 2.1 × 10−4). No differences in other parameters, including the FLIPI score, LDH, sIL-2R, β2-MG level, or high tumor burden, were found between the two groups.
Subsequently, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to clarify the predictive risk factors for POD24 (Table 3). The univariate analysis showed that elevated LDH level (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.01–7.67, p = 0.049) and high Ki-67 expression (HR: 7.17, 95% CI: 2.28–22.55, p = 7.4 × 10−4) were related to the occurrence of POD24. In the multivariate analysis, only high Ki-67 expression was associated with POD24 occurrence (HR: 6.29, 95% CI: 1.96–20.22, p = 0.0020).

2.3. Association between the Microenvironment and POD24

We compared the proportions of microenvironment components in two distinct areas, which were categorized into intrafollicular and interfollicular between patients with and without POD24, to investigate potential associations between the microenvironment and the occurrence of POD24 (Figure 2). Compared with patients with POD24, patients without POD24 demonstrated a higher proportion of CD3-positive cells in intrafollicular (mean: 45% vs. 31%; p = 0.024) and interfollicular (mean: 78% vs. 54%; p = 5.1 × 10−4), CD4-positive cells in intrafollicular (mean: 41% vs. 21%; p = 0.0018) and interfollicular (mean: 60% vs. 40%; p = 0.019), CD8-positive cells in intrafollicular (mean: 29% vs. 11%; p = 1.7 × 10−7), and CD68-positive cells in intrafollicular (mean: 20% vs. 7%; p = 3.2 × 10−9) and interfollicular (mean: 23% vs. 12%; p = 7.9 × 10−4). In addition, Ki-67 expression by immunohistochemistry analysis, which was separated from Ki-67 expression in clinical data, was evaluated. Compared with patients without POD24, patients with POD24 demonstrated a higher proportion of Ki-67-positive cells in intrafollicular (mean: 52% vs. 31%; p = 0.0092). There was no difference in interfollicular Ki-67 expression (mean: 23% vs. 22%; p = 0.92) (Figure S1).

2.4. Relationship between Microenvironment Components and Clinical Outcomes

Next, we investigated the relationship between the microenvironment components in two distinct areas and clinical outcomes using multivariate analysis (Table 4). Reduced CD3-positive cells in interfollicular (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99, p = 0.022) and CD68-positive cells in intrafollicular (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99, p = 0.045) were significantly associated with higher risk of POD24 development. Reduced CD3-positive cells in interfollicular (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93–0.98, p = 0.0012) and CD8-positive cells in intrafollicular (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86–0.97, p = 0.0038) were significantly associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS). There was statistically no association between microenvironment components and overall survival (OS).

3. Discussion

We revealed high Ki-67 expression as a predictive risk factor for POD24 in patients with FL. Several studies revealed that patients with FL exhibiting high Ki-67 expression (≥30%) demonstrated inferior outcomes [19,20,21]. However, only a few studies reported the association between high Ki-67 expression and POD24 [21]. Consistent with a previous report [21], we revealed high Ki-67 expression as a simple and efficient predictive factor for POD24. Additionally, we observed higher Ki-67 expression in the intrafollicular area in patients with POD24 compared with those without POD24 [20], while no difference was noted in interfollicular Ki-67 expression. Nasir et al. [22] revealed that high Ki-67 expression in the interfollicular area was associated with inferior outcomes, whereas Klapper et al. [23] demonstrated no correlation between interfollicular Ki-67 and clinical outcomes, consistent with our findings. Immune cells such as T cells do not only exist in interfollicular, but they also exist in intrafollicular. Meanwhile, tumor B cells can spread to the interfollicular area in some FL patients. Thus, it can be unclear whether Ki67 was stained with tumor B cells or activated T cells. Future studies are warranted to identify whether cells stained with Ki-67 spread tumor B cells or activate immune cells because various cells exist in interfollicular. Our study had some limitations, including our cohort being from a single center, the retrospective study design, patients receiving different first-line treatments, and molecular data, such as gene mutations, were not assessed, in addition to a lack of some clinical data including β2-MG. In fact, an elevated baseline level of β2-MG was included in FLIPI2 or PRIMA-PI as the prognostic marker [5,6]. Thus, further validation is required.
Our findings for OS at 5 years of 66.7% and 95.8% in patients with POD24 and without POD24, respectively, were similar to those of FLASH data analysis (71.2% and 93.6%, respectively) [2]. However, compared with FLASH data, our cohort included much older patients with higher rates of patients receiving bendamustine and immunotherapies such as rituximab and obinutuzumab. Notably, rates of POD24 occurrence in patients treated with bendamustine-based therapies (0%) were lower than those with alkylator-based regimens (18.5%). This observation was consistent with previous reports [3,24]. Thus, bendamustine-based therapies as first-line treatment may decrease the incidence of POD24; however, the median follow-up in patients with bendamustine-based therapies was shorter than those with alkylator-based regimens in our study (861 days vs. 2948 days). However, previous reports [3,24] showed a high risk of developing transformation to DLBCL in FL with POD24 after frontline bendamustine-based therapies. In particular, early progression after BR therapy may have a high risk of transformation to DLBCL. Therefore, the treatment strategy for improving clinical outcomes in FL patients still remains.
The significant finding in the present study is that patients with FL with POD24 demonstrated reduced numbers of immune cells compared with those without POD24. A previous report on the more frequent T cell infiltration in FL with spontaneous remission, lower numbers of immune cells in high-risk FL, the role of memory and naive T cells for maintenance of antitumor immunity, and low immune infiltration related to experience POD24 events support our data [14,16,17,25,26]. Additionally, corroborating our observations, a recent study with immune infiltration by intratumoral T cells quantified 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET revealed that high total metabolic tumor volume reflected an inverse association with the numbers of intratumoral CD4- and CD8-positive T cells and a correlation with increased tumor B cell infiltration and high Ki-67 expression [27]. Similarly, Bio-FLIPI determined that only a lack of intrafollicular CD4 expression predicts early failure [12]. Moreover, a previous single-cell RNA sequencing study revealed the existence of cytotoxic CD4 T cells in the FL microenvironment and a T cell-depleted microenvironment with an inferior clinical outcome [17]. Conversely, CD4-positive T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are enriched in FL and generally support tumor growth in FL [28]. However, a recent study on the FL organoid model revealed a significant positive correlation between Tfh activation and tumor-killing after bispecific antibody treatment [29]. Thus, Tfh cell dysfunction, including immune activation, suppression, and exhaustion may be more complicated in FL. The subsets of CD4-positive cells were unspecified in our study, and there was no association between the proportion of simple CD4-positive cells and clinical outcomes; thus, further studies are warranted.
We showed that patients with decreased CD8-positive cells had inferior PFS and a tendency for POD24 development. Similar to our results, Rai et al. [30] demonstrated that CD8-positive T cell markers (CD8A, CD8B, FLT3LG, GZMM, and GZMK) were downregulated in FL patients with POD24, while NK cell markers and immune checkpoint markers were almost equivalently expressed in those with or without POD24. Liu et al. [31] showed that decreased CD8-positive T cells with upregulated LAG-3 expression around FL-cells were observed in intrafollicular during POD24. Also, Alvaro et al. [14] showed that FL patients with higher infiltration of CD8-positive T cells had a favorable prognosis. These findings suggest immune cells such as CD8-positive T cells have a potential impact on survival and risk of POD24 in FL patients. In fact, the combination of lenalidomide plus rituximab [32] or obinutuzumab [33] in patients with untreated FL patients has produced promising results. The RELEVANCE trial (phase II study) on the combination of lenalidomide plus rituximab in untreated FL patients showed that the 2-year PFS was 86% and the 5-year OS was 100% [32]. A LYSA study (phase II study) on the combination of obinutuzumab and lenalidomide in untreated FL patients reported that 3-year PFS was 82% and OS was 94% [33]. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator, and T cells and NK cells stimulated by lenalidomide may enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and cytotoxic T cell activity. In addition, lenalidomide has been shown to produce synergistic effects in combination with rituximab, dexamethasone, bortezomib, and B cell receptor signaling inhibitors [34]. Therefore, the evaluation of immune cells in FL patients may be important for exploring effective treatment options.
In our study, patients with reduced CD3-positive cells in interfollicular had poorer PFS and a higher risk for POD24 occurrence. Xerri et al. [35] reported that low CD3 and low PD1 counts in malignant follicles containing intrafollicular and interfollicular were associated with inferior PFS using FL samples from rituximab-treated patients enrolled in the randomized PRIMA trial. Additionally, RNAseq analysis showed a correlation between low CD3 and CD8 expression and poorer PFS. According to separately counted intrafollicular and interfollicular in our study, we found that only CD3-positive cells in interfollicular had a prognostic value. CD3 is a pan T cell marker covering a broad range of potentially complementary and antagonistic T cell subsets (e.g., regulatory T cells). Nevertheless, we suggest that CD3-positive cells in interfollicular can be a helpful tool for predicting prognosis.
The impact of macrophages that contributed to clinical outcomes is different in patients with FL treated with and without rituximab [14,15,16,36]. These observations indicated that the clinical impact of macrophages in patients with FL may depend on the administered agents, such as the anti-CD20 antibody, accentuating the requirement for a better understanding of macrophages that mediate antitumoral activity in FL. Tobin et al. [16] revealed that low expression of immune infiltrating cells, including macrophage markers, was correlated with a higher risk of POD24 events, consistent with our results, including most patients treated with immunochemotherapy. Additionally, a current study on multi-omic profiling demonstrated that the microenvironment in patients with high-risk FL changed to a loss of follicular dendritic cell meshwork, a reduction in macrophages, and the expansion of stromal cells [37]. Recently, CD47 blockade (Hu5F9-G4 or magrolimab), which is a macrophage checkpoint inhibitor that induces macrophage-mediated tumor killing, combined with rituximab [38] showed potential efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory FL. The rates of complete response and partial response were 43% and 29%, respectively. Considering our findings that reduced macrophages were found in patients with POD24, the response to the combination of 5F9 and rituximab may depend on the proportion of macrophages in intrafollicular.
In conclusion, we revealed that increased Ki-67 expression before FL treatment can be a hallmark of POD24 events. Furthermore, patients with FL with POD24 have reduced immune cells in the microenvironment. These results can effectively contribute to future therapeutic strategies for FL.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients

This analysis enrolled 101 untreated patients aged 30–86 years who were newly diagnosed with FL at our institution from 2003 to 2021. Following the World Health Organization classification, expert pathologists performed histologic diagnosis. This study excluded patients with histologic grade 3b FL, defined as histologic transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Moreover, in situ follicular B cell neoplasm, pediatric FL, or duodenal-type FL were excluded [39]. Patients were staged following the Ann Arbor classification and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). High tumor burden, according to GELF criteria, was defined as at least one of the parameters including B symptoms, involvement of ≥3 nodal sites (each > 3 cm), any tumor mass over 7 cm, splenomegaly, organ compression by tumor, pleural/peritoneal effusion, leukemic phase, or cytopenias [40]. All measurable lesions were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, physical examination, and bone marrow biopsy. Patient response after induction chemotherapy was classified according to the International Workshop criteria [41]. Clinical data, including age, sex, histological grade, stage, PS, FLIPI, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), and β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), were collected at diagnosis. Furthermore, Ki-67 was included in the clinical data, which is routinely used for pathological diagnosis. High Ki-67 expression was defined as ≥30% based on previously described [19,42]. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Showa University, Tokyo, Japan, (No. 22-251-A) on 30 January 2023.

4.2. Histology and Immunohistochemistrical Analysis

All samples were collected at the time of initial diagnosis. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of 3 µm sections was used to evaluate the histopathological findings of tumors. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections stained with the following antibodies were used for the immunohistochemistry analysis: CD3 (clone 565, 1:200; Novocastra, Newcastle, U.K.), CD4 (clone 1F6, 1:40; Novocastra, Newcastle, U.K.), CD8 (C8/144B, 1:100; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD68 (KP1, 1:200; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and Ki-67 (clone MIB-1, 1:200; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). An automated immunostainer (Histostainer 36 A, Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used for immunostaining following the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples for this analysis were available in 15 patients with POD24 and 53 patients without POD24. Initially, a low-power magnification (magnification 100×) was used to determine the number of CD3-, CD4-, CD8-, and CD68-positive cells. The positive cells were evaluated in two distinct areas, including intrafollicular- and interfollicular-positive cell counts, considering the various numbers of these cells inside and between the neoplastic follicles. Both intrafollicular- and interfollicular-positive cells were counted separately on high power (magnification 400×) from three different hot spots per case (Figure 3). Two different pathologists, blinded to the patient background, independently performed the counts. The statistical analysis incorporated the mean percentages of cells expressing each marker divided by all nucleated cells in three distinct hot spots [18,43,44,45].

4.3. Definitions and Statistics

POD24 was disease progression or relapse within 24 months from treatment initiation (modified definition) [10], PFS was the time from the date of diagnosis to relapse, progression, or death from any cause, and OS was the time between the date of diagnosis and the patient’s death from any cause or last follow-up. Progression in lymphoma is defined as ≥50% in the area from the nadir, which indicates that a 22.5% increase in each of the maximal and perpendicular axes is needed for a 50% increase in area.
Laboratory parameters were dichotomized using the lower and upper limits of normal established in our hospital. To compare intergroup differences, the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables. The log-rank test for OS was used for univariate analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictive risk factors of POD24. Statistical significance was considered at a p-value of <0.05. EZR [46] and GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) were used for statistical analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms252011057/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.H.; methodology, N.H., E.S. and T.Y.; formal analysis, N.H.; investigation, N.H., H.N., K.K. and S.M.; resources, S.M., Y.S. (Yosuke Sasaki), M.H., E.S. and T.Y.; data curation, H.N. and Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.N. and N.H.; writing—review and editing, N.H., N.K., H.H., K.N., R.O., Y.U., Y.S. (Yohei Sasaki), S.S., M.W., N.A. and K.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author, N.H., upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participating patients and clinical staff members who contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Casulo, C.; Byrtek, M.; Dawson, K.L.; Zhou, X.; Farber, C.M.; Flowers, C.R.; Hainsworth, J.D.; Maurer, M.J.; Cerhan, J.R.; Link, B.K.; et al. Early relapse of follicular lymphoma after rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone defines patients at high risk for death: An analysis from the national LymphoCare study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2516–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Casulo, C.; Dixon, J.G.; Le-Rademacher, J.; Hoster, E.; Hochster, H.S.; Hiddemann, W.; Marcus, R.; Kimby, E.; Herold, M.; Sebban, C.; et al. Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials. Blood 2022, 139, 1684–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Freeman, C.L.; Kridel, R.; Moccia, A.A.; Savage, K.J.; Villa, D.R.; Scott, D.W.; Gerrie, A.S.; Ferguson, D.; Cafferty, F.; Slack, G.W.; et al. Early progression after Bendamustine-rituximab is associated with high risk of transformation in advanced stage follicular lymphoma. Blood 2019, 134, 761–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Solal-Céligny, P.; Roy, P.; Colombat, P.; White, J.; Armitage, J.O.; Arranz-Saez, R.; Au, W.Y.; Bellei, M.; Brice, P.; Caballero, D.; et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood 2004, 104, 1258–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Federico, M.; Bellei, M.; Marcheselli, L.; Luminari, S.; Lopez-Guillermo, A.; Vitolo, U.; Pro, B.; Pileri, S.; Pulsoni, A.; Soubeyran, P.; et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index 2: A new prognostic index for follicular lymphoma developed by the international follicular lymphoma prognostic factor project. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 4555–4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bachy, E.; Maurer, M.J.; Habermann, T.M.; Gelas-Dore, B.; Maucort-Boulch, D.; Estell, J.A.; Van den Neste, E.; Bouabdallah, R.; Gyan, E.; Feldman, A.L.; et al. A simplified scoring system in de novo follicular lymphoma treated initially with immunochemotherapy. Blood. 2018, 132, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mir, F.; Mattiello, F.; Grigg, A.; Herold, M.; Hiddemann, W.; Marcus, R.; Seymour, J.F.; Bolen, C.R.; Knapp, A.; Nielsen, T.; et al. Follicular Lymphoma Evaluation Index (FLEX): A new clinical prognostic model that is superior to existing risk scores for predicting progression-free survival and early treatment failure after frontline immunochemotherapy. Am. J. Hematol. 2020, 95, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Casulo, C. Follicular lymphoma: Is there an optimal way to define risk? Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2021, 2021, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pastore, A.; Jurinovic, V.; Kridel, R.; Hoster, E.; Staiger, A.M.; Szczepanowski, M.; Pott, C.; Kopp, N.; Murakami, M.; Horn, H.; et al. Integration of gene mutations in risk prognostication for patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma: A retrospective analysis of a prospective clinical trial and validation in a population-based registry. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jurinovic, V.; Kridel, R.; Staiger, A.M.; Szczepanowski, M.; Horn, H.; Dreyling, M.H.; Rosenwald, A.; Ott, G.; Klapper, W.; Zelenetz, A.D.; et al. Clinicogenetic risk models predict early progression of follicular lymphoma after first-line immunochemotherapy. Blood 2016, 128, 1112–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huet, S.; Tesson, B.; Jais, J.P.; Feldman, A.L.; Magnano, L.; Thomas, E.; Traverse-Glehen, A.; Albaud, B.; Carrère, M.; Xerri, L.; et al. A gene-expression profiling score for prediction of outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma: A retrospective training and validation analysis in three international cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mondello, P.; Fama, A.; Larson, M.C.; Feldman, A.L.; Villasboas, J.C.; Yang, Z.Z.; Galkin, I.; Svelolkin, V.; Postovalova, E.; Bagaev, A.; et al. Lack of intrafollicular memory CD4 + T cells is predictive of early clinical failure in newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2021, 11, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rodríguez-Sevilla, J.J.; Fernández-Rodríguez, C.; Bento, L.; Diez-Feijóo, R.; Pinzón, S.; Gibert, J.; Fernández-Ibarrondo, L.; Lafuente, M.; Ferrer, A.; Sánchez-González, B.; et al. Evaluation of 4 prognostic indices in follicular lymphoma treated in first line with immunochemotherapy. Blood Adv. 2023, 7, 1606–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alvaro, T.; Lejeune, M.; Salvadó, M.T.; Lopez, C.; Jaén, J.; Bosch, R.; Pons, L.E. Immunohistochemical patterns of reactive microenvironment are associated with clinicobiologic behavior in follicular lymphoma patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 5350–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Canioni, D.; Salles, G.; Mounier, N.; Brousse, N.; Keuppens, M.; Morchhauser, F.; Lamy, T.; Sonet, A.; Rousselet, M.C.; Foussard, C.; et al. High numbers of tumor-associated macrophages have an adverse prognostic value that can be circumvented by rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma enrolled onto the GELA-GOELAMS FL-2000 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tobin, J.W.D.; Keane, C.; Gunawardana, J.; Mollee, P.; Birch, S.; Hoang, T.; Lee, J.; Li, L.; Huang, L.; Murigneux, V.; et al. Progression of disease within 24 months in follicular lymphoma is associated with reduced intratumoral immune infiltration. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 3300–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, G.; Deng, Q.; Marques-Piubelli, M.L.; Dai, E.; Dang, M.; Ma, M.C.J.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Henderson, J.; Kudryashova, O.; et al. Follicular lymphoma microenvironment characteristics associated with tumor cell mutations and MHC Class II expression. Blood Cancer Discov. 2022, 3, 428–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sander, B.; de Jong, D.; Rosenwald, A.; Xie, W.; Balagué, O.; Calaminici, M.; Carreras, J.; Gaulard, P.; Gribben, J.; Hagenbeek, A.; et al. The reliability of immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor microenvironment in follicular lymphoma: A validation study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium. Haematologica 2014, 99, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.A.; Wang, L.; Hochberg, E.P.; Muzikansky, A.; Harris, N.L.; Hasserjian, R.P. Low histologic grade follicular lymphoma with high proliferation index: Morphologic and clinical features. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29, 1490–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sohani, A.R.; Maurer, M.J.; Giri, S.; Pitcher, B.; Chadburn, A.; Said, J.W.; Bartlett, N.L.; Czuczman, M.S.; Martin, P.; Rosenbaum, C.A.; et al. Biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma receiving anti-CD20-based biological therapy. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2021, 45, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, J.; Gao, F.; Zhao, J.; Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Han, W.; Ma, L.; Wang, J.; et al. The prognostic index PRIMA-PI combined with Ki67 as a better predictor of progression of disease within 24 months in follicular lymphoma. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1090610. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nasir, A.; Hegerova, L.; Yousaf, H.; Forster, C.L.; Shanley, R.; Linden, M.A.; Bachanova, V.; Yohe, S. Digital and manual interfollicular Ki-67 are associated with a progression-free survival in patients with low-grade follicular lymphoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2024, 161, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Klapper, W.; Hoster, E.; Rölver, L.; Schrader, C.; Janssen, D.; Tiemann, M.; Bernd, H.W.; Determann, O.; Hansmann, M.L.; Möller, P.; et al. Tumor sclerosis but not cell proliferation or malignancy grade is a prognostic marker in advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: The German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 3330–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yoon, S.E.; Cho, J.; Kim, W.S.; Kim, S.J. Impact of transformation on the survival of patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma that progressed within 24 months. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 2488–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Z.Z.; Kim, H.J.; Villasboas, J.C.; Price-Troska, T.; Jalali, S.; Wu, H.; Luchtel, R.A.; Polley, M.C.; Novak, A.J.; Ansell, S.M. Mass cytometry analysis reveals that specific intratumoral CD4+ T cell subsets correlate with patient survival in follicular lymphoma. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 2178–2193.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Milcent, B.; Josseaume, N.; Petitprez, F.; Riller, Q.; Amorim, S.; Loiseau, P.; Toubert, A.; Brice, P.; Thieblemont, C.; Teillaud, J.L.; et al. Recovery of central memory and naive peripheral T cells in Follicular Lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-chemotherapy based regimen. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nath, K.; Law, S.C.; Sabdia, M.B.; Gunawardana, J.; de Long, L.M.; Sester, D.; Shanavas, M.; Tsang, H.; Tobin, J.W.D.; Halliday, S.J.; et al. Intratumoral T cells have a differential impact on FDG-PET parameters in follicular lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 2644–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roider, T.; Baertsch, M.A.; Fitzgerald, D.; Vöhringer, H.; Brinkmann, B.J.; Czernilofsky, F.; Knoll, M.; Llaó-Cid, L.; Mathioudaki, A.; Faßbender, B.; et al. Multimodal and spatially resolved profiling identifies distinct patterns of T cell infiltration in nodal B cell lymphoma entities. Nat. Cell Biol. 2024, 26, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kastenschmidt, J.M.; Schroers-Martin, J.G.; Sworder, B.J.; Sureshchandra, S.; Khodadoust, M.S.; Liu, C.L.; Olsen, M.; Kurtz, D.M.; Diehn, M.; Wagar, L.E.; et al. A human lymphoma organoid model for evaluating and targeting the follicular lymphoma tumor immune microenvironment. Cell Stem Cell 2024, 31, 410–420.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rai, S.; Inoue, H.; Sakai, K.; Hanamoto, H.; Matsuda, M.; Maeda, Y.; Haeno, T.; Watatani, Y.; Kumode, T.; Serizawa, K.; et al. Decreased expression of T-cell-associated immune markers predicts poor prognosis in patients with follicular lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2022, 113, 660–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, L.; Yu, X.; Li, Z.; He, X.; Zha, J.; Lin, Z.; Hong, Y.; Zheng, H.; Lai, Q.; Ding, K.; et al. Revealing the evolution of the tumor immune microenvironment in follicular lymphoma patients progressing within 24 months using single-cell imaging mass cytometry. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Morschhauser, F.; Nastoupil, L.; Feugier, P.; Schiano de Colella, J.M.; Tilly, H.; Palomba, M.L.; Bachy, E.; Fruchart, C.; Libby, E.N.; Casasnovas, R.O.; et al. Six-year results from RELEVANCE: Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) versus rituximab-chemotherapy Followed by rituximab maintenance in untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 3239–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bachy, E.; Houot, R.; Feugier, P.; Bouabdallah, K.; Bouabdallah, R.; Virelizier, E.N.; Maerevoet, M.; Fruchart, C.; Snauwaert, S.; Le Gouill, S.; et al. Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide in advanced, previously untreated follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy: A LYSA study. Blood 2022, 139, 2338–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gribben, J.G.; Fowler, N.; Morschhauser, F. Mechanisms of action of lenalidomide in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2803–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xerri, L.; Huet, S.; Venstrom, J.M.; Szafer-Glusman, E.; Fabiani, B.; Canioni, D.; Chassagne-Clément, C.; Dartigues-Cuilléres, P.; Charlotte, F.; Laurent, C.; et al. Rituximab treatment circumvents the prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating T-cells in follicular lymphoma patients. Hum. Pathol. 2017, 64, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gouni, S.; Marques-Piubelli, M.L.; Strati, P. Follicular lymphoma and macrophages: Impact of approved and novel therapies. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 4303–4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Radtke, A.J.; Postovalova, E.; Varlamova, A.; Bagaev, A.; Sorokina, M.; Kudryashova, O.; Meerson, M.; Polyakova, M.; Galkin, I.; Svekolkin, V.; et al. Multi-omic profiling of follicular lymphoma reveals changes in tissue architecture and enhanced stromal remodeling in high-risk patients. Cancer Cell 2024, 42, 444–463.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Advani, R.; Flinn, I.; Popplewell, L.; Forero, A.; Bartlett, N.L.; Ghosh, N.; Kline, J.; Roschewski, M.; LaCasce, A.; Collins, G.P.; et al. CD47 blockade by Hu5F9-G4 and rituximab in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1711–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alaggio, R.; Amador, C.; Anagnostopoulos, I.; Attygalle, A.D.; Araujo, I.B.O.; Berti, E.; Bhagat, G.; Borges, A.M.; Boyer, D.; Calaminici, M.; et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia 2022, 36, 1720–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brice, P.; Bastion, Y.; Lepage, E.; Brousse, N.; Haïoun, C.; Moreau, P.; Straetmans, N.; Tilly, H.; Tabah, I.; Solal-Céligny, P. Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: A randomized study from the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997, 15, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheson, B.D.; Horning, S.J.; Coiffier, B.; Shipp, M.A.; Fisher, R.I.; Connors, J.M.; Lister, T.A.; Vose, J.; Grillo-López, A.; Hagenbeek, A.; et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI sponsored international working group. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kawaguchi, Y.; Shiozawa, E.; Shimada, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Abe, M.; Murai, S.; Baba, Y.; Arai, N.; Okamoto, N.; Kabasawa, N.; et al. Ki-67 expression of immunohistochemistry using computerized image analysis is a useful prognostic marker in follicular lymphomas. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 3366–3374. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Wahlin, B.E.; Aggarwal, M.; Montes-Moreno, S.; Gonzalez, L.F.; Roncador, G.; Sanchez-Verde, L.; Christensson, B.; Sander, B.; Kimby, E. A unifying microenvironment model in follicular lymphoma: Outcome is predicted by programmed death-1–positive, regulatory, cytotoxic, and helper T cells and macrophages. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sweetenham, J.W.; Goldman, B.; LeBlanc, M.L.; Cook, J.R.; Tubbs, R.R.; Press, O.W.; Maloney, D.G.; Fisher, R.I.; Rimsza, L.M.; Braziel, R.M.; et al. Prognostic value of regulatory T cells, lymphoma-associated macrophages, and MUM-1 expression in follicular lymphoma treated before and after the introduction of monoclonal antibody therapy: A Southwest Oncology Group Study. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Blaker, Y.N.; Spetalen, S.; Brodtkorb, M.; Lingjaerde, O.C.; Beiske, K.; Østenstad, B.; Sander, B.; Wahlin, B.E.; Melen, C.M.; Myklebust, J.H.; et al. The tumour microenvironment influences survival and time to transformation in follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era. Br. J. Haematol. 2016, 175, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kanda, Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overall survival in patients with FL with and without POD24.
Figure 1. Overall survival in patients with FL with and without POD24.
Ijms 25 11057 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of immune cells between patients with FL with and without POD24 according to separately counted intrafollicular and interfollicular areas. (a) CD3, (b) CD4, (c) CD8, and (d) CD68. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Comparison of immune cells between patients with FL with and without POD24 according to separately counted intrafollicular and interfollicular areas. (a) CD3, (b) CD4, (c) CD8, and (d) CD68. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 25 11057 g002
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining (magnification, 100×) of the intrafollicular area (black asterisks) and interfollicular area (black triangles) in samples of patients with FL and POD24 (66 years, male) and non-POD24 (63 years, female). Staining for (a) CD3, (b) CD4, (c) CD8, and (d) CD68.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining (magnification, 100×) of the intrafollicular area (black asterisks) and interfollicular area (black triangles) in samples of patients with FL and POD24 (66 years, male) and non-POD24 (63 years, female). Staining for (a) CD3, (b) CD4, (c) CD8, and (d) CD68.
Ijms 25 11057 g003
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Parametern (%)
Number of patients101 (100)
Age
<60 years28 (28)
≥60 years73 (72)
Sex
Female50 (50)
Male51 (50)
ECOG PS
0–194 (93)
2–47 (7)
Ann Arbor
Stage I/II22 (22)
Stage III/IV79 (78)
Histological findings
Grade 1–280 (79)
Grade 3a21 (21)
FLIPI
Low risk26 (26)
Intermediate risk34 (34)
High risk41 (41)
Hb
<LLN (g/dL)21 (21)
≥LLN (g/dL)80 (79)
LDH
<ULN (U/L)69 (68)
≥ULN (U/L)32 (32)
sIL-2R
<ULN (U/mL)28 (28)
≥ULN (U/mL)72 (71)
Data missing1 (1)
β2-MG
<ULN (mg/L)37 (37)
≥ULN (mg/L)25 (25)
Data missing39 (39)
Ki-67
Low (<30%)70 (69)
High (≥30%)30 (30)
Data missing1 (1)
High tumor burden by GELF criteria39 (39)
POD24
POD2415 (15)
Non-POD2486 (85)
First treatment
Rituximab + chemotherapy80 (79)
Rituximab monotherapy9 (9)
Other12 (12)
Abbreviations: ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FLIPI: Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; Hb: hemoglobin; LLN: lower limit of normal; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor; ULN: upper limit of normal; β2-MG: beta-2 macroglobulin; GELF: Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires; POD24: progression of disease within 24 months of front line.
Table 2. Patient characteristics based on POD24 status.
Table 2. Patient characteristics based on POD24 status.
FactorPOD24Non-POD24p-Value
(n = 15), n (%)(n = 86), n (%)
Age
<60 years3 (20)25 (29)0.55
≥60 years12 (80)61 (71)
Median (range), years65 (48–83)65 (30–86)0.53
Sex
Female7 (47)43 (50)1.00
Male8 (53)43 (50)
Performance status (ECOG)
0–113 (87)81 (94)0.28
2–42 (13)5 (6)
Ann Arbor
Stage I/II3 (20)19 (22)1.00
Stage III/IV12 (80)67 (78)
Histological findings
Grade 1–211 (73)69 (80)0.51
Grade 3a4 (27)17 (20)
FLIPI
Low risk2 (13)24 (28)0.36
Intermediate risk7 (47)27 (31)
High risk6 (40)35 (41)
Hemoglobin
<LLN (g/dL)4 (27)17 (20)0.37
≥LLN (g/dL)11 (73)69 (80)
LDH
<ULN (U/L)7 (47)62 (72)0.071
≥ULN (U/L)8 (53)24 (28)
sIL-2R
<ULN (U/mL)2 (13)26 (30)Ijms 25 11057 i0010.22
≥ULN (U/mL)13 (87)59 (69)
data missing0 (0)1 (1)
β2-MG
<ULN (mg/L)2 (13)35 (41)Ijms 25 11057 i0010.052
≥ULN (mg/L)6 (40)19 (22)
Data missing7 (47)32 (37)
Ki-67
Low (<30%)4 (27)66 (77)Ijms 25 11057 i0012.1 × 10−4
High (≥30%)11 (73)19 (22)
Data missing0 (0)1 (1)
High tumor burden by GELF criteria8 (53)31 (36)0.25
First treatment group
Rituximab + chemotherapy11 (73)69 (80)0.68
Rituximab monotherapy2 (13)7 (8)
Other2 (13)10 (12)
Abbreviations: POD24: progression of disease within 24 months of front line; ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FLIPI: Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; LLN: lower limit of normal; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor; ULN: upper limit of normal; β2-MG: beta-2 macroglobulin; GELF: Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires.
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictive risk factors for POD24.
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictive risk factors for POD24.
nPOD24 UnivariatePOD24 Multivariate
HR95% CIpHR95% CIp
Age
<60 years281
≥60 years731.670.47–5.930.43
Sex
Female501
Male511.060.38–2.910.92
ECOG PS
0–1941
2–472.310.52–10.240.27
Ann Arbor
Stage I/II221
Stage III/IV791.260.36–4.470.72
Histological findings
Grade 1–2801
Grade 3a211.420.45–4.470.55
FLIPI
Low/Int601
High411.140.41–3.210.80
Hb
<LLN (g/dL)211
≥LLN (g/dL)800.620.20–1.960.42
LDH
<ULN (U/L)691 1
≥ULN (U/L)322.781.01–7.670.0491.870.66–5.270.24
sIL-2R
<ULN (U/mL)281
≥ULN (U/mL)722.840.64–12.570.17
Ki-67
Low (<30%)701 1
High (≥30%)307.172.28–22.557.4 × 10−46.291.96–20.220.0020
High tumor burden
No621
Yes392.000.72–5.510.18
Abbreviations: POD24: progression of disease within 24 months of front line; ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FLIPI: Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; LLN: lower limit of normal; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor; ULN: upper limit of normal.
Table 4. Association between immune cells and clinical outcomes by multivariate analysis.
Table 4. Association between immune cells and clinical outcomes by multivariate analysis.
POD24PFSOS
HR 95% CIpHR 95% CIpHR 95% CIp
CD3+ cells in intrafollicular1.010.97–1.050.591.010.99–1.040.411.010.96–1.060.80
in interfollicular0.950.92–0.990.0220.950.93–0.980.00120.960.92–1.010.14
CD4+ cells in intrafollicular1.020.96–1.090.501.010.98–1.050.540.980.91–1.060.66
in interfollicular0.980.93–1.030.390.980.95–1.010.251.010.96–1.070.68
CD8+ cells in intrafollicular0.910.83–1.000.0530.920.86–0.970.00380.950.86–1.050.30
in interfollicular1.030.97–1.090.281.030.99–1.070.0931.060.99–1.140.064
CD68+ cells in intrafollicular0.850.72–0.990.0450.950.90–1.020.140.910.80–1.030.13
in interfollicular0.990.92–1.070.871.010.97–1.060.611.050.97–1.140.22
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Narita, H.; Kuroiwa, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Murai, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Homma, M.; Kawamata, N.; Hayashi, H.; Nagao, K.; Okamura, R.; et al. High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011057

AMA Style

Narita H, Kuroiwa K, Kawaguchi Y, Murai S, Sasaki Y, Homma M, Kawamata N, Hayashi H, Nagao K, Okamura R, et al. High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(20):11057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narita, Hinako, Kai Kuroiwa, Yukiko Kawaguchi, So Murai, Yosuke Sasaki, Mayumi Homma, Natsuki Kawamata, Hidenori Hayashi, Kazuki Nagao, Reiko Okamura, and et al. 2024. "High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 20: 11057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011057

APA Style

Narita, H., Kuroiwa, K., Kawaguchi, Y., Murai, S., Sasaki, Y., Homma, M., Kawamata, N., Hayashi, H., Nagao, K., Okamura, R., Uesugi, Y., Sasaki, Y., Shimada, S., Watanuki, M., Arai, N., Yanagisawa, K., Shiozawa, E., Yamochi, T., & Hattori, N. (2024). High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(20), 11057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop