Next Article in Journal
The Relationship between Serum miRNAs and Early Mortality in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Bortezomib-Based Regimens
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer Cells Survival and Their Therapeutic Targeting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Potential of Dimethyl Fumarate in Counteract Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Modulating Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms24032942
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Intracellular and Secreted Sides of Osteopontin and Their Putative Physiopathological Roles

by
Ana Clara Santos da Fonseca Bastos
1,2,3,
Amanda Vitória Pampolha Gomes
1,
Gabriela Ribeiro Silva
1,4,
Mariana Emerenciano
2,3,
Luciana Bueno Ferreira
1,2,4 and
Etel Rodrigues Pereira Gimba
1,2,4,5,*
1
Grupo de Hemato-Oncologia Molecular, Coordenação de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro 20230-130, CEP, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Oncologia, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro 20231-050, CEP, Brazil
3
Programa de Carcinogênese Molecular, Coordenação de Pesquisa e Inovação, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro 20230-130, CEP, Brazil
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biomédicas, Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Instituto Biomédico, Niterói 24210-130, CEP, Brazil
5
Departamento de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio das Ostras 28880-000, CEP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2942; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032942
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Molecular Pathways in Oncology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Classically, osteopontin (OPN) has been described as a secreted glycophosprotein. Indeed, most data concerning its physiological and pathological roles are mainly related to the secreted OPN (sOPN). However, there are several instances in which intracellular OPN (iOPN) has been described, presenting some specific roles in distinct experimental models, such as in the immune system, cancer cells, and neurological disorders. We herein aimed to highlight and discuss some of these secreted and intracellular roles of OPN and their putative clinical and biological impacts. Moreover, by consolidating data from the OPN protein database, we also analyzed the occurrence of signal peptide (SP) sequences and putative subcellular localization, especially concerning currently known OPN splicing variants (OPN-SV). Comprehending the roles of OPN in its distinct cellular and tissue environments may provide data regarding the additional applications of this protein as biomarkers and targets for therapeutic purposes, besides further describing its pleiotropic roles.

1. Introduction

Osteopontin (OPN), encoded by the secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) gene, also known as early T-lymphocyte activation 1 protein (ETA1), is a member of the small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoprotein (SIBLING) family. OPN is an acid glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed in several tissues and is involved in many physiologic and pathologic processes, including vascularization, cell regeneration, calcification, inflammatory and immune-modulating disorders, and neurologic disorders, as well as in cancer [1]. It has also been hypothesized that diabetes-induced OPN and its target product Furin result in worse outcomes in diabetic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, owing to the roles of these proteins in promoting viral infection and increasing metabolic dysfunction [2].
This glycophosphoprotein is synthesized by many cell types, such as osteoclasts, osteoblasts, epithelial, endothelial, neuronal, and immune cells (T cells, NK cells, macrophages, and Kupffer cells), and is constitutively expressed in several tissues (kidney, breast, brain, skin, bone, bone marrow, and bladder) and biological fluids, such as plasma, urine, milk, and bile [3].
The name osteopontin, in which “osteo” means bone and “pontin” means bridge, is associated with its function of linking bone cells to bone extracellular matrix. This protein is a major component of the bone matrix and is expressed at different stages of bone formation, remodeling, and resorption. In bone remodeling, OPN generally acts by inhibiting mineralization by promoting osteoclast differentiation and activity [4], although it can also behave as a stimulatory factor for mineralization [5].
The SPP1 gene is located on chromosome 4, locus q22.1 (Figure 1A). OPN expression is influenced by genetic polymorphisms in its promoter region, and a large number of polymorphisms can be found along the gene and are associated with cancer and autoimmune diseases. It has been reported 310 variant sequences of the human SPP1 gene. Approximately 10 of them correspond to short deletion and insertion polymorphisms, and the remaining 300 correspond to single nucleotide polymorphisms [6].
This protein consists of 314 amino acid residues with molecular weights ranging from 41 to 75 kDa. In detail, the SPP1 gene comprises seven exons, exon 1 untranslated, while exons 2–7 contain the coding sequences (Figure 1A). Exon 2 codes for the signal peptide (SP) and two amino acids of the mature protein. Exon 3 codes the sequences of serine phosphorylation, while exon 4 codes for a proline-rich region and a transglutaminase site, and exon 5 codes for another protein phosphorylation site. Finally, exons 6 and 7 encode more than 80% of the OPN protein. This region carries an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence that interacts with αvβ1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 integrins receptors. The adjacent Ser-Val-Val-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg (SVVYGLR) sequence domain interacts with α9β1, α4β1, and α4β7 integrins, which are exposed in response to thrombin cleavage. Thrombin cleavage generates an N-terminal fragment that comprises the integrin binding site and gives rise to a C-terminal fragment containing calcium and heparin-binding sites, which interacts with the cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) isoforms, such as CD44v3, CD44v6, and CD44v7 [7,8] (Figure 1A and Figure 2). In addition to thrombin cleavage, OPN can also be cleavaged by matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-3 and MMP-7, plasmin, and cathepsin D, rendering the above domains more accessible, then enhancing OPN binding efficiency. These enzymatic cleavages generate OPN variants that retain their activity or acquire additional functions [9,10].
Ijms 24 02942 g001a 550Ijms 24 02942 g001b 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the OPN gene and its transcripts. (A) OPN encoding gene located on human chromosome 4q22.1. The gene is 14,762 bp long and contains 7 exons. (B) OPN splice variants. The OPN primary transcript is processed by the alternative splicing resulting in at least five variants: OPN-a contains 7 exons and is known as the canonical isoform; OPN-b lacks exon 5 (green box); OPN-c lacks exon 4 (blue box); OPN-4 lacks both exon 4 and exon 5 (blue and green boxes); and OPN-5, which has an extra exon (red box), resulting from the retention of an intronic portion between exon 3 and exon 4, being the longest OPN splice variant. OPN-5 starts its translation at an alternative site located in the extra exon. (C) OPN-5 subvariants. OPN-5a is the OPN-5, as described above; OPN-5b has the extra truncated exon; OPN-5c has an additional 9 bp in the 3’ region in the extra exon (red box surrounded by a bolded black line); OPN-5d has an additional 9 bp in the 3’ region in the extra exon and deletion of exon 5; OPN-5e lacks exon 5. This Figure was partially based on information provided in previous reports [9,11,12].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the OPN gene and its transcripts. (A) OPN encoding gene located on human chromosome 4q22.1. The gene is 14,762 bp long and contains 7 exons. (B) OPN splice variants. The OPN primary transcript is processed by the alternative splicing resulting in at least five variants: OPN-a contains 7 exons and is known as the canonical isoform; OPN-b lacks exon 5 (green box); OPN-c lacks exon 4 (blue box); OPN-4 lacks both exon 4 and exon 5 (blue and green boxes); and OPN-5, which has an extra exon (red box), resulting from the retention of an intronic portion between exon 3 and exon 4, being the longest OPN splice variant. OPN-5 starts its translation at an alternative site located in the extra exon. (C) OPN-5 subvariants. OPN-5a is the OPN-5, as described above; OPN-5b has the extra truncated exon; OPN-5c has an additional 9 bp in the 3’ region in the extra exon (red box surrounded by a bolded black line); OPN-5d has an additional 9 bp in the 3’ region in the extra exon and deletion of exon 5; OPN-5e lacks exon 5. This Figure was partially based on information provided in previous reports [9,11,12].
Ijms 24 02942 g001aIjms 24 02942 g001b
OPN is a negatively charged protein due to the presence of multiple aspartate residues and displays a secondary structure with 8 α-helices and 6 β-sheets [13]. It is also an intrinsically disordered protein, displaying simultaneously sample extended, random coil-like conformations and stable, cooperatively folded conformations [14,15].
OPN displays several isoforms generated by alternative splicing [16], alternative translation, and post-translational mechanisms [17], such as serine/threonine phosphorylation, glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, and proteolytic cleavage. These modifications are cell-type specific and depend on pathophysiological mechanisms that affect OPN structure, protein–protein interactions, and functions. The sum of all these variants comprehends the total OPN (tOPN), generally named only as OPN in most reports.
The OPN primary transcript is subject to alternative splicing, generating at least five splice variants (OPN-SV) named OPN-a, OPN-b, OPN-c, OPN-4, and OPN-5 [18] (Figure 2). OPNa is the full-length variant; OPN-b lacks exon 5, while OPNc lacks exon 4. In OPN-4, both exons 4 and 5 are deleted, while OPN-5 contains an extra exon generated from the retention of a portion of intron 3 of the canonical isoform [18]. Once OPN-5 has a different start codon, it is the largest OPN transcript. More recently, four additional splice variants have been described for OPN-5, which were named OPN-5b, OPN-5c, OPN-5d, and OPN-5e [12] (Figure 2). The roles of OPN-a, OPN-b, and OPN-c have been extensively investigated, mainly in human tumor cells, in which these splice variants are aberrantly expressed and present tumor and tissue-specific roles [19]. We also recently found that OPN-4 and OPN-5 are co-expressed in several human cancer cell lines and tumor tissues [17], further evidencing their roles in cancer biology, as has been previously found in several reports regarding OPN-a, OPN-b, and OPN-c splice variants [16,18,19]. More recently, OPN-SV expression has also been reported in mouse metastatic and primary breast tumors [20].
The expression of OPN-SV has also been evaluated in some human cardiac pathological conditions. OPN-a, OPN-b and OPN-c are differentially expressed during calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) progression and can inhibit biomineralization [21]. OPN-SV expression has also been studied in heart failure of different origins. OPN-a is expressed in higher levels in dilated compared to ischemic cardiomyopathies. Otherwise, OPN-b and OPN-c were only detected in ischemic cardiomyopathy. These data evidenced the correlation of the expression of these OPN-SV with different cardiac clinical-pathophysiological settings [22]. Human OPN-SV also exerts divergent effects on neovascularization through differential effects on arteriogenesis and macrophage accumulation in vivo and on macrophage migration and survival. In this experimental model, OPN-a and, most importantly, OPN-c significantly increased macrophage migration [23]. Moreover, OPN-a stimulates pro-inflammatory signaling in both macrophages and myoblasts, possibly through induction of TNC–TLR4 signaling, opening possibilities to target this splice variant and related pathways in the damaged muscle microenvironment as a therapeutic approach [24].
Alternative translation from the different start codons of the single OPN messenger RNA (mRNA) can generate two OPN isoforms, a secreted OPN (sOPN) and an intracellular OPN (iOPN) (Figure 2), through a molecular mechanism elegantly reported by Shinohara et al. (2008) [25]. The sOPN is the longest isoform, containing the N-terminal SP sequence corresponding to exon 2, allowing targeting to secretory vesicles and cytokine secretion. Otherwise, iOPN is the shortest one, lacking the sOPN N-terminal SP, as a result of a non-AUG alternative translation from a downstream start site sequence, and is mainly localized into the cytoplasm [25,26].
Ijms 24 02942 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of OPN splice variants. The canonical translation start site is located on exon 2, with the first 16 amino acids coding for the signal peptide (SP). Exon 4 has an important site for transglutaminase binding. Exon 6 has glycosylation, sulfation, thrombin, and MMP cleavage sites. Exon 6 has the RGD and the SVVYGLR domains, regions where protein binds to different integrins. Exon 7 has calcium and heparin-binding domains and a site for MMP cleavage. Phosphorylation regions are scattered throughout the protein, and each * means one phosphorylation site. This Figure was partially based on information provided in previous reports [18,27,28].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of OPN splice variants. The canonical translation start site is located on exon 2, with the first 16 amino acids coding for the signal peptide (SP). Exon 4 has an important site for transglutaminase binding. Exon 6 has glycosylation, sulfation, thrombin, and MMP cleavage sites. Exon 6 has the RGD and the SVVYGLR domains, regions where protein binds to different integrins. Exon 7 has calcium and heparin-binding domains and a site for MMP cleavage. Phosphorylation regions are scattered throughout the protein, and each * means one phosphorylation site. This Figure was partially based on information provided in previous reports [18,27,28].
Ijms 24 02942 g002
Considering the existence of both sOPN and iOPN, we recently analyzed OPN-SV amino acid sequences obtained from NCBI using some software that predicts SP sequences and the location of their cleavage sites, as well as their putative subcellular localization. The collection of these data is shown in Table 1.
We found that among all reported OPN-SV annotated amino acid sequences, only OPN-5 does not contain the SP. The OPN-4, OPN-a, OPN-b, and OPN-c splice variants contain SP eukaryotic consensus sequences, besides also displaying peptidase cleavage sites at the same amino acid position, in between amino acids 16 and 17 of the SP sequence. Further evaluating these amino acid sequences to predict OPN putative subcellular localization, we found that although OPN-5 does not contain a predicted SP sequence, it has been predicted that it displays an 81% probability of being secreted. Otherwise, the remaining isoforms have higher scores rates for being secreted. Moreover, these 5 OPN-SV also contain predicted nuclear localization sequences (NLS) and calculated scores that indicate it is partially localized to the nucleus, or it can be localized to both the nucleus and the cytoplasm and even into the mitochondria. It has also been recently described that OPN-5 and its corresponding sub-variants (OPN-5b, OPN-5c, OPN-5d, and OPN-5e) are also secreted [12]. We then hypothesize that most OPN-SV protein sequences could generate both secreted and intracellular isoforms after SP proteolytic cleavage.
Although most studies refer to sOPN, the analysis of OPN total transcripts and protein expression do not distinguish between the sOPN isoforms that are still inside the cells and will be secreted later and the iOPN isoforms. Hence, for didactical purposes, we herein define as the sOPN the data of variants that relate to the isoforms that can extracellularly bind to cell receptors and/or are present in the conditioned media (CM) secreted by cells. Otherwise, those OPN isoforms detected inside the cells (even if they will be secreted later), such as in the cytoplasm, in the nucleus, or any other cellular compartment, were considered herein as iOPN.

2. Secreted Roles of OPN

Most of OPN’s roles at the cellular level have been attributed to the extracellular effects that occur after secretion, where receptor binding results in the activation of specific intracellular signaling pathways. Indeed, OPN receptors include αv (β1, β3, or β5) and (α4, α5, α8, or α9) β1-integrins, the variants 6 and 7 of the hyaluronan receptor CD44, and also the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [34]. Until the first description of iOPN, the studies regarding OPN were focused on the cytokine-like properties of this protein [35,36]. Different signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, PKB/Akt, and MAPK, mediate cancer-related aspects, such as angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. In this context, some molecules, such as soy isoflavone genistein, have been reported to regulate these pathways by controlling the expression of secreted OPN expression in breast cancer metastatic cells [37].
In this section, we only considered the studies that assessed OPN proteins in the extracellular microenvironment, either using exogenous addition of OPN (recombinant OPN or using a conditioned medium) and evaluating the effects of OPN by binding to its receptors.

2.1. Secreted OPN Activities Mediated by the Integrin Receptors

Amongst the wide variety of integrins by which OPN and OPN-SVs can bind to exert their effects on different cancer models, αvβ3 is the most frequently found. In a melanoma cancer model, for instance, by binding to αvβ3, OPN induces MEKK1-dependent JNK1 phosphorylation [38]. In gliomas, OPN directly stimulates angiogenesis via the αvβ3/PI3K/AKT/eNOS/NO signaling pathway and may play an important role in tumorigenesis by enhancing angiogenesis in gliomas [39,40] In tumor angiogenesis, malignancy, invasion, and metastasis; hypoxia is a unique parameter. The key regulator of hypoxia phenomena is hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF1α). Under hypoxia, OPN regulates HIF1α-dependent VEGF expression via inducing αvβ3-linked kinase (ILK)/Akt-mediated nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 activation [41].
Taking into consideration data regarding secreted OPN-SV and its effects, the full-length OPN-a splice variant acts as an oncogene in lung cancer cells. Higher levels of OPN-a are associated with poor clinical outcomes in these patients, and αvβ3 integrin is involved in the OPN-a-mediated malignant behavior of these tumor cells. The interaction of OPN and αvβ3 integrin has a role in lung cancer cell adhesion to the bone matrix, which is probably one of the early steps of bone metastasis formation in lung cancer [42].
Other authors reported that in esophageal adenocarcinoma, the OPN-b and OPN-c splice variants have distinct pro-invasion and dissemination phenotypes. In vitro and in vivo ectopic expression of OPN-b significantly enhanced cell migration and adhesion to laminin, while OPN-c overexpressing cells showed decreased cell migration and increased cell detachment. Moreover, by inhibiting the RGD motif, cell migration, adhesion, and clonogenic survival promoted by OPN-b were significantly abrogated, but not the OPN-c mediated phenotypes. These data evidenced that OPN-b, but not OPNc, acts through integrin-dependent signaling in esophageal adenocarcinoma [43]. High expression levels of OPN-a, OPN-b, and especially OPN-c, as opposed to low expression of OPN-4 and ITGA2 integrin variants, are associated with an advanced stage of tumor progression and poor prognosis in melanoma [44].
By binding to integrin α9β1, OPN increases angiogenesis and motility of melanoma cells through the secretion of COX-2 and PGE2, activating ERK and p38-dependent AP-1 [45]. Integrin receptors also mediate the roles of sOPN in immune regulation. Secreted OPN binds to monocytes, but not resting T cells, NK cells, or B cells and mediates chemoattraction of IL-1-activated human monocytes. Schack L and co-workers [46]. identified an αXβ2 integrin (CD11c/CD18), which is highly expressed on the cell surface of monocytes, as a novel OPN receptor that is required for OPN-mediated phagocytosis, thereby elucidating an important mechanism of an innate immune function of OPN [46]. In neutrophils, OPN has chemotactic activity. This effect can be explained by extracellular post-translational modification, polymerization, and/or thrombin cleavage. In these immune cells, OPN polymerizes in vivo and plays a critical role in the chemotactic activity. In leukocytes, OPN has this polymerization role dependent on α9β1 integrin [38]. Secreted OPN binding to integrin receptors on macrophages is also a hallmark of OPN roles in these cells. For instance, OPN treated-bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were challenged with growth factor withdrawal and neutralizing integrin antibodies. Authors have found that the survival of BMDMs is mediated primarily through the α4 integrin. Moreover, in chemotaxis studies, migration to OPN was blocked by neutralizing α4 and α9 integrin antibodies. Further, OPN did not affect macrophage activation, as measured by IL-12 production. Additionally, the relative contributions of the RGD and the SLAYGLR functional domains of OPN to leukocyte recruitment were evaluated in an in vivo model. By generating chimeric mice expressing mutated forms of OPN in myeloid-derived leukocytes, and found that the SLAYGLR functional domain of OPN, but not the RGD, mediated macrophage accumulation in response to thioglycollate-elicited peritonitis. Taken together, these data indicated that OPN interacts with α4 and α9 integrins via the SLAYGLR domain playing a key role in macrophage biology by regulating migration, survival, and accumulation [40].
Secreted OPN also plays a role in rat mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs) inducing migration through β1 integrin binding. In this model, OPN promotes rMSCs migration by activating FAK and ERK pathways, which may be attributed to changes in cell stiffness caused by the reduction in the amount of organized actin cytoskeleton [47].

2.2. Secreted OPN Activities Mediated by the CD44 Receptor

CD44 is one of the best-characterized receptors by which OPN acts on tumor progression. Studies have been reporting that OPN upregulation induces CD44 expression, which in turn increases OPN expression in an autocrine manner [48,49]. OPN binds to CD44, leading to many different effects in cells, including invasion, focus formation, proliferation, invasion, motility, and clonogenicity. In a cancer progression model using NIH3T3 fibroblastic cells containing Ras family mutants (H-RasV12 and Rit79L), for instance, OPN is overexpressed, promoting overexpression of CD44. By employing an antibody to inhibit CD44 or short interfering RNA from knocking down OPN expression, cell invasion and foci formation induced by H-RasV12 were reduced, requiring an intact OPN-CD44 system [48]. In thyroid carcinoma, OPN also has a functional role in the OPN/CD44 axis. It has been shown that rearrangement of the (RET/PTC) signaling triggers the formation of an autocrine loop involving OPN and CD44 that stimulates the proliferation and motility of PCCl3 rat cells [49]. These same authors also reported that the treatment of human papillary thyroid cancer cells with recombinant exogenous OPN stimulated matrigel invasion and activated the ERK and AKT1 signaling pathways, while the blockage of anti-CD44 antibodies prevented these effects [50]. In a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model, OPN from the HCC cell line conditioned media (CM) induced cell proliferation in a paracrine manner. This effect was demonstrated to be dependent on CD44, once only CD44 positive cell lines responded to CM rich in OPN, while CD44 knockdown blocked the proliferative effects [51].
Through binding to the CD44 receptor, OPN activated c-jun-NH2-kinase signaling and promoted the clonogenicity of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. In this study, macrophages, when co-cultured with CD44-positive CRC cells, were able to produce higher levels of OPN, which in turn facilitated the tumorigenicity and clonogenicity of these cells. The knockdown of CD44 or treatment with CD44-blocking antibodies attenuated OPN secretion, further reinforcing that CD44 can modulate OPN expression [52]. Human recombinant OPN (rhOPN) also promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, accompanied by upregulation of ALDH1- positive cancer stem cells in CRC cells through the activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK/3β-β-catenin pathway [53].

2.3. Secreted OPN Activities and Transactivation of EGFR

Transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by OPN is another mechanism by which OPN plays its role. Lee S. J. and co-workers [54] reported that OPN has an important role in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) proliferation induced by 4-hydroxynonenal, which is mediated by activation of AP-1 and C/EBPβ through EGFR pathways. An in vitro study further speculated that OPN might also bind to integrin β1 to maintain the activation of EGFR, which allows the proliferation of the human prostate tumor cells [55]. Further reinforcing OPN and EGFR transactivation, some reports have been demonstrating a significant correlation between the expression of these markers in some cancer types, such as in hepatocellular carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma [56,57].

2.4. Secreted OPN Activities Mediated by More Than One Receptor

In some specific experimental models, OPN can also exert its functions by binding to more than one receptor, individually or at the same time. In PC3 human prostate cancer cells, for instance, OPN can activate Akt and Raf/MEK/ERK pathways either through the αvβ3 integrin or the CD44 cell surface receptor, leading to enhanced proliferation and survival (anti-apoptotic) effects [58]. A further example in cancer cells is mediated by the human recombinant OPN, which induces MMP-2 upregulation through the SDF-1a/CXCR4 axis, and by binding to integrin αvβ3 and CD44v6. In this way, it activates the PI3K/Akt and JNK pathways in HepG2 and SMMC7721 cells, enhancing HCC cell invasion [59]. The combined action of OPN-mediated receptors has also been reported in an osteoclast cell model, in which OPN can induce the expression of its receptors in an autocrine manner. The exogenous addition of OPN to OPN-deficient osteoclasts increased the surface expression of CD44 and rescued osteoclast motility due to the activation of αvβ3 integrin [60]. OPN roles in cancer progression can also be mediated by the integration of multiple signals, in which OPN could act as a scaffold on multiple cell receptors, including ICOSL, CD44, and several integrins. COSL/ICOS are costimulatory molecules pertaining to immune checkpoints, and their binding transduces signals having anti-tumor activity. In a mouse breast cancer metastatic model, for instance, the ICOSL is a receptor for OPN, interacting at a different domain than that used by ICOS. ICOSL binding by ICOS or OPN exerts opposing effects on breast cancer cell migration, which is induced by OPN and dominantly inhibited by ICOS [61].

3. Intracellular OPN and Diseases

The iOPN was first described by Zohar et al. (1997) [62], and current data regarding iOPN are summarized in Table 2. By evaluating the possible relationships between OPN expression and stages of osteogenic cell differentiation in cell populations derived from fetal rat calvarial cells, it was found that iOPN displayed a perinuclear and a perimembranous distribution, in which patches of OPN were concentrated at the cytoplasmic cell surface. It also demonstrated the co-localization of iOPN, CD44, and the complex containing the actin-binding proteins ezrin, radixin, and moesin in migrating fibroblasts [63]. The co-localized iOPN and CD44 were also observed in activated macrophages, migrating osteoclasts, and metastatic cells, which was consistent with the induction of CD44 and iOPN expression and the migratory properties of these cells [63,64]. Moreover, the iOPN can also modulate CD44-dependent chemotaxis in mice peritoneal macrophages [64]. Intracellular OPN has also been associated with the transformation of chondrocytes into cells presenting osteocytic phenotype [65].
Human iOPN was also found to be expressed in human cell lines and tissues of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and seems to be associated with tumorigenesis in this cancer type once not detected at the normal oral mucosa or gingiva [66]. In colorectal carcinoma (CCR), co-expression of cytoplasmic OPN and nuclear β-catenin has been associated with unfavorable prognostic factors [67]. In central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, the balance between sOPN and iOPN activities has a pro-tumorigenic role, in which iOPN causes transcriptional downregulation of the NF-κB inhibitors, A20/TNFAIP3 and ABIN1/TNIP1, while sOPN promotes receptor-mediated activation of NF-κB [68]. A similar combined action of sOPN and iOPN is associated with head and neck (HNC) cancer progression induced by cancer-associated fibroblast-derived IL-6. The IL-6 induced-sOPN could promote HNC progression via the integrin αvβ3-NF-κB pathway, and the combination of iOPN and IL-6 cytoplasmic evaluation had a better prognostic and diagnostic performance in HNC than either molecule alone [69]. The concerted action of sOPN and iOPN similarly control hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication and assembly in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-infected cells. In response to interactions of sOPN with the cell surface receptors αvβ3 and CD44, the iOPN isoform associates with some HCV proteins (including NS5A and core proteins) in the endoplasmic reticulum and lipid droplets, the specialized sites where HCV replication and assembly occur [70]. In this same tumor type, iOPN may function as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated immune responses to ameliorate inflammation-associated cytokines, favoring mice hepatocarcinogenesis [71].
Table
Table 2. Main current findings regarding iOPN and associated roles.
Table 2. Main current findings regarding iOPN and associated roles.
iOPN Expression Pattern/RoleMain FindingsCell TypeApproach/MethodologyReference
OPN displayed a perinuclear and a perimembraneous distributioniOPN was associated with stages of osteogenic cell differentiationFetal rat calvarial cellsSingle-cell analysis, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy[62]
iOPN localizes in the cytoplasm but outside secretory vesiclesiOPN is translated from a non-AUG codon, accompanied by deletion of the N-terminal 16-aa signal sequence. Dendritic and T cellsR’ RLM-RACE, in vitro translation, confocal microscopy, Ifna4 promoter reporter assay, isolation of secretory vesicles; in vivo assays, ELISA and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry, immunoblotting, RT-qPCR[25,26]
Soluble OPN altered the actin cytoskeleton of tumor cellsiOPN induces rapid Tyr-418 dephosphorylation of c-Src, with decreases in actin stress fibers and increased binding to the vascular endotheliumHuman melanoma and sarcoma cell lines; and patient-derived samplesFunctional assays in vitro, in tumor cells, in mouse models, and ex vivo, using exogenous OPN or negative controls, including a site-directed mutant OPN[72]
iOPN co-localizes with fungal PRRs in macrophages stimulated by PneumocystisiOPN is essential for generating antifungal innate immune responses in PRR recognition, signal transduction, phagocytosis, clearance of Pneumocystis, and cytokine productionCells obtained from C57BL/6, Opn−/−, Rag2−/−, and Opn−/− Rag2−/− miceRT-qPCR, confocal microscopy, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, ELISA, and analyses of phagocytosis, ROS production, and Pneumocystis clearance[73]
iOPN expression is enhanced by VSV and SeV virus infectioniOPN acts as a positive regulator in innate antiviral immunity through the stabilization of TRAF3 iOPN ectopic overexpression or OPN deficiency or knockdown; SPP1 knockout mice; Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting; ELISA; RT-qPCR; ubiquitination assays[74]
OPN: osteopontin; iOPN: intracellular OPN; pattern recognition receptor (PRR); plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC); Sendai virus (SeV); vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV); tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 3 (TRAF3); Cytoplasmic OPN has also been reported to be differentially expressed at the pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared with age-matched control brains. Moreover, cytoplasmic OPN staining intensity was significantly associated with amyloid-β load and aging among all control and AD subjects [75]. It has also been shown that exhaustion of cytoplasmic OPN expression is associated with the loss of its protective role in the pancreas islets cells and with destructive insulitis and diabetes [76].
Nuclear localization of iOPN has also been observed. In embryonic kidney 293 cells, OPN accumulates in the nuclei and is correlated with chromatin condensation during cell division, exhibiting a subcellular distribution that coincided with polo-like kinase-1 (Plk-1), an established regulator of centrosome-related events and mitosis [77]. Moreover, OPN splice variants detected inside the cells differently contribute as breast cancer prognostic markers. The nuclear OPN-c isoform is strongly associated with mortality in patients with early breast cancer, while cytoplasmic OPN-a and OPN-b predict poor outcomes. By contrast, iOPN does not correlate with prognosis [78]. A similar result was demonstrated by other authors, in which most CRC samples showed high OPN nuclear expression, but it did not mean any prognostic value. However, cytoplasmic OPN overexpression was associated with a favorable prognostic in this tumor model [79]. In ovarian cancer, high nuclear OPN-c staining patterns were observed in patients that responded to platinum or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) treatment, and this pattern was associated with longer overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). It was also found that longer PFS was also associated with high expression of both nuclear and cytoplasm OPN-c, both in platinum-resistant and in those patients that responded to PLD [80].
It has also been reported that nuclear localization of OPN in cardiomyocytes is a marker of severe heart failure and cardiac allograft vasculopathy [81].

4. Intracellular OPN and Immunity

Several reports also described the roles of iOPN in the immune system and many inflammatory and immune-modulating disorders. These studies demonstrated that innate immune phagocytes, such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), constitutively express high levels of both iOPN and sOPN, while T cells preferentially express sOPN. Shinohara and co-workers [82] reported that iOPN selectively coupled TLR9 signaling to express IFN-α in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC). Moreover, the co-localization of iOPN and MyD88-containing signal transduction complex after TLR9-iOPN mediated engagement was essential for efficient nuclear translocation of the transcription factor IRF7 and associated IFN-α gene expression in these cells [82]. The inhibition of the TLR9-MYD88-STAT3 signaling pathway is also associated with the role of B cell iOPN in protecting from autoimmunity-driven mouse lymphoma development [83]. Inhibition of iOPN expression mediated by Type-I IFN receptor (IFNAR) expressed by DCs de-repressed interleukin-27 (IL-27) secretion, and as a result, prevented Th17 responses in vitro and in vivo, which, when aberrantly expressed, has been associated to the generation of autoimmune diseases [25]. Further, these same authors demonstrated that the coordinated action of sOPN and iOPN regulates the functional phenotype of DCs subsets. The shortened OPN translation isoform activates Ifna4 gene expression and podosome formation in pDC, contributing to the biological activities of this DC subset. These findings indicate that factors that alter the translational balance of OPN in favor of either iOPN or sOPN may contribute to the phenotype of activated DCs [25].
Another role of iOPN in the immune system was described by Leavenworth et al. (2014) [84]. NK cells display an important role in the immune system’s response against viruses and cancer. In this report, the authors demonstrated the potential contribution of iOPN in NK cell homeostasis, survival, and development through IL-15 ligation. NK cells overexpress iOPN, and in the absence of this protein, NK cells exhibit a decrease in the ability to develop memory-like cells and respond to viral infection and metastatic tumors. Moreover, the iOPN deficient phenotype increases NK cell death and impaired NK cell expansion and differentiation.
In the context of follicular helper T (TFH) and follicular regulatory T (TFR) cells, responsible for regulating humoral immunity, it was demonstrated that iOPN and its association with p85α are crucial to the differentiation of these TF cells [85]. Bcl-6, a transcription factor that regulates TF cell differentiation, is protected by iOPN from ubiquitin-dependent proteasome degradation.
The imbalance between myeloid and lymphoid cells directly impacts immune responses; thus, hematopoiesis is tightly controlled. Inflammations, infections, and irradiation require a greater immune system response through increased activation of myelopoiesis to compensate for the loss of myeloid cells. However, lymphocytes have distinct mechanisms from myeloid cells, and a normal immune system keeps an optimal balance between myeloid and T cells through the activation of some proteins, such as OPN. Other authors found that OPN regulates cell population balance through an increase in lymphoid and a decrease in myeloid cells. During lymphoid cell expansion, irradiation, and systemic fungal infection, iOPN induces a negative regulation of myelopoiesis, while sOPN stimulates lymphoid cell expansion. Both OPN forms work together in this balance despite having different roles [86].
OPN also has a protective role in infectious diseases, including iOPN involvement in the host response against fungi. iOPN is essential for generating antifungal innate immune responses in fungal pattern recognition receptors (PRR) (such as dectin-1, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), and mannose receptor (MR) recognition and clustering on the cell surface, signal transduction, phagocytosis, fungi clearance and cytokine production [73,87].
Furthermore, it was demonstrated that iOPN is an essential positive regulator in innate antiviral immunity by activating IFN-β through a new regulatory mechanism in innate antiviral signaling through iOPN-mediated stabilization of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 3 (TRAF3). In this study, the knockdown of OPN significantly attenuated virus-induced IFN-β production and enhanced vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) replication, while overexpression of iOPN showed the opposite effect [74].

5. Conclusions

OPN has been classically classified as an extracellular cytokine. However, as a result of several post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms, different OPN variants can be formed, including the sOPN and iOPN isoforms. Amongst these variants, the OPN-SVs have been extensively characterized in distinct tumor models and display tissue and tumor-specific roles. By analyzing OPN-SV amino acid sequences as well as their expression patterns, current data provide evidence that most of them display a high probability of being secreted, although OPN has also been detected in distinct cellular compartments, mainly perimembrane, cytoplasmic, and nuclear. The iOPN isoforms have been identified in distinct cellular contexts, such as modulating tumorigenesis, controlling viral infection and assembly, regulating immune responses, neurological disorders, infectious diseases, and gene expression. In association with signaling pathways induced by sOPN and their corresponding receptor binding, both sOPN and iOPN have several key roles in some experimental models. These expression patterns and mechanisms, in addition to sOPN and their variant’s specific localization, are summarized in Figure 3. Hence, a better understanding of the iOPN roles and their association with sOPN may provide additional evidence for using these molecules as disease markers and putative targets for new therapeutic approaches that could specifically target sOPN or iOPN.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.S.d.F.B. and E.R.P.G.; methodology, E.R.P.G.; writing—original draft preparation A.C.S.d.F.B., G.R.S., A.V.P.G., M.E., L.B.F. and E.R.P.G.; supervision, E.R.P.G.; project administration, E.R.P.G.; funding acquisition, M.E., L.B.F. and E.R.P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CNPq, grant number 312416/2021-0, and FAPERJ, grant numbers E26/210.100/2022; E-26/200.975/2022; E-26/211.267/2021. The APC was funded by FAPERJ E-26/200.975/2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank BioRender.com for figure editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kariya, Y.; Kariya, Y. Osteopontin in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets. Int. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 2, 419–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adu-Agyeiwaah, Y.; Grant, M.B.; Obukhov, A.G. The Potential Role of Osteopontin and Furin in Worsening Disease Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Diabetes. Cells 2020, 9, 2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Icer, M.A.; Gezmen-Karadag, M. The Multiple Functions and Mechanisms of Osteopontin. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 59, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Si, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Wang, B.; Zhou, Y. Osteopontin in Bone Metabolism and Bone Diseases. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e919159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Iline-Vul, T.; Nanda, R.; Mateos, B.; Hazan, S.; Matlahov, I.; Perelshtein, I.; Keinan-Adamsky, K.; Althoff-Ospelt, G.; Konrat, R.; Goobes, G. Osteopontin Regulates Biomimetic Calcium Phosphate Crystallization from Disordered Mineral Layers Covering Apatite Crystallites. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amar, A.; Afzal, A.; Hameed, A.; Ahmad, M.; Khan, A.R.; Najma, H.; Abid, A.; Khaliq, S. Osteopontin Promoter Polymorphisms and Risk of Urolithiasis: A Candidate Gene Association and Meta-Analysis Study. BMC Med. Genet. 2020, 21, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, D.-X.; Li, Z.-J.; Jiang, X.-O.; Lum, Y.L.; Khin, E.; Lee, N.P.; Wu, G.-H.; Luk, J.M. Osteopontin as Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Gastric and Liver Cancers. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 3923–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peraramelli, S.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Wanko, B.; Zhao, L.; Nishimura, T.; Leung, T.H.; Mizuno, S.; Ito, M.; Myles, T.; et al. Thrombin Cleavage of Osteopontin Initiates Osteopontin’s Tumor-Promoting Activity. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2022, 20, 1256–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Briones-Orta, M.A.; Avendaño-Vázquez, S.E.; Aparicio-Bautista, D.I.; Coombes, J.D.; Weber, G.F.; Syn, W.-K. Osteopontin Splice Variants and Polymorphisms in Cancer Progression and Prognosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2017, 1868, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castello, L.M.; Raineri, D.; Salmi, L.; Clemente, N.; Vaschetto, R.; Quaglia, M.; Garzaro, M.; Gentilli, S.; Navalesi, P.; Cantaluppi, V.; et al. Osteopontin at the Crossroads of Inflammation and Tumor Progression. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 4049098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lamort, A.-S.; Giopanou, I.; Psallidas, I.; Stathopoulos, G.T. Osteopontin as a Link between Inflammation and Cancer: The Thorax in the Spotlight. Cells 2019, 8, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chou, C.-F.; Huang, C.C.; Bin Dabil, N.; Chang, P.-L. Assessing SPP1/Osteopontin (OPN) Splice Variants and Their Association to Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer by Absolute Quantification: Identification of OPN-5 Subvariants and Their Protein Coding Potential. Cancer Investig. 2021, 39, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, K.X.; Denhardt, D.T. Osteopontin: Role in Immune Regulation and Stress Responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kurzbach, D.; Platzer, G.; Schwarz, T.C.; Henen, M.A.; Konrat, R.; Hinderberger, D. Cooperative Unfolding of Compact Conformations of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein Osteopontin. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 5167–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, H.; Ng, D.Y.W.; Lieberwirth, I.; Weidner, T.; Bonn, M. Intrinsically Disordered Osteopontin Fragment Orders During Interfacial Calcium Oxalate Mineralization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 18577–18581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gimba, E.R.; Tilli, T.M. Human Osteopontin Splicing Isoforms: Known Roles, Potential Clinical Applications and Activated Signaling Pathways. Cancer Lett. 2013, 331, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silva, G.R.; Mattos, D.S.; Bastos, A.C.F.; Viana, B.P.P.B.; Brum, M.C.M.; Ferreira, L.B.; Gimba, E.R.P. Osteopontin-4 and Osteopontin-5 Splice Variants Are Expressed in Several Tumor Cell Lines. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 8339–8345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gimba, E.R.P.; Brum, M.C.M.; De Moraes, G.N. Full-Length Osteopontin and Its Splice Variants as Modulators of Chemoresistance and Radioresistance (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Da Fonseca Bastos, A.C.S.; da Silva Rezende, A.C.; Ferreira, L.B.; Blunck, C.B.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S.; Emerenciano, M.; Gimba, E.R.P. Osteopontin-c Is Overexpressed in KMT2A-AFF1 Positive Pediatric B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia When Compared to Those with ETV6-RUNX1. Leuk. Res. 2020, 91, 106316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamalabadi-Farahani, M.; Atashi, A.; Jabbarpour, Z.; Aghayan, S.S. Expression of Osteopontin-5 Splice Variant in the Mouse Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells. BMC Res. Notes 2022, 15, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grau, J.B.; Poggio, P.; Sainger, R.; Vernick, W.J.; Seefried, W.F.; Branchetti, E.; Field, B.C.; Bavaria, J.E.; Acker, M.A.; Ferrari, G. Analysis of Osteopontin Levels for the Identification of Asymptomatic Patients with Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012, 93, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cabiati, M.; Svezia, B.; Matteucci, M.; Botta, L.; Pucci, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Caselli, C.; Lionetti, V.; Del Ry, S. Myocardial Expression Analysis of Osteopontin and Its Splice Variants in Patients Affected by End-Stage Idiopathic or Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, G.S.; Salazar, H.F.; Joseph, G.; Lok, Z.S.Y.; Caroti, C.M.; Weiss, D.; Taylor, W.R.; Lyle, A.N. Osteopontin Isoforms Differentially Promote Arteriogenesis in Response to Ischemia via Macrophage Accumulation and Survival. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Many, G.M.; Yokosaki, Y.; Uaesoontrachoon, K.; Nghiem, P.P.; Bello, L.; Dadgar, S.; Yin, Y.; Damsker, J.M.; Cohen, H.B.; Kornegay, J.N.; et al. OPN-a Induces Muscle Inflammation by Increasing Recruitment and Activation of pro-Inflammatory Macrophages. Exp. Physiol. 2016, 101, 1285–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shinohara, M.L.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Garcia, V.A.; Cantor, H. Alternative Translation of Osteopontin Generates Intracellular and Secreted Isoforms That Mediate Distinct Biological Activities in Dendritic Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 7235–7239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cantor, H.; Shinohara, M.L. Regulation of T-Helper-Cell Lineage Development by Osteopontin: The inside Story. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hao, C.; Cui, Y.; Owen, S.; Li, W.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, W.G. Human Osteopontin: Potential Clinical Applications in Cancer (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 1327–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Göthlin Eremo, A.; Lagergren, K.; Othman, L.; Montgomery, S.; Andersson, G.; Tina, E. Evaluation of SPP1/Osteopontin Expression as Predictor of Recurrence in Tamoxifen Treated Breast Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Teufel, F.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Gíslason, M.H.; Pihl, S.I.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 6.0 Predicts All Five Types of Signal Peptides Using Protein Language Models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hiller, K.; Grote, A.; Scheer, M.; Münch, R.; Jahn, D. PrediSi: Prediction of Signal Peptides and Their Cleavage Positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W375–W379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Sønderby, C.K.; Sønderby, S.K.; Nielsen, H.; Winther, O. DeepLoc: Prediction of Protein Subcellular Localization Using Deep Learning. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, Y.; Wang, D.; Yao, Y.; Eubel, H.; Künzler, P.; Møller, I.M.; Xu, D. MULocDeep: A Deep-Learning Framework for Protein Subcellular and Suborganellar Localization Prediction with Residue-Level Interpretation. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 4825–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brameier, M.; Krings, A.; MacCallum, R.M. NucPred—Predicting Nuclear Localization of Proteins. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1159–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, L.; Huan, X.; Xiao, G.-H.; Yu, W.-H.; Li, T.-F.; Gao, X.-D.; Zhang, Y.-C. Osteopontin and Its Downstream Carcinogenic Molecules: Regulatory Mechanisms and Prognostic Value in Cancer Progression. Neoplasma 2022, 69, 1253–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lund, S.A.; Giachelli, C.M.; Scatena, M. The Role of Osteopontin in Inflammatory Processes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2009, 3, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. O’Regan, A.; Berman, J.S. Osteopontin: A Key Cytokine in Cell-Mediated and Granulomatous Inflammation. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2000, 81, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khongsti, K.; Das, K.B.; Das, B. MAPK Pathway and SIRT1 Are Involved in the Down-Regulation of Secreted Osteopontin Expression by Genistein in Metastatic Cancer Cells. Life Sci. 2021, 265, 118787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rangaswami, H.; Kundu, G.C. Osteopontin Stimulates Melanoma Growth and Lung Metastasis through NIK/MEKK1-Dependent MMP-9 Activation Pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2007, 18, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Yan, W.; Lu, X.; Qian, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, P.; Shi, L.; Zhao, P.; Fu, Z.; Pu, P.; et al. Overexpression of Osteopontin Induces Angiogenesis of Endothelial Progenitor Cells via the Avβ3/PI3K/AKT/ENOS/NO Signaling Pathway in Glioma Cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 90, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lund, S.A.; Wilson, C.L.; Raines, E.W.; Tang, J.; Giachelli, C.M.; Scatena, M. Osteopontin Mediates Macrophage Chemotaxis via A4 and A9 Integrins and Survival via the A4 Integrin. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Raja, R.; Kale, S.; Thorat, D.; Soundararajan, G.; Lohite, K.; Mane, A.; Karnik, S.; Kundu, G.C. Hypoxia-Driven Osteopontin Contributes to Breast Tumor Growth through Modulation of HIF1α-Mediated VEGF-Dependent Angiogenesis. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2053–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hao, C.; Cui, Y.; Hu, M.U.; Zhi, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Wu, W.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, W.G. OPN-a Splicing Variant Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Effects on the Bone Metastatic Abilities of Lung Cancer Cells In Vitro. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 2245–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lin, J.; Myers, A.L.; Wang, Z.; Nancarrow, D.J.; Ferrer-Torres, D.; Handlogten, A.; Leverenz, K.; Bao, J.; Thomas, D.G.; Wang, T.D.; et al. Osteopontin (OPN/SPP1) Isoforms Collectively Enhance Tumor Cell Invasion and Dissemination in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 22239–22257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jámbor, K.; Koroknai, V.; Kiss, T.; Szász, I.; Pikó, P.; Balázs, M. Gene Expression Patterns of Osteopontin Isoforms and Integrins in Malignant Melanoma. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2022, 28, 1610608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kale, S.; Raja, R.; Thorat, D.; Soundararajan, G.; Patil, T.V.; Kundu, G.C. Osteopontin Signaling Upregulates Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Tumor-Associated Macrophages Leading to Enhanced Angiogenesis and Melanoma Growth via A9β1 Integrin. Oncogene 2015, 34, 5408–5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schack, L.; Stapulionis, R.; Christensen, B.; Kofod-Olsen, E.; Skov Sørensen, U.B.; Vorup-Jensen, T.; Sørensen, E.S.; Höllsberg, P. Osteopontin Enhances Phagocytosis through a Novel Osteopontin Receptor, the AlphaXbeta2 Integrin. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 6943–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zou, C.; Luo, Q.; Qin, J.; Shi, Y.; Yang, L.; Ju, B.; Song, G. Osteopontin Promotes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration and Lessens Cell Stiffness via Integrin Β1, FAK, and ERK Pathways. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 65, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Teramoto, H.; Castellone, M.D.; Malek, R.L.; Letwin, N.; Frank, B.; Gutkind, J.S.; Lee, N.H. Autocrine Activation of an Osteopontin-CD44-Rac Pathway Enhances Invasion and Transformation by H-RasV12. Oncogene 2005, 24, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Castellone, M.D.; Celetti, A.; Guarino, V.; Cirafici, A.M.; Basolo, F.; Giannini, R.; Medico, E.; Kruhoffer, M.; Orntoft, T.F.; Curcio, F.; et al. Autocrine Stimulation by Osteopontin Plays a Pivotal Role in the Expression of the Mitogenic and Invasive Phenotype of RET/PTC-Transformed Thyroid Cells. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2188–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guarino, V.; Faviana, P.; Salvatore, G.; Castellone, M.D.; Cirafici, A.M.; De Falco, V.; Celetti, A.; Giannini, R.; Basolo, F.; Melillo, R.M.; et al. Osteopontin Is Overexpressed in Human Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas and Enhances Thyroid Carcinoma Cell Invasiveness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 5270–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Phillips, R.J.; Helbig, K.J.; Van der Hoek, K.H.; Seth, D.; Beard, M.R. Osteopontin Increases Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Growth in a CD44 Dependant Manner. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 3389–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rao, G.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Huang, L.; Xue, D.; Wang, X.; Jin, H.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, Y.; et al. Reciprocal Interactions between Tumor-Associated Macrophages and CD44-Positive Cancer Cells via Osteopontin/CD44 Promote Tumorigenicity in Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cheng, Y.; Wen, G.; Sun, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Du, M.; Zhu, G.; Wang, G.; Meng, X. Osteopontin Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Invasion and the Stem Cell-Like Properties through the PI3K-AKT-GSK/3β-β/Catenin Pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 3014–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, S.J.; Baek, S.E.; Jang, M.A.; Kim, C.D. Osteopontin Plays a Key Role in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation via EGFR-Mediated Activation of AP-1 and C/EBPβ Pathways. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 108, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Angelucci, A.; Festuccia, C.; Gravina, G.L.; Muzi, P.; Bonghi, L.; Vicentini, C.; Bologna, M. Osteopontin Enhances the Cell Proliferation Induced by the Epidermal Growth Factor in Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate 2004, 59, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tsai, W.-C.; Lee, H.-S.; Jin, J.-S.; Gao, H.-W.; Chao, T.-K.; Chen, A.; Nieh, S.; Chan, D.-C.; Chang, F.-N.; Lin, C.-K. Association between Osteopontin and EGFR Expression with Clinicopathological Parameters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Chin. J. Physiol. 2012, 55, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Matušan-Ilijaš, K.; Damante, G.; Fabbro, D.; Dorđević, G.; Hadžisejdić, I.; Grahovac, M.; Avirović, M.; Grahovac, B.; Jonjić, N.; Lučin, K. EGFR Expression Is Linked to Osteopontin and Nf-ΚB Signaling in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2013, 15, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Robertson, B.W.; Bonsal, L.; Chellaiah, M.A. Regulation of Erk1/2 Activation by Osteopontin in PC3 Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, R.; Pan, X.; Huang, Z.; Weber, G.F.; Zhang, G. Osteopontin Enhances the Expression and Activity of MMP-2 via the SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chellaiah, M.A.; Kizer, N.; Biswas, R.; Alvarez, U.; Strauss-Schoenberger, J.; Rifas, L.; Rittling, S.R.; Denhardt, D.T.; Hruska, K.A. Osteopontin Deficiency Produces Osteoclast Dysfunction Due to Reduced CD44 Surface Expression. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Raineri, D.; Dianzani, C.; Cappellano, G.; Maione, F.; Baldanzi, G.; Iacobucci, I.; Clemente, N.; Baldone, G.; Boggio, E.; Gigliotti, C.L.; et al. Osteopontin Binds ICOSL Promoting Tumor Metastasis. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zohar, R.; Lee, W.; Arora, P.; Cheifetz, S.; McCulloch, C.; Sodek, J. Single Cell Analysis of Intracellular Osteopontin in Osteogenic Cultures of Fetal Rat Calvarial Cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 1997, 170, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zohar, R.; Suzuki, N.; Suzuki, K.; Arora, P.; Glogauer, M.; McCulloch, C.A.; Sodek, J. Intracellular Osteopontin Is an Integral Component of the CD44-ERM Complex Involved in Cell Migration. J. Cell. Physiol. 2000, 184, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhu, B.; Suzuki, K.; Goldberg, H.A.; Rittling, S.R.; Denhardt, D.T.; McCulloch, C.A.G.; Sodek, J. Osteopontin Modulates CD44-Dependent Chemotaxis of Peritoneal Macrophages through G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Evidence of a Role for an Intracellular Form of Osteopontin. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004, 198, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ishizeki, K.; Shinagawa, T.; Nawa, T. Origin-Associated Features of Chondrocytes in Mouse Meckel’s Cartilage and Costal Cartilage: An In Vitro Study. Ann. Anat.—Anat. Anz. 2003, 185, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Devoll, R.E.; Li, W.; Woods, K.V.; Pinero, G.J.; Butler, W.T.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Happonen, R.-P. Osteopontin (OPN) Distribution in Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Oral Epithelium and Expression in Cell Lines Derived from Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1999, 28, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Youssef, N.S.; Osman, W.M. Relationship between Osteopontin and β-Catenin Immunohistochemical Expression and Prognostic Parameters of Colorectal Carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 1503–1514. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yushi, Q.; Li, Z.; Von Roemeling, C.A.; Doeppler, H.; Marlow, L.A.; Kim, B.Y.S.; Radisky, D.C.; Storz, P.; Copland, J.A.; Tun, H.W. Osteopontin Is a Multi-Faceted pro-Tumorigenic Driver for Central Nervous System Lymphoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 32156–32171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qin, X.; Yan, M.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhu, X.; Shi, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, W. Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Derived IL-6 Promotes Head and Neck Cancer Progression via the Osteopontin-NF-Kappa B Signaling Pathway. Theranostics 2018, 8, 921–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Iqbal, J.; Sarkar-Dutta, M.; McRae, S.; Ramachandran, A.; Kumar, B.; Waris, G. Osteopontin Regulates Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication and Assembly by Interacting with HCV Proteins and Lipid Droplets and by Binding to Receptors AVβ3 and CD44. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e02116-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fan, X.; He, C.; Jing, W.; Zhou, X.; Chen, R.; Cao, L.; Zhu, M.; Jia, R.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; et al. Intracellular Osteopontin Inhibits Toll-like Receptor Signaling and Impedes Liver Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Mandelin, J.; Lin, E.C.K.; Hu, D.D.; Knowles, S.K.; Do, K.-A.; Wang, X.; Sage, E.H.; Smith, J.W.; Arap, W.; Pasqualini, R. Extracellular and Intracellular Mechanisms That Mediate the Metastatic Activity of Exogenous Osteopontin. Cancer 2009, 115, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Inoue, M.; Moriwaki, Y.; Arikawa, T.; Chen, Y.-H.; Oh, Y.J.; Oliver, T.; Shinohara, M.L. Cutting Edge: Critical Role of Intracellular Osteopontin in Antifungal Innate Immune Responses. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhao, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, P.; Song, G.; Liu, B.; Wu, H.; Yin, Z.; Gao, C. Intracellular Osteopontin Stabilizes TRAF3 to Positively Regulate Innate Antiviral Response. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wung, J.K.; Perry, G.; Kowalski, A.; Harris, P.L.R.; Bishop, G.M.; Trivedi, M.A.; Johnson, S.C.; Smith, M.A.; Denhardt, D.T.; Atwood, C.S. Increased Expression of the Remodeling- and Tumorigenic-Associated Factor Osteopontin in Pyramidal Neurons of the Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2007, 4, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gong, Q.; Chipitsyna, G.; Gray, C.F.; Anandanadesan, R.; Arafat, H.A. Expression and Regulation of Osteopontin in Type 1 Diabetes. Islets 2009, 1, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Junaid, A.; Moon, M.C.; Harding, G.E.J.; Zahradka, P. Osteopontin Localizes to the Nucleus of 293 Cells and Associates with Polo-like Kinase-1. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 292, C919–C926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zduniak, K.; Ziolkowski, P.; Ahlin, C.; Agrawal, A.; Agrawal, S.; Blomqvist, C.; Fjällskog, M.-L.; Weber, G.F. Nuclear Osteopontin-c Is a Prognostic Breast Cancer Marker. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Assidi, M.; Gomaa, W.; Jafri, M.; Hanbazazh, M.; Al-Ahwal, M.; Pushparaj, P.; Al-Harbi, A.; Al-Qahtani, M.; Buhmeida, A.; Al-Maghrabi, J. Prognostic Value of Osteopontin (SPP1) in Colorectal Carcinoma Requires a Personalized Molecular Approach. Tumour Biol. 2019, 41, 1010428319863627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. De Sousa, I.J.D.; Marques, D.S.; Príncipe, C.; Portugal, R.V.; Canberk, S.; Prazeres, H.; Lopes, J.M.; Gimba, E.R.P.; Lima, R.T.; Soares, P. Predictive Biomarkers and Patient Outcome in Platinum-Resistant (PLD-Treated) Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Irion, C.I.; Dunkley, J.C.; John-Williams, K.; Condor Capcha, J.M.; Shehadeh, S.A.; Pinto, A.; Loebe, M.; Webster, K.A.; Brozzi, N.A.; Shehadeh, L.A. Nuclear Osteopontin Is a Marker of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Evidence from Transplant and Retransplant Hearts. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Shinohara, M.L.; Lu, L.; Bu, J.; Werneck, M.B.F.; Kobayashi, K.S.; Glimcher, L.H.; Cantor, H. Osteopontin Expression Is Essential for Interferon-Alpha Production by Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Rizzello, C.; Cancila, V.; Sangaletti, S.; Botti, L.; Ratti, C.; Milani, M.; Dugo, M.; Bertoni, F.; Tripodo, C.; Chiodoni, C.; et al. Intracellular Osteopontin Protects from Autoimmunity-Driven Lymphoma Development Inhibiting TLR9-MYD88-STAT3 Signaling. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Leavenworth, J.W.; Verbinnen, B.; Wang, Q.; Shen, E.; Cantor, H. Intracellular Osteopontin Regulates Homeostasis and Function of Natural Killer Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Leavenworth, J.W.; Verbinnen, B.; Yin, J.; Huang, H.; Cantor, H. A P85α-Osteopontin Axis Couples the Receptor ICOS to Sustained Bcl-6 Expression by Follicular Helper and Regulatory T Cells. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kanayama, M.; Xu, S.; Danzaki, K.; Gibson, J.R.; Inoue, M.; Gregory, S.G.; Shinohara, M.L. Skewing of the Population Balance of Lymphoid and Myeloid Cells by Secreted and Intracellular Osteopontin. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 973–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Inoue, M.; Shinohara, M.L. Intracellular Osteopontin (IOPN) and Immunity. Immunol. Res. 2011, 49, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 02942 g003 550
Figure 3. Roles and mechanisms of osteopontin in cancer cells. Osteopontin is a highly expressed protein that acts through several mechanisms in cancer cells. Secreted OPN can regulate PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and JNK intracellular signaling pathways through interacting with its known membrane receptors, CD44 variants, integrins, and/or EGFR, resulting in the activation of a pro-tumorigenic phenotype, including increased survival, proliferation, clonogenicity and capacity of migration and invasion. Extracellular OPN has been extensively associated with the immune system once this protein mediates chemoattraction of cells, such as monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, as well as macrophage accumulation in diverse diseases, including in tumor microenvironments. This variety of extracellular roles is due to several modifications, such as post-translational mechanisms, polymerization, and thrombin cleavage. Intracellular OPN has been localized in the perimembranous and perinuclear regions regulating the expression of NF-kB, cytoskeleton remodeling through the CD44 receptor, and activation and differentiation of immune cells in responses against viruses and fungi. Besides cytoplasmic OPN, it has been observed a nuclear localization for this protein where it accumulates and is associated with the presence of Plk-1 and chromatin condensation. Once OPN has been associated with a poor prognosis and acquisition of pro-tumorigenic features, molecules aiming the regulation of OPN have been the focus of studies, such as genistein, which inhibits sOPN expression, leading to reduces colony formation rates, migration, and invasion. sOPN: secreted OPN. iOPN: intracellular OPN. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 11 November 2022).
Figure 3. Roles and mechanisms of osteopontin in cancer cells. Osteopontin is a highly expressed protein that acts through several mechanisms in cancer cells. Secreted OPN can regulate PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and JNK intracellular signaling pathways through interacting with its known membrane receptors, CD44 variants, integrins, and/or EGFR, resulting in the activation of a pro-tumorigenic phenotype, including increased survival, proliferation, clonogenicity and capacity of migration and invasion. Extracellular OPN has been extensively associated with the immune system once this protein mediates chemoattraction of cells, such as monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, as well as macrophage accumulation in diverse diseases, including in tumor microenvironments. This variety of extracellular roles is due to several modifications, such as post-translational mechanisms, polymerization, and thrombin cleavage. Intracellular OPN has been localized in the perimembranous and perinuclear regions regulating the expression of NF-kB, cytoskeleton remodeling through the CD44 receptor, and activation and differentiation of immune cells in responses against viruses and fungi. Besides cytoplasmic OPN, it has been observed a nuclear localization for this protein where it accumulates and is associated with the presence of Plk-1 and chromatin condensation. Once OPN has been associated with a poor prognosis and acquisition of pro-tumorigenic features, molecules aiming the regulation of OPN have been the focus of studies, such as genistein, which inhibits sOPN expression, leading to reduces colony formation rates, migration, and invasion. sOPN: secreted OPN. iOPN: intracellular OPN. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 11 November 2022).
Ijms 24 02942 g003
Table
Table 1. Predictions for SP and subcellular localization for OPN-SV protein sequences.
Table 1. Predictions for SP and subcellular localization for OPN-SV protein sequences.
OPN-SVN-Terminal SequenceSignal-6.0
SP Eukaryotic Consensus Sequence		Signal-6.0
Peptidase
Cleavage Site 16/17		PrediSi
Probability of SP Prediction		DeepLoc
Probability of Being Secreted		MULocDeep
Probability of Subcellular Localization		NucPred
Probability of Nuclear Localization
OPN-aMRIAIVICFCLLGITCAIyesyes84.0%>90%100% secreted61%
OPN-bMRIAIVICFCLLGITCAIyesyes84.0%>90%100% secreted60%
OPN-cMRIAIVICFCLLGITCAIyesyes84.0%>90%100% secreted54%
OPN-4MRIAIVICFCLLGITCAIyesyes84.0%>90%100% secreted55%
OPN-5MGIVPRSLDKKAHRVQFQNoNo0.0%81%<10% secreted; ~30% mitochondrial; ~20% nuclear65%
The OPN-SV amino acid sequences were analyzed by software that predicted the SP sequences (SignalP 6.0 [29]) and corresponding peptidase cleavage sites (PrediSi [30]). SignalP 6.0 also identifies the position of the amino acid sequence in which is located the peptidase cleavage site (in between amino acids 16 and 17 of the OPN SP sequence). Other software predicted the probability of each OPN-SV to be secreted (DeepLoc [31]), their subcellular (MULocDeep [32], or nuclear localization (NucPred [33]). The N-terminal end of each OPN-SV amino acid sequence is shown; SP: signal peptide; Yes: presence of SP; No: absence of SP; >: probability higher than; The NCBI reference number for each amino acid sequence analyzed are as follows: OPN-a, NP_001035147.1; OPN-b, NP_000573.1; OPN-c, NP_001035149.1; OPN-4, NP_001238758.1, and OPN-5, NP_001238759.1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bastos, A.C.S.d.F.; Gomes, A.V.P.; Silva, G.R.; Emerenciano, M.; Ferreira, L.B.; Gimba, E.R.P. The Intracellular and Secreted Sides of Osteopontin and Their Putative Physiopathological Roles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032942

AMA Style

Bastos ACSdF, Gomes AVP, Silva GR, Emerenciano M, Ferreira LB, Gimba ERP. The Intracellular and Secreted Sides of Osteopontin and Their Putative Physiopathological Roles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bastos, Ana Clara Santos da Fonseca, Amanda Vitória Pampolha Gomes, Gabriela Ribeiro Silva, Mariana Emerenciano, Luciana Bueno Ferreira, and Etel Rodrigues Pereira Gimba. 2023. "The Intracellular and Secreted Sides of Osteopontin and Their Putative Physiopathological Roles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032942

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop