Next Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor
Previous Article in Journal
Nrf2 Pathway and Oxidative Stress as a Common Target for Treatment of Diabetes and Its Comorbidities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heterologous Hydrogenase Overproduction Systems for Biotechnology—An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Heterologous Expression of Difficult to Produce Proteins in Bacterial Systems

by
Neus Ferrer-Miralles
1,2,3 and
Elena Garcia-Fruitós
4,*
1
Institute for Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
2
Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
3
Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBER-BBN), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Ruminant Production Group, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), 08140 Caldes de Montbui, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(2), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020822
Submission received: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 25 December 2023 / Published: 9 January 2024
Proteins play a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis, providing structure, and enabling various functions in biological systems. The study of proteins was a complex task before the advent of genetic engineering because they had to be obtained from natural sources with low concentrations, making purification processes challenging and yielding limited amounts. However, the development of recombinant DNA technology has allowed science to make a qualitative leap in this field of research. The production of recombinant insulin in Escherichia coli in the 1970s was a significant milestone, not only revolutionizing the treatment of diabetes but also initiating the use of recombinant proteins for a wide number of applications [1,2]. This breakthrough sparked a surge in biological and structural studies on proteins. Over the past nearly 50 years, the market for recombinant proteins in industries, biomedicine, and research has continued to expand, underscoring the importance of this biotechnological field [3]. Therapeutic proteins are now used in human health for the treatment of diabetes, cancer, infectious disorders, hemophilia, and anemia, and serve as indispensable tools in the diagnosis of numerous diseases [4]. In addition, recombinant proteins are used in animal production and health [5]. Moreover, the production of recombinant proteins has contributed to an exponential growth in scientific knowledge concerning the three-dimensional structure of proteins and has been instrumental in elucidating their functions [6,7]. Therefore, achieving controlled and high-performance production systems for recombinant proteins remains a top priority.
Despite advances in understanding the physiology of producing cells and the physicochemical characteristics of proteins, obtaining certain recombinant proteins still poses technological challenges due to high protein complexity and the intricacies of biological production systems. In some environments, recombinant proteins may undergo proteolysis, aggregation, or be produced in meager quantities [8]. Homologous expression systems offer an effective alternative for producing eukaryotic proteins that often undergo complex post-translational modifications. These systems create conditions favoring the accumulation of functional proteins. Nonetheless, the high cost of production processes in eukaryotic systems and the potential presence of human pathogens have led to the development of alternative yet efficient prokaryotic expression systems [9]. Among these systems, the Escherichia coli-based expression system has been extensively employed, utilizing a broad range of expression vectors and recombinant strains that enable the production of large quantities of heterologous proteins [10]. The technical procedures associated with these prokaryotic systems are simpler, faster, inexpensive, and easily scalable compared to most eukaryotic systems. However, certain types of proteins still pose challenges in terms of achieving sufficient quantity and quality when using a bacterial expression system. Ongoing scientific research continually reports advancements in the production processes of these difficult-to-produce proteins [11]. Access to tools and strategies that facilitate the production of such proteins is crucial for meeting the scientific and healthcare demands of our society. Therefore, it is a significant milestone for the entire scientific community specializing in this field.
This new Special Issue entitled “Heterologous Expression of Difficult-to-Produce Proteins in Bacterial Systems” of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences includes a total of nine contributions—four original articles and five reviews—that compile the latest biotechnological advancements, which enable the full utilization of the bacterial expression system’s potential in obtaining difficult-to-produce heterologous proteins.
One important challenge in recombinant protein production processes using bacteria is post-translational modification. Among these modifications, disulfide bond formation is especially relevant since the folding of significant number of proteins depends on it. Thus, the development of strategies to produce functional proteins containing cysteines, which form disulfide bonds, is highly relevant in a reducing environment such as the E. coli cytoplasm. Commercial strains with mutations in the two genes involved in the reduction pathway (gor and trxB) were developed [3]. In addition, a CyDisCo (cytoplasmic disulfide bond formation in E. coli) system was developed to produce proteins rich in disulfide bonds. The CyDisCo system is based on the co- or pre-expression of enzymes involved in disulfide bond formation and isomerization, which has proven to be a good strategy for proteins that have between one and five disulfide bonds [12]. Taking a step further, an article published in the Special Issue has shown the potential of this system to produce mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins containing between 8 and 44 disulfide bonds, proving that this system has no upper limits for disulfide formation, making it possible to produce complex disulfide-bonded proteins in E. coli BL21(DE3). Moreover, Tungekar and Ruddock have recently noted that the CyDisCo system can also be used to recombinantly produce IgG1-based Fc fusion proteins [13].
On many occasions, overproduced proteins are toxic for the producer host, inhibiting its growth and having a final low protein yield. For that reason, inducible systems are widely used [14,15,16]. However, most of these systems are only regulated at the transcriptional level to avoid any leakage expression, which frequently occurs. Thus, a complete suppression of leakage expression is needed, especially for toxic proteins. It has been observed that a complete suppression of the expression can only be controlled by dual transcriptional–translational control. In the review published in this Special Issue, Kato summarizes the principles of this dual control and lists examples of this approach, including the use of site-specific unnatural amino acid incorporation, riboswitches, ribozymes, and antisense RNA [17]. Additionally, fusion tags have been widely used to reduce protein toxicity, also increasing protein solubility [18,19]. Another approach that can be used for these difficult-to-produce or toxic proteins is the cell-free or in vitro recombinant protein synthesis system, which has been extensively described by Smolskaya et al. [20]. The E. coli extract-based cell-free expression system is the most popular, and it has significantly improved during the last few years. Two main advantages of this system are that there is no need to support cellular metabolism and that the reaction environment can be controlled, making it possible to add any necessary component into the reaction mixture to reach the optima protein production conditions.
The aggregation of recombinant proteins in the form of inclusion bodies (IBs) is also a major issue associated with recombinant production processes. Some proteins show a low solubility and are mainly produced in their aggregated version. In consequence, many solubilization strategies and a wide number of refolding parameters have been described for the isolation of soluble proteins from IBs [21]. Due to the extent of IB characterization in the last two decades, showing that IBs are protein aggregates formed (at least partially) by correctly folded and fully active recombinant proteins [22], non-denaturing solubilization protocols have been recently developed [23,24].
Finally, emerging tools are also being used to optimize the expression of recombinant proteins. The use of high-throughput technologies allows the reshaping and optimization of traditional production processes in a fast and efficient way. This includes cultivation platforms, detection methods, and screening systems [25]. In addition, the use of synthetic biology to design and build genome-reduced bacteria is an interesting technology to design bacteria with a minimal genome removing the unnecessary proportions of genome which can improve cellular capacity, and, consequently, increase heterologous protein expression [26].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the CERCA Program (Generalitat de Catalunya) and European Social Fund for supporting our research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Baeshen, N.A.; Baeshen, M.N.; Sheikh, A.; Bora, R.S.; Ahmed, M.M.; Ramadan, H.A.; Saini, K.S.; Redwan, E.M. Cell factories for insulin production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sanchez-Garcia, L.; Martín, L.; Mangues, R.; Ferrer-Miralles, N.; Vázquez, E.; Villaverde, A. Recombinant pharmaceuticals from microbial cells: A 2015 update. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016, 15, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McElwain, L.; Phair, K.; Kealey, C.; Brady, D. Current trends in biopharmaceuticals production in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Lett. 2022, 44, 917–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lagassé, H.A.; Alexaki, A.; Simhadri, V.L.; Katagiri, N.H.; Jankowski, W.; Sauna, Z.E.; Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Recent advances in (therapeutic protein) drug development. F1000Research 2017, 6, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gifre, L.; Arís, A.; Bach, À.; Garcia-Fruitós, E. Trends in recombinant protein use in animal production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vedadi, M.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; Allali-Hassani, A.; Senisterra, G.; Wasney, G.A. Biophysical characterization of recombinant proteins: A key to higher structural genomics success. J. Struct. Biol. 2010, 172, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, R.; Anderson, S.; Aramini, J.; Belote, R.; Buchwald, W.A.; Ciccosanti, C.; Conover, K.; Everett, J.K.; Hamilton, K.; Huang, Y.J.; et al. The high-throughput protein sample production platform of the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium. J. Struct. Biol. 2010, 172, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baneyx, F.; Mujacic, M. Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, R. Bacterial expression systems for recombinant protein production: E. coli and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1102–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosano, G.L.; Morales, E.S.; Ceccarelli, E.A. New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5-year update. Protein Sci. 2019, 28, 1412–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saccardo, P.; Corchero, J.L.; Ferrer-Miralles, N. Tools to cope with difficult-to-express proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 4347–4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saaranen, M.J.; Ruddock, L.W. Applications of catalyzed cytoplasmic disulfide bond formation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tungekar, A.A.; Ruddock, L.W. Efficient Production of Fc Fusion Proteins in the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli: Dissecting and Mitigating Redox Heterogeneity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pouresmaeil, M.; Azizi-Dargahlou, S. Factors involved in heterologous expression of proteins in E. coli host. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morello, E.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Llull, D.; Solé, V.; Miraglio, N.; Langella, P.; Poquet, I. Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 14, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ejaz, S.; Khan, H.; Sarwar, N.; Aqeel, S.M.; Al-Adeeb, A.; Liu, S. A Review on Recent Advancement in Expression Strategies Used in Bacillus subtilis. Protein Pept. Lett. 2022, 29, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kato, Y. Extremely Low Leakage Expression Systems Using Dual Transcriptional-Translational Control for Toxic Protein Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Correa, A.; Oppezzo, P. Tuning different expression parameters to achieve soluble recombinant proteins in E. coli: Advantages of high-throughput screening. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6, 715–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ortega, C.; Oppezzo, P.; Correa, A. Overcoming the Solubility Problem in E. coli: Available Approaches for Recombinant Protein Production. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2406, 35–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smolskaya, S.; Logashina, Y.A.; Andreev, Y. Escherichia coli Extract-Based Cell-Free Expression System as an Alternative for Difficult-to-Obtain Protein Biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singhvi, P.; Panda, A.K. Solubilization and Refolding of Inclusion Body Proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2406, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cano-Garrido, O.; Rodríguez-Carmona, E.; Díez-Gil, C.; Vázquez, E.; Elizondo, E.; Cubarsi, R.; Seras-Franzoso, J.; Corchero, J.L.; Rinas, U.; Ratera, I.; et al. Supramolecular organization of protein-releasing functional amyloids solved in bacterial inclusion bodies. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 6134–6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. López-Cano, A.; Sicilia, P.; Gaja, C.; Arís, A.; Garcia-Fruitós, E. Quality comparison of recombinant soluble proteins and proteins solubilized from bacterial inclusion bodies. New Biotechnol. 2022, 72, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gifre-Renom, L.; Baltà-Foix, R.; Arís, A.; Garcia-Fruitós, E. Non-denaturing solubilization of Inclusion Bodies from Lactic Acid Bacteria. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2406, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, M.; Gao, A.X.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Bai, Z. High-throughput process development from gene cloning to protein production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, G.Y.; Kim, J.; Park, G.; Kim, H.J.; Yang, J.; Seo, S.W. Synthetic biology tools for engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 1955–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferrer-Miralles, N.; Garcia-Fruitós, E. Heterologous Expression of Difficult to Produce Proteins in Bacterial Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020822

AMA Style

Ferrer-Miralles N, Garcia-Fruitós E. Heterologous Expression of Difficult to Produce Proteins in Bacterial Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(2):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferrer-Miralles, Neus, and Elena Garcia-Fruitós. 2024. "Heterologous Expression of Difficult to Produce Proteins in Bacterial Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 2: 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop