Next Article in Journal
HSP90AB1 Is a Host Factor Required for Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of the Gene for Alanine Racemase Modulates Amino Acid Metabolism with Consequent Alterations in Cell Wall Properties and Adhesive Capability in Brucella spp.
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Strategies to Use β-Cationic Porphyrin-Imidazolium Derivatives in the Photoinactivation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prioritization of Critical Factors for Surveillance of the Dissemination of Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation

by
José Roberto Guerrero Ramírez
1,
Lizbeth Alejandra Ibarra Muñoz
2,
Nagamani Balagurusamy
2,
José Ernesto Frías Ramírez
1,
Leticia Alfaro Hernández
1 and
Javier Carrillo Campos
3,*
1
Instituto Tecnológico de Torreón, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Torreon 27170, Coahuila, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Biorremediación, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreon 27275, Coahuila, Mexico
3
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31453, Chihuahua, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(21), 15969; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115969
Submission received: 30 June 2023 / Revised: 17 October 2023 / Accepted: 20 October 2023 / Published: 4 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Pesticides are chemicals used in agriculture, forestry, and, to some extent, public health. As effective as they can be, due to the limited biodegradability and toxicity of some of them, they can also have negative environmental and health impacts. Pesticide biodegradation is important because it can help mitigate the negative effects of pesticides. Many types of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and algae, can degrade pesticides; microorganisms are able to bioremediate pesticides using diverse metabolic pathways where enzymatic degradation plays a crucial role in achieving chemical transformation of the pesticides. The growing concern about the environmental and health impacts of pesticides is pushing the industry of these products to develop more sustainable alternatives, such as high biodegradable chemicals. The degradative properties of microorganisms could be fully exploited using the advances in genetic engineering and biotechnology, paving the way for more effective bioremediation strategies, new technologies, and novel applications. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the microorganisms that have demonstrated their capacity to degrade pesticides and those categorized by the World Health Organization as important for the impact they may have on human health. A comprehensive list of microorganisms is presented, and some metabolic pathways and enzymes for pesticide degradation and the genetics behind this process are discussed. Due to the high number of microorganisms known to be capable of degrading pesticides and the low number of metabolic pathways that are fully described for this purpose, more research must be conducted in this field, and more enzymes and genes are yet to be discovered with the possibility of finding more efficient metabolic pathways for pesticide biodegradation.

1. Introduction

Currently, there are 5000 mega hectares (38% of the Earth’s surface) of land on Earth that have been recorded as being used for agricultural development. This surface can be divided into three parts, where one part represents crops, and the remaining two are prairies and pastures [1]. To keep crops suitable for human consumption, free of pests, and maximize their production, it is necessary to apply pesticides; according to Clark and Tilman [2], by 2030, the world population is expected to reach 8.5 billion people, which in turn will increase the use of pesticides.
A pesticide is any substance that can destroy, diminish, prevent, repel, control, attract, or even kill a pest or non-target organism; pesticides are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) according to their degree of danger based on the lethal dose (LD50) in rats. Exposure to the substance, either by single or multiple exposures during a short period, causes an effect on the person who handles the product [3,4].
Due to the negative impact that pesticides have on the environment and non-target species, there is a constant search to find ways to reduce the effects caused by these compounds. Microorganisms have a considerable biochemical versatility, which they use to adapt and develop in different environments. This feature and others make microorganisms a suitable tool for the remediation of both soil and water. Additionally, their use is commonly less expensive compared to physical and chemical methods [5]. The great variety of microorganisms that have the capacity to degrade pesticides include fungi, bacteria, actinomycetes, and algae; these organisms can use xenobiotic compounds as a source of nutrients [6]. These microorganisms can use xenobiotic compounds as a source of nutrients through the use of enzymes [7].
An emphasis on bacteria has been present throughout previous decades; this is understandable since bacteria are more easily cultivated. Other microorganisms with a more complex and diverse metabolism, such as fungi, have also been studied but not as in-depth as bacteria. For instance, most of the metabolic pathways discussed in this review were studied from bacteria; this presents an opportunity for further research to focus on fungi or algae to explore if more efficient metabolic pathways for pesticide degradation are present in these microorganisms.
In this review, we will provide a comprehensive list of microorganisms that can degrade diverse pesticides, the metabolic pathways some of them use to achieve this process, and the genetics behind these metabolic pathways. Finally, a current panorama and perspectives on the application of microorganisms as a method for the bioremediation of xenobiotic compounds focused on agricultural pesticides will be presented.

2. Pesticides Used in Agriculture

According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) [8], a pesticide is any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, or controlling any pest, including vectors of human or animal disease, unwanted species of plants or animals causing harm during or otherwise interfering with the production, processing, storage, transport or marketing of food, agricultural commodities, wood, wood products, or animal feedstuffs, or substances which may be administered to animals for the control of insects, arachnids, or other pests in or on their bodies. The term includes substances intended for use as a plant growth regulator, defoliant, desiccant, or agent for thinning fruit or preventing the premature fall of fruit, and substances applied to crops either before or after harvest to protect the commodity from deterioration during storage and transport.
Pesticides have been used in agriculture for at least 80 years, and the first pesticide to be created was dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). Twenty years after its discovery, DTT was banned for its use in agriculture [9]. Since the DDT discovery, several other types of pesticides have entered the market, most of them claiming safe use. Nonetheless, there is still public concern about the risks to health that the use of pesticides may present.
The use of pesticides has been increasing for the last few decades. From 2016 to 2021, the use of different pesticides experienced steady growth (Figure 1); when analyzed from 1990 to 2016, the trend of more tons per year is clearer [10].

2.1. Classification

There are different forms of classification of pesticides; they can be classified based on their chemical composition or by their target [10]. The WHO (World Health Organization) provides a classification based on the pesticide lethal dose 50 (LD50), which represents the dose required to kill half the tested population after a standardized test duration. WHO reports the LD50 for two types of exposition to the substances, dermal and oral [11]. This classification (Table 1) is very useful because it gives information about the health risks of any type of pesticide.

2.2. Extremely Hazardous Pesticides

According to WHO and the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the UN (United Nations) [4], these types of pesticides may cause cancer and genetic defects and may have a negative impact on fertility or an unborn child. Table 2 shows pesticides that are used in agriculture that are extremely hazardous.
Aldicarb is a highly toxic carbamate insecticide that is soluble in water due to its polarity; in both target and non-target organisms, this pesticide acts as a cholinesterase inhibitor. Though the inhibition is reversible, the effect may be acute depending on the amount of pesticide exposure to the organism; in non-target organisms such as humans, it may have a considerable effect on the central nervous system [15,16]. This pesticide has been found in the drinking water of some U.S. cities, such as New York, where it exceeded the permissible limit [17].
Terbufos (TBF), an organophosphate (OP) pesticide, is used as an insecticide and nematicide; its use is prohibited in the European Union, and in the United States, the EPA lists it as a restricted use pesticide (RUP), meaning that it can be used for agricultural purposes, but it should not be used in homes [18,19].
Methyl parathion is used as an insecticide, nematicide, and acaricide/organophosphate acaricide to control agricultural crop pests; its application on crops consumed by children is prohibited [19,20].

2.3. Highly Hazardous Pesticides

According to the WHO classification, a pesticide that falls into class Ib is one whose median lethal dose is within the values of 5–50 mg kg−1 body weight orally and 50–200 mg kg−1 dermally. Table 3 shows the pesticides in use that fall within this classification [4].
Cyfluthrin is a type II pyrethroid, which is frequently used in veterinary medicine and agriculture against pests [23]; the residual pesticide may end up in food consumed by humans, affecting their health. If present in soils, it can have a detrimental effect on the soil microorganisms [24].
Tefluthrin is a type I pyrethroid, which contains a cyclopropane carboxylic acid moiety linked to an aromatic alcohol [25]. Its action on pests results in paralysis and death; it is applied to lepidopteran and coleopteran pests [26].
Carbofuran is an N-methylcarbamate pesticide used to control crop insect and nematode pests [27]. As a cholinesterase inhibitor, it can cause harmful effects on the health of non-target organisms such as mammals. Due to this and other health effects, the use of carbofuran has been banned in some countries, but it has not stopped being used in developing countries [28].

2.4. Moderately Hazardous Pesticides

According to the WHO classification, a pesticide that falls into class II is one whose median lethal dose is within the values of 50–2000 mg kg−1 body weight orally and 200–2000 mg kg−1 dermally. Table 4 shows the pesticides in use that fall within this classification [4].
DDT is a moderately toxic pesticide with a half-life of 4–30 years. In addition to being toxic, it is a recalcitrant chemical with a complex degradation process [37]. In the 1960s, it was observed that DDT was present in all life forms in addition to water, air, and soil [38].
Lambda-cyhalothrin is a pesticide belonging to the pyrethroid class, developed in 1984 [39,40]. It is an acaricide insecticide [41]. Concentrations of this pesticide have been detected in mixtures with other types of pesticides, and relatively high doses (ranging from 10 to 100 ng of active ingredient per liter of water) can commonly be detected [41].
Permethrin was the first photostable synthetic pyrethroid developed in 1972 by Michael Elliot [39]. This pesticide is one of the most common pesticides that can be found in the environment. Permethrin is commonly used in agricultural and domestic applications, and traces of this pesticide have been found and reported in water bodies [42]. It belongs to the group of organophosphates commonly used as insecticides. It is one of the insecticides used after the prohibition of the use of organochlorines. Studies have shown that complete biodegradation of permethrin can take more than 15 years [39,43]. It is one of the pesticides included in the European Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC), monitoring its persistence in water [44].
Dimethoate is an insecticide commonly used to kill insects and mites. It targets the central nervous system of pests [45]. It is also used to control fungal diseases of fruits, vegetables, and field crops [46].
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a phenoxy herbicide that was originally synthesized in 1941 and was commercialized for the first time in 1945, and since then, it has been one of the lowest-cost herbicides sold in the USA [38]. Even though it is considered an excellent herbicide, it is a disruptor of the endocrine system of mammals, highly toxic to the liver and kidneys, and has been cataloged as a carcinogenic and mutagenic pesticide [47].
Dicamba is a post-emergence pesticide that is used in a variety of crops where glyphosate-resistant weeds have emerged [48]. Considerable exposition to this pesticide can have a toxic effect on the liver and cellular functions. When comparing the toxicity of this pesticide with that reported in the pesticide data sheet, a great difference can be observed [48]. Toxic effects on mammals, from embryotoxicity and teratogenicity to neurotoxicity, have been demonstrated [49].
Cyanazine, a herbicide belonging to the triazine group, is one of the most widely applied pesticides in the US crop. This pesticide is commonly found in water samples [50]. According to some studies, the concentration of this pesticide has reached up to 1300 µg L−1 in surface water and 3500 µg L−1 in groundwater [51].

2.5. Slightly Hazardous Pesticides

A pesticide that falls into class III has a median lethal dose of >2000 mg kg−1 body weight orally and >2000 mg kg−1 dermally. Table 5 shows pesticides in use that fall within this classification [4].
Glyphosate is one of the most used herbicides in the world; it is used to control the growth of weeds in fields. After its application, the pesticide remains in the soil, reaching groundwater, and as a potential contaminant, it may affect wildlife and humans [55]. It is a non-selective herbicide [39]. This pesticide was originally patented as a chelator in 1950 [56].
Atrazine is a synthetic herbicide of the triazine group. This herbicide is responsible for modifying the development of plants by affecting the process of enzyme production and photosynthesis [57].
Metolachlor belongs to the chloroacetanilide herbicides, which are very common to find when analyzing water samples. This herbicide was banned in 2006 [54]; when introduced to the market, it was sold as a product containing the enantiomer pair (R and S). It was developed for the control of grasses and weeds and is recorded to have been used on at least 70 crops [58].

2.6. Unlikely to Present Acute Hazard Pesticides

The pesticides that are classified in this group are those that do not present alarming toxicity since, to cause lethal toxicity, very high quantities are needed, exceeding 5 g of pesticide [4]. Table 6 shows the pesticide in this classification that is used in agriculture.
Trifluralin is a pesticide capable of depolymerizing microtubules or altering the concentration of calcium ions in the cell, causing interference in the mitotic division of cells. It affects the meristems and the subterranean tissues of the plant [60]. This herbicide is used in pre-emergence stages for weed control, mainly in wheat crops [61].

3. Biodegradation of Pesticides

3.1. Microbial Diversity

Some pesticides are extremely resistant to degradation, making them persistent contaminants in the environment. Moreover, most of them may be considered a health concern. Due to the chemical stability of the chemicals, new strategies, such as biodegradation, are needed to achieve the removal of these molecules from the environment [62]. As Matsumura et al. [63] rightly argue, one environmentally friendly method is the use of microorganisms with the capacity to biodegrade these contaminating compounds that are present in soil and water.
Microorganisms have a strong capacity to adapt to the constant changes in the environment they inhabit, for example, mutation or induction. Microorganisms will use different types of metabolisms to metabolize these xenobiotic compounds, which they can later use as a source of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, energy, etc. Microbial metabolism of the pesticides ends in one of two scenarios: the complete biodegradation of the molecules or the mineralization of it; in this case, most of the by-products are suitable for their re-entry into the environment [63,64].
It should be emphasized that pesticide biodegradation is less expensive than traditional methods, which makes it financially viable for companies wishing to implement it, and that the by-products produced are less or almost not harmful to the environment [64,65]. Within the microbial kingdom, bacteria, fungi, and algae are currently being investigated for their ability to degrade pesticides [66].

3.1.1. Bacteria

Multiple genera of bacteria (Table 7) have the metabolic tools to metabolize pesticides. In this process, pesticide molecules may be used as nutrients or as electron donors; the metabolism rate will depend on several biotic and abiotic factors, such as temperature, water availability, nutrient availability, other microorganisms present, and physical disruption of soil by agricultural practices. The overall result of the bacterial pesticide biodegradation process is the conversion of a highly toxic substance to a less or even non-toxic product [65,67].

3.1.2. Fungi

Because fungi show mycelial growth, they are more frequently used for bioremediation in soil than in water, and they have the property of producing extracellular enzymes in sufficient quantities to produce the enzymes needed for bioremediation [215]. It must be emphasized that the right factors must be in place for the fungi to achieve proper degradation of the xenobiotic compounds in the soil, pH, minerals present, and moisture, to name a few factors [65].
Basidiomycetes is one of the main soil bioremediating agents against xenobiotic compounds. They are characterized by a high degradation capacity, and their bioremediation strategy relies heavily on the production of extracellular ligninolytic enzymes, converting toxic compounds into sources of energy and nutrients, going from complex to simple compounds [216]; a list of pesticide-degrading fungi is shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Pesticide degrading fungi.
Table 8. Pesticide degrading fungi.
WHO Pesticide ClassificationPesticide (% of Biodegradation Rate)FungiReference
Extremely
Hazardous
Aldicarb (40–50%)
Terbufos (50–100%)
Methyl parathion (80–100%)
Ascochyta sp. CBS 237.37
Trametes versicolor
Coriolus versicolor NBRC 9791
Bjerkandera adusta 8258
Pleurotus ostreatus 7989 Phanerochaete chrysosporium 3641
Fusarium sp.
Yarrowia lipolytica
Aspergillus niger AN400
Penicillium citrinum DL4M3
Penicillium citrinum DL9M3
Fusarium proliferatum DL11A
Aspergillus sydowii
Penicillium decaturense
Aspergillus niger MRU01
Aspergillus niger NCIM 563
[217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226]
Highly
Hazardous
Cyfluthrin (10–70%)
Carbofuran (96%)
Ascochyta sp. CBS 237.37 Trichoderma viride 2211
Aspergillus niger ZD11
Aspergillus nidulans var. dentatus
Sepedonium maheswarium
Trametes versicolor
Mucor ramannianus
Pichia anomala
Trametes versicolor
[217,227,228,229,230,231,232,233]
Moderately
Hazardous
DDT (50–100%)
Lambda-
Cyhalothrin (50–100%)
Permethrin (90%)
Chlorpyrifos (40–100%)
Dimethoate (60–97%)
2,4-D (2–30%)
Ganoderma lingzhi
Fomitopsis pinicola
Gloeophyllum trabeum
Cladosporium sp.
Aspergillus sydowii
Trichoderma sp.
Cladosporium cladosporioides Hu-01
Rhodotorula glutinis
Rhodotorula rubra
Phanerochaete chrysosporium
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma virens
Byssochlamys spectabilis
Aspergillus fumigates
Aspergillus terreus TF1
Verticillium sp.
Aspergillus sp.
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma harzianum
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus oryzae
Penicillium citrinum
Aspergillus fumigates
Trametes versicolor
Penicillium chrysogenum
Aspergillus niger MRU01
Eurotim sp. F4
Emericella sp. F5
Trichosporon sp.
Penicillium implicatum
Aspergillus viridinutans
[96,120,137,216,225,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249]
Slightly
Hazardous
Glyphosate (60–80%)
Atrazine (70–100%)
Metolachlor (30%)
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus terricola
Fusarium sp.
Aspergillus niger
Scopulariopsis sp.
Trichoderma harzianum
Fusarium oxysporum
Penicillium notanum
Aspergillus oryzae A-F02
Penicillium chrysogenum
Fusarium dimerum
Fusarium verticillioides
Aspergillus fumigatus
Penicillium citrinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Mucor spp.
Sterilia spp.
Trametes maxima
Paecilomyces carneus
Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310
Trametes versicolor
Bjerkandera adusta
Pluteus cubensis SXS320
Gloelophyllum striatum MCA7
Agaricales MCA17
Polyporus sp. MCA128
Datronia stereoides MCA167
Datronia caperata MCA5
Metarhizium robertsii
Trichoderma sp.
Aspergillus section Flavi
Pichia kudriavzevii Atz-EN-01
Penicillium sp. yz11-22N2
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Anthracophyllum discolor
Glomus caledonium
Aspergillus niger
Candida xestobii
Mortierella
Kernia
Chaetomium
Trichosporon
Candida tropicalis
Penicillium oxalicum MET-F-1
[165,167,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277]
Unlikely
Hazardous
Trifuralin (80%)Phanerochaete chrysosporium
Trametes versicolor
Penicillium simplicissimum
Metacordyceps chlamydosporia
Stachybotrys chartarum
Alternia alternata
[211,278]

3.1.3. Algae

As mentioned by García-Galán [279], contrary to fungi and bacteria, algae can and should be cultured in aqueous media. A particularity of algae is that they can grow in low-quality water where other microorganisms would experience excessive stress, considerably hindering their ability to grow. Algae are good bioremediation agents of contaminated water, whether coming from the industrial, domestic, or agricultural sector; thanks to their metabolic versatility, algae can use effluents contaminated with heavy metals, pesticides (Table 9), or organic matter and transform them into a source of nitrogen (N), eliminating the excess of nitrogen in the environment. They can also sequester carbon and produce oxygen (O2) [280].
If metabolically impeded, algae can establish relationships with heterotrophic microorganisms to achieve the bioremediation of pesticides present in water [281,282].
Table 9. Some of the algae currently have a bioremediating function.
Table 9. Some of the algae currently have a bioremediating function.
AlgaeDegraded Pesticide Reference
Chlorococcum humicola
Gracilaria verrucosa
2,4-D 1[283,284]
Chlorella vulgaris
Scenedesmus bijugatus
Methyl Parathion 1[285]
Chlorococcum sp.DDT 1[285]
Selenastrum capricornutum
Synechococcus elongatus
Chlorella vulgaris
Chlorella sp.
Atrazine (60–80%)[286,287,288]
Oscillatoria limnetica
Skeletonema costatum
Emiliania huxleyi
Isochrysis galbana
Glyphosate 1[289,290]
Chlorella sp.
Scenedesmus sp.
Chlorpyrifos 1[291]
Chlorella vulgarisCarbofuran (100%)[292]
Chlorella vulgarisDimethoate (100%)[292]
Chlorella vulgarisMetolachlor (100%)[292]
1 Biodegradation rates for these pesticides are not reported.

3.1.4. Actinomycetes

Actinomycetes have an established ability to metabolize xenobiotic chemicals from soil and water. They are capable of adapting to different environmental setups; for example, they can grow well in acidic and alkaline conditions; this is important because the availability of different toxic compounds could be determined by this chemical factor. The genus Streptomyces is one of the most researched members of the actinomycetes; they are saprophytic bacteria that can be found both in soil and water [7,293,294].
Actinobacteria, such as Streptomyces, can use pesticides as a carbon source, degrading inorganic compounds completely and rendering them non-toxic to the environment [293]. Streptomycetes can utilize several metabolic tools to achieve bioremediation processes, one of which is the production of enzymes such as hydrolases, glucosyltransferases, xylanases, laccases, and proteinases [7].
Using a consortium of different genera and species of bacteria makes bioremediation more feasible. Streptomycetes can degrade different families of pesticides, such as organochlorines, organophosphates, pyrethroids, and urea [7]. According to Alvarez [295,296], the most outstanding genera belonging to the actinobacteria are Frankia, Janibacter, Kokuria, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, Pseudonocardia, and Streptomyces.

3.2. Metabolic Pathways

Metabolic pathways play a crucial role in the biodegradation of pesticides. Microorganisms utilize various metabolic pathways to break down pesticides into less harmful compounds. These pathways may include mitochondrial energy metabolism, fatty acid and lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, oxidative and hydrolytic pathways, and methylation.
Understanding these pathways is essential for two reasons. First, for developing safe and efficient pesticide use and bioremediation strategies for contaminated soil and water. Second, a comprehensive understanding of the enzymes involved in the metabolic pathways could allow the use of metabolic engineering or DNA recombinant techniques to use these biomolecules and, to a certain degree, not depend on the microorganisms.
The present section discusses metabolic pathways for the degradation of different pesticides. Almost all the information comes from bacteria; this observation is important because it exposes the need to study the metabolic pathways of pesticides from different microorganisms, such as fungi and algae.
Fungi exhibit a greater metabolic diversity compared to bacteria; this is evident in various aspects of their metabolic capabilities and interactions within ecosystems.
One key aspect is the diversity of fungal cytochrome P450 enzymes. Fungi possess a wider range of cytochrome P450 families than plants, animals, and bacteria [297]. These enzymes play a crucial role in the metabolism of various compounds, including xenobiotics and natural products [298]; the tremendous variation in fungal cytochrome P450s suggests that fungi have evolved diverse metabolic functions to meet novel metabolic needs [297].
Furthermore, studies have shown that fungi have a greater metabolic activity and diversity in certain environments. For example, in forest soils, fungi are more important and active at low temperatures than bacteria [299]. In suboptimal combinations of temperature and moisture, the cultivable bacteria in planted soil exhibit higher activity and metabolic diversity compared to unplanted soil, while the cultivable fungi in planted soil exhibit higher metabolic diversity than those in unplanted soil [300]. These findings highlight the metabolic versatility of fungi in different environmental conditions.
The metabolic diversity of fungi also has implications for carbon turnover and nutrient cycling in ecosystems. Fungal decomposers have wider enzymatic capabilities than bacteria, allowing them to mineralize low-quality substrates like particulate leaf litter [301]. Fungi dominate over bacteria in terms of biomass, production, and enzymatic substrate degradation in freshwater ecosystems [302]. These findings highlight the importance of fungal metabolic diversity and how it can be exploited for the biodegradation of pesticides.

3.2.1. Extremely Hazardous Pesticides

Aldicarb

The metabolic degradation of aldicarb from microorganisms, such as bacteria, proceeds by oxidative and hydrolytic pathways in which they use this carbamate as the only source of carbon and nitrogen; therefore, their growth depends on the use of aldicarb (Figure 2) [67,303].
The first phase in metabolic degradation is sulfur oxidation, where aldicarb is first oxidized to aldicarb sulfoxide (2-methyl-2-(methylsulfinyl) propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime) and subsequently to aldicarb sulfone (2-methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl) propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime) [303,304]; these intermediates may enhance crop production but will persist in soil with a toxicity similar to that of the original aldicarb [303,305].
In the second stage, hydrolysis of sulfone and sulfoxides occurs via the enzymatic action of aldicarb hydrolase. This enzyme was detected in a cell-free extract of Enterobacter cloacae strain TA7 in the biodegradation of carbamates [296,303]. The products of the enzyme reaction are carbamic acid, which breaks down into carbon dioxide (CO2) and a corresponding amine [15], as well as N-methyl-carbamic acid and oximes, which undergo dehydration to form nitriles [303].
The products derived from the hydrolytic route are less toxic than aldicarb. It has been reported that bacteria belonging to the genera Arthrobacter, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Methylobacterium, and Kocuria can use aldicarb and its degradation products in the form of nitrogen [304].

Terbufos

Terbufos (TBF) [S-t-butylthiomethyl-O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate] is an organophosphate (OP) pesticide used as an insecticide and nematicide [18]. Terbufos is vulnerable to the enzymatic activity of organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH), an enzyme known to be very efficient in degrading organophosphorus compounds [306]. It is also subject to other microbial enzymatic reactions, such as hydrolysis, oxidation, alkylation, and dealkylation [307,308].
Biodegradation of terbufos requires several steps (Figure 3). The first step is the generation of the intermediate terbufos-oxon, which is formed by oxidative desulfurization by an -OH radical on the P-S bond. Then, the interfacial transfer of a single electron from the sulfur atom near the phosphorus atom leads to the formation of the cation radical terbufos and the cleavage of the C-S bond in this radical, causing the formation of (C2H5O)2P(S)S- radicals which are the precursor of the O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioic ester [309,310].
The intermediate tert-butyl-hydroxymethyl sulfide is hydrolytically formed by the C-S bond of terbufos and leads to the formation of -SC(CH3)3 radicals, which are precursors of tert-butanethiol; recombination of these radicals can form dimers such as di-tert-butyl disulfide [310].
Finally, cleavage of the C-S bond leads to the formation of the tert-butyl carbonium ion, and hydrolysis of this molecule produces tert-butanol, dehydrogenation leads to the formation of isobutene which is oxidized to form acetone [309].

Methyl Parathion

Methyl parathion is produced by the reaction of O,O-dimethyl phosphorochloridothionate and 4-nitrophenol sodium salt in an acetone solvent [311]. Organic phosphorus hydrolase (OPH) hydrolyzes methyl parathion into 4-nitrophenol (PNP) and dimethylphosphate (DMP); this hydrolytic reaction is the first step in the degradation of methyl parathion by soil microorganisms [311,312] (Figure 4). In addition, OPHs are important bacterial enzymes as they participate in the hydrolyzation of PO and P=S bonds [313].
PNP is hydrolyzed to benzoquinone, which is subsequently transformed into hydroquinone, γ-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde, and maleylacetate. These reactions are important in the degradation process of methyl parathion to finally form β-ketoadipate [314]. The enzyme monooxygenase is involved in catalyzing the reaction of PNP to benzoquinone in the presence of FAD and NADH [315].

3.2.2. Highly Hazardous Pesticides

Cyfluthrin

Degradation of this pyrethroid begins with the transformation of the carboxylester bond by cleavage to yield 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl-cyclopropanomethanol and 4-fluoro-3-phenexy-benzoic acid [316] (Figure 5). This reaction is the primary step of biodegradation of Cyfluthrin [88]. Then, 4-fluoro-3-phenexy-benzoic acid undergoes diaryl cleavage, resulting in a molecule of 3,5-dimethoxy-phenol and a molecule of phenol; both are further metabolized [317].
Carboxylesterases are essential in the metabolism of various living organisms and are produced as a defense to metabolize pesticides and insecticides [318]. In addition, they efficiently hydrolyze cyfluthrin to its corresponding acids and alcohols to reduce toxicity [319].

Tefluthrin

The degradation process of tefluthrin, a chemical lacking the α-cyano group in the phenoxybenzyl moiety [320], includes hydrolysis of the central ester bond and oxidation at several points (Figure 6) [321].
After the first step of hydrolysis, two intermediates are formed, cyclopropane carboxylic acid and PBAlc; the latter is oxidized to PBAld, and finally, PBA1d is transformed to either 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid or 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic butyl dacyl ester [322].
Different enzymes are involved in the biodegradation process of tefluthrin, such as carboxylesterase, which is the most purified enzyme of pyrethroid-degrading microorganisms; the enzymes monooxygenase and aminopeptidase are attributed to the hydrolysis of the ester bond during microbial degradation [25].
Transformation of tefluthrin occurs through the involvement of carboxylesterases at the central ester bond or monooxygenases at one or more of the acid or alcohol binding sites [323]. Monooxygenases are mediated by cytochrome P450, a metabolic system involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, such as insecticides, in all living organisms, including microorganisms and plants [324]. They also catalyze the degradation of aromatic compounds by introducing an oxygen molecule, which increases their reactivity and solubility [324,325].

Carbofuran

Biodegradation of carbofuran proceeds in three main steps: hydrolysis of the carbamate bond, processing the aromatic fraction, and subsequent degradation of the aromatic ring [85].
Hydrolysis of carbofuran involves the participation of a hydrolase to separate the ester bond of the carbonyl group of N-methylcarbamic acid attached to phenol and the amide bond of methylcarbamic acid to produce carbofuran-7-phenol (7-phenol (2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranol)), CO2, and methylamine (Figure 7) [325,326].
Carbofuran-7-phenol is then converted to 3-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl) benzene-1,2-diol by carbofuran-7-phenol hydrolase [327]. The enzyme carbofuran hydrolase is encoded by the mcd gene, which was cloned from the plasmid DNA of Achromobacter sp. WM111, and it was observed that some carbofuran-degrading bacteria have sequence homology with this gene [328]. Carbofuran-7-phenol is the main metabolite produced in this process, which is considered less toxic than the parent compound, while methylamine is used as a carbon source by carbofuran-degrading microorganisms [326].
It has been reported that some bacteria that degrade carbofuran into carbofuran phenol belong to the genera Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, Achromobacter, Sphingomonas, Novosphingobium, and Paracoccus [27]. By meta-scission of the aromatic ring, 3-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl) benzene-1,2-diol is formed. Oxidation of this intermediate produces 2,8-dihydroxy-8-methyl-6-oxonone-2,4-dienoic acid; hydroxylation of this product leads to the production of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl butanoic acid and 2-oxopent-4-enoate, which is then converted to acetyl-CoA and pyruvate [85,327].

3.2.3. Moderately Hazardous Pesticides

DDT

DDT DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethane) is first dechlorinated and transformed to either 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDD) or 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethylene (DDE) [329]. Both intermediates are more toxic than the original molecule; DDD can also be transformed into DDE [330] (Figure 8).
Several chemical reactions occur in the degradation of DDT, but mainly reductive dechlorination, which occurs through the dechlorination of the aliphatic chloroethyl group of the molecule [331]. Other chemical reactions that may be involved during the degradation process are dehydrohalogenation, dioxygenation, hydroxylation, hydrogenation, and meta-ring cleavage [307]. In addition, there are enzymes involved in the process, such as dehydrochlorinase, dioxygenase, reductase, decarboxylase, and hydrolase [331].
As mentioned before, the first primary intermediate in the DDT metabolic biodegradation route is DDD or DDE. Each of them is produced under different growth conditions. DDD is more common in anaerobic conditions, while DDE is associated with aerobic conditions [332]. Under aerobic conditions, DDT is transformed into DDE by dehydrochlorination carried out by the dehydrochlorinase enzyme [333]. Only a few microorganisms can completely degrade DDE to CO2 using co-metabolism of biphenyl to obtain biphenyl dioxygenase, an enzyme required to degrade DDE [334].
DDE and DDD are transformed to DDMU (1-chloro-2,2-bis(4′-chlorophenyl) ethylene), which is transformed into DDOH (2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethanol) and DDA (bis(4′-chlorophenyl) acetate) by hydroxylation and carboxylation, respectively, and finally mineralized to carbon dioxide [37]. DDMU is hydroxylated to DDOH by a hydroxylase, which has been detected in some bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa [97]. DDA is obtained by the carboxylation of DDOH [98].

Lambda-Cyhalothrin

Pyrethroids are insecticides containing an ester bond formed by alcohol and an acid. Lambda-cyhalothrin belongs to the type II pyrethroids, in which an alpha-cyano group is present in the phenylbenzyl alcohol position [323,335]. The main mechanism of biodegradation of type II pyrethroids is the hydrolysis of their carboxyl ester bonds, in which metabolites, such as PBA (3-phenoxybenzoic acid), PBAlc (3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol) and PBAld (3-phenoxybenzaldehyde), are formed [336].
Hydrolysis of ester bonds is performed by a carboxylesterase. This type of enzyme plays a fundamental role in the detoxification of pyrethroids, and some genes of carboxylesterase enzymes involved in the degradation of pyrethroids have been identified [323].
After hydrolysis of the carboxyl ester bond, 2-hydroxy-2-(3-phenoxyphenyl) acetonitrile is formed, which is converted to PBAld (3-phenoxybenzamide), and both compounds can be transformed into PBA (Figure 9) [25]. In addition, PBAld can become PBAlc, while PBAlc becomes PBA or PBAld [337]. The catalytic conversion of PBAld to PBA involves aldehyde oxidizing enzymes, such as aldehyde dehydrogenase. PBAlc is oxidized to PBAld by an alcohol dehydrogenase [338]. The aldh gene encoding aldehyde dehydrogenase has been found to be activated by pesticide presence in Bacillus spp. [339].

Permethrin

Permethrin (Per) is a type I pyrethroid with no cyanide in its chemical composition, and it is present in two forms of diastereomers, cis-Per and trans-Per [340]. An important step in the degradation of permethrin is ester cleavage, which allows this process to produce its metabolites [317,341] (Figure 10). During biodegradation, through the action of carboxylesterase, the metabolites 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol (PBAlc) and 3-phenoxybenzaldehyde (PBAld) [342] are obtained. In addition, cyclopropanic acid (Cl2CA) is produced, and the PBAlc fragment is often intermediate in the photocatabolism of permethrin that can be oxidized to 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (PBAcid) [343]. The decarboxylation of cyclopropanic acid and phenoxybenzoic acid allows the production of CO2 [342].

Chlorpyrifos

Chlorpyrifos (CP) is the common name for the insecticide 0,0-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)-phosphorothioate, which is commonly used in the treatment of crops, turf, and ornamentals [344]. The degradation pathway of this insecticide comprises different metabolic steps (Figure 11). In the first step, chlorpyrifos is converted to chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPO) by oxidative desulfurization performed by an oxidase enzyme [345].
Chlorpyrifos reacts with hydroxyl radicals produced photochemically in the atmosphere to enable the formation of CPOs. Chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPO) is an unstable intermediate formed from chlorpyrifos by oxidative desulfurization or acylation. CPO hydrolyzes rapidly to TCP and diethylphosphate (DTP) in alkaline soils [346]. After this, two other metabolites are produced: 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) and diethyl thiophosphate (DETP) [347].
The hydrolysis of chlorpyrifos is important for degradation, producing 3,5,6-trichloro-2-methoxy pyridine (TMP) and deactivating CPO to TCP [345]. In addition, reductive dechlorination produces 2,3-dihydroxypyridine, which hydrolyzes to 2,5,6-trihydroxypyridine, and metabolites are subsequently oxidized to aliphatic amines, inorganic phosphate, carbon fragments, etc. 2,3-dihydroxypyridine can also be broken down to produce maleamic acid, which in turn is oxidized to pyruvic acid, finally entering the Krebs cycle [345]. Chlorpyrifos is ultimately converted to CO2, or its metabolites are integrated into organic soil matter.
DETP is hydrolyzed to phosphorothioic acid and ethanol, where it is subsequently used by CP-degrading microorganisms as a source of sulfur, phosphorus, and carbon [347]. Enzymes, such as hydrolase, phosphotriesterase, phosphatase, catalase, and oxidase, hydrolyze chlorpyrifos by cleavage of the P-O, P-F, and P-S bonds [348].

Dimethoate

Biodegradation of dimethoate is achieved mainly by bacteria; two main pathways of biodegradation have been documented, and their intermediate metabolites have been detected and confirmed. In the first pathway (Figure 12A), dimethoate is first oxidized to omethoate, and the result of the metabolic route is two molecules, Aspartylglycine ethyl ester and O, O, O-Trimethyl thiophosphate. Both are mineralized and assimilated by the cell. In this pathway, two types of enzymes are proposed to participate: phosphatase and amidase [93].
In the second pathway (Figure 12B), dimethoate is first oxidized to form dimethoate carboxylic acid by the release of a molecule of methylamine. Dimethoate carboxylic acid may be decarboxylated or oxidized, and there are two possible products of the metabolic route: O,O,O-trimethyl phosphoric ester and phosphorothioic O,O,S-acid [136]. Enzymes involved in this second pathway remain to be discovered.

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

2,4-D is usually referred to as the oldest organic herbicide; it is used against wide-leaf weeds in different crops, including rice, wheat, sorghum, sugar cane, and corn [349]. It is a molecule that mimics the action of auxins, promoting the synthesis of metabolites such as ethylene and ABA, triggering cell death. It has been used for more than 80 years [350], and due to its high environmental persistence, it can accumulate in soil and eventually contaminate underground water [349].
Biological degradation of 2,4-D has been documented in fungi and bacteria. In bacteria, two pathways have been characterized [351], and the enzymes that participate in both are known and well-studied (Figure 13). In both metabolic pathways, the enzymes involved are oxidoreductases, except for one dehalogenase that participates in the second pathway (Figure 13B).
Recently, an engineered strain of E. coli succeeded at degrading 2,4-D [352]. In both metabolic pathways, the result is a molecule that enters the Krebs cycle and can be used for the central metabolism of the cell.
In fungi, the full biodegradation pathway has not been elucidated, but there is evidence that the cytochrome P450 enzymes may be involved to some extent in the fungal metabolism of this herbicide [353].

Dicamba

Dicamba (2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid) is an auxin mimic herbicide used to control wide-leaf weeds that are used in a variety of crops [354]. It is one of the most commonly used herbicides [355], and due to its chemical properties, the off-target movement of this herbicide considerably poses a risk for contamination of soil, ground, and surface water [356].
Biodegradation of Dicamba has been documented mainly in bacteria; the experimentally confirmed metabolic pathway involves the dechlorination and demethylation of the molecule to end up with a molecule of 2-chloromaleylpyruvate (Figure 14) [357]; subsequent enzymatic transformation of this molecule has been inferred from the homology analysis of the genes in the operon, where two or three more enzymes participate with a proposed final product of pyruvate and fumarate/maleate. Both of them can be incorporated into the central metabolism of the cell [357].

3.2.4. Slightly Hazardous Pesticides

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is one of the most commonly used wide-spectrum herbicides. For more than 40 years, it has been used in a variety of crops; it is considered to be the number one herbicide used worldwide. The existence of genetically modified crops that are resistant to glyphosate has caused a surge in its use during the last 20 years.
Glyphosate acts as an inhibitor of the enzyme EnolPyruvylShikimate-3-Phosphate Synthase (EPSPS), causing the plant to not be able to synthesize aromatic amino acids and eventually causing cell death.
Its bioremediation is performed by bacteria and fungi [358]. In bacteria, two different metabolic pathways have been elucidated; the first one involves the dephosphorylation of the molecule, and oxidation of the metabolic intermediate results in a molecule of glycine and formaldehyde, both of which are used as carbon sources. In the second metabolic pathway, the molecule is first oxidized, resulting in a metabolic intermediate and a molecule of glyoxylate, which the bacteria can use in the glyoxylate cycle. The intermediate is also oxidized, and a molecule of formaldehyde is the resulting product (Figure 15) [359].

Atrazine

Atrazine is an s-triazine-derived herbicide that has different uses, such as agricultural applications in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane and non-agricultural applications in forestry and conifers [360]. Atrazine inhibits one subunit of the photosystem II in plants, halting this process and ultimately causing plant death.
Due to its chemical structure, aerobic degradation of the molecule is difficult, and for this reason, microbial degradation is usually performed by a consortium of microorganisms rather than just one microorganism doing the job [361]. Three pathways have been elucidated with a common product, cyanuric acid. The first pathway (Figure 16A) is the most common one, mainly found in bacteria, the second (Figure 16B) and third (Figure 16C) are usually associated with microorganisms consortia [360].
In the three pathways, the dealkylation and dechlorination of the molecule are performed by oxygenases and hydrolases. Cyanuric acid is degraded to ammonia and carbon dioxide and used as a source of nitrogen and carbon, respectively (Figure 16).

Metolachlor

Metolachlor is a pre-emergent herbicide that is used to control grasses and some weeds in corn, sorghum, soybean, and cotton [362]. This type of herbicide acts as an alkylating agent that can bind to different types of proteins within the plant, but the principal mechanism of action is the inhibition of lipid biosynthesis [362].
Metolachlor has a considerable half-life, and its persistence in the environment can cause its mobilization to water bodies. The biodegradation process of this molecule has been studied since 1990 [363]. Several metabolites of the metolachlor biodegradation pathway have been identified so far, but a complete metabolic pathway remains to be fully discovered; the general pathway that has been described involves the dichlorination (Figure 17B) or hydroxylation (Figure 17A) of the molecule. In both steps, intermediates are formed, which are then further metabolized to carbon dioxide [275] (Figure 17).

3.3. Genetics of Pesticide Biodegradation

Analysis of the genes involved in the biodegradation of pesticides is key to fully comprehending this biological process. Understanding the genetics could help to trace the evolutionary history of pesticide biodegradation; it could also support the engineering of microorganisms that can degrade pesticides more efficiently and the development of new bioremediation techniques that can be used to remove pesticides from contaminated soils, sediments, and water.
Genes related to the degradation of carbamate pesticides, such as carbofuran, have been identified in more than 50 carbofuran-degrading bacteria [364]; the mcd gene encodes a carbofuran hydrolase and was first identified in the pPDL11 plasmid. The gene for the degradation of carbaryl cehA, another carbamate pesticide, also encodes a hydrolase. Homology between these two genes is very low, and the carbaryl hydrolase has no activity in the presence of carbofuran [365]. A homolog of the cehA gene has been found in the bacteria Novosphingoium sp. KN65.2. The gene cdfJ encodes a hydrolase that shows enzymatic activity both with carbaryl and carbofuran [85]. Other genes for carbamate pesticide degradation have been found in different bacteria, and most of them share a high homology with the cehA gene [304]. All the genes are present in plasmids and are thought to be mobile elements that can be shared between bacteria.
Genes involved in the degradation of organophosphates pesticides, such as Terbufos, Methyl Parathion, Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate, and Glyphosate were discovered in the late 80’s [366]. The opd gene encodes an organophosphorus hydrolase and was found in a plasmid. A chromosomal homolog of the opd gene, the opdA gene, was found in Agrobacterium radiobacter P230 [367]. Whole genome sequencing has allowed the discovery of several opd-like genes in different microorganisms, all of which are phylogenetically closely related, indicating horizontal mobility [315].
The mpd gene is also involved in the degradation of organophosphate pesticides, particularly parathion and methyl parathion; the gene encodes a hydrolase that has been well characterized. The hydrolase has conserved β-lactamase domains [368], and several homolog genes have been found in different microorganisms, although experimental evidence of their activity as parathion hydrolases is yet to be proved [368].
The phnJ gene encodes a C-P lyase that participates in the biodegradation process of glyphosate; the gene is part of the phn operon, and the C-P lyase has an important physiological function, possibly explaining that the gene is highly conserved within bacteria [369]. Glyphosate oxidation is performed by the enzyme glyphosate oxidase, which is the product of the gene gox [370]; the gene has not been fully studied, and whether it is present or not in other microbial genomes is unknown.
Pyrethroids such as Cyfluthrin, Tefluthrin, Lambda-cyhalothrin, and Permethrin are biodegraded by microorganisms by the action of carboxylesterases, also known as pyrethroid hydrolases. These enzymes and their genes have been identified in mammals, insects, and microorganisms [317]. Several bacterial pyrethroid degrading genes like pytY, pytZ, estP, pytH, and pye have been identified [37].
The genes involved in the degradation of organochloride pesticides like DDT have been described by genome annotation of Stenotrophomonas sp., dhc, and rdh genes are involved in the transformation of DDT to DDMU; sds, dhg, and hdt genes are involved in the transformation of DDMU to DDHO. dlc and hdl genes are involved in the last step of DDT biodegradation [371].
Genes involved in the biodegradation process of the chlorophenoxy herbicide Dicamba are situated in two different operons. In the first one, dmt genes encoding a demethylase are responsible for the first step in the biodegradation route of dicamba [372]; in the second operon, we found the genes dsmABC, dtdA, dsmD, dsmG, and dsmE that are responsible for the steps of reduction, oxidation, and dichlorination of the demethylated metabolite of dicamba. 2,4-D is another chlorophenoxy herbicide. The genes involved in both metabolic pathways have been identified; the tfd operon [373] comprising the genes tfdA and tfdBCDEF(II) is responsible for the metabolic pathway of 2,4-D biodegradation.
Atrazine and Cyanazine are both triazine-based herbicides. The genes involved in the biodegradation process of Atrazine are part of the atz operon, where atzABC genes are responsible for the transformation of Cyanazine to Cyanuric acid [374].
Understanding the genetics behind the biodegradation of pesticides is important for several reasons. Firstly, it allows for identifying and characterizing the genes and enzymes involved in pesticide degradation, which can help obtain more insights into the biochemical pathways and mechanisms of biodegradation. This knowledge can be used to develop bioremediation strategies and novel applications, such as the development of transgenic plants tolerant to herbicides.
Secondly, understanding the genetics of pesticide biodegradation can help in the assessment and monitoring of biodegradation processes in environmental settings, such as agricultural soils and bioremediation systems. This information is crucial for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of biodegradation processes and for designing strategies to mitigate environmental pollution.
Finally, studying the genetics of pesticide biodegradation can contribute to understanding microbial adaptation and evolution in response to selective pressures, such as organic xenobiotics. This knowledge can enhance our understanding of microbial ecology and the role of microorganisms in alleviating environmental pollution.

3.4. Application and Perspective

Pesticide bioremediation is a promising approach to mitigating the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment. Bioremediation can be achieved by using microorganisms such as fungi [375], bacteria [376], algae [279], and actinobacteria [377], all of them strong promising candidates to be used as bioremediating agents of pesticides. Through this process, different economically important chemicals, such as biofertilizers, biogas, or bioplastics [280,378], can be obtained.
Pesticide bioremediation has remained largely in the laboratory phase, where experiments under controlled conditions are performed. In order to be successfully used in situ, factors such as pesticide bioavailability, physiochemical conditions, temperature, pH, soil moisture, soil composition, surfactants, and organic amendments still reamain to be fully manageable [376].
When microorganisms are a constraint for the bioremediation process, enzymes [379] can be used. In an in situ scenario, free or immobilized enzymes are added to the contaminated soil or water, and degradation of the pollutant molecule is achieved through enzymatic activity. A successful pesticide bioremediation process using enzymes is dependent on several factors, the most important of which is enzyme stability.
New technologies could help achieve an effective pesticide biodegradation process. The use of nanoparticles to deliver pesticides is an alternative where a more precise quantity of pesticide is used, and due to the chemical and physical properties of the nanoparticles, biodegradation by the action of microorganisms could be more efficient [380,381,382]. Nanocarriers are also a potential alternative for pesticide biodegradation; biomolecules, such as enzymes, can be transported, attached to the nanoparticles, and delivered to the place where the pesticide is. Chitinases have been successfully immobilized in nanoparticles and tested for biocontrol against nematodes [383], opening the possibility of using nanocarriers for pesticide-degrading enzymes.
As the population increases, so does the production of crops; the necessity to maximize the production of these crops to meet the needs of the population will likely continue to be the implementation of pesticides. More research is needed for the development of different approaches and new technology, and their effective adoption is and will continue to be crucial for pesticide biodegradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.C.; investigation, J.R.G.R., L.A.I.M. and J.C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.R.G.R., L.A.I.M. and J.C.C.; writing—review and editing, N.B., J.E.F.R., L.A.H. and J.C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work of J.R.G.R., J.C.C., L.A.I.M., N.B. and J.E.F.R. was funded by Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico (grant number: ITI6A654). J.R.G.R. was the recipient of a CONAHCYT scholarship (788351). J.R.G.R., J.C.C., L.A.I.M., and J.E.F.R. would like to thank Instituto Tecnológico de Torreón for the economic support to cover publishing fees.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Uso de La Tierra En La Agricultura Según Las Cifras. Available online: https://www.fao.org/sustainability/news/detail/es/c/1279267/ (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  2. Clark, M.; Tilman, D. Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Production Systems, Agricultural Input Efficiency, and Food Choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 064016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zikankuba, V.L.; Mwanyika, G.; Ntwenya, J.E.; James, A. Pesticide Regulations and Their Malpractice Implications on Food and Environment Safety. Cogent Food Agric. 2019, 5, 1601544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clasificación Recomendada por la OMS de los Plaguicidas por el Peligro Que Presentan y Directrices para la Clasificación 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/publications/i/item/9789240005662 (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  5. Carles, L.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Devers, M.; Spor, A.; Rouard, N.; Beguet, J.; Besse-Hoggan, P.; Batisson, I. Potential of Preventive Bioremediation to Reduce Environmental Contamination by Pesticides in an Agricultural Context: A Case Study with the Herbicide 2,4-D. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, F.; Xiao, M.; Lin, D.; Long, X.; Wu, Z. Microbial Degradation of Pesticide Residues and an Emphasis on the Degradation of Cypermethrin and 3-Phenoxy Benzoic Acid: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Briceño, G.; Fuentes, M.S.; Saez, J.M.; Diez, M.C.; Benimeli, C.S. Streptomyces Genus as Biotechnological Tool for Pesticide Degradation in Polluted Systems. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 48, 773–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals; World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Eds.) The International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management; Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals: Paris, France; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014; ISBN 978-92-5-108548-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Egbuna, C.; Sawicka, B. Natural Remedies for Pest, Disease and Weed Control; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; ISBN 978-0-12-819304-4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Raffa, C.M.; Chiampo, F. Bioremediation of Agricultural Soils Polluted with Pesticides: A Review. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Guidance on Pesticide Licensing Schemes: International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2021; ISBN 978-92-4-003042-8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rice, N.C.; Rauscher, N.A.; Moffett, M.C.; Myers, T.M. Organoleptic Assessment and Median Lethal Dose Determination of Oral Aldicarb in Rats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1480, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zali Chedjeu, D.; Manfo Tsague, F.P.; Akono Nantia, E.; Zofou, D.; Nguedia Assob, J.C. Subchronic Toxicity of a Terbufos-Based Pesticide (Counter 15FC) in Adult Male Rats. J. Chem. Health Risks 2021, 11, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, P.; Song, X.; Yuan, W.; Wen, W.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, X. Effects of Cypermethrin and Methyl Parathion Mixtures on Hormone Levels and Immune Functions in Wistar Rats. Arch. Toxicol. 2006, 80, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mustapha, M.U.; Halimoon, N.; Johar, W.L.W.; Shukor, M.Y.A. An Overview on Biodegradation of Carbamate Pesticides by Soil Bacteria. Sci. Technol. 2019, 27, 547–563. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dixit, S.; Zia, M.K.; Siddiqui, T.; Ahsan, H.; Khan, F.H. Interaction of Human Alpha-2-Macroglobulin with Pesticide Aldicarb Using Spectroscopy and Molecular Docking. PPL 2021, 28, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, M.; Hearon, S.E.; Johnson, N.M.; Phillips, T.D. Development of Broad-Acting Clays for the Tight Adsorption of Benzo[a]Pyrene and Aldicarb. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liang, Y.; Tong, F.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y. Fatal Poisoning by Terbufos Following Occupational Exposure. Clin. Toxicol. 2018, 56, 140–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pohanish, R.P.; Sittig, M. (Eds.) Sittig’s Handbook of Pesticides and Agricultural Chemicals, 2nd ed.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-4557-3148-0. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tiwari, B.; Chakraborty, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Mishra, A.K. Biodegradation and Rapid Removal of Methyl Parathion by the Paddy Field Cyanobacterium fischerella sp. Algal Res. 2017, 25, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mehta, M.; Mehta, B. Structural Correlation of Toxicological and Environmental Effects of Cypermethrin and Cyfluthrin-Type-II Pyrethroids. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lewis, K.A.; Tzilivakis, J.; Warner, D.J.; Green, A. An International Database for Pesticide Risk Assessments and Management. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2016, 22, 1050–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez, J.-L.; Ares, I.; Martínez, M.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.-R.; Anadón, A.; Martínez, M.-A. Bioavailability and Nervous Tissue Distribution of Pyrethroid Insecticide Cyfluthrin in Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, L.; Yang, D.; Song, Y.; Shi, Y.; Huang, B.; Bitsch, A.; Yan, J. The Potential Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Cyfluthrin on the Soil Model Organism, Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhan, H.; Huang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. New Insights into the Microbial Degradation and Catalytic Mechanism of Synthetic Pyrethroids. Environ. Res. 2020, 182, 109138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Gao, B.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; He, Z.; Wang, M. Novel Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Enantioseparation of Tefluthrin via a Box–Behnken Design and Its Stereoselective Degradation in Soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 11591–11597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, X.; Jin, W.; Wu, G.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Z.; Ji, J.; Qiu, J.; He, J.; Jiang, J.; Hong, Q. Hydrolase CehA and Monooxygenase CfdC Are Responsible for Carbofuran Degradation in Sphingomonas sp. Strain CDS-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00805-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jiang, W.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ke, Z.; Wu, C.; Qiu, J.; et al. Identification of the Key Amino Acid Sites of the Carbofuran Hydrolase CehA from a Newly Isolated Carbofuran-Degrading Strain Sphingobium sp. CFD-1. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Porto, M.F.; Milanez, B.; Soares, W.L.; Meyer, A. Double Standards and the International Trade of Pesticides: The Brazilian Case. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2010, 16, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Çelik, A.; Mazmanci, B.; Çamlica, Y.; Aşkin, A.; Çömelekoǧlu, Ü. Cytogenetic Effects of Lambda-Cyhalothrin on Wistar Rat Bone Marrow. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2003, 539, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Atashi, H.A.; Zaferani Arani, H.; Agatha, F.; Ghorani, S.M.; Teimouri Khorasani, M.S.; Moalem, M. Cardiac and Respiratory Arrest in a 12-year-old Girl with Acute Permethrin Oral Toxicity: A Case Report. Clin. Case Rep. 2022, 10, e05245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Goel, A.; Dani, V.; Dhawan, D.K. Protective Effects of Zinc on Lipid Peroxidation, Antioxidant Enzymes and Hepatic Histoarchitecture in Chlorpyrifos-Induced Toxicity. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2005, 156, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. World Health Organization. Pesticide Residues in Food: 2021: Toxicological Evaluations: Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues, Virtual Meeting, 6–17 September, 4 and 7 October 2021; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; ISBN 978-92-4-005462-2. [Google Scholar]
  34. Seiler, J.P. The Genetic Toxicology of Phenoxy Acids Other than 2,4,5-T. Mutat. Res. Rev. Genet. Toxicol. 1978, 55, 197–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wolfgang Reuter Toxicology of Glyphosate, Isoxaflutole, Dicamba and Possible Combination Effects. Available online: https://www.testbiotech.org/content/toxicology-glyphosate-isoxaflutole-dicamba-and-possible-combination-effects (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  36. Walker, A.I.T.; Brown, V.K.H.; Kodama, J.K.; Thorpe, E.; Wilson, A.B. Toxicological Studies with the 1,3,5-Triazine Herbicide Cyanazine. Pestic. Sci. 1974, 5, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pan, X.; Lin, D.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Y.; Cai, L.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Biodegradation of DDT by Stenotrophomonas sp. DDT-1: Characterization and Genome Functional Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wong, M.H.; Leung, A.O.W.; Chan, J.K.Y.; Choi, M.P.K. A Review on the Usage of POP Pesticides in China, with Emphasis on DDT Loadings in Human Milk. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 740–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matthews, G.A. A History of Pesticides; CABI: Wallingford, CT, USA; Boston, MA, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78639-489-7. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schleier, J.J., III; Peterson, R.K.D. CHAPTER 3. Pyrethrins and Pyrethroid Insecticides. In Green Chemistry Series; Lopez, O., Fernandez-Bolanos, J., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 94–131. ISBN 978-1-84973-149-2. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shen, W.; Lou, B.; Xu, C.; Yang, G.; Yu, R.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y. Lethal Toxicity and Gene Expression Changes in Embryonic Zebrafish upon Exposure to Individual and Mixture of Malathion, Chlorpyrifos and Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mundy, P.; Huff Hartz, K.; Fulton, C.; Lydy, M.; Brander, S.; Hung, T.; Fangue, N.; Connon, R. Exposure to Permethrin or Chlorpyrifos Causes Differential Dose- and Time-Dependent Behavioral Effects at Early Larval Stages of an Endangered Teleost Species. Endang. Species Res. 2021, 44, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dawood, M.A.O.; El-Shamaa, I.S.; Abdel-Razik, N.I.; Elkomy, A.H.; Gewaily, M.S.; Abdo, S.E.; Soliman, A.A.; Paray, B.A.; Abdelkhalek, N. The Effect of Mannanoligosaccharide on the Growth Performance, Histopathology, and the Expression of Immune and Antioxidative Related Genes in Nile Tilapia Reared under Chlorpyrifos Ambient Toxicity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 103, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Karbalaei, S.; Hanachi, P.; Rafiee, G.; Seifori, P.; Walker, T.R. Toxicity of Polystyrene Microplastics on Juvenile Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow Trout) after Individual and Combined Exposure with Chlorpyrifos. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Banazeer, A.; Afzal, M.B.S.; Shad, S.A. Characterization of Dimethoate Resistance in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa): Resistance Selection, Cross-Resistance to Three Insecticides and Mode of Inheritance. Phytoparasitica 2020, 48, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eken, A. Dimethoate Organophosphate Insecticide Toxicity and the Role of Oxidative Stress. In Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 59–68. ISBN 978-0-12-819092-0. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, G.; Ma, J.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Jiang, B.; Luo, S.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Guan, Y.; Chen, L. Cationic Metal-Organic Frameworks as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid from Aqueous Solutions. Environ. Res. 2020, 186, 109542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Attademo, A.M.; Lajmanovich, R.C.; Peltzer, P.M.; Boccioni, A.P.C.; Martinuzzi, C.; Simonielo, F.; Repetti, M.R. Effects of the Emulsifiable Herbicide Dicamba on Amphibian Tadpoles: An Underestimated Toxicity Risk? Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 31962–31974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marouani, N.; Tebourbi, O.; Cherif, D.; Hallegue, D.; Yacoubi, M.T.; Sakly, M.; Benkhalifa, M.; Ben Rhouma, K. Effects of Oral Administration of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) on Reproductive Parameters in Male Wistar Rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin-Clark, Y.; Lydy, M.J.; Zhu, K.Y. Effects of Atrazine and Cyanazine on Chlorpyrifos Toxicity in Chironomus tentans (Diptera: Chironomidae). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002, 21, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Loux, M.M. Drinking Water Health Advisory: Pesticides: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water Health Advisories, Lewis Publishers, 121 South Main Street, P.O. Drawer 519, Chelsea, M. J. Environ. Qual. 1990, 19, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Turkmen, R.; Dogan, I. Determination of Acute Oral Toxicity of Glyphosate Isopropylamine Salt in Rats. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 19298–19303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Suter Ii, G.W. Ecological Risk Assessment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-429-19182-4. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nicol, É.; Genty, C.; Bouchonnet, S.; Bourcier, S. Structural Elucidation of Metolachlor Photoproducts by Liquid Chromatography/High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Elucidation of Metolachlor Photoproducts by LC/MS/MS. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 29, 2279–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bhatt, V.K.; Iyer, B.D. A New Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Glyphosate: Statistical Optimization and Application in Biodegradation Studies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Richmond, M.E. Glyphosate: A Review of Its Global Use, Environmental Impact, and Potential Health Effects on Humans and Other Species. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2018, 8, 416–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Chauhan, A.; Datta, S.; Wani, A.B.; Singh, N.; Singh, J. Toxicity, Degradation and Analysis of the Herbicide Atrazine. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, H.; Ye, W.; Zhan, X.; Liu, W. A Comparative Study of Rac- and S-Metolachlor Toxicity to Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 63, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Perez, E.R.; Le Calvé, S.; Mirabel, P. Near-UV Molar Absorptivities of Alachlor, Mecroprop-p, Pendimethalin, Propanil and Trifluralin in Methanol. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2008, 193, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fernandes, T.C.C.; Mazzeo, D.E.C.; Marin-Morales, M.A. Origin of Nuclear and Chromosomal Alterations Derived from the Action of an Aneugenic Agent—Trifluralin Herbicide. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 1680–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Busi, R.; Goggin, D.E.; Onofri, A.; Boutsalis, P.; Preston, C.; Powles, S.B.; Beckie, H.J. Loss of Trifluralin Metabolic Resistance in Lolium rigidum. Plants Exposed to Prosulfocarb Recurrent Selection. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3926–3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sviridov, A.V.; Shushkova, T.V.; Epiktetov, D.O.; Tarlachkov, S.V.; Ermakova, I.T.; Leontievsky, A.A. Biodegradation of Organophosphorus Pollutants by Soil Bacteria: Biochemical Aspects and Unsolved Problems. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2021, 57, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Matsumura, F. Degradation of Pesticides in the Environment by Microorganisms and Sunlight. In Biodegradation of Pesticides; Matsumura, F., Murti, C.R.K., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1982; pp. 67–87. ISBN 978-1-4684-4090-4. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dar, M.A.; Baba, Z.A.; Kaushik, G. A Review on Phorate Persistence, Toxicity and Remediation by Bacterial Communities. Pedosphere 2022, 32, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maqbool, Z.; Hussain, S.; Imran, M.; Mahmood, F.; Shahzad, T.; Ahmed, Z.; Azeem, F.; Muzammil, S. Perspectives of Using Fungi as Bioresource for Bioremediation of Pesticides in the Environment: A Critical Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 16904–16925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tang, W.; Ji, H.; Hou, X. Research Progress of Microbial Degradation of Organophosphorus Pesticides. Prog. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 1, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fareed, A.; Zaffar, H.; Rashid, A.; Maroof Shah, M.; Naqvi, T.A. Biodegradation of N-Methylated Carbamates by Free and Immobilized Cells of Newly Isolated Strain Enterobacter cloacae strain TA7. Bioremediat. J. 2017, 21, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Naqvi, T.A.; Kanhar, N.A.; Shar, A.H.; Hussain, M.; Ahmed, S. Microcosm Studies for the Biodegradation of Carbaryl in Soil. Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 1079–1084. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, C.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, Y.; Xu, P.; Liu, R. Simultaneous Hydrolysis of Carbaryl and Chlorpyrifos by Stenotrophomonas sp. Strain YC-1 with Surface-Displayed Carbaryl Hydrolase. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ortiz-Hernández, M.L.; Quintero-Ramírez, R.; Nava-Ocampo, A.A.; Bello-Ramírez, A.M. Study of the Mechanism of Flavobacterium sp. for Hydrolyzing Organophosphate Pesticides. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003, 17, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, F.; Hong, M.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.; Shou, P.; Yan, H.; Shi, G. Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion by Acinetobacter radioresistens USTB-04. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19, 1257–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Qiu, X.-H.; Bai, W.-Q.; Zhong, Q.-Z.; Li, M.; He, F.-Q.; Li, B.-T. Isolation and Characterization of a Bacterial Strain of the Genus Ochrobactrum with Methyl Parathion Mineralizing Activity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Yan, Y. Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion and P-Nitrophenol by a Newly Isolated Agrobacterium sp. Strain Yw12. Biodegradation 2012, 23, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pakala, S.B.; Gorla, P.; Pinjari, A.B.; Krovidi, R.K.; Baru, R.; Yanamandra, M.; Merrick, M.; Siddavattam, D. Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion and P-Nitrophenol: Evidence for the Presence of a p-Nitrophenol 2-Hydroxylase in a Gram-Negative Serratia sp. Strain DS001. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 73, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alvarenga, N.; Birolli, W.G.; Meira, E.B.; Lucas, S.C.O.; De Matos, I.L.; Nitschke, M.; Romão, L.P.C.; Porto, A.L.M. Biotransformation and Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion by Brazilian Bacterial Strains Isolated from Mangrove Peat. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rong, X.; Zhao, G.; Fein, J.B.; Yu, Q.; Huang, Q. Role of Interfacial Reactions in Biodegradation: A Case Study in a Montmorillonite, Pseudomonas sp. Z1 and Methyl Parathion Ternary System. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 365, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Castrejón-Godínez, M.L.; Tovar-Sánchez, E.; Ortiz-Hernández, M.L.; Encarnación-Guevara, S.; Martínez-Batallar, Á.G.; Hernández-Ortiz, M.; Sánchez-Salinas, E.; Rodríguez, A.; Mussali-Galante, P. Proteomic Analysis of Burkholderia zhejiangensis CEIB S4–3 during the Methyl Parathion Degradation Process. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 187, 105197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chen, S.; Zhan, H. Biodegradation of Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticides. In Microbial Metabolism of Xenobiotic Compounds; Arora, P.K., Ed.; Microorganisms for Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 10, pp. 229–244. ISBN 9789811374616. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ortiz-Hernández, M.L.; Gama-Martínez, Y.; Fernández-López, M.; Castrejón-Godínez, M.L.; Encarnación, S.; Tovar-Sánchez, E.; Salazar, E.; Rodríguez, A.; Mussali-Galante, P. Transcriptomic Analysis of Burkholderia cenocepacia CEIB S5-2 during Methyl Parathion Degradation. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 42414–42431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Pino, N.; Peñuela, G. Simultaneous Degradation of the Pesticides Methyl Parathion and Chlorpyrifos by an Isolated Bacterial Consortium from a Contaminated Site. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2011, 65, 827–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fioravante, I.A.; Barbosa, F.A.R.; Augusti, R.; Magalhães, S.M.S. Removal of Methyl Parathion by Cyanobacteria Microcystis novacekii under Culture Conditions. J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Geed, S.R.; Samal, K.; Srivastava, H.; Kartheek, B. Study the Performance of Continuous Bioreactor for the Treatment of Wastewater Containing Methyl Parathion by Isolated Alcaligenes Species. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wan, J.; Sun, X.; Ma, W.; Ni, H. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Methyl Parathion Hydrolase from an Organophosphorus-Degrading Bacterium, Serratia marcescens MEW06. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fny279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jayasree, V.S.; Sobhana, K.S.; Poulose, P.; Babu, K.R.; Jasmine, S.; Ranjith, L.; Saravanan, R.; Jose Kingsly, H.; Sreenath, K.R.; Joshi, K.K.; et al. Biodegradation of the Pyrethroid Pesticide Cyfluthrin by the Halophilic Bacterium Photobacterium ganghwense Isolated from Coral Reef Ecosystem. Indian J. Fish. 2020, 67, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, T.P.O.; Helbling, D.E.; Bers, K.; Fida, T.T.; Wattiez, R.; Kohler, H.-P.E.; Springael, D.; De Mot, R. Genetic and Metabolic Analysis of the Carbofuran Catabolic Pathway in Novosphingobium sp. KN65.2. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 8235–8252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Saikia, N.; Das, S.K.; Patel, B.K.C.; Niwas, R.; Singh, A.; Gopal, M. Biodegradation of Beta-Cyfluthrin by Pseudomonas stutzeri Strain S1. Biodegradation 2005, 16, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hu, G.P.; Zhao, Y.; Song, F.Q.; Liu, B.; Vasseur, L.; Douglas, C.; You, M.S. Isolation, Identification and Cyfluthrin-Degrading Potential of a Novel Lysinibacillus sphaericus Strain, FLQ-11-1. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chen, S.; Dong, Y.H.; Chang, C.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, X.F.; Zhong, G.; Song, H.; Hu, M.; Zhang, L.-H. Characterization of a Novel Cyfluthrin-Degrading Bacterial Strain Brevibacterium aureum and Its Biochemical Degradation Pathway. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 132, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gupta, J.; Rathour, R.; Singh, R.; Thakur, I.S. Production and Characterization of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) Generated by a Carbofuran Degrading Strain Cupriavidus Sp. ISTL7. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 282, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Duc, H.D. Enhancement of Carbofuran Degradation by Immobilized Bacillus sp. Strain DT1. Environ. Eng. Res. 2021, 27, 210158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Park, H.; Seo, S.I.; Lim, J.-H.; Song, J.; Seo, J.-H.; Kim, P.I. Screening of Carbofuran-Degrading Bacteria Chryseobacterium sp. BSC2-3 and Unveiling the Change in Metabolome during Carbofuran Degradation. Metabolites 2022, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Laocharoen, S.; Plangklang, P.; Reungsang, A. Selection of Support Materials for Immobilization of Burkholderia cepacia PCL3 in Treatment of Carbofuran-Contaminated Water. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yasmin, A.; Ambreen, S.; Shabir, S. Biotransformation of Dimethoate into Novel Metabolites by Bacterial Isolate Pseudomonas kilonensis MB490. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2022, 57, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Yang, C.-H.; Zhang, X. Isolation and Characterization of a Chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol Degrading Bacterium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 251, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Aswathi, A.; Pandey, A.; Sukumaran, R.K. Rapid Degradation of the Organophosphate Pesticide—Chlorpyrifos by a Novel Strain of Pseudomonas nitroreducens AR-3. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 122025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Purnomo, A.S.; Sariwati, A.; Kamei, I. Synergistic Interaction of a Consortium of the Brown-Rot Fungus Fomitopsis pinicola and the Bacterium Ralstonia pickettii for DDT Biodegradation. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rizqi, H.D.; Purnomo, A.S.; Kamei, I. Interaction and Effects of Bacteria Addition on Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane Biodegradation by Daedalea dickinsii. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 668–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Pan, X.; Xu, T.; Xu, H.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Characterization and Genome Functional Analysis of the DDT-Degrading Bacterium Ochrobactrum sp. DDT-2. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 592, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Xie, H.; Zhu, L.; Xu, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Jiang, J.; Meng, Y. Isolation and Degradation Ability of the DDT-Degrading Bacterial Strain KK. Env. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, X.; Oba, B.T.; Wang, H.; Luo, Q.; Liu, J.; Tang, L.; Yang, M.; Wu, H.; Sun, L. Degradation of DDT by a Novel Bacterium, Arthrobacter globiformis DC-1: Efficacy, Mechanism and Comparative Advantage. Water 2023, 15, 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Grewal, J.; Bhattacharya, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, D.K.; Khare, S.K. Biodegradation of 1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2- Bis (4-Chlorophenyl) Ethane (DDT) by Using Serratia marcescens NCIM 2919. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2016, 51, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Erdem, Z.; Cutright, T.J. Biotransformation of 1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-Bis(p-Chlorophenyl) Ethane (4,4′-DDT) on a Sandy Loam Soil Using Aerobic Bacterium Corynebacterium sp. Env. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Suman, S. Tanuja Isolation and Characterization of a Bacterial Strain Enterobacter cloacae (Accession No. KX438060.1) Capable of Degrading DDTs Under Aerobic Conditions and Its Use in Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil. Microbiol. Insights 2021, 14, 117863612110242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, S.; Deng, Y.; Chang, C.; Lee, J.; Cheng, Y.; Cui, Z.; Zhou, J.; He, F.; Hu, M.; Zhang, L.-H. Pathway and Kinetics of Cyhalothrin Biodegradation by Bacillus thuringiensis Strain ZS-19. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ding, J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Huang, Z. Biodegradation of λ-Cyhalothrin through Cell Surface Display of Bacterial Carboxylesterase. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Abdelkader, A.A.; Khalil, M.S.; Mohamed, M.S.M. Simultaneous Biodegradation of λ-Cyhalothrin Pesticide and Vicia faba Growth Promotion under Greenhouse Conditions. AMB Expr. 2022, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tian, J.; Long, X.; Zhang, S.; Qin, Q.; Gan, L.; Tian, Y. Screening Cyhalothrin Degradation Strains from Locust Epiphytic Bacteria and Studying Paracoccus acridae SCU-M53 Cyhalothrin Degradation Process. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11505–11515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Anwar, S.; Liaqat, A.; Munir, A.; Ashraf, M.F.; Iqbal, S. Bioaugmentation of a Novel Bacterial Consortium in Cotton-Planted Soil for Degradation of Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Pedosphere 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ramya, K.; Vasudevan, N. Biodegradation of Synthetic Pyrethroid Pesticides under Saline Conditions by a Novel Halotolerant Enterobacter ludwigii. DWT 2020, 173, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Birolli, W.G.; Da Silva, B.F.; Rodrigues Filho, E. Biodegradation of the Pyrethroid Cypermethrin by Bacterial Consortia Collected from Orange Crops. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Birolli, W.G.; Dos Santos, A.; Pilau, E.; Rodrigues-Filho, E. New Role for a Commercially Available Bioinsecticide: Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner Biodegrades the Pyrethroid Cypermethrin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4792–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhan, H.; Wang, H.; Liao, L.; Feng, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S. Kinetics and Novel Degradation Pathway of Permethrin in Acinetobacter baumannii ZH-14. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hadibarata, T.; Kristanti, R.A.; Bilal, M.; Yilmaz, M.; Sathishkumar, P. Biodegradation Mechanism of Chlorpyrifos by Halophilic Bacterium Hortaea sp. B15. Chemosphere 2023, 312, 137260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Briceño, G.; Fuentes, M.S.; Palma, G.; Jorquera, M.A.; Amoroso, M.J.; Diez, M.C. Chlorpyrifos Biodegradation and 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol Production by Actinobacteria Isolated from Soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 73, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jha, S.K.; Chishti, Z.; Ahmad, Z.; Arshad, K.-R. Enterobacter sp. SWLC2 for Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos in the Aqueous Medium: Modeling of the Process Using Artificial Neural Network Approaches. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 193, 106680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Islam, N.; Iyer, R. Functional Analysis of Chlorpyrifos Biodegradation in Agricultural Soils Augmented with a Three-Strain Bacterial Consortium. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gaonkar, O.; Nambi, I.M.; Suresh Kumar, G. Biodegradation Kinetics of Dichlorvos and Chlorpyrifos by Enriched Bacterial Cultures from an Agricultural Soil. Bioremediat. J. 2019, 23, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Farhan, M.; Ahmad, M.; Kanwal, A.; Butt, Z.A.; Khan, Q.F.; Raza, S.A.; Qayyum, H.; Wahid, A. Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos Using Isolates from Contaminated Agricultural Soil, Its Kinetic Studies. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Omeiri, M.; Khnayzer, R.; Yusef, H.; Tokajian, S.; Salloum, T. Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos by Bacterial Strains Isolated from Lebanese Soil and Its Association with Plant Growth Improvement. Bioremediat. J. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kumar, G.; Lal, S.; Soni, S.K.; Maurya, S.K.; Shukla, P.K.; Chaudhary, P.; Bhattacherjee, A.K.; Garg, N. Mechanism and Kinetics of Chlorpyrifos Co-Metabolism by Using Environment Restoring Microbes Isolated from Rhizosphere of Horticultural Crops under Subtropics. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 891870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Tehri, N.; Khanna, S.; Vashishth, A. Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos by Soil-Derived Aerobic Consortia and Bacterial Isolates. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2023, 59, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shi, T.; Fang, L.; Qin, H.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Hua, R. Rapid Biodegradation of the Organophosphorus Insecticide Chlorpyrifos by Cupriavidus nantongensis X1T. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lara-Moreno, A.; Morillo, E.; Merchán, F.; Madrid, F.; Villaverde, J. Chlorpyrifos Removal in an Artificially Contaminated Soil Using Novel Bacterial Strains and Cyclodextrin. Evaluation of Its Effectiveness by Ecotoxicity Studies. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Govarthanan, M.; Ameen, F.; Kamala-Kannan, S.; Selvankumar, T.; Almansob, A.; Alwakeel, S.S.; Kim, W. Rapid Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos by Plant Growth-Promoting Psychrophilic Shewanella sp. BT05: An Eco-Friendly Approach to Clean up Pesticide-Contaminated Environment. Chemosphere 2020, 247, 125948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Dubey, S.; Dhanya, M.S. Chlorpyrifos Degradation in Semi-Arid Soil by Pseudomonas fluorescens Strain CD5 Isolated from Manured Soil. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2023, 32, 460–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Levío-Raimán, M.; Bornhardt, C.; Diez, M.C. Biodegradation of Iprodione and Chlorpyrifos Using an Immobilized Bacterial Consortium in a Packed-Bed Bioreactor. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Conde-Avila, V.; Peña, C.; Pérez-Armendáriz, B.; Loera, O.; Martínez Valenzuela, C.; Leyva Morales, J.B.; Jesús Bastidas Bastidas, P.D.; Salgado-Lugo, H.; Ortega Martínez, L.D. Growth, Respiratory Activity and Chlorpyrifos Biodegradation in Cultures of Azotobacter vinelandii ATCC 12837. AMB Expr. 2021, 11, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Vijayan, N.P.; Ali, S.H.; Madathilkovilakathu, H.; Abdulhameed, S. Chlorpyrifos-Degrading Cyanobacterium—Coleofasciculus chthonoplastes Isolated from Paddy Field. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 77, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Asamba, M.N.; Mugendi, E.N.; Oshule, P.S.; Essuman, S.; Chimbevo, L.M.; Atego, N.A. Molecular Characterization of Chlorpyrifos Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Contaminated Dairy Farm Soils in Nakuru County, Kenya. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Yadav, S.; Khan, M.A.; Sharma, R.; Malik, A.; Sharma, S. Potential of Formulated Dyadobacter jiangsuensis Strain 12851 for Enhanced Bioremediation of Chlorpyrifos Contaminated Soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Mali, H.; Shah, C.; Patel, D.H.; Trivedi, U.; Subramanian, R.B. Degradation Insight of Organophosphate Pesticide Chlorpyrifos through Novel Intermediate 2,6-Dihydroxypyridine by Arthrobacter sp. HM01. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2022, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Khalid, S.; Hashmi, I. Biotreatment of Chlorpyrifos in a Bench Scale Bioreactor Using Psychrobacter alimentarius T14. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Santillan, J.Y.; Muzlera, A.; Molina, M.; Lewkowicz, E.S.; Iribarren, A.M. Microbial Degradation of Organophosphorus Pesticides Using Whole Cells and Enzyme Extracts. Biodegradation 2020, 31, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Elzakey, E.M.; El-Sabbagh, S.M.; Eldeen, E.E.-S.N.; Adss, I.A.-A.; Nassar, A.M.K. Bioremediation of Chlorpyrifos Residues Using Some Indigenous Species of Bacteria and Fungi in Wastewater. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Li, X.; Yin, X.; Lian, B. The Degradation of Dimethoate and the Mineral Immobilizing Function for Cd2+ by Pseudomonas putida. Geomicrobiol. J. 2017, 34, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Li, R.; Zheng, J.; Wang, R.; Song, Y.; Chen, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, S.; Jiang, J. Biochemical Degradation Pathway of Dimethoate by Paracoccus sp. Lgjj-3 Isolated from Treatment Wastewater. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2010, 64, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Derbalah, A.; Massoud, A.; El-Mehasseb, I.; Allah, M.S.; Ahmed, M.S.; Al-Brakati, A.; Elmahallawy, E.K. Microbial Detoxification of Dimethoate and Methomyl Residues in Aqueous Media. Water 2021, 13, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Xia, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, J.; Shan, H. The Gut Bacterium Serratia marcescens Mediates Detoxification of Organophosphate Pesticide in Riptortus pedestris by Microbial Degradation. J. Appl. Entomol. 2023, 147, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, Q.; Chen, K.; Ni, H.; Zhuang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhu, J.; He, Q.; He, J. A Novel Amidohydrolase (DmhA) from Sphingomonas sp. That Can Hydrolyze the Organophosphorus Pesticide Dimethoate to Dimethoate Carboxylic Acid and Methylamine. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Liang, Y.; Zeng, F.; Qiu, G.; Lu, X.; Liu, X.; Gao, H. Co-Metabolic Degradation of Dimethoate by Raoultella sp. X1. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Yuan, S.; Yang, F.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yao, W. Biodegradation of the Organophosphate Dimethoate by Lactobacillus plantarum during Milk Fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sandoval-Carrasco, C.A.; Ahuatzi-Chacón, D.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Ruiz-Ordaz, N.; Juárez-Ramírez, C.; Martínez-Jerónimo, F. Biodegradation of a Mixture of the Herbicides Ametryn, and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) in a Compartmentalized Biofilm Reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wu, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Pan, D.; Tu, X.; Lv, P.; Wang, Y.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Hua, R. Rapid Biodegradation of the Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Cupriavidus gilardii T-1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3711–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Neetha, J.N.; Ujwal, P.; Kumar, K.G.; Chidananda, B.; Goveas, L.; Sandesh, K. Aerobic Biodegradation and Optimization of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by E. hormaechei Subsp. Xiangfangensis and Assessment of Biodegraded Metabolite Toxicity. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Muhammad, J.B.; Shehu, D.; Usman, S.; Dankaka, S.M.; Gimba, M.Y.; Jagaba, A.H. Biodegradation Potential of 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Cupriavidus campinensis Isolated from Rice Farm Cultivated Soil. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. González, A.J.; Gallego, A.; Gemini, V.L.; Papalia, M.; Radice, M.; Gutkind, G.; Planes, E.; Korol, S.E. Degradation and Detoxification of the Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) by an Indigenous Delftia sp. Strain in Batch and Continuous Systems. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 66, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zabaloy, M.C.; Gómez, M.A. Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous 2,4-D Herbicide Degrading Bacteria from an Agricultural Soil in Proximity of Sauce Grande River, Argentina. Ann. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Vanitha, T.K.; Suresh, G.; Bhandi, M.M.; Mudiam, M.K.R.; Mohan, S.V. Microbial Degradation of Organochlorine Pesticide: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Axenic and Mixed Consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 382, 129031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Wu, C.; Zhuang, L.; Zhou, S.; Yuan, Y.; Yuan, T.; Li, F. Humic Substance-mediated Reduction of Iron(III) Oxides and Degradation of 2,4- D by an Alkaliphilic Bacterium, Corynebacterium humireducens MFC-5. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Xiang, S.; Lin, R.; Shang, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, X.; Zong, F. Efficient Degradation of Phenoxyalkanoic Acid Herbicides by the Alkali-Tolerant Cupriavidus oxalaticus Strain X32. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3786–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ha, D.D. Anaerobic Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Thauera sp. DKT. Biodegradation 2018, 29, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ghosh, S.; Purohit, H.J.; Qureshi, A. Managing Gene Expression in Pseudomonas simiae EGD-AQ6 for Chloroaromatic Compound Degradation. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yao, L.; Jia, X.; Zhao, J.; Cao, Q.; Xie, X.; Yu, L.; He, J.; Tao, Q. Degradation of the Herbicide Dicamba by Two Sphingomonads via Different O-Demethylation Mechanisms. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chakraborty, S.; Behrens, M.; Herman, P.L.; Arendsen, A.F.; Hagen, W.R.; Carlson, D.L.; Wang, X.-Z.; Weeks, D.P. A Three-Component Dicamba O-Demethylase from Pseudomonas maltophilia, Strain DI-6: Purification and Characterization. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 437, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yao, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, Z.; Yao, L.; Zhu, J.; Qiu, J.; Wang, G.; He, J. The Properties of 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase (MetF1) and Its Role in the Tetrahydrofolate-Dependent Dicamba Demethylation System in Rhizorhabdus dicambivorans Ndbn-20. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ermakova, I.T.; Kiseleva, N.I.; Shushkova, T.; Zharikov, M.; Zharikov, G.A.; Leontievsky, A.A. Bioremediation of Glyphosate-Contaminated Soils. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Nguyen, N.T.; Vo, V.T.; Nguyen, T.H.P.; Kiefer, R. Isolation and Optimization of a Glyphosate-Degrading Rhodococcus soli G41 for Bioremediation. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ermakova, I.T.; Shushkova, T.V.; Sviridov, A.V.; Zelenkova, N.F.; Vinokurova, N.G.; Baskunov, B.P.; Leontievsky, A.A. Organophosphonates Utilization by Soil Strains of Ochrobactrum anthropi and Achromobacter sp. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Acosta-Cortés, A.G.; Martinez-Ledezma, C.; López-Chuken, U.J.; Kaushik, G.; Nimesh, S.; Villarreal-Chiu, J.F. Polyphosphate Recovery by a Native Bacillus cereus Strain as a Direct Effect of Glyphosate Uptake. ISME J. 2019, 13, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Manogaran, M.; Shukor, M.Y.; Yasid, N.A.; Johari, W.L.W.; Ahmad, S.A. Isolation and Characterization of Glyphosate-Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Local Soils in Malaysia. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 2017, 28, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kryuchkova, Y.V.; Burygin, G.L.; Gogoleva, N.E.; Gogolev, Y.V.; Chernyshova, M.P.; Makarov, O.E.; Fedorov, E.E.; Turkovskaya, O.V. Isolation and Characterization of a Glyphosate-Degrading Rhizosphere Strain, Enterobacter cloacae K7. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Hadi, F.; Mousavi, A.; Noghabi, K.A.; Tabar, H.G.; Salmanian, A.H. New Bacterial Strain of the Genus Ochrobactrum with Glyphosate-Degrading Activity. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2013, 48, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhao, H.; Tao, K.; Zhu, J.; Liu, S.; Gao, H.; Zhou, X. Bioremediation Potential of Glyphosate-Degrading Pseudomonas spp. Strains Isolated from Contaminated Soil. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rossi, F.; Carles, L.; Donnadieu, F.; Batisson, I.; Artigas, J. Glyphosate-Degrading Behavior of Five Bacterial Strains Isolated from Stream Biofilms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 420, 126651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Masotti, F.; Garavaglia, B.S.; Piazza, A.; Burdisso, P.; Altabe, S.; Gottig, N.; Ottado, J. Bacterial Isolates from Argentine Pampas and Their Ability to Degrade Glyphosate. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Mishra, S.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. Characterization of a Novel Glyphosate-Degrading Bacterial Species, Chryseobacterium sp. Y16C, and Evaluation of Its Effects on Microbial Communities in Glyphosate-Contaminated Soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 432, 128689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Lipok, J.; Wieczorek, D.; Jewgiński, M.; Kafarski, P. Prospects of in Vivo 31P NMR Method in Glyphosate Degradation Studies in Whole Cell System. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2009, 44, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Pérez Rodríguez, M.; Melo, C.; Jiménez, E.; Dussán, J. Glyphosate Bioremediation through the Sarcosine Oxidase Pathway Mediated by Lysinibacillus sphaericus in Soils Cultivated with Potatoes. Agriculture 2019, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Li, J.; Chen, W.-J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Q.; Wu, S.; Huang, Y.; Mishra, S.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. Effects of Free or Immobilized Bacterium Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila Y4B on Glyphosate Degradation Performance and Indigenous Microbial Community Structure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 13945–13958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Hernández Guijarro, K.; De Gerónimo, E.; Erijman, L. Glyphosate Biodegradation Potential in Soil Based on Glycine Oxidase Gene (thiO) from Bradyrhizobium. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 1991–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Firdous, S.; Iqbal, S.; Anwar, S. Optimization and Modeling of Glyphosate Biodegradation by a Novel Comamonas odontotermitis P2 through Response Surface Methodology. Pedosphere 2020, 30, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, J. Kinetic Study of the Biodegradation of Glyphosate by Indigenous Soil Bacterial Isolates in Presence of Humic Acid, Fe(III) and Cu(II) Ions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Grube, M.; Kalnenieks, U.; Muter, O. Metabolic Response of Bacteria to Elevated Concentrations of Glyphosate-Based Herbicide. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Elarabi, N.I.; Abdelhadi, A.A.; Ahmed, R.H.; Saleh, I.; Arif, I.A.; Osman, G.; Ahmed, D.S. Bacillus aryabhattai FACU: A Promising Bacterial Strain Capable of Manipulate the Glyphosate Herbicide Residues. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2207–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Kaczynski, P.; Lozowicka, B.; Wolejko, E.; Iwaniuk, P.; Konecki, R.; Dragowski, W.; Lozowicki, J.; Amanbek, N.; Rusilowska, J.; Pietraszko, A. Complex Study of Glyphosate and Metabolites Influence on Enzymatic Activity and Microorganisms Association in Soil Enriched with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Sewage Sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Xu, B.; Sun, Q.-J.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Chen, W.-M.; Hsueh, C.-C.; Chen, B.-Y. Exploring the Glyphosate-Degrading Characteristics of a Newly Isolated, Highly Adapted Indigenous Bacterial Strain, Providencia rettgeri GDB 1. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2019, 128, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Abo Serih, N.; Salim, R.; Fikry, A.; Hammad, M.; El-Sayed, G. In-Vitro Biodegradation of Glyphosate Using Genetically Improved Bacterial Isolates from highly Polluted Wastewater. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Malla, M.A.; Dubey, A.; Kumar, A.; Patil, A.; Ahmad, S.; Kothari, R.; Yadav, S. Optimization and Elucidation of Organophosphorus and Pyrethroid Degradation Pathways by a Novel Bacterial Consortium C3 Using RSM and GC-MS-Based Metabolomics. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 144, 104744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Góngora-Echeverría, V.R.; García-Escalante, R.; Rojas-Herrera, R.; Giácoman-Vallejos, G.; Ponce-Caballero, C. Pesticide Bioremediation in Liquid Media Using a Microbial Consortium and Bacteria-Pure Strains Isolated from a Biomixture Used in Agricultural Areas. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 200, 110734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Stosiek, N.; Terebieniec, A.; Ząbek, A.; Młynarz, P.; Cieśliński, H.; Klimek-Ochab, M. N-Phosphonomethylglycine Utilization by the Psychrotolerant Yeast Solicoccozyma terricola M 3.1.4. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 93, 102866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Esikova, T.Z.; Anokhina, T.O.; Suzina, N.E.; Shushkova, T.V.; Wu, Y.; Solyanikova, I.P. Characterization of a New Pseudomonas putida Strain Ch2, a Degrader of Toxic Anthropogenic Compounds Epsilon-Caprolactam and Glyphosate. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Firdous, S.; Iqbal, S.; Anwar, S.; Jabeen, H. Identification and Analysis of 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-Phosphate Synthase (EPSPS) Gene from Glyphosate-Resistant Ochrobactrum intermedium Sq20: Identification of EPSPS from Ochrobactrum Intermedium Sq20. Pest. Manag. Sci 2018, 74, 1184–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Shahid, M.; Khan, M.S. Glyphosate Induced Toxicity to Chickpea Plants and Stress Alleviation by Herbicide Tolerant Phosphate Solubilizing Burkholderia cepacia PSBB1 Carrying Multifarious Plant Growth Promoting Activities. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Háhn, J.; Kriszt, B.; Tóth, G.; Jiang, D.; Fekete, M.; Szabó, I.; Göbölös, B.; Urbányi, B.; Szoboszlay, S.; Kaszab, E. Glyphosate and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides (GBHs) Induce Phenotypic Imipenem Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Zhumakayev, A.R.; Vörös, M.; Szekeres, A.; Rakk, D.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Szűcs, A.; Kredics, L.; Škrbić, B.D.; Hatvani, L. Comprehensive Characterization of Stress Tolerant Bacteria with Plant Growth-Promoting Potential Isolated from Glyphosate-Treated Environment. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Hertel, R.; Schöne, K.; Mittelstädt, C.; Meißner, J.; Zschoche, N.; Collignon, M.; Kohler, C.; Friedrich, I.; Schneider, D.; Hoppert, M.; et al. Characterization of Glyphosate-resistant Burkholderia anthina and Burkholderia cenocepacia Isolates from a Commercial Roundup® Solution. Env. Microbiol. Rep. 2022, 14, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Obojska, A.; Ternan, N.G.; Lejczak, B.; Kafarski, P.; McMullan, G. Organophosphonate Utilization by the Thermophile Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus T20. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2081–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zhu, J.; Fu, L.; Jin, C.; Meng, Z.; Yang, N. Study on the Isolation of Two Atrazine-Degrading Bacteria and the Development of a Microbial Agent. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Topp, E. A Comparison of Three Atrazine-Degrading Bacteria for Soil Bioremediation. Biol. Fertil Soils 2001, 33, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wang, X.; Ma, C.; Tang, H.; Xu, P. Atrazine Degradation by a Simple Consortium of Klebsiella sp. A1 and Comamonas sp. A2 in Nitrogen Enriched Medium. Biodegradation 2010, 21, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Pan, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhai, Q.; Tang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, X.; Liang, S.; Zhang, H. Immobilization of Bacterial Mixture of Klebsiella variicola FH-1 and Arthrobacter sp. NJ-1 Enhances the Bioremediation of Atrazine-Polluted Soil Environments. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1056264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Tao, Y.; Hu, S.; Han, S.; Shi, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Akindolie, M.S.; Ji, M.; et al. Efficient Removal of Atrazine by Iron-Modified Biochar Loaded Acinetobacter lwoffii DNS32. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Qu, M.; Li, N.; Li, H.; Yang, T.; Liu, W.; Yan, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhu, D. Phytoextraction and Biodegradation of Atrazine by Myriophyllum spicatum and Evaluation of Bacterial Communities Involved in Atrazine Degradation in Lake Sediment. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Yuan, J.; Yang, P.; Liu, Y.; Stewart, K. Rapid Biodegradation of Atrazine by Ensifer sp. Strain and Its Degradation Genes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 116, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Gali, S.B.; Sufyan, A.J.; Babandi, A.; Ibrahim, S.; Shehu, D.; Ya’u, M.; Mashi, J.A.; Babagana, K.; Abdullahi, N.; Ibrahim, A.; et al. Characterizing Atrazine Degradation by Molybdenum-Reducing Pseudomonas sp. J. Biochem. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Liang, Y.; Ding, L.; Song, Q.; Zhao, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, S. Biodegradation of Atrazine by Three Strains: Identification, Enzymes Activities, and Biodegradation Mechanism. Environ. Pollut. Bioavailab. 2022, 34, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Wong, M.; Geng, B. Atrazine Biodegradation in Water by Co-Immobilized Citricoccus sp. Strain TT3 with Chlorella vulgaris under a Harsh Environment. Algal Res. 2023, 70, 102994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Cao, B.; Deng, S.; Bi, M.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Biodegradation of Atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. DNS10 during Co-Culture with a Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria: Enterobacter sp. P1. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Zhang, F.; Sun, S.; Rong, Y.; Mao, L.; Yang, S.; Qian, L.; Li, R.; Zheng, Y. Enhanced Phytoremediation of Atrazine-Contaminated Soil by Vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) and Associated Bacteria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 44415–44429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Madariaga-Navarrete, A.; Rodríguez-Pastrana, B.R.; Villagómez-Ibarra, J.R.; Acevedo-Sandoval, O.A.; Perry, G.; Islas-Pelcastre, M. Bioremediation Model for Atrazine Contaminated Agricultural Soils Using Phytoremediation (Using Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and a Locally Adapted Microbial Consortium. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2017, 52, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. El-Bestawy, E.; Sabir, J.; Mansy, A.H.; Zabermawi, N. Isolation, Identification and Acclimatization of Atrazine-Resistant Soil Bacteria. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2013, 58, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. James, A.; Singh, D.K. Atrazine Detoxification by Intracellular Crude Enzyme Extracts Derived from Epiphytic Root Bacteria Associated with Emergent Hydrophytes. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2021, 56, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Fang, H.; Lian, J.; Wang, H.; Cai, L.; Yu, Y. Exploring Bacterial Community Structure and Function Associated with Atrazine Biodegradation in Repeatedly Treated Soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zhu, J.; Fu, L.; Meng, Z.; Jin, C. Characteristics of an Atrazine Degrading Bacterium and the Construction of a Microbial Agent for Effective Atrazine Degradation. Water Environ. J. 2021, 35, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Billet, L.; Devers-Lamrani, M.; Serre, R.-F.; Julia, E.; Vandecasteele, C.; Rouard, N.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Spor, A. Complete Genome Sequences of Four Atrazine-Degrading Bacterial Strains, Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADPe, Arthrobacter sp. Strain TES, Variovorax sp. Strain 38R, and Chelatobacter sp. Strain SR38. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Carles, L.; Joly, M.; Bonnemoy, F.; Leremboure, M.; Donnadieu, F.; Batisson, I.; Besse-Hoggan, P. Biodegradation and Toxicity of a Maize Herbicide Mixture: Mesotrione, Nicosulfuron and S-Metolachlor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 354, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Li, Y. The Metolachlor Degradation Kinetics and Bacterial Community Evolution in the Soil Bioelectrochemical Remediation. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 125915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Kanissery, R.G.; Welsh, A.; Gomez, A.; Connor, L.; Sims, G.K. Identification of Metolachlor Mineralizing Bacteria in Aerobic and Anaerobic Soils Using DNA-Stable Isotope Probing. Biodegradation 2018, 29, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Bellinaso, M.D.L.; Greer, C.W.; Peralba, M.D.C.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Gaylarde, C.C. Biodegradation of the Herbicide Trifluralin by Bacteria Isolated from Soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 43, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Zablotowicz, R.M.; Locke, M.A.; Hoagland, R.E.; Knight, S.S.; Cash, B. Fluorescent Pseudomonas Isolates from Mississippi Delta Oxbow Lakes: In Vitro Herbicide Biotransformations. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 16, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Erguven, G.O.; Bayhan, H.; Ikizoglu, B.; Kanat, G.; Nuhoglu, Y. The Capacity of Some Newly Bacteria and Fungi for Biodegradation of Herbicide Trifluralin under Agitated Culture Media. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016, 62, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Bellinaso, M.D.L.; Henriques, J.A.; Gaylarde, C.C.; Greer, C.W. Genes Similar to Naphthalene Dioxygenase Genes in Trifluralin-Degrading Bacteria. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Mata-Sandoval, J.C.; Karns, J.; Torrents, A. Influence of Rhamnolipids and Triton X-100 on the Biodegradation of Three Pesticides in Aqueous Phase and Soil Slurries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3296–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Faramarzi, M.; Avarseji, Z.; Gholamalipuor Alamdari, E.; Taliei, F. Biodegradation of the Trifluralin Herbicide by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 3591–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Gouma, S.; Fragoeiro, S.; Bastos, A.C.; Magan, N. Bacterial and Fungal Bioremediation Strategies. In Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 301–323. ISBN 978-0-12-800021-2. [Google Scholar]
  216. Ellouze, M.; Sayadi, S. White-Rot Fungi and Their Enzymes as a Biotechnological Tool for Xenobiotic Bioremediation. In Management of Hazardous Wastes; Saleh, H.E.-D.M., Abdel Rahman, R.O., Eds.; InTech: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-953-51-2616-4. [Google Scholar]
  217. Kaur, P.; Balomajumder, C. Simultaneous Biodegradation of Mixture of Carbamates by Newly Isolated Ascochyta sp. CBS 237.37. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C.E.; Madrigal-León, K.; Masís-Mora, M.; Pérez-Villanueva, M.; Chin-Pampillo, J.S. Removal of Carbamates and Detoxification Potential in a Biomixture: Fungal Bioaugmentation versus Traditional Use. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 135, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Jauregui, J.; Valderrama, B.; Albores, A.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Microsomal Transformation of Organophosphorus Pesticides by White Rot Fungi. Biodegradation 2003, 14, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Usharani, K.; Muthukumar, M. Optimization of Aqueous Methylparathion Biodegradation by Fusarium sp in Batch Scale Process Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 591–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wang, X.-X.; Chi, Z.; Ru, S.-G.; Chi, Z.-M. Genetic Surface-Display of Methyl Parathion Hydrolase on Yarrowia lipolytica for Removal of Methyl Parathion in Water. Biodegradation 2012, 23, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Marinho, G.; Rodrigues, K.; Araujo, R.; Pinheiro, Z.B.; Silva, G.M.M. Glucose Effect on Degradation Kinetics of Methyl Parathion by Filamentous Fungi Species Aspergillus niger AN400. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2011, 16, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Rodrigues, G.N.; Alvarenga, N.; Vacondio, B.; de Vasconcellos, S.P.; Passarini, M.R.Z.; Seleghim, M.H.R.; Porto, A.L.M. Biotransformation of Methyl Parathion by Marine-Derived Fungi Isolated from Ascidian Didemnum ligulum. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Alvarenga, N.; Birolli, W.G.; Seleghim, M.H.R.; Porto, A.L.M. Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion by Whole Cells of Marine-Derived Fungi Aspergillus sydowii and Penicillium decaturense. Chemosphere 2014, 117, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Mohapatra, D.; Rath, S.K.; Mohapatra, P.K. Accelerated Degradation of Four Organophosphorus Insecticides by Malathion Tolerant Aspergillus niger MRU01 a Soil Fungus. Geomicrobiol. J. 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Shah, P.C.; Kumar, V.R.; Dastager, S.G.; Khire, J.M. Phytase Production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 563 for a Novel Application to Degrade Organophosphorus Pesticides. AMB Express 2017, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Saikia, N.; Gopal, M. Biodegradation of β-Cyfluthrin by Fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Liang, W.Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Li, H.; Wu, P.C.; Hu, J.M.; Luo, N.; Cao, L.X.; Liu, Y.H. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Pyrethroid Hydrolase from Aspergillus niger ZD11. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7415–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Mukherjee, I.; Mittal, A. Dissipation of β-Cyfluthrin by Two Fungi Aspergillus nidulans Var. dentatus and Sepedonium maheswarium. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2007, 89, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Mir-Tutusaus, J.A.; Masís-Mora, M.; Corcellas, C.; Eljarrat, E.; Barceló, D.; Sarrà, M.; Caminal, G.; Vicent, T.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C.E. Degradation of Selected Agrochemicals by the White Rot Fungus Trametes versicolor. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 500–501, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Seo, J.; Jeon, J.; Kim, S.-D.; Kang, S.; Han, J.; Hur, H.-G. Fungal Biodegradation of Carbofuran and Carbofuran Phenol by the Fungus Mucor ramannianus: Identification of Metabolites. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Yang, L.; Chen, S.; Hu, M.; Hao, W.; Geng, P.; Zhang, Y. Biodegradation of Carbofuran by Pichia anomala Strain HQ-C-01 and Its Application for Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2011, 47, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Madrigal-Zúñiga, K.; Ruiz-Hidalgo, K.; Chin-Pampillo, J.S.; Masís-Mora, M.; Castro-Gutiérrez, V.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, C.E. Fungal Bioaugmentation of Two Rice Husk-Based Biomixtures for the Removal of Carbofuran in on-Farm Biopurification Systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2016, 52, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Kumar, A.; Sharma, A.; Chaudhary, P.; Gangola, S. Chlorpyrifos Degradation Using Binary Fungal Strains Isolated from Industrial Waste Soil. Biologia 2021, 76, 3071–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Fang, H.; Xiang, Y.Q.; Hao, Y.J.; Chu, X.Q.; Pan, X.D.; Yu, J.Q.; Yu, Y.L. Fungal Degradation of Chlorpyrifos by Verticillium sp. DSP in Pure Cultures and Its Use in Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil and Pakchoi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 61, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Yadav, M.; Srivastva, N.; Shukla, A.K.; Singh, R.S.; Upadhyay, S.N.; Dubey, S.K. Efficacy of Aspergillus sp. for Degradation of Chlorpyrifos in Batch and Continuous Aerated Packed Bed Bioreactors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 175, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Abd-Alrahman, H.; Mostafa, A.A. Mycoremediation of Organophosphorous Insecticide Chlorpyrifos by Fungal Soil Isolates. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 8, 2945–2951. [Google Scholar]
  238. Gao, Y.; Chen, S.; Hu, M.; Hu, Q.; Luo, J.; Li, Y. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Chlorpyrifos Hydrolase from Cladosporium cladosporioides Hu-01. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Bempelou, E.D.; Vontas, J.G.; Liapis, K.S.; Ziogas, V.N. Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol by the Epiphytic Yeasts Rhodotorula glutinis and Rhodotorula rubra. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 1368–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Castellana, G.; Loffredo, E. Simultaneous Removal of Endocrine Disruptors from a Wastewater Using White Rot Fungi and Various Adsorbents. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2014, 225, 1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Xingjia, Y.; Bin, L. Dimethoate Degradation and Calcium Phosphate Formation Induced by Aspergillus niger. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 7603–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Ferreira-Guedes, S.; Mendes, B.; Leitão, A.L. Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by a Halotolerant Strain of Penicillium chrysogenum: Antibiotic Production. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Boelan, E.G.; Purnomo, A.S. Biodegradation of 1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-Bis (4-Chlorophenyl) Ethane (DDT) by Mixed Cultures of White-Rot Fungus Ganoderma lingzhi and Bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2019, 26, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Rizqi, H.D.; Purnomo, A.S.; Ulfi, A. The Effect of Bacteria Addition on DDT Biodegradation by Brown Rot Fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Chen, S.; Hu, Q.; Hu, M.; Luo, J.; Weng, Q.; Lai, K. Isolation and Characterization of a Fungus Able to Degrade Pyrethroids and 3-Phenoxybenzaldehyde. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8110–8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Willian, G.A. Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos by Whole Cells of Marine-Derived Fungi Aspergillus sydowii and Trichoderma sp. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2015, 7, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Maya, K.; Upadhyay, S.N.; Singh, R.S.; Dubey, S.K. Degradation Kinetics of Chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol (TCP) by Fungal Communities. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 126, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Xu, G.; Li, Y.; Zheng, W.; Peng, X.; Li, W.; Yan, Y. Mineralization of Chlorpyrifos by Co-Culture of Serratia and Trichosporon spp. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 1469–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Abdel-Wareth, M.T.A.; Abd El-Hamid, R.M. Mycoremediation of Chlorpyrifos and Lambda-Cyhalothrin by Two Species of Filamentous Fungi. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 73, 974–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. Restructured Fungal Community Diversity and Biological Interactions Promote Metolachlor Biodegradation in Soil Microbial Fuel Cells. Chemosphere 2019, 221, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Esparza-Naranjo, S.B.; Da Silva, G.F.; Duque-Castaño, D.C.; Araújo, W.L.; Peres, C.K.; Boroski, M.; Bonugli-Santos, R.C. Potential for the Biodegradation of Atrazine Using Leaf Litter Fungi from a Subtropical Protection Area. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Marinho, G.; Barbosa, B.C.A.; Rodrigues, K.; Aquino, M.; Pereira, L. Potential of the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus niger AN 400 to Degrade Atrazine in Wastewaters. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 9, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Castro, J.V.; Peralba, M.C.R.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Biodegradation of the Herbicide Glyphosate by Filamentous Fungi in Platform Shaker and Batch Bioreactor. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2007, 42, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Bujacz, B.; Wieczorek, P.; Krzysko-Lupicka, T.; Golab, Z.; Lejczak, B.; Kavfarski, P. Organophosphonate Utilization by the Wild-Type Strain of Penicillium notatum. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2905–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Fu, G.; Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Yuan, X.; Liu, C.; Li, B.; Wan, Y. Pathway and Rate-Limiting Step of Glyphosate Degradation by Aspergillus oryzae A-F02. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 47, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Klimek, M.; Lejczak, B.; Kafarski, P.; Forlani, G. Metabolism of the Phosphonate Herbicide Glyphosate by a Non-Nitrate-Utilizing Strain of Penicillium chrysogenum. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Guo, J.; Song, X.; Li, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, S.; Li, Q.; Tao, B. Isolation of a Degrading Strain of Fusarium verticillioides and Bioremediation of Glyphosate Residue. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 182, 105031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Bravim, N.P.B.; Alves, A.F.; Orlanda, J.F.F. Biodegradation of Atrazine, Glyphosate and Pendimetaline Employing Fungal Consortia. RSD 2020, 9, e1549119679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Spinelli, V.; Ceci, A.; Dal Bosco, C.; Gentili, A.; Persiani, A.M. Glyphosate-Eating Fungi: Study on Fungal Saprotrophic Strains’ Ability to Tolerate and Utilise Glyphosate as a Nutritional Source and on the Ability of Purpureocillium lilacinum to Degrade It. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Aluffi, M.E.; Carranza, C.S.; Benito, N.; Magnoli, K.; Magnoli, C.E.; Barberis, C.L. Isolation of Culturable Mycota from Argentinean Soils Exposed or Not-Exposed to Pesticides and Determination of Glyphosate Tolerance of Fungal Species in Media Supplied with the Herbicide. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2020, 52, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Chan-Cupul, W.; Heredia-Abarca, G.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, R. Atrazine Degradation by Fungal Co-Culture Enzyme Extracts under Different Soil Conditions. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2016, 51, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. de Lopes, R.O.; Pereira, P.M.; Pereira, A.R.B.; Fernandes, K.V.; Carvalho, J.F.; da França, A.S.D.; Valente, R.H.; da Silva, M.; Ferreira-Leitão, V.S. Atrazine, Desethylatrazine (DEA) and Desisopropylatrazine (DIA) Degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2020, 38, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Bastos, A.C.; Magan, N. Trametes versicolor: Potential for Atrazine Bioremediation in Calcareous Clay Soil, under Low Water Availability Conditions. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2009, 63, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Dhiman, N.; Jasrotia, T.; Sharma, P.; Negi, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, R.; Mahnashi, M.H.; Umar, A.; Kumar, R. Immobilization Interaction between Xenobiotic and Bjerkandera adusta for the Biodegradation of Atrazine. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Henn, C.; Monteiro, D.A.; Boscolo, M.; da Silva, R.; Gomes, E. Biodegradation of Atrazine and Ligninolytic Enzyme Production by Basidiomycete Strains. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Szewczyk, R.; Różalska, S.; Mironenka, J.; Bernat, P. Atrazine Biodegradation by Mycoinsecticide Metarhizium robertsii: Insights into Its Amino Acids and Lipids Profile. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 262, 110304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Pelcastre, M.I.; Ibarra, J.R.V.; Navarrete, A.M.; Rosas, J.C.; Ramirez, C.A.G.; Sandoval, O.A.A. Bioremediation Perspectives Using Autochthonous Species of Trichoderma sp. for Degradation of Atrazine in Agricultural Soil from the Tulancingo Valley, Hidalgo, Mexico. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems 2013, 16, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  268. Yu, J.; He, H.; Yang, W.L.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G.; Wu, X. Magnetic Bionanoparticles of Penicillium sp. Yz11-22N2 Doped with Fe3O4 and Encapsulated within PVA-SA Gel Beads for Atrazine Removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 260, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Wu, X.; He, H.; Yang, W.L.; Yu, J.; Yang, C. Efficient Removal of Atrazine from Aqueous Solutions Using Magnetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bionanomaterial. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7597–7610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Elgueta, S.; Santos, C.; Lima, N.; Diez, M.C. Immobilization of the White-Rot Fungus Anthracophyllum discolor to Degrade the Herbicide Atrazine. AMB Express 2016, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Shan, X.; Chen, B.-D.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Bell, J.N.B. Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus (Glomus caledonium) on the Accumulation and Metabolism of Atrazine in Maize (Zea mays L.) and Atrazine Dissipation in Soil. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Herrera-Gallardo, B.E.; Guzmán-Gil, R.; Colín-Luna, J.A.; García-Martínez, J.C.; León-Santiesteban, H.H.; González-Brambila, O.M.; González-Brambila, M.M. Atrazine Biodegradation in Soil by Aspergillus niger. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 99, 932–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Munoz, A.; Koskinen, W.C.; Cox, L.; Sadowsky, M.J. Biodegradation and Mineralization of Metolachlor and Alachlor by Candida xestobii. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Cabrera-Orozco, A.; Galíndez-Nájera, S.P.; Ruiz-Ordaz, N.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Martínez-Jerónimo, F.F. Biodegradation of a Commercial Mixture of the Herbicides Atrazine and S-Metolachlor in a Multi-Channel Packed Biofilm Reactor. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 25656–25665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Chang, X.; Liang, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, B.; Li, X.; Li, Y. Isolation, Degradation Performance and Field Application of the Metolachlor-Degrading Fungus Penicillium oxalicum MET-F-1. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Sanyal, D.; Kulshrestha, G. Metabolism of Metolachlor by Fungal Cultures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Nykiel-Szymańska, J.; Bernat, P.; Słaba, M. Biotransformation and Detoxification of Chloroacetanilide Herbicides by Trichoderma spp. with Plant Growth-Promoting Activities. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 163, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Fragoeiro, S.; Magan, N. Enzymatic Activity, Osmotic Stress and Degradation of Pesticide Mixtures in Soil Extract Liquid Broth Inoculated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trametes versicolor. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. García-Galán, M.J.; Monllor-Alcaraz, L.S.; Postigo, C.; Uggetti, E.; López De Alda, M.; Díez-Montero, R.; García, J. Microalgae-Based Bioremediation of Water Contaminated by Pesticides in Peri-Urban Agricultural Areas. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Lutzu, G.A.; Ciurli, A.; Chiellini, C.; Di Caprio, F.; Concas, A.; Dunford, N.T. Latest Developments in Wastewater Treatment and Biopolymer Production by Microalgae. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Singhal, M.; Swapnali, J.; Swaroop, S.S.; Mahipal Singh, S.; Rajeev, K. Microalgae Based Sustainable Bioremediation of Water Contaminated by Pesticides. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 12, 149–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Muñoz, R.; Guieysse, B. Algal–Bacterial Processes for the Treatment of Hazardous Contaminants: A Review. Water Res. 2006, 40, 2799–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Narchonai, G.; Arutselvan, C.; LewisOscar, F.; Thajuddin, N. Enhancing Starch Accumulation/Production in Chlorococcum humicola through Sulphur Limitation and 2,4-D Treatment for Butanol Production. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 28, e00528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Nie, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kumar, M.; Usman, M.; Li, J.; Shao, J.; Wang, L.; Tsang, D.C.W. Bioremediation of Water Containing Pesticides by Microalgae: Mechanisms, Methods, and Prospects for Future Research. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 136080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Fu, P.; Secundo, F. Algae and Their Bacterial Consortia for Soil Bioremediation. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 49, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Friesen-Pankratz, B.B.; Doebel, C.C.; Farenhorst, A.A.; Gordon Goldsborough, L. Interactions Between Algae (Selenastrum capricornutum) and Pesticides: Implications for Managing Constructed Wetlands for Pesticide Removal. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2003, 38, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Hu, N.; Xu, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhu, L.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, C. Removal of Atrazine in Catalytic Degradation Solutions by Microalgae Chlorella sp. and Evaluation of Toxicity of Degradation Products via Algal Growth and Photosynthetic Activity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. González-Barreiro, O.; Rioboo, C.; Herrero, C.; Cid, A. Removal of Triazine Herbicides from Freshwater Systems Using Photosynthetic Microorganisms. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Salman, J.M.; Abdul-Adel, E. Potential Use of Cyanophyta Species Oscillatoria limnetica in Bioremediation of Organophosphorus Herbicide Glyphosate. Mesop. Environ. J. 2015, 1, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  290. Wang, C.; Lin, X.; Li, L.; Lin, S. Differential Growth Responses of Marine Phytoplankton to Herbicide Glyphosate. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Avila, R.; Peris, A.; Eljarrat, E.; Vicent, T.; Blánquez, P. Biodegradation of Hydrophobic Pesticides by Microalgae: Transformation Products and Impact on Algae Biochemical Methane Potential. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Hussein, M.H.; Abdullah, A.M.; Badr El Din, N.I.; Mishaqa, E.S.I. Biosorption Potential of the Microchlorophyte Chlorella vulgaris for Some Pesticides. J. Fertil. Pestic. 2017, 8, 1000177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Jagannathan, S.V.; Manemann, E.M.; Rowe, S.E.; Callender, M.C.; Soto, W. Marine Actinomycetes, New Sources of Biotechnological Products. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Kaur, R.; Singh, D.; Kumari, A.; Sharma, G.; Rajput, S.; Arora, S.; Kaur, R. Pesticide Residues Degradation Strategies in Soil and Water: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 3537–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Alvarez, A.; Saez, J.M.; Davila Costa, J.S.; Colin, V.L.; Fuentes, M.S.; Cuozzo, S.A.; Benimeli, C.S.; Polti, M.A.; Amoroso, M.J. Actinobacteria: Current Research and Perspectives for Bioremediation of Pesticides and Heavy Metals. Chemosphere 2017, 166, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Ariffin, F.; Rahman, S.A. Biodegradation of Carbofuran; A Review. J. Environ. Microbiol. Toxicol. 2020, 8, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Ichinose, H. Molecular and Functional Diversity of Fungal Cytochrome P450s. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Shin, J.; Kim, J.-E.; Lee, Y.-W.; Son, H. Fungal Cytochrome P450s and the P450 Complement (CYPome) of Fusarium graminearum. Toxins 2018, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Pietikäinen, J.; Pettersson, M.; Bååth, E. Comparison of Temperature Effects on Soil Respiration and Bacterial and Fungal Growth Rates. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 52, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Klimek, B. Scots pine roots modify the short-term effects of temperature and moisture on soil bacteria and fungi. Appl. Ecol. Env. Res. 2013, 11, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Fabian, J.; Zlatanovic, S.; Mutz, M.; Premke, K. Fungal–Bacterial Dynamics and Their Contribution to Terrigenous Carbon Turnover in Relation to Organic Matter Quality. ISME J. 2017, 11, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Krauss, G.-J.; Solé, M.; Krauss, G.; Schlosser, D.; Wesenberg, D.; Bärlocher, F. Fungi in Freshwaters: Ecology, Physiology and Biochemical Potential. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 620–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Malhotra, H.; Kaur, S.; Phale, P.S. Conserved Metabolic and Evolutionary Themes in Microbial Degradation of Carbamate Pesticides. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 648868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Mishra, S.; Pang, S.; Zhang, W.; Lin, Z.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. Insights into the Microbial Degradation and Biochemical Mechanisms of Carbamates. Chemosphere 2021, 279, 130500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Kattiparambil Manoharan, R.; Sankaran, S. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutant Aldicarb by Non-Metal-Doped Nanotitania: Synthesis and Characterization. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 20510–20517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Kumar, S.S.; Ghosh, P.; Malyan, S.K.; Sharma, J.; Kumar, V. A Comprehensive Review on Enzymatic Degradation of the Organophosphate Pesticide Malathion in the Environment. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2019, 37, 288–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Córdoba Gamboa, L.; Solano Diaz, K.; Ruepert, C.; Van Wendel De Joode, B. Passive Monitoring Techniques to Evaluate Environmental Pesticide Exposure: Results from the Infant’s Environmental Health Study (ISA). Environ. Res. 2020, 184, 109243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Sidhu, G.K.; Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Datta, S.; Singh, J. Toxicity, Monitoring and Biodegradation of Organophosphate Pesticides: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 1135–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Tsipi, D.; Botitsi, H.; Economou, A. (Eds.) Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Pesticide Residues and Their Metabolites; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-119-06998-0. [Google Scholar]
  310. Wu, R.-J.; Chen, C.-C.; Chen, M.-H.; Lu, C.-S. Titanium Dioxide-Mediated Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Degradation of Terbufos: Parameter Study and Reaction Pathways. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Kumar, J.; Mishra, A.; Melo, J.S. Biodegradation of Methyl Parathion and Its Application in Biosensors. Austin J. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 4, 1024. [Google Scholar]
  312. Zhao, F.; He, J.; Li, X.; Bai, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Smart Plant-Wearable Biosensor for in-Situ Pesticide Analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 170, 112636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Bhende, R.S.; Jhariya, U.; Srivastava, S.; Bombaywala, S.; Das, S.; Dafale, N.A. Environmental Distribution, Metabolic Fate, and Degradation Mechanism of Chlorpyrifos: Recent and Future Perspectives. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 2301–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Xu, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, M.-Q.; Gao, J.-J.; Li, Z.-J.; Tian, Y.-S.; Peng, R.-H.; Yao, Q.-H. Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli for Methyl Parathion Degradation. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 679126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Chen, Q.; Huang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Li, Z.; Cui, Z.; Liu, W. Crystal Structure of P-Nitrophenol 4-Monooxygenase PnpA from Pseudomonas putida DLL-E4: The Key Enzyme Involved in p-Nitrophenol Degradation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 504, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Yao, T.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.; Li, C. Evaluation of Beta-Cyfluthrin Biodegradation by a Novel Bacterial Consortium: Microbial Succession, Degradation Pathway and Toxicity Assessment. SSRN J. 2021, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Bhatt, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhan, H.; Chen, S. Insight into Microbial Applications for the Biodegradation of Pyrethroid Insecticides. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Ghodke, V.M.; Punekar, N.S. Environmental Role of Aromatic Carboxylesterases. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 2657–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Cai, X.; Wang, W.; Lin, L.; He, D.; Huang, G.; Shen, Y.; Wei, W.; Wei, D. Autotransporter Domain-Dependent Enzymatic Analysis of a Novel Extremely Thermostable Carboxylesterase with High Biodegradability towards Pyrethroid Pesticides. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Schleier, J.J.; Peterson, R.K.D. The Joint Toxicity of Type I, II, and Nonester Pyrethroid Insecticides. JNL Econ. Entom. 2012, 105, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Ensley, S.M. Pyrethrins and Pyrethroids. In Veterinary Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 515–520. ISBN 978-0-12-811410-0. [Google Scholar]
  322. Sheng, Y.; Benmati, M.; Guendouzi, S.; Benmati, H.; Yuan, Y.; Song, J.; Xia, C.; Berkani, M. Latest Eco-Friendly Approaches for Pesticides Decontamination Using Microorganisms and Consortia Microalgae: A Comprehensive Insights, Challenges, and Perspectives. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Gajendiran, A.; Abraham, J. An Overview of Pyrethroid Insecticides. Front. Biol. 2018, 13, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Reddy, V.D.; Rao, P.N.; Rao, K.V. Pests and Pathogens: Management Strategies; BS Publish: Hyderabad, India, 2011; ISBN 978-0-415-66576-6. [Google Scholar]
  325. Sharma, B.; Dangi, A.K.; Shukla, P. Contemporary Enzyme Based Technologies for Bioremediation: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 210, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Mishra, S.; Zhang, W.; Lin, Z.; Pang, S.; Huang, Y.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. Carbofuran Toxicity and Its Microbial Degradation in Contaminated Environments. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Mohapatra, B.; Dhamale, T.; Saha, B.K.; Phale, P.S. Microbial Degradation of Aromatic Pollutants: Metabolic Routes, Pathway Diversity, and Strategies for Bioremediation. In Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 365–394. ISBN 978-0-323-85455-9. [Google Scholar]
  328. Shin, D.-H. Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Carbofuran-Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Agricultural Soils. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Suhara, H.; Adachi, A.; Kamei, I.; Maekawa, N. Degradation of Chlorinated Pesticide DDT by Litter-Decomposing Basidiomycetes. Biodegradation 2011, 22, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Ma, J.; Pan, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Tao, S.; Zhao, L.; Qin, X.; Sun, Z.; Hou, H.; Zhou, Y. DDT, DDD, and DDE in Soil of Xiangfen County, China: Residues, Sources, Spatial Distribution, and Health Risks. Chemosphere 2016, 163, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Nikolaivits, E.; Dimarogona, M.; Fokialakis, N.; Topakas, E. Marine-Derived Biocatalysts: Importance, Accessing, and Application in Aromatic Pollutant Bioremediation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Cutright, T.J.; Erdem, Z. Overview of the bioremediation and the degradation pathways of ddt. J. Adnan Menderes Univ. Agric. Fac. 2012, 9, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  333. Abbes, C.; Mansouri, A.; Werfelli, N.; Landoulsi, A. Aerobic Biodegradation of DDT by Advenella kashmirensis and Its Potential Use in Soil Bioremediation. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2018, 27, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Xu, H.-J.; Bai, J.; Li, W.; Murrell, J.C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Luo, C.; Li, Y. Mechanisms of the Enhanced DDT Removal from Soils by Earthworms: Identification of DDT Degraders in Drilosphere and Non-Drilosphere Matrices. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Colombo, R.; Yariwake, J.; Lanza, M. Degradation Products of Lambda-Cyhalothrin in Aqueous Solution as Determined by SBSE-GC-IT-MS. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2018, 29, 2207–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Shen, C.; Dong, S.; Hu, X.; Lin, M.; Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Zhong, J.; Xie, Y.; et al. Construction and Characterization of a Class-Specific Single-Chain Variable Fragment against Pyrethroid Metabolites. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7345–7354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Cycoń, M.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. Pyrethroid-Degrading Microorganisms and Their Potential for the Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Wang, X.; Martínez, M.-A.; Dai, M.; Chen, D.; Ares, I.; Romero, A.; Castellano, V.; Martínez, M.; Rodríguez, J.L.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.-R.; et al. Permethrin-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity and Metabolism. A Review. Environ. Res. 2016, 149, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Bhatt, P.; Gangola, S.; Chaudhary, P.; Khati, P.; Kumar, G.; Sharma, A.; Srivastava, A. Pesticide Induced Up-Regulation of Esterase and Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Indigenous Bacillus spp. Bioremediation J. 2019, 23, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Zhang, M.; Mei, J.; Lv, S.; Lai, J.; Zheng, X.; Yang, J.; Cui, S. Simultaneous Extraction of Permethrin Diastereomers and Deltamethrin in Environmental Water Samples Based on Aperture Regulated Magnetic Mesoporous Silica. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 16152–16162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Qin, S.; Gan, J. Enantiomeric Differences in Permethrin Degradation Pathways in Soil and Sediment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9145–9151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Feng, X.; Liu, N. Functional Analyses of House Fly Carboxylesterases Involved in Insecticide Resistance. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 595009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Tyler, C.R.; Beresford, N.; Van Der Woning, M.; Sumpter, J.P.; Tchorpe, K. Metabolism and Environmental Degradation of Pyrethroid Insecticides Produce Compounds with Endocrine Activities. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Liu, H.-F.; Ku, C.-H.; Chang, S.-S.; Chang, C.-M.; Wang, I.-K.; Yang, H.-Y.; Weng, C.-H.; Huang, W.-H.; Hsu, C.-W.; Yen, T.-H. Outcome of Patients with Chlorpyrifos Intoxication. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2020, 39, 1291–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Ahirwar, U.; Kollah, B.; Dubey, G.; Mohanty, S.R. Chlorpyrifos Biodegradation in Relation to Metabolic Attributes and 16S rRNA Gene Phylogeny of Bacteria in a Tropical Vertisol. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Pang, S.; Chen, J.; Bhatt, P.; Mishra, S.; Chen, S. Insights into the Microbial Degradation and Catalytic Mechanisms of Chlorpyrifos. Environ. Res. 2021, 194, 110660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. McLachlan, M.S.; Undeman, E.; Zhao, F.; MacLeod, M. Predicting Global Scale Exposure of Humans to PCB 153 from Historical Emissions. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2018, 20, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Dar, M.A.; Kaushik, G.; Villarreal-Chiu, J.F. Pollution Status and Bioremediation of Chlorpyrifos in Environmental Matrices by the Application of Bacterial Communities: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 239, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Magnoli, K.; Carranza, C.S.; Aluffi, M.E.; Magnoli, C.E.; Barberis, C.L. Herbicides Based on 2,4-D: Its Behavior in Agricultural Environments and Microbial Biodegradation Aspects. A Review. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 38501–38512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Islam, F.; Wang, J.; Farooq, M.A.; Khan, M.S.S.; Xu, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, M.; Muños, S.; Li, Q.X.; Zhou, W. Potential Impact of the Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid on Human and Ecosystems. Environ. Int. 2018, 111, 332–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Trefault, N.; De La Iglesia, R.; Molina, A.M.; Manzano, M.; Ledger, T.; Perez-Pantoja, D.; Sanchez, M.A.; Stuardo, M.; Gonzalez, B. Genetic Organization of the Catabolic Plasmid pJP4 from Ralstonia eutropha JMP134 (pJP4) Reveals Mechanisms of Adaptation to Chloroaromatic Pollutants and Evolution of Specialized Chloroaromatic Degradation Pathways. Env. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Wang, Y.; Tian, Y.-S.; Gao, J.-J.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.-J.; Fu, X.-Y.; Han, H.-J.; Wang, L.-J.; Zhang, W.-H.; Deng, Y.-D.; et al. Complete Biodegradation of the Oldest Organic Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Engineering Escherichia coli. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 451, 131099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Nykiel-Szymańska, J.; Stolarek, P.; Bernat, P. Elimination and Detoxification of 2,4-D by Umbelopsis isabellina with the Involvement of Cytochrome P450. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 2738–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Dicamba and Associated Salts. Available online: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P10049M3.PDF?Dockey=P10049M3.PDF (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  355. Lerro, C.C.; Hofmann, J.N.; Andreotti, G.; Koutros, S.; Parks, C.G.; Blair, A.; Albert, P.S.; Lubin, J.H.; Sandler, D.P.; Beane Freeman, L.E. Dicamba Use and Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study: An Updated Analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 49, 1326–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  356. Riter, L.S.; Pai, N.; Vieira, B.C.; MacInnes, A.; Reiss, R.; Hapeman, C.J.; Kruger, G.R. Conversations about the Future of Dicamba: The Science Behind Off-Target Movement. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14435–14444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  357. Li, N.; Peng, Q.; Yao, L.; He, Q.; Qiu, J.; Cao, H.; He, J.; Niu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Hui, F. Roles of the Gentisate 1,2-Dioxygenases DsmD and GtdA in the Catabolism of the Herbicide Dicamba in Rhizorhabdus dicambivorans Ndbn-20. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9287–9298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Kanissery, R.; Gairhe, B.; Kadyampakeni, D.; Batuman, O.; Alferez, F. Glyphosate: Its Environmental Persistence and Impact on Crop Health and Nutrition. Plants 2019, 8, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Gill, J.P.K.; Datta, S.; Singh, S.; Dhaka, V.; Kapoor, D.; Wani, A.B.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Kumar, M.; et al. Herbicide Glyphosate: Toxicity and Microbial Degradation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Rajendran, K.; Pujari, L.; Ethiraj, K. Biodegradation and Bioremediation of S-Triazine Herbicides. In Environmental Biotechnology Vol. 3; Gothandam, K.M., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 50, pp. 31–54. ISBN 978-3-030-48972-4. [Google Scholar]
  361. Billet, L.; Devers, M.; Rouard, N.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Spor, A. Labour Sharing Promotes Coexistence in Atrazine Degrading Bacterial Communities. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Böger, P.; Matthes, B.; Schmalfuß, J. Towards the Primary Target of Chloroacetamides-New Findings Pave the Way. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Liu, S.Y.; Freyer, A.J.; Bollag, J.M. Microbial Dechlorination of the Herbicide Metolachlor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Desaint, S.; Arrault, S.; Siblot, S.; Fournier, J.-C. Genetic Transfer of the mcd Gene in Soil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  365. Hashimoto, M.; Fukui, M.; Hayano, K.; Hayatsu, M. Nucleotide Sequence and Genetic Structure of a Novel Carbaryl Hydrolase Gene (cehA) from Rhizobium sp. Strain AC100. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1220–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Horne, I.; Sutherland, T.D.; Harcourt, R.L.; Russell, R.J.; Oakeshott, J.G. Identification of an opd (Organophosphate Degradation) Gene in an Agrobacterium Isolate. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3371–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Iyer, R.; Iken, B.; Damania, A. A Comparison of Organophosphate Degradation Genes and Bioremediation Applications: Review of OP Degradation Genes and Their Applications. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Dong, Y.-J.; Bartlam, M.; Sun, L.; Zhou, Y.-F.; Zhang, Z.-P.; Zhang, C.-G.; Rao, Z.; Zhang, X.-E. Crystal Structure of Methyl Parathion Hydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. WBC-3. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 353, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Stosiek, N.; Talma, M.; Klimek-Ochab, M. Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase—The State of the Art. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 190, 1525–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  370. Hove-Jensen, B.; Zechel, D.L.; Jochimsen, B. Utilization of Glyphosate as Phosphate Source: Biochemistry and Genetics of Bacterial Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 176–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Bhatt, P.; Bhatt, K.; Huang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Chen, S. Esterase Is a Powerful Tool for the Biodegradation of Pyrethroid Insecticides. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Li, N.; Chen, L.; Chen, E.; Yuan, C.; Zhang, H.; He, J. Cloning of a Novel Tetrahydrofolate-Dependent Dicamba Demethylase Gene from Dicamba-Degrading Consortium and Characterization of the Gene Product. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 978577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Kumar, A.; Trefault, N.; Olaniran, A.O. Microbial Degradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid: Insight into the Enzymes and Catabolic Genes Involved, Their Regulation and Biotechnological Implications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 42, 194–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Cao, D.; He, S.; Li, X.; Shi, L.; Wang, F.; Yu, S.; Xu, S.; Ju, C.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Characterization, Genome Functional Analysis, and Detoxification of Atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. C2. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  375. Mohapatra, D.; Rath, S.K.; Mohapatra, P.K. Soil Fungi for Bioremediation of Pesticide Toxicants: A Perspective. Geomicrobiol. J. 2022, 39, 352–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Pileggi, M.; Pileggi, S.A.V.; Sadowsky, M.J. Herbicide Bioremediation: From Strains to Bacterial Communities. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  377. Mawang, C.-I.; Azman, A.-S.; Fuad, A.-S.M.; Ahamad, M. Actinobacteria: An Eco-Friendly and Promising Technology for the Bioaugmentation of Contaminants. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 32, e00679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Rafeeq, H.; Afsheen, N.; Rafique, S.; Arshad, A.; Intisar, M.; Hussain, A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms for Environmental Remediation. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Iman Moezzi, S.M.; Ravan, N.; Gholami, A.; Lai, C.W.; Chiang, W.-H.; Omidifar, N.; Yousefi, K.; Behbudi, G. Recent Advances in Enzymes for the Bioremediation of Pollutants. Biochem. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Parisi, C.; Vigani, M.; Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. Agricultural Nanotechnologies: What Are the Current Possibilities? Nano Today 2015, 10, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Awad, M.; Ibrahim, E.-D.S.; Osman, E.I.; Elmenofy, W.H.; Mahmoud, A.W.M.; Atia, M.A.M.; Moustafa, M.A.M. Nano-Insecticides against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Toxicity, Development, Enzyme Activity, and DNA Mutagenicity. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0254285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Aliyari Rad, S.; Nobaharan, K.; Pashapoor, N.; Pandey, J.; Dehghanian, Z.; Senapathi, V.; Minkina, T.; Ren, W.; Rajput, V.D.; Asgari Lajayer, B. Nano-Microbial Remediation of Polluted Soil: A Brief Insight. Sustainability 2023, 15, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Qin, X.; Xiang, X.; Sun, X.; Ni, H.; Li, L. Preparation of Nanoscale Bacillus thuringiensis Chitinases Using Silica Nanoparticles for Nematicide Delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pesticide use from 2016 to 2021 (data from https://www.fao.org/faostat, accessed on 18 October 2023).
Figure 1. Pesticide use from 2016 to 2021 (data from https://www.fao.org/faostat, accessed on 18 October 2023).
Ijms 24 15969 g001
Figure 2. Aldicarb degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [303].
Figure 2. Aldicarb degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [303].
Ijms 24 15969 g002
Figure 3. Terbufos biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [310].
Figure 3. Terbufos biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [310].
Ijms 24 15969 g003
Figure 4. Methyl parathion biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [314].
Figure 4. Methyl parathion biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [314].
Ijms 24 15969 g004
Figure 5. Cyfluthrin biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [88].
Figure 5. Cyfluthrin biodegradation: metabolic pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [88].
Ijms 24 15969 g005
Figure 6. Tefluthrin degradation pathways—adapted and re-drawn from [25].
Figure 6. Tefluthrin degradation pathways—adapted and re-drawn from [25].
Ijms 24 15969 g006
Figure 7. Carbofuran degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [326].
Figure 7. Carbofuran degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [326].
Ijms 24 15969 g007
Figure 8. DDT degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [98].
Figure 8. DDT degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [98].
Ijms 24 15969 g008
Figure 9. Lambda-cyhalothrin degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [25].
Figure 9. Lambda-cyhalothrin degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [25].
Ijms 24 15969 g009
Figure 10. Permethrin degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [343].
Figure 10. Permethrin degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [343].
Ijms 24 15969 g010
Figure 11. Chlorpyrifos degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [346].
Figure 11. Chlorpyrifos degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [346].
Ijms 24 15969 g011
Figure 12. Dimethoate degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [93,136]. (A) Dimethoate degradation via omethoate. (B) Dimethoate degradation via carboxylation.
Figure 12. Dimethoate degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [93,136]. (A) Dimethoate degradation via omethoate. (B) Dimethoate degradation via carboxylation.
Ijms 24 15969 g012
Figure 13. 2,4-D degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [349]. (A) 2,4-D biodegradation pathway dependent of the enzyme 2,4-D dioxygenase. (B) 2,4-D biodegradation pathway dependent on the enzyme 2,4-D dehalogenase.
Figure 13. 2,4-D degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [349]. (A) 2,4-D biodegradation pathway dependent of the enzyme 2,4-D dioxygenase. (B) 2,4-D biodegradation pathway dependent on the enzyme 2,4-D dehalogenase.
Ijms 24 15969 g013
Figure 14. Dicamba degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [357].
Figure 14. Dicamba degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [357].
Ijms 24 15969 g014
Figure 15. Glyphosate degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [359]. (A) Glyphosate degradation pathway mediated by the enzyme Glyphosate Oxidoreductase. (B) Glyphosate degradation pathway mediated by the enzyme C-P lyase.
Figure 15. Glyphosate degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [359]. (A) Glyphosate degradation pathway mediated by the enzyme Glyphosate Oxidoreductase. (B) Glyphosate degradation pathway mediated by the enzyme C-P lyase.
Ijms 24 15969 g015
Figure 16. Atrazine degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [360]. (A) Most common bacterial degradation pathway. (B,C) degradation pathways usually associated with microbial consortium.
Figure 16. Atrazine degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [360]. (A) Most common bacterial degradation pathway. (B,C) degradation pathways usually associated with microbial consortium.
Ijms 24 15969 g016
Figure 17. Metolachlor degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [275]. (A) Metabolic pathway where hydroxylation is the first step. (B) Metabolic pathway where dechlorination is the first step.
Figure 17. Metolachlor degradation pathway—adapted and re-drawn from [275]. (A) Metabolic pathway where hydroxylation is the first step. (B) Metabolic pathway where dechlorination is the first step.
Ijms 24 15969 g017
Table 1. WHO pesticide classification.
Table 1. WHO pesticide classification.
ClassOral LD50 for the Rat (mg/kg Body Weight)Dermal LD50 for the Rat (mg/kg Body Weight)
Ia: Extremely hazardous<5<50
Ib: Highly hazardous5–5050–200
II: Moderately hazardous50–2000200–2000
III: Slightly hazardousOver 2000
U: Unlikely to present acute hazard5000 or higher
Table 2. Extremely hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
Table 2. Extremely hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
SubstanceLD50 in Rats (mg/kg Body Weight)Reference
Aldicarb (Carbamate)0.46–0.93[12]
Terbufos (Organophosphate)1.6–4.5[13]
Methyl Parathion (Organophosphate)6.9[14]
Table 3. Highly hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
Table 3. Highly hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
SubstanceLD50 in Rats (mg/kg Body Weight)Reference
Cyfluthrin (Pyrethroid)900[21]
Tefluthrin (Pyrethroid)21.8[22]
Carbofuran (Carbamate)7[22]
Table 4. Moderately hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
Table 4. Moderately hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
SubstanceLD50 in Rats (mg/kg Body Weight)Reference
DDT (Organochlorine)113–118[29]
λ-cyhalothrin (Pyrethroid)612[30]
Permethrin (Pyrethroid)430–4000[31]
Chlorpyrifos (Organophosphate)135[32]
Dimethoate (Organophosphate)245[33]
2,4-D (Organochlorine)375[34]
Dicamba (Organochlorine)1581[35]
Cyanazine (Organochlorine)140–750[36]
Table 5. Slightly hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
Table 5. Slightly hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
SubstanceLD50 in Rats (mg/kg Body Weight)Reference
Glyphosate (Organophosphate)7203.58–7397.25[52]
Atrazine (Organochlorine)1869[53]
Metolachlor (Organochlorine)1500[54]
Table 6. Unlikely hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
Table 6. Unlikely hazardous pesticides used in agriculture.
SubstanceLD50 in Rats (mg/kg Body Weight)Reference
Trifluralin (Organophosphate)10,000[59]
Table 7. Pesticide degrading bacteria.
Table 7. Pesticide degrading bacteria.
WHO Pesticide ClassificationPesticide (% of Biodegradation Rate)BacteriaReference
Extremely
Hazardous
Aldicarb (85%)
Terbufos (42%)
Methyl parathion (7–90%)
Enterobacter cloacae TA7
Micrococcus arborescens
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Brachybacterium sp.
Salsuginibacillus kocurii
Stenotrophomonas sp. YC-1
Flavobacterium sp.
Ochrobactrum sp. B2
Agrobacterium sp. YW12
Fischerella sp.
Serratia sp. DS001
Bacillus sp. CBMAI 1833
Bacillus cereus P5CNB
Pseudomonas sp. Z1
Burkholderia zhejiangensis CEIB S4–3
Nodularia linckia
Nostoc muscorum
Oscilatoria animalis
Phormidium foveolarum
Burkholderia cenocepacia CEIB S5-2
Acinetobacter sp.
Pseudomonas putida
Bacillus sp.
Citrobacter freundii
Stenotrophomonas sp.
Flavobacterium sp.
Proteus vulgaris
Pseudomonas sp.
Acinetobacter sp.
Klebsiella sp.
Proteus sp.
Microcystis novacekii
Alcaligenes sp. SRG
Serratia marcescens MEW06
[20,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83]
Highly
Hazardous
Cyfluthrin (80%)
Tefluthrin 1
Carbofuran (97.5%)
Photobacterium ganghwense T14
Novosphingobium sp. KN65.2
Pseudomonas stutzeri S1
Lysinibacillus sphaericus FLQ-11-1
Brevibacterium aureum
Cupriavidus sp. ISTL7
Enterobacter cloacae TA7
Bacillus sp.
Chryseobacterium sp. BSC2-3
Burkholderia cepacia PCL3
[67,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]
Moderately
Hazardous
DDT (5–98%)
Lambda-
Cyhalothrin (70–90%)
Permethrin (80–100%)
Chlorpyrifos (60–90%)
Dimethoate (80–98%)
2,4-D (30–90%)
Dicamba 1
Cyanazine 1
Alcaligenes faecalis strain DSP3
Pseudomonas nitroreducens AR-3
Ralstonia pickettii
Stenotrophomonas sp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ochrobactrum sp. DDT-2
Alcaligenes sp. KK
Arthrobacter globiformis DC-1
Serratia marcescens NCIM 2919
Advenella kashmirensis
Corynebacterium sp.
Enterobacter cloacae
Bacillus thuringiensis ZS-19
Bacillus velezensis sd
Bacillus subtilis
Paracoccus acridae SCU-M53
Brucella intermedia Halo1
Alcaligenes faecalis CH1S
Aquamicrobium terrae CH1T
Enterobacter ludwigii
Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner
Acinetobacter baumannii ZH-14
Hortaea sp. B15
Streptomyces sp.
Enterobacter sp. SWLC2
Pseudomonas putida CBF10-2
Ochrobactrum anthropi FRAF13
Rhizobium radiobacter GHKF11
Methylobacterium extorquens
Bacillus cereus Ct3
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CP28
Pseudomonas putida T7
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M2
Klebsiella pneumoniae M6
Alcaligenes sp.
Bacillus subtilis
Enterobacter sp.
Klebsiella sp.
Micrococci sp.
Cupriavidus nantongensis X1T
Bacillus megaterium CCLP1
Bacillus safensis CCLP2
Shewanella sp. BT05
Pseudomonas fluorescens CD5
Achromobacter spanius C1
Pseudomonas rhodesiae C4
Weissella confusa
Azotobacter vinelandii ATCC 12837
Coleofasciculus chthonoplastes
Lysinibacillus sp. HBUM206408
Achromobacter insuavis
Dyadobacter jiangsuensis 12851
Arthrobacter sp. HM01
Psychrobacter alimentarius T14
Streptomyces phaeochromogenes
Streptomyces praecox SP1
Pseudomonas putida
Xanthomonas campestris pv. Translucens
Pseudomonas kilonensis MB490
Serratia sp. (100%)
Sphingomonas sp. DC-6
Raoultella sp. X1
Lactobacillus plantarum
Chryseobacterium
Variovorax
Aeromonas
Xanthobacter
Acidovorax
Cupriavidus gilardii T-1
Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis 19_357_F
Cupriavidus campinensis
Delftia sp.
Cupriavidus necator
Arthrobacter sp. SVMIICT25
Sphingomonas sp. SVMIICT11
Stenotrophomonas sp. SVMIICT13
Corynebacterium humireducens MFC-5
Cupriavidus oxalaticus X32
Thauera sp. DKT
Pseudomonas simiae EGD-AQ6
Sphingobium sp. Ndbn-10
Sphingomonas sp. Ndbn-20
Pseudomonas maltophilia DI-6
Rhizorhabdus dicambivorans Ndbn-20
[37,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155]
Slightly
Hazardous
Glyphosate (30–90%)
Atrazine (40–100%)
Metolachlor (40–100%)
Rhodococcus soli G41
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia GP-1
Achromobacter sp. MPK7A
Bacillus cereus
Burkholderia vietnamiensis AO5–12 Burkholderia sp. AO5–13
Enterobacter cloacae K7
Ochrobacterium anthropic GPK3
Pseudomonas sp.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CNI28
Novosphingobium sp. CNI35
Ochrobactrum pituitosum CNI52
Gallinifaecis sp. CAS4
Chryseobacterium sp. Y16C
Spirulina platensis
Streptomyces lusitanus
Lysinibacillus sphaericus
Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila Y4B
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Comamonas odontotermitis P2
Bacillus subtilis
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Serratia sp.
Bacillus aryabhattai FACU
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Providencia rettgeri GDB 1
Bacillus cereus
Pseudomonas alcaligenes
Pseudomonas stutzeri
Bacillus licheniformis
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
Bacillus shackletonii
Pseudomonas citronellolis ADA-23B
Solicoccozyma terricola M 3.1.4.
Achromobacter denitrificans
Ochrobactrum haematophilum
Pseudomonas putida Ch2
Ochrobactrum intermedium Sq20
Burkholderia cepacia PSBB1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ensifer adhaerens SZMC 25856
Pseudomonas resinovorans SZMC 25875
Burkholderia anthina
Burkholderia cenocepacia
Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus T20
Bacillus licheniformis ATLJ-5.
Bacillus megaterium ATLJ-11
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudaminobacter sp.
Nocardioides sp.
Klebsiella sp. A1
Comamonas sp. A2
Klebsiella variicola FH-1
Arthrobacter sp. NJ-1
Acinetobacter lwoffii DNS32
Agrobacterium rhizogenes AT13
Acetobacter
Pseudomonas
Clostridium-sensu-stricto
Burkholderia
Ensifer sp.
Solibacillus sp.
Bacillus sp.
Arthrobacter sp.
Bacillus velezensis MHNK1
Citricoccus sp. TT3
Paenarthrobacter sp. W11
Methylobacillus
Enterobacter sp. P1
Arthrobacter sp. DNS10
Bradyrhizobium
Rhodococcus
Hydrogenophaga sp. Gsoil 1545 Sinorhizobium sp. TJ170
Rhizobium sp.
Bacillus anthracis
Pseudomonas balearica
Pseudomonas otitidis
Pseudomonas indica
Providencia vermicola
Pseudomonas spp. ACB
Pseudomonas spp. TLB
Methylobacterium
Mycobacterium
Bacillus atrophaeus
Variovorax sp. 38R
Arthrobacter sp. TES
Chelatobacter sp. SR38
Bacillus megaterium Mes11
Ralstonia
Phyllobacterium
Stenotrophomonas
Holophaga foetida
[55,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208]
Unlikely
Hazardous
Trifuralin (30–95%)Arthrobacter aurescens CTFL7
Herbaspirillum sp.
Klebsiella sp.
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Bacillus simplex
Bacillus muralis
Micrococcus luteus
Micrococcus yunnanensis
Clostridium tetani
Klebsiella oxytoca
Herbaspirillum seropedicae
Bacillus megaterium
Brevundimonas diminuta
Streptomyces PS1/5
[123,209,210,211,212,213,214]
1 Biodegradation rates for these pesticides are not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guerrero Ramírez, J.R.; Ibarra Muñoz, L.A.; Balagurusamy, N.; Frías Ramírez, J.E.; Alfaro Hernández, L.; Carrillo Campos, J. Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115969

AMA Style

Guerrero Ramírez JR, Ibarra Muñoz LA, Balagurusamy N, Frías Ramírez JE, Alfaro Hernández L, Carrillo Campos J. Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(21):15969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guerrero Ramírez, José Roberto, Lizbeth Alejandra Ibarra Muñoz, Nagamani Balagurusamy, José Ernesto Frías Ramírez, Leticia Alfaro Hernández, and Javier Carrillo Campos. 2023. "Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 21: 15969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop