Next Article in Journal
Modulation of Cellular Senescence in HEK293 and HepG2 Cells by Ultrafiltrates UPla and ULu Is Partly Mediated by Modulation of Mitochondrial Homeostasis under Oxidative Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
The Air–Liquid Interface Reorganizes Membrane Lipids and Enhances the Recruitment of Slc26a3 to Lipid-Rich Domains in Human Colonoid Monolayers
Previous Article in Journal
A Dual-Function “TRE-Lox” System for Genetic Deletion or Reversible, Titratable, and Near-Complete Downregulation of Cathepsin D
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Safety Profile of a New Combined Advanced Therapeutic Medical Product Platelet Lysate-Based Fibrin Hydrogel for Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Local Delivery in Regenerative Medicine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms24076746
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sevoflurane Induces a Cyclophilin D-Dependent Decrease of Neural Progenitor Cells Migration

by
Pan Lu
1,2,
Feng Liang
2,
Yuanlin Dong
2,
Zhongcong Xie
2,* and
Yiying Zhang
2,*
1
Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, China
2
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6746; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076746
Submission received: 4 March 2023 / Revised: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 April 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clinical studies have suggested that repeated exposure to anesthesia and surgery at a young age may increase the risk of cognitive impairment. Our previous research has shown that sevoflurane can affect neurogenesis and cognitive function in young animals by altering cyclophilin D (CypD) levels and mitochondrial function. Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) migration is associated with cognitive function in developing brains. However, it is unclear whether sevoflurane can regulate NPCs migration via changes in CypD. To address this question, we treated NPCs harvested from wild-type (WT) and CypD knockout (KO) mice and young WT and CypD KO mice with sevoflurane. We used immunofluorescence staining, wound healing assay, transwell assay, mass spectrometry, and Western blot to assess the effects of sevoflurane on CypD, reactive oxygen species (ROS), doublecortin levels, and NPCs migration. We showed that sevoflurane increased levels of CypD and ROS, decreased levels of doublecortin, and reduced migration of NPCs harvested from WT mice in vitro and in WT young mice. KO of CypD attenuated these effects, suggesting that a sevoflurane-induced decrease in NPCs migration is dependent on CypD. Our findings have established a system for future studies aimed at exploring the impacts of sevoflurane anesthesia on the impairment of NPCs migration.

1. Introduction

Approximately six million children in the United States undergo surgery with anesthesia each year [1]. Population studies have suggested that early and repeated, but not single, exposure to anesthesia and surgery may increase the risk of cognitive impairment in children ([2,3,4,5], reviewed in [6,7]).
Sevoflurane, a commonly used anesthetic in pediatric patients, has been shown to induce neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment in rodents ([8,9,10,11,12,13], reviewed in [6]). Specifically, multiple exposures to sevoflurane have been shown to suppress neurogenesis in hippocampal neural stem/progenitor cells in vitro and in rodent models [14,15,16,17]. However, the underlying mechanism by which sevoflurane influences neurogenesis is not yet fully understood.
Previous studies have demonstrated that anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment in both young and adult mice are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, particularly the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) [18]. In addition, anesthesia has been shown to affect neurogenesis [16,17,19] and synaptogenesis [20,21] in the developing brain. These findings suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction plays a critical role in anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment in young mice.
Cyclophilin D (CypD) is a protein located in the mitochondria and is part of the mPTP, and CypD regulates mPTP opening and is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death [22,23]. Increased CypD expression has been observed in the brain of adult AD transgenic mice, which may contribute to the disease’s progression [24,25,26]. CypD deficiency stabilizes mitochondrial function and may improve cognitive and synaptic function in old AD transgenic mice [24,25,26,27].
Sevoflurane anesthesia can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and increase CypD expression in the hippocampus, and CypD deficiency may protect against sevoflurane-induced cognitive impairment [14]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that anesthesia can damage neurogenesis by decreasing the self-renewal capacity of neural stem cells [28,29,30,31].
In addition, anesthesia has been shown to inhibit neural progenitor cells (NPCs) self-renewal, as well as neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity [14,32]. Despite these findings, the impact of CypD on the migration of NPCs in the developing brain is unclear.
Finally, in our previous work, we detected the effect of sevoflurane on the mitochondrial permeability transit pore (mPTP) in NPCs and demonstrated that sevoflurane reduced the binding of CypD with adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT, the other component of mPTP) and caused the mPTP opening [14].
To gain a comprehensive understanding of how anesthesia affects changes in mitochondrial proteins and to investigate the potential link between mitochondrial function and NPCs migration, we also used mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to identify changes in protein abundance, which can provide information on both metabolic and cellular pathways as well as predicted biochemical responses. Specifically, we aimed to identify potential changes in mitochondrial proteins and determine whether sevoflurane-induced elevation of CypD could lead to decreased expression of doublecortin (DCX), the marker of cell migration [33], and reduced migration of NPCs.
Previous studies have shown that mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation is dependent on CypD expression [34]. Thus, in the present study, we determined the effects of sevoflurane on the levels of both ROS and CypD in NPCs.

2. Results

We performed the in vitro studies using NPCs in the present study. To confirm that the cells we used in subsequent studies were indeed NPCs, we first observed that these cells could grow into neurospheres. Further analysis revealed that most of these neurospheres stained positive for nestin, a common marker of NPCs, as well as SOX2, [SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2]. We also conducted immunofluorescence staining and found that the neurospheres were able to differentiate into neurons (as marked by the neuronal marker β-Tubulin) and astrocytes (as marked by Glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP). These results are depicted in Figure 1.

2.1. Sevoflurane Induced the Decrease of Migration in NPCs Harvested from WT Mice

We then exposed the NPCs harvested from wild-type (WT) mice to 4.1% sevoflurane for 4 h, and the treated NPCs were subjected to wound healing assay. We found that the sevoflurane treatment led to a decrease in the distance the cells were able to move at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment (Figure 2A). Quantification of the migration distance showed that the sevoflurane treatment significantly reduced cell migration at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment (Figure 2B). In addition, we conducted a transwell assay and observed a decrease in the number of cells that were able to migrate after 24 h of sevoflurane treatment (Figure 2C,D).

2.2. Sevoflurane Increased CypD and ROS Levels and Decreased DCX Levels in NPCs Harvested from WT Mice

We first found that sevoflurane treatment increased ROS levels compared to the control condition in NPCs harvested from WT mice (Figure 3A). We next analyzed the levels of CypD protein in the NPCs based on the immunohistochemistry staining and Western blot. To examine CypD levels, we first stained mitochondria using Complex V as a marker and then analyzed CypD levels in the mitochondria of NPCs harvested from WT mice. Immunofluorescence staining of CypD revealed a significant increase in CypD levels in the mitochondria of NPCs harvested from WT mice following the sevoflurane treatment compared to the control condition (Figure 3B). Immunoblotting of CypD showed that sevoflurane treatment resulted in increased CypD levels compared to the control condition (Figure 3C). There was no significant difference in β-Actin levels between these two groups. Quantification of the Western blot demonstrated a significant increase in CypD levels in NPCs harvested from WT mice following the sevoflurane treatment (Figure 3D, * p = 0.029). Conversely, sevoflurane treatment led to a decrease in DCX levels compared to the control condition (Figure 3E). Quantification of the Western blot demonstrated a significant decrease in DCX levels in NPCs harvested from WT mice following the sevoflurane treatment (Figure 3F, ** p = 0.004).

2.3. Sevoflurane Induced a CypD-Dependent Impairment of Migration of NPCs

To investigate the role of CypD in sevoflurane-induced effects on NPCs, we used NPCs harvested from CypD knockout (KO) mice in the present study. We found that there were no visible changes in ROS levels (Figure 4A) or DCX levels (Figure 4B,C) in NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice between the sevoflurane treatment and control condition. Additionally, we conducted a transwell assay and observed no visible change in the number of cells that were able to migrate after 24 h of sevoflurane treatment in NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice compared to the control condition (Figure 4D,E).

2.4. Sevoflurane Induced a CypD-Dependent Decrease of DCX-Positive Cells in Hippocampus of Young WT Mice

Given the in vitro findings that sevoflurane induced a CypD-dependent effect in impairing the migration of NPCs, next, we set out to determine the in vivo relevance of these findings by employing young WT and CypD KO mice.
To have a comprehensive understanding of the protein changes associated with sevoflurane anesthesia, we first determined the profiles of mitochondrial proteomes in the hippocampus of young WT mice following sevoflurane anesthesia, utilizing the TMT 10-plex tagging approach (Figure 5A). We performed the mitochondrial proteome analysis with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 1% for both peptide and protein identification (Supplemental Table S1), and we chose the proteins which had more than a two-fold increase after the sevoflurane anesthesia. We identified 12 proteins that were associated with peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity (Figure 5B and Table 1). Among them, the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase F (Ppif, CypD) had a 3.9-fold upregulation in the hippocampus of the young WT mice following the sevoflurane anesthesia compared to the control condition.
Our previous studies have demonstrated that the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is involved in the anesthesia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction [18]. CypD, a mitochondrial matrix protein, plays an essential role in the regulation of the opening of mPTP and has been identified as a potential target of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in the developing brain [14]. Given the finding that sevoflurane anesthesia induced a 3.9-fold upregulation of CypD levels in the hippocampus of young WT mice, we measured the CypD protein levels by Western blot in the hippocampus of young WT mice. Immunoblotting of CypD revealed that the sevoflurane anesthesia (2% and 2 h daily for 3 days on postnatal 6, 7, and 8) led to increased visibility of the bands representing CypD as compared to the control condition at postnatal 8 (Figure 5C). There were no significant differences in β-actin levels in the hippocampus between the sevoflurane-treated mice and the mice in the control group.
Furthermore, we analyzed DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of postnatal 8 WT mice after the sevoflurane anesthesia. Immunofluorescence staining of DCX demonstrated that there were significantly fewer DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of the postnatal 8 WT mice after the sevoflurane anesthesia compared to the control condition (Figure 6A). Quantification of the images revealed that there were significant decreases in the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of sevoflurane-treated WT mice compared to the control condition (Figure 6B, * p = 0.043).
Next, we assessed the effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of young CypD KO mice. In contrast to young WT mice, the same sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly change the number of DXC-positive cells in the hippocampus of the young CypD KO mice on postnatal day 8 (Figure 6C, D). These data demonstrated that the KO of CypD might attenuate the sevoflurane-induced impairment of migration of NPCs. These in vivo results in both WT and CypD KO young mice were consistent with the in vitro findings in the NPCs harvested from WT mice and NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice.

3. Discussion

Overall, the study highlighted the potential adverse effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on the migration of NPCs and mitochondrial function, which may have implications for anesthesia neurotoxicity in the developing brain. Future studies will further test the hypothesis generated in this proof-of-concept study. Specifically, sevoflurane led to increases in ROS and CypD levels in vitro in NPCs and in vivo in the hippocampus of young mice. This upregulation of CypD then contributes to the sevoflurane-induced decrease of migration of NPCs in vitro and the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of young mice in vivo. These results suggest that sevoflurane can induce a CypD-dependent and DCX-related impairment of NPCs migration.
In the in vitro NPCs studies, we demonstrated that the sevoflurane treatment could decrease the migration of NPCs harvested from WT mice (Figure 2) as well as increase levels of ROS and CypD and decrease DCX levels in the NPCs harvested from WT mice (Figure 3). More importantly, the same sevoflurane treatment did not significantly change the levels of ROS and DCX nor the migration of NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice (Figure 4). Together, these results suggest that sevoflurane can induce a CypD-dependent impairment of the migration of NPCs.
Then, in the in vivo relevance study in both WT and CypD KO mice (Figure 5 and Figure 6), the sevoflurane anesthesia was found to specifically increase the protein levels of CypD in the hippocampus of young mice and NPCs. The study also showed that sevoflurane anesthesia decreased the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of WT mice. DCX is the marker of migration of cells [18]; thus, these results suggest that sevoflurane can also impair the migration of NPCs in the hippocampus of mice.
Moreover, sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly change the DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of CypD KO mice. Taken together, these results suggest that sevoflurane anesthesia can induce a CypD-dependent and DCX-related impairment of NPCs migration in the hippocampus of young mice.
Our previous studies have shown that sevoflurane anesthesia might induce a CypD-dependent impairment of neurogenesis and cognitive impairment in the developing brain [14]. The current study is the first to suggest that CypD also contributes to the sevoflurane-induced decrease in the migration of NPCs. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore potential strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on neurotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction in the developing brain.
Using proteomics, the study found that sevoflurane may affect peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase proteins, especially cyclophilin D (CypD) (Figure 5), as well as other proteins associated with sevoflurane (Figure 5, Table 1, and Supplemental Table S1). Although we only focused on the CypD experiment in the present study, the findings from the proteomics will help us to design additional studies to further investigate the underlying mechanism of anesthesia neurotoxicity in the developing brain.
CypD is a mitochondrial matrix protein that plays a critical role in regulating mitochondrial function and has been implicated in several neurological diseases [23,24,25,26]. CypD deletion prevents cognitive impairment and mitochondrial dysfunction associated with aging by preventing mPTP opening [27]. CypD also protects brain mitochondria against the permeability transition, which contributes to neuronal and oligodendrocyte injury in various neurodegenerative diseases [23,24,25,26]. However, the role of CypD in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury shifts from promoting to protecting against injury during development [35]. These findings suggest that CypD plays a complex role in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration, with its effects depending on the context and disease stage. Zhang et al. demonstrated that CypD contributes to anesthesia neurotoxicity in the developing brain by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and decreasing neurogenesis in NPCs [14]. The findings from the current studies showed, for the first time, that sevoflurane may also induce a CypD-dependent and DCX-related decrease in the migration of NPCs (Figure 7).
It is not known at present how CypD affects DCX levels. We hypothesize that the increases in CypD levels can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, which attenuates the migration of NPCs, marked by decreases in DCX levels. Future studies will test this hypothesis both in NPCs in vitro and in young mice in vivo.
NPCs migration is the prerequisite for the development of the embryonic nervous system. In both embryonic and adult nervous systems, most NPCs need to migrate a certain distance to reach their functional sites [36]. Defective NPCs migration is closely associated with multiple neurodegenerative diseases and cognitive impairments [37,38].
In our previous study, we demonstrated that sevoflurane anesthesia increased CypD levels and reduced NPCs proliferation in WT young mice or NPCs harvested from WT mice but not in CypD KO mice or NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice. These data suggest that the sevoflurane might induce a CypD-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation [14]. In the present study, we further found that sevoflurane might also induce a CypD-dependent inhibition of the migration of NPCs.
The studies have several limitations. Firstly, we only investigated the effects of sevoflurane in the present study, but not the other anesthetics such as isoflurane and desflurane. Our future studies will include the comparison among sevoflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane on NPCs migration. Secondly, we did not assess the potential sex-dependent effects of anesthesia neurotoxicity in developing brains in the current studies, as it is challenging to determine the sex of 6-day-old mice accurately. We plan to explore this aspect in future studies by utilizing established systems to determine sex-dependent effects. Finally, we did not determine the cognitive function in young mice in the present study; however, our previous studies have shown well that the same sevoflurane anesthesia can induce cognitive impairment in young mice [14,39,40,41]. Nevertheless, future studies still need to directly link the sevoflurane-induced inhibition of NPCs migration and the sevoflurane-induced cognitive impairment in young mice.
In conclusion, our studies suggest that anesthetic sevoflurane can inhibit the migration of NPCs, and such effects are dependent on CypD. These results could promote further research into mitochondria, migration of NPCs, and anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in the young brain, which could ultimately lead to better postoperative outcomes in children.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Neural Progenitor Cells (NPCs) Culture and Treatment

The protocol use of animals in research and teaching was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Standing Committee in Boston. For the experiments, C57BL/6J mice [wild-type (WT)] and CypD homozygous null mice, B6;129-Ppiftm1Maf/J (Ppif−/−) mice were used, all of which were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, ME. Primary cultured NPCs were obtained from mice fetuses at embryonic day 18–19 (E18-E19) from timed-pregnant mice under sterile conditions. The mice were bred in-house and kept in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment (20–22 °C; 12-h light: dark on a reversed light cycle) with free access to food and water. The NPCs were harvested using the methods described in previous studies [14], and 1.0 × 106 cells were seeded in each well of a six-well plate containing 2.5 mL of “complete” proliferation media. The “complete” proliferation media consisted of 50 mL of NeuroCult™ neural stem cell proliferation supplements and 200 μg of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), which were added to 450 mL of NeuroCult™ neural stem cell basal media to achieve a final concentration of 20 ng/mL of hEGF, 100 units/mL of penicillin, and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin in the culture media. For the in vitro studies, the NPCs were treated with 4.1% sevoflurane plus 21% O2 and 5% CO2 for 4 h, as described in previous studies [14].

4.2. Immunofluorescence Staining

The cultured cells were seeded onto six-well plates, and their differentiation potency was characterized and tested using immunofluorescence staining analysis. To fix the cells, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) was used. Mouse monoclonal anti-nestin antibody (1:500, Abcam, Boston, MA, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody (1:500, Abcam), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-tubulin III antibody (1:500, Abcam) were used for NPCs identification. D4′, 6′-diamidion-2′-phenylindole (DAPI, 1:1000, Abcam) was used to counterstain the nuclei. To detect CypD and Complex V (mitochondrial marker), anti-CypD (1:200, ab110324, Abcam) and anti-complex V (1:200, 45, 9000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) antibodies were used. After fixing the cells for 20 min, they were placed in 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min, followed by a blocking buffer (10% goat serum) for 1 h. The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Samples were incubated in secondary antibodies [fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated IgG] for 2 h, followed by DAPI incubation for 5 min at room temperature. The slides were rinsed with DPBS, and the images were captured using a laser confocal microscope (TSC SP2, Leica, Manheim, Germany).

4.3. Wound Healing Assay

To assess the directional migration of NPCs, a wound healing assay was performed. The NPCs were seeded on poly-D-lysine (PDL) precoated six-well plates at a cell density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL in a “complete” proliferation medium and allowed attaching for 12 h. After cell attachment, plates with consistent cell density were selected for the next experiments. After cell attachment, a scratch was created on the monolayer using a sterile plastic 200 μL micropipette tip in each cultured well. The cells were washed twice in a warm serum-free medium to remove cellular debris and floating cells from scratches and then exposed to 4.1% sevoflurane plus 21% O2 and 5% CO2 for 4 h. The scratch wounds were visualized with a phase contrast light microscope. Photographs were captured at two time points (0 h and 24 h after sevoflurane exposure). The NPCs were kept in the incubator between the photographs within the “complete” proliferation medium. The measurement was conducted by using Image J software (Version 1.8.0). The distance between the two separated sides at 0 h was used as a reference, and subsequent changes in the distance over time were measured as the cell migration distance. Result was quantified by determining the percent scratch closed [(initial scratch width- final scratch width)/initial scratch width × 100%].

4.4. Transwell Migration Assay

To evaluate NPCs migration, an 8-mm pore-size transwell system (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) coated with poly-D-lysine (PDL, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 100 μg/mL in PBS overnight was used. NPCs were dissociated into single cells and resuspended in a “complete” proliferation medium at a density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL. Then, 200 μL of cell suspension was loaded into the top chamber of the transwell, and 600 μL of “complete” proliferation medium containing 10% FBS was loaded into the bottom chamber. The cells were cultured for 12 h to form an adherent monolayer culture. After sevoflurane treatment, the cells were cultured for another 24 h; then, the cells on top of the membrane were removed by a cotton swab, and the migrated cells on the bottom of the membrane were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with either DAPI or 0.1% crystal violet. The migrated cells were photographed under a microscope, and for each insert, 10 fields were randomly captured, and the cell number was counted using Image-Pro Plus 6.0.

4.5. Western Blot Analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as described [42]. Specifically, anti-CypD (1:1000, ab110324, Abcam) and anti-DCX (1:500, ab113435, Abcam) were used to detect CypD and DCX separately. β-actin antibody (1:5000, 42 kDa, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to detect β-actin as a loading control. Quantification of Western blots was performed as described previously [42]. A protein levels of 100% indicates control levels. Signal intensity was analyzed using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA) image program. The Western blots were quantified using two steps. First, β-actin levels were used to normalize (e.g., determining the ratio of CypD levels to β-actin levels) for any loading differences in total protein amounts. Second, changes in CypD levels in treated cells were presented as percentages of the corresponding levels in the control cells. Each band in the Western blot represented an independent experiment. The results were averaged by six independent experiments.

4.6. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Measurement

ROS measurement was performed as described previously [18]. Briefly, prepare NPCs cells by culturing them in a black 96-well cell culture plate overnight in the incubator. Prepare the DCFH-DA/media solution by dissolving DCFH-DA in the cell culture media to a final concentration of 10 μM. Protect the solution from light during the preparation and use. Remove the cell culture media from the NPCs cells and add the DCFH-DA/media solution to each well. Incubate the cells at 37 °C for 30 min to allow the cells to uptake the DCFH-DA. After 30 min, remove the DCFH-DA/media solution and wash the cells with fresh media to remove any excess DCFH-DA. The DCFH-DA loaded NPCs cells were then exposed to 4.1% sevoflurane for 4h. The treated cells were lysed by adding 100 μL of cell lysis buffer to each well. Mix the lysate thoroughly and incubate for 5 min at room temperature away from light. Finally, the fluorescence was read with a fluorometric plate reader at 480 nm/530 nm within 10–15 min. The amount of fluorescence is proportional to the amount of ROS present in the cells.

4.7. Mice Anesthesia

The protocol of the animal study was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Standing Committee on Animals (Boston, MA, USA) on the use of Animals in Research and Teaching.
We made every effort to minimize the number of mice used and obtained both WT and CypD KO mice from our breeding. The mice were housed in a controlled environment with free access to water and food, and we maintained the temperature at 20–22 °C on a reversed light cycle of 12 h light and dark. Due to the difficulty of determining the sex of young mice, we did not allocate an equal number of female and male mice to the anesthesia or control group and did not assess the sex-dependent effects of anesthesia neurotoxicity in the present study. The mice were randomly assigned to either the anesthesia group or the control group. The mice in the anesthesia group received 3% sevoflurane plus 60% oxygen (balanced with nitrogen) for two hours on postnatal day(P) P6, P7, and P8, as described in our previous studies [39,40,41,43].

4.8. Brain Tissue Collection

Mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide and decapitation at the end of the experiments. We used half of the harvested brain tissues for the immunohistochemistry staining and half of them for the Western blots, according to our previous studies [14]. We used different mice and harvested their hippocampus tissues to obtain the mitochondria for the mass spectrometry studies.

4.9. A Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-Labeling and Sample Cleaning up for MASS Spectrometry Study

In the current study, we utilized TMT for the relative quantitation of proteins present in multiple samples. Isobaric stable isotope tags were used to label the peptides, which fragmented into reporter ions upon collision-induced dissociation, allowing for quantitation. Mitochondria samples were obtained from the hippocampus tissues of young mice, and 10-plex TMT tags were employed. The labeling of tryptic peptides was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, TMT reagents (0.8 mg) were dissolved in 41 μL of anhydrous acetonitrile, and aliquots of samples were incubated with TMT reagents for one hour at room temperature. The reactions were quenched by adding 8 μL of 5% hydroxylamine solution and reacted for 15 min. The combined TMT-labeled samples were dried under Speed Vac, reconstituted with trifluoroacetic acid solution, and desalted using an Oasis HLB 96-well Elution plate (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) before LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.10. Proteomic Data Analysis

The data were searched twice against a concatenated decoy Swiss Prot mouse database v 3.46 using BioWorks v 3.3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and SEQUEST v 28 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The parameters for the SEQUEST search were the same as described previously [44]. Peptides were filtered and assembled into proteins using DTASelect v 1.9. Non-mitochondrial protein contaminants with altered protein levels and inaccurately quantified proteins were not considered in the analysis. Significant changes in protein levels were determined based on a fold change > 2.0 (upregulated) and a p-value < 0.05 in the experiment.

4.11. Immunohistochemistry Staining

To assess the effects of sevoflurane on DCX levels in mouse brain tissue, immunohistochemistry was performed [44]. Specifically, on P8, mice were decapitated, and their brain tissues were harvested and fixed in formalin for 30 min at room temperature. Brain sections were stained with anti-DCX antibody (1:200, ab113435, Abcam) and examined under a 10× and 40× objective using a KEYENCE BZ-9000E all-in-one fluorescence microscope. Regions of interest in the dentate gyrus, including the outer and inner halves of the granular layer, were analyzed using the software provided by KEYENCE Corporation of America. The software enabled us to quantify red colors that corresponded to DCX staining or DAPI staining. We then counted the numbers of DCX-positive cells and DCX/DAPI-double-positive cells in each region per unit area using Image-J (NIH Image 1.62, Bethesda, MD, USA). The mean number of DCX/DAPI double-positive cells was calculated from five to six brain sections for each animal, with N = 3 mice for each group.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

Based on our previous studies, sufficient power to detect a significant effect should be achieved using the wound healing assay, transwell assay, Western blot, and fluorescence staining studies, and we used 6 samples per group for the former three assays and 3 samples per group for the latter. We used the student’s t-test with Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment to compare the difference between the two groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). We defined statistical significance as p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, and significance testing was two-tailed. For Bonferroni corrections, the adjusted p-values, calculated by dividing real p-values by sample size, are reported. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0) and SPSS statistical software (version 21.0).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24076746/s1.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: Y.Z. and Z.X., Acquisition of data: P.L., F.L. and Y.Z., Analysis and interpretation of data: P.L., F.L. and Y.Z., Drafting of the manuscript: Y.Z. and Z.X., Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Y.Z. and Z.X., Obtained funding: Y.Z. and Z.X., Administrative, technical, and material support: Y.D., Study supervision: Y.Z. and Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institutes of Health through R21 AG065606 (awarded to Yiying Zhang), R01 HD086977, and RF1070761 (awarded to Zhongcong Xie). The APC was funded by NIH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol of the animal study was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Standing Committee on Animals (Boston, MA, USA) on the use of Animals in Research and Teaching.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zhe Ji from Northwestern University for his valuable comments and insightful discussions. Zhongcong Xie is a consultant for NanoMosaic, Baxter (invited speaker), Shanghai 9th and 10th hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict interest.

Abbreviations

Ppif: peptidyl-prolylcis-trans isomerase F; CypD, Cyclophilin D; mPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; NPCs, neural progenitor cells; SVZ, subventricular zone; DG, dentate gyrus; SOX2, SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2; DCX: Doublecortin; WT, wild-type; ROS, reactive oxygen species; S.D., standard deviation; rpm, rapid per minute; ANOVA, Analysis of variance; MS, Mass spectrometry; N.S, non-significant differences.

References

  1. Soriano, S.G.; Vutskits, L.; Jevtovic-Todorovic, V.; Hemmings, H.C.; Davidson, A.; Warner, D.O.; Sun, L.S. Thinking, fast and slow: Highlights from the 2016 BJA seminar on anaesthetic neurotoxicity and neuroplasticity. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 119, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wilder, R.T.; Flick, R.P.; Sprung, J.; Katusic, S.K.; Barbaresi, W.J.; Mickelson, C.; Gleich, S.J.; Schroeder, D.R.; Weaver, A.L.; Warner, D.O. Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 2009, 110, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sun, L.S.; Li, G.; Miller, T.L.; Salorio, C.; Byrne, M.W.; Bellinger, D.C.; Ing, C.; Park, R.; Radcliffe, J.; Hays, S.R.; et al. Association Between a Single General Anesthesia Exposure Before Age 36 Months and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Later Childhood. JAMA 2016, 315, 2312–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davidson, A.J.; Disma, N.; de Graaff, J.C.; Withington, D.E.; Dorris, L.; Bell, G.; Stargatt, R.; Bellinger, D.C.; Schuster, T.; Arnup, S.J.; et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): An international multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Warner, D.O.; Chelonis, J.J.; Paule, M.G.; Frank, R.D.; Lee, M.; Zaccariello, M.J.; Katusic, S.K.; Schroeder, D.R.; Hanson, A.C.; Schulte, P.J.; et al. Performance on the Operant Test Battery in young children exposed to procedures requiring general anaesthesia: The MASK study. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 122, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vutskits, L.; Xie, Z. Lasting impact of general anaesthesia on the brain: Mechanisms and relevance. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ing, C.; Warner, D.O.; Sun, L.S.; Flick, R.P.; Davidson, A.J.; Vutskits, L.; McCann, M.E.; O’Leary, J.; Bellinger, D.C.; Rauh, V.; et al. Anesthesia and Developing Brains: Unanswered Questions and Proposed Paths Forward. Anesthesiology 2022, 136, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lunardi, N.; Ori, C.; Erisir, A.; Jevtovic-Todorovic, V. General anesthesia causes long-lasting disturbances in the ultrastructural properties of developing synapses in young rats. Neurotox. Res. 2010, 17, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhou, Y.F.; Wang, Q.X.; Zhou, H.Y.; Chen, G. Autophagy activation prevents sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity in H4 human neuroglioma cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2016, 37, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Piao, M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, N.; Wang, X.; Chen, R.; Qin, J.; Ge, P.; Feng, C. Sevoflurane Exposure Induces Neuronal Cell Parthanatos Initiated by DNA Damage in the Developing Brain via an Increase of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 583782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Z.; Lv, J.; Li, X.; Meng, Q.; Yang, Q.; Ma, W.; Li, Y.; Ke, Z.J. Sevoflurane decreases self-renewal capacity and causes c-Jun N-terminal kinase-mediated damage of rat fetal neural stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Song, R.; Ling, X.; Peng, M.; Xue, Z.; Cang, J.; Fang, F. Maternal Sevoflurane Exposure Causes Abnormal Development of Fetal Prefrontal Cortex and Induces Cognitive Dysfunction in Offspring. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 6158468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, X.; Yang, Z.; Liang, G.; Wu, Z.; Peng, Y.; Joseph, D.J.; Inan, S.; Wei, H. Dual effects of isoflurane on proliferation, differentiation, and survival in human neuroprogenitor cells. Anesthesiology 2013, 118, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Lu, P.; Liang, F.; Liufu, N.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, J.C.; Xie, Z. Cyclophilin D Contributes to Anesthesia Neurotoxicity in the Developing Brain. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yi, X.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Q.; Li, W. Sevoflurane inhibits embryonic stem cell self-renewal and subsequent neural differentiation by modulating the let-7a-Lin28 signaling pathway. Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 365, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, H.; Shie, V.; Wang, H.; Busscher, J.J.; Yue, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xie, Z. Sevoflurane inhibits neurogenesis and the Wnt-catenin signaling pathway in mouse neural progenitor cells. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 1446–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, F.; Song, R.; Ling, X.; Peng, M.; Xue, Z.; Cang, J. Multiple sevoflurane anesthesia in pregnant mice inhibits neurogenesis of fetal hippocampus via repressing transcription factor Pax6. Life Sci. 2017, 175, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, H.; Dong, Y.; Shi, H.N.; Culley, D.J.; Crosby, G.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Tanzi, R.E.; Xie, Z. Anesthetics isoflurane and desflurane differently affect mitochondrial function, learning, and memory. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 71, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stratmann, G.; Sall, J.W.; May, L.D.; Bell, J.S.; Magnusson, K.R.; Rau, V.; Visrodia, K.H.; Alvi, R.S.; Ku, B.; Lee, M.T.; et al. Isoflurane differentially affects neurogenesis and long-term neurocognitive function in 60-day-old and 7-day-old rats. Anesthesiology 2009, 110, 834–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chung, W.; Ryu, M.J.; Heo, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Yoon, S.; Park, H.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Yoon, S.H.; et al. Sevoflurane Exposure during the Critical Period Affects Synaptic Transmission and Mitochondrial Respiration but Not Long-term Behavior in Mice. Anesthesiology 2017, 126, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amrock, L.G.; Starner, M.L.; Murphy, K.L.; Baxter, M.G. Long-term effects of single or multiple neonatal sevoflurane exposures on rat hippocampal ultrastructure. Anesthesiology 2015, 122, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Basso, E.; Fante, L.; Fowlkes, J.; Petronilli, V.; Forte, M.A.; Bernardi, P. Properties of the permeability transition pore in mitochondria devoid of Cyclophilin D. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18558–18561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Baines, C.P.; Kaiser, R.A.; Purcell, N.H.; Blair, N.S.; Osinska, H.; Hambleton, M.A.; Brunskill, E.W.; Sayen, M.R.; Gottlieb, R.A.; Dorn, G.W.; et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature 2005, 434, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Du, H.; Guo, L.; Zhang, W.; Rydzewska, M.; Yan, S. Cyclophilin D deficiency improves mitochondrial function and learning/memory in aging Alzheimer disease mouse model. Neurobiol. Aging 2011, 32, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Du, H.; Guo, L.; Wu, X.; Sosunov, A.A.; McKhann, G.M.; Chen, J.X.; Yan, S.S. Cyclophilin D deficiency rescues Abeta-impaired PKA/CREB signaling and alleviates synaptic degeneration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 2517–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Du, H.; Guo, L.; Fang, F.; Chen, D.; Sosunov, A.A.; McKhann, G.M.; Yan, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Molkentin, J.D.; et al. Cyclophilin D deficiency attenuates mitochondrial and neuronal perturbation and ameliorates learning and memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jara, C.; Cerpa, W.; Tapia-Rojas, C.; Quintanilla, R.A. Tau Deletion Prevents Cognitive Impairment and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Age Associated by a Mechanism Dependent on Cyclophilin-D. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 586710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, C.; Gao, J.; Karlsson, N.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Li, H.; Kuhn, H.G.; Blomgren, K. Isoflurane anesthesia induced persistent, progressive memory impairment, caused a loss of neural stem cells, and reduced neurogenesis in young, but not adult, rodents. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2010, 30, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Qiu, J.; Shi, P.; Mao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. Effect of apoptosis in neural stem cells treated with sevoflurane. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015, 15, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nie, H.; Peng, Z.; Lao, N.; Dong, H.; Xiong, L. Effects of sevoflurane on self-renewal capacity and differentiation of cultured neural stem cells. Neurochem. Res. 2013, 38, 1758–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Culley, D.J.; Boyd, J.D.; Palanisamy, A.; Xie, Z.; Kojima, K.; Vacanti, C.A.; Tanzi, R.E.; Crosby, G. Isoflurane decreases self-renewal capacity of rat cultured neural stem cells. Anesthesiology 2011, 115, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Simon, W.; Hapfelmeier, G.; Kochs, E.; Zieglgansberger, W.; Rammes, G. Isoflurane blocks synaptic plasticity in the mouse hippocampus. Anesthesiology 2001, 94, 1058–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Francis, F.; Koulakoff, A.; Boucher, D.; Chafey, P.; Schaar, B.; Vinet, M.C.; Friocourt, G.; McDonnell, N.; Reiner, O.; Kahn, A.; et al. Doublecortin is a developmentally regulated, microtubule-associated protein expressed in migrating and differentiating neurons. Neuron 1999, 23, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.; Quarm, A.K.; Xi, S.; Sun, T.; Zhang, D.; Qian, J.; Ding, H.; Gao, J. Cyclophilin D-mediated angiotensin II-induced NADPH oxidase 4 activation in endothelial mitochondrial dysfunction that can be rescued by gallic acid. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 940, 175475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Carlsson, Y.; Basso, E.; Zhu, C.; Rousset, C.I.; Rasola, A.; Johansson, B.R.; Blomgren, K.; Mallard, C.; Bernardi, P.; et al. Developmental shift of cyclophilin D contribution to hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 2588–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Akter, M.; Kaneko, N.; Sawamoto, K. Neurogenesis and neuronal migration in the postnatal ventricular-subventricular zone: Similarities and dissimilarities between rodents and primates. Neurosci. Res. 2021, 167, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guarnieri, F.C.; de Chevigny, A.; Falace, A.; Cardoso, C. Disorders of neurogenesis and cortical development. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 20, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Accogli, A.; Addour-Boudrahem, N.; Srour, M. Neurogenesis, neuronal migration, and axon guidance. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2020, 173, 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen, X.; Dong, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, H.; Miao, C.; Soriano, S.G.; Sun, D.; Baxter, M.G.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z. Selective Anesthesia-induced Neuroinflammation in Developing Mouse Brain and Cognitive Impairment. Anesthesiology 2013, 118, 502–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tao, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.; Yu, B.; Crosby, G.; Culley, D.J.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z. Sevoflurane induces tau phosphorylation and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta activation in young mice. Anesthesiology 2014, 121, 510–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tan, H.; Boukhali, M.; Khatri, A.; Yu, Y.; Hua, F.; Liu, L.; Li, M.; Yang, G.; et al. Tau Contributes to Sevoflurane-induced Neurocognitive Impairment in Neonatal Mice. Anesthesiology 2020, 133, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xie, Z. Propofol and magnesium attenuate isofluraneinduced caspase-3 activation via inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Med. Gas. Res. 2012, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Xu, G.; Lu, H.; Dong, Y.; Shapoval, D.; Soriano, S.G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Z. Coenzyme Q10 reduces sevoflurane-induced cognitive deficiency in young mice. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 119, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Drobish, J.K.; Gan, Z.S.; Cornfeld, A.D.; Eckenhoff, M.F. From the Cover: Volatile Anesthetics Transiently Disrupt Neuronal Development in Neonatal Rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 154, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 06746 g001 550
Figure 1. Identification of neural progenitor cells (NPCs). (A) Light view of NPCs, Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Immunostaining of NPCs for DNA marker DAPI (blue), the NPCs markers SOX2 (green), and nestin (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of NPCs that differentiate into neurons and astrocytes after 3 day’s differentiation culture. Double immunofluorescent staining of cells for β-tubulin III (neuronal marker, green) and GFAP (astrocyte marker, red). The nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 1. Identification of neural progenitor cells (NPCs). (A) Light view of NPCs, Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Immunostaining of NPCs for DNA marker DAPI (blue), the NPCs markers SOX2 (green), and nestin (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of NPCs that differentiate into neurons and astrocytes after 3 day’s differentiation culture. Double immunofluorescent staining of cells for β-tubulin III (neuronal marker, green) and GFAP (astrocyte marker, red). The nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 50 μm.
Ijms 24 06746 g001
Ijms 24 06746 g002 550
Figure 2. The effects of the sevoflurane treatment on cell migration using wound healing and transwell assays. (A) The bright-field images of the wound healing assay demonstrate cell movement 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment compared to the control condition. The blue line indicates the migration distance relative to the control condition. NPCs were maintained in the incubator between inspections. (B) Quantification of the migration shows that the sevoflurane treatment significantly reduces the migration distance in the wound healing assay compared to the control condition at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment (** p = 0.001). (C) Transwell assay images of migrated cell stained by crystal violet (top) or DAPI (below) 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment. (D) Quantification of the transwell assay shows that the sevoflurane treatment significantly decreases the number of migrated cells as compared to the control condition (** p = 0.001; N = 10 in each group). Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data.
Figure 2. The effects of the sevoflurane treatment on cell migration using wound healing and transwell assays. (A) The bright-field images of the wound healing assay demonstrate cell movement 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment compared to the control condition. The blue line indicates the migration distance relative to the control condition. NPCs were maintained in the incubator between inspections. (B) Quantification of the migration shows that the sevoflurane treatment significantly reduces the migration distance in the wound healing assay compared to the control condition at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment (** p = 0.001). (C) Transwell assay images of migrated cell stained by crystal violet (top) or DAPI (below) 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment. (D) Quantification of the transwell assay shows that the sevoflurane treatment significantly decreases the number of migrated cells as compared to the control condition (** p = 0.001; N = 10 in each group). Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data.
Ijms 24 06746 g002
Ijms 24 06746 g003 550
Figure 3. Sevoflurane increases ROS and CypD levels but decreases doublecortin (DCX) levels in NPCs harvested from WT mice. (A) Sevoflurane treatment (black bar) increases the levels of ROS compared to the control condition (white bar). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining of CypD in NPCs harvested from WT mice. Column 1 is the CypD (green) staining, column 2 is the mitochondrial markers Complex V (red) staining, and column 3 is a merged staining image. Sevoflurane (row b) increases levels of CypD compared to the control condition (row a) in NPCs harvested from WT mice. (C) Western blot shows that the sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly increases the levels of CypD compared to the control condition (lanes 1 to 3). There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the sevoflurane treatment and control condition. (D) Quantitation of the Western blot illustrates increased amounts of CypD levels following the sevoflurane treatment compared to the control condition (* p = 0.029). (E) Sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly decreases doublecortin (DCX) levels compared to the control condition. There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the sevoflurane treatment and control condition. (F) Quantitation of the Western blot illustrates the decreased amounts of DCX levels following the sevoflurane treatment as compared to the control condition (** p = 0.004). N = 6–8 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data.
Figure 3. Sevoflurane increases ROS and CypD levels but decreases doublecortin (DCX) levels in NPCs harvested from WT mice. (A) Sevoflurane treatment (black bar) increases the levels of ROS compared to the control condition (white bar). (B) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining of CypD in NPCs harvested from WT mice. Column 1 is the CypD (green) staining, column 2 is the mitochondrial markers Complex V (red) staining, and column 3 is a merged staining image. Sevoflurane (row b) increases levels of CypD compared to the control condition (row a) in NPCs harvested from WT mice. (C) Western blot shows that the sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly increases the levels of CypD compared to the control condition (lanes 1 to 3). There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the sevoflurane treatment and control condition. (D) Quantitation of the Western blot illustrates increased amounts of CypD levels following the sevoflurane treatment compared to the control condition (* p = 0.029). (E) Sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly decreases doublecortin (DCX) levels compared to the control condition. There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the sevoflurane treatment and control condition. (F) Quantitation of the Western blot illustrates the decreased amounts of DCX levels following the sevoflurane treatment as compared to the control condition (** p = 0.004). N = 6–8 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data.
Ijms 24 06746 g003
Ijms 24 06746 g004 550
Figure 4. CypD KO mitigates the sevoflurane-induced increases of ROS, decreases of DCX, and inhibition of cell migration in NPCs. (A) The sevoflurane treatment does not increase ROS levels compared to the control condition in NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice. Quantitative Western blot (B,C) analysis shows that the sevoflurane treatment does not decrease DCX levels compared to the control condition in the NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice. There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between each condition. (D) The representative transwell assay images of migrated cell stained by crystal violet (top) or DAPI (below) at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment. (E) Quantification of the transwell assay shows that the sevoflurane treatment does not significantly affect the number of migrated NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice compared to the control condition. N = 6–8 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. N.S: non-significant differences.
Figure 4. CypD KO mitigates the sevoflurane-induced increases of ROS, decreases of DCX, and inhibition of cell migration in NPCs. (A) The sevoflurane treatment does not increase ROS levels compared to the control condition in NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice. Quantitative Western blot (B,C) analysis shows that the sevoflurane treatment does not decrease DCX levels compared to the control condition in the NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice. There is no significant difference in β-actin levels between each condition. (D) The representative transwell assay images of migrated cell stained by crystal violet (top) or DAPI (below) at 24 h after the sevoflurane treatment. (E) Quantification of the transwell assay shows that the sevoflurane treatment does not significantly affect the number of migrated NPCs harvested from CypD KO mice compared to the control condition. N = 6–8 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. N.S: non-significant differences.
Ijms 24 06746 g004
Ijms 24 06746 g005 550
Figure 5. Proteomics analyses identify mitochondrial proteins in the hippocampus of mice. (A) Experimental design and workflow for quantitative profiling of mice hippocampus mitochondrial proteomics after the sevoflurane anesthesia. (B) Quantitative proteomic analysis of the abundance ratio of Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (Ppif) associated proteins after the sevoflurane anesthesia. (C) Sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly increases the levels of CypD as compared to the control condition (lanes 1 to 3) in the hippocampus of WT mice; there is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the groups.
Figure 5. Proteomics analyses identify mitochondrial proteins in the hippocampus of mice. (A) Experimental design and workflow for quantitative profiling of mice hippocampus mitochondrial proteomics after the sevoflurane anesthesia. (B) Quantitative proteomic analysis of the abundance ratio of Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (Ppif) associated proteins after the sevoflurane anesthesia. (C) Sevoflurane treatment (lanes 4 to 6) discernibly increases the levels of CypD as compared to the control condition (lanes 1 to 3) in the hippocampus of WT mice; there is no significant difference in β-actin levels between the groups.
Ijms 24 06746 g005
Ijms 24 06746 g006 550
Figure 6. CypD KO mitigates the sevoflurane-induced decrease of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of mice. (A) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining DCX in the hippocampus of WT mice. Column 1 is the DAPI (blue) nuclear staining, column 2 is the DCX (red) staining, and column 3 is the merged staining image. Sevoflurane (row b) decreases the number of DCX-positive cells compared to the control condition (row a) in the hippocampus of WT mice. (B) Quantification of the image shows that sevoflurane (black bar) significantly decreases the number of DCX-positive cells compared to the control condition (white bar) (* p = 0.043). (C) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining DCX in the hippocampus of CypD KO mice. (D) Quantification of the image shows that the sevoflurane anesthesia (black bar) does not change the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of CypD KO young mice compared to the control condition (white bar). N = 5–6 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. The arrows indicate the DCX positive cells in hippocampus. The Box indicates the zoom in image area in staining. N.S: non-significant differences.
Figure 6. CypD KO mitigates the sevoflurane-induced decrease of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of mice. (A) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining DCX in the hippocampus of WT mice. Column 1 is the DAPI (blue) nuclear staining, column 2 is the DCX (red) staining, and column 3 is the merged staining image. Sevoflurane (row b) decreases the number of DCX-positive cells compared to the control condition (row a) in the hippocampus of WT mice. (B) Quantification of the image shows that sevoflurane (black bar) significantly decreases the number of DCX-positive cells compared to the control condition (white bar) (* p = 0.043). (C) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining DCX in the hippocampus of CypD KO mice. (D) Quantification of the image shows that the sevoflurane anesthesia (black bar) does not change the number of DCX-positive cells in the hippocampus of CypD KO young mice compared to the control condition (white bar). N = 5–6 in each group. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. The arrows indicate the DCX positive cells in hippocampus. The Box indicates the zoom in image area in staining. N.S: non-significant differences.
Ijms 24 06746 g006
Ijms 24 06746 g007 550
Figure 7. Hypothetical pathway by which sevoflurane decreases mitigation. Sevoflurane triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increases CypD levels to induce mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to a decrease in the levels of DCX, a protein involved in neuronal migration and differentiation, resulting in a decrease in NPCs migration.
Figure 7. Hypothetical pathway by which sevoflurane decreases mitigation. Sevoflurane triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increases CypD levels to induce mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to a decrease in the levels of DCX, a protein involved in neuronal migration and differentiation, resulting in a decrease in NPCs migration.
Ijms 24 06746 g007
Table
Table 1. The summary of identified Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase proteins regulated by sevoflurane anesthesia.
Table 1. The summary of identified Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase proteins regulated by sevoflurane anesthesia.
Uniport IDsProtein Full NameGene NameMWControl vs. Sevoflurane Abundance Ratio
Q9D1M7Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP11Fkbp1122.28.167487685
Q99KR7Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase F, mitochondrialPpif223.931292942
P45878Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP2Fkbp2, Fkbp1315.62.857343838
O35465Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP8Fkbp8, Fkbp3844.52.669543147
P26883Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AFkbp1a, Fkbp111.92.519260401
P24369Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase BPpib23.72.282234957
Q9CWW6Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 4Pin413.81.732792463
Q62446Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP3Fkbp3, Fkbp2525.21.453658537
Q9CR16Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase DPpid40.71.001914608
P58389Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A activatorPtpa, Ppp2r440.60.948455804
P30416Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP4Fkbp4, Fkpb5251.80.578207406
P17742Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase APpia180.414748708
The data in Table 1 illustrate the full name, gene name, and other information of the protein identified by using mass spectrometry in the hippocampus tissues obtained from the young mice following the sevoflurane anesthesia.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, P.; Liang, F.; Dong, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y. Sevoflurane Induces a Cyclophilin D-Dependent Decrease of Neural Progenitor Cells Migration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076746

AMA Style

Lu P, Liang F, Dong Y, Xie Z, Zhang Y. Sevoflurane Induces a Cyclophilin D-Dependent Decrease of Neural Progenitor Cells Migration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(7):6746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Pan, Feng Liang, Yuanlin Dong, Zhongcong Xie, and Yiying Zhang. 2023. "Sevoflurane Induces a Cyclophilin D-Dependent Decrease of Neural Progenitor Cells Migration" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 7: 6746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop