Next Article in Journal
Changes in K+ Concentration as a Signaling Mechanism in the Apicomplexa Parasites Plasmodium and Toxoplasma
Next Article in Special Issue
Serum IGFBP-1 Concentration as a Predictor of Outcome after Ischemic Stroke—A Prospective Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
New Pharmacological Approaches for Rare Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Westernization on the Insulin/IGF-I Signaling Pathway and the Metabolic Syndrome: It Is Time for Change
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms24087273
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Placental Remote Control of Fetal Metabolism: Trophoblast mTOR Signaling Regulates Liver IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation and IGF-1 Bioavailability

by
Fredrick J. Rosario
1,*,
Anand Chopra
2,
Kyle Biggar
2,
Theresa L. Powell
1,3,4,
Madhulika B. Gupta
4,5,6,† and
Thomas Jansson
1,†
1
Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
2
Institute of Biochemistry, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
3
Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
4
Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
5
Department of Pediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
6
Children’s Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7273; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087273
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 2 April 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 14 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of the IGF Axis in Disease 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The mechanisms mediating the restricted growth in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remain to be fully established. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling functions as a placental nutrient sensor, indirectly influencing fetal growth by regulating placental function. Increased secretion and the phosphorylation of fetal liver IGFBP-1 are known to markedly decrease the bioavailability of IGF-1, a major fetal growth factor. We hypothesized that an inhibition of trophoblast mTOR increases liver IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation. We collected conditioned media (CM) from cultured primary human trophoblast (PHT) cells with a silenced RAPTOR (specific inhibition of mTOR Complex 1), RICTOR (inhibition of mTOR Complex 2), or DEPTOR (activates both mTOR Complexes). Subsequently, HepG2 cells, a well-established model for human fetal hepatocytes, were cultured in CM from PHT cells, and IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation were determined. CM from PHT cells with either mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition caused the marked hyperphosphorylation of IGFBP-1 in HepG2 cells as determined by 2D-immunoblotting while Parallel Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS) identified increased dually phosphorylated Ser169 + Ser174. Furthermore, using the same samples, PRM-MS identified multiple CK2 peptides coimmunoprecipitated with IGFBP-1 and greater CK2 autophosphorylation, indicating the activation of CK2, a key enzyme mediating IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. Increased IGFBP-1 phosphorylation inhibited IGF-1 function, as determined by the reduced IGF-1R autophosphorylation. Conversely, CM from PHT cells with mTOR activation decreased IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. CM from non-trophoblast cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition had no effect on HepG2 IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. Placental mTOR signaling may regulate fetal growth by the remote control of fetal liver IGFBP-1 phosphorylation.

1. Introduction

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with functional changes in multiple fetal tissues, including skeletal muscle, the islet, and the liver [1,2,3]. These changes contribute to metabolic adaptations resulting in restricted fetal growth and predisposition for disease later in life. Although limited amino acid availability, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and epigenetic regulation have been implicated, the mechanisms underlying these functional changes in a range of fetal tissues in IUGR remain to be fully established.
Emerging evidence shows that factors secreted by the placenta are critical for normal fetal organ development. Using Stable Isotope Labelling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, we have identified a wide array of secreted proteins in the conditioned media of a Primary Human Trophoblast (PHT) cell culture [4]. Moreover, serotonin synthesized by the placenta in mid-gestation is required for the normal development of the forebrain in mice, and maternal immune activation disrupts fetal neurodevelopment mediated by an increased placental serotonin secretion to the fetus [5,6]. In addition, the inhibition of placental O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) constitutes the link between maternal stress and fetal hypothalamic gene expression changes and offspring neurocognitive development [7,8]. Importantly, using PHT cells, we recently reported that a mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a negative regulator of serotonin synthesis and a positive regulator of OGT expression in the placenta [9], providing a possible link between placental mTOR signaling and fetal brain development.
mTOR regulates cellular metabolism, growth, and proliferation [10,11]. Placental mTOR is inhibited in IUGR in both women [12,13,14,15,16] and animal models [17,18,19,20,21]. Trophoblast mTOR signaling responds to diverse maternal nutritional and metabolic signals. For example, trophoblast mTOR is activated by insulin/IGF-1, glucose and amino acids [22], fatty acids [23], and folate [21,24,25] and inhibited by cortisol [26], adiponectin [20,27], malaria infection [15], and reduced uteroplacental blood flow [13]. Moreover, mTOR is a positive regulator of trophoblast amino acid [28,29,30,31] and folate transport [32] and mitochondrial respiration [33]. These data suggest that trophoblast mTOR signaling functions as a critical hub linking maternal nutrition, metabolism, and uteroplacental blood flow to placental function, fetal growth, and developmental programming.
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is a key regulator of fetal growth [34,35,36], and the bioavailability of IGFs are regulated by six binding proteins (IGFBP-1–6) [37]. IGFBP-1, secreted by the fetal liver [38], is believed to be the predominant IGFBP during fetal life [39,40]. Mouse fetuses over-expressing IGFBP-1 are growth restricted [38,41,42], clearly demonstrating a cause-and-effect relationship between IGFBP-1 and fetal growth. The phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 leads to a 6–10-fold increase in its affinity for IGF-1 [43], resulting in an inhibition of IGF-1 function [43,44]. IUGR is associated with elevated fetal IGFBP-1 [45], and we have shown that IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at three specific residues is increased in human IUGR fetuses [46,47,48] and the decidua of IUGR pregnancies [49]. However, the mechanisms regulating fetal liver IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation remain to be fully established. Here, we test the hypothesis that the inhibition of trophoblast mTOR increases fetal liver IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation.
To study the effects of factors released by trophoblast cells that may be impacting fetal organs, such as fetal liver, we collected conditioned media (CM) from PHT cells in a culture (Figure 1). To experimentally modulate the activity of the mTOR pathway, we used siRNA to silence a regulatory-associated protein of mTOR: RAPTOR (resulting in specific inhibition of mTOR Complex 1, mTORC1); RICTOR, a key component of mTOR Complex 2 (mTORC2, resulting in mTORC2 inhibition); or DEP domain-containing mTOR-interacting protein DEPTOR (leading to the activation of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 Complexes). Subsequently, HepG2 cells (an established model for human fetal hepatocytes [50,51]) were cultured in CM from PHT cells, and IGFBP-1 secretion/site-specific phosphorylation and casein kinase CK2 activity were determined.

2. Results

2.1. CM from PHT Cells with mTORC1 Inhibition Increased IGFBP-1 Secretion in HepG2 Cells

Using immunoblotting, we showed that CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 (RAPTOR siRNA) moderately, but significantly, increased IGFBP-1 secretion in HepG2 cells (Figure 2A). In contrast, CM from PHT cells with mTORC2 inhibition (RICTOR siRNA) had no effect on IGFBP-1 secretion in HepG2 cells (Figure 2A).

2.2. Increased IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation in HepG2 Cells Incubated in CM from PHT Cells with Either mTORC1 or mTORC2 as Indicated by 2-D Immunoblot Analysis

We validated the effects of the CM from PHT cells with RAPTOR or RICTOR silencing on IGFBP-1 phosphorylation by comparing phosphoisoform profiles using 2-D immunoblotting. CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells silenced for RAPTOR (inhibition of mTORC1) or RICTOR (inhibition of mTORC2) both showed marked hyperphosphorylation of IGFBP-1 secreted from HepG2 cells compared to the control (non-coding siRNA). The 2-D immunoblots are displayed in Figure 2B (left panel), and the 3-D digital images (Figure 2C, right) are representations of the 2-D spot intensities. The RAPTOR siRNA (Figure 2B) exhibited six distinct spots (spot number 1 to 6), where spot 1 represents the least phosphorylated isoform, and spots 3–5 corresponded to variably increased phosphorylated isoforms, in which spot 6 indicated the most highly phosphorylated IGFBP-1 isoform. The corresponding 3-D digital image (Figure 2C) showed that the highly phosphorylated isoforms were the most abundant, whereas the less phosphorylated isoforms had a diminished abundance. Similarly (Figure 2B,C), RICTOR showed significantly increased phosphorylation (spots 2–5), showing that the incubation of HepG2 cells in CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 inhibition and incubation with CM from PHT cells mTORC2 inhibition resulted in similar patterns of IGFBP-1 hyperphsophorylation. We propose that the marked shift in the IGFBP-1 phosphoisoform profile to the left is caused by an increased net protein charge (pI) due to an increased phosphorylation level.

2.3. Incubation of HepG2 Cells in CM from PHT Cells with mTORC1 Increased Site-Specific IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation

To determine the site-specific IGFBP-1 phosphorylation, we performed immunoblotting with antibodies previously validated to recognize pSer101, pSer119, and pSer169 [48,52]. As shown in Figure 3A–C, CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 inhibition, but not CM from PHT cells with mTORC2 inhibition, markedly increased Ser101, Ser119, and Ser169 phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 secreted from HepG2 cells (Figure 3A–C).

2.4. Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS) Analysis Identified Increased IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation at pSer169/pSer174 Following Incubation in CM from PHT Cells with mTOR Inhibition

To determine relative levels of dual IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at pSer169 and pSer174, we performed PRM-MS, as no antibodies were available to assess this modification. Following co-immunoprecipitation, PRM-MS readily detected unmodified and dual pSer169/pSer174 IGFBP-1 peptides (Figure 4A–C). In addition, both CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition resulted in a several-fold increase in IGFBP-1 pSer169/pSer174 levels relative to the control (Figure 4D).

2.5. HepG2 Cells Incubated in CM from PHT Cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 Inhibition Activated CK2 Activity

We then assessed casein kinase CK2, which has been shown to be the major kinase phosphorylating IGFBP-1 in HepG2 cells [53,54]. From PRM-MS, CK2 peptides co-immunoprecipitated with IGFBP-1 were readily detected in all samples (Figure 5A). In addition, we found that CM from PHT cells with mTORC2 inhibition increased the relative levels of co-immunoprecipitated CK2 (Figure 5B). As shown in Figure 5C, CM from PHT cells with either mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition activated CK2 activity in HepG2. This finding is in line with the increased IGFBP-1 phosphorylation under these conditions, as indicated by the immunoblot and PRM-MS analysis (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

2.6. IGF-1R Autophosphorylation Decreased in HepG2 Cells Incubated in CM from PHT Cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 Inhibition

The functional effects of phosphorylated IGFBP-1 secreted from HepG2 cells incubated in CM collected from PHT cells treated with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, or RICTOR siRNA was determined (Figure 6A) by assessing the relative inhibitory effects on IGF-1 induced IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation in P6 cells (n = 3) (methodology described in Supplementary Figure S1). Our data in Figure 6A (Lane 2) shows a marked increase in IGF-1Rβ autophosphorylation in P6 cells treated with IGF-1 alone, serving as a positive control.
Notably, the control CM constitutes both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated IGFBP-1 forms. Accordingly, when P6 cells were treated with IGF-1 in complex with CM from the control (Figure 6A, Lane 3), IGF-1R autophosphorylation was markedly inhibited compared to IGF-1 alone (positive control) (Figure 6A, Lane 2). Importantly, in P6 cells treated with IGF-1 in complex with CM from PHT cells with either RAPTOR (Figure 6A, Lane 4) or RICTOR (Figure 6A, Lane 5) siRNA, IGF-1Rβ autophosphorylation was further reduced. Thus, we demonstrate that the increased phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 in HepG2 cells following incubation with CM from PHT cells with either mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) functionally is associated with decreased IGF-1-mediated IGF-1R activation. We propose that these changes are a result of an enhanced affinity of phosphorylated IGFBP-1 for IGF-1 following incubation in CM from PHT cells with mTOR inhibition.
The inhibition of IGF-1R in P6 cells was also tested using trophoblast cell media from the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR knockdown in the absence of externally added IGF-1 (Figure 6B) and showed no inhibitory effects on IGF-1R autophosphorylation, serving as a negative control.

2.7. DEPTOR Silencing Markedly Inhibited IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation

DEPTOR is an endogenous inhibitor of both mTORC1 and 2, and silencing DEPTOR activates mTOR signaling [55]. Although the secretion of IGFBP-1 was not affected, phosphorylation was markedly inhibited at all three (Ser101, 119, and 169) phosphorylation sites in HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with DEPTOR silencing while relatively smaller decrease in IGFBP-1 secretion (Figure 7A–D).

2.8. No Change in IGF-1 Secretion from PHT Cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 Inhibition

The effect of CM from PHT cells on IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation in HepG2 cells could be confounded if RAPTOR or RICTOR silencing regulates the secretion of IGF-1 in PHT cells. IGF-1 secretion was determined in CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA (Figure 8A) and in CM from HepG2 cells after treatment (Figure 8B) with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. However, neither RAPTOR nor RICTOR silencing impacted PHT or HepG2 cell IGF-1 secretion (Figure 8A,B).

2.9. CM from RAPTOR- or RICTOR-Silenced PHT Cells Does Not Affect mTORC1 or mTORC2 Activity in HepG2 Cells

We have previously demonstrated that mTOR signaling is a key regulator of IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in HepG2 cells [48,55] and primary fetal baboon hepatocytes [48]. Thus, we explored the possibility that HepG2 mTOR signaling may mediate the effect of CM from RAPTOR- or RICTOR-silenced PHT on IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. However, we found that CM from RAPTOR- or RICTOR-silenced PHT cells does not affect mTORC1 or C2 activity in HepG2 cells (Figure 8C,D) as reflected by no changes in phosphorylation of its functional readouts p4E-BP1 Thr70 (mTORC1) (Figure 8C) and pAKT Ser473(mTORC2). (Figure 8D).

2.10. CM from Non-Trophoblast Cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 Inhibition Did Not Affect HepG2 IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation

To explore to what extent the marked effects of PHT cell CM on HepG2 cell IGFBP-1 phosphorylation is specific to trophoblast cells, we examined the impact of CM collected from renal carcinoma cells in which RAPTOR or RICTOR was silenced. As shown in Figure 9, CM from non-trophoblast cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition did not affect HepG2 IGFBP-1 secretion or phosphorylation.

3. Discussion

The mechanisms mediating the restricted growth in IUGR are poorly understood. mTOR signaling functions as a placental nutrient sensor, indirectly influencing fetal growth by regulating placental functions like protein synthesis, nutrient transport, and oxidative phosphorylation. In this study, we provide evidence to support the model (Figure 10) that placental mTOR signaling directly influences the endocrine and metabolic function of fetal tissues, specifically by modulating the bioavailability of IGF-1, mediated by signals released into fetal circulation.
IGFBP-1 is the predominant IGF-1 binding protein in fetal life, and phosphorylation of the protein increases its affinity for IGF-1 6–10-fold [43] and makes IGFBP-1 more resistant to proteolysis [44,56]. Functionally, phosphorylation increases the capacity of IGFBP-1 to inhibit IGF-1-stimulated cell proliferation, DNA synthesis, amino acid transport, and apoptosis [53,57,58]. Furthermore, we reported that hepatic IGFBP-1 phosphorylation that was induced in response to hypoxia caused a profound increase in its affinity for IGF-1, resulting in a marked inhibition of IGF-1-dependent cellular proliferation [59,60]. Thus, the regulation of fetal liver IGFBP-1 phosphorylation represents a powerful mechanism to alter the trajectory of fetal growth mediated by changes in IGF-1 bioavailability.
The 2-D immunoblotting based on isoelectric points of IGFBP-1 demonstrates that CM from both RAPTOR and RICTOR siRNA-treated PHT cells caused marked shifts in spots toward the acidic pH. These observations indicate that the phosphorylated amino acid residues contribute to the IGFBP-1 net protein charge showing pronounced increases in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation.
Using targeted multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) for relative quantification of IGFBP-1 phosphorylation, we have previously shown Ser174 phosphorylation singly and/or combined with Ser169 is an mTOR-sensitive IGFBP-1 phosphorylation potentially involved in IGF-1 binding [55]. Further, using PRM-MS analysis, we demonstrated increased dual (Ser174/Ser169) IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in the plasma of mothers carrying an IUGR fetus [49].
In this study using PRM-MS, we demonstrate that the increased phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 secreted by HepG2 cells incubated in CM from PHT cells with RICTOR silencing involves Ser174 phosphorylation combined with Ser169. Based on molecular modeling and mapping the proximity for pSer174 binding with IGF-1, we earlier proposed that phosphorylation at residue Ser174 likely affects the affinity of the IGFBP-1 to bind IGF-1 [55]. Furthermore, we showed that CM from PHT cells with the inhibition of mTORC1- or mTORC2-activated HepG2 CK2, an enzyme playing a key role in phosphorylating IGFBP-1, resulted in IGFBP-1 hyperphosphorylation. In this study, IGFBP-1 hyperphosphorylation also decreased IGF-1 bioavailability, which had functional effects on IGF-1 action. Although we have provided evidence previously that CK2 is a major contributor to IGFBP-1 phosphorylation, including in response to changes in mTOR signaling, we often find that measured changes in CK2 activity are lower than the measured changes in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. There may be several reasons for this discrepancy. First, it is possible that the relationship between CK2 activity and IGFBP-1 phosphorylation is not 1:1 and that small changes in CK2 activity are related to larger changes in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. Second, there may be additional kinases, such as PKA or PKC, contributing to IGFBP-1 phosphorylation; third, it cannot be excluded that our approach to measure CK2 activity underestimates the actual activity.
These changes could not be replicated by incubating HepG2 cells in CM from renal carcinoma cells where RAPTOR or RICTOR had been silenced, suggesting these signals are specific to trophoblast cells. Because mTOR regulates IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in HepG2 cells [48,55] and primary fetal baboon hepatocytes [48], we tested the hypothesis that signals secreted from cultured trophoblast cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition impacted HepG2 mTOR signaling. However, CM from RAPTOR- or RICTOR-silenced PHT cells did not affect mTORC1 or C2 activity in HepG2 cells. Similarly, we found no evidence that changes in IGF-1 concentrations in the PHT CM influenced our results.
Although the identity of the factor(s) linking trophoblast mTOR signaling to regulation of IGFBP-1 in the fetal liver remains to be established, the signal may be a protein secreted from the trophoblast. mTOR signaling is a master regulator of protein synthesis, and trophoblast mTOR may regulate the secretion of proteins from the placenta into the maternal and/or fetal circulation. Using Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino Acids in Cell Culture, we identified a total of 1344 proteins secreted by cultured PHT cells, most of which have not previously been reported to be secreted by the human placenta or trophoblast [4]. Importantly, using the SOMALOGIC proteomic platform, we recently reported that the human term placenta secretes 341 proteins into fetal circulation [61].
Another possibility is that exosomes mediate the remote control of trophoblast mTOR signaling on liver IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation. Exosomes are small (~40–100 nm) nanovesicles produced via the endosomal pathway and released upon the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane [62]. Exosomes transport bioactive proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs and play a central role in cell-to-cell communication in normal physiology and disease [63,64,65], including in pregnancy [66,67]. Importantly, mTORC1 regulates exosome release in mouse embryo fibroblasts, cell lines, and in vivo in mice [68], and mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes enhance β-cell mass and insulin production in the pancreas of diabetic animals mediated by PDX1 [69]. Furthermore, the human placenta secretes exosomes into the maternal [66,67,70,71,72,73] and fetal circulation [74]. Mouse studies have shown that miRNA is trafficked from the placenta into both the maternal and fetal circulations [75], consistent with the possibility that the placenta regulates the development and function of fetal organs mediated by exosomal miRNA.
Emerging evidence suggests that trophoblast mTOR signaling represents a critical hub in the overall homeostatic control of fetal growth, adjusting the fetal growth trajectory according to changes in maternal nutrition and metabolism and uteroplacental blood flow [76,77]. In support of this model, placental mTOR signaling is inhibited in IUGR and activated in fetal overgrowth. Specifically, placental mTOR signaling is inhibited in IUGR in women [12,13,14,15,28] and animal models of IUGR [17,18,20,21]. Importantly, placental mTOR signaling has been shown to be inhibited prior to its reduction in fetal growth [17], consistent with the possibility that changes in placental mTOR signaling are a cause rather than a secondary consequence of abnormal fetal growth. mTOR is a master regulator of placental function. For example, trophoblast mTOR inhibits autophagy [78]. Moreover, mTOR signaling is a positive regulator of trophoblast amino acid [28,29,30,31] and folate transport [32] and mitochondrial respiration [33]. It is therefore believed that trophoblast mTOR signaling influences fetal growth indirectly by regulating placental function [76,77].
This report provides evidence that mTOR signaling in the trophoblast directly regulates fetal growth by modulating the bioavailability of IGF-1, a key fetal growth factor [34,35], providing novel mechanistic information on the role of the placenta in regulating fetal metabolism and growth. Because the placenta—in contrast to the fetus—is easily accessible from the maternal circulation and an array of approaches to specifically target the placenta with, for example, nanoparticles is currently under development, we speculate that the gene targeting of placental mTOR may provide an avenue to correct abnormal fetal growth in the future. The main limitation of the study is that the data is based on in vitro studies, and our findings need to be confirmed in vivo using a placental-specific targeting of mTOR.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Human Placenta Collection

We recruited healthy term (>37 weeks of gestation) pregnant women delivered by Caesarean following written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included concurrent maternal disease; pregnancy complications like gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia; smoking; and the use of illicit drugs. The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (HSC20100262H) and the University of Colorado Hospital (number 14-1073) approved this protocol.

4.2. Isolation and Culture of Primary Human Trophoblast PHT Cells

A well-established method involving sequential trypsin digestion and Percoll centrifugation [30,79] was used to isolate and culture primary human trophoblast (PHT) cells. Briefly, isolated PHT cells were plated at 1.5 × 106 per well in six-well plates and cultured in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, 25 mM glucose) and Ham’s F12 medium (10 mM glucose) with 2 mM glutamine, 50 μg/mL gentamicin, 60 μg/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum. Media was changed at 18 h, followed by daily media changes.

4.3. RNA Interference-Mediated Silencing (siRNA) in PHT Cells

PHT cells were plated at 2.5 × 106 per well in six-well plates and cultured as described above. At 18 h, culture, small interference RNAs (siRNAs) (Sigma) targeting RAPTOR (100 nm; sense, 5′CAGUUCACCGCCAUCUACA, or SASI_Hs01_00048382); RICTOR (100 nm; sense, 5′ CGAUCAUGGGCAGGUAUUA, or SASI_Hs01_00223573); DEPTOR (SASI_1297010-H/5582, 1297011-H); or a non-coding control (100 nM; sense: 5′GAUCAUACGUGCGAUCAGATT) were added to the media along with DharmaFECT transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA) and incubated for 24 h [80]. Cells were then washed and subsequently cultured in standard media. CM was collected from PHT cells in culture between 66 and 90 h and stored at −80 °C.

4.4. HepG2 Cell Culture

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas VA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium with nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) at 37 °C in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 [48,59]. Following treatments, cell media and cell lysate were prepared as described [48] and stored at −80 °C.

4.5. Incubation of Cultured HepG2 Cells in CM from PHT Cells

HepG2 cells were plated and grown to ~70% confluency (overnight). Cells were rinsed with fresh DMEM/F-12 (FBS-free). CM (800 uL) collected from PHT cells silenced with RAPTOR, RICTOR, DEPTOR, or non-coding siRNA were topped up to 1 mL total volume by the addition of 200 uL of fresh FBS free DMEM/F-12 media. HepG2 cells were subsequently incubated for 24 h in CM collected from PHT cells treated with either control (non-coding), RAPTOR (inhibition of mTORC1), RICTOR (inhibition of mTORC2), or DEPTOR (activation of mTORC1 and C2) siRNA. Cell media and cell lysate from HepG2 cells incubated with CM from respective PHT treatments were collected after 24 h and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

4.6. SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting

Equal amounts of cell lysate protein (35–50 μg) from HepG2 cells were separated by SDS-PAGE to determine total expression and phosphorylation of p70-S6K (Thr389), Akt (Thr308 and Ser473), and IGF-1Rβ (Tyr1135), as well as total expression levels of siRNA target proteins and β-actin. In addition, IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation (Ser101, Ser119, and Ser169) by HepG2 cells were determined using an equal volume of cell media (30–40 μL). Nitrocellulose membranes from immunoblot analyses were blocked with 5% skim milk or 5% BSA in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) plus 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h. All primary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA, USA) except for monoclonal anti-human IGFBP-1 (mAb 6303) (Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland) and pre-validated custom phospho-site-specific IGFBP-1 polyclonal antibodies targeting pSer101, pSer119, and pSer169 (generated at YenZyme Antibodies LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA). Primary antibodies were all used at a dilution of 1:1000, and peroxidase-labeled goat-anti mouse or goat-anti rabbit antibodies (1:10,000, BioRad Laboratories Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada) were used as secondary antibodies. Band intensities were determined using densitometry in Image Lab (Beta 3) software (BioRad). In the absence of a recognized loading control for secreted proteins (equivalent to actin for non secreted protein), we used an equal volume of cell media [55,59] as a loading control.

4.7. Two-Dimensional (2-D) Immunoblot of IGFBP-1

HepG2 CM from either control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC1), RICTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC2), or DEPTOR-silenced (Activation of mTORC1 and C2) PHT cells were analyzed on 2-D Western immunoblotting to separate the IGFBP-1 phospho-isoform based on isoelectric point (pI). The 2-D immunoblot analysis with HepG2 cell media (~150 μL) was performed using polyclonal IGFBP-1 antibody (a kind gift from Dr. Rob Baxter, Northern Clinical School, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, Australia). Subsequent three-dimensional (3-D) image analysis of the 2-D spot intensity and the phosphoisoform profiles were created as described previously [47,59,80] using Progenesis 200 (PG200; Non Linear Dynamics, Durham, NC, USA).

4.8. Parallel Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS)

4.8.1. Immunoprecipitation of IGFBP-1

Equal aliquots of CM samples from HepG2 cells treated with CM from RAPTOR- or RICTOR-silenced PHT cells or control were used for PRM-MS analysis. Prior to immunoprecipitation, total IGFBP-1 was validated with Western blot (not shown). PRM-MS of IGFBP-1 phosphopeptides was run essentially in the same manner as previously described [81], whereby three biological replicates of respective CM were pooled and used for immunoprecipitation. In brief, specific samples were immunoprecipitated (IP) with IGFBP-1 mouse monoclonal anti-human (mAb) 6303 antibody (Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland) using Protein A Sepharose beads (50 µL, 50% slurry; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) as described previously [81].

4.8.2. Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS) Analyses of IGFBP-1 Peptides and CK2 co-Immunoprecipitation

The IP samples were digested as described below for PRM-MS analysis. The quantification of site-specific phosphorylation of both IGFBP-1 and CK2 was performed using PRM-MS approaches designed to monitor the presence of peptide-specific mass [m/z] and peptides post-translationally modified at specific sites by phosphorylation. In addition, CK2 peptides co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) with IGFBP-1 were identified with PRM-MS and tested for their activation status via autophosphorylation.
Beads from the IP containing bound IGFBP-1 proteins were first exchanged into trypsin digestion buffer (50 mM (NH4) HCO3, pH 7.8) and then digested with 10 ng of sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, V511A) overnight at 37 °C. Half of each sample was then diluted with 2X Asp-N reaction buffer (NEB, B8104S) and digested with 10 ng of Asp-N (NEB, P8104S) overnight at 37 °C. The resultant peptides were desalted with C18-ZipTip (Millipore Sigma, ZTC18S096), dried by SpeedVac, and resuspended in 20 μL MS-grade water containing 0.1% formic acid. PRM-MS was performed at the John L. Holmes Mass Spectrometry Facility at the University of Ottawa. Briefly, peptides were chromatographically separated on a Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim PepMap™ 100 precolumn (2 cm × 100 μm ID, C18, 5 μm, 100 Å) and a Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim™ PepMap™ RSLC C18 column (15 cm × 75 μm ID, 3 μm, 100 Å) using an EASY nLC II System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First, the peptides were loaded onto the columns for 100 min at a flow rate of 0.25 μL/min. Separation occurred using multiple linear gradients of water + 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (B) solutions (0 to 6% B for 2 min, 6 to 43% B for 70 min, 43 to 100% B, for 4 min, washing for 10 min at 100% B, then 100 to 10% B for 4 min, and washing for 10 min at 100% A). Next, eluted peptides were directly electrosprayed (Thermo Scientific™ EASY spray, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.) into a Q-Exactive Plus hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer, where PRM scanning was performed and guided by an isolation list (i.e., peptide sequences and m/z ratios for IGFBP-1 and CK2 peptides) developed in Skyline software [82].
Chromatographs depict transitions ions detected for a given parent ion (i.e., peptide), where the retention time specifies the elution of the parent ion from the column just prior to MS. To quantify IGFBP-1 dual pS169/pS174 phosphorylation, the total peak area was derived using Skyline software and normalized to that of an unmodified IGFBP-1 internal peptide (NH2-DNFHLMAPSEE-COOH) to account for any slight differences in protein abundance. In the same manner, CK2 pY182 phosphorylation levels were quantified using peak areas of modified phosphopeptide (NH2-DWGLAEFY[Pho]HPGQEYNVR-COOH) and unmodified CK2 internal peptide (NH2-DVNTHRPREYWDYESHVVEWGNQ-COOH). To quantify levels of CK2 and PKC co-immunoprecipitated with IGFBP-1, the total peak area for multiple peptides along the CK2 and PKC protein sequences were summed for each sample and normalized to that of the control.

4.9. IGF-1 Receptor Activation Assay

To examine whether the alterations in IGFBP-1 phosphorylation functionally alter IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) autophosphorylation, P6 cells (a BALB/c3T3 cells derivative, gift from Dr. R. Baserga, Thomas Jefferson University) were used. P6 cells are immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblast cells that overexpress human IGF-1R but do not express IGF-1 [83]. We used a well-established protocol developed in our lab [48,52]. In brief, P6 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 with sodium pyruvate supplemented with 10% FBS. The P6 cell bioassay was performed in FBS-free conditions. Aliquots of HepG2 cell media from various treatments conducted using control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC1), or RICTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC2) CM from PHT cells containing equal concentrations of IGFBP-1 (250 ng IGFBP-1) were buffer-exchanged to P6 cell media using Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL Centrifugal Filter Units (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) per manufacturer’s instructions. As illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1, CM from HepG2 cells from respective PHT cell treatments were subsequently incubated with rhIGF-1 (25 ng/mL) for two hours at room temperature. IGF-1 (10 ng) served as a positive control. P6 cells were then treated for 10 min with the P6 media containing IGFBP-1: IGF-I complexes or with IGF-1 alone (positive control) and were used to treat serum-starved P6 cells (75% confluent) in culture dishes for 10 min. The P6 cells were collected in a lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts) containing protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma Aldrich). Subsequently, lysed samples were separated using SDS-PAGE, and immunoblot analysis was performed to assess IGF-1R autophosphorylation using phospho-site specific IGF-1Rβ (Tyr1135) primary antibody. The membrane was stripped (Pierce Chemical Co) and re-probed with an antibody for total anti-IGF-1R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The densitometry of the phosphorylated IGF-1R band was determined by Image Lab (Beta 3) software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and was normalized to the band intensity of total IGF-1Rβ. The data used for final analysis were collected in triplicate from three biological experiments.

4.10. Casein Kinase CK2 Activity Assay

CM collected from HepG2 cells treated with CM from control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC1), or RICTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC2) PHT cells were analyzed for CK2 activity using P32 as described previously [47,59,80]. In addition, the CK2 substrate peptide RRRDDDSDDD (DSD) (100 μM) was used to measure CK2 activity [84].

4.11. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for IGF-1 in CM Samples of HepG2 Cells

HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with CM collected from PHT cells either control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTORC1), and RICTOR-silenced (inhibition of mTOR C2) PHT cells were used for the quantitative measurement of IGF-1 using human IGF-1 ELISA kit (Abcam). IGF-1 was also measured in CM from PHT cells with either control, RAPTOR-, or RICTOR-silenced PHT cells before treatment of HepG2 cells.

4.12. Non-Trophoblast Renal Carcinoma Cells

Renal carcinoma A498 cells were obtained from the ATCC and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were transfected with pooled siRNA reagent (Thermo Fisher) with the Amaxa Nucleofector system for RAPTOR and RICTOR knockdown according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples of CM were harvested at 72 h following transfection. A non-targeting scramble siRNA pool was used as negative control (Thermo Fisher) [85].

4.13. Data Presentation and Statistics

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (Graph Pad Software Inc., CA). Three replicates were analyzed for each treatment condition, including the control treatment. For each quantified protein, the mean density of the control sample bands was assigned an arbitrary value of 1, and averaged densitometry values for each treatment were expressed relative to this mean. We employed a one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Post-Test and expressed results as the mean ± SEM. Significance was accepted at * p < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24087273/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.J.R., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; methodology, F.J.R., T.L.P., K.B., M.B.G. and T.J.; formal analysis, F.J.R., T.L.P., K.B., A.C., M.B.G. and T.J.; investigation, F.J.R., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; resources, F.J.R., K.B., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; data curation, F.J.R., K.B., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; writing—original draft preparation, F.J.R., K.B., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; writing—F.J.R., K.B., T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; supervision, T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; project administration, T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J.; funding acquisition, T.L.P., M.B.G. and T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH (HD071306 and HD068370, HD089980).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (HSC20100262H) and the University of Colorado Hospital (number 14-1073) approved this protocol.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All the data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stremming, J.; Jansson, T.; Powell, T.L.; Rozance, P.J.; Brown, L.D. Reduced Na(+) K(+) -ATPase activity may reduce amino acid uptake in intrauterine growth restricted fetal sheep muscle despite unchanged ex vivo amino acid transporter activity. J. Physiol. 2020, 598, 1625–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lien, Y.-C.; E Pinney, S.; Lu, X.M.; A Simmons, R. Identification of Novel Regulatory Regions Induced by Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Rat Islets. Endocrinology 2021, 163, bqab251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shen, Z.; Zhu, W.; Du, L. Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles in the Liver of Rats With Intrauterine Growth Retardation. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 801544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rosario, F.J.; Pardo, S.; Michelsen, T.M.; Erickson, K.; Moore, L.; Powell, T.L.; Weintraub, S.T.; Jansson, T. Characterization of the Primary Human Trophoblast Cell Secretome Using Stable Isotope Labeling With Amino Acids in Cell Culture. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 704781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Goeden, N.; Velasquez, J.; Arnold, K.A.; Chan, Y.; Lund, B.T.; Anderson, G.M.; Bonnin, A. Maternal Inflammation Disrupts Fetal Neurodevelopment via Increased Placental Output of Serotonin to the Fetal Brain. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 6041–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hanswijk, S.; Spoelder, M.; Shan, L.; Verheij, M.; Muilwijk, O.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Kolk, S.; Homberg, J. Gestational Factors throughout Fetal Neurodevelopment: The Serotonin Link. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Howerton, C.L.; Bale, T.L. Targeted placental deletion of OGT recapitulates the prenatal stress phenotype including hypothalamic mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9639–9644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Howerton, C.L.; Morgan, C.P.; Fischer, D.B.; Bale, T.L. O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a placental biomarker of maternal stress and reprogramming of CNS gene transcription in development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5169–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kelly, A.C.; Kramer, A.; Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling decreases levels of O-GlcNAc transferase and increases serotonin release in the human placenta. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 3123–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saxton, R.A.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease. Cell 2017, 169, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, J.; Guan, K.L. mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yung, H.-W.; Calabrese, S.; Hynx, D.; Hemmings, B.A.; Cetin, I.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Burton, G.J. Evidence of Placental Translation Inhibition and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Etiology of Human Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 173, 311–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, Y.-Y.; Rosario, F.J.; Abu Shehab, M.; Powell, T.; Gupta, M.B.; Jansson, T. Increased ubiquitination and reduced plasma membrane trafficking of placental amino acid transporter SNAT-2 in human IUGR. Clin. Sci. 2015, 129, 1131–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hung, T.-H.; Hsieh, T.-T.; Wu, C.-P.; Li, M.-J.; Yeh, Y.-L.; Chen, S.-F. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling is a mechanistic link between increased endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy in the placentas of pregnancies complicated by growth restriction. Placenta 2017, 60, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dimasuay, K.G.; Aitken, E.H.; Rosario, F.; Njie, M.; Glazier, J.; Rogerson, S.J.; Fowkes, F.J.I.; Beeson, J.G.; Powell, T.; Jansson, T.; et al. Inhibition of placental mTOR signaling provides a link between placental malaria and reduced birthweight. BMC Med. 2017, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Roos, S.; Jansson, N.; Palmberg, I.; Säljö, K.; Powell, T.; Jansson, T. Mammalian target of rapamycin in the human placenta regulates leucine transport and is down-regulated in restricted fetal growth. J. Physiol. 2007, 582, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rosario, F.J.; Jansson, N.; Kanai, Y.; Prasad, P.D.; Powell, T.; Jansson, T. Maternal Protein Restriction in the Rat Inhibits Placental Insulin, mTOR, and STAT3 Signaling and Down-Regulates Placental Amino Acid Transporters. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kavitha, J.V.; Rosario, F.J.; Nijland, M.J.; McDonald, T.J.; Wu, G.; Kanai, Y.; Powell, T.L.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Jansson, T. Down-regulation of placental mTOR, insulin/IGF-I signaling, and nutrient transporters in response to maternal nutrient restriction in the baboon. FASEB J. 2013, 28, 1294–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Arroyo, J.A.; Brown, L.D.; Galan, H.L. Placental mammalian target of rapamycin and related signaling pathways in an ovine model of intrauterine growth restriction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 201, 616.e1–616.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Rosario, F.J.; Schumacher, M.A.; Jiang, J.; Kanai, Y.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Chronic maternal infusion of full-length adiponectin in pregnant mice down-regulates placental amino acid transporter activity and expression and decreases fetal growth. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 1495–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rosario, F.J.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Maternal folate deficiency causes inhibition of mTOR signaling, down-regulation of placental amino acid transporters and fetal growth restriction in mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Roos, S.; Lagerlöf, O.; Wennergren, M.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Regulation of amino acid transporters by glucose and growth factors in cultured primary human trophoblast cells is mediated by mTOR signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Cell 2009, 297, C723–C731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lager, S.; Gaccioli, F.; Ramirez, V.I.; Jones, H.N.; Jansson, T.; Powell, T.L. Oleic acid stimulates system A amino acid transport in primary human trophoblast cells mediated by toll-like receptor 4. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Silva, E.; Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Is a Novel Molecular Mechanism Linking Folate Availability and Cell Function. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1237–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. mTOR folate sensing links folate availability to trophoblast cell function. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 4189–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Vaughan, O.R.; Fisher, H.M.; Dionelis, K.N.; Jefferies, E.C.; Higgins, J.S.; Musial, B.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Fowden, A.L. Corticosterone alters materno-fetal glucose partitioning and insulin signalling in pregnant mice. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 1307–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Aye, I.L.M.H.; Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Adiponectin supplementation in pregnant mice prevents the adverse effects of maternal obesity on placental function and fetal growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12858–12863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jansson, T.; Castillo-Castrejon, M.; Gupta, M.B.; Powell, T.L.; Rosario, F.J. Down-regulation of placental Cdc42 and Rac1 links mTORC2 inhibition to decreased trophoblast amino acid transport in human intrauterine growth restriction. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roos, S.; Kanai, Y.; Prasad, P.D.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Regulation of placental amino acid transporter activity by mammalian target of rapamycin. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2009, 296, C142–C150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rosario, F.J.; Kanai, Y.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Mammalian target of rapamycin signalling modulates amino acid uptake by regulating transporter cell surface abundance in primary human trophoblast cells. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 609–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rosario, F.J.; Dimasuay, K.G.; Kanai, Y.; Powell, T.; Jansson, T. Regulation of amino acid transporter trafficking by mTORC1 in primary human trophoblast cells is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates trophoblast folate uptake by modulating the cell surface expression of FR-α and the RFC. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rosario, F.J.; Gupta, M.B.; Myatt, L.; Powell, T.L.; Glenn, J.P.; Cox, L.; Jansson, T. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Promotes the Expression of Genes Encoding Electron Transport Chain Proteins and Stimulates Oxidative Phosphorylation in Primary Human Trophoblast Cells by Regulating Mitochondrial Biogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Baker, J.; Liu, J.P.; Robertson, E.J.; Efstratiadis, A. Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell 1993, 75, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, J.-P.; Baker, J.; Perkins, A.S.; Robertson, E.J.; Efstratiadis, A. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r). Cell 1993, 75, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lassarre, C.; Hardouin, S.; Daffos, F.; Forestier, F.; Frankenne, F.; Binoux, M. Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins in the Human Fetus. Relationships with Growth in Normal Subjects and in Subjects with Intrauterine Growth Retardation. Pediatr. Res. 1991, 29, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Clemmons, D.R. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and their role in controlling IGF actions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1997, 8, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Ben Lagha, N.; Seurin, D.; Le Bouc, Y.; Binoux, M.; Berdal, A.; Menuelle, P.; Babajko, S. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein (IGFBP-1) Involvement in Intrauterine Growth Retardation: Study on IGFBP-1 Overexpressing Transgenic Mice. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 4730–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Chard, T. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in normal and abnormal human fetal growth. Growth Regul. 1994, 4, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  40. Murphy, V.E.; Smith, R.; Giles, W.B.; Clifton, V. Endocrine Regulation of Human Fetal Growth: The Role of the Mother, Placenta, and Fetus. Endocr. Rev. 2006, 27, 141–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Watson, C.S.; Bialek, P.; Anzo, M.; Khosravi, J.; Yee, S.-P.; Han, V.K.M. Elevated Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 Is Sufficient to Cause Fetal Growth Restriction. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Rajkumar, K.; Barron, D.; LeWitt, M.S.; Murphy, L.J. Growth retardation and hyperglycemia in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 transgenic mice. Endocrinology 1995, 136, 4029–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jones, J.; Busby, W.; Wright, G.; Smith, C.; Kimack, N.; Clemmons, D. Identification of the sites of phosphorylation in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Regulation of its affinity by phosphorylation of serine 101. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gibson, M.; Aplin, J.; White, A.; Westwood, M. Regulation of IGF bioavailability in pregnancy. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 7, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Giudice, L.C.; de Zegher, F.; Gargosky, S.E.; Dsupin, B.A.; De Las Fuentes, L.; Crystal, R.A.; Rosenfeld, R.G. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the term and preterm human fetus and neonate with normal and extremes of intrauterine growth. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 1548–1555. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Abu Shehab, M.; Khosravi, J.; Han, V.K.M.; Shilton, B.H.; Gupta, M.B. Site-Specific IGFBP-1 Hyper-Phosphorylation in Fetal Growth Restriction: Clinical and Functional Relevance. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abu Shehab, M.; Inoue, S.; Han, V.K.M.; Gupta, M.B. Site Specific Phosphorylation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) for Evaluating Clinical Relevancy in Fetal Growth Restriction. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5325–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abu Shehab, M.; Damerill, I.; Shen, T.; Rosario, F.J.; Nijland, M.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Kamat, A.; Jansson, T.; Gupta, M.B. Liver mTOR Controls IGF-I Bioavailability by Regulation of Protein Kinase CK2 and IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation in Fetal Growth Restriction. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gupta, M.B.; Abu Shehab, M.; Nygard, K.; Biggar, K.; Singal, S.S.; Santoro, N.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. IUGR Is Associated With Marked Hyperphosphorylation of Decidual and Maternal Plasma IGFBP-1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 104, 408–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kelly, J.H.; Darlington, G.J. Modulation of the liver specific phenotype in the human hepatoblastoma line Hep G2. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1989, 25, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wilkening, S.; Stahl, F.; Bader, A. Comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line Hepg2 with regard to their biotransformation properties. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2003, 31, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abu Shehab, M.; Iosef, C.; Wildgruber, R.; Sardana, G.; Gupta, M.B. Phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 at Discrete Sites Elicits Variable Effects on IGF-I Receptor Autophosphorylation. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 1130–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Frost, R.; Tseng, L. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 is phosphorylated by cultured human endometrial stromal cells and multiple protein kinases in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 18082–18088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ankrapp, D.; Jones, J.; Clemmons, D. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 kinases from human hepatoma cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 1996, 60, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Damerill, I.; Biggar, K.K.; Abu Shehab, M.; Li, S.S.-C.; Jansson, T.; Gupta, M.B. Hypoxia Increases IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation Mediated by mTOR Inhibition. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 30, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dolcini, L.; Sala, A.; Campagnoli, M.; Labò, S.; Valli, M.; Visai, L.; Minchiotti, L.; Monaco, H.L.; Galliano, M. Identification of the amniotic fluid insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 phosphorylation sites and propensity to proteolysis of the isoforms. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 6033–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, J.; Iwashita, M.; Kudo, Y.; Takeda, Y. Phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) inhibits while non-hosphorylated IGFBP-1 stimulates IGF-I-induced amino acid uptake in cultured trophoblast cells. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 1998, 8, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Siddals, K.; Westwood, M.; Gibson, M.; White, A. IGF-binding protein-1 inhibits IGF effects on adipocyte function: Implications for insulin-like actions at the adipocyte. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 174, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Seferovic, M.D.; Ali, R.; Kamei, H.; Liu, S.; Khosravi, J.M.; Nazarian, S.; Han, V.K.M.; Duan, C.; Gupta, M.B. Hypoxia and Leucine Deprivation Induce Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 Hyperphosphorylation and Increase Its Biological Activity. Endocrinology 2008, 150, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gupta, M.B. The role and regulation of IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in fetal growth restriction. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2015, 9, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Michelsen, T.M.; Henriksen, T.; Reinhold, D.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. The human placental proteome secreted into the maternal and fetal circulations in normal pregnancy based on 4-vessel sampling. FASEB J. 2018, 33, 2944–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Hessvik, N.P.; Llorente, A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Guay, C.; Regazzi, R. Exosomes as new players in metabolic organ cross-talk. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19 (Suppl. S1), 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ying, W.; Riopel, M.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Dong, Y.; Birmingham, A.; Seo, J.B.; Ofrecio, J.M.; Wollam, J.; Hernandez-Carretero, A.; Fu, W.; et al. Adipose Tissue Macrophage-Derived Exosomal miRNAs Can Modulate In Vivo and In Vitro Insulin Sensitivity. Cell 2017, 171, 372–384.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Mitchell, M.D.; Peiris, H.N.; Kobayashi, M.; Koh, Y.Q.; Duncombe, G.; Illanes, S.E.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C. Placental exosomes in normal and complicated pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S173–S181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Adam, S.; Elfeky, O.; Kinhal, V.; Dutta, S.; Lai, A.; Jayabalan, N.; Nuzhat, Z.; Palma, C.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C. Review: Fetal-maternal communication via extracellular vesicles—Implications for complications of pregnancies. Placenta 2017, 54, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zou, W.; Lai, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Xing, Z.; Li, T.; Zou, Z.; Song, Q.; Zhao, X.; Xia, L.; et al. Exosome Release Is Regulated by mTORC1. Adv. Sci. 2018, 6, 1801313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mahdipour, E.; Salmasi, Z.; Sabeti, N. Potential of stem cell-derived exosomes to regenerate β islets through Pdx-1 dependent mechanism in a rat model of type 1 diabetes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 20310–20321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jin, J.; Menon, R. Placental exosomes: A proxy to understand pregnancy complications. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 79, e12788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mincheva-Nilsson, L.; Baranov, V. The Role of Placental Exosomes in Reproduction. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 520–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salomon, C.; Rice, G.E. Role of Exosomes in Placental Homeostasis and Pregnancy Disorders. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 145, 163–179. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sarker, S.; Scholz-Romero, K.; Perez, A.; Illanes, S.E.; Mitchell, M.D.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C. Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over the first trimester of pregnancy. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Miranda, J.; Paules, C.; Nair, S.; Lai, A.; Palma, C.; Scholz-Romero, K.; Rice, G.E.; Gratacos, E.; Crispi, F.; Salomon, C. Placental exosomes profile in maternal and fetal circulation in intrauterine growth restriction—Liquid biopsies to monitoring fetal growth. Placenta 2018, 64, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Chang, G.; Mouillet, J.-F.; Mishima, T.; Chu, T.; Sadovsky, E.; Coyne, C.B.; Parks, W.T.; Surti, U.; Sadovsky, Y. Expression and trafficking of placental microRNAs at the feto-maternal interface. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 2760–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gupta, M.B.; Jansson, T. Novel roles of mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling in regulating fetal growth. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 100, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chassen, S.; Jansson, T. Complex, coordinated and highly regulated changes in placental signaling and nutrient transport capacity in IUGR. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1866, 165373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cao, B.; Parnell, L.A.; Diamond, M.S.; Mysorekar, I.U. Inhibition of autophagy limits vertical transmission of Zika virus in pregnant mice. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 2303–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Rosario, F.J.; Kelly, A.C.; Gupta, M.B.; Powell, T.L.; Cox, L.; Jansson, T. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 Regulation of the Primary Human Trophoblast Cell Transcriptome. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 670980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nissum, M.; Abu Shehab, M.; Sukop, U.; Khosravi, J.M.; Wildgruber, R.; Eckerskorn, C.; Han, V.K.M.; Gupta, M.B. Functional and Complementary Phosphorylation State Attributes of Human Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) Isoforms Resolved by Free Flow Electrophoresis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2009, 8, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Nandi, P.; Jang, C.E.; Biggar, K.; Halari, C.D.; Jansson, T.; Gupta, M.B. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Signaling Links Hypoxia to Increased IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation in Primary Human Decidualized Endometrial Stromal Cells. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. MacLean, B.; Tomazela, D.M.; Shulman, N.; Chambers, M.; Finney, G.L.; Frewen, B.; Kern, R.; Tabb, D.L.; Liebler, D.C.; MacCoss, M.J. Skyline: An open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 966–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Pietrzkowski, Z.; Sell, C.; Lammers, R.; Ullrich, A.; Baserga, R. Roles of insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and the IGF-1 receptor in epidermal growth factor-stimulated growth of 3T3 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 3883–3889. [Google Scholar]
  84. Vilk, G.; Saulnier, R.B.; Pierre, R.S.; Litchfield, D.W. Inducible Expression of Protein Kinase CK2 in Mammalian Cells. Evidence for functional specialization of CK2 isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 14406–14414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Shanmugasundaram, K.; Block, K.; Nayak, B.K.; Livi, C.B.; Venkatachalam, M.A.; Sudarshan, S. PI3K regulation of the SKP-2/p27 axis through mTORC2. Oncogene 2013, 32, 2027–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 07273 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Ijms 24 07273 g001
Ijms 24 07273 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of IGFBP-1 secretion and IGFBP-1 phosphorylation by 1-D and 2-D immunoblot analysis using CM from HepG2 cells incubated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. For a densitometric analysis (A), proteins in equal aliquots of CM from HepG2 cells (7 µL) treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA were separated and probed using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303). The data were normalized to the control (average arbitrarily set to 100) with Mean + SEM, analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and corrected with Bonferroni multiple comparison test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. (B) Equal aliquots of HepG2 CM (100 µL) from PHT cells with Control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA were exchanged against a rehydration buffer and loaded onto a 7 cm IPG strip followed by 2-D gel electrophoresis and a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 polyclonal antibody. The spots on the blots (B) corresponded to IGFBP-1 phosphoisoform in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. The corresponding 3-D view (C) of IGFBP-1 phosphoisoform in the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR is represented in the adjacent figure on the right.
Figure 2. Analysis of IGFBP-1 secretion and IGFBP-1 phosphorylation by 1-D and 2-D immunoblot analysis using CM from HepG2 cells incubated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. For a densitometric analysis (A), proteins in equal aliquots of CM from HepG2 cells (7 µL) treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA were separated and probed using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303). The data were normalized to the control (average arbitrarily set to 100) with Mean + SEM, analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and corrected with Bonferroni multiple comparison test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. (B) Equal aliquots of HepG2 CM (100 µL) from PHT cells with Control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA were exchanged against a rehydration buffer and loaded onto a 7 cm IPG strip followed by 2-D gel electrophoresis and a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 polyclonal antibody. The spots on the blots (B) corresponded to IGFBP-1 phosphoisoform in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. The corresponding 3-D view (C) of IGFBP-1 phosphoisoform in the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR is represented in the adjacent figure on the right.
Ijms 24 07273 g002
Ijms 24 07273 g003 550
Figure 3. Site-specific IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of CM (μL) from HepG2 treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA was used to determine site-specific IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. CM (40 µL) was loaded on 1-D gels for Western blot for pSer101 (A), pS119 (B), and pS169 (C) IGFBP-1. The band intensity of each sample was normalized to the control (average arbitrarily set to 100). Data were presented in the bar figure as Mean + SEM, analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and corrected with Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 3. Site-specific IGFBP-1 phosphorylation in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of CM (μL) from HepG2 treated with CM from PHT cells with the control (non-coding siRNA), RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA was used to determine site-specific IGFBP-1 phosphorylation. CM (40 µL) was loaded on 1-D gels for Western blot for pSer101 (A), pS119 (B), and pS169 (C) IGFBP-1. The band intensity of each sample was normalized to the control (average arbitrarily set to 100). Data were presented in the bar figure as Mean + SEM, analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and corrected with Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ijms 24 07273 g003
Ijms 24 07273 g004 550
Figure 4. Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS) analysis identified increased IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at pSer169/pSer174 following incubation in CM from PHT cells with mTOR inhibition. To determine relative levels of dual IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at pSer169 and pSer174, PRM-MS was performed, as no antibodies were available to assess this modification. Detection of IGFBP-1 (A) internal (m/z = 645.2770, z = +2) and (B) pS169/pS174 (m/z = 1015.4623, z = +3) peptides by PRM-MS. Displaying chromatograms of individual fragment ions. (C) The red font indicates the peptide sequences and fragmentation patterns corresponding to panels A and B. Serine phosphorylation sites. (D) The peak area of pS169/pS174 peptides normalized to the peak area of the internal peptide control, shown as relative to the control (non-coding) siRNA.
Figure 4. Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry (PRM-MS) analysis identified increased IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at pSer169/pSer174 following incubation in CM from PHT cells with mTOR inhibition. To determine relative levels of dual IGFBP-1 phosphorylation at pSer169 and pSer174, PRM-MS was performed, as no antibodies were available to assess this modification. Detection of IGFBP-1 (A) internal (m/z = 645.2770, z = +2) and (B) pS169/pS174 (m/z = 1015.4623, z = +3) peptides by PRM-MS. Displaying chromatograms of individual fragment ions. (C) The red font indicates the peptide sequences and fragmentation patterns corresponding to panels A and B. Serine phosphorylation sites. (D) The peak area of pS169/pS174 peptides normalized to the peak area of the internal peptide control, shown as relative to the control (non-coding) siRNA.
Ijms 24 07273 g004
Ijms 24 07273 g005 550
Figure 5. HepG2 cells incubated in CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition increased CK2 activity. (A) Detection of CK2 peptides with PRM-MS; displaying chromatograms of individual peptides. The inset displays lower-intensity peptides. (B) Relative CK2 levels co-immunoprecipitated with IGFBP-1 from HepG2 CM after treatment with CM from PHT cells with either the control, RAPTOR (Rap), or RICTOR (Ric) siRNA. The total peak area for each treatment was normalized to that of the control. (C) CM from PHT cells with either mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition activated CK2 activity in HepG2.
Figure 5. HepG2 cells incubated in CM from PHT cells with mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition increased CK2 activity. (A) Detection of CK2 peptides with PRM-MS; displaying chromatograms of individual peptides. The inset displays lower-intensity peptides. (B) Relative CK2 levels co-immunoprecipitated with IGFBP-1 from HepG2 CM after treatment with CM from PHT cells with either the control, RAPTOR (Rap), or RICTOR (Ric) siRNA. The total peak area for each treatment was normalized to that of the control. (C) CM from PHT cells with either mTORC1 or mTORC2 inhibition activated CK2 activity in HepG2.
Ijms 24 07273 g005
Ijms 24 07273 g006 550
Figure 6. Inhibition of IGF-1R autophosphorylation in P6 cells using CM from HepG2 Cells treated with CM from PHT cells with RAPTOR and RICTOR siRNA. The ability of IGFBP-1 secreted from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA to inhibit IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation in P6 cells. (A) An equal amount of P6 cell lysate protein (25 µg) was loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using an antibody against p-IGF-1Rβ Tyr1135. (B) Aliquots (1 mL) of HepG2 CM was used to treat a confluent culture of P6 cells in the absence of IGF-1 as a negative control while a serum-free sample containing 10 ng IGF-1 was a positive control. An equal protein amount (25 µg) of treated P6 cell lysate was loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using an anti-p-IGF-1R β antibody. The membranes were then stripped and re-probed with a total IGF-1Rβ antibody. The data were represented normalized to the control with Mean + SEM, analyzed with a one-way ANOVA, and corrected with a Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Means without a common letter differ are considered significant, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Inhibition of IGF-1R autophosphorylation in P6 cells using CM from HepG2 Cells treated with CM from PHT cells with RAPTOR and RICTOR siRNA. The ability of IGFBP-1 secreted from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA to inhibit IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation in P6 cells. (A) An equal amount of P6 cell lysate protein (25 µg) was loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using an antibody against p-IGF-1Rβ Tyr1135. (B) Aliquots (1 mL) of HepG2 CM was used to treat a confluent culture of P6 cells in the absence of IGF-1 as a negative control while a serum-free sample containing 10 ng IGF-1 was a positive control. An equal protein amount (25 µg) of treated P6 cell lysate was loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using an anti-p-IGF-1R β antibody. The membranes were then stripped and re-probed with a total IGF-1Rβ antibody. The data were represented normalized to the control with Mean + SEM, analyzed with a one-way ANOVA, and corrected with a Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Means without a common letter differ are considered significant, p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 07273 g006
Ijms 24 07273 g007 550
Figure 7. IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control and DEPTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of CM from HepG2 cells (7 μL) treated with CM from PHT cells with the control or DEPTOR siRNA (activates mTOR signaling) were loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303) (A); 40 μL of cell media loaded for pS101 (B), pS119 (C), and pS169 (D). Samples were normalized to non-targeting siRNA control, and data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with unpaired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 7. IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation in CM from HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control and DEPTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of CM from HepG2 cells (7 μL) treated with CM from PHT cells with the control or DEPTOR siRNA (activates mTOR signaling) were loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303) (A); 40 μL of cell media loaded for pS101 (B), pS119 (C), and pS169 (D). Samples were normalized to non-targeting siRNA control, and data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with unpaired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ijms 24 07273 g007
Ijms 24 07273 g008 550
Figure 8. ELISA analysis of IGF-1 secretion before and after treatment of HepG2 cells with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA and densitometric analysis of mTORC1 and mTORC2 functional readouts from cell lysates of HepG2 treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. IGF-1 secretion was determined in CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA before treatment of HepG2 cells (A) and CM from HepG2 cells after treatment with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR (B). Equal aliquots (50 μL) of CM were analyzed with an IGF-1 ELISA kit. A representative Western blot of HepG2 cell lysates (35 μg protein) displaying p-P70S6K Thr389 (C) and p-Akt Ser473 (D) in HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, or RICTOR siRNA. Samples were normalized to the control. The data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 8. ELISA analysis of IGF-1 secretion before and after treatment of HepG2 cells with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA and densitometric analysis of mTORC1 and mTORC2 functional readouts from cell lysates of HepG2 treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. IGF-1 secretion was determined in CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA before treatment of HepG2 cells (A) and CM from HepG2 cells after treatment with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR (B). Equal aliquots (50 μL) of CM were analyzed with an IGF-1 ELISA kit. A representative Western blot of HepG2 cell lysates (35 μg protein) displaying p-P70S6K Thr389 (C) and p-Akt Ser473 (D) in HepG2 cells treated with CM from PHT cells with the control, RAPTOR, or RICTOR siRNA. Samples were normalized to the control. The data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ijms 24 07273 g008
Ijms 24 07273 g009 550
Figure 9. Analysis of IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation from HepG2 cells after treatment by Renal Carcinoma cells transfected with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of HepG2 cell media (7 μL) were loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303) (A); 40 μL loaded for pSer101 (B), pSer119 (C), and pSer169 (D). Samples were normalized to the control. The data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 9. Analysis of IGFBP-1 secretion and phosphorylation from HepG2 cells after treatment by Renal Carcinoma cells transfected with the control, RAPTOR, and RICTOR siRNA. Equal aliquots of HepG2 cell media (7 μL) were loaded on 1-D gels for a Western blot using anti-human IGFBP-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 6303) (A); 40 μL loaded for pSer101 (B), pSer119 (C), and pSer169 (D). Samples were normalized to the control. The data were represented as Mean + SEM in bar figures and analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ijms 24 07273 g009
Ijms 24 07273 g010 550
Figure 10. The proposed model of placental mTOR signaling directly influences the endocrine and metabolic function of fetal tissues. Specifically, the bioavailability of IGF-1 is mediated by signals released into fetal circulation.
Figure 10. The proposed model of placental mTOR signaling directly influences the endocrine and metabolic function of fetal tissues. Specifically, the bioavailability of IGF-1 is mediated by signals released into fetal circulation.
Ijms 24 07273 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosario, F.J.; Chopra, A.; Biggar, K.; Powell, T.L.; Gupta, M.B.; Jansson, T. Placental Remote Control of Fetal Metabolism: Trophoblast mTOR Signaling Regulates Liver IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation and IGF-1 Bioavailability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087273

AMA Style

Rosario FJ, Chopra A, Biggar K, Powell TL, Gupta MB, Jansson T. Placental Remote Control of Fetal Metabolism: Trophoblast mTOR Signaling Regulates Liver IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation and IGF-1 Bioavailability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosario, Fredrick J., Anand Chopra, Kyle Biggar, Theresa L. Powell, Madhulika B. Gupta, and Thomas Jansson. 2023. "Placental Remote Control of Fetal Metabolism: Trophoblast mTOR Signaling Regulates Liver IGFBP-1 Phosphorylation and IGF-1 Bioavailability" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop