Next Article in Journal
Application of 2D NMR Spectroscopy in Combination with Chemometric Tools for Classification of Natural Lignins
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Effects of Sex Hormones on Macrophage Polarization
Previous Article in Journal
Transglutaminase in Foods and Biotechnology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polarization of Melatonin-Modulated Colostrum Macrophages in the Presence of Breast Tumor Cell Lines

by
Kenia Maria Rezende Silva
1,
Danielle Cristina Honório França
2,
Adriele Ataídes de Queiroz
1,
Danny Laura Gomes Fagundes-Triches
1,2,
Patrícia Gelli Feres de Marchi
2,
Tassiane Cristina Morais
3,
Adenilda Cristina Honorio-França
1,2,* and
Eduardo Luzía França
1,2
1
Postgraduate Program in Basic and Applied Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças 78600-000, MT, Brazil
2
Institute of Biological and Health Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças 78600-000, MT, Brazil
3
Postgraduate Program in Public Policies and Local Development, Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória EMESCAM, Vitória 29045-402, ES, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12400; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512400
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 30 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 August 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023

Abstract

:
Human colostrum and milk contain diverse cells and soluble components that have the potential to act against tumors. In breast cancer, macrophages play a significant role in immune infiltration and contribute to the progression and spread of tumors. However, studies suggest that these cells can be reprogrammed to act as an antitumor immune response. This study aimed to evaluate the levels of melatonin and its receptors, MT1 (melatonin receptor 1) and MT2 (melatonin receptor 2), in colostrum and assess the differentiation and polarization of the colostrum macrophages modulated by melatonin in the presence of breast tumor cells. Colostrum samples were collected from 116 mothers and tested for their melatonin and receptor levels. The colostrum cells were treated with or without melatonin and then cultured for 24 h in the presence or absence of breast tumor cells. The results showed that melatonin treatment increased the expression of MT1 and MT2 in the colostrum cells. Furthermore, melatonin treatment increased the percentage of M1 macrophages and decreased the percentage of M2 macrophages. When the colostrum macrophages were cocultured with breast tumor cells, melatonin reduced the percentage of both macrophage phenotypes and the cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 8 (IL-8). These data suggest that melatonin can regulate the inflammatory process via M1 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment and, simultaneously, the progression of M2 macrophages that favor tumorigenesis.

1. Introduction

Breast tumors have a complex microenvironment that includes resident tissue cells, such as adipocytes, and recruited cells, particularly immune system cells [1]. Macrophages are a major component of the immune infiltrate in breast cancer. While they can contribute to the progression and spread of tumors, studies suggest that these cells can also be reprogrammed to act as a potent antitumor immune response [2].
Macrophages can be polarized into two phenotypes, M1-like macrophages and M2-like macrophages, in response to signals from the microenvironment. These dynamic cells can participate in inflammatory processes or resolve diseases [3]. M1 and M2 macrophages express distinct surface markers and inflammatory mediators [4], and the phenotypic diversity of these cells increases with tumor development [5]. In tumors, the switch from the pro-immune M1-like macrophages to the immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages increases tumorigenesis and tumor progression and growth [6] via the release of cytokines [4,7].
Bioactive components are present in human colostrum and milk, such as antibodies, enzymes, cytokines, a large number of macrophages (55 to 60%), and the melatonin (MLT) hormone [8,9,10]. Melatonin has been found to stimulate the immune system and play a role in various physiological processes [11,12,13]. It acts through melatonin receptor 1A (MTRN1A) and melatonin receptor 1B (MTRN1B), also MT1 and MT2 receptors, respectively, in different organs, tissues, and cells, such as breast epithelial cells and immune cells [14,15,16].
Despite being present in all the body, there is still much to learn about the functional role of melatonin in humans. Studies have shown that melatonin can have an antitumor effect on human MCF-7 cells by increasing intracellular calcium release and inducing apoptosis [17]. Additionally, several intrinsic suppressor mechanisms can induce apoptosis to prevent the development of breast tumors [18,19].
Studies have shown that when monocytes or colostrum macrophages are cocultured with breast tumor cell lines, they can increase apoptosis and have antitumor effects [20,21,22]. In colostrum, macrophages comprise 40 to 50% of the cell content. However, the literature has not clarified the presence of the M1 and M2 phenotypes and their correlation with breast cancer. Colostrum macrophages differ morphologically and functionally from other monocytes and macrophages in other tissues [23,24].
This study explores the potential anti-cancer effects of human milk and melatonin. Many cells in human milk may have a pro-immune profile and could act on breast cancer when stimulated by melatonin. This work examines how melatonin affects the differentiation and polarization of colostrum macrophages in the presence of breast tumor cells (MCF-7).

2. Results

The melatonin levels were determined in colostrum supernatant, and the MT1 and MT2 concentrations were measured in colostrum cells lysed in the presence or not of melatonin (Table 1). MT1 and MT2, when treated with melatonin, showed higher concentrations in the lysed cells. Furthermore, the ratio of melatonin to MT1 in the lysed cells was higher than that of melatonin to MT2, as shown in Table 1.
Table 2 shows the percentage of colostrum macrophages CD14+ expressing CD163+ treated with melatonin. The results indicate the percentage of cells expressing CD14+ decreased after melatonin treatment. The expression of CD14+ in the colostrum cells was higher after 24 h of incubation. Moreover, the highest percentages of colostrum cells expressing CD14+ were observed in the cells not treated with melatonin after 24 h (Table 2).
Figure 1 shows the interactions of the colostrum macrophages and the MCF-7 cells in culture at 2 and 24 h in the presence or absence of the melatonin hormone. The most morphological alterations were observed after 24 h in culture.
In contrast, Table 2 shows that the expression of CD14 (a classic marker of monocytes/macrophages) and CD163+ (a phenotypic marker of M2 macrophages) in colostrum macrophages treated with melatonin decreased after 24 h in culture. On the other hand, the highest percentages of colostrum macrophage expression of CD14+CD163+ were observed in the cells not treated with melatonin.
Table 2 also displays the percentage of colostrum macrophages expressing CD163+ treated with melatonin in coculture with MCF-7 cells. It was observed that CD14+ expression decreased after melatonin treatment, although CD14+ expression in the colostrum cells in culture with MCF-7 cells was higher after 24 h of incubation regardless of the melatonin treatment (Table 2). Interestingly, the expression of CD14+CD163+ in the colostrum macrophages cocultured with MCF-7 cells was similar regardless of the incubation time or melatonin treatment (Table 2, Figure 2).
Table 3 compares the percentage of M1 and M2 expression in colostrum macrophages under different incubation conditions with and without melatonin. After 2 h in culture, the expression of M1 macrophages was lower in the colostrum cells, although treatment with melatonin increased their expression to levels similar to those of M2 macrophages. There was no difference in the expression of melatonin-treated M2 cells after 2 h of culture. However, after 24 h of culture, there was an increase in M1 macrophages and a decrease in M2 macrophages regardless of the melatonin treatment (Table 3 and Figure 3).
Additionally, Table 3 and Figure 3 display the expression of M1 and M2 cells treated with melatonin in culture with MCF-7 cells under different incubation conditions. After 24 h, melatonin reduced the expression of both M1 and M2 cells, although after 2 h, there was no difference in the expression of either cell type regardless of the melatonin treatment.
Table 4 shows the correlation between M1 and M2 cells in the presence or absence of melatonin. In addition, there was a positive correlation between M2 macrophages not treated with melatonin and M2 macrophages treated with the hormone.
Regarding the cytokine concentrations, it was observed that in the colostrum macrophages, melatonin increased the secretion of interleukin 8 (Table 5). On the other hand, the concentration of TNF-α and IL-8 in the culture supernatant of colostrum macrophages under melatonin modulation was reduced when cocultured with MCF-7 cells. For the other cytokines, no differences were observed (Table 5, Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Colostrum and human milk have been shown to reduce the risk of breast cancer [25] because they help to differentiate breast tissue and reduce the number of ovulatory cycles over a person’s lifetime. Reproductive factors can cause lasting changes in the epithelium of the mammary gland or surrounding stromal tissue, making the breast more or less susceptible to carcinogens [26,27].
Several studies have shown the interaction between immune system cells and tumor progression. In addition, the immune response to the tumor appears to be associated with the type of cell involved and hormonal interactions. In this study, CD163 expression and polarization of the M1 and M2 macrophages and cytokines released in culture supernatant in the presence of melatonin and breast tumor cells were evaluated in colostrum.
Studies have shown a relationship between the concentration of endogenous melatonin and the risk of breast cancer in humans. Specifically, research has suggested that melatonin [17,28] and its receptors have oncostatic properties in breast cancer models [29,30]. In this study, the melatonin levels showed concentrations similar to other works in the literature [12,31].
The effect of melatonin on the body depends on several factors, including the concentration, circadian rhythm, and receptor affinity. It has been shown that melatonin and its receptors can impact cancer on a cellular level. Specifically, the MT1 melatonin receptor has been found to play a role in the anti-cancer effect of melatonin in breast cancer models. Interestingly, this receptor may be continuously active in breast cancer cells, naturally suppressing their growth [16]. The administration of exogenous melatonin can cause changes in the expression and function of MT1 and MT2 receptors. This has been observed in mammals, with research indicating that the amount of melatonin can impact receptor expression and function. A study using a system of melatonin receptors found that the dosage of melatonin influenced its expression and function [32]. This study detected both melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) in colostrum cell lysate, with their concentrations being higher in the presence of exogenous melatonin with a higher melatonin and MT1 receptor ratio, indicating that melatonin interacts with colostrum cells, particularly mononuclear cells, which probably can regulate macrophage functions and the antitumor effects.
Macrophages are cells that play a role in both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the microenvironment of malignant tumors [33]. Depending on their activation state, they can transform into different specific phenotypes [34]. Different factors can impact the phenotype of macrophages, which in turn affects their performance. Activated macrophages fall into M1-like and M2-like macrophages [35].
M1 macrophages promote inflammation and have strong microbicidal activity [36,37], while M2 macrophages have anti-inflammatory properties and produce cytokines that neutralize inflammation [38]. This study showed CD163-positive macrophages in colostrum, and the hormone melatonin reduced the percentage of these cells after 24 h in culture. CD163 is a phenotypic marker of M2 macrophages and can be used to distinguish M2 and M1 macrophages.
Macrophages express the marker CD163+ during the resolving phase of inflammation [34,39]. Studies have shown that the proportion of these cells increases after 40 h in culture, indicating a resolving macrophage phenotype [40]. However, when colostrum macrophages were cocultured with MCF-7 cells and treated with melatonin, the expression of this marker remained similar regardless of the incubation time. Despite not causing inflammatory processes, colostrum macrophages are still considered activated cells, which have high phagocytic and microbicidal activity when stimulated by melatonin [12,28,41] and can produce oxygen-free radicals [23,42]. Interestingly, human colostrum supernatant can change murine macrophages to the M2 profile in vitro, as shown in a study by Panahipour et al. [43], reinforcing the hypothesis that the components found in human milk have anti-inflammatory properties.
In this study, the expression of M1 macrophages was lower in colostrum, and melatonin restored the expression of M1 cells to percentages similar to those of M2. However, when in culture for 24 h, independent of melatonin, an increase in M1 macrophages and a reduction in M2 macrophages were observed. Interestingly, there was a positive correlation between M2 macrophages not treated with melatonin and M2 macrophages treated with the hormone, suggesting the action of this hormone in the M2 immunosuppressive phenotype.
Due to macrophage plasticity, studies have revealed that melatonin modulates the polarization of M1 macrophages via the STAT-1, NF-kB, and NLRP3 pathways and of M2 macrophages via STAT6 activation [44,45], being able to modulate the development and progression of several diseases associated with macrophages [40], including breast cancer [28]. Experimental and systems biology modeling studies have revealed that the polarization spectrum of M1–M2 macrophages results from a complex network of conduction signaling pathways and intracellular regulatory mechanisms. This allows for investigating system-level mechanisms during macrophage polarization and repolarization. [46].
In breast cancer, macrophages represent one of the main components of the immune infiltrate, and these cells appear to contribute to the progression and spread of tumors. Still, studies suggest that these cells can be reprogrammed to act as a potent antitumor immune response [2]. Macrophages are dynamic and participate in inflammatory processes or disease resolution [3], and the phenotypic diversity of these cells increases with tumor development [5].
In tumors, the switch from the pro-immune M1 phenotype to the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype increases tumorigenesis and tumor progression and growth [6] by releasing cytokines and growth factors [4,47,48]. Here, melatonin reduced the expression of both macrophage phenotypes (M1 and M2) in culture with MCF-7 cells after 24 h, suggesting that this hormone acts on both macrophage phenotypes. This effect is important for the antitumor action of this hormone [17] since it reduces both the pro-immune M1 and the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype in the breast microenvironment.
Various cytokines can be released into the tumor environment against or favoring tumor growth. For instance, cytokines like IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α play a crucial role in breast cancer. Several studies indicate that these cytokines can increase the transcriptional levels of various inflammatory factors and chemokines, potentially leading to tumor formation [49,50,51,52]. However, oncogenic and tumor suppressor effects have also been observed [53]. IL-6 has physiological and pathological roles in inflammation and immunity and can promote tumor growth. A deregulated IL-6 signaling pathway has been found to play an important role in tumor proliferation, migration, and adhesion [54]. Moreover, in an inflammatory tumor microenvironment, IL-1β stimulates IL-6 production, which can increase the aggressiveness of luminal-type breast cancer cells [55].
The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 can also unexpectedly stimulate tumor cell proliferation and migration [56]. According to this study, melatonin caused a decrease in the amount of TNF-α found in the culture supernatant of colostrum macrophages and MCF-7 cells. M1 macrophages release TNF-α and can promote tumor formation by increasing the inflammatory factor and chemokine transcriptional levels [57,58]. Other studies have shown that melatonin has antitumor and anti-inflammatory effects [58,59,60,61]. The results of this study support these findings, as the secretion of TNF-α and expression of M1 macrophages were reduced in cocultures treated with melatonin; this hormone could be a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer.
Interestingly, the melatonin-treated cocultures also showed a decrease in IL-8 secretion. Interleukin 8 is a cytokine that is also pro-inflammatory [59,60], whose expression is closely related to the development of several tumors, in particular breast cancer [61,62,63]. In addition, IL-8 is one of the components of colostrum and mature milk, showing a higher concentration in the early stages of lactation [64,65].
Cytokines, such as IL-8, are crucial for regulating the immune response [66]. IL-8 is important during the early phase of inflammation, as it activates and attracts neutrophils [34,67]. However, IL-8 is a significant factor in regulating the microenvironment in the context of a tumor microenvironment [7,63,68]. Kim et al. [69] showed that melatonin suppressed IL-8 production in human lung fibroblasts, reinforcing the antitumor role of melatonin. Further studies are required to comprehend the actual mechanisms involved in this process.

4. Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out with the participation of 116 clinically healthy donors enrolled at the Municipal Hospital of Barra do Garças, MT, Brazil. The study’s inclusion criteria were as follows: aged 18 to 35 years; gestational age at delivery between 37 and 416/7 weeks; negative serological reactions for hepatitis, HIV, and syphilis during prenatal period; no food restrictions; and signed informed consent form. The exclusion criteria were: gestational diabetes; type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus; obesity; twin pregnancy; fetal malformations; and delivery before the 36th week of gestation.

4.1. Colostrum Sampling and Separation of Colostral Cells

Approximately 8 mL of colostrum from each woman was collected in sterile plastic tubes between 48 and 72 h postpartum. The samples were centrifuged (160× g, 4 °C) for 10 min, separating the colostrum into three phases: a cell pellet, an intermediate aqueous phase, and a lipid-containing supernatant. The upper fat layer was discarded, and the aqueous supernatant was stored at −80 °C for later analyses. The cells were separated via a Ficoll–Paque gradient (Pharmacia, Upsala, Sweden), producing 98% pure mononuclear cells prepared and analyzed via light microscopy. The purified macrophages were resuspended independently in serum-free medium 199 at a 2 × 106 cells/mL final concentration. The cells were used for assays of immunophenotyping and MT1 and MT2 receptors. The scheme for obtaining samples and the experimental design is shown in Figure 5.

4.2. Melatonin Determination

The melatonin hormone in colostrum supernatant was quantified via enzyme immunoassay on ELISA microplates. The test had a lower detection limit of 1.6 pg/mL, and the coefficients of variation (%) for the intra-assay and inter-assay were 3.0–11.4 and 6.4–19.3, respectively. The colostrum melatonin was extracted via affinity chromatography and concentrated in a vacuum centrifuge. The ELISA kit we used was an Immuno-Biological Laboratories Melatonin ELISA RE54021-IBL, Hamburg, German. The reaction values were measured using a plate spectrophotometer with a 405 nm filter and the results were obtained through a standard curve, which we expressed in pg/mL.

4.3. Melatonin Receptor 1A (MTNR1A) and Melatonin Receptor 1B (MTNR1B) Determination

Following the separation, some colostrum cells were treated or not with 50 µL of melatonin (MLT) at a final concentration of 100 nM [12]. The cells were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS-Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and lysed with Triton X 100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min. The lysed cells were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min at 8 °C to remove cellular debris. A sandwich enzyme immunoassay (ELISA kit—Cloud Clone Corporation, Katy, TX, USA) for the in vitro quantitative measurement of MT1 (MTNR1A) and MT2 (MTNR1B) receptors in human colostrum cells lysed was used and the procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each assay performed, a phagocyte control (2 × 106 cells/mL) was incubated for a similar time, depending on the type of assay in the medium 199 in the absence of melatonin. The ELISA kit for both MTNR1A (MT1) and MTNR1B (MT2) was used to present the following characteristics: the lower detection limit was 156 pg/mL (0.156 ng/mL) and the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (%) were <10% and <12%, respectively. The reaction values were measured via absorbance in a plate spectrophotometer with a 450 nm filter. The results were obtained through a standard curve and expressed in pg/mL.

4.4. Tumor Cell Lines and Cell Culture

ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines were used to analyze the differentiation and polarization of colostrum macrophages modulated by melatonin in the presence of breast tumor cells.
The lines were cultivated and frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage. Subsequently, they were cultivated in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham’s F10 (Sigma), plus HEPES, penicillin, streptomycin, sodium bicarbonate, and fetal bovine serum (SFB, Cultilab, Campinas, SP, Brazil). The cells were grown in bottles and kept at 5% CO2 and a temperature of 37 °C until the formation of a cell monolayer. Then, the cell bottles were subjected to trypsinization. First, the cells were washed with 5 mL Hanks, and the strains were subjected to 3 mL of trypsin 0.05% EDTA produced from a 10-fold concentrated solution (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) until the cells were detached from the bottles. Next, the cells were homogenized with varying volumes of the culture medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum for trypsin neutralization. Finally, the volume of the cell suspension obtained in one bottle was transferred to two other bottles to obtain an adequate cell quantity for the experiments. Next, the concentrations of MCF-7 cells were adjusted to 1 × 105 cells/mL, and they were subcultured in RPMI medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum in 24-well plates in the presence or absence of 50 μL of melatonin for 24 h at 5% CO2 and a temperature of 37 °C. A control was performed using MCF-7 cells in the absence of treatment. The MCF-7 cells were also cocultured with colostrum cells (2 × 106 cells/mL) and subcultured using the same protocol described above.
After this period, the MCF-7 cells cocultured or not with colostrum cells were trypsinized again, washed twice, and submitted to different assays. In addition, the coculture cells were centrifuged and pellet dyed with 200 µL acridine orange (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; 14.4 g/L) for 1 min. The sediment was resuspended in cold 199 medium, washed twice, and observed under immunofluorescence microscopy at 400× and 1000× magnification.

4.5. Melatonin Hormone Modulation

The colostrum cells were incubated with melatonin in the presence or absence of MCF-7 cells and kept in culture for 2 and 24 h. For each assay performed, as a control for the experiments, the cells (2 × 106 cells/mL) were incubated for a similar time, depending on the type of assay, in medium 199 in the absence of the hormone. The final melatonin concentration was 100 nM, as previously determined [12].

4.6. Immunophenotyping and Macrophage Identification and Polarization

The colostrum cells were washed with Phosphate Buffer (PBS) plus BSA (bovine serum albumin) for 10 min at 4 °C. The cells were labeled with 5 μL of anti-CD14+(FITC). A PE-tagged IgG1 isotype was used as a control. The cells were evaluated via flow cytometry. The cells expressing CD14+ were used for the polarization analysis [33,61,62]. The cell suspensions were labeled with antibodies specific for CD197, CD86, and CD163, and they were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix–Cytoperm solution (BD, Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The cells that were CD197+CD86+ were defined as M1-type macrophages, while the cells that were CD197-CD86+ or CD14+CD163+ were defined as M2-type macrophages [70,71].

4.7. Cytokine Determination

The cytokine concentrations in the culture of supernatant were evaluated using the Cytometric Bead Array Kit (CBA, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The IL-1-β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, and IL-12p70 concentrations were analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. These cytokines were analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The results were generated in graphs and tables using the CellQuest (BD)® software version 5.1, and the data were analyzed using the FCAP Array software version 3.0.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistically significant differences in the melatonin receptors and percentages of CD197+, CD86+, and CD163+ cells treated or not treated with melatonin and cocultured or not with MCF-7 cells were evaluated using an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the correlations between the M1 and M2 macrophages were evaluated using Pearson’s linear correlation. Statistical significance was considered for a p-value < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

These data suggest that colostrum macrophages can differentiate into M1 or M2 phenotypes and that the hormone melatonin increases the number of M1 macrophages known to protect against pathogens. When these macrophages are cocultured with MCF-7 cells, melatonin reduces the number of M1 and M2 macrophages, suggesting that it may prevent the formation of the inflammation that M1 macrophages cause in the tumor microenvironment and, at the same time, the progression of M2 macrophages, which promote tumorigenesis. Furthermore, melatonin reduces the secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-8 when cocultured with MCF-7 cells, which are closely related to tumor development and reinforce the potential of melatonin as a therapeutic strategy for cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M.R.S., T.C.M., A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; data curation, K.M.R.S., A.A.d.Q., D.L.G.F.-T., P.G.F.d.M., T.C.M., A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; formal analysis, K.M.R.S., D.C.H.F., A.A.d.Q., D.L.G.F.-T., P.G.F.d.M., T.C.M., A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; funding acquisition, A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; investigation, D.C.H.F.; methodology, K.M.R.S., D.C.H.F., A.A.d.Q., D.L.G.F.-T., P.G.F.d.M. and T.C.M.; resources, D.L.G.F.-T. and A.C.H.-F.; supervision, A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; validation, D.C.H.F., A.A.d.Q. and P.G.F.d.M.; writing—original draft, K.M.R.S., D.C.H.F., D.L.G.F.-T., P.G.F.d.M., T.C.M., A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F.; writing—review and editing, A.C.H.-F. and E.L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil), processes numbers Nº 447218/2014-0 and Nº 305725/2018-1, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), process number 2019/25112-2 and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT), process number Nº 000253/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Araguaia Research Ethics Committee at the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Brazil. An informed consent statement was provided. The study received approval from the Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 66496523.5.0000.5587).

Informed Consent Statement

The subjects provided written informed consent before entering the experimental protocol.

Data Availability Statement

The authors will make the data supporting this study’s interpretations available if requested.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted without commercial or financial relationship with potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Noy, R.; Pollard, J.W. Tumor-associated macrophages: From mechanisms to therapy. Immunity 2014, 17, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cassetta, L.; Pollard, J.W. Repolarizing macrophages improves breast cancer therapy. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 963–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lawrence, T.; Natoli, G. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: Enabling diversity with identity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 750–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rippaus, N.; Taggart, D.; Williams, J.; Andreou, T.; Wurdak, H.; Wronski, K.; Lorger, M. Metastatic site-specific polarization of macrophages in intracranial breast cancer metastases. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 41473–41487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hung, C.-H.; Chen, F.-M.; Lin, Y.-C.; Tsai, M.-L.; Wang, S.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-T.; Hou, M.-F. Altered monocyte differentiation and macrophage polarization patterns in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vallerand, D.; Massonnet, G.; Kébir, F.; Gentien, D.; Maciorowski, Z.; De la Grange, P.; Sigal-Zafrani, B.; Richardson, M.; Humbert, S.; Thuleau, A.; et al. Characterization of Breast Cancer Preclinical Models Reveals a Specific Pattern of Macrophage Polarization. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, Y.; Ren, Y.; Dai, Z.-J.; Wu, C.-J.; Ji, Y.-H.; Xu, J. IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α levels correlate with disease stage in breast cancer patients. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 3, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Morais, T.C.; Honorio-França, A.C.; Silva, R.R.; Fujimori, M.; Fagundes, D.L.G.; França, E.L. Temporal fluctuations of cytokine concentrations in human milk. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 2015, 46, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujimori, M.; França, E.L.; Morais, T.C.; Fiorin, V.; de Abreu, L.C.; Honório-França, A.C. Cytokine and adipokine are biofactors can act in blood and colostrum of obese mothers. Biofactors 2017, 23, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fagundes, D.L.G.; França, E.L.; Gonzatti, M.A.B.; Rudge, M.V.C.; Calderon, I.M.P.; Honorio-França, A.C. The modulatory role of cytokines IL-4 and IL-17 in the functional activity of phagocytes in diabetic pregnant women. Apmis 2018, 126, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fagundes, D.L.G.; França, E.L.; Hara, C.C.P.; Honorio-França, A.C. Immunomodulatory effects of poly (Etilene Glicol) Mi-crospheres adsorbed with cortisol on the activity of colostrum phagocytes. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 1, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Honorio-França, A.C.; Hara, C.C.P.; Ormonde, J.V.S.; Nunes, G.T.; França, E.L. Human colostrum melatonin exhibits a day-night variation and modulates the activity of colostral phagocytes. J. Appl. Biomed. 2013, 11, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pereira, Q.L.C.; Hara, C.C.P.; Fernandes, R.T.S.; Fagundes, D.L.G.; França-Botelho, A.C.; Gomes, M.A.; França, E.L.; Honorio-França, A.C. Human colostrum action against Giardia lamblia infection influenced by hormones and advanced maternal age. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ekmekcioglu, C. Melatonin receptors in humans: Biological role and clinical relevance. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2006, 60, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hardeland, R.; Cardinali, D.P.; Srinivasan, V.; Spence, D.W.; Brown, G.M.; Pandi-Perumal, S.R. Melatonin—A pleiotropic, orchestrating regulator molecule. Prog. Neurobiol. 2011, 93, 350–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, D.Y.; Smith, D.G.; Hardeland, R.; Yang, M.Y.; Xu, H.L.; Zhang, L.; Yin, H.D.; Zhu, Q. Melatonin Receptor Genes in Vertebrates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11208–11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. França, E.L.; Honorio-França, A.C.; Fernandes, R.T.S.; Marins, C.M.F.; Pereira, C.C.S.; Varotti, F.P. The Effect of Melatonin Adsorbed to Polyethylene Glycol Microspheres on the Survival of MCF-7 Cells. Neuroimmunomodulation 2016, 23, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nicholals, C.; Pinto, A.R.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Simpson, R.; Liu, J.-P. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) induces cancer cell senescence by interacting with telomerase RNA component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13308–13313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, X.; Shapiro, D.J. The immune system and inflammation in breast cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014, 382, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ribeiro, A.A.L.; Silva, F.H.; Cotrim, A.C.M.; Deluque, A.L.; Marchi, P.G.F.; Fagundes, D.L.G.; Sousa, P.C.; Franca, E.L.; Honorio-Franca, A.C. Herbal Mixture Adsorbed to Polyethylene Glycol Microspheres Induces Apoptotic Effects on Breast Cancer Cells. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2018, 14, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, F.H.; Ribeiro, A.A.L.; Deluque, A.L.; Cotrim, A.C.M.; de Marchi, P.G.F.; França, E.L.; Honorio-França, A.C. Effects of barium chloride adsorbed to polyethylene glycol (PEG) microspheres on co-culture of human blood mononuclear cell and breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7). Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2018, 40, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Honorio-frança, A.C.; Fernandes, R.T.S.; Tozetti, I.A.; Fuhjimori, M.; Pinho, C.L.C.; Fagundes-Triches, D.L.G.; França, E.L. Mechanism Anti-Tumor of IgA-based Delivery System on the Human Colostral Mononuclear Cells via Fcα Receptor. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 14906–14917. [Google Scholar]
  23. Honorio-França, A.C.; Carvalho, M.P.; Isaac, L.; Trabulsi, L.R.; Carneiro-Sampaio, M.M.S. Colostral Mononuclear Phagocytes are Able to Kill Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Opsonized with Colostral IgA. Scand. J. Immunol. 1997, 46, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Honorio-França, A.C.; Launay, P.; Carneiro-Sampaio, M.M.; Monteiro, R.C. Colostral neutrophils express IgA Fc receptors (CD89) lacking y chain association that mediate non-inflammatory properties of secretory IgA. J. Leuk. Biol. 2001, 69, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Russo, J.; Balogh, G.A.; Russo, I.H. Full-term Pregnancy Induces a Specific Genomic Signature in the Human Breast. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17, 17–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Russo, J.; Moral, R.; Balogh, G.A. The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, L.; Jacobsen, K.H. A Systematic Review of the Association between Breastfeeding and Breast Cancer. J. Women’s Health 2008, 17, 1635–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fernandes, R.T.S.; França, E.L.; Triches, D.L.G.F.; Fujimori, M.; Machi, P.G.F.; Massmman, P.F.; Tozetti, I.A.; Honor-io-França, A.C. Nanodoses of melatonin induces apoptosis on human breast cancer cells co-cultured with colostrum cells. Biointerface Res. 2019, 9, 4416–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Witt-Enderby, P.A.; Radio, N.M.; Doctor, J.S.; Davis, V.L. Therapeutic treatments potentially mediated by melatonin receptors: Potential clinical uses in the prevention of osteoporosis, cancer and as an adjuvant therapy. J. Pineal Res. 2006, 41, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, J.; Clough, S.J.; Hutchinson, A.J.; Adamah-Biassi, E.B.; Popovska-Gorevski, M.; Dubocovich, M.L. MT1 and MT2 Melatonin Receptors: A Therapeutic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 56, 361–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Morceli, G.; Honorio-França, A.C.; Fagundes, D.L.G.; Calderon, I.M.P.; França, E.L. Antioxidant Effect of Melatonin on the Functional Activity of Colostral Phagocytes in Diabetic Women. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Gerdin, M.J.; Masana, M.I.; Rivera-Bermúdez, M.A.; Hudson, R.L.; Earnest, D.J.; Gillette, M.U.; Dubocovich, M.L. Melatonin desensitizes endogenous MT2 melatonin receptors in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: Relevance for defining the periods of sensitivity of the mammalian circadian clock to melatonin. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1646–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Skytthe, M.K.; Graversen, J.H.; Moestrup, S.K. Targeting of CD163+ Macrophages in Inflammatory and Malignant Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yao, Y.; Xu, X.-H.; Jin, L. Macrophage Polarization in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yunna, C.; Mengru, H.; Lei, W.; Weidong, C. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 877, 173090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murray, P.J. Macrophage Polarization. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017, 79, 541–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Appari, M.; Channon, K.M.; McNeill, E. Metabolic Regulation of Adipose Tissue Macrophage Function in Obesity and Diabetes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jayasingam, S.D.; Citartan, M.; Thang, T.H.; Mat Zin, A.A.; Ang, K.C.; Ch’ng, E.S. Evaluating the Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Into M1 and M2 Phenotypes in Human Cancer Tissue: Technicalities and Challenges in Routine Clinical Practice. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Garg, S.K.; Delaney, C.; Shi, H.; Yung, R. Changes in Adipose Tissue Macrophages and T Cells During Aging. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Evans, B.J.; Haskard, D.O.; Sempowksi, G.; Landis, R.C. Evolution of the Macrophage CD163 Phenotype and Cytokine Profiles in a Human Model of Resolving Inflammation. Int. J. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 780502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hara, C.C.P.; Honorio-França, A.C.; Fagundes, D.L.G.; Guimarães, P.C.L.; França, E.L. Melatonin Nanoparticles Adsorbed to Polyethylene Glycol Microspheres as Activators of Human Colostrum Macrophages. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 973179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. França, E.L.; Bitencourt, R.V.; Fujimori, M.; Morais, T.C.; Calderon, M.P.; Honorio-França, A.C. Human colostral phagocytes eliminate enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli opsonized by colostrum supernatant. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2011, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Panahipour, L.; Kochergina, E.; Kreissl, A.; Haiden, N.; Gruber, R. Milk modulates macrophage polarization in vitro. Cytokine: X 2019, 1, 100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anhe, G.F.; Caperuto, L.C.; Souza, L.C. Melatonin induces tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and JAK-2 in the rat pré-optic hypothalamic area in vivo. Diabetes 2002, 51, 453–454. [Google Scholar]
  45. Xia, Y.; Chen, S.; Zeng, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, C.; Deng, B.; Zhu, G.; Yin, Y.; Wang, W.; Hardeland, R.; et al. Melatonin in macrophage biology: Current understanding and future perspectives. J. Pineal Res. 2019, 66, e12547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Zhao, C.; Medeiros, T.X.; Sové, R.J.; Annex, B.H.; Popel, A.S. A data-driven computational model enables integrative and mechanistic characterization of dynamic macrophage polarization. iScience 2021, 24, 102112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ma, S.; Liu, M.; Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Ge, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, D.; Shi, J. A double feedback loop mediated by microRNA-23a/27a/24-2 regulation M1 versus M2 macrophage polarization and thus regulates cancer progression. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 13502–13519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kartikasari, A.E.R.; Huertas, C.S.; Mitchell, A.; Plebanski, M. Tumor-Induced Inflammatory Cytokines and the Emerging Diagnostic Devices for Cancer Detection and Prognosis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 12, 692142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Z.-W.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Zhang, L.-Y.; Zhou, T.; Li, Y.-Y.; Zhou, G.-C.; Miao, Z.-M.; Shang, M.; He, J.-P.; Ding, N.; et al. Duality of Interactions Between TGF-β and TNF-α During Tumor Formation. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 810286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, X.; Turkowski, K.; Mora, J.; Brüne, B.; Seeger, W.; Weigert, A.; Savai, R. Redirecting tumor-associated macrophages to become tumoricidal effectors as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 48436–48452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shen, Z.; Zhou, R.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, W.; Shaos, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, F.; Xu, L.; Zhou, X.; et al. MicroRNA-105 is involved in TNF-α-related tumor microenvironment enhanced colorectal cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Si, H.; Lu, H.; Yang, X.; Mattox, A.; Jang, M.; Bian, Y.; Sano, E.; Viadiu, H.; Yan, B.; Yau, C.L.; et al. TNF-α modulates genome-wide redistribution of Np63α/TAp73 and NF-κB c-REL interactive binding on TP53 and AP-1 motifs to promote an oncogenic gene program in squamous cancer. Oncogene 2016, 35, 5781–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Laha, D.; Grant, R.; Mishra, P.; Nilubol, N. The Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor in Manipulating the Immunological Response of Tumor Microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 656908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, J.; Wei, Y.; Yang, W.; Huang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, K.; Chen, J. IL-6: The Link Between Inflammation, Immunity and Breast Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 903800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, O.K.; Park, Y.; Seo, M.W.; Lee, D.S. IL-1β induces IL-6 production and increases invasiveness and estrogen-independent growth in a TG2-dependent manner in human breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Carrillo-Vico, A.; Lardone, P.J.; Alvarez-Sánchez, N.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A.; Guerrero, J.M. Melatonina: Protegendo o sistema imunológico. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 8638–8683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lv, D.; Cui, P.-L.; Yao, S.-W.; Xu, Y.-Q.; Yang, Z.-X. Melatonin inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in pancreatic cancer cells. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2012, 24, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S. Anti-inflammatory Activity of Melatonin in Central Nervous System. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2010, 8, 228–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Qiu, X.; Liang, T.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, W.; Gao, B.; Qiu, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, T.; Deng, Z.; et al. Melatonin reverses tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced metabolic disturbance of human nucleus pulposus cells via MTNR1B/Gαi2/YAP signaling. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 2202–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Russo, R.C.; Garcia, C.C.; Teixeira, M.M.; Amaral, F.A. The CXCL8/IL-8 chemokine family and its receptors in inflammatory diseases. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 10, 593–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Santangelo, C.; Varì, R.; Scazzocchio, B.; Di Benedetto, R.; Files, C.; Masella, R. Polyphenols, intracellular signalling and in-flammation. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita 2007, 43, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Deng, F.; Weng, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Fan, M.; Shi, Q. Overexpression of IL-8 promotes cell migration via PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and EMT in triple-negative breast cancer. Pathol. Res. Pr. 2020, 223, 152824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hanker, L.C.; Rody, A.; Holtrich, U.; Pusztai, L.; Ruckhaeberle, E.; Liedtke, C.; Ahr, A.; Heinrich, T.M.; Sänger, N.; Becker, S.; et al. Prognostic evaluation of the B cell/IL-8 metagene in different intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 137, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Todorović-Raković, N.; Milovanović, J. Interleukin-8 in Breast Cancer Progression. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2013, 33, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Polat, A.; Tunc, T.; Erdem, G.; Yerebasmaz, N.; Tas, A.; Beken, S.; Basbozkurt, G.; Saldir, M.; Zenciroglu, A.; Yaman, H. Interleukin-8 and Its Receptors in Human Milk from Mothers of Full-Term and Premature Infants. Breastfeed. Med. 2016, 11, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ustundag, B.; Yilmaz, E.; Dogan, Y.; Akarsu, S.; Canatan, H.; Halifeoglu, I.; Cikim, G.; Denizmen Aygun, A. Levels of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α) and trace elements (Zn, Cu) in breast milk from mothers of preterm and term infants. Mediat. Inflamm. 2005, 2005, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hirahara, K.; Vahedi, G.; Ghoreschi, K.; Yang, X.-P.; Nakayamada, S.; Kanno, Y.; O’shea, J.J.; Laurence, A. Helper T-cell differentiation and plasticity: Insights from epigenetics. Immunology 2011, 134, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xie, K. Interleukin-8 and human cancer biology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001, 12, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, G.-D.; Lee, S.E.; Kim, T.-H.; Jin, Y.-H.; Park, Y.S.; Park, C.-S. Melatonin suppresses acrolein-induced IL-8 production in human pulmonary fibroblasts. J. Pineal Res. 2011, 52, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Benoit, M.; Desnues, B.; Mege, J.-L. Macrophage Polarization in Bacterial Infections. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3733–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kwiecień, I.; Polubiec-Kownacka, M.; Dziedzic, D.; Wołosz, D.; Rzepecki, P.; Domagała-Kulawik, J. CD163 and CCR7 as markers for macrophage polarization in lung cancer microenvironment. Central Eur. J. Immunol. 2019, 44, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Illustrative images of the coculture of colostrum macrophages and MCF-7stained via acridine orange methods and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The colostrum cells and MCF-7 cells were incubated with melatonin for 2 and 24 h. Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Figure 1. Illustrative images of the coculture of colostrum macrophages and MCF-7stained via acridine orange methods and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The colostrum cells and MCF-7 cells were incubated with melatonin for 2 and 24 h. Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Ijms 24 12400 g001
Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of subsets of cells expressing CD14+ (colostrum macrophages) and CD14+CD163+ (M2 macrophages) at 2 ((A) colostrum cells and (B) coculture figures) and 24 h ((C) colostrum cells and (D) cocultures figures) in the presence (MLT +) or not of melatonin (MLT −).
Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of subsets of cells expressing CD14+ (colostrum macrophages) and CD14+CD163+ (M2 macrophages) at 2 ((A) colostrum cells and (B) coculture figures) and 24 h ((C) colostrum cells and (D) cocultures figures) in the presence (MLT +) or not of melatonin (MLT −).
Ijms 24 12400 g002
Figure 3. M1 and M2 expression in (A) colostrum cells non-treated, (B) treated with melatonin (MLT), and (C) colostrum cells in coculture with MCF-7 non-treated and (D) treated with melatonin (MLT) indicated by fluorescence intensity. Flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA) carried out immunofluorescence assays. Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Figure 3. M1 and M2 expression in (A) colostrum cells non-treated, (B) treated with melatonin (MLT), and (C) colostrum cells in coculture with MCF-7 non-treated and (D) treated with melatonin (MLT) indicated by fluorescence intensity. Flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA) carried out immunofluorescence assays. Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Ijms 24 12400 g003
Figure 4. Fluorescence intensity of cytokines in culture supernatants (A) colostrum cells and (B) coculture colostrum cells and MCF-7 treated or not with melatonin (MLT). Fluorescence analyses were carried out via flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA). FL3 (fluorescence in channel 3). Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Figure 4. Fluorescence intensity of cytokines in culture supernatants (A) colostrum cells and (B) coculture colostrum cells and MCF-7 treated or not with melatonin (MLT). Fluorescence analyses were carried out via flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA). FL3 (fluorescence in channel 3). Without melatonin MLT (−); with melatonin MLT (+).
Ijms 24 12400 g004
Figure 5. Representative scheme for obtaining samples and the experimental design.
Figure 5. Representative scheme for obtaining samples and the experimental design.
Ijms 24 12400 g005
Table 1. Melatonin concentrations in colostrum supernatant and MT1 and MT2 concentrations in colostrum cells lysed treated or not with melatonin.
Table 1. Melatonin concentrations in colostrum supernatant and MT1 and MT2 concentrations in colostrum cells lysed treated or not with melatonin.
Parameterspg/mL
MLT183 ± 33
MT1 in cells lysed 199 medium 277 ± 135
MT1 cells lysed + MLT850 ± 138 *
MT2 in cells lysed medium 199670 ± 58
MT2 in cells lysed + MLT952 ± 110 *
MLT/MT1 cells lysed ratio0.7 ± 0.2
MLT/MT2 cells lysed ratio0.3 ± 0.1 #
Note: MLT-melatonin; MT1-melatonin receptor 1; MT2-melatonin receptor 2. p < 0.05. * differences between melatonin receptor (MT1 or MT2) treated or not with melatonin; # differences between MLT/receptor (MT1 or MT2) in cells lysed.
Table 2. Expression percentage of the macrophage scavenger receptor CD163+ in colostrum macrophages in coculture or not with MCF-7 cells and treated or not with melatonin.
Table 2. Expression percentage of the macrophage scavenger receptor CD163+ in colostrum macrophages in coculture or not with MCF-7 cells and treated or not with melatonin.
ColostrumMelatonin2 h24 h
CD14+No10.8 ± 4.726.9 ± 7.0 +
Cells Yes6.5 ± 1.9 *16.4 ± 7.1 *+
CD14+CD163+No15.0 ± 2.526.3 ± 6.1 +
Yes16.3 ± 7.016.9 ± 7.1 *
CD14+No10.7 ± 5.722.5 ± 5.2 +
Coculture Yes6.4 ± 2.0 *23.7 ± 5.9 +
CD14+CD163+No15.0 ± 2.516.1 ± 6.6
Yes16.2 ± 7.715.6 ± 6.4
Note: p < 0.05. * differences between untreated and melatonin-treated cells, considering the same incubation time; + differences between incubation times, considering the same treatment.
Table 3. Expression in percentage (%) of M1 and M2 in colostrum cells in coculture or not with MCF-7 cells in the presence of melatonin at different incubation times.
Table 3. Expression in percentage (%) of M1 and M2 in colostrum cells in coculture or not with MCF-7 cells in the presence of melatonin at different incubation times.
ColostrumMelatonin2 h24 h
M1No11.3 ± 5.531.0 ± 2.2 +
Cells Yes21.4 ± 7.1 *27 ± 4.0
M2No28.5 ± 4.2 #4.8 ± 1.4 #+
Yes22.3 ± 7.25.5 ± 1.8 #+
M1No24.4 ± 5.224.1 ± 9.4
Coculture Yes18.3 ± 5.03.5 ± 0.5 *+
M2No24.8 ± 10.024.8 ± 10.0
Yes17.1 ± 4.35.2 ± 2.0 *+
Note: p < 0.05. * differences between untreated and melatonin-treated cells, considering the same cell type and incubation time; # differences between cell types, considering the same treatment and incubation time; + differences between incubation time, considering the same treatment and cell type.
Table 4. Correlation between M1 and M2 cells in the presence or absence of melatonin.
Table 4. Correlation between M1 and M2 cells in the presence or absence of melatonin.
MacrophagesM1 MLT (−)M1 MLT (+)M2 MLT (−)M2 MLT (+)
M1 MLT (−)__r = 0.4709
p = 0.3458
r = −0.2864
p = 0.9821
__
M1 MLT (+)r = 0.4709
p = 0.3458
____r = 0.7231
p = 0.1043
M2 MLT (−)r = 0.2864
p = 0.9821
____r = 0.7098
p = 0.0498
M2 MLT (+)__r = 0.7231
p = 0.1043
r = −0.7098
p = 0.0498
__
r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient; p (p-value).
Table 5. Cytokine concentrations in the culture supernatant of colostrum macrophages in coculture or not with MCF-7 untreated or treated with melatonin.
Table 5. Cytokine concentrations in the culture supernatant of colostrum macrophages in coculture or not with MCF-7 untreated or treated with melatonin.
CellsMLTTimeIL-1 βIL-6IL-8IL-10TNF-αIL-12P70
MNNo24 h55.5 ± 17.210.7 ± 10.485.1 ± 68.528.4 ± 6.713.5 ± 7.523.3 ± 15.
Yes24 h43.3 ± 19.814.1 ± 9.3102.5 ± 78.0 *31.3 ± 7.322.2 ± 7.4 #39.2 ± 8.6
MN+MCF-7No24 h48.2 ± 17.516.9 ± 8.264.7 ± 12.1 #33.8 ± 9.615.7 ± 5.928.7 ± 15.5
Yes24 h47.4 ± 12.617.5 ± 8.941.5 ± 5.7 #*27.7 ± 2.610.8 ± 6.4 #22.1 ± 16.3
Note: MN-mononuclear cells; IL-interleukin. p < 0.05. * Differences between colostrum cells plus MCF-7 not treated and treated with melatonin, considering the same incubation time; # differences between colostrum cells and coculture with MCF-7, both treated with melatonin and in the same incubation time.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, K.M.R.; França, D.C.H.; de Queiroz, A.A.; Fagundes-Triches, D.L.G.; de Marchi, P.G.F.; Morais, T.C.; Honorio-França, A.C.; França, E.L. Polarization of Melatonin-Modulated Colostrum Macrophages in the Presence of Breast Tumor Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512400

AMA Style

Silva KMR, França DCH, de Queiroz AA, Fagundes-Triches DLG, de Marchi PGF, Morais TC, Honorio-França AC, França EL. Polarization of Melatonin-Modulated Colostrum Macrophages in the Presence of Breast Tumor Cell Lines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(15):12400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512400

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Kenia Maria Rezende, Danielle Cristina Honório França, Adriele Ataídes de Queiroz, Danny Laura Gomes Fagundes-Triches, Patrícia Gelli Feres de Marchi, Tassiane Cristina Morais, Adenilda Cristina Honorio-França, and Eduardo Luzía França. 2023. "Polarization of Melatonin-Modulated Colostrum Macrophages in the Presence of Breast Tumor Cell Lines" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15: 12400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512400

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop