Next Article in Journal
The Potential Role of Gossypetin in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Associated Complications: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Anaerobutyricum soehngenii Reduces Hepatic Lipogenic Pathways and Increases Intestinal Gluconeogenic Gene Expression in Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Controversies Surrounding Albumin Use in Sepsis: Lessons from Cirrhosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Cardiogenic Shock Integrated PHenotyping for Event Reduction: A Pilot Metabolomics Analysis

1
Dipartimento Cardio-Respiratorio, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20100 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20126 Milan, Italy
3
Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 4365 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
4
Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, 20162 Milan, Italy
5
Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
6
Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
7
Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Anestesia e Rianimazione I, 27100 Pavia, Italy
8
The CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
9
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15100 Alessandria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(24), 17607; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417607
Submission received: 6 November 2023 / Revised: 10 December 2023 / Accepted: 15 December 2023 / Published: 18 December 2023

Highlights

  • Therapeutic approaches in patients with cardiogenic shock hingers on the profiling of clinical and biomarkers phenotypes.
  • There are no consistent data on the metabolomic profile and inflammatory status of patients with heart failure cardiogenic shock (HF-CS).
  • Interleukin-6 and kynurenine could be considered early markers of a worsening sta-tus and prognosis in patients with HF-CS.
  • The tryptophan–-kynurenine metabolites could affect the prognosis of HF-CS patients throughout inflammation-related pathways.

Abstract

:
Cardiogenic shock (CS) portends a dismal prognosis if hypoperfusion triggers uncontrolled inflammatory and metabolic derangements. We sought to investigate metabolomic profiles and temporal changes in IL6, Ang-2, and markers of glycocalyx perturbation from admission to discharge in eighteen patients with heart failure complicated by CS (HF-CS). Biological samples were collected from 18 consecutive HF-CS patients at admission (T0), 48 h after admission (T1), and at discharge (T2). ELISA analytical techniques and targeted metabolomics were performed Seven patients (44%) died at in-hospital follow-up. Among the survivors, IL-6 and kynurenine were significantly reduced at discharge compared to baseline. Conversely, the amino acids arginine, threonine, glycine, lysine, and asparagine; the biogenic amine putrescine; multiple sphingolipids; and glycerophospholipids were significantly increased. Patients with HF-CS have a metabolomic fingerprint that might allow for tailored treatment strategies for the patients’ recovery or stabilization.

1. Introduction

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life threatening, heterogenous syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that can potentially lead to multiorgan failure if not promptly recognized and adequately treated [1,2]. CS epidemiology has been exclusively focused on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), although recent data have shown that CS related to AMI and to heart failure (HF) is approximately equally distributed [1]. The use of translational medicine, including immunophenotyping, metabolomics, inflammatory biomarkers, and genomics, is emerging as a robust approach to tailor HF diagnosis and treatment, yet it has been scarcely applied in CS.
The aim of this project was to explore the biomarkers and metabolomic profile of a cohort of patients with HF-CS. The Cardiogenic shock Integrated PHenotyping for Event Reduction (CIPHER) study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04323371) is a prospective pilot study that is part of the Italian Altshock-2 program. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been previously reported [3]. This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Milano Area 3 of the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano). All patients provided written informed consent. This study’s endpoints were the following: (i) the exploratory assessment of targeted metabolomics through the quantification of almost 180 molecules, including acylcarnitine, amino acids and biogenic amines, hexoxide, sphingolipids, and glycerophospholipids; (ii) the exploratory assessment of temporal changes in IL6, Ang-2, and markers of glycocalyx perturbation from admission to discharge.

2. Results

The median age of the study population was 50 years (25% and 75% percentiles equal to 42 and 60 years, respectively), and the study population was predominantly males (78%) (Table 1). We assessed four different parameters involved in the pro-inflammatory response (interleukin-6 (IL-6)) and in the endothelial perturbation (angiopoietin-2, syndecan-1, and heparan sulfate) (Supplementary Table S1). Among these biomarkers, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 was significantly reduced compared to baseline in the patients who were successfully hemodynamically stabilized with medical treatment (35.24 ± 14.79 pg/mL versus 52.43 ± 26.09 pg/mL, p = 0.016). No significant differences were reported at baseline among the survivors and non-survivors (during hospital stay).
The results of the mixed linear models for the metabolomic analysis are reported in the Supplementary Table S2. Although no significant differences in the metabolomic profile were found when comparing T1 vs. T0, several metabolites were significantly different comparing T2 vs. T0 (Figure 1). Kynurenine, N-acetylornithine, and glutamic acid were the metabolites for which significant lower levels were found in T2 compared to T0, while several metabolites were significantly higher in T2 vs. T0, among them the amino acids arginine (Arg), threonine (Thr), glycine (Gly), lysine (Lys), and asparagine (Asn); the biogenic amine putrescine; 10 sphingolipids; and a total of 69 glycerophospholipids (among which were 8 lyso PC, 28 PC aa, and 33 PC ae). The results of the pathway analyses showed that, among the potential most-altered pathways, are glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism; arginine and proline metabolism; and linoleic acid metabolism (Supplementary Table S3). Furthermore, when considering only the samples collected at T0, a few glycerophospholipids (PC aa C40:2, PC aa C34:1, PC ae C44:6, PC ae C38:1, PC aa C32:2) were lower in non-survivors compared to patients who survived (odds ratio of the logistic regressions < 1), while putrescine was higher (odds ratio > 1), although not statistically significant when considering the FDR p-value (Supplementary Table S2).

3. Methods and Experimental Design

Blood samples were collected from 18 consecutive HF-CS patients admitted to the Intensive Coronary Care Unit (ICCU) at ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, and locally stored until all needed samples were obtained.
Three blood samples were collected from each patient, at admission (T0), 48 h after admission (T1), and at discharge (T2), after a median of 44 (interquartile range 32–58) days. The biomarkers were assessed with ELISA analytical techniques; comparisons between T0 and T1 were performed with the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while comparisons among T0, T1, and T2 were performed with the non-parametric Friedman test. The metabolomic profile of plasma samples was assessed with a targeted approach, in particular, a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method implementing the AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit (Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria) [4]. With this assay, a total of 188 metabolites were quantified: a total of 21 amino acids, 21 biogenic amines, the sum of hexose (H1), 40 acylcarnitine, 15 sphingolipids, and 90 glycerophospholipids among which were 14 lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPC), 38 diacylphosphatidylcholine (PC aa), and 38 acylalkylphosphatidylcholine (PC ae). This approach is widely used in the metabolomic community and has the advantage of good interlaboratory reproducibility. The analytical details used in our analyses were extensively reported previously [5]. Metabolite concentrations were log-transformed and standardized, and then, a linear mixed-effects model was built for each metabolite in which the dependent variable was the metabolite concentration; the independent variables with fixed effects were age, body mass index, sex, and sample collection (T0, T1, or T2), while the patients were considered the random intercept variable. In addition, logistic regression models were built to assess the association between metabolite concentration at T0 and patient survival; for each metabolite, a model was built considering whether the patient died (yes or no) as the dependent variable, and the metabolite measured at T0 as the independent variable along with sex, age, and body mass index as further independent variables. The inclusion of all these independent variables to the model was necessary, despite the low number of observations, since the metabolome is highly influenced by several confounding factors, and we decided to correct at least for the most important ones. The p-values were adjusted for multiple testing controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), and an FDR p-value lower than 0.1 was considered statistically significant. Finally, pathway analyses were performed using MetaboAnalyst [6] with the global test enrichment method, the topology analysis out-degree centrality, and the pathway library Homo sapiens (KEGG).

4. Discussion

For the first time to our knowledge, we highlight the prominent role of systemic inflammation in HF-CS using a metabolomics-based approach as underlined with the increased values of the serum tryptophan–kynurenine pathway metabolites, which consistently decreased in the survivors.
If confirmed in larger studies, the evaluation of inflammatory and metabolomic profiles might turn into an innovative fingerprint to drive patient-tailored stratification in cardiogenic shock and as a tool to titrate the amount of hemodynamic support.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogenous syndrome with in-hospital mortality of up to 50% that has remained stagnant over time despite observed improvements with pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches [1]. This lack of benefit has been attributed to the inability to characterize the different phenotypes with specific responses to treatments. Accordingly, it has been suggested to move on from diagnostic and therapeutic strategies based on the improvement of cardiac output toward mechanistic drivers of shock phenotypes that allow for a more personalized patient selection for treatment strategies based on integrative approaches, including metabolomics and biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [2].
Several biomarkers have been previously investigated, but they were mostly limited to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and provided limited information (Table 2).
Inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), are frequently elevated in CS and add further to cardiac dysfunction through their negative inotropic effect. In addition, cytokines lead to the production of high levels of nitric oxide (NO) through the induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which may result in a state of inappropriate vasodilation and in perturbation of endothelial function [1]. Inflammatory stimuli applied to the endothelium may, therefore, contribute to the alteration of other regulatory systems. Among several biomarkers, the endothelial glycocalyx (through its most prevalent proteoglycan syndecan-1) and the Ang/Tie system are involved in the vascular barrier dysfunction during critical illness and are associated with the development of CS in acutely ischemic patients [7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, their prognostic role is not clear across the spectrum of CS etiologies.
Moreover, the biochemical pathways involved in heart failure (HF) suggest that, as hearts begin to fail, altered energetics play an increasingly important role in pathogenesis. The concept that unique patterns of metabolomic expression and energy utilization occur in different etiologies and severity grading of HF has recently been introduced [13] and could revolutionize the diagnosis and management of heart failure.
Metabolites can be considered a direct signature of biochemical activity [14]. A few pathways have been explored in heart failure but are not defined across the whole spectrum of CS syndrome. Preliminary data exist on structural abnormalities in mitochondria along with reduced activity of the respiratory carriers (Krebs cycle intermediates) and oxidative phosphorylation [13,15].
They can mostly occur in patients with CS after longstanding disease in order to enhance the patients’ tolerance to low cardiac output states and/or elevated ventricular filling pressures. As a proof of concept, metabolomic profiling following left ventricular (LV) assist device implantation in end-stage HF patients resulted in a decrease in circulating L-C acylcarnitine [16] due to the reduced update and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism of FAs.
The tryptophan–kynurenine pathway metabolites have been previously associated with heart failure and atrial fibrillation [17,18,19], higher risk of acute coronary syndrome, and cardiovascular death [20,21].
It has also been reported that the tryptophan–kynurenine pathway has a tight interplay with the cytokines activation and has been implicated in the modulation of inflammatory responses in vascular and immune cells [22].
The main limitation of this study is its small sample size, which may restrict the generalizability of our results to a broader population. However, this work serves as a foundation for future studies with larger and more diverse cohorts, which can further validate and build upon our findings. Indeed, this work confirms the relevant role of metabolomic profiles in HF-CS patients. Further studies focusing on the integration with genomics and other ‘omics data and clinical phenotype will have a meaningful impact on patient outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242417607/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M. and G.F.; methodology, G.F. and J.C.; formal analysis, G.F., S.F. and J.C.; investigation, N.M., F.P., A.S., L.V., L.G. and G.T.; data curation, N.M., G.F., J.C., L.G. and L.V.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M., G.T., F.P. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, F.P. and N.K.K.; supervision, F.P. and N.K.K.; funding acquisition, N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication of this article was supported by the “Ricerca Corrente” funding from the Italian Ministry of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and it was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Milano Area 3 of the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano). Approval number: 527-15092020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon specific request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jentzer, J.C.; van Diepen, S.; Henry, T.D. Understanding How Cardiac Arrest Complicates the Analysis of Clinical Trials of Cardiogenic Shock. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2020, 13, e006692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Diepen, S.; Katz, J.N.; Albert, N.M.; Henry, T.D.; Jacobs, A.K.; Kapur, N.K.; Kilic, A.; Menon, V.; Ohman, E.M.; Sweitzer, N.K.; et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 136, e232–e268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Morici, N.; Marini, C.; Sacco, A.; Tavazzi, G.; Cipriani, M.; Oliva, F.; Rota, M.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Campolo, J.; Frigerio, G.; et al. Early intra-aortic balloon pump in acute decompensated heart failure comoplicated by cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the randomized Altshock-2 trial. Am. Heart J. 2021, 233, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Biocrates-Life-Sciences-AG AbsoluteIDQ® p180 Kit. Available online: https://biocrates.com/absoluteidq-p180-kit/ (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  5. Frigerio, G.; Favero, C.; Savino, D.; Mercadante, R.; Albetti, B.; Dioni, L.; Vigna, L.; Bollati, V.; Pesatori, A.C.; Fustinoni, S. Plasma Metabolomic Profiling in 1391 Subjects with Overweight and Obesity from the SPHERE Study. Metabolites 2021, 11, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Augustin, H.G.; Koh, G.Y.; Thurston, G.; Alitalo, K. Control of vascular morphogenesisand homeostasis through the Angiopoietin-Tie system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pang, Z.; Zhou, G.; Ewald, J.; Chang, L.; Hacariz, O.; Basu, N.; Xia, J. Using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for LC-HRMS spectra processing, multi-omics integration and covariate adjustment of global metabolomics data. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 8, 1735–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gamble, J.R.; Drew, J.; Trezise, L.; Underwood, A.; Parsons, M.; Kasminkas, L.; Rudge, J.; Yancopoulos, G.; Vadas, M.A. Angiopoietin-1 is an antipermeability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Benest, A.V.; Kruse, K.; Savant, S.; Thomas, M.; Laib, A.M.; Loos, E.K.; Fiedler, U.; Augustin, H.G. Angiopoietin-2 is critical for cytokine-induced vascular leakage. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pöss, J.; Fuernau, G.; Denks, D.; Desch, S.; Eitel, I.; de Waha, S.; Link, A.; Schuler, G.; Adams, V.; Böhm, M.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock—A biomarker substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-Trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2015, 17, 1152–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chong, A.Y.; Caine, G.J.; Freestone, B.; Blann, A.D.; Lip, G.Y. Plasma Angiopoietin-1, Angiopoietin-2, and Angiopoietin receptor Tie-2 levels in congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 43, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pöss, J.; Ukena, C.; Kindermann, I.; Ehrlich, P.; Fuernau, G.; Ewen, S.; Mahfoud, F.; Kriechbaum, S.; Böhm, M.; Link, A. Angiopoietin-2 and outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2015, 104, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McGarrah, R.W.; Crown, S.B.; Zhang, G.F.; Shah, S.H.; Newgard, C.B. Cardiovascular Metabolomics. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1238–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Patti, G.J.; Yanes, O.; Siuzdak, G. Innovation: Metabolomics: The apogee of the omics trilogy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ruiz, M.; Labarthe, F.; Fortier, A.; Bouchard, B.; Thompson Legault, J.; Bolduc, V.; Rigal, O.; Chen, J.; Ducharme, A.; Crawford, P.A.; et al. Circulating acylcarnitine profile in human heart failure: A surrogate of fatty acid metabolic dysregulation in mitochondria and beyond. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2017, 313, H768–H781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Diakos, N.A.; Navankasattusas, S.; Abel, E.D. Evidence of Glycolysis Up-Regulation and Pyruvate Mitochondrial Oxidation Mismatch During Mechanical Unloading of the Failing Human Heart: Implications for Cardiac Reloading and Conditioning. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2016, 1, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lund, A.; Nordrehaug, J.E.; Slettom, G.; Solvang, S.E.H.; Pedersen, E.K.R.; Midttun, Ø.; Ulvik, A.; Ueland, P.M.; Nygard, O.; Giil, L.M. Plasma kynurenines and prognosis in patients with heart failure. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227365. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dschietzig, T.B.; Kellner, K.H.; Sasse, K.; Boschann, F.; Klüsener, R.; Ruppert, J.; Armbruster, F.P.; Bankovic, D.; Meinitzer, A.; Mitrovic, V.; et al. Plasma kynurenine predicts severity and complications of heart failure and associates with established biochemical and clinical markers of disease. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2019, 44, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zapolski, T.; Kamińska, A.; Kocki, T.; Wysokiński, A.; Urbanska, E.M. Aortic stiffness—Is kynurenic acid a novel marker? Cross-sectional study in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sulo, G.; Vollset, S.E.; Nygard, O.; Midttun, O.; Ueland, P.M.; Eussen, S.; Pedersen, E.R.; Tell, G.S. Neopterin and kynurenine-tryptophan ratio as predictors of coronary events in older adults, the Hordaland Health Study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 1435–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zuo, H.; Ueland, P.M.; Ulvik, A.; Eussen, S.; Vollset, S.E.; Nygård, O.; Midttun, Ø.; Theofylaktopoulou, D.; Meyer, K.; Tell, G.S. Plasma biomarkers of inflammation, the kynurenine pathway, and risks of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 183, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baumgartner, R.; Forteza, M.J.; Ketelhuth, D.F.J. The interplay between cytokines and the Kynurenine pathway in inflammation and atherosclerosis. Cytokine 2019, 122, 154148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Volcano plot representing the results of the mixed effects linear regression models considering the metabolites (dependent variables) in relation to sampling (T2 vs. T0), adjusted for age, BMI, sex, and time sampling. Patients were considered as the random intercept variable. Each dot represents a metabolite, and they are displayed based on the standardized beta coefficient (x-axis) and the negative logarithm (base 10) of the FDR p-value (y-axis). The dashed line represents an FDR p-value equal to 0.1. The significantly different metabolites comparing T2 vs. T0 are noted with their full names in the graph.
Figure 1. Volcano plot representing the results of the mixed effects linear regression models considering the metabolites (dependent variables) in relation to sampling (T2 vs. T0), adjusted for age, BMI, sex, and time sampling. Patients were considered as the random intercept variable. Each dot represents a metabolite, and they are displayed based on the standardized beta coefficient (x-axis) and the negative logarithm (base 10) of the FDR p-value (y-axis). The dashed line represents an FDR p-value equal to 0.1. The significantly different metabolites comparing T2 vs. T0 are noted with their full names in the graph.
Ijms 24 17607 g001
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the included patients (n = 18).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the included patients (n = 18).
VariableNumber (%)
Male gender14 (78%)
Age50 (42–60)
BMI25 (23–27)
Hypertension3 (17%)
Diabetes 2 (11.1%)
Ischemic etiology 6 (33%)
On admission
SCAI Stage
B6 (33%)
C9 (50%)
D3 (17%)
Ejection fraction (%)20 (18–30)
Central venous pressure (mmHg)10 (4–15)
Wedge pressure (mmHg)19 (10–24)
Cardiac index L/min/m22 (1.4–2.5)
PAPm (mmHg)33 (26–35)
SOFA score5.5 (3–6)
Hb, gr/dl9 (8–10)
Serum creatinine, mg/dl1.7 (1.3–2.1)
ScVO2 (%)45 (41–60)
Lactates mmol/L3 (2.2–3.4)
During Hospital stay
Epinephrine (17 patients)
maximum dose, mcg/Kg/min0.05 (0.04–0.12)
total time of administration, days9 (5–20)
Sodium Nitroprusside (15 patients)
maximum dose, mcg/Kg/min0.4 (0.3–0.5)
total time of administration, days5 (2–8)
Maximum inotropic score7 (4–12)
IABP13 (72%)
Total support time, days8 (5–19)
ECMO3 (17%)
Total support time, days7 (6–13)
Mechanical ventilation7 (39%)
NIV14 (78)
CRRT2 (11%)
In-hospital Outcome
Heart transplantation8 (44%)
Left ventricular assist device1 (5%)
Death 7 (44%)
Data are presented as n (%) for categorical variables and median (25%, 75% percentiles) for continuous variables. Abbreviations. BMI: body mass index; SCAI: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions classification; PAPm: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; Hb: hemoglobin; ScvO2: central venous oxygen saturation; IABP: intraortic balloon pump; ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; NIV: Non-invasive ventilation; CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy.
Table 2. Biomarkers in cardiogenic shock patients.
Table 2. Biomarkers in cardiogenic shock patients.
AuthorYearSample SizeBiomarkersOutcome
Appoloni O

Chest. 2004 Jun;125(6):2232-7
200433
patients

(75% ischemic heart disease)
TNF-
IL-6
IL-10
TGF-
IFN-
cytokine polymorphisms
70% ICU mortality

The rare TNF-2 allele of the TNF-promoter is a strong independent factor associated with better survival from cardiogenic shock.
Geppert A

Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2035-42
200638 AMI-CS patientsIL-1
IL-6
IL-10
ICAM-1
E-selectin
40% mortality at 30 days

Association with IL6, no other markers.
200 pg/mL as the most valuable IL-6 cut-off concentration for predicting 30-day mortality with a specificity of 87% and a sensitivity of 74%.
Debrunner M

Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 May;97(5):298-305
200841 AMI patients

(19 with CS: 7 developed SIRS)
TNF-α
IL-6
IL-1 Ra
71% In-hospital mortality in group 3 (SIRS)

IL-1Ra showed the most impressive changes.
Sleeper LA

Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):443-50
20101217 AMI patients

(294 from the
randomized trial and 923 from the registry)
Creatinine ≥ 1.9 mg/dL57% in-hospital mortality at 30 days
Prondzinsky R

Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 May;101(5):375-84
201240 AMI-CS patientsIL-1b
IL-6
IL-7
IL-8
IL-10
32% mortality at 96 h

The pro- and anti-inflammatory markers IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, and IL-10 showed a predictive power for mortality of infarct-related CS patients, while IL-1b did not discriminate.
No IABP effect.
Link A

Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(22):1651-62
201396 CS patients

(58% AMI)
Ang-1
Ang-2
37.5% mortality at 28 days.
61.5% mortality at 1 year

Ang-2 level >2500 pg/mL at admission is an independent predictor for 1-year mortality
(HR 2.11; 95% CI (1.03–4.36); p = 0.042)
Fuernau G

Crit Care. 2014 Dec 21;18(6):713
2014600
patients in the original trial

(190 included: Leipzig cohort with blood sample available)
AMI
OPG
GDF-15
40.2% mortality at 30 days

Multivariate: GDF-15, TIMI flow grade < 3 after PCI, age, LVEF, and serum lactate remained significant predictors of 30-day mortality.
Poss J

Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;17(11):1152-60
2015600
patients in the original trial

(1890 included)
AMI
Ang-2
IQR
41% mortality at 30 days
53% mortality at 1 year

Ang-2 was an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality (with creatinine, lactate, NTproBNP, FGF 23, SAPSII, age, EF)
Fuernau G

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15; 191:159-66
2015600
patients in the original trial

(190 included: Leipzig cohort with blood sample available)
AMI
Creatinine
NGAL
KIM1
CysC
54% mortality at 1 year

Creatinine demonstrated a better predictive performance at all 3 time points with respect to 1-year mortality in comparison to the other 3 biomarkers.
Poss J

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 18;69(15):1913-1920
2017600
patients in the original trial

(480 included)
AMI
Validation in IABP shock II registry
(188 pts)
and
Cardshock cohort
(219 pts)
Glucose
Creatinine
Arterial Blood Lactate
41% mortality at 30 days

Age > 73 years, prior stroke, glucose at admission > 10.6 mmol/L (191 mg/dl), creatinine at admission > 132.6 mmol/l (1.5 mg/dl), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade < 3 after percutaneous coronary intervention, and arterial blood lactate at admission >5 mmol/l.
Tolppanen H

Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):e666-e673
2017145 ACS-CS patientssST2
NT-proBNP
43% mortality at 30 days

Combination of results for soluble ST2 and NT-proBNP provide early risk assessment beyond clinical variables of Cardshock score
Rueda F

Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 21;40(32):2684-2694
201948 AMI patients

(Validation in 97 patients from Cardshock–71% ACS)
Quantitative proteomics analysis (QPC)37.1% mortality at 90 days

4-protein combination: the CS4P with proteins liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP, P07148), beta-2-microglobulin (B2MG, P61769), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B (ALDOB, P05062), and SerpinG1 as the best protein classifier to identify short-term mortality risk with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74–0.89)
Peng Y

Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Dec; 511:97-103
2020707 of critically ill
patients with CS

(55% CAD)
Systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII)40% mortality at 30 days
50% mortality at 90 days
60% mortality at 1 year

High-SII group independently associated with mortality (any time).
Low-SII group (<82.85), 235 in the mid-SII group (82.8–111.7), and 236 in the high-SII group (>111.7)
Cuinet J

Sci Rep. 2020 May 6;10(1):7639
202024
patients

(12 ACS-CS—50%
6 HF-CS—25%)
WBC counts
IL-1β
IL-5
IL-6
IL-10
TNFα
IFNγ
MCP-1
Eotaxin (CCL11)
21% In-hospital mortality

Early (T1) neutrophilia and IL-6, IL-10, and MCP-1, rise of eosinophils over time. Most severe shock had reduced lymphocytes and monocytes at T2 and T3
Ceglarek U

Eur Heart J. 2021 Jun 21;42(24):2344-2352
2021458 patients

(derivation cohort of culprit shock, 152 patients among 458 were used for internal validation
+
163 patients (validation cohort) IABP shock II trial)
AMI
Lactate
Cystatin C
NT-proBNP
IL-6
43.4% mortality at 30 days
Zhang Z

Int J Gen Med. 2021 Aug 12; 14:4459-4468
20211487 patients

(CAD 63.8%)
Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR)Approximately 50% in-hospital mortality at 30 days

Low-LMR group had a poor prognosis in crude cohort (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.12–1.74, p = 0.003).
After PSM, low-LMR group had a similar poor prognosis in crude cohort (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.08–1.68, p = 0.016) compared with high-LMR group.
Acronyms: TNF = tumor necrosis factor; IL = interleukin; IL-1 Ra = interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; TGF = transforming growth factor; IFN = interferon; ICAM = soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; Ang = angiopoietin; OPG = osteoprotegerin; GDF = growth-differentiation factor; NGAL = neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; KIM1 = kidney injury molecule 1; CysC = cystatin C; WBC = white blood cells.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morici, N.; Frigerio, G.; Campolo, J.; Fustinoni, S.; Sacco, A.; Garatti, L.; Villanova, L.; Tavazzi, G.; Kapur, N.K.; Pappalardo, F. Cardiogenic Shock Integrated PHenotyping for Event Reduction: A Pilot Metabolomics Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417607

AMA Style

Morici N, Frigerio G, Campolo J, Fustinoni S, Sacco A, Garatti L, Villanova L, Tavazzi G, Kapur NK, Pappalardo F. Cardiogenic Shock Integrated PHenotyping for Event Reduction: A Pilot Metabolomics Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(24):17607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morici, Nuccia, Gianfranco Frigerio, Jonica Campolo, Silvia Fustinoni, Alice Sacco, Laura Garatti, Luca Villanova, Guido Tavazzi, Navin K. Kapur, and Federico Pappalardo. 2023. "Cardiogenic Shock Integrated PHenotyping for Event Reduction: A Pilot Metabolomics Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 24: 17607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop