Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of PEBP Gene Family in Two Dendrobium Species and Expression Patterns in Dendrobium chrysotoxum
Previous Article in Journal
Visualization of the Dynamics of Photoinduced Crawling Motion of 4-(Methylamino)Azobenzene Crystals via Diffracted X-ray Tracking
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alterations in Rat Hippocampal Glutamatergic System Properties after Prolonged Febrile Seizures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0

by
Aleksey V. Zaitsev
Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, 194223 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(24), 17464; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417464
Submission received: 4 December 2023 / Accepted: 13 December 2023 / Published: 14 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0)
Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 70 million people worldwide have epilepsy. This disorder is characterized by periodic and spontaneous seizures caused by the hyperexcitability and hypersynchronization of brain neurons [1]. Epilepsy can manifest itself in various forms and have a significant impact on an individual’s quality of life [2]. Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disease that is linked to different etiological factors, such as genetic, infectious, traumatic, vascular, toxic, tumor, etc. Despite the availability of many antiseizure drugs, about 30% of epilepsy patients, especially those with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), continue to experience seizures. One reason for this might be that most current antiseizure drugs focus on a single “terminal” mechanism of epilepsy. For example, the main anticonvulsants aim to (1) modulate voltage-gated sodium, calcium or potassium channels; (2) enhance GABA-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission; (3) attenuate glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission; and (4) modulate neurotransmitter release via a presynaptic action [3].
However, the most rational therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy is preventing the development and progression of epilepsy, based on an understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of epileptogenesis [4,5]. In recent decades, progress has been made in the field of epilepsy due to advancements in genetics, resulting in a better understanding of the pathophysiological basis for epilepsy syndromes and epileptic encephalopathies [6]. Currently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have linked specific low-level somatic mutations with intractable epilepsy, identifying multiple genes at risk of epilepsy (see for review [7,8]).
This Special Issue, “Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0”, emphasizes the breakthroughs that have been made in identifying the molecular, cellular, and network alterations associated with severe epilepsy. Shevlyakov et al. [9] used a computational in silico approach to generate a comprehensive network of molecular pathways involved in epilepsy based on known human epilepsy candidate genes and their established molecular interactors. The authors found several other gene clusters beyond neuronal hyperactivity, including genes not directly related to epilepsy but otherwise critical to CNS function and worthy of further investigation. Among such gene clusters, the following deserve a special mention: (1) mitochondrial and metabolic genes; (2) the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway; (3) transcription factors and chromatin remodeling genes; (4) cytoskeleton and cell division. The authors examine the relationships between these different genetic factors and show that abnormalities in one cluster can contribute to dysfunction in many cellular systems. For instance, mutations in the mitochondrial genome can affect other, higher-level systems that may also be relevant to the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Indeed, considering the dependence of many molecular processes on ATP, mutations in mitochondrial genes pose a significant risk of disrupting such ATP-dependent mechanisms.
Metabolic and mitochondrial disorders are known to cause epilepsy, including several common types such as glucose transporter (GLUT1) deficiency syndrome, hypoglycemia, creatine deficits, and mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. A shared characteristic of these widespread metabolic disorders, leading to epileptic seizures, is a reduction in energy compounds that results in decreased ATP levels [10]. These data imply that seizures can be managed by influencing metabolic pathways. The ketogenic diet [11] is a well-known strategy, as are drugs that impede metabolism, such as 2-deoxyglucose [12] and stiripentol [13], which demonstrate antiepileptic effects, indicating the potential of the metabolic management of epilepsy. Epilepsy treatment still requires the identification of more effective therapeutic targets, and the metabolic pathway presents a promising alternative [10].
Mutations in genes within the mTOR pathway are also a common cause of epilepsy [14]. These mutations often occur alongside focal cortical dysplasia (PCD) and other malformations in the cortex [15]. Hyperactivated mTOR plays a critical role in the development of acquired epilepsy in animal models. Various studies have shown that mTOR inhibitors, such as rapamycin and its analogs, can reduce seizure development and prevent epileptogenesis-related mechanisms in many animal models. Additionally, some studies have also demonstrated anticonvulsant activity. Therefore, this pathway has been recognized as a potential target for novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of epilepsy and epileptogenesis [16].
A promising therapeutic approach to preventing epileptogenesis is to influence peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) [17]. PPARs are nuclear transcription factors that regulate metabolic and tissue development processes. They are involved in various physiological functions and have been linked to metabolic diseases, lipid metabolism, and inflammation control [18,19]. PPARs can be activated by certain ligands, such as short-chain fatty acids, which are metabolites produced by the gut microbiota. An experimental study published in this Special Issue by Zubareva et al. examines the effects of Bifidobacterium longum, a probiotic, on inflammation, neuronal degeneration, and behavior in a lithium–pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) induced in young adult rats [20]. The results indicate that B. longum may have a beneficial effect on TLE and may provide valuable insights into the role of gut microbiota in epileptogenesis.
When searching for and selecting effective anticonvulsants, it is crucial to consider that pharmacoresistance may result from genetic factors. Brancati et al. analyzed the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiseizure drugs and assessed whether these polymorphisms could impact the efficacy, blood levels, and clinical outcomes of treatment in patients with epilepsy. Interindividual variability in drug response can be influenced by SNPs in genes that encode drug efflux transporters (ABCB1, ABCC2) located in the gastrointestinal tract and blood–brain barrier, brain targets of antiseizure drugs (voltage-gated sodium channels, synaptic vesicle protein SV2A), and enzymes involved in drug metabolism (CYP2C19, UGT1A4) [21]. The authors conclude that SNPs in enzymes and transporters have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Therefore, population pharmacokinetic modeling that incorporates the genotypes of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters can be a highly effective tool in determining personalized dosing regimens for antiseizure therapy. Clinicians can rely on genetic and non-genetic factors affecting enzyme activity in choosing the most suitable anticonvulsants and adjusting dosage levels for their patients.
In conclusion, this Special Issue highlights a range of techniques used to study the molecular and cellular mechanisms of epilepsy. Advancing our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of epilepsy and epileptogenesis, along with incorporating innovative drug, cell, and gene therapy approaches into carefully controlled clinical trials, will promote significant progress in a field with many unmet needs.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wong, R.K.; Traub, R.D.; Miles, R. Cellular Basis of Neuronal Synchrony in Epilepsy. Adv. Neurol. 1986, 44, 583–592. [Google Scholar]
  2. Banerjee, P.N.; Filippi, D.; Allen Hauser, W. The Descriptive Epidemiology of Epilepsy—A Review. Epilepsy Res. 2009, 85, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sills, G.J.; Rogawski, M.A. Mechanisms of Action of Currently Used Antiseizure Drugs. Neuropharmacology 2020, 168, 107966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Klein, P.; Tyrlikova, I. No Prevention or Cure of Epilepsy as Yet. Neuropharmacology 2020, 168, 107762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Löscher, W. The Holy Grail of Epilepsy Prevention: Preclinical Approaches to Antiepileptogenic Treatments. Neuropharmacology 2020, 167, 107605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Myers, K.A.; Johnstone, D.L.; Dyment, D.A. Epilepsy Genetics: Current Knowledge, Applications, and Future Directions. Clin. Genet. 2019, 95, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Lin, Z.-J.; Liu, L.; Xu, H.-Q.; Shi, Y.-W.; Yi, Y.-H.; He, N.; Liao, W.-P. Epilepsy-Associated Genes. Seizure 2017, 44, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dunn, P.; Albury, C.L.; Maksemous, N.; Benton, M.C.; Sutherland, H.G.; Smith, R.A.; Haupt, L.M.; Griffiths, L.R. Next Generation Sequencing Methods for Diagnosis of Epilepsy Syndromes. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shevlyakov, A.D.; Kolesnikova, T.O.; de Abreu, M.S.; Petersen, E.V.; Yenkoyan, K.B.; Demin, K.A.; Kalueff, A.V. Forward Genetics-Based Approaches to Understanding the Systems Biology and Molecular Mechanisms of Epilepsy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fei, Y.; Shi, R.; Song, Z.; Wu, J. Metabolic Control of Epilepsy: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Epilepsy. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vamecq, J.; Vallee, L.; Lesage, F.; Gressens, P.; Stables, J. Antiepileptic Popular Ketogenic Diet: Emerging Twists in an Ancient Story. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 75, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Garriga-Canut, M.; Schoenike, B.; Qazi, R.; Bergendahl, K.; Daley, T.J.; Pfender, R.M.; Morrison, J.F.; Ockuly, J.; Stafstrom, C.; Sutula, T.; et al. 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Reduces Epilepsy Progression by NRSF-CtBP–Dependent Metabolic Regulation of Chromatin Structure. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 1382–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sada, N.; Lee, S.; Katsu, T.; Otsuki, T.; Inoue, T. Targeting LDH Enzymes with a Stiripentol Analog to Treat Epilepsy. Science 2015, 347, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lipton, J.O.; Sahin, M. The Neurology of MTOR. Neuron 2014, 84, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Crino, P.B. The MTOR Signalling Cascade: Paving New Roads to Cure Neurological Disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2016, 12, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Citraro, R.; Leo, A.; Constanti, A.; Russo, E.; De Sarro, G. MTOR Pathway Inhibition as a New Therapeutic Strategy in Epilepsy and Epileptogenesis. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 107, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zubareva, O.E.; Melik-Kasumov, T.B. The Gut–Brain Axis and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in the Regulation of Epileptogenesis. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 57, 743–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monsalve, F.A.; Pyarasani, R.D.; Delgado-Lopez, F.; Moore-Carrasco, R. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Targets for the Treatment of Metabolic Diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 549627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Delerive, P.; Fruchart, J.-C.; Staels, B. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Inflammation Control. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 169, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zubareva, O.E.; Dyomina, A.V.; Kovalenko, A.A.; Roginskaya, A.I.; Melik-Kasumov, T.B.; Korneeva, M.A.; Chuprina, A.V.; Zhabinskaya, A.A.; Kolyhan, S.A.; Zakharova, M.V.; et al. Beneficial Effects of Probiotic Bifidobacterium Longum in a Lithium–Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Urzì Brancati, V.; Pinto Vraca, T.; Minutoli, L.; Pallio, G. Polymorphisms Affecting the Response to Novel Antiepileptic Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaitsev, A.V. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417464

AMA Style

Zaitsev AV. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(24):17464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaitsev, Aleksey V. 2023. "Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Epilepsy 2.0" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 24: 17464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop