Next Article in Journal
Sphingolipid Long-Chain Base Signaling in Compatible and Non-Compatible Plant–Pathogen Interactions in Arabidopsis
Next Article in Special Issue
Adsorptive Removal of Direct Azo Dyes from Textile Wastewaters Using Weakly Basic Anion Exchange Resin
Previous Article in Journal
Exosomes in Colorectal Cancer: From Physiology to Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bottom-Up Synthesis of De-Functionalized and Dispersible Carbon Spheres as Colloidal Adsorbent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cationic Pullulan Derivatives Based Flocculants for Removal of Some Metal Oxides from Simulated Wastewater

by
Luminita Ghimici
*,
Maria Magdalena Nafureanu
and
Marieta Constantin
“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Grigore Ghica Voda 41A, 700487 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(5), 4383; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054383
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 February 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials for Pollutants Removal: From Molecular Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Modified polysaccharides have been increasingly used as flocculants in wastewater treatment due to their non-toxicity, low price, biodegradability, etc. However, the pullulan derivatives are less used in wastewater purification processes. Therefore, this article presents some data regarding FeO and TiO2 particle removal from model suspensions by some pullulan derivatives with pendant quaternary ammonium salt groups, trimethylammonium propyl carbamate chloride (TMAPx–P). The influence of the polymer ionic content, dose, and initial solution concentration as well as of the dispersion pH and composition (metal oxide content, salts, and kaolin) on the separation efficacy were considered. UV-Vis spectroscopy measurements have shown a very good removal efficacy of TMAPx–P for the FeO particles (around 95% and more), irrespective of the polymer and suspension characteristics; a lower clarification of the TiO2 particles suspension (removal efficiency between 68% and 75%) was noticed. Both the zeta potential and the particle aggregates size measurements revealed the charge patch as the main mechanism which governs the metal oxide removal process. The surface morphology analysis/EDX data provided supplementary evidence regarding the separation process. A good removal efficiency (90%) of the pullulan derivatives/FeO flocs for the Bordeaux mixture particles from simulated wastewater was found.

1. Introduction

Pullulan, a non-ionic polysaccharide produced by some microorganisms (Aureobasidium pullulans, Teloschistes flavicans, Cytariaharioti, etc.) and different carbon sources (jackfruit seed, cassava bagasse, ricehull, etc.) [1], has attracted expanding interest due to the advantages encountered, generally, of the polymeric materials belonging to polysaccharides class (non-toxicity, low price, easy availability, biodegradability), but also related to its chemical structure (high flexibility of the chain, high solubility in water, ability to be modified by different chemical reactions, etc) [1,2,3]. The wide range of chemical reactions used to modify this polysaccharide (esterification, sulfation, copolymerization, and oxidation) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] lead to pullulan derivatives that, apart from the properties of the unmodified sample, may exhibit new ones, suitable for certain applications. For example, the introduction of ionizable groups such as carboxylic, quaternary ammonium, or amino ones, which dissociate in polar solvents and lead to charged polymer chains, can give the ionic pullulan derivatives the possibility to interact with oppositely charged particles by means of the electrostatic attraction forces, thus becoming suitable polymers for using in the wastewater purification field. Microspheres of pullulan-graft-poly(3-acrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride) and some soluble pullulan derivatives containing either tertiary amine groups (aminopropyl dimethylamine) or quaternary ammonium salt ones (grafted chains, poly[(3-acrylamidopropyl)-trimethylammonium chloride]) have been already tested and successfully removed some organic particles, such as dyes (Methyl Orange, Acid Orange 7, Azocarmine B, Methylene Blue, Reactive Blue 2) [11] and commercial pesticide formulations (Fastac 10EC, Karate Zeon, Novadim Progress, Bordeaux mixture, Decis, Confidor oil, Confidor Energy) [12,13] as well as inorganic ones (clay and kreutzonit) [12,14] from simulated wastewater. The latter particles are mostly used in some ceramic industry processes, namely for the sprocket gypsie and glaze preparation, and are, therefore, found in ceramic wastewater. Along with the aforementioned particles, metal oxides (iron oxides (Fe2O3, FeO), cobalt oxide (CoO), copper oxide (CuO), nickel oxide (NiO), etc.), and zinc oxide (ZnO)) are used in ceramics to impart color to glazes and bodies or as opacifier agents (titanium oxide (TiO2)). Many of them are also used in paints, coatings, adhesives, rubber, printing inks, cosmetics, textiles industries, etc. Their presence in wastewater which has to be reused could have undesired effects on different steps of the industrial processes mentioned above. Thus, some effort has been spent to remove them from wastewater by adsorption/flocculation methods in order to protect the water resources [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. So far, the flocculants were based either on synthetic polymer (homopolymers and graft copolymers of acrylamide (AM) and diallyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC) [15,23], PEG, and Pluronic-type polymers [19] or polysaccharides derivatives based on chitosan [17,21], dextran [18], and cellulose [20]).
The inspection of the literature data reveals that until now there are no systematic data concerning the application of the pullulan derivatives as flocculants for the removal of metal oxides. The lack of this kind of information, on the one hand, and the excellent performance exhibited by the grafted pullulan derivatives as well as those with pendant tertiary amine groups in the removal of clay and kreutzonit particles (removal efficiency (RE%) between 95–99%), on the other hand, encouraged us to investigate the efficiency of some pullulan derivatives containing different amounts of pendant strong basic quaternary ammonium salt groups, trimethylammonium propyl carbamate pullulan (TMAPx–P) randomly distributed along the polymer backbone in the removal of some metal oxides, namely FeO and TiO2 from simulated wastewater. The results will be compared with those obtained when some of the polymers mentioned above were used as flocculants (Table 1).
Our research considered the influence of some tunable parameters, such as the pullulan derivatives ionic content, polymer dose, and initial concentration (cip), dispersion pH and composition (contaminant content (cFeO), salts and kaolin presence), as the main parameters influencing the separation efficacy.
UV-Vis spectroscopy, zeta potential, the particle aggregates size measurements together with surface morphology, and EDX analyses were used as tools to evaluate the flocculation efficacy of the pullulan derivatives investigated herein and the possible mechanisms controlling the metal oxides removal process.

2. Results and Discussion

The optimum dose (doseop) (the polymer dose (PD) corresponding to the maximum removal efficiency of contaminants) is one of the terms, routinely used to express the efficiency of the flocculation process. It can be influenced by parameters related either to the chemical structure of polymers (molecular mass, ionic group content and nature, the alkyl chain length, etc.) or dispersion medium characteristics (composition, pH, temperature, the polymer and contaminant concentration, etc.). In the following, some data regarding the influence of some of the aforementioned parameters on the doseop, and hence the separation efficacy of the pullulan derivatives investigated in dispersions of FeO and TiO2 particles, are presented.

2.1. Pullulan Derivatives Ionic Group Content

  • FeO suspension
The ionic group content of a polyelectrolyte chain is, probably, the parameter with the greatest impact on the chain conformation in solution, which in turn, influences the flocculation ability of an ionic polymer. The impact of a series of TMAPx–P having different ionic content (see Table 3, Section 3.1. Materials) on the removal of FeO (cFeo = 0.4 g L−1) and TiO2 (cTiO2 = 0.05 g L−1) particles has been examined and presented below. The residual FeO absorbance vs. TMAPx−P dose plots (Figure 1) show a very good removal of the FeO particles (removal efficiency around 95% and more) in the polymer dose interval between 0.14 mg L−1 (TMAP0.7-P) and 1 mg L−1 (TMAP0.2–P); according to the calibration curve, the residual FeO concentration is 0.014 g L−1 (TMAP0.7–P) and 0.015 g L−1 (TMAP0.2–P).
The investigations regarding the polymer–particle interactions have brought out the diversity of forces (electrostatic attractions, hydrogen bonding, ion binding, hydrophobic ones) implied in these systems, depending on the characteristic of the partners investigated [24]. Taking into account (i) the presence of the quaternary ammonium salt groups on the TMAPx–P chains and the negatively charged FeO particles (ζ = −26.7 mV—see the Experimental Section 3) at the working pH (7.1) and (ii) the poor performance of the unmodified pullulan sample in the separation of this type of particles (maximum removal efficiency around 55%) (Figure 1, inset), one may assert that the electrostatic attraction forces between the oppositely charged sites on the TMAPx–P and FeO particles prevail in the separation process. This assumption is supported by another finding, worthy to underline, namely the decreasing of doseop values with augmentation of the ionic group content (Table 2).
A higher amount of charged groups on the polymer chains means an increased ability to electrostatically attract the negative charges on the FeO particle′s surface, and hence the separation process. The neutralization process is also helped by the more extended chains of the highest charged sample (TMAP0.7–P), conformation resulting from the increased electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged segments of the chain. Moreover, the enhancing efficacy in FeO/TMAPx–P interactions with augmentation pullulan derivatives charged content is reflected in flocs size (median values D50, µm) recorded at doseop for each pullulan derivative sample, which follows the next order: D50TMAP0.2–P = 5.23 ± 0.16 µm < D50TMAP0.4–P = 5.99 ± 0.33 µm < D50TMAP0.7–P = 8.32 ± 0.39 µm (Figure 2).
Anyway, the narrow size distribution and small size of the FeO/TMAPx–P aggregates, irrespective of the pullulan derivatives ionic group content, compared with that of the untreated FeO particles (D50FeO= 2.19 ± 0.02 µm) enforces the mechanisms based on the electrostatic attraction between the oppositely charged particles (charge neutralization or charge patch), as the main ones in the separation of the FeO particles. According to the finding of Claesson et al. [25], the flocs size increase with the ionic group content of polymer samples indicating that the charge patch mechanism prevails in the FeO particle removal. We would like to recall the reader that in this type of mechanism, aggregation occurs as a consequence of the electrostatic attraction forces between oppositely charged patches on different particles [24]; a higher number of charged groups at the adsorption site entail an enhanced electrostatic attraction between the oppositely charged patches on the surfaces of different particles. This result is in agreement with those found in the flocculation of some clay particles by two series of polyelectrolytes with different charge densities, namely (poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)-PDADMAC [26] and cationic dextran derivatives (D40-EtX) [27]. Another argument in favor of this mechanism was obtained by corroborating the UV-Vis spectroscopy results with those provided by zeta potential measurements (ζ), performed, also, in dependence of the TMAPx–P dose. As seen in Figure 3, ζ values corresponding to doseop are negative for all of the polymer samples (−14.9 mV (TMAP0.7–P), −15.46 mV (TMAP0.4–P), and −16.86 mV (TMAP0.2–P)) that pleads for the charge patch mechanism, where zeta potential needs not to be zero [28], as for the neutralization mechanism [29].
One also observes that ζ increases for polymer doses higher than doseop up to positive values, namely 22.4 mV in the presence of TMAP0.7–P, 16.8 mV for TMAP0.4–P, and 9.81 mV for TMAP0.2–P. The charge inversion of the particles and hence, their electrostatic repulsion could explain the restabilization of the FeO suspension, noticed in the UV-Vis spectroscopy measurement results (Figure 1). The inefficiency of the flocculation process at polymer doses higher than doseop was also confirmed in the case of TMAP0.7–P by particle size distribution measurements (Figure 4).
The smaller FeO/TMAP0.7–P aggregates size, D50 = 5.36 ± 0.17 µm, was noticed for the higher pullulan derivative dose (1.4 mg L−1) than that recorded at doseop, D50 = 8.32 ± 0.39 µm (doseop = 0.14 mg L−1) might be a consequence of a surplus of positively charged polymer chains adsorbed onto the FeO particles surface; repulsion between the positive charges on the microflocs prevents their growth in larger ones.
b.
TiO2 suspension
In the case of the TiO2 particles, the ionic content influence on the particle’s flocculation resembles that noticed for the FeO particles. Therefore, only the separation performances of TMAP0.2–P and TMAP0.7–P are depicted in Figure 5a. The minimum residual TiO2 absorbance values were located only around 32% for the lowest charged sample (TMAP0.2–P) and 25% for the highest charged one (TMAP0.7–P) at doseop values which increased with the ionic group content (see Table 3, Section 3.1. Materials).
The poor separation performance could be an outcome of the weak non-electrostatic and electrostatic attractive forces between the pullulan derivatives and TiO2 particles. The former kind of force was checked in an experiment where the unmodified pullulan sample has been used as a flocculant (Figure 5a, inset). The minimum residual TiO2 absorbance was 73%. This means that the attractive electrostatic interactions between the negative charges on the TiO2 particle surface (TiO) (ζ = −38.1 mV) and the cationic groups on the polymeric chains play the most important role in the TiO2 particle separation. However, they are quite weak, as mentioned above, a finding also revealed by zeta potential measurements (Figure 5b). For both of the TMAPx–P samples, the increase in ζ values was small compared to the initial value (ζTiO2 = −38.1 mV), over the entire range of the pullulan derivative doses investigated (up to ζ = −20 mV for the TMAP0.2–P and ζ = −16.8 mV for the TMAP0.7–P). The electrostatic repulsion interactions between the positively charged pullulan derivative segments adsorbed on different TiO2 particles and/or the steric ones (between the uncharged segments on the polyelectrolyte chains extended into solution, as tails, loops) could, probably, obstruct, to some measure, the polyelectrolytes/TiO2 particles interactions. However, one has also to remark that the pullulan derivatives efficacy in the removal of this oxide from dispersion prepared in water was higher than those of some cationic dextran derivatives (hydrophilic and amphiphilic)—removal efficiency values between 50% and 60% [17]—and PEG and the Pluronic-type polymers—removal efficiency values 56% and 20%, respectively [19] (see Table 1). Previously, Divakaran and Pillai [18] found that chitosan did not clarify a suspension of TiO2 particles prepared in distilled water but only in tap water; the authors surmised that some species present in the tap water played an important role in the flocculation of TiO2 particles.
From the data presented above, the pullulan derivatives proved to be better flocculants for the FeO particles than for the TiO2 ones; therefore, the impact of some other parameters, namely cip, dispersion pH, and composition (cFeO, salts, and kaolin presence) on their removal, was further investigated and presented below. As the impact of these parameters on the flocculation efficacy was similar for all of the three pullulan derivatives (data not shown), only one polymer sample was chosen as an example: TMAP0.4–P for the cip influence and TMAP0.7–P for the influence of the other parameters.

2.2. Initial Solution Concentration of the Pullulan Derivatives (cip) and FeO Dispersion (cFeO)

The initial solution concentration of the pullulan derivatives, cip, refers to the concentration of the polyelectrolyte stock solution added to the clay suspension. The polymer chains conformation may vary as a function of concentration regimes, from the extended (rigid) (dilute regime) to the overlapped or even entangled one (semidilute regime) which could lead to modification of some properties, including the separation one. To find out the impact of this parameter on the FeO particle removal, flocculation tests have been undertaken with solutions of TMAP0.4–P with three different initial polymer concentrations, namely cip = 0.1 g L−1, 0.3 g L−1, and 1 g L−1. They are located below, close to, and above the critical overlap concentration, c* = 0.35 g L−1, which delimits the diluted and semi-diluted concentration regimes. c* was estimated by means of Equation (1) [30]:
c* = 1/[η]
where, [η] = intrinsic viscosity obtained by the Wolf method [31]; [η] = 2.81 L g−1.
The curves exhibited in Figure 6a (cip = 0.1 g L−1 and 0.3 g L−1) and Figure 1 (cip = 1 g L−1) show the removal efficiency values were quite close, between 93.5% (cip = 0.1 g L−1) and 95.66% (cip = 1 g L−1).
However, the doseop values were different for the three cip investigated. They are higher for cip located either in the dilute regime (cip = 0.1 g L−1) or in the semidilute one (cip = 1 g L−1), doseop= 0.5 mg L−1 and doseop = 0.6 mg L−1, respectively, than that recorded for cip close to c* (doseop = 0.3 mg L−1). Probably, at this concentration, the polymer chains have a better arrangement on the FeO particle′s surface than in the other two cases, making easier the electrostatic attractions between the oppositely charged groups of the polymer chains and FeO particles, improving, thus, the flocculation process. One has to underline here, that this result, namely the dependence of doseop on cip is different from that obtained when hydrophilic ionic polymers based on dextran were used for the flocculation of some clay particles [27]—the doseop values were almost the same irrespective of cip; only the residual turbidity corresponding to doseop varied.
These investigations revealed clearly the cip influence on the FeO particles removal process showing that a suitable concentration of the initial solution of TMAP0.4–P is required to get the best contaminant removal: cip = 0.3 g L−1 in the flocculation processes where low polymer doses are required while cip = 1 g L−1 is more suitable when a higher removal efficiency is preferred.
As regards the impact of the FeO particles concentration (cFeO) on the flocculation efficiency of the pullulan derivatives, in addition to cFeO = 0.4 g L−1 (Figure 1), experiments on FeO particles suspensions with cFeO = 0.2 g L−1 and 0.6 g L−1 at the natural suspensions pH were performed; for this test, the TMAP0.7–P sample was used as a flocculant (Figure 6b).
These figures point out a negligible influence of cFeO on the doseop when suspensions with cFeO = 0.2 g L−1 and 0.4 g L−1 were used, namely 0.1 mg L−1 in case of the former concentration and 0.14 mg L−1 for the latter one. A notable influence of cFeO on the doseop was observed for the highest cFeO when a removal efficiency of around 95% and more was obtained for an interval of doseop between 0.14 mg L−1 and 0.8 mg L−1. This, probably, occurs because a greater content of FeO particles in dispersion requires a higher TMAP0.7–P chains amount for neutralization and aggregation, hence the increase in doseop.

2.3. Suspension pH

It is well known that in real wastewater, the suspension pH could change and influence, thus, the flocculation process as it can affect the charge content on the polymer chains (hence, their conformation) or particle surface. To find out the influence of this parameter on the flocculation efficacy, the experimental tests were carried out using the TMAP0.7–P sample on suspension of FeO particles with pH 9.5, and the results (Figure 7) were compared to those obtained on the initial suspension of FeO particles with pH 7.1 (Figure 1). The suspension pH was adjusted using 0.1M NaOH solution. The investigation of the pullulan derivative in the removal of the FeO particles at lower pH values than the natural one has not led to consistent results due to the instability of the FeO particles.
TMAP0.7–P (like all the TMAPx–P samples) is a strong polyelectrolyte which means it is completely ionized irrespective of the pH value and consequently, its conformation does not depend on this parameter. As regards the FeO particles, a small increase in the medium pH from the natural one, pH 8.34 to pH 9.5, determined an increase in ζ values from −26.7 mV to −47.6 mV, which indicated an increase in the (FeO) groups concentration on the oxide particles surface against that at natural pH. As seen in Figure 8, a slight enhancement of the removal efficacy (98%) and a pronounced one of the doseop (6 mg L−1) were recorded; this could be explained by the stronger electrostatic attraction interactions between the FeO particles and the positive groups of TMAP0.7–P. This result shows that the pullulan derivative sample could be successfully used for the removal of FeO particles at a higher pH value than the natural one.

2.4. FeO Particles in Suspensions Containing Salts, Kaolin, or TiO2 Particles

The real wastewater may contain low molecular salts, clay particles, mixtures of oxides, dyes, etc., which could influence, in a certain extent, the flocculation efficacy of a polymer. In order to evaluate the influence of other contaminants on the FeO removal percent by the pullulan derivatives investigated here, experiments on suspensions containing along with FeO particles (0.2 g L−1), different salts (NaCl, Na2SO4, NaNO3, CaCl2, MgCl2) (each salt with cs = 1 × 10−3 M) and kaolin (0.2 g L−1) or TiO2 particles (FeO/TiO2 (w/w, 1/1)) were carried out.
As can be seen in Figure 8a, the presence of salts and kaolin particles in the FeO suspension has not decreased the separation performance of TMAP0.7–P, the residual FeO absorbance being very low, between 1.31% and 3.33%, at polymer doses located in the interval 0.14 mg L−1 and 2 mg L−1, after a settling time of 30 min.
In order to see the effects of salts or kaolin particles on the FeO particle suspensions stability, two kinds of suspensions have been prepared: one containing FeO particles and salts and the other one, FeO and kaolin particles. The residual FeO absorbance declined to about 52.66% in the former case and 93% in the latter one, after the same settling time. This means that even though the residual FeO absorbance decrease is much lower than in the presence of TMAP0.7–P, the salts in suspension play a certain role in the separation process.
As both metal oxides could be found in wastewater (for example in the ceramic ones), the flocculation performance of TMAP0.7–P (the sample with the smallest doseop used for both metal oxides) on suspensions containing mixtures of FeO/TiO2 (w/w, 1/1) has been checked (Figure 8b). It turned out that the polymer sample was a very good separation agent for the suspension containing the mixture of FeO and TiO2, a removal efficiency of about 90% of both metal oxides being noticed in the interval of polymer doses between 0.14 mg L−1 and 0.24 mg L−1 after 120 min settling time. It seems that the presence of the FeO particles helps the polymer to remove TiO2 particles; in the absence of TMAP0.7–P, the residual absorbance values of the two oxides in the mixture were 56.28% (FeO) and 51.13% (TiO2), after the same settling time.
Additional evidence for the role played by the polymer in the separation of the above mixtures was obtained with the help of the particle′s surface morphology (Figure 9a–d).
The scanning electron micrographs reveal that, in the absence of TMAP0.7–P, both mixtures contain separated particles of different sizes and shapes (Figure 9a,c), while bigger aggregates are formed after the interactions with polycation chains (doseop: 0.6 mg L−1 and doseop: 0.2 mg L−1, respectively) (Figure 9b,d), proving once more the role of TMAP0.7–P in the particles aggregation and separation.

2.5. Effect of the Pullulan Derivative/FeO Flocs on the Reduction of the Fungicide Bordeaux Mixture Particles Content from Synthetic Wastewater

It is well known that the flocculation process generates different types of sludge that, apart from a large amount of water, could contain the removed contaminants, the coagulants (aluminum- or iron-based salts)/flocculants (polymers), etc., depending on the composition of the wastewater treated and type of the treatment method applied. These, in their turn, could contaminate the groundwater, the land, etc., challenging, thus, the scientific community to find solutions for proper wastewater sludge management (disposal, regeneration, reuse). As some of them are expensive or difficult to apply (landfills, incineration, compression into building blocks, digestion) [32,33,34,35], some other cost-effective and environmentally friendly options have been investigated. Thus, the use of sewage sludge and that generated by various wastewater treatment plants, as adsorbents, has become an alternative to chemicals to remove heavy metals, phosphorus/phosphates, dyes, phenolic compounds, pesticides, etc. [36,37,38,39,40]. Regarding pesticides, one of the most dangerous types of contaminants for the whole environment (groundwater and surface water, atmosphere, soil), fertilizer and steel industry wastes for removal of 2,4-D and carbofuran pesticides [41], alum sludge for removal of glyphosate [42], activated sludge followed by pine bark adsorption for lindane and heptachlor [43], etc., have been used. Quite recently, in a preliminary test, some flocs, obtained in the flocculation process of zirconium silicate (kreutzonit) particles by grafted cationic derivatives based on pullulan, exhibited remarkable efficacy in the removal of the Bordeaux mixture particles, a fungicide widely used to combat diseases of fruits, grapes, ornamental plants, etc., from simulated wastewater; a removal efficiency higher than 95% (residual BM content of 25 mg L−1) at an optimum amount of flocs (10 g flocs/1000 mL BM suspension) was found [14]. Both this result and the lack of information regarding the use of polymer/contaminant flocs, as adsorbents for pesticides, motivated us to also test the ability of the FeO/TMAPx–P flocs to reduce the BM particles content from a model suspension.
For the separation tests, performed according to the method already reported by Ghimici and Constantin [14], flocs of TMAP0.7–P/FeO, dried for several days at room temperature and 1 day under vacuum, and a BM sample (MIF type -IQV, Spain) (a combination of 20% copper sulfate, slaked lime (Ca(OH)2), and water) have been used. Different amounts of FeO/TMAP0.7–P flocs were added under stirring (200 rpm) to 50 mL BM particle suspension placed into 100 mL beakers (c, w/w) = 0.5 g L−1), previously sonicated for 15 min. Stirring of the mixture was continued for a different time when the flocs amount was kept constant and 1 h for the experiments when this varied. In order to evaluate the BM removal percent, supernatant absorbance measurements were performed after the established settling times of the suspension.
Figure 10a depicts the impact of both the stirring and settling time on the BM particle separation when 0.1 g flocs were used as adsorbent. The stirring time had no effect on the separation process, the residual BM absorbance values being constant over 20 h of stirring, at the same settling time.
On the other hand, the BM particle removal increased with the settling time, irrespective of the period of stirring. The highest removal efficiency increase was observed after the settling time of 20 h (around 50%), with further increase in this parameter leading to an increase in removal efficiency to a lesser extent, up to 65% (48 h) and 70% (72 h). Given the finding above, Figure 10b shows only the data collected after 20 h and 48 h, for the experiments with different amounts of flocs. The flocs amount was in the range of 0.1 g/50 mL to 0.7 g/50 mL suspension of BM. The plotted data show a pronounced downtrend of the fungicide content in the model suspension with the flocs amount augmentation up to 0.5 g of flocs/50 mL suspension when a residual BM absorbance of around 10% (corresponding to a residual BM concentration of about 0.049 g L−1) was observed; the calibration curve for the BM suspension was not shown here. For the higher amounts of flocs, the residual BM absorbance values increase, which means the decline in removal efficacy of FeO/TMAP0.7–P flocs. In order to explain these results, we performed additional experiments where a solution of TMAP0.7–P or FeO particles was used for the BM suspension separation. As Figure 11 shows, the polymer sample has shown a very good separation efficiency for the fungicide particles, namely 94% (polymer dose 6 mg L−1), after 2 h settling.
Regarding the implication of the FeO particles in the separation process, the tests have shown residual BM absorbance values around 48% (20 h settling time) and 33% (48 h settling time) for particles FeO amount/50 mL BM suspension between 0.01 g and 0.03 g. Given that in the absence of the metal oxide particles, the residual absorbance value for fungicide were almost the same, 49.19% (20 h settling time) and 36.33% (48 h settling time), one may assume that there are no interactions between the fungicide and the FeO particles. From these results, one may surmise that the polymer chains on the flocs surface have a decisive role in the fungicide separation process. Here, we have to remind the reader that the main flocculation mechanism implied in the FeO particle removal by the pullulan derivatives TMAPx–P is the charge patch one (see Section 2.1). It is possible that the polymer chains adsorbed on the FeO particles have free positive charges which could attract the negative species of BM (for example, SO42−) (ζ = −20 mV), entailing the fungicide particle separation. Moreover, the interactions between the polymer chains and the above-mentioned contaminant could be also favored by the Cu2+ ions′ affinity to the amine/carbamate groups within its chemical structure (Scheme 1, Section 3.1. Materials).
Supplementary evidence for the BM particle retention by the FeO/TMAP0.7–P flocs was obtained by both particle size distribution (Figure 12a) and EDX (Figure 12b,c) measurements.
Thus, the higher size of the flocs (D50 = 40 ± 2.36 µm) formed after the retention of BM particles (Figure 12a) compared to that of TMAP0.7P/FeO (8.32 ± 0.39 µm, Figure 2) and the presence of Cu ions on the FeO/TMAP0.7–P/BM floc surface demonstrated by EDX (Figure 12c) enforce the ability of the FeO/TMAP0.7–P to separate BM particles from suspension.
Although TMAP0.7–P/FeO flocs exhibited a slightly lower removal efficiency compared to that shown by the grafted pullulan derivatives/kreutzonit flocs, this result could give useful information regarding the beneficial use of the pullulan-based flocculants/FeO flocs for removal of the BM particles from simulated suspensions. We have to mention here that this study is the first step of a series of investigations where the flocs resulting from the flocculation of different inorganic particles (other metal oxides, clays) will be tested as adsorbents for other toxic organic contaminants (pesticides, dyes, etc.) from wastewater.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials

Cationic pullulan derivatives with three different contents of pendant quaternary ammonium groups (TMAPx–P) were prepared by a two steps reaction (Scheme 1): Firstly, pullulan (P) (Mw = 200 Kg mol−1 purchased from Hayashibara Lab. Ltd. (Okoyama, Japan)) was modified by the amidation reaction with 3-dimethylamino-1-propylamine (DMAPA) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and in the presence of N,N’-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) as activator and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as a catalyst, according to Constantin et al. [7,8]. Then, the pullulan derivatives containing three different amounts of tertiary amine groups (DMAPAx–P) were used as precursors in the synthesis of quaternary ammonium derivatives possessing methyl groups (TMAPx–P) [9]. Briefly, a methyl iodide solution (MeI) (18%, w/v; MeI/DMAPA molar ratio = 3/1) in DMF was dropwise added to the DMAPAx–P solution in DMF (5%, w/v) at 20 °C for 15 min. and the quaternization reaction was continued at 50 °C for 24 h. The obtained product (TMAPx–P) was precipitated in acetone. The precipitate was dissolved in 15% (w/v) NaCl solution in order to replace the iodide ions with chloride ions followed by dialysis with deionized water for 3 days to remove inorganic materials and then freeze-dried.
Following these procedures, pullulan derivatives with various degrees of substitution (DS) with quaternary ammonium groups (number of amino groups per anhydroglucose unit in pullulan), namely 0.2, 0.4, and 0.7, were successfully obtained (chemical structure in Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis route and chemical structure of TMAPx–P derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthesis route and chemical structure of TMAPx–P derivatives.
Ijms 24 04383 sch001
The polymers code is TMAPx–P, where P means pullulan, TMAP is trimethylammonium propyl carbamate group, and x = DS.
Table 3 summarizes the synthesis parameters and some characteristics for the pullulan derivatives.
Table 3. Synthesis parameters and structural characteristics of synthesized pullulan derivatives.
Table 3. Synthesis parameters and structural characteristics of synthesized pullulan derivatives.
Sample
Code
P
(mmol)
CDI
(mmol)
DMAPA
(mmol)
Molar Ratio MeI/UGU of DMAPAx-PDegree of Substitution DS aAmine Groups Content
(meq. g−1)
TMAP0.2–P6.171.541.540.56/10.2 ± 0.0291.09 ± 0.108
TMAP0.4–P3.703.731.47/10.4 ± 0.0422.14 ± 0.065
TMAP0.7–P6.176.192.07/10.7 ± 0.0842.78 ± 0.125
a represents the average value determined by 1H NMR and conductometric titration [7,8,9,10].
FeO particles are commercially available in packs with 150 g (Kynita SRL, Valcea, Romania). TiO2 particles, crystalline form anatase, were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).
NaCl, Na2SO4 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany), NaNO3 (Acros Organics, Geel, Germany), CaCl2 (Cristal R Chim SRL, Bucharest, Romania), MgCl2 (abcr GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used as received.
Kaolin—gift sample from Romanceram Co., Romania, chemical composition: SiO2, 45–55%; Al2O3, min. 34%; Fe2O3, max. 1.5%; TiO2, max. 0.5%; CaO and Na2O max. 0.25%; MgO max. 0.31%; particle size distribution: <20 μm 90–95%; <10 μm 55–65%; <6 μm 45–52%; <2 μm 30–35%; <1 μm 18–25%.

3.2. Methods

The simulated suspensions of metal oxide particles were prepared in distilled water, as follows: (i) FeO model dispersions: concentration (cFeO): 0.2 g L−1, 0.4 g L−1, 0.6 g L−1, pH = 8.34, zeta potential (ζ) = −26.7 mV; (ii) TiO2 model dispersions: cTiO2: 0.05 g L−1, pH = 5, ζ = −38.1 mV. The polymer solutions with different concentrations (cip, g L−1) = 0.1, 0.3, and 1) were also prepared in distilled water and stabilized at room temperature for 1 day before use. The flocculation experiments were carried out according to the method already reported by Ghimici et al. [27]. Before starting the tests in a Cole Parmer stirrer/hotplate with 9 places, at room temperature, the dispersions of inorganic particles were sonicated for 15 min (ultrasonicator SONICS VCX 750) and then placed into 100 mL beakers (50 mL each). Different volumes of pullulan derivatives solution were added to metal oxide suspensions under stirring (500 rpm) which was kept for another 3 min. Then, the stirring speed was decreased to about 200 rpm for 15 min after which the suspension was left to settle for 120 min (FeO particles) and 1200 min (TiO2 ones). The above periods of settling time, called in the paper the optimum settling time (OST) (period of time after which the residual absorbance of the supernatant (%) remained almost constant) was established, in previous experiments. Subsequently, absorbance measurements (spectrophotometer SPECOL 1300 Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) at λ = 635 nm for FeO and 400 nm for TiO2 particles) and zeta potential ones (Zetasizer Nano-ZS, ZEN-3500 model (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, England)) were performed on the supernatant sample (10 mL). The separation of metal oxide particles from suspension in the absence of the pullulan derivatives under the selected experimental conditions (pH, concentration of polymer and metal oxide particles, etc.) has been also evaluated.
The metal oxides particles removal was given as a percent of the initial absorbance recorded for the inorganic particle suspensions without polymer, at time zero (residual metal oxides particles absorbance (%)):
residual   metal   oxides   particles   absorbance   ( % ) = A f A i × 100
where, Ai = the absorbance of the metal oxides suspension in the absence of polymer; and
Af = the absorbance of supernatant after the addition of the pullulan derivative.
The size distribution of the FeO particles/flocs before and after the treatment with polycations has been determined with Laser Particle Size Analyzer—Partica LA-960V2—HORIBA (Japan) (D50, µm). In addition, the surface morphology analysis was performed on FeO particles and some flocs using a Verios G4 UC Scanning Electron Microscope (Thermo Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyzer (Octane Elect Super SDD detector, Mahwah, NJ, USA); SEM analysis was carried out in high vacuum mode using a secondary electron detector (Everhart-Thornley Detector, Thermo Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

4. Conclusions

The separation of FeO and TiO2 particles from synthetic wastewater containing the metal oxides alone or a mixture of them, as well as different salts and kaolin by cationic pullulan derivatives with different content of N,N,N-trimethylammonium propyl carbamate chloride (TMAPx–P), has been investigated. The main results of the present investigations may be outlined as follows:
  • The residual metal oxides absorbance values changed with the addition of different doses of pullulan derivatives, irrespective of the particle′s dispersion medium composition.
  • The doseop values decreased with increasing ionic group content from 1 mg L−1. (TMAP0.2–P) to 0.14 mg L−1 (TMAP0.7–P) in the case of the FeO particles and from 3 mg L−1 (TMAP0.2–P) to 1.4 mg L−1 (TMAP0.7–P) in the case of the TiO2 ones.
  • For the FeO particles removal, higher doseop values were recorded for the initial polymer concentration, cip located either in the dilute regime (cip = 0.1 g L−1doseop= 0.5 mg L−1) or in the semidilute one (cip = 1 g L−1doseop = 0.6 mg L−1) than that recorded for cip close to c* (cip = 0.5 g L−1doseop = 0.3 mg L−1).
  • A noticeable increase in the doseop (0.6 mg L−1) and optimum dose interval (0.14 mg L−1 and 0.8 mg L−1) was found for the higher pH value than that of the natural one and the high particle suspension concentration, cFeo= 0.6 g L−1, respectively.
  • The zeta potential and the particle aggregate size measurement results pointed to the patch flocculation mechanism.
  • The pullulan derivatives proved to be good flocculants for the mixture of FeO and TiO2 particles (w/w, 1/1) as well as for the FeO particles from suspensions containing mixtures of salts and kaolin particles.
  • The FeO/TMAP0.7–P flocs exhibit good performance in the removal of the fungicide Bordeaux mixture particles from simulated wastewater (residual BM content of 0.049 g L−1) at the optimum amount of particles (50 g flocs/1000 mL BM suspension).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G.; Methodology, M.C. and M.M.N.; Software, M.M.N.; Validation, L.G. and M.C.; Investigation, L.G., M.C. and M.M.N.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.G.; Writing—review and editing, L.G.; Visualization, L.G., M.C. and M.M.N.; Supervision, L.G. and M.C.; Funding acquisition, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-0296, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, R.S.; Saini, G.K.; Kennedy, J.F. Pullulan: Microbial sources, production and Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 73, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cheng, K.C.; Demirci, A.; Catchmark, J.M. Pullulan: Biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salehizadeh, H.; Yan, N.; Farnood, R. Recent advances in polysaccharide bio-based flocculants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 92–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bataille, I.; Meddahi-Pelle, A.; Le Visage, C.; Letourneur, D.; Chaubet, F. Pullulan for biomedical uses. In Polysaccharides in Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Applications; Popa, V., Ed.; Ismithers Rapra Publishing: Shrewsbury, UK, 2011; pp. 145–182. [Google Scholar]
  5. Prado, H.J.; Matulewicz, M.C. Cationization of polysaccharides:A path to greener derivatives with many industrial applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 52, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dionísio, M.; Braz, L.; Corvo, M.; Lourenço, J.P.; Grenha, A.; Rosa da Costa, A.M. Charged pullulan derivatives for the development of nanocarriers by polyelectrolyte complexation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Constantin, M.; Asmarandei, I.; Filimon, A.; Fundueanu, G. Synthesis, characterization and solution behavior of pullulan functionalized with tertiary amino groups. High Perform. Polym. 2015, 27, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Constantin, M.; Bucatariu, S.; Ursu, L.; Butnaru, M.; Daraba, O.M.; Burlui, A.M.; Fundueanu, G. Novel cationic and hydrophobic pullulan derivatives as DNA nanoparticulate carriers. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2019, 53, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grigoras, A.G.; Constantin, M. Solution behaviour of new pullulan derivatives with biotechnological potential. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2019, 18, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moraes, F.C.; Antunes, J.C.; Forero Ramirez, L.M.; Aprile, P.; Franck, G.; Chauvierre, C.; Chaubet, F.; Letourneur, D. Synthesis of cationic quaternized pullulan derivatives for miRNA delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 577, 119041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Constantin, M.; Asmarandei, I.; Harabagiu, V.; Ghimici, L.; Ascenzi, P.; Fundueanu, G. Removal of anionic dyes from aqueous solutions by an ion-exchanger based on pullulan microspheres. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghimici, L.; Constantin, M. A review of the use of pullulan derivatives in wastewater purification. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 149, 104510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghimici, L.; Constantin, M.; Nafureanu, M.-M. Grafted Pullulan Derivatives for Reducing the Content of Some Pesticides from Simulated Wastewater. Polymers 2022, 14, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghimici, L.; Constantin, M. The separation of kreutzonit particles by cationic pullulan derivatives from model suspension, Environ. Chall. 2021, 5, 100352. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, D.; Zhu, S.; Pelton, R.H.; Spafford, M. Flocculation of dilute titanium dioxide suspensions by graft cationic polyelectrolytes. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1999, 277, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tahir, S.S.; Rauf, N. Removal of Fe(II) from the wastewater of a galvanized pipe manufacturing industry by adsorption onto bentonite clay. J. Environ. Manag. 2004, 73, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ghimici, L.; Nichifor, M. Separation of TiO2 particles from water and water/methanol mixtures by cationic dextran derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1637–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Divakaran, R.; Sivasankara Pillai, V.N. Mechanism of kaolinite and titanium dioxide flocculation using chitosan-assistance by fulvic acids? Water Res. 2004, 38, 2135–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghimici, L.; Brunchi, C.E. Titanium dioxide separation from water by PEG and Pluronic type polymers. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 103, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghimici, L.; Suflet, D.M. Phosphorylated polysaccharide derivatives as efficient separation agents for zinc and ferric oxides particles from water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 144, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, X.; Huang, T.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Zheng, H. The role of sulfonated chitosan-based flocculant in the treatment of hematite wastewater containing heavy metals. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2020, 585, 124070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khan, J.; Lin, S.; Nizeyimana, J.C.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X. Removal of copper ions from wastewater via adsorption on modified hematite (α-Fe2O3) iron oxide coated sand. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 319, 128687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. You, Z.; Zhao, C.; Sun, Y.; Zhuang, C. Application of PAFC/CPAM for the removal of ZnO nanoparticles by enhanced coagulation. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 484–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bolto, B.; Gregory, J. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. Water Res. 2007, 41, 2301–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Claesson, P.M.; Dahlgren, M.A.G.; Eriksson, L. Forces between polyelectrolyte-coated surfaces: Relations between surface interaction and floc properties. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1994, 93, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Petzold, G.; Geissler, U.; Smolka, N.; Schwarz, S. Influence of humic acid on the flocculation of clay. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2004, 282, 670–676. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ghimici, L.; Morariu, S.; Nichifor, M. Separation of clay suspension by ionic dextran derivatives. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 68, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bobacka, V.; Eklund, D. The influence of charge density of cationic starch on dissolved and colloidal material from peroxide bleached thermomechanical pulp. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1999, 152, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kleimann, J.; Gehin-Delval, C.; Auweter, H.; Borkovec, M. Super-stoichiometric charge neutralization in particle-polyelectrolyte systems. Langmuir 2005, 21, 3688–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frish, H.L.; Simha, R. The Viscosity of Colloidal Suspensions and Macromolecular Solution; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolf, B.A. Polyelectrolytes revisited: Reliable determination of intrinsic viscosity. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, K.M.; Fowler, G.D.; Pullket, S.; Graham, N.J.D. Sewage sludge-based adsorbents: A review of their production, properties and use in water treatment applications. Water Res. 2009, 43, 2569–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roy, M.M.; Dutta, A.; Corscadden, K.; Havard, P.; Dickie, L. Review of biosolids managements options and co-incineration of a biosolid-derived fuel. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 2228–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gianico, A.; Braguglia, C.M.; Gallipoli, A.; Montecchio, D.; Mininni, G. Land Application of Biosolids in Europe: Possibilities, Con-Straints and Future Perspectives. Water 2021, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hanum, F.; Yuan, L.C.; Kamahara, H.; Abdul Aziz, H.; Atsuta, Y.; Yamada, T.; Daimon, H. Treatment of Sewage Sludge Using Anaerobic Digestion in Malaysia: Current State and Challenges. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Babatunde, A.O.; Zhao, Y.Q. Constructive Approaches Toward Water Treatment Works Sludge Management: An International Review of Beneficial Reuses. Environm. Sci. Technol. 2007, 37, 129–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Devi, P.; Saroha, A.K. Utilization of sludge based adsorbents for the removal of various pollutants: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 578, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Soliman, N.K.; Moustafa, A.F. Industrial solid waste for heavy metals adsorption features and challenges; a review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 10235–10253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guerra-Rodríguez, S.; Oulego, P.; Rodríguez, E.; Singh, D.N.; Rodríguez-Chueca, J. Towards the Implementation of Circular Economy in the Wastewater Sector: Challenges and Opportunities. Water 2020, 12, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taheriyoun, M.; Memaripour, A.; Nazari-Sharabian, M. Using recycled chemical sludge as a coagulant aid in chemical wastewater treatment in Mobarakeh Steel Complex. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2020, 22, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gupta, V.K.; Ali, I.; Suhas, S.V.K. Adsorption of 2,4-D and carbofuran pesticides using fertilizer and steel industry wastes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 299, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, Y.S.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Sorohan, B. Removal of glyphosate from aqueous environment by adsorption using water industrial residual. Desalination 2011, 271, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sousa, S.; Jiménez-Guerrero, P.; Ruiz, A.; Ratola, N.; Alves, A. Organochlorine pesticides removal from wastewater by pine bark adsorption after activated sludge treatment. Environ. Technol. 2011, 32, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose for: TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P; (star); the inset: P (triangle); cip = 1 g L−1, cFeO = 0.4 g L−1, pH = 8.34, settling time 120 min.
Figure 1. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose for: TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P; (star); the inset: P (triangle); cip = 1 g L−1, cFeO = 0.4 g L−1, pH = 8.34, settling time 120 min.
Ijms 24 04383 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution for initial FeO particles (square) and aggregates obtained at doseop as a function of the ionic group content, TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P (star); and settling time 120 min. The particle size distribution curves represent the mean of three independent measurements.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution for initial FeO particles (square) and aggregates obtained at doseop as a function of the ionic group content, TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P (star); and settling time 120 min. The particle size distribution curves represent the mean of three independent measurements.
Ijms 24 04383 g002
Figure 3. Zeta potential (ζ) dependence on the polycation dose for TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P (star); and settling time 120 min.
Figure 3. Zeta potential (ζ) dependence on the polycation dose for TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.4–P (inverted triangle); TMAP0.2–P (star); and settling time 120 min.
Ijms 24 04383 g003
Figure 4. Particle size distribution for FeO/TMAP0.7–P aggregates at doseop: 0.14 mg L−1 (red circle) and polymer dose: 1.4 mg L−1 (blue circle), settling time 120 min. The particle size distribution curves represent the mean value of the three independent measurements.
Figure 4. Particle size distribution for FeO/TMAP0.7–P aggregates at doseop: 0.14 mg L−1 (red circle) and polymer dose: 1.4 mg L−1 (blue circle), settling time 120 min. The particle size distribution curves represent the mean value of the three independent measurements.
Ijms 24 04383 g004
Figure 5. The residual TiO2 absorbance (%) (a) and zeta potential (b) dependence on the polymer dose for: TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.2–P; (star); the inset: P (triangle); cip = 1 g L−1, cTiO2 = 0.05 g L−1, pH = 5, settling time 1200 min.
Figure 5. The residual TiO2 absorbance (%) (a) and zeta potential (b) dependence on the polymer dose for: TMAP0.7–P (circle); TMAP0.2–P; (star); the inset: P (triangle); cip = 1 g L−1, cTiO2 = 0.05 g L−1, pH = 5, settling time 1200 min.
Ijms 24 04383 g005
Figure 6. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose: TMAP0.4–P for cip = 0.1 g L−1 (empty square) and cip = 0.3 g L−1 (solid square); cFeO = 0.4 g L−1 (a) and TMAP0.7–P for cFeO = 0.2 g L−1 (empty diamond) and cFeO = 0.6 g L−1 (solid diamond); cip = 1 g L−1 (b); pH = 8.34, settling time 120 min.
Figure 6. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose: TMAP0.4–P for cip = 0.1 g L−1 (empty square) and cip = 0.3 g L−1 (solid square); cFeO = 0.4 g L−1 (a) and TMAP0.7–P for cFeO = 0.2 g L−1 (empty diamond) and cFeO = 0.6 g L−1 (solid diamond); cip = 1 g L−1 (b); pH = 8.34, settling time 120 min.
Ijms 24 04383 g006
Figure 7. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P) at pH 9.5, cFeO = 0.4 g L−1, cip = 1 g L−1, settling time 120 min.
Figure 7. The residual FeO absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P) at pH 9.5, cFeO = 0.4 g L−1, cip = 1 g L−1, settling time 120 min.
Ijms 24 04383 g007
Figure 8. The residual metal oxides absorbance dependence (%) on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P)—suspension prepared with a mixture of FeO, NaCl, Na2SO4, NaNO3, CaCl2, MgCl2 (cs = 1 × 10−3 M) and kaolin (0.2 g L−1); cip = 1 g L−1; cFeO = 0.2 g L−1; settling time: 30 min (a) and a mixture of metal oxides (cFeo = 0.05 g L−1, cTiO2 = 0.05 g L−1), cip = 1 g L−1; settling time: 120 min (b).
Figure 8. The residual metal oxides absorbance dependence (%) on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P)—suspension prepared with a mixture of FeO, NaCl, Na2SO4, NaNO3, CaCl2, MgCl2 (cs = 1 × 10−3 M) and kaolin (0.2 g L−1); cip = 1 g L−1; cFeO = 0.2 g L−1; settling time: 30 min (a) and a mixture of metal oxides (cFeo = 0.05 g L−1, cTiO2 = 0.05 g L−1), cip = 1 g L−1; settling time: 120 min (b).
Ijms 24 04383 g008
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of the mixtures FeO, different salts (NaCl, Na2SO4, NaNO3, CaCl2, MgCl2) (cs = 1 × 10−3 M), kaolin (0.2 g L−1), and FeO and TiO2 (w/w, 1/1) in the absence of TMAP0.7–P (a,c) and their aggregates with TMAP0.7–P (b,d); doseop: 0.6 mg L−1 and doseop: 0.2 mg L−1, respectively.
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of the mixtures FeO, different salts (NaCl, Na2SO4, NaNO3, CaCl2, MgCl2) (cs = 1 × 10−3 M), kaolin (0.2 g L−1), and FeO and TiO2 (w/w, 1/1) in the absence of TMAP0.7–P (a,c) and their aggregates with TMAP0.7–P (b,d); doseop: 0.6 mg L−1 and doseop: 0.2 mg L−1, respectively.
Ijms 24 04383 g009
Figure 10. Residual BM absorbance (%) dependence on the stirring time (flocs dose: 0.1 g flocs/50 mL suspension) (a) and the flocs dose (b) (stirring time 1 h).
Figure 10. Residual BM absorbance (%) dependence on the stirring time (flocs dose: 0.1 g flocs/50 mL suspension) (a) and the flocs dose (b) (stirring time 1 h).
Ijms 24 04383 g010
Figure 11. The residual BM absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P); cip = 1 g L−1; cBM = 0.5 g L−1.
Figure 11. The residual BM absorbance (%) dependence on the polymer dose (TMAP0.7–P); cip = 1 g L−1; cBM = 0.5 g L−1.
Ijms 24 04383 g011
Figure 12. Particle size distribution for BM particles (blue circle) and the FeO/TMAP0.7P/BM aggregates (green triangle) (a); EDX spectrum of the BM particles (b) and TMAP0.7P/FeO/BM flocs (c). Flocs amount = 0.5 g/50 mL suspension.
Figure 12. Particle size distribution for BM particles (blue circle) and the FeO/TMAP0.7P/BM aggregates (green triangle) (a); EDX spectrum of the BM particles (b) and TMAP0.7P/FeO/BM flocs (c). Flocs amount = 0.5 g/50 mL suspension.
Ijms 24 04383 g012
Table 1. Polymer-based flocculants for TiO2 removal.
Table 1. Polymer-based flocculants for TiO2 removal.
PolymerMineral
Oxides
DoseopRemoval Efficiency (%)RemarksReference
PolyDADMACTiO21.25 mg polymer/g TiO2-Suspension prepared in water[15]
Pluronic-type polymersTiO2Over the entire polymer dose20Suspension prepared in water[19]
PEG240 mg L−156
ChitosanTiO2--No flocculation in the case of the suspension prepared in distilled, but only in the tap water[18]
Dextran derivativesTiO21.2 ÷ 1.4 mg L−150 ÷ 60Suspension prepared in water[17]
Table 2. Ionic group content influence on doseop.
Table 2. Ionic group content influence on doseop.
PolycationFeOTiO2
doseop (mg L−1)
TMAP0.2–P13.0
TMAP0.4–P0.6-
TMAP0.7–P0.141.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghimici, L.; Nafureanu, M.M.; Constantin, M. Cationic Pullulan Derivatives Based Flocculants for Removal of Some Metal Oxides from Simulated Wastewater. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054383

AMA Style

Ghimici L, Nafureanu MM, Constantin M. Cationic Pullulan Derivatives Based Flocculants for Removal of Some Metal Oxides from Simulated Wastewater. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(5):4383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghimici, Luminita, Maria Magdalena Nafureanu, and Marieta Constantin. 2023. "Cationic Pullulan Derivatives Based Flocculants for Removal of Some Metal Oxides from Simulated Wastewater" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 5: 4383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop