Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of Long Non-Coding RNAs Related to UV-B Radiation in the Antarctic Moss Pohlia nutans
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Developments in the Synthesis of HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Incorporating Pyridine Moiety
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Co-Adsorption Mechanism of Magnetic Clay-Biochar Composite for De-Risking Cd(II) and Methyl Orange Contaminated Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
[4+2]-Cycloaddition to 5-Methylidene-Hydantoins and 5-Methylidene-2-Thiohydantoins in the Synthesis of Spiro-2-Chalcogenimidazolones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Evaluation on the Fungicidal Activity of S-Alkyl Substituted Thioglycolurils

by
Ekaterina E. Vinogradova
1,
Anna L. Alekseenko
2,
Sergey V. Popkov
2,
Natalya G. Kolotyrkina
1,
Angelina N. Kravchenko
1 and
Galina A. Gazieva
1,*
1
N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky Prosp., Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Faculty of Chemical-Pharmaceutical Technologies and Biomedical Preparations, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, 9 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow 125047, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5756; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065756
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Synthesis of Biologically Active Compounds)

Abstract

:
A series of S-alkyl substituted thioglycolurils was prepared through the alkylation of corresponding thioglycolurils with halogenoalkanes and tested for their fungicidal activity against six phytopathogenic fungi from different taxonomic classes: Venturia inaequalis, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium moniliforme, Bipolaris sorokiniana, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and two pathogenic yeasts: Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. A number of S-alkyl substituted thioglycolurils exhibited high activity against Venturia inaequalis and Rhizoctonia solani (85–100% mycelium growth inhibition), and moderate activity against other phytopathogens. S-Ethyl substituted thioglycolurils possessed a high activity against Candida albicans. Additionally, the hemolytic and cytotoxic properties of promising derivatives were determined using human red blood cells and human embryonic kidney cells, respectively. Two S-ethyl derivatives possessed both low cytotoxicity against normal human cells and high fungicidal activity against Candida albicans.

1. Introduction

Parasitic fungi endanger the health of humans or domestic animals and cause damage to crops or ornamental plants. Invasive fungal infections are increasingly recognized as life-threatening infections in clinics. More than 300 million people suffer from fungal infections, which lead to over 1,350,000 deaths per year [1]. The most common pathogens of mycoses in humans are Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Cryptococcus spp. [1,2]. In addition, plant diseases are an important factor in agricultural production, causing significant economic losses [3,4]. Antifungal resistance represents a major challenge and requires a constant updating of the drugs and agrochemicals used [5,6]. In this regard, the development of new effective fungicides is an urgent task [7].
Imidazole and benzimidazole cores are widely found in natural products and biologically active compounds [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. 2-Thioderivatives of imidazole were found to possess antifungal activity [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. 4-Methyl-2-methylthio-4-phenyl-1-phenylamino-1H-imidazol-5(4H)-one, known as the fungicide fenamidone, has been present on the market of agrochemical plant protection products since 2001. It blocks fungal energy production due to mitochondrial respiration inhibition through binding to the Qo site of the cytochrome bc1 complex [2,17]. Its analogues (for example 1) were found to show fungicidal activity against Phytophthora infestans, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrcularia oryzae, and Fusarium oxysporum (Figure 1) [18,19].
Recently [20], we have synthesized a series of S-methyl and S-ethyl thioglycoluril derivatives 2, 3 possessing fungicidal activity against the phytopatogenes Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium moniliforme, and Bipolaris sorokiniana (see Figure 1). It was found that S-ethyl derivatives are somewhat more active than S-methyl ones. We assumed that the elongation of the alkyl chain at the S atom from C2 to C3 and C4 would lead to an increase in fungicidal activity. In this paper, we synthesized a series of new S-propyl, S-allyl and S-butyl derivatives of 4-[(E)-((E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-5-thioxohexahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4-[(E)-((E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]thioglycoluril) and evaluated their fungicidal activity. S-allyl thioglycolurils were synthesized to reveal the influence of the unsaturated fragment on the activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthetic route to the S-alkyl thioglycolurils 4a–f, 5a–f, and 6a–h is outlined in Scheme 1. To begin, imidazotriazines 7a,b were synthesized via the cyclisation of 4,5-dihydroxyimidazolidin-2-ones 8a,b with thiosemicarbazide [22]; the treatment of compounds 7a,b with (E)-3-phenyl(furan-2-yl)acrylaldehyde derivatives 9a–d in refluxing methanol in the presence of catalytic HCl gave thioglycolurils 10a–h in 43–65% yields [20]. Alkylthio derivatives 4–6 were prepared through the alkylation of corresponding thioglycolurils 10 with 1-bromopropane, 3-bromoprop-1-ene, or 1-bromobutane, respectively, in the presence of potassium carbonate (Scheme 1).
The structures of compounds 4a–f, 5a–f, and 4a–f were confirmed via IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS spectral data. The starting compounds 10a–h have an E configuration around the C=N and C=C bonds [20]. The constants of the vicinal interaction of protons of the CH=CH-Ar fragment of derivatives 4–6 lie in the range of 15.8–16.1 Hz, which is also characteristic of the trans arrangement of substituents at a double bond.

2.2. Fungicidal Activity Testing

Synthesized alkylthio derivatives 4–6 were tested in vitro to a common conventional procedure [20,23,24,25,26] with six phytopathogenic fungi characterized by high impact on crop production: Venturia inaequalis, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium moniliforme, Bipolaris sorokiniana, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. The effect of the testing compounds on the mycelium radial growth in potato-saccharose agar was measured at a concentration 30 μg mL−1. Triadimefon was used as a reference compound (Table 1).
As shown in Table 1, some compounds demonstrated moderate to excellent mycelial growth inhibition. In particular, compounds 4a,b,e, 5e,f, and 6a,b,e,f,g showed moderate inhibitory activity against the causative agent of apple scab disease, V. inaequalis, with inhibition percentages of 42–75%, which were comparable or higher than those for triadimefon (41%). Derivative 6h possessed excellent fungicidal activity, suppressing the growth of V. inaequalis mycelium by 100%. Compounds 4b,e, 5e, and 6b,c,d,e,f,h inhibited the growth of R. solani mycelium by 43–78%, which was comparable or higher than that of triadimefon (43%). At the same time, derivatives 4a (100%), 5f (85%), 6a (91%), and 6g (93%) almost totally inhibited the growth of the fungus. Compounds 4a,e, 5f, and 6a,b,c,e,g exhibited a remarkable antifungal activity against F. oxysporum with inhibition rates of 51–75%, although these values were lower than that of triadimefon (77%). Compounds 4a,b and 6a,b,e–h showed remarkable activity against F. moniliforme (55–66% mycelium growth inhibition). However, they are inferior to the triadimefon (87%). The inhibitory effect of compounds 4a,b,d,e, 5e,f, and 6a,b,d,e–h (from 46 to 75%) against B. sorokiniana exceeded that of triadimefon (44%). Compounds 4a,e, 5f, and 6a,e,g showed activity at the same or slightly less (from 53 to 62%) than the triadimefon level (61%) against S. sclerotiorum.
From the SAR point of view, compounds 4–6 differ in substituents at N(1) and N(3) nitrogen atoms and at the sulfur atom, as well as an aromatic fragment. Substituents at N(1) and N(3) nitrogen atoms do not have a definite effect on the activity of compounds. In some cases, 1,3-dimethyl substituted derivatives 4a, 6a, and 6e were more active than the corresponding 1,3-diethyl derivatives 4b, 6b, and 6f. At the same time, 1,3-diethyl substituted compounds 5f and 6h were more active than the corresponding 1,3-dimethyl derivatives 5e and 6g. In all other pairs of compounds, it is impossible to definitely choose which compound is better.
Among the S-alkyl derivatives, in general, activity increased with an increase in the length of the alkyl chain (Figure 2, Table 1), which is quite likely due to the increasing lipophilicity with the elongation of the alkyl chain. The activity of S-allyl derivatives 5c–e was at or slightly less than the level of S-propyl derivatives 4c–e (Table 1).
The aromatic fragment also affected the activity of the tested compounds. Compounds containing a phenyl ring with an electron-donating methoxy group possessed moderate to remarkable activity (4e, 5e, 5f, 6e, 6f). Introducing an electron-withdrawing nitro group in the ortho-position of the aromatic fragment led to a significant reduction in activity (4c,d, 5c,d, 6c,d). The most active compounds are among the derivatives containing an unsubstituted phenyl or furyl ring (4a, 6a, 6g, 6h) (Figure 3, Table 1). Perhaps, besides the electron effects of the aryl ring substituents, the steric ones can affect the activity.
Thus, we found some structure–activity correlations: (i) an increase in the length of the alkyl chain at the sulfur atom leads to an increase in activity; and (ii) depending on the arylmethylidene fragments, compounds could be arranged according to decreasing activity as follows: Ph-substituted ≥ Fu-substituted > 2-MeOC6H4-substituted >> 2-NO2C6H4- substituted.
Some S-alkyl derivatives, both new and earlier synthesized [20], were assessed for microbiological activity by COADD (the Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery) [27,28,29,30,31]. S-Methyl (2a,b,e), S-ethyl (3a,b,d,e,g), S-propyl (4a,d) and S-butyl thioglycolurils (6b) were tested for inhibitory activity against two yeast fungi (Candida albicans ATCC 90028 and Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii ATCC 208821). All the tested compounds did not possess significant activity against Cryptococcus neoformans in a concentration of 32 μg mL−1 (<50% mycelium growth inhibition, MIC values >32 μg mL−1 for 3a,b,e,g). The results of the analysis of activity against Candida albicans are shown in Table 2.
Among the tested S-alkyl derivatives, only S-ethyl thioglycolurils 3a,b,e,g exhibited high fungicidal activity against Candida albicans. S-Methyl 2a,b,e, S-propyl 4a,d, S-butyl thioglycolurils 6b, and S-ethyl thioglycoluril 3d with a nitrophenyl ring as an aromatic fragment were inactive. For the more potent compounds, 3a,b,e,g, minimum inhibitory concentrations and cytotoxicity on human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293, ATCC CRL-1573, CC50) and human red blood cells (RBC, HC10) were additionally determined. Compounds 3b and 3e were found to exhibit higher cytotoxicity than fungicidal activity, while two compounds, 3a and 3g, displayed potent activity along with low cytotoxicity towards HEK-293 and RBC cells.

2.3. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxic activity of some new compounds, 4b and 5d–f, was studied at the concentration 10−5 M against a panel of approximately 60 cancer cell lines derived from nine neoplastic diseases (leukemia, melanoma, lung, colon, CNS, ovarian, renal, prostate, and breast cancers) using the sulforhodamine B method of the National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutic Program (DTP). Some results are presented in Table 3. It was found that compounds 4b and 5d,e did not exhibit cytotoxic activity against all tested cancer cell lines. The mean growth of cell lines was 94.44–95.93%. Compound 5f in a 10 μM concentration was slightly more active inhibiting the cell growth of HL-60(TB), K562, SR (leukemia), MDA-MB-435 (melanoma), and MCF-7, MDA-MB-468 (breast cancer). The growth percentage values for these cell lines were 2.79–45.58 %. On the whole, it can be concluded that synthesized compounds 4b and 5d–f practically do not possess cytotoxicity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. General Information

Melting points were determined in open glass capillaries on a Gallenkamp (Sanyo) melting point apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ALPHA instrument on KBr pellets. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured on a Bruker micrOTOF II instrument using electrospray ionization (ESI). The measurements were completed in a positive ion mode (interface capillary voltage—4500 V) or in a negative ion mode (3200 V), with a mass range from m/z 50 to m/z 3000 Da, and external or internal calibration was conducted with electrospray calibrant solution (Fluka). A syringe injection was used for solutions in acetonitrile or methanol (flow rate 3 μL/min). Nitrogen was applied as a dry gas; the interface temperature was set at 180 °C. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV-300 (300.13 MHz (1H)) and Bruker AM-300 (300.13 and 75.47 MHz, respectively) spectrometers using DMSO-d6 as a solvent and referenced to the residual solvent peak. The chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ); multiplicities are indicated by s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), m (multiplet). Coupling constants, J, are reported in hertz. The analysis of compound 4f was carried out on a 1100 LS/MSD (Agilent Technologies) chromate-mass spectrometer equipped with an ELSD PL-ELS-1000 mass detector, with detection at 254 nm. The column used was Onyx monolithic C18, 50 × 4.6 mm. The flow rate was 3.75 mL min–1 and the eluent gradient was “A” (2.0 min)—“B” (0.6 min)—“A” (0.2 min) (A—0.1% F3CCOOH, 2.5% MeCN in H2O, B—0.1% F3CCOOH in MeCN).
1-Bromopropane, 99%; 3-bromoprop-1-ene, 99%, stabilized; and 1-bromobutane, 99%, were ordered from Acros organics. Thioglycolurils 10a–h, and S-methyl and S-ethyl derivatives 2a,b,e, and 3a,b,d,e,g were prepared according to the procedures in the literature [20].

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Alkylthio Derivatives of Thioglycoluril 4a–f, 5a–f, and 4a–f

To a stirred suspension of thioglycoluril (10) (1 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.138 g, 1 mmol) in methanol (30 mL), the corresponding bromoalkane (2.5 mmol) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 24 or 4 h (for the synthesis of compounds 4 or 5, 6, respectively), and then concentrated to dryness. A precipitate was washed with water on the filter and dried. Recrystallization from MeOH: H2O (1: 1) gave the S-alkyl derivative (4a–f, 5a–f, 6a–h).
1,3-Dimethyl-4-[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4a). Yield 189 mg (53%); white solid; mp: 155–157 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3056, 3030 (Ar), 2997, 2981, 2961, 2930 (Alk), 2873, 2863 (C-S), 1698, 1562 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.89 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.99 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.87 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.96 (dd, J = 15.9, 8.5 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.05 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.25–7.45 (m, 3H, Ph-3-5), 7.58 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.93 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.31 (Me), 22.23 (CH2), 28.46 (SCH2), 30.79 (NMe), 32.00 (NMe), 72.06 (CH), 79.94 (CH), 125.45, 127.03, 128.79, 129.02, 136.07, 137.86 (=CH, Ph), 141.26 (HC=N), 157.89 (C=O), 165.91 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C18H23N5OS [M + H]+: 358.1696; found: 358.1695.
1,3-Diethyl-4[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4b). Yield 235 mg (61%); white solid; mp: 132–134 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3083, 3033 (Ar), 2964, 2930 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1979, 1879, 1821 (Ar), 1706, 1565 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.90–1.05 (m, 6H, 2Me), 1.13 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.50–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.85–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.12–3.29 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.35–3.55 (m, 1H, NCH2), 5.65 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.90–7.10 (m, 2H, =CH, Ph-CH=), 7.20–7.45 (m, 3H, Ph-3-5), 7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.78 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.17 (Me), 13.44 (Me), 13.87 (Me), 22.17 (CH2), 31.85 (SCH2), 36.25 (NCH2), 37.64 (NCH2), 70.37 (CH), 78.59 (CH), 125.33, 126.91, 128.59, 128.81, 135.93, 137.47 (=CH, Ph), 140.48 (HC=N), 157.02 (C=O), 165.21 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C20H27N5OS [M + H]+: 386.2009; found: 386.2006.
1,3-Dimethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4c). Yield 330 mg (82%); yellow solid; mp: 147–149 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2968, 2935 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1699, 1564 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.50–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.88 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.00 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 5.57 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.90 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.04 (dd, J = 15.7, 8.8 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.32 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.55 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.70 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.96 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, N=CH), 8.00–8.10 (m, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.12 (Me), 22.04 (CH2), 28.24 (CH2), 30.48 (NMe), 31.86 (NMe), 71.67 (CH), 79.75 (CH), 124.32, 127.90, 129.20, 130.16, 130.33, 130.43, 133.26 (=CH, Ar), 140.05 (HC=N), 147.89 (ArC-NO2), 157.55 (C=O), 165.39 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C18H22N6O3S [M + H]+: 403.1547; found: 403.1541.
1,3-Diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4d). Yield 301 mg (70%); yellow solid; mp: 129–131 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2972, 2932, 2918 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1691, 1563 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.85–1.05 (m, 6H, 2Me), 1.13 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.50–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.90–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.12–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.40–3.55 (m, 1H, NCH2), 5.66 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.95 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.06 (dd, J = 15.8, 8.8 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.30 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.55 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.71 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, N=CH), 7.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.03 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.15 (Me), 13.43 (Me), 13.94 (Me), 22.13 (CH2), 31.86 (SCH2), 36.23 (NCH2), 37.74 (NCH2), 70.34 (CH), 78.58 (CH), 124.40, 127.99, 129.25, 130.16, 130.23, 130.58, 133.33 (=CH, Ar), 139.62 (HC=N), 147.85 (ArC-NO2), 157.02 (C=O), 164.92 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C20H26N6O3S [M + H]+: 431.1860; found: 431.1855.
4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-Methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-1,3-dimethyl-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4e). Yield 197 mg (51%); white solid; mp: 154–156 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2997, 2964, 2924 (Alk), 2874, 2838 (C-S), 1705, 1560 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.95 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.50–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.80 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.89 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.99 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.55 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.80–6.99 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.20–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.16 (Me), 22.07 (CH2), 28.26 (NMe), 30.49 (NMe), 31.82 (SCH2), 55.47 (OMe), 71.76 (CH), 79.70 (CH), 111.50, 120.71, 124.30, 125.75, 126.92, 129.94, 132.20 (=CH, Ar), 141.83 (HC=N), 156.63 (ArC-OMe), 157.61 (C=O), 165.60 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C19H25N5O2S [M + H]+: 388.1802; found: 388.1811.
1,3-Diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-5-propylthio-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (4f). Yield mg (90%); white solid; mp: 145–147 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3083, 3033 (Ar), 2964, 2930 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1979, 1879, 1821 (Ar), 1706, 1565 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.80–1.05 (m, 6H, 2Me), 1.13 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.50–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.85–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.15–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.40–3.50 (m, 1H, NCH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.65 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.88–7.00 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.15–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.64 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.83 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.19 (Me), 13.44 (Me), 13.90 (Me), 22.20 (CH2), 31.88 (SCH2), 36.27 (NCH2), 37.67 (NCH2), 55.53 (OMe), 70.37 (CH), 78.58 (CH), 111.54, 120.76, 124.31, 125.77, 127.10, 130.01, 132.20 (=CH, Ar), 141.37 (HC=N), 156.70 (ArC-OMe), 157.11 (C=O), 165.26 (C=N). LS MS: retention time 1.481 min (95%), API-ES, m/z 415.9 [M]+.
5-Allylthio-1,3-dimethyl-4-[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5a). Yield 209 mg (59%); white solid; mp: 149–151 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3078, 3045 (Ar, =CH2), 2992, 2939 (Alk), 2879 (C-S), 1947, 1872 (Ar), 1718, 1560 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.89 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.40–3.80 (m, 2H, SCH2), 5.13 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.57 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.80–6.10 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 6.93 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.6 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, Ph-CH=), 7.20–7.45 (m, 3H, Ph-3-5), 7.59 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.94 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 28.25 (NMe), 30.58 (NMe), 32.56 (SCH2), 72.06 (CH), 79.82 (CH), 118.22 (=CH2), 125.33, 126.89, 128.59, 128.81, 133.43, 135.92, 137.72 (=CH, Ph), 141.19 (HC=N), 157.60 (C=O), 165.12 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C18H21N5OS [M + H]+: 356.1540; found: 356.1546.
5-Allylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5b). Yield 199 mg (52%); white solid; mp: 134–136 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3081, 3031 (Ar, =CH2), 2970, 2932 (Alk), 2877 (C-S), 1978, 1825 (Ar), 1705, 1565 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.01 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.14 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 3.10–3.25 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.35–3.55 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.60–3.80 (m, 2H, SCH2), 5.12 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.80–6.10 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 6.80–7.10 (m, 2H, =CH, Ph-CH=), 7.20–7.45 (m, 3H, Ph-3–5), 7.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.37 (Me), 13.86 (Me), 32.58 (SCH2), 36.21 (NCH2), 37.63 (NCH2), 70.50 (CH), 78.58 (CH), 118.17 (=CH2), 125.24, 126.91, 128.60, 128.80, 133.48, 135.89, 137.60 (=CH, Ph), 140.64 (HC=N), 157.00 (C=O), 164.72 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C20H25N5OS [M + H]+: 384.1853; found: 384.1847.
5-Allylthio-1,3-dimethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5c). Yield 288 mg (72%); yellow solid; mp: 181–183 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2942, 2908 (Alk), 1699, 1563 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.88 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.60–3.80 (m, 2H, SCH2), 5.13 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.58 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.80–6.10 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 7.03 (dd, J = 15.7, 8.9 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.33 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.55 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.70 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.01–8.10 (m, 2H, Ar, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 28.22 (NMe), 30.45 (NMe), 32.58 (SCH2), 71.80 (CH), 79.82 (CH), 118.28 (=CH2), 124.34, 127.93, 129.25, 130.15, 130.27, 130.59, 133.28, 133.35 (=CH, Ar), 140.23 (HC=N), 147.91 (ArC-NO2), 157.53 (C=O), 164.88 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C18H20N6O3S [M + H]+: 401.1390; found: 401.1388.
5-Allylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5d). Yield 300 mg (70%); yellow solid; mp: 160–162 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3070, 3022 (Ar, =CH2), 2970, 2931, 2872 (Alk), 1959, 1881, 1819 (Ar), 1696, 1563 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.98 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.14 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, Me), 3.05–3.30 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.35–3.55 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.60–3.80 (m, 2H, SCH2), 5.12 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5. 68 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85–6.10 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 7.05 (dd, J = 15.7, 8.8 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.31 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.55 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.70 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, N=CH), 7.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.03 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.38 (Me), 13.93 (Me), 32.59 (SCH2), 36.21 (NCH2), 37.73 (NCH2), 70.48 (CH), 78.58 (CH), 118.24, 124.39, 128.01, 129.27, 130.09, 130.21, 130.74, 133.33, 133.42 (=CH, Ar), 139.79 (HC=N), 147.86 (ArC-NO2), 157.01 (C=O), 164.45 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C20H24N6O3S [M + H]+: 429.1703; found: 429.1695.
5-Allylthio-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-1,3-dimethyl-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5e). Yield 300 mg (78%); white solid; mp: 154–156 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3060 (Ar, =CH2), 2988, 2969, 2929, 2889, 2837 (Alk, C-S), 1706, 1562 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.88 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.60–3.75 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.12 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.57 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.80–6.10 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 6.80–6.99 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.20–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.99 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 28.23 (NMe), 30.45 (NMe), 32.54 (SCH2), 55.48 (OMe), 71.89 (CH), 79.76 (CH), 111.50, 118.20, 120.71, 124.28, 125.68, 126.93, 129.98, 132.34, 133.44 (=CH, Ar), 141.99 (HC=N), 156.64 (ArC-OMe), 157.58 (C=O), 165.09 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C19H23N5O2S [M + H]+: 386.1645; found: 386.1640.
5-Allylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (5f). Yield 330 mg (80%); white solid; mp: 132–135 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3075, 3047 (Ar, =CH2), 2969, 2932 (Alk), 2837 (C-S), 1703, 1575 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.99 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.14 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 3.08–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.35–3.50 (m, 1H, NCH2), 3.60–3.79 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.12 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.29 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1H, =CH2), 5.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.80–6.05 (m, 2H, CH, -CH=), 6.90–6.99 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.20–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.65 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.85 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.35 (Me), 13.85 (Me), 32.54 (SCH2), 36.16 (NCH2), 37.58 (NCH2), 55.47 (OMe), 70.43 (CH), 78.49 (CH), 111.48, 118.14, 120.68, 124.21, 125.64, 127.02, 129.97, 132.23, 133.48 (=CH, Ar), 141.48 (HC=N), 156.63 (ArC-OMe), 156.99 (C=O), 164.65 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C21H27N5O2S [M + H]+: 414.1958; found: 414.1951.
5-Butylthio-1,3-dimethyl-4-[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6a). Yield 356 mg (96%); white solid; mp: 101–103 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3081, 3057, 3029 (Ar), 2997, 2956, 2928 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 2053, 1952, 1883, 1823 (Ar), 1701, 1562 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.83 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.91 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.03 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 5.57 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.89 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.95 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.5 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.07 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.25–7.50 (m, 3H, Ph-3-5), 7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.95 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.45 (Me), 21.34 (CH2), 28.26 (CH2), 29.57 (SCH2), 30.61 (NMe), 30.76 (NMe), 71.93 (CH), 79.76 (CH), 125.40, 126.87, 127.14, 128.57, 128.82, 135.96, 137.58 (=CH, Ph), 141.01 (HC=N), 157.62 (C=O), 165.65 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C19H25N5OS [M + H]+: 372.1853; found: 372.1852.
5-Butylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-[((1E,2E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6b). Yield 351 mg (88%); white solid; mp: 103–105 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3079, 3056, 3039 (Ar), 2963, 2928 (Alk), 2870 (C-S), 1938, 1873 (Ar), 1699, 1560 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.02 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.14 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.95–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.15–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.40–3.60 (m, 1H, NCH2), 5.66 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.94 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.90–7.10 (m, 2H, =CH, Ph-CH=), 7.30–7.45 (m, 3H, Ph-3-5), 7.61 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, Ph-2,6), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.46 (2Me), 13.90 (Me), 21.38 (CH2), 29.59 (CH2), 30.88 (SCH2), 36.29 (NCH2), 37.66 (NCH2), 70.39 (CH), 78.65 (CH), 125.33, 126.92, 128.61, 128.83, 135.94, 137.48 (=CH, Ph), 140.48 (HC=N), 157.05 (C=O), 165.24 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C21H29N5OS [M + H]+: 400.2166; found: 400.2164.
5-Butylthio-1,3-dimethyl-4-{[((1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6c). Yield 403 mg (97%); yellow solid; mp: 148–150 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3081, 3014 (Ar), 2960, 2933 (Alk), 2872 (C-S), 1840, 1766 (Ar), 1696, 1560 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.82 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.89 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.03 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 5.57 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.04 (dd, J = 15.8, 8.8 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.33 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=),7.55 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.71 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.96 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.01–8.10 (m, 2H, Ar, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.42 (Me), 21.30 (CH2), 28.23 (CH2), 29.59 (SCH2), 30.48 (NMe), 30.70 (NMe), 71.67 (CH), 79.75 (CH), 124.33, 127.90, 129.22, 130.16, 130.32, 130.44. 133.28, 135.82 (=CH, Ar), 140.05 (HC=N), 147.88 (ArC-NO2), 157.56 (C=O), 165.40 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C19H24N6O3S [M + H]+: 417.1703; found: 417.1701.
5-Butylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6d). Yield 417 mg (94%); yellow solid; mp: 135–137 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3059 (Ar), 2957, 2930 (Alk), 2870 (C-S), 1692, 1566 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 0.99 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.15 (J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.90–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.25–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.40–3.55 (m, 1H, NCH2), 5.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.96 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.06 (dd, J = 15.8, 8.8 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.31 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.56 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.72 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, N=CH), 7.98 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.03 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.44 (2Me), 13.93 (Me), 21.35 (Me), 29.60 (CH2), 30.83 (CH2), 36.27 (NCH2), 37.76 (NCH2), 70.36 (CH), 78.63 (CH), 124.40, 127.99, 129.26, 130.16, 130.24, 130.59, 133.34 (=CH, Ar), 139.61 (HC=N), 147.86 (ArC-NO2), 157.04 (C=O), 164.95 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C21H28N6O3S [M + H]+: 445.2016; found: 445.2013.
5-Butylthio-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-1,3-dimethyl-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6e). Yield 349 mg (87%); white solid; mp: 113–115 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3074, 3045 (Ar), 2998, 2957, 2928 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1711, 1562 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.82 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.90 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.03 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 3.87 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.57 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.90 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.85–6.99 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.20–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.67 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.48 (Me), 21.36 (CH2), 28.27 (CH2), 29.57 (SCH2), 30.50 (NMe), 30.77 (NMe), 55.48 (OMe), 71.76 (CH), 79.71 (CH), 111.49, 120.73, 124.30, 125.76, 126.93, 129.98, 132.21 (=CH, Ar), 141.83 (HC=N), 156.63 (ArC-OMe), 157.62 (C=O), 165.62 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C20H27N5O2S [M + H]+: 402.1958; found: 402.1954.
5-Butylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allylidene]amino}-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6f). Yield 408 mg (95%); white solid; mp: 108–110 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3072, 3044 (Ar), 2960, 2932 (Alk), 2872 (C-S), 2022, 1899, 1824 (Ar), 1699, 1562 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.01 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.15 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.90–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.15–3.30 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.40–3.55 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.87 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.95 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.90–7.01 (m, 2H, Ar, =CH), 7.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.20–7.40 (m, 2H, Ar, Ph-CH=), 7.67 (d, J =7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.85 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.44 (2Me), 13.90 (Me), 21.37 (Me), 29.58, 30.87 (SCH2), 36.27 (NCH2), 37.64 (NCH2), 55.51 (OMe), 70.34 (CH), 78.59 (CH), 111.51, 120.73, 124.27, 125.75, 127.06, 129.99, 132.16 (=CH, Ar), 141.33 (HC=N), 156.67 (ArC-OMe), 157.08 (C=O), 165.22 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C22H31N5O2S [M + H]+: 430.2271; found: 430.2279.
5-Butylthio-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(furan-2-yl)allylidene]amino}-1,3-dimethyl-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6g). Yield 321 mg (89%); light brown solid; mp: 130–132 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3116 (Furyl), 2957, 2929 (Alk), 2871 (C-S), 1700, 1569 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.81 (s, 3H, NMe), 2.88 (s, 3H, NMe), 3.01 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 2.84 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.50–6.80 (m, 3H, Fu, =CH), 6.94 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.74 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H, Fu), 7.89 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.44 (Me), 21.32 (CH2), 28.25 (CH2), 29.54 (SCH2), 30.57 (NMe), 30.75 (NMe), 71.96 (CH), 79.75 (CH), 111.01, 112.37, 122.73, 123.20, 124.70, 140.38, 144.03 (=CH, Fu), 151.85 (HC=N), 157.62 (C=O), 165.59 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C17H23N5O2S [M + H]+: 362.1645; found: 362.1647.
5-Butylthio-1,3-diethyl-4-{[(1E,2E)-3-(furan-2-yl)allylidene]amino})-3,3a,4,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one (6h). Yield 335 mg (86%); light brown solid; mp: 127–129 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3117 (Furyl), 2960, 2931 (Alk), 2872 (C-S), 1698, 1571 (C=O, C=N) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.00 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.15 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Me), 1.30–1.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.90–3.10 (m, 2H, SCH2), 3.12–3.30 (m, 3H, NCH2), 3.40–3.60 (m, 1H, NCH2), 5.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.91 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.50–6.58 (m, 3H, Fu, =CH), 6.94 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, Ph-CH=), 7.70–7.80 (m, 2H, Fu, N=CH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.45 (2Me), 13.87 (Me), 21.36 (Me), 29.54, 30.87, 36.27 (NCH2), 37.64 (NCH2), 70.42 (CH), 78.63 (CH), 111.12, 112.39, 123.10, 124.62, 139.82, 144.07 (=CH, Fu), 151.83 (HC=N), 157.02 (C=O), 165.14 (C=N). HRMS (ESI): Calculated for C19H27N5O2S [M + H]+: 390.1958; found: 390.1945.

3.2. Bioassays of Fungicidal Activities against Phytopathogenic Fungi

The fungicidal activities were tested according to the conventional procedure [20,23,24,25,26] with six phytopathogenic fungi from different taxonomic classes: Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Ssclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.). The effect of the chemicals on mycelial radial growth was determined by dissolving a concentration of 3 mg mL−1 in acetone and suspending aliquots in potato-saccharose agar at 50 °C to give a concentration of 30 µg mL−1. The final acetone concentration of both fungicide-containing and control samples was 10 mL L−1. Petri dishes containing 15 mL of the agar medium were inoculated by placing 2 mm mycelial agar discs on the agar surface. Plates were incubated at 25 °C and radial growth was measured after 72 h. The mixed medium without a sample was used as the blank control. Three replicates of each test were carried out. The mycelium elongation diameter (mm) of fungi settlements was measured after 72 h of culture. The growth inhibition rates were calculated with the following equation: I = [(DC − DT)/DC] × 100%. Here, I is the growth inhibition rates (%), DC is the control settlement diameter (mm), and DT is the treatment group fungi settlement diameter (mm). The results are summarized in Table 1.

3.3. Antifungal Assay against C. albicans and C. neoformans

Preliminary antifungal screening and MIC determination assays were carried out at the University of Queensland following reported methods [29,30,31]. Fungal strains were cultured in yeast nitrogen base media (YNB), and added to each well of the compound-containing plates (384-well plates, NBS). Plates were covered and incubated at 35 °C for 36 h. Growth inhibition of C. albicans was determined by measuring absorbance at 530 nm (OD530), while the growth inhibition of C. neoformans was determined by measuring the difference in absorbance between 600 and 570 nm (OD600–570), after the addition of resazurin (0.001% final concentration) and incubation at 35 °C for an additional 2 h. The absorbance was measured using a Biotek Synergy HTX plate reader. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each well, using the negative control (media only) and positive control (bacteria without inhibitors) on the same plate as references. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined following the CLSI guidelines, identifying the lowest concentration at which the full inhibition of the fungi was detected. Full inhibition of growth was defined at <=20% growth (or >80% inhibition), and concentrations were only selected if the next highest concentration displayed full inhibition (i.e., 80–100%) as well (eliminating ‘singlet’ active concentration). In addition, the maximal percentage of growth inhibition was reported as DMax, indicating any compounds with marginal activity. Compounds were plated as a 2-fold dose response from 32 to 0.25 μg/mL, with a maximum of 0.5% DMSO in the final assay concentration. Samples with MIC <= 16 μg/mL were declared as a hit.

3.4. Cytotoxicity Assay by COADD

Cytotoxicity assays were carried out at the University of Queensland following reported methods [29,30,31]. HEK293 ATCC CRL-1573 human embryonic kidney cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were incubated together with the compounds for 20 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Growth inhibition of HEK293 cells was determined by measuring fluorescence at ex: 530/10 nm and em: 590/10 nm (F560/590), after the addition of resazurin (25 μg/mL final concentration) and incubation at 37 °C for an additional 3 h in 5% CO2. The fluorescence was measured using a Tecan M1000 Pro monochromator plate reader. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each well, using the negative control (media only) and positive control (cell culture without inhibitors) on the same plate as references.
CC50 (concentration at 50% cytotoxicity) was calculated by curve fitting the inhibition values vs. log (concentration) using the sigmoidal dose–response function, with variable values for bottom, top, and slope. The curve fitting was implemented using Pipeline Pilot’s dose–response component (giving similar results to similar tools such as GraphPad’s Prism and IDBS’s XlFit). Any value with >indicates a sample with no activity (low DMax value) or samples with CC50 values above the maximum tested concentration (higher DMax value).
Cytotoxic samples were classified using CC50 ≤ 32 µg mL−1 in either replicate (n = 2 in different plates).

3.5. Hemolysis Assay

Hemolytic activity assays were carried out at the University of Queensland using human red blood cells (RBC) following reported methods [29,30,31]. HC10 (Concentration at 10% haemolytic activity) and HC50 (concentration at 50% haemolytic activity) were calculated by curve fitting the inhibition values versus log (concentration) using a sigmoidal dose–response function with variable fitting values for top, bottom, and slope. The curve fitting was implemented using Pipeline Pilot’s dose–response component (giving similar results to similar tools such as GraphPad’s Prism and IDBS’s XlFit).

3.6. Cytotoxicity assay against 60 Cancer Cell Lines at the National Cancer Institute

The initial assessment of cytotoxic activity was performed using an NCI 60 set of sixty human tumor cell lines derived from nine tumor diseases according to the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Drug Evaluation protocol at a single dose (10–5 mol L–1) [32]. The percentage growth number is an increase in the number of cells compared to the control, wherein the cells were not treated with the test substance. This allows the detection of both growth inhibition (values from 0 to 100) and lethality (values less than 0). A value of 100 means no growth inhibition.

4. Conclusions

The fungicidal activity of a series of S-alkyl substituted N-(3-arylallylidene)aminothioglycolurils was studied, and structure–activity relationships were established. Compounds exceeding or comparable to the well-known fungicidal agent triadimefon were identified. The S-alkyl-N-(3-arylallylidene)aminothioglycolurils with an unsubstituted phenyl or furyl ring were the most effective at inhibiting the growth of phytopathogenic fungi. Inhibitory activity increased with an increase in the length of the alkyl chain at the S atom. Compounds containing an ethyl substituent at the S atom demonstrated elevated activity against yeast Candida albicans. The hemo- and cytotoxicity tests showed that 5-ethylthio-1,3-dimethyl-6-[(E)-((E)-3-phenylallylidene)amino]-3,3a,6,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one 3a and 5-ethylthio-6-{(E)-[(E)-3-(furan-2- yl)allylidene]amino}-1,3-dimethyl-3,3a,6,6a-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-d]imidazol-2(1H)-one 3g exhibited low toxicity to the normal human cell lines, while still showing high fungicidal activity. Further research should focus on in vivo assessment of the fungicidal activity of S-alkyl thioglycolurils and clarification of the mechanism of their action.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24065756/s1: NMR spectra of synthesized compounds, LS MS data for compound 4f.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A.G. and S.V.P.; investigation, E.E.V., A.L.A. and N.G.K.; resources, G.A.G., A.N.K. and S.V.P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.E.V. and G.A.G.; writing—review and editing, G.A.G. and S.V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and in the Supplementary Information.

Acknowledgments

High resolution mass spectra were recorded at the Department of Structural Studies of the N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Moscow.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yin, W.; Cui, H.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, T.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, L.; Su, X.; Zhao, D.; et al. Broadening antifungal spectrum and improving metabolic stability based on a scaffold strategy: Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel 4-phenyl-4,5-dihydrooxazole derivatives as potent fungistatic and fungicidal reagents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 227, 113955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brauer, V.S.; Rezende, C.P.; Pessoni, A.M.; De Paula, R.G.; Rangappa, K.S.; Nayaka, S.C.; Gupta, V.K.; Almeida, F. Antifungal Agents in Agriculture: Friends and Foes of Public Health. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, C.; Long, L.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Q.; Chen, C.; Yu, X.; Liu, Q.; Bao, J.; Long, Z. Antifungal activity, main active components and mechanism of Curcuma longa extract against Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rauzan, B.M.; Lorsbach, B.A. Designing Sustainable Crop Protection Actives. In ACS Symposium Series; Rauzan, B.M., Lorsbach, B.A., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 1390, pp. 1–9. ISBN 978-0-8412-9821-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wiederhold, N.P. Antifungal resistance: Current trends and future strategies to combat. Infect. Drug Res. 2017, 10, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lopat’eva, E.R.; Budnikov, A.S.; Krylov, I.B.; Alekseenko, A.L.; Ilovaisky, A.I.; Glinushkin, A.P.; Terent’ev, A.O. 4-Disubstituted Pyrazolin-3-Ones—Novel Class of Fungicides against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Agrochemicals 2023, 2, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thind, T.S. Changing Trends in Discovery of New Fungicides: A Perspective. Indian Phytopathol. 2021, 74, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beliaeva, M.A.; Seebeck, F.P. Discovery and Characterization of the Metallopterin-Dependent Ergothioneine Synthase from Caldithrix abyssi. JACS Au 2022, 2, 2098–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, D. Synthesis of Imidazole-Based Medicinal Molecules Utilizing the van Leusen Imidazole Synthesis. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rossi, R.; Ciofalo, M. An Updated Review on the Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Molecular Hybrids and Conjugates Bearing Imidazole Moiety. Molecules 2020, 25, 5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, M.; Ali, S.; Khan, M.; Rashid, U.; Ahmad, M.; Khan, A.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Ullah, F.; Latif, A. Synthesis, biological activities, and molecular docking studies of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole based derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 80, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siwach, A.; Verma, P.K. Synthesis and therapeutic potential of imidazole containing compounds. BMC Chem. 2021, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuptsova, A.O.; Vinogradova, E.E.; Kravchenko, A.N.; Gazieva, G.A. Methods for substitution of the thioxo group with the oxo group in imidazolidine-2-thione derivatives. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022, 71, 885–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cho, S.H.; Kim, S.-H.; Shin, D. Recent applications of hydantoin and thiohydantoin in medicinal chemistry. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 164, 517–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Devi, P.; Shahnaz, M.; Prasad, D.N. Recent Overview on Synthesis of 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole Derivatives and its Activities. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2022, 12, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Imran, M.; Bawadekji, A.; Alotaibi, N. Synthesis and evaluation of antimicrobial properties of some azole derivatives. Tropical J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 19, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. FRAC. Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. Available online: http://www.frac.info/home (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  18. Porter, L.D.; Cummings, T.F.; Johnson, D.A. Effects of Soil-Applied Late Blight Foliar Fungicides on Infection of Potato Tubers by Phytophthora infestans. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 964–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ding, M.W.; Chen, Y.F.; Huang, N.Y. Synthesis and fungicidal activities of derivatives of 2-alkylthio-3-amino-4H-imidazol-4-one. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2004, 179, 2287–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gazieva, G.A.; Anikina, L.V.; Nechaeva, T.V.; Pukhov, S.A.; Karpova, T.B.; Popkov, S.V.; Nelyubina, Y.V.; Kolotyrkina, N.G.; Kravchenko, A.N. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new substituted thioglycolurils, their analogues and derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 140, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gazieva, G.A.; Nechaeva, T.V.; Kostikova, N.N.; Sigay, N.V.; Serkov, S.A.; Popkov, S.V. Synthesis, S-alkylation, and fungicidal activity of 4-(benzylideneamino)thioglycolurils. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2018, 67, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gazieva, G.A.; Kravchenko, A.N. Unexpected Formation of Thioglycolurils Precursors. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2015, 52, 1858–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Popkov, S.V.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Bobylev, M.M.; Molchanov, O.Y.; Krimer, M.Z.; Tashchi, V.P.; Putsykin, Y.G. The Synthesis and Fungicidal Activity of 2-Substituted 1-Azol-1-Ylmethyl-6-Arylidenecyclohexanols. Pestic. Sci. 1997, 49, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xia, D.; Cheng, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Huang, N.; Cheng, Y.; Lv, X. Discovery of Novel Pyrazole Carboxylate Derivatives Containing Thiazole as Potential Fungicides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 8358–8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Obydennov, K.L.; Kalinina, T.A.; Galieva, N.A.; Beryozkina, T.V.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Glukhareva, T.V.; Bakulev, V.A. Synthesis, Fungicidal Activity, and Molecular Docking of 2-Acylamino and 2-Thioacylamino Derivatives of 1H-Benzo[d]Imidazoles as Anti-Tubulin Agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 12048–12062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Metodicheskie Rekomendatsii po Opredeleniyu Fungitsidnoi Aktivnosti Novykh Soedinenii. (Methodological Recommendations for Estimation of the Fungicidal Activities of Novel Compounds); NIITEKhIM: Cherkassy, Ukraine, 1984; p. 32. (In Russian)
  27. Blaskovich, M.A.T.; Zuegg, J.; Elliott, A.G.; Cooper, M.A. Helping Chemists Discover New Antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hansford, K.A.; Blaskovich, M.A.T.; Cooper, M.A. Chemical philanthropy: A path forward for antibiotic discovery? Future Med. Chem. 2016, 8, 925–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Frolov, N.A.; Fedoseeva, K.A.; Hansford, K.A.; Vereshchagin, A.N. Novel Phenyl-Based Bis-quaternary Ammonium Compounds as Broad-Spectrum Biocides. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 2954–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frei, A.; Zuegg, J.; Elliott, A.G.; Baker, M.; Braese, S.; Brown, C.; Chen, F.; Dowson, C.G.; Dujardin, G.; Jung, N.; et al. Metal complexes as a promising source for new antibiotics. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 2627–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zalevskaya, O.; Gur’eva, Y.; Kutchin, A.; Hansford, K.A. Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activities of Terpene-Derived Palladium Complexes. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shoemaker, R.H. The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. S-alkyl derivatives of imidazolidinethione and thioglycoluril possessing fungicidal activity against Phytophthora infestans (P. i.), Botrytis cinerea (B. c.), Pyrcularia oryzae (P. o.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), and Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.) and the aim of this work.
Figure 1. S-alkyl derivatives of imidazolidinethione and thioglycoluril possessing fungicidal activity against Phytophthora infestans (P. i.), Botrytis cinerea (B. c.), Pyrcularia oryzae (P. o.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), and Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.) and the aim of this work.
Ijms 24 05756 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of thioglycolurils 4a–f, 5a–f, and 4a–f.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of thioglycolurils 4a–f, 5a–f, and 4a–f.
Ijms 24 05756 sch001
Figure 2. Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.) mycelium growth inhibition under treatment with triadimefon and S-alkyl derivatives 2a20, 3a20, 4a, and 6a.
Figure 2. Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.) mycelium growth inhibition under treatment with triadimefon and S-alkyl derivatives 2a20, 3a20, 4a, and 6a.
Ijms 24 05756 g002
Figure 3. Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.) mycelium growth inhibition under treatment with triadimefon and S-alkyl derivatives 6a, 6c, 6e, and 6g.
Figure 3. Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.) mycelium growth inhibition under treatment with triadimefon and S-alkyl derivatives 6a, 6c, 6e, and 6g.
Ijms 24 05756 g003
Table 1. In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 4a–e, 5c–f, and 4a–f against Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.).
Table 1. In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 4a–e, 5c–f, and 4a–f against Venturia inaequalis (V. i.), Rhizoctonia solani (R. s.), Fusarium oxysporum (F. o.), Fusarium moniliforme (F. m.), Bipolaris sorokiniana (B. s.), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. s.).
EntryIjms 24 05756 i001
Compound
Mycelium Growth Inhibition, % (C = 30 μg mL−1)
R1R2ArV. i.R. s.F. o.F. m.B. s.S. s.
14aMePrPh6710075526657
24bEtPrPh445843575723
34cMePr2-NO2C6H4223921213816
44dEtPr2-NO2C6H433342938467
54eMePr2-MeOC6H4427460386253
65cMeAll2-NO2C6H422341623387
75dEtAll2-NO2C6H4223226423910
85eMeAll2-MeOC6H4474349475226
95fEtAll2-MeOC6H4568572485757
106aMeBuPh739174647462
116bEtBuPh585451576226
126cMeBu2-NO2C6H4254358251418
136dEtBu2-NO2C6H4284519345617
146eMeBu2-MeOC6H4556864667555
156fEtBu2-MeOC6H4455732506321
166gMeBu2-furyl759371636454
176hEtBu2-furyl1007846647336
18Triadimefon414377874461
Table 2. In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 2a,b,e, 3a,b,d,e,g, 4a,d, and 6b against C. albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and cytotoxicity on human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293, CC50) and human red blood cells (RBC, HC10) are expressed in μg mL−1.
Table 2. In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 2a,b,e, 3a,b,d,e,g, 4a,d, and 6b against C. albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and cytotoxicity on human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293, CC50) and human red blood cells (RBC, HC10) are expressed in μg mL−1.
EntryIjms 24 05756 i002
Compound
C. albicans Mycelium Growth Inhibition, %
(C = 32 μg mL−1)
MIC C.a.HC10CC50
R1R2Ar
12aMeMePh11.46---
22bEtMePh7.44---
32eMeMe2-MeOC6H42.69---
43aMeEtPh99.388>32>32
53bEtEtPh98.7432>3212.05
63dEtEt2-NO2C6H40.78---
73eMeEt2-MeOC6H498.45>32>3213.52
83gMeEt2-furyl98.788>32>32
94aMePrPh11.42---
104dMePr2-NO2C6H421.77---
116bEtBuPh5.64---
12Flc a 0.125 [31]
a Flc—Fluconazole.
Table 3. Antiproliferative screening data at a concentration of 10 μM.
Table 3. Antiproliferative screening data at a concentration of 10 μM.
Ijms 24 05756 i00360 Cell Line Assay in One Dose 10 mM Concentration
CompoundR1R2ArMean Growth, %Range of Growth, % aMost Sensitive Cell LinePositive Antiproliferative Effect b
4bEtPrPh94.4470.05–117.64UO-31 (renal cancer)0/60
5dEtAll2-NO2C6H495.6968.34–116.54T-47D (breast cancer)0/57
5eMeAll2-MeOC6H495.9368.68–124.64A498 (renal cancer)0/59
5fEtAll2-MeOC6H471.222.79–122.21MDA-MB-435 (melanoma)7/60
a The range of percentage growth shows the lowest and the highest percent growth found among all the tested cell lines. b Ratio between number of cell lines with percentage growth from 0 to 50 and total number of cell lines.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vinogradova, E.E.; Alekseenko, A.L.; Popkov, S.V.; Kolotyrkina, N.G.; Kravchenko, A.N.; Gazieva, G.A. Synthesis and Evaluation on the Fungicidal Activity of S-Alkyl Substituted Thioglycolurils. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065756

AMA Style

Vinogradova EE, Alekseenko AL, Popkov SV, Kolotyrkina NG, Kravchenko AN, Gazieva GA. Synthesis and Evaluation on the Fungicidal Activity of S-Alkyl Substituted Thioglycolurils. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vinogradova, Ekaterina E., Anna L. Alekseenko, Sergey V. Popkov, Natalya G. Kolotyrkina, Angelina N. Kravchenko, and Galina A. Gazieva. 2023. "Synthesis and Evaluation on the Fungicidal Activity of S-Alkyl Substituted Thioglycolurils" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop